Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-12-09; City Council; MinutesCOUNCIL clrky em 'x of f-JjjJg-& w v I Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Adjourned Regular Yeeting) Time of Meeting: 6:OO P.M. Date of ?4eeting: December 9, 1980 P1 ace of Meeting : .Counci 1 Chambers .. .. \ ROLL CALL : - Council Member Anear arrived at 6:06 P.M. (79) 1. 'REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE. The City t4anager introduced the matter by outiining the report received by Council at their meeting of October 7, 1980. Assistant City Manager/Development, Ron Beckman, continued the the development of the Public Faci1itie.s Fee. tie then explaine the recent staff committee study of the matter. The City Engineer, Les Evans, continued with the staff report by referencing a wall exhibit displaying the intersections in the City where a traffic signal will be required :in, the future. He recommended that traffic s-ignals.be funded by the Fee. He continued by referencing the previous report as it related '.to funding of arterials, and displayed a wall exhibit showing the proposed arterials in the City. He recommended that developers be responsible for arterials going through , or adja- cent to their developments, but referenced several arterials in the City which would require City funding. He recommended that those arterials requiring City funding be funded by the 'Fee, and stated the amount projected for such funding would. b'e 13.8 million dollars. The Parks.and Recreation Director, Dave Bradstreet, gave a report .on funding which would be required for parks in the City as contained in his Memorandum dated December.8, 1980, ' attached to the Agenda Bill. He also distributed to Council a listing of the areas considered as existing or proposed parks, and explained recommended new park standards which he proposed to be funded by the Fee. Mr. 'Beckman concluded the staff report stating the revised study and recommendation would result in required funds at buildout l"n the amount of 74.6 million dollars, and that the current 2% fee would generate approximately 71 mill ion dollars, He concluded by recommending that the.fee remain at 2%, subject . to review every two years; that no park-in-1 ieu credit be given against the fee; and that staff identify the projects that would be non-developer funded. Council recognized Mr. Bob Ladwig, 3289 Donna Drive, represent- ing the Chamber of Commerce Public Facilities Committee. Mr. Ladwig stated the Committee' did an analysis of the public facility requirements, and had arrived at a similar recommenda- tion as that of staff.. Council discussed the matter of funding arterials, and the question of establishing a fee which would raise the required funds for the public .facilities. Council directed staff to return with the necessary documents which would revise Council Policy 17 to incorporate new findi and eliminate the Pub1 ic Facilities Fee/park-in-1 ieu credit; establish the fee at 2.1%; and identify developer financed and Public Faci.lities Fee financed capital facilities, to include language to support findings that facilities are of City-wide benefit and the inability of the City to provide these facilitie would result in constraints on existing developmental and growth pol icies. '. . report with the aid of a flip-chart, detailing the history of COUN IL Page 2 (57) 2. PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT AND MASTER PLAN FOR MACARIO The Parks and Recreation Director, Dave Bradstreet , gave a staff report, a copy of which was distributed to Counci 1. He then introduced Mr. Russel 1 Iwanaga of Iwanaga Associates , the consultant firm accepted by Council at their meeting of December 2, 1980. Mr. Iwanaga introduced Mr. Ernest Seidel of Iwanaga Associates, the Project Manager, and Mr. David Wilcox of Economic Research Associates, and Kenneth Mullens of Danielian Associates noting each area of responsibility associated with the pyoject. Mr. Wilcox gave a brief history of his company, and indicated he would be providing the economic analysis of .the project. Mr. Mu1 lens gave a brief hi story of his company and his pro- posed activities in connection with the project. Mr. Seidel referenced a wall exhibit and explained the projecte In response to Council questions, they stated that prior to making a recommendation regarding use , an area would be studied to make sure such a use would be feasible. They also stated -that the entire economic feasibility of the project would be addressed, and that the proposed survey would be-conducted by staff, following preparation of the forms by the consultant, and analysis a'f the results by the consultant Mr. Bradstreet responded to a question re Hub Park noting that it is included with Macario. Mayor Packard suggested, and Council concurred, that should any policy decisions be required during the project, that they be brought before Council immediately as opposed to proceeding with false assumptions. RECESS: Mayor Packard called a recess at 7:52 P.M. and Council reconvened at 8:09 P.M. with all Council Members present. PLANNING MORATORIUM IN THE PALOMAR SEWER SERVICE