Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-07-27; Planning Commission; MinutesMEETING OF: DATE : TIME: PLACE: CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 27, 1971 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS City staff,members present: D. A. Agatep, E. J. Olinghouse, L. A. Moe, J. E. Spano. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the adjourned meeting of 6/29/71 were approved as submitted by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the regular meeting of 7/13/71 were approved as corrected by unanimous voice vote approval. :WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None I /ORAL. COMMUNICATION: ! Mr. Olinghouse read Ordinance No. 8056, an Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad establishing requirements for filling of an existing body of water,, which was adopted by the City Counci.1 on July 20, 1971' by unanimous voice vote approval, to take effect immediately. Briefly, this ordinance says, "No permit shall be issued to allow the filling of any existing body of water, except for the filling and excavation in the c.onstruction of a swim- ming pool, without prior Planning Commission and City Council approval of Specific Plans of development." PUBLIC HEARINGS: I (a) Continued - Resolution of Intention No. 79 - ,Recommending a change of zone from M (manufacturing) to RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple) in an area north of Chestnut between Tyler Street and A.T. & S.F. Rail- road; applicant: Planning Department Mr. Agatep introduced a memorandum (as requested at the regular meeting of 7/13/71) to the Planning Commission from the Planning Staff regarding the bar- rier between M (manufacturing) and residential zones. The memo outlined the requirements as specified in the City Ordinances. There is not an existing ordinance within the City administrative structures that requires a physical barrier to be built between nonconforming/ noncompatible uses, at least at the time of reclassifi- 'cation. At such time that the property is improved, the owner/developer will be subject to the existing City Ordinances, specifically those pertaining to physical separation of non-compatible uses by a fence or barrier. MR. C. ROBERT HUBBARD, 1707 Sandpiper, Palm Desert, who is a national consultant for United Parcel was pre- sent to clarify some questions about the barrier and who would be responsible for building it. The public hearing was closed at 7:45 P.M. ffter discussion', a motion was made to adopt Planning MOTION Yommission Resolution No. 714, A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AYES TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE, ON ABSTAI 'ROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF CHESTNUT AVENUE, AND BETWEEN TYLER STREET AND A.T. & S.F. RAILROAD. 4 + jp": I CITY OF CMLSBAD COMMISSIONERS -2- Commissioners Forman and Hermsen abstained because of their absence at the 7/13/71 meeting when the proposal was discussed. Commissioner Forman wished to indicate that he favors the zone change. I 7 (b) Variance - Shell Oil Company - to replace an existing 64-square-foot sign with a 36-square-foot sign mounted on the Shell station located on the N.E. cor- I ner of El Camino Real & Marron Road; applicant: Shell Oil Company. I Mr. Agatep introduced the staff report of 7/27[71. The technical report covered the particular situation re the location, height, and size of the proposed new sign. Reasons for approval were as follows: (1) Sight distance across the intersection will be improved; (2) the new sign will not block visibility of any other structures; (3).the present sign is out of proportion with the rest of the building due to topography; (4) the new sign will be more architecturally conforming to the present building than is the present sign. the sign ordinance and how the new sign would deviate from the ordinance. The commissioners had several questions regarding MR. CALVIN MASSEY, 3511 El Camino Real, San Diego, was present to represent Shell Oil Company. He dis- cussed the proposed new sign and the improvements it showed. He also showed some pictures which illustrated the changes. MR. GUY ROARK, 2590 El Camino Real, who is the dealer of the Shell station concerned was present to state his opinions about the new sign. He said his customers felt the present sign was a hazard because it blocked their view. I There was no one present to sDeak in oDDoeition I to the proposal. The public hearing was closed at 8:12 P.M. ~ Commissioner Jose felt that since similar requests had been turned down in the past, the approval of this /request would set a precedence and therefore disappro- lved the variance. After further discussion among the commissioners and Mr. Moe, City Attorney, a motion was lmade to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 715, 1A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION /GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAS CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND MARRON ROAD, dele,ting - reason..