Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-09-11; Planning Commission; MinutesMeeting o.f: Date of Jllleetlm: Time of !'lee t ir)J : Place of Meeting: CALL ro ORDE:R: MINUTES ~ (DIMISS[~ Septemer 11, 1985 6:00 p.m. City Counci l Chalrbers r 1 1'ie Heetlng was Cl!llled to order by O\ail"!t\'!n Schlehuber at b:00 p.m. IOU. CM.L: t>resen t : Ola 1 rman Schlehuber , Cbmni ss ioners L ' Heureux, Marcus, S'n.i th and Ra 11 • 11.bsent : Ctmu.iss icoers McFadden and Rcrrtx,t ls. PLEZXZ OP~ was led by O\airma.n Schlehuber. P~ ClHUSSI~ PRX:Et(JRES: Chainmn Schlehuber sumnarized the Procedures while they -re being shcNn cri a transparency for the audience. Robert Holmes was intt"Oduoed as the new Planning camli.ssion Meatier appointed by the Council last ~ning. 1 • SDP 8"-4 ~ PAl.CMAR vmruRES -Al!endnent to a p~iously ~ site developnent plan for the construction of bole) research and develqmmt b.Jildi.ngs en the n::Jr:thwest corner of Palcmu-Airport Road and Aveni& Enci.na.s 1n ~ P-M----O rO')e. Chairrlllll'l Schlehuber announced a r-equest to o::,ntinue this it.em to Septent>er 25, 1985. Planning Caanissloo oonti.nued this itef!l to t.1-ie 5ept.elltler 25, 1985, meeting. 2. CT 85-19/PID-87 -~ -Request foe-a 112- unit tentative tract Ill!;> and planned unit developnent on 28.0 acres located beboeen ltelroee Avenue and Rancho santa Pe Road east and south of Alga Road ln the P-C ZIC:ne. Olarles Grum, Principal Planner, gav,e the presentatioo as o::intained in the st.at f report, using a transparency to atn, the si t.e and >tall m.,e to shoot the prop::,sed project. Staff stated they did not approve the dght bJrn cnly a.coess and the project has a a:oditioo stating this. In ~ to q:,ery, staff said the dght turn did not !Met Clty standards as far as intersect.loo spacir,q. o--1astcner L'Beurewt cp!Stiooed Conditioo 26, stating lf i:ecreatimal vehicles are prohibited, .«ry is stcx"age a.rea being required, and Charles GrUIIII answered the lntent was to eliJli.nate recreation.al ·Jehicle parking cri the alte and to have the de9elope.r m>re a provislai aouuh!re ln LIJ Cost.a foe-storage. ~ La CosUt area 1• behiM ai providing storage foe recreational vehlclee, and provisioo should have been lll!lde 9Clllet !..ire ,q:,. Sdllehuber L'Reurewl KarC\JJl Smith Hall CD X X X IX X :x MINUTES Sept.efftler 11, l98S Pbqe 2 In answer to a quest ion as to whether the riqht. turn access could be an cption in case the other ace-es.'! could not be Lnst.alled, City Enc!i.neer Gene Donovan stated s taff reo::imended it rot be an cpt ion. The spe€Cl on Melrose, once a::nstructed, .rill be rapid and that WOJld be an l..np!d~nt. Re added staff preferred the subdivl.sl.oo lll!IP be approved in accordance .,itl1 the ~1-de- sac fOl i c.y . I f the Meadow 1 art Ranch Road oot let can ' t be bu 11 t , they "'i 11 be unabl,:, to t-u il d l»"?y non.> uni ts . Staff explained t"M!!re WOJl<'I be a transiticnal aco>leration lane for i;ul l inq cut cnt.o Rancho Santa Pe Road, in crder not to interfere with the traffic flow. Olairman Schlehuber q,er-.ed the rublk hearing at 6 : 17 p.m., a-id issued the invitation to spea):. Bi 11 Rotman, Planning Ccnsul t.ant, represent inq ~ Corporaticn, 5250 Av-enida Encinas, addre~ the Camdssicn, !X)inti~ cut the maior features of the propoeed project. Re stated the proiect is o:::npatible with the surroundl..ng area and at the low end of the &!!nsity range. 