Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-02-25; Planning Commission; Minutes-- MEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: February 25, 1981 TIME OF MEETING: 7:00 P.M. a PLACE OF MEETING: Council Chambers - . CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called,to order at 7:03 P.M. by Chairman Marcus. ROLL CALL Present - Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Larson, L"Heureux, Friestedt, Jose, and Leeds. L -_ Absent - Commissioner Rombotis. Ex-Officio member Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, was also present. Staff members present were: Bill Hofman, Associate Planner Paul Klukas, Planning Technician Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Marcus. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURE Chairman Marcus explained Planning Commission procedures in its capacity' as an advisory commission to the City Council . and identified those matters delegated to the Planning Commission for a final decision. Chairman Marcus further explained the procedure observed by the Commission during public hearing items. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. V-321/MS-515, CRISMAN'. Request for approval of a Minor Subdivision creating a panhandle lot and two Variances of the Zoning Ordinance. Bill Hofman indicated that the applicant and Staff are requesting a continuance on this item to the meeting of April 8, 1981, for the purpose of allowing the applicant to resolve problems with the project in meeting the subdivision ordinance. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:05 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Commissioner Jose requested that Staff provide the Commission with the minimum sideyard and lot widths of those lots to the north of this application. A motion was made to continue this:item to the meeting of April 8, 1981. 2. CT 80-~~/PuD-28, ANDREX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. Request for approval of a tentative subdivision map and planned unit development, to create and develop six industrial lots and buildings, .in two phases, on the south side of Corte de la Pina between Yarrow Drive and El Camino Real in the P-M zone. The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. 6 \ I :OMMISSIONERS Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds .A. ~ 2, -,.; Page 2 -- . February 25, 1981 With the aid of the overhead projector, he showed the project design and location. Mr. Hofman explained that, overall, Staff is satisfied with the project design, and feels that the development can be supported. However, he indicated that Staff is concerned with the circulation system, and was unable to resolve same with the applicant prior to this meeting. He further explained that the concern is the location of an individual driveway access off of the public street, Corte de la Pina, located adjacent to the private cul-de-sac, and explained the- problems with same., Mr. Hofman continued‘that the Fire Department has indicated that they have no need of this driveway for fire protection. He explained that adequate,access for the building currently exists off of the private cul-de-sac, and therefore, Staff is recommending that the driveway access be deleted from the location. In response to inquiry reference the condition dealing with landscaping, Bill Hofman explained that the intent is to continuously maintain the landscaping as long as the building is in existence. He'added that after the occupancy permit has been issued, if there is no bond, it would be difficult to enforce: Commissioner Joseinquired as to the height of the third building, in'that it was not stated in the report, and requested that same be noted as it is for the other buildings. He also expressed concern over the Fire Department's position on the driveway. Staff explained the Fire Department did not need it because of the distance they have, and the current access; however, they did not indicate they preferred to have it deleted. Cotiissioner La&on suggested for Commission consideration, that a finding be included to support the reason for allowing the encroachment into the setbacks because of the heavy landscaping-and the recreation areas. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:16 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Howard Mann, Andrex Decelopment Company, 3000 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 1004, Santa Monica. Mr. Mann explained the concept of the development. He also addressed the curb cut issue, and briefly discussed some alternatives to same. The Commission then recognised Mr. Jim Federhart, 5252 Balboa, San Diego; the traffic engineer. With the aid of wall exhibits, Mr. Federhart showed the different alternatives to the curb cut issue, and driveway approaches. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the.public hearing at 7:25 P.M. Commissioner Friestedt inquired as to the position of the City Engineer. Richard Allen responded that the entrance does have the potential to cause conflicts with the main driveway; however, in that the applicant has cut,it down substantially, he feels the conflict problem will be relatively minor, and added that it would discourage people from parking in the front, and force them to drive around to the rear of the building. :OMFIISSTONERS ’ -- -. Page 3 February 25, 1981 Following Commission discussion on the parking situation, a motion was.made to approve the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and the following Resolutions were adopted, reommending approval of CT 80-47/PUD-28, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; with the provision that the exhibits be amended to show the landscape barrier from side to side to prevent through access; also, if necessary, that a condition be proposed that the 12-unit parking area be.for executive use only, and that it be so signed to indicate same, that it is not a through street; and that a finding be added on Resolution No. 1772, supporting the reasons for allowing setback reductions: c RESOLUTION NO. 1771, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO CREATE SIX INDUSTRIAL LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CORTE DE LA PINA BETWEEN YARROW DRIVE AND EL CAMINO REAL. RESOLUTION NO. 1722, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF‘A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR SIX INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, IN TWO PHASES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CORTE DE LA PINA BETWEEN YARROW DRIVE AND EL CAMINO REAL. 3. ZC-215, UKEGAWA. Request for a Zone Change from E-l-(A) County;to M (Industrial,) on the south side of Palomar Airport Road, east of Laurel Tree Road. With the aid of the overhead projector, Bill Hofman presented the staff report, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:36 P.M.,.and extended the invitation to speak. . . The Commission recognized Mr. Don Agatep, 2921 Roosevelt, Carlsbad; representing the applicant.' Mr. Agatep explained that their application was to annex approximately 14 acres to the City; however, they only-intend to use about six acres at the present time for an actual industrial facility. He added that they have no immediate use for the area to the east. Mr. Agatep stated the applicant is in agreement with the Staff recommendations, and expressed the.willingness to answer any questions. Following discussion on the option to file a site development plan with 'the City at the time development actually occurs, . Bill Hofman explained that the only way the City could require a site development plan would be to place a Q-overlay over the property. , The Assistant City Attorney indicated that they had two concerns; first, that without the Q-overlay there were some problems with consistency with the General Plan, and secondly, with regard to,a specific'plan, in that under the General Plan, certain areas within the City require a specific plan before development can occur. He explained that this is preannexational zoning, and adding the Q-overlay to the P-M zone would satisfy the requirements of the General Plan. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:40 P.M. :OMMISSIONERS ’ Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Page 4 -- February 25, 1981 A motion was made to adopt,the following Resolution, approving ZC-215 for the P-M-Q Zone, rather than the requested M Zone based on the findings contained therein, and that the Resolution be amended to so indicate same: RESOLUTION NO. 1777, APPROVING A PREANNEKATIONAL ZONE CHANGE FROM COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO E-I-A TO CITY OF CARLSBAD P-M-Q (PLANNED INDUSTRIAL) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF LAUREL TREE ROAD. 4. CUP-195;HAWTHORNE. Request for+a conditional use permit to allow for the rental and servicing of construction equipment on property generally located on the east side of Paseo de1 Norte between Palomar Airport Road and - Camino de1 Parque in the M Zone. The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter, with the aid of wall exhibits. Mr. Hofman indicated that the Planning Department had received two letters of opposition to the project from Mr. Ron Whitney, and Mr. Otto J. Rose; copies of which were handed out to the Commission, Chairman Marcus opened-the public hearing at 7:47 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Bob Ladwig of Rick Engineering, Carlsbad, representing the applicant, Mr. Ladwig pointed out that this is M zoned property, and the specific plan only covers specific requirements as far as emissions from the site. He also pointed out that Mr. Hawthorne owns the Tip Top Meat land and building, therefore, as far as being concerned about objectionable uses with the neighboring properties, the neighboring property is owned by the same applicant. ._ Mr. Ladwig distributed pictures of an operation that is currently in existence in Escondido,.and also copies of assessor's parcels to show the adjacent zonings; to the Commission. He explained that unlike other rental businesses, Hawthorne will only be open five days a week, with normal operating hours, and all the activities