The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1968-05-14; Planning Commission; Minutesrc r I I. I. I. I. I. I. I 111111 I 111111 111111 111111 I'I I I I I 1l1111 I 111111 I .IIIIII I I I 11.1 I I 111111 I I.IIIIl I 111111 I I lllllt II'IIII I ROLL CALL was answered by Commis'sioners,Smith, Jose,ivPalmateer, Gullet't, Voorh.eis, and Little. ; ; A1 so presen.t were City Attorney Wilson, City Eng-1 I ineer Lill, Assistant City Engineer.Spano, ,and I I 111111 Planning Director Schoell. I I I I :- APPROVAL OF MINUTES: : (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of April 23, :Smith llllll I ,XIXI I I 'I IPalmateer I I 1x1 I I I I I 1968, were approved as submitted. ;Jose :x: :x; : ; :. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: I :Gullett : : : : :x: I I 'XI I I ~Voorheis I I Ix~ I I :Little I I I I I I I I I I I I I11111 I11111 11l111 I11111 11l111 111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (a) Letter dated May 2, 1968, from C..F. Weiler,: Director of Public Works, requesting that the I Planning Commission consider establishing pro- cedures which would provide the County Airport ; Commission with information relative to requests I for rezoning, va-riances, tentative subdivision : maps and annexations. The County-Planning I Commission and the County Airport Commission are I surveying the common interest relative to current: and future land use in the.vicinity of our County1 Airports and stated they would appreciate assis- I tance of the City of Carlsbad in these matters. : ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Chairman Little welcomed Dr. Gullett to the Planning Commission. I I I I I PUBLIC HEARINGS: I I (a) RECLASSIFICATION - To consider an applic- ation for a zone change from R-1 to R-3, located : on property North of Laguna .Drive to Knowles I Avenue from In€erstate 5 Freeway West to Davis I Avenue; bei.ng Parcel 1 , Book 156, Page 164, and I I Parcels 2 through 8,book 155, Page 280 of I Assessors' Map of San Di'ego County. Applicants: I Forest J. Brady, et al. I I No.tice of hearing was read. The- Secretary certi-: fied that publication was given and-that property: owners in the'area were notified and then read ; the application, with 12 property owners in the I area who approved of the zone change. I I A petition with 29 signatures of prope'rty Bwners : in the area, received May 8, 1968, was'read I protesting .the-zone change. ' , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11ll11 I I 111111 I llllll I 111111 111111 I I 111111 I 111111 1: 111111 111111 I I 11lll1 I 111111 I I11111 I 1.1 I I I I 111111 I 111111 I .I I I I I I i i h b I -2- I I I I I I. L I. 1. 1. I' I11111 111111 llllll llllll 11111~ 111411 Ill111 111111 .)lIIIl 111111 1,IIIII 111111 11'1111 1111l1 111111 111111 111111 111111 Ill111 Ill111 111l1~ 111111 llllll 1l1111 lllllf 1l1111 1l1111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 -IIIIII 111111 111111 111111 I1111~ 111111 11l111 It1111 llllll 111111 111111 llllll 111111 I11111 111111 I11111 Illlll I11111 111111 I11111 I11111 111111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 111111 1l1111 llllll 111111 111111 I 11.1 I I I11111 I11111 I11111 111111 llllll llllll Ill111 llllll I 1.1 I I I 111111 I11111 111111 Ill111 Ill111 111111 111111 111111 I11111 111111 llllll 111l11 llllll 111111 llllll 1111l1 111111 I Letter dated May 13, 1968, from Jack Y. Kubota, I I I was read stating approval of the zone change. I I I ?he Planning Director presented a map showi'ng the: I location of the proposed zone change in the area I I I and the freeway widening. He also .presented a ; 11111~ I.map of the general area of the property and the I I I property owners located in the area. He then I I I briefly read and explained the P.1anning Report ; I11111 : of the facts resulting from the staff investig- I I into a high density area the streets should be I 111111 : improved to City Standards to handle the increase: ~JIIIII ; of traffic. There is adequate undeveloped R-3 : I property in the area at this tiye. He presented : 111111 : a map showing the parcels that are now developed I : R-3 property and R-3 property that is vacant in : I- the City. He also p,ointed out that the proposed I llIll1 zone change is not in conformance with the .Genera{ I Plan. I The Assistant City Engineer read and explained I ; the Engineering Report and stated that this area : I being considered is an irregular shaped parcel ; i and is located a-djacent to the freeway. Access I I the North and Laguna Drive on the South. Both I : streets are presently unimproved and dead-end intd ; the freeway, providing a poor circulation pattern; I He also pointed out that the street improvements ; : were inadequate and that ornamental street lightsI I were needed. Also that a larger sewer main would: be needed in Knowles Avenue to accommodate the ; higher density. I The Chairman announced the Commission would now ; : FOREST J. BRADY, applicant, stated that there are : llllll i four (4) houses in this area of rezoning.,He also I I I stated that this property- is zoned for a single : I family. He explained that the proprpty owned ; by the Winklers, Johnsons, Baldwins, and the I I McMahons is approximately 830 feet long and be- ; I11111 : cause of the shape and location of the property I I it would be dif.ficult to sell.. He pointed out I I ; that this will have to be change to R-3 so these : I11111 : people can sell thefr property. There has been I Imany people interested in buying this property I : but for the. last four years they have not wanted ; 111l11 ; to because it is an R-1 zone. The land is too I ; valuable for a R-1 zone and by increasing the value of the City is by developing high density : 1111ll I areas. :The Chairman announced the Commission would now. ; 111111 :hear from any others wishing to speak in favor I I lof this application. I I :As there were no others present wishing to speak I ;in favor, the Chairman announced the Commission , I Ill111 would now hear from anyone wishing to speak in I I 11l111 :opposition. I I I I I .; ation. He pointed out that if this land is made I I I t I F ; to this area is primarily from Knowles Avenue on : I11111 I I I I I I hear from the applicant or his representative. I I* I I c I I I t I I I I I t I llllll 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111l11 11111t 1.1 I I 1 I 1.1 I I I I 11111~ Il111~ I I I I 8 I I B 1 I 1: I I I I I I I I' I I I I ~~ ~ ~~~~ I .I I I I I I I I I- .. I I I I I t I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -3- -. I I. b 1. I- 1, It MR. BAYLARD, 1012 Home Avenue, Carlsbad., stated I I I11111 llllll that the reports and recommendations from the . I I 1111l1 IllIlI various departments indicates that there are many: I11111 improvements in this area -that are needed, which I 111111 11l111 indicates a raise in taxes or by projecting our I I 1111l1 budget. The map indicates that tbere is adequate: '*J I I I I I 111111 R-3 property ava-ilable in the City. There is no I 111111 I.IIIII assurance as to what will 'be built. He pointed I I 111111 out that if multiple apartmentas are p-lanned to .; Ifllll llllll be constructed then why not a re-quest for a R-3L I 111111 11111l Zone. Schools will be required in the future, I 111111 shopping areas will shift, traffic will increase ; . . I11111 tlllll along With the budget, if this- is changed to a I 111111 111111 high densicty area. The resale of property will : . 111111 be increasl~~yi'd.t"fficult. The individual homes . ; 111l11 llllll will devaluate because of the hi.gh density-area. I 111111 111111 He felt that no one. would purchase a single I 111111 dwelling for theif:family next to a R-3 Zone. I I 111111 llllll I 111111 MR. LEIVONEN, 965 Home Avenue, Carlsbad, stated ! I 111111 111111 by developing this area into a h&gh density area I 111111 111111 would be very premature. There are many homes I I 11l111 on Davis Street, Davis Place and Laguna Drive 111l11 I llllll that are relatively new homes. The owners I I 111111 I11111 purchased these homes in good faith feeling that : I11111 it would be a good place