Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-12-10; Planning Commission; MinutesCITY OF CARLSBAD - Minutes of: PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: December 10, 1980 Time of Meeting: 7:00 P.M. Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER was made by Chairman Marcus at 7:02 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: CHAIRMAN MARCUS COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE. Ex-Officio member Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, was also present. Staff members present were: Michael Holzmiller, Principal Planner Bill Hofman, Associate Planner Les Evans, City Engineer Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Marcus. AGENDA ITEM COMMUNICATIONS Mike Holzmiller advised that two letters concerning items on the agenda had been received. The first was from Mr. & Mrs. Dickey expressing their opposition to the variances requested in Item 4. The second, from Mr. & Mrs. Nornhold, in favor of the requested zone change in item 6. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURE Chairman Marcus explained Planning Commission procedures in its capacity as an advisory commission to the City Council and identified those matters delegated to the Planning Commission for a final decision. Chairman Marcus further explained the procedure observed by the Commission during public hearing items. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) CT 80-31/CP-113 - EVENT PROPERTIES - Request for a tentative subdivision map and condominium permit to develop 9 units on the northwest corner of-Unicornio Street and Cacatua Street in the RD-M zone. Page 1 ,- - Mike Holzmiller advised that a, Staff presentation was not necessary. This item had been referred back for Staff to prepare a resolution of approval, with conditions, and the only action required was for the Commission to approve this resolution. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:06 P.M. and invited the applicant to speak, The Commission recognized Mr. Tom Cade, Attorney for the applicant, who advised that he concurred with the Staff recommendations. Since no one else wished to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:07 P.M. Commissioner Jose indicated that he would abstain from voting on this item since he was not present at the meeting when it was originally presented. The Commission then adopted the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 1721 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT TO DEVELOP 9 UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF UNICORN10 STREET AND CACATUA STREET. MOTION: COMMISSIONER FRIESTEDT SECOND: COMMISSIONER LEEDS AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSEN, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER JOSE. 2. ZCA430, CITY OF CARLSBAD - An amendment to the zoning ordinance to amend the planning moratorium to allow the processing of applications for projects located within an area to be served by a satellite sewage treatment facility. ,- Mike Holzmiller presented the Staff Report and advised that this item had been continued from the Commission's meeting of November 26, 1980, in order to seek additional guidance from the City Council regarding its intent concerning direction given to the Commission in amending the planning moratorium for projects located in an area to be served by a satellite * sewage treatment plant. He advised that the City Council had discussed this item at its meeting last night and approved a motion to lift the moratorium to allow both processing and 'initial approval of all types of applications but to hold up final approvals until the Council finds that sewer capa- city is available. He further commented that, before any discussion by the Commission, it was the City Manager's suggestion that the City Engineer provide a summary of a previous presentation which was given to the City Council on December 10, 1980, concerning sewer capacity availability. Page 2 ,- Les Evans summarized the presentation made to the City Council covering present and future sewer capacity for the city. He pointed out that in addition to the Encina Plant there are a number of others either in the process of being built or planned for the future. The soon to be completed Lake Calavera Hills plant would have a capacity of 1.2 million gallons per day and the Council has been giving serious consideration to another satellite plant in the Palomar Airport area. He enlarged upon the improvements being made to the Encina plant which will bring it from the present 4 million gallons per day capacity to 5.76 million gallons in two years, with further expansion bringing a possible capacity up to 6.83 million gallons. He also commented that this plant has the potential for expansion ultimately to a 45 million gallon per day operation. With the aid of the overhead projector, Mr. Evans showed potential happenings for the Carlsbad service area. He discussed the projected population growth for the future in relation to sewer capacity and explained the anticipated phases of expansion at Encina which could keep in line with growth until after the year 2000 when Phase 5 would be completed bringing the capacity to a population of 125,000. Following this there would be a drop in sewer capacity below population projections and, at this point, Encina could be asked to increase capacity or if the Palomar Airport Plant was built it would give a wider safety margin. Mr. Evans then commented regarding pressures for satellite treatment plants to keep sewer capacity well above the population projections. He advised that the Council had also considered presentations from the Director of the