HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-02-11; City Council; MinutesT e MINUTES a
Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting)
Time of Meeting: 6:OO p.m. Date of Meeting: February 11, 1986
Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
~ ~~~~
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Casler called the meeting to order at 6:OO p.m.
ROLL CALL was taken by the City Clerk, as follows:
Present - Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin,
Chick and Pettine.
Absent - None.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Council Member Chick requested Items No. 5 and 6 be
withdrawn from the Consent Calendar.
Council affirmed the action of the Consent Calendar,
with the exception of Items No. 5 and 6, as follows:
1. WAIVER OF ORDINANCE TEXT READING:
Council waived the reading of the text of all
Ordinances and Resolutions at this meeting.
(79) 2. AB f8510 - USE OF CITY VEHICLES AND MILEAGE ALLOWANCE.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8395, establishing
policy and authorization for the use of City
vehicles and mileage allowance.
(68) 3. AB f7216 - Supplement #4 - DISSOLUTION OF CARLSBAD
COMMUNITY EDUCATION, INC.
Council, by minute motion, approved the
dissolution of Carlsbad Community Education, Inc.
(74) 4. AB #8511 - WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE FOR RESERVE POLICE OFFICERS.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO, 8396, extending the
City's self-insured workers' compensation coverage
to reserve police officers if state compensation
insurance fund coverage is not applicable.
(105) 5. AB /I8512 - REFUND OF FEDERAL/STATE DISASTER
ASSISTANCE GRANT.
This Item was withdrawn from the Consent
Calendar.
(97) 6. AB 1#7609 - Supplement #I - FARADAY AVENUE
SUPPLEMENT TO CONSULTANT AGREEKNT.
This Item was withdrawn from the Consent
Calendar.
6Y
7
\p 5
COUNCIL % 9A'
MEMBERS % $
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
) Chick
X)
) Pettine
-
MINUTES 0
(99)
(99)
(105)
(97)
February 11, 1986 Page 2
CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
7. AB %8505 - Supplement W1 - APPEAL - REQUEST FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
-CT 85-21/LCDP 85-3 - PARK VIEW EAST.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8403, granting an
appeal of a Planning Commission decision to deny
Park View East, CT 85-21ILCDP 85-3, and returning
the matter to the Planning Commission for further
report .
8. AB ##a507 - Supplement #I - APPEAL - REQUEST FOR
TENTATIVE MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT - CT 84- 43/CP-302 - CASA LOMA CONDOS.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8404, granting an
appeal of a Planning Commission decision to deny Casa Loma Condos, CT 84-43/CP-302, and returning
the matter to the Planning Commission for further
report.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
5. AB W8512 - REFUND OF FEDERAL/STATE DISASTER
ASSISTANCE GRANT.
6. AB f7609 - Supplement #I - FARADAY AVENUE
SUPPLEMENT TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT.
Council Member Chick stated he had asked for Items No.
5 and 6 to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar to
discuss the loss of these funds. Item No. 5 is a
refund of almost $8,000 to the State as insufficient
records were kept by the City. Therefore, the State
Controller's office audited the Engineering Department
records and found that, since insufficient records had
been kept, the 'City should refund the $7,939.00.
Council Member Chick stated on Item No. 6 he felt the
redesign of the right-of-way and the road for Faraday
Avenue should be paid by Beckman because they reneged on the original agreement and alignment.
Council Member Chick, at this point, stated he had a
continuing problem with the administration of the
City, and had voiced his complaints and a long list of
problems over the last few years. He felt there was
an improper allocation of PFF monies as recommended by
the staff for the new Safety Center. There have been
redesigns because of overrides, and there is a rumor
that there will be even more overrides.
Council Member Chick stated the City has no inspector
or field man for the Architect on the Safety Center.
The Architect is not responsible for this work. He
stated a full-time inspector was needed there now. No
one has been hired or assigned to perform this duty.
Council Member Chick stated the assessment districts
were authorized over a year and a half ago, and he
felt there were continuing problems in the City that
called for a change in administration. He stated his
remarks were there for anyone to read them.
