HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-01-15; City Council; Minutes0 a MINUTES
Neeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting)
Date of Meeting: January 15, 1985
Time of Meeting: 6:00 p.m.
Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
CAUL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by
Mayor Casler at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL was taken by the City Clerk as follows:
Present: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Chi&,
Kulchin and Pettine.
Absent: None.
IWOCATION was given by Mayor Casler.
PLECGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Pettine.
MINUTES :
Minutes of the Regular Meeting held January 2, 1985,
were approved as presented.
Mayor Casler announced requests to mntinue two item
on the Agenda; Item #14, to March 19, and Item $16, for
one week.
Council continued Item #14 to the meeting of March 19,
1985, and Item #I6 to the meeting of January 22, 1985.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Mayor Casler requested Item #2 be withdrawn from the
Consent Calender.
Council Member Lewis requested Item #7 and Item $9 be
withdrawn from the Consent Calendar.
Council confirmed the action of the Consent Calendar,
with the exception of Item #2, 87 and #9, as follows:
WAIVER OF OrnINANCE TEXT READIN%:
Council waived the reading of the text of dl
ordinances and resolutions at this meeting.
1. AB $8006 - RATIFICATION OF DENANDS AGAINST TEFE
CITY*
Council ratified the payment of demands against the
City in the amunt of $1,349,018.43, for the period
December 28, 1984 to January 9, 1985; Payroll
demands in the amount of $323,571.39, for the
period December 16, 1984 to December 29, 1984; and
Housing demands in the munt of $66,171.81, for
the period December 28, 1984 to January 9, 1985.
a MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 2
I
CONSEMI' m: (Continued ) I
2. AB #8015 - EKTCROACWEWT PERMIT.
This item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar.
3. AR #7789 - Supplement 82 - TRANSFEE? OF FUNDS FOR
TAMARACK - SUMNYHILL TO SKYLINE - CONTRACT NO. 3143. I
Council adopted RE,SOLUTION NO. 7874, authorizing
the transfer of funds for Tamarack Avenue I
construction from Sunnyhill Drive to Skyline Road -
Contract No. 3143.
4. AE3 a7961 - Supplement #1 - CON'RACT FOR CARISBAD
BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN - CONTRACT NO. 3169.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7875, accepting bids
and authorizing the execution of mntract no. 3169
for mnstruction of the Carlsbad Boulevard storm
drain.
5. AB #8016 - VILCAGE SIGN PRCGRAM - (DhTRACT NO.
3705.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7876, approving
plans and specifications and authorizing the City
Clerk to invite bids for the Village Siqn Program -
Contract No. 3705.
6. AE3 #4053 - Supplement #8 - QUITCLAIM OF SEWER AND
WATER EASEMEPaTS - CT 76-15, PALISADES POINT.
Council adopted RESOLVTION NO. 7877, approving
quitclaims for sewer and water line purposes.
7. AB #7899 - Supplement 82 - REVISION TO CDhTSULTAWT
AGREEMENT FOR AN ENVIRONMEWTAL IMPACT Repom ON
CARLSBAD BEACH BLUFF PROTECTION - FIR 84-2.
This item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. I
8, AB #80 17 - REEHABILITATION OF SNACK RAR/RESTRCXMS
AT CHASE FIELD.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7879, approving the
plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of I
Chase Field and authorizing the City Clerk to
advertise for bids.
9. AB 88018 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
INTERSECTION IMP- OF CAFtLSBAD BOUUWARD AND
POINSmTIA LANE - CONTRACT NO. 3168.
This item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. I
10. AB a8019 - SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY NOR'IV COUNTY
CAMPUS.
Council authorized the Mayor to submit a letter
supporting the proposal for the North County Campus
of San Dieqo State University.
- MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 3
CONSENT CAL8NDA.R: (Continued)
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7881, accepting a
bid and authorizing the execution of a purchase
order for refencing and new backstops at Chase
Field.