Costa Real Municipal Water District and a report from the engineering consultant, both of whom stressed future water problems will be encountered in Southern California thereby creating a need for satellite facilities to provide reclaimed water to support our present lifestyle. Mr. Evans ended his presentation with further comments concerning the possible Palomar Airport treatment plant. Chairman Marcus then inquired if anyone wished to speak either for or against this amendment and, since no one came forward, the public hearing was closed. The Commission then approved the following motion: THAT STAFF BE INSTRUCTED TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE PROCESSING OF TENTATIVE MAPS, PUDS, ZONE CHANGES, ANNEXATIONS, ETC. IN AN AREA TO BE SERVED BY A SATELLITE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT SUCH AS THE PALOMAR DRAINAGE AREA, SUCH RESOLUTION TO SPECIFICALLY STATE THAT NO FINAL MAPS WILL BE RECORDED OR BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED UNTIL COUNCIL MAKES THE FINDING THAT SEWER SERVICE IS AVAILABLE. MOTION: COMMISSIONER ROMBOTIS SECOND: COMMISSIONER L'HEUREUX AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE. Page 3 _- NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. CT 79-28(A)/CP-137, MOLA - Request for an amendment to permit 10 additional units to a previously approved 140 unit Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit located on the east side of El Camino Real at Swallow Lane in the P-C zone. Mike Holzmiller introduced the staff report and indicated that the Commission had previously approved, at their meeting of July 9, 1980, the 40 units to which these would be added. The applicant had now received 10 additional sewer permits and wished to proceed with the further 10 units. Bill Hofman, with the aid of wall map exhibits, showed the addition to the project and explained that it was consistent with the previously approved 40 units and the General Plan and met all criteria of the Condominium Ordinance. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:28 P.M. The Commission recognized Mr. Jim Hicks, 2530 La Gran Via, Carlsbad, representing Mola Development. Mr. Hicks advised he concurred with the staff report and would be willing to answer any questions. Commissioner Jose raised the question of the effect on the nature trail proposed in this application if the street widening should take place in connection with an application to convert the adjoining apartments, owned by the same applicant, to condominiums. Mr. Hicks advised there would be no effect at the present time with this project but admitted that the street widening, in the event of the conversion of the nearby apartments, would cause some problem. However, he felt there was plenty of leeway in the area because of the width of the easement and that this question could be dealt with if and when the conversion should take place. Bill Hofman indicated that widening the street within the SDG&E easement would require an amendment to this tentative map, thus, the Planning Commission would be able to review any proposed changes to the nature trails. Since no one else wished to speak, the public hearing closed at 7:37 P.M. Discussion then ensued among the Commissioners regarding possible wording of the approval in order to alleviate the problem raised by Commissioner Jose. It was suggested to change the wording on Exhibit G to indicate "proposed street widening" instead of "future street widening" within the SDG&E easement. ,- Based upon discussions, the Commission then approved the following resolution: Page 4 .- RESOLUTION NO. 1733, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A 40 UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT TO ADD 10 ADDITIONAL UNITS TO A PROJECT ON EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF SWALLOW LANE, WITH AN AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT G CHANGING "FUTURE STREET WIDENING" TO "PROPOSED STREET WIDENING". MOTION: COMMISSIONER LARSON SECOND: COMMISSIONER ROMBOTIS AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE. 4. V-312/PCD-27, DOMINY - Request for variances to reduce the required front and side yards to O', to allow tandem parking, and to exceed the 25' height limit by construction of a 41' - 6" condominium building on property generally located on the west side of Ocean Street between Beech Street and Cypress Avenue in the R-3 zone. Mike Holzmiller advised that the request for variances was to allow the applicant to develop a 3 unit condominium project. He pointed out that there had been differences of opinion between the applicant and staff over the zoning ordinance and he further brought to the Commissioners' attention that it was important to keep in mind it was necessary to make four specific findings before a variance can be approved. Therefore the discussion should focus on whether each of the findings can be made with respect to the variance requests. Also, he indicated the Commission should consider the cumulative effect of the variances. Bill Hofman, with the aid of a wall map exhibit, showed the location of the building, parking in side and front setbacks, tandem parking and the building height which exceeds the height limitation for the R-3 zone. He advised that staff could not make the previously mentioned four mandatory findings and, in addition, the cumulative effect of approving so many variances was also a factor in recommending denial. Chairman Marcus then opened the public hearing at 7:42 P.M. The Commission recognized Mr. Ronald Knoll, an Attorney with Hicks, Fletcher & Mack, representing the applicant, who advised it is the owner's intention to occupy