'nle closest har!e is ,, feet fran the property line, in addition to the set.back of the Meadowlark h::lmes . The extension of Alga Road to Rancho Sant.a Pe Road would be precluded, and the applicant felt th is extension would be disruptive. Mr. Rofman stated the c-ecreaticnal area and q:>en space is foor t~ the !IIID.lTlt required a-id the proiect wi 11 be providing najor street ~?Ull'l!Slent.s to the area . Rancho Sant.a Pe Road and Melrose inte~ ion .ri 11 be re-designed up f rent , with Melrose inproved to full width along the property fra"ltage a-id Alga Road inproved fran E:l F'uerte to Melr06e. litr. RoflMn erq:tlasi zed these streets .ri 11 be in place ~ the people llDl/'e ln. Mr. Rofman stated Ccnditioo 26 was rot appropriat.P. for this de-velO{nent, Staff cited the La Cost.a ~t.er Plan, and this proiect 1..8 rot ln that Plan. There 1..8 no need for recreat icnal vehicle sttx age at th i s t.iJre . The La Cost.a Master Plan called for a Ji}asin:i plan for recreaticnal vehicle stccage and oaoo has oone this. The City did rot adopt this plan. Kr. Rofman ~st:f!d the ~•a foe this project t'f!'qUlate RV's in their project and the Master Plan will pro-,,ide recreatiooal vehicle storage ln this area. Mr. BofJen questicned Ccndi t ion 58 regardinci Rancho Sant.a P11 Road frat La Costa to Melt"06e, using a aep to indicate Rancho Saita Fe Road frail Oliv-enhain to Me lrose, stating if this oonditia, were applied t.o all projects generating traffic a, that road, it would apply t.o all projects in the ecuthwest ~rant of the City. Re felt this "38 a 11111jor enculllberanoe .rd Ul'\I"ea8al4b.e to apply t.o this project when 1 t d:les rot fnrit en the road. Clay Mdtown, 1923 Redwing, epolte as a resident of the tteadowlark area, st.Ating his conoern about wiat wi 11 hlR)en in the area. Be expressed ple48Ure with ro exit ooto Redwi.ng, .rd ~ that the eecond access would not be a good c:ne .rd a\ly crap 1 i cate the ex i at ing fX'Oblem. Al Koenig, 1808 Meaibwlm Ranch ~, discussed the increased traffic from this project, and ea.id there would be an easement O"I h.is ~rty, as he oms the ~l at the axner of. the proposed eecond access. !'tr. ltoenig upresaed <Xll'IOl!rn ab::>ot the eucalyptuB ~ that &¥J~ ~tiffl~~deninq of Rancho Sant.a Pe MINUTES 5eptenber 11, 1985 ?age 3 Chait'll\M Schlehuber st.ated II letter had been re~ived frcm Rctierta Md:~ and t.rutt letter would be given to the Cerni ss I cners for the i r inform11t ion and would be filed. Ange la Shadr id< , 20 52 Me.'M:b,, lark Ranch l.,ane, Sfdce a.bout the safety factor ln widening Rancho Sant11 Pe Road «1CI Meeldowlark Ranch Rot\d. She suqqested an al temate route be a:ns idered for the sea:;,nd acC"eSS. Bill Rotman spoke l..n ~, stating ?at O'Day could address the safety aspect of the intersect ion and the reaovinq of the trees. Pat O'Day, <::alsultant, 7752 "H" El Camino R&!ll, stated the intersection plan was sent to the Rngineering Department prior to th is ireet ing. With the interaection ~nt, approximately half of the trees would remain. Aowever, when t.>\e County cbes nor., i~t.s. mre trees IOOUld have to be ~- ln ansvoer to query regarding the right-tum lane, Mr. O'Dlly stated it did rot -t the City st..anda,rds and could not be noved either direction. As to deaaMn's curve, Hr . O • Day st.a ted he understood the County was l.n the pr'OOeSS of renoving part of that bluff. s lnoe ro cne else "'1.shed to speak, the p.ibl i c tes incriy was a:included at 6:36 p.m. Camtlssion disC\lSSion a?ntered on Condition 26 regarding RV stocaqe area, "'1th st.aff stating RV's would not be permitted on individual lots or streets, and RV storage was needed ln the LIi C'os ta area . 'n'le Carmlssioners questioned the fairness of conditioning this project to provide the RV s torage lot, particularly whE!f1 thls project is rot part of the l..a Coeta ~ter Plan. Staff indicated if the a:mussion wished to see a plan for that storage, and th 1.s applicant had to sut:mi t sud'l a plan, they would not object. The CXln8enSUS of the Caamission ~ that this project would ha~ an i.npact on RV storage, since 1 t W!IB fe 1 t people bJying 1n this area IO.lld own sud'l ll'ehicles. It vaa felt this l!l'Plial!lt shc:uld be required to indicate that their iroject a:ntribut.es to the storage pi:-obls, but ahould rot haY'e to abide by O::ndition 26. O::ndition S8 .a diaOJSSed, "'1th staff indicating this was WX"dlng that 1188 very cloee to IIOC"ding ~ last night by Councll and this IXllldition was placed on other Daon projects generating traffic on Rancho Santa Pe Ibid. The