63
\y 5
COUNCIL % %
-. q MEMBERS %
9
- -
0 MINUTES 0
February 11, 1986 Page 3
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
Mayor Casler stated, and the majority of Council
agreed, that the matter of the City Manager's
performance should be discussed in a Closed Session.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8397, AUTHORIZING THE REFUND OF $7,939
TO THE STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE
TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE CONTINGENCY FUND.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8398, APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO AN
AGREEMENT WITH RICK ENGINEEPING COMPANY FOR THE DESIGN
OF FARADAY AVENUE, PROJECT NO. 3142.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(26) 9. AB W8483 - Supplement #I - EMINENT DOMAIN
PROCEEDINGS FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY ON 3AMES DRIVE.
City Engineer Gene Donovan introduced Warren Diven,
with F. MacKenzie Brown, Inc., who gave the report on
this item. Mr. Diven stated the purpose of this hearing was to determine whether the Council should
adopt a Resolution declaring the necessity to order
eminent domain proceedings for acquisition of property
on James Drive.
Mr. Diven stated there is an extensive staff report on
this item and two Resolutions to be adopted by
Council.
Mr. Diven referred to the plat map included in the
packet showing the property to be acquired for a
turning radius coming off of Basswood Street onto
games Drive to meet safety standards. If this
property is not obtained, there would not be a safe
turning radius at that intersection. An offer of just
compensation has been made to the property owners and
they have not accepted. They are present tonight for
the hearing.
In answer to query, City Engineer Gene Donovan stated
an offer had been made to the Steins to modify the
sidewalk in that area and to narrow it to a width of
five feet. That offer has been rejected.
Staff verified an offer had been made by the City to reduce the width of the sidewalk to five feet. Now,
it is ten feet, which would be in accordance with City
I standards.
Mayor Casler opened the Public Hearing at 6:15 p.m.,
and issued the invitation to speak.
: I
62d
v
COUNCIL y % 3 %
MEMBERS % %
Casler
Lewis
X
Chick
I Kulchin
,
Pettine
Casler Lewis
Kulchin x;
Chick Pettine
0 MINUTES 0
February 11, 1986 Page 4
PUBLIC HEARING: (continued)
Leone Stein, one of the owners of the property at 1630
Basswood, spoke regarding her property. She stated
they had not been included in the Assessment District
for the development of games Drive that was approved in 1985. They were told they did not benefit from
this District. They learned the City planned to
install a sidewalk at the corner, and 9 to 12% of a
minimum front yard by the front bedroom was going to be taken for this sidewalk. Mrs. Stein stated they
had met with the consultants, mediator and City Engineer and discussed alternatives. She further
stated there had been a promise of a possibility of a
15' inner and outer radius, rather than 20' or 30', as
outlined. When this was marked out on their property, it was only a difference of 1 1/2 feet. Mrs. Stein
referred to an alternative which would not include
curbing at the corner. This would require no use of
their land, as that would be on the City right-of-way.
She had indicated to the City that was the preferred
alternative. She wrote a letter October 30, 1985,
stating this preference, and two and a half months
later they were called and visited by an assessor with a statement of just compensation. Mrs. Stein stated
she did not want the City to pay damages, because she
did not want any damages. Mrs. Stein referred to the
justification for acquiring their piece of property
for the turn around and stated a sidewalk was not
necessary in that area, inasmuch as there are long
gaps in the sidewalk on their side of the street.
Mrs. Stein distributed pictures of the corner of their
lot and the house to give Council an indication of the
sidewalk at the corner and how it would impact their
property.
Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the
Public Hearing was closed at 6:25 p.m.
In answer to query, City Engineer Gene Donovan stated
the curbing could be installed without a sidewalk.
The radius would be 25 feet and it would miss the property corner. Upon further question, he stated
this would be a safe turn.
Mayor Casler recommended a motion be made indicating a
minimal amount of improvement work be done on the
sidewalk and curbing at that corner.
Mr. Diven recommended adopting the Resolution and
adopting a separate motion directing staff to do the
minimum amount of work necessary. The engineers
would work with the staff and would obtain an amended
legal description for the property, if necessary.
Council Member Kulchin stated she was not in favor of
eminent domain proceedings, if they were not
necessary.
61
-
\p 5
COUNCIL 3 9&'
MEMBERS % a
- F
(
(
0 MINUTES a
February 11, 1986 Page 5
PUBLIC HEARING : ( continued)
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8399, DESCRIBING PR03ECT AND PROPERTY
FOR EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS AND AUTHORIZING THAT
SAID PROCEEDINGS BE COMMENCED TO ACQUIRE SAID
PROPERTY.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8400, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND F. KACKENZIE BROWN, INC. TO
PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY BY EMINENT
DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS.
