HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-04-22; Planning Commission; MinutesIM-INUTES
MEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: April 22, 1981
TIME OF MEETING: 7:00 P.M. PLACE OF MEETING: Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Marcus at 7:03 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present - Chairman Marcus, Commissioners L'Heureux, Jose,
Rombotis, and Farrow.
Commissioner Schlehuber arrived at 7:09 P.M.
Absent - Commissioner Friestedt.
Ex-Officio member,s Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney;
and James Hagaman, Planning Director; were also present.
Staff members present were:
Mike Holzmiller, Principal Planner
Bill Hofman, Associate Planner
Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Marcus.
PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURE
Chairman Marcus explained Planning Commission procedures in
its capacity as an advisory commission to the City Council
and identified those matters delegated to the Planning
Commission for a final decision. Chairman Marcus further
explained the procedure observed by the Commission during
public hearing items.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. CT 81-3/CP-149, MOLA DEVELOPMENT CORP. Request for an
80-unit tentative tract map and condominium permit to
convert an existing apartment project to condominiums
on the east side of El Camino Real, south of Swallow Lane in the RD-M (Q) zone.
Mike Holzmiller gave the staff report, indicating that this
item was continued from the Planning Commission meetings of
March 25, 1981, and April 8, 1981. He continued that Staff
was initially recommending denial of the project; however,
since the original public hearing on the item, the applicant
has been working with Staff, and has made numerous revisions
to the plan, which has resulted in Staff changing the
recommendation to approval.
Mr. Holzmiller continued the staff report, essentially as
contained in the Statement of the Matter; with Bill Hofman
using wall exhibits to point out the revisions to the design
criteria. He indicated that in addition to the revisions
listed in the staff report, the applicant is also proposing
to link the pedestrian system in the project with the trail
system approved on his project to the east. Mr. Holzmiller
also explained the revisions made, with regard to development
standards, as contained in the staff report.
He concluded by referring to the memo distributed to the
Commission relating to revisions to Resolution No. 1787,
explaining same, and indicating that Condition No. 5 should
be deleted, as it requires the applicant pay school fees.
:OblMISSIONERS '
NUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
--
April 22, 1981 Page 2
Chairman Marcus opened the-public hearing at 7:17 P.M., and
extended the invitation to speak.
The Commission recognized Richard Harlow, 808 Adams Avenue,
Huntington Beach; representing the applicant. Mr. Harlow
explained they have worked with Staff to obtain the revised
plan as presented at this meeting. He added they have also
worked closely with the tenants of the project, in attempt
to qualify them to purchase their units at the prices
indicated. Mr. Harlow further stated his opinion that the‘
present plan does meet the.design criteria and standards of
the City, and indicated that the applicant does agree with
the modified Condition No. 19, as recommended by Staff.
In response to Commission query regarding Condition No, 19,
the Assistant City Attorney explained that Staff would not
be enforcing the condition. He continued, referring to
another project in which a similar condition was incorporated
there were some difficulties with the Title Insurance
Company, due to the fact that there was n0t.a definite
termination date on it. The Title Insurance Company was
hesitant to insure the title, until they could be convinced
that there was a definite restriction, and a time limit
given the nature of.that particular project,
Commissioner L'Heureux inquired about the parking along the
San Diego Gas &'Electric easement; and indicated his concern
that there is nothing that would preclude them from revoking
the easement. He stated that to his knowledge, one of the
premises upon which Staff is seeking grounds of approval is
due to the fact that there would be major parking in this
easement, which if later revoked, causes concern as to the
continued viability of the project.
Mr. Harlow responded that they could not provide .any more
insurance than that indicated in the letter. He explained
that the legal counsel for Mola Development met with the
legal counsel for San Diego Gas & Electric, as well as their
staff people in attempt to firm the'situation; He stated
that this is as far as they can go. Mr. Harlow pointed out
that Mola Development owns-the land, and San Diego Gas &
Electric has an easement over that right-of-way for the
purpose of transmitting electrical energy for const'ructing
particular facilities, and they can not arbitrarily withhold
the use of the property from the land owner, as long as it
is not interferring with their public charge.
