Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-08-28; Planning Commission; MinutesfG!'IlC. OF: Dkff or MEETnc: TINE OF MPZJ'It«;: PUCE OF NE!!TIIC: MINUTES ~IC<nNISSION Auguat 28, 1985 6:00 P.M. City Council Owrbers CALL TO OR:>ER: rtle meeting was called to order by dialr:man schleruber at 6:00 p.111. Present: Olairman Schlehuber, Cormisaioners l'k:f'adden, 9nith, Kall, and Harcus. ~t: camtiasioners Ra!tx>tis an:l L' Heurew;. (O:mnisaioners RICllb:>tis and L'Heureux joined the meetirq at 6:10 p.m.) Staff l1elllbers Present: Olarles Gri.mn, Pt'incipitl Planner Kilte Howes, Associate Planner Dan Hentsdllte, Assistant City Attorney Michael Holm.iller, Land Utie Planning !'\anaqer !tent sears, Traffic Engineer Brad fllerrian, Principal City Engineer PL!DG! OF ALUX;ID«::! was led by OlairrMn Scnlehuber. Qlairman Schlehuber called attention to the Plaming a:maiaion Prooedures being ahcM'l on the screen an:l asked the audien::,e to take a fev minutes to read then. Qlaiman ScbletaJt>er explained that he wanted to dillCU.8S itam where requests for than to be continued had been made. 3) fllJSDJ:, r.L!K12ff R!NISI~ -Request for approval of revl..! Hou.sing ilwnt. Revisions include ~ state lava, text clarification and tanoval of outdated text and policies. Olllitwv'I Schlehubez: asked if there was anyone in the aa5im llbc> vi..S to llpeak on this i te but no one ~ to epeak. l aotico IMS puaed contira.rlng Ite 13 until sepb!lllber 25, Schleblber 1985. ~ ~ lt.::ftl:1dli, io:Uaatad she ll0Uld like to baw a bnellbr by 9),ldrant of lfflllt ttwy had in Section 8 ~ 8IDJ.on uw. lb»iag. Sbe wnted to know ~ the State ...S.taS t. c::barq9d ard whicb of the c:harJge9 llere to be aot:al. a. alao aantiaoa! abe ll0Uld like a copy of the uUlting 1911 Houaiag El ,t. o:,-tui<Jner ~ ....S if ~• ... an ~ta on the De9el~ Pee Table on pa,-58. adth Kall l'lm:ua <D MINUTES August 28 , l98S Cba.i l'lllan Schleb.i.ber ccmMnt£rl that thoee quest ions could be ~ed by staff in a vr i tten memorandum. o:-.iuiooer 9nith pointed out that O:lun:11 adopted 9766 vith the General Plan llmeidueut as preaented by the Citizem Collltlttee, am that this was adopted on a taipora.ry bas 1 a . He vanted to Jcnow if they were going to be 1 nstnrted by CXlUDc 11 as to when th 1 s would take place Cld bov, am vhat projects were a ffected. Caimissione.r 8lllli th stated that he unders toed that there ,-er e ten project.a that vould not be affected arrl that he would l 1 ke a 11st of than. Olaicnan SChlehlber stated tllat staff could provide a "reaponae. Dl!l'l Hl!ntachlte, .usistant City Attorney, in:!icated it was effective nov. Kichael Hol :mu ller , Lard Use Planning Manager , cont i tm!rl that it __. effective, but staff could provide the cc.aiaaionen vith a list. He explained that fourteen projects were already 9Cheduled for the PlanniDJ o:-isaion or City Council am that the Council exeupted ~ frcm this review. 0:llllliaaioners L.' Heureux am Raxbot 1s joined the meet i ng at 6110 p.a. 6) GP~ 8~ZC-33S -CI"fY Of' CARl.58N) -Request for a Olner P ••• •»et•t from c (C&:rmamity cmaerciAll to RKI (Res.idential l'tedhn High Density) am a zaie chaoge fraa ~2-Q (General Q::mmn;ial with a Qualified Oevel~t o,,,erlay) to R£HoKl (Qesidem.ial Omsi t}"-"lll tiple with a ()la! it ied o.ve.J.opnem: OVierlay) for a 4 .S6 acre ai te located at the aouthl,eat corner of the La Colrta Aven.Je and Raocbo santa Pe Rmd intersection. Olaiman Scbleb.:Jber imicated that there vaa a r~ to the C.ity of ca.rlst.:! for a coot.iouanoe ot Ital f6 -» by t:he proparty ~r. Olarla Grua, Prioc:ipal Planner, stated that from a City -tan%>oi"'lt, thare .