HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-07-27; Planning Commission; Minutes-.
I I ', *, ., - ' I I I I
I I
I 4
' .'
ICITY OF CARLSUAD I Hi nutes of: :Date of t'4eetimg: Ju?.~ 27, 1355 Name '8* ''!8& I
!Tine of Xeeting: 7:30 P.i.1. af 'Place of Pleeting: Council Chambers Member *$Y@.&? d.; ;""""""""""""""""""".""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""~
ROLL Call was answered by Cornmissioners Palmateeri ;4cCarthy, Sutherland and Lamb. Commissioners 6 ::;: I& :John C. blunn, illcComas and Freistadt were absent. i Also present were City Attorney Wilson, Ass ' t Ci ti ; Engineer Thornton, Planning Director Schoell, and: i 3uilding Inspector Osburn.
I '., '\ '., ', '.,'*' I
I ', '\, *8 ", '\,'\, I
1 ', 8, \\. " , ' I PLAWIJIEJG COI1I*IISSlOiJ '\ '84 \'+ ,O', 's ''$NtY. +,++ I
i;:;;;
I :;:::;
;; ;;::::
,I8:;:
4 ;::;:: I1 I1
I I :::i::
I ::;;;:
I I :McCarthy I $ ixi : i
: (a) iviinutes of the regular meeting of July ISutherland; : :x; i ;
I ::: ::i I
I I ::::::
I I :;:;;;
I (a) Council action on Planning I,latters was i :l:~Il
: noted. ;:':;: p;:!;I 1. The Council appointed General J.C. : i::::;
; iv?unn to fill the unexpired term of John H. Grant : ;:::;;
1 2. Aemorandum from the Planning Commis-I I:;;,; I1 i sion Chairman - re: The ;;laster Plan and Harbor I :::;I:
i Plan. The Council instructed the City Attorney ; ;:p:I ;:::::
I to write DblJi-l a letter requesting a complete I I;':::
!briefing be given to the Planning Director Donald! ;:::;;
I Schoell on the Harbor Plan and on its effect on i I ::;:
::;IlI I the itlaster Plan. I I ::::::
I I ;*181; I I::;:;
The City Attorney reported that the letter has i ;';I@ 4,;:: : been drafted as directed but had not been mailed ; ::!::I I yet. I :; I' I :;:;;;
I 3. The Commission agreed to take Item I Ill I;
i I :iI:!;
I I I :$::
I (b) Letter from Bert D. Alton, 4380 Adam St! '1 1;: :;ii;: i dated July 25, 1955, stating that a petition for ; ;;il;; I a zone cnange from R-1-15 to a higher density de-; ;;::I; i signation has been joined in practical unanimity ; :;::;:
:by residents along Adams St. overlooking the Aguai i;::;: ;::::: Hedionda Lagoon. He asked the Planning Commission *;*I': : to consider this and requested a time and place I h;C; ;;I' i for collective appeal and presentation of their : ::::;; 1::;
: petition. I I ::;II
: The Planning Director explained that he informed ::!i:: i4r. and Mrs. Alton that it was a little premature: 11;: i to be asking for this zone change since the Har- I
; bor study was not complete, however, they are I concerned and wished the Commission to consider ai i change in zone in the flaster Plan.
: ORAL COilT4UH I CATIONS :
: There were no oral communications.
; PUBLIC HEARINGS:
;I1 I@ i Chairman Sutherland explained to the applicants t*l;';
; that it would require a unanimous concurrence of i i the four Commissioners present in order to adopt ; :::;;; : a resolution recommending a zone change or grant-! ::;I!! i in3 a variance or conditional use permit. I I 1;;:;;
:*I
;lI'Il
I (a) VARIAifCE, continued,-Applicant: Donald I :I:::; I A. Briggs, Jr. ;:;1:1
I 1:::;:
I Neither i4r. Briggs nor a representative were pre-l I;:!!; :!I:;: i sent. I ::::;:
I I ;lllI; I 1:::::
I I ::;I #I
I :I!:::
I 4 'Il;I; t :::;I!
