HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-06-01; Traffic Safety Commission; MinutesMINUTES OF:
DATE OF MEETING:
PLACE OF MEETING:
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
June 1, 1970 -3:00 P.M.
City Manager's Conference Room
--------------------------------------------~-----------------------PRESENT: Clifton Nooncaster, Manny Puentes, Hunter Cook, Capt.
GUESTS:
ABSENT:
Rossall, Bill Harkins
W.W. Rogers and F. A. Johnson
Don Johnson, Win Priday
1. The minutes of the meeting of April 6, 1970 were approved as
written.
2. Jefferson Street Soeed Study -Mr. Cook reported that the formal
recommendation of the Automobile Club has been received stating
the speed limit on Jefferson ~tr~et in the area discussed should
be 40 MPH. He also met with Judges Stevens and Reick of the
North County Municipal Court. They advised him that the City
Council has a mandate to establish any speed zoning based on an
engineering study.
'Mr. Rogers questioned why the 25 MPH limit is not enforced.
Mr. Puentes explained in detail the basic policy for law enforc~-
. ment in prima facie speed zones and stated they are not an
absolut!'e .limit.
Mr. Cook re!X)rted the Judge handles the citations based on the
roadway conditions using the posted speed limit as a secondary
item.
Mr~ Rogers f~lt that a 40 MPH limit would be unreasonable and
dangerous for residents in the area. Mr. Johnson also stated
many children ride bikes on Jefferson Street near Las Flores
Drive. It was reported the speed limit would be reduced
starting at Knowles Avenue and southerly.
It was reported the recommended speed limit would have to be the
same as the engineering survey. 1
Considerable discussion was made on the speed limit and also the
problem of noise. Mr. Nooncaster stated this survey was taken
over a two-month period and has been given a great deal of con-
sideration in all respects.
Mr. Rogers was not in agreement with the 40 MPH speed limit.
It was moved that the Automobile Club report by Mr. Puentes
recommending a 40 MPH speed limit be ac~epted and submitted to
Traffic Safety Commission
June 1, 1970
Page 2
the Council for approval. The motion was seconded and approved.
Mr. Cook will submit it to the Council.
3. Two-Hour Parking in the downtown area -Mr. Cook stated this
Commission recommended to the Council that angle parking be
abolished and that consideration of a time limit be made after
angle parking was removed. The Council referred it to the
central Business Listrict Action Committee for their review.
Howeve·~, since that time, they have not had n quorum.
It was moved that this Commission's original recommendation
be resubmitted to the Council strongly recommending the Council
take action. The n,:;.tion was seconded and approved.
4. Intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue
Mr. Nooncaster repo~ted a recent accident at this location and
-questioned the possibility of a signal. Mr. Cook stated he is . I currently studying this location.
5. Updatirtq signals on Carlsbad Boulevard at Elm and Grand Avenues -
Mr. Cook stated th~ contract for this work should be out in the
next month.
6. Deliveries to Carlsbad State Park -Capt. Rossall stated he
talked to Mr. Morgan of the State Parks Dept. regarding this
matter who in turn talked to the vendor making deliveries. It
was deciued that deliveries would be made at the south end of
the Park. This matter has been settled.
7. Carlsbad Boulevard and State Street -Mr. Cook displayed a 24.!.
nour traffic volume of the intersection showing: north on
Carlsb~d Bl. = 4, 260r south on Carlsbad Bl. turning left =
3,390r north on State St.= 3,320. He suggested relocating
the stop sign from northbound traffic on Carlsbad Bl. to left
turning ~raffic southbound on Carlsbad Bl. in an effort to
reduce accidents at this intersection.
After discussion on the matter Mr. Nooncaster suggested deferring
this matter until such time as a survey can be made and pending
a field check by this Commission at lts next meeting. This was
agreed.
Traffic Safety Commission
June 1, 1970
Page 3
8. Rising Glen Drive closure -Mr. Cook stated tne two property
owners on this private road were contacted regarding the
closure of one end to through traffic. One was in agreement
while the other was opposed to the idea. The City Attorney
has indicated there is no legal reason why the City could not
close one end. Mr. Cook stated the El Camino Real end wo~ld
be closed.
Mr. Nooncaster suggested getting a written statement from.the
City Attorney on this matter and if necessary to submit to the
Council, have the City Attorney's report include~ with the
recommendation. This was agreed.
9. Time of meeting -Mr. Harkins stated that due to ~,is workload,
it will not be possible to attend many meetings at the scheduled
}ime of 3:00 P.M. He stated this is al&o the case with
' 1 Mr. Johnson.
t
Discussjon was made on having the me~ting after the normal
office hours and it was suggested that the new City Mana·ger
be advised of this matter and advise the Co,.nmission of his
thought8.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
..i.k,~~"-1.().., ~~~
Barbara Bishop
Recording Secretar~
NOTE; The next meeting will be held July 6, 1970 at 3:00 P.M.
unless otherwisa notified.
• 'I .,