Aaaistant City Attorney stated the wording of Caldition S8 represented Council 'a ruHng m this, and he aiggested it not be ~. '"1ia l!l'Plies to projects rot fronting cri Rancho santa Pe~. but ccntribJtlng t:o the traffic ilq)act.. O\aiomn Schlehuber suggested that it be noted the Planning Ccaaia ioo vanted to be a?ruin th is o:nd it ion awlied t:o all iroject.a. 0:-1asl'lner L'Beureux said he vanted it 11rntioned on reaxd that this applicant was .ware of the new ~ition regarding the traffic 1.apact. fee. MINUT ES Septesitier 11, 1985 Paqe 4 Bill Bof!Mn s t..ated the ~1 ica.nt did rot cbject to that condition as long as it i.c; ~lied to al l projects within the are., where the traffic ls i.Jrpacted. It was cc:nmwted that Daon Corporation trought this additicnal condition to the attention of staff. Planning Comniss tJ'I approved the Neqa ti ve Dec 1 ar at ion issued ~ the !..and Use Planning Manager a.nd lldopted the fol1001ing Resolution: RESOWrI~ ~. 2488, ~rn:; APPJOVM. CF A 112--l.t,TI T'l!NrATTVE ~ ANO ~ lNIT C£\TELOPMrN!' CN l'fOPER!"Y GFNEAALI..Y uxxrID BE"IW8EN MP.L!OSE Avm.IB AND !WOO SANTA PE fOAD, Ei\S'T' NID s:um OF A.J..G.>. fOAD. Modified as fol lows: Q:ndi t ion 26 be mxJi fied with wording inserted to stat e that the CXR's of the project sMll ront.di:-t a provisicn prohibiting parking and storing of RV's rn site and t.~ ~licant will participate ln the design or locat ioo of an RV s toraqe lot ln the eoutheast quadrant. Modified Condition '>8 to be incl ooed and Condi ti <:r1 59 to be changed , renov ing the word • inproved. and insert i ng • awt'Oll'ed • . A new Conditioo after Condition 66 t o be added as re<:nmended this evening ~ st.aff. Planning ccrtruission aoopted a m.. :1ute not lon to reflect that Condit ion 26 should l:ecom? a standard a::nd it ion as far IIS stating the COi's of IJn)' project shall ront.ain a provis ion prohibiting parki.ng and storing of RV's oo site, and adding that staff take an actiV'e p:,sition in locating and starting to develop an RV st.oraqe site ln the four quadrants of the l.a Cost.a "4ster Plan. Condition 58 is to be interpreted to o!R)ly to all projects and all develCJEDents lnpact.i ng Ranct.o S<'l.Tlt..a Pe Road in lJTrf fashion. 3. GP~S 85,-1 -CITY CF CAALS8AD -Request for a GeneralPan Amerdnent for an Rist.ark Preservation Element which is fltt4l0800 to eet goals and policies oo preserving the City's heritage through rr.snageaent and prot.ecti.on of his t.ode re&"lUrces. Chris SAlan::ne, <:amuni ty ledeve lCJ?!l!!flt Manager, gave the pr-esentation ti!! contained in the staf t report. In ~ to <µ!ry ~ing County p:x:ltets of land withi.n the City, Mr. Salaa:ine replied the COunty MS the ~tical <Xdi.nance. Chait111111 Schlehuber q:,erled the ?Jbl 1c hearing at 7 :04 p.a., and Lssued the invitation to speak. Karjorie ~. 3985 Park DriVO!!, President of Bitrtcxioal Society, IIMJ:esse.d the caaiss ion, st.at ing thia ele.ent has been worked on foe a long time and wi 11 be a vehicle foe people "10 own ixq>erty and v iah tall benefits ala,g wi th recognized historical value. Mrs. Boward-Jaiee narrated a slide ()["eSefltatiai depicting a tour thro.Jgh C4rl sblld. She erq::ti.m;iud this elenent did not ~t OWO!rs ot property from having control of their ptopet ty. Ill. Bto..n Bellm, 2638 lJJciernaga, hi Roe Ccmnittee, spolte in faYOr ot the eleiient, stating tlle Ba1M type of ordinanoe .-, eleaent is w::rking in the surrounding areaa hel p ing to pr:eeerve valuable reso.rroes. ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ COMMISSIONERS ~ t ~ i\ Schlehuber X L'Aeureux X X Marcu.c; X Smith X Hall X Schlehuber X l.'Aeureux X X Marcus X Smith X Fl4ll X MINUTES Septefttler 11, 198S In answer to q.Jery reqarding t!w property 0otner 's dght to alter his property in Mr<f manner, Mr . Salcm:ine answered that if prq:,ert y is des lgna ted as an historic l andmart at the time you p.irchased ' t, you would need permissla, for arry changes. Rc:wever, lf you own the property and it is rot desi.gnated an historic landm.u-k, you oo have a right to change a.'Tf -,, you wish. Ae called att.entia, to Page 7, Line 26, suiting "Witho.Jt the ixq:,erty cwner 'a <XlnSeflt to the proposed des ignat i<:¥1, the process st\41 l t.ermi na te . • Since no cne else vi.shed to speak rn this item, the public t.estincny ws ~c;l~ at 7;23 p.m. In discussiai, the Cc:mnissioners felt this:; was a well- dra-m ordincmce and the City ..ould benefit from the identlficatico of historic sit~. Camdssioner L 'Heureox suited the appl !cat Ion form <X consent form should cnnta in a st.a teiren t to inform the owners of wruit l t ent:..ai ls. Chairman Schlehuber added he would \ofMlt the rot ice to property oomers to o:int.ai.n a st.atenent in told face type that the o,,ner is subject.log himself to O?rt:..ain legal obligations, and that unless the a.mer clearly underntands this ooligatiCl"I, he should seek aid. Planning Camussion llR)roved the Negat i v-e Declarat icn issued t,,, the Land use Planning ~r and adopted the follooting Resolutia,: REOOim'IO. ti). 2489, ~rN:; APf'RJI/M, Of' AN ~ TO THE GENEAAL Pt.AN TO EST•:...ISH AN RISl"ORJC ~Ol F.LEMmT. ~fied as follows: "nle rotice to property oomer should contain told face type to the effect that t,,, cxnsenting to this application, the o.mer ls subjecting hl..mBelf to O?rt.ain legal obligations, >lhi ch he should clearly undernt.and. RJ!XESS: Cllairmn Schlehuber declared a recess at 7: JO p.m., and Planning Comd.ssioo re-cx:invened at 7:44 p.m., with five lllelllbers present and CCl!llliss iaiers Mcf'adden and Ror!b:)ti.s absent. Char lee Gri.ma, Principal Planner, Ol!ll led at tent ioo to the ~ gi '1'en to camdss ioners ton i¢it and referred to page 20, KIISter Plan Text, Sectioo C, atatirY::J the aentenoe in the seoond paragraph should read ... "bulldirY::J pend ts foe planning ~ J, IC or L of phase three•. Be then introduced other City <XJn8Ult.ant.a available for ~tions and llr. Olris DeCertx:>, wbo wuld be presetting oenvtrcnment.al and econcn1c uipacta. Schlehuber X L'Heureux X Marcus X X Smith X Hall X @ MINUTES Septeat>er 11, 1985 Paqe 6 Chrlatopher OC!Cerbo gave the st.a.ft report a, EIR 84-3, as a:ntained l..n the at tac:hed report, st.at ing that all provisions vill be a a:inditicn of appt"OITal or part of a master plan. Be mentia'led the l.npact en Lalceshore Gardena and Batiquitos Lagoon. Re stated the ~itheater had ~ deleted from the plan and the recreaticnal areas IIIOYed. The 118Ster plan EIR was based en two previous EIR's that had been pc-epa.red foc this property. In nnswcr to q.,er:y ~ir,c:; the ~ en Mid ~t of La C06ta Avenue, rtr. DeCerbo stated that will be considered when the second ftlase 118P i.s sutm1 tted. A major traffic study ""1.11 be required at that tine. Caamissicner Smith inquit"f'!d al:xlut bicycles being used on the property and their incluslcn in the traffic study. Mr. DeCerbo stated the project would be nainly Be lf-a:ntained, vi th peq> le -..ork i ng arrl living there . The narket feasibility study was discussed, vi.th Mr. Deeerbo stating all elements of success were present in this proposed project and it would tend to draw students ft'OIII ootside cartsbad and m:n throughout the c.ountry. Kr OeCerbo said the final ronclus ion ~ that m;1y students vill be attracted to this t.niversity, and with a well-trained staff the goals = be achieved. He felt the retail uses would draw fran Lalcestw:xe Gardens, am the related rusi.ness offires for the university would require a large p:xtion of the l:usiness office space. The proposed hotel would have ronference facilities lllhich are n:>t available in Noc-th County. The recreation facilities ancl training center would serve as an attraction to the development, vi.th exhibitions bf the Olywpian teams and public use allowed a, a fee b!is is. The f iaoal uipact analys i.s was suamsri :ted bf Hr • DeCerbo, stating the ror tax would be beneficial to the City f inanoes and would be a po6 it l ~ eoonond C influence fOt" Carlsbad. 