HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-03-28; Planning Commission; Minutesi
A
I i
c
CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE : MARCH 28, 1972 PLACE: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TIME:
ROLL CALL :
City staff members present: J. E. Spano, D. A. Agatep, J. B. Arnold, R. S. Osburn, G. W. Anear; La. A. Moe, E. J. Olinghouse
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the regular meeting of March 14, 1972 Motion X were approved as submitted by proper voice vote. Ayes xxxxxx
WRITTEN COMMU'NICATION:
A letter from S.D.G. & E. 'to Chairman Jose dated
March 9, 1972 was r,ead by the secretary. Mr.- J. F.
Dietz, Manager-Environmental Coordination,thanked
Chairman Jose for participating in the public hearings concerning the proposal to construct Encina .#5.
ORAL COMMUNICATION: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(a) Continued - TENTATIVE MAP - Request for approval of a tentative subdivision map for a 7-lot commercial
development on 502 acres located easterly of 1-5 between Cannon Road and Palomar Airport Road; Applican.;: Tri-City Auto Dealers
Absent X
""""""""""""""""""""""""""-
Mr. Agatep read the staff report which covered the situation and listed reasons and conditions of appro- val.
Mr. John Mamaux, 1393 Basswood, was present to repre-
sent the applicants. He said they were in agreement
with the conditions of the staff report. He also discussed the arrangement of the buildings on the property and answered questions regarding the access
from Lowder Lane to Cannon Road,
There was no one present to speak in favor or opposi- tion. The public hearing was closed at 7:46 P.M.
After a short discussion, a motion was made to adopt Motion X Resolution No. 773 for the reasons as listed in the Ayes xxxxx
staff report and subject to conditions 1-6. Absent X
(b) Request for Change of Zone, from R-1-7,500 to P-C
(Planned Community) Zone, Adoption of a Master Plan, Amendment to the Land Use Portion of the General Plan, and Adoption of a Specific Plan for Phase A., Applican.;:
Donald A. Briggs, Jr.
Abstained X
""""""""""""-""""""""""""""
Mr. Agatep presented the staff report which outlined
the applicant's request re density, surrounding zoning, types of surrounding s$ruc$ures, potential traffic generation, types of structures planned, and open space and recreational facilities planned,
The report discussed the 4 phases of development as to types of structures planned, recreational facilitier;, and shopping facilities. The reasons and conditions
for approval were given in the event the Planning
Commission decided that the request was a viable
project. I 1
j
CITY OF CARLSBAD
-2-
The staff recommended denial in the subject report.
A question regarding the total number of units planned was answered by staff.
The secreta’ry read letters from the following persons:
1. Mr. George W. Haylings- commenting on the errors
IN OPPOSITION: in. the property owner map
1. Frances Yarbrough, 4265 Sunnyhill
2. Harry Frank, F & S Development Co., 820 Whittier
3. George Burnette, 1711 Tamarack Avenue
Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90210
4. Walter H. Clayton, Jr. 1715 Tamarack Avenue Geraldine W-. Clayton
5. Jerry Rombotis, Kamar Construction. Company
6. J. W. Klug, J. W. Klug Development Co., Inc. 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660
IN FAVOR:
1. Chip Development Company
2. There were approximately 31 letters from various individuals. These letters were submitted in the form of a petition and signed individually.
Mr. Robert Skinner, the architect representing Mr. Briggs, was present to discuss the project regarding the type of development, architectural aspects, and landscaping. He also discussed the traffic generation density, and variqus other pertinent items.
Commissioner Dominguez asked that the unit figure of 968 be entered into the record to clarify the question of proposed units.
Mr. Harry Truax, E. Brian Smith Engineers, 2656 State Street was also present to represent Mr. Briggs. He discussed the utilities, i(e.sewer capac-tty and water capacity. He also discussed the problem of Hillside Drive.
The fol.lowing persons spoke in favor of the proposal:
1. Mr. Glissman, 4400 Park Drive
2. Mr. Bart Lefferdink, 4576 Cove Drive made several comments regarding the drainage problem.
3. Carol French, 521 Chinquapin
4. Dave Allred, 4590 Cove Drive, asked several questions regarding the drainage problem.
5. W. A. Morehouse, 4041 Skyline Drive
6. Sue Goss, 4095 Sunnyhill Drive
COMMl SSIONERS
CITY OF CNLSBAD
-3-
The following persons spoke in opposition:
1. Grace Thacker, 3910 Park Drive
2. Stanley Smith, 3991 Alder, representing Mr. Farmer Mr. Murray, and Mr. Jansen
3. Mr. Daugs, Pannonja' Investment Corporation
4. James Girard, 3751 Park Drive
5.' Rue1 Tibbitts, 1721 Tamarack
6. Toni Farrels, 1750 Kirk Place
7. Don Johnson;4065 Sunnyhill Drive
8. John Pyle, 3990 Scott Drive
9. Gayle Edybils, 3964 Scott Drive
The public hearing was closed at 9:33 -P.M.