I 'I, I I
11
I"
I
APPROVAL OF I4INUTES: i~a~mateer I : : ; 5 i
I
I i 13, 1965, were approved as submitted. I :Lamb ; blxi : ;
'11 I 4
I !\lilITTEiJ COI'?MUIiICATIONS:
4 QI 101 I
I
I I
I
on tile Planning Commission. I I I :iii;:
I
I
3 up under iJew business. I I
I
1 t I i::::; ,*:I:
I
I ;!:#:a
I 1,;:;; :;;;::
I i;:i::
I I::::!
I I ;p;:; 11
I :::I:I
I I ::;:;:
I I ::;I;:
I I ::;:*:
I I 'I;::; I1
I I I:;+
4:;:; ::;::;
I * I I
I I
I
I I
'I
I b I
'1'1
I I
* I
I
I I I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I I I I
I
I
I I I I :I,;:; ::::;I
I I
I
! ;:!l!I
c
I 8 ', ,' . .. I I I ,' I
I I I
', ',,'*,, '., 8' " I
I I I '\ ' 8,,'s8't, I
I : of '.+>St \ I y?$*, &&+ i
I
I 8' '" '
I '\ ', ', '. i
I I I -2- Name"*."+ **.:*$ i
~"""""~""""""""-""""~"""""""""""""-""""-"~;""-""-"---"- : Member *,?d"p'Qtg """"- 484
j4r. Thornton explained that the Council granted : 4'1*( !::;:I
:Mr. Griggs a waiver of street improvements at thii i::;;, #I1'!
!time on Parcel D provided a future street improvef :::::: jrnent agreement is entered into. Parcels A,B and : :::;:: 11
:C must have bond or cash posted for street im- I I ::;@:I jprovements before the lot split can be approved. { :;'::I
81 1 I $lr. Briggs has not complied with these require- : ::;@#I ;/;::i jments to date. I ' I lid;:
1 I ::;::;
I1 11
I !Upon being questioned, the City Attorney advised :the Commission they could deny the request or con-: Itinue the hearing. The City Attorney reported i
:that Mr. Briggs had been in to see him after the : icounci 1 meeting . I
!The Commission agreed to continue the hearing untijl :the next regular meeting and if the lot split is : !not completed by that time, the request for a I jvariance would be denied.
I75 to C-1. Applicants: Jerry L. Rombotis, et al. i
!The applicants agreed to hav.e the hearing con- i :tinued to the next regular meeting when there are :
!more Commissioners present. I
iwi ch. I I
!The Planning Director explained that the applica- : :tion had been withdrawn. I
!The Commission agreed to consider the Conditional i !Use Permi t and Variance appli catton together. I
I (d) COHDITIONAL USE PERMIT - To permit con- i
!struction of a sanctuary for religious services : ;on property located on the rlorthwesterly corner i :of the intersection of Pine AVB. and Harding St., : :on Lots 26 through 32, Block58, Map 775, Town of I icarlsbad. Applicants: Carlsbad Union Church. I I
I (e) VARIAiiCE - To consider a reduction in
Ithe required number of parking spaces from 134 to I55 spaces on i:-.c .:;rt:-,crltt cf pipc*b.ve t,Ct!, :J..ffclrsc7c a;? ;:3r,'fnc; SArects. Appl !cants: ICarlsbad Union Church.
:Notice of hearings were read. Secretary i4cCarthy jcertified that notice of hearings was sent to the :property owners in the area, and then read the
japplications.
I I
I I I
I I I
I I (b) RECLASSIFICATION, continued, R-3 and R-1;-
I 0 I I
I I 1
I I I
I (c) VARIAiJCE - Applicant: Charlotte F. Left-!
I I
I I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
t I I
I I
"
I !There was no correspondence an the request for a :condi ti onal use permi t.
