HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-07-12; Planning Commission; Minutes1
P - I I' : 888 '8,,8888 8, 88 '\
I ', '8 '8,'\,
. \I' \8' I I I ;CITY OF CARLSBA~ I 8\8 I I 88, '88 ' I :Minutes of: PLANRIMG COMMISSlON :Date of i.leeting: July 12, 1966 Na me 8.. '\%, "8:+
:Time of Pieeting: 7:30 P.Y. :Place ,""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""*"-"""""~"-"-"--"-""-"-"~-"-~ of 1:feeti ng: Council Chambers : Member ~~~,~\O ',d8
I I :;11::
iF?OLL CALL was answered by Commissioners Smith, I :;;;::
ISutherl and, Palmateer, ?lcComas , YcCarthy and I I ::::::
:Frcistadt. Commissioner Little was absent. I I :::I:I :::I:: :Also present were City Attorney \!ilson, Building :::$I !Inspector Osburn, and Planning Director Schoell. I 81 ::::ii
I I ;iii:r
!APPROVAL OF NINUTES: I I I !:!I::
11**:: ;(a) rlinutes of the regular adjourned meeting of !Smith 1 j ;x; ; i
:June 21, 1966, were approved as submitted. ISutherlandi : : I :x:
I lPalmateer i ;x; : ; 11::1
'8\ '\ ', '8 8 ' I I 1 : of '+;@.,;,$+ @A i i
I
I I
11
(I( I'
11
I
1 I I)
I I I $lcComas I ; :x : ; : i jf4cCarthy !xi ;xi i i
I :Freistadt : x ;xi : :
I I I ;;I#::
i(b) Minutes of the regular meeting of June 28, jsmi th : : :x; , I
:::;
:1966, were approved as corrected.
I :PaImateer I I ; : k: i :
I I IYcComas : i !x ; :
I :!lcCarthy I k 'x;
I I i i
I I ifreistadt I !xi :x ; I :
I I I ii!;ii
:I.IRITTEN COMiUJNICATIOMS: I I I !:::::
;:1;4
!(a> Hemorandum dated July 5, 1966, from J. ti. I 1:;::: 111 18
ICarmicbae? , Chairman, Park 8 Recreation Commissiod :;;:;: Ire: Widening of Tamarack Avenue near the freeway: j:I;lI !stating they are still concerned about the po- l I :::I::
jtential loss of the trees and would like to I I ::;:::
I ;:':I: :know where this subject stands.
:The Chairman stated that the report of the
:Committees' findings had been given to the Councili :and was in their hands. I I
:Commissioner Freistadt stated that the Committees$ !had suggested swerving Tamarack Southerly in or- I
:der to save the trees, however, the Engineering ;
:Department representatives'opinion b:ras that this I iwould be unacceptable to the State tiighway Dept. :
!The Chairman asked that if the Park and Recreatioi
:were not notified of this action they be so I jnotified.
:ORAL COMMUMICATIOMS:
:There were no oral communications. I
:PUBLIC HEARIRGS:
!(a> VARIANCE - To consider a reduction in the !required front yard setback along Carlsbad Blvd. : :from 20 ft. to zero, and reduction in side yard i :setback from 10 ft. to 5 ft. on property adjacent: :to A.T. SC S.F. Railway right of way, on the NE'ly i
jside of t4ountain View Dr. between Ocean St. and : ICarlsbad Blvd., being Lot 47, Granville Park, I !Map 1782. Applicants: Army and Navy Academy
!Notice of the hearing was read.
:Secretary Palmateer asked that this hearing be jcontinued until a study of the intersection at ; :Carlsbad 61vd. and Mountain Vies.! Dr. has been !made. Sone time ago the City Engineer did not i
I 11
11 jSutherland j :x i ;
I
I I 111
'7 I
I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I 4 * I I
I I
P
J
I I' ', .* I I I I I I \, '\ '\ \ 8 t I \\,\\' I I I ' 8' '\ I I I I
., '\ '\, '8 .' I
1 1 8t8 ",,"\ '8,. ',,'a,
I -2- N a me \\.\ ',$, '8,
1 I : of '$08$8 ', 'f&.8
I : Member $&?,&O $'.-I '\L .o \ .p\,$$' I :""""""""""~""""""""""~""""""""""""""""~~~--""--""-----~--~--~-----
I I ;::is Ifeel it would be feasible to move the intersectioi ll::;; jNortherly on itop of 'the overpass,' hwever, this iS ;;:::: :being done now on freevjays. Commissioner Palmatecir al#;ll ::;::i 11 jfelt this would eliminate the blind curve. He diq :;::;: jnot believe the building ~ould. affect the inter- : ::::I: :section but there would have to be a fill there 1 :;;:ll I 1::; :if the street is moved northerly.