-. oo prob).• with a contiruance. O.iman 9ctlleblber u.ked about the t.illling for the ocat1maxia, aa2 P'rm J. l't)rey, the applicant, r~ tmt it be ~ lllltil October 9, 1-98S . N1dael Holailler ~i008:S that staff had oo pc-oblaa with that date. O.ilam Sdll.lbuber opened the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. S1nce DO ooa v1..s to apeak, it _. cl~ at this tia. ~ -,tioo -puNd c:cat:iaa.ing Item t6 1.mtil OCtober 9, 19115. Sduetlober I Pl.ftddal ll saith I ll ftl.ll It llalt)otia :r ~ ll L'llluraD • (i) r, •·· r,; 1,. L~ MINUTES August 28, 1985 Page 3 8) SOP 84-4 ' >-• -\L-_,.._. · Vl'H!'{JRES -Amencbent to a previousl-, ,, , '"' -te developnent plan for the ccnauuct.i... research and developnent buildings or tilt:' ,orthwest corr,er of Palanar Airport Road and Avs-nida !nc1naa in the ~~ zone. Olll i cman Sehl ehuber pointed oot that th is was not a publ i c bearing and th!lt both staff an:! the applicant were in agremient for a continuance. A motion was passed continuing Item t 8 until septemer 11, Schlehuber 1.985. l't:P'addt.."!'l 0:-!ui <Xler Raztx>tis afflOUnOed that he would not be participating in the di&cuaSioo an:! voting on Item fl, an:! cc-.iaaicner L • Heu.rewr stated that he would a.l so not participate sinoe he we.n' t at the last meeting when this i tan -a d iacusaed. ll er 8~1~8 -P.MH:»11.A -llleguest fo1: approval of a 1,2 l 4 unit tentativoe tract map and planned unit deYel~t, locaWd south ot Tsnarack Avenue and wst of Neblina Dl:ive. Olarl• Grimn, Principal Plar-.ner, referred to changes outlir-1 in the -.:>r~ f.ran the Umd oae Planning Offioe to the Planning ()aniaaion dated Auguat 28, 1985, am indicated that the applicant -. rot -re of the c::t:wmgae ywt. tie thal proc,eeded to give the presentatioo on thia ita u ooatau.5 in the staff report, using a tranaparency to allOlt the aite. o:-1w1oner Kall aaad about the park and Mr. Grus nplied that the park we being propoeed with Alternative 8 and explained ..tm:e it wculd be located. O:-!utaner ~th queiaticned what wculd hail)lll to Skyline .,_, Ulder Altematift A, aaS end 'ftwrrian, Principal Civil llbgimer, r-.poiltSed that the r-t of the atreet wculd raain the -• 0:-1M1omr Ncftddan l«l.1dered about con:Ution tll ainc:e it wa bar azmnta:dlag that a baautball court wculd be im:lla1ad ill the area, llld Nr. Gr:ia di901111:J why a paaah• IA)Coad» _. dacidld ~. 0:-!wiamr Rllrcua ~ that m■ talt the people oo ftlac:q19 l,..._ wuld pr<Jbably wnt to be pr--,t tD dlacuM Altematlve B. 0:-1NiONr 9111th ~tad that be WU aatiafied that tbe dftelqm bed &x.. 9IJ0d job, aaS indic:atad that be .. c:,moe ...... about Alt.cnati w B. In ~..---to o-iwionu ~th'• C000KJ1 tboot the meidmta oa Taieacxis:-,...,..., Dao Rm~, Aaut.ant City &t:tm.wy, p:,int:ed oat that tt.y .oald t.... rwcaiwd ll&QPllr notica ab109 it ... a p.mlic bearing. 