;Letter dated Llay 11, 1965 from Dr. Harris A. Tayloi, Secretary, Carlsbad City Schools governing Board tb !Dr. Jerry D. Colling, Chairman Building Committee,:
:Carlsbad Union Church notifying then that the I +aster plan for the administration center and Pine: Sve. School cal'ls for the development of 50 tab 100; !off-street parking spaces. The letter also stated! :that it is the Board's policy that these parking : %paces may be used by members of the community i
+vhen they are not needed for official school use. : :Therfore, these parking spaces would be available i
ion Sunday for members of their church. I I
I
I I
I * :
I
I I I r
I
I !
i I
i
I t I I I I I I I * I I I s I I I *
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
1 I I I I
I I I I I
I I !
1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I
I
-3
!"""""""".""""""""""""*"""""
I I : The only other item of correspondence was an en- I velope submitted that evening from r".lr. Eli john sol^ : containing photographs of parked cars. I I
: The Chairman announced the Commission would now '.;:: ! hear from those persons wishing to speak in op- ; I position. I I
i MI. IJM. BIGLEY, owner of property at Jefferson i : and Oak, stated that he was not opposed to bui Id-; ing churches but is concerned with the parking ; : facilities, as there is no room now for guests i of his tenants on Sunday for a couple of hours. : i He stated that he felt they should conform to i : the ordinance as he had to comply with the code. :
: i4RS. ELI JOHNSON, 897 Oak St., asked the Commis- I sion to consider the parking. She stated that : all new bui ldings are required to have adequate i i off-street parking and asked why the church : should be an exception. She stated there are i several lots available for off-street parking and : they are planning to sell their property. She : stated that the traffic was impossible on Sundays! : and people park in front of their house and therq i is no room for their own guests to park on Sun- ; i days.
i There were no other persons desiring to speak in I : opposition.
i DR. COLLING, stated that it seemed more logical : i tnat flrs, Johnson has more parking problems from i : the church across the street from her since they : I have no off-street parking facilities, than from!
I 6
I !
* I
L *
I I I.
I
I 1 I I
I I I I * I b
I I
I I 1 I
the Carlsbad Union Church. 6 I
b t
I I I I
9 : The public hearings were closed at 8:07 P.I.I.
I I I I The Planning Director reported making a study of I' I the area with Dr. Colling for possible parking : i sites. He explained that this is in an old sec-I : tion of the to';?rn and that when he first stuf'aed : i the parking situation, he felt the church might i
I acquire more property for parking but some of I i the properties that were available were over 300; i feet from the proposed sanctuary and would re- I : quire another variance. He explalned tile facts ; resulting from the staff investigation and that : ; the curb parking along the South side of Pine St! i and West side of Harding St. not used by the Pin$ : St. School on Sundays will provide an additional ; i 30 parking spaces.within 300' of the southwest i ; corner of Pine Ave, and Harding St, plus the i diagonal parking on the tlortherly si de of Pine, i : around the church property.
; the letter from the school is an added induce- : I ment but cannot be considered a legal document i : since the added parking will have to be for the ; life of the church; that the business offices i : are unoccupied during the services; whether 32 : I cars could park in the parking lot florth of the i : Sunday School; many of the cars parked would i have children attending Sunday School while the I : parents attend church services; that there are : many parents who leave their children off to : i attend Sunday School and pick them up later; that : the parking spaces should be over 100 instead of! I
I I
I I t I I
Points discussed were the parking facilities; thgt
I 4
I 4
I I I I I I I I !