:The Chairman and the rest of the Commission felt : :the hearing should be heard since it was adverti- !sed. 19:::; 11
I I ;':I
:The Planning Director gave a report of his find- i jings and stated the use of the property at the : :Academy differs from the residential use of the i :surrounding areas. Me explained that the appli- : :cants are asking for this variance to have the i /maintenance shop in the background so it would : :not conflict with the residential uses of other i :;l,ll jnearby properties. 11;:
!The Building Inspector explained the topography i :and width of the streets and slope And location :of the railroad right of way.
:The Chairman announced the Commission would now ! :hear from the applicant or his representative and:
jany others t+ho wished to speak in favor of this i jvariance. 1 I
jMR. JIM ATKIMSON, Army and Ravy Academy, Business i :lvlanager, stated the request for the variance was : jneeded in order to build on to the existing build; :ing and keep it in the background to avoid build- iing a structure that would be obnoxious to the i :surrounding area. The view of the proposed addi- : ition to the building would be blocked by large i :trees from Flountain View Drive. He explained I ithat the height limit will not exceed 20 ft. and jthere will he a false roof on the Mountain View : :side to keep it in conformance with the existing I :building. The new building will have a nine ft. : :ceiling. The noise factor will be buffered by ithe bridge and railroad right of way. The build-: :ing will be a maintenance shop for the school I jbuilding and facilities and will not be used by i :the students. The present shop is attached to th4
:change in the dining area and the shop building :blocks the entrance to the dining area at the :present time. He stated the presentation drawing
:is slightly in error as the new structure will :completely fill in the area s'hown open between th4 iri,ew and existing structures. He reported driving i ion Pacific Avenue for many years and even if the : :entrance to Carlsbad Blvd. is elevated the bui'id- j Iing would still be below the maximlrm height limit: :unless the bridge is reconstructed. The present i
jbuilding is 2 storizs and the addition will be : :one story. I
:P!o others spoke in favor or voiced objection to Ithis variance.
:The public hearing was closed at 0:13 P.M.
I
I
I1
I I :;I I I I::@
1 I 4:::: :l:;:l :i:;::
!:&8::
::#:I:
:::::I
111 8;:: iii:ji ::;:I:
1:::::
I I
I I I
I I
*I
jil:t: j:;:
I I I ::::::
811
I I I :;:I
I I I I I I
I I
I I
:rear of ,the kitchen. The Academy has made a I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I b I I I I I I I I I
1 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
h
r
I I' .' I
I I I \, ', 8, ' ' ' I I I
I 1 '8 '\\.'\ 't, ', '. I
I , . , '.\ y8, I I I \, ',, ', \ 8 '
I -3- 8 I i Na me '8, SF^, '8,. '8pSl ,?,,
t ; of x,+ 0 I I .?d@&+,gi&. i :"""-""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""~ : Member .'$8@..@'9',d' I ::;;:; i Commissioner Palmateer explained that he believes: ::I:;; : this is an ideal location for tbe maintenance sh4p, ::;;,I ! however, he felt this is a good time for the I I ::::;: IS
: Engineering Department to study this rather than i 1:;::;
to wait until the structure is built and find ! ;*I::: ::; Ill 8 i that the structure would interfere with correct-: I:I ::I:;: : ing this intersection as there would be a need : ;l1114
i for a fill on the slope. He pointed out there ii : a 50 unit apartment building on Ocean Street I nearby and that traffic is increasing. Ocean st.! I : is a narrow street with restrictive parking. I I
! Point s discussed were the intersection at CaC1s-i I bad Blvd. and tslountain View Dr., on&-way traffic : i entering Carlsbad Blvd. from Cypress; non-conforq- : inq use of the Academy since it was established : : at that location before the current zoning ordin:
ance was adopted; that the Academy has 40 to 45 .$ years to use this property with the non-conform- i
i that this is a good location for the shop buildiig. I
Thc City Attorney advised the Chairman to re-opei
; the public hearing H the Commission wished to i i continue it.
i The Chairman re-opened the public hearing.