Mike Holzmiller indicated that if the use of the easement
area for parking was ever revoked, there is an area to the
north of Swallow Lane, which the applicant had originally
proposed for recreational facilities. However, it was felt
that they wou,ld not be very accessible to the units, and it
was proposed to change them.over to the south of Swallow Lane
and the applicant then proposed to put some of the required
parking in the area to the north of Swallow Lane. Tt was
pointed out that the parking then would not be accessible,
and it was suggested to.landscape that area, and provide a
nice entrance to the project. He concluded that if the
parking was ever revoked, this area could be used for parking
even though it is not the most convenient.
The Commission recognized Bob Brady, 6905 #E Quail Place,
Carlsbad, a-tenant of West Bluff. Mr. Brady indicated he has
met with other tenants of the project, and pointed out that
the petition provided the Commission, is indicative of the
overall feeling of most of the tenants.
DMMISSIONERS ’
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981 Page 3
Mr. Brady concluded that this was a unique opportunity for
the tenants to buy in Carlsbad , and urged the acceptance of
the application.
The Commission recognized Celestal Brady, 6905 #E Quail
Place, Carlsbad. Mrs. Brady urged the acceptance of the
application, and expressed her opinion that the complex is
far superior .to other condominium complexes she has visited.
She continued that she does not find any dominance of any
internal street system. She also indicated that it was a
unique opportunity for people such as herself to enter the
housing market, and be able to afford the financing.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:36 P.M.
In response to query by Commissioner Farrow regarding
ingress and egress into the cul-de-sac on the south side,
particularly egress onto El Camino Real, where there is a
median allowing egress to be northbound only; Richard Allen
explained that originally when the project to the south was
approved, it was intended that it be a public street, and
there was a plan that this project would have a driveway
access into the cul-de-sac. When the project came back for
a redesign, it was believed by Staff that this project,
being an apartment, would most likely not be able to be
converted to condominiums, and therefore, it was not
appropriated to have the apartment traffic going through
the other condominium project. The applicant also wanted
the street to be private, therefore, the project to the
south has a private street, and is under a different
ownership, which presents legal difficulties allowing this
project access to cross the project to the south.
Commissioner Jose expressed his feeling that this. was
somewhat precedent setting in reference to the San Diego Gas
and Electric easement, where the new parking area is. He
further stated his opinion that apartments built as
apartments should remain as apartments, and those to be
converted in the future, should be built in accordance with
the Condominium Ordinance.
Commissioner Schlehuber indicated that he would only support
a Resolution that would provide that each unit carry a CC&R
for a price restriction of one year from the date of sale, so
that there is no open end that can cause title problems.
Commissioner L'Heureux stated he is in favor of the project;
however, feels that the language in certain conditions is
unclear. With regard to Condition No. 19, he stated
his opinion that it is almost unenforceable, and does not
think it possible to determine the price limitation under '
the condition as it is now written.
The Commission adopted the following Resolution, recommending Marcus
approval of CT 81-3/CP-149 to the City Council based on the L'Heureux
findings contained therein; with a revision to Conditions Jose
No. 3a, 8; and in Condition No. 19 putting a one year from Rombotis
the date of sale on each unit, and a revision to Condition Farrow
No. 25: Schlehuber
RESOLUTION NO. 1787, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR AN 80 UNIT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL SOUTH
OF SWALLOW LANE. APPLICANT: MOLA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.
COMMISSIONERS \;
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981
.
Page 4
Mike Holzmiller indicated they had received a letter from the
School District indicating that school facilities are
available to serve the project. He also provided information,
at the request of Commissioner L'Heureux, on the number of
units that have been converted in the City of Carlsbad, and
added that they might keep a running count of same in the
future; and the vacancy rate.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. CT 81-8/CP-151, WALTON. - Request for a 10 unit
tentative tract map and condominium permit on property
located on the‘west side of Santa Isabel, La Costa,
in the RD-M zone.
Commissioner L'Heureux requested disclosure information, as
to who comprises the Limited.Partnership, known as American
Views II. Bill Hofman responded that it was Staff's under-
standing that the members listed are the partnership. Mr.
Dave Walton also explained that he is a member of San Diego
Land Corporatiqn, who is a General Partner, and this is their
third project in. the area. %Ir. Walton added that there are
also Limited Partners, one of which is Costa Ltd., and another
is Reza Paydar.
