HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-03-07; Traffic Safety Commission; MinutesMINUTES
MEETING OF: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: TIME OF MEETING: 3:OO p.m.
PLACE OF MEETING:
March 7,2005 (Regular Meeting)
City Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Cress called the Meeting to order at 3:OO p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chair Gordon Cress
Vice-Chair Steve Dorsey
Commissioner Guy Roney
Commissioner Bonnie Bradshaw
Commissioner Susan Gardner
Staff Members Present: Robert Johnson, Deputy City Engineer, Transportation
Lt. Don Rawson, Carlsbad Police Department
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
February 7,2005
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Roney, and duly seconded by
Commissioner Gardner, to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of February 7,2005 as presented.
Cress, Dorsey, Roney, Gardner, Bradshaw
VOTE: 5-0-0
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ITEM 4 - ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
There were no requests to address the Commission on any non-agenda items.
March 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting
ITEM 5 -PREVIOUS BUSINESS:
Page 2
Robert Johnson, Deputy City Engineer, stated that he had two items to report. Upon the
recommendation of the Traffic Safety Commission, the City Council adopted the
ordinance to establish stop signs for the stem of the T-intersection at two locations. One
was on Cadencia Street at Romeria Street and the second location was on Unicornio
Street at Rancho Cortes.
ITEM 6 - NEW BUSINESS:
ITEM6A: Investigate the need for a STOP sign on Rancho Cortes at its
intersection with Carrillo Way.
Referring to Exhibit 1 on the overhead projection, Mr. Johnson stated that Rancho Cortes
at Carrillo Way is a T-intersection located in a residential area. Staff received a citizen
request to investigate the need for intersection control on Rancho Cortes at this location.
Carrillo Way has a posted 25-mile per hour speed limit. The intersection is at the top of a
vertical curve created with the Carrillo Way centerline grade of 8.2 percent to the west
and 7.7 percent to the east.
Mr. Johnson stated that staff evaluated the safe approach speed on Rancho Cortes
approaching the intersection to determine if there should be some type of intersection
control at that location. At the decision point on Rancho Cortes, which is assumed to be
50 feet from the Carrillo Way intersection, the clear sight distance both east and west
along Carrillo Way to meet the 10 mile per hour safe approach speed criteria is 140 feet.
Referring to Exhibit 2, Mr. Johnson said that for eastbound vehicles on Carrillo Way,
there is 165 feet that is available, with 140 feet being required. For westbound vehicles,
140 feet is required and there is 135 feet of actual clear sight distance available.
Therefore, it is slightly below the minimum requirement to observe those westbound
vehicles based upon the 25 mile per hour posting on Card10 Way.
Staff observed vehicles and paced some of the vehicles to determine that the operating
speed on Carrillo Way approaching the intersection varied between 3 1 miles per hour and
36 miles per hour. Mr. Johnson stated that staff performed the same clear approach sight
distance analysis for 3 1 miles per hour and 36 miles per hour.
Referring to Exhibit 3, Mr. Johnson stated that for 31 miles per hour, the required
distance for the westbound vehicle is 210 feet; the actual is 135 feet. Therefore, there is a
deficiency in the westbound direction.
Referring to Exhibit 4, Mr. Johnson stated that the actual distance availahle at the
decision point on the minor street is 135 feet for 36 miles per hour, with 260 feet being
required, thus creating a deficiency to observe the vehicles in the westbound direction.
March 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 3
Staff observed driver behavior on Rancho Cortes to determine how the drivers were treating the
intersection, whether they were rolling through the intersection because they were comfortable with
their approach to the intersection or were they actually coming to a stop or treating the intersection
as a stop condition by slowing to less than 10 miles per hour. Staff conducted three field
observations. The first one was on December 1,2004, in the morning between 7: 10 am - 8: 15 am. It
was found that approximately 37 percent of the approach vehicles on Rancho Cortes treated the
intersection as a stop condition. The second observation was on February 1,2005, in the evening
between 500 pm - 6:OO pm, and it was found that approximately 63 percent of the approach
vehicles on Rancho Cortes treated the intersection as a stop condition. The third observation was
conducted on February 10,2005, in the mid-morning between 10:30 am - 1 1 :30 am. It was found
that 50 percent of the approach vehicles on Rancho Cortes treated the intersection as a stop
condition.
Mr. Johnson stated that based upon the limitations at the intersection for the Rancho Cortes driver to
observe westbound vehicles as the driver approaches the Carrillo Way intersection, and based upon
many of the drivers already treating the intersection as a stop condition by slowing to less than 10
miles per hour, or by stopping on Rancho Cortes, the Traffic Safety Coordinating Committee
recommends installing a STOP sign on Rancho Cortes at its intersection with Carrillo Way.
DISCUSSION:
Vice-Chair Dorsey asked Mr. Johnson what was the width of Carrillo Way at that intersection.
Mr. Johnson stated that it was the standard 4o-foot curb-to-curb residential type street. It is
unclassified on the Circulation Element, but is the old standard of 40 feet curb-to-curb.
Chair Cress commented that he drove by the intersection and was struck by the limited amount of
sight distance when going down Rancho Cortes. When approaching the intersection, visibility is
diminished. He could understand why a driver would almost come to a stop just for safety purposes.
He stated that he was torn about installing the residential stop signs, although he was inclined to go
along with the recommendation of the Traffk Safety Coordinating Committee.
Commissioner Gudner stated that it seemed that traffic was going considerably faster than the
posted speed limits, and wondered if the Commission should be considering that also. Even if the
driver came to a stop, if drivers on Carrillo Way are going too fast, one could pull out and still have
issues.
Mr. Johnson stated that the observation of approach vehicles traveling between 3 1-36 miles per hour
was, unfortunately, a common residential speed limit. Staff has noticed this on many residential
March 7,2005 Traffic Safety Cornmission Meeting Page 4
streets that have prima facie 25 mile per hour speed limits. The public that drives on these streets,
mainly the residents in a case like this, are pretty much operating their vehicles in that low 30-mile
per hour range. It is very common throughout the city.
Chair Cress commented that he thought the stop sign on Rancho Cortes at its intersection with
Carrillo Way would at least get the people to stop before going out into that traffic. He agreed that
traffic coming fiom the right, if you’re going to be making a left turn, can be a problem especially if
one doesn’t slow down or stop completely.
MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Vice-Chair Dorsey, and duly seconded by Commissioner
Roney, to recommend installing a STOP sign on Rancho Cortes at its
intersection with Carrillo Way.
Cress, Dorsey, Roney, Gardner, Bradshaw
VOTE: 5-0-0
AYES: NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ITEM 7: REPORT FROM TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER$
None.
ITEM 8: REPORT FROM TRAFFIC ENGINEER
Mr. Johnson reported that next month’s regular meeting of the Trafic Safety Commission would be
held on April 4,2005 at 3:OO p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
ADJOURNMENT:
Chair Cress adjouined the Regular Meeting of March 7,2005 at 3 : 10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Steckdaub
Minutes Clerk