HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-11-07; Traffic Safety Commission; MinutesMINUTES
MEETING OF: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: November 7,2005 (Regular Meeting) TIME OF MEETING: 3:OO p.m.
PLACE OF MEETING: City Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER.
Chair Dorsey called the Meeting to order at 3:OO p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chair Steve Dorsey
Vice-Chair Susan Gardner
Commissioner Gordon Cress
Commissioner Guy Roney
Commissioner Bonnie Bradshaw
Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Robert Johnson, Deputy City Engineer, Transportation
John Kim, Associate Engineer, Transportation
Don Neu, Assistant Planning Director
Lt. Don Rawson, Carlsbad Police Department
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
October 3,2005
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Roney, and duly seconded by
Commissioner Bradshaw, to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of October 3,2005 as presented. VOTE: 4-0- 1
AYES: Dorsey, Gardner, Roney, Bradshaw
NOES: None ABSTAIN: cress
November 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 2
Mr. Robert Johnson clarified that at the October 3, 2005 meeting, Commissioner Bradshaw had
asked for verification of Item 6A, page 3 in the minutes of the August 1, 2005 meeting, where it
stated that Commissioner Cress said that “in looking at the speed survey, the maximum speed
recorded was 34 miles per hour indicating that drivers are traveling below 34 miles per hour.
He asked if the 30-mile per hour speed limit was worthwhile spending the money to put up stop
signs if drivers are already driving that speed. ” Mr. Johnson informed the Commission that he
asked Commissioner Cress if his statement was accurate, and Commissioner Cress indicated that
the minutes were correct.
ITEM 4 - ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
ITEM 5 - PREVIOUS BUSINESS:
Robert Johnson, Deputy City Engineer, stated that the item that was presented at the October 3,
2005 Traffic Safety Commission meeting to remove the existing signs located on Marina Drive
that prohibits on-street parking during street sweeping hours was appealed by Brian Biernacki
who had initiated the action. This item is scheduled to be heard by the City Council at their
November 15,2005 meeting.
At that same Commission meeting, Lt. Rawson, Carlsbad Police Department, initiated a request
to adopt an ordinance to establish a new municipal code section to allow the police department’s
special enforcement unit (SVP members) enforcement authority for municipal code parking
violations. The City Attorney reviewed that agenda bill submitted to have the item placed on the
City Council agenda and determined that the California Vehicle Code does not grant such
authority. Therefore, the City Council cannot adopt an ordinance to allow SVP members to write
additional parking citations .
Chair Dorsey presented a Resolution of Commendation to Commissioner Cress in recognition of
his service as Chairperson from May 3, 2004 through June 23, 2005, as adopted at the August 1,
2005 Traffic Safety Commission meeting.
ITEM 6 - NEW BUSINESS:
ITEM 6A: Update Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) Chapter 10.32 by revising sections
10.32.091 that addresses the existing truck routes and also designating new
truck routes to be incorporated into section 10.32.091.
Mr. Johnson stated that the purpose of this item was to revise Section 10.32.091 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code that addresses the existing truck routes and to consider adding new truck routes to
November 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 3
be incorporated into section 10.32.091. The last major revision to the truck route ordinance was in
1986.
Mr. Johnson explained that truck routes in Carlsbad were designated for commercial vehicles
exceeding a gross vehicle weight rating (G.V.W.R.) of seven tons. A good example of suchvehicles
is a moving van and they should remain on the truck route as long as possible until they near their
destination. Per the Carlsbad Municipal Code, truck mutes govern commercial vehicles over seven
tons G.V.W.R. Vehicles over seven tons G.V.W.R. must remain on designated truck routes. If
commercial vehicles over seven tons G.V.W.R. have a destination in Carlsbad, they must remain on
a truck route to the intersection nearest its destination before the vehicle deviates fiom the truck
route. Large commercial vehicles, such as construction vehicles, may be on certain roads if they
receive an approved Haul Route Permit from the Engineering Department. Other large vehicles,
typically construction vehicles, may be on certain roads if they receive an Oversize Load Permit.
Mr. Johnson stated that commercial vehicles considered as through traffic are to be operated on
designated truck routes with the following exceptions: (1) operation on street of destination; (2)
authorized emergency vehicles; (3) waste management or other authorized vehicles; and (4) detoured
vehicles. The objective for establishing truck routes is to minimize the intrusion of trucks on local
residential streets and to keep commercial vehicles on designated mutes to the greatest extent
possible.
Mr. Johnson explained that the general criteria for restricting commercial vehicles over seven tons
G.V.W.R. from use of certain streets is the demonstration that it will promote the health, safety, and
welfare of the public and not create an undue hardship on other users of the transportation network.
Specific criteria when evaluating potential truck routes include: (1) reasonable alternate route is
provided; (2) the character and frequency of commercial vehicle traffic on the proposed truck route
is compatible with the affected area to the greatest extent possible; (3) the roadway should be
functionally classified on the Circulation Element map as either a collector road or arterial road; and
(4) one portion of the community should not be unduly burdened with commercial vehicle trac at
the expense of relieving other portions of the community from commercial vehicle .traffic.
