Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-01-15; City Council; Minutes0 a MINUTES Neeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting) Date of Meeting: January 15, 1985 Time of Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers CAUL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mayor Casler at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL was taken by the City Clerk as follows: Present: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Chi&, Kulchin and Pettine. Absent: None. IWOCATION was given by Mayor Casler. PLECGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Pettine. MINUTES : Minutes of the Regular Meeting held January 2, 1985, were approved as presented. Mayor Casler announced requests to mntinue two item on the Agenda; Item #14, to March 19, and Item $16, for one week. Council continued Item #14 to the meeting of March 19, 1985, and Item #I6 to the meeting of January 22, 1985. CONSENT CALENDAR: Mayor Casler requested Item #2 be withdrawn from the Consent Calender. Council Member Lewis requested Item #7 and Item $9 be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. Council confirmed the action of the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item #2, 87 and #9, as follows: WAIVER OF OrnINANCE TEXT READIN%: Council waived the reading of the text of dl ordinances and resolutions at this meeting. 1. AB $8006 - RATIFICATION OF DENANDS AGAINST TEFE CITY* Council ratified the payment of demands against the City in the amunt of $1,349,018.43, for the period December 28, 1984 to January 9, 1985; Payroll demands in the amount of $323,571.39, for the period December 16, 1984 to December 29, 1984; and Housing demands in the munt of $66,171.81, for the period December 28, 1984 to January 9, 1985. a MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 2 I CONSEMI' m: (Continued ) I 2. AB #8015 - EKTCROACWEWT PERMIT. This item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. 3. AR #7789 - Supplement 82 - TRANSFEE? OF FUNDS FOR TAMARACK - SUMNYHILL TO SKYLINE - CONTRACT NO. 3143. I Council adopted RE,SOLUTION NO. 7874, authorizing the transfer of funds for Tamarack Avenue I construction from Sunnyhill Drive to Skyline Road - Contract No. 3143. 4. AE3 a7961 - Supplement #1 - CON'RACT FOR CARISBAD BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN - CONTRACT NO. 3169. Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7875, accepting bids and authorizing the execution of mntract no. 3169 for mnstruction of the Carlsbad Boulevard storm drain. 5. AB #8016 - VILCAGE SIGN PRCGRAM - (DhTRACT NO. 3705. Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7876, approving plans and specifications and authorizing the City Clerk to invite bids for the Village Siqn Program - Contract No. 3705. 6. AE3 #4053 - Supplement #8 - QUITCLAIM OF SEWER AND WATER EASEMEPaTS - CT 76-15, PALISADES POINT. Council adopted RESOLVTION NO. 7877, approving quitclaims for sewer and water line purposes. 7. AB #7899 - Supplement 82 - REVISION TO CDhTSULTAWT AGREEMENT FOR AN ENVIRONMEWTAL IMPACT Repom ON CARLSBAD BEACH BLUFF PROTECTION - FIR 84-2. This item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. I 8, AB #80 17 - REEHABILITATION OF SNACK RAR/RESTRCXMS AT CHASE FIELD. Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7879, approving the plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of I Chase Field and authorizing the City Clerk to advertise for bids. 9. AB 88018 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INTERSECTION IMP- OF CAFtLSBAD BOUUWARD AND POINSmTIA LANE - CONTRACT NO. 3168. This item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. I 10. AB a8019 - SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY NOR'IV COUNTY CAMPUS. Council authorized the Mayor to submit a letter supporting the proposal for the North County Campus of San Dieqo State University. - MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 3 CONSENT CAL8NDA.R: (Continued) Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7881, accepting a bid and authorizing the execution of a purchase order for refencing and new backstops at Chase Field. (99) 12. AT3 #6658 - Supplement P10- FINAL MAP - CARLSSAD TRACT 81-10, UNIT 2A - CAlUSBAD RESWH CEWI1ER. Council approved the final map of Carlsbad Tract 81- 10, Unit 7A. Council adopted RESOLrnION NO. 7882, accepting a grant deed; RESOLITTION W. 7883, accepting a grant deed: WSOLUTION NO. 7884, accepting a grant deed; and RESOLVTION NO. 7885, accepting a arant deed. ( 79) 13. AB #8021 - RGVISION OF COUNCIL POLICY STATPEEKPI' NO. 20. Council approved a revision of Council Policy Statement No. 20 to expand the variety of street name cateqories available. I ITEMS F@NXrEa FROM THE CONSEEJT CALENDAR: Mrs. Ooreen Ryan, 152 Sequoia Avenue, representing homeowners and herself, addressed