HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-04-22; City Council; Minutes, * 0 0 MINUTES
(62)
(70)
(81)
(45)
Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting)
Time of Fleeting: 6:OO p.m. Date of Meeting: April 22, 1986
Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
~~ ~~ ~
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Casler called the Meeting to order at 6:Ol p.m.
ROLL CALL was taken by the City Clerk, as follows:
Present - Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin,
Chick and Pettine.
Absent - None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of the Regular Meeting held April 8, 1986, were approved as amended.
PRESENTATION:
Mayor Casler read a Proclamation declaring the week
of May 4-10, 1986, as "Hire a Veteran Week". The
Proclamation was accepted by Sharryn Mendoza,
Chairman, Jobs Service, Employment Development Department of the State of California.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Council Member Chick requested Item No. 8 be
withdrawn from the Consent Calendar.
Council Member Pettine requested Item No. 10 be
withdrawn from the Consent Calendar.
Council affirmed the action of the Consent Calendar,
with the exception of Items 8 and 10, as follows:
WAIVER OF ORDINANCE TEXT READING:
Council waived the reading of the text of all
Ordinances and Resolutions at this Meeting.
1. AB #8588 - IMMUNITY FOR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES - SENATE RILL - 1694.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8508, in support
of Senate Bill 1694 (Bergeson).
2. AB 86779 - Supplement #I - CARLSBAD SWIM COMPLEX
FEE REVISIONS.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8509, authorizing
the fees for the Carlsbad Swimming Pool Complex.
3. AB /I8119 - Supplement #23 - AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR
ACCESS FLOORING.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8510, accepting
the bid and authorizina the execution of contract
3006-7F access flooring for the construction of
the Carlsbad Safety and Service Center.
168
COUNCIL \p 5 % Yb
MEMBERS % $ >
Casler
: Chick
: Kulchin
1 Lewis
XI
x Pettine
Casler
X Chick
xx Kulchin
X Lewis
X
X Pettine
, 0 0 MINUTES
(97)
(96)
(78)
(81)
(45)
(70)
(59)
(44)
(45)
(81)
April 22, 1986 Page 2 COUNCIL \v % % MEMBERS % %
CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
4. AB f8589 - TAMARACK AVENUE - ADAMS TO HIGHLAND - PR03ECT NO. 3144.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8511, approving
plans and specifications: authorizing the City
Clerk to invite bids for Tamarack Avenue
improvements from Adams to Highland - Project No.
3144.
5. AB /I8590 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL - EL CAMINO REAL AND
FARADAY AVENUE.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8512, authorizing
the City Manager to contract for the design of the
signal at El Camino Real and Faraday Avenue and
appropriating $40,000 from the PFF to fund the
City's portion of the cost.
6. AB f8591 - REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO DESTROY
FILES.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8513, authorizing
the destruction of certain files.
-
7. AB /I8119 - Supplement R24 - ELEVATOR CONTRACT FOR
CARLSBAD SAFETY AND SERVICE CENTER.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8514, approving an
amendment to Contract No. 3006-3A for the Carlsbad
Safety and Service Center.
8. A6 f8592 - PHASE I OF CALAVERA HILLS COMMUNITY
PARK.
This item was withdrawn from the Consent
Calendar.
-
9. AB 88593 - DUPLICATION EQUIPMENT.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8516, appropriating
funds for purchase of copy machines; and approving
a policy of standardizing with Xerox copy
machines.
IO. AB 88594 - APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT FOR MUNICIPAL
PR03ECTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES.
This item was withdrawn from the Consent
Calendar.
11. AB /I8595 - CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION EQUIPMENT
FOR SAFETY CENTER.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8518, accepting a
bid and authorizing the execution of a purchase
order for the purchase of closed circuit
television equipment.
Iff 7
MINUTES 0
-
(74)
(70)
(44)
(45)
\p 5
COUNCIL % yL
April 22, 1986 Page 3 MEMBERS % $
CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
12. AB #8596 - MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH
CARLSBAD POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION.
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8519, adopting a
Memorandum of Understanding between
representatives of management and the Carlsbad
Police Officers' Association; and
Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8520, adopting
salary plan for employees represented by the
Carlsbad Police Officers' Association, for the
1986-87 and 1987-88 fiscal years.