9'.11.ith Hall Ralt>otis Harcus L'Heurewc X X X I X X X X ► I ~ !.' ~ MINJTES August 28, l 98S Paige 4 Cbait:man Schlehuber pointed out that the project would al.o go to the C 1 ty Counc i l which would g Ive the res ident.s adat t ional t 1JDe to e xpresa their views. ca..iaaiooer "1CP'Zldden warlered i ! the applicant would be required to •tart the aasee--.t district, aod Mr. GrUll!I referred to oon:1ition 151 ..tiich required the developer only to participate in an 11ssessrnent: district it one was fotmed. Cmmisaioner Hall suted that he did not think that an e•eezrent district -.a the way to han:ile it since he felt that thia project should bear the cost , and also i rd ic:ate:l that he felt there llhould be iq,rovenenu on Highlan:l fran Hillside to Tmnarack. CbaiCDan Schlerober sa id that he reviewed the engineering r.p,rts and that he did not thinll it Wl!IB real 1st le to say that this project would malte such an •ct where they llhould be required to IMlce all the iq,rovemnts. ,tie Planning Cl:amission approved th.. !jeqative Declaration issued by the Land oae Planning Manager and adopted the foll01i1ing Resolution: RFSXm'ICli t«). 2470 R!O'.H4lH>IN:. APPR<NAL OF 11. 142 LO!' 'l'ZlffM'In TRIIC'r HAP ~ 1, l 'JN!T Pt.ANNID UNIT 0~ C1i Pm>!R'l'r GDl!RALLY IA:AffD ~ fflE scxmi SIDE OF ~ Avn«1! AHO WEST OP N!BLINA DRIVE. With the following changes: ftedific:ationa of oon:11tions tlO, 24, and 4l(a)f2 as outlined 1 n the ~endl.D frcm the Land Ose Planning Office to che Planning Cl:amiss ion dated August 28, 1985. Add • finding that the applicant's project vill a:intribute to ttaff ic on Hill.aide. 2) ZC.J~fl -CARLS8M) u•• IWiOi CUlB -Request for of a sarie dimje arid oondi tiooal uae pc:mit to allow a i-:t-club facility, located along the wst aide of 0c"-ar Street, approxlmtely 200 feet aouth of K1m ll."'80Ue/CA..aan Street intersection. OJlaiatoaer Acabotia rejoina, the amt>era of the 0-1Mioo at thi.a tuE. o.:.aiuioner L'tteurewr stated that be W0Uld abaain oo thia itm since he va.a not rn11 ,t .at the lut , .ng. Kika ac...., Aaociate Plamer, gave the presentation on thla it.a • c:oatain.S in the at:a!f report, using a t:raaapuenc:y to llbow the aite. He diacnwad ':he dla'lgell outlu.5 in the _,DI"""-frm the Leid ON Planning Offica to the Plam:1ng 0-!ssian data, August 28, 1985 anS lDISicat.5 that the eppl iamt -.-re of thm and had DO prclbl-with tha. 0-jp\,amr llalbotia P ica! if t:bare VU 8 public acx::ess tiat ,_ already da11cz -ed , and Judy Olrroll, P.O. Boll 20lt, Dal 1111:, r llllP(lrX\ed that there was oot a publicly dlll!icat.a, acoaaa at th1 tu.. fht als:> atatl!ld that ber 0Ji4Wi7 did nol ptc.y:w, t0 gate the eo::.aa frca the OCNn to tia beacb, ~ that rhe only gate they "°'11.d ba putting in ..oald be at the deal ng ar•. Schlehuber JI l'1cFadden ll 9nith JI Kall ll l'l:l.rcus JI L'Heurf!\ll I I i ! I ' . ' ' MINUTES Au:;JUSt 28, l 98S Page 5 e:-1 as iooer 9:nJ th aslced about the two p, rk 1 ng spaces siJXie he was won::lerlng It there would be o conflict with the Coast.a 1 o::mni ss i OD 1 f they were ramYed • Ctlmissione.r Snith questioned what right they had to illprove the beach directly In front of them and to what degree. and Dan Hentschke. Ass i Stant City Attorney. replied that anything below the mean high tide land was coast lan::1 , and anything above 1 t was the property owner • s • camtlsaioner 9ni th wanted to lcnow about change of ownership and Mr . Hentschke resporrled that the con:I it ional w,e pcnni t ran vi th the land . The Planning O:mnission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Resolutions: RF.S:UJTION t«>. 