1'lere would be oo ~ er, the ~ified school district. Nr. Grial again e:rplained the anster plan and site plN\S, ut1ing a transparency to show the site, and a val l mp to lndiaate the locetion of. this proposed project. The dU'ferent parts wen, descrlbed as fol lows: Ar:eo A. Law achool er:lJceticnal instituticn and related Rib~, of.rioee, ldld.niatrative offic::es l!l'>d student buildings. kN B. ltJ.lti-family nside.nti.al -ca,cx,e Ot' apaitwita. kN C, Ol!tadled single f.all!ily <.nits vi.th aininua lot abe ~ 3,600 ~ feet. APIA-~-'-· am,. 1111u-r.uy type project -ca,cx,e Q[' apartwsta. AaL,t. Town.'1caes. Am.Ji. Sbdent housing -one hurdred t.nit.s, and atlti- faally. ltN R. Single faaily cletached hca!s. atB...I. Aecreatkrlal/~rcial area -gya, ballfields, poallily pool, temi.s, apcrt.s clinic, dayClm! center. OlYllll)ic volleyball and wightlifting team. @ MINUTES ~r 11, 1985 AreA...I. Pt-opoGed tQJrtst/c:onm!rcial. An:-, g Propo8ed hou l and t l~P ..., I ts . AD:A..J,. ~ti~ hotel and confer ena> center. Area ft. ~iqhtx>rhood a::wnrerrial type center and llgt-: ~rdaJ. ARM N, 0 !nd P. Oper1 spaa! -trai 1 system; and viewpoint.II . Be indicated that there are (X'Ol'lsions u, the rmster plan to protect the City ~ld the university fail. If the university ceases lt.<1 funct ion CX' if the~ is a decline ln enrollment of SO percent with In boo years , e">eryth ing would st.op and the mster plan would return to City Councl l and Planning CCftllli ss ion for appropr ate &ct Ion . Another ~t.~ i \l't. pt"OYis ion Ir the IIB5 tee plan involV'l!d parltlng. ~ are thr~ phases ln the mster plan, and if, aft.er the first ~. parld-.g is a probl-, it can be adjusted ln the seoond or thlri1 ftla,se. M":-. C.Tum stated there v 11! be a a:mnercl a l center along 1-S, and this shopping center has 1:::een reduced ln e lze to el im.lnate nejor nnnet o::inpet It ion vi th the cent.er approved at Poinsettia and t-5. Another tssue 1.5 that staff and the applicant dt!laqt"t'.'e on ~ the trails are to be l.oalted In the q:,en space a~, but that wi 11 be handled through the laqoon enhancement program and ls subject to opproval o f the Land Use Planning Manager. ltr. Grial otated wt th regard to the JS feet height 11.ait, then are acme c:xceptlons being requested, but et.aft felt they ~ IIC\::ePt.a.ble. n-ie center of the proj~ alllll)m'lile ls 90 feet and is the landmark for the IX'Oject. MOther ~ion was the CJ'fT1l fee volleyball, "'1idl needs to have a certain height b,' International ~lleyba.11 Standards. 1'ie bJildlng wo.tld not be Yll!ry viaible ft"O!! C4r lsl»d Boulevar'd or I -S, ancl e taf r had no problen vi th that exoept Ion. n-ie entranceway to the hot.el was the third exc:eptlon as far • height, and et.sf f disagreed with th Is request and &_lt lt &hould be left at JS feet. Kr. c.ru. a:ncluded, etatlng staff did hav'e concerns about the BUCO!!S8 of the ia'liversity, but that staff WM ~ @tWal baaed al the 1S1iqueness, q.ia.lity w future potent la.l of the IX'O:)ect. Chairmn Schlehuber q,ened the p.ihl le hearing at 81 33 p.1!\. aid i.aeued the lmrl tat ion to spe,,a)t • .JCS\ Brlp, 8laiJI Pcupat•ies, 2650 c-1.no Del Rio ll0rth, Bin Dlego, lp(lke to the 0:-1 sa ion, stat ing Pk. 8-1.a nig::-etted not being pn:sent talight, ae he has bNr\ thint.ing ot thi8 (XOject foe ten years. Be ~ the pl.mwling st.aft, etating 1 t -O"le cL the finlat lCld 1.ae pl.s'8 he had eeerl. Ill:'. llrip narnted a slide pr-eeentation ,-.Jlowing the prq.cw.,d KRing at Highway 10 l , the use of salt --~ in the lagocnl, aaking C411'ran8 foc pe~ion to ~ l.armalpe ~ portion at I-S ~ by this IX'Oject, Md pbotogup t.aken ot the Edel depictlng the <!iftennt _.... at the project. ,,_.e a:ldel .-as ai dilpllly at the trait ot the O\allbera. Nr. Briggs stated tbla pt:Oject '°11.d be an asset to the City o! CaTlatiad, proride a l.n1que envil'Of1Rnt rd bring people t:o tt..