ITEMS WITHDRAWN FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
8. AB /I8592 - PHASE I OF CALAVERA HILLS COMMUNITY
PARK. -
Council Member Chick stated he requested this item be
withdrawn to inquire about the administration and
inspection fees.
Dave Bradstreet, Director of Parks and Recreation,
gave a breakdown on the costs, stating these were
internal charges from the Engineering Department, and
those charges were not originally anticipated.
Council adopted the following Resolution: Casler
RESOLUTION NO. 8515, APPROVING PLANS AND Kulchin
SPECIFICATIONS: AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO INVITE Chick X
BIDS FOR PHASE I OF CALAVERA HILLS COMMUNITY PARK, Pettine
PROJECT NO. 3173.
1
Lewis
IO. AB W8594 - APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT FOR MUNICIPAL
PR03ECTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES.
Council Member Pettine stated he requested this item
be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar to inquire of
Mr. Aleshire what the duration of the services would
be for this consultant. He questioned if the pay
schedule was in line with what the City currently pays
engineers.
Richard Allen, Engineering Department, stated the
contract did read one year, but could be terminated by
either party with 30 days notice.
City Manager Frank Aleshire stated the City was
advertising at this time for engineers. He stated the
City is having difficulty finding engineers, and it
may be necessary to review the salary ranges.
Council adopted the following Resolution: Casler
Lewis
RESOLUTION NO. 8517, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR Kulchin
MUNICIPAL PR03ECTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING Chick
THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO FINANCE REQUIRED SERVICES. Pettine F
)//
MINUTES e
April 22, 1986 Paae 4 4
~ I
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION:
(113) 13. AB 88585 - ZONE CHANGE - ZC-345 - CITY OF
CARLSBAD.
I Council adopted the following Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 9802, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR A ZONE
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CREST DRIVE NORTH OF
McCAULEY LANE AND SOUTH OF FOREST STREET.
CHANGE FROM R-1-7500 TO R-1-9500 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
(81) 14. AB lI8586 - CREATION OF PROCEDURE FOR COVENANTS OF EASEMENT.
I Council adopted the following Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 9803, AMENDING TITLE 20, CHAPTER 20.04
OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF
SECTION 20.04.140 TO ALLOW FOR THE CREATION OF
EASEMENTS BY RECORDATION OF A COVENANT.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(26) 15. AB f8495 - Supplement 83 - PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD WEST ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CONTINUED PUBLIC
HEARING.
Richard Allen, Engineering Department, introduced the
item and recommended it be continued to May 6, 1986.
Norm Neste, Assessment Engineer with Neste, Brudine &
Stone, gave a verbal update on the status of this
Assessment District. He stated the discussions are
continuing with the property owners in order to find a
solution to forming the district.
Mr. Neste used a transparency to indicate Palomar
Airport Road and the assessment area. He stated this
Assessment District would complete six lanes of
roadway from Paseo del Norte to El Camino Real, except
for that portion of road in front of the Palomar
Airport, which is County-owned. The City has
requested the County to make improvements on that
portion.
Council received the report and continued this item to
May 6, 1986.
(26) 16. AB 88236 - Supplement 82 - PARK DRIVE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT.
Richard Allen, Engineering Department, introduced the
i tem.
16s 1
-r
COUNCIL kp % 9+, \* cri MEMBERS ’
I1
Casler
Pettine
X Chick
Kulchin
xx Lewis
)
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
xx Kulchin
X Lewis
X
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
X Kulchin
X Lewis
xx
- T
0 MINUTES 0
April 22, 1986 Page 5
PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued)
F. MacMenzie Brown, Brown & Nazarek, P.O. Bo 8025,
Rancho Santa Fe, Special Counsel, stated this would be
the first of two public hearings, and if Council
wished to proceed, the single resolution that has been
prepared would need to be passed by a 4/5 vote. The
second hearing would be held upon completion of
construction and the subject matter at that time would
be correctness of the assessment. The property owners
have 60 days to commence construction from the date
they were originally notified.
Bob Sergeant, Willdan Associates, referred to a
transparency indicating the widening for Park Drive.
He stated the spread of costs had been done on a
front-footage basis consistent with the policy of the
City's Future Improvement Agreements recorded against
the property. This includes widening and improvements
on Park Drive, plus a retaining wall.