2468 REO:Hml:>I!«:; APPROVAL OP A WNE ~ m»-1 f'«JLTIPLE f"MILY RESIDEln'IAL ro OP~ SPICE ON 2 ,2« ~ P'FZI' Of' PROPERTY GmERAU.Y LOCI.Tm ON nm WEST SIDE OF OCEAN STREET APPROCI19.TELY 200 FEET scxmi OF fflE Ellt A~~ STREET IN'l"ER:58:: m:)rl. RESCUJ'l'ION 00. 2469 APPROVI!«:; A CCHlITIONAL USE Pl'»!IT ro AUDl A BE10f a.oB 1'1.clLITY ltiIOi INCLOOES D!'.OCit«. AtCl BE10i ~FN!HI' S'!'ORAGE ON PROPERTY Gaa:RALL'f LOCATID ON M li!S'i' StDE (]t 00:'AN S!'REET, APPR(]l(lM!'IZf 200 PEET 9'.Xffll Of' 'niE FLN AVPHJ!Vcx::!WI S'1'Rm' frff!RSOCTION . With the following changes: Modify conditions t2 and 7 as outlined in the marorandl,Jll fraa the Land Oae Planning Office to the Planning caa.iuion dated AlxJW!t 28, 1985. NDI POBLIC tm1JU1«:.S 4) CT U-33~ 74 -VISTA DE 1--' VALLE -Request for a 1' lot/771mt tenbltive tract aap and plamed unit developm!l'lt, located on an 11 acre site bet;_eer, ltlm A-.. and Hosp MIiiy at the Pbrest str-t stub. OJarl• Grbm, Principal Planner, gave the staff praentat1on on thi• it-. aa C'Ontainad in the ataff report, using a transparency to show the site and -11 aapa to mow the propoeed project. He decribed how staff'• ccncerna wre being mitigated and teca1111eud.ed approval of the project. 01w1atoner Slllith "2!1nted to Jmov whether staff ltnl!v for aure that Pbr•t Street IIIOUl.d be going through to Elm A,..._ at acae ta. in the future, and Hr. Grimn explained the ci~ surrouming the future extenaion. ltlltt Seara, Traffic EZ:lgineet, discussed the reasons for aardiog the Pl,gineering r_, dation that the dl!l'veloper DOt be required to install the aignal light at thia ti.me bat cow.d bond for i ta installation. 01wiai00er a.1th a.ued if a traffic atudy vas done on Hmp Illy, and Hr. sears rMPOnded to hi• question. tte 4111ihuized that no more unita should be added until a c:lC>mCtioo to Elm All'8Clle _. imde. Schlehuber J; ~ I Snith I Kall I lblt)otis I I Marcus I L'Heureux I © t, r-; ~ ·"' ;. ~--' ... MINUTES ~ (XM(ISSIOO ~st 28, 1985 Page 6 0-iNioner L'Hew:eux queried whether this was t111 acceptable deaign frCD the City standpoint unt 11 Forest ... C00llected to !:lm Aven.Je, and Hr • Sea rs I oo ios ted that thia project would work with one access at this time. In -to O::mmiaaioner ~•s query, Hr. Sears atated that it 110Uld be •overkill• to require a traffic light at this time. He said there was enough site <S1stanoe but .mnted the applicant to post a bord . a:-iaaioner 11d."adden pointed cut that she did not see any con:Htiorus regarding extra soil and asked for details i n that regard. l'tt. fllerrian explained that if during the design pbue they felt there vas a problen, they would request a soil Investigation at that time. camdasioner P1c1"aMen also wanted to know the i:tiasing of the grading on this project, and l'tt. "n'lerrlan replied that it would all be done at cnoe. Olaiman Schleblber opened the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. and 1---' the invitation to speak. Mr. Barry Bender, Rick fz.lgioeering, 3088 Pio Pico Drive, Olrl.tlbad, repreeented the applicant and stated that they agrem with all the c0n:HtiON1 preaented in the staff report. ABgarding the deYeloper bond for the traffic light, Mr. Bender indicated that he felt a pro rat.a share would be m:n:e appropriate. He also ~ the soil issue. Mr. ram.th Dllbbe, Donna Drive, Carlsbad, asked where the a.