HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-02-09; Planning Commission; MinutesI
iCITY CF CA.itLSBd3 :Minutes of: PLANNI NG COMMI SSION !Date of Meeting: February 9, 1965 !Time of Meeting: 7: 30 PC M. ;Place of Meeting: Council Chambers
.:teCLL CALL was answered by Commissioners
.. , .
1'~"""""""""""""""""""-"-""---~""-"- -."""""". Palmateer,
I I I I I I I 1 I I 4 I I I I ' 'I'
iMcCarthy, Sutherland, Lamb, McComas and Freifta$t ,&,, :Commissioner Grant was absent, Also present wei?&&"h.; :Thornton, and Building Inspector Osburn, Cjy dZ5q~ey tU& I.
I I
I I 1 ~APP~CVAL OF MINUTES:
I jPalmateer - I
: (a) Minutes of the remlar meeting of January 26,196hiMcCarthy !were approved as submitted. ;Sutherland
I I I
:Lamb
I t IMcComas
I :Freistadt
lvk it1 TTEN COMMUNICA'ITCNS,:
I ( 1) Memorandum from the City Manager dated
I
I I I * b I I I I I L I * I * I I I I
(a) Council Action on Flrinning matters.
:February 3, 1965, regardirlg an appeal of the decision of ; Ithe Planning Commission submitted by Lawson Martineau, i :et al, for reclassification of property knawn as South Carl$ :bad Annexation No. 1.5 from 2 one RA1 to Lones C-M and i :M. It was the decisioh of the Council that this matter !should be referred back to the Commission for further jstudy and a report made back to the Council, as it is the : :opinion of the Council this area should be zoned compatible! :with its present use,
iSuqpytians for use as a basis for discussion re! revision [ :of M zones were attached. These suggestions were pre-; jsented to the members of the Council and they instructed i :the City Manager to forward them to the Commission. I I
khairman Sutherland appointed Commissioners Lamb, Mci !Carthy and McComds to Work with the City Manager on the I :zoning on South CarlGbad Annexation No, 1.5 to determine ; :what should be enclobed in the "M" zones and to report I :their findings at the next meeting. I I
:The City Attorney informed them that if the Commission i idid not make a report back to the Council within 40 days it i :would be deemed to be approved by the Commission. I I
I
b I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I (b) Letter dated February 9, 1965, from John and I !Jean FOX, 4215 Harrison St. , requesting the Commission i
:to'Witate action to permit overnight camping for their : kuests at Fox's Snug Harbor. I I
!The City Attorney stated that he assumed they were asking I :that the zone be amended to allow campsters or trailers as:
ithe uses permited now in the R-T zone do not permit this. pormally this would be considered under a conditional use : permit and he had not requested an application for this. i
hfter further discussion by the Commission, it was agreed: :that they should know more about this before initiating any : :action. l I
i (c) Copy of a letter from Eknest Adler, Jr. 3836 !Cherry Avenue, Long Beach, dated February 8, 1965, to i ;Mr. C. R. Thornton, Assistant City Engineer, regarding i :the cuts and fills along their property line in the Falcon ; hills subdivision, I I
;The Commission were in complete agreement to have Mr. i !Thornton handle this letter.
pdAL COMMUNICATICNS:
{There were no oral communications.
I I I I
I I I $
I I b 6
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I * I I I * I I I I I I I 1 I * I 1 I 1 I I I b I I I !
"
I
."
,-
0
0 0 * I * 0 I 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 b 0 0
0 -2-
0 I 0 I
I 0 (a) itECLASSIFICATION - d-1-6 to C-2 (General i Commercial) on property located at 841 and 869 Tamaracq
i Avenue, on the southerly side of Tamarack Ave. between ; i Jefferson St. and State Freeway XI-SD-2B. Applicants: i i Arthur C. Morgan and Dorothy D. Morgan. 0 *
i Notice of hearing was read. Acting Secretary McCarthy : : certified that proper notices of the public hearing were i i given and then read the application. I I I (I,*
I I
0 0
I 0 1 # 0 O::;;! i There was no correspondence on this matter. 0 :;;
I 0 I :;;::: ::;::: i The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear i @I))1* 004;i : from the applicant and any others desiring to speak in i i::
I I :;;:q
I ;::;I;
i MR. A-RTHUit MORGAN presented a petition stating that ;i:;:o
11:: : Mr. Morgan intends to use the property after rezoning fori i:ii:@
: Planning Commission to grant the requested zone change. I :::;;; i The petition was signed by the following:
0 ;;o:al
