The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1983-01-26; Planning Commission; MinutesMeeting of: Date of Meeting: Time of Mee ting : Place of Meeting: CALL TO ORDER: MINUTES l'IANNI?«; OOM-IISSION January 26, 1983 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers The meeting was called to order by Chairman Schlehuber at 7 :03 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present -Chairman Schlehuber, Coumi~sionera Rombotis, Marcus, Farrow, Jose and Friestedt. Absent -Coumissioner Rawlins . Staff Members Present: Charles Grium, Principal Planner Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer Ex-Officio Members Present: Michael Ho l zmiller, Land Use Planning Manager Da.1iel Hentschke, Auistant City Attorney PLEDGE OF ALLl!GIANCE was led by Chairman Schlehuber. PIANNI?«; OOtlHSSION PROCEDURES: Chairman 2chlehuber announced the Planning Coumission Procedure as printed on the reverse side of the Agenda and he gave a short suumary of the Procedure. The Coumission granted a continuance until February 9, 1983, on Item 14 -ZC-269, WSK, since no one wished to speak on this subject, as requested by applicant. NK'W PUBLIC HBAIU!ES: l. CUP-224, Cllll -Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow~ sandwich shop in a portion of Suite A at 2382 Camino Vida Roble in the Palomar Air- port Business Park in the P-M Zone. Charle• Gri11111, Principal Planner, used an overhead trans- parency to show the aite, with staff-recoumended approval, •• contained in the Staff Report. Chairman Schlehuber open~d the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Since no one viahed to apeak on this matter, the public hearing••• cloaed. C-iaaioner Harcua aaked about pedestrian crossing at thia aite, and vaa aaaured a aignal light will be 1natalled in the future. 'Iba C-iaaiou approved the Negatf.ve Declaration iHued by tba Land Uae Planning Manager and adopted the following .. 1t0lut1on: U10wno11 110, 2072. APPIK>VI!E A CONDITIONAL USE PaNIT '1'0 ALU>W A Till-OUT SANDWICH Sll>P ON PROPBllTY GIIIIAU.Y U>CATID IN SUITE A AT 2382 CAKIII> VID.\ ROBt I. Schlehuber X Rombotia X X Marcus X Farrow X Jose X Frieatedt X Schlehuber I loabotia I Harcua I Parrow I Joae I I ' Prieatedt I MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION January 26, 1983 Page 2 2. CT 81-17/PUD-46, MANDANA CORPORATION -Request for a 148-lot subdivision located approximately one mile east of El Camino Real at the western terminus of Sunny Creek Road in the R-E Zone. Mike Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager, gave the staff report, using a transparency to show the location of the site and a wall map to show the planned project. When this plan was originally submitted, staff thought it did not meet the intent of the R-E Zone requirements and so indicated to the applicant, but staff wa~ willing to consider the proposal. A meeting was arranged with the applicant and the surrounding property owners and staff attended the meeting. Although there were several concerns expressed, the over-all feeling was that the surrounding property owners did not object to the concept as proposed by the applicant. At first, staff thought of bringing just the policy issue to the Planning Canmission, but decided to bring the plan before the C01111.1issi on to allow them to see the proposed concept. Staff did set up a criteria for this project. The proposal does not meet the criteria set down by staff, as outlined in the staff report. A copy of the R-E Zone was provided to the Commission for their review. The main issue is one of policy, and that should be decided first, as to whether the concept does comply with the intent of the R-E Zone. Coo.missioner Farrow stated he wanted to make some comments prior to the public testimony . After considering all the factors involved, he felt this property was correctly zoned R-E, but this project does not meet the intent of the R-E Zone, and he questioned whether they had a large enough piece of property. The City designated this piece of property as R-E, and it is the only one in the City of Carlsbad. This project is a good one, but it does not fit the intent of the R-E Zone, and if the R-E Zone is to be retained, it would be difficult to accept this project on this piece of property. .1'.lso, if this ~roject were approve<\ with changes made and on a trade-off basis, it wouldn't be setting a ~recedent within the City of Carlsbad. He stated he liked the project--but it doesn't meet R-E Zone intent. Chairman Schlehuber opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. 