- ana tna all ovwr the Coontry. I © MINUTES Septer;ber 11, 198~ paqe 8 Hiram Bo6ltin, 7'307 San Luis , Lall:~hore Gardens, President of fbaeOon"lers , stated their park i!rlioins thiia area and they have had several rreetings with Samus representatives and appreciate the effort to cooperate and ~te the ::-esidents of their park. Pay lb..lrd, 26J0 Cazadero Drive, Batiquitos i,.,,goc., Foul'ldotion, ·.-ead fran a letter sent to tM City Manager, Ci cy Counci 1 and P 1 ann inq Ccmni ss ion C:ha i rne.n, 1 as t Mc,)' , stat , ng the pos i t i er. of the Pl::1Jnda t ion and t! •i r ~l of the plan. Mr. Found stated t'1e Pounda:ion was lcdcing fontard to the '!nhanoement of t.he laQoon. Re said the Po.Jndat ion was pleased with the lll!l!tter plan and felt an educat icoa: park was tin excit ,g and t.r1ique a:inoept and the Po..tndat ion offered it.s Sl ~t. "· Brown-Bell.Jmn, 2638 t.uciernaqa, asked th.\t traffic ilpact be lcdced at =~ closely--erternal as well as intern.. 1, and the i.npect er, LI! Cost.a Avenue. Dale Srnroiber, Pcnto Stori,ge, handed a o:,py of hls letter to the Camlisslcri llel't)ers and he read that letter 1.nto the rea:n-d with his concerns ab::lut the proposed project . Giraro /\near, 1728 C!tlavo, addressed the Cmmission etatini, the traffic problems will be increased with the bi.lte r11ers and he was ccnoerned arout riding those bi.lcee a, ~ i c streets. Mr. Anear stated the re- locat !.on ot Highllay 1 o 1 was in a:infl 1 ct "1 t.h the St.ate' F propo641 to have a beadi p,u1c i.nq lot. Re also obj~ to the small lot si :r:es. Mr. .-.near suggested ~t all the proapectiv-e tenants should be finali:r:ed bt>fore ~l ~ gi V't!l1 for the project.. Mr. Bdqgs spolte in respcnse, stating traffic was cne of their pri.mry ccnoerns -and alt.hough a eeoor,dary arteria' "813 rot warranted, they designed the street to the mx:uum, vith two lanes in eadi direction end m-di.ana ~ vill a::nduct traff 1c studies ot La C'osta Aven:Nt, Poinsettia and A~ida Encinas and the I-5 int:e-ral; ,gee and abide ~ the reooamend,aticns ot those atudi-"1'. Briggs stated tile 8f'.)Plicant "°-lld perticw at.e 1n iJlproving the Poinsettia bridge, Sld felt the oicy ~e rldJng lllOU.l.d be m ~ amenity that "°-lld help illl: -ovoe traffic a::ingestion. As to the lot sizes, Nr. Brl9'J8 stated 3,600 is a mininum lot, vi th 11Cl6t ~ the aing.te faaily lots being owr 5,000 square feet ~ to 12,000 square tee~. Since re cne else wished to ~ on thl.8 item, the public I 9tin:.ny W,S a:,nciu&,d at 9; 18 p.m. ln di.ao.: ,alon, tM 0:-18"11.onen agreed it .s an uclting proj ect md felt the rewards to the City IOlld be ~-~ agreed that planning staff abculd receive apeci.a.l ~ tion foe their 1IIIXk on thia pro .ct. ~rno IIMt! exprea&ed aixlu'. -ting to k81P car: 1tia1 9oulevard t951denUal Sid not a:-rcial, tbe traf' 1c on La Coat.a A91eBle, t'tol Highway 101 to I-5 aDl5 ... o,ud co !l c.1no Real, wi tll tllf' slgnals to be lnstallec ~ r.nw three. 'l'tllt o:.-1ss1.onera e,q,ressed CXJnOam al:lcut the fe.ssibility of the univoersity. In lnNlrl to query lllxlut -..1:io ..auld pay foe tm 9 1/7 llilcs ot. a.id to be p.it on the be&chee, "1'. Brl9911 at4ted tq,eful.ly the Port ot Loe Angel•. I I I MINUTES SEptent:>er 11, 1985 Planninq CClffllissia, ~ted the fol lowing Resolut lens: REOCll..OTIOI NJ. 2482, ~ni.:; CERT! P1CATIOI CF ENI/I~ IMPA.....,-~ F.I R 84-3 FUR A C.U.'ER-'L Pv\N ~. ZCNE ~ />l£J A 19..~ Pl.AN POR P!OP'P.RTY I..OC"ATl'l) JUST 1'0R'.nl OP IV\..""1Cllrro5 l~ BE"IWEEN I-5 IIND CARLSBAf) B'.XJI..,E.'11M: inc 1 ud i nq c:h.anc::res lnct uded in revised at.aft report . · REOOUJI'ICN NJ. 2483, RECIM©ID!N:; APP!OJM. CF AN A.~ 'tO 'rHE I.AND USE ~ Of' fflP. GffiERAL PLAN "°" !fl!, RESIDfNT'I AL JIIG)TTJM AND ~, RESrDEWTTAf. l'E:>TI.JM RIGR 'IO P, PRIV1ll'£ ~L, R'I, RESH)fNi"lAL l'fl>IUM, ~, RFt::REA'I'lOI a::M'lf.lCIAL, 'I'S, -mAVEL SERVI CT AND N, P<EIG8B)REIXI) ~1-'L OI P!O?ERrY GrnERJ\LLY UX-.J\.T&l Il'MIDIM"ELY !Oml O!' B.\T1 curn:~ LAG::Ol ~ CARLS8Af> SCULE\IJ>..