Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-08-26; Planning Commission; MinutesMINUTES MEETING OF: DATE OF MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION August 26, 1981 TIME OF MEETING: 7:00 P.M.- PLACE OF MEETING: Council Chambers COMMISSIONERS ’ CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Marcus at 7:02 P.M. ROLL CALL Present - Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Rombotis, Jose, Friestedt, and L'Heureux. Commissioner Farrow arrived at 7:03 P.M. Absent - Commissioner Schlehuber. Ex-Officio Members James Hagaman, Planning Director; and Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, were also present. Staff members present were: Michael Holzmiller, Principal Planner Bill Hofman, Associate Planner Charles Grimm, Associate Planner Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Marcus. AGENDA ITEM COMMUNICATIONS Michael Holzmiller indicated that Staff had received a request by letter from a Mr. Murphy to address the Commission, as an off-agenda item, regarding the modifications to the landscaping for the Murphy/Wilson parking lot. Staff advised Mr. Murphy that if he wished to address the matter before the Commission, he could do so at the end of the regular agenda. The Commission concurred. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES Chairman Marcus explained Planning Commission procedures in its capacity as an advisory Commission to the City Council, and identified those matters delegated to the Planning Commission for a final decision. Chairman Marcus further explained the procedure observed by the Commission during public heaing items. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. GPA-60, CITY OF CARLSBAD. Revisions to Housing Element of General Plan. Charles Grimm gave a staff report on the matter, and indicated that in addition to the changes listed in the staff report, there was a new change on page 21. Under section V-10, Mr. Grimm explained that since the new element has additional programs included in it, Staff would like to change this particular section, so that it would apply to all programs. .- August 26, 1981 MINUTES Page 2 Staff is therefore suggesting that the wording be changed in section V-IO to, "The City will adopt programs for rent regulations and resale control where federal subsidies mandate such programs, or where the City Council deems necessary to ensure that units developed pursuant to the goals, policies, and action program of the housing element will remain available to persons of low and moderate income." Mr. Grimm added that Staff feels that the changes which have been made to the housing element are relatively minor, and they include firming up the City's commitment by adding such words as :"shall" and "will" to the program, rather than "may," which is in the existing text. Staff also added the new area wide housing opportunity plan numbers into the text, as requested by HCD. Staff does not feel the changes have any real dramatic effect, and they do not see any new issues relative to the housing element being created by these changes. In response to Commission query regarding the effect on the City if no housing element was adopted, the Assistant City Attorney explained that if the City did not have a housing element, they could not approve any development. If the City does not have a certified General Plan by October 1, we lose the statutory presumption that the plan was developed in accordance with HCD guidelines. Mr. Hentschke continued to explain that the City would have an adopted General Plan, that in the City's opinion, meets the requirements, but in HCD's opinion does not meet the requirements. If someone chose to litigate the issue and stop development, the City would have to go into Court and prove that the element was adopted in conformance with the guidelines. If it has not been adopted in conformance with the guidelines, we would have a non-conforming housing element, and no General Plan. If we do not amend the General Plan and get HCD certification, and our housing element is found not to be in compliance with the guidelines, then we are required by October 1 to adopt a new housing element that is in compliance with newly adopted statutes, which spell out what housing elements shall contain. The new statutes contain more restrictive language than the old guidelines. They require a much greater commitment is resources and funds, and a much greater commitment to various types of programs. Mr. Hentschke concluded that if the City does not make the changes, we run the risk of someone challenging the element, and also precluding development until the City has a new housing element. Commission discussion reflected the sections dealing with reserve sewer capacity, and density. Commissioner Rombotis requested clarification on section v-17. Michael Holzmiller explained that per direction from the City Council last year, Staff has been working on a program, and the first part will be coming to the Commission next month. The first part deals with reducing the density in the existing zones that are inconsistent with the maximum densities allowed by the General Plan. MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 3 4 COMMISSIONERS ’ \ Mr. Holzmiller continued that at the same time, the purpose is to come up with a new General Plan designation that would permit a higher density than is allowed under the existing General Plan, and then to create a zone to implement that; and to apply that zone under very limited circumstances, in attempt to obtain low or moderate income