{ Archie Koyl, 834 N. Pickering, U hittier, Calif, I 01:: I i:: '1; i William C. Baldwin, 4036 Baldwin Ln., Carlsbad. I I d::i;
:Edward Gerent, 815 Tamarack Ave., Carlsbad. 1 :*so 1 ;::;I: i Charles J. Hawkes, 765 Tamarack Ave. , Carisbad. 0 I ;::I::
0 ;::::: :Marian E. dawkes, 765 Tamarack Ave., Carlsbad. 0 0 *,Io( !Eugene E. Hawkes, 1942 S. Pacific, Oceanside. 0 ;;o:aO
0 ;0:4: :Hisako Ikemi, 244 Tamarack Ave., Carlsbad. 0 ;:o:::
iEdwin M. Sherman, 841 Tamarack Ave., Carbbad. 0 0 1;:':::
:Nancye Sherman, 841 Tamarack Ave., Carlsbad. 0 :;;*::
iEvalee A. Smith, 869 Tamarack Ave. , Carlsbad . I i:;;o; :C. J. deltibridle, 1520 dunsaker St., Oceanside. * ::i;::
0 ;:o:;:
:Mi%. MCRGAN stated that he had purchased the Sowell pro: /;::: iperty on the Southeast corner of Tamarack and Jefferson : :i;i::
:and was not asking for a zone change on that corner now ;p;:i
:Ooi;; I Io !but eventually he would ask for a zone change on the pro- : ;:: :perty also, He stated that the only reason he is asking fori ;: ithis zone change is to enable him to put a restaurant in. : 1;::;
;!;:I;
:He submitted renderings of the proposed buildings and floot :plans of the restaurant to the Commission. Upon being : ;::;;; :questioned regarding the freeway, he explained that accord! o;*a
;;:::I jing to the Engineers in San Diego from the Division of b ;:::ii State Highways they will be taking 60 to 70 feet of his pro- i $0 0;:;;
berty parallel with the freeway. I :o:'o'
I 0 ;:;;::
:There were no others present desiring to speak in favor. ! ;:::I!
I I 0 ;::;;;
;The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear i :::;I; ;:;o:o
From those present desiring to speak in opposition. 0 ,o*;*;
8 * ;::;:;
hlzS. CONSTANCE L. KISON, 3919 Jefferson St., stated
;oo:;: ::I:::
$hat she lives on the third lot down on Jefferson St. and ob-: :I:!!; jected to this commercial zone because it is a residential i 'I0 ;;:::: prea and there are two grade schools nearby. 0 ;o:::;
0 ;;;:;;
!Ma. ED aDZA, 812 Citrus Pl., stated that he is opposedi ;::i:; !to this reclassification 100% and he bought his property I ::;i:: with the understanding that it was a residential area. The ; ;:* 1::;; *o browsed restaurant will be directly behind his home. He i i!:;;; Explained that he works for the San Diego Gas & Electric ;. company and it will be detrimental to him if there is noise i
~uring the night, He felt that it will increase their taxes : bithout increasing the value of their homes. ae asked that I o:::\i the gentleman buy their homes for parking area. 0 0
0
I
favor of this reclassification. * I 0
i establishing a restaurant and requesting the Carlsbad I Ool,~; ::;;:; I
0
0 0 I ii:::: 001 00
I I
0
0
*
0
I b I
0
*$#;I 10
0 I I b ::;* 6 I
10:;
I
* *I
I 0
0 81 8
I
0 I 8
01'1 ;:;::I 0 ::
;Oq:; ;::
;:::I:
I 0:::;;
0 0 ::o01;
0 0 i::;;;
b ;*:;I;
I 0 ;::;lo 01
b I ;i:::*
0 0 on!&::
0 * 0
0
0 1
:Oil
* * I 0
I
0
I
0
0
1
I I' I
I I b8, 't8" '\, '8, *', I
I I ',, ', *8 'S ', '8 I
I I I I 8 '"t', ', '\ '.
I I
I t D I
I I
D -3- I
:this reclassification would increase the value of his pro- jperty eventually, he has invested more money than he can : :get out of it and no one would want to pay the price at this i :time. He objected to being in back of a restaurant until : :the freeway takes his property. I I
: LT. JEAN P. COLE, 3915 Jefferson St. stated that he . i :lives next to Mrs. Kison, and objected to living next to a : !commercial area, as the purpose for buying their propert$ :was to live in a residential area. He did not feel there i jwould be sufficient room for the restaurant and off-street ; :parking after the freeway is widened. He pointed out that Ithe other commercial zoning was across the freeway. I I
:Ma. JAMES L. EWING, 819 Citrus Place, stated that he i I:::;: :objected for the same reasons as the others, as the taxes i :ii:;: jwill be increased and he does not want to live next to a corn : mercial area.
iMrZ. OitVILLE RUE, 820 Citrus Place, stated that he live4 :::I:;
inex t door to Mrs. Miller and objects to living next door : : to a restaurant. I I
MRS. BERNICE MILLER, representing Mrs. Alice Dyson Wilk, owner of the property at 836 Citrus Flace, who ask-: I ed her to report that she does not approve of any zone I I : change.
i MRS. RGBERT EILERS, 811 Citrus Place, voiced objec- i : tion for the same reasons as the others that she did not : icare to live near a commercial zone.