The Commission recognized Reza Paydar, who indicated there
were five (5) other people, including himself, and three ($1
small investors who reside in California. He further offered
to provide a list of these ,members to the Commission, and
indicated who the Limited Partners are,
Commissioner L'Heureux stated that based on the information,
he would proceed with the item.
With the aid of the overhead projector, Bill Hofman presented
the staff report, essentially as contained in the Statement
of the Matter.
Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:54 P.M., and
extended the invitation to speak.
The Commission recognized Dave Walton, of San Diego Land
Corporation; who expressed the willingness to respond to any
questions.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:56 P.M.
Commissioner L'Heureux inquired regarding Condition No. 20,
as to why fire retardant roofs were being required. The
Assistant City Attorney responded that they are now a
requirement of the Building Code for all new projects.
In response to inquiry by Commissioner LIHeureux with regard
to Condition No. 22, Bill Hofman indicated this condition is
imposed on projects where the Fire Marshal feels it is
necessary, as it gives them enforcement capabilities.
The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by
the Planning Director, and adopted the following Resolution,
recommending approval of CT 81-8tCP-151 to the City Council
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein:
RESOLUTION NO. 1799, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 10 UNIT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SANTA ISABEL STREET.
Marcus
L'Heureux
Jose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981 Page 5
3. CUP-42(H), CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Request for approval
of an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit to sell
beer at the U.S. Gran Prix Motocross, at the Carlsbad
Raceway, on the north side of Palomar Airport Road,
west of Linda Vista Drive in the C-2 zone.
Commissioner L'Heureux indicated that he is a Director of the
Chamber of Commerce, and the City Attorney, under a written
memorandum has determined that he has a conflict of interest
on this item, and will therefore abstain from same.
Commissioner Rombotis indicated he had received the same
letter, and would also be abstaining on the matter.
The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially
as contained in the Statement of the Matter. With the aid of
the overhead projector, he showed the location of the raceway
and referred to the memorandum from the Chief of Police on
the matter, dated April 8, 1981; indicating that Chief Jimno
wished to address his concerns to the Commission.
Chief Jimno explained that his memo calls attention to the
liabilities and problems that the City would face involving
any major sporting event, at which alcoholic beverages may
or may not be available. He stated this is a unique situatio
because of the City growing into an internationally known
posture, due to the major sporting events held in the
community. He continued that his position is to remind the
City of the liability possibilities, policing problems that
might arise, and some of the problems dealt with in the past.
Chief Jimno indicated that in looking back to the past posture of the police department, there has .been a strong
negative towards the serving of alcoholic beverages at this
event. However, the City was smaller at that time, the
crowds were similar in nature, and the problems were much mor
difficult for a smaller staff to handle. Currently, the City
is growing, and staff is able to handle more in these kinds
of events.
Chief Jimno stated the concerns he has are that the site is
not necessarily conducive to easy access, in or out. With
the increased use of alcoholic beverages, there will be
traffic problems that will develop at the closing of the
event, with people leaving in large masses. Secondly, any
time there is an increase in use of alcoholic beverages, ther
will be a greater hostility towards authority figures.
Thirdly, there has been some experience with problems in the
site during the event, but they have been limited in nature
to present. However, they have found that most instances are
caused by people who have had too much to drink, or are under
the influence of narcotics.
He continued that they have not been effectively able to
enforce the restriction of alcoholic beverages prohibition,
as people carry it in. He added that the Department is not
able to control it, with a crowd of 20,000 people. He stated
the Department has limited resources, and there is grave
accessibility to the site, because it is not a stadium.
Chief Jimno explained that people can only drink what they
carry in, and it is more under control, because it is a
limited amount. However, he is concerned as they will carry
in cans and bottles, which can be used as w-eapons. He
suggested that if we allow alcoholic beverages, that the City
restrict cans and bottles, which would give some semblance
of control.
l
\; :OPlMISSIONERS
It!PNUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981
s
Page 6 COMMISSIONERS
Chief Jimno concluded that if the Planning Commission has
a feeling that the City would like to present the event with
the Chamber's request approved, the Police Department can live
with it; however, it is going to cost some money. He pointed
out 'that there would be liability for the Chamber if the
event goes sour, and liability if someone gets injured. He
stated that the minimal conditions he has placed, are rather
restrictive for any sporting event.
