Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-01-22; Planning Commission; MinutesMEETING OF: DATE: TIME: CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION January 22, 1974 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers .I".@. ' ..*e. "... CALL TO ORDER:. 7~35 P.M. . ROLL CALL: Commissioners Dominguez, Forman, Cas1 er , Wrench & Little were present. Commissioner Palmateer has submitted his resignation to Mayor Dunne, effective January 17, 1974. He will no longer be listed as an absent Commissioner. 5EE NOTE AT END OF MINUTES: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Meeting of 10-30-73 were placed on the Agenda in error. They were approved at the meeting of January 8, 1974. Minutes of the Meeting of December 11 , 1973 were approved as presented. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Planning Director stated there were no written communications except those pertaining to particular items on the Agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Planning 'Commission Chairman Dominguez inquired if the City Council had put together any papers, etc. to be filled out by the Commissioners, with regard to the Sen. Stull Disclosure Law letter. City Attorney Vince Biondo advised the Commissioners he expected information manuals from the Secreta of State soon. He said he understood they had been mailed to all cities in California. As soon as he receives this information he assured the Commissioners he will forward same to them. PUBLIC HEARING: 5. (a) CASE NOS: EIS-232, SP-147 and CT 73-58 - T. K. TRACY (continued). Request for approval of Final Environmental Impact Report, adoption of a Specific Plan and consideration of a Tentati Map to a1 low development of a 353 unit condominium complex on . property generally located at the northwest corner of the intersec of Lowder Lane and Poinsettia Lane, presently zoned P-C (Planned- Community ). The Planning Director, D. Agatep, stated we have received a letter addressed to the City requesting a continuance to. the meeting of February 12, 1974. As the date of the 12th is a Holiday, the item would be heard on February 13, 1974, which will be the first meeting in February for the Planning Commission. . Motion was made that EIS-232, SP-147 and CT 73-58 be continued to the first meeting in February, 1974. """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""". .. By Minute Mdtion - it was established that the first meeting in February would be the 13th, as the date of the .12th .is a city 'hol iday . """"""""""""""""""""-~"""""""""""". i II I I b r L, I ! MOTION: Ayes : i' n MOTION: Ayes : MOT I ON : Ayes : Planning Commission January 22, 1974 -2- Public Hearings continued: 5 (b) CONTINUED: CASE NOS: ZC-139, and CT 73-54 - JUSTUS. c. ;ILFILLAN - Request for approval. of a chgnge of zone from R-1-7500 to (20 d.u./aCre) and consideration of a tentative map (~~73-5 to allow development Of 49 condominium units .on 2.9 acres of land, generally located to the north Of Locust Street, between Adams Stre Ind-Harrison Street. Zoned R-1-7500, 9ssociate Planner Williams 'presented the staff report for this project and advised that a Resource Management Permit for the sub- ject property would be needed. He also advised that a letter had been received from the School District indicating an Agreement had been made with the developer: It was staff recommendation that the change of zone request be granted and the tentative map request be tabl ed . Commissioner Domi nguez questioned the reasoning beki nd the tabl i ng request for the tentative map, and was advised that the applicant was in full concurrence with th-is action at this time. Public Hearing was opened and Harry Truax of 'E. Brian Smith Cngineers, representing the applicant stated they were in agreement vith the recommendations of staff, and even to the tabling of the tentative map until the abandonment proceedings for Locust Street Ire completed. He stated the applicant felt the City has a certain losition to maintain regarding this abandonment and with that in nind, they would agree to the tentative map being tabled. The City Attorney asked Mr. .Truax if it was his stated wish'to lave the Tentative Map tabled, and Mr. Truax answered in the 3ffirmative. ulr. James Bender of 4070/spoke to the Commission in opposition to this proposed change of zone. Mr. Bender .lives directly across the street from the property in question. He stated