The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1964-02-11; Planning Commission; MinutesI I I I I I I I I I 1 *, 8'' ' I I I 8 I I I I CITY OF CARLSBAD Minutes of: PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: February 11, 1964 Time of Meeting: 7:30 P. M. I i ROLL CALL was answered by Commissioners Davis, : Ward, Grant, Palmer, Jarvie, Lamb and Sonneman. I Also present were City Attorney Stuart C. Wilson and ; City Planner Uhland B. Melton. : APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ward ! (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of January 28, 1964 Palmer : I were approved as submitted. : Jarvie I : Snneman i e l I 8 b I I t I I 8 I I I I 4 I I I I I : Davis I : Grant ix 8 Lamb i I WRITTEN COMMU~?IICATIONS: I I t I I I I I I * I (a) Mrs. Elizabeth E. Hansen - re: Reclassification i i from Zone R-1 to R-3 on on her property located at 1199 i ; Oak Avenue. I Chairman Palmer instructed the City Planner to advise ; Mrs. Hansen of the standard procedure for applying for a i I reclassification. I I b * I I I I I I I 8 I 8 I I I I I I I I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: I I I (a) There were no oral communications from the ; audience . ! (b) The City Planner reported that the Council approve4 th i the reclassification of the property on Eureka Street from: : R -1 to R -3 for John D. Angelo, et al; and the Council ha@ i I not appointed a committee to work on the Master Plan as $et. b I 8 0 I 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS: I I : (a) RECLASSIFICATION - To consider a zone change : Jefferson St. between Laguna Drive and State Freeway i 101. Applicant: Resolution of Intention No. 44 of the City from R-1 to R-3 on property located on both sides of Planning Commission. .I I 8 : Notice of hearing was read. Secretary Grant certified to i publication of notice of hearing and reviewed Resolution i of Intention No. 44. I I The City Planner reported that this notice was published i+ the newspaper with a map and letters were sent to all of ; : the owners of property to be reclassified. I ! Letters returned to the Planning Department stating that i i they are in favor of this reclassification were from: i Norman D. Whipple January 28, 1964 i Mrs. Vera A. Largent January 28 1964 ; Richard W . Rahe & Don Hickethier January 28 1964 i i Donald A. Briggs , Jr. January 26 1964 ; ; Ethel Hagen January 28, 1964 : i Robert 0. Hall January 29, 1964 i : Carl 8t Lydia SegerbLom January 29, 1964 : I Harry L. Larson January 28, 1964 i : Luella J. Parr January 30, 1964 Ruben Raszler February 3, 1964 ; : Melvin E. Osland & Patricia Osland January 29 1964 i i Francis T. Gennett February 2, 1964 ; : Max Malets February 2, 1964 i Clarence f. Buck February 3, 1964 ; Elmer B. Johnson February 2, 1964 i i Samuel T. Justice February 3, 1964 ; ; Thomas €4. Trainer Sr. February 4, 1964 i Wilford H. Norris February 7, 1964 ; : Mrs. Marie L. Seaberg February 8, 1964 C. D. Nornhold February 6, A964 ; I I 8 I I I I b I , I I I I I -2- : foilowing property owners: : Harry L. Larson Grace B. Larson : Elmer R. Johnson i Asta Johnson i Samuel T. Justice : Thomas H. Trainer, Sr. Wilford H. Norris : Charlotte V. Norris Claude E. Barnett : John H. Gasser i Lake E. Buckingham : Eleanor L. Bowman : Max Maletz i Wilbur G. Allen :Mrs. W. G, Allen Richard W. Rahe : Audrey 0, Rahe I Donald M. Hickethier I Mary Hickethier : Francis T. Gennett : Clarence J. Buck i Luella Parr ; Mrs. Ruben Raszler I Mrs. Ethel H. Hagen ; Norman D. Whipple Robert A. €?&den I I Ernestine Maletz Francis W. Frederick I I : Donald A. Briggs Jr. ' i T, T. M-cDonald i Melvin E. Osland :Mr.