HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-03-16; Parks & Recreation Commission; MinutesMINUTES
Meeting of:
Time of Meeting:
Date of Meeting:
Place of Meeting:
PARKS 4 RECREATION COMMISSION
5:00 p.m.
March 16, 1987
Safety and Service Center
COMMISSIONERS
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Donovan called the Meeting to order at
5:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present - Chairperson Donovan, Commissioners Dahlquist,
Lawson, Morrison, Popovich, Regan and Wright.
Absent - None.
Staff Present:
Dave Bradstreet, Director of Parks and Recreation
Keith Beverly, Management Analyst
Doug Duncanson, Parks Superintendent
Mark Steyaert, Park Planner
Ken Price, Principal Recreation Supervisor
PUBLIC OPEN FORUM;
There was no one present wishing to address the Commission
during theypoblic open forum.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The Minutes of the Meeting held February 23, 1987, were
approved as amended.
On the vote on the January 19, 1987, Minutes, Commissioner
Wright abstained, as he was absent.
Page 2, Item D Ballfleld Analysis, the number one
statement should be changed as follows:
Eliminate separate youth and adult sport categories.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA;
Dave Bradstreet requested a change in the order of the
Agenda under Unfinished Business, as follows: A, F, C, B
and D to be heard in that order.
The Agenda was approved as amended.
APPOINT SCRIBE;
Commissioner Regan was appointed Scribe for this meeting.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS;
A. Scribe Report
Chairperson Donovan called attention to the Scribe Report
contained in the packet.
Donovan
Dahlquist
Lawson
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
Wright
MINUTES
P^RKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
COMMISS.ONERS
NEW BUSINESS:
F. Hosp Grove Financing
Ray Patchett, Assistant City Manager, aave a report on
Hosp Grove Financing, referring to the Council Agenda Bill
with Hosp Grove Financing alternatives outlined, and the
memorandum from the City Manager to the City Council dated
March 13, 1987. Mr. Patchett stated he wanted to report
to this Commission some of the variations to the
alternatives. The suggestion had been made to consider
Hosp Grove a park. This would allow the use of Park-In-
Lieu Funds and PFF. The suggestion was to classify Hosp
Grove as a park and combine the northeast and northwest
quadrants into one north park district. This would
incorporate all the area north of Palomar Airport Road
into a single district. By designating Hosp Grove as a
park, the 20 acres of the Robertson site, which is
designated as a future community park, could be deleted
and the $2.5 million dollars that has been set aside for
purchase of that property could be used for acquiring Hosp
Grove. An amount of $500,000 would be appropriated from
the existing revenue sharing funds for the purchase,
together with borrowing $3.*f million from the Sewer Fund.
This would then be incurring $850,000 a year pay back from
the Public Facilities Fee.
Mr. Patchett stated he would like input from the
Commissioners as to their feelings about classifying Hosp
Grove as a park. He stated this would be discussed at the
Council meeting tomorrow night, and he would like to have
the topic discussed at this time.
Dave Bradstreet pointed out the Robertson property site on
a wall map and stated since the population figures have
been revised downward, the Robertson property might not be
needed to bring park land up to standards.
In answer to Commission query, staff indicated Larwin is
counted as a community park. Staff could not recommend
taking Larwin out of the community park figures until
someone said it was not developable as an active park.
Ray Patchett stated maintenance for Hosp Grove would come
from the General Fund, whether it was considered a park or
not. The PFF is used to construct facilities, not for
operational costs.
In answer to Commission query regarding the use of Hosp
Grove, If considered a park, Mr. Patchett stated the 52
acres would be classified as passive/natural, with an
interpretive center and trails. This would infringe on
active parks and reduce that number.
Dave Bradstreet stated the City did not want to accept
open space areas that had trails in them and would not at
this time accept any of that type of park land. The
existing 27 acres and the trails were already there and
had been accepted by the City previous to the change in
the park element. He added some of the land in Hosp Grove
could be used for parking, picnic areas, and perhaps a
safer duck feeding area. However, some of that land is
undevelopable because of the steepness of the
embankments.
—
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
March 16, 1987 Page 3
COMMISSIONERS
NEW BUSINESS: (continued)
Keith Beverly handed out sheets of statistics to the
Commissioners and went through those numbers page by page.
This report gave the community park acres necessary in the
four quadrants and gave the number of acres available at
the present time. The report also contained the number of
ballfields and playing fields available now and needed at
buildout.
Commission Dahlquist stated her concern with "watering
down" the park areas by classifying Hosp Grove as a park,
for people only use that type of an area for "cutting
through."
Commissioner Regan stated the goal of Parks and Recreation
was to have parks within a certain ratios of all homes.
If the Robertson site was dropped and the northern
quadrant was made Into one complete district, the
northeast quadrant would be shorted. That would then
change the goals of the Parks and Recreation element.
Dave Bradstreet answered, stating they have tried to put
the parks where the people are, and there are not that
many people in the Robertson area. Also, with the Growth
Management Plan, there will not be that much development
in that area. The projected population for that area has
been decreased considerably.
In answer to query regarding Macario Canyon Park, Dave
Bradstreet explained that park contains 280 acres, plus 92
acres leased land. There has been 25 acres credited to
each quadrant from Macario Canyon and the suggestion has
been made to still credit those 25 acres to each quadrant.
The only amenities where the City would fall short would
be soccer fields.
In answer to Commission question regarding the status of
the Robertson site, Mr. Bradstreet stated it is owned by a
private party, and there is $2.5 million in the CIP for
acquisition of this property.
The consensus of the Parks and Recreation Commission was
they were against designating Hosp Grove as a park and
deleting the Robertson land as a future park.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS; (continued)
C. Larwin Community Park Status
Dave Bradstreet gave the report on this item, stating the
Commission at the last meeting discussed getting bids on
performing a development feasibility study of Larwin Park,
and wanted to discuss the matter further.
Commissioner Wright stated he would like to see the
Robertson property used as developable park land and
Larwin as open space.
Commissioner Lawson agreed and stated he recognized the
comment made by Ray Patchett anticipating a feasibility
study for about $5,000, but his concern at the last
meeting was that it was not clear what all it would cost
the City to determine whether or not Larwin was useable
park land. He felt the Commissioner needed to find out
the feasibility of that land, and he could support that.
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
March !6, 1987 Page COMMISSIONERS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: (continued)
Commissioner Dalhouist stated that when that area was
chosen, it was near a future high school area. She asked
whether that was still being considered.
Commissioner Wright answered, stating the schooi system is
going to revise their present plant and in about five or
seven years, they will be looking at a second site. The
site will be the ^4 acres next to the Rancho Carlsbad
area.
Commissioner Regan stated the Commission had looked at the
Larwin site so many times, she would like to see a
feasibility study at the cost mentioned. She added it was
not an attractive open space area at this time. She would
like a professional to determine what can be done with
that area.
In answer to guery as to whether there was a problem with
changing the status of Larwin, Dave Bradstreet stated it
is now included as a community park. Mr. Bradstreet asked
the Commission whether they wanted to count Larwin as a
community park or did they want to change this. If this
is changed to a special use area or open space, he would
have to check that.
The price of the feasibility study was discussed with the
amount being approximately $11,000+. Mr. Bradstreet
stated that once it was determined whether Larwin was
developable, there would be other studies that would have
to be done.
Ray Patchett stated the Larwin area is considered as
passive now and not developable.
Commissioner Wright said that was his concern and he felt
it was a legitimate reason for changing the status.
Chairperson Donovan inquired whether, with the purchase of
Hosp Grove and the City in a saving mode, would it be the
right time to have a feasibility study at a cost of
$11,000+. Ray Patchett answered, yes, it would be, if the
Commission wanted to deal with the issue of whether or not
Larwin was developable.
Commissioner Lawson stated his preference for a limit
being placed on the amount of money to be spent for a
feasibility study. Dave Bradstreet answered they were
going to attempt to keep the cost as low as possible for
this study, and he would ask the help of the Parks and
Recreation Commission through their Park Site Committee.
The two Commissioners designated to work with staff were
Commissioners Dalhquist and Lawson.
Parks and Recreation Commission turned the feasibility
study of Larwin over to the Park Site Committee to work
with staff to come up with a plan for a feasibility study
for Larwin.
Dononvan
Dahlquist
Lawson
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
Wright
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
March 16, 1987 Page 5 COMMISSIONERS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: (continued)
B. Annual Report Presentation
Dave Bradstreet stated there would be a slide presentation
on the annual report to give an update on where the Parks
and Recreation Department is, where they have been, and
their accomplishments.
At the conclusion of the slide presentation, Dave
Bradstreet stated the slides were available to be shown to
any group.
D. Surplus State Park Property/Cannon Lake
Dave Bradstreet gave the report on this item, stating he
had written to the State Parks and Recreation Department
regarding the land between the City's Cannon Lake park and
the area known as Palomar Triangle. He stated the
Commission had wanted that area passive in nature.
Commissioner Dahlguist had asked for the minutes of that
meeting to be pulled in order to ascertain whether or not
the Commission voted on their preference for this land.
Dave Bradstreet stated the Commission had told staff to
look into the availability of surplus land located to the
south of the triangle piece. The State Parks and
Recreation Department asked in their letter whether or not
Carlsbad wished to pursue the purchase of the four acres
of surplus land. Mr. Bradstreet stated there is a lot of
water on that land, and if the City wanted to buy it,
there would be around 11 acres that would be useable. He
stated the reason this was designated as a passive area
was because of the neighbors, the water and the train
tracks. He stated there was a possibility there could be
some tennis in that area. Mr. Bradstreet stated the
direction of the Commission was for a passive area with
parking, picnic areas and restrooms.
After further discussion, the question was brought up
about not designating the use with the request to purchase
the land. The Commissioners wanted staff to acquire the
land and determine the use at a later date.
Parks and Recreation Commission requested staff to pursue
the acquisition of approximately four acres of State
Park land in the vicinity of Cannon Lake.
Chairperson Donovan stated the Commission would determine
what disposition to make of this land at a later time.
She also directed staff to check out whether or not the
Commission voted on the use of that area at a previous
meeting.
Donovan
Dahlquist
Lawson
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
Wright
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
March 16' 1"7 Paae 6 COMMISSIONERS
NEW BUSINESS: (continued)
A. Carlsbad Booster Club Request
Dave Bradstreet reported this item had been pulled from
the agenda, as no papers had been received.
Commission Wright added the Booster Club wanted to see
about getting the same fee that the seniors pay for
holding a binqo game. However, at this point they have
decided they are going to use the High School for this
activity.
B. Vending Machines in Park Areas
Dave Bradstreet gave the report on this item, stating
requests have come into the Parks and Recreation
Department from vendors wanting to install vending
machines in the parks. In answer to query regarding
whether there was a problem with upkeep of machines, Dave
Bradstreet replied, yes, there had been. There is not
only a problem with the machines, but with vandalism.
Parks and Recreation Commission denied requests to install
vending machines in park areas.
C. Grading Request/Macario Canyon Park
Keith Beverly, Management Analyst, gave the staff report,
stating the Engineering Department had sent this request
for the Commission's approval to grade a small parcel of
land within Macario Canyon. This would be a half acre
parcel in the area where the Canyon overlooks the rock
quarry. The encroachment would be 18,000 square feet,
with the alternative to be a crib-type wall. Staff viewed
the site and did not feel this would create any problem
with the slope. The developer is quite willing to
cooperate as far as any landscaping the City would dictate
to be done to that area to eliminate any further
problems.
Parks and Recreation Commission approved a request from
Robert P. and Richard C. Kelly to grade a small parcel of
land located outside Macario Canyon that would spill over
onto the City's land. The developer will work with the
Parks and Recreation Department on landscaping the slope.
Commissioner Lawson abstained because of professional
conflict of interest.
Commissioner Wright left the meeting at 6:*9 p.m.
Donovan
Dahlquist
Lawson
Morrison
Popov ich
Reaan
Wright
Donovan
Dahlquist
Lawson
Morrison
Popov ich
Regan
Wright
X
X
X
X
Xx_
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
March 16, 1987 Page 7 COMMISSIONERS
NEW BUSINESS: (continued)
D. Beach Planning Meeting
Dave Bradstreet gave the report on this item, stating it
was an information item only. There will be another
meeting on April 2, to work up an agenda for future
meetings and talk about the City's interest in taking some
islands along Carlsbad, making them useable and leasing
them.
E. Formation of Commission Brochure
Commissioner Lawson explained this request as a follow-up
to the annual report presentation. He felt this
Commission should be more active and directed staff to
look into the formation of a brochure. He felt questions
should include what the Parks and Recreation Commission
is, describe it, give the roles of the Commissioners and
what the Commission does for the City. Also, there should
be a way to get the public's concerns addressed by the
Commission and list the Commissioners. He felt there was
a need for communication between this Commission and the
public that would aid in the Commission's task.
Commissioner Dahlquist stated in the program that goes out
the Commissioners are listed and there could be another
areas included on that program to address these concerns.
She would suggest that the program be expanded to include
this information without the additional cost of a
completely new brochure.
Commissioner Lawson stated he did not wish this to be an
action item, just an information item.
Commissioner Regan added It could possibly be done with a
one page Insert Into the program, also with copies of that
available in the Parks and Recreation Department.
Commissioner Dahlquist left the meeting at 6:58 p.m.
Chairperson Donovan stated It was important to let the
community know how this Commission works and how they can
voice their concerns. She suggested perhaps a quarter
page of the local newspaper be used to report to the
community the information needed and suggested by
Commissioner Lawson.
The consensus of the Commission was there should be some
form of communication between the Parks and Recreation
Commission and the general public and everything should be
done to get that information out to the public as to how
the Commission does function and how the public can
communicate with the Commission.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT;
Dave Bradstreet asked the opinion of the Commission as to
the newsletter, and the Commissioners commented it was
excellent.
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
March 16, 1987 Paqe 8 COMMISSIONERS
ITEMS FOR THE NEXT AGENDA:
Chairperson Donovan stated she would like an Item on the
next agenda regarding the parcel of land across from the
school on Levante. She would like to look into the
possibility of selling that land.
Chairperson Donovan requested another agenda item on the
actual cost of putting on the triathlon. This is the
complete cost to the City as a whole, the participants
where they come from, and a comparison of the costs and
revenue.
SCRIBE REPORT:
Commissioner Regan gave the Scribe Report.
Chairperson Donovan reminded the Commissioner of the Joint
Meeting tomorrow night with the City Council at 6:00 p.m.,
at the Safety and Service Center.
ADJOURNMENT;
By proper motion, the Meeting of March 16, 1987, was
adjourned at 7:04 p.m. The next meeting will be April 20,
1987, at the Safety and Service Center.
Respectfully submitted,
HARRIETT BABBITT
Minutes Clerk
HB:tb
March 19, 1987
TO: RAYMOND PATCHETT, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
DEVELOPMENT AND PARK PLANNING SCHEDULE
As I discussed at our Wednesday staff meeting, it was
apparent from last Tuesday's Council meeting that our
park construction policy is not clear to everyone. I
think it will help if we relate the timing of park con-
struction to building houses and not to "development"
which is a lengthy process. Also, a graphic represen-
tation will help clarify the point.
To that end, I have prepared a graphic — which I shared
with you at the staff meeting. As you asked, I discussed
it with both Phil Carter and the Assistant Planning Dir-
ector and both of them thought it was a good idea and
was an accurate representation of the planning process.
Attached is a cleaned up version of the graphic for your
use. I have also given copies to those listed below.
Phil said he will use it in the Facilities Management
material. I am also preparing an overhead graphic for
use at Council i'f you desire. I have not distributed
a copy of the graphic to Council pending your approval.
RICHARD H. ALLEN
RHA/mm
Attachment - 2 copies of graphic: "Development and
Park Planning Schedule"
c: City Manager
Community Development Director
City Engineer
Planning Director
Assistant Planning Director
Finance Director
Parks and Recreation Director
Keith Beverly ''',
Phil Carter
Elin Thorgfen
ATTACHMENT B
111
QLU
I
O
CO
O
CO
UJ
CO
O
Q
ffi
QC
<a.
l-DC
O
DI£
CO g
LU
^Q.
O_l
UJ>
LU
O
h-oD
OC *g 5§ "•O
I
00
oo
I
zUJ
DC
<a.
I
COLU
Q
IS
Oo
t
FINAL MAPAPPROVALfc
•*V.
!*•DEDICATEPARKLANDO —e
0)
E
Q.O
f
>
°QC
UJ
K-
UJ
O•e
MINUTES
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION May 19, 1986 Page 2
COMMISSIONERS
Parks & Recreation Commission recommended che City of Carlsbad
select ERA Associates to conduct the Golf Course Feasibility
Study.
D. Cannon Lake Park
Dave Bradstreet reported SDG&E had notified the City they
were in the process of enlarging their plant area, and would
like to have Cannon Park land back, as agreed in the lease
between SDG&E and the City. This was presented to this
Commission at the last meeting, and SDG&E indicated it was
willing to contribute $100,000 toward other land in that
area to compensate for the loss of Cannon Park.
The Commission directed staff Co return with alternative
plans for Cannon Lake Park and cost estimates.
Hark Steyaert continued the report, referring to two wall
charts indicating che land owned by the State, the City and
State Parks & Recreation. Two plans were shown, one, Plan
A, was described as a rustic/passive area and the second,
Plan B, was a passive/semi-active park. The first plan
proposed a camping area, restrooms, picnic area and parking.
The second plan would have soccer fields in che State-owned
area, and no camping area. Both plans are contingent upon
further studies.
Lynn Chase explained the camping area would be used for
group activities on a reservation basis. This would be
occasional use, and not open for public camping. The lake
is a concern, as far as liability is concerned. The wacer
would be under controlled use under organized supervised
programs offered by Parks & Recreacion. Anyone jusc enCering
the area without a reservation would be trespassing. The
railroad tracks were also a concern, and a ten-.foot fence
was proposed for the entire area along the railroad tracks.
The entire plan needs more study and careful consideration.
Dave Bradstreet stated there would be 10.7 acres, and using
a $60,000 an acre cost for basic grading, restrooms, parking,
etc., and adding design, engineering, administration and
other costs, this would be a 1.3 million dollar project.
Mark Steyaert explained the parking proposed under the
power lines, and additional parking provided in both plans.
Doug Duncanson, in answer to. query, stated Che land does
become covered with water at times, and this is an added
concern.
Commissioner Conti expressed his desire for a passive park,
with benches, flowers and grass.
Commissioner Dahlquist stated It would be difficult to trade
an active park, such as Cannon Park, for a passive park.
The comment was made that Cannon Park is actually a grass
area.
Vice-Chairperson Donovan inquired how staff planned to keep
Che use organized, and Dave Bradstreet answered they would
monitor the area and probably gate part of the park.
Mark Steyaert seated che area is buffered on the east by
shrubs and more shrubs and plants would be placed there co
increase Che buffer.