Chief Jimna indicated that if the Planning Commission and/or
City Council is to present the event with an approval of
the Chamber's request, he suggests the following:
1) That the Police Chief be given the authority to
designate all booths for the dispensing of alcoholic
beverages.
2) That the Police Chief be given the final authority as
to how much manpower would be required to police the
event.
3) That the Police Chief be given the final authority,
which he already has by law but requests it be
reaffirmed in the CUP, to close down any of the
dispensing operations that do not comply with normal
control.
4) That the promoters or concessionaires be required to
reimburse the City for all costs involving police
protection.
5) That an insurance policy or hold-harmless agreement be
presented for the City's protection, should an incident
occur in which liability is incurred, through injury or
negligence.
Chief Jimno indicated he had one other concern, and inquired
if this would set precedent for other events to follow, and
suggested this be directed towards the City's legal staff.
Commissioner Schlehuber referred to the policy of San Diego
Stadium, and inquired, regardless of what action is taken
with the Chamber request, if there if some way.to tighten as
people come through the gate, and inspect what is open.
Chief Jimno responded that a stadium is designed for control,
at the entrances and.exits, and they are equipped with
adequate security forces. He continued that the raceway has
temporary fences, access routes for motorhomes, and large
equipment vans bringing the equipment in, and it is
extremely difficult to restrict what is brought-in.
Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:18 P.M., and
extended the invitation to speak.
The Commission recognized Don Brown, Carlsbad Chamber of
Commerce; who indicated the Chamber disagrees with the Staff
recommendation, and urged approval of the amendment to the
CUP. Mr. Brown referred to his letter of March 4, 1981, to
the Planning Commission, stating the Chamber has Carlsbad's
best interest at heart. He continued that the Chamber has a
contract to do certain things for the City, and part of that
contract is to promote its' natural assets, and its' potentia:
as a place to visit, live, and work.
Mr. Brown added that the.Chamber hopes to generate funds from
the sale of the beer and soft.drinks for the-use_in the
operations of the Chamber and for local service programs whicl
benefit the entire community.
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981
m
Page 7
Mr. Brown explained that the Chamber fully intends to
comply with all laws pertaining to the sale and distribution
of beer. He pointed out that the Chamber has been around
for a long time, and is not a fly-by-night organization.
He stated the Chamber is prepared to work with the Chief of
Police, and the Commission on any conditions they see fit to
impose. If people knew there was going to be on-site sale of
beer, most people would not carry it in, which would allow
more control of the event. Further, Mr. Brown pointed out
that it would lessen some of the consumption to and from the
event. He assured the Commission that ABC would have
their people present at the event, and the Chamber would have
signs displayed requiring that identification be presented
by those purchasing the beer.
Mr. Brown continued that the Chamber will provide the
necessary insurance coverage; and wish to do whatever is
necessary to run the event smoothly, for the enjoyment of the
spectators. He added that the Chamber has worked closely
with the promoters, and have had their assurance of
cooperation as well.
ThesAssistant City Attorney inquired if the owner, who is
the holder of the CUP on the whole project, as an amendment
to the CUP, would be willing to write a letter indicating.
his concurrence with the amendment. Mr, Brown indicated that
the owner's signature appeared on the original application
as property owner, not as applicant, and has been very
encouraging to the Chamber; howe,ver, they would have to
contact the owner on this. /
Commissioner 3ose indicated that there was a correction to
the staff report, in that it was 1967, not 1966, when the
owner requested that beer be sold; and it was denied by the
Commission then, and also in 1969.
The Assistant City Attorney reiterated that if the
Commission approves the application, and if it is also their
desire to incorporate the Police Chief's suggestion that the
promoter be responsible for the extra police force, that as
a condition of approval, it be required that a letter of
consent be submitted by the owner.
Mr. Brown stated the Chamber fully agrees that there should
be additional Carlsbad Police Officers on site for the
event. In conclusion, Mr. Brown submitted a letter to the
Commission, from Ken Chriss, Chairman of the Housing and
Redevelopment Advisory Committee, stating his favor of the
Chamber proposal.
The Commission then recognized Jerry Farrell, 3920 Holly
Brae Lane, Carlsbad; President of the Chamber of Commerce.
Mr. Farrell indicated that the Chamber initially has concern
over this project; however, after analysis they had support
from their 24-man Board of Directors, and from the over 500
person membership within the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce.
