HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-05-27; City Council; MinutesI e MINUTES 0
Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting)
Time of Meeting: 6:OO p.m. Date of Meeting: May 27, 1986 Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
(86)
(80)
(114)
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Casler called the Meeting to order at 6:OO p.m.
ROLL\,CALL was taken by the City Clerk, as follows:
Present - Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin,
and Pettine.
Council Member Chick arrived at 6 :08 p.m.
Absent - None.
PRESENTATION:
Tina Napier, Fairest of the Fair, presented Council
Members with tickets to the Del Mar Fair, and encouraged attendance on Carlsbad Day.
Mayor Casler read and presented a Proclamation to Bob
Lucas in recognition of T.V. Pursuits Day on May 29,
1986.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. AB #8516 - Supplement #2 - MASTER PLAN DENSITY
RANGES AND DENSITY CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE -
ZCA-ISO/AMENDMENT TO MP-1, 139, 149, 174 & 175.
Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director, gave the staff
report as contained in the Agenda Bill and his
memorandum dated May 20, 1986.
Mayor Casler opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m.,
and issued the invitation to speak.
Bob Ladwig, Rick Engineering, referred to page I of
the Ordinance, line 26 1/2, and expressed the opinion
that the word "floodways1' should be "floodplain".
Mr. Holzmiller expressed agreement with the change
suggested by Mr. Ladwig.
Mr. Ladwig continued referring to page 2 of the
Ordinance, Section 21.44.240, and indicated the
section was unclear, and could cause confusion in the
future.
For clarification purposes, Mr. Holzmiller stated
though commercial and industrial did not have density
calculations, they should be sensitive to the areas
identified in Section 21.44.230 of the Ordinance.
Doug Avis, Bieri-Avis Partnership, addressed Council.
Mr. Avis referred to the recommendations of the Citizens Committee, and stated he did not believe
these additional restrictions were necessary. He
noted that if Council did determine to move forward
with these changes, that the development restrictions proposed for 40% slopes should not apply to the R-L
Zone.
JJO
T
\p 5
COUNCIL 3 %
MEMBERS % $
1
- -.r
I
~ i
* e MINUTES 0
May 27, 1986 Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING: (continued)
Since no one else wished to speak on the item, Mayor
Casler closed the public hearing at 6:45 p.m.
Mayor Casler referred to Ordinance No. 9795, and
indicated that items 5 through 9 in Section 21.44.230 were not approved, nor recommended, by the Citizens Committee; therefore, she could not vote in favor of
the proposed Ordinance. Additionally, Ordinance No.
9794 also referred to Ordinance No. 9795, and those
items; therefore she could not vote in the affirmative
for either Ordinance. Council Member Chick concurred
with the comments of Mayor Casler.
Council introduced the following Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 9794, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9778, 9708,
9706, 9735, 9570 AND 9694 TO APPLY THE LAND USE
ELEMENT DENSITY RANGES ADOPTED ON DECEMBER 17, 1985 AND NEW OPEN SPACE PROTECTION MEASURES TO EXISTING
MASTER PLANS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
Council introduced the following Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 9795, AMENDING TITLE 21, CHAPTER 21.44
OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF
SECTIONS 21 .'44.230 AND '21.44.240 TO RESTRICT
DEVELOPMENT ON CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AREAS IDENTIFIED
IN THE GENERAL PLAN AND TO EXCLUDE CONSIDERATION OF
SPACE LAND FROM DENSITY CALCULATIONS.
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY,MANAGER REPORTS:
(77) 2. WORKSHOP ON GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
Mayor Casler announced that Council would not take any
public testimmy on this item at this time. Public
testimony would be received at the scheduled public
hearing on the proposed ordinance.
City Manager, Frank Aleshire, introduced the matter
indicating this was being provided for information
purposes for the City Council. He stated it was not
necessary for Council to take any action, and he aave
an overview of the matter.