Donovan
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
ATTACHMENT C
MINUTES
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION May 19, 1986, Page 4
COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner Dahlquist seated she liked Plan B, the semi/
active park. Commissioner Morrison stated her preference
for the rustic/passive park. She felt all types or organi-
zations and people need to have their needs considered.
Commissioners Popovich, Donovan and Regan concurred.
Commissioner Regan said she would like staff to investigate
whether there is a Coastal Commission requirement for
Cannon Park. If they have designated that as open space,
the park may not be lost to the City.
Commissioner Conti reiterated his choice of a park area with
benches, trees and flowers. He would like a grassy area.
Dave Bradstreet stated this item will be on next month's
agenda.
B. Senior Citizen Community Center - Feasibility Study
Commissioner Conti referred to a handout distributed to
Commission members, with the recommendations. He used
drawings of the two different proposals by the school district
and stated the committee had four meetings during the last
month. They felt che senior center building would need to
be 16,000 or 17,000 square feet to allow for future growth.
The senior center part of the proposal would be the same
in both cases, with the administration offices of the school
being the difference in plans. There is ample space on this
parcel to have a one-story building, which is less expensive
to build. The Committee recommended Concept #2, and made
recommendations, copies of which were given to the Commission.
Mr. Conti concluded his report saying it was necessary to
get this firmed up and get the project moving.
Dave Bradstreet summarized the report, stating the report
says it is feasible to tear down the building on Harding
Street and build a new building approximately the same size,
but it is not practical.
The school district proposed the plan before the Commission,
and the Senior Citizen Commission adopted Concept #2. Mr.
Bradstreet asked for a recommendation from the Parks &
Recreation Commission to enable staff to work with the school
board to pursue this concept. The financing would have to
be worked out. This is in the Redevelopment area, and
Redevelopment funds could be acquired to purchase the land
and build the center. That will be looked into.
Commissioner Dahlquist stated the Commission had indicated
they did not want the Harding Street buildine demolish*"1.
She suggested the schools could use the Parks & Recreation are
for their buses, after Parks had moved back to Harding Street.
Mr. Bradstreet said that has been 'suggested. He added the
Senior Citizen Commission had stated if Pine Street fell
through, they would again consider Harding Street.
Mr. Bradstreet requested the Commission endorse the Senior
Citizen Evaluation Report and Concept #2.
Parks & Recreation Commission adopted the Senior Citizen
Evaluation Report and Concept #2.
(Page 9 of RSI Report, recommendations 1, 2 and 3.)
Donovan
Conti
Dahlquist
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
MINUTES
Oune 16, 1986
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Page 3 COMMISSIONERS
r>
Commissioner Conti asked Dave Bradstreet approximately
when the 30 acres from Hunt would be dedicated. A
representative from Sammis answered that It would probably
be at the end of the year. There was discussion on
whether 30 acres would meet the standard when the entire
quadrant was bulltout. The answer was no. It was also
discussed If whether the amount of money that Sammis would
put Into the park would be enough to develop all 10 acres.
Mr. Brlggs stated that they would give the City a finished
park and If the cost went over their required amount they
would get a credit from the City for their Public Facility
Fund requirement.
The Parks 4 Recreation Commission directed Dave Bradstreet
to continue negotiating with Sammis and to come back to
the 3uly meeting with more Information regarding projected
park development costs for five years from now.
C. Cannon Park
Keith Beverly, Administrative Assistant, stated that
neither the City nor SDG<S£ have found anything to back up
what was mentioned in the Qulsenberry letter regarding the
Planning Commission minutes and the SDG4E proposal for
Cannon Park site in 1963.
In regards to the Commission's Inquiry of the zoning of
Cannon Park, Mr. Bradstreet stated it has been identified
as open space on the Agua Hedionda Local Coastal Plan and
the Carlsbad General Plan. He stated that In order for
SDC4E to pursue development plans of Cannon Park, they
will be required to follow the process for zone changes
with the City of Carlsbad.
D. Stagecoach Community Park Update
Dave Bradstreet updated the Commission on the development
of Stagecoach Community Park. He Informed the Commission
that the Contractor has asked for a 40-day extension
because they could not get access to a certain area of the
park due to a slide problem. Staff is evaluating their
request and will be making a decision on whether or not to
grant the extension.
Dave Bradstreet also gave an update on the grading
situation. The grader, H & A, has filed a claim for
excess money for removal of additional dirt. Staff Is in
the process of analyzing this, request and will be coming
back to the Parks 4 Recreation Commission with a
recommendation to the City Manager's Office.
Mr. Bradstreet informed the Commission of another problem
they have encountered. He explained that a developer of
the property on the south side of the park discovered that
a portion of the property was found to have a slide
condition and may affect a portion of Stagecoach Park.
This required us to halt development in this section of
the park. Construction has now started up again. They
have geologists analyzing the situation and staff Is
currently evaluating the results.
PROPERTY NANAGENENT INDEX - ALPHABETICAL 10/36
LOCATION
Alga Road
Alga Road
1906 Arenal Road
Aura Circle
6200 Avenida Encinas
6200 Avenida Encinas
6200 Avenida Encinas
1620 Basswood Avenue
Batiquitos Drive
Batiquitos Drive
Batiquitos Drive
Batiquitos Drive
258 Beech Avenue
Blenkarne
1601 Buena Vista Way
Cadencia Street
Cadencia Street
Calavera
Calavera
Calavera
Calavera
Calavera
Camino De Los Ondas
Cannon Road
Carlsbad Boulevard
Carlsbad Boulevard
Carrillo Ranch
3701 Catalina
Chestnut
Chestnut
Chestnut
Chestnut
Columbine
Cordoba
Corintia
Cynthia Lane
Donna Drive, N. Ext.
Donna Drive
Donna Drive
Donna Drive
Donna Drive
1166 Elm Avenue
1200 Elm Avenue
ELn Avenue
1275 Elm Avenue
APN'S
215-501-36
215-504-12
215-140-19
207-230-40
211-030-06
211-030-08
214-010-08
205-060-26
214-366-26
214-366-27
214-368-01
214-390-33
203-142-04
167-130-42
156-200-16
223-271-25
223-271-26
167-101-09
168-020-12
163-020-13
168-020-18
168-020-19
214-252-39
210-090-17
155-200-01
155-200-02
222-011-03
167-150-01
167-070-19
167-270-48
167-393-40
167-393-41
215-515-07
207-? 40-46
215-410-15
156-230-25
156-090-42
167-180-31
205-151-11
205-153-24
205-330-10
156-180-32(Port)
156-180-34(8)
156-190-38
156-190-41
RPN'S
100129
100130
1001 27
100095
100109
100110
100119
100075
100124
100125
100123
100126
100062
100043
100026
100142
100143
100041
100057
100058
100059
100060
100122
100107
100004
100005
100134
100046
100036
100052
100055
100056
100132
100096
100128
100030
100012
100048
100084
100082
100065
100018(2)
100020(8)
100024
100022
USE
Median
Median
Fire Station #2
Blocker Strip
Part of Encina Plant
Part of Encina Plant
Part of Encina Sewer Plant
Right of Way/Games Dr. Ass. Dist.
Spinnaker Hills Open Space
Spinnaker Hills Open Space
Spinnaker Hills Open Space
Spinnaker Hills Open Space
Magee House
Blocker Strip
Buena Vista Reservoir
Cadencia Park
Cadencia Park
Calavera Hills Plant
Lake Calavera Property
Lake Calavera Property
Lake Calavera Property
Lake Calavera Property
Right of Way
Cannon Lake Park
Home Plant
Home Plant
Carrillo Ranch Park
Fire Station #3
Water Tank
Blocker Strip
Open Space
Open Space
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Fuerte Park
Easement
Easement
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
P&R Office/Yard
City Hall Complex
Parking Lot/Fire Station
Fire Station #1
ATTACHMENT E
- 2 -
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INDEX - ALPHABETICAL 10/86
LOCATION
Elm Avenue
Elm Avenue
Elm Avenue
Elm Avenue
ELn Avenue
Elm Avenue
Elm Avenue
Elm Avenue
Elm Avenue
Eureka Place
Eureka Place
3215 Eureka Place
3237 Eureka Place
Glasgow Drive
Gloria Lane
Harding Street
Harding Street
Harding Street
Harding Street
Highland Drive
Hillside Drive
Hillside Drive
Hosp Grove
Hosp Grove
Games Drive
Dames Drive
Oanis Way
Oeanne Place
Jefferson Street
Oefferson Street
Knowles & Pio Pico
La Costa Avenue
La Costa Avenue
La Costa Avenue
La Golondrina
Laguna Drive
Laguna Drive
Laguna Drive
Lake Calavera
Linmar Lane
Macario Canyon
Macario Canyon
Macario Canyon
Macario Canyon
Macario Canyon
APN'S
156-190-51
156-190-56
156-220-19
156-220-21
167-090-41
167-090-44
167-090-48
167-090-49
167-250-26(2)
205-111-17
205-111-24
205-111-26
205-111-27(4)
167-101-07
207-130-30
203-352-12
203-353-05
203-353-06
203-353-07
156-051-21
207-240-48
207-271-08
156-340-15
156-080-13
207-130-28
207-130-29
167-240-24
207-130-42
156-301-01
156-301-02
156-164-60
223-120-33
223-120-35
223-J50-50
215-541-22
155-200-08
156-164-52
156-164-53
168-040-02
206-041-07
212-010-05
212-010-07
212-010-11
212-010-12
212-010-13
RPN'S
100023
100025
100027
100028
100037
100038
100039
100040
100051
100077
100078
100079
100060
100145
100090
100068
100069
100070
100071
100007
100098
100102
100147
100010
100088
100069
100050
100093
100033
100034
100017
1001 37
100138
100139
100133
100006
100014
100015
100061
100066
100112
100113
100114
100115
100116
USE
Parking Lot/Fire Station
Land East of Library
Elm Avenue Slopes
Elm Avenue Slopes
Larwin Park
Larwin Park
Larwin Park
Larwin Park
Elm Reservoir
Part of Holiday Park
Part of Holiday Park
Kruger House
Part of Holiday Park
Calavera Hills Park
Blocker Strip
Community Center
Community Center
Community Center
Community Center
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Open Space
Open Space
Blocker Strio
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Hosp Easement
Hosp Easement
Right of Way
Levante Open Space
Levante Open Space
Levante Open Space
Blocker Strip
Maxon Brown Park
Lot
Lot
Water
Blocker Strip
Macario Park
Macario Park
Macario Park
Macario Park
Macario Park
PROPERTY HANAGENENT INDEX - ALPHABETICAL
- 3 -
10/36
LOCATION
Macario Canyon
Macario Canyon
Maezel Lane
Manzano Drive
Matron Road
Marron Road
Mimosa Drive
Mission Avenue
Mission Estancia
Mission Estancia
Mission Estancia
Mission Estancia
Mission Estancia
Mission Estancia
Monroe Street
Monroe Street
3401 Monroe Street
Monroe/Donna - Alley
Neblina Drive
4-05 Oak Street
405 Oak Street
Orion Way
Pajama Drive
Palm Avenue
Park & Kelly
7621 Paseo Del Norte
Paseo Del Norte
Paseo Del Norte
Pio Pico
Pio Pico
Pio Pico
Poinsettia Lane
Pueblo Street
Pueblo Street
Rancho Santa Fe Road
Refugio
Roosevelt Street
Roosevelt Street
Roosevelt Street
Roosevelt Street
San Marcos Canyon
Sevil la
Sierra Morena
Skyline Road
State Street
APN'S
212-030-06
212-030-15
205-080-48
210-113-23
156-080-10
156-080-11
215-513-25
160-550-01
223-060-40
223-060-41
223-060-42
223-060-43
223-060-45
223-060-46
156-280-22
156-280-23
205-140-27
205-151-03
207-300-36
204-010-05
204-010-06
209-050-26
149-070-47
204-193-01
207-241-02
211-060-08
21^-140-39
214-300-09
156-180-33
156-180-41
156-230-58
214-353-08
223-180-08
223-380-25
223-050-66
207-240-47
203-304-02
203-304-03
203-304-04
203-304-05
223-050-43
207-240-49
167-270-51
207-100-44
203-054-29
RPH'S
1001 17
1001 18
100076
100108
100008
100009
100131
100035
1001 36
100157
100158
100159
100151
100160
100032
100031
100081
100063
100103
100072
100073
100146
100001
100074
100100
100111
100120
100144
100019
100021
100029
100121
100140
100141
100149
100097
100154
100153
100152
100150
100135
100099
100054
100037
100148
USE
Macario Park
Macario Park
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
Open Space Trail - Hosp
Open Space Trail - Hosp
Blocker Strip
San Luis Rey Warehouse
Stagecoach Park
Stagecoach Park
Stagecoach Park
Stagecoach Park
Stagecoach Park
Stagecoach Park
Open Space Trail - Hosp
Open Space Trail - Hosp
Swimming Pool
Blocker Strip
Blocker Strip
City Yard
City Yard
Safety Center
Mesa Drive Reservoir
Continuation School
Laguna Riviera Park
Car Country Park
Altamira Open Space
Open Space
Park's Maintenance Yard
Oak Park
Pio Pico Park
Abondon Park Site
La Costa Canyon Park
La Costa Canyon Park
Fire Station #6
Blocker Split
Roosevelt Street Parking Lot
Roosevelt Street Parking Lot
Roosevelt Street Parking Lot
Roosevelt Street Parking Lot
San Marcos Canyon Open Space
Blocker Split
Blocker Split
Skyline Reservoir
Alley
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INDEX - ALPHABETICAL 10/36
LOCATION
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street (near)
1265 Stratford Lane
Tamarack
Tamarack
Tamarack
Tamarack
Trieste Drive
Trieste & El Camino
Trieste & El Camino
Trieste & El Camino
Truesdell
Unknown
Unknown
Valencia
Valewood
Westwood Drive
Westwood Drive
APN'S RPN'S USE
203-294-02 100063 Parking Lot
203-294-03 100064 Parking Lot
203-294-04 100065 Parking Lot
203-294-05 100066 Parking Lot
203-294-06 100067 Parking Lot
203-296-10 100155 RR R/W AT&SF
156-164-23 100016 Lot
207-072-19 100156 Blocker Strip
207-130-31 100091 Blocker Strip
207-130-32 100092 Blocker Strip
207-130-54 100094 Blocker Strip
167-220-32 100049 Blocker Strip
208-050-59 100104 Open Space - Woodbine Banks
208-060-55 100105 Open Space - Woodbine Banks
208-070-01 100106 Open Space - Woodbine Banks
167-130-43 10004-4 Blocker Strip
155-170-37 100002 Drainage Easement
155-170-46 100003 Drainage Easement
207-250-59 100101 Blocker Strip
167-270-49 100053 Blocker Strip
167-130-44 100045 Blocker Strip
167-180-41 100047 Blocker Strip
SELL/TRADE
This classification includes areas which are unsuitable for recreation due
to size, location, or physical conditions. These areas should either be
sold or traded for areas of higher recreation value.
Areas within the Sell/Trade classification include:
Cannon Lake Park
Fuerte Park
Larwin Park
Occidental Park
Hosp Grove
San Marcos Creek
Levante Canyon/Lot
Alta Mira
REHABILITATION
Facilities no longer providing adequate recreational opportunities should
be rehabilitated. This condition is due to either existing facilities
that lack attraction appeal or popular facilities that require re-conditioning
or updated facilities. Areas classified for Rehabilitation are:
Cannon Park
Holiday Park
Chase Fields
Pine Field
OPEN SPACE
This classification includes land of significant ecological value or land
possessing a potential liability that it requires being left in a natural
state. Although organized recreational opportunities are not compatible
61
March 31, 1987
TO: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
FROM: KEN PRICE, PRINCIPAL RECREATION SUPERVISOR
FINANCIAL SUMMARY CARLSBAD TRIATHLON
Attached you will find the financial summary for the 1986 Carlsbad
Triathlon.
It should be noted that there are no expenditures identified
for the services of the Police and Streets Departments. As
you are aware, there is no inter-departmental billing; however,
the monies have been documented for budget purposes only. They
are as follows:
Police Dept. $690.00
Streets Dept. $930.45
$1,620.45
If you have any questions regarding this summary or the Carlsbad
Triathlon, please feel free to call.
KP:lt
Attachment
ATTACHMENT F
1986 CARLSBAD TRIATHLON
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
REVENUE $25,851.45
EXPENDITURES $20,958.02
NET + $ 4,843.43
Revenue;
Entry Fees $23,910.00
Co-Sponsors 1,100.00
T-Shirt Sales 500.00
Photography Sales 177.45
Insurance Refund 89.00
Adidas Refund 75.00
$25,851.45
Expenditures;
Race T-Shirts $ 4,475.69
Awards 1,255.04
Printing 1,047.00
Race Results/Bike Racks 1,925.00
Pre-Registration Social 1,300.00
Liability Insurance 1,222.00
Triathlon Federation Sanctioning Fee 150.00
Staff (Full/Part Time) 8,104.83
Hudson (1-5 Ramp Closing) 365.23
Swim Buoys 131.73
Film and Processing 318.54
State of California Beach Permit 25.00
A.B.C. License 16.00
Race Bib Numbers 280.00
Adidas Flag Deposit 75.00
Petty Cash 106.86
Postage 160.10
$20,958.02
8/86
MARCH 30, 1987
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Planning Director
RESPONSE TO PARK INVENTORY/DESIGNATION QUESTIONS
At the public hearing for the Local Facilities Management Plan
for Zone 3 on March 18, there were several questions raised
concerning the park inventory in Park District 1 (Northwest
Quadrant). David Bradstreet, Parks and Recreation Director, has
provided a response which is attached to this memo.
The parks inventory section of Local Facilities Management
Plan for Zone 3 has been modified to include the ownership and
type of parks listed. The following summarizes Mr. Bradstreet's
response.
1. At the January 20, 1986 meeting, the Parks and Recreation .
Commission voted to reclassify existing neighborhood parks
as Community Parks to correspond with the 1982 Parks and
Recreation Element revisions.
2. At the January 20, 1986 meeting, the Parks and Recreation
Commission also voted to credit 100 acres of Macario Canyon
Park into the Community Park classification and to credit
each park district with 25 acres of community parks.
3. On April 20, 1986, the Parks Commission recommended the
realignment of the park district boundaries to correspond to
the city's four quadrants and on February 23, 1987
officially endorsed a proposed Council agenda bill to make
this boundary change.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH/POC/arb
cc : Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director
David Bradstreet, Parks St Recreation Director i
Attachment ATTACHMENT G
March 24, 1987
TO: MARTY ORENYAK, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
ZONE 3 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN/PARKS CONCERN
In an effort to standardize and consolidate park facilities, the
Parks and Recreation Commission, on January 20, 1986 voted
unanimously to categorize all park facilities into the classifications
created by the 1982 revised Parks and Recreation element.