-D-o-f .-me staff report and subject to the condi- tion that any further sign applications be brought" to the commission for review. I (c) Change of zone and adoption of a Specifict.Plan - Reclassification in zone from R-3 to RD-M and adoption of a specific plan for 12 dwelling units on the NE cor- ner of Carlsbad Boulevard and Redwood Avenue; applicant Donald MacDonald. MOT I ON AYES NOES I CITY OF CARLSBAD . COMMISSIONERS -T- Mr. Aga.tep pointed out the location and the re- quirem'ents on a graphic. Mr. Olinghouse presented the detailed staff report of 7/27/71, which outlined the location of the proposal, the surrounding zones, the densities as outlined by the General Plan, and parking requirements. The secretary read all the correspondence re this proposal. MR. & MRS. VICTOR F. PARKS, 131 Hem1 ock Avenue, Apartment #2,.submitted a letter dated 7/19/71 disap- proving the zone change to RD-M. MR. V. H. BEISSWINGER, 160 Hemlock Avenue, Apart- ment. #3 submitted a letter dated 7/22/71, opposing the zone change to RD-M and stating that the City of Carls- bad is in violation of California state law by not having an adopted Master Plan before June 30, 1969. DOROTHEA B.' DAMON, 141 Hemlock Avenue submitted a letter dated 7/21/71 to the Planning*Commission regis- tering her definite opposition to the proposed zone change to RD-M on.property located on the NE corner of Carlsbad Blvd. and Redwood Ave. She feels it will alter the character of the area unfavorably. A memorandum f,?om Mr. Olinghouse dated 7/27/71 was- read which relayed to the Commission a telephone con- versation Mr. Olinghouse had with Mr. Harry Backman of Monterrey Park on 7/27/71. Mr. Backman owns the pro- perty at 3820 Carlsbad Boulevard and is opposed to a zone change on the basis of the 10-foot setback. MR. DONALD MACDONALD, 70 Giralda Walk, Long Beach, was present to comment on his proposal and answer questions.. He feels his project would not be detrimen- tal to the area. There was-no one present to speak in favor of the The following people spoke in opposition: MRS. DOROTHY REED, 146 Redwood Avenue, Carlsbad. VICTOR PARKS, 131 Hemlock. Avenue, Apt. 2, Carlsbad, The Public Hearing was closed at 8:37 P.M. Commissioner Dominguez suggested Mr. Beisswinger's proposal. letter be dealt with since it made some allegations about the City. Mr. Olinghouse assured the commission that the City does have a General Plan according to state law and that the City .has filled the requirements, The City is in conformance with any state law. tinued until the next meeting so that the legal aspects could be clarifi,ed. Mr. Olinghouse suggested a continuance for further Commissioner Jose felt the hearing should be con- taff study and revision of the staff report, Commissioner Jose made a motion to continue until he next regular meeting so additional staff study can e made. I B MOTION AYES CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMISSIONERS -4- (d) Change of Zone - from (P-C) Planned Community to R-lr7,500 East of the intersection of Kelly Drive and Park Drive; applicant: Allan 0. Kelly, BECRAH, INC. Mr. Agatep introduced the staff report of 7/27/71 which discussed the overall concept and gave recommenda- tions and reasons for approval. MR. W. ALLAN KELLY of 3455 Spanish Way, was present There was no one present to speak in favor of opposition of the zone change. The public hearing was closed at 8:5! P.M. to discuss his proposal and answer questions. The commissioners commented that they regret a Planned Community concept for that area was not approved because they feel it is a good and workable idea. Commissioner .Domdnguez asked th'at when a subdivi- sion map becomes available the PXanndng Commission will have a chance to review it. A motion was made to adopt' Planni-ng Commission X MOT I ON Resolution No. 717, A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE CAMINO REAL AND EAST OF KELLY DRIVE. NOES CITY COUNCIL CHANGE OF ZONE FROM P-C (PLANNED COMMUNITY) xxxxxx AYES TO R-1-7,500 ZONE, .ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF EL ABSENT (e) Conditional Use Permit - To allow a recreational vehicle park to locate along Palomar Airport Road between 1-5 and El Camino Real, applicants: Vincent 81 Nancy Ferraro Mr. Agatep first discussed the location of the pro- posal since several Commissioners were not positive of the exact area, He then read the staff report of 7/27/71 which discussed the entire recpeational vehicle park concept and what the proposed plan included. MR. VINCENT FERRARO, the applicant, was present to discuss his plan and answer questions regarding the campground. He requested that. condition number 6 of the staff report (review of the C.U.P.) be moved up to 20 years instead of 10 years since he must obtain a 25- year lease with Mr. Carrol Kelly. MRS. BETTY WOLLRICH, 4150 Skyline Drive, was pre- sent to represent the Parks and Recreation Department. She feels this campground will be an asset to the City of Carlsbad and is needed by all recreational-minded people. CRAIG HARRIS, 1116 S. Tate, Oceanside, was present !to voice his favor of the proposal, He feels that since Ithe campground will be in compliance with the City Ordinances, it will be most beneficial re tourism. No one was present to speak in opposition. The public hearing was closed at 9:17 P.M. ~ ..~. ~ - F Discussion ensued regarding the time limit on review of the C.U.P. and it was decided by the Commis- sioners to.set it at 15 years. The emergency access road and drainage was discussed. A motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 718, A‘ RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, KELLY DRIVE AND THE PROPOSED MACARIO ROAD. GRANTING A PRE-ANNEXATIONAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON I (f) Variance - Requesting a variance in required front year setback from 20 feet to 18 feet on lots 4, 10, 14, 19-, 21, 27 and 33 and from 20 feet to 15 feet on. lots 3, 5‘, 8, and 28 - All for proposed El Camino Hesa Unit No. 6 on property located East of Trieste Drive; applicant: Kamar Construction Company. Mr. Agatep in’troduced the staff report of 7/27/71, which outlined the location, the request in setbacks, and the reasons for approval of the request. MR. JERRY ROMBOTIS, the applicant, of 3505 Charter Oak Drive was present to express his reasons for wantin the setbacks. He feels this is a good concept, and will get away from .the typical straight subdivision streets. Mr. Rombotis answered questions of the Com- mission and audience. MR.. RUDY DELGADO, 3735 Sierra Morena, was present to clarify some questions regarding the proposed set- backs, since his property lies within the 300-foot rad- ius. His questions were-satisfactorily answered by Mr. Rombotis and the staff. There was no one present to speak in favor or opposition of the proposal. The Public Hearing was closed at 9:43 P.M. The commission, after a short discussion, decided this.was a good proposal, so a motion was made to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 719, A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON SIERRA MORENA AVENUE AND LONGVIEW DRIVE IN EL CAMINO MESA UNIT NO. 6 FOR REDUCTION IN REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACKS. NEW BUSINESS: The planning staff presented a memo dated 7/23/71 to the Planning Commission regarding the review of a mobile home park design. A short review of the last meeting (when the plan change was discussed) was made t acquaint those commissioners not present at that meetin After discussion on the deviations from the origin plan, a motion was made to adopt Sequoia Pacific’s amen ded plan in that it did not deviate substantially from the original plan. 40T ION \YES JOES \BSENT ITION 1Y ES VOES MOTION AYES NOES f’ CITY OF CARLSBAD -6- ILD BUSINESS: ‘0.3 Buena ,Vista Lagoon - Mr. Olinghouse commented that Irdinance No. 8056 adopted by City Council establishing *equirements for the filling of an existing body of rater would have an impact on Buena Vista Lagoon in the ‘uture. Staff informed the commission that the nuisance Irdinance would be on the August 3rd agenda of the :ity Council for discussion. If the ordinance draft s approved by City Council then the Planning Commission rill start proceedings for a public hearing to consider In amendment to the zoning ordinance. ‘0.24 Off-street Parking in R-Zones - CIC Parking iommittee submitted a memo reviewing the proposed re- lision in parking requirements in R zones. Mr. Agatep lead the memo. The commissfon instructed staf; to instigate pro- :eedings for a Resolution of Intention to change the ‘itle Planned Community to a more comprehensive zoning lesignation, i.e. .Planned Unit Development, Planned :esidential Development or Planned Development. ‘0.28 Freeway Landscaping - Mr. Agatep informed the lanning Commission of City Council’s. decision to back landscaping program along 1-5. OMMITTEE REPORTS: None DJOURNMENT: The meeting was’adjourned at 10:15 P.M. ith unanimous voice vote approval. espectfully submitted, ANDRA L2k L. LUCKY, Secretary COMM1 SSIONERS MOTION AYES NOES