Richard Allen, Engineering Department, recommended
rather than a wheelchair ramp from the curb line ten feet into the property, the City make a sidewalk
parallel 5 1/2 feet from the property, with less
concrete at the corner.
Council directed the Engineer to make the damage as
minimal as possible to the Stein property.
:571 IO. AB !I8513 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE
1113) DOWNZONING PROPERTY ON LA CORUNA PLACE - GPA/LU 85-7/ZC-337 - CITY OF CARLSBAD.
Charles Grimm, Principal Planner, gave the staff
report as contained in the Agenda Bill, using a
transparency to show the property and the access to
the property from La Coruna Place.
Mayor Casler opened the Public Hearing at 6:58 p.m.,
and issued the invitation to speak.
Since no one wished to speak on this item, the Public
Hearing was closed.
Council approved the Negative Declaration issued by
the Planning Director; directed the City Attorney's
office to prepare documents approving GPA/LU 85-7/ZC-
337; and introduced the following Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 9793, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR A ZONE
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LA COSTA AVENUE 3UST WEST
OF LA CORUNA PLACE.
Council directed that the project be submitted to
Council for consideration following consideration by
the Planning Commission.
CHANGE FROM RD-M TO RD-M-6.5Q ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
60
\p 5
COUNCIL % %'
MEMBERS % 8 -.
Casler
Lewis
X
Kulchin
Chick
Pettine
Casler Lewis
Kulchin
x;
Chick
I Pettine
Casler
) Pettine
r Chick
r Kulchin
1 Lewis
x>
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
xx Kulchin
X Lewis
X
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
X Kulchin
xx Lewis
X
a MINUTES 0
I
February 11, 1986 Page 6
PUBLIC HEARING : ( continued)
(114) 11. AB 118516 - MASTER PLAN DENSITY RANGES AND DENSITY
(57) CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE - ZCA-ISO/GPA/LU 86-
(113) I/AMENDMENT TO MP-1, 139, 149, 174 & 175.
Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director, gave the staff
report as contained in the Agenda Bill. Mr.
Holzmiller referred to the memo dated February 11,
1986, to Council from the City Attorney asking Council
to consider changes in the wording on Sections E & F
in Ordinance No. 9794 and Sections G & H in Ordinance
No. 9795. Staff recommendation is for those projects
to have a maximum of two years from the date of the
Ordinance to get building permits and develop under
previous regulations. After that time, they will be
required to comply with the new Ordinance.
Mayor Casler opened the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m.,
and issued the invitation to speak.
Bob Ladwig, Rick Engineering, addressed Council
stating his agreement with the revision to the density
ranges. Mr. Ladwig said he found nothing in the
Committee recommendations about denying density credit
for the area for right-of -way of an arterial in one's
property. He felt it was proper for Council to
request the builder to build the road, but that road serves other parts of the City, and should not be a
penalty against the developer. Mr. Ladwig called
attention to lines 2@ and 21 in Ordinance No. 9794. He stated the words, "in no event shall the top of the
density range established by this Ordinance be exceeded" were a cause for concern as that could
eliminate the possibility of low-income housing.
Mr. Ladwia referred to Section B, Paragraph 1, on Page
7 of Ordinance No. 9795, where the word, "floodplains"
was used in the lands to be considered undevelopable
and to be excluded from density calculations. He
stated he believed the word should be "floodways". He
added there was a big difference between the two, as the plain is overflow area and would be a much larger
area.
Mr. Ladwig next referred to Ordinance No. 9795, Page 7
of the Agenda Bill, Item No. 7, line 19, stating land
subject to major power transmission easements would be considered undevelopable and be excluded from density
calculations. Mr. Ladwig referred to the
recommendations of the Committee on Page 32 of Exhibit
Y in the packet, Item No. 3, which states that major power line easements may be counted in calculating
density if they are enhanced and maintained as a passive green corridor.
Mr. Ladwig next referred to Page 7, line 23 of that same page in Ordinance No. 9795, where it stated that
slopes with an inclination of 25% - 40% inclusive
would be given only 50% credit. He referred Council
to the recommendations of the Committee on Page 31 of
Exhibit Y, where it stated "slopes in access of 25%
and less than 40% shall be reviewed by staff on a case
to case basis". Mr. Ladwig felt those areas should
be looked at separate1 and develqpment discouraged, but the developer shouyd get credit.