Mr. Brown inquired of the City Clerk whether any written communications had been received, and the City
Clerk stated there had been none.
Mayor Casler opened the Public Hearing at 6:33 p.m.,
and issued the invitation to speak.
Raymond Spangler, 3774 Skyline Road, stated he was
here in protest. He stated he was for the Assessment
District, but cannot agree with the costs as
estimated.
3im Alvord, 4602 Park Drive, stated he was not in
opposition to the Assessment District, but felt the
costs were entirely too high.
Joe Wilson, 4916 Avila Avenue, representing 4614 Park
Drive, said he had a letter stating the reason they
were improving the street was to alleviate some of the
parking in the Bristol Cove area. He stated if this
were true, he felt everyone should pay a portion of
the improvements and not just those on one side of the street. Mr. Wilson stated the owners were in favor of
the Assessment District, but could not find
justification for the cost estimates.
Frank Ausman, 846 Williamston Street, Vista,
representing Raymond Spangler, reiterated the cost
difference in the original estimates in 1981 or 1982
and the present assessments. He did not feel it was
fair that individual property owners were required to
improve the street for the benefit of everyone in that
area. He stated the property owners would like to go
along with the original costs proposed in 1981.
Council Member Lewis clarified the fasct that the
district was postponed in 1981 at the request of the
property owners.
Ray Rohde, 4640 Park Drive, stated he bought his house
19 months ago, and was told the City was holding up
the Assessment Project. He stated he now had a bill
from the City, and felt the assessment was unfair. He
asked the City reconsider these assessments.
164 I
COUNCIL /p % 9A
MEMBERS % %
9 MINUTES 0
April 22, 1986 Page 6
~~~ ~ ~ ~~~
PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued)
In response to query, Mr. Sergeant stated the
retaining wall was included in the design in lieu of
heavy grading on the slope. It would be cheaper to
have a wall rather than pay for the gradina.
Girard Anear, 1728 Calava Court, stated he was on the
Council when this was first considered for
improvement. He stated he did not know why the
Assessment District was not put in at that time. He stated the property owners should be allowed to put in
the improvements and the City inspect those
improvements. Mr. Anear stated the improvements are needed and have been needed for some time.
Ed Stoll, 4610 Park Drive, stated he acquired this
property from Mr. Wilson in 1982, and was told at that
time the improvements were going to be put in at a
cost of approximately $4,000. He now has a bill for
$23,000. He does not agree with that figure and he
felt the property owners should get the work done
themselves.
Mr. Spangler returned, stating he had been trying to
sell and develop his property since 1978. The Coastal
Commission has not permitted him to do that. He
stated there has been no income from this property,
just outgo as far as taxes. He stated the assessment
costs would just be an additional hardship on him with
his restricted income.
Since no one else wished to speak on this item, the
Public Hearing was closed at 7:Ol p.m.
City Attorney Vincent Biondo stated the property
owners had signed a Future Improvement Agreement which
reflects clearly that the property owners agree to the
best estimates of costs at the time the agreement is
prepared. It is merely an estimate. That Agreement
also says that the actual costs would be assessed at
the time the improvements were to be made. He stated
any increase in actual costs over and above the
original one would now include the costs of increased
engineering, as well as increased construction costs.
The Agreement, as signed by the property owners, did
put the full responsibility and obligation onto the
property owner.
Mr. Brown stated the property owners have until May
31, 1986, to commence construction on the
improvements.
City Manager Frank Aleshire stated he would like to explain the circumstances of what is being discussed
tonight, since there seems to be some confusion. The
City has an Ordinance that anyone who builds on
property must put in the improvements. In some cases,
the City allows that owner to sign an Agreement. That
is what is being discussed tonight. These property
owners signed an Agreement stating they were obligated
to put in the street improvements at a future time.
/63
7
MEMBERS COUNCIL p %
\
& $
- -r
' MINUTES 0
April 22, 1986 Page 7
PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued)
When the City requires the improvements, the property
owners had 60 days to install those improvements. If
those improvements were not put in by the property
owners, the City has the right, under the Assessment
District proceeding, to force the improvements. The
property owners can still put in the improvements with
their own money and hire their own contractor;
however, if they fail to do that, the City Engineer is
obligated to go ahead and build the street
improvements and assess the property.