one of the units with a Second being occupied by his son. He indicated that the type of development proposed conforms with the R-3 zoning for the area and to build the structure as envisaged the owner needs the variances requested. Mr. Knoll then covered each of the variance requests and, with the aid of the wall map exhibit, indicated the irregular shape of the lot, placement of the building and the proposed parking. As regards height, Mr. Knoll showed, with the aid of photos, how the height of neighboring properties exceeded those of this structure and stressed that the building would be no taller than any other on Ocean Street. On the subject of fire hazards, Mr. Knoll advised that discussions had been held with the Fire Department who adivsed that they had no objections to the proposed structure. He also drew to the attention of the Commission Page 5 - the fact that as a result of this project, the street would be widened and realigned to remove the jog at that point and a sidewalk would also be added. The Commission then recognized Mr. Gordon Klett of 960 Avonock Terrace, Glendale, the owner of the lot. Mr. Klett advised he had purchased this property in 1979 with the specific purpose of building a condominium on it. One unit was intended to be a second home and eventually their per- manent retirement home, with at least one other unit occu- pied by members of his family. He expressed the feeling that the project reflected quality in the neighborhood and would be of benefit in upgrading the area. He further expressed the hope that the Commission would agree to the variances to allow them to occupy their dream home. The next speaker to be recognized was Mr. Lou Dominy of Dominy & Bokal, 244 Ninth Street, De1 Mar, the Architect on this project. Mr. Dominy commented that he felt there should be no problem in granting the variances given the irregularities of the lot and it was felt the project did not exceed any of the requirements on this street. He further pointed out that he had gone to great lengths to provide extra parking for this project and felt what was now offered conformed with requirements. ,- The Commission then recognized Mr. Raymond Eade who resides at 2600 Ocean Street. Mr. Eade stated that he lived dir- ectly across from this project and, after examining the plans, wished to advise that he felt it would be a definite asset to the area and he was in favor of the application. Speaking against the project, the Commission recognized Mrs. Carol Dickey, 2605-2607 Ocean Street. Mrs. Dickey advised that she was the immediate neighbor on the south side of the proposed project. Mrs. Dickey indicated that she agreed with the Planning Department regarding the cumulative impact of the number of variances requested and she pointed out that other problems also existed such as the projection of the chimneys and balconies. She expressed her feeling that there were no extenuating circumstances to allow the vari- ances and the granting of them would set a precelent for further variances on Ocean Street. The next speaker was Dr. Ray Mulland, 2617 Ocean Street. Dr. Mulland advised that he had resided here for 23 years and in that time had seen a great many changes. He indi- cated that, while he sympathized with Mrs. Dickey, he was in favor of the tandem parking because of the difficulties always encountered along the beach with the lack of parking. He felt that any restrictions in the plan which would take away some parking would be a grave mistake. Dr. Mulland informed the Commission that he had no objections to any of the variances. The public hearing then closed at 8:20 P.M. Page 6 .- C ? The Commissioners -elt the tandem parking an Juilding set- backs would not cause any particular problems. The Com- mission was concerned, however, with the building height and visitor parking in the front and sideyard setback and suggested the applicant work with staff to address these concerns. After discussion by the Commissioners concerning various concerns regarding the variances and upon advice from the Assistant City Attorney, the following motion was adopted: THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE REOPENED AND THAT THIS ITEM BE CONTINUED UNITL JANUARY 14, 1981, AND THAT STAFF BE DIRECTED TO GET TOGETHER WITH THE APPLICANT TO SEE IF DIFFERENCES CAN BE RESOLVED TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE COMMENTS COMMISSIONERS HAVE MADE. MOTION: COMMISSIONER JOSE SECOND: COMMISSIONER ROMBOTIS AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE After further discussion the Commission then directed Staff to prepare a study on development standards on Ocean Street especially height. RECESS The Commission recessed at 8:50 P.M. and reconvened at 9:07 P.M. 5. CT 79-25(A), RANCHEROS - An amendment to an approved 99 unit Tentative Tract Map relating to phasing and street dedication and improvements located on the east side of El Fuerte Road, south of Alga Road extended in the P-C Zone. Mike Holzmiller introduced the Staff Report and explained the modifications, indicating that the Planning Commission had previously seen the project as a discussion item at the October 22, 1980 meeting. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:lO P.M. and, since no one wished to speak on this application, the hearing was then closed. The Commission then adopted the following resolution: I-- RESOLUTION NO. 1734 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A 99 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP RELATING TO PHASING AND STREET DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF ALGA ROAD, EAST OF EL FUERTE STREET IN THE P-C ZONE. MOTION: COMMISSIONER JOSE SECOND: COMMISSIONER L'HEUREUX AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE. Page 7 r 6. ZC-22'1‘; BANDEMER '&“SCBLEHUBER - Request for a zone change from R-3 [Multiple Family) to R-P (Residential Professional) on a parcel located on the east side of Jefferson Street between Laguna Drive and Home Street. Mike Holzmiller presented the staff report and detailed the zoning in the area. He pointed out the need to determine compatibility with existing surrounding land use and, with the aid of the overhead projector, showed the surrounding zoning. He further expressed the feeling of staff that Jefferson Street, north of Home, makes a good dividing line to separate the transition between office and residential use. Chairman Marcus then opened the public hearing at 9:17 P.M. - The Commission recognized Mr. Clarence Schlehuber, 4085 Sunnyhill Drive, Carlsbad, who stressed that R? zoning would be compatible with the neighborhood since there was already this type of zoning on Jefferson Street. He read excerpts from various letters, copies of which had been given to Commissioners, and went into detail. regarding discussions with the adjoining property owner who had expressed his interest in also applying for the same zone change. With the aid of photos, Mr. Schlehuber then attempted to show the surroundingarea and expressed the view that their project would only upgrade it. He also pointed out that Jefferson is a busy street and any other type of building except professional offices would cause a greater traffic hazard. Mr. Schlehuber also pointed out that the area had become one of spot zoning with a great many of the houses probably becoming offices in the future and he felt this was a good argument for approval of the zone change. The Commission then recognized Mr. Bob Olivas, 857 Passiflora, Leucadia, the owner of the aprartments immediately behind the subject property on Laguna, who stated he did not see the need for the zone change. He felt there would be safety problems for children and parking would be a problem. The public hearing was then closed at 9:29 P.M. The Commission expressed the concern that this would be a spot zone and that perhaps if the entire block was brought in for rezoning, the application might be more acceptable. After discussion, and incorporationg a suggestion from the Assistant City Attorney to deny the Zone Change without prejudice which would allow the applicant to reapply without any time limit, the Commission adopted the following resolutio Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 1735 DENYING A ZONE CHANGE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FROM R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-P, RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET BETWEEN LAGUNA DRIVE AND HOME STREET. MOTION: COMMISSIONER ROMBOTIS SECOND: COMISSIONER JOSE AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEURXUS AND JOSE. 7. CUP-184 '- CABLEVISION - Request for a conditional use permit to construct and operate a 160' high communi- cations antenna on the northeast side of Squires Dam Reservoir. Mike Holzmiller introduced the staff report and advised that the antenna would be compatible with existing and future land uses and that it meets required finding for approval of the conditional use permit. Bill Hofman, with the aide of the overhead projector, went into detail regarding the location and height of the antenna, pointing out that staff believed that the site is well suited for this type of use and that the use is compatible with surrounding existing and future land uses. P Chairman Marcus then opened the public hearing at 9:40 P.M. The Commission recognized Mr. Adolf Kuhn, 3558 Ames Place, Carlsbad, representing Cablevision. Mr. Kuhn advised that he concurred with staff's report and would be pleased to answer any questions. There being no one else wishing to speak, the public hearing closed at 9:41 P.M. The Commission then adopted the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 1731, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 160' HIGH COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF SQUIRES DAM RESERVOIR. MOTION: COMMISSTONER JOSE SECOND: COMMISSIONER L'HEUREUX AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE. NEW DISCUSSIDN r‘ 8. PCD’46’; HOEHN MOTORS - Request to develop an automobile dealership on the east side of Paseo De1 Norte between Cannon Road and Palomar Airport Road in the C-2 Zone. Page 9 An introductory statement was presented by Mike Holzmiller who advised that to ensure continuity of development in Car Country under Specific Plan 19 it was required that the Commission approve the plans prior to construction of any portion of the automobile center. The application in this instance is for a Mercedes Benz dealership and it was felt the project was well designed and compatible with other developments in Car Country. Bill Hofman presented the staff report and advised that this dealership was an existing one which was being relocated three lots to the north. With the aid of a wall map exhibit he showed the proposed main buildings and two service build- ings located in the rear. He advised that access would be off Paseo De1 Norte and from a private cul-de-sac along the southerly property line of the project. Based on.the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, the Commission adopted the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 1732 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO DEVELOP AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE BETWEEN CANNON ROAD AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. MOTION: COMMISSIONER JOSE SECOND: COMMISSIONER