The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-04-02; City Council; Minutes- - ' 0 MINUTES e Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting) Date of Meeting: April 2, 1985 Time of Meeting: 6:OO p.m. Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mayor Casler at 6:Ol p.m. ROLL CALL was taken by the City Clerk as follows: Present: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Chick, Kulchin and Pettine. Absent: None. INVOCATION was given by Reverend A. Barry Jones of the Carlsbad Union Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Rulchin. APPROVAL OF MINUTES : (one mtion ) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held March 5, 1985, were approved as presented, Minutes of the Regular Meeting held March 12, 1985, were approved as amended. CONSENT CALEN61AF.: Mayor Casler requested Item #12 be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. CouncilMe&r Pettine requested Item #17 be withdrawn. Council Member Chick requested Item #10 be withdrawn. Council confirmed the action of the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Items 10, 12 and 17, as follows: WAIVER OF ORDINANCE TEXT READING: Council waived the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions at this meeting. (50) 1. AB #8107 - RATIFICATION OF DENANDS AGAINST THE CITY. Council ratified the payment of den-mds against the City in the munt of $2,880,759.63, for the period March 15 to March 28, 1985; Payroll demands in the amunt of $320,520.80, for the period March 11 to March 24, 1985; and Housing demands in the munt of $1,181.74, for the period March 15 to March 28, 1985. ('SI ) 2. AB #7073 - Supplement #3 - ACCEPTANCE OF A EOFiTION OF COLLEGE BOULEVARD. Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7947, accepting a grant deed for an easewnt for road purposes of a portion of College Boulevard, 12 P - \p 5 COUNCIL % % MEMBERS % f Cas ler Lewis Kulchin Chick X Pettine Cas ler Lewis Ku lch in Chick Pettine Cas ler Lewis Kulchin Chick X Pettine I . 34) (59) 33) (28) 0 MINUTES a April 2, 1985 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR: (Continued) 3. AB #8108 - FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PROPOSED FREEWAY INTERCHANGE AT RANCHO DEL OR0 DRIVE ON HIGHWAY 78. Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7948, requesting CalTrans to analyze the feasibility, location of and configuration of an interchange on Route 78 freeway at Rancho Del Or0 Drive. 4, AB #8109 - REFUND OF FEES. Council approved the refund of $1,636.00 to R. E. Hughes Construction Company to refund a cash deposit for grading work. .5, AB #8110 - REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY To DESTROY FILES. Council adopted RESOLUTION No. 7949, authorizing the destruction of certain files in the Finance Department. 1 . AB #8111 - REwTIh'G REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING FFICES . I t" Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7950, authorizing the Finance Director to transfer funds up to $5,000 for Redevelopment and Housing Office relocation costs. (84) /ikNE. AB #8112 - PURCHASE OF TRUCK-MOUNTED STRIPING Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7951, accepting a bid and authorizing the execution of a purchase order for the purchase of a truck-mounted striping machine. 1(84) 1 . AB #8113 - PURCHASE OF TRUCKS. Council adopted RESOLUTION No. 7952, accepting bids and authorizing the execution of purchase orders for the purchase of four pickup trucks. p; I , AB #7867 - Supplement #I - AMENTMENT To TRAFFIC IGNAL MAINTESIANCE CONTRACT. Council adopted RESOLUTION No. 7953, approving an amendrrent to the aareement between the City of Carlsbad and Southwest Signal Service for rehabilitation and refurbishing of traffic signal controllers, (30) 10. AB #8114 - APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR BUILDING .IEPA.R"ENT PLJW CHECKING SERVICES. This item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. I(112) 11. AB #8064 - Supplement #1 - WEEp A3ATFbvIENT PRCGW. Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7955, declaring as public nuisances weeds,' rubbish, and refuse upon private property in the City of Carlsbad. I ~ 12 3 I COUNCIL \v 5 % % MEMBERS % 4 0 0 M I-N U.T ES April 2, 1985 . _.- ~ - Page 3 ~. - . CONSE" CALENDAR: (Continued) I ( 1 1 3) 12. AB #7999. - Supplement #2 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN .- - FOR AN INDUSTRIAL/OFFICE coE.rlpLM - SDP 84-5 - CARLSBAD GATEWAY. (96) (31 1 1(45) I I /(31) (45) ~ ~ ~ [:;I ~ I- i (57) I (99) " This item w+s withdrawn from the Cpnsent Calendar. .