'Iha Comiasion recognized Mr. Don Agatep, 2956 Roosevelt, Carlsbad, representing the Mandana Corporation, who stated he understood the principle. However, he stated he took exception to the interpretation of the intent of the R-E Zone. 'Iha R-E Zone intended to allow large-lot developnents in the City of Carlsbad. This large-lot statement was us\aed under the auspices of the sewer moratorium--if you had a septic tank, you had to have bigger lols--to create a rural subdivision environ111ent when fe&sible. It is his i~pression the PUD Ordinance allows for innovative designs, and with the open spaces, the golf course, the ponds, the applicant had to reduce the lot size to less than one acre. Mr. Agatep used the graphic to show the sizes of the lots and their positions in the project. MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION January 26, 1983 Page 3 COMMISSIONERS Mr. Agatep questioned whether the R-E Zone was the proper Zone for this property at this time. He felt the project should be returned to staff with an approval and his client could do some re-design of the project and come up with something acceptable to staff. Commissioner Friestedt asked what the active open space was and the passive space--what percentage--and Mr. Agatep answered approximately 25 to 30 percent that he classified as active open space, not counting any passive open space such as setbacks, slopes, etc. In answer ~D a question from Commissioner Jose as to whether the golf course would be available to the public, Mr. hgalep stated there would l.Je me.'ni,~rships available to the public; it would be a private club with memberships av:iilable to the citizens of Carlsbad. Crnmnissioner Farrow asked Mr. Agatep if they had discussed u,~ phasing to insure developing the golf course first. Mr. Agatep stated that it would be started in the first phase, but might not be completed until a later phase. Commissioner Friestedt commented that in cases of this kind, where there is a trade-off and the golf course is a signifi- cant factor in that trade-off, it certainly should be built first. Mr. Agatep assured the Commission that if they did approve the project, by the time the applicant returned for conditions of approval, a time frame would be set up for the building of the golf course. It would not be just a promise for the future. Chairman Schlehuber asked about the ownership of t:he golf course and the maintenance and Mr. Agatep answered it would be in the C.C.&R. 's of the project and the homeowners would be the owners . The Commission recognized Mr. Robert Sonneborn, 3985 Stella Maris, Carlsba~, who spoke in favor of the subdivision, listing the assets of the plan and expensive type of sub- division; also he stated he was surprised at the recommen- dation to deny the project. Ms. Ione Elsner, 730 Las Palmas, Vista, addressed the C011111ission as an interested citizen. She stated she had no interest in the project per se, but wanted the right kind of growth for Carlsbad. She felt this project would be an asset to the City and would also want the golf course built first. The Commission next recognized Mr. Jim Hagaman, 5320 Sunny Creek Road, CarJ.11bad, who spoke in opposition to the projec1 . He stated it did not meet the intent of the R-E Zone and as a property owner in that area, he fult the Commission and the property owners should get together to see where they are going with the entire area. Mr. Russell Grosse, 5850 sunny Creek Road, carlsbad, was the next speaker, and he stated he was in favor of the concept, but felt it did not oonfor111 to the Rural Estate lone. He alao stated you could build to the exact code and ■till have it look like tract housing, and he felt thi■ plan avoided that with the design they presented. Thia would be a desirable place for executives to live and Mr. Grosse suggested that with prices as they are on real eat&te, perhaps Carlabad can no longer afford an R-E zone. He at&ted he was ■peaking for his neighbor, Mr, Gribble, who ha■ the same feelings. MINUTES PLANNING 001'9'1ISSION January 26, 1983 Page Cotmnissioner Friestedt asked how many ,.ots would be lost in order to comply with the subdivision minimum of one acre for each lot, and Mr . Agatep answered that it would probably cause them to lose one or two lots. This did not take into consideration the slope requirement . Since no one else wished to speak on this matter, the public testimony was closed at 8:00 p.m. Commissioner Marcus stated the project does not meet the intent of the R-B Zone, and she could not support the request in its present form. Chairman