AREA. The City Manager gave a brief' introduction to the matter out- December 4, 1980. Council recognized Mr. Roy Ward, Calavera Hills, who reported o the progress and status of the Cal avera Hi1 1 s Plant, and urged Council to lift the Planning Moratorium in the Palomar Service Council recognized Mr. Don Woodward, 5727 Jefferson StEeet, Carl sbad, of the Woodward Companies. Mr. Woodward indicated he was speaking for owners representing approximately 900 acres in the Pal omar Service area , and he stated they are wi 11 ing to . enter into an agreement, and will move forward with the propose Palomar Plant, even if the Planning Moratorium .would be ltfted. COUNCIL .. Council recognized8Mr. Bernie Fipp, of the Koll Company. He . Council recognized Mr. Ted Gildred, Lomas Santa Fe, 265 Santa Helena , Sol ana Beach. He stated that they were4 a property owner in the service area and would support the plant. He requested the Planning Moratorium be lifted. In response to Council questions, the City Attorney'stated that if Counci 1 finds that adequate sewer is available based on the Encina and Cal avera Plants, then the moratori um should be lifted. He further stated that maps would not final until such Council directed that tract maps , zone changes , annexations, and similar applications are to be included in the lifint of the moratorium. (27) 4. AUDIT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1.979-80, AND FIRST QUARTER REPORT FOR- FISCAL YEAR 1980-81. Finance Director who, with the aid of a flip chart, summarized the contents of the audits as contained in the staff report presented with the Agenda Biol. Council recognized ,Mr. A. 3. Skotnicki , 3535 Bedford Circle, In response, the Finance Director stated that staff was current reviewing the matter of the funds required to pay bonds, and that the matter would be presented to Council for consideration upon completion. He also stated that the auditor had not been queried about the possibility of borrowing water funds. status of revenue for the first quarter as well as the sources. He also reported on the expenses of the first quarter and projected expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year. COUNCIL Page 4 (99) 5. AGENDA BILL #3069 - Supplement #ll - APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP. CT 76-12. APPLICANT:' LAKE CALAVERA'HILLS. Council approved the final map for Carl sbad Tract 76-12. (68) 6. AGENDA BILL #6447 - SANDAG AREAWIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY After a brief report by the City Manager, the foll owing . Resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 6381, ADOPTING THE SANDAG AREAWIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY PLAN. (25) 7. SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION ANNEXATION TAX EXCHANGE. . . The City Manager gave a brief report indicating the church- related use of the property which results in no taxes. The following Resolution was adopted: '(251.8. AGENDA BILL NO. 6449 - ANNEXATION OF THE KOLL PROPERTY. The City Manager gave a brief repprt on the matter referencing previous Council action regarding the tax exchange issue on the property with the County. Council discussion related to the tax exchange versus the cost of providing services to the area, and possible methods for generating additional funds. Also discussed was the possi bil i t of future legislation affecting the tax exchange on this property and whether the property could be conditioned to re- quire additional funds for pub1 ic services. Council recognized Mr. A. J. Skotnicki, 3535 Bedford Circl.e, Carlsbad. Mr. Skotnicki urged Council to be careful when negotiating with the County on tax exchanges so as not to set a bad precedent for this City and other cities. It was moved that staff prepare an agreement'with the Koll Company to ensure that they will be subject to the same tax split as others when a final resolution of the problem is determined by legislation. The motion died for lack of a c Council adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 6383, APPROVING THE ANNEXATI0N:OF CERTAIN UN- KOLL ANNEXATION. CITY ATTORNEY ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: Agua Hedionda Lagoon Regulations The City Attorney reported to Council on the recently received Attorney General's opinion relative to requiring a certificate of insurance from boaters prior to issuing a permit to operate . on the lagoon. -q= Ad * Page 5 December 9, 1980 Chula Vista v Coastal Commission The City Attorney stated he had received a copy of Judge Butler's opinion in the Chula Vista/Coastal Commission case whic.h the City had participated as amicus curae. He summar stating the Coastal Commission was instructed to either approve plans or disapprove with stated reasons, but not condition plans. Dautrich v. PERS The City Attorney reported on the resolution of the case. Highway 680 Council Member Anear reported that the vote of Supervisor Lucille Moore had defeated the 'inclusion of Highway 680. ADJOURNMENT: By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, &uLL $4- .ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ City Clerk COUNCIL