I 8
b 1
c
I I I' '\ "'",, '., " 'b I I
I I ', 8 \ '*,8'% I I I I ', ",'*., '*. '\,'\\ I I
I 'U' '\\ '\ '. ' '
I I I
I
I I -5- Na me 8% '\.:+& i
b I i of '\4j%&,>.$? : I :""""~"""""""""""""""-"""""""-"-"*"""""""~""".""""~ I Member *%("p.,*-@8.:
9" I""'"" IJ i there is curb parking along the South side of Pin$ ;1:;1; ;: i St. which is not used by the Pine Ave. School on ,:::I II
::'e:: : Sundays and on the west side of Harding St. I I :;::::
I I I 1I::l;
I 2. Also there is additional parking being ii!ii: :allowed them from the Carlsbad Union School Dist.! :I /;::: I@
:at the Morthwesterly corner of Jefferson St. and I I ii:::: 81 i Pine Ave. for 20 spaces. I 11;:;;
I 3. The maximum need for parking is limited ! ::I:;;
!to a few hours a week on one day. :I:::;
l $I;;; i of Pine Ave. adjacent to the church property per-: ;::t::
!mi ts more dense parking than parallel parking. 4 1;1:::
I I i:iiii
I I l;;181
!The motion died for lack of second. I ::':;:
I I :*::;;
I :i::;; !Commissioner PlcCarthy inquired if they could con-: ;:::;: I ))11 :tinue this hearing in order that the church could! l:;*ll jsubmit a different plan for parking and the City i ::;::: :::::: :Attorney stated that if they want a different I i plan they will have to re-apply for a variance. j:::i:
I 1 :+; ::
;The City Attorney advised the Commission to adopti *8p:: ia resolution denying the request for a variance. : ::I:;: - ;I::;;
$ 1 I ;;;:;;
I :::I:: :A motion was made to adopt Resolution 140. 405 I ' I 1; :denying the request for a variance'4for.rthe follow: I iiiii: $8 I i ing reasons:
I I I ;::::i ;::;::
I 1.That the request for the reduction of pari--. l:;o;l
hng spaces from 84 to 55 spaces required too great $6;::; ::;;I;
!a variation from the ordinance. I I 4;*1;1 :11;1;
., :;::::
;Planning Commission Resolution No. 406. A RESOLU-:: Palmateeri $ :x! : i : TION DENYIHG A VARIANCE Oil PROPERTY AT THE t;lORTH I McCarthy : : ; :xi : IERLY SIDE OF PINE AWEWUE BETWEEN JEFFERSON STREET; Sutherlana i !x; : i
!AND HARDING STREET, was adopted by title only and: Lamb :x; ;xi : : further reading waived. I :;;I*'
6;
!The Chairman asked Plr. Thornton to meet with Dr. :i:;1, iColling and the Planning Director to study park- : I:#:*
: ing faci li ties for the church. I I I:::,; 111
I
I
I
4. The diagonal parking along the Morth side ;::;e1
I
I
11 1
I I
I
I I
I
I
I I :;I::; 91;;
::;:::
I I ::::I, It
I (f) Amendment to Section 1612, Ord. 9060 - i ;i:;:; !i:*:: 4;l
;~;~:@
I ;;:i:i
I !:::I;
I
I
I
re: Hedge Heights, Anlending first paragraph - de-: : leting the word "hedge" except within the required :$:: jfront yard setbacks and the required side yards : :ll@l;
:on the street side of corner lots or reversed I ;::::: i corner lots. 1 1 *I::
ii4otice of hearing was read. The Secretary certi-i :;:;:; : fied that notice of the public hearing was pub- : ii:i:i ilished and then reviewed Resolution of Intention i ;/@I; 1;:::; jNo. 53 initiated by the Planning Commission. I I :;::I,
I I :;::I:
:The Chairman asked if any one wished to speak fori :I::I;
!or against this matter. I ;::;:;
1 ll;ltl
I 1 I :;I:;: I (@,I 8 ::::I;
I !:::;:
;Ip:8
:The Building Inspector stated that this rasolutiod 1;1:*: :of intention was reviewed by the Planning Staff : :;:::;
;I:::; i and the Bui lding Departnent and they are in agree4 ;:;0:1 :ment. I I ;;:p I* 11
I I I**:;:
!There were no others present destring to speak foj !or against this matter.