I
I
I
I
I
Community Development Director, Marty Orenyak,
continued with the report explaining the projects
considered to be in the pipeline as noted in the
Agenda Bill in Categories A, B, and C. He further
explained that in Category A, 1,746 units could pull
building permits after 3uly 22, 1986 without a phasing plan; and 1,757 in Category A would require a phasing
plan. In Category B, 860 of the 4,609 total units
would be exempt from the moratorium, but not exempt
from the phasing plan requirements. And, in Category
C, 304 of the 3,973 total units would be exempt from
the moratorium but not from the phasing plan
requirements. He also indicated that since 1980, the
City has averaged approximately 1,500 residential
permits per year.
JOY
c
\v 5
COUNCIL % ?k
MEMBERS % $
Casler
Lewis Kulchin
x<
Chick
Pettine
Casler
Lewis
Kulchin
x;
Chick Pettine
7 I .
I
.* e MINUTES 0
- -r
I
May 27, 1986 Page 3
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTZ: (continued)
Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director, continued with the
report referring to his memorandum dated May 23, 1986,
and the workload of the Planning staff. He gave an
update on the status of action which resulted from the Citizens Committee recommendations noting those items
completed, those scheduled for completion by 3uly 22,
1986, and those to be completed after 3uly 22, 1986.
Mayor Casler called a recess at 7:53 p.m., and Council
reconvened at 8:08 p.m., with all Council Members
present.
2. WORKSHOP ON GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
(continued)
City Manager Frank Aleshire continued with the report
explaining the possible modifications to the Growth
Management Program as contained on page 3 of the
Agenda Bill. He referred to a wall exhibit which
divided the City into three categories, and stated
that the program could be simplified by the
elimination of those three categories. He also stated
that the City could develop the public facilities
phasing program for the entire City rather than just
for Zones 1-6. He referred to the draft ordinance
attached to the Agenda Bill, and stated that it was
prepared in accordance with the original proposal
which included the 25 zones and the three categories.
Mr. Aleshire responded to questions noting that the
growth would be controlled by the timing of the public
facilities. He also indicated that Council direction
had focused on the density of the City at buildout,
and the provision of public facilities concurrent with
need.
Council Member Pettine expressed concern that the
program did not address the phasing of growth. He
also stated that the City should set the standards;
therefore, the City should prepare the public
facilities plan.
Council directed City staff to hire a consultant to do
a public facility phasing plan for Zones 7 through
25.
For clarification purposes, the City Manager indicated
that Council had already authorized staff to hire a
consultant to prepare the public facility phasing plan
for Zones 1-6; therefore, this action would mean that
the City would be hiring a consultant to prepare
public facility phasing plan for the entire City -- all 25 zones.
208
-
COUNCIL \p 5 % %'
MEMBERS % $
Casler
Chick
X Kulchin
X Lewis
XF
X Pettine
X
I
,
.f . a MINUTES 0
COUNCIL \v Zio 3 %
May 27, 1986 Page 4 MEMBERS % $
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: (continued)
Council directed staff to simplify the system, and Casler
Kulchin future urbanizing) from the program.
Lewis eliminate the three categories (urbanized, urbanizing,
X
Chick
Pettine
Council discussion related to the workload of the
Planning Department, and the timing for completing the
Growth Management Program.
For clarification purposes, the City Attorney stated
that the City's overall public facility phasing plan
would not replace a11 the individual developer plans.
Following additional discussion relating to concerns Casler
about completing the program on schedule, Council Lewis x:
directed staff to apply available staff time to the Kulchin
Growth Management Program as a high priority, and Chick
directed staff to cease processing other projects Pettine
which do not have a final map subject to the other
J
exceptions in the draft Growth Management Ordinance,
and Council directed staff to include the appropriate
Ordinance.
provisions of implementation in the Growth Management
Mayor Casler indicated she had abstained on the item
because she felt she needed additional information
prior to voting in favor of, or against, the motion.
AD30URNMENT:
By proper motion the Meeting of May 27, 1986, was
adjourned at 9:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, - de-
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ
City Clerk
ALR: tc
Jo?
I