-r linea wre going to be couiect«S and o:nn!uioner lllalboU. pointed out that the tentative 111ap ~ it ocaing cblD to the adjacent project below the propoeed project. Mr. Dllbbe expt9S81!d ccncern that the road ll0Ul.d affllc:t his property, ~ Mr. 'lherrian ~ted that he oca. into the Pllllning Office to revi-the t.Sltative lllllP• S1noe no one elN vi.ta, to speak, pub! ic teatim:>ny wa clc.ai at 6:50 p.a. 0--iaiomr L'a.tteux aalted for an •tiJll!ste on the total papalatico for the project, and Mr. Griml replied that it ..au1d be aAJr0Xiaately 2.5 people per unit (77 units). 0--!Ml<IDC L'llmrem atat:a! that he .. not a:,nvi.nca! that thia wa goad plamiag since thlte would be ~tely 1'2 pegple living in thie project: vith only cne mUWWW 11115 ed t. 0:W91Mll'lner ~ Ch~lal'•t:old that abe WS ~ tbout traffic. 0--Jpt'lQK lllalbotia uked what the City'• cul~'• policy -with regam to dlM.lliog unit.a and WU told the a::,unt-120. 0:W91N1ll0ar 81111th e.cpu:1J 11 ,;:,orx:arn about circulation, b:at atat-1 tbat aiace the Traffic llnginee:r wa omortable witb ·the sitmticn, he would take his advice. He also aid tbat be b0ped lbrest would go t:hrougb to Ila A\l'mlle in tbe n-r tutme, am if not, he felt an arrn; ,t c:oal4 be ai5e for it to go in front of the wter tank • r ' MINUTES August 28. 1985 Page 7 Oviianan Schlehuber irxHcated that he felt that 0-1.aioner L' Heureux had a good point but that he did not like to 1q:,oae con:H t ions when the pol icy says aaaething elae am .. eCUiliieided changing the cul~sac policy instead. Cmmi ssioner Schlehuber mentioned that although it ¥!1Bn't an ideal situation, based on staff's rec:amen1!I ti ons he voul.d accept it. O:mniasioner ROl'llbotis aalted about the pro rat.a share, and Brad "n'ler r i an replied that the Ci ty voul.d back it up. fl,e Planning CCllln.ission aR)roved the Negative De::laratioo issued by the Land OSe Planning Misnaqer an:l adopted the following Resolution: RISCXm'IQI NO. 2473 REOH'l!K>IN:; APl'RO',IM. OF A 77 UNIT T!Br'A'J'IV! nw::T MAP AN) PlANNID UNIT OEV!:LOf'KDll' ~ PRP!Rft GPll!RALLY LCCAT!D ~ AN 11-N:RE SITE ~ ~ AvmJE Nl> Fa;P W>.Y AT fflE P'ORES'I' STREET S'!UB. With the foll owl ng d'\ange: Rmove comition f57 as per staff's request as outlined in the lll!IIIOrandull fran the Land Ose Planning Office to the Planning Caaia ion dated August 28, 1985 . S) er 85-13/PUD-83 -ALTal fU>EN -Rl!qlest for an eight unit tent.a ti Ye aiap aid a planned unit devel0pll!!'nt for prcperty located on the west side of Canyon Street bet:lleen Baa8"00d Avoenue and 0ak Avenue. Kilte "'-9, Asaociate Planner, gave the presentation on thi• itall as contained in the staff report, using a trampareoc:y to llhow the II i te and a -.a 11 aiap t:o show the propceed project. Claaiuioner Marcus Ulced about oak Street am Mr. Howes pointed to it on the ma.p. Ccaaiuioner ~ wanted t:o know what voul.d happen to the Uating drivway e&I e••., and P'I? • Hew irdiatted that he believed it would be closed off ard lot 5 M:JUld gain aoc.u frca the private street. 