57
"
COUNCIL y % %
MEMBERS % $
I I
0 MINUTES 0
February 11, 1986 Page 7
PUBLIC HEARING: (continued)
In conclusion, Mr. Ladwig referred to Page 8 of the
Agenda Bill, Ordinance No. 9795, Page 2 of the
Ordinance, lines 16 and 17, which is a new Section
21.44.240, Non-residential development restrictions on
Open Space and Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The
Ordinance reads: 'I Non-residential development shall
be designed to avoid development on lands identified
in Section 21.44.230." Mr. Ladwig stated he did not recall any discussion or agreement that areas for non-
residential development should be treated the same as
residential for sensitive and open space areas.
Don Woodward, 100 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, stated
he agreed with Mr. Ladwig's suggestions.
3ack Henthorn, Development Consultant, 2982 3efferson
Street, stated he had a question to ask about Page 7,
line 27, in Ordinance No. 9795. He felt that
subsection (a) was not the appropriate section and
felt it should be subsection (b). Staff agreed this
was an error. Mr. Henthorn stated his thoughts were
the same as the previous speakers and added the four
items being considered here tonight had not been
evaluated by the developers or the general public and
he felt that they should be. He asked Council to
consider taking action only on those items that had
been aired publicly and all aspects of the community
had been able to address. He asked these new items be
returned for additional evaluation and input.
Christopher Garrett, CalFederal Interprises, 701 "B"
Street, Carrillo Ranch, stated he was in favor of the
emergency Ordinance, but what Council was considering
this evening was quite different and he wanted to speak in opposition to that document. He stated a
whole new set of circumstances and statements were
included which the development community had not
assessed. He stated these changes were instituted at
the Planning Commission and no one had been given an
opportunity to study and evaluate just how the new
wording and new restrictions would impact the developers.
William Savage, Rancho Santa Fe, requested Council re-
think about the 25-40% slopes. He said any good
engineer would say that, given good soil conditions,
slopes of 25-40% can be developed. The 25-40% slopes were not included in the Land Use Committee's
recommendation for exclusion from density
calculations. He stated the land he owns would
constitute a loss of 35% of the value if this portion
of the Ordinance remains as it is. He asked Council
not to cut the credit in half on the 25-40% slopes.
58
c
COUNCIL \p 5 % YA"
MEMBERS % $
- 7
a MINUTES 0
February 11, 1986 Page 8
PUBLIC HEARING: (continued)
Doug Avis, 11300 Sorento Valley Road, Bieri-Avis
Partnership, stated they have two projects in
Carlsbad, and are in opposition to the additions by
the Planning Commission to the set of criteria
developed by the Land Use Committee. He was
particularly concerned about the slope areas and felt
that this would be double jeopardy if they allowed
only 50% credit for slopes of 25-40%. This was not
recommended by staff to the Planning Commission and
not recommended by the Land Use Committee. He asked
Council give consideration to the land use changes
openly discussed and give additional consideration to
these most recent additions by the Planning
Commission.
Dr. Ray 3enkins, Encinitas, stated he was interested
in the Encinitas Creek Area and was here to support
the Ordinance. He commended the Council for their
stewardship of the land. He asked Council to continue
lowering densities and preserve the land.
Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the
Public Hearing was closed at 7:40 p.m.
In response to Council query, City Attorney Vincent
Biondo stated if a project does not comply with the
Ordinance, and there is no grandfather clause, it
would have to be reconsidered and reviewed. He stated
if Council intended to stop projects with final maps,
findings would have to be made to show this was
necessary to protect the health and safety of the
people and no other feasible alternative was available to solve the problem.
Council Member Lewis stated he felt the large projects
should meet the new standards; and if they did not
meet the new standards, they should be reconsidered.
Council Member Chick felt the projects that have been
approved are quality projects, and the concerns of the Land Use Committee were not so much the quality of
projects, but the feeling of a need to reduce the
overall density in the City so that at buildout time there would not be as much density.
Staff indicated they had not analyzed the problem in
terms of the number of discretionary approvals if
there were no grandfather clause, and if Council
desired that information, staff would like time to
review that.
Council Member Chick commented that the Committee had
recommended that adopted Master Plans should not be
affected.