housing; or to accomplish the point that Commissioner L'Heureux referred to in the industrial area of applying the higher density designation so that you could get a greater density of development per housing unit. Commissioner Friestedt stated his opinion that the City will find itself in a difficult position in stating that we are going to create an ordinance, and create a new density without defining same. He added that he feels we should define what we want to do, and then create it. He indicated his feeling that the City Council has not given clear enough direction to the Commission, Staff, or the Planning Department as to what the criteria should be for the new ordinance. He further stated that he would feel comfortable with V-17 being included in the housing element. Charles Grimm explained that the purpose of including this in the General Plan is not to come up with the standards at this time; but only to give the City the power to come up with the zoning standards in the future. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:24 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. With regard to section V-17, Commissioner Friestedt inquired if he understood same; in that Staff has indicated the intent to provide the vehicle for exercising the Council's power in the future to create a zone. Director Hagaman explained that the City has a policy, and the Council has adopted it. The General Plan is of a very low density, and they have applied it to the low and moderate income unit of the housing element. They are in the process of developing such a zone. He stated his opinion that it can be done, and we can go higher density. He added that this is the intent of a program to attempt to accomplish something. The Commission recommended to the City Council not to adopt the changes proposed in the Housing Element, and denied Resolution No. 1855. 2. CT 81-23, A&W VENTURES. Request for a six lot Tentative Tract Map on the east side of Park Drive between Calavo Drive and Hillside Drive in the R-1-10,000 Zone. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, Michael Holzmiller gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. In reference to page 2 of the staff report, third paragraph, Commissioner Jose expressed concern as to the wording of same; and inquired if the applicant has been required to enter into an agreement for the improvements. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 4 Michael Holzmiller explained that that would be a requirement as part of the final subdivision map, and what is proposed here is what they are going to attempt to do. Commissioner Jose inquired if the applicant has agreed to do this in the event that this is approved by the Commission. Mr. Holzmiller indicated that Staff has not heard any objection from the applicant on the issue. Commissioner Jose suggested that the wording be changed to "shall be required to enter into an agreement," instead of "would." Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:33 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Jean Jensen, P. 0. Box 1307, Carlsbad; Planning Consultant for R. B. Hill and Associates, Inc. Ms. Jensen indicated that the applicant is going to accept Staff's recommendations, and expressed the willingness to respond to any questions. Commissioner Farrow inquired if the applicant had any objection to the change of wording suggested by Commissioner Jose. Ms. Jensen indicated that the applicant has already agreed to take care of that issue. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:34 P.M. Commissioner Rombotis inquired if this subdivision complies with the grading ordinance. Richard Allen explained that it will have to meet the grading ordinance, and he has reviewed the proposed plan. With regard to the l-1/2 to 1 slope, adjacent to the public right of way; Mr. Allen indicated that the applicant will be required to have a soils report to justify that the l-1/2 to 1 will be stable. Ms. Jensen indicated that they have done a soils report, and same has been approved. Commissioner L'Heureux expressed concern over the sight distance at Park Drive and Adams Avenue, as there are no improvements on that particular corner. Richard Allen explained that there is one intersection along Bristol Cove where the Engineering Department is looking into doing some changes with a City contract. He indicated that they have accumulated a number of future agreements of properties along Park Drive, and are in the process of notifying those property owners to construct their improvements. Commissioner L'Heureux referred to the existing house that will be served by the panhandle, and inquired if special design will be implemented so that the water will run down Whitey Drive. Richard Allen responded that he was not familiar with the drainage on that lot; however, the drainage on Whitey Drive will have to handled in a proper manner. He added that we are requiring them to take access off the public street. MINUTES August 26, 1981 The Commission approved the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopted the following Resolution, recommending approval of CT 81- 23 to the City Council, based on the findings and subject to the Conditions contained therein: 3. RESOLUTION NO. 1852, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SIX LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PARK DRIVE BETWEEN CALAVO DRIVE AND HILLSIDE DRIVE IN THE R-?