- 13. AB #8116 - OFF-SI'IX SUBDIVISION SIGNS ON COUNTY PROPERTY. -~." Council .authorized the Mayor 'to send a letter to the County Board of Supervisors asking for their assistance in the remval of off-site subdivision signs on county land within Carlsbad ' s sphere of inf hence, 14. AB #8068 - Supplement-#2 - AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONCRE'I'E WORK CARLSW SAFETY AND SERVICE C- - BID PACKAGE E#). 1. Council-adopted RESOLUTION NO, 7957, accepting a negotiated oontract and authorizing the -execution ~f-contract-no. 3006-1B for the construction- of the Carlsbad . " Safety and Service Center. 15. AB #8068 -. Supplement #3 - CONTFUlCTS FOR STR- STEEL A?lD METAL DECK FOR SAFETY CENTER - BID PACKAGE No. 2. Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7958, accepting bids and authorizing the execution of contract nos. 3006- ~. 2A and 3006-2B for the mnstruction of the Carlsbd .Safety and Service Center. - ." 16. AB #8117 - AGREXMlZNT TO PmDE ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEE;EUNG SEHVICES TO THE lxxJMTowN IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. __ Council adopted RESOLUTION.No. 17959, approving an - agreement-between the City of Carlsbad and Rick Engineering Company to provide architectural engineering service. for the downtam improvement program, 17. AB #8118 - ESTABLISEDlEIW OF PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD FOR THE SNUG HARBOR AMENDMENT TO THE AGUA HEDIONDA LAND USE PLAN. " &is item was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. 18. -AB #7740 - Supplement #2-- FINAL MAP FOR CARLSEND TRACY? 83-36. UNIT NO. 1 - sYCAMO~..CREEK. ~~~~~~ ~~ . .- Council &mroved the final map -for Carlsbad Tract .. 83-36, UA't 1, and adopted REkOLuTION NO. 7965, accpting a grant deed- accepting an offsite drainage easement; RESOLUTION No. 7966, approving quitfclaim for slope easement purposes along El Camino Real; and RESbLWION NO. 7967, accepting an out-f-tract easement .. for road purposes. .. 126 - *% MEMBERS COUNCIL ~~ % 2. 9$%$ 6 2. 4 0 MINUTES 0 April 2, 1985 Pzge 4 ( ( CONSENT CALENDAR: (Continued) '106) 19. AB #8124 - SUPPORTING APPLICpTION OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FOR ALLOCATION OF FEDERAL HYDROELECTRIC PCWER. Council adopted RESOLUTION W. 7968, regarding the application of low-cost Federal hydroelectric per. ITEMS REMOWZD FM "E CONSW cAL?F_I'NAR: :30) :.- 10. AB #8114 - APPFOPFXATION OF FUNDS FOR BUILDING DEPARR\IIENT PLAN CHECKING SERVICES. Marty Orenyak, Director of Building and Planning, clarified the matter, and Council adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION No. 7954, APPrnPRIATItG FUNDS FOR BUILDING PLAN CHECKING SEWICES. (1 13) 12. AB #7999 - Supplement #2 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN INDUSm/OFFICE (DTl?LEX - SDP-84-5 - CARZ;SBAD GATmY. (57) Mr. Ken Lounsbery, representing the applicant, addressed Council and requested a one-week continuance to discuss Condition 35 with Mac Brown to resolve the differences. Council continued approval of a site development plan for an industrial/office conplex SDP 84-5 - Carlsbad Gateway, for one week. 17. AI3 #8118 - ESTABLISHMENT OF PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD FOR !THE SNUG HARBOR A"IENT T%, THE AGUA HEDIONDA LAND USE PLAN. Council Member Pettine asked why a specific density range had not been selected for the area, and staff explained this was for the review process. When the matter is returned to Council for a public hearing, there will be specific density recommendations from staff. Council opened a six-week public review perid for the draft Snug Harbor Amendment to the Aqua Hedionda Land Use Plan. 12s c - \p 5 COUNCIL % 91 MEMBERS % $ Cas ler Lewis Kulchin Chick X Tettine Casler Lewis x: Chick Kulchin Pettine Cas ler 1 Pettine 2 Chick z Kulchin z Lewis x> - 0 MINUTES 0 : 78) 37) :96) : 26) COUNCIL \p 5 % Y&' April 2, 1985 Page 5 MEMBERS % q ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION: 20. AB #8106 - STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR SECURITY AND mRGENcY ALARM SYSTEMS. Council adopted the following Ordinance: Casler Lewis ORDIWWCE NO. 1278, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE CARLSBAD Ku lch in x: MUNICIPAL CODE BY 'INE ADDITION OF CJdAPTER 8.50 Chick REQUIRING REGISTRATION OF ALARM AGENTS, ISSUING ALARM PERMITS, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AWD REGULATIONS FOR Pettine ALAFW SYSTJZMS, EQUIPMENT OR DEVICES AND ESTABLISHING CRIMIEAL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THE ALARM SYSTEMS ORDINJWE , AMD BY THE lWJ3JIXmT OF TITLE 1, CHAPTER 1 -08 OF THE cARLSI3AD MUNICIPAL CODE REW-TING TO PENXTIES FOR VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 8.50. 