Specifically, those areas are community parks, special use areas
and special resource areas. Additionally, the Commission credited
a total of 100 acres of the Macario Cayon Park to the community
park inventory of each of the four park districts (25 acres each).
The most recent review of the parks inventory by the Commission was
on May 19, 1986. Although listed as an information item on the
agenda, no changes to the inventory were suggested.
On April 21, 1986, the Commission recommended the realignment of
the park district boundaries to be consistent with the Growth
Management program. The Commission officially endorsed the park
boundary change February 23, 1987 as part of a proposed Council
Agenda Bill for the revision of ordinances and procedures establishing
park-in-lieu fees.
KB: It
Attachments:Jan 20, 1986, PRC Agenda
Jan 20, 1986, PRC Minutes
Jan 20, 1986, PRC Agenda Attach G "PFF Revision"
Feb 10, 1986, PRC Agenda
PFF Update Report Jan 29, 1986
Feb 10, 1986 PRC Minutes
May 19, 1986 PRC Agenda
"Park Inventory" Attachment G, May 19, 1986, PRC Meeting
c: Ray Patchett, Assistant City Manager
Mike Holzmiller, Planning Director
Jim Hagaman, Research and Analysis Group
WRITE IT—II01VT SAY IT INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO 4"OATifr .c;;.."c "V, ,
REPLY ON THIS SHEET FROM
MARCH 19, 1987
TO: MARTY ORENYAK, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: Assistant Planning Director
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING - ZONE 3 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT
PLAN
The Planning Commission held their 1st public hearing on the Zone
3 Local Facility Management Plan last night and continued the
Plan until April 15. Public discussion was minimal at the
hearing but the Commission had a number of questions, raised
several major policy issues, and asked for numerous additions to
the text. The Commissioners had studied the Plan in detail and
the questions were well thought out and even raised some issues
that staff had not previously considered. Four of the major
issues are summarized below:
(1) Circulation - The Commission brought up the fact that
the standard for circulation states that intersections
cannot be projected to be below a level of service "D"
at peak hours and Zone 3 has several intersections that
are projected to fail at some time in the future. The
Planning Commissison understood that there are only 21
residential units remaining until buildout and that the
remaining development could not be responsible for all
the future improvements in the zone. They still felt,
however, that they needed to know when the improvements
would take place to mitigate the future failing
intersections. The majority of Commissioners felt they
could not confirm the circulation section until that
information is available upon completion of the Barton-
Aschman Traffic Study in April.
(2) Growth Control Point - Zone 3 will exceed the growth
control point established by Council by 66 units. The
Plan indicated that these units will be made up or
balanced from other zones in the northwest quadrant.
Members of the Commission wanted to know what zones may
be lowered because of the increase in Zone 3. Staff
felt that information in this regard would be
speculative and was not necessary for confirmation of
Zone 3.
(3) Parks - The park inventory listed in the Plan is the
latest list of community and other parks received from
the Parks and Recreation Department. Apparently some
of the parks listed as community parks in park district
1 (NW quadrant) are not listed in the Parks fc
Recreation Element of the General Plan. If that is the
case the Commissioners cannot make a finding that the
uocal Plan is consistent with the General Plan. Some
Commissioners raised concerns as to whether parks
should relate to non-residential construction as well
as the residential.
(4) Library - According to several Commissioners, the
wording in Proposition E may be interpreted to mean
that all construction, not just residential, must be
stopped until library services are brought up to
standard. Staff had felt that the standard in the
adopted Citywide Plan only applied to residential uses
and we had not considered Proposition E as a standard.
The additional work created by the required research and
revisions to Zone 3 will necessitate some amendment to the
schedule recently distributed by the Planning Director. Zone 4
was originally scheduled for Planning Commission on April 15.
The planning and engineering team for Zone 3 is also the team
working on Zone 4. It would appear that Zone 4 will have to be
trailed until May 1. This may affect the timing of other zones
as well. Once we know exactly what the Planning Commission wants
for Zone 3, however, it should establish a format for the
remainder of the zones.
CHARLES GRIMM
CG/arb
cc: Lloyd Hubbs
-2-
City of Carlsbad
Parks & Recreation Commission
City Council Chambers
January 20, 1986
5:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Public Open Forum
4. Approval of Minutes - December 16, 1985
5. Approval of Agenda
6. Appoint Scribe
7. Unfinished Business
A. Scribe Report
(Refer to Attachment "A")
B. McKellar Development
The department received a response
from the Planning Department regarding
the fence requirement at the McKellar
Development. (Refer to Attachment "B")
C. RFP for Golf Course Feasibility Study
It is requested that the Commission
endorse the RFP for the Golf Course
Feasibility Study. (Refer to Attachment "C")
D. Speed Soccer at Monroe Tennis Courts
The Commission received a complaint
concerning the speed soccer at the
Monroe Street Tennis Courts.
(Refer to Attachment "D")
8. New Business
A. Mini Golf Practice Range at Alta Mira
Mr. Allan Lynne would like to address the
Commission regarding the creation of a
mini golf practice range at Alta Mira.
Staff recommends that this item be referred
to the Park Site and Facility Planning
Committee for discussion. (Refer to
Attachment "E")
(Information)
(Information)
(Action)
(Information)
(Action)
B. Creation of a Foundation (Action)
Staff would like to address the
Commission regarding the creation of
a foundation to support recreational
activities. (Refer to Attachment "F")
ir^ C. PFF Revisions (Action)
Staff was directed to update the
calculations for the Public Facility
Fee (PFF). It is requested that the
Commission endorse the report.
(Refer to Attachment "G")
9. Council Report
10. Committee Reports
A.
B.
C.
11. Director's Report
(Refer to Green Sheet)
12. Additional Business
A. Election of new chairperson
B.
C.
13. Attachments
A. Library Board of Trustees Minutes
B. Planning Commission Minutes
C. City Manager's Blue Sheet
(Because of the Holiday, the next meeting will be
held February 10th in the Council Chambers.)
MINUTES
January 20. 1986 Page 5 W\ VjA \
\V&$W
COMMISSIONERS \3cA$N^
Parks 4 Recreation Conunission requested staff to find out
the details of the request to have a golf practice range
at Alta Mira and bring their report to the Park Site and
Facility Planning Committee.
Jim Smith, Alta Mira, addressed the Commission, stating
the golfers in all four areas of Alta Mira could get
together to support this request.
The Park Site and Facility Planning Committee for this
item will be Commissioners Conti, Popovich and Regan
B. Creation of a Foundation
This item was withdrawn from the Agenda and will be placed
on February 10 Agenda.
•Jr* C. PFF Revisions
Dave Bradstreet explained the revisions in the Public
Facilities Fees program, stating the figures now
represented 1986 dollars. He also referred to the park
inventory and stated he felt that should Include all the
small park areas previously not included in the calculation:
Parks & Recreation Commission endorsed and accepted the
report on the revisions for Public Facilities Fees, and
the addition of the small parks into the inventory.
D. Harding Street Center for Seniors
Dave Bradstreet reported Council had directed a feasibility
study to see whether the Site Committee's proposal of
razing the existing structure and building a 12,000 square
foot building is the appropriate size and location for
this center. Staff is also to incorporate into the study
what the displacement of recreation programs for the
Parks & Recreation Department would mean, the parking issue:
and the displacement of the seniors during construction.
Chairman Wright stated the Commission will have ample time
and opportunity to express opinions and make recommendation!
after the feasibility study and he felt no position should
be stated at this time.
Dave Bradstreet said it had been recommended that a
committee be appointed to study this report and sake
suggestions, with a member from the Parks & Recreation
Commission. Commissioners Dahlquist and Conti volunteered
to serve on any such committee.
COUNCIL REPORT:
Council Member Pet tine had left the meeting prior to this
item.
Wright
Conti
Dahlquist
Donovan
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
Wright
Conti
Dahlquist
Donovan
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3!
January 14, 1986
TO: JIM HAGAMAN, RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS GROUP
VIA: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
FROM: MARSHA PAYNE, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE (PFF)
Staff has updated the calculations for PFF. The overall costs to
develop the parks from PFF funds have now been changed to $40,393,750.
This is based on the following criteria:
1. The population standard has been revised to 150,000 at
build-out. Based on this new information, the park
acreage standards per thousand population at build-out
will be:
Spcial Resource Areas 375
Special Use Areas 75
Community Parks 300
2. The parks that are listed under the category of mini and
neighborhood have been transferred to the category of
Special Use Area for Community Parks (see attachment).
The revised acreage for the park standards are as follows:
SUA
1985
Standard
(45,000 pop.)
22.5
90
1985
Actual
Acres
63.3
99.2
1985
Deficit/
Surplus
40.8+
9.2+
Build-Out
Population
(150,000)
75
300
Acres Needed
to Reach
Build-Out
11.7
200.8
Parks
All this information was used to determine the costs to develop the
parks utilizing PFF funds. Acquisition is not included in the total
because it is to be financed from PIL Fees. The costs are:
SUA (11.7 x $87,500/acre) $ 1,023,750
Community Parks (200.8 x $87,500/acre 17,570,000
Macario (includes 25% increase over 1982 dollars) 14,000,000
Leo Carrillo 1,200,000
Community Centers (6 @ $1.1 million each*) 6,600,000
Grant Total $40,393,750
*This is the actual cost to construct a 17,000
sq. foot building in 1985.
If you need any further information, please give me a call at Ext. 5571
MP:jm Attachment G S~
REVISED
PARK INVENTORY
SPECIAL USE AREAS (SUA)
Site Quadrant
1. Car Country NW
2. Pio Pico NW
3. Oak NW
4. Maxton Browne NW
5. Rotary NW
6. Cannon NW
7. Larwin NE
8. Fuerte SE
9. Buena Vista Elem. NW
10. Cadencia SE
11. CHS Tennis Courts NW
12. Swim Complex NW
13. Chase Field NW
14. Harding Com. Center NW
15. Jefferson Elementary NW
16. Kelly Elementary NW
17. Levante Elementary SE
18. Magnolia Elementary NW
19. Maxton Browne Ext. NW
20. Pine Elementary NW
21. Valley Jr. High NW
Total
Acres/
TotalDeveloped
1.0
.8
.4
1.4
1.0
1.7
3.0
6.6
2.3
4.1
3.0
5.0
2.3 .
1.5
2.6
2.8
8.0
4.2
2.1
2.0
63.3
Undeveloped Status
Leased
3.6 Owned
Ci
COMMUNITY PARKS
1. Holiday
2. Laguna Riveria
3. Magee
4. La Costa Canyon
5. Cannon Lake
6. Alta Mira
7. Hosp Grove
8. Stagecoach
9. Calavera
10. Alga Norte
11. Macario
NW
NW
NW
SE
NWsw
NW
SE
NE
SE
5.4
6.8
3.0
9.0
0
12.0
27.0
28.0
8.0
0
Total
SW,SE,NE,NW Q
99.2
6.0
10.0
23.0
100.0
139.0
Natural
Natural/Dt
2 5 acres
credited •
ea. quadr;
Attachment G]
C. Libraries - (56.3-million 1982)
New Major Facility in
Alga Norte Park
Existing Library Expansion
D. Parks - un.VBilliuu 1002)
Future
Estimated
Costs 1986
$
Community Parks:
Stagecoach
Calavera
-0-
Alga Norte
S.W. Park
Macario Canyon
Special Use Facilities:
Levante
El Fuerte _
SUA ( Future) 4.7 acres
Community Parks (Future)
Six Community Centers
Special Resource Areas:
Leo Carrillo
«j •» '(•/< ww3,020,000
6,600,000
1,200,000
E. Arterials - '(517.3-million 1982)
Current
Exnenditur*
$
$ N/A $
$ N/A $
$ 14,000,000 $
_,948,000 P.F.F.1,097,000 P.I.L.' $"560,720 P.F.F.U482,280 P.I.L.-0-
-0-
-0-
N/A
H4,807 P.I.L.
26,395 Grant
with $8,798
match/P.I.L
Tamarack Av«.
(1-5 to Sunnyhill)
Carlsbad Blvd.
(Tamarack to Elm)
Carlsbad Blvd.
(Tamarack to Palomar
Airport Rd., including
bridge)
Palomar Airport Rd.
(west of airport to 1-5)
Intersection
(Palomar Airport Rd. &
Carlsbad Blvd.)
Estimated
1982
$ 1,875,000
750,000
3,750,000
2,500,000
1,375,000
Estimated
1986
Expended
-2-
Attachment G2
City of Carlsbad
Parks and Recreation Commission
City Council Chambers
February 10, 1986
5:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Public Open Forum
4. Approval of Minutes - January 20, 1986
5. Approval of Agenda
6. Appoint Scribe
7. Unfinished Business
A. Scribe Report
(Refer to Attachment "A")
B. PFF Report
(INFORMATION)
(INFORMATION)
(ACTION)
As a result of the Commission's action
on January 20, 1986, staff has compiled
a report to reflect the updated park
classification and public facilities
fee cost. (Refer to Attachment "B")
Beech Street Beach Access
Staff has recommended Council action
regarding the acceptance of ownership
of the access easement. Funding possi-
bilities are being pursued. (Refer to
Attachment "C")
Mini Golf Practice Range at Alta Mira
Staff met at the Alta Mira open space
site with Mr. Alan Lynne. The use and
maintenance issues were discussed as well
as liability insurance. Mr. Lynne is
currently investigating the feasibility
of acquiring liability insurance.
Stagecoach Community Park Phase II Kick-Off (INFORMATION)
Phase II kick-off ceremonies are scheduled
for February 20, 1986 at 4:00 p.m.
(INFORMATION)
(INFORMATION)
(ACTION)
(ACTION)
F. Parks & Recreation Commission
Letter to the Editor
(Refer to Attachment "D")
8. New Business
A. Creation of a Foundation
Staff would like to address the
Commission regarding the creation of
a foundation to support recreational
activities. (Refer to Attachment "E")
B. Performance Theater Proposal
The Commission is requested to
consider a proposal by Mr. Mike
0'Hara and Joe Sandi regarding the
possibility of a performance facility
to be constructed in the Macario Canyon
Park. (Refer to Attachment "F")
9. Council Report
10. Committee Report
A.
B.
C.
11. Director's Report (refer to Green Sheet)
12. Additional Business
A.
B.
C.
13. Attachments
A. City Manager's Newsletter - 1/24/86
B. City Manager's Newsletter - 1/31/86
C. Library Board of Trustees Minutes
D. Traffic Safety Commission Minutes
E. Letter from Rosemary Eshelman, Recreation Supervisor
January 29, 1986
TO: JIM HAGAMAN, RESEARCH & ANALYSIS GROUP MANAGER
FROM: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
PFF UPDATE (SUPERSEDES MEMO OF 1/14/86 & 1/21/86)
As per your request, I have reevaluated and revised the PFF figures
that Marsha Payne sent you in the January 14, 1986 memo (refer to
Attachment A).
The new figures and calculations based on a population of 150,000
are as follows:
1985 Revised Standard For Land Dedication
Community Parks 82.5 Ac/I,000= 375 Ac.
Special Use Areas 9 .5 Ac/1,OOP « 75 Ac.
Total 3.0 Ac/1,000 Total 450 Ac.
Revised Parks Assessment
1986 Developed Build-out Projection Acres Needed to
Classification Acres Requirement Reach Build-out
Com. Park
SUA
117.
64.
Total . 181.
49
3
79
375 Ac.
75
450
(*-100 Ac.
Macario)
157
10
168
.51
.7
.21
*New Cost Estimate for PFF'"
Community Park - 157.51 Ac. x $87,500 Dev. Cost = $13,782,125
Special Use Areas - 10.7 Ac. x $87,500 Dev. Cost = 936,250
Total Parks 14,718,375
Macario (calculated at 25% over 1982 Est.) 14,000,000
Leo Carrillo 2,000,000
Community Centers - 6 8 1.3 million each : 7,800,000
Grand Total All Areas $38,518,375
*Note;
The reason that I have revised the above figures from prior calculatic:
is that: on Janaury 20, 1986, the Parks and Recreation Commission
voted unanimously to extract park land that was dedicated prior to
1982 and incorporate all those acres into either the new Community
Parks or Special Use Area -classifications* . These- n«v. classifications
were a result of the 1982 Park and Recreation Master Plan revision.
Attachment B
Jim Hagaman
PFF Update
January 29, 1986
Page 2
The Commission also credited to the Community Park classification
100 acres from the Macario Canyon Special Resource Area. The 100
acres have been evenly distributed, 25 additional acres to each
Park-in-Lieu District; thus reducing the build-out acreage require-
ments for each of those districts.
When the Parks and Recreation Element to the General Plan was revised
in 1982, it created an instant shortage in two new proposed classi-
fications - Community Parks and Special Use Areas. In order to
offset this shortage, the Commission incorporated previously identi-
fied mini and vest-pocket parks into the Special Use Area classifi-
cation. They also reclassified the existing neighborhood parks and
incorporated them into the Community Park classification. This
action and the inclusion of 100 acres of the Macario Canyon Park
into the Community Park classification greatly reduced the instant
shortage created by the 1982 revision.
I feel that even though some of the new community park areas do not
meet the criteria as outlined in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan,
it was the intent of the old Master Plan that these subject areas
were to have community use.
New Park Assessment 1986
Based on the 1982 park standard and the incorporation of pre-1982
dedicated and purchased park land, the following is an analysis.,
of the city's park inventory. This is based on a population pro-
jection of 150,000 at build-out.
Developed Park Land City Wide
Classification
Community
SUA
Build-out-
Requirement
375 Ac.
75 "Ac.
1986
Existing
117.49 Ac.
64.3.. Ac.
Acres Req.
45,000 Pop.
112.5 ac.
22.5 Ac.
Current-
Surplus
+4.99 Ac..a. AC.
Special Resource Areas
Developed/Undeveloped
SRA 375 Ac.1313 Ac,112.5 Ac. +1200.5 Ac.
*Refer to Attachment B
DB: jm
c: Ray Patchett, Asst. City Manager
Frank Mannen, Asst. City Manager
Jim Elliott, Finance Director
Gene Donovan, City Engineer..
Mike Holzmiller, Planning Manager
Mark Steyaert, Park Planner
Attachment B-2
Revised Park Inventory
Community Parks Developed
Site Quad. Dist. Acres Type Ovner s h i o
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
Holiday
Laguna Riviera
Magee
La Costa Canyon
Alta Mira
Hosp Grove
Stagecoach
Calavera Hills
Larwin
Community Parks Undeveloped
1. Cannon Lake
2. Calavera Hills
3. Alga Norte
4. Hunts
5. Sammis
Special Use Areas
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 .
6 .
7 .
8 .
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Car Country
Pio Pico
Oak
Maxton Browne
Rotary
Cannon
Fuerte
Fuerte Elem.
Buena Vista Elem.
Cadencia
CHS Tennis Complex
Swim Complex
Chase Field
Harding Com. Center
Jefferson Elem.