Mr. Farrell added that the Chamber is dedicated to implement
the project smoothly, and will work closely with the Police
Chief to add any conditions he feels are important. He
indicated they do not feel it is precedent setting, and it is
a one time request for a non-profit organization. He conclud-
ed by urging approval of the amendment to the CUP.
MINUTES _
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981 Y Page 8 :OHMISSIONERS \;
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:42 P.M.
Discussion.reflected the individual Commissioners' feelings
of selling beer on-site, and concern was expressed over
approving the CUP for a period of five years, and it was
suggested that consideration be given for approval of the
first year only.
Bill Hofman responded that, as conditioned, the permit is
for five years, and subject to yearly review by the Planning
Director. If there were any problems, it would be brought
back to a public hearing, where further conditions could be
imposed, or the entire permit could be revoked. Mr. Hofman
indicated that if the Commission decided to approve the CUP,
the condition could be modified for a one year review by the
Planning Commission, at a public hearing.
Dan Hentschke, the Assistant City Attorney, indicated that
in his opinion, the present condition, with regard to the
one year review, is not an effective way to enforce the
concerns that Commissioner Schlehuber expressed. He
continued that the way to accomplish an adequate review, is
to have the CUP terminate after one year, with a renewal
provision; and he suggested amending Condition No. 11 to
reflect same. The Police Chief had indicated he would prefer
it be handled as suggested by the Attorney.
Don Brown explained that there is a $500 filing fee per year,
and that was the reason they applied for the five years, to
save money on the one time filing fee. Bill Hofman indicated
it could also be conditioned so that future fees would be
waived.
A motion was made adopting the following Resolution; with the Marcus
modification to Condition No. 11, granting the Conditional L'Heureux
use Permit for a period of one year, rather than five years; Jose
and the addition of a condition that would state that the Rombotis
Police Chief shall have final authority for the following Farrow
items: Schlehuber
a) The operation and locations of all dispensing
b 1
C 1
Further I
booths.
The number of City police staff necessary to
safely enforce the event.
To close down any of the dispensing operations that
do not comply with normal control.
a modification to Condition No. 6; directing that
the applicant shall pay for the full cost of providing police
protection, including both salaries and benefits to the
satisfaction of the Police Chief:
RESOLUTION NO. 1801, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
SELL BEER AT THE U.S. GRAN PRIX MOTOCROSS, AT THE CARLSBAD
RACEWAY ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD WEST OF LINDA VISTA DRIVE.
The motion failed due to lack of a majority.
The Commission adopted the following Resolution, denying
CUP-42(H), based on the findings contained therein:
RESOLUTION NO. 1801, DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO SELL
BEER AT THE U.S. GRAN PRIX MOTOCROSS, AT THE CARLSBAD
RACEWAY, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF .
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD WEST OF LINDA VISTA DRIVE.
Commissioners Marcus and Schlehuber voted for denial to allow
the applicant the opportunity to appeal to the City Council.
Marcus
L'Heureux
Jose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1981
s
Page 9 COMMISSIONERS '-' \
RECESS
Chairman Marcus called a recess at 8:56 P.M., and the
Commission reconvened at 9:07 P.M., with six members present.
4. V-322, NERLINGER. Request for a variance to allow
construction of two condominium units within the 5 foot
building setback required from private driveways. This
request is made in conjunction with a request for a
4-unit minor condominium permit on a -26 acre lot on
the south side of Chinquapin Avenue between Garfield
Street and the AT&SF Railway in the RD-M zone.
With the aid of the overhead projector, the staff report was
presented by Mike Holzmiller. Bill Hofman used a wall
exhibit to show the project description during the staff
report.
Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:09 P.M., and
extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to
speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed.
The Commission a‘dopted the following Resolution, approving
V-322, based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein:
RESOLUTION NO. 1800, APPROVING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE
BUILDING SETBACK FROM A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY FROM 5-FEET TO
ZERO-FEET ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
CHINQUAPIN BETWEEN GARFIELD STREET, AND THE AT&SF RAILWAY IN
THE RD-M ZONE. APPLICANT: NERLINGER. CASE NO. V-322.