Mr. Aleshire stated the issue is the costs of the
improvements and why those costs are so much higher
today then four or five years ago. The City was not
committed to any price and the original estimate was
just an estimate. The costs have now increased
because of legal costs, engineering, and other costs.
In answer to Council question, Mr. Spangler stated he
would be very happy to put in the improvements
himself. However, no bank would lend him money on
bare land. Mr. Spangler further added he could not
finance the construction of the improvements within 60
days. He felt it would take 90 days minimum time.
Council discussion involved whether the time could be
extended to 90 days to allow the property owners to
seek financing for the improvements.
Staff explained the plans were available and could be
taken to a contractor in order to have a bid placed for those improvements.
Mr. Wilson stated within 90 days they could start
construction of the improvements.
Council continued this item for two weeks to allow the
homeowners to explore other avenues of financing to
achieve the improvements on Park Drive.
(26) 17. AB f7612 - Supplement 82 - CYNTHIA LANE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT.
Richard Allen, Engineering Department, stated this
Assessment District had been requested by the
homeowners.
F. MacKensie Rrown stated the same 60-day period was
allowed for the homeowners to complete the
improvements before the City ordered the improvements
to be made.
The City Clerk stated two written communications had
been received and copies supplied to Council Members.
16L
c
\p 5
COUNCIL 3 9&
MEMBERS % %
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
Pettine
x
- -
l
e MINUTES 0
April 22, 1986 Page 8
PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued)
Mr. Sergeant referred to a location map showing the
area included in the Assessment District. He stated
sidewalks had not been included in this Assessment
District due to the numerous driveways which would
require removal of the sidewalks at the time of
development. The assessments have been based on a
frontage basis. Negotiations are in progress for the
right-of-way for one parcel, and it is hoped that
would be achieved at no cost. The City would not call for bids until the end of the 60-day period, May 31,
1986.
Mayor Casler opened the Public Hearing at 7:38 p.m.,
and issued the invitation to speak.
Clyde Wickham, 1320 Knowles Avenue, stated the
property owners are looking for the best way to put in
the road. They would like to put in the improvements
themselves. He stated he withdrew his request for a
30-day extension, inasmuch as there is still 30 days
left in which to start the improvements.
By motion, Council closed the Public Hearing at 7:40
p.m.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8522, MAKING FINDINGS AT PUBLIC HEARING
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 27 OF THE "IMPROVEMENT ACT OF
1911".
RECESS:
Mayor Casler declared a Recess at 7:42 p.m., and
Council reconvened at 7:59 p.m., with all Members
present.
Mayor Casler announced if there was no objection, Item No. 20 would be heard out of order at this time.
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: -
(102) 20. AB #8532 - Supplement 81 - TRUCK ROUTES - UPDATE
OF MUNICIPAL CODE.
Police Chief Vincent 3imno gave the staff report as
contained in the Agenda Bill. He commented that
communications had been received from other agencies,
including the City of San Marcos, copies of which have
been distributed to Council Members. Chief 3imno
continued his report at the wall map, showing the
recommended routes. He referred to a transparency
showing the area between Olivenhain Road and Rancho Santa Fe Road where there would be no exit if Council
adopted the recommendations of the Traffic Safety
Commission as they exist. He recommended that the
restrictions be started south of the intersection of
Olivenhain and Rancho Santa Fe to allow trucks to get
to the landfill facilities without conflict.
Id/
c
COUNCIL /p % yA
MEMBERS % $
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
x
1 Pettine
1 Chick
Casler x;
Lewis
Kulchin
Chick
Pettine
1 I
1 I
7 I
1 I
- c
e MINUTES a
April 22, 1986 Page 9
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: (continued)
City Manager Frank Aleshire stated the portion of
Olivenhain Avenue by the triangle and the Water
District is the area in question. He stated that is a
one-way street eastbound only, and he suggested the
triangle would have to be a truck route in order to
provide for a flow of traffic.
Kent Whitson, 105 West Richmar, representing the City
of San Marcos, stated their concern with Rancho Santa
Fe Road being deleted as a truck route. Mr. Whitson
read from the Resolution attached to the communication
from the City of San Marcos, copies of which were
supplied to all Members of Council. He requested
Council retain Rancho Santa Fe Road as a truck route.