Kelly Elem.
Levante Elem.
Magnolia
Maxton .Brown Ext.
Pine Elem.
Valley Jr. High
St. Eli-abeth
NW
NW
NW
SE
SW
NW
SE
NE
NE
>ed
NW
NE
SE
SW
SW
SW
NW
NW
NW
NW
SW
NE
SE
SE
NW
SE
NW
NW
NW
NW
NW
NW
SE
NW
NW...
NW.
NW
SE
1
1
1
4
3
1
4
2
2
Total
3
2
4
3
3
Total
3
1.
1
1
1
3
2
4
4
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
• 1.
1
1
4
Total
5.4
6.8
3.0
9.0
12.0
27.0
28.0
8.0
18.29
117.49
6.7
10.0
23.0
30.0
5.0
" t A T74 . 7
1.0
.8 .
.4
1.4
1.0
1.7
4.0
3.6
2.0
2.3
4.1
3.0
4.0
2.3
1.0
2.6
2.8
8.0
4.2
2.1.
2.0
7.5
1.0
64.3
Active
Active
Active
Active
Passive /Natural
Passive/Natural
Active
Active
Passive/Natural
N/A
Active
Active
Active
Active
Passive
Passive
Passive
Passive
Passive
Active
Passive
Active
Active
Active .
Passive /Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Passive .
Active
Active
Active
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
Cesco - to i
dedicatee
Daon - to be
dedicatee
Hunts - to I
dedicatee
Sammis - to
dedicatee
City
City
City
City
City
Leased SDGt
City
City
SMUSD
CUSD
City
CUSD
City
City
City
CUSD
CUSD
EUSD
CUSD
City
CUSD
CUSD
Private lea
Special Resource Areas
Dist.Acres Type Dev,Ownership
1. Carrillo
2. Macario
3. HUB
4. Batiquitos
Lagoon
5. Agua Hedionda NW
Lagoon
6. Buena Vista NW
Lagoon
7. Beaches
SE
SW
sw
SW
NW
NW
T
4
3
3
3
1
1
/^+- a i
10.3
188.0
92.0
484.0
254.0
202.0
113.0
1 I 1 1 1
Active
Active
Active/
Passive
Passive
Passive/
Active
Passive
Active/
Passive
No
No
No
No
Partial
Partial
Partial
City
City
Lease
SDG&E
Private
State
Lease
SDG&E
State
State
Private
1/29/86
3DY3HDV
E-
CJ
o
0.
ena
a
<
en
0.oa.
oo
o o. -^a,o oo o <o oo —« in*•* "^ •^» • rsi• OU < I
m uim
I K
aa:<a
tn
^<
i en< uen ca u
en
£ U UX U ulO — a.U en en
3DV3HOY
a
3
O T
O «-t
- 3O
m C— O
C 3•u a.
0
•C Q.
K
5
jj -y•s> a:'U fl
3 "3O w
I T3
3 -J-a «
30Y3HDV
/-»h fr* o n
MINUTES
PARKS i RECREATION CO«y.ISSIOS
February 10, 1986 Page 3
COMMISSIONERS
be re-evaluaced and aAt the end of the year, this will
decision made at that time.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The Minutes of the January 20, 1986, Meeting were approved
as presented.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Commissioner Donovan asked for an update on the work stoppage
on Rancho Santa Fe Road and possible impact on Stagecoach
Park.
The Agenda was aproved as amended.
APPOINT SCRIBE:
Commissioner Popovich was appointed Scribe for this Meeting.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. Scribe Report
Chairman Wright referred to the report as contained in the
packet.
B. PFF Report
Dave Bradstreet referred to his memorandum dated January 29,
1986, to Jim Hagaman, Research & Analysis, which updated
the PFF requirement for community parks, special use areas
and special resource areas. The conclusion, after an
analysis of the new park requirements, was that in 1986
dollars the total was $38,518,375. the reason the figures
were revised from prior calculations is that: "on January 20
1986, the Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously t<
extract park land that was dedicated prior to 1982, and
incorporate all those acres into either the new Community
Parks or Special Use Area classifications. These new
classifications were a result of the 1982 Parks and Recreatioi
Master Plan revision.
"The Commission also credited to the Community Park classi-
fication LOO acres from the Macario Canyon Special Resource
Area. The 100 acres have been evenly distributed, 25
additional acres to each Park-in-Lieu District; thus reducing
the build-out acreage requirements for each of these district
"When the Parks and Recreation Element to the General Plan wa
revised In 1982. it created an instant shortage in two new
proposed classifications — Community Parks and Special Use
Areas. In order to offset this shortage, the Commission
Incorporated previously identified mini and vest-pocket parks
into the Special Use Area classification. They also re-
classified the existing neighborhood parks and incorporated
Wright
Conti
Oahlquisc
Donovan
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
Wright
Conti
Dahlquist
Donovan
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
MINUTES
PARKS i RECREATION COMMISSION
February 10, 1986 Page 4
COMMISSIONERS
"them into the Community Park classification. This action
and the inclusion of 100 acres of the Macario Canyon Park
into the Community Park classification greatly reduced the
instant shortage created by th* 1982 revision.
"Even though some of the new community park areas do not
meet the criteria as outlined in the Parks & Recreation
Master Plan, it was the intent of the old Master Plan that
these subject areas were to have community use."
The following analysis of the City's park inventory is
based on a population projection of 150,000 at buildout.
Community Parks - Required at Buildout, 375 acres; 117 acre:
on hand as of 1986; Required to have, 112
acres, making a surplus of 5 acres.
Special Use Areas - Required at Buildout, 75 acres; 64 acres
on hand as of 1986; Required to have,
22.5 acres, making a surplus of 36.8
acres.
Special Resource Areas - 375 acres Required ac Buildout;
1986 acreage approximately 1,300
acres; required by population of
45,000, 112 acres; a surplus of
1.200 acres.
The new Revised Park Inventory now coincides with the
Element of the General Plan. There are ten community parks
developed, and the reporc gave the quadrant, district,
number of acres, the type—whether active, passive or
natural, and the ownership. The Community Parks Undeveiopec
lists five parks, including Cannon Lake, Calavera Hills,
Alga Norte, Hunts and Sammis, giving the sane information
as for Che developed parks. Special Use Areas lists 23
areas and Special Resource Areas lists 7 areas.
Mr. Bradstreec summed up his report, saying that by the
action taken, the numbers hav« been straightened out,
giving a positive outlook as far as park acreage.
C. Beech Street Access
Dave Bradstreet reported on this icem, referring to the
memorandum contained in the packet. Staff Inspected this
access and found it in poor condition. The Coastal
Conservancy owns this property and the Parks & Recreation
Commission, some time ago, recommended to the City Council
noc to accept this access, since 1C did not meet width
standards. Nothing has been done co Che access ac this
time, and staff now recommends Che Commission advise staff
to go before the Cicy Council to request the Cicy Co accepc
this access and apply for grant funds from Che Coascal
Conservancy Co improve Che seeps and make Che access safe.
Keith Beverly answered Commission questions regarding the
staff report. Dave Bradscreec seated he felt this was a
"lame duck" and something should be don* by th* City.
Commission discussion followed, wich the consensus of Che
Commissioners being co gee Che deed from Coascal
Conservancy, repair and restore chis access to make ic
safe. A question was raised about lighting, and Dave
Bradscreec scaced he would invesclgace that, although no
accesses do have lights.
City of Carlsbad
Parks and Recreation Commission
Levante Community Center
3035 Levante
May 19, 1986
5:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Call to order
2. Roll Call
3. Public Open Forum
4. Approval of Minutes - April 21, 1986
5. Approval of Agenda
6. Appoint Scribe
7. Unfinished Business
A. Scribe Report (Attachment A)
B. Senior Citizen Community Center -
Feasibility Study
Staff will update the Commission regarding
the progress of the feasibility study for
the senior citizens center.
C. Consultant Selection for Golf Course
Feasibility Study
Interviews for consultant selection to
perform the golf course feasibility study
were held Thursday, May 8th and Monday,
May 12, 1986. Based on committee review
and evaluation, the consultant selection
will be presented for the Commission's
endorsement. (Attachment B)
D. Cannon Lake Park
Staff will present a conceptual plan for
the development of Cannon Lake Community
Park. Cost estimates for site development
will also be discussed. (Attachment C)
The Commission is also requested to review
a letter by Marie E. Quisenberry regarding
Cannon Park and the SDG&E proposal.
(Attachment D)
(INFORMATION)
(INFORMATION)
(ACTION)
(INFORMATION)
8. New Business
A. Requested Variance From Median Design (ACTION')
Standards
The landscape architect for the Kelly Ranch
project, on behalf of the developer, would
like to differ from the City of Carlsbad's
median standard on the future Cannon Road
adjacent to the project site. (Attachment E)
B. Requested Varience from Median Design (ACTION)
Standard
Sammis Properites, developer of the Batiquitos
Lagoon Educational Park, is requesting approval
for a deviation from the city "standard" median
treatment in the development of landscape
medians for their project. (Attachment F)
*C. Park Inventory Update (INFORMATION)
Staff has prepared a park inventory update
of existing and future community parks as
well as special use and resource areas. The
inventory was designed to depict park acreage
needs based on existing and future population.
(Attachment G)
D. Park-In-Lieu Update (ACTION)
Staff has prepared a report regarding the
annual park-in-lieu fee update. Commission
input is requested concerning a proposed
increase of land values used in the park-
in-lieu calculations. (Attachment H)
E. Mayor's Summary Report (INFORMATION)
Summary report includes the mayor's comments
regarding issues discussed at the April 21,
1986 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
(Attachment I)
9. Council Report
10. Committee Report
A. Senior Citizen Feasibility Study (Conti) (INFORMATION)
(Attachment J)
B.
C.
-2-
11. Director's Report (See Green Sheet)
12. Additional Business
A.
B.
C.
13. Enclosures
A. City Manager's Newsletter - May 2 & 9, 1986
B. Library Board of Trustees Minutes - March 19, 1986
C. Planning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1986
D. Traffic Safety Commission Minutes - April 7, 1986
(The June 16, 1986, Parks and Recreation Commission
meeting will be held at the City Council Chambers
at 5:00 p.m.)
-3-
(M ''^
I I I
— — —
a a S a
b3
iiii
aa a a
rS
S
i *e e i
S 2
8
IM
IM
s
fc
IS
s
ft
(M
U
U
»
U
fi
U
Ov
S3
^1
3
<•"•I
I
,,1
2
§
$
•
in
a
a
•
£
1
^§
^§z
1
:*
5
^
c
S
if.
^
3.'
VCcc
S S ~ £,y r»» ^ i*^
ho «- *- QD
i i < i
•— (M m *
W ** *rf Wo ^o u y5333M >/> v) vt
S o S a
nil5<5 o>o>
!*«!*
Co
fl•3
g
Jr
5
-
a
13U
~
1i
m
^ so ^ o iso ^ vo r**
^ ** *|
till
— rsi « *
U U U U
3333« in in M
seas
_. . . .
Illl
ss53
vO SVO ^ O
" i 12 2 03_ </i S 3
O = 2 z
2 < 2 2
L/\ ft
S2*SSams
CE 3 « <
-» vo
i 5 53~ • <
L-.2
ON Oa — ».o
o> a: a. -».£3:2*
t/»
M
*<
3
d -
i ,
*i
SOy ™
2«fi
9\i^»>
»T^
Ld
U1
—
1
§
u
<
o
*i5
5j
*
^
5
o
i
«
^
^
fcA
^5
1VU V V £
$$$!
o u u u
o o o o|u
* ® O OJrsj
I/N ^O '*» PHMVJ
~
^e
u
4 <«•SCO— 3 c a
,,.
^5
•jj•• i
u
—o
s
{J
*
l/\
<
as*
*f^«
" '
"2iz
^
* —«^ in
S?
***eR(R
V 0ko
*"
^0
M *—
^ ^
X
&.v e
^ "5-. k>
O -I
<M
M
_0
k.
VI
ss
o
o4D
VO
U
K
I
jT
,^
.
°^vO
^*
"23
^1)
VI
V)
•M
0)0
fSjLsj
"
^
5
b
5?
/vs
U
U
» a
0<
m
*
S
t^J
<D
O
O
^
o
°\
^f*S
V V
II
w u
o o u
ocfo
ON 9 ^
^
C 0
g
•0 %^ o
V« X
^
t)
3
LJ ain —
uj
<T,
*J
"^J
£•*rg 1
01*l
»]
5i
1^ '«L.I
<]
"•;!^ ,
^«
i
1
H
1
1
HJ
I
I
•
I
Ip
,!
5 :
^<- !
-j* •o ;
a5
S
e:
•g
5c0
^'1
*'
-t-9 I
-Zairi
S
~*<
= §5-
2 *5 in Q
J 1 S s d
zw
g a IA S
** « _ ^"
£ « £ i <
Mz
|
s
o•«
M
» —
*
5 Si
!«j y.
1.1 ^s
^0 W
— oin
-i
(/I OUJ O
—I
1
Vi
-0
^u 1)
V Q
U U
r* o
\o iX
gl^ uo1 ^
t) e
O "u OS
o1!'
^
u
k.
in
is
5
r*
^*
ON
m
**
o
^^ON
-^
•^
F^
^o
^
J.
+
R
pj
VO
^"J
^t^
.
1) 0
4J 4<
0 O .
o op
O u^n/N
-
", i ^u o
^,1
— e
— fl U 9vfl £ * ONo £ x -
*v
_0
w
m
ui a
C
e
i
o•
f*
0
CC
r*..
r*.
l> V C
4141 4»
— m o
00 Oljj
o e ojo
a m i/^lo
"
| ^
t. 0
0
s*5
S <n x ^
p*>
u
u
555
c
93
-V
"
O
e
0
as
O
v u
4* 4!
1 5"a o
e op
f~> ^[03
"
sl iON U O
i •
« 5.u O
bt
O ^
^
u3
ss
^3
^—.VO
^S
,
5 :
* J7 !
— *
21• ,
£ j
* io j
•» !
S ?
» J
•* •!= ]
o
a
5
f ...
Attachment G*• r;-
t£ _J I
-" I !i* S
— " a
a o _,
e a a a a i•tat -«pr w «•> UJ !
> a§ &r oUJ wI*
I &
u 3
U
y
>w1
l 1 1 1
u u u u
o a o a
* Ul » uz z w) 35
s
5 >* '< 09 ^ I
0 — «/
_3
"a
u
IM
05
VO
a
u
OUUUUUOCJUUUOUUUUUOUU«<«
X • O
§x* « -w«lZ«l_. • O • •u « — aw e c t- m i-e a — c«— -o— *fflcr>U >CBu.UMUJ-« —— e>> vu •>• — c uj >.& O I- fl M- UCJVXOO V*3 •« c |X.<£«ewv-S
<o
vO
03
O
amU
O fl*
,
Is-
u19u
i(A
52
« V « « V
u u u ol< < < <l
o — o e
II I) O u x*i «j c c uju u t) fl?s !i-i i JU. U. u -1 l/l
u3
«,
vo !
o
o
5
1 3
s
Attachment G-2
-^
*
I/I
a^a,
%
5
S
5
v5
S
S
S
3§
12X
-J
5
•
^M>
>•
S
Q
VO
£
9t » — ysj^
^ rf *** fvj \fl
^ r^ ^ *n \fl
vo »- — oo r*» _j x
^ ftj ^ ^ *^ ^ Q*~ f^ ^ Si i i i -* a 2i™ v* <u> C
-M«» 0 = £ -
M M M M 7^23a u _o o
b b b b
IA tf» IA «A
S a S S 35~ •"-••* s 2 «i• • „• • 5 - s
»»o w a: a i
Z z * in
•~
5:£i
i
Q vfi 3O> i—
- S ^ " i
^ X < fl.ai
2
b
8 £
%
• SM ^ Q.
ss
MB •»v ^
* *2 B i/i
" S <
Ul Ni-
O («
3
8
» JO 9\ 0|0«
5z-5*v
1 1 1 1
••* * ^ J"^ *^^ *J ^ *
IIII s— — J2 J>
S O O O
ni'i i
5 »d o 3
* -J » UJ • 3E Z 10 i/l 5
QJ
o
A U
<
^
O
<*>
^—
9v
0
-'
*
o
-
7
"""^ JV fl 4;> U >"* a "•<rt *» (Am fl mM ^ fQa 52
11 i "$
w 3 S "ZO fl q y< z & <
4)-x. -*^ *J
UJ V V 0) *fl3n w *•» >cfl it) tl •«
IQ t) ** ** U
W J i/) irt ^
2 22
b b bS. 22.
% %\
U U (A lA j
* a 2 * 1
M «J S J
eee c
? § -
-1 ? i
5 ^ * *C <0 b Mo *•» o o
S _i ** ""
« > M
3 I »-? i JJ
^^
•2
«>
52
^
*
^IA
^ij.
j-
o
£
~~
u
a>
£
o
f>
a.
V
—
^
u
II
2
b
2
u J
* }
s s' 1
^.^
i fl
u o
•w h—
«lV£
^<M
3
VI
£S
e
W
o
^»*
vo
P^
VO
'*•*'
u
^
0
r*
^j
!x
*
u
^vo
t) V 0
« X IA(A M IA
2 2 S.
33 33 33
V
•S* 3 * B 'S fl —— a v 3 M Mbo 5! _j i (/) ui a.
H
8 8 8 t
5532
« « « 2 :
g K | S* K
co —1 -* TS -3_J IB ^
(A U O3e •« •>r J ^
rQ ** Oj s % :z z a e
^^
^
|
«!
55
u
^
~
o
^
ID
o
<
_'
9v
VO
13u
b V
3 ^i/t in
I £_> «
"s *"2 1
t) K
u ma.
2 2
b ta
2 2
2 * S
O 05 «^ r\j m
^^
i 3
U 0
o ^ * *""
3 1
S ^
^^
•*
3<n
S2
-
"™
>
O |
^
i_ '
^:— i
0 1<1^ 1
1
< i
*o
*
*""
u
i:
" '
_,
0
*—a
5
Attachi.ier.'. G-2
MINUTES
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION May 19, 1986 Page 7
COMMISSIONERS
Vice Chairperson Donovan said the street could be left
without the median, but Sammis wanted the median installed
to make their project look better. They will do the planting
and the maintenance. She suggested that be in a contractual
form with a fund set up to protect the City for a set time.
She would also like more staff input into the concept.
Mr. Nakawatase assured the Commission this was not the final
concept, and they would be happy to work with staff to have
a concept close to City standards.
Parks & Recreation Commission approved the request for
variance by Sammis Properties to install medians, subject
to an agreement with Sammis and City staff in keeping with
City standards.
Parks & Recreation Commission recommended the Sanunis Properti
medians be maintained at no cost to the City.
