Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-12-28; Planning Commission; Minutes. -. f ": -. \ c .- CITY OF CNLSBAD MEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1971 PLACE: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TIME: 7:30 P.M. ~ ROLL CALL: City staff members present: D. A. Agatep, G. W. Anear W. C. Smith, J. E. Spano, E. J. Olinghouse APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the regular meeting of 12-14-71 were approved as submitted. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None ORAL COMMUNICATION: Mr. Olinghouse mentioned that a continuance has been suggested by the staff of item (d) of the public hearings regarding a. tentative map approval request by Difcon, Inc. After a short discussion, a motion was made to continue this item until the next regular meeting, 1-11-72. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (a) Continued - REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONE AND ADOPTIO OF A SPECIFIC PLAN - Reclassification in zone from R-1 to RD-M on property located on the NW quadrant of Tamarack and Jefferson for a 40-unit townhouse complex and adoption of a specific plan; Applicant: Mrs. Hisako Ikemi . Discussion ensued regarding a letter which was sub- mitted by James Bree asking for an extension of two weeks so that a new tentative map showing 60 units wit. a to.tal of 106 bedrooms could be submitted. The com- mission felt that the application should be withdrawn and then resubmitted when final pla-is are completed. Mr. James Bree was present to request the extension so that he can resubmit the new plans in two weeks. Mr. Olinghouse commented that two weeks would not be sufficient time to review the plans. After further discussion, it was decided the present application should be withdrawn and then a new plan resubmitted, so that the property owners in the area may be renotified and aiso enabling the proposal to be advertised in the Journal. The Chairman suggested that Mrs. Ikemi submit her withdrawal request in writi A motion was made to continue until the 11 January 1972 meeting to provide the applicant time to withdraw her application and give Mr. Bree time to resubmit- plans. A property owner' in the ,area .concerned asked for the letter from the school board to be read so that th people in that area will know what stand the school has taken in this matter. He was informed.by the commission that the count would be. changed when the new plan was submitted (i.e. new bedroom count), but the letter was briefly read to enlighten.the property owners as to how many children this proposal would add to the school system. COMMISSIONERS 'RESENT .BSENT fOTION .YES .BSTAINED ,BSENT fOTION iYES IBSENT r. lOTION ,YES ,BSENT X CITY OF CARLSBAD -2- (b) VARIANCE - Request to permit the division of a 1.04 acre parcel into 3 lots, each being 254 square feet short of the 15,000 square feet normally required, on property located between Hoover Street and Adams Streel on the west side of Highland; Applicant: Charles A.! Anthony """"""""""""""""""""""""""" Mr. Agatep introduced the staff's report of 12-28-71 which outlined the applicant's request, gave recommend; tions, and reasons and conditions of approval. The applicant's representative, Mr. Porter Yarbrough, 706 Madison Avenue, San Diego, California, informed the commissioners that he intends to build a ve.ry nice h0m.e and wants to maintain the high quality of the neighborhood. Later on, the other two lots would be sold. Discussion ensued among the comm2ssion and it was the overall opinion that the variance would not be detrimental to the area. The following person was present to speak in favor of the proposal: Burt Alton, 4380 Adams Street There was no one present to speak in opposition to the proposal. The public hearing was closed at 8:OO P.M. Discussion continued regarding this request. A motion was made to approve planning commission resolu- tion no. 746, A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HIGHZAND DRIVE BETWEEN HOOVER STREET AND ADAMS STREET, for reasons as outlined in the staff's report of 12-28-71, and subjecl to the conditions as outlined in the same report. (c) VARIANCE - Request to create panhandle lots on property located on the east side of Spruce Street between Forest Avenue and Yourell Avenue; Applicant: E. Lamont Geissinger """"""""""""""""""""""""""" Mr. Agatep read the staff report, dated 12-28-71, which covered the situation regarding location, panhan- dle lot requirements, and listed reasons and condition: of approval. Condition #3 regarding sidewalks.was discussed by tht commission and the Assistant City Engineer. The com- mission noted that many houses in that area do not have sidewalks, and felt it unreasonable to require the applicant to install sidewalks at this time. How- ever, it was felt that the applicant should be requirec to enter into a future street improvement agreement. Commissioner Forman had a question about the normal grading condition which is usually added, but was not added in this case. The Assistant City Engineer com- mented that the lots are already sloping to the street, but that the condition could be added if so desired. He also commented that the driveway should be put on COMMl SSIONERS OTION YES BSENT CITY OF CARLSBAD -3- the north side and, asked the commission to consider adding a condition to this effect. Mr. Vern Geissinger, 704 Coronado Shores, Coronado, California was present to represent his parents, who'! are the applicants. He made various comments about the variance request and added that he would cooperatt in a future street agreement. The commission asked several questions which were answered by the applicani There was no one present to speak in favor or opposi- tion to