Arie DeJong, 5960 El Camino Real, owner of Coast Waste
Management, stated he attended the Traffic Safety Commission meeting held in La Costa. He stated he had
instructed his vehicles to be rerouted to alleviate
the problems. The primary problem is the area of La
Costa Avenue, and he felt that could be eliminated as
a truck route, other than for trucks servicing the area. Also, Alga Road could be eliminated.
Mr. DeJong stated he did have a problem with Rancho
Santa Fe Road and Olivenhain Road. He believed this was a County road with only a part under the
jurisdiction of Carlsbad. He stated he did not want
to be landlocked, as his trucks needed to get to the
landfill. Mr. DeJong stated he has a problem getting
one of his large vehicles around the corner at Rancho Santa Fe Road and Palomar Road. He stated when the
intersection is completed, the truck will be able to
negotiate the corner.
Gordon Landis, 7108 Primrose Way, stated he had
difficulty with trucks going up La Costa Avenue to El
Camino Real. He stated he also had a problem with
trucks on Alga Road.
Don Wakefield, 7412 Colina Street, representing the La
Costa Community Awareness Group, stated they were in
agreement with the idea of the recommendation to ban
trucks from La Costa Avenue, Alga Road (east of El
Camino Real), and was surprised there were no reasons
trucks should be banned from Rancho Santa Fe Road. He
cited several reasons for banning trucks from Rancho
Santa Fe Road.
Girard Anear, 1728 Calavo Court, Co-Chairman of the
Traffic Circulation Committee, stated one of the
biggest worries of that Committee was Rancho Santa Fe
Road. It was the feeling of that Committee it should
be a prime arterial. When it is built to its
specifications, it will be designed to carry all types
of traffic.
Robert Accetta, 7319 Muslo Lane, representing
Concerned Citizens of La Costa, stated he attended the
Traffic Safety Commission meeting, March 6, 1986, He
stated he was in favor of the Traffic Safety
Commission recommendations.
160
\p 5
COUNCIL % ?L
MEMBERS % $
\ b
$ -
' MINUTES 9
- April 22, 1986 Page 10
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: (continued)
Council Members stated they concurred with the Traffic
Safety Commission recommendations at this time, with
the situation to be reviewed at the time Rancho Santa
Fe Road is widened to six lanes and perhaps a
realignment is obtained north of La Costa Avenue.
In discussion, it was ascertained that Olivenhain Road
is in the County, with City limits on the north side
of the road. By allowing them to use the area of
Olivenhain Road at the connection of Qlivenhain
Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road, trucks would then be able
to return to El Camino Real.
City Attorney Vincent Biondo stated in the City of
Carlsbad trucks are banned from all City streets
unless they are designated as truck routes. The City
cannot delete these streets as truck routes because
they have not and never have been truck routes under
the City Ordinance. The only action being taken
tonight would be introducing the Ordinance which would
designate La Costa Avenue from westerly city limits to El Camino Real as a truck route.
Council Member Pettine stated if Olivenhain Road is to
be used as an escape route, he wondered whether they
were creating the same noise problem for the residents
along Olivenhain Road as the noise problem that is now
on Rancho Santa Fe Road. It was stated Olivenhain is
a truck route in the County; in Carlsbad, it is not a
truck route.
Council introduced the following Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 3196, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.32,
SECTION 10.32.091 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY
THE ADDITION OF SUBSECTION (i) DESIGNATING LA COSTA AS
A TRUCK ROUTE; amended to desipate the small section
of Rancho Santa Fe Road from Questhaven to the city
limits and a small section at Olivenhain Road and
Rancho Santa Fe Road west to Olivenhain Road as a
truck route.
Council directed that once Rancho Santa Fe Road has
been constructed to full width, the truck route
schedule would be re-evaluated.
(79) 18. AB /I7099 - Supplement 87 - ADOPTING OF NEW PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE.
City Attorney Vincent Biondo gave the staff report as
contained in the Agenda Bill.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8523, REVISING COUNCIL POLICY NO. 17 TO
INCREASE THE PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE FROM TWO PERCENT OF
THE BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION TO TWO AND ONE HALF
PERCENT OF THE BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION AND REVISING
THE FORM OF AGREEMENT OF PAYMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
FEES TO REFLECT THE INCREASED FEE.