Council, presentins photographs to Council Members for their perusal. Mrs. Ryan expressed concern about the safety of the street. She explained there is a wall there with a fence on top of it, without the benefit of a permit. Mrs. Ryan felt the wall and fence were just to enhance the property, and not necessary. She added this muld set a precedent and others would request an encroachment. Ron Beckman, City Enqineer, explained the curb and sidewalk are not in place in that area, and the property slopes up, needing to be retained until the adjoining property does construct a curb. The retaining wall is to keep the dirt in place and the fence is to keep anyone from stepping off into the fall area. In answer to query, Mr. Beckman explained the wall does extend out into the street, and thst five- foot extension muld have to be removed eventually by the person noakinq the next improvement to that section of the street. He said this developer had to build the wall and the adjoining property uwner would have to take it down upon development of his property. City Manager Frank Aleshire inquired whether the developer dose to put in this wall and/or ask for perrslission, or did the City require it because of safety problems. Mr. Beclcman answered the existing driveway was there and had to he kept in place and the developer proposed this wall to accomplish that, and the City approved it. Fre added that the developer should have gotten a permit before building the wall and fence. e MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 4 Council discussed the hardship on the property to the east created by this wall, with an estimated cost of $200 to rmve it, and felt the developer should deposit mney with the City for future elimination of that five feet of wall extending into the street. Mrs. Ryan suggested they slope the bank and plant it, and this would solve the problem. Mayor Casler recormended it be included in the conditions that the developer be reguired to post a cash deposit to guarantee remval of the retaining wall and chain link fence when property is developed adjacent to this property, with staff to aet an estimate of the mst and include that amount. Council approved the Encroachment Permit subiect to the condition of a cash deposit sufficient to guarantee the rmval of the retaining wall and chain link fence when the adjacent property develops. (70) 7. AB #7899 - Supplement #2 - FWISION TOCONSULTANT (45) AGREMENI' FOR AN ~RO~AL IMPACT REPORT ON CARLSBAD STATE BEACH BLUFF PROTECTION - FIR 84-2. Council Vember ~ewis stated the City kgineer had provided the information he needed on this item as contained in his memorandum dated January 15, 1985. Council adopted the following Resolution: - RESOLIPTION NO. 7878, APPROVING A REVISION 'IO AN - AGIIEEMENT BEX'WEEN T!JE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND AWTEC SERVICES, INC., FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ETJVIFOBTMEXTAL IMPACT REPOR!T ON ?HE CARLSRAD S??A!TE BEACH BLUFF PrnECTIOM. ( 45 j INTERSECTION IMPhm OF GLSBAD BOULEVARD AND POINSmIA LANE - CONTRACT h!. 3168. (97) 9. AB 8801 8 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR Council Member Lewis stated the City Engineer had provided. information on. this item, also. However, he added he had a problem with the vacant land and thouqht it was to be paved. I City Engineer Ron Beckman used the chalkboard to draw the intersection at the future intersection of Poinsettia and Carlsbad Boulevard and explained the placement of the signals to enable this area to be paved later, if necessary. He added that a straight-in entrance is less desirable than the present entrance to the Park, since there is a quite often a queue onto Carlsbad Boulevard into the Park. Council adopted the followina Resolution: I RESOLUTION NO. 7880, APPFOVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK ?O INVITE BIDS JTlR THE CONSTRUCTION OF !lTAFFIC SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION IMPFOW3EETS OF CARLSBAD BOULRARD AND POINSF_rrIA LANE - Co?ATRACT W. 3168. a m MINUTES January 15, 1985 PUBLIC HEARINGS: I lZ6) 14. AB87366-Supplement#5-JAMESDRIVEASSESSMENT DISTRICT. This item was continued to March 19, 1985. :99) 15. AB #8022 - ZONE CHANGE AND !TENTATIVE MAP - ZC- (113) 318/CT 84-35 - FALCON HILIS. Mayor Casler announced the Council Members had received a letter on this project. Mike Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager, gave the staff report on this item, using a transparency to show the site, and wall charts to show the type of project. He stated this was a standard, single-family development, wit21 Pontiac Drive to be connected with Tamarack Avenue. Bellwood Drive would be extended through the property to connect with Pontiac, uiving the property three accesses, all public streets. The primary