L'HEUREUX AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE. 9. ZC-218/CT 8'0-35/PUD-26, HAWORTH - Appeal of an environ- mental determination by the Planning Director. Bill Hofman presented the Staff Report and outlined the problems associated with the traffic impact of this project on Chestnut Avenue. He advised that disagreement had arisen with the applicant concerning the condition for the extension of Pontiac Avenue to Tamarack Avenue to relieve the congestion in view of the severe financial burden this would place upon his client. The applicant feels an alternative would be to postpone development of his property until the extension of Elm Avenue to the East and Pontiac Avenue to the north occurs. Since the applicant is unwilling to agree to staff's proposed mitigation measure under the new environmental protection ordinance, the Planning Director's only alternative is to require a focused Environmental Impact Report to address mitigation measures to the traffic impact. In response to a question from Commissioner Larson, Les Evans reported that a lot of things had been left out of the traffic study reports by the Consultant for the applicant. He advised there was a great deal of concern regarding the present traffic problems on Chestnut Avenue and perhaps one of the considerations, if the applicant finds economics P.age 10 I e . - prevent him from putting Pontiac Avenue through to Tamarack, is that maybe the time has not yet come for this development, Mr. Evans then stated that he felt the focused E3CR was needed. Discussion then took place on the problems with traffic on Chestnut Avenue and the merits of extending Pontiac Avenue to Tamarack. Chariman Marcus then indicated the Commission was willing to hear from the applicant. Mr. Ed Haworth, representing the applicant, spoke at great length on the traffic situation and the studies done by their Consultant. He discussed the focused EIR and the fact that even if this was done they would still be back later before the Planning Commission with the same decision to be made. He advised he was not there because of refusal to do the EIR but rather because he did not feel it would provide any,further information. He then requested that the Traffic Consultant be allowed to make a presentation. Prior to the consultant speaking, Mike Holzmiller advised that, based upon the information which staff had received, it was felt that unless Pontiac is extended to Tamarack there is going to be a significant impact and if the applicant will not comply with the condition to enable this to be reduced to an insignificant level then the Environ- mental Protection Ordinance requires an Environmental Impact Report. While there may not be any further information from this report it is a requirement and would then need to go to a public hearing. Mr. Bill Darnell of Basmaciyan-Darnell,' Inc., 4262 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, advised he had been retained to do a traffic study for this project. Mr. Darnell discuseed the reports he had submitted and expressed the opinion that there definitely is a problem on Chestnut Avenue but he felt the small number of cars which would be taken off the street if Pontiac was extended to Tamarack would not warrant the construction costs for this section of street. He further expressed the opinion that the only way to take traffic off Chestnut from this subdivision was to completely eliminate access to the north. Mr. Darnell stated that the real problem was the two blocks between El Camino Real and Trieste with the mistake having been made originally in allowing only one exit for that area. He spoke further giving figures on the various alternatives and stated that a focused EIR would not come back with any other mitigation measures. - Mr. Haworth spoke again and once more expressed the opinion that the extension of Pontiac to Elm would have far more effect on relieving traffic congestion than extending Pontiac south. The Assistant City Attorney then explained to the Commissioners the review process and the standards in deciding this appeal. Page 11 Lengthy discussion then ensued ryarding the project's impact and, after hearing once more from Mr. Haworth, the Commission adopted the following motion: THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGREE WITH THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S DECISION REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TO ADDRESS ALL THE MITIGATING MEASURES RELATING TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT WHICH WOULD BE CREATED BY THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. MOTION: COMMISSIONER FRIESTEDT SECOND: COMMISSTONER L'HEUREUX AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTES, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE 10. REPORT ON PRIVATE STREETS It was decided that this item should be brought back for discussion at the next meeting on December 17, 1980. 11. REVISIONS 'TO EIR ORDINANCE The Commission adopted the following motion: THAT THE COMMISSION APPROVES THE REVISIONS TO THE EIR ORDINANCE AND THAT THERE BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION. MOTION: COMMISSIONER JOSE SECOND: COMMISSIONER LARSON AYES: CHAIRMAN MARCUS, COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE. INFORMATION ITEMS 12. LETTER FROM .SOUTH COAST ASPHALT PRODUCTS CO., INC. Bill Hofman advised that property owners had been called in reference to the letter extending hours for the month of December and they wished to be put on record opposing this. By proper motion the Commission adjourned at 11:07 P.M. Respectfully submitted, JAMESC.HAGAMAN Secretary to the Planning Commission r- Page 12