the area is now a quiet part of the city and would not like to see a change of zone occur and a development eventually take place, and all of this :resting circulation and parking problems for the area. He also stated he felt it would be spot zoning. Yr. Roger Badeker of 4050 Adams Street, Carl sbad spoke opposing this rezoning also, stating he agreed with the reasons presented by Mr. Bender, and also felt if you once start spot zoning, there could be no end to it, and he and neighbors felt they wanted the neighborhood to stay as it is now. . Mr. John Fox also spoke in opposition (4215 Harrison St.) and also stated he felt the Adam St. circulation problem could get permitted. Public hearing was closed and Commissioners, the Planning Di (Lampman and Associates) have any determinations as to the c Little advised he was. opposed out of hand if this rezoning were in answer to questions from the rector stated that the Consultants not as yet presented the City with irculation problem. Commissioner to the.project as .he felt .the Commission had to draw the 1 ine someplace with regard to the densities in a residential neighborhood and the traffic circulatiot problem. Commissioner Wrench stated he felt projects were now ,. starting to get close to the Lagoon and circulation should be a major concern --now . He felt the. residents have :a good argument. . .. . .. . ! Planning. Commission Meeting January"22, 1974 -.-- ? lo C f h C W P Z i S - 5 f t t Z A i i M 0 W M - 5 L T P A C Y r i I he applicant, Justus Gilfillan spoke in rebuttal of the previous peakers, opposed. to his 'project and Mr. Truax, who spoke on behalf f the applicant at the beginning of the Public Hearing also spoke r. Truax stated he f-elt this was not spot zoning, the request 'as in conformance with the general plan, circulation has been rovided for and this will be a beautiful and expensive project 4th lots of open space. ommissioner Forman advised he felt this concept has been provided 'or in the General Plan, and felt the applicant was certainly with is rights- to request a change of zone, and feels the traffic irculation has been provided for. 'ith no further discussion or rebuttal, a Motion was made that the lanning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending Denial of' C-139for the reasons that the use would be non-conforming to . urrounding lands, and would expand 'the problem of circulation n the area. ................................ (c) CASE NOS: SP-155, and CT 73-59 - PACESETTER HOMES: Request or adoption of a. Specific Plan and approval of a Tentative Map o allow development of 326 units on property generally located on he east side of Lowder Lane, north of Poinsettia Lane, presently oned P1 anned Community (P-C) . ssociate Planner.Wi1liams read a memorandum requesting continuanc f these items to consider the possible impact of the newly adopte nterim Open Space Zoning Ordinance for this project. It 'as requested that the matter be continued to the first meeting n February,.l974. lotion was made that SP-155 and CT 73-59 be continued to the leeting of February 13, 1974: """"""""_""""""""""-""""""-"------------ I (d) CASE NOS. SP-151' and CT 73-60 - D. L. LA CAVA FOR LA COSTA AND.: Request for adoption of a Specific Plan and approval of ,a 'entative Map to allow a 102 unit condominium development on lroperty generally located southerly of and adjacent to La Costa ,venue and approx. 610-ft. westerly of the intersection of Nueva :astill0 Way and La Costa Avenue. r. Williams, Associate Planner presented the staff report for thi equest, describing the elevations and heiqhts. He also advised he Commission that there has been numerous letters opposing this roject from surrounding'property owners, all of wh'l'ch are on ile. lanning Director Donald' Agatep advised the Commission there had een letters of opposition received from Mr. Ben Fox, Herman lexander, Merle D. Pullen, Chicago Pacific Company, Andrew J. weeney and Mr. A1 bert !dills. These letters .objected to the . . eight and traffic this project'would generate. Public Hearing was opened and Mr.. Donald LaCava of 9171 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills, addressed the Commission. He advised that thei.r correct name should read LA COSTA LAND, and the word Company on the end should be dropped, as that is a completely different company than theirs. He advised this is a general, partnership developing this property, and their precise reason for desiring a higher height is to give them more open area in the project. He stated in letters of opposition, Lots 150 and 151 were mentionel and it was his feeling there was no obstruction to not only those two lots, but to any of the other lots in the area. Upon questioning from the Commission, Mr. LaCava stated t,he garaae in Mc AS Nc b e d M( AI S . 