issue was that of gradins, since there would be a significant amount. Mr. Holzmiller reported that since this is a single family development, as opposed to a planned development where clustering is possible, more grading would be required to set the minimum lot sizes. The applicant has proposed to save one qrove of eucalyptus trees in the north portion, with all slopes to have mmn maintenance-either homeowners or maintenance district. In answer to query abut why some lots show W access and others ib not, Mr. Holzmiller stated in a single family development there is no ordinance requirement for RV parking, but some of these lots had provided rear yard access for RV parking. This was over and above the ordinance requirement. Council Member ~ewis expressed concern that the grove of trees might be destroyed in the building process and felt the developer should be responsible for replacing the grove, if that happened. Council Mmber Pettine inquired whether this project was affected by Council policies recently adopted, and Mr. Holzmiller stated two policies affected this project; pre-annexation zoning and annexation. The zoning would allow more density than if left in the County. This project had been reviewed by the Planning Cormnission and was mentioned in the Resolution as exempted from the policy. In answer to query about Tamarack handling the traffic from Pontiac, Mr. Holzmiller stated Pontiac was designed for traffic, with no lots taking access to Pont iac. Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 6:40 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Mike Rider, 9605 Scranton Road, San Diego, Austin Hansen Fehlman, Architects and Planners, representing the applicant, addressed Council, stating this project was exempted from the new Council policy and would be compatible with the surrounding has. He explained the project and accesses, as well as the reason for the excessive gradinq, which is mainly because of the aliqment of Pontiac Drive. a e MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 6 Mr. James Ready, Attorney, Oceanside, representing Jose Rams, owner of the property on which Falcon Hills is planned, spoke in favor of this project, stating any negative action or delay could! result in a financial loss for the Rams family and a loss of some acreage by foreclosure. He said this is an island of land in the County that belongs in the City, and it is not feasible to farm this property at the present time. Mr. Ready discussed the traffic circulation, stating thi should improve the flow of traffic in this area, and since there will no longer be farming in the area, there will be no trucks removing crops from the farm land. 1 Mrs. Joyce Spring, 2721 York Road, spke about her concerns ahout the schools, statinq they are over-cr0d.e now and mre homes should not be built without schmls being built first . Mayor Casler answered Mrs. Spring, stating the mney has been paid to the school district for schools in that area, and the school board should be contacted by the citizens. Mr. Nel Halvarson, 2723 Lyons Court, asked whether a ful EIR had been done, and was concerned about the falcons and hawks in the area and what would happen to them when this project was built. 1 Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the public hearing was closed at 6:56 p.m. Council Member Pettine stated that 3%. Ready was a personal friend and campaign treasurer; therefore, he would abstain from voting on this project. Council directed the City Attorney to prepare &cuments approving CT 84-35 and introduced the followinq Ordinance: ORDINANCENO. 9749,AMENDINGTITLE 21 OF THE CARI;SEAD MUNICIPAL 03DE RY AME31DINC- THE ZONING W FOR A PRlWtW?,XATIONAT, ZONE CHANGE FROM A-70 (COUNTY) TO R-l- 8,000 AND R-1-7,500 ON APPROXIYF.TELY 65.5 ACXES ON PROPmrrY GENERALLY LOCATED ,SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF FWPIAC DRIVE, (99) 16. AB#8023-ZONECHANGE, TWATIVEMAP,AND ( 1 1 3) COEEOMINIUM PEPPIIT - ZC-308/CT 84-1 1 /CP-283 - CAE?LSBAD RACQUET CLUR. This item was continued for one week. I (114) 17, AB P7882 - Supplement #2 - ZONE CODE AND (1 13) SPECIFIC PL7lN AMENDMENT FOR SIGN REGULATIONS - ZCA- 174/SP-19(B) - CITY OF CARGSBAD. Mike Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager, gave the staff report on this item as mntained in the Agenda Bill, adding that any additional signing would have to be requested, a 9 MINUTES January 15, 1985 Pzge 7 Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Don Stewart, Bob Raker Volkswagen Chrysler- Plymouth, addressed Council, statinq each factory awns the pole sign and will only allow their own sign on that pole. With the present ordinance, it is impossible to qet the required signs on the property. Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the public hearing was closed at 7:05 p.m. Council Member Lewis stated his belief that all signing changes should be the ultimate responsibility of the Council, and Council Member Pettine concurred. Mayor Casler explained that the attempt had been made to relieve Council of mne of the work load., and the Planninq Codssion auenda is available to Council Members. She felt this should stay with the Planning Commission. Council Members Kulchin and Chick concurred. City Manager E'rank Aleshire said Council does have the right of appeal on any matter on which the Planning Cdssion acts. Fny time they felt a mistake had been made on a signing action, they could review that action. Motion was made that all sign projects mrrte before Council. Motion failed due to the lack of a majority. Council introduced the following Ordinances: (one mtion) ORDINANCE KO. 9733, AMENDING TITLE 21, '33G'TER 21.41 SECTIOJX 21.41.075(b) OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF SURSEC'TIOM (9) TO Am THE PLAEJNING COPMISSION 173 CONSIDER FPPROVF-L OF M1?4'OR KIDIFICATIONS TO SIGN SPACING REQUIREMENTS. ORDINANCE NO. 9734, AMENDIM; ORDINANCES 9720 AND 9288 BY ADDING A PRBVIELON ?n COYDITICN ha. 15 173 ALLOW TJ?E PW?Ih?G COMMIS~I~~ TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF NINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE SPACIKG ~UIPF~ OF FREESTANDIE SIGNS. (113) 18. AB #8024 - ZONE CmE - PEA SOUP ANDERSEN'S. City Manager Frank Aleshire reported on this item, using a transparency to show the location of the road. His remmendation was not to approve the zone change until the road is mmpleted and accepted by the City. Pea Soup Andersen's has no objection to a ninety-day continuation. Casler Lewis Kulchin Chick ~ett ine Casler Lewis Kulchin Chick Pet t ine Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on this item, the public hearing was closed. a MINUTES Council continued the public hearing on this zone change request until April 16, 1985. DEPAKIND3TF.L AND CITY MANAGER REPOKJ!S: Planninu (99) 19. PaB #8015 - REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION DGTERE1INATION FOR A 13 UNIT APAFZMEEP PROJECT - -61 - WER. Mike ~olzmiller, Land Use Planning Manaqer, gave the staff report on this item, as conntained in the Agenda Bill, using a transparency to show the site, and adding this project muld be all one-bedroom units. The parking meets the requirements for an apartment project. He stated staff had recommended denial to Planning, based on density. Staff felt the project did not meet enough of the criteria to justify the density requested. Mr. Holzmiller stated the impact on Tamarack was a consideration, since the street was downqraded in the Circulation Element. I Mr. Holzmiller said staff had been contacted today by the applicant, who indicated he was willina to delete one unit, makin? a total of twelve, makinq the density 25.5 units per acre. The parking would be retained as it is, making it in excess 5y me and a half or two spaces. He stated staff is lookin? closer at the traffic in this area, due to the narrow streets and n&r of deadend streets. Mayor Ca.sler stated she was aware there is a problem in that area and had decided to ask the members of the Goals Comittee to make one qoal for next year the revision of the parking ordinance in that particular area. In answer to query, Mr. Holzmiller stated 5,000 trips per day is the maximum number on a collector street. Tamarack would have 9,000 vehicles per day--but not at this time. Council Merrtber Chick stated there were 7,500 at the present time: alreasy exceeding the maximum for a collector street. Mayor Casler stated the Attorney suggested this item has to be returned to the Planning Corranission to look at conditions of approval, as they did not consider those. Council Member Pettine appealed. this item to the Council. Council Memher Pettine stated the vote was close at the Planning Corrnnission, and he felt the traffic circulation problem was significant enough to warrant an appeal of the decision. Council Member Lewis stated he wanted this reviewed by the Land Use Review Comittee, because of the traffic circulation prohlein. a a MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 9 Council Member Kulchin aqreed this area needs to be looked at as far as traffic circulation and she said she auld not support this project. Council Member Chick felt the terms in the Auenda Bill were not stiff enouuh. He did not have a problem with the density of the project, and felt the problem was with the downgrading of Tamarack, which he voted against. Council Member Pettine stated he felt traffic circulation was the issue and why he opposed the project . Mayor Casler mmnented there wuld be twelve units instead of thirteen. She did not feel the proiect would create a severe impact on traffic. Mayor Casler stated the Council auld make Tamarack a