Commissioner Popovich added he would like the motion to
require Sammis and staff to come back to this Commission
with the proposal they agree upon, once the matter has been
resolved.
Commissioner Conti made a motion to amend the prior motion
to indicate when an agreement is reached with Sammis, staff
apprise the Commission of the details. The motion was
withdrawn.
Parks & Recreation Commission amended the previous motion
to include when all of the details discussed with respect
to Sammis Properties' medians are worked out and Sammis and
staff are in agreement, before any action is taken to
implement any of those agreements, the matter be brought back
to this Commission for consideration and approval.
C. Park Inventory Update
Dave Bradstreet reported he was requested to make this
update because of an initiative regarding development Macario
Canyon because of the lack of ballfields. With the data
available on development of the parks now underway, the
City will be above standard.
D. Park-Tn-Lieii
Donovan
Conti
Dahlquist
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
Donovan
Conti
Dahlquist
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
Donovan
Conti
Dahlquist
Morrison
Popovich
Regan
March 20, 1937
TO: RAY PATCHETT, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
VIA: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
FROM: KEITH BEVERLY, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
PARK LAND CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS
One of the major accomplishments of the 1982 Revised Parks and
Recreation Element to the General Plan was to standardize,
consolidate and define park facilities into the following
categories:
1. Community Parks
Community Parks are leisure facilities, approximately 20 to
50 acres in size, designed to serve the recreational needs of
several neighborhoods. The nature of this type of facility
encourages and attracts family unit populations from a nearby
vicinity on a daily frequency.
Minimum facilities should include:
. Family-oriented picnic areas
. Group picnic areas
. Turfed open space areas for free play
. Multi-purpose lighted playfield(s)
. Tot areas
. Structure for lectures, meetings, skills instruction, etc.
. On-site parking
. Security night lighting
. Buffer areas
. Special-use facilities as per specific community demand
. Tennis courts
Special-use facilities, such as swimming pools, tennis courts,
horseshoes, handball and racquetball courts, etc. may be located
within these parks if appropriate to the interest and need of
the community in which the park is located.
The service radius for community park sites is approximately
two miles. The primary access orientation is vehicular. It
is therefore established that community parks should be located
adjacent to a secondary arterial or circulation route of greater
hierarchy as defined within the Circulation Element.
2. Special-Use Areas
Special-use areas are local facilities that meet the needs of
only one or two activity-type uses. They are between one to
five acres in size and generally do not provide the basic
March 20, 1987
Ray Patchett
Page Two
universally accepted facilities found in a park site. Facilities
of this type are swim, tennis or racquetball complexes, meeting
halls, athletic complexes and playlets.
Location of special-use area sites should be based upon adequate
access to its supporting community population. It is therefore
established that these facilities should be located adjacent to
arterials.
3. Special-Resource Areas
Special-Resource Areas are local amenities that have either
city-wide or potential regional significance. The significance
is in the quality of the site that makes it unique as a recreation
area; this quality may be of a natural (water, geological, etc),
historical (architectural, etc.) or of a cultural (pageants, etc.)
or of a combination thereof. Consequently, the site or its
facilities have an attraction or drawing power to users locally
and beyond.
Locations of 100 acres or more; or a unique character and/or use,
not found in community parks; or the local beaches and lagoons.
A recreational site characterized by the existance of a special
or unusual feature, natural or man-made, i.e., a water body,
earth formation, historic amenity, etc.
(Scanc'ard - 3.0 acres per 1.C30 pcpulatlsn)
1936 POP. BY SI3T.'3UAJ.
NV Quad. (District 1) - 25.029
NE Quad. (District 2) - 5.607
SU Quad. (District 3) - 5.416
SE Quad. (District 4) - 16.128
52.190
3L'I'_3C'JT
NW Quad. (District 1; - 11.-~*
NE Quad. (District 2) - :;.3,3
SW Quad. (District 3) - 31."5
SE Quad. (District 4) - 4:.317
NW
NE
QUADRANT
KW-DIST. 1
COMMUNITY
SPECIAL
USE AREA
ACREAGE
SITE MARCH 1987
Holiday 5.4 AC
Laguna Riviera 6.8 AC
Magee 3.0 AC
Hosp 27.0 AC
TOTAL 42.2 AC
Pio Pico .8 AC
Maxton Brown 1.4 AC
Rotary 1.0 AC
Butna Vista 2.3 AC
CHS Tennis Cts. 3.0 AC
Suia Complex 3.0 AC
Chase Field 2.3 AC
H.S.C.C. 1.0 AC
Jtfferson Elea. 2.6 AC
Kelly Elea. 2.8 AC
Magnolia 4.2 AC
Haxton Brown Ext 2.1 AC
Pine Elea. 2.0 AC
Valley Jr. H.S. 7.5 AC
Car Country 1.0 AC
Cannon 1.7 AC
TOTAL 39.1 AC
OWNER-
SKIP
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
CUSD
CUSD
City
City
City
CUSD
CUSD
CUSD
City
CUSD
CUSD
City
SDG&E
COMH. + SUA TOTAL 81.3
FUTURE
DEVO.OPMENT
EXISTING
•f
FUTURE
NE-Dist. 2
COJMIHm
SPECIAL
USE AREA
Cannon Lake 6.7 AC
Pine School 7.0 AC
Macario 25.0 AC
Pine Sr Ctr 3.0 AC
TOTAL 41.7 AC
TOTAL 123.0 AC
Calavtra Hills 8.0 AC
Larwla 18.29AC
TOTAL 26.3 AC
Larwla 4.0 AC
TOTAL 4.0 AC
City
CUSD
City
CUSD
City
City
City
COMM. •«• SUA TOTAL 30.3
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING
+•
FUTURE
Calavera Hills 10.0 AC
Ph. II
Macario 25.0 AC
TOTAL 35.0 AC
TOTAL 65.3 AC
City
City
REQD 1987 ACRES REQD BUILDOUT ACRES
2.5/1000 COM. PARKS (-DEFICIT) 9 3.0 AC/1000 POP (-DEFICIT)
.5/1000 SUA + SURPLUS 2.5/1000 COM. PARKS + SURPLUS
TYPE TOTAL 3.0/1000 AS PER 1987 .5/1000 SUA AT HUILDOVT
Active
Active
Active
Passive/
Natural
62.5 (-20.3) 98.7 f-56.5)
Passive
Passive
Passive
Passive
Active
Active
Active
Active
Coma. Ctr.
Active
Active
Active
Passive
Active
Active
Passive
Active
12.5 +26.6 19.7 +19.4
75 6.2 118.4 (-37.1)
Active
Active
Active
Com. Ctr.
118.4 *»L6
Active
Passive/
Natural u +12.3 52.1 (-25.8)
Passive ___ ___
2.8 + 1.2 10.4 ( -6.4) ,
16.8 13.5 62.5 '.-3:. 2)
Active
Active
62.5 +24
IAL 'JSE AREA/COMMUNITY ?AAK. "jr.; RE :£vri:?>^
(Scandari - 3.0 acres per I.COO oopulacicn)
1936 POP. 3" 3IST/CUAD.
NW Quad. (District 1) - 25,029
NE Quad. (District 2) - 5,607
SW Quad. (District 3) - 5,416
SE Quad. (District 4) - 16,128
52,190
./ACREAGE
OUADRANT SITE /MARCH 1987
SW
SE
NW/NESW/SE
TOTAL
SW-DIST. 3
COMMUNITY
SPECIAL
USE AREA
COMM
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING
FUTURE
SI-Dist. 4
COMMUNITY
SPECIAL
USE AREA
COMM
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING
FUTURE
====^E====
CITYVIDE
TOTAL
NW.Nl.SW.SE
Alta Mira £y ,
TOTAL
Splonaiter
TOTAL
. + SUA TOTAL .
HPI
Saomli
Macarlo
City Acqulat.
School Dlat.SUA
TOTAL
TOTAL
La Coita Canyon
Stagecoach
TOTAL
Fuerce
Fuerte Elem.
Cadencia
Levant*
St. Elizabeth
TOTAL
. + SUA TOTAL
Alga Sort*
Macario
Carrillo
TOTAL
TOTAL
5=
1937
COMM/ SUA
ACRES
133.20 AC
JJMT
i.O
4.0
^^^^~
28.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
6.0
79.0
95.0
9.0
28.0
37.0
3.6
2.0
4.1
8.0
1.0
18.7
55.7
21.0
25.0
10.0
56.0
111.7
:===
REQD
<? 3.0
156.0
===
-AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
OWNER-
SHIP
City
O
City
HPI
Sammis
City
City
CUSD
City
City
SMUSD
SMUSD
City
SMUSD
Prv.Li
La Costa
Ranch
City
City
AC
,••... || •!.!•....—
1987
AC/1000
AC
=
•fjU *"> Ouad. (District 1) - 3*,.~*
IJ>^ fr ^ QUad' (DiSCri" 2) " :C>3-3
Ijjt**^ P' SW Quad. (District 3) - 31, "5
/iS/ij ** SE Quad. (District 4) - ;:.31'
.*** IJH,-.;.
REQD ACRES 1987 POP REQD BUILDOUT ACRES
9 3.0 AC/1000 POP (-DEFICIT) 8 3.0 AC/1000 POP (- DEFICIT)
2.5/1000 COM. PARKS + SURPLUS 2.5/1000 COM. PARKS + SURPLUS
TYPE .5/1000 SUA AS PER 1987 .5/1300 SUA AT S'JILOr.T
Passive/
Natural U>J (_1>S) ?9_4 (.-7>4)
Fasslv*
2.7 +1.3 15.9 (-11.9)
16.2 (-.2) 95.3 I.--1.31
Active
ACClV< T 1 <^ •*<. tf*-r*>v\i I \S Q J
Active
Active
Acclve
95.3 (-.3)
Active
Active
40.3 (-3.3) 107 (-70)
Active
Active
Acclve
Active
.Active
8 +10.7 21.4 (-2.7)
48.3 +7.4 128.4 (-72.7)
'
Active
128.4 .'-16.7)
^-DEFICIT) REQD B'.'ILOOUT v-DEFICIT)
+SURPLUS COKM/SUA/FUTURE ACRES +SURPLUS
AS PER 1987 ACRES » 3.0 AC/1000 AT 3UILDOUT
+2o.6 395 AC 40».9 AC ' -f) . 0 AC)
.
March 20, 1937
TO: RAY PATCHETT, Assistant City Manager
FROM: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
INFORMATION REQUESTED REGARDING ROBERTSON PROPERTY, HOSP GROVE
AND BALLFIELDS
1. Question; Do we need the Robertson property today?
Based on the recent Growth Management's population projections
at buildout and on our current park standards the number of
park land acres required in the NE quadrant will be 62.5. The
existing and future total park land in this quadrant at buildout
will be 65.3 acres, a 2.8 acre surplus. Therefore, the
acquisition and development of the Robertson property is not
needed today.
However, if the Larwin Community Park is deemed undevelopable
and its classification is changed to open space, the City will
be faced with a 15 acre deficit in the NE quadrant at buildout.
2. Question; Why was the Robertson property considered for
acquisition?
There were two reasons the Robertson's property was considered.
First, the population projection prior to the Growth Management
Program was higher, resulting in the need for additional park
acres in all quadrants of the city. The second reason was that
the city and the CUSD discussed several years ago on having an
educational park in several areas of the city. One of the areas
identified was the future CHS site which is located just east of
the Robertson's property in the NE quadrant.
3. Question: What will the ballfield status be at buildout in the
northeast part of the city?
Based on the recently adopted ballfield standard which excludes
the Robertson's property, there will be a shortage of three
soccer fields at buildout in the NE quadrant of the city.
4. Question: What effect will the purchase of Hosp Grove have on
the ballfield status in the northern part of the city?
Our analysis indicates that the northern part of the city will
have a shortage of three (3) soccer fields at buildout (refer
to attached matrix).
. The Hosp Grove acquisition will have no effect on the ability
to provide these additional soccer fields.
DB:lt
Attachment
BALLFIELD ANALYSIS
1986 EXISTING COMBINED TOTAL INVENTORY
NORTHWEST + NORTHEAST Field Totals
SB/BB SOC FB
EXISTING 672
30,600 (Pop) 1986 REQD 7.5 7.5 2
60,000 (Pop) BLD.OUT REQD 15 15 3
1986 EXISTING + FUTURE COMBINED TOTAL
NORTHWEST + NORTHEAST Field Totals
SB/BB SOC FB
EXISTING + FUTURE 15 12 3
30,600 (Pop) 1986 REQD 7.5 7.5 1.5
60,000 (Pop) BLD.OUT REQD 15 15 3
City of Carlsbad
Facility Standards
Activity *City Standards
Softball/baseball 1/4,000
Soccer 1/4,000
Football **1/20,000
Tennis 1/2,000
Notes
* Standards will be reviewed on an annual basis
** At least one (1) field per quadrant for football only
where area permits soccer size will be 75 yds x 120 yds
city uses multi-use field concept
50% of fields lighted.
Feb 10, 1967
Parks & Recreation Commission
Page Three
Existing + Future On-Line Facilities
NW
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Site
Pine
Chase
Jefferson
Magnolia
Valley Jr. High
Kelley
CKS
Monroe
Buena Vista
Softball
Baseball
1
3
1
0
1
0
2
0
2
Soccer
1
0
2
2
1
1
1
0
2
Football
0
0
0
01
01
0
0
Total 10 10
T s r. r. L s
0
0
0
0
6
0
9
2
0
17
NE
1. Calavera Hills, P-I 2
2. Calavera Hills, P-II 1
3. Hope 1
4. Safety Center 1
Total 5
0
1
1
0
01
0
0
0
2
0
0
sw
SE
1. Levante
2. Fuerte
3. La Costa Canyon
4. Stagecoach
Total
1
2
0
3
6
City Wide Total 21
2
2
0
2t^^^^mu
6
18
0
0
0
1^•^•i
1
4
0
0
2
4
25
j~.ir.ziri -
NW ;aud. (District 1) - 25,J29
NE Quad. (District 2) - 5,607
SW Quad. (District 31 - 5,416
SE Quad.(District 4) - IS, 128
52, 190
;,'W Quad, i District -I -
NE Quad. (District 2) -
SW Qaud. (District 3) -
SE Quad. (District 4) -
QlADRANT SITE
ACREAGE OWNER-
JULY 1986 SHIP TYPE
REQUIRED ACRES 1986 POP
1 3.0 AC/1000 POP (- DEFICIT)
* SURPLUS
AS PER 1986
134.914
REQUIHED 3UILOOUT ACRES
3 3.0 AC/1000 POP (- DEFICIT)
+ SL'XPL'.S
AT 3L'!L3C'JT
SV-DtST. I
Cjsmunicy
SPECIAL
USE AREA
NE-Dlst. 2
Community
SPECIAL
USE AREA
SE-DlSt. 4
Corn-unity
SPECIAL
USE AUA
Holiday
Laguana Riviera
Magee
Hosp
TOTAL
Pto Pico
Oak
Maxton Brown
Rotary
Buana Vista
CHS Tannls Cts.
Swla Complex
Chase Field
H.S.C.C.
Jsftsrson Elem.
Kslly Elam.
Magnolia
Haxton Brown Ext
Pint Elam.
Valley Jr. H.S.
Car Country
Cannon
TOTAL
Calavsra Hills
Larwla
TOTAL
Latvia
TOTAL
La Costa Canyon
Stagecoach
TOTAL
Fuarte
Fuerte Elem.
Cadaacia
Lsvante
St. Elizabeth
5.4 AC
6.8 AC
3.0 AC
27.0 AC
42.2 AC
.8 AC
.4 AC
1.4 AC
1.0 AC
2.3 AC
3.0 AC
3.0 AC
2.3 AC
1.0 AC
2.6 AC
2.8 AC
4.2 AC
2.1 AC
2.0 AC
7.5 AC
1.0 AC
1.7 AC
39.0 AC
sTTT"
8.0 AC
18.29AC
26.3 AC
4.0 AC
4.0 AC
9.0 AC
28.0 AC
37.0 AC
3.6 AC
2.0 AC
4.1 AC
8.0 AC
1.0 AC
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
CUSD
CUSD
City
City
City
CUSD
CUSD
CUSD
City
CUSD
CUSD
City
SDC4I
City
City
City
City
City
SMDSO
SMUSD
City
SMUSD
Prr.Ls.
Active
Active
Active
Passive/
Natural
63 (-21) 99 -5-1
Passive
Passive
Passive
Passive
Active
Active
Active
Active
Coma. Ctr.
Active
Active
Active
Passive
Active
Active
Passive
Active ___ _____
13 +26 20 +19
76 S 119 (-3a)
Active
Passive/
Natural —— — — — —U +12.3 52 (-25.3)
Passive ___
28 +1.2 10.4 (-6.4)
ActiveActive _ ____ _____
40.) (-3.3) 107 (-70)
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active ._ _____
TOTAL 18.7 AC +10.7 (-2.7)
PA'RK5,'2•~ t
Southwest Quadrant - , ^
'sting Improved Park Acreage: U ^" '"2- —
/•^ditional Improved Park Acreage Needed: -S4-r33 1^
Total: 95.33
•
Acres
1. Southwest Quadrant Devt. ^0
(a) Hunts - (Comm. Center ~°
12,000 sq. ft.) -21
(b) Alta Mira - (Cym 6 Comm.
Center 18,000 sq. ft.) g£,^r-IZ- *
2. Special Use Areas Undetermined
a) Southwest Quadrant School
Sites 6
3. Macario Canyon 25
Total: JMr~T\
1936
$ 4,225,000
-0-
l^£> -0-
367,500 ..
