HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-09-22; City Council; Minutes:; t
- 1 [
I:
i
MINUTES
Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Adjourned Regular Meeting)
Time of Meeting: 6:OO P.M.
Date of MeetQg: September 22, 1981
Place of Meeting: Council Chambers COUNCIL \ %?
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Packard called the meeting to
order at 6:OO P.M.
MEMBERS
INVOCATION: The invocation was given by Mayor
Packard .
ROLL CALL: Roll Call was taken by the City Clerk: I
Present: Mayor Packard, Council Members Casler,
Anear, Lewis and Kulchin.
:99] 1. AB f6602 - Supplement #3 - FINAL MAP CT 81-3 -
APPLICANT : MOLA;
The Assistant City Manager/Development, gave a brief
report on the matter, referencing the Memorandum, dated
September 11, 1981, from the Director of Planning to
the City Manager.
Council approved the final map of Carlsbad Tract 81-3.
PRESENTATION:
Mayor Packard read and presented a Resolution to Judi
Missett honoring her for her dedication to physical
fitneess by the promotion of Jazzercize.
:921
. Packard
Cas ler
Anear
Lewis
Ku lch in
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. AB #6737 - CALAVERA HILLS TREATMENT PLANT.
The City Manager gave a brief introduction of the matter,
noting that the material presented to Council at this
meeting is identical to that presented to them at the
previous meeting, held on September 8, 1981. He stated
that the agreement is not in final form; however,
following the public hearing, Council Committee would mee
again with staff and the developer in accordance with
Council direction.
I
Ms. Missett expressed her appreciation for the Resolution
has well as the support of all the citizens of Carlsbad.
I I
t
Mr. Ron Beckman, Assistant City Manager/Development, bega
the staff report by detailing the history of the matter
as well as Council's actions to date. I
The City Engineer, Les Evans, continued with the report
and explained the two phases of the contract, which relate
to the sewer plant and the water reclamation facility. He
also reiterated some of the discussions that took place
regard to costs and capacity. With the aid of a
transparency, he explained how population projections were
converted into sewage flow, and possible effects with and
without the Lake Calavera Hills Plant.
1 during the preparation of the initial agreement with
Mr. Evans also explained projections for water
availability and demand, and indicated that the need for
reclaimed water may generate the need for the Lake
Calavera Hills Plant, rather than the need for sewer.
With the aid of a wall map, Mr. Evans showed the location
of the plant, and explained the amount of line needed to
connect the plant to the existing line along Palomar
Airport Road. He also referenced the Master Sewer Plan
for the City, and noted the need for its revision in
accordance with the existing Lake Calavera Hills Plant.
X
"
MINUTES
-2-
September 22, 1981
I Mr. Beckman concluded the staff report by explaining the
pros and cons of staying with the existing agreement or
moving forward with a new agreement. He indicated that if
the City takes over the plant at this time, it would cost
approximately one million dollars to complete the effluent
disposal line, and approximately one million dollars to
complete the water reclamation facility.
Council recognized Mr. Dennis Reid, Manager of the Encina
Water Pollution Control Facility. Mr. Reid expressed the
opinion that water reclamtion may be feasible in the late
1980's, or early 1990's. He stated that they are ahead of
the Phase IV schedule at Encina, and it may be completed
in 1984. He also stated that it appears to be cheaper to
process sewage at Encina, rather than at a smaller plant,
and noted the need for consideration of the service to be
provided.
Mr. Reid concluded by stating that he had read the
existing agreement and the proposed agreement, and
concurs with the proposed agreement.
Mayor Packard opened the hearing to public testimony at
7:lO p.m.
Mr. Roy Ward, 1207 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, addressed
Council. For clarification, Mr. Ward stated that the
treatment plant is complete, but what needs to be done is
to build the effluent disposal line. He stated that to
date they have spent 2.9 million dollars, and have built
a dual line from the plant to El Camino Real, and have
participated in the line along Palomar Airport Road.
He further stated that the cost to the City to date and in
the future is zero. He noted that an advantage to
the City and taxpayers is that the developer is providing
the facility for the use of future development in the City
at a fairly reasonable cost. In addition, he stated that
the existing contract says that the cost of construction,
including interest, runs until the City accepts or rejects
the plant, and that interest is running at approximately
$46,000 per month. He stated that the City's acceptance
of the plant would stop that interest from adding to the
cost, and would allow the City flexibility in the
determination of the final placement of the effluent
disposal line. He concluded by stating that they were
reserving the right in the contract to finish the
effluent disposal line if the City cannot, and the
developer needs the capacity to proceed with development.
I Mr. John Gray, 5451 Los Robles Drive, Carlsbad, Vice- President of the Association of Carlsbad Taxpayers,
addressed Council. Mr. Gray stated that the Association
had a committee study the proposal in an attempt to
analyze its effect on the Carlsbad Taxpayers. He stated
that Mr. Aldrich and Mr. Nyhagen would present those
findings to Council.
Mr. Nelson Aldrich, 4410 La Portalada Drive, Carlsbad,
addressed Council. Mr. Aldrich distributed to Council at
typewritten product of their committee meetings and read
same for Council consideration.
