Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-02-22; Planning Commission; MinutesCITY OF CARLSBAD COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE : FEBRUARY 22, 1972 PLACE. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TIME: 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: X X X X Present City staff members present: R. S. Osburn, D. A. AgateD, G. W. Anear, J. E. Spano, H. T. Cook, L. A. Moe, J. B. Arnold . . APPROVAL OF 'MINUTES: The minutes of the regular meeting of- February 8, 1972 were held over for approval because there was not a quorum present of eligible voters. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None ORAL COMMUNICATION: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: (a) Continued - VARIANCE - Request for reduction in required fronta.ges to create a panhandle lot split Applicant: Robert Bangar Absent xx """"""""""""""""""""""""""~~ Mr. Harry Truax, representative of the applicant, requested a continuance until the next meeting because two commissioners were absent thereby lessening his chances for approval, A motion was made to continue the hearing until the Motion X next regular meeting, March 14,' 1972. Ayes x x xx Noes Absent xx (b) CHANGE OF ZONE, ADOPTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Request for reclassification in zone from R-1 and R-3 to G-2 and adoption of a Specific Plan and Conditiona1,Use Permit for a freeway oriented service facility on property located at the northwest quadrant of Interstate-5 and Elm Avenue. Applicants: John H. Grant and Standard Oil Co. of Cal f. """"""""""""""""""""""""""" The City Attorney requested that this item (b) be konsf%%red later during the meeting, so he could check on the legality of the public hearing. There was not a quorum present of commissioners who had been present at the first public hearing, Feb. 8, 1972, (c) TENTATIVE MAP - Request for approval of a te.nta- tive map for 35 single family residential units on property located between Hillside and Park on Valencia to be known as Laguna Rivfera #5. ' Applicant: L R Partnership 7-y"" """"""""""""""""""""""" Mr. Agatep read the staff report of 2-22-72. This report outlined the applicant's request re access, type of dwelling structures, etc. The report also listed reasons and conditions of approval. Mr. Jerry Rombotis, 3505 Charter Oak, was present to represent L R Partnership. He said that they were in agreement with the staff report as submitted, qnd offered to answer any questions the commi'ssl'on or public might have. I CITY OF CARLSBAD -2- There was no one present to speak in favor or opposi- tion to the proposal. The public hearing was closed at 7:50 P.M. Discussion ensued amon-g the commission. There were no questions. The commission decided that the pro- posal was an extension of Laguna Riviera and that it was a good plan. A motion wasmade to adopt Resolution.No. 766, for reasons as outlined in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval. I (d') Request for Change of Zone from R-1-7,500 to P-C (Planned Community)Zone, Adoption of a Master Plan, Amendment to the Land Use Portion of the G'eneral Plan and Adoption of a Specific Plan on Phase A. Applicant: Donald A. Briggs, Jr. """"-"""""""""""""""""""""" The staff report was presented by Mr. Agatep. The report, dated 2-22-72, outlined the location of the property, number of units, surrounding zoning, Genera Plan densities, etc. The initial phase of the development was illustrated on the graphic on the wall behind the commissioners. Mr. Agatep illustra- ted the proposed plan and elevations on graphl'cs. The secretary read two letters in opposition from the following persons: 1. Jerry Rombotis, Kamar Construction Co. 2. Dr.George W. Merkle, 806 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad. I At this point, the City Attorney, Mr. Moe, returned and reported on his findings about whether the public hearing could be held on Mr. Grant's and . Standard Oil's proposal. The City Attorney felt that the commission should handle this matter as in the past until he had further time to look into the matter Therefore the public hearing was continued until the next meeting. The City Attorney also said he would see if absent commissioners could listen to the tape of past discussion which would enable them to vote at the public hearing. The Chairman asked if-the applicant was present. He was not present. The Chairman also noted that the staff had asked for a 90-day continuance for further study. Chairman Little asked that this Itern be re- advertised if the hearing was continued. The applicant, Donald A. Briggs, Jr., arrived at this point. He was advised that only 4 commissioners * were present and in order to obtain approval he would have to receive 3 affirmative votes. Several comment made before Mr. Briggs arrived were reiterated at the request of the City Attorney. .