~ AND INTERSTA're 5 : t ncl ud i. ng rev I. sed st.a ff ceport. RE9'.)U11'Ia. MJ. 2484, REO::MIDIDn,(; Af>PRJ'JJU. CF A zt:NE ClWCE P'I04 ID-M--0' RES IDE>lrlAL t.fNS ITY-KJL TI PU: wrrn A QU1'Lil'1ID CE'll'El.OPMENl OVERLAY 'IO PC, P~ CXMUNTT'f 01 P!:OPERI'Y ~y r..o::,.:rrn ONDIATELY tORnl CF BATIC:UITC6 ~ ~ CARLSBAD ~ AND INTERSTATE 51 including revised staff report. RFSJUJr'IOI N), 2485, RFO:MIDIDm:; APPfOVM. CF A~ PLAN !'OR 'IKE ~ CE' ffiE BA.TIC0na5 ~ EOOCATIOW.. PM]'; CN PRJPERn GFNERALLY tOCAT?.D IIN!DL'l'NLY ~ CF BATICOI'l'CS l)!GXN ~ CARLS8AD ~ NID ~ 5. Revl..sed cr1 pages 20, 21, 65 and 71. "A)licant to participate in traffic study and analysis for traffic lnpact at the different au,ges, a, Poinsettia, La COst.a and Avenida Encinas 'Ind I-5 interchanges. Cmrnl..,. Lcne-c-"'8ra.is stated foc the reoo:.-d that she ard Camd ss lcni?r Hall had ll.ll'ldl with l(r . Br igga lll'ld Hrs. Trlgas and both felt this ~ a unique <:Xlncept whk'l should be b!neticial to the City. RBOOWrIOI N). 2487, APPRJ'vIN; A SITE~ Pl,l,N ~ PIW;:B I Of MP-175 ro N.lDI a:NS'TROCTIOl CF A I.A>! SODlL, Ni CFFICE BJILODC NlD 'nC> RESEN!Ol HID Cl!VELCJPfEfT BlllDn«:.S ~ 129 RESromt'IAL mrrs CN PfUii!kft G:lmWLY ux:A1"m) CN EO'I"B SIDe.S CF WDOIOSE CIJCLE Jt.m RRnl CF ~"'Ic:m-ros ~- alDDl'ICII N:>. 2'86, ~IN:i APPKMU.. CE' AN 80-1.D!' Tllfitiivi iilici' ~ ~ 129-CMT ~ CNIT ~ ~ H<IPBRti GENl!:RALLY u:x:M'fD D9Q!DIATELY IOl!'B <JI! IP,'fi(JOI'IOO I.NXXN IE'I'Wl'»i INI"l!:RSTA'l' 5 Am CMlSW) BXJtZVMD. O,.t rwn Sd\l.ehuter lnlOUl'l0l!d the NoYellber 27, 1 985, wt1ng fall.a cr1 the We&'le8day befcxe Than>a,gi ving, and aWf CDJld ~e the item cr1 the agenda for that eYfilUJl9. Be auggest.ed the eetlng be canoeled. Plmlning 0--1 sa ten canoe led the Nc:,,;,,ellber 27 , 1985, aaetlng. Schlehuber L'Reureux M,ar1;US Smith Hall Schlehuber L'Heurewt l'\.arcus Smith Hall Schlehuber L'Aeurewt fl\arcl.Ul Smith Rall Schlehuber L'Heureux Marcus Smith Hall Schlehuber L'Beurewt Marcus Slaith Ball Schlehuber L'Beureux Marcus Slaith Ball X X X X X X X X X X X X )( X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ll X X X X l X l MINUTES Septellber 11, 1985 Page 10 Olaf nan Sdl lehuber ~ the quest i cnna 1 res distributed this es.-ening a. e to be returned by the next 0:-1ssim -ting. Quur,mn Sdllehuber said Ca.m.iss1cner Md'adden WO-!ld ,epi:esent the Plann.11-q Camlissicn a, thf? o::rinitt~ tD in~rview consult.ants relative to the bead) camunity. Chairman Sd1lehuber .!lmOUnCed there "'°°ld be an al I~ ~ SOR tuie between Oct.ob 16 and Novellt)er 6, 1985. 'the Minutes of the August 14, 1985, -t Inca were ~ as presented. ~: By ~r notioo, the nEet ing of sept:esrt>er 11, 1985, vas adjourned at 9:,2 p.m. Rl!s:pect.fully eutmitted, Harriett Bal::bitt Minutes Cleric IUTilGi ARE N.ro '17\PED MD m>T Ol F'l LE u m L THE MDIJTES AAE APPFOVED. Schlehuber L'Beureux Marcus Smith Ra.J l Payor, C1 t y '.'.nyor Office., C1ty ~:.1u1a~er, :.1.ty !.a.ll8,6er .,ff1ce., .:1ty Atty, ::I. t y "tty i.•f f1 ce., City of :.U-lsta.d., ~laba.d Ha.rung .Jept., 1200 :jo Ave., .'.:arlsbl.d, va 92008 Ref• Case r1le-dR 84-J/::t-A/k 85-10/.--)19/ ~J--175/..:T 85-14/P~v-90/~Jt-85-5 APFLl ::ANT I EA Tl.,.iJI TO-i l..AGOO:t WUCA Tl OliAl .h\Rr, CITY C.t' :ARLS~ Fl.4N'.l!I:~ .'.:O~;M::;::;1 01, 8 -Jl-85 Dear nann1 ng S:ollll!I, P-'.emben.: ...ale ::.C t\re1 ber ~2<)() ront o : r . , :arls bBd, ·a ?ZO◊e ..>e pt 10th, 1985 Thia letter concerns the S&IIUUa rroject, as we have a great deal of intere.·t ln th1s development for the follov1~ reasons aoo ~uest1on the~ as follovs • ;i1nce it contains a ii ese~h and J evelopaient (h.lgh rech ) al'1!&S, we a.re concerned llbout these act1 v1 t1ea. There are several researh and development sect1 ons v1 th1 n the educ& t1on field vho by coa:JDOn k.novled.