I
I I
I I 1 I I
::i:;; a'
I I:;::,
I ::;;::
I ;::;:;
public !!earin? : 3s c~cs:. ..: 6t ::c>-P. I ;::;:;
I ;:;t;1
s I I:':;:
I I :I:::: 811
I I :;;II:
I I :;I;:; I ;I::::
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! I *!!I!@
I
L
I I I I I
I I I
I G;
I -4 -
I
I I I """""" "" "" * """ * """_ * ""* "" ""_ _"" """""."""" i The following resolution was presented:
I After a short discussion, a motion was made to i : adopt Resolution No. 407 regarding hedge heights : i in the City of Carlsbad and found the following I i facts and reasons to exist which make said amend-: :ment necessary to carry out the provisions and I
i 1. That this amendment will clarify the en- : forcement and end the controversy of distinguish-: i ing between hedges and trees. I
i Planning Commission Resolution No. 407. A RESO- i LUTION RECOMi4EilCING AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE :NO. 9060, ARTICLE 16, SECTION 1612, REGARDING
: by 'title only and further reading waived. Lamb
; OLD BUSINESS:
! (a) Calaveras Lake - Designation as a park site;
- i BETTY WOLLRICH, Parks and Recreation Commissioneri ; stated that about 3 months ago the Parks and I ; Recreation Commission asked the Planning Commissibn to designate 250 acres of property at Calaveras i i Lake for a recreational area. At that time it : ;was tabled until a road could be engineered into I i it. She stated that the Parks and Recreation I I : Commission requests that the Planning Commission i i designate this property for a recreation area I I : immediately. They see no reason for the engineerjng i to be achieved before being designated as a park ; : site. She pointed out they are being pressured I i on many sides for various uses for this property : : and that it is imperative that this is designated: a recreational area. The land owners have agreed: : to dedicate property for right of way. Allan I I
Kelly has agreed to dedicate street right of i way. She reported they have a stumbling block ! : on the other side. They now have an offer to i put in a 90' road from Sunset Drive but they I : cannot do anything until the City designates this! I property as a park. She explained they would I I : like to have fishing, primitive youth camping, i
! The City Attorney stated that he would have to i : check on this matter but since the City owns the i property he felt they could recommend this to the: : Council and he would check on it and prepare a i i resolution of intention for the next regular I I : meeting to consider designating Lake Calaveras i
i A short recess was called at 9:18 P.M. Rcconveneb : at 9:a5 P.k * I
I (b) Landscaping of off-street parking areas.
i The City Attorney stated the Parks and Recreation! : Commission would like an ordinance for landscapinb i off-street parking areas, and if the Commission ; :would like to consider this they could adopt a i i resolution of intention to hold a public hearing i t on this matter since it would be an amendment to ;
I I 1 I 1 I
general purpose of Ordinance No. 9060: I I I I b I I
: I
I I I I
i HEDGE HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, was
I I
8 I I I I I t I
I I
I I "
i riding and hiking trails, etc. I I
I I I I
as a park site. I 1 * I I
I I
I
I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !
I
I I I '\ '\ '*, ', ', '8 I I I I '., a, \ * ' ' I I I 8. '\ \' I I '8 '','\8 '\ '\,'8, I
I -4 - '\ ', '% ', \ 8
I I Na me "8, '& 8s,N'+ i
:"""""""""""""""""~""""""".""~"""~""""""~""""""""" : Member ,o $$?-p-,b.i "" ""
b I I
I I Of *.&* '.*@ ". 9',+,?u, $ ;
ithe zoning ordinance. The resolution of intentioh i::;i; jwould be adding Section 1518 to Ordinance No. 906b. 1:;:::
;::'It
:The Planning Director explained that this came : ::q :before the Planning Commission some months before: ;::;I : It was given to him and he made recommendations : I::I;:
and it was sent to DMJM for their recommendations; ::;:::
***;I; : tle stated that he felt this was a good step for I
i;:;!:
i the whole City to require landscaped parking area;. '1:' 1::
I I:::;;
MRS. WOLLRICH asked that they consider all of the: ::p;; p:::;
f blacktopped areas including ingress and egress to: ;::;:I
the parking areas. I :;:::;
I :x;*,
/There was some discussion on a beautification I I I::$;
committee, and Mrs. Wollrich stated that this * I ::::I;
; request was from the Parks and Recreation Com- : I:;I:I
l';:;;
mission and something will be set up later for a i :: I(( 'I:;t;
; beautif#cation committee. !+':I
I I I ;;!:!: ! Commissioner Lamb asked that the wording of the i ::;:;:
i resolution be written clearly and that all paved : I:'::: ;i;:;; i areas including loading areas be included. I I :::;;;
I 4;:;:
: adopt Resolution of Intention No. 54 to consider NcCarthy :X: :xi : : i an amendment to Ordinance No. 9060, by adding i Sutherland : !x: i i : Section 1518 regarding landscaping of off-street i Lamb
parking areas. I I $!:;
I#;I::
811 '1;
I '18;;;
If ! Item No. 3, re: Proposed Chinquapin Ave. over- f ::::;: i crossing of Interstate Route No. 5 in lieu of : :I/:;: : frontage road on east si de of Freeway between i iitiii i Chinquapin Ave. and Tamarack Ave. I 8 :I!!;:
i Mr. fhornton explained that the City discussed I ;lI*I; : this matter with the State Division of Highways i i and the City would like to have an overpass on ; : Chinquapin crossing the Freeway in lieu of the I *:'*,I
i State extending Harrison Street to Tamarack. @ I 84:: I The overpass would be constructed at no cost to i qi;; the City when the Freeway is widened. The I I :*,@:I I present proposed widening of the Freeway pro- poses Harrison Street to be extended northerly 1'::;: I into Pi0 Pic0 at the Tamarack intersection. The i ::;:;: City feets that this overpass would help the I I :i:;;: : traffic distribution. There would be no Freeway i ! off or on ramps at the Chinquapin overpass. It : would allow Chinquapin and Adam to become the i ()I I'
: main drive around the north side of the lagoon : i without conflicting traffic with the east/west i : traffic and Freeway traffic at the Tamarack I Interchange.
i The Secretary read a letter dated July 22, 1965, i : from P. B. Franklin, 1175 Harborview Lane, I I;!!;: opposing this overpass as he fe?t it would creati ::;e;: ; nore traffic on Chinquapin where there are many i I::::: children and would be uneconomical. 8 I t:;:;:
(11'0
t 8 I :;;:;: ! There was discussion on the present traffic flow: :i:;i: I and the future traffic flow. I I ::;;:; ;@:;I;
I I I I ;::;:;
I I 8 I ;::;:;
I I I ;::;:;
I I I :;;:!;
I ::;:::
I I I ;;:I::
I I t ;::;:i 8 I @:;#;I
I I I I !!;:I: 8 I ::!I!t 1;::
8
I
I
I
81 18
8 I
I
I I I
**
I I II
- i After due consideration, a motion was made to i ~atmateer i I I
II I :x: x:, : i
I I ::;:::
f I :;;:;:
:*I
I I I I I NElJ BUSINESS:
I I
(a) Council Action on Planning Hatters. 8 I ::;:;I
I @ *I
8 I I # I:;::: ;:
;:::;I ;::!:! ;i::;;
I I ::::;: ;:::::
i::;:! II:;i:
::;:I:
/I;:; ;::;:; ::::;I
I ::;:;;
I I i::iii
I I ::::I; :I:::; i;::;;
c
I
I
I 1
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
!
D I .