1 d s, )tion: fes : )es : ITION: res : ! Planning Commission January 22, 1974 -4- would not open up to La Costa Avenue, but would be c7osed and entered. into from the back of the property. Speaking in opposition, Mr. Albert Wills, owner of Lot 151 stated he is new to the area and sees'no reas0.n to allow a developer to come into this relatively 'new are'a and break up the zoning. He stated when he purchased the property he thought La Costa Land Company would honor the heights limits. He stated he is approx. 100-125 ft. above the ground in that area, and if this new height is allowed, he will be looking out of his window onto only the . roofs of -new construction. He felt if the Commission opens up the area with new zoning, there would be approx. 5-600 acres that could become involved. Mr. Harry Hoffman, 2420 Sevilla Way stated he had received no notice at all. The Planning Director advised that notices are sent to Pesidents within 300 ft. and if he is listed on the current Assessor's roll, then he would have been contacted. Mr. Hoffman stated he had been in the area about 6 mos., and was advised that more than likely the Assessors Rolls.are not up to date as yet, explaining why he would not have been listed. Mr. Gary Alma1 of 655 Second Street expressed concern about this type of development being approved in La Costa, and' if so, felt ttiere. could be a problem with others wanting to develop high-rise' also. In rebuttal, Mr. LaCava stated. he wanted to clear up a possible. confusSon as to the height of the building, which will be 53 ft. high. He stated the building would be 52' below Mr. Hoffman and 40' below everyone else who had come to testify. Public Hearing was closed,' and Commissioner Wrench asked to be clarified as to the procedure being relaxed for raising heights. Planner Williams read the Interim Ordinance regarding Hillsides. Commissioner Wrench stated he had driven to La Costa and looked at the property in question. .He stated the hill involved is a ver large one and was a bit conc erned about departing from the 35' height limit. He also said he feels there is very little cutting being done, and came away with the feeling that no ones view woulc be taken away. Commissioner Forman stated he felt as Conmissionc Wrench and didn't think any one was being denied a view. He also stated he would not like to see 2-3 story.buildings put up. Commissioner Little advised he did not feel the'commission should set a precedent and allow a change in height, as later we.will have to let other developers do the same. Fire Chief Anear advised the Commission that the department had reviewed the plan and the developer has cooperated with what they have required him.to do. MOTION was made that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recomnending to the City Council the approval of SP-151, for the reasons stated in staff report, and subject to the conditions also stated therein. MOTION: that the Planning Commission grant a Open Space Resource Management Permit for this development. 'MOTION was.-made that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending to the City Council the approval 'of CT 73-60, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in the'staff report, with the omission of Condition #3. There was a recess called at 9:35 P.M. The meeting convened at 9:.55 P.M;, with all Commissioners-again present. .. """""""""""""""""""""-"""-"-----------" ~""""""""""""""""""""""-""""--------- IOT I ON : \yes : loes : IOTION: \yes : ioes : IOTION: \yes : loes : . P1 anni ng Commission January 22, 1974 -5- ..Z" c ._." ' "- 5. (e) CASE NOS: EIS-230, ZC-138 and MP-150 R. 1. .FARROW, for FARROW REALTORS (CALAVERA PROPERTY). Request 'for approval of Final Environmental Impact Report, Change of Zone from L-C (1 imit control) to R-A-10 (residential-agricultural) to P-C (planned community), and adoption of a 'Master Plan, to allow 3452 resident units on property southerly of'the present southerly most extensi of Mira Monte Drive, at the northerly most City limit line. Chairman