(99) 12. AT3 #6658 - Supplement P10- FINAL MAP - CARLSSAD
TRACT 81-10, UNIT 2A - CAlUSBAD RESWH CEWI1ER.
Council approved the final map of Carlsbad Tract 81-
10, Unit 7A.
Council adopted RESOLrnION NO. 7882, accepting a
grant deed; RESOLITTION W. 7883, accepting a grant
deed: WSOLUTION NO. 7884, accepting a grant deed;
and RESOLVTION NO. 7885, accepting a arant deed.
( 79) 13. AB #8021 - RGVISION OF COUNCIL POLICY STATPEEKPI'
NO. 20.
Council approved a revision of Council Policy
Statement No. 20 to expand the variety of street
name cateqories available.
I ITEMS F@NXrEa FROM THE CONSEEJT CALENDAR:
Mrs. Ooreen Ryan, 152 Sequoia Avenue, representing
homeowners and herself, addressed Council, presentins
photographs to Council Members for their perusal. Mrs.
Ryan expressed concern about the safety of the street.
She explained there is a wall there with a fence on top
of it, without the benefit of a permit. Mrs. Ryan felt
the wall and fence were just to enhance the property,
and not necessary. She added this muld set a
precedent and others would request an encroachment.
Ron Beckman, City Enqineer, explained the curb and
sidewalk are not in place in that area, and the
property slopes up, needing to be retained until the
adjoining property does construct a curb. The
retaining wall is to keep the dirt in place and the
fence is to keep anyone from stepping off into the fall
area. In answer to query, Mr. Beckman explained the
wall does extend out into the street, and thst five-
foot extension muld have to be removed eventually by
the person noakinq the next improvement to that section
of the street. He said this developer had to build the
wall and the adjoining property uwner would have to
take it down upon development of his property.
City Manager Frank Aleshire inquired whether the
developer dose to put in this wall and/or ask for
perrslission, or did the City require it because of
safety problems. Mr. Beclcman answered the existing
driveway was there and had to he kept in place and the
developer proposed this wall to accomplish that, and
the City approved it. Fre added that the developer
should have gotten a permit before building the wall
and fence.
e MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 4
Council discussed the hardship on the property to the
east created by this wall, with an estimated cost of
$200 to rmve it, and felt the developer should
deposit mney with the City for future elimination of
that five feet of wall extending into the street.
Mrs. Ryan suggested they slope the bank and plant it,
and this would solve the problem.
Mayor Casler recormended it be included in the
conditions that the developer be reguired to post a cash
deposit to guarantee remval of the retaining wall and
chain link fence when property is developed adjacent to
this property, with staff to aet an estimate of the mst
and include that amount.
Council approved the Encroachment Permit subiect to the
condition of a cash deposit sufficient to guarantee the
rmval of the retaining wall and chain link fence when
the adjacent property develops.
(70) 7. AB #7899 - Supplement #2 - FWISION TOCONSULTANT
(45) AGREMENI' FOR AN ~RO~AL IMPACT REPORT ON CARLSBAD
STATE BEACH BLUFF PROTECTION - FIR 84-2.
Council Vember ~ewis stated the City kgineer had
provided the information he needed on this item as
contained in his memorandum dated January 15, 1985.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
- RESOLIPTION NO. 7878, APPROVING A REVISION 'IO AN - AGIIEEMENT BEX'WEEN T!JE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND AWTEC
SERVICES, INC., FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ETJVIFOBTMEXTAL
IMPACT REPOR!T ON ?HE CARLSRAD S??A!TE BEACH BLUFF
PrnECTIOM.
( 45 j INTERSECTION IMPhm OF GLSBAD BOULEVARD AND
POINSmIA LANE - CONTRACT h!. 3168.
(97) 9. AB 8801 8 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
Council Member Lewis stated the City Engineer had
provided. information on. this item, also. However, he
added he had a problem with the vacant land and thouqht
it was to be paved.