& Mrs.A.R.Brilhart, Jr. : Victor J. Genereux Ruth C. Genereux i John R. Warden :Agnes R. Warden jG. C. DeWeeoer : Marie L, Seaberg I Charles W . Chalupnik !Joseph E. Barth I Robert 0. Hall i Edythe Hall : Mr , and Mr s . L. E. Liddla i D. R. Dinius , et a1 : Kremeyer Co., by R.L.Means i I I 1 I : Also received was a petition reqxesting that the Ptznning i i Commission initiate proceedings to re-zone the real : property on both sides of Jefferson Street, commencing at! I State Highway U, S. 101 and ru$%ming in a Southerly direc - i ; tion to the property now zoned R-3 because the present ; : developmentland growth, its highest and best use is for f { rhultiple dwellings. The requested zone change will serve: i public necessity and coxwenieace in that there is a definite; : need for multiple houskg and present zoning of large par-! : ccls to R-T and R-3 within the immediate vicinity of the ; i area and would appear to be consistant with good planning : : and enable property owners to develop their property to it4 I I zone R-1 suffers a hardship in that through economic chznks highest and best use. This petition was signed by the I I I I I I I # I I I I 2502 Jefferson 2502 Jefferson 2546 Jefferson 2546 Jefferson 2450 Jefferson 2518 Jefferson 2530-2538 JeffersoG 2530-2538 Jefferso4 2464 Jefferson t I 1107 Las Flores Drj 1107 Las Flores Dr: 2424-2426 Jefferso$ 2494 Jefferson St. : 2434 Jefferson 2688 Jefferson 2688 Jefferson 2300 Block Jeffersoh 2300 Block Jeffersob 2300 Block Jeffersoll 2300 Block Jeffersob 915 Buena Place : 2642 Jefferson I I 26 1 8 Jefferson I I 2644 Jefferson 26 52 Jeffe r son 2632 Jefferson 2596 Jefierson 2300 Block Jeffcrsofi (3355 Valley St.) : 2381 Jefferson 1 2363 Jefferson 2373 Jefferson 2386 Jefferson I I 2645 Jefferson 2646 Jefferson 2637 Jefferson 2637 Jefferson 2685 Jefferson 2585 Jefferson 2595 Jefferson 2601 Jefferson 2541 Jefferson 26 00 Block Jeffer so16 2600 BLOCI~ Jeffersh 2475 Jefferson 2100 Block Jeffersh 26 29 Jefferson .~ I 8 * I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 8 1 I 1 I I I I I I I # I 1 I I I I I I * : The following returned the letters indicating that tkey I I I 8 I I I I I were opposed to this reclassification: Alfred C. Prewett 2.635 .Tcffer;on I I : Erie H. Shermen 1 1/18 Lns Flores Dr! i Ruth Ross * I : William W. Rogers opposed this on the grounds that there ; i is enongh traffic already and suggestc,d a new look at pavi& : Jefferson with more reasonable participation than 10% as i proposed 2 or 3 years ago. I I I 1 I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I - 3- I ! The Chairman announced that since this reclassificiation ! i was initiated by the Commission, they would now hear ; : from those persons opposed to this zoning. I I I I I G. A . GRI O:BER, 6492 Easy Street, stated that he lived bn I Jefferson for 16 years although he has not Lived there this:. : past year, and he did not want to stop progress or hold any- ! thing back, but wanted to know what the plans are for ; : improvements of Jefferson Street, and if the City widens : i the street, would the property owners have to pay for this:. Commissioner Jarvie explained that the City spent about I $5 000. several years ago for improvement plans, contrast documents, assessment diagrams, preliminary field work I on Jefferson Street and the property owners did not want I i it as there were over 50% protests. I Chairman Palmer stated that he did not feel this question ! : was addressed to the proper body and the City is improvi4g the streets as fast as they can afford to do so. I 1 I I * * I I I I I I I I I . i There were no others present desiring to speak. i The public hearing was declzred closed at 8:09 P.M.. : I t I I I ;:::I; I I I :;,::' ;;:::I I* I ;:::I1 ";I Ill 1 I I I,!*:; i The City Planner stated that there yvere 58 pieces of I property to be considered and the Planning Department : had received no reply from the owners of 17 pieces of : I property. 37 were in favor of this reclassification and : 4 were opposed. : Points brought out in discussion were that this would not : be spot zoning as it would be next to R -3 on Jefferson and! I would unify it with the present R-3 and the R-T in the lagfon, I and would also be a solution to developing property with ; : deep lots; the fact that so many of the property owners : i were desirous of this reclassification; that the sewer pfa<% : will be moved to the south of the City in the naar future; i the improvements and widening of Jefferson Street and thq : widening of the bridge that crosses the U.S. 101 Freeway.! It was pointed out that Jefferson Streeet is designated as 3 ; secondary street on the Master Plan. 1 I 8 1 1 t I I I I I I 1 1 ;;;;;I I JACK HUGHES, 270 Redwood Ave., called attention to : 4:::: I the fact that the Gas Tax funds will take care of about 