I59
-
COUNCIL /j 3 % q
MEMBERS % %
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
Kulchin
X Lewis
xx
Casler
X Pettine
xx Chick
Kulchin
X Lewis
X
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
xx Kulchin
X Lewis
X
- -
(
e MINUTES e
COUNCIL y$ 3 yA '
April 22, 1986 Page 11 MEMBERS % $
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: (continued)
Council introduced the following Ordinance: Casler
X Pettine SECTION 5.09.030 TO MODIFY THE AMOUNT OF THE BUSINESS
X Chick THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE AMENDMENT OF
xx Kulchin ORDINANCE NO. 6078, AMENDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 5.09 OF
X Lewis
1
LICENSE TAX ON NEW CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN
CONSISTENCY WITH CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 17.
:85> 19. AB W8260 - Supplement 81 - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FOR THE LA COSTA AREA.
Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director, gave the staff
report as contained in the Agenda Bill.
Marty Bouman, Transportation Consultant, continued the
report, giving an overview of the study methodology
and the primary conclusions of the report. A slide
presentation was given showing the projects that are a
part of the traffic impact fee, examples of the
projects to be funded by other sources, as well as
projects not practical to be included in this fee.
Bob Ladwig, 3088 Pi0 Pico, Rick Engineering, urged its
adoption. He called attention to page 13, section
18.42.020, line 15 1/2, where it stated south of
"Poinsettia Lane and Alga Roads". He stated this
should be "Poinsettia Lane and Carrillo Roads".
Frank Mola, 6994 El Camino Real, Ste. 202,
representing the La Costa Ranch Company, formerly Daon
Corporation, supported the recommendation. He stated
the problems with the traffic in La Costa are not
totally generated by La Costa, and he urged Council to
continue working with the County and other cities to
mitigate their impact on La Costa traffic.
Hap L'Heureux, President, Carlsbad Chamber of
Commerce, stated the Chamber supported this Traffic
Impact Fee.
Council introduced the following Ordinance: Casler X
Lewis X
ORDINANCE NO. 8107, AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE CARLSBAD Kulchin xx
MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF CHAPTER 18.42 Chick X
ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM TRAFFIC FEE FOR SOUTH EASTERN Pettine X
AREA OF CARLSBAD (LA COSTA AREA) .
As corrected on page 2 of the Ordinance, line 15 1/2,
to change "Alga Roads" to "Carrillo Roads".
Council adopted the following Resolution: Casler X
Lewis X
RESOLUTION NO. 8524, DESIGNATION THE CIRCULATION Kulchin xx
IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FUNDED BY THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Chick X
FOR THE SOUTH EASTERN AREA OF THE CITY. Pettine X
I58
-
e MINUTES 0
(102)
(76)
(41)
April 22, 1986 Page 12 -
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: (continued)
20. AB a8.532 - Supplement #I - TRUCK ROUTES - UPDATE
OF MUNICIPAL CODE.
This item was taken out of order. (See page 8)
21. AB f8571 - PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT.
Council Members made the following nominations:
Council Member Kulchin nominated Sharon Schramm, who
serves as President of the Library Board of Trustees.
Council Member Chick nominated Sharon Schramm.
Mayor Casler nominated Sharon Schramm.
Council Member Pettine nominated Barbara Donovan.
Council Member Lewis nominated Barbara Donovan.
Council adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 8478, APPOINTING SHARON SCHRAMM TO THE
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION.
CLOSED SESSION:
Mayor Casler made a motion to authorize a Closed
Session regarding pending threatened litigation as
follows:
Council hold a closed session pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(b) (2) to decide whether on advice
of the City Attorney based on existing facts and
circumstances there is a significant exposure to
litigation against the City and, if the Council so
determines, to remain in closed session to discuss the
situation constituting that exposure pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(I).
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 9:46 p.m.,
and reconvened at 10:08 p.m., with no action taken.
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion, the Meeting of April 22, 1986, was
adjourned at 1O:OY p.m., to May 6, 1986, at 5:OO p.m.,
City Council Chambers for a Closed Session.
Respectfully submitted, &(fh
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ
City Clerk
I/
Harriett Babbitt
Minutes Clerk
HB: tc
157
-
\p 5
COUNCIL % 9/-
MEMBERS % 8
Casler Lewis
X
Kulchin
Chick
XI Pettine x
x ;I I
Casler
X Pettine
X Chick
X Kulchin
X Lewis
xx