Schlehuber asked what kind of road would be put in and Mike Holzmiller replied there would be two new roads put in eventually. He used the overhead projector to show the location of the two roads that would be built. One road would be built to acc011mOdate the initial units built and when needed, the second road would be put in. Cotmnissioner Rombotis inquired whether there were other properties in the area that would annex to the R-B Zone, or was this an R-B island. Mike Holzmiller used the wall maps showing Zoning and Land Use to indicate there is property to the North that is still in the County that might be s·1itable for R-E, but there are no plans on this property at this time. Commissioner Rombotis stated it do~e not fit the R-E Zone aE presented and felt the project could not be approved withoul changing the zoning, or re-submitting the plan. Commissioner Friestedt stated that i f the applicant were to reduce the plan by two or three lots and make all lo ts conform with the size requirement, and with innovative design as presented, then it would be a viable project. Coamissioner Farrow re-■tated his feelings that it is not in harmony with the terrain and wildlife. He would like a compromise, if possible, but would not want to amend the R-B Zone. Commissioner Jose agreed that the project does not meet with the intent of the R-B Zone and could not be approved on that basis . 'lbe Coamiasion diacusoed the possibility of sending the project back to a workshop .snd letting staff and the applicant work together to c0111e up with an acceptable plan. Mr. Agatep re~ueated some time to confer with his client and the Coamis■ion agreed to trail this item for that purpo•~- 3. y-345. 367 JSlllZ C'(IQ'ANY -Request to allow two above- grade decks to be built to the rear property line of a proposed condoaini\111 project on property located at 7506 Jerea Court, La eo.ta, in the RD-M Zone. Cha~les Grima s ave the presentation on this item, aa con- taiaed in the n aff report. Cbairaan Schlehuber coaaented that a ■imilar requeat on adjoining property had been denied, but a building penait bad been i aaued and tha deck was built. MINUTES PLANNING CCIOIISSION January 26, 1983 Page 5 !~ ~\ ~:f'~~ COMMISSIONERS ~ ~~ m.\ Chairman Schlehuber opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr . Rob Wilkinson, 3331 Fosca Street, Carlsbad, addressed the Comnission. He stated their property was on the 15th hole of the La Costa golf course with an unobstructed view across the golf course, using a transparency to show the location of the property. He didn't feel a precedent would be set by allowing this request and pointed out they had volunteered to seek a variance. Comnissioner Jose asked Mr. Wilkinson what would happen to the lanJ underneath these decks, inasmuch as the deck• would be eight feet above ground, and Mr. Wilkinson point ed out the units would be semi-stacked with part of a patio underneath the deck. He stated further the decks would be concrete and there would be no drainage onto the patio below. Mr. Wilkinson asked the Comnission to consider giving them something to work with, even if the Comnission found they could not grant the request as presented. Chairman Schlehuber read into the record a letter received from Maury Goosenberg, as follows: January 20, 1983 City of Carlsbad Planning Comnission 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 re: Case file V-345 Gentlemen: Circlllll8tances prevent my wife and me from attending the public hearing scheduled for January 26, 1983, in the matte1 of a variance to allow two above-grade decks to be built to the rear property line on property generally to be located at 7506 Jerez Court ln Carlsbad. I We are against the granting of the proposed variance. TherE is now no above-grade deck on any rear property line betwee1 our property at 7505 Jerez Court and the end of the golf courae, and to construct such decks as requested would, in our opinion, obstruct the present and future clear and unobatructed view of the golf courae froa our property. We hope that the C:0-iaaion will take a similar stance to oura, and deny the requeated variance. Thank you, Maury Gooaenberg )Ir, Wilkin~on returned to the tranaparency to show that be felt ther~ vaa no -y the view of the people writing the letter could be i111>aired . Chairaan Schlehuber cloaed the public testimony a t 8:35 p.m. The A11 i 1tant City Attorney pointed out the difficulty with th• variance procedure. It 11 1uppo1ed to relieve any hard1hip placed upon the applicant. In thi1 ca1e, the fac t that a precedent