54% I of the street improvements on a secondary street. I I :::;i; ::: 81 I I ;lt*:l I 1:;::: '4:: I 1. That public necessity, convenience and general i I::;:; ;:I::; 1::::1 '::;I I I I It was agreed that the following facts exist: t ;I:;:; [:::I; I I I I I I I I I I welfare require an R-3 zone in this vicinity. I I The following resolution was presented: I I I I I I I I i::;:: I: I I i Resolution No. 333. A i IFICATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED i THE CITY OF I pLANmGMMISSION ; FROM ZONE R-1 TO ZONE i only and further reading waived. ! (b) RECLASSIFICATION - To consider a zone change i I from R -1 to C -1 on property located on the Northeast : corner of Las Flores and Pi0 Pico. Applicant: Nelson i 1 I in the Carlsbad Journal and read the application. 1 : There were no written communications for OT against thi$ 1 zone change. I I I I I I 1 I E. Westree. The Secretary certified to publication of notice of hearingl' I I I I I I I I b I. I 8 t I I I I t I I I I I ! ! -. I .. i The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear from the applicant and any other persons who wished to i : speak in favor of this teclassification. I I ! NELSON E. WESTREE stated that after filing this applicai I tion he had consulted 11 sets of property owners and had i i zcceived 7 approvals with no objections. The owners of ; the 4 other pieces of property stated that they were neutra! i and would not oppose this zone change. He stated that in ; ; that night's Blade-Tribune paper he found out he intended i : to put in a service station at this corner. He has been : i growing tropicalfruits for a number of years and plans to i i continue doing this and has no intention of having a service: : station in there. He submitted 16 signatures of those i living within 300 feet of this property in favor of this zoni&. The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear i I I I I I I I I I : from all persons desiring to speak in opposition. i There were no persons present desiring to speak in opposi!- i tion. i The public hearing was declared closed at 8:40 P.M. I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I t I a I I The City Planner explained that the location of this site i : could attract tourists from the Eeeway and that the City is:. i in the process of acquiring property to extend Las Flores 3 . . . : Drive to Highland. ! Commissioner Jarvie stated that he felt this corner shod4 i be zoned C-1 . & t I I I I I I I I I I I The Chairman asked for a clarification of the property : : owners being notified within 300 feet and there was a dis: cussion regarding this matter. The City Attorney stated that they were not required to i : send a written notice under the section of the code as long i as it was publicized in the papea but this could be done if : : the Commission wished. I I : Commissioner Sonneman stated that she is in favor of i zoning the entire block to C-1 in'cluding the rest home. t i The owner of the rest home has tried so many times to geq ; rezoning on her property. Commissioner Sonneman stated i that she would like to see a street worked up in that block.: Commissioner Ward stated that he felt property located i I I I I I b I I I I I I 1 4 i near an off -ramp should be commercial. : The Chairman stated that it would be much better to con- I i sider this property for the sale of macdamia nuts instead ; i of a service station. : Commissioner Sonneman stated that she did not feel i and did not want too much commercial carried into the i ; residential area. Commissioner Lamb stated that the Commission should i i consider this for what the property is really suited for, ; and that no one will put a station in until the freeway is : i changed, and it will be just as good an intersection as E% ; and Tamarack. i The Chairman asked Randolph Duke if he had something to! I say. 