I ', ,', . \' I I
I
:I1
:::Il, II :::
$::It
I 4::;; 11::
I I I
: ing use and may increase the building to 40%; I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I
Pt motion was made that the variance for setbacks: Smith i requested by the Army and F!av,y Academy be con- i : tinued pending studies by the Engineering Depart! i ment of the feasibility of brinaing Pacific Ave. ; : and Pjountain View Dr. into Carlsbad Elvd. at a : i right angle in order to improve a blind inter- i : section. A specific study of the slope effect i$ i requested for the next regular meeting to be I I : held on July 26, 1966, and what affect the pro- : i posed addition to the 4cadem.y building ~rould havi : or! this. I t
! CILD BUSINESS:
I I I I I
1 I
I #
(a) Laauna Riviera. Letter dated July 12, 1366,; : from ramar Construction Co., Inc. by Jerry L. i Rombotis, President, asking that the tentative i : map cf Laguna Riviera Subdivision be put over : i until the next regular scheduled meeting on July: : 26, 1966, is held so that studies affecting thisj i::::; i subdivision may be completed. I I ::::;;
i The Commission reviewed the proposed R-T zone I : which had been considered at several adjourned i i meetings.
f.12. JOHN FRANCES FOX, 4215 Harrison St. ,Carlsbadi : stated that his property is already zoned 8-T : i with 4,000 sq.ft. lots permitted, and questioned: ::I:;: i the setbacks; subdividing his property and which! I::::: ; is considered the front and rear yards on his ; : property.
I The Chairman explained this is a new R-T zone : : the Commission are considering and ?ir. Fox could! i speak..at the public hearing on this matter.
i The Commission then reviewed a :propgsed R-lZr : Residential-Waterway Zone.
e I
11
I I ;:::,I
;::;I, :i:::;
I :::::I
I I I :i;:i: i:: :;:
1:::::
::;I;:
4::;;
I ::1:1;
I I ;:::::
I ;::::; ;::;:: ::;::;
I ;::::I
I ;::::;
I 1::I;l
I I ::;:::
I :*1:1; I I ;:::::
I I ;:I;::
I I I I ::::::
1 :I:;::
I I ;,I ; ; I !
I I 1 * ':*;::
I I
1111
I
Il(III
I I I
lt11II
I I I I
I 11 I
I I I I I I I I I I!;:::
I I 4 4 I:, ::i:
I :!!l!t
h
r
r
I 1 ',\.\\" I" I I I 8" I
I I I
I I I I ',. ".,'\.,8 ";+, I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
-4-
I
ileted.
:After further discussion a motion was made to I
\adopt Resolution of Intention No. 58 declaring :
jintent to hold public hearings on the R-T and R-n!
:zones. I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I :F.IE\J BUSINESS: I
I
i(a) Precise Plan for zone reclassification from i IR-1 to R-3. The Planning Director stated that an j
\application had come in for a zone change on the 4 :property next to the village. The applicant woul~
:like to purchase the Village and tile property to :
ithe north and use the property to the north to j
:construct a rest home for the Village. The Plan-:
ining Director explained the property is R-1 and : i the City does not need more R-3 property for resi; :dential use in this area unless it would be used I jfor a specific purpose so they have requested a : :precise plan with this zone change. I I
:The following resolution was nresented:
:After due consideration a motion was made to :adopt Resolution KO. 448.
I I
I I * I I I I a I I I I I I
I 1
I
I I
i(h) Proposed zoning. Other sections of the pro- :posed zoning ordinance were dfscussed in reaarr's : i to the need and priority.
;The Chairman authorized the Planning Director to i :work vith the City Attorney on these matters. I I
:(c) Buena Vista Lagoon. Commissioner Palnateer i :reported receiving a letter dated July 1, l96G, i :from Charles A. DeTurk, Chief, Division of Beacheg :and Parks expressing appreciation for the jcourtesies extended to representatives of that i :office on their initial visit to the Buena Vista I !Lagoon on June 21, 1966, and stating they have :
I I
I I 1 I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I 8
I I
I l I I
8
I a s I
I
I I
8 *
1
f-
r
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-5-
:"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
!tentatively scheduled a trip to the area :i9itchel1 and ;Ir. Bruce Chang the third we
!July. He asked that sone individual or o :designated as their official contact for (project. Their planners are busy with th jof infornation supplied and will welcome jadditional information.
:dr. Lawrence Ragley, Director of the Plan :in Oceanside or Mr. John J. tlamaux, Carls :City Hanager have heen designated as offi i contacts.
I
I
8
I 1
I
:By proper motion the meeting was adjourned :9:46 P. 1.1.
!Respectfully submitted,
1 I
""""""
for I"1r.
ek in ffice he this e volume
a nY
ninq Dep
bad ci a1
:Recording Secretary
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !
at