The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1971-11-23; Planning Commission; Minutes,I . MEETING OF: DATE : TIME: PLACE: CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 23, 1971 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS City staff members present: D. A. Agatep, E. J. Olinghouse, R. A. Johnston, J. B. Arnold, J. E. Spano, R. A. Osburn I APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of 11-9-71 were continued to December 14, 1971 because there was not a quorum of commissioners present who had attended the previous meeting. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None ORAL COMMUNICATION: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: (a) Continued - REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONE - Reclas- sification in zone from R-1-7,500 to R-3 on certain properties lying east of Eureka Place between Chestnut Avenue and Pine Avenue; Applicant: Richard D. Mantle I I, Mr. Agatep outlined the progress of the Pi0 Pic0 study. He informed the commission that .a letter and questionnaire had been sent to all the property owners November 10, 1971 with the property owners to get their ideas. Since then, staff has b.een reviewing the ques- tionnaires and has arrived at several recommendations. Yr. Agatep read the staff report which outlined the location of the property and gave reasons and condition of approval. The commissioners felt that the f.il1 commission shou oncerned,.r and that a meeting, had been held on be present when this application is heard since this zoncerns many surrounding property owners. The chair- nan asked Mr. Mantle, the applicant, if he would like t contimue until a full commission was present. The 2pplicant agreed to a continuance. ""-""""""""""""""""""""""""" iesolution of Intention No. 82 - A RESOLUTION OF THE 'LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT (RESIDENTIAL DENSITY PORTION) OF THE GENERAL 'LAN, EAST OF PI0 PICO DRIVE, BOUNDED BY ELM AVENUE, TAMARACK AVENUE AS INDICATED BY MAP TITLED PI0 PICO IRIVE AMENDMENT TO LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN 10. 3 4 I Mr. Agatep asked if a presentation could be made re ?esolution of Intention NO. 82 at this point on the tgenda because it was omitted by mistake. Mr. Agatep illustrated several graphics which showed existing land uses and existing zoning. He also dis- :ussed the various elements which are being considered in the General Plan Amendment, i.e. eastward extension 2f multiple zoning, etc. He informed the commission khat the staff has made recornwendations as to the jevelopment of the area after meeting and corresponding rJith the property owners. Mr. Agatep read the letter zrhich was sent to the property owners requesting their COMMISSIONERS Presen Absent d CITY OF CMLSBAD -2- I comments. Mr. Olinghouse added that at the hearing for General Plan Amendment, various information will be presented, such as background data on the land use element, histo- rical background, and other information relating to a re-evaluation of the General Plan, looking at land uses east of 1-5 in general. He feels this information will be significant in looking at the total picture. After discussion, it was decided the public hearing date should not be set until the commission hears full information and looks at the total picture of land use. It was suggested that the commissioners help staff in studying this matter. A motion was made to continue until more complete information was available. I """""""""""""""""""-"""""""" PEW BUSINESS: . a) RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 83 - To set a public earing date to consider a reclassification in zone fro1 F -P to-C-M and adoption of a specific plan for Peachey- eese, et a1 __ , Mr. Agatep introduced the staff report and commented hat it was a follow-up of the original application. specific plan for this property has been developed fter meeting with the applicants. Mr. Agatep illus- rated the proposed rezoning on graphics and also read he conditions.of the specific plan. Discussion ensued among the commissioners -as to the esirability of C-M zoning, traffic c,irculation, and arious conditions. Mr. Arnold, City Manager, mtde two comments. First, as that Roosevelt Street is not fully improved and hat State Street is narrow because of angle parking, econdly, he feels the property has the potential for ood commercial use. He commented that the specific lan is an attempt to come half way, working with the wners to upgrade the area. HARRY TRUAX, 2656 State Street, was present and made everal comments. He believes that the staff has pro- osed a prac.tica1 approach for the area. After further discussion, a motion was made to adopt esolution of Intention No. 83, A RESOLUTION OF THE LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DECLARING T5 INTENTION TO CONSIDER A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-P TO -M AND ADOPTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN ON CERTAIN PROPERTII OCATED ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF ROOSEVELT, SOUTH OF AGUNA DRIVE AND NORTH OF BEECH AVENUE. ---"""""""""""""""""""""""""~, b) Planning Commission review.f40f, Parks & Recreation Questionnaire - -, . Mrs. Betty Wollrich, Parks & Recreation Commission irector, presented a parks & recreation questionnaire hich will be sent out early in Decembe,r to all citizen! COMMl SSIONERS lotion lye s loes ,bsent Motion Ayes Absent Noes AbsCainec I .- A k: CITY OF CARLSBAD -3- I f Carlsbad. She asked for comments from the commis- ioners. Discussion ensue.d re the questionnaire and ake Calavara. Mr. Arnold-said a memo will be presen- ed at the next City Council meeting outlining all the roposals made to date on Lake Calavara. Mrs. Wollrich commented that the questionnaire is a tart to get some summary information. Chairman Little ommended Mrs. Wollrich for her persistence. """"""""""""""""""""""""""" c) HOUSE MOVE - From 2727 Roosevelt Street to Stratfor ane - owner - Gerald McClel lan Mr. Osburn presented the building department's eport on'the proposed house move. Discussion ensued e the age of the house being moved, and the ages of he houses where,it will be placed. After a short iscussion, a motion was made to approve the house move """"""""""""""""""""""""""" d) RESOLUTION OF 1NTEN.TION NO. 84 - To set a public earing date to consider an amendment to the Carlsbad unicipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.46 .Section 21.46. 30 Walls, Fences, or Hedges. cl. E. Spano, Assistant City Engineer, made several omments in regards to problems with sight obstruction hich the engineering department has faced in the past. r. Arnold, City Manager, commented on corner lot encing restrictions, and suggested that we follow the raft submitted by building departmen,t. .i Discussion ensued among the commission. It was felt hat the City needs the revision so that the fence equirements can be more fairly enforced. Mr. Osburn ommented that those persons with nonconforming fences ould have to comply with the new ordinance within ourteen to sixteen months. After further discussion, a motion was made to dopt Resolution of Intention No. 84, A RESOLUTION OF HE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DECLARI TS INTENT TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RECOM- ENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE AMENDMENT TO THE CARLS- AD MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 21, CHAPTER 21.46 SECTION 1.46.130 WALLS, FENCES OF HEDGES. """"""""""""""""""""""""""" LD BUSINESS: a) 'Continued' Items Attachment - Planning Department Reports 0.24-Off-street Parking in R-Zones - Mr. Agatep report hat letters had been sent to other cities in San Diego ounty requesting their parking requirements. A report ill be submitted which outlines other cities' require- ents. ........................... COMMISSIONERS p ,otion Yes ,bsent bstained Motion Ayes INoes Absent Abstaine . # t: C ITY OF -4- CARiLSBAD Discussion ensued in regards to house It was felt that in considering house mo age! of the house being moved should be account to avoid it being moved into a m neighborhood. Discussion also took place in regards requirement of minimum size of dwelling felt that this requirement should be rep City Code. move procedure ves, that the taken into uch newer to the past unit. It was laced in the MR. Agatep commented on the public hearing items for the next regular meeting of December 14, 1971. None The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 P.M. by proper voice vote approval. bespectfully submitted, COMMISSIONERS otion Yes bsent