-0-
3,500,000
$ 8,092,500
Est. Costs
(Buiidout Needs)
1987
$ -0-
5,520,000
6,072,000
-0-
N 650,000
3,500,000
$ 15,752,000
utheast Quadrant -
existing Improved Park Acreage: 55.7
Additional Improved Park Acreage Needed: 72.75
Total: 128.45
Acres
1. Alga Norte
(a) Phase 1 - (Swim Complex,) 21
(b) Phase 11 - (Comm. Center
12,000 sq. ft.) 16 -
2. Leo Carrillo 10.3
3. Macario Canyon 25
Total: 72.3
1986
$ 3,531,000
-0-
-0-
2,000,000
3,500,000
$ 9,031,000
Est. Costs
(Buiidout Needs)
1987
$ -0-
4,620,000
2,815,000
2,075,000
3,500,000
$ 13,011,000
CITYWIDE PARKS SUMMARY:
Existing Improved Park Acreage: 153
Additional Improved Park Acreaged Needed: 259.75
Estimated Park Buiidout Costs 1987: 263 Acres $ 44,320,000
-3-
:.O
.RKS:
S
' Northwest Quadrant -
Existing Improved Park Acreage: 81.3
Aacitional Improved Park Acreage Needed: 37.14
Total: 118.44
i
Acres
1. Cannon Lake 6.7
2. Non-determined Sites f\ ^ ^-
(a) Pine School L- ^Q 8.0
3. Macario Canyon 25.0
4. Pine Community Center
(Senior Citizen Center)
(a) Phase 1 - (land acq.,
demolition, landscaping)
$1,010,000 (TIB)
(b) Phase II - (construction. -V-,^;
28,000 sq.ft.) ('^ f&>? r\
$3,596,000 (TIB) <Q "3-U
Total: J&^h-
1986
$ 649,000
Jt£> ^ ' ~-0-_ . ••'
3,500,000
1,679,000
-0-
4-1-1 $ 10,053,000
Est. Costs
(Buildout Needs]
1987
$ 650,000
('~~1,100,000 ^:
3,500,000
-0-
-0-
-0-
$ 5,250,000
— Northeast Quadrant - 6 _
Existing Improved Park Acreage: 4 4 a ~t- 'S —
Additional Improved Park Acreage Needed: -SS-i-13
Total: 62.53
Acres
1. Calavera Hills
(a) Phase 1 8
(b) Phase II - (Comm. Center
18,000 sq.ft.) 10
2. Northeast Quadrant Dev't.
(a) Larwin Park 13
2. Macario Canyon 25
Total: 61
^2..-Z-
1986
$ 2,270,000
-0-
-0-
4,225,000
-0-
3,500,000
$ 9,995,000
Est. Costs
(Buildout Needs)
1987
$ -0-
1,567,000
2,500,000
-0-
2,640,000
3,500,000
$ 10,307,000
-4-
APRIL 10, 1987
TO: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
VIA: LYNN CHASE, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
FROM: Carl Pope, Aquatic Supervisor
AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON - RECOMMENDED ORDINANCE CHANGES
BACKGROUND
Carlsbad Municipal Code and the California Boating Safety Laws are
the basis of the City's Lagoon Enforcement Program. The program
has been conducted by the Parks and Recreation Department for the
past four years with no increase in permit fees nor changes other
than a few unofficial traffic pattern changes.
The Lagoon Patrol Specialist for the past four years has recommended
changes in the Municipal Code, Chapter 11.24 to improve the safe
boating practices and to increase fees to offset higher operating
costs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The attachment titled "PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL
CODE, CHAPTER 11.24" shows the current wording and the proposed
changes and additions are shown in bold type.
The significant changes are summarized as:
1. Reduce the maximum number of power vessels operating on the
water from 80 to 45
2. Change the traffic pattern for "continuing traffic" to improve
safety and reduce congestion in the east/west channels created
by the sandbar and to reserve the marina area north of the
sandbar for take-off and drop-off traffic during heavy use periods.
3. Regulate approved use of power vessels in the middle lagoon, west
of Interstate 5 for lifeguards, patrol vessels, and scientific
research vessels.
4. Designate the eastern section of the Inner Lagoon as "Special Use
Area" for use as a water ski slalom course and for boardsails
when no jet skis are on the water.
5. The permit fees are revised by
0 dropping the weekly fee
0 increase the annual permit fee for all vessels by $5 per year
0 increase the daily permit fee
power vessels: residents increase = $2
non-residents increase = $3
board sails : residents increase = $1
ATTACHMENT Hnon-residents increase = $2
See page 4 for current and proposed permit fees ^
AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON - RECOMMENDED ORDINANCE CHANGES page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
The projected increase in revenue is $3,460 which is needed to
offset the increased cost of conducting the program.
Higher program costs are based on the need to operate the patrol boat
on the Lagoon during a longer season, higher fuel and maintenance costs,
staff time to monitor the liability insurance requirement to insure
proper coverage and endorsement naming the City of Carlsbad as additionally
insured in addition to Snug Harbor Marina Owners/Operators and/or
Bristol Cove Property Owner's Association, depending on the launch site
for power boats. Higher program cost also results from increasing
number of illegal launched vessels from private property surrounding
the lagoon.
The Lagoon Enforcement Program is conducted on a self-sustaining basis.
An increase in revenue is needed to continue to operate at no cost
to the general taxpayer for the day-to-day enforcement program.
CONCLUSION
I believe these changes are necessary to continue safe and efficient
operation of the lagoon program, and should be implemented as soon
as possible.
CPrpa
Attachment: Proposed Revisions for Carlsbad Municipal Code,
Chapter 11.24
c: Keith Beverly, Marnagaanent
Lynn Chase, Recreation Superintendent
PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 11.2*
"AQUATIC AREAS AND DEVICES"
11.2^.020 Boat Speed Limits
Current
No person shall operate a boat at speeds in excess of five miles an hour in any
of the followinq situations:
(1) Within one hundred feet of any person who is enaaaed in the act of
bathing;
(2) Within two hundred feet of any swimming float, diving platform, life line,
dock, pier or landing float. (Ord. 3118 (part), 1980: Ord. 3093 (part),
1972).
Proposed
No person shall operate a boat at speeds in excess of five miles an hour in any
of the following situations:
(1) Within one hundred feet of any person who is engaged in the act of
bathing. A person engaged in the sport of waterskiing shall not be
considered as engaged in the act of bathing for the purposes of this
section;
(2) Within two hundred feet of any swimmino float, divina platform, life line,
dock, pier or landing float. (Ord. 3118 (part), 1980: Ord. 3093 (part),
1972).
11.24.031 Special use area—Middle Lagoorr
Current
The Middle Laqoon, includina the water area between Interstate 5 and the
railroad tracks, is declared to be a special area. No person shall operate a
power boat or let skis or similar device at any time on the Middle Lanoon.
(Ord. 3118 (part), 1980).
Proposed
The Middle Lagoon, including the water area between Interstate 5 and the
railroad tracks, is declared to be a special use area. No person shall operate
a power boat or jet skis or similiar device at any time on the Middle Laaoon,
except the following:
(1) Lifeguard personnel of the Y.H.C.A.;
(2) City of Carlsbad Laqoon Patrol personnel;
(3) Persons and Agencies with City approval to do research;
-1-
11.2fr.032 Special use area—Inner Lagoon
Current
The Inner Laqoon, including all water areas east of Interstate 5 is declared to
be a special use area which shall be subject to the following regulations:
(1) 3et skis or similar devices shall be limited to use in Snug Harbor on
weekends and holidays, at all other times use will be limited to the
eastern section of the Inner Lagoon which is marked by buoys. Oet skis
must follow the traffic pattern when traveling to and from this desianated
area.
Proposed
The Inner Lagoon, including all water areas east of Interstate 5 is declared to
be a special use area which shall be subject to the followina reaulations:
(1) (A) 3et skis or similar devices shall be limited to use in
the "special use area" designated at the eastern section of
the Inner Lagoon. The City may, in the intrest of safety,
terminate the use of jet skis or similar devices at any
time.
(B) Oet skis or sinilar devices shall follow the established
traffic pattern when traveling to and fro* the "Special Use
Area" designated for their use.
(C) 3et skis or similar devices must obey right-of-way rules and
operate in a safe and prudent manner.
Current
(2) Power boat use will be limited to five miles per hour in Snua Harbor on
weekends and holidays only. A boat lane along the eastern shore of Snug
Harbor shall be used for power boat entry and exit into the Inner Lagoon
during the five-miles-per-hour restriction in Snug Harbor. Power boats and
jet skis have exclusive use of the Inner Laooon weekends and holidays from
May 2*fth to October 1st between the hours of nine a.m. to three p.m.
Proposed
(2) Exclusive use and restrictions.
(A) Powerboats, jet skis, and similar mechanically-powered
vessels have exclusive use of the Inner Lanoon on
weekends and holidays from mid-Hay through mid-October
between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
(B) The "Special Use Area" will be restricted to jet skis
and sinilar devices on weekends and holidays from mid-
Hay through mid-October or anytime there is one or more
jet skis or similar devices in this designated area.
-2-
Current
(3) No person shall operate a non-power boat, including hut not limited to sail
boats, row boats, board sails or canoes on the Inner Lagoon during any
period of exclusive power boat use.
Proposed
(3) (A) Sailboards are not allowed on the Inner Lagoon on
weekends or holidays from mid-May through mid-October
at any tine.
(B) No person shall operate a non-power boat, including but not limited to
sail boats, row boats, board sails or canoes on the Inner Lagoon
during any period of exclusive power boat use.
Current
(4-) The maximum number of boats allowed on the Inner Lagoon at any one time
shall be eighty.
Proposed
(k) The maximum number of vessels operating on the Inner Laaoon at
any one time shall be:
30 - Power boats.
15 - 3et skis or similar devices.
Current
(5) No person shall operate a parakayak or similar device at any time on the
Inner Laaoon.
Proposed
(5) No person shall operate a parasall or similar device at any
time on the Inner Lagoon.
Current
(6) No person shall operate a power boat, sail boat, board sail, or jet ski on
the Inner Laooon without a city permit and boat decal issued by the Parks
and Recreation Department or their designated representatives. The
following reguirements must be met to obtain a permit:
(A) The power boat, sail boat, board sail, or jet ski must have a state
approved currently valid registration;
(R) The power boat, sail boat, board sail, or jet ski owner must sian a
hold harmless agreement provided by the City;
-3-
(C) The power boat must be properly muffled in accordance with the Harbors
and Navigation Code;
(D) A permit fee must be paid.
Carlsbad Resident Nonresident
Annual permit* $20 $30
Weekly permit 10 15
Daily permit 5 7
Board Sail: Annual permit* 10 15
Daily permit 2 3
*Annual permits are effective from January 1st to December 31st each year.
(E) A board sail must be equipped with a windowed sail.
Proposed
(6) No person shall operate a power boat, sail boat, hoard sail,
or jet ski on the Inner Laaoon without a City permit and
boat decal issued by the Parks and Recreation Department or
their designated representatives. The following
requirements must be met to obtain a permit:
(A) The power boat, Jet ski, or sail boat over eight feet
in length must have current vessel registration;
(8) All lagoon users must siqn a hold harmless agreement
provided by the City.
(C) All power boats must be properly muffled in
accordance with the Harbors and Navigation Code:
(D) All sailboards must be eauipped with a windowed sail.
(E) A permit fee must be paid:
Annual fee is based on the calendar year, Oanuary 1
to December 31; Annual fee shall be half price when
purchased anytime between October 15 and December 31.
Daily fee Is sold at the Snug Harbor Marina Office and
is valid for only one day 8:00 a.m. to sunset; one
daily fee, with proof of receipt, may be applied as
credit toward the full purchase price of an Annual fee.
ANNUAL DAIL1
Resident Power Vessel/Sailboats (8* & up) $25 $ 7
Non-resident Power Vessel/Sailboats (8* & up) $35 $10
Resident Sailboard/Passive Vessels (under 8') $15 $ 3
Non-Resident Sailboard/Passive Vessels (under 8') $20 $ 5
Note: No power boat over 22 feet in length shall be
operated on Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
Current
(7) The city council may approve a special operations permit to temporarily
vary the requirements of this section, subject to such terms and conditions
as the city council deems necessary. (Ord. 3161 §§1, 2, 3 and 4, 1983;
Ord. 3153 §3, 1982; Ord. 3127 §1, 1981; Ord. 3118 (part), 1980).
No change.
11.2*».Q35 Skiers--Ski boats
Current
Waterskiing procedures shall be conducted as follows:
(1) Traffic Pattern. Ski boats leaving and approaching the shore shall follow
a counterclockwise pattern and continue in a counterclockwise pattern. No
ski boat shall leave the shore entering the ski course at more than a
forty-five-degree angle and must give right-of-way to any ski boats
approaching from the left.
Proposed
Waterskiing procedures shall he conducted as follows:
(1) Traffic Pattern
(A) Ski boats shall maintain a counterclockwise pattern.
(B) No ski boat shall enter the traffic pattern at more
than a forty-five degree angle.
(C) All continuing "Through Traffic" shall stay on the
south side of the sandbar during weekends and holidays
between mid-Hay to mid-October or if heavy traffic
exists during any day of the year.
(D) The entire body of water from north of the sandbar,
into Snug Harbor Marina, shall be reserved for take-off
and drop-off traffic exclusively on weekends and holidays
froa Mid-Nay to mid-October of if heavy traffic exists
during any other day of the year.
Current
(2) Procedure for Dropping Skiers. When returning skiers to the beach, the to w
boat must continue in a straight pattern, stopping in the nearest
uncongested area to pull in towards the center of the ski pattern and
reverse direction until he has passed the place he intends to beach, then
when clear, he shall cross the ski pattern and, when clear, he shall
approach the beach in a counterclockwise manner.
-5-
Proposed
(2) Take-off/Drop-off Procedures
(A) Snug Harbor
(1) Incoming and continuing traffic have the right-of-way
over take-off traffic. Take-off traffic shall standby
until the way is safe and clear before starting.
(2) During drop-off, the ski boat shall stay out of the 5
miles per hour zone marked by buoys. The red ski flag
must be clearly visible 100 yards before drop-off and
shall be continually visible until the towline is on
board and the skier reaches safety or is on board.
Immediately after the skier has been dropped off,
the ski boat shall proceed approximately 200 yards
to the center of the marina area, just north of the
sandbar, to draw in the tow line.
(B) South Beach and other Lagoon Area Beaches
(1) All ski boats starting from these areas shall enter the
ski lanes at no more than a *5 degree angle.
(2) All drop-offs shall be done parallel to the shoreline.
The ski boat shall not "hook* but remain parallel to the
shoreline. Once the skier drops-off, the ski boat shall
stop, draw in the tow line and when safe, make a small
counterclockwise turn back to the desired beach location.
Current
(3) Following Too Closely is Prohibited. Do not overtake or follow in the wake
of another boat in the process of towing skiers, aguaplaners, etc., at a
distance of less than two hundred feet.
Proposed
(3) Following too closely is prohibited. Do not over-take or follow
in the wake of another boat in the process of towing skiers,
aguaplanes, etc., at a distance that is reckless or
negligent.
Current
(<f) Slack Lines Prohibited. Mo boat shall put into the beach with sk i
line dragging behind.
(5) Boat and water vehicle racing is prohibited. (Ord. 3118 (nart),
19SO: Ord. 3093 (part), 1972).
-6-
11.2^.060 Areas for swimming or wading
Current
No swimmina or wadinp from shore shall he permitted in the area except in
designated zones. (Ord. 3118 (part), 1980: Ord. 3093 (part), 1972).
Proposed
No swimming or wading froa shore shall be permitted in the area except in
designated zones permitted by the Lagoon Patrol when these zones are Judg<
safe for wading.
-7-
Regular Meeting - 3 -
RECEIVED APR 1 GOT.
March 25, 1987
Superintendent Brierley reported 1) that the renovation of the City Council
Chambers would not be complete until the end of April and 2) that initial
plans were underway for the formation of the California Movement for
Educational Reform (CMER) spearheaded by Nancy and Bill Honig.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
John Beach, President, Carlsbad High School Lancer Booster Club, spoke
in support of the club's implementation of a Bingo program at Carlsbad
High School. Additional supportive comments were made by Chuck Duff.
The group had been licensed by the city and were requesting permission
from the Board to hold the games in the Carlsbad High School cafeteria
with additional use of the faculty room, student parking lot, lighting,
chairs and tables, custodial services and storage facilities. Liability
insurance had been arranged, volunteers committed and it was expected
that initial attendance would average 200 to 250 players on Saturdays
from 3:00 to 10:00 p.m. All proceeds would go to the Carlsbad High.
School Lancers athletic program.
It was moved by Trustee Angel, seconded by Trustee Johnson and carried
unanimously to approve the request of the Carlsbad High School Lancer
Booster Club for use of Carlsbad High School facilities for the purpose
of holding Bingo games.
CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
An informational staff report was presented to the Board describing the
increase in 1986-87 California Assessment Program (CAP) test scores by
twelfth grade students. Letters of congratulations were to be sent to
both students and staff at Carlsbad High School.
A detailed staff report on the English-as-a-second-language (ESL) pro-
gram was presented for information.
It was moved by Trustee McCormick, seconded by Trustee Switzer and
carried unanimously to approve submission to the state of applications
from Buena Vista, Hope, Kelly and Magnolia Elementary Schools for
AB 803 funds.
Funds available for continuation of the staff development program
were considered at length. Board members were in agreement that the
program was a valuable one for the instructional program, but concern
was expressed due to the financial curbs expected in 1987-88.
It was moved by Trustee Nygaard and seconded by Trustee Switzer to
approve the 1987-88 staff development plans with the cost of $69,550
to be taken from lottery funds.
Bingo Program
(Booster Club)
Ayes: Trustees Nygaard, Switzer, Johnson, Angel.
Noes: Trustee McCormick.
Absent: None.
CAP Scores
(12th grade)
ESL Report
AB 803
Applications
Staff
Development
ATTACHMENT I
CITY OF CARLSBAD — AGENDA BILL
AB#_
MTG._
DEPT..
TITLE: " 2 HOUR PARKING LIMIT " at
COMMUNITY SWIM COMPLEX
DEPT.
CITY ATTY.
CITY MGR.
O<
OO
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Introduce Ordinance No. amending the City Municipal Code
to designate "2 Hour Parking Limit; 7:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.;
{Monday through Friday; September through June)" on twenty-five
parking spaces directly in front of the Carlsbad Community Swim
Complex.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
During the school year, students attending Carlsbad High School
fill all or most of the parking spaces directly in front of the
Community Swim Complex, as well as all of the spaces in the
"Swim Complex" parking area directly east of the tennis courts.
Parking on the street in front of the Swim Complex is also limited,
As a result, the public using the Swim Complex must often park on
the streets, two blocks away or more. Limiting parking to two
hours in the 25 spaces in front of the Swim Complex will open
those spaces to the public. The City of Carlsbad owns the land
that both parking areas are on: Real property #10081, Appraisers
Parcel # 205-140-27 deeded to the City October 10, 1977.
The Carlsbad Unified School District feels this action would
have a negative impact on parking at Carlsbad High School.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Unknown expenditure for enforcement by the Police Department which
will be partially offset by citations.
EXHIBITS;
1. Vicinity and location map.
2. Ordinance No. amending the City Municipal Code
to designate "2 - Hour Parking Limit" in front of the Carlsbad
Community Swim Complex.
3. Letter from C.U.S.D. Facilities Manager.
ATTACHMENT J
1 =
c x i 3 r ' /v c c. *. *
ST
SITS PLAN - PZOJECT
bird.
fujimoco
Elfish
x B
2
u o
ino • u
Sfs
• \ \> 15
2 £ U
3 • "•5 o 0
0 0 L
U S U
Mi —. .'05 /.