are within the enclosed yard or building. Further, their operation*consists of renting equipment, and providing preventative maintenance on same. Mr. Ladwig added that there will not be noise or emissions coming from the site. The Commission then recognized Mr. Andrew McReynolds, 2316 Calle Chiquita, La Jolla, who is a neighboring property owner. Mr. McReynolds stated he was not speaking either in favor or opposition of the project. With the aid of a wall exhibit, Mr. McReynolds gave some background on some of the properties in the area, and some ideas for potential new development. The Commission recognized. Ms, Joel Lee McKibben, 6571A Paseo De1 Norte, Car&bad. Ms..McKibben inquired if a study was done on truck traffic, and if not, if the City was considering having one done. Staff responded they have not, however, traffic was always taken into consideration. Ms. McKibben explained her concern was additional 'truck traffic hn Paseo De1 Norte. Mr, Bob Ladwig of Rick Engineering explained that one of the primary reasons Hawthorne is interested in this location is its close proximity and access to Interstate 5. Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt .Jose Leeds Page 5 -- February 25, 1981 The Commission recognized Mr. TOM Richardson, representing Dixon Ford. He explained his office is within 100 feet of Hawthorne's .Yard, and he is in his office every day by 6:30 to 6:45 A.M., and does not feel there is any objectionable noise. He added that it would benefit the City to allow Hawthorne to locate on Paseo De1 Norte, as it would help the downtown traffic problem. The Commission then reeognized Mr. Richard Mantle, 6737 Russelia Court, Carlsbad; representing over 300 property owners of Alta Mira. Mr. Mantle indicated that the property owners have signed a petition, opposing the construction of Hawthorne Equipment on Paseo De1 Norte. c Mr. Mantle stated he is also representing Otto 3. Rose, owner of Arco Equipment Co.; the Cal-MI1 Plastic Products Co; John Callahan; and Paul and Peggy Hadley, owners of lots 1, 2, 3, and 4; and also 'Mr. Ron Whitney of Motel 6; all of whom are in opposition to the construction of Hawthorne Equipment, Mr. Mantle addressed the traffic problem, as it currently exists, and stated that Hawthorne would only add to the problem with their equipment. In conclusion, Mr. Mantle stated he was in agreement with the 'staff report. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman' Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:17 P.M. Commissioner Jose indicated that he feels this type of a facility would not be of an esthetic value to the area. He addressed the hours of operation, and the potential.,that the equipment will be checked out prior to 'dispatch for construction sites. Further, he suggested that this type of facility would be better suited in an area such as the Palomar Airport Industrial area, . . In response to Commission inquiry as to the ability of the area to handle its present traffic, Richard Allen responded that it is a secondary arterial, and is capable of handling a significant amount of traffic. Commissioner L'Heureux expressed concern also as to the esthetic value the facility would have to the area, 'along with the compatibility of the project to the particular area. Following Commission discussion, a motion was made to adopt the following Resolution, denying CUP-195, based on the findings contained therein: . RESOLUTION NO. 1773, DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO -- ALLOW FOR THE RENTAL AND SERVICING OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE BETWEEN PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND CAMINO DEL PARQUE. RECESS Chairman Marcus called a recess at 8:30 P.M., and the Commission reconvened at 8:43 P.M., with six members present. Following Commission discussion on the decision to re-zone on Paseo De1 Norte, a motion was made to direct Staff to bring back a General Plan Amendment for the June zone code. The motion was then withdrawn. The Planning Director indicated they will come back to the . Commission with a report, and at that time make the determination as to what deadlines can be met. :OMMISSIONERS ’ Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds UTE§ Page 6 -- February 25, 1981 CONTINUED DISCUSSION ITEMS, _. - 5. MS-505, AVIS/O'DAY. Request for a minor subdivision creating three lots one of which would be a panhandle lot on property generally located.on the east side of Arland Road between Buena Vista Avenue and Highland Drive in the R&1-7500 zone. Chairman Marcus indicated,she had a request to continue this item to the meeting of March 11, 1981, as the applicant was unable to attend this meeting, A motion was made to continue this item'to the Planning Commission meeting of March 11, 1981. NEW DISCUSSTON ITEMS 6. MS-514, LUNDEEN. Request for approval of a minor sub- division to create three lots, one of which would be a panhandle lot,' on.the east side of Highland Drive between Hoover Street and Adams Street in the R-1-15,000 zone. The staff report'was presented by Bill