21. AB #8100 - ORDINANCE FSGARDIhC LIMITATION OF LLABILITY. Council adopted the following Ordinance: Cas ler ORDINANCE NO. 1277,, ATJlENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 1 -01 OF Kulchin x: TJ3E CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY T?B ADDITION OF SECTION Chick 1.01.110 'Io CLEARLY STATE COUNCIL'S INTENT _REGARDING Pettine LIABILITY ON THE PART OF THE CITY OR ANY OF ITS EMPLDYEES FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OR IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS CODE. 22. AF3 #8096 - TRAFFIC CONTROL AT EL FUEF?!I'E STREET AND UNICORNIO STREET. Council adopted the followinq Ordinance: Casler ORDINANCE NO. 3187, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.28 OF Kulchin hE CARLSBAD MWJICIPAL CODE BY THE m\TDMENT OF SECTION Chick x: 10.28.324 RE.MOVING THE &WP SIGN ON "HE IKRIW LEG OF l?L Pettine FUEIZTE STREET AT UNICORN10 SET AND REPLACING THE YIELD SIGN ON ZHE ERST LEG WITFT A STOP SIGN. SECURITY ANll EPEFGENcY ALARM LSYSTENS NCYT INCLUDING FIRE: Lewis Lewis PUBLIC Imas : 23. $3 #7306 - Supplement #7 - JAMES DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Ron Beckman, City Engineer, qave the staff report on this item, stating the actions before Council were to consider alternative oonstruction programs. Mr. Becknan used wall charts to shw the original cul-de- sac design and the alternate design with James Drive as a through street to Oak. Mr. Mac Brown, Bond Counsel, reported the original plan was the cul-de-sac, and the alternative muld be the extension of the street. The written protests for the cul-de-sac represented 16.7 percent of the property owners, while the written protests on the extension of the street represented 41.2 percent. He stated Alternative A would be the cul-de-sac; Alternative l3 would k the extension of the street through to Oak; and the other alternative would. be to abandon the project . ,aY - 1 0 MINUTES 0 April 2, 1985 Page 6 PUBLIC HEARXS: (Continued) Mr. Beckman stated the new cost spread contains some City contribution for the storm drain and to pay for some parking lanes, curb and gutter where rn adjoining properties wuld benefit directly from this project. That City mntribution would be $54,500.00 on the cul- de-sac alternative and $60,441.00 on the through street . Mr. Beckman stated the difference in percentages in the protests on record is the difference between the temporary cul-de-sac and the street extension. Mayor Casler opened the continued public hearing at 6:30 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Tim Saunders, 3226 Highland, spoke in favor of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Russell Holmes, 3182 Highland, Parcel #17, requested Council to reject the project. Council declared the continued public hearing closed at 7:OO p.m. Council Member Lewis stated that he was not in favor of dumping the traffic on Basswood, but felt the traffic should be equally shared between Oak and Basswood; therefore, he said he auld not supprt the cul-de-sac alternative. In answer to Council query, Mr. Eeckman retraced the history of this project; stating the temporary cul-de- sac was the mnf iguration first proposed, with the extension of the street through to Oak having been proposed later. The opposition to the through street is considerably greater than to the cul-de-sac, with the propoerty owners favoring the original proposal of a temporary cul-de-sac. Marty Bouman, Traffic Consultant, stated the cul-de-sac would serve only those residents of the area, while a through street would serve other than just the residents of the area, since there would be through traffic. Mr. Beckman stated the issue was not "if" the street would go throuqh, but %hen" the street would go through. If the cul-de-sac is put in m, when parcels 11 and 12 are developed, the street would be put throuqh as a part of the mnditions of approval for development of those two parcels. However, there may be alternatives offered at that time that staff has not considered. Staff's position at this time is that James Drive should be extended through to Oak, with the only question being the timing. 