va1 1at unintentionally doa1 not warrant allovina another illegal ~roject to be built. The Plannina eo.ti11ion aigbt want to con■ider denying thil (J) MINUTES PLANNING COtlifISSION January 26, 1983 Page 6 ,~o ~ .. \ ~ ~..,,,~ ~ COMMISSIONERS ~ ~~ ~\ request and initiating a Zone Code Amendment and direct staff to consider vhat kinds of encroachments should be allowed along a permanent open space area such as this. The following Resolution was adopted, without prejudice: RESOLUTION NO, 2075, DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW TWO ABOVE-GRADE DECKS TO BE BUILT TO THE RF.AR PROPERTY LINE OF A l'ROPl!RTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7506 JEREZ COURT. The C0111Dission directed staff to bring back a list of appropriate intrusions, such as this circumstance, to accoamodate a zone change where property abuts open space, within six weeks. The Coumiesion again took up Item 12 -CT 82-17/PUD -46- HANDANA CORPORATION, for further discussion. The Comnission discussed possible solutions with Mr. Don Agatep, repre- senting the applicant. A motion -wae 11Bde to continue to February 23, 1983. This motion was then withdrawn. A motion wae then made to deny CT 82-17/PUD-46, based on the findings in Resolution No. 2071. This motion died for lack of a second. The Coumission voted to continue CT 82-17/PUD-46-HANDANA CORPORATION -request for a 148-lot euhdivision located approximately one mile east of El Camino Real at the eastert ~erminue of Sunny Creek Road in the R-E Zone, for two weeks. RECESS: Chairman Schlehuber called a recess at 8:58 p.m. and the Coumission reconvened at 9:07 p.m. with all Comnission Members present, except Coumiseioner Rawlins. 5. CT 82-25/V-344. UKl!GAWA -Request for an eight-lot tentative tract map with a variance for setback reductions on the south side of Palomar Airport Road, east of Laurel Tr~e Lane in the PM-Q Zone. Mike Holzmiller explained to the Comnission that there was a reque1t for a continuation in this matter, and normally that reque1t comes from the applicant and is automatically granted. However, this request is from another individual and he will have to present valid reasons to consider a continuance. Also, the applicant should be allowed to state whether that continuance would cause him any hardship. He felt this continuance request should be heard before the 1taf~ pre1entation. The eo-i1aion recognized the individual asking for the continuance, Kr. Floyd Sellenger, 1303 Avocado, Newport leach, who addre1aed the eo-is1ion, stating h.! was aaking for a 60-day continuance. Thi1 continuance was requeated to allow tiae for Kr. Sellenger to hire engineer, and atudy what thi1 new uae of this land might do to the value of bia property. He felt it mi&ht be pca1ible that the zonlng on bla property ahould be chanaed, inaaaach •• now there would be ~laht lot• and uybe eight buildings inatead of the one toMto packin& abed that had previou1ly be.en approved for the property. Schlehuber X Rombotis X X Marcus X Farrow X Jose X Fries tedt X Schlehuber X Rombotis X X Marcus X Farrow X Jose X Friestedt X Schlehuber X Rombotis X Marcus X Farrow X X Jose X Friestedt X MINUTES PI.ANNIN~ COMMISSION January 26, 198] Page 7 Chainnan Schlehuber r•inded Mr. Sellenger that this property has been industrial for quite some time and this is not a request to change the zoning; that the Commission is simply talking about a plan on an industrial site. Commissioner Friestedt collll\ented that technically there could be a number of two-story tilt-up concrete buildings, or a variety of packing sheds. If Mr. Sellenger did not want this zoning, he should have appeared before the Commission at the time the zone change took place. Chainnan Schlehuber stated the applicant has people present for the public hearing anc he felt the hearing should procee,1. The Commission voted to proceed with the Public Hearing on CT 82-25/V-344, UJCEGAWA. Charles Grimm gave the presentation on this subject, using wall maps, as contained in the staff report. Chainnan Schlehuber asked if the piece of land left by the road change would be anything but open space, and Charles Grimm answered it would be large enough to be used as an industrial parcel. Commissioner Friestedt asked if the prope~ty owner next to this property had been notified that possibly a road change could be coming through his property and Charles Grirrrn said his Agent was present tonight and they were aware of the proposed changes. Chainnan Schlehuber opened the public testimony at 9: 27 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Don