Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-01-12; City Council; Minutes~. . A? r POI [86 1 [281 [251 MINUTES MEETING OF: CITY COUNCIL (Ad j owned Regular Meeting) DATE OF MEETING: January 12, 1982 TIME OF MEETING: 6:OO p.m. /p PLACE OF MEETING: Harding Street Community Center COUNCIL % % I MEMBERS % $ CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mayor Packard at 6:03 p.m. ROLL CALL: I Mayor Packard indicated that all five Council members were present. Mayor Packard expressed appreciation for the presence of members of the Planning Commission and the Housing and Redevelopment Advisory Committee. II I..: 1 1. AB #6861 - APPEAL OF PARK-IN-LIEU FEE - MacDOUGAW; Following a brief report by the City Manager, Council Lewis park-in-lieu fees based on that appraisal value of Anear property , and authorizdd staff to recalculate the Casler approved the appraisal as submitted on the MacDougall Packard $99,000. Kulchin II council ember Anear suggested that in the future the City should appoint the appraiser rather than the property owner. 2. PROPOSED CAMP PENDLETON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE. Mayor Packard introduced Mayor Larry Bagley of Ocean- side. Mayor Bagley indicated his purpose was to brief Council on what the City of Oceanside is doing relative to the proposed annexation of Camp Pendleton. He stated they are preparing an application to LAFCO, and feel it would be vital to receive support from other communities. Therefore, he indicated he was enlisting support of the City of Carlsbad in Oceanside's annexa- tion efforts. He stated there would be no increase in taxes if the annexation were approved, and the base operation would remain under control of the government. In response to questions, Mayor Bagley indicated that possibly the City of San Clemente would oppose the annexation, and explained the issue revolving around San On0 fre . Mayor Packard suggested that staff research and report back to Council at a later date in order for Council to consider taking a position on the matter. X xx X X X 3. WORKSHOP ON REDEVELOPMENT. I II The City Manager gave a brief introduction to the matter followed by a short staff report by Drew Aitken of the Redevelopment .Department. Due to difficulties experienced with the slide pro- jector, the matter was trailed to later in the meeting. ~ 4. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED SAN DIEGUITO INCORPORATION. The City Manager gave a brief htroduction on the matte and introduced Mr. Vern Farrow, Planning Commissioner I \ 1 h 4 1 a ps r MINUTES January 12 , 1982 Page 2 who had served on the techincal advisory committee on this issue. Mr. Farrow, with the aid of an aerial photograph of the area surrounding Bataquitos Lagoon, reported on the various activities regarding the San Dieguito incor- poration as contained in the memorandum from the Director of Ulitities dated January 8, 1982. Council recognized Mr. Roger Wooley. Mr. Wooley also reported on the activities at the technical advisory committee meetings. He expressed the belief that the report from LAFCO does not fully address the situ- ation, and expressed the hope that the City of Carlsba would support the annexation of the Wooley properties into the City of Carlsbad and exclude them from the San Dieguito incorporation. .d Council Member Lewis expressed concern that no detailed information had been prepared regarding the assets and liabilities of these properties being annexed to the City of Carlsbad. In response, the City Manager indicated that there had been no detailed planning analysis by City staff. He indicated staff was not recommending annexation, but was recommending the exclusion of those properties identified on the map from the San Dieguito City boundaries. Council recognized Mr. Joe Sandy representing Hunt Properties who own the area commonly referred to as Green Valley. Mr. Sandy stated that because of drain- age, circulation considerations, and the fact that community services to the Hunt properties would be provided by the City of Carlsbad, that those areas should be included in Carlsbad, and not San Dieguito. He stated an application for annexation had been submitted to LAFCO for the remaining Hunt properties. He expressed the desire of the property owner to work with one jurisdiction in conjunction with the property rather than two. Council Member Casler expressed the opinion that the City should take a strong position on the matter. She indicated that the Hunt developers are proposing to restore the lagoon and are asking to be annexed to the City of Carlsbad so that they can master plan their entire area. Council Member Casler suggested that the Council should take a firm position and indicate their approval of the concept of annexation to the City of area 'IC", known as Green Valley. She stated she did not favor annexing the other areas defined as "A", "B", or "D", and that they do not have the overriding benefit factors to the City. I Council Member Anear indicated agreement with Council Member Casler with the exception that he believed all the properties under discussion have overriding factors and should be included in consideration for annexing to the City of Carlsbad. Mayor Packard suggested that the line should follow property lines within the ridge line, including that area reflected in gold on the map (Wooley properties) . I /a" COUNCIL \\$ 5 %?