NEW DISCUSSION ITEMS:
.5. MS-524, JEFFRESS. Request for approval of a minor
subdivision to create two lots, one of which is a
panhandle lot, on the north side of Tamarack Avenue
between Hibiscus Circle and Jefferson Street in the
R-1-7500 zone.
With the aid of wall exhibits to show the.proposed request,
the staff report.was presented by Mike Holzmiller, essential11
as contained in the Statement of the Matter. He also pointed
out that it was a discussion item. For clarification
purposes, Mr. Holzmiller indicated that the map that was
submitted does show the garage'as being extremely close, if
not on the property 'line to parcel 1, and Staff is requiring
as a condition of the minor subdivision that is approved by
the City Engineer, that the garage be modified or relocated
so that it meets all setback requirements,
Commissioner Farrow inquired if it was feasible to put a
dedicated street, or access through, and provide enough land
area to separate the properties. The Planning Director
responded that they are blocked in by development in that
area; therefore, the idea of extending east or west in the
area is precluded by previous development.
The Commission adopted the following Resolution, approving
MS-526, based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein; with the addition of a Condition No. 8
in reference to the garage:
RESOLUTION NO. 1798, APPROVING THE CREATION OF ONE PANHANDLE
LOT AS PART OF A ,MINOR SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF TAMARACK AVENUE BETWEEN HIBISCUS CIRCLE AND JEFFERSON
STREET IN THE R-1-7500 ZONE. APPLICANT: JEFFRESS.
Marcus
L'Heureux
Jose'
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
.,
Marcus
L'Heureux
Jose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
M”NUTES .
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981
. \\. ,'
\ ‘\ l Page 10 C&MISSIONERS '
6. REPORT ON ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES.
The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as
contained in the Statement of the Matter, who also indicated
that this was a discussion item.
Commissioner L'Heureux inquired if an internal procedure will
be developed in order to keep track of these kinds of
variances that are approved, so a record could be kept of
what is being approved and what is being denied. The Planning
Director responded that, as a matter of policy, they would be
put on(an information basis to the Planning Commission.
The Assistant City Attorney further indicated that there would
have to be a mechanism for notifying the public of what the
decisions are.
The Commission directed staff to prepare a Zone Code
Amendment implementing AB 1557 pursuant to Alternative No. 3
as stated in the staff report.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS:
7. Resolution No. 1792. Bandemer & Schlehuber. m-230)
The Commission adopted the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 1792, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3,
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RP-Q, RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL
WITH A QUALIFIED OVERLAY ZONE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET BETWEEN LAGUNA DRIVE AND
HOME STREET. APPLICANT: BANDEMER AND SCHLEHUBER. 8
Commissioner Schlehuber abstained, due to a conflict of-
interest.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of March 25, 1981, were approved as submitted,
The minutes of April 1, 1981, were approved as corrected.
The minutes of April 8, 1981, were approved as corrected.
Marcus
L'Heureux
Jose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
Marcus ::'
L'Heureux
Jose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
Marcus
L'Heureux
3ose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
Marcus
L'Heureux
3ose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
Marcus
L'Heureux
Jose
Rombotis
Farrow
Schlehuber
IWTNUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 22, 1981 Page 11
DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Jim Hagaman, the Planning Director, reported on the City
Council meeting of April 21, 1981. He indicated that on the
Vallas appeal, Council approved the zone change, and directed
Staff to study the equestrian situation. He added that
Council is very concerned about horses crossing highways,
and sought to have Staff look at the equestrian area, as well
as the Parks and Recreation Consultant who is currently
reviewing the Parks and Recreation Element.
Mr. Hagaman also reported on the condominium project at
3efferson .and Laguna; which was approved by Council. Staff
has been directed to establish what the Department of Fish
and Game owns horizontally along the edge of the lagoon, and
what access points there are or are not.
Mr. Hagaman reported on the Pointe San Malo project, which he
indicated would be coming back to the Commission; He added
that Council certified the EIR, and granted the zone change,
and have referred same back for report.
Council has also asked for a report and conditions of the
development standards of the condominiums, which were not
addressed by the Planning Commission due to the denial of-the
zone change. Therefore, Council is requesting a
recommendation from the Planning Commission on same.
ADJOURNMENT
By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 9:43 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
JAMES C. HAGAMAN
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Ann R. Alleman, Minutes Clerk