Council Member Kulchin stated she would like to have
specific numbers and Council Member Lewis stated he
would like to know what units were affected. Council Member Lewis stated he wanted to know what had been
done to the densities by all recent Council action.
57
COUNCIL \p 5 3 9&'
MEMBERS % $
a MINUTES e
February 11, 1986 Page 9
~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~
PUBLIC HEARING: (continued)
Mike Holzmiller said staff was working on that. He
added within 30 days staff could make a more precise
report on what each one of the different changes had
done in terms of impact and density.
Council continued Ordinance No. 9794 for further
information.
Council Member Lewis stated he would like Items 1, 2,
3 and 4 on the face of the Agenda Bill to be returned to the Planning Commission and the other parts (5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) adopted. Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 were
recommended in the Citizens Committee report. The
other items need more information as to how this would
impact the developers. This needed to be reviewed by
the public for feedback.
Council Member Chick asked whether lands to be
excluded from development would be exempt from paying
taxes and Mayor Casler stated she had looked up the
purpose and intent of the open space element and it is
not intended and shall not be contrued as authorizing
the City to exercise its power to adopt, amend, or
repeal open space zoning Ordinances in a manner to
take or damage property for public use without payment of just compensation.
Mayor Casler stated that lines two through twenty-six
in Ordinance No. 9795 should be returned to the
Planning Commission. Items 1-4 on the face of the
Agenda Rill should also be returned. In the
Ordinance, the word "floodways" should be inserted
rather than "floodplain".
Council sent Ordinance No. 9795, lines twenty-one
through twenty-six (also shown as Items 1-4 on the
Agenda face) back to the Planning Commission to deter- mine the impact to the City.
The developers present were asked whether they had
seen the revised wording for Sections E & F of
Ordinance No. 9794 and Sections G & H of Ordinance No.
9795, and they indicated they had not.
City Attorney Vincent Biondo stated his memo and the
proposed changes only clarified and corrected the
wording problems, with no change in the intent as
announced by the Planning Commission.
56
COUNCIL \p % 4 %
MEMBERS % 8
Casler
Lewis Kulchin
X
Chick
I Pettine
Casler xx Lewis
X
x Pettine
x Chick
X Kulchin
a MINUTES 0
February 11, 1986 Page 10
-
I PUBLIC HEARING: (continued)
Staff stated if Council wished to know how many
projects were affected by the grandfather clause, they
would need time to evaluate this and get the
information back to Council.
Council continued the grandfather clauses in
Ordinances 9794 and 9795 until the Planning Department comes back with more information on the impacts.
Council directed the City Attorney's Office to prepare
documents approving GPA/LU 86-1, as amended.
RECESS :
Mayor Casler declared a recess at 8:15 p.m., and
Council reconvened at 8:27 p.m., with all Members
present.
I 12. NUMBER NOT USED. rgg) 13. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE - CT 85-24 .. CARLSBAD
RESEARCH CENTER TENTATIVE MAP.
Council continued CT 85-24 until February 25,
1986.
I DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS
(85) 14. AB f8514 - AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING/TRAFFIC
(28) ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN BEACH AREA OF THE CITY,
(45 1 AND APPOINTMENT OF A TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE.
Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director, gave the staff
report as contained in the Agenda Bill. He stated the
consultants would make a brief presentation on the
scope of their work.
3im Douglas, Parsons Binckerhoff Quade and Douglas,
Inc., 2323 North Broadway, Santa Ana, gave an overall
view of their proposal.
Paul Zucker, explained the scope of work to be
accomplished, as contained in the Agenda Bill.
In conclusion, Mike Holzmiller stated the proposed
TAC, or Technical Advisory Committee, will consist of:
a Planning Commission Member, 3eanne McFadden: the
Traffic Safety Commission has not made an appointment;
the beach area resident will be Ann Mauch; the
Engineering Department will be someone selected by the
City Engineer and the Planning Department will be
represented by Mike Holzmiller.
55
"r
COUNCIL \p 5 3 94'
MEMBERS % 9
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
x
Chick
Pettine
Casler
Lewis X
Kulchin
Chick
Pettine 7 I
Casler
r Pettine
r Chick
r Kulchin
r Lewis
x:
1
0 0 MINUTES
February 11, 1986 Page 11
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: (continued)
Ann Mauch, Garfield, spoke thanking Council for its
commitment to the Beach Special Treatment Area. She
stated her approval of the hiring of Parsons
Binckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., to perform the
planningltraffic analysis.