I
City Engineer Ron Beckman used the chalkboard to draw
the intersection at the future intersection of
Poinsettia and Carlsbad Boulevard and explained the
placement of the signals to enable this area to be
paved later, if necessary. He added that a straight-in
entrance is less desirable than the present entrance to
the Park, since there is a quite often a queue onto
Carlsbad Boulevard into the Park.
Council adopted the followina Resolution: I
RESOLUTION NO. 7880, APPFOVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK ?O INVITE
BIDS JTlR THE CONSTRUCTION OF !lTAFFIC SIGNAL AND
INTERSECTION IMPFOW3EETS OF CARLSBAD BOULRARD AND
POINSF_rrIA LANE - Co?ATRACT W. 3168.
a m MINUTES
January 15, 1985
PUBLIC HEARINGS: I
lZ6) 14. AB87366-Supplement#5-JAMESDRIVEASSESSMENT
DISTRICT.
This item was continued to March 19, 1985.
:99) 15. AB #8022 - ZONE CHANGE AND !TENTATIVE MAP - ZC-
(113) 318/CT 84-35 - FALCON HILIS.
Mayor Casler announced the Council Members had received
a letter on this project.
Mike Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager, gave the
staff report on this item, using a transparency to show
the site, and wall charts to show the type of project.
He stated this was a standard, single-family
development, wit21 Pontiac Drive to be connected with
Tamarack Avenue. Bellwood Drive would be extended
through the property to connect with Pontiac, uiving
the property three accesses, all public streets. The
primary issue was that of gradins, since there would be
a significant amount. Mr. Holzmiller reported that
since this is a single family development, as opposed
to a planned development where clustering is possible,
more grading would be required to set the minimum lot
sizes. The applicant has proposed to save one qrove of
eucalyptus trees in the north portion, with all slopes
to have mmn maintenance-either homeowners or
maintenance district.
In answer to query abut why some lots show W access
and others ib not, Mr. Holzmiller stated in a single
family development there is no ordinance requirement for
RV parking, but some of these lots had provided rear
yard access for RV parking. This was over and above
the ordinance requirement.
Council Member ~ewis expressed concern that the grove
of trees might be destroyed in the building process and
felt the developer should be responsible for replacing
the grove, if that happened.
Council Mmber Pettine inquired whether this project
was affected by Council policies recently adopted, and
Mr. Holzmiller stated two policies affected this
project; pre-annexation zoning and annexation. The
zoning would allow more density than if left in the
County. This project had been reviewed by the Planning
Cormnission and was mentioned in the Resolution as
exempted from the policy.
In answer to query about Tamarack handling the traffic
from Pontiac, Mr. Holzmiller stated Pontiac was
designed for traffic, with no lots taking access to
Pont iac.
Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 6:40 p.m. and
issued the invitation to speak.
Mr. Mike Rider, 9605 Scranton Road, San Diego, Austin
Hansen Fehlman, Architects and Planners, representing
the applicant, addressed Council, stating this project
was exempted from the new Council policy and would be
compatible with the surrounding has. He explained
the project and accesses, as well as the reason for the
excessive gradinq, which is mainly because of the
aliqment of Pontiac Drive.
a e MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 6
Mr. James Ready, Attorney, Oceanside, representing Jose
Rams, owner of the property on which Falcon Hills is
planned, spoke in favor of this project, stating any
negative action or delay could! result in a financial
loss for the Rams family and a loss of some acreage by
foreclosure. He said this is an island of land in the
County that belongs in the City, and it is not feasible
to farm this property at the present time.
Mr. Ready discussed the traffic circulation, stating thi
should improve the flow of traffic in this area, and
since there will no longer be farming in the area, there
will be no trucks removing crops from the farm land. 1
Mrs. Joyce Spring, 2721 York Road, spke about her
concerns ahout the schools, statinq they are over-cr0d.e
now and mre homes should not be built without schmls
being built first .
Mayor Casler answered Mrs. Spring, stating the mney has
been paid to the school district for schools in that
area, and the school board should be contacted by the
citizens.