-10,000 ZONE. APPLICANT: A&W DEVELOPMENT CT 81-26/CP-170, LA BRETCHE. Request for a 24 unit Tentative Tract Map and Condominium project on property located on the north side of Navarra Drive between Viejo Castilla Way and the cul-de- sac in the RD-M Zone. Bill Hofman gave the staff report, with the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project. With regard to the visitor parking, Mr. Hofman indicated that Staff is aware of the Commissions' concerns about same; however, it should be noted that this project was in process, prior to the concerns being raised at the last workshop meeting. Mr. Hofman continued that in this instance, Staff feels the visitor parking will be acceptable; however, in the new guidelines given Staff by the Commission, this situation would be discouraged in all future applications. Mr. Hofman further indicated that there were revisions to Fire Department Conditions No. 24 and 26: Condition No. 24 will read, "The parking garage shall be sprinklered, unless required openings are provided." Condition No. 26 will read, "Due to poor access to the rear building, a horizontal dry standpipe system shall be installed, unless said building is fully sprinklered." Mr. Hofman explained that the Fire Department felt these revised conditions would be more enforceable. In addition, Mr. Hofman distributed a list of ownership interest to the Commission, and explained same should have been contained in the staff report. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:47 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Frank Fitzpatrick, 455 N. Hale, Escondido; the engineer on the project. Mr. Fitzpatrick indicated that they have read and accepted the conditions of approval, and requested approval of the plan as presented. Commissioner Farrow stated that in looking at the plan, he does not see any feasible means of putting any more visitor parking on-site. The Commission recognized Herbert lewis, 6502 Morrow Heights Road, San Luis Rey; general contractor on the project. Mr. Lewis indicated that he was present to answer any questions the Commission might have. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 6 Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:49 P.M. The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopted the following Resolution, recommending approval of CT 81-26/CP-170, to the City Council, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the staff report; with the revision of Conditions No. 24 and 26 as outlined by Staff: RESOLUTION NO. 1856, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 24 UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NAVARRA STREET BETWEEN VIEJO CASTILLA WAY AND THE CUL-DE-SAC. APPLICANT: LA BRETECHE, LTD. 4. cm'-205, MOLA DEVELOPMENT. Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages at a restaurant on the east side of El Camino Real between Alga Road and Dove Lane in the C-l-Q Zone. The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as contained in the written staff report, with the aid of a transparency showing the location of the site. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:51 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. The Commission approved the Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance filed by the Planning Director, and adopted the following Resolution, approving CUP-205, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1853, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT THE "CRAZY BURRO" RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND DOVE LANE. APPLICANT: MOLA DEVELOPMENT. 5. CUP-140(A), COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Request for an amendment to an existing Conditional Use Permit to construct a recycling center adjacent to the Palomar Transfer Station located near the northeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real in the M-Q Zone. Michael Holzmiller indicated that Staff would like to request that this item be renroved from the agenda for further staff analysis, and re-noticed for a public hearing when the analysis was completed. Chairman Marcus inquired if anyone in the audience was present to address this item at 7:53 P.M. The Commission recognized Jane Skotnicki, 3535 Bedford Circle, Carlsbad. Mrs. Skotnicki stated that she believes in recycling, and feels that in this situation, she can not see why the City should have any complaints. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 7 COMMISSIONERS Mrs. Skotnicki continued to speak in favor of recycling. Commissioner Rombotis called attention to the last paragraph of Condition No. 14, and suggested that same is incorrectly worded. The Commission continued CUP-140(A) for re-noticing. 6. CT 81-29/PUD-23, ALICANTE HILLS. Request for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Unit Development to develop 38 single- family homes on the north side of Alfil Way west of Alicante Road in the R-1-10,000 Zone. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, Michael Holzmiller gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. For the purpose of the record, Commissioner Jose clarified that it is the La Costa/Daon Corporation. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:59 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Arnie Hamill, representing the Daon Corporation as Project Manager for Alicante Hills. He stated that Staff has summarized their project, as their intent was to provide a type of housing product that currently is not in the inventory of La Costa. Mr. Hamill showed a slide presentation on the project, and in conclusion, urged approval of the project. Mr. Hamill expressed concern with the standard City condition of a sidewalk, and urged consideration for deletion of same, as the applicant does not see a safety issue. However, he did indicate that if required, they would comply with same. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:05 P.M. Commissioner Friestedt stated that typically if that were a public dedicated street , sidewalks would be required on both sides. However, this is a private street in a private system, and he does not feel it is the case that the applicant be required to meet the City codes. Michael Holzmiller explained that one of the reasons Staff had decided to retain Condition No. 23 of Resolution No. 1859 was that sidewalks would be required on one side of the street, the southerly side of the private street; and Staff felt that it was necessary to have the sidewalk to allow pedestrian access to the recreational areas. Discussion reflected the width of the sidewalk. The concensus of the Commission was that they agreed with Staff on the internal circulation, and that the condition be reworded to provide "a sidewalk or an alternate circulation system to provide access to all the dwellings through the recreational facilities, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and/or the City Engineer." Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 8 Chairman Marcus inquired if the applicant was in agreement with the condition. Mr. Hamill responded that they could accomodate a four foot sidewalk better than a five foot sidewalk. The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopted the following Resolutions, recommending rescission of CT 75-6 and all amendments thereto, and recommending approval of CT 81- 29/PUD-33, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; with the revision of Condition No. 23 of Resolution No. 1859, as outlined: RESOLUTION NO. 1858, RECOMMENDING RESCISSION OF TENTATIVE MAP CT 75-6 AND ALL AMENDMENTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON ALICANTE ROAD AND ALFIL WAY. APPLICANT: ALICANTE HILLS RESOLUTION NO. 1859, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO CREATE LOTS FOR 38 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALFIL WAY, EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD. APPLICANT: ALICANTE HILLS RESOLUTION NO. 1860, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 38 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALFIL WAY, EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD. APPLICANT: ALICANTE HILLS 7. CT 79-25(B)/CP-176, RANCHEROS/MEADOW CREST. Request for an amendment to a previously approved Tentative Tract Map to amend the boundaries, revise the phasing and to process a 116 unit Condominium Permit on Phase V of CT 79-25, located east of El Fuerte Road, south of Alga Road, and west of Melrose Avenue in the P-C and RD-M(Q) Zones. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, the staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Commissioner Friestedt inquired if there were any significant changes or anticipated problems in grading, due to the topography. Richard Allen explained that the developer plans to put some fill on the condominium site, and the remainder of the map is unchanged. Commissioner Jose pointed out a correction to the staff report, on page 3, first paragraph, last sentence; in that it should read "Exhibit I," not "Exhibit H." Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:16 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Jim Goff, 1241 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad; representing the Daon Corporation. Mr. Goff indicated that they have reviewed the staff report, and concur with the recommendations. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 9 With regard to the concern relative to the grading, Mr. Goff explained that it is approximately 50,000 cubic yards short on the site, that will have to be imported. He added that they have no problem with moving the parking spaces onto whatever drawing is appropriate. In conclusion, Mr. Goff expressed the willingness to respond to any questions. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:18 P.M. The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopted the following Resolutions, recommending approval of CT 79-25(B) and CP- 176 to the City Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; with the modifications concerning the clarification of parking spaces on the exhibits: RESOLUTION NO. 1857, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A 104 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CHANGE THE PHASING, INCLUDE A REMAINDER PARCEL AND PREVIOUSLY DESIGNATED SCHOOL SITE ON PROPERTY GENERAUY LOCATED SOUTH OF ALGA ROAD, EAST OF EL FUERTE ROAD AND WEST OF MELROSE AVENUE IN THE P-C AND RD-M(Q) ZONES. APPLICANT: RANCHEROS RESOLUTION NO. 1862, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 116 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALGA ROAD AND MELROSE AVENUE. APPLICANT: MEADOW CREST 8. ZCA-137, CITY OF CARLSBAD. Request for approval of miscellaneous amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and Environmental Protection Ordinance. Michael Holzmiller suggested moving this item to the end of the agenda, since it is a City-initiated item involving amendments to the Code. Chairman Marcus inquired if anyone in the audience was present to address this item, and received no response. The Commission agreed to hear this item at the end of the agenda. RECESS Chairman Marcus called a recess at 8:20 P.M., and the Commission reconvened at 8:30 P.M., with six members present. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ITEMS: 9. Ms-532, HARKINS. Request for approval of a Minor Subdivision to create three lots; two of which are panhandle lots, on the north side of Pine Avenue between Pio Pica and Highland in the R-l- 7500 Zone. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, Michael Holzmiller gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 10 Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:32 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Glenn McComas, 1265 Cynthia Lane, Carlsbad; representing Mr. and Mrs. Bill Harkins. Mr. McComas stated that they understand that the dwelling units, other than the main house, do create a planning problem, and that same would require mitigation. He added that they do not wish to see the application denied on the basis of the unit located at the point. Mr. McComas continued to request that the Commission approve the application with a mitigation request, and with a requirement that the non-conforming lot be removed. He indicated that the applicant does wish to retain the guest house. He added that to his knowledge, no objections have been submitted by any neighbor or surrounding property owner. Discussion reflected on the creation of panhandle lots, versus cul-de-sacs. Mr. McComas requested that the Commission express their desire, and mitigate to that extent, rather than a denial. Michael Holzmiller explained that if the Commission denies this item, they will only be denying the proposal to do a minor subdivision with panhandles, and the applicant could still come in an revise the minor subdivision map to show a public street. Director Hagaman explained that the applicant could also appeal the decision to the City Council. The Commission adopted the following Resolution, denying MS-532, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the staff report: RESOLUTION NO. 1835, DENYING THE CREATION OF TWO PANHANDLE LOTS AS PART OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PINE AVENUE IN THE R-1-7500 ZONE. APPLICANT: HARKINS NEW DISCUSSION ITEMS: 10. SDP-78-1(B), HUBBARD. Request for approval of a Site Development Plan to develop an industrial/office complex on the east side of El Camino Real, north of Palmer Way in the M-Q Zone. Bill Hofman gave a staff report on the matter, with the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project. The Commission pointed out that Condition No. 34 on page 5 of Resolution No. 1854 is the same as Condition No. 13. Staff indicated that it was an error, and same should be deleted. The Commission recognized James Leary, 11545 Sorrento Valley Road, San Diego; Architect representing the applicant. Mr. Leary stated they are in agreement with the staff report; however, with regard to Condition No. 11, the applicant did submit a sign criteria outlining a sign program, and therefore question this condition. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow A--. MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 11 Bill Hofman explained that the sign criteria was not reviewed in detail by the Staff as part of this application. He stated that Staff will review same, and if it does meet the sign ordinance, the condition will be satisfied; however, Staff would like to retain the condition until the sign criteria is approved. Mr. Leary referred to Condition No. 16, regarding the key- card pump facility, and stated that the applicant feels this is a forward-looking type feature of the project, and requests deletion of same. Michael Holzmiller explained that the reason for the condition is that anytime gasoline is dispensed to the public, it falls under the definition of a service station, and requires a conditional use permit. The condition was included to let the applicant know that it is not approved as part of this application, and if they requested approval, they would have to apply for a conditional use permit. Mr. Leary stated that they understood this; however, the wording leads them to believe that it is specifically dis- approved. The Assistant City Attorney suggested the addition of the wording, "as part of this application," to the end of Condition No. 16 of Resolution No. 1854. The Commission concurred. The Commission approved the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopted the following Resolution, approving SDP 78-l(~), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; with the deletion of Condition No. 34 on page 5, and the modification of Condition No. 16 to read, n "The key-card pump facility and driveway cut to service same, as shown on Exhibit "A", are specifically not approved as part of this application:" RESOLUTION NO. 1854, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 78-l(~), TO DEVELOP AN INDUSTRIAL/OFFICE COMPLEX ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF PALMER WAY. APPLICANT: HUBBARD 11. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC. Report of compliance regarding conditions of approval of a single stack at the Encina Power Plant on property generally located on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Cannon Road and the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Michael Holzmiller gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. The Commission recognized Jane Skotnicki, 3535 Bedford Circle, Carlsbad; who indicated she is a member of the Community Resource Panel of the Regional Air Quality Control Strategy Committee. Mrs. Skotnicki expressed concern that the staff report does not contain any statistics. She indicated she has spent the last two months working on the bi-annual report for air quality in San Diego County. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 12 Mrs. Skotnicki continued to suggest that before the matter goes before the City Council, it should be expanded, and contain more definitive information. Commissioner Jose indicated that he has not seen the report that Mrs. Skotnicki referred to; however, the one he saw mentioned cleaning the stack mOre frequently, the possibility of the use of gas instead of the low sulfur fuel due to the cost of oil, and that it is of a lessor pollution factor than the old system. He added that he would go along with Mrs. Skotnicki's suggestion that the Staff expand and provide this information to the Council, should the Commission pass this on at this meeting. Mrs. Skotnicki pointed out that the Plant is one of the two largest stationary pollution producers, and may be the largest, in the County. Chairman Marcus suggested that it might be appropriate that the Commission consider referring this back to Staff, for review of the Reasonable Further Progress Report which Mrs. Skotnicki referred to. The Commission recognized George W. Flanders, 2168 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad. Mr. Flanders stated he reviewed the staff report, and feels there are some pertinent questions that should be addressed to APCD and San Diego Gas & Electric; i.e., use of natural gas, and emission reduction. Michael Holzmiller stated that that is why Staff is recommending that the City still be provided. with an annual report, in case they do change any kind of operation. The Commission accepted the report as satisfying the conditions required by SP-144(B) and forwarded same to the City Council, recommending its acceptance with the stipulation that the final APCD report which will be completed in April 1982 be reviewed by the City Council at that time, and that SDG&E continue to submit the required annual report; and that the documents referred to in discussion at this meeting be made available to the City Council. OFF-AGENDA ITEM: 12. MURPHY/WILSON PARKING LOT. Michael Holzmiller explained that when the development was approved, a request was made to the Commission to allow two separate ownerships to have a comprehensive parking arrangement, where they would share parking. Although it was under two separate ownerships, it was centered around the same parking lot. As part of the approval of the joint use of the parking, the Planning Commission required that Mr. Murphy landscape the parking lot, which was part of Mr. Wilson's property. Mr. Murphy, at this time, has some problems in complying with exactly how the plan was approved. He requested that Staff allow some modifications, and some areas to be deleted. Staff did not want to do that, because the plan was approved by the Commission. Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 13 Michael Holzmiller continued to explain that there is no written staff report because the request was made late last week, and Staff has indicated to Mr. Murphy, because he does have some time constraints, that he could come to the Commission under an off-agenda item, and make his presentation, or he could hold up for a couple of weeks, and Staff could write a staff report. Michael Murphy addressed the Commission, and with the aid of a wall exhibit, explained the problems that the current landscape plan will create. Mr. Murphy submitted three drawings (Exhibits A, B, and C,) which show the auto overhang section, the recommended design, and the Staff recommendation of wheel stops two feet from the planter. Mr. Murphy indicated that they are ready to begin, and in talking with some landscapers, he has been advised that as is, it will be heavily maintainable, and is not cost efficient. Commission discussion included the proposed design, and the alternatives to same. The concensus of the Commission was that the landscaping would only be of esthetic value when there are few of no cars in the parking lot. The Commission approved the modifications as proposed by the applicant. ITEM OUT OF ORDER: 8. ZCA-137, CITY OF CARLSBAD. Request for approval of miscellaneous amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and Environmental Protection Ordinance. The Commission approved the Negative Declaration isssued by the Planning Director and adopted the following Resolution, recommending approval of ZCA-137, based on the findings contained in the staff report: RESOLUTION NO. 1861, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE AND CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 20 IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO HAVE FINAL APPROVAL AUTHORITY IN CERTAIN MATTERS AND TO MAKE THE ORDINANCES CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND OTHER RECENT LEGISLATION. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting, held August 12, 1981, were approved as corrected; Page 5, third paragraph, last sentence, changing "compatible," to "incompatible." Also, on page 6, paragraph 11, adding in parentheses after Jeanette Lowe, "aka Ike." Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Marcus Rombotis Jose Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow MINUTES August 26, 1981 Page 14 COMMISSIONERS ADJOURNMENT By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, JAMES C. HAGAMAN Secretary to the Planning Commission Ann R. Alleman, Minutes Clerk Exhibit A <- OLD wow GWEP l?p++JB 6-2G7-&I BIZO Exhibit B OLD WGLD CENfep F?hpwW B*QG-01 612& Exhibit C OLD wQpLF3 (33nEP p)rzWtJG 0-20931 a20