The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1963-03-04; Planning Commission; Minutest I " ', *' ' ' . 1 i CITY CF CARLSBAD I . 8. I : Minutes of: PLANNING CQM MISSION 1 '8 3 8 ', ', '\ i Date of Meeting: Marcb 4,1963 (Adjourned Meeting) Name .,, .,& ,~, ' ,,:a I : Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.M. : of '.+O' ' *+\ i Place of Meeting: Council Chambers Member \.& $@,.p$~~~ a$,+ * ~""""~"""""""-""~""-"~"""~""""""""""-""""~"~~"-""""-"-"- "","" Ward, Palmer, Jarvie and Sonneman. Chairman Ewald i t:;b,l !II!O! was present at 8:14 P.M. Commissioner Davis was I I absent. Also present were Planning Technician Uhland B.i Melton and Secretary Frice. I I CLD BUSINESS: I \ " I 8', *\;a,, " 8' '. I I '\' '" '\ '8 '\ '. 1 t I * ROLL CALL was answered by Commissioners Grant, I ;@lbl1 :::::; I 1 I I 1 1 (a) Amendment to PI-T Zone. The Searetary rdvidtlded a k, solution of Intention fop the i Commission's consideration, aad repoeted that when larg4 motels and hotels come into the City in the Recreational- ; Tourist area, that it would not be economically feasible I to operate a high class motel or hotel without a restaurant! and cocktail lounge, He stated that he feels that R-T is a quasi commercial zone. 8 l . The Commission discussed the possibility of residential : homes being next to a restaurant that has a cocktail * I lounge. It was pointed out that liquor licenses are not : allowed to be closer than 200' apart and that when an I application for a liquor license is applied for, notices are i posted and a hearing is held before the Alcoholic Beveragq Control and their decision is final. The zoning has to be i right to begin with and then the ABC can act. 9 The Secretary reviewed Resolution of Intention No. 38 he , had prepared to create a new R-1-4,000 sq. ft. , (One- :QmiLy residential zone) as it is related to this type of I zoning in that it is intended for property along the lagoon and ocean and stated that he believes there should be mor4 I front yard setback than ten feet as there will be trouble : : with off-street parking in regards to guests, etc. , and it i is not good planning where autos parked in the driveway : : extend into public property due to the lack of sufficient i front yard setback. ; I I I I I 9 I t The Flaming Technician stated that he believes the front i : yard setback should be 5' and recommended a 3' setback 04 i the second floor for marina type developments. He i pointed out that there will be more lakes in the future and 1 ; there may be developments around Calaveras Lake and I Squires Dam. b I The Secretary pointed out that there are subdfvisions in I : the City that are highly restricted as far as deed restricti4ns, I but after the initial enthusiasm is over, those making the : ; deed restrictions leave and deed restrictions are violated i so many times and as a matter of fact become invalid and :, : unenforceabie, where if the City has a specific ordinance ! it would eliminate this. 4 The Commission questioned the effect this zone will have i ; on the pro ty that is alreadlzoned R-T and tho Secretary i stated that ?!F mendment would have none. Change of zone : : has to be initiated by Resolution of Intention of the Fhn- i i ning Commission, Council, or an individual and it could :, : not be retroactive. The Secretary stated that he did not '4;. - ' believe the R-1-4,000 sq. ft. zone would be suitable for : :the plans of Pirates' Cove as they expect to have some i multiple dwellings. 8 i The Planning Technician stated that the R-T could be : subject to the issuance of a variance or conditionat use i permit for "off sale" liquor. After review a conditional : : use permit could be granted to allow cocktail lounges. I FRANK DeVORE, San Diego Gas St Electric Co. , asked 1 i why it would not be proper to zone all of the north shore : : R-T and then issue conditional use permits as the Commisi- i sion see fit. 1 I - I b , 1 I I 1 * I I I I 1 1 I I I 9 I I * b I I 9 I I 1 I I ! . -2- I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I k I I I I 1 I I I f f : The Secretary explained that this amendment is primarily i I for the guests of hotels and motels and it would be necess-: : ary for him to have a hotel or motel before this proposed i I amendment to R -T Zone would be applicable to his property. The Secretary pointed out that touristism is industry and ! ithe City has a good climate to attract tourist business and i that the proper zoning is absolutely ncessary to attract i i outside capital. I i It was agreed that Resolution of Intentioh No, 40 be adoptea i for the following