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 t b I I I I I macadamia nuts will be the ultimate use of the property I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I . L . ' :. I 6' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -5- I I I I I i was put in there, it would definitely tower the values of : : the surrounding property. He stated that he had not i objection to Mr. Westree having a nursery at this locatiod. I He did not know if Dr. Phillip Libby would be opposed to I i this. I I 1 I I I I I I I The Chairman pointed out that if this is zoned C-1 , they -L ,:-. . : would be able to have any of..the permitted uses under C-1:. : Commissioner Grant asked Mr. Westree if he wished to I I I I I speak in rebuttal. I I I I I I 1 i MR. WESTREE stated that he had contacted all of the i : property owners within 300 feet and had not contacted Mr.: Duke as he did not live within 300 feet of this property, : i He reported that he had a lengthy discussion with Dr. Libby : within the last two hours before the meeting and Dr. i Libby was neutral to this reclassification and was not i : opposed or in favor of this. : Commissioner Davis stated that he was in favor of Mr. i i Westree running a nursery there, but C-1 at this time did: : not appeal to him. He did not feel that all property at off i i and on-ramps should be commercial, and the topography : I was not ideal for commercial but would be fine for a moth! i location. He felt that commercial next to fine residences: : is a mistake at this time. I I i Commissioner Grant stated that he does site location in i :I;:;: his line of work and felt this would be an ideal location ; ; for Coffee Dan's or Denny's Coffee Shop. He felt that i I initially it will be used as a nursery but ultimately it will : i:iI:# 1': : be used for a different purpose and he is in favor of this. :He i::ll; :;: He called attention to the future traffic when Las Flores ib :::::I : extended to Highland. He stated that if this was the first I i intersection to be rezoned, he would consider this differeatly, : but there have been two precedents. : The City Planner stated that he has had two different i freeway plans cross his desk and they are still in the : :::;;: Ill I I I I I I I I I I /:a:: I :::::: ;::::: I I ;::i:: 181;:: ::::I; :::;:I I 10 :::'I; /4:1 (0 I i!::!; I I I I i::;:: :a::,; I I I+:i: I I I::!:! I I I I :::;;I I I ::;I;: I -:;;i :I I$;: pi::: !;I1:; ::;I :a;;;: 8: I I 1 la:;l: ;:;::; ::I::; I ;::&;I I I 1 :i:i:! ::i::: I :i:;:i I ;I:@:@ I-::: G:;l1 1:;1;1 It I !::::I I 1::1:: I I i:4@: I 1, That the property is close to well established R-1 I 1;;:; ::;; I ;: I ;:::I; I I ;:ll:l I 2. That the U. S. 101 Freeway p!ans are not firm so: I#!:;: 14 , ;::I;: I ;:I-: I I I I ;: :!:I #:I!:; I I I I basic study of the freeway. Commissioner Lamb stated that he felt that when the freeway is finished, the freeway traffic will not be able : I to see this location, and felt this should be zoned R-T wi+ Ill : the view that it has, and that no one will be putting in a : I gas station for 5 or 6 years there. He questioned whethe< I::!: : the Westrees desires could be handled with a conditional : I use permit. t I :: I I A conditional use permit was discussed, and it was point* ;::::I : out that a nursery does not qualify for a conditional use i i permit. i Commissioner Lamb inquired if Mr. Westree would be : : selling more trees and have signs there if this was I rezoned, and Mr. Westree stated that he would extend : his business as this is a side line now : A motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 334 denying ; i this reclassification for the following reasons: I I I I I I I I I ;I:;:; :::;:; I I I residences . I I I I I we do not know the location of the future off-amp. I I I I I c ;:i::i ,,. I I I I I , \' , , .' I I , ', ', '. I 1 t8, I I I ', 'X ', ', ',,'\, I I 163 ', '\ ', , , I of \,e@ ' I ,$@,; '*&, i I : Member &\(n82'+'6, I I ;;1nt1 14 I " I :;:::; I 3. That although there is an off-rampl there is no i 4;::; ::::&I I :::;:; I I :::::I I I I i:::;; I :x:x: ; I : Ward I I : !xi CITPMMISSION DENYING RECLASSIFICA: :palmer I I :x; : i : TION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN THE CI~Y ~arvie : ; : :X:?: OF CARLSBAD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM ZONE : Lamb !xi :xi I i : R-1 TO C-1 was adopted and further reading waived. i I Sonnema ; !XI I : I I :;@ll; : The Chairman advised Mr. Westree that he had ten days I I I 11 : Council in writing if he desired to do so. I I :::!:I I I I I Name '.,'*$$, '8.)qj, i :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""-~"" ,o '0 +$?88d I I I I I Io1 i need for this rezoning since the improvements of the high) : way are some time in the future. : The following resolution was presented: Davis : ; i Resolution No. 334. A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAI) Grant I : i !x: : I 11 I 81 I I :::::a I 4::11 from that time in which to appeal this decision to the I I I :::Il* ::: I I :::;:I I : A recess was called at 9:25. Reconvened at 9:35 P, M. I : Commissioner Grant was absent at 9:35 P. M. I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I i (c) RECLASSIFICATION - To consider a change in i i zone from R -1 -1 5 to R-T on the North side of Adams ; : between Highland and Park Drive. Applicant: David E. I Baird. I I I I I I i The Acting Secretary, Mr. Melton, certified to publicatioA : in the paper of the notice of hearing and read the applicati&. I I There was no written correspondence on this matter. : The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear I from the applicant and any other persons who wished to I I I I I I I I I I speak in favor of this reclassification. I I b I I I ; DAVID BAIRD stated that he did not have too much to say i activities from the lagoon drove him away from this propek- : ty and he withheld any request for rezoning until the i sewers are available. I The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear since the application was pretty plain. The'noise and I I I I I 8 I I I I I from all persons desiring to speak in opposition. I I I I I I I i There were no persons present desiring to speak in oppo-I I sition. i The public hearing was deelared closed at 9:39 P. M. I I I I I I I I I I I Commissioner Jarvie stated that he lives near the lagoon $nd : agrees there is a lot of noise. i The City Planner explained the location of the property i i consisting of 1.83 acres on Adams, and the surrounding : I i zoning. I I I after a short discussion, it was agreed to recommend approval of this reclassification for the following reasons:: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1. That this property is opposite to R -T property, I namely, Whitey's Landing, and that a section of the new ; Shelter Cove Subdivision is directly across from this i property and is zoned R-T so it will not be'lspot'' zoning. i I I I I I I I I 2. That the noise from the boats on the lagoon is ver$ loud at this location and has caused some of the residents : : to move away. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I 3. That it is a reasonable request. I I I L I I I I I I I I I I & 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I t I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. That it abutts R-T property. 5. That there were no oral or written protests. I I I I I I I I i The following resolution was presented: Resolution No. 335. A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBA$ CTTMMISSION RECOMMENDING RECLASS-, IFICATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN : ZONE R-1-15 TO ZONE R-T, was adopted and further : reading waived. THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FR+ I I I I I ' I I I I (d) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - To consider an addition to an existing church on the South side of Elm Avd. , between Jefferson and Harding Streets. Applicant: I I Gospel Tabernacle of Carlsbad, by P. A. Zimmerman, i Fastor. The Acting Secretary certfied to notice of public hearing I being sent to the property owners in the area and read the: application. I I I Letter from W. Roy Pace and Mary W. Pace, dated February 1 1964 asking that the Commission approve this conditional use permit. The Acting Secretary stated that Claude Fennel was in the! City Hall and did not express any objections to this reque+. The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear I from the applicant and any other.persons who wished to : speak in favor of this reclassification. I I P.A. ZIMMERMAN, Pastor representing the corporation! of the Gospel Tabernacle of Carlsbad, stated that the present buildings were constructed before the City was i incorporated so they have submitted this application on i the advise of Mr. OsbGrn, the Building Inspector who ; stated that this was a