0--!utcxwr L'l-ll!ureux uked about the aigniticance of the ~ a pialt colors on the .U 11111p, and Kr. Hows npJ •trw, t:bet there wre t:vo di tferent property owne::• a t:bet it lho.d the different areu <M.:S by tha. o--iaaicxwr lalt>oti• wondered it the purpose of the prbate etrat wa to better deftlop the property and be -told that he ws correct • .,_1wtocar ac.botia aaad about the crib .U adjacent tD t:be entry stnet IIXI Mr. HOW98 stated that if they cawd D0t 9ft pm:aiMiOll fraa the prcperty <Ml81' to a:>ve t:be st:r..t over, t:tisi they ooald ?Jt in a atardard decorati ._ r.taining all. O.imm ScblAll:lul:IE opa.s the public hearing at 7:00 p.a. mS iMua1 the hmtation to ape&Jt. Mr. Alton RlXieo, 2733 ,_. Drive, 0oMoaide, u..-,t.ad t:bet t:bJ.a -• cl.Mak Ulllll¢e of good infill platming alS t:bet the private street ws 4kJ99Mt.ad by stall. Sd'llehuber J; Mc1"adden J; 911.ith J; H.11 I IO!i>otis I I Marcu5 X L'Heureux I ) r -, MINUTES PLAN1iD13 CCMUSSIQI August 28, 1985 Page 8 Per. T.s Barry, 3160 canyon Street, Garlllbad, pointed out hia property on the transpuency ard stated that he had no abjection to a publ 1c street but objected to a private atteet. He mentioned his concerns regarding traff k on Oln)'0n and that the private e treet would oot be up to Ci ty •t:aa!arda • OlaiDDlln Schlehuber cla.r if ied that the road met publ le ~ relative to the road that was proposed. Mr. l'!liezer Annan:io Benavides, 66 San1ra Court, Newbury Part, e .. plAined that he was conoerned since hie property (3175 Cmyon Street) would be ~osing the front yard. He antioned that he had not receive any information on the detaila of the project, am that he originally cane to the meeting becawse he vas concerned vi th the grad!ng of the cite am the retaining wall mentioned earlier. CllaiDll!ln Schlehuber pointed out that detailed maps were available at the Planning Office. Kr. Benavides aslta:! additional questions regarding the retaining wall. Mr. Clarence AliEl'l, n,o Bonita Lane, carlsbad, Yanted to know about euementa aad what would happen to them. OOlm!iaaioner Rambotis clar 1 f ied what the speaker vas t:a1Jt ing about and Ola iOlllln Schlehuber su:Jgested that Kr. Allen's attorney could probably provide him vith answers to his <peatlona. Ha. Diane Villescaz, 1704 Baeswood Avenue, Carlsbad, e:q,laimd the recotded eaament. Mr. Harry Prigg, 3235 ltllew t.11De, Carlsbad, e.q,r~ ccncem about the ee ,t running acrou his property ard diSOlaed other al tarnat i wa. '!'he reaident at 1794 BvPC>Od Aven.ie, Cllrlabl!ld, repr-,ting Diane VillNalZ, diacuaaed how the private d.riw ll0Ul.d bmafit the camunity. He also talta, about the---· tU. Mr. lllrnrl Skal.9')', 11'0 Clmyon, Carubad, agreed that the ap wa not a good ODe and eqiireued oooc:em about the slse of the lot:a. l'tr. ttowa irdicate.1 that the m.iniam lot •1-ws 7500 ~ faet. Olaizmm Schletmber pointad -:,at that tlwy wre just diac:uaiag the tentative 11111> st tbla ti.a arxl approving only the concept that r,aung. 8inoe no ona elN wished to spmk, the public bNtia:lny wa c1o.a, st 7:CO p.a. O:lw1A1l'lDK Ball ukaS ~ parking lf0Uld be allO.:, OD the street, aD5 Nr. eo.. atatad that it ll0Ul.d be allOIMd only an one aide of the stnet. In responae to 0-!Mionar'• ~ ~ regaxding si~u, Ptt. Hew aid tbat •inoe it,.. suctl a abort dist:anat, aidew.llcs would ODt be 1ncJ.umd. r I MINUTES August 28, 1985 Page 9 flw Plaming o:-J.saion awroved the Negative Declaration iuued by the Lam Oae Planning Manager ard adopted the following '-Olution: IIIBCI.OTlOII I«>. 