reasons: I I 1. To encourage the tourist business in the City of i i Carlsbad and that it is not economically desirable to 1 1 ;operate a large motel or hotel without a cocktail lounge. : i Resolution of Intention No. 40, RESOLUTION OF INTEN'-'j, ' 1 I 1 ? I I I t I I I I I I AU mY PLANNING COMMISSION I DIRECTING THE SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING CCM-: - I I I I i (b) Resolution of Intention to create an R-1-4 Zone I (R - 1 -4 Ob 0 sq . ft . , one -family residential zone). / The Planning Technician recommended that the Commissi& :change the heading by adding one-family residential water I I front property, and asked that Section 501 -A, Height I I ; Limitation, be left at 35' I I 9 I I 1 6 f I t The Flanning Technician made the following recomrnenda- - i tions: I I I I I t i Section 502 -A. Front yard setback shall be not less than ; 5 feet. i Section 503 -A. Side yard setback, item 1 be changed from ! : 4' to 3 l/Zf. Item (b) should be changed to 7 feet. That the second Line in Section 2 be changed to "create a i : (one-family residential waterfront zone)'' and that the last i i paragraph be changed from lagoon and ocean property to : i waterfront property. I I It was agreed that this Resolution of Intention be adopted i i as amended for the following reasons: I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1. In the lagoon areas and beach areas there is a i decided need for smaller R-1 Lots than presently exists i I under the zoning ordinance. I I : 2. That a zoning of this nature is in the best interests i of public convenience necessity and general welfare. I I : 3. That it allows the highest and best use of water - I i front property. I It was further agreed that this be scheduled for a hearing i ion March 26, 1963, with X.O.I. 38 to be heard first and I ;then R,O. I. 40 next. I I I I I I I * I I I I I I I . l ion of Intention No, 38. RESOLUTION OF INTEN- i G COMMISSICN DIRECTING THE; SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING CGMMISSION TO I : ADVERTISE FGR AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO.: I 9060, BY ADDING ARTICLE 5-A TO CREATE AN R-1- I i 4, ooo sc. FT. , (WATERFRONT ONE-FAMILY RESIDEN+ ; TIAL ZONE), AND DECLARING FINDINGS OF FACT ; i WHICH RECUIRE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO I 4 ; ADOPT THIS RESOLUTICN OF INTENTION, was adopted; ! I i OLD BUSINESS: i fb) Height limitations. I I I I The Planning Technician displayed a map he had prepared! I of a proposed area for "high rise" height limitations for I the Commission's consideration, which could be the begin; I ning of a study area for boundaries. The proposed area I : included property on Carlsbad Boulevard from Walnut to ; 180' plus or minus east of the intersection of Lincoln and : ; Walnut; thence north to Oak Avenue, thence east to freew& I and thence north on the freeway to Laguna Drive, and i : westerly on Laguna to State and Carlsbad Boulevard I i thence gesterly to the ocean and back to the point of : beginning at Carlsbad Boulevard and Walnut. : After considerable discussion, Vice-chairman Ward t i appointed a committee, with Commissioner Grant as t I : Chairman, and Commissioners Palmer and Sonneman to meet with the Plannim Technician to study an area, as it : : was felt that if an area is established for certain height I i limitations, it would eliminate the necessity of people : ; having to apply for a variance for height. I t I I I I I - I I I I I I I Ewald Grant Ward Palmer Jar vie Sonnem 1 ! (c) Lagoon zoning. ! I I i I * The Planning Technician stated that he had met with I Commissioners Sonneman, Jarvie, the Secretary and i : Frank DeVore to study the zoning on the lagoon, He I I explained that the Allen Development Company had asked I : for a change of zone and was denied this request because ; .- i of insufficient traffic circulation. The Planning Cornmisston sent a memorandum to the Council recommending that are8 : be precised planned. It was given to the Engineering Department who returned it back to the Commission with i ; a proposed plan of the streets for their opinion on this. i i The map the Planning Technician prepared showed that : Jefferson Street would be extended with a little westerly i i jog in the road southerly from Chinquapin to a proposed ; I un-named street near the lagoon, and there would be cul- i I 1 de-sacs on each side of Jefferson south of Chinquapin. Tkle Engineering Department's map showed that Jefferson Stre+t i would extend southerly with an easterly jog in the road ; ; south of Chinquapin and would go through a portion of Mr4. Mike Lewis' property, who had not indicated whether she would give any of her property; and the map also showed i : a proposed street next to the freeway. Commissioner : : Sonnernan asked if the property owners who had indicated i i they would give rights of way for the extension of JeffersoQ ; StEd had been written to and contacted as she felt they should be kept informed of the progress being made towards the extension of this street. 