Dominguez stated he would-abstain from matter as he works with the Board of Supervisors County, which are currently working on a regiona which may affect this project. Comissi.oner Casler was asked to Chair this port meetinq, and advised the applicant that he would V 1 i oting on this for San Diego . park program , on of the have to receivG-four (4) affirmative votes to pass this request tonight. She suggested that they proceed with the public hearing portion tonight and make as much progress as possible at this meetinq. .Planner Williams presented the staff report for this request, anc discussed the E. I.R. He advised of the projected 10 year progran to completion. He stated the major concern was the growth inducing impact as discussed on Page 49 of,the FIR., and that this whole idea is based on the net acre and this was the first Master Plan that has been considered .on this type of acreage. The school districts (2) letters have been received. Commissioner Little commented that most of the Open Space is goin to remain just open space', with very little of it being useable. Public Hearing was opened and MR. Bob Farrow, representing the corporation owners spoke briefly outlining some of t.he background on projects completed in the past, and .stated they would like to make Carlsbad their pr.imary area of development now. Mr. Jeffrey Holland of the firm Environmetrics, a Consultant for Farrow Realtors, addressed the Commission outlining the background for the proposed project, complimenting staf.f on their work and coope in putti'ng together the proper elements necessary for this reques referred to the goals and .objectives explained in the plah, identified exhibits displayed in the Chambers, and stated it was their feeling that at the present time Carlsbad is being pinched into a north/south direction, and their plan is to move out to expand Carlsbad on the east/west boundaries also. He 'stated they felt this would help the central business district. Mr. Holland. explained the slopes. and hillside area on the map.and stated. 2/3 of the entire area will not be built upon at all; described the open space involved and circulation element is part-of . County Highways; three (3) resource management zone districts refer to this project; discussed urban plan for the city; their desire to work with citizen groups for their input during all stages of this project. Mr. Jerry Farrow also addressed the commission and told them it was their intention to develop a project that everyone' would be proud of, and stated they had been travelling down to this area working on the plans, etc. for this project, almost 19 months. Mr; J-im Tennant, representing San Diego County with regard to their Park programs addressed the Commission stating he did not want to give the impression he was opposed to this project, but stated there were a few concerns involved regarding the Calavera Lake Program. Stated he had discussed with staff the possibilit) of purchasing 200 acres on. a 10 year program. -Mr. Tennant also advised they were looking at a .viable park project and financing could possibly be solitified within one month, and stated the County feel they can work with the Developer. I I1 1 tion 1 Planning Commission Meeting January 22, 1974 ? e; c L - 6- Mrs. Gloria Fry of 4014 Vista Calavera St., Oceanside, inquired as to the density that would be allowed in this area-and was advised by staff it would be 5.69 d.u./acre. Commissioner Wrench asked Mr. Farrow to give him the names of some of thei-r previous proj.ects .in. southern California. Mr. Farrow named a few such as Huntington Harbor area, Fountain Valley Santiago Ranchos and Festival Homes. Acting City.Engineer Flanagan spoke advising there were 2 settle tanks in the area and that.possibly a temporary sewer agreement . could be worked out with CFIWD. There is a.10 acre park site and a 10 acre school site. Commissioner Little. expressed concern over the circulation element and it was stated there was a great need for the internal street system to connect to El Camino Real. .. Comm.issioner Wre.nch said he was impressed with the presentation of the applicants. He stated this is a large project and would like to defer a final decision on this matter to give other departments more time to study the plan, and felt the City Manager may want to really look over the project. Mr, Paul Bussey, City Manager,advised the Commission and