2474 APPROIII«. AH EIGfT\-LOT' Stlll)JVISIOII 81LV11D BY A PIUVM'E S"I'R!2"!' OIi PR>PEM'Y Gl.N!RAU.J ux::Arm Clf ffl! MPSr SIDE OF CAW'!ON STR!"Z"r 8!:'nm'}l 8.\SSWXD AVPXJE UI) CWt Avn«JE. With the following addition: A oonSition locating a •· s1devalk on the ~erly pon1on of the •tr-t and an eumient to the ere of the street. 7) GPA/LO 8~ 7/1.C-337 -CIT? OF o.RLS8AO -Request for a Gmenl Plat, w&.;;,t fr0111 RMf (Residential 11edi1J11 High Daulityl to RU1 (Aeeidentlal Low Mediun Density) a.rd a mne change from RD-f'I ( Res !dent la 1 Dena! ty "'1ltiplel to R-1-7500 for a 1.58 acre property loc ~ted on the south a ide of La Costa AYen.Je , loleSt of LIi Coruna Pl4oe. O\axl• Gr1-, Principal Planner , ga11e the preeErltation on thl• 11:811 as oontai~ in the staH report, using a tranaplrency to show the site. He discussed the bedtgrow:d and .rnded a reduct ion l n dens l ty. OlaiDIBD Schlehuber opened the public hearing ot 7 :28 p.m. and i■--, the invitation to apeak . 111. Gary Gr~, 220, Garnet, Pac 1 r le Bench, repr~ the OIA'lers ,n:l atl!ted that they did not r~ivw not1oe of t..~ hear Ing, an:! therefore did not ~"" • copy of at.aft'• repor t. He requested t..'la t a conuruanoe be granted, ard that 1f one was not granted, tN! was inter~ ln finding out whldl rea 1dent.s ~la1~- 1tt . John Jtore.lldl, 7607 Loll Corunt1 Pl aoe, Carlsbad, t..pt 11:>iid other ~rs and dlao1•ee:l a l etter which he ~ out t:o the ~1aa1on. He deea-11:-' three 1tam outlu..1 in the l.t~ vhlch corcerr-1 the residents. Sinca no one e.1.-wist., to speak, the publ IC testuaony -cloea! at 7 1 32 p.a. 0:..iu1008Y L' lta1rau aalte:, how DJdl longer the appl leant IIOald .at l f the '-aring -. cont.1 rued, and 0\111 DIIUI 8d\labJ.bm aaid that tine» It riad tD qo to the City CQmc:11, he did not &al that a C'Ontl ruance,.. ~ry. 0:-iaaionm ~ witlon.:l Iii» would agr-V lth O.imari Sc:hleb.Jber am I a, lcated that 111w thought th 1, _. axti bet tar 10ninq than what -. propc»ed earl le. b .-:iti~ th.t atw wcu.ld not \IOte for add! t lonal 11C0N8 off L.a et.ta A-... ffa PlarlD ing ~-ior, 4R)T'CWcl the ~ t i WI Oac:la a, t 1 on i...s by the I.am Oae Pl&nning ~ 4"' adopt-' the fol.lolJin; laeo.lut 1ona: ..alDfICII IK>. 2'78 iclll.N'lm>u,I; ~ Of' Ml NmiD(P.Jff !0 M r.-,7ill ltoDaf c, Tffl GINIR!H, PLW P'IID( Rl'lf {10- 20 00/M:) TO _,. (0-C 00/M:) CII PIIOPG'ii ~ LCDftl> (II 1'GI !Dffl! smz OF LA CDBrA AVPJIJE, WPS'!' or I.A CXllla PLACI. Schlehuber McFadden 91lith Hall lblbotla ~ L'Heureuz Sc:hln.iber lil.ftddal 911th Hlt.11 11:abotla ~ L'Hauram ll ll ll ll ll ll II ll I I • • I I :I X l f_., ,,, . .., ' J MINUTES PI.Aa!DIG CXMUSSION .t.ugust 28, 1985 RBSCUn'ION !«>. 2479 R1!0.>4M!!K>I1'1. APPRO'v'M. OP A 7.CNE OWCE PIOI RD-K (RP.SID!NTIAL DDl.SITY P«JLTIPt.El ro ~1-7500 ON PI01!Rft G!NERALLY LOCM'ID ON 'niE s:xml SIDE OF LA <X6'TA AVDEB, lft'.S'!' OF U. CORUNA PL.ICE. 9) SOP 8szr-368 -ICOBO'J'A -Request for approval of a site d opnent plin to develop tvo office buildings ard approval of ll variance to reduce the frontyaro aetbaclt from 20 feet to 15 feet on the west side of Pio Pico Drive beo,een &lEna Vista Averue am Lat! Plores Drive In the RP--O r.a1e. Nike Howes, Associate Plamer, <J8Ye the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report, using a transparency to show the ai te ani a ..ell mp to show the propoeed project. He discussed the