Hofman, essenti,ally as contained in the Statement of the Matter. With the aid'of the overhead projector, he showed the project description and location. The Commission recognized Mr, Joe Von Hoffman, of Brian Smith Engineering in Carlsbad, representing the applicant. Mr. Von Hoffman expressed agreement with the staff report, and the willingness to answer any questions. A motion was made to adopt the following Resolution, approving MS-514, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1776, APPROVTNG THE CREATION OF ONE PANHANDLE LOT AS PART OF A MINOR SUBDJVISION LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HIGHLAND DRIVE BETWEEN HOOVER STREET.AND ADAMS STREET IN THE R-1-15,000 ZONE. 7. PCD-29, DIXON FORD. Request to-construct a new showroom at an existing automobile dealership on the west side of' Paseo.Del Norte between Cannon Road and Palomar Airport Road in the C-2 zone, The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter, With the aid of wall exhibits, 'Staff depicted the design of the building. In response to Commission inquiry, Staff explained that the loss of the parking spaces due to construction does not interfere with the parking ratio required for the building. The Commission then recognized Mr. Tom Richardson, representing Dixon Ford. Mr. Richardson explained that Dixon Ford is taking on a new line, and this is the purpose for the showroom. It will be a satellite showroom, and it is a requirement from the factory. Mr. Richardson expressed willingness to answer any questions of the Commission. / . - ___ .--.. -- i . OMI'IISSIONERS \ Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds I . u Page 7 -- February 25, 1981 A motion was made to adopt the following Resolution, approvin PCD-29, based on the findings'and subject to the conditions contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1770, APPROVING A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SHOWROOM AT AN EXISTING AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHTP ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE BETWEEN CANNON ROAD AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTTON 8. Resolution No. 1755 - Denying ZC-2.27 (Mobile Home Park Rezonings.) Commissioner L‘Heureux indicated that, in reference to a paragraph in the Resolution, the public hearing was' closed on January 28, 1981; however, the Resolution indicates public hearings were held on February 11, 1981, and February 25, 198 also. The Assistant City Attorney explained these dates' should be stricken from the Resolution. Commissioner L'Heure also expressed concern over the finding. The Commission then di.scussed the Sunset Clause, and the finding for Resolution No. 1755. A motion was made to adopt the following Resolution, denying ZC-227, based on the findings and subject to the conditions cdntained therein; with the incorporation into Finding No. 1 that any requirement of relocation within 15 miles of the Pacific Ocean as a condition of relocation be eliminated: RESOLUTION NO. 1755, DENYING A ZONE CHANGE FOR THE EXISTI'NG MOBILE HOME PARKS TN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FROM: 1. RD-M TO RMHP FOR SOLAMAR MOBILE HOME PARK LOCATED.ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN PALOMAR ATRPORT ROAD AND POTNSETTIA LANE. 2. R-1-10,000 TO RMHP FOR LANAKAI LANE MOBILE HOME PARK LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND POTNSETTTA LANE. . 3. R-1-10,000 TO RMHP FOR LAKESHORE GARDENS MOBILE' HOME PAR LOCATED SCUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF POINSETTTA LANE AND INTERSTATE 5. 4. R-A-10,000 TO RMHP FOR RANCH0 CARLSBAD MOBILE HOME PARK LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the Regular Meeting, held January 28, 1981, were approved as corrected. Commissioner Jose indicated that his abstention was due to the fact that he feels Ttem No. 4, Sun-Faire, incorrectly reflects issues brought up by various Commissioners. Minutes of the Regular Meeting, held February 11, 1981, were approved. COMMISSIONERS ‘9 Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds I Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Marcus Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds . L K i \ 5 I ! 2; I , L I : : : L t L k ‘t 1 -- Page 8 February 25, 1981 Commissioner L'Heureux commented on the letter to the Mayor, dated February 19, 1981, received by Bob Ladwig of Rick Engineering,. and commended him for his efforts. He also suggested that the Commission send Mr. Ladwig a letter, expressing their appreciation of his concern in bringing the information to the Commission. The Commission concurred. The Commission, along with the Planning Director, then briefly discussed housing'in the City. It was suggested that the Commission hold three consecutive one-hour workshop meetings on Thursdays, beginning March 12, 1981, from 4 to 5 P.M. The Commission concurred.' ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 9:43 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, JAMES C. HAGAMAN Secretary to the Planning Commission' Ann R. Alleman, Minutes Clerk 1 \ l ; :OIf’IISSIONERS