appli'cant because of the magnitude of this development he felt' it deserved further, more detailed study. He said he felt that some of the testimony given tonight enabled the City to 1ook.into some other areas . of the development and suggested the matter be continued for a thirty day period. He advised the applicants he would like to arrange a meeting with them as well as the City Engineer, Planning Director .and himself to discuss this'matter further. Motion was made that the Planning Commission continue this public hearing to the second meeting in February, 1974. ................................. (f) CASE NO: SP-152 - OCCIDENTAL LAND COMPANY (SHOPPERS WORLD) Request that the original Specific Plan for this property be nullified and a new Specific Plan be approved to permit constructil of a community s.hopping facility on property generally located at. the southwest corner o.f the intersection of Poinsettia Lane and Interstate 5, bordered by Avenida Encinas on the west, and . presently zon.ed C-2. Planner Williams read a letter addressed to the Chairman of the Planning Commission, Dominguez, from Mr. Ken Wassman, Vice Pres. of Occidental Land Company, requesting this matter be TABLED due to drainage problems. Motion was made that SP-152 be TABLED, and before the matter is brought before the Commission again, it be re-advertised as required by law. ................................ At this point, the Meeting was returned to Chairman Dominguez from Commissioner Casler. ""i""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""- (9) CASE NO: V-235 - L. E. LIDDLE: Request for approval of a Variance to allow a lot to be created with a 50 foot substandard,. frontage, at the westerly end of Butters Road. Planner Williams reviewed the staff report for the Commissioners explaining that the -request is for a Variance of Section 21.10.080 of the Municipal Code to enable the applicant to use 'an odd shaped lot he owns which contains a frontage of only 50 ft. instead of the required 60 ft. frontage. " MOTION: Ayes : MOT I ON : Ayes : * - ? 1 i Planming Commission January 22, 1974 -7- '. Mr. L. E.. Liddle; the applicant, addressed the Cotnmiss'ion explai a bit of the background of the parcel, and stating the peculiar shape of the lot made it necessary for them to have to split it order to be able to utilize the property to its highest potenti He also advised that this parcel .is 24,000 sq. ft. in size. ni I in. a1 Public Hearing was opened and Mr. Edward Deckelman spoke opposing thi.s proposal stating he was unsure as to what would happen with the remainder of the split parcel ; if someone else could come in , and split it again and even possib.le get a zone change on it and build again. He asked for some kind of assurance there would not b another panhandle created in the future on this property. He asked that the Commission deny this request. No one else wished to spea and the public hearing was closed; The Commissioners held a short discussion on this property, and felt it was a warranted request. With this i-n mind, the following motion was made: MOTION was made that the Planning Commission approve Variance 235, to allow a Variance from Municipal Code requirements, allowing a. 50 ft. frontage instead of 60 ft.. Request is granted for the reasons-stated in staff report and with konditions stated there """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""- 5 (h) CAS€ NO: V-236 - CHARLES J. KUDERNA: Request for a Variance to satisfy requirements ofthe Open Space Zoning Ordinance in the RM-1, R"2 and RM-5 Resource Management Districts. Assistant Planner Mike Zander presented the report for this request stating the-Tentative Map had been approved by the Planning Commission, and before the City Council will act on same, it reques a report from the Planning Commission as to this project's compliar with the Interim Open Space Zoning Ordinance. Publ ic Hearing was opened and Mr. Harry Truax , representing Mr. Kuderna, advised the Commission that this is one of the peculiar situations that arise from time to time as this property is in a R-W (residential-waterway) devel.opment. He stated this project has been approved by the Coastal Commission and they were required to grant a 10 ft. easement on the west side of the property and a 6 ft. strip on the southerly side, on the level part. of the lot. The Planning Director advised there would be a Open Space Easement needed and it