Mr. Nel Halvarson, 2723 Lyons Court, asked whether a ful
EIR had been done, and was concerned about the falcons
and hawks in the area and what would happen to them when
this project was built. 1
Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the
public hearing was closed at 6:56 p.m.
Council Member Pettine stated that 3%. Ready was a
personal friend and campaign treasurer; therefore, he
would abstain from voting on this project.
Council directed the City Attorney to prepare &cuments
approving CT 84-35 and introduced the followinq
Ordinance:
ORDINANCENO. 9749,AMENDINGTITLE 21 OF THE CARI;SEAD
MUNICIPAL 03DE RY AME31DINC- THE ZONING W FOR A
PRlWtW?,XATIONAT, ZONE CHANGE FROM A-70 (COUNTY) TO R-l-
8,000 AND R-1-7,500 ON APPROXIYF.TELY 65.5 ACXES ON
PROPmrrY GENERALLY LOCATED ,SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY
TERMINUS OF FWPIAC DRIVE,
(99) 16. AB#8023-ZONECHANGE, TWATIVEMAP,AND
( 1 1 3) COEEOMINIUM PEPPIIT - ZC-308/CT 84-1 1 /CP-283 - CAE?LSBAD
RACQUET CLUR.
This item was continued for one week. I
(114) 17, AB P7882 - Supplement #2 - ZONE CODE AND
(1 13) SPECIFIC PL7lN AMENDMENT FOR SIGN REGULATIONS - ZCA-
174/SP-19(B) - CITY OF CARGSBAD.
Mike Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager, gave the
staff report on this item as mntained in the Agenda
Bill, adding that any additional signing would have to
be requested,
a 9 MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Pzge 7
Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. and
issued the invitation to speak.
Mr. Don Stewart, Bob Raker Volkswagen Chrysler-
Plymouth, addressed Council, statinq each factory awns
the pole sign and will only allow their own sign on
that pole. With the present ordinance, it is
impossible to qet the required signs on the property.
Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the
public hearing was closed at 7:05 p.m.
Council Member Lewis stated his belief that all signing
changes should be the ultimate responsibility of the
Council, and Council Member Pettine concurred.
Mayor Casler explained that the attempt had been made
to relieve Council of mne of the work load., and the
Planninq Codssion auenda is available to Council
Members. She felt this should stay with the Planning
Commission. Council Members Kulchin and Chick
concurred.
City Manager E'rank Aleshire said Council does have the
right of appeal on any matter on which the Planning
Cdssion acts. Fny time they felt a mistake had been
made on a signing action, they could review that
action.
Motion was made that all sign projects mrrte before
Council.
Motion failed due to the lack of a majority.
Council introduced the following Ordinances:
(one mtion)
ORDINANCE KO. 9733, AMENDING TITLE 21, '33G'TER 21.41
SECTIOJX 21.41.075(b) OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY
THE ADDITION OF SURSEC'TIOM (9) TO Am THE PLAEJNING
COPMISSION 173 CONSIDER FPPROVF-L OF M1?4'OR KIDIFICATIONS
TO SIGN SPACING REQUIREMENTS.
ORDINANCE NO. 9734, AMENDIM; ORDINANCES 9720 AND 9288
BY ADDING A PRBVIELON ?n COYDITICN ha. 15 173 ALLOW TJ?E
PW?Ih?G COMMIS~I~~ TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF NINOR
MODIFICATIONS TO THE SPACIKG ~UIPF~ OF
FREESTANDIE SIGNS.
(113) 18. AB #8024 - ZONE CmE - PEA SOUP ANDERSEN'S.
City Manager Frank Aleshire reported on this item,
using a transparency to show the location of the road.
His remmendation was not to approve the zone change
until the road is mmpleted and accepted by the City.
Pea Soup Andersen's has no objection to a ninety-day
continuation.
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
~ett ine
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
Pet t ine
Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. and
issued the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to
speak on this item, the public hearing was closed.
a MINUTES
Council continued the public hearing on this zone
change request until April 16, 1985.