1 I
1 I
I I
I I
'81:;: i:: 19 I
I I /4;: ;::'la
D 1:::::
I
I I
I1
I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I
The Chairman commented that the Commission prefer for i i those opposed to reclassification or variances to write : :letters to the Commission upon receiving notices of the i
public hearings so these letters will be on file as a part of : :the record. They were also welcome to appear at the ! hearings in person.
I I I I I I I I
When questioned regarding who is eligible to sign petition< ;the Chairman stated that anybody in the City could sign, !but more consideration mould be given to the property I :owners within 350 feet. I I
: The public hearing was closed at 8: 13 P. M.
: Commissioner McCarthy asked to abstain due to business i : reasons.
i Points discussed were property taxes;, that according to 'I : the proposed Master Plan it was inevitable that changes : e;;::,
::I::: i would occur and would have to be faced; that according to : ;:i::: : DMJM, both sides of the freeway would be commercial i I:*:::
zoning for about a block and 1 /2 as the property is too i ;I::I;
;;ll;I i valuable for residential, and this part is level with the ; freeway; the blending of zones; the area to be used being i ;::;:; ;tI*I;
i too small and working a hardship on neighboring property; : :uses permitted in C-2 zones and street widths.
! The Building Inspector pointed out that an adequate screen i i of a cement block or brick wall, or dense hedge is require@ :between the parking area and a residential area for a light i !barrier. Apartment houses are required to have a screent : ing area, and it is required in all Commercial zones that i
I
I I I
I I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
are next to R zones. I
I :+ I I I I I t
I I
I I D D
l a
I I .
I D I D 1 D I D D I
I I I
I
I I D D l I 1 D l D
I I
-4-
I
"""""",""""r,"""~""~""""""""""-""-"""-""""~"
When questioned about the freeway, Mr. Thornton explain-! ed that the public hearings on the freeway would be next . ; month, and are generally held in the area concerned. They will then have to acquire rights a€ way within the nexi few years as they anticipate having 8 moving lanes by 1969;
He also explained that Tamarack Avenue is designated as ;
a major street between Carlsbad Blvd. and Pi0 Pic0 Dr. , i but felt that the use of that street as a secondary would be
adequate for approximately the next 15 years and would re: quire 8' street dedication. 1 1
D t
I I I :After further discussion the Chairman re-opened the pub- ilic hearing and continued the hearing to the next regular i !meeting of the Planning Commission with the consent of : :Mr. Morgan. b
I 1 I
I I l
s (b) Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. 9060-re- i !pealing Subsections 31 and 35 of Section 1300 and Subsec- :
:tion 29 of Section 1200; and adding Subsections 21 and 22 i jto Section 1400 of Ordinance No. 9060, all regarding
:storage space for transit and transportation equipment, ex: icepting freight classification yards and regarding veterin- i :arians , kennels , and small animals' hospitals. I I
:The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked that thii !hearing be 6c)ntinued to the next regular meeting due to the! :relationshig+his matter and the zoning in South Carlsbad : !Annexation No. 1.5. Ze appointed Commissioners Lamb, i :McComas and McCarthy to work with the City Manager on: this proposed amendment.
iquired frontages from 60' to 12 1 /2' in order to create two! :"panhandle" lots, on property located on the Southerly side: jof Basswood Ave. , between Adams St. and Highland Dr. , : :and to restore Lot 10 to Chestnut Manor Subdivision. I !Applicant: H. Von Packard.
!The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked to refer!
:this matter to a committee of Dr. Palmateer and himself, jwho voted in opposition to each other, to study this variancp :and to report at the next regular meeting. D D
D I
I 1 I
D l D D I I b D D (c) VAaIANCE - To consider a reduction in the re- :
1 D I D L I
D D I I i OLD BUSINESS:
I I I I (a) M-1 Zoning. The City Attorney explained the draft ! jof the I'M" zoning presented to the Commissioners. I D 1 I D I !After discussion of this matter, the Chairman appointed a :committee of Commissioners Lamb, McComas and him-.. ; !self to work on an ordinance for a planned industrial zone. i
I I D * I D l (b) Citizens' Committees. Keports were received i :from the Annexation Committee and the aarbor and Vv ater-: !front Committee, and the Chairman asked the Kecording i :Secretary to make copies of these reports. D I I D D l I 1 (c) City Planner Position. The Chairman reported that:
!he had talked to the City Manager and they had discussed !
:hiring a retired planner on a part time basis for a couple : !of days a week. It was reported that the citizens commit- i jtees felt there should be a planner on the staff.
iADJOURNEMNT: 8 D I
:By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 8:49 P. M. i
t D 1 * D D D
I I I I
Ltespectfully submitted, D l -
Secretary
8 D D I I I D I I I I I I I D *
i D I