PC.OJEC
12EA,
1
2
3
4
18
19
23
24
26
28
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.40 OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF SECTION 10.40.061
TO DECLARE A "TWO - HOUR PARKING LIMIT" FOR
TWENTY-FIVE SPACES LOCATED DIRECTLY EAST OF
THE COMMUNITY SWIM COMPLEX
5
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
6
hereby ordains as follows;
7
SECTION 1: That Title 10, Chapter 10.40 of the Carlsbad
8
Municipal Code is amended by the addition of Section 10.40.061 to
9
read as follows:
10
"10. 40.061 Parking Restricted in front of the Community
11
Swim Complex. Except for employee parking designated by proper
12
display of authorized permit, there will be no parking for longer
13
than a two - hour period, Monday through Friday, from 7:00 a.m. to
14
2:00 p.m., September through June, from the driveway located on
15
Monroe Street at the south end of the Swim Complex to the driveway
16
on Monr
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty
on Monroe Street at the north end of the Swim Complex.
17
days after its adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published once
in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days of its adoption.
21
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City
Council held the day of ,1987, and
- -
thereafter,
//
//
//
•j_ PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City council
2 held the day of , 1987, by the following
vote,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
8 ATTEST:
9"
10
11 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
12 (SEAL)
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
' jrLiiS^^• t />""~^
HCarlsbad Unified School District4P*-%j$
801 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 729-9291 "Excellence In Education"
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
JULIANNE L. NYGAARD
President
J. EDWARD SWITZER, )R.
Vice President
DONALD M. JOHNSON
Clerk
JOE ANGEL
Member
(AMESMcCORMICK
Member
DISTRICT
ADMINISTRATION
THOMAS K. BRIERLEY. Ed.D.
Superintendent
SUSAN-HARUMI BENTLEY
Assistant Superintendent
Instructional Services
JOHN H. BLAIR
Business Manager
GERALD C. TARMAN
Director
Personnel Services
ROBERT LAWRENCE
Manager
Facilities/Maintenance/
Operations
March 3, 1987
RECEIVED [-.;
Lynn Chase
Recreation Superintendent
Parks & Recreation Department
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 920C8
Dear Lynn,
Per your request, I am sending this letter to follow up our phone
conversation regarding parking at the pool area.
I have had conversations with Bill Dunmeyer, Carlsbad High School
Principal and Deems-Lewis, the architect that is working on the high
school renovation project. What I layed out was your decision to
install two(2) hour parking in fifteen(15) of the parking stalls.
Mr. Dunmeyer pointed out his concern regarding the negative impact
this parking change will have at Carlsbad High School. Mr. Scott
Smith, Deems-Lewis Representative also pointed out that parking is
the number one problem to overcome as their firm looks at the reno-
vation project.
In conclusion, I understand your reason for wanting to make this
change, especially if it is having the effects that you are suggesting
however, I must reiterate that it will have a negative impact on
parking at Carlsbad High School.
If I can be of additional service, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Bob Lawrence
Facilities Manager
Distinguished School Board Award 1984, United States Department of Education iL
-:<r~-«_<L ^ ('--«•
->/:.•/ L
TO
H
O
N
£
M
E
M
FROM -Jt,I AREA CODS
\ EXTENSION
BACK
CO
RETURNED
CALL •—
\ SIGNED
WANTS TO—j WILL CALL !
SEE YOU —1 AGAIN _!'.vA3,Ni_;j URGENT
iGNES FORM NO. 50-176
97
January 28, 1986
TO: LYNN CHASE, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
FROM: CARL POPE, AQUATIC SUPERVISORi
SWIM COMPLEX PUBLIC PARKING
I have followed up on the citizen contact from Lillian Holmes (Aqua X)
regarding the lack of parking available to the public in front of
the Swim Complex.
I contacted Dale Mitchell, Carlsbad High's Vice Principal, and told
him what the situation was. I asked him to recommend possible solu-
tions. Dale said that the number of students at Carlsbad High has
increased by about 100 per year for the past two years. He recommended
that I investigate either designating certain space in front of the
pool as 2 hour limit parking or that the City request the north grass
area back from the School District be turned into a parking lot.
Next I contacted Mike Shipley in the Police Department to investigate
what steps will be necessary to designate 2 hour parking in front of
the Swim Complex. He said a formal request should come from you or
Dave Bradstreet to the Traffic Safety Commission and the City Council.
He is aware of the City/School Agreement and said that it should be
checked first for any limitations.
I believe that parking will continue to be a real problem for patrons
using the Swim Complex during the week, during the school year. I
recommend 2 hour limit parking be designated for all spaces in front
of the Swim Complex and request your help to accomplish that.
CP:hlj
:-j.-n to:
/soo
ooci;r.;:::v
- CITY
9***"
. 11.00*
GRANT DEED
The Carlsbad Unified School District of San Diego County, California does
hereby grant to the City of Carlsbad that certain real property situated in the
County of San Diego, State of California, as more particularly described as
follows:
That portion of Tract 248 and Tract 249, Thum Lands, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the Office of the Recorder of San Diego
County, December 9, 1915, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Tract 248; thence
South 28°39' East along the northeasterly line thereof, a distance of
442.29 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along
the northeasterly line of said Tract 248 and Tract 249, South 28°39'
East 692.39 feet; thence South 61°21' West 170.65 feet; thence North
28"39' West 54.00 feet; thence South 61°21' West 97.00 feet; thence
North 28°39' West 555.00 feet; thence South 61°21' West 26.35 feet;
thence North 28"39' West 347.04 feet to a point on the northwesterly
line of said Tract 248; thence North 30°04' East along said north-
westerly line a distance of 88.56 feet; thence South 28°39' East
309.64 feet; thence North 61.21' East 218.32 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
The above said grant of real property is made for and in consideration of
the City of Carlsbad constructing a swimming pool thereon at the city's sole
expense and permitting the Carlsbad Unified School District to use said swimming
pool for educational purposes for a period of fifteen (15) years from
July 20, 1977. ^ _
NO F£
Dated:1977
»- — .. . -'.';;-.- \. ui ±^
iUol ?<":p%<-| N." "'•• - lOC&i
Carlsbad Unified School District
of San Diego County, California
By S'iPresident ,/Goiierning" Board
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
On the IP th day of
Anita M- Milllama
nn-nhof , 1977, before me,
a notary public in and for said County and State,
residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
Mary A. Schgrr , known to me to be the President of the Governing
Board of the Carlsbad Unified School District that executed the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that such school district executed the same, pursuant to a
resolution of said Governing Board.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed by official seal
the day and year in this certificate first aoove written.
\\v
Notary Public in and for the County
of San Diego, State of California.
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
NAME r
ADDRESS '7^3
PROBLEM:
DATE
CITY
< ? TIME ? ,' ^£ /T At
PHONE ?^c/- «?<?
^tc^J ,
-/w^y-. A^JL ClAt
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY
'}NAME 6 L
ADDRESS
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE 3 J //TIME *7-'
CITY
< /£• _
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
L
ADDRESS
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
NAME u ae ft rw Lf\
. \/iLLafrt \£
DATE "3 -
CITY
TIME
PHONE ^ ?4 -
H,
L. dO
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME r//
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
iv
ADDRESS £ 73 '/
PROBLEM:
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE 3/J* /
CITY
TIME
PHONE/ ^ 7 ~ f J2 f 7
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/ 11 / 83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS _.
PROBLEM:
V,
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMEN1
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE MA-fid* //,/??? TIME / # i 3 C <L/ ~~~~~~~————
CITY / W.,/t/ • PHONE
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
. W^
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE 11 V\\Q>TIME
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
—
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS _
PROBLEM:
If
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
J
7
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
<>
, h £>'f
DATE
CITY
/
-8 7 TIME 9
PHONE
A/ ^7
o C
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS^?
''9' 'PROBLEM; / uZ*
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
NAME fy],-i r\/ /rile Y
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE TIME
ADDRESS .:?23.r /I/.? A /-f / / / ^ T/ CITY^
PROBLEM: S'w.'vn (Lcmnlek //, r /C S ;•-> ,-t
? </ -
^A,- n^.-v u . S . " c '' Yl
4" c
VI (.( f-
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS
PROBLEM:
RECEIVED BY
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
7/11/83 - 77 Pii
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE 3 A/ #7 TIME
X
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE
PROBLEM :
CITY
TIME
PHONE
'RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
C:TY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 9Z008
438-5571
NAME
ADDRESS
PROBLEM:
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE -^f >( I f>
CITY
TIME _
PHONE
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
NAME
ADDRESS
Eva Shaw DATE 3/13/87
1758 Yourell AVe.CITY Carlsbad, CA
TIME 10:12 AM
PHONE 729-1326
PROBLEM: The students from CHS are using the parking lot designated for
the swim complex—therefore there in insuffient parking for
lap swimmers. Could signs be designed for the lot to be used
by swimmers only? Or extend the lot?
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARK; & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-f>571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
</ GL.>.L £> & // ^ DATE 3//3/K7 TIME//
ADDRESS 32>£*
PROBLEM: f / / ^//
dr
CITY 4 PHONE
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS
PROBLEM:
RECEIVED BY
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
£<-f^tOr_K>O -5T
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE
CITY
-/£> -^ 7 TIME /O(
PHONE
COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
1156 EI Avenue
Carlsbad, California 920C8
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
'.^1E pY\cxV>sVo^ j— ^L^XxNVi
-3DRESS 2^\^ vo \\S-o.x -Sry
~ROBLEM: -r^ oo^V,,_ --V Vv-
5 ^
DATE ^ I -'* x'?
CITY Oc^v\\\V^c^
'c«.^ta^A '>iO-.. <r»^ Coo-
TIME
PHONE
-T^i
*
1G '(^
759-^\T
rK v /•V-
T^
-^V
O
\^< <^
~rr -^ ^y
PHONERECEIVED BY COUNTER OTHER
11 '£3 BY DATE
NAME
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
<t £fM?S»V 3~ I1"
ADDRESS 3&16
PROBLEM:/
DATE
CITY
CSC
TIME
PHONE
iH-6
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER/^g* rH6
7/11/83 BY DATE
ADDRESS .
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE.j7 /J~?7 — &TIME <. /
'-Z^Li^
ECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY
NAME
ADDRESS ££70
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS _
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE
CITY .S f
'.I** Y/L- TIME ^ cl
^ PHONE
A
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
NAME
ADDRESS
PROBLEM:
DATE
CITY 9 >
TIME f -'^
PHONE 7-A./ -
/V.3 9-'
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE •10
NAME
ADDRESS _
PROBLEM:
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
DATE 5"
/ ,— /, ^ -n,^ /
'
TIME
PHONE
•?/3c /?*.
v/
RECEIVED BY COUNTER PHONE OTHER
7/11/83 BY DATE
NAME
ADDRESS \\>\
PROBLEM :
RECEIVED BY
CITY OF CARLSBAD - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1166 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
438-5571
CITIZEN CONTACT FORM
______ DATE
COUNTER PHONE
TIME
OTHER
BY DATE
1200 ELM AVENUE M^Tm TELEPHONE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 •JwljB (619)438-5571
Citp of Cartebab
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
March 17, 1987
Carlsbad Unified School District
Robert Lawrence
801 Pine Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
SWIM COMPLEX PARKING
Thank you for your expedient response to the request for a letter
stating the impact of limited parking on Carlsbad High School
students. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the original
letter to Dr. Brierly, and a site diagram showing the specific
parking spaces affected.
Effective immediately the Police Department will not be enforcing
the two-hour limit. You will be informed when the City Council
has passed the ordinance approving the limited parking, and when
the Police Department will begin enforcement.
Sincerely,
CARL POPE
Aquatic Supervisor
CPrlt
Attachment
.INSIDE WASHINGTON.
Lawmakers Face Parks Dilemma By Cathy Dombrowski
Providing the park and recreational activities required by
an increasingly active American society is a major task
confronting local governments and one expected to gar-
ner more attention, though not necessarily more dollars from
Washington. A presidential commission recently spent 18
months examining outdoor recreation and found the greatest
demand is for recreational activities close to home — within 15
minutes by foot or bike and within 10 miles by car or public
transportation.
The commission's work, culminating in a final report this
spring, is doing much to focus attention on society's recrea-
tional needs and the role local government plays in this area,
says R. Dean Tice, executive director of the National Recrea-
tion and Park Association (NRPA).
Creation of a trust fund providing $1 billion per year for
park and recreational lands was recommended by the commis-
sion, which did not suggest
any specific formula for
splitting the money among
government agencies. Tice
says, however, the commis-
sion did suggest the funds
would have the highest so-
cial and environmental
merit if applied to services
that are most used — those
closest to home.
Legislation already has
been introduced by Sen. J.
Bennett Johnston of Flor-
ida, who chairs the Senate
Energy and Natural Re-
sources Committee, au-
thorizing $1 billion per year
in funding. Appropriations
may not reach that level
since about S125 million
annually has been budgeted
in recent years. "I think the
prospects are very good in
the 100th Congress that we
will see an expanded capital investment program come out for
parks and I would think that a major element of that will be
responsive to city and county needs," Tice says. "But again,
only if the cities and counties make sure they're heard on this
thing. In the past, they've been underreprescnted."
Tice notes federal funding increases may not be immediate.
"It's important to keep in mind that the last effort similar to
the current commission was one that functioned from 1958
through 1962. Some of its recommendations, even ihe pood
ones, went six to eight years before getting on the books."
Even without more federal dollars, local governments have
many options, Tice says, citing partnerships with the private
sector, creative taxation, user fees and charccs on those pro-
viding services at recreational facilities. "Local governments
have tremendous assets," he says. "Those guys want your wa-
terfront. They want to sell food to your visitors. They want to
transport people, entertain people and cart away their wasics.
\1I of these, no matter how mundane, are opportunities for
someone to make a dollar."
Local governments must explore all these options, he noiev
"At the local level, there are more than 100.000 park, and rev-
reation places. If you were never to create another new park,
8
"There is no
entity of
government at
the national
level. . .
to look
comprehensively
at parks,
recreation
and leisure."
R. Dean Tice
you have a tremendous capital investment in existing recrea-
tion resources. They get worn out. There are more people,
more pressure, more demands."
The commission also identified the need for an "entity" at
the national level to encourage leadership on recreation issues.
"That's where my organization may have a serious diversion of
opinion with the commission," Tice says. "We think there
needs to be something much more substantial than that."
There are many federal programs that could be used to benefit
recreation, he points out.
The clean water program is based on two recreational objec-
tives, fishable and swimmable waters. "Yet we have no one in
EPA, to my knowledge, expressly looking at the recreation po-
tential ... If the clean water planners in Dayton, Ohio, talked
to the park and recreation planners in Dayton, we'd have some
marriages that would have mutual benefit to the public, far be-
yond our lifetime. But they
don't have that now."
In addition to the envi-
ronmental programs, there
are transportation, housing
and agricultural activities
with recreation as a sec-
ondary beneficiary if prop-
erly planned, he adds.
"There is no entity of gov-
ernment at the national
level that has either the
perspective or the capacity
to look comprehensively at
parks, recreation and lei-
sure." The NPRA would
like to see that change, Tice
says, so one organization
would examine how agen-
cies work together, how
programs work together,
how funds can best be used
for mutual advantage, how
_«_«_i.____^__i_^__ ! a technical inquiry can be
answered and how research
can be focused.
The budget deficit is real, he says, "but how much are we
losing by not doing better by these things? It's a question of
priorities, and our hope is that the work of the commission, as
a starting point, can engender a greater attention by all kinds
of people — county executives, members of Congress, state
legislators."
Parks and recreation will continue to be of major public in-
terest, guaranteed by growing demand as the population grows
and becomes increasingly health-conscious, Tice says. Also, he
notes, people are concerned with the land.
"There's a high public interest in wildlife. People are inter-
ested in natural resources. They want cities to be attractive.
They want services when they get there." The previous com-
mission said the greatest recreational challenges were in met-
ropolitan regions, and Tice says that is still the case. "Forget
who's in the White House or the city manager. Recreation in a
social context is a demand for space and resources, and is a
function of people." D
Cathv Dombrowski is the Washington correspondent for
American CM, 4 Coun.v. ATTACHMENT K
American City ft County/April 1987
April 13, 1987
TO: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
FROM: KEITH BEVERLY, MANAGEMENT ANALYST®
20 MILLION DOLLAR GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
As we discussed, this is the project description, quadrant location
and estimated cost of items to be included in a possible general
obligation bond. This will be presented as an item for discussion
at the April 20, 1987 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
Project Quadrant Estimated Cost
1. Purchase Hosp Grove N.W. $ 6,700,000
2. Sidewalks on Bluff Areas N.W. 500,000
3. Macario Canyon Development N.W. 5,000,000
Passive Activities
Teen Activity Facilities
4. Two (2) Pedestrian Over Passes S.E. 400,000
£-, Golf Course (Alga Norte) S.E. 4,500,000
6. Alta Mira or Hunt Park S.W. 2,900,000
Development and 50 Meter
Swim Complex
KB: pa
n-
TOTAL $ 20,000,000
($55 per household)
ATTACHMENT L
April 9, 1987
TO: RAY PATCHETT, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
FROM: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
1987-88- BUDGET CUT PROPOSALS /PARKS & RECREATION, BUILDING MAINTENANCE
As requested,.! have analyzed our budget request to identify
additional budget cuts using the following guidelines.
0 Use FY 86-87 Budget as a guideline for budget projection.
0 Include slight increase in personnel salaries and
fringe benefits due to locked in salary adjustments.
0 Use an overall 3% increase in maintenance and operation
accounts.
0 New mandated programs such as Stagecoach and Calavera
Hills Community Park, Nutrition Program and facility
maintenance increases will be adjusted accordingly.
0 No additional capital outlay.
0 Implement hiring freeze for vacant FY 86-87 positions.
0 No temporary or part-time staffing to back fill full-time
positions.
0 No new full-time positions for FY 87-88.
0 Identify service impact of proposed cuts.
ADMINISTRATION
87/88
Suggested
increase as
PERS
M/0
C/0
SUB TOTAL
SERV.
TOTAL
$
$
$
86-87
205,737
120,146
550
326,433
[-3,323]
323,110
%
+2
[-9]
[-100]
per
$
$
$
ACM's
210,454
110,060
0
320,514
[-3,323]
317,191
Mandated
Program
Costs
0
0 ,
0o 3/t
0 2,1
Dept/Recom
87-88
$ 210
110
,0-7 $-020
[-3
<?•#% -3*^
,077
060
0
T&^4
,323]
r*91
•*-/-
+$ 4,
[- 10,
340
086]
[-550]
[-5,
l-*5-y
919]
•MS]
%
+2
[-9]
[-100
[-2]
[-2]
0 Total Administration Budget Request for FY 87-88 is down $5,919
, (2%) over FY 86-87 approved fund allocation.
0 No new programs are projected, additional responsibilities created
**** ^^P™^ Vlll fa
PARKS
PERS
M/O
C/0
SUB TOTAL
SERV.