DEPAKIND3TF.L AND CITY MANAGER REPOKJ!S:
Planninu
(99) 19. PaB #8015 - REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION
DGTERE1INATION FOR A 13 UNIT APAFZMEEP PROJECT - -61 - WER.
Mike ~olzmiller, Land Use Planning Manaqer, gave the
staff report on this item, as conntained in the Agenda
Bill, using a transparency to show the site, and adding
this project muld be all one-bedroom units. The
parking meets the requirements for an apartment
project. He stated staff had recommended denial to
Planning, based on density. Staff felt the project did
not meet enough of the criteria to justify the density
requested. Mr. Holzmiller stated the impact on
Tamarack was a consideration, since the street was
downqraded in the Circulation Element.
I Mr. Holzmiller said staff had been contacted today by
the applicant, who indicated he was willina to delete
one unit, makin? a total of twelve, makinq the density
25.5 units per acre. The parking would be retained as
it is, making it in excess 5y me and a half or two
spaces. He stated staff is lookin? closer at the
traffic in this area, due to the narrow streets and
n&r of deadend streets.
Mayor Ca.sler stated she was aware there is a problem in
that area and had decided to ask the members of the
Goals Comittee to make one qoal for next year the
revision of the parking ordinance in that particular
area.
In answer to query, Mr. Holzmiller stated 5,000 trips
per day is the maximum number on a collector street.
Tamarack would have 9,000 vehicles per day--but not at
this time. Council Merrtber Chick stated there were
7,500 at the present time: alreasy exceeding the
maximum for a collector street.
Mayor Casler stated the Attorney suggested this item
has to be returned to the Planning Corranission to look
at conditions of approval, as they did not consider
those. Council Member Pettine appealed. this item to
the Council.
Council Memher Pettine stated the vote was close at the
Planning Corrnnission, and he felt the traffic
circulation problem was significant enough to warrant
an appeal of the decision.
Council Member Lewis stated he wanted this reviewed by
the Land Use Review Comittee, because of the
traffic circulation prohlein.
a a MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 9
Council Member Kulchin aqreed this area needs to be
looked at as far as traffic circulation and she said
she auld not support this project.
Council Member Chick felt the terms in the Auenda Bill
were not stiff enouuh. He did not have a problem with
the density of the project, and felt the problem was
with the downgrading of Tamarack, which he voted
against.
Council Member Pettine stated he felt traffic
circulation was the issue and why he opposed the
project .
Mayor Casler mmnented there wuld be twelve units
instead of thirteen. She did not feel the proiect
would create a severe impact on traffic.
Mayor Casler stated the Council auld make Tamarack a
secondary arterial if they desired to do so. When it
is improved, it will be two traffic lanes, two parking
lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalks.
Council Member Lewis stated the streets in this area
were built for single family homes, and he felt the
entire quadrant should be reviewed before these
projects are built. He added he wuld wait for the
review before -ins a reconmendation.
In answer to query, staff indicated at the minimum, the
project wuld be 9 units, at 19.1, and at 10 units,
would be 21.2 units be acre.
Motion was made to approve this project at twelve units
and send back to Planning Commission for mnditions of
approval. Flotion failed due to lack of a rrrajority.
Motion was made and seconded to grant the appeal and
deny this project.
Council Member Chick stated the applicant indicated he
wanted a continuance and asked whether a mtion for
continuance took priority. The consensus of Council was
to allow Ken Chriss to make a presentation at this
time.
Mr. Ken Chriss, representing the applicant, stated
this project wuld have little effect on Tamarack,
since all would be me-bedroom units. He stated the
right-of-way is there on Tamarack, and Council could
upgrade the street at any time. The original
recorranendation from staff was for approval. Then
traffic became an issue, and denial was reconnnended.
He stressed. the quality of the project, and requested
approval.
The mtion to =ant the appeal and deny this project
was restated. Motion failed due to the lack of a
majority.