would be placed as a condition on the tentative map. Mr.Squires of 4519 Cove Drive #4, spokesman for the Hacienda Calla Homeowners Association, presented a petition and a letter opposing this project, from the other property owners in the area, objecting to any change of,current use of the property. Mr. Squires stated they felt this project would deflate the value of their homes and create a traffic hazard.with the 21 units proposed. He asked the Planning Commission to defer action until access roads and traffic problems are alleviated. Pr. Truax spoke again advising they di.d not understand the oppositior as the present property owners have far less restrictions on them than this particular piece of property. He stated they have agreed to far more severe restrictions and felt the property owners were ' opposed for no good reason. Publ ic Hearing -was closed and the- Commissioners dliscussed -the Municipal Code requir.ements set up for-a Variance. - " VOTION: \yes : n. ed e """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-" .. Takensout of Agenda Order: .. 7(a) ..CASE NO: CT 73-10 - LA COSTA ESTATES NORTH: Request that Ten tative Map 73-10 be revised so that Cafeto Drive is deleted, Candil Court' and .Managua Street be a1 igned, and five panhandle lots be . created .fronting on .Managua Court. Said property is located south- east intersection of' Alga Road and SDG&E easement; northerly of the intersection of Alicante Road and Alfil Way, zoned P-C. 'Chaiman Dominguez inquired if there was any one in the.audience tha.t wished to speak on the-last public hearing (5-i) which was the Floddpl.ain.Overlay Zone and Exclusive .Agriculture Zone. There was one,;peyson,:and.. he stated he would be willing' to- wait to. the end of the agenda if that 'was the wish of the Commission,. .. P.lanner Wi-lliams gave .the .staff report stating topography problems have -ma.de it necessary to delete Cafeto Drive and all of the . ir+t.e.r.ia for creating' panhandle lot3 ha! been met ,. wi'th the ex.- cepti.0-n "of -driveway 'lengths, which are in exdess of the required 150 ..ft. He stated' it was staff's'recommendation that .the commissio request. the City Council to .amend approved Resolution 31 52. .. .Mr.. Bob Ladwfg, Rick Engineering, 509 Elm Avenue spoke and stated they agree with staff's recommendation. and urge- approval'. He also sa+d he.want.ed to clarify condition #i7. of Res. 3152 as they -had already submitted calculati.ons showing the size of water mains, a.nd"stat6d. there was no need for condition #16 as this. had been tak care. of, previously . The Cornmission agreed. -.'W.ith no fur-ther d'iscussion frpm the Commission, -Motion was made-'tha the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that approved Resolution 3152 be revised to permit the. requested- revisio .suggested del etion of nos., .16- and 17. . suej,ect to.the'r?emaining cond'itions in said Resojution, with -the -. ~ .. .. . .. ~. -. .I .. .. .. .. PI anhi'ng: %ommi 3si on January 22, 1974 %. < , .. . .- .. - 8- i -. ". .. .u "."< .- Motion was made that the Planning Commission adopt a 'Resolution I MOTION: approving Variance #236, granting a Variance from the .In,terim Open- Ay,es Space Zone Ordinance and Open Space Permit, for the 'reasons listed in staff report, and subject -to the conditions contained therein.. I '1 -1 I lr Ir s .. """""~"i""""""""""""""""~""~""""""". . .- . .. .. .., .7 'x,b-)- .' PONDEROSA .HOMES: .Thi s -was :a' -study .and. report-. iack. to.. thi City Council. on SPECIFIC PLAN 131 for -PONDEROSA HOMEStRancho , .. .- del -Ponderosa): The Planning Director red the memo and report, .. stating the City Council 'had granted the a.ppea1. of -the denial,.fQr! ' the Specific Plan, with the provision that redesi.gn be done regardi further grading in order to provide single family houses1 so .as to me'et the intent of the Planned Community Zone, provide functional and usealjle Open Space and provide amenities in exchange for smallc lots. Mr. Agatep also further explained the reasons for denia.1 .as giv.en -by the Planning Commission. Commissioner L-ittle stated' his decision is .still the same on this project, and felt the Commissior should not make a deci-sion on this matter until they have had more time to thoroughly check the redesign that has .been submitted. ..Mr. Lyle Gabrielson of Rick Engineering spoke for this project and- eaplained he was we1 1 aware of the concerns as' they were explained'at the last hearing; but stated t.he average lot size in this project is 8800 sq. ft. with 15.2%'being under 7500.sq. ft. He stated 'he felt 400 homes will support a community as designated by the Planned Community Ordinance. He proceeded to explain all ' of the revisions on two large maps on the Council walls. .. -. . .