$, %% '9, ~ MEMBERS Z. 6 Z. /'4i.c MINUTES [=I @ 1471 \\y 5 January 12, 1982 Page 3 COUNCIL %9$%T MEMBERS Z. tp Z. Council Member .Kulchin made a motion that Council accept staff recommendations 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 as defined on the Agenda Bill. Following brief discussion, Council Member Kulchin withdrew the motion. council Member Kulchin made a motion that Council accept staff recommendations 1, 2 , 3 , and 4 as out- lined on the Agenda Bill. The motion died for lack of a second. Following further discussion , Council approved re- Packard xx commendations 1, 2 , 3, and 4 as contained on the Agenda Casler X Bill. Ane ar X Lewis X Kulchin X Council indicated their approval of the concept of Packard X annexation of area "C" (Green Valley) and indicated Casler xx that the City would be willing to work with property Anear X owners and would have no objections to master planning Lewis X the entire holding of 1700 acres. Kulchin X Council indicated the City would favor annexation Packard X applications from interested property owners who have Casler already submitted applications on property south of Anear xx Olivenhain, and from other property owners south of Lewis Olivenhain extending no farther south than the ridge Kulchin X line, and no farther west of El Camino Real than the ridge line. Staff was directed to modify their map to reflect council's intent, and for Council member Casler to convey the City's position at the LAFCO hearing. RECESS Mayor Packard called a recess at 7 :50 p.m. and Council reconvened at 8:04 p.m. with all Council members present. 3. WORKSHOP ON REDEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) . Staff presented a slide presentation which displayed redevelopment projects in other cities and financing methods utilized. Mr. Dudley Lang, Community Development Director of DOwney, gave a brief introduction of himself and his experience with redevelopment. He commented briefly "on cities goals in redevelopment, and the role of city council, the property owner, the developer, and staff. Mr. Frank Fargo , wainwright and Ramsey , Inc. , municipal finance consultants, continued with the presentation and briefly outlined the various financial aspects relating to redevelopment. 5. COASTAL CONSERVANCY PROGRAM FOR BUENA VISTA LAGOON. council Member Anear reported on the meeting that afternoon with representatives from Senator Craven's office, Fish and Game , City of Oceanside, City of Vista, Assemblyman Frazee's office, and various City staff regarding the activities on the Buena Vista CY - 4D MINUTES January 12, 1982 Page 4 MEMBERS COUNCIL k \ I I Lagoon. He reported on the various soil types and the fact the soil in the lagoon is good for nothing. He reported on the proposal of the Conservancy staff to allocate $40,000 for planning studies of Buena Vista Lagoon, and indicated the need for Council support of the proposal. He further indicated that any plans or programs developed as a result of the studies would not be mandatory for the cities due to their endorsing the preparation of the studies. Following discussion, Council endorsed the proposal of the Conservancy staff to allocate $40,000 for planning studies of Buena Vista Lagoon. Council stressed the importance of City staff providi input throughout the process of the studies. Packard Casler Anear Lewis Kulchin I ng X The City Manager also reported that the issue of Bataquitos Lagoon had been addressed at that meeting. He indicated the need to plan for that lagoon is important, and indicated his desire to review the matter prior to other agencies preparing plans. [251 6. REVIEW OF ANNEXATION UTTER. I I The City Manager referenced a letter and indicated it was merely an information item unless Council desired to change anything. He explained that the letter had been prepared in accordance with prior Council in- s tructions . Council Member Casler requested that staff investigate the possibility of reducing the amount of time required to annex by possibly allowing portions of step one and step two identifie-d in the report to process concur- rently. Mayor Packard suggested, and Council concurred with the desireability of holding a joint meeting with LAFCO to discuss various issues. Mayor Packard also suggested that the City Manager set up a meeting with the water district in that the agreement previously cancelled by the City would be finally terminated. I ~ ~ The City Manager reported that an issue which would probably be raised before the Planning Commission at their meeting January 13, would relate to that matter. He stated that a tentative map report requires that water be provided by the City even though the project is in the Costa Real Municipal Water District. He indicated this is a result of the fact that Council repealed the agreement and as of March 1, 1982 there is no agreement with CRMWD. Therefore, engineering is conducting a study on the various areas of the city with regard to logical service agency. ~ Mayor Packard announced that he would be appointing a Council committee to meet with representatives of CRMWD to renegotiate the agreement. \ B p 5 E z z z > LY 4% \ L I I I I /2 MINUTES [481 I *% January 12, 1982 Page 5 COUNCIL \\$ %9A "0 %@ST MEMBERS 2. @ 2. 7. AB #6802 - SUPPLEMENT #1 - CITY ELECTION DATE. Council recognized Mr. Maurice Kimball, 1623 James Drive, Carlsbad. Mr.Kimbal1 distributed a copy of the page from the State constitution defining urgency. He indicated only six cities in San Diego County had changed their election date and requested that Council retain the City's election date of April. Council adopted the following Ordinance : ORDINANCE NO. 1242, AMENDING TITLE I, CHAPTER 1.12 X Kulchin DImCT PRIMARY ELECTION. xx Lewis ELECTION BE HELD ON THE SAME DAY AS THE STATE WIDE mear SECTION 1.12.020 TO REQUIRE THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL X Casler OF THE CARISBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF X Packard Council member Anear indicated his negative vote was due to the fact that he believed November would be the appropriate election date. CLOSED SESSION: Council adjourned to a closed session at 10:17 p.m. for the purpose of discussing litigation. Council reconvened at 10 :35 p.m. with all Council members present and the Mayor announced that litigation had been discussed and no action taken. ADJOURNMENT: By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 10 : 36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ALETHA d&zxLR&y L. RAUTENKRANZ City Clerk