1x3 - COUNCIL y % 9A MEMBERS % $ Cas ler Kulchin xx Lewis X X Pettine X Chick X - "c I 0 MINUTES 0 April 2, 1985 Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued) Council adopted the followinq Resolutions: RESOLUTION NO. 7961, MAKmG PINDIPJGS AND DGTEFMINATIONS, AND OVEMULX AND DENYING PFOI'FSTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICI'. RESOLUTION NO, 7962, FINDING AND DETERE-INIG THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CDNVENIEMCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE IMPRO~S AND APPURTENANCES SUBSTANTIALLY AS SET FOWH IN THE REPOIIT FILED PUFSUAJYT TO THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJOMTY PFOI'ECI' ACT OF 1931 'I; ?HAT THE PROJECT IS FEASIBLE; AND THAT THE LANDS WILL BE ABLE 20 CARRY THE BURDEN OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. I Council directed the City Engineer and the Assessment Advisor to proceed with processing of the assessment district for James Drive. (113) 24. AB #8003 - RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE SUNNY CREEK AREA - SP-191. Mike Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager, gave the staff report on this item, tracing the history of the area, using a transparency to shaw the area involved and wall charts to shaw the zoning and densities. A graphic was used to summarize the features of the Sunny Creek Specific Plan. Coun.ci1 Member Chick suggested the same grading standard apply to this Plan as proposed by the City for the LCP. Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Russell Grosse, 5850 Sunny Creek Road, distributed to Council copies of mmunications from property owners in the Sunny Creek area and stated these owners, totaling 13 people, are in favor of the Plan with the inclusion of the followinu amendment: "If a single owner or group of owners working through a single representative process a zone change to P.C. and a master plan comprised of all or substantially all of the Sunny Creek Planning Area, with an average density of rn mre than two dwelling units per acre, that plan would be reviewed without any prejudice due to the adoption of the present Sunny Creek Plan, and, if acceptable, could replace the Sunny Creek Plan. I' Mr. Nick Banche, 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, addressed Council representing Mike O'Hara. Mr. Banche again distributed copies of the proposed amendment to Council and stated 13 of the 15 owners support the Plan with the amen&nt. 12 2 I COUNCIL /p 3 9A MEMBERS % $ Cas ler Lewis Kulchin Chick X Pettine Casler Lewis Kulchin X Chick Pettine Cas ler Lewis x Chick Kulchin Pettine e MINUTES 0 April 2, 1985 Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued) Mr. B. T. Cantarini, 905 Laguna Drive, representing the Cantarini family, stated they support the Sunny Creek Plan and definitely want the amendment. A qentlemen from Imine CA, representing Madonna Corporation, stated they also support the Sunny Creek Plan with the proposed amendment. Mr. John Lonigan, 1103 Bel Aire Place, Los Angeles, spoke for the owner of the Sandlin parcel, stating their support for the Plan. Mr. Ron Schwab, 4080 Skyline Road, representing Westerr Land, stated support of the Plan and the amendmnt. Mr. Steve Bieri, 11300 Sorrento Valley Road, representin? E~ug Avis, stated his opposition to the Plan in its present form and to the amendment proposed by Mr. Banche. Mr. Bieri felt each project should be judged as it is presented, and he asked Council to vote against adoption of the Sunny Creek Plan as written, If the Sunny Creek Plan is adopted, Mr. Bieri requestec an amendmnt fair to all proprty owners should be included, if necessary, and not one that discriminates against property owners holding less than 100 acres, All property owners should have the privilege to amend the plan. Mrs. Deborah Kato, 2004 Subida Terrace, spoke for the Kato family, statinq opposition to the Plan as presented tonight. They also oppose the amendmnt as proposed by Mr. Banche, as it is selective, excludinq two property owners from its benefits, and restricting the amendmen to include owners of over 100 acres of land. She stated their land is uniuue, is farmed at the present time, and will be fanned for another five years. They border Leisure Village, which allows seven units per acre. Pictures were distributed to Council to show hc Leisure Village will appear at the Kat0 property line. i Mr. Brian Mooney, 9903 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, Mooney, Lehieri & Associates, told of plans for the Kato property, and showed the property in relation to the Sunny Creek area, Mr. Paooney stated tlis property is unique in topograph and clustering of units would be preferable to use the buildable portions and take advantage of Ocean views. If an amendment to the Plan is needed, it should affor equal treatment for all the property owners in the area. The Katos oppose the Plan as submitted, as it doesn't allow creativity or flexibility for a good product t in the future. They feel they should be able to present a plan for development as well as owners of over 100-acre parcels. 