HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-06-17; City Council; Minutesn 0 0 MINUTES
Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Adjourned Regular)
Date of Meeting: 3une 17, 1988
Time of Meeting: 6:OO p.m. Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
I CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Lewis called the Meeting to order at 6:OO p.m.
ROLL CALL was taken by the City Clerk, as follows: I Present: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Mamaux
and Larson. Council Member Pettine
arrived at 6:02 p.m.
Absent : None.
(48) 1. AB #9485 - OPEN SPACE UPDATE.
Mayor Lewis introduced the item, stating he and Council
Member Larson had represented the Council with the
S.O.S. group and felt the intent of the initiative was
good, but there were potential conflicts through the
wording and the map attached to the initiative.
Council Member Larson stated he wanted to underscore tl
word "potential", and concurred with the Mayor, that
the problem was not with the intent or purpose of the
proposal, but in the drafting of the text and the
interpretation of the map accompanying the text, and
how this could jeopardize provisions already adopted
and in place that do have strength. I
Mike Holzmiller continued the report, detailing the
materials with the Agenda bill. He emphasized there wa
no conflict with the intent and purpose; however, in
some of the sections looked at by staff, there was a
chance for potential conflicts with the open space
provisions of the Growth Management Program. 1 Mr. Holzmiller stated the Conservation Overlay used
with the map in the initiative does not reflect all
areas preserved in open space in the City and causes
conflicts with approved projects.
City Attorney Vincent Biondo said the old conservation
overlay was written into the initiative and included on
their map, becoming a part of the open space zone,
which is part of the City's General Plan. This is
conceptual, erroneous, outdated, and does not reflect
present realities.
Mr. Biondo called attention to two asterisks shown on
the overlay, one at Bataquitos Lagoon and one in the
north portion of the City. This was the City and Count)
park plan in 1972, with the City to have one major
community park in the north and one in the south, each
to be 100 acres. The initiative includes these, even
though these were abandoned by San Diego County and
Carlsbad by 1974. The community park concept has been
adopted by the City, with a park in each quadrant, and
the initiative conflicts with the present Parks and
Recreation Element.
Mr. Holzmiller indicated that there are differences in
the open space boundaries as shown on the overlay used
in the initiative, and it appears that to change those
boundaries would require a 2/3 majority vote of the
people. He added that Council was aware of how
difficult it is to get a 2/3 majority.
I6 2
/
I
COUNCIL \\B 5 559 0 Ab A 3
MEMBERS % %%
0 0 MINUTES
I
3une 17, 1988 \\b 5
?age 2 COUNCIL % %% 3 MEMBERS % $%
Mr. Holzmj-ller stated another area of conflict was in
the uses permitted in open space and it was not clear
about uses permitted on privately held open space.
Under the Growth Management Plan, no density credit is
given for open space, and it is not clear which
restrictions would apply.
Mayor Lewis stated the restrictions are clear now, and
with the wording of the initiative they are not.
Council Member Larson agreed and added that other
people might have confusion with the wording and that
could weaken the open space position of the City. He
said that with the present policy, the City asks for
15 percent open space over and above the constrained
open space area, and under the initiative that
additional 15 percent could be lost.
Council Member Pettine stated there is a need to refine
the S.O.S. wording and use an updated map consistent
with the present policies to eliminate ambiguities.
Council Member Pettine stated the citizens do not
trust the future Councils and want to make the open
space provisions specific. The S.O.S. agree with
existing policies, but want to make sure they are kept
intact .
Council Member Mamaux said he saw nothing wrong with
existing ordinances, and they could be put on the
ballot. He said he would support any initiative that
does not conflict with the Growth Management Plan.
Council Member Pettine stated there is nothing wrong
with the current ordinances, but they can be changed
by a vote of three Council Members, and an initiative
incorporating all of the ordinances would be the best
way to go.
.City Attorney Vincent Biondo stated there was another ,
conflict in Section IO of the S.O.S. initiative, where
they intend to limit the people's future ability to
adopt initiatives by saying if they adopt this
ordinance by a majority vote, it can only be changed or
repealed by a 2/3 vote in the future.
Mr. Biondo stated Municipal elections are decided by
majority votes and the only exemptions are special
taxes and bond issues. Section 10 would
disenfranchise the majority of the people; is
unconstitutional and in violation of the State
Election Code. Mr. Biondo said this may have to be
reviewed by the Court before the election.