I D D D D :"""""""""""""""""-"""""""""" D I """"""""""~,
D :Oakley Parker, 1092 Chinquapin Ave., stated that i
:he felt the proposed extension of Harrison is a i :bad mistake and the overpass would create more : :traffic on Chinquapin. He stated that chinquapin!
jdoes not get as much traffic now due to the bend : :in the road on Pi0 Pic0 Drive. He objected to ani !increase in traffic on Chinquapin and stated that;
;he is not going to give his land away. I I
iF. J. FOX, 4215 Harrison Street, inquired if the :overpass from the railroad would swing on to a net jroad tying into the downtown area?
I D 6
4
1 D D I e I I :Mr. Thornton stated that they would like the :Commission's opinion on this matter that evening i :as they will never get another chance to obtain ; ja structure from the state at this location. b :Harrison Street will cost some money but nothing i !in comparison to the overcrossing. * I + D
It was the unanimous decision of the Planning Comf mission that the City should have this overpass : and that Harrison Street could stand on its own
:merits later on.
!The Chairman asked that a letter be written to I
ithe Council stating that the Commission approved : :of the overpass. D b
e * 8 I D
D D
! D D i (b) The Planning Director reported attending I :the meeting held at the Encino Power Plant on :Monday, July 26, 1965, with the San Diego Gas ?I I
:Electrict Co. and Paul Neal , Larry Williams, Econq- :mist and Joe Brown, Civil Engineer from DMJM. I I :Also present were islayor Atkinson, City Manager IMamaux, Commissioner Lamb, and C. Id. Lafoon, 1 D :F. 14. DeVore and P.M. Klauber. A brief economic i ireport was presented and they answered basic D D !engineering aspects of a plan for the development:
;of the harbor, and the relocation for the entrance :to the harbor. They found out a great deal as i !far as the physical aspects of the lagoon are :concerned, and it was a good start towards under- i :standing the development. They spoke of i t as a : :natural harbor and it is too fine an opportunity i j to bypass.
D 1
I D
I D D
I D
:FRANK DEVORE stated the Gas Company had directed i ia letter to DMJM requesting DMJM to furnish D D :reasons and facts for developing the harbor as i !shown on the colored plan DMJM had shown SDG&E. : :They are not saying that the plan as represented :
jis not a workable plan but they had been furnished :no information to make a judgement. One comment : i they made on the harbors was that all harbors !silt up along the coast.
!The report is in the rough form now.
D D I D D t D I I I
D D
D I
!in the County sou iPlanning Director ithat afternoon to :Board meeting and
iregarding the zon * D D D D I D D I D b D I D I 1 e
I D
(c) Zoning in County. Commissioner Palmateer i :inquired if there had been a report for the zonincj theast of Carlsbad, and the D I stated that he had a call in Roger Courtney and he was in a I would call them on Friday D D ing. D # D I D D D D 8 I D D e D D I D * I f
c
I I
I I
.-
I i
I 4 I I I I I :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~~ 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I I
(d) Rules and Regulatfons of the Plannin Commissicn for conducting meetings. Commis:ioner i Lamb asked that the City Attorney look these
rules over and change the voting requirements, and that the Commission then follow them.
The Planning Director recommended that persons i speaking at a public hearing on variance applica- : itions be instructed to address the Commission ;only on points directly pertaining to the four i ;requirements for a variance. These four require- I lments should be printed and made available to the:
!audience at the meeting to assist them in their j iremarks.
#
I
I I I I I I I 4 I I
I I
I I I I I I !The Chairman instructed the City Attorney and the i :Planning Director to work together on setting up ; jthese rules and regulations. I 6 4 I 4 I
!By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at :10:22 P.M. to Tuesday, August 3, 1965, at 7:30 i :o'clock P.M. in the City Engineer's office for th4 :purpose of discussing the Revised Preliminary I I $raft Report from DLIJM.
!Respectfully submitted, I !
I I
I I
I I I t
!DOROTHY h. SOUSA !Record1 ng Secretary
I I
t
I I I I I I I I I I !
,,-
I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I 6 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I
I I
6 I I 1 I * I I * I I
I I 1 6 I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I t
I I I I I