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
Pett ine
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 10
Council denied this project without prejudice and asked
for a re-design of the project and re-consideration by
the Planning Cdssion.
RECESS :
Mayor Casler declared a recess at 8:00 p,m., and
Council re-convened at 8:12 p.m., with all Members
present.
City Manager
(88) 20, AB #8026 - REQUEST TO ADDFESS COUNCIL RJ%ARDm
MOBILE HOT FOOD PREPARATION VEHICLES.
Assistant City Manager Frank Mannen gave the report on
this item as contained in the Agenda Rill.
Mayor Casler stated there were five requests to speak
on this item, and questioned whether Council desired
a public hearing on this item at a later date, or hear
it tonight without a public hearing.
After discussion, the decision was made by Council to
hear the people here tonight, and set for public
hearing later, if necessary.
Mr, James Marinos, 111 Elm Street, San Eiego,
representing Mobile Catering Industry, addressed
Council, giving a history of the "hot trucks" situation
in Sm Diego County. Mr, Marinos stated these trucks
are a hazard to health and safety. Be recommended the
Council reject the oversight in 1982, and not allow
"hot trucks" in the City of Carlsbad.
Mr. Douglas Nunn, 201 South Upas, Escondido,
representing Canale Foods, Inc., a large catering
company, stated they had four hundred trucks, with 250
of them "hot trucks", Mr. Nunn stated they wuld like
to donate those trucks to charity-the claims for
injuries on those trucks are five and a half to one in
comparison with the other mbile trucks. He stated.
anyone can get a license to operate the "hot trucks"
and it is very difficult to inspect them and to know
where they buy the food or what type they buy. His
company feels these trucks are hazardous. Mr. Nunn
said the mks on those trucks do not sit down, as
required, but stand to cook while the truck is in
motion, causing my injuries, The cold trucks are
inspected daily, but the "hot trucks" cannot be
inspected or regulated.
Mr. Samuel Lopez, New Concepts Za-tering, Escondido,
addressed Council stating these "hot trucks" are
dangerous, with propane controls inside the trucks, and
one exit in case of fire. He stated the food cannot be
cooked at the site, as there is not sufficient time,
necessitating the cooking of food while in mtion.
a MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 11
Mr. Fred Thornburgh, 6675 B Paseo Del Norte, spoke
against the "hot trucks", stating Council Members had a
letter regarding this, and if the one inspector tried
to inspect the "hot trucksn, restaurants would not be
inspected for lack of time.
Mr. Bill Amstrong, 1010 Yarine View Drive,
representing Classic Catering, spoke in opposition to
the "hot trucks", from the driver's standpoint. He
stated the food is not inspected and the trucks are
very unsafe for those mrking on them. They were
approved to sit in one location and cook the food, not
cook food while in mtion.
Mayor Casler commented that only one side had been
heard from this evening, those opposing the "hot
trucks".
Assistant City Manager Frank Mannen stated the County
Department was neutral as far as the adoption of
regulations and was aware of the difficulty in
inspecting these trucks.
In answer to query regardins enforcement of
recplations, the City Attorney stated the City
contracts with the County and they act as the Health
Officer.
Council directed staff to prepare an amended ordinance
prohibiting "hot trucks" and set the item for public
hearing, with operators of those trucks being notified
of the hearing date.
Finance
(100) 21. AB #8027 - REVISIONS TO COUECTION PROCEDURES FOR
THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX.
Jim Elliott, Finance Director, gave the report on this
item as mntained in the Agenda Bill.
In response to questions, the City Attorney stated upon
sale of property, the seller mst have a tax clearance
certificate from the city for the amount of TWT due.
If the seller does not obtain the certificate, the
person purchasinq the property wuld withhold that
arnount .
Council introduced the following Ordinance:
ORDINA??E NO. 1275, AMENDING TITLE 3, CEEFbPTER 3-12 OF
THE CARLSMD MJNICIPAL CODE BY THE AMENDMENT AND
ADDITION OF VARIOUS SEC'rICNS ?O REVISE THE PROCEDURES
FOR 03UECI'ION OF THE CITY'S TFWlSIENT OCCUPANCY ?ax.