- I " .. I MOTION: Ayes : ,. 'Y . . Planning Commission "4, 1974 -9- .. Mr. Chuck Sallazzo also sp.oke for Ponderosa Homes and-.told the Commissi.oners that Kaiser-Aetna was attempting to. provide a' communi that will be pleasing to people moving into Carlsbad who want a good size home on a large lot, with recreation a'reas. He.also said they are keeping grading to a.'minimum., Minute Motion was made to adopt the two Exhibits on the wall as Exhibits A. & B. .. .. Motion was made that the Planning Cothission approve the memo . with attached Specific Plan and Tentative revisions (Exhibits A.&B. for Rancho del Ponderosa, and forward to the City Council. Commissioner Little'again stated it was his feeling the Commissione needed more time to go over this project and i.ts revisions. ................................ 7 (c) HOUSE MOVE FROM 141 TAMARACK AVE. TO 1275 KNOWLES' AVENUE: This is a request to move'a house from 141 Tamarack Avenue, which is a R-3 lot, to 1275 Knowl es Avenue, in order to further develop the lot on Tamarack .to its fullest potential: Mr. Robert Gillingham, 2618 Wilson Street, owner of the house, advised the Commission he wa'nted to develop his R-3 lot on Tamarack the house he would.be moving was about 20 years old, the lot he is moving the house to is about 4-lots from the freeway, and he will be moving a garage also. . It was- the feeling of the Commission that this request should be referred to the Building Director for his written comments, to be .presented back to the Commission at their next meeting. It was a1 so fel t that the property owners in the Knowl es Avenue area should be contacted as to this item so they may speak on this re- quest. MOTION: was made that the Commission refer this item to the Buildin Director for his action and that the property owners be contacted, and this matter be placed on the next Planning Commission agenda.' The, appl icant was in agreement wi-th this action.., ................................ LATE ITEMS: It was announced by the Planning Director that Commissioners Dominguez, Jose and Wrench would be attending the P1annin.g . Commissioners Workshop in Palm Springs from February.6-8, 1974. ................................. 5( i). CASE N0:ZCA-54 and ZCA-55 - FLOOD PLAIN OVERLAY ZONING AND EXCLUSIVE AGRICULTURAL ZONING: Adoption of an Ord'inance to add Chapter 21.39 establishing floodplain overlay zoning and an Ordinance Amending Title 21 and Section 21.06.010 of the Municipal Code to establish exclusive agricultural zoning (E-A). As. the.houi'was late, the public hearing was 'opened on this item and Mr. Perry Lamb from the audience, wishing to speak on this matter, agreed to a continuance.of the public.hearing at another meeti ng . Motion was made that this matter (ZCA-54 and 55) ..be continued to a meeting to be held on January 29, 1974 at 9:OO'A.M. in 'the City Counci 1. Chambers. .- """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""- I Y MOTION : - Ayes: Noes : S MOTION: Ayes : M0T.I ON : Aies : L X Plan,ning Commission January 22 , 1974 -1 0- I..-.." . -, C.&."' ".- .. .. LATE ITEMS continued: .. ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 1974: Commi.ssi.oner Wrench nominated Co&issioner Mary 'Casler as. the Chairman for 1974. Commissioner Little moved the nominations be closed. -. . ,. . . Commissioner Forman nominated Commissioner Robert T. Little for Vice Chairman for 1974. - Commi s.s i oner Wrench moved nomi nations be cl osed . """""""""""""""""-""""""""""""""" ADJOURNMENT: By prober motion, this meeting was adjourned- to January.29, 1974, at 9':.00 A.M. in the City Council Chambers. Adjournment came at, 1:15 A.M. -"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" .. . Respectful ly submitted , .. - .. .. ' , . (1 I/ DOTTY XLZNGMAN., - . Rei3jrdi n.g Secretary .. *NOTE: Commissioner Jose.wanted the minutes to reflect that he did come into the Council Chambers before the meetinq and did advise the Chairman he would not be.able to . .. stay as a family emergency had arisen. . . .. .. .. MOTION: Ayes : MOTION: Ayes : MOTION; Ayes : t !