Richard Yoder, 7738 Madrilena Way, addressed Council,
comparing the City's Growth Management Plan to a fine automobile, indicating that to improve the safety of
that Plan by adding to it would help less skillful
Councils in the future, especially if they were not
motivated to save open space.
J(e I I
0 0 . MINUTES
3une 17, 1988 Page 3
Mr. Yoder stated S.O.S. was to save open space, and not
to attack the Growth Management Plan or be a substitute
for it. The idea was to supplement the Growth
Management Plan, and if there are deficiencies in the
initiative , those should be remedied.
Council Member Pettine asked Mr. Yoder for his comment
about the drafting of a measure removing the
inconsistencies and ambiguities, and using an updated
map.
Mr. Yoder stated he personally would support such a
measure.
Ann Mauch, Oleander Street, addressed Council stating
she protested the City's treatment of the initiative,
and there had been "disinformation".
Ms. Mauch said the initiative merely closes the
loopholes, and does not count beaches and lagoons
toward the 15 percent open space, as the City does
now.
Ms. Mauch stated the initiative does not amend the
Hillside Ordinance and Growth Management Plan. She
stated the composite open space map was not invalid as
stated by the City, as the initiative group could
choose any map.
Courtney Heineman, 2879 Woodridge Circle, stated he was delighted to hear in detail how the S.O.S.
initiative was in conflict with the Growth Management
Plan. He related how the S.O.S. group tried
to get answers from the City, and the group felt
the City did not want to discuss the ways the S.O.S.
could be integrated with City ordinances.
Mr. Heineman stated it seemed the City was not serious
about making constructive approaches to the
-preservation of open space.
3im Swab, 3640 Adam Street, asked whether there was a
possibility of working together for a ballot measure
that everyone could support, rather than have Council
use its power to keep the initiative off of the
ballot.
Mr. Swab stated the initiative was supposed to
supplement and be in addition to the existing
regulations on open space. He stated the citizens are
concerned about the environment and the natural
resources and sensitive lands and would welcome and
consider a map that incorporated the natural resource
inventory with an updated open space map.
~
Mike Holzmiller stated that an updated map would
include the areas under the Growth Management Plan
that were restricted from development, both public and
private. The Natural Resource Map is a planning tool
similar to the conservation overlay, and shows more areas than are prohibited under the Growth Nanagement
Plan for development. He stated they would consider
the environmentally constrained areas and the 40
percent slopes that are not developable. Also, the
open space areas would be designated as such.
~ I (, n
-
\\k 5
COUNCIL % ?k9 2 MEMBERS % $%
I
*
*
e m MINUTES
3une 17, 1988 Page 4
Iqbal Rashid, a founding member of S.O.S., stated the
intent was to save open space and only amended the
City laws and maps, and he felt the only difficulty
was that the City acted as though the citizens were
attacking City Hall.
Mayor Lewis stated he would still have to rely on the
report of professional staff. He reiterated the intent
of the initiative was fine, but he had problems with the
wording. He stated he would like to have the present
ordinances protected.
Marty Orenyak, Director of Community Development,
stated staff had conferred with the City Clerk
concerning election deadlines, and those could be met.
Council directed staff to prepare an updated open
space map that would include designated areas of open
space, environmentally constrained areas, as well as
those areas on the natural resource inventory map
that Council deems appropriate, that would be put into
the format of an alternative initiative with express
provisions in the initiative so as not to make it in
conflict with other open space ordinances of the Growth
Management Plan, and that staff be directed to provide
copies of this alternative to members of S.O.S. for
their comment and review and then bring it back to the
Cou nci 1.
Council agreed that Council Members Pettine and Larson
would serve as the subcommittee to meet with S.O.S.
representatives.
AD30URNMENT:
By proper motion, the Adjourned Regular Meeting of June
17, 1988, was adjourned at 7:52 p.m.
-Respectfully submitted,
L2Ln-L A@*
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ
City Clerk
Harriett Babbitt
Minutes Clerk
/cs’9
COUNCIL \\b 5 % %a 9
MEMBERS % %%
Lewis
X Mamaux
xx Pettine
X Kulchin
X
X Larson