to raise a family. He ; I11111 111111 felt that if this zone change was approved it '. I 111111 llllll wobld trap the home owners between these two I I 111111 large R-3 zones, and would be detrimental to the .; 111111 111111 residential, atmosphere. I 111111 1l1111 I 111111 As there were no others wishing to speak in I 111l11 I 111111 opposition, the Chairman closed the public hearin4 IIIIII at 8:14 P. M. 111111 Illill 111111 Commissioner Palmateer felt that this zone change! would not be advisable since there are large llllll I lllllt areas. of undevtiloped R-3 property in the City and: 111111 llllll t'hat this zone change is not in accordance with I I llllll the General Plan. 111111 I 111111 I I 111111 111111 Commissioner Smith stated that by denying this : 111111 application would Be asking one man to pay the ; I 11.1 I I I11111 taxes .on 8 acres of land. He .stated that the I I11111 llllll only way to increase thevvl3ue of the City is to 11l111 build on present properties which wouTd develop ; 111111 1l1111 better streets and lights. He. felt that due to llllll the fa.ct oPlthe freeway widening this property : 111111 111111 should be rezoned so that it can be developed. I 1l1111, I I 1.1 I I I 111l11 After further discussion, a motion was made to . ; I 1l1l11 111111 adopt Resolution No. 553, denying application I11111 I I11111 for a change of zone as requested for the I 111111 following reasons: I I Illlll 111111 I 11l111 I' 111111 1. That there are large areas of undeveloped I 111111 R-3 property in this vicinity that are not I I lllllI I11111 presently being used. .I I 111111 I 111111 111111 2. The applicant did not show public necessity I I llllll 111111 to warrant this zone change. I 1 I11111 I 11111l 111l11 3. That this proposed zone change is not in I I 111111 llllll accordance with the General Plan. I 111111 I I11111 I I11111 llllll I llllll I 1: llllll I ,IIIIII I 111f11 I 111111 I Illl11 llllll ~~~ ~~~~ I 1111i. I I 111111~ I I -II~III 'I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I ._ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. That this .proposed zone change would jeopar- ; dize the environment of maw new homes of sinqle I I 111111 111111 111111 111111 tamily residents in this area. I 111111 I 11l111 I 111111 The following resolution was presented:' I ~11111 I '.J I I I I I I 111111 Planning Commiss.ion Resolution No. 553. A RES0LU:Smith 111111 I I I 1x1 I FION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION :Jose 111111 DENYING APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE-FROM R-1 :Palmafeer ;x: :x: ; ; I r 1x1 I I TO R-3 ON PROPERTY NORTH OF LAGUNA DRIVE TO . ~Gullett I I 1x1 I I KNOWLES AVENUE FROM INTERSTATE 5 FREEWAY WEST :Voorheis : :x:x: : TO DAVIS AVENUE, was adopted by title only furtheqLit.tle . 8 I 8x1 I I reading waived. .. 111111 I 111111 I I I11111 111111 I 111111 I 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 I 111111 I I 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 11111l 111111 lltlll I11111 I 111111 I 111111 111111 I I 111111 111111 I 111111 I 111111 Illlll I 111111 lllllt I -IIIIII I11111 I 111111 I 111111 I I11111 I I11111 I 111111 111111 111111 Illtll I 111111 I 111111 I 11.1 I I t11111 I Illlll I llltll I 111111 I11111 111111 111111 (b) PREZONING - To consider an application-for I prezoning to C-M (L-ight Industrial,) on p.roperty : IIIlIl located on the Westerly side of El Camino Rkal, ; 111111 Northerly of Palomar Airport; being a. portion of I 111111 Lot F, Rancho Aqua Hedionda, Map 823, in County : of San Diego. Notice of hearing was read. The Secretary certi-: 111111 fied that property owners in the area were noti- I fied and then re.ad the application. I I I I I TENTATIYE MAP - CAMINO REAL INDUSTRIES - 40 lots.: Location: Westerly of El Camino Real, NortherPy I of Palomar Airport. Owners and Subdividers: Camino Real Industries. I Notice of hearing was read. The Secretary certi-I fied that property awners in the area were noti- I fied and then read the application. I I IIIII'. The Prezoning and