MEMBERS COUNCIL \
4
MINUTES
-3-
September 22, 1981
I
Mr. Norman Nyhagen, 3445 Ann Drive, Carlsbad, addressed
Council. Mr. Nyhagen stated that the Association believed
that the new agreement should be accomplished by means of
deletions or amendments, rather than creating a new
contract .
Mr. John Gray concluded the Association's presentation by
questioning the need for the City to assume the risk and
liability of completing the plant.
RECESS :
Mayor Packard called a recess at 8:07 P.M, and Council
reconvened at 8:19 P.M., with all Council Members present.
Mr. Bruce KOPSCO, 3970 Gloria Lane, Carlsbad, addressed
Council. Mr. Kopsco questioned the need for the plant,
and expressed the opinion that this plant is an example of
poor City planning and engineering.
Mr. Bill Meadows, 4305 Seabright Drive, Carlsbad, General
Manager of the Costa Real Municipal Water District,
addressed Council. Mr. Meadows referenced the District's
letter which had been submitted on July 8, 1981, as a
response to the report. Mr. Meadows stated that water
reclamation should be placed in perspective and that it is
important to realize that it is one of many ways to cope
with water shortages in the future. He suggested that
water reclamation should be looked at on a regional
basis.
i
Mr. Jess Alvarez, 1220 Stratford Lane, Carlsbad, addresse
Council. Mr. Alvarez requested that the proposed
agreement not be approved.
Mr. Hugh Singleton, 1235 Stratford Land, Carlsbad,
addressed Council. Mr. Singleton expressed the opinion
that Council had waited too long to receive citizen input
on the matter. He suggested that the City wait, and if i
is determined in the future that the plant is needed, the
they should buy it.
d
.t
In
Mr. Jack Kubota, P.O. Box 1095, Carlsbad, addressed
Council. Mr. Kubota stated that he is registered Civil
Engineer, and expressed willingness to make himself
available to work with staff on the matter.
Since no one else wished to speak, Mayor Packard closed
the public hearing at 8:38 P.M.
I Council comments indicated that though many had stated th
it is going to cost the taxpayers money when, in fact,
it is not. The money to complete the line and the water
reclamation facility would come from future sewer
connection fees. Therefore, the proposed contract would
save the City money.
a:
The City Manager summarized the comments stated at the
public hearing, and commented on same. He further
explained the the'proposed agreement would not cost the
taxpayers any funds. Also, another consideration for not
completing the plant at this time was due to the many
uncertainties in the water reclamation issue.
MEMBERS COUNCIL k
MINUTES
-4-
September 22, 1981 - I
Council concurred that the Council Committee should meet
with staff and the developer to finalize the agreement fo
presentation to Council for discussion and action. .i
In response to the City Manager's summary, Mr. Jack Kubot
stated, and the Manager agreed that he, in fact, had not
said the word "reclamation" during his coments. 1 9 DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
I City Attorney I I [70] 3. AB 86689 - Supplement #l - MACARIO CANYON PURCHASE. I
cS1l The City Attorney gave a brief report on the matter,
indicating that the signed deed had just been delivered
five minutes prior to the Council Meeting. He further
stated that the signed deed was different than the copy
previously distributed in that there were some "subject
to's" on the signed deed. He concluded by suggesting that
if Council desired to move forward with the matter, that
they accept the deed subject to the resolution of the
exceptions to the City Attorney's satisfaction.
I Council adopted the following Resolution: I
RESOLUTION NO. 6678, ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED FROM
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER FOR GENERAL MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES, subject to the resolution of the
exceptions to the City Attorney's satisfaction.
c921
C45 1
Maintenance I 4. AB 86752 - REFUSE COLLECTION RATE INCREASE. I
Mr. Roger Greer, the Utilities/Maintenance Director, gave
a brief staff report on the matter as contained in the
agenda bill.
Council recognized Mr. Arie De Jong, President of Coast
Waste Management, 7204 Ponto Drive, Carlsbad. Mr. De Jon
stated that the existing rates have been in effect since
1978. He further outlined the rising costs for his
operation, and requested approval of the requested
increase.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
1g
RESOLUTION NO. 6679, REVISING THE REFUSE
COLLECTION RATES FOR TFIE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
City Manager I 5. AB # 6753 - AGREEMENT FOR GAS LINE EXTENSION AT ENCINA
PLANT. I
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 6680, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION BY
VISTA SANITATION DISTRICT OF AN AGREEMENT WITH TH
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ON BEHALF OF I
THE ENCINA JOINT POWERS.
COUNCIL k %?
MEMBERS
Packard
Cas ler
Anear
X
Lewis
Kulchin
Packard
Cas ler
Anear
Lewis
Kulchin X
Packard
Cas ler
Anear
X
Lewis
Ku lch in
I, i.
MINUTES
-5-
September 22, 1981
CLOSED SESSION:
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 9:15 P.M., to
discuss litigation. Council reconvened at 10:25 p.m.,
with all Council Members present, and the Mayor announced
that litigation had been discussed and no action taken.
I ADJOURNMENT :
By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 10:26 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
L2!&22&$ - ~~ ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ
City Clerk
1
-
/y
CoUNC'L %( 39
MEMBERS