Agatep, 2956 Roosevelt Street, Carlsbad, repre- senting the applicant, addresaed the Commission. The applicant is requesting a sub.livision of the thirteen acres into eight lots, one to be open space and seven to be buildable. They requested the Co11111ission to amend Conditio 12-A to allow left turn ~ccess to Palomar Road on a tempor- ary basis, until a permanent alignment of Laurel Tree Lane is established. CoDlllissioner Farrow aaked Mr. Agatep to address the concern of the neighbor who asked for a continuance in this matter. Mr. Agatep stated this property owner was aware of their progr-and had not attended any hearings other than the Coastal Colaission, and they do not want to delay the project st thia time. Mr. Pete NaclCauf, 4218 Sltylin~ Drive, the General Manager o the Ukegawa P'aru, addressed the Coaaission. Their plan five year• ago was to improve the packing capability of their tomato farm by building an-packing facility on thia site. Thia waa the reaaon the propeity waa purchased. However, business has been so poor the last four years, the are j uat trying to stay in ~uai nesa. They need to realize a011e c apital froa this land ab soon as possible. Nr. Bob Ladwig , Rick Engineering, representing the Hunt ington Beach property, addressed the Coamisaion, adding their support to this project. Schlehuber X Rombotis X X Marcus X Farrow X Jose X Friestedt X G) MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION January 26 , 1983 Page 8 COIIIIIISIONERS Chainnan Schlehuber asked Mr. Ladwig why the road didn't continue through the Huntington Beach property straight across the street and Mr . Ladwig exp lained the road then would not meet the City requi re111ent s of l, 200 feet between intersections . This wi 11 be a major road with 102 feet of right-o f-way and intersections every quarter of a mile . Since no one else wished to speak on this matter, Chairman Schlehuber closed the puhlic t estimony at 9:37 p.m. Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer, reported the left turns onto Paloaar Airport Road could be permitted as long as it was a teaporary situation. If the time came when this created a hazard, then left turns would not be allowed. The Co-iss1on approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the followi,,g Resolutions : RESOLUTION NO . 2073, APPROVING AN EIGHT LOT TEN'.:ATIVE TRACT MAP ON PROPER1'Y GENERALLY LOCATED ON niE S:)t.JTH- SIDE Of' PALOMAR AIRPORT ~AD. EAST Of' LAUREL TREE LANE. RESOLUTION NO. 2074, APPROVING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE 1".-IE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR SEVEN LOTS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE Of' PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF LAUREL TREE LANE, INCLUD'NG VARIANCE V-344 AND WITH REVISED l;l-A CONDI'l'IC.'. C011111iasioner RolnboUt> announced he would remove himself from the Colllnisaion for Items 6 and 7, as he owns property in the area wh1ch might be affected. 6. GPA-68(A), CITY OF CARLSBAD -Amendaents to the Land Use Plan and minor amendments to the t ext of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to bring them into confonaance with the adopted Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan. Presentation was given by Charles Grimll essentially as in the staff report. Chairman Schlenubor opened the public hearing at 9:43 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Wayn C.llahan, representing Cal Connuni ties, who is developing th• Kelly properties, 18002 Sky Park Circle, addressed the c.c-iasion. He stated he would like to see a decision delayed until~ future ti.me to see where the CC..tal C~isaion is going. Na. Ion• Elenor, 7 JO Laa Palau, Vista, was recognized by th• C:C-iaaion, and stated s he was part owner of two parcels of land on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. She stated they had :,pent so much tiae with the Coaatal C:C-iasion and it had been accepted and it should be accepted now. Since no one else wished to speak on this 1aatter, the public testiaony was closed at 9146 9.a. Charlu Grua stated that they -re only asking to bring the Lan4 Uee Plan into oonfoniance and 11\aking the two doc\aents ooMietAU\t. The usietant City Attorney stated the changes bein9 propoeed by th• at.ff apply only to the portion that deei9nate■ what land ueea will be in the Land Use e1-.nt. Schlehuber Rombotis Marcus Farrow Jose Friestedt X X X X X X X MINUTES PI.ANNI?