Tentative Map were considered ; concurrently. I Letter dated May 13, 1968, fr0.m D. C. Cherrier, ; San Di.ego County Director, statiig that any grading that affects County territory must be done in compliance with the ,County Excavation and: Grading Ordinance No. 2925. City approval of this s.ubdivision should be conditioned upon I I 111111 I I I I I I, annexation as specified in the Subdivision Map I Act. Also stated that a' County representative I was directed to appear at the Carlsbad Planning ; Commission to emphasize the importance and I advantages of a cooperative study to expand the : Palomar Airport into a portion of the area I I incblded on this tentativ map. Letter dated May 13, 1968, from Jack Y. Kubota, I Carlsbad Municipal Water District, stating that I as far as the zoni-ng is concerned, they have no 111111 objection of the proposed use of the property. I They recommended that the Planning Commission I include a specific condition, in the event the I Tentative Map is appnoved, requiring the Developek to conform to any and all requirements of this .; District with necessary limitation of the use of the land along thfwpipeline easement, as well ; I I11111 I 111111 111111 111111 111l11 111111 111111 111111 11111l 111111 I I 111111 111111 I 111111 111111 I 111111 111111 111111 I11111 111111 IIIlll IIlIll 111111 111111 111111 I11111 111111 I I11111 llllll IlIlIl 1: ~IIIIII I 1111ll I llllll I I 11l111 11111l I 11111: I I ~. ~~~~~ ~ . ~~~~ ~~ "" I- I I I I I any necessary pipelin-e .relocations. In addition .: I there.should be pecific language that the I developer i.s responsibl'e for al-l expenses incurred. I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I .I I Lett dated May 10, 1968, from W. C. Atkinson, Jr.1 Lt. Colonel, ANA, stating that the industrial I development in the area of Palomar Airport would ; seriously jeopardize future growth and expansion I of the airport. It is the City's duty-to the I entire area to assure. that no de-velopment whether; it be industrial, commercial, residential, or I governmental should be allowed in.any way to I interfere with the plans of expansion of Palomar I Airport. I I I I l I I I I I Letter dated April 16, 1968, from Howard 'C; Harmo; , I District Superintendent of C.at1sba.d Union Schools: :. stating that they can foresee no possible objec- ; I tions to such a development. I I I I .. I I 1 I I : A letter from S. Y. Shore, rt8ting that P8cific ; I Clay Products would like to go on record I regarding the Camino Real Industries'.Tentative : Map by stating that thier company has mineral I I rights on and qu'aranteed access to parcels I 212-020-2 and 21 2-020-6. I I A recess was called at 8:46 P. M. The meeting I I Reconvened at 8:55 P. M. I I The Planning Director presented a map of the I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I proposed subdivision and stated that the appli- ; I 1 cant requestsa pre-annexation zone change from I 'I County E-1A and M zones to City of'carlsbad I C-M zone. He pointed out on the map the property; I that was pre-zoned C-M in October, 1966. The I proposed rezoning contains approximately 140 atres. He also presented a map showing the I entire area including -the area for pre-zoning;. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L Mr. Lill presented the tentative map and the I Engineering Report and stated that the proposed I subdiv,ision is in agreement with the City I Standards except that between lots 1 and 2 should Be eieher included in. these lots or a City Street for access should be provided. He ; explained that lots 2 through 6 should have I frontage on IYacaVio Road and Arroyo Lane. Also I that the pcoposed subdiv-ision should be developed; as one unit or in units that are approved by the I City. He then briefly reviewed and explained I the improvement-requirements. C. F. WEILER, San Diego County Director of Public: Works, stated that the County meither supports ; nor opposes the industrial park. He stated that I the County would hate to object to an aviation- ; oriented industry.. He asked the Commi.ssion to I cooperate with the County and the City Council I in initating a study of future needs of Palomar ; Airport. He stated that Palomar Airport is one I of the City's greatest assets and has freedom I of air space. ' He also stated that the County I would welcome the industrial park next to the I airport but the airport needs room to grow. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I' I I I I I ~~ ~~~ . I. L I. I. I* I. 111111 I I'I I I I I11111 I11111 llllll 111111 111111 '..! I I I I I 111l11 l111l1 llllll IIIIII I~IIII 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 . llllll Illlll l111l1 t11l11 1l1111 llllll I11111 llllll llllll 111111 11l111 111111 111l11 111111 I11111 1111~1 IIIlll llllll 1l1111 I11111 111111 llllll llllll I11111 111111 111111 111111 llllll llllll llllll 111111 1111l1 111111 111111 11111l 111111 11111l 111111* 111111 111l11 llllll 111111 I11111 1111l1 llllll llllll 111111 111111 111111 1l1111 111111 I 11.1 I I 111111 111111 1111l1 111111 111111 111111 I11111 111111 llllll 11111l~ 111111 111111 I11111 llllll I11111 111111 I11111 I11111 111111 1111l1 111111 Illlll 111111 I11111 1l1111 111111 llllll 111111 111111 111111 111111 llllll l1l111 llllll I11111 11111l 111111 1111l1 111111 llllll ,IIIIII 11l111 I11111 I11111 111111 111111 111.1, I I I - h I I I I I ............................. I -6- I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I Mr. Weiler also point.ed. out that Palomar Airport .I will play an increasingly impoptant'role in the .I future and :that it will eventually need a second : east-west runway and the only wat to expand' Palomar is parallel North tb the existi.ng runway ; which would also allow a secondary taxiway and I aviation development along, this runway. The I expansion .would cut into the lower tier of lots : owned by Kasmir. He asked, on behalf -of the I County that this land. not be com.mitted until the study is underway. I When questioned, Mr. Weiler stated that the Count$ estimates an additional 5,000 fo'ot runway requir-I ing 120 acres. The Chairman announced the Commiss'ion would now I hear from the applicant or his representative. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'GRAHAM KELLY, representing the previous owners, I stated that the scheduled payments accrued on taxes and interest are approximately $20,000 I a month. He did feel that the applicant is I understandably concerned about any extended I I I the land while this land is under study. It was I , I his feeling that the tentative subdivision map ; I I should be approved, so that it would apply force I I to the Board of Supervisors in getting this I study done. He stated that this is not a final ; I map and if the County wants to acquire that I I strip, changes can be made. 1 BURTON SHAMSKY, representing Kashmir Oil, stated I I that his client has confidence in Patomar Airport: : and that they would welcome expansion of the air ; I facility. He-also stated that tt would be the I I b,est -interest to the City of Carlsbad and Kashmir: I I not to delay action on the prezoning a.nd tenta- ; I tive map because this would force the County intol ; funding the airport study. He pointed out that I 1 if they.do not get approval of the tentative map : I the County may not fund the study. He stated that Kashmir has a time 'schedule and has to I operate in accordance with this schedule and I by delaying this would seriously jeopardize their: : plans and would be very costly to Kashmir Oil. I JAMES BARRINGTON, Architect for Kashmir Oil, I I I I I I I I I I - I I study, because there is little they can do with I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - .I I I I I I I I I I I I stated that they would be perfectly willing to ; I provide part of this property for the airport I expansion, because it would be an: advantage to I I the subdivision. If this problem does become a I I fact he felt that Kasmir.wil1 have to resubmit I I their map, but at the present time Kashmir has ; I I put in alot of time and consideration on this I I subdivision. I