1 121 I \p 5 COUNCIL (% % MEMBERS % <c ! ! ~ - I e MINUTES a \p 5 COUNCIL 3 %I April 2, 1985 Page 9 MEMBERS % q PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued) Mrs. Kat0 stated she felt they could bring a plan to Council that would not impact the area in a negative way and added that a fair amendment would allow property owners of any size parcel to submit a plan to Council for consideration. She added that a Q overlay could be added, to respond to property owners of less than 100 acres. Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the public hearing was closed at 7:48 p.m. The differences in amendments, with the second amendtment asking for any property mer to be able to Council with a plan rather than limiting that to those owners of mre than 100 acres, were discussed. In response to Council query, Mike Holniller explained staff's concerns, and stated staff did not support either amendnent. Mr. Hentschke suggested if Council desired an amendment equitable to all property owners, the Attorney's Office should he directed to prepare such an amendment. RECESS : Mayor Casler declared a recess at 8:30 p.m., and Council re-convened at 8:41 p.m., with all Members present. Assistant City Attorney Hentschke read the following proposed amendn-ent: '"he provisions of this plan my be amended through either of the following procedures: 1) a raster plan adopted pursuant to the plannec! comunity zone submitted by an owner or unified group of owners for all or substantially all of the Sunny Creek planning area; 2) a specific plan amendment for property of at least 45 acres and single ownership on the northerly boundary of the specific plan area or for property of at least 73 acres and single mership on the northeasterly boundary of the specific plan area. The amendments will be considered without prejudice due to the adoption of the present Sunny Creek specific plan. In m event shall the density within the Sunny Creek specific planning area exceed two dwelling units per acre. '' Council Members stated their desire to hear again from the property owners with regard to the proposed amenc3ment . Mr. Russell Grosse stated he favored the amendrent prepared by Mr. Banche, but noted his preference for the Plan "as is " rather than include an amendment which would allow small property owners to change the concept of the area. I 12 0 - 1 m MINUTES m April 2, 1985 Page 10 ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ PUBLIC HEARlMGS: (Continued) Mr. Doug Avis, Bieri - Avis, stated they supported the proposed amendment by the Assistant City Attorney, as fairness was the key issue. They did request time to review and mmnt on the proposed amendment. Mr. Mooney felt the proposed arrrendment was fair and just, but requested time for review. Mr. Banche said he would suprt the Sunny Creek Plan with m amendments as a holding zone. Council Member Chick stated the Kat0 property is not in the viewshed and neither is the Kelly property. He questioned whether these properties should be included in the Sunny Creek Planning Area. Staff stated access to both of those properties did involve this area, and that was why they were included. Council Member Pettine stated he could not support any amendments to the Plan. Council amended the Sunny Creek Plan under Section IV, Grading, to reflect the wording submitted on the LCP, with changes to be made to the wording any time the 25 percent slope is mentioned in the Plan. Council introduced the following Ordinance, amended as to the wording reqarding 25 percent slope areas, to conform to the wording in the LB: ORDINANCE ID. 9748, APPRoVIhG SPECIFIC PLAN SP-191, AS AMENDED REGARDING DEVELOm.ENT OF HILLSIDES WITH SLOPES OF 25% OR GREATER, A RESIDEFT1F.L SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 'IRE: SUNNY CREEK AREA BoUI'.?.?ED BY FUTURE CANNON w3AD TO THE NORTH, FUTURE COLLM;E AVENUE TO THE WEST, THE SUNNY CREEK BIOLOGICAL HABITAT TO THE SOUTH AND THE DAWSON ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE TO THE EAST. Council indicated their intent to consider an amendanent to the Sunny Creek Plan, to be discussed at the April 9, 1985, meeting. Council Member Pettine requested the record reflect his support for the Plan, but his opposition to the change in wording for