- Commissioner Little commented that he felt there were serious drainage problems and that these problems COMMISSIONERS Moti Ayes Noes Abse CITY OF CARLSBAD -3- should be looked into before the public hearing took place. The applicant requested that the public hearing be opened and heard to an extent before a continuance was made since his architect had come from west Los Angeles to speak to the commission. Mr. Briggs commented that he felt a 90-day continuance would not make any difference since the plan has been studied for over a year. He said he would like the proceedin .to go ahead ..since'he had asked many people to be present. The City Manager commented on the incompleteness of the staff report regarding density, and suggested that this problem be solved. Chairman Jose said he would consider 14 or 15 units per acre, but commented that he felt the whole commission should be present. He asked for a show of hands from the audience of those in favor. Seven persons raised their hands. There were approximately 25 persons in opposition. Commissioners Dominguez and Forman said they were in favor of a Planned Community-type development, but felt the density problem should be further looked into. Commissioner Little was also unhappy with the density and said he could not vote in a positive manner. Chairman Jose said he felt it should be continued until March 14 or later. The City Attorney commented that the commissioners c ould consider the zone change and the amendment to the land use portion of the General Plan if they. desired and any commissioner-present at the next meeting could vote even if he had not been present at this meeting (2-22-72). Mr. Robert Skinner, 12140 W. Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, the architect representing Mr. Briggs, made several comments. He asked if they could hold a discussion on density without opening the public hearing. He felt that if the density problem could be discussed, then they could come back in about 30 days with a project designed for Carlsbad. He also discussed the type of traffic generated by a condom- inium development and why they felt the density was not too high. He said that adding another 90 days to the time schedule would present a great burden. The parking problem and landscaping maintenance was briefly discussed. Further discussion ensued regardi the length of time needed to resolve the problems, etc. Mr. Briggs- said that standard subdivision proceedings would be instigated in case the Planned Community development was denied, After further discussion, a motion was made to contin until April 25, 1972 for the following reasons: 1. The commission feels that this will be sufficient time to complete the staff report and condi.tions, etc. 2. This will give the applicant time to arrive at S . CITY OF -4- CARLSBAD an agreement with the staff regarding densities. 3. Also, that the property owners be re-notified. Th'e meeting was recessed for 5 minutes and resumed at 9:12 P.M. with all present. (e) Reclassification in zone from R-P (RESIDENTIAL- PROFESSIONAL) to C-M (HEAVY COMMERCIAL - LIMITED IN- DUSTRIAL) zone and Adoption of a Specific Plan on properttes l'ocated westerly of Roosevelt Street between Laguna Drive and,Beech Avenue. Applicants: Planning Department Mr. Agatep read a memo from the staff regarding the status of this matter. The chairman asked for those persons wishing to speak in favor or opposition. There was no 'one present wishing to speak. The public hearing was closed at 9:14 P.M. Chairman Jose made several comments regarding thl's matter. He suggested a memo be sent to the City Coun regardfng the Planning Commission decisl'on, and that Resolution No. 739 and 740 be deleted from the record A motion was made to that effect. The downtown study was discuss.ed and the commission was informed that there is no prbjected date of completion. Mr. Arnold made comments regarding ongoi.ng:]P'.U.C, *< hearings and investigations.on the Grand railroad crossing. The crossing may be closed. After further discussion, Commissioner Doml'nguet made a motion to send'a note to the City Councl'l reml'ndl'ng them of the ongoing P.U.C. hearings on railroad crossings and recommend that they make their input .on the new central business road redesign to avol'd red tape later on. NEW BUSINESS: (a) HOUSE MOVE - Request for a house moye from 2469 Jefferson Street to 3072 Madison Street by L. E. Liddl e .......................... Mr. Dick Osburn, Director of Bul'lding, discussed the proposed house move. According to Mr. Osburn, the house is in good condition and no problems should arise. They are taking part of the house and destrog the other part. The house is about 18 years old, and is being moved to a vacant lot. They are moving it from R-3 to R-P zone and it is a single family residence. After a short discussion, a motfon was made to approve the house move. OLD BUSINESS: Motion Ayes Noes Absent b il Motion Ayes Noes Absent Mot ton Ayes Noes Absent ng Motion Ayes Noes Absent COMMl SSIONERS