the proposal. The public hearing was closed at 8:16 P.M. After discussion among the commission, a motion was made to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 747, A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SPRUCE STREET BETWEEN FOREST AVENUE AND YOURELL AVENUE, for reasons as outlined in the staff report of 12-28-71 and subject to the conditions as outlined in the same report with two added conditi0n.s to read as follows: (7) The middle lot shall be graded subject to approval of the City Engineer; (8) That a driveway to be constructdd in conjunction with the lot facing Spruce Street shall be located along the northern property line. """""~""""""""""""~""""""""-. NEW BUSINESS: (a) Staff Report on La Costa request for annexation-.tc the City of Carlsbad Mr. Olinghouse presented the report and discussion on this matter. He informed the commission that they have been requested by the City Council to present a written report. Mr. Olinghouse discussed several elements of the annexation request. La Costa will ha1 to apply for prezoning and a master plan (the staff has suggested that a Planned Community Zone be utilized). Mr. Olinghouse informed the commission thi we would have to rely on background information. Lanc use and land use patterns as designated in the Land- Use Element of the General Plan would have to be reviewed to determine if the planning area can be expanded. Interdependent elements such as recreation, schools, municipal services, etc. would also be taken into consideration. Final annexation would be appro- ximately one year away. Mr. Olinghouse said that at this time, we cannot present how we intend to modify the General Plan. This will be done in progress. .. Chairman Little commented that he felt the report should be submitted to the City Council with the undel standing that it is only a.3mall part of intended par. ticipation by the commiss,ion. He asked that certain thin.gs be included in t4$ planning reports, ie. (1) break even point, (2) additional money required from taxpayers, (3) additional services required. Commissioner Jose suggested that a committee be appointed to study this with the staff, t.hen a work- shop session be held later on with the whole commissic The Plannins Director said the item would be aarriec on the 'continued' items attachment to keep the com- mission abreast of progress, etc. COMMISSIONER S fOTION L YES JOES LBSENT . A I COMMISSIONERS CITY OF CARLSBAD -4- ~~ Commissioner Dominguez suggested the possibility of an external evaluator, because he feels that the com- mission cannot provide the council with the informa- tion they need to make such a weighty decision. Mr. John Mamaux, 1393 Basswood, representing La Costa Land Company, made comments regarding their request for annexation to the City. He also outlined the procedure for annexation and the time periods involved. Mr. Mamaux discussed the economic .aspects and benefits that he feels the City will gain through annexation of La Costa. Lenghty discussion ensued regarding the report sub- mitted by the Planning Director, the City Manager's report, and what input the commission will provide to the City Council. It was agreed that additional info; mation must be reviewed befpre a report is submitted from the commission. It was suggested that discussion be continued until 11 January 1972. A motion was made to continue Item 6(a) [Staff Report on La Costa request for annexation to the City of Carlsbad], to January 8, 1972 at 1:OO P.M. for a tour of the La Costa area by the commissiol OLD BUSINESS: (a) Continued - Memorandum to the Planning Commission from.the City Manager, outlining City Council action dn'kesolution of Intention No. 80. A memorandum to the Planning Commission from the City Manager, outlining Council action on Resolution of. Intention No. 80 was read by the secretary. The city council has returned the matter to the Planning Commission for further study. They request that consideration be given to the feasibility of having two separate ordinances, setting up the criteria for a Planned Community Zone and a Planned Residential Development Zone. Comments were made by the commissioners regarding the possibility of two separate zones and criteria foi each zone. A motion was made to study the possibility of creating two separate ordinances and presenting this report to the City Council. (b) 'Continued' Items Attachment 70.20 Plan for Community Living - Mr. Olinghouse informed the commission that information has been received regarding federal assistance for a grant, and that things look qavorable. 70.22 - Nuisance Ordinance - Mr. Olinghouse has receil a draft pertaining to parking of recreational vehicles This matter will come back to the Planning Commission for public hearing. MOTION AYES ABSENT rs. YOTION PYES PBSENT I Y Y X X 1 1 i ? I' " CITY OF CARLSBAD -5- 70.29 Pi0 Pic0 Gen.era1 Plan Amendment - Mr. Agatep ssked for comments from the commission in regards to the report submitted for review. Commissioner Hermsel: said a work committee should be established on this matter. Commissioner Palmateer and Commissioner Herms were appointed. A short discussion took place. It was suggested that the commission approve this plan basically and go by the recommendations that an amend- ment to the General Plan be considered and that the Planning Department proceed with their study .along with the Planning Commission. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Mr. 0l.inghouse asked the members Df the committee on downtown rezoning study to meet with him after the meeting to discuss a few items. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:46 P.M. to January 8, 1972 at 1:OO P.M. for a tour of La Costa . Respectfully submitted, COMMISSIONERS 1