Mayor Casler stated she had a phone call from the
President of the Chamber of Commerce requesting the
Chamber be represented on the TAC committee.
Council Member Kulchin recommended one member of the
TAC committee be a beach area property owner who lives
in that area. She stated she had talked with Mario
Monroy and he had agreed to serve on the Committee.
Council approved two additions to the TAC Committee as
follows:
A Member of the Chamber of Commerce.
A property owner in the beach area.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8401, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADE &
DOUGLAS, INC. FOR PREPARATION OF A PLANNZNG/TRAFFIC
ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN BEACH AREA OF THE CITY, AND
APPOINTMENT OF A TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Council appointed Mario Monroe to the TAC Committee as
a Beach Area property owner.
(88) 15. AB 118515 - ADOPTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM.
Brian Watson, Batallion Chief, gave the staff report
as contained in the Agenda Bill.
Dave Merk, from the Department of Health Services for
the County of San Diego, presented a 12-minute slide
presentation on the hazardous materials emergency
response program.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8402, ADOPTING THE UNIFIED SAN DIEGO
COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PROGRAM.
(28) 16. AB %8509 - DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPOINTMENTS.
Mayor Casler announced the Housing and Redevelopment
Advisory Committee unanimously recommended 3erry
Rombotis represent them on the Design Review Board.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8393, APPOINTING 3ERRY ROMBOTIS TO
SERVE ON THE CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
5Y
-
\p 5
COUNCIL ?$ 5'
MEMBERS % %
Casler
Kulchin
Lewis
x.
Chick
Pettine
Cas 1 er
Lewis
Kulchin x;
Chick
Pettine
Casler
Lewis
1
1 Pettine
1 Chick
XI Kulchin
1
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
xx Kulchin
X Lewis
x
Cas 1 er
Lewis
xx
X Pettine
X Chick
X Kulchin
X
e MINUTES e
(40)
February 11, 1986 \p 5
Page 12 COUNCIL ?$ %
MEMBERS % 4
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: (continued)
Council adopted the following Resolution: X Casler
Lewis
RESOLUTION NO. 8393, APPOINTING JERRY ROMBOTIS TO Kulchin
SERVE OH THE CARLSBAD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Chick
Pettine
17. AB #8369 - Supplement #I - ACQUISITION OF SPACE
FOR BUILDING, PLANNII\!G AND ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENTS.
City Manager Frank Aleshire requested this item be
continued until next week.
COUNCIL REPORTS:
Parks & Recreation Commission
Council Member Pettine reported on the recent Parks ti
Recreation Commission Meeting.
Coastal Commission Hearing
Council Member Chick reported on the meeting where the
LCP was accepted unnanimously.
Batiquitos Lagoon Restoration
Council Member Chick reported on the meeting in San
Pedro and added there was some doubt whether the Port
of Los Angeles could mitigate off-site, using public
funds.
Depot Committee
Council Member Kulchin reported the Depot Grant of
$30,000 should be determined within a week.
CITY MANAGER ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
City Manager Frank Aleshire presented and narrated a
slide presentation on The Quality of Life in
Carlsbad.
CITY ATTORNEY ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
City Attorney Vincent Biondo reported on the Coastal Commission/Elsner dispute, stating the Commission
approved the amendment to make the zoning and General
Plan consistent and approved Council's action amending
the Coastal Plan.
53
b
-
8 0 MINUTES
February 11, 1986 Page 13
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Casler made a motion to adjourn to a Closed
Session to continue the performance review of Council-
appointed officials. Council Member Lewis seconded
the motion. Council Members stated a preference to
meet prior to Council Meeting next week. The motion
was withdrawn.
By proper motion the Meeting of February 11, 1986, was
adjourned at 9:50 p.m., to 5:OO p.m., Tuesday,
February 18, 1986, at the City Council Chambers, for a
Closed Session to review the performance of Council appointed officials.
Respectfully submitted, &?xAdxy
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ
City Clerk
Harriett Babbitt
Minutes Clerk
HR/tc
I 52 I
~
Harriett Babbitt
Minutes Clerk
HR/tc
52
\y 5
COUNCIL ?3 9L
MEMBERS % $