TOTAL
86-87
$ 551
' 533
55
$1,140
[-27
$1,112
,564
,571
,370
,505
,941]
,564
87/88
Suggested
increase as
% per ACM's
-10 $
[-3]
$1
$1
537,
549,
,086,
[-27,
,058,
220
578
0
798
941]
857
Mandated
Program
Costs
+$ 67
+ $ 46
+ 15
$128
0
$128
,000
,238
,000
,238
,238-
Dept/Recom
87-88 +/- %
$ 604
567
15
$1,187
[-27
$1,159
,220
,875
,000
,095
,941]
,154
+$52,
+34,
+15,
+46,
656
304
000
590
+10
+ 6
[-70]
+ 4
. Total Park Operation Budget up $46,590 (4%) over FY 86-87.
. Reason: Mandated maintenance for Stagecoach and Calavera Hills Community
Park (6 mos. and 8 mos. respectively, additional over 86-87
Budget request). 3% inflationary m/o costs, salary and fringe
benefit increases.
. MAJOR IMPACT OF HOLD THE LINE BUDGET REQUEST.
A. Eliminate landscape maintenance of fire stations.
B. Eliminate Boys and Girls Club Litter Program.
~C. Reduced quantity of weekend restroom maintenance and trash pick up
in park areas and beaches.
D. Reduction and/or elimination of in-house special projects and
assistance to various special events.
. SERVICE IMPACT OF HIRING FREEZE - (3 MWI POSITIONS)
A.
B.
C.
Eliminate ability to maintain Stagecoach and Calavera Hills Community
Park.
To assume maintenance of Stagecoach and Calavera Hills Parks, utilizing
existing personnel only, will severely reduce the quality of maintenance
currently performed and could increase safety and liability concerns.
Since 1986, the following new areas have or will soon come on line and
will require extensive park and landscape maintenance.
1. Stagecoach Community Park
2. Calavera Hills Community Park
3. Safety Center
4. Fuerte School/Park
5. Fire Station #4
6. Poinsettia Bridge
7. Additional medians
8. Hosp Grove
28,
8,
Total
Grand Total
,0 Ac
,0 Ac
15.0 Ac
8.0 Ac
1.0 Ac
.5 Ac
1.0 Ac
53.5 Ac
53
106.5 Ac
it is recommended not to freeze; hiring of three (3) Park Maintenance Worker !'=
that have been funded in FY 86-87.
TREES
PERS
M/O
C/O
SUB TOTAL
SERV.
TOTAL
86-87
87/88
Suggested
increase as
per ACM's
$
$
$
175,
65,
11,
252,
252,
,332
,600
,960
,892
0
,892
+ .05
+3.0
[-100]
$
$
$
176
67
243
243
f
/
/
i
375
600
0
975
0
975
Mandated
Program Dept/Re"com
Costs
0
0
0
0
0
87-88 +/- %
$
$
176,
67,
243,
375
600
0
975
0
+$1/043
+957
[-11
-$8
r
r
960]
917]
•
3.
5
0
[-100
[-3.6
$ 243,975 -$ 8,917] [-3.6
Total FY 87-88 is down $8,917 (3.6%) below FY 86-87 approved fund allocation.
SERVICE IMPACT
A. Maintenance for Hosp Grove is not included in this request (approximately
$80,000).
B. Service levels for right-of-way and tree maintenance will maintain
status quo for FY 87-88.
C. Assistance to in-house projects and special events will be eliminated.
RECREATION OPERATIONS
PERS
M/O
C/O
SUB TOTAL
SERV.
TOTAL
$
$
86-87
84,960
54,267
46,210
185,437
0
87/88
Suggested Mandated
increase as Program
% per ACM's Costs
[-17.5] $ 72,280
[-8.5] 50,000
0
$122,280
0
$ 22,300
0
7,500
$ 29,800
0
Dept/Recom
87-88 +/- %
$ 94,600
50,000
7,500
$152,100
0
+$9,640
[-4,267]
[-38,710]
[-33,337]
+ 11
[-8.5
[-84]
[-22]
$ 185,437 [-34] $122,280 $ 29,800 $152,100 [-$33,337] [-18]
The Recreation Operations FY 87-88 Budget request is down $33,337 (18%) over
FY 86-87 approved fund allocation.
SERVICE IMPACT
A. Mandated cost for operation of Stagecoach and Calavera Hills Phase I
Community Park is $29,800 which includes part time staff or receptionist/
cashier and vehicle for ballfield maintenance.
B. Hold the line budget for the operation of Stagecoach and Calavera Hills
Community Park will result in the operation of Stagecoach Community Center
to only six (6) days per week. TO operate (1) one additional day per
week would cost an additional $10,000.
Recreation Operations (Cont.)
. HIRING FREEZE IMPACT
~ A. The hiring freeze for one (1) full time receptionist/cashier may result
in the reduction of creditable accountability of collected revenues, from
various programs, continuity of bookkeeping and receptionist capabilities,
knowledge of recreational programming and operation will be reduced.
B. Department recommends FY 87-88 budget includes Part-time salaries to
perform the Receptionist/Cashier duties.
FEE SUPPORTED
87/88
Suggested Mandated
increase as Program Dept/Recom
86-87 % per ACM's Costs 87-88 + /- %
PERS $ 377,523 $332,231 $120,463 $452,694 +$75,171 +16.6
M/0 ' 306,205 +3 316,931 39,479 356,410 + 50,205 +14
C/0 700 0 0 0 Q
SUB TOTAL $ 684,428 $649,162 $159,942 $809,104 +124,676 18
SERV. 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL $ 684,428 [-12] $649,162 $159,942 $809,104 +$124,676 18
. The Recreation Fee Supported budget request for FY 87-88 is $124,676 (18%)
over FY 86-87 allocated funding.
. SERVICE IMPACT
A. To operate recreation programs at Stagecoach for a full year and Calavera
Hills Phase I for .an 8 month funding period, the cost have been identified
as $54,307.
B. A hold the line budget request for Fee Supported recreation means that
no new programs can be implemented during FY 87-88, i.e. industrial
sports league programming.
C. Programs recommended to be deferred or eliminated until additional staff
can come on line.
1. Triathlon
2. Theatre arts program
3. Reduction or elimination of community wide special events, i.e.
Easter egg hunt. Spring recital. Garage sale.
D. The Fee Supported Recreation Division goal is to be 60% self-sustaining.
They currently operate at 65% self-supporting basis. It is anticipated
that Stagecoach Gymnasium/Community Center would substantially increase
the revenues generated and, therefore, the self-supporting percentage.
Any reduction in Recreation programming would result in substantial
self-supporting capabilities for this Division.
FEE SUPPORTED (Cont.)
."~ THING FREEZE IMPACT
A hiring freeze of 3 approved full time recreation specialist positions
will greatly impact the Fee Supported Recreation programs.
The existing Recreation supervisorial staff will be required to assume
additional responsibilities of the Recreation Specialist position. This
added responsibility will result in reduction of training, marketing,
coordinating and implementation of recreation programs and special event
activities.
The FY 87-88 revised budget proposal include part time funding of $70,369
for:
3 - Part time recreation specialists
1 - Part time graphic technician
AQUATICS
PERS
M/0
C/O
SUB TOTAL
SERV.
TOTAL
$
$
$
86-87
100,879
68,458
8,524
177,861
0
177,861
87/88
Suggested
increase as
% per ACM ' s
$
$
$
105
70
177
177
,492
,511
0
,003
,003
Mandated
Program Dept/Recom
Costs 87-88 +/- %
0
0
0
0
0
$
$
$
105,492
70,511
0
177,003
177,003
+ $
+ $
[-$
[-$
[-$
4,613
2,053
8,524]
858]
858]
4
3
[-100]
[-.05]
[-.05]
0 The Aquatics Budget Request for FY 87-88 is $177,003 (-.05%) below
FY 86-87 approved fund allocation.
SERVICE IMPACT
A. Hold the line budget, no new programs will be implemented and no
additional hours of operation will be approved.
B. The City will no longer be able to provide for additional service to
the Carlsbad High School to set up for swim and water polo meets.
\oc
SENIOR CITIZENS
PERS
M/O
C/0
SUB TOTAL
SERV.
TOTAL
86-87
87/88
Suggested
increase as
% per ACM's
$
$
$
90,
43,
1,
135,
135,
098
968
120
186
0
186
[-.01]
[ -11]
[-100]
$
$
$
88,
20,
109,
109,
762
850
0
612
0
612
Mandated
Program
Costs
$ 5,145
28,000
0
$ 33,145
0
Dept/ Re.com
87-88
$ 93,907
48,850
0
$142,757
0
$ 33,145 $142,757
+$3,809 + 4
-I- 4,882 +11
- 1,120 [-100]
+ 7,751 +5.6
0
+ 7,751 +5.6
The total Senior Citizens budget is up $7,571 (5.6%) over the FY 86-87
approved fund allocation.
SERVICE IMPACT
A. The primary reason the budget is up is due to the inclusion of the
Council mandated Nutrition Program totalling $33,145.
B. The Senior Citizen coordinator position responsibility has increased
approximately 50% due to the newly implemented Nutrition Program.
C. The level of service and programming for other Senior Citizens activities
will be lower than FY 87-88 due to hold the line and implementation
of the Nutrition Program.
Q\
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
86-87
87/88
Suggested Mandated
increase as Program
% per ACM's Costs
[-1]
+3
$247,
263,
$511,
[-50,
$461,
376
910
0
286
000]
286
+ $133
+ 10
+ $143
+ $143
,550
0
,000
,550
0
,550
Dept/
Recom.
87-88 +/- %
$380,
263,
10,
$654,
[-50,
$604,
926
910
000
836
000]
836
$86,
7,
[-4,
+$89,
+ $72,
835
688
750]
773
775
+ 23
-f 3
[-33]
+ 13.
PERS $294,091
M/0 ' 256,222
C/0 ' 14,750
SUB TOTAL $565,063
SERV. [-33,002]
TOTAL $532,061
0 The Building Maintenance budget request for FY 87-88 is $72,775 (13.6%) above
FY 86-87 allocated funding.
0 Identified mandated program cost have been estimated to be $62,950.
A. Building Maintenance Superintendent ($45,500)
B. Increase of part time hours ($7,500)
C. Mandated salary increases ($2,262)
D. 3% inflationary factor for M/0 ($7,688)
0 HIRING FREEZE IMPACT
The hiring freeze fiscal impact is $70,600, and will affect the hiring
_ of three (3) critical positions to this Division, they are:
1. Custodian II position
This position took the place of one (1) Custodian I during FY 86-87,
however, the position has not been filled due to negotiations to
increase the salary range and job responsibilities.
If this position is not immediately filled, it will
create a service level impact on supervising personnel and
contractual services during evening hours. Presently the Acting
Building Superintendent and Supervisor are performing this task.
If the issue regarding the Custodial II salary and job description
cannot be resolved, it is recommended that the position be filled
by a Custodian I to augment the existing custodial complement.
Presently, the existing custodial personnel are asked to perform
services beyond our adopted standards of 18,000 square fee per
person. They presently try to cover 29,500 square feet per person.
2. Building Maintenance Carpenter (1) and MWII position.
Due to a recent resignation, the Maintenance Worker II is currently
filled by a provisional appointment. The Building Maintenance
Carpenter is currently being filled with part time help.
BLDG MAINT (Cont.)
If these two positions are not immediately filled, it will create
— a serious maintenance impact to all departments city wide.
According to our records, there are an average of 28 work orders
submitted to the Building and Maintenance Department per month.
Presently, there is a backlog of over 30 orders that require action.
It is strongly recommended that these two positions be filled as
soon as possible.
3. Building Maintenance Superintendent
The Recreation Superintendent is currently performing the duties
of Building Maintenance Superintendent. Much of the knowledge
required for this position is above and beyond her expertise.
City Council has recently approved the job, classification and
hiring of this position.
SERVICE IMPACT
A FY 87-88 hold the line budget request will seriously impact the
the level of service for custodial operations to all departments.
Existing service levels may be cut by 50% in order to provide
custodial service to existing and new facilities throughout the
City.
No new positions other than Building Maintenance Superintendent
"~ have been added to 87-88 request.
The request for a facility attendant to set up and take down for
meetings at the Safety Service Center has been withdrawn by our
department. There is currently part-time status personnel performing
these duties. The position is being funded by the Police Department.
103
SUMMARY
rxsion
Admin
Com
Parks
Trees
Rec Op
Rec Fee
Aquatics
Sen Cit
Sen Com
Build
AHL
86-87
$323,110
800
$1,112,564
252,892
185,437
684,428
177,861
135,186
500
532,061
19,400
$3,424,239
ACM
Re com
87-88
$ 317,191
400
$1,058,857
243,975
122,280
649,162
177,003
109,612
400
461,286
21,200
[-$5,919]
[ -400]
[-$53,707]
[ -8,917]
[-63,157]
[-35,266]
[ -858]
[-25,574]
[ -100]
[-25,275]
+1,800
Dept/
Re com
87-88 +/-
$ -3-17,191 [-$5,9I.9.]-lQ-Z3<
400 [ -400]
$1,159,154 +$46,590
243,975 [-8,917]
152,100 [-33,337]
809,104 +124,676
177,003 [ -858]
+7,751
[ -100]
+72,775
+1,800
142,757
400
21,200
$3,161,366 [-262,873] [8%] $3,628,120 +5.
APPROVED FY 86-87 FULL TIME POSITIONS AFFECTED BY
HIRING FREEZE/FY 87-88 FULL TIME PERSONNEL REQUEST
Positions Positions
Not Recommended Which Could FY 87-88
Be Frozen Be Frozen Request
(3) Park Maint Worker I (3) Recreation Building
Specialists Maintenance
(1) Building Maint Worker II Superintendent
(1) Receptionist/
(1) Building Maint Carpenter Cashier (Stagecoach)
(1) Custodian II
(1) Rec Supervisor (Stagecoach)
April 3, 1987
TO: DAVID BRADSTREET, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
FROM: / KEITH BEVERLY, MANAGEMENT ANALYST^=J>
MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH
ADMINISTRATION;
THE FY 87-88 BUDGET has undergone additional cuts at the department
level. The Finance Department has requested these reductions
primarily due to a reduction of revenues generated by the City.
Staff will be analyzing methods of enhancing revenues at the
departmental level for the purpose of offsetting any additional
increases over the FY 86-87 budget.
STAGECOACH PARK dedication is drawing near and is currently planned
for May 30, 1987. Capital outlay items are being ordered for the
start up of the Community Center/Gymnasium. Rain delays have
hampered the process of adding soil amendments to grass play fields
and additional turfed areas. Santa Ana weather conditions were
helpful to this situation in late March.
PARKS AND TREE MAINTENANCE;
Backstops, fencing, benches and bases have been installed at the
BUENA VISTA SCHOOL site. Many organized area teams have participated
at the newly enhanced ballfield facility.
The landscape is presently being installed at the CAR COUNTRY MEDIANS
and the new landscape look will be completed shortly. Parks Division
staff are to be complimented on yet another outstanding in-house
project.
A NEW SOFTBALL PLAYFIELD at the Public Service and Safety Center
underwent final preparation by parks crews for the April 2
dedication. The site will serve as the home field to the senior
league teams.
Apr 3, 1987
David Bradstreet
Page Two
RECREATION; . _
THE FIFTH ANNUAL INSTRUCTIONAL CLASS SPRING RECITAL performed
rigerous rehearsals during March in preparation for the April 6
performance at the Carlsbad Community Cultural Arts Center.
YOUTH BASKETBALL completed a very successful season, providing
competitive recreation to over 150 youngsters. The 3rd and 4th
grades and 7th and 8th grades division were victorious at the San
Diego County championship play-offs. The 5th and 6th grades
team was also #1 in the county and is scheduled to play in the
upcoming Torrey Pines Invitational AAU Youth Basketball Tournament.
THE ANNUAL CARLSBAD PARKS.,AND RECREATION TRACK AND FIELD MEET,
co-sponsored by the CARLSBAD EVENING ROTARY was held on Saturday,
March 21, 1987. 147 youngsters participated and the top finishers
in all age groups will compete in the San Diego- County track and
field meet on May 9 at San Diego State University.
DAYTRIPPER EXCURSIONS hosted 4 trips and 147 participants this month
which included trips to Death Valley, Laughlin, Nevada; Anza Borrego
and the Dorothy Chandler Pavillion for a Gilbert and Sullivan musical,
To date 40 applications are on file for volunteer assistance to the
DayTripper tour program.
A two pitch softball tourney was held by the Special Events section
over the weekend of March 28-29. 8 teams with over 100 participants
competed. : -
CHRIS HARMON, THE LAGOON .PATROL SPECIALIST will bid us adieu as he
heads for the French Island of Martinique where he will instruct
water ski courses for Club Med. Chris will be replaced by Oscar
Alvarez of the Swim Complex who assisted the Lagoon patrolman last
year.
AQUATICS:
The monthly operation of the COMMUNITY SWIM COMPLEX generated a
revenue of $4,178 and provided aquatic recreational opportunities
for 5,935 participants. Eight competitive Carlsbad High School
swim meets were held, nine learn to swim courses and a safety
training session in CPR.
Apr 3, 1987
David Bradstreet
Page Three
SENIOR CITIZENS:
In celebration of "EMPLOY THE OLDER WORKER WEEK" (March9 -
March 13, 1987), the Senior Center hosted an EMPLOYMENT FAIR
on March 12.;;; Seventy-three .seniors a'tterided and had an opportunity
to discuss employment opportunities with over
were present;,;.
20 employers who
Staff submitted, a proposed budget to the AREA- AGENCY-ON AGING
for operations of;, the Transportation'^' Mobile Meals'and Nutrition
through June 30,
Program currently
noon lunches and
programs for-the time period, of M'arch 1» 1987
1987. During the. mo nth of March the Nutritior
operated by th^.. Seniors Division ser'ved: 2,200
780 mobile meal:s were delivered. Tra'risporatiob "provided for 532.
March events-ass:istance programs/participatiori: -
. Line dancing;; r. 160 : :.-- ' - : • .
. Ballroom dance, class:.- 104 j
. Crafty crafters - 38 -'- •••..- "" . "
. Bridge - 48 ;
. Friday afternoon social bingo-- 167 |
. Blood pressure check - 82 " |
. Medicare eoujiseling - 8 - : ! ' ;
. Legal assistance - 9 -. : |
. Tax assistance - 84 |
BUILDING MAINTENANCE;
A WORK ORDER REQUEST moratorium inacted during March enabled Building
Maintenance personnel to help catch up on an Overwhelming- amount of
back logged requestsv , . An::additi:onal -30 emergency. wq^TC ofdefs were
received and completed this-month. |
Two NEW EMPLOYEES, Ken Hansen and Joe Jardin were :recruited into
the Building Maintenance Division this month.! Ken Hansen comes to
us from the Utility Maintenance Department as a 6 month provisional
appointment for Building Maintenance Carpente^r. Joe Jardin -was
hired as a new full time custodian.
KB: It
c: Frank Aleshire, City Manager
Ray Patchett, Assistant City Manager