«; cntMISSION January 26, 1983 Page 9 COMMISSIONERS The Agua Hedi~nda Land Use Plan is a Council document. The Council has approved it and the Coastal Comiission has ~ertified the Council action. It is a City of Carlsbad plan We could amend the Cor.atal Plan at any time, if we followed the procedures set by State law. The Co11111isaion adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUllON NO. 2070, RECCMIENDING APPROVAL OF AMEND- MENTS '00 THE LAND USE PLAN AND TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELBMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO OONFORM WITH THE ADOPTED AGUA HIIDIONDA LAND USE Pl.AN, 7. ZCA-159, CI TY OF CARLSBAD -AMENI»{ENT '00 THE ZONING ORDINANCE, to provide for review of coastal develop- ment pet"lllit applications consistent with the ce~tlfie~ Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan of the City of Catlsbad. Charles Gr i11111 gave the presentation using a map to st.ow the property, as contained in the staff report. Chairman Schlehuber opened the public hearing at 9:56 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Ms. Ethel Watham, 4360 Sunny Hill, Carlsbad, addressed the Co11111ission, asking how this affected her property. It is zoned R1M--will it stay that way or will it be changed? Charles Griom answered her, assuring her the zoning would stay RIM, zero to four, but, an applicant would not have to go to the Coastal Colllllission and could just come to the City of Carlsbad. To change the density, it'would have to come to the City of Carlsbad and a General Plan Amendment and zoning change would have to be made. All property owners would be notified of that type of action. Mr. Vick Arndt, 4625 Park Drive, Carlsbad, addressed the Co11111iasion in favor of this parcel being specifically zoned and controlled by t he City of Carlsbad as R1M density. Ma. Jerry Alexander, (no address given) asked if one of the pieces of property circled belonged to them; it looked as though it did. It was her property and she was assured it was designated as RMH and would not change. Chairman Schlehuber informed the audience that this will not change zones. The City of Carlsbad could issue permits for deve lopmen instead of the applicants having to go through the Cosstal Coimiission. The Assistant City Attorney stated that at this time it is a two-step procedure to develop property; the Coastal Commission and the City of Carlsbad. The City of Carlsbad vould like to issue permita for the entire area, but at this time the only ones the City can i ssue are for the properties outlined in blue on the map. The rest of the people will still have to go through both the Coastal Co11111iaaion and the City. The City is really trying to regain control of the Lagoon. Ma. Joyce J-e•, 3931 Garfield, addressed the Co11111iaaion from the audience, asking about a piece of property which wasn't outlined. Staff agreed that it should have been included with the other properties outlined i n blue . Schlehuber Rombotia Marcus Farrow Jose Friestedt X X X X X X X MINUTES PLANNING <XJMMISSION January 26, 1983 Page 10 Since no one else wiahed to speak on the matter, the public testimony was closed at 10:05 p.m. The C:0-ission adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO, 2076, RBCO!l'IKNDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CODE AM!NlllERT, AMENDING TITLE 21, OF THE CAlUSRAD MUNICIPAL CODE, BY TIIE ADDITION OF CHAPTER 21.80 PROVIDING FOR REVIEW OF OOASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS CDNSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED AGUA HEDIONM LAND USE PLAN OF THE CITY OF CAlUSRAD. C:0-issioner R.ombotis returned to the Commission at 10:08 p. 11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes of the December 8, 1982, Meeting were approved as presented. The Minutes of the December 22, 1982, Meeting were approved as corrected; adding to Coumissioner Jose's conment on page 3, "due to the proximity of the two exits". The Minutes of the January 12, 1983, Meeting were carried over until the next meeting. TRAVEL Rll}UEST: Commissioner Marcus asked the Coumission's approval to attend the Conference at Monterey, CA., March 2, 3 and 4, 1983. Chairman Schlehuber asked anyone wishing to attend to please let Mike Holzmiller know as so, as possible. ADJOURRIENT: By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 10:18 p.m. Reapectfully submitted, . 0 -~ I Ln 'rd\ .~ ... " ... ,Vl h MICHAEL J. i>;~ .... Land Use Planning Manager Harriett Babbitt, Minutes Clerk Schlehuber .I Rombotis .I Marcus X Farrow X Jose X X Friestedt X Schlehuber X Rombotia X Marcus X Parrow X Jose X X Friestedt X Schlehuber X R.ombotis X Marcus X Farrow X Jose X X Friestedt X