~e &rt' wishing to nlocate, one of these being the L&verence L1ver1110re t.uclear :lad1at1on Labs of the Li--Systec. Is th1i, pi.rt of this Project. •• ?? ie a.re concerned over the (;ener&l } lan ..:hange 1n the roa.d ayste m, which nov cont&ina tvo atop lights and varlvus changes to the now ven I lan, which 11as to flov t!":., traffic thru to the Jollet Co1:u:ierlcal l.JC!V at Ave. ::.nclnas and }01nsett.a /f ':J off ra:iip. I t ls our un- atal'lling froi:i both the Jeveloper and the .:~ ty H ann1.,g (;...e::iobo ) U-At th1a Plan 111ahea to rest.net the flov ant!. pass 1t ~orth on ~arlst:ad Uvd to r olr.setta Ave, thru deleatlng the flo11 thru the Jollet :ommer1al !Jevelopment. :s this 11hat 11e want as a ne11 ; l.Anned Road"? There 1s a lot of future traffl.c condf1€ fro:r. t he .:ast :our.ty in the near futun as ,..?8 1a 111proved and La -os t.a and t-alairar i!d, gain as t he tack anas develop. and continue to V1s1 t tt·.e beach p:-opert1es . iJo ve wish to change the Ceneral Han and c ur-tail th1a traffic -='lov. Thia ne11 Har. a s FTOp0S!!"'1 on Page a65., contains a statement that as t.his ls proposaed a secUon of .:arls't:ad Elva ( old 101 highway )"111 be deverted to the • .,;s1 and thus 11111 create a tvo I-a.reel surplus for development, state ir-€ that the -ITI to exchange these Parcels !'or the uevelop::ient (;eooral 1 nprovoent cost to the ~veloper. fhese larcels con- tain 2.1 Acre and 2.9 Acre, a total of Approx flve aa-es. ard vould be given the .,«,v• eloper 1n exchao«e for the 111prov:ncnts for the overi:ass and project street ~1111provaents as ~ulred. The value of these t110 pa.reels of Approx. five acres at $22.00 per SqUAle ft. 111 equal to approx f1ve iclllon dollars. and contains the 11011t expenaive lani:t in the =1ty of :&rl&b&d. This 1s the sar.ie 1dea(concept) 11h1ch v&s used by the ~R1n the 1960's ani:t when the land i,u valued at Approx 5,50 per square ft. ,a.rd ~1n ln the 19?0' a vhen the land had a approx value of lJ.18 per sq. ft • .;1nce this could not be granted • when the value ws 1.2 ~11; and again at 2.? 1'.1l~ an:! now "1th the land value at approx +22.00-25.00 per sq. ft., as ls our five acres 11h1ch a.butt am and are surrounded by th1a project, hov do "" now propose to do this ••• , llease expl&ln. •e feel that &11 <ievelos-nt. Projects v1th1n the :tty should stand on their ovn .. rtt as to firanci~. road i ■pronMnta, &n:1 etc. The :1ty has no right or authority to ceite gifts or exchanges of t.nJ.s a■ount or any UIOunt, !'or tt.t •tter. to beneflt the developer and curtail the ~neral hlblic Funds, Lets :;:,ut thia •tter t.o a vote of the .:1t1zens of the .:tty.... ud', Aa we 011n 5 acrea 1n this a.rea of 11h1ch l. S ac. &re surrounded on three aides by th1• / v ~ demoprant fl&n, 11.m these ;Jlrcels were a i:art of a con:le•tlon procedure 1n 1~ by 11"'1 the St.ate Hiwa.7 :ol:lll, theN ls a legal quosUon as to the ~ta of the CitJ, after t&Jc.1ag · thea troa the State &n:1 ::ian '..,tego t.:ounty ilO&d .uepts., .,nd cha~ng the use fro• that. /II\~ wtd.ch t1,e1 we~ taken and i nten:led as ~oad &I'll right-&-)" (over) \IJ,I, ' ' Dale Sc".re1ber 1J1L«11 tvo of two. Sept 10,1965 rather than plot thea blck to the org1n1Al Pa.reels. Pleaae addreaa this •tter ••••. Since we van not 1nforllltd unt1ll Sept 9th at 1,30 PM, 1965 of these chan,;ea and the •tho:1 of 1t, ve have not had 1U11ple Um to rev1ew the new Pl&m aai cha11g9a. A.ft.er rece1v1ng the Plans rro11 Kr John Brtgis, Saa1s Rep. on the 9th, we cl1d have a _.Ung with l1r Cris De Sobo,c1ty planner for this project on Sept 10th at 9,15 thur 9145 AM, vho wa.a helpful but ve do require 1:)0?'9 t111111 ard request that this •tter be set a.aide unilll we can study 1t fun.her. Ve hereby request that this 1111!1.tter be set aside unUll study can be lade, a.a we have not had aaple Um alloved to amlYT,e th1s nev lani uae, v1th1n the P-'nto ~. CCI ~1_.o11-t1,J~ Ponto Storage Ste., File, 9 10,85 • D, Serv1cea. @I Q... . C r)~E-~, '-C:. C ~ l ':>--1 1 / PviJ -~ 7 ~ ~ m ~ PtJ)o . ....) L Ar.u:> vJ e.-, I-· "-<. ~ J.1.r1 '..:J ~ ... -{ ~ . !. ~ le-h<. u. ~ li!-<. I ~ k.~, ~ffo~ ..... '.-1 of-f-4 o..ho,-<. ~"'1--,JlA.-J ~\C-\1\-..ul ~ d.A,.~.,l,Q~~ h"'xll --~17°--}-~ f'Oo ,~ ·~ '-'\.(. ~ ~J.o....,lO\✓'k. ~ J,__, f~I c,. ~ m.i •~ ~ v v;:)~ o.,,y.J,J ,o'J ~ . 'i I ,