technicality, but should be taken : care of as to having a conditional use permit on file. I I The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear i from all persons desiring to speak in opposition. The public hearing was declared chsed at 9:53 P. M. No one present spoke in opposition. The City Planner explained the location of the church and : the parking facilities, and that the addition would be for I classrooms. He stated that although there was not suffi- : cient parking spaces for some of the buildings in the area; the church would be used during a time when the lack of : parking spaces from the business buildings would not interfere. I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : Commissioner Lamb questioned the amount of parking i ; spaces. I I I I I I I The City Attorney stated that he did not see any need for i i increasing the parking spaces as they are not increasing : ; the pews. I It was agreed to grant the request for a conditional use i permit for an addition to an existing church for the applieg ; property for the following reasons: I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1. That it will enhance the corner of the street that is now vacant. I I I I I I I I 2. That there were no objections to this conditional i i use permit. # I 1 I I I I I I I I I 8 ! .. ,- I I I B I * * '* I I I I I -8- :-""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" I 3. That the buildings of the Gospel Tabernacle are * credit to the City and are kept in good condition. I I i The following resolution was presented: I I li" 11 ! Resolution No. 336. A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAd :::: i CMPLISSION GRANTING A CONDITION~L :::I :;;: USE PERMIT TO THE GOSPEL TABERNACLE OF CARL!+ Davis i ; ;x! : BAD TO ALLOW AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING CHURCl$ Ward : : !x: i ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16 : Palmer I : ;xi : IN BLOCK 57, CARLSBAD TOWNSITE, MAP 775 IN THE I Jarvie I ix:x; i CITY OF CARLSBAD, STATE OF CALIFORNLA, was ; Lamb : :x; : adopted and further reading waived. i Sonnemad 4 :x: 1 . ::!I :I 11 I I I I I :::; j OLD BUSINESS: * I i (a) Report on Improvements of South Coast Asphalt ! : Products Co. , Inc. The City Planner stated that before i i he went out to the plant he went over the files and they did : : not state on the conditional use permit that they were required i to put in planting improvements. He reported that he went: , i out to the plant and saw the plantings and the palm and euc.$A : lyptus trees that were planted. They spent about $300. fok trees. trees. I I I I I I : The Building Inspector stated that ,you~caxbonly enfozce i conditions that are in a resolution. He looked this over a& i the improvements were only mentioned in the minutes. I The Building Inspector also pointed out that the cafe acrosi ithe street from the Gospel Tabernacle Church has 12 park; ing spaces down the street. It is the State Law that an ; : occupancy certificate be obtained from local building I offical based on off-street parking and the use of the : building. The,parking requirements are not retroactive. i They only have to meet the parking requirements for the ; added space they are adding to, provided it does not exceep I I I I I I I I : 50%. i The Chairman stated that the Commission was glad to hav$ :the advise of the Building Inspector. I I : The Commission requested that the Recording Secretary i send a letter to Paul Ecke of appreciation for the poinsettia I plants. I I I I I I I I I 6 I I I I I I I I I I i NEW BUSINESS: I i The City Planner stated that the City Manager had inform& him that Carlsbad will be the host to the California Leagu4 of Cities at the Ocean House, February 28 I 1964 I at 7:30 : P.M. Reservations are necessary and the City will pay i ;for the dinners for the Commissioners and the cost is i $4.25 for each wife or husband. i The City Planner also informed the Commission that he : was going to Sacramento for 3 days to the American i Institute of Planning State Convention. I ! I I I I * I I I I I I I I I I i ADJOURNMENT: I I I By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 P. M. I 1 1 I i Respectfully submitted, I I I I : I Recording Secretary 1 1