The commission discussed the proposal at length. The City Manager made comments regarding the utility capacity for the project and the silting problem at Bristol Cove. The commissioners had questions regarding the bedroom count, the extension of Hillside Drive, and the overall effect a development of this type would have on the area.
Several persons from the audience spoke at this'time.
1. James R. Girard, 3751 Park 2. Carl .Finney, 4117 Park Drive 3. Mr. Morehouse 4. Don Johnson
I
After considerable. discussion among the commission and individual comments by each commissioner, a motion was made to add the following items as conditions of approval :
1. That the unit count be lowered from 968-units to 880 units on the master plan.
2. That the extension of Hillside Drive be taken into consideration, if approved.
3. That a check be made on the sewer, water and traffic capacity.
4. That criteria for accepting the development be drafted by staff.
Also, that Resol uiions No. 767, 768, 769 be adopted including the conditions outlined above.
Motion Ayes Noes Absent
COMMISSIONERS
i
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF
-4-
CARLSBAD
i
The meeting was recessed to order at 10:50 P.M. w Commissioner Forman.
(c) CONDITIONAL USE PERM allow the annual Boys' C Camino Real parking lot; -,
I
1
at 10:40 P.M. and called th.everyone present, except
T - Request for a C.U.P. to
ub carnival at the Plaza
Applicant: Car'lsbad Jaycees """"""""""""""""""""""""""-
Mr. Agatep presented the s€dff- report.
Mr. E. W. Dom.inguez, 2208 Park Drive, .was present to represe-nt the applicants. He commented on the carnival and where the funds will go.
The public hearing was closed at 11:OO P.M. There was no one present to speak in favor or opposition.
A motion was made to adopt Resolution NO'. 763, for reasons as outlined in the staff r.eport and,subject to the conditions of approval.
NEW BUSINESS:
(a) House Move - From Jefferson Street to 2575 Highlar Drive; Owner: L. E. Liddle
Chairman Jose commented on the 'revision of the ordi- nance pertaining to house moves. The chairman also commented that a few months ago, the planning depart- ment was asked to study the ordinance pertaining to property owner notification of 300 feet. He asked Mr. Agatep about the status of this.
Discussion ensued regarding the house move. Mr. Osbur presented a memo regarding the soundness of the house being moved, the age, etc..
A motion was made to approve the house move. """"""""""""""""""""""""""-
(b) Resolution of Intention No. 84 - To consider the amendment to the Circulation Element of the Inner Cit)
Mr. Olinghouse explained the proposal and illustrated the proposed circulation with graphics. He a.lso said that the Chamber of Commerce will be presented with a report on the 11th of April. Mr. Olinghouse made several other comments.
The Planning Commission briefly discussed the proposal A motion was made to adopt Resolution of Intention No. .84, setting a date for public hearing.
OLD BUSINESS:
(a) Cortez Development Company - City Council referral for 60-units located on the NW corner of Jefferson and Tamarack
""""""""""""""""""""""""""-
Mr. Agatep commented on the changes made in the new plan. He said that the City Council wants a report from the Planning Commission on the new plan,
The commissioners commented on the changes made by
Motion Ayes Noes Absent Abstained
Motion Ayes Absent
Mot i on Ayes Noes Absent
?' c
2 i
3
I
K X
X
X
X
X
X
I i !
CITY OF CARLSBAD
-5-
Cortez Development and how they improved over the
original plan.
After a short discussion, a motion was made that a memo be draft-ed to the 'City Council from the Planning
Commission informing them that the plan ,is an improve-
ment over the originaJ .plan.
(b) 'Continued' Items Attachment 7 Planning Department Reports I
70.22 Recreat'ional Vehicle Ordinance - Mr. Olinghouse
suggesked that a workshop meeting be held preceding I a planning commission meeting, The chairman suggested
that the meeting be, held after the 11th of April. I 70.30 South Carlsbad General Plan Revision - Mr. Olinghouse commented that a meeting will. be held on I Thursday at 8:30 A.M.
Chairman Jose asked about the meetings on the Pi0
Pic0 General Plan revision. Mr. Olinghouse said
that a recommendation had been worked out which would be presented at the meeting on April 25, 1972.
Assembly bill 1301 - Mr. Olinghouse said a workshop
meeting would be held on Thursday, March 30, at 1O:OO A.M. with Planning Directors and Assistants
from San Diego County.
The City Manager made comments regarding a report he
had just received from LAFCO pertaining to the
annexation of La Costa. Mr. Arnold asked for a minute motion from the commission that the commissian
and staff cooperate in a study for Palomar Airport.
The motion was made by Commissioner Dominguez.
COMMITTEE REPORTS: None I
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 P.M.
by proper voice vote approval.
Respectfully subml'tted, I &&&A* SANDRA L. LUCKY, Secretafy
COMMISSIONERS