secondary arterial if they desired to do so. When it is improved, it will be two traffic lanes, two parking lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalks. Council Member Lewis stated the streets in this area were built for single family homes, and he felt the entire quadrant should be reviewed before these projects are built. He added he wuld wait for the review before -ins a reconmendation. In answer to query, staff indicated at the minimum, the project wuld be 9 units, at 19.1, and at 10 units, would be 21.2 units be acre. Motion was made to approve this project at twelve units and send back to Planning Commission for mnditions of approval. Flotion failed due to lack of a rrrajority. Motion was made and seconded to grant the appeal and deny this project. Council Member Chick stated the applicant indicated he wanted a continuance and asked whether a mtion for continuance took priority. The consensus of Council was to allow Ken Chriss to make a presentation at this time. Mr. Ken Chriss, representing the applicant, stated this project wuld have little effect on Tamarack, since all would be me-bedroom units. He stated the right-of-way is there on Tamarack, and Council could upgrade the street at any time. The original recorranendation from staff was for approval. Then traffic became an issue, and denial was reconnnended. He stressed. the quality of the project, and requested approval. The mtion to =ant the appeal and deny this project was restated. Motion failed due to the lack of a majority. Casler Lewis Kulchin Chick Pett ine Casler Lewis Kulchin Chick MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 10 Council denied this project without prejudice and asked for a re-design of the project and re-consideration by the Planning Cdssion. RECESS : Mayor Casler declared a recess at 8:00 p,m., and Council re-convened at 8:12 p.m., with all Members present. City Manager (88) 20, AB #8026 - REQUEST TO ADDFESS COUNCIL RJ%ARDm MOBILE HOT FOOD PREPARATION VEHICLES. Assistant City Manager Frank Mannen gave the report on this item as contained in the Agenda Rill. Mayor Casler stated there were five requests to speak on this item, and questioned whether Council desired a public hearing on this item at a later date, or hear it tonight without a public hearing. After discussion, the decision was made by Council to hear the people here tonight, and set for public hearing later, if necessary. Mr, James Marinos, 111 Elm Street, San Eiego, representing Mobile Catering Industry, addressed Council, giving a history of the "hot trucks" situation in Sm Diego County. Mr, Marinos stated these trucks are a hazard to health and safety. Be recommended the Council reject the oversight in 1982, and not allow "hot trucks" in the City of Carlsbad. Mr. Douglas Nunn, 201 South Upas, Escondido, representing Canale Foods, Inc., a large catering company, stated they had four hundred trucks, with 250 of them "hot trucks", Mr. Nunn stated they wuld like to donate those trucks to charity-the claims for injuries on those trucks are five and a half to one in comparison with the other mbile trucks. He stated. anyone can get a license to operate the "hot trucks" and it is very difficult to inspect them and to know where they buy the food or what type they buy. His company feels these trucks are hazardous. Mr. Nunn said the mks on those trucks do not sit down, as required, but stand to cook while the truck is in motion, causing my injuries, The cold trucks are inspected daily, but the "hot trucks" cannot be inspected or regulated. Mr. Samuel Lopez, New Concepts Za-tering, Escondido, addressed Council stating these "hot trucks" are dangerous, with propane controls inside the trucks, and one exit in case of fire. He stated the food cannot be cooked at the site, as there is not sufficient time, necessitating the cooking of food while in mtion. a MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 11 Mr. Fred Thornburgh, 6675 B Paseo Del Norte, spoke against the "hot trucks", stating Council Members had a letter regarding this, and if the one inspector tried to inspect the "hot trucksn, restaurants would not be inspected for lack of time. Mr. Bill Amstrong, 1010 Yarine View Drive, representing Classic Catering, spoke in opposition to the "hot trucks", from the driver's standpoint. He stated the food is not inspected and the trucks are very unsafe for those mrking on them. They were approved to sit in one location and cook the food, not cook food while in mtion. Mayor Casler commented that only one side had been heard from this evening, those opposing the "hot trucks". Assistant City Manager Frank Mannen stated the County Department was neutral as far as the adoption of regulations and was aware of the difficulty in inspecting these trucks. In answer to query regardins enforcement of