Engineering
(99) 22. AB #8028 - TEWTATIVE MAP EXTENSION - CT 82-25 -
UI(EGAl4TA.
Ron Reckman, City Engineer, gave the staff report on
this item as mntained in the Agenda Bill.
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
Pettine
e MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 12
Mr. Don Agatep, 2956 Roosevelt Street, representing
Ukegawa Brothers, the applicant, stated they understcod
the conditions imposed by staff and were not opposed to
creating an assessment district for Palomr Airport
Road. He stated they have an obligation for 1,400 feet
of hprovement, but do not understand the degree to
which this mer muld be obligated for hprovements in
the assessment district. He asked time to meet with
staff to discuss the limit of responsibility in the
assessment district.
Council extended Agenda Bill 48028 one week to allow
the applicant to consult with staff regardina the
proposed assessment district.
(72) 23. AB#8029-NOPARKX-'fmARACRAVENUEFROM
SKYLINE ROAD TO ETM AVENUE.
Ron Beckman, City Engineer, gave the staff report on
this item as contained in the Agenda Bill.
Council introduced the following Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 31 82, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.40 OF
THE CARTsBAT, MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ANENDMEKC OF SECTION
10.40.059 TO DECLARE A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON B3TH
SIDFS OF !PAMARACK AWTE FFOM SKYLINE ROAD TO ELM
AVENUE.
Ron Beckman, City Engineer, asked these two items be
considered together, and gave the report as contained
in the Agenda Bills.
Council introduced the following Ordinances:
ORDINANCE NO. 3183, MENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.28 OF
THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY PIE RE-AMENDMEW'' OF
SECTION 10.28.340 F?EQUIRING ADDITIONAL SKlPS FOR.
STREETS INTERSECTING EL FUEIiTE STREET.
ORDINANCE NO. 3184, AMENDING !TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.28 OF
THE CARI;SBAD MUNICIPAL CDDE BY THE RE-m OF
SECTION 10.28.320 REQUIRING ADDITIONAL SKIPS FOR
STREETS rnERsECTING ACGA mAD.
(81) 26. AB 88032 - ACCEPTANCE OF ACCESS RIGHTS ON OBELISCO
CIRCLE.
Ron Bechan, City Engineer, save the staff report on
this item as contained in the Agenda Bill, calling
attention to the location map ad the omission of
another roadway serving the property on Obelisco Circle.
He added the two accesses were the reason for the
waivinq access onto Obelisco Circle, since staff does
not allow throuqh access onto two streets.
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
Pettine
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
Pett ine
e MINUTES
January 15, 1985 Page 13
Council adopted the followinq Resolution:
RESOLUTION N@. 7887, ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED.
COUNCIL REFOR!l?S
Citizens' Meetins
Council Member Pettine reported on a citizens' meeting
held last Thursday evening.
Coastal Commission Hearins
Council Member Chick reported on the hearing last
Friday attended by Chris Salomne and himself.
LCP Review Committee
Council Member Chick reported on the recent meeting.
Council Member Kulchin reported on the recent meeting.
Downto~m Merchants Committee
Council Member Mulchin reported on the meeting held
this mrning and said there will be a dedication for
Glenn McComs on January 24, 1985, at 2:00 p.m. at the
Fountain.
Fine Arts Ad Koc Committee
Mayor Casler reported on the orqanizational meeting.
General Plan Review Committee
Mayor Casler stated the Library Conference Room has
been reserved for these meetings, starting the first
week in February on Thursday evenings. She asked for
the appointments to be made next Tuesday night, giving
staff two weeks to send out the letters with the dnarge
and background information.
~y proper mtion, the meeting of January 15, 1985, was
adjourned at 9:39 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
ALm L. RAUTEWZm7Z
City Clerk
Harriett Babbitt
Minutes Clerk