4 I I t I I 0 I i It was agreed that the Planning Commission go on record i Ewald :xi jxr I i i as favoring the plan drawn by the Planning Technician,to : Grant : ; ;x: ; : ; precise plan the extension of Jefferson Street as adopted Ward i i :xi I i by the Planning Commission and the Council at previous : Palmer i : ;x: : i : meetings because of the staighter alignment of Jefferson, i Jarvie ::%::@ i and that it is not desirable to have a road next to the free-: Sonneman ix{x! ; : I: ; way, and because of the topoqraphy; it is better to have a I l;;l:l : backyard facing the freeway; rt would be making the highee :;i::: and best use of the land; and that the road on the southwes! 'le: I part of the map would make a better access to the YMCA. : :!!l!l ;:#;:a :::;;; I camp. 1 I I I -4 - I I I I I I I I I' I 8, ', .8 '\ '\ .\, I I ,\ r*', I ',, 'a,'',, '8, 'x, 't I I 1 I I I I b, (',, '\\'* '* I $ I Name '8b,'8!&, '.'%.& i I I I :::;:I * I I i of '*&8,>,'$$4& ~""""""""""-""""""""""""""""""-"""~"""""~~""-~..-.."~~"-" I Member %'p.**p "","" *dr; :A recess was called at 3:25. Reconvened at 9:39 F.M. :::;I; I :;;##I i Lagoon zoning. step 2. I I ::I::: ;1::1s I I :::::i :A street extending from Hoover Street to Hillside was I I I::l:l !discussed and when the property owners would be permittep I:;::: :to connect to the new sewer system. It was pointed out : 1';;;; ;~~ll: ithat the City will let sewer bids in about a month and that i It ;::::: :it wiL1 be finished about the last part of 1964 or the first : I::;:! :part of 1965. ! Ewald :xi :x: I I : Grant ; 11 ; :x; : : :It was agreed that the Planning Technician be directed to Ward i ; !x: : : :proceed with Step 2 of acquiring a parksite for the City : Palmer : i ;xi i I !from Paul Ecke at the foot of Hoover Street. i Jarvie ; : :x( ; ; I : Sonncman i :x :xi : I !NET1 BUSINESS: I I :I::!: I :;i::: i (b) Resolution of Intention to create a Public Utility !:::;I :Zone. I :!::I* :"- 4 11:: I p:a/ !The Planning Technician stated that he had met with the i 1';::; :City Attorney, the Secretary and with Frank CeVore to I ;i;;i; !discuss this in regards to amending Section 1304 to have nd 11 11;; I :height limitation. It was felt that this would be illegal to i i:;;:: jamend Section 1304 to exclude utility companies as it would - :::::: I* :be granting a special privilege for one type of use. It was i jagreed that it would be better to amend Section 1300 to have ii:::; :no height limitations in the M zone and to review the I I lo* p::;; !permitted uses in the CM and M zones, and to study lands : ;:::It :which are considered desirable for CM and M zoning. ::p* I I ;!:i;i :The Secretary stated that the community does a lot of talk-! Ewaid : : i iing about inviting industry to the City, but he 'believes the : Grant ;xi::: p; i :City should make it as convenient as possibLe, without Ward I I ;x; : I :granting a special privilege by removing the height limi- ! Palmer ; :X! i : ' ::I 1 .., #ations in M zone, in order to attract industry into the City+ Jarvie I I i ; ; ; I : Sonneman : : !It was agreed that the Secretary be directed to prepare a i !Resolution of Intention to amend Section 1304 to have no t ;p:q 1 :I:! :height limitation in the M zone, and that certain uses in th4 ;: ::It iM zone be changed to the C-M zone and from the C -M to I ;: /:::~ :the M zone. I;:# - I ::,::I I I ::;;:: :ADJOURNMENT: I I !:;:;; I I I !!$:: !By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at'10:17 P. M,! :::::I I 181 I I::!:; :Respectfully submitted, I :::;;I I l:;;;l i::bl 8: I I :::::: I I i:: 14: I ;;:::: I $4:: I I I ;::::I I I I ::::I: 11::: I :::::I I I> I:::;:. I * ;:!::I I ,. I t :::::: I 1 la::;: ;I 1 I * I :':: I :;;;:: I :y:;: I I I ::,:I; I ;:;l:l 1 I:*::: I I I ;;::I1 I i:::;: I 1::::: 4 ::;I:: I ::::;: I :::::: I ::'::: I 1 I I :;::I: :::::: I I:!::: I :I:;:: I ! :!I,!: I( I I I llbl*; I 11 t I 11 I1 I ;I* ;:::ti I' I I I I I I@ If I I I I l'~1:: I I I I 6 I 6 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 b I I I I I I * I I I I I I I :I:::: ;::a ': I I 1 :::I;$ 1::: I b I I I I I I I I I I I I t * I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I