propo&41 for reduction ot frootyard aetbadt ani •tw.Xlliileirled approval. OOmm.iaaioner McFadde'l asked where the driveway al igrmient 111U am what lll0U.ld it mean to people across the street. Kr. HolM9 pointed to the area on the t.ransparency. o-iaioner ~. dlso111-ed condition 129 am why it _. being included, am Brad Therrian, Principal City fhgineer, explained that they were atterll>ting to lim1t the lUllber of access pointa to Pio Pico. amiuiooer ~ alao wanted to ltnow why there ~•t any caxHtiona tor noiae attaluation, am !'tt. ftaw. stated they they do not put thm generally on o..~•dal buildings but could add the it the camdasion viat.d. Mr. Brian P0IMc, 1275 &ana Vista Nay, carabad, was ooacm:D-' about traffic in the area, and alao W'lticom that the buildings -y block vi-. to the ooean. (Mic:t.al Houmiller, Lam ON Planning ltllnage.r, pointed oat that t:h1a ... notiC., aa a public hearing am that it - inr::ornc:tly 1181:ad u a Diacuaion Itaa on the ~ema.J a.~ Sdlltihubc opaned the public ?Im.ring at 7:42 p.111. m5 i~ the invitation to speak. Nr. J-=t KUbota, o.o. Bal 1095, carabad, the at11licant, irdic:ated be agrad with staff's uport am_. willing to aa.. myquatiaw. 0-!!Miomt Sid th ultm it Nr. iubota thoogbt any t:raff ic la2ld CJO fraa the project to a-Vista A'IIIIB>e, and Mt. Dlbota niplied that: be didri't think it l«lUld ba1119 ax:h bpc:t: at: all. Nr. J'-=lt bul, 1265 Bml1B Vista, Carl.t.:S, aaid that he did not tbiak 18 partiag plaoN wr• mough for ti«> .,.,-•1 r tonal buildings. He ... canoeme1 about children attadlng the matbf achool and amtton., he for..., tr bJa prtt,1-with b«:> buildings on the -11 lot. Nr. lady altber, 1260 ~ Vista, Carl.t.:S, expteued cancm:n J:'9IJl,lding t:raff 1c and ~king on the street. a.J.zan 9cblalu>c uplaiD-' that the ~ing at the ontt ....... ' ' ' , MINUTES Augw,t 28, l 98~ PIii. Mlureen Hann, l270 a>erla Vista, Car~, asked qaaationa about bow lll5llY people WIOUld be occupy !ng the buildlogB ~ the logi.c awl ied to deciding whether a varimoa a:bould be alla..ied. Bot.h Olaitman Schlehuber and Mr. Hcw9 raporded to Ms. Ml!lnn'e questions. Sinoa DO one else wiahecl to spealt , the p.Jbl ic hearing waa clONd at 7:52 p.m. 0-iaa'.ooer McFadden stated that this was II cr~ site in midi the awlicant worked ha.rd to design atttacti vely, and Uku:! again about cond i tion t 29 and the d r ! YeWay . MI • ltllbota explained the reuon they were agreeing to this 000:Htioo. ftllt Planning Camrlasioo awroved the Negat!w Declaration 18aJed by the Lam Otte Planning Clmnisaion arrl odopt:.ed the followlog Raolutiona: RISamICli ll'.>. 2480 APPRO/IN:; SITED~ PL.AN 00. 85-8, TO om 'nl) OfTICE BOIIDINGS ~ PtOPERT'Y G!ND\f/Y LOCAflD Cli TM!: WEST SIDE IY PIO Pl(X) DRIVE AOOJC!IPr TO Itff!RSTAT! S, WEST OF BOF20. Vt.STA Avm.JE. RIBXDl'ION ti), 2481 APPRO/IMG A VARI~ TO Rl!nJCE fflE PlOffnRD ~ P101 nmm Pl:.E'I' ro !'IP'l'Enl P?%T ON Pil0rlllli LOCAflD ON 'ffl! IG!ST SID£ CP PIO Pl(X) DRIVE AOOllCl!RT TO IN'l'ZRSTATE S, NEST OF B0120. VISTA AV!NUE. By prq,er motion, the meeting of August 28, 1985 was adjc:amad at 7 :55 p.m. P rp:tfolly --1 ttad, MIOIIII, IDJMIU.IR Lad 0.. Plmn.ing Manager aithStan K1nuta Cl.erk WDllS AIB Al.a> ftPID 1111) IOlPf ON P1LE ONfIL 'ffl! MIKl'TZS AB All&J&J. Schlehl.ber I '1c:1'adderl 11 91\ith 11 Hall I Ra!bot:is I I Harcus 11 L'tteurewi 11