recplations, the City Attorney stated the City contracts with the County and they act as the Health Officer. Council directed staff to prepare an amended ordinance prohibiting "hot trucks" and set the item for public hearing, with operators of those trucks being notified of the hearing date. Finance (100) 21. AB #8027 - REVISIONS TO COUECTION PROCEDURES FOR THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX. Jim Elliott, Finance Director, gave the report on this item as mntained in the Agenda Bill. In response to questions, the City Attorney stated upon sale of property, the seller mst have a tax clearance certificate from the city for the amount of TWT due. If the seller does not obtain the certificate, the person purchasinq the property wuld withhold that arnount . Council introduced the following Ordinance: ORDINA??E NO. 1275, AMENDING TITLE 3, CEEFbPTER 3-12 OF THE CARLSMD MJNICIPAL CODE BY THE AMENDMENT AND ADDITION OF VARIOUS SEC'rICNS ?O REVISE THE PROCEDURES FOR 03UECI'ION OF THE CITY'S TFWlSIENT OCCUPANCY ?ax. Engineering (99) 22. AB #8028 - TEWTATIVE MAP EXTENSION - CT 82-25 - UI(EGAl4TA. Ron Reckman, City Engineer, gave the staff report on this item as mntained in the Agenda Bill. Casler Lewis Kulchin Chick Pettine e MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 12 Mr. Don Agatep, 2956 Roosevelt Street, representing Ukegawa Brothers, the applicant, stated they understcod the conditions imposed by staff and were not opposed to creating an assessment district for Palomr Airport Road. He stated they have an obligation for 1,400 feet of hprovement, but do not understand the degree to which this mer muld be obligated for hprovements in the assessment district. He asked time to meet with staff to discuss the limit of responsibility in the assessment district. Council extended Agenda Bill 48028 one week to allow the applicant to consult with staff regardina the proposed assessment district. (72) 23. AB#8029-NOPARKX-'fmARACRAVENUEFROM SKYLINE ROAD TO ETM AVENUE. Ron Beckman, City Engineer, gave the staff report on this item as contained in the Agenda Bill. Council introduced the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 31 82, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.40 OF THE CARTsBAT, MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ANENDMEKC OF SECTION 10.40.059 TO DECLARE A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON B3TH SIDFS OF !PAMARACK AWTE FFOM SKYLINE ROAD TO ELM AVENUE. Ron Beckman, City Engineer, asked these two items be considered together, and gave the report as contained in the Agenda Bills. Council introduced the following Ordinances: ORDINANCE NO. 3183, MENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY PIE RE-AMENDMEW'' OF SECTION 10.28.340 F?EQUIRING ADDITIONAL SKlPS FOR. STREETS INTERSECTING EL FUEIiTE STREET. ORDINANCE NO. 3184, AMENDING !TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE CARI;SBAD MUNICIPAL CDDE BY THE RE-m OF SECTION 10.28.320 REQUIRING ADDITIONAL SKIPS FOR STREETS rnERsECTING ACGA mAD. (81) 26. AB 88032 - ACCEPTANCE OF ACCESS RIGHTS ON OBELISCO CIRCLE. Ron Bechan, City Engineer, save the staff report on this item as contained in the Agenda Bill, calling attention to the location map ad the omission of another roadway serving the property on Obelisco Circle. He added the two accesses were the reason for the waivinq access onto Obelisco Circle, since staff does not allow throuqh access onto two streets. Casler Lewis Kulchin Chick Pettine Casler Lewis Kulchin Chick Pett ine e MINUTES January 15, 1985 Page 13 Council adopted the followinq Resolution: RESOLUTION N@. 7887, ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED. COUNCIL REFOR!l?S Citizens' Meetins Council Member Pettine reported on a citizens' meeting held last Thursday evening. Coastal Commission Hearins Council Member Chick reported on the hearing last Friday attended by Chris Salomne and himself. LCP Review Committee Council Member Chick reported on the recent meeting. Council Member Kulchin reported on the recent meeting. Downto~m Merchants Committee Council Member Mulchin reported on the meeting held this mrning and said there will be a dedication for Glenn McComs on January 24, 1985, at 2:00 p.m. at the Fountain. Fine Arts Ad Koc Committee Mayor Casler reported on the orqanizational meeting. General Plan Review Committee Mayor Casler stated the Library Conference Room has been reserved for these meetings, starting the first week in February on Thursday evenings. She asked for the appointments to be made next Tuesday night, giving staff two weeks to send out the letters with the dnarge and background information. ~y proper mtion, the meeting of January 15, 1985, was adjourned at 9:39 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ALm L. RAUTEWZm7Z City Clerk Harriett Babbitt Minutes Clerk