RALPH REGNALL, rep'resentilg Don Nasland, Civil I I Engineer, stated that the property line that the : I line, which would be in the 1,000 foot strip that1 I the gounty Airport is asking for. BY bringing I I that runway up to level elevation, they are going: ; to have to find some means of producing some I I dirt for that;akea. I I I I I .I I I I I I I I. City Engineer has called upon is the actual water: I I I I I 1: I I I I I I I I I I I " ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ llllll I. C 1. I. 1. I' 111111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 llllll 111111 ...! I I I I I I11111 111111 I,IIIIl 11l111 F~IIII 111111 111111 111111 llllll llllll . 111111 1111l1 . 1l1111 I11111 111111 1l1111 11l111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 111l11 111111 111111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 111111 111111 111111 1l1111 llllll 111111 llllll 111111 111111 111111 I11111 111111 llllll I11111 llllll Illlll 111111 111111. 111111 11111l I11111 llllll llllll llllll I11111 111111 llllll 111111 111111 I11111 111111 111111 I 11.1 I I 111111 llllll 111111 I11111 111111 llllll 111111 111111 llllll 111111 11111l Illlll 111111 I11111 llllll I11111 111111 I11111 I11111 111111 111111 111111 ltllll I11111 llllll llllll 11l111 1111l1 111111 111111 111111 11l111 111111 I11111 llllll 111111 ~IIIIII llllll 111111 Illlll 111111 IIIII: 1111l. IIII~I 111111, 111111 ., ,. t I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I ~"""""-"""""""""""""""""""- I -7- I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I .- I I I I I I Mr. Re-ghall al.so stated' if -they were to put substantial.elevation on that water Jine they . would have to relocate it at a lower elevation. I I Camino Real property is designed for th-is partic-; ular area so that the drainage is following the I natural course at all times. At the present I time the airplanes can tax.i across to this partic: ular strip as the grading is not that steep. 'I I I .I I I I Chairman Little announced that the Commission would now hear from any others wishing to speak ; in favor of this application. I As there were no others wishing to speak 'in favor, the Chairman annou'nce,d the .Commission I would now hear from. those in opposition.'. No one was present wishing to speak i'n oppos.ition: The public hearing was closed at $:45 P. M. I I I I I I I I I 1 I I. I. 1. I. I, 1. l111l1 1111l1 I 1'1 I I I 111l11 111111 I11111 llllll 111111 '..J I I I I I llllll tl1111 I.IIIII 111111 I~IIII 111111 1l1111 111111 111111 llllll . 111111 llllll llllll 111111 111111 11111l 111111 111111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 111l11 111111 I llllll I 111111 I 111111 Illlll I Illlll I I Illlll 1l1111 I 111111 I llllll I 111111 I 111111 I 111111 I 111111 111111 111111 111111 I 111111 I 111111 I 111111 Chairman Little stated that he would,like to continue this for 60 days, or the first meeting I in July. This w'ould give the County adequate time to get a study underway. Burton Shamsky respectfully requested for a shorter oantinuation, peridd which may force the Board of Supervisors into Qundind the air- I .port study. I I The Cdty Attorney -stated that action must be taken by the Planning Commission within 30 I I 111111 111111 days unless the applicant requests a longer continuation. Burton Shamsky stated that Kashmir would like to 1 have action taken within the 30 days. After further consideration, a motion was made :Smith to continue the Prezoning and Tentative Map of :Jose :x: :x1 Ill I I Camino Real Industries, ,to the regular meeting :Palmateer ; :x;x: ; ; of June 11, 1968, to allow the County Board of rGullett I I 1x1 I I Supervisors the opportunity ,to investigate :Voorheis : :x: : further as to the funding and comprehensive study;Little I I of enlarging Palomar Airport. A recess was called at 10:02 P. M. The meeting I reconvened at 1O:lO P. M. I -IIIIII I I I11111 111111 I 111111 I llllll 111111 I I llllll 111111 I 111111 111111 I I 1x1 I I I 'x: ; : I llllll I 111111 I llllll 111111 I I Ill111 