the 25% slopes and the consideration af any proposed amendment to the Sunny Creek Plan. DEPAFFPEWAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: City Manager 25. AB #8119 - CARLSRAD SAFFJ.?I AND SERVrCE CE;TJTER (.81 ) UPDATE AND CONSTWCTIopil OF FACILITIES. City Manaqer Frank Aleshire stated Mr. Smith would update the progress on the Safety and Service Center. If 9 c \v 5 COUNCIL 3 9L. MEMBERS % c Cas ler Lewis Ku lch in Chick Pettine X Cas ler Lewis Kulchin X Chick Pettine - "r I . e MINUTES e April 2, 1 985 Page 11 Mr. Bill Smith, Senior Project Manager with Koll Construction company, reported on the bid packages and progress made on the construction of the Safety Center. Council received and approved the progress report of the Carlsbad Safety and Service Center architect and construction manager, and adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 7963, ACCEPTING THE PL'FIOGRESS l?EX'OR!I' OF KOLL O3WIlUJmION AND APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS EOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITIES AT THE CARLSBAD SAFETY AND SEIKTICE CENTER. Redevelopent (72) 26. AB #8120 - lXWNTWN VILLAGE PARKIJS PFCGRAM. Chris Salomne, Community Redevelopment Manager, gave the staff report on this item as contained in the Agenda Bill, using a transparency showing the area included in the proposed parking program. Another transparency was used to show the location of the proposed parking lot. Mr. Salomne said negotiations would continue for the parking lot and a further report made to Counci 1. Mr. Stephen Densham, 2678 Ocean Street, spoke in support of the proposed parking program and parking lot. Mr. Roy Sanchez, 3482 Roosevelt, addressed Council in support of this proposal. Mrs. Janice Selby, 318 Juniper Avenue, spoke in favor of prompt action on the first two proposals in the Agenda Bill. Mayor Casler mved to eliminate the last parking program recommendation for two-hour parking: 'The northerly 150 feet of the public parking lot easterly of the Railroad between Elm Avenue and Oak Avenue" from the Resolution. Motion was withdrawn. Council adopted the following Resolution with the elimination of the following sentence: The northerly 150 feet of the public parking lot easterly of the Railroad between Elm Avenue and Oak Avenue, I' RESOLUTION In. 7964, DESIGNATILY; CEJXTAIN STREETS IN THE VILLAGE AREA FOR T"H0UR PARKING LIMIT. I Council directed staff to enter negotiations for the purchase of the property on the east side of Roosevelt between Elm and Grand Avenues (parcels 203-304-02, 03, 04 and 05). ~ , In response to query, staff indicated they would investigate the availability of other lots in the downtown area. I 1 tP - \I 5 COUNCIL 3 9& MEMBERS % 8 Casler Lewis x: Kulchin Pettine Chick 7 1 3 1 7 1 7 1 Casler Lewis X Kulchin Chick Pettine Cas ler Kulchin Lewis X Pettine Chick - .o MINUTES m c (70) (78) (96) (78) \p 5 COUNCIL 3 3 April 2, 1985 Page l2 MEMBERS % q I Police 27. AB #8121 - A" TO !I%! MUNICIPAL CODE REGAI?DIE DFUNKIJ!JG ON THE BEACH. Police Chief Vincent Jimno gave the staff report on this item as contained in the Agenda Bill. Council introduced the following Ordinance: Cas ler Lewis ORDINANCE NO. 3188, RENDIFK TITLE 8, (3W?"ER 8.44 OF Kulchin X THE CARLSEWD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ?ME AMENDMENT OF SECTION Chick 8.44.020 REGARDING DRINKING ON THE BEACH. Pettine Engineering 28. AB #8122 - TWFFIC CONTROL AT LA FOI?I'PmA DRIVE AND MILANO COm. Ron Beckman, City Engineer, gave the staff report on this item as contained in the Auenda Bill. Council introduced the following Ordinance: Cas ler ORDINANCE EO. 3189, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.28 OF Kulchin X THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF SECTION Chick 10.28.326 REPLACING THE EXISTING YIELD SIGNS ON MIL. Pettine COuIlT A!?! LA FOEUXLADA DRIVE WITH STOP SIGNS. 29. AB #8123 - SPEED LIMITS FOR RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD. Ron Beclanan, City Engineer, gave the staff report on this item as contained in the Agenda Bill. Council introduced the following Ordinance: Cas ler ORDINANCE NO. 3190, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.44 Kulchin X MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF SECTION 10.44.180 'IO Chick REVISE THE SPEED LIMIT ON E?ANCHO SANTA FE XIAD. Pettine Lewis Lewis AIXTOURNMENT: By proper mtion, the meting of April 2, 1985, was adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Respectfully submitted, kt+ 84 6z- ALll3mA L. RAUTENKRANZ City Clerk Harriett Babbitt Minutes Clerk // 3