111111 I I 111111 111111 I 111111 ; OLD BUSINESS: I Commissioner Jose read and presented the Resolu- I I tion of Commendations No. 556 to former Commis- : I 111111 I 111111 I llllll I I11111 llllll llllll 111111 .I 111111 I 111111 I 111111 111111 111111 111111 llllll 111111 111111 I 111111 I11111 111111 llllll I' .lIIIII I 111111 I I11111 I 111111 I I11111 I 11111I I I I I I sioner Glenn E. McComas. I (a) New Sign Ordinance. Commissioner Jose I I 111111 I stated that he has contacted the downtown busi- I I ness men and the Chamber of Commerce. The sign I I I committee members are Ben Ward, SidtSmith, :- . .. '. I I 111111 ., . . I ,. , F~aak Novak, Mo Sims, Lu Olson, Larry Black I I and Commi'ssioner Rollin Smith. He stated that .I : they have had three meetings and after the meet- ; 111111 I ing Monday night he felt that they are really I making good headway. I I I I I I E ~ ~~ ~ . .- r A -8- 1 I I 111111 : (b) Planned Cornmunit-y .Development Zone. The I c 111111 111111 I Planning Direct0.r stated that the type of zoning.; 1111~1 I $hat Carlsb-ad has today is a very old type and I 111111 111111 111111 I There is a need in.Carlsbad for this type of I '..I I I I I I I development &bat would give the developer more I I Illill 111111 1. expression in his development and would giVe_the : I.IIIII I Council and Planning Commission more opportunity ; tr1111 llllll : to look at the type of development that would I 111111 111111 I I come before the City.. He then b-riefly reviewed ; 111111 .I and explained the ordinance and asked the Commis-1 111111 111111 : sion if they woufd study this ordinance and to I I . . llllll 111111 I discuss this at the next meeting. I l11l11 I * 111111 I llllll : It was agreed that,thtbsSign Ordinance, Planned . I I llll~~ I Community Ordinance, and .the Pla'nned Industirial I 111111 111111 I Ordinance be continued to a.specia.1 study meeting: 111111 111111 I 111111 I 111111 I 111111 : NEW BUSINESS: I 111111 I llllll I I11111 I (a) Initation for Precise Plan Removal - South- ; I llllll 111111 I west corner of Monroe Street and Chestnut Avenue.l llllll llllll I llllll I Letter dated May 6, 1968, from Jay Lear, Inc., I I llllll 111111 requesting that the Planning Commission initate I I 1l11l1 I11111 I proceedings for the removal of Precise Plan PP ; 11111l I 6706 so.that it might be considered at the I llllll llllll : Planning Commission Meeting on May 28, 1968. I 111111 111111 llllll ; After furthir consideration, a motion was made to: 111111 111111 : adopt the following resolution: I I 111111 111111 llllll , Resolution No. 557. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING ;Smith 111111. 1x1 1x1 I I I I OOMMISSION.OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DETERMINING :Jose 111111 I THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD TO CONSIDER :Palmateer ; ; ;x; ; ; I I 1x1 I I RECOMMENDING A PRECISE PLAN REMOVAL TO THE CITY lGullett I I IxI I I I COUNCIL AND OR'DERING NOTICE THEREOF TO.BE GIVEN, :Voorheis : :x:x: I 1 : was adopted by title only and further reading ILi ttle I I 'XI I I : waived. I I 111111 I. b h I. 1. I' I there are additional ways of developing 1an.d. I I llllll I I I I I I I' I I I I I .I I I I I I I llllll I 111111 I I 111111 111111 I I I ; ADJOURNMENT: I I I 111111 11.1 I I I I I 111111 11l111 IIQ(1II I By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at :Smith I I 10:46 P. M. to Monday, May 27, 1968, at 4:OO P.M. :Jose :x: 5(: : : I for a study session concerning'signs, Planned :Palmateer ; :x?; ; I Industrial Zone, and Planned Community Zone. tGullett I I NI I I, tLi ttl e I I I I I I 111111 I llllll 111111 I I 111111 111111 I I11111 I 111111 I 111111 I 111l11 I I llllll .I 111111 I 111l11 I I 111111 I I 111111 I I I 111111 111111 I. I I 11l111 I I I Illlll 1111l1 I I I 11l111 I I 11111l I I 111111 I I llltll I I Illlll I I 111111 I I ltllll I 1: I ~IIIIII I 01111 I I llllll I 111l11 I I I I 11111! 111lil I :Voorheis : : 5( : ; I ::p::: ; Respectfully submitted, I I I I : TONI DERRIGOi I Recording Secretary ~______~