Referring to the Powerpoint slide of the Circulation Element Plan, Mr. Johnson indicated where the
existing truck routes were designated. Truck routes include El Camino Real, Carlsbad Boulevard and
Rancho Santa Fe Road (north-south) and Palomar Airport Road (east-west). Although not in
Carlsbad’s street right of way, Interstate Highway 5 is also a designated truck route. The portions of
Carlsbad Village Drive, Tamarack Avenue, and Cannon Road west of Interstate Highway 5 each are
designated truck routes.
Mr. Johnson stated that circumstances have changed with several of the previously established truck
routes due to new road construction that necessitates revisions to section 10.32.091. The first is
Cannon Road, from Carlsbad Boulevard to El Camino Real. At the time 10.32.091 (d) was adopted,
Cannon Road terminated at Paseo del Norte. The extension of Cannon Road to El Camino Real was
completed in 2003. El Camino Real is a designated truck route. The second revision is Palomar
Airport Road from Carlsbad Boulevard to easterly city limits. The entire length of Palomar Airport
November 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 4
Road is located within the city limits of Carlsbad and there is no reason to reference a specific land
use adjacent to Palomar Airport Road that no longer exists. Finally, Rancho Santa Fe Road is a
designated truck route from the southerly city limits to the northerly city limits. Rancho Santa Fe
Road has been widened to four lanes from the southerly city limits to the intersection of Olivenhain
RoadCamino AlvaroRancho Santa Fe Road and to six lanes from the Olivenhain RoadCamino
AlvaroRancho Santa Fe Road intersection to the northerly city limits (segment north of San Elijo
Road currently under construction).
Mr. Johnson stated that the Traffic Safety Coordmating Committee was recommending that three
road segments be added to section 10.32.091 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code as truck routes,
The first is Melrose Drive from Palomar Airport Road to the northerly city limits. The second
isFaraday Avenue from Cannon Road to the east city limits. The last recommendation is
College Boulevard from Palomar Airport Road to El Camino Real.
DISCUSSION:
Chair Dorsey asked how truck routes affect truck drivers when they are trying to drive home in
Carlsbad.
Mr. Johnson explained that to the greatest extent possible, truck drivers were to remain on the
designated truck routes as long as possible and then exit at the intersection closest to their
destination.
Chair Dorsey asked if it was possible to designate a higher gross vehicle weight rating on a portion
of a truck route than the seven ton gross vehicle weight rating.
Mr. Johnson replied that it had never been brought up before. Vehicles over seven tons G.V.W.R.
were required to use the truck routes and that is the threshold weight for commercial vehicles on
truck routes.
Commissioner Gardner asked how the neighboring communities such as Vista, Encinitas and
Oceanside were handling this truck route issue.
Mr. Johnson stated that in Vista, Melrose Drive is a truck route. Upon completion of
construction next year, Melrose Drive will connect to Palomar Airport Road in Carlsbad.
In San Marcos, Rancho Santa Fe Road is a truck route and the road will continue into Carlsbad after
construction is completed on the Carlsbad portion next year. In Encinitas, Olivenhain Road is a
November 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 5
designated truck route. In Encinitas and Oceanside, El Camino Real is a truck route that joins with
the existing truck route in Carlsbad.
Commissioner Bradshaw asked when Faraday Avenue would be complete.
Mr. Johnson stated that the portion under construction hm Orion Way to the east city limit would
be completed in about a year fiom this date.
Commissioner Bradshaw asked if it was considered to be a problem to propose a truck route when
the road was not actually existing yet.
Mr. Johnson stated that this was not a problem.
Commissioner Bradshaw asked if the truck routes could be shown on the Circulation Element map.
Mr. Johnson stated that it could be shown on a future revision of the Circulation Element.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY:
Chair Dorsey opened Public Testimony.
Patti Conley, 88049 Paseo Arrayan, Carlsbad asked if Calle Barcelona was part of the proposed
truck route?
Chair Dorsey stated that Calle Barcelona was not on the agenda and neither was Melrose Drive south
of Palomar Airport Road, and neither was proposed as a truck route.
Ms. Conley stated she was very relieved since that was the street where she lived and was concerned
about.
Andy Lee, 7040 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, stated he is the owner of the La Costa Breeze
Newspaper. Mr. Lee asked what the future held for Calle Barcelona and Melrose Drive and is it
possible that they never would be considered.
November 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 6
At the request of Chair Dorsey, Mr. Johnson explained that these roads were not being considered
for truck route designation at this time, but he could not predict the future, and he could never say
never. Some circumstance in the future could change and then it would be a possibility that those
streets would need to be considered as truck routes, but it is not likely. Conditions do change, so
there can be no guarantees.
Chair Dorsey commented that this was the first major revision to the truck route section of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code since 1986.
Mr. Lee asked if Calle Barcelona or Melrose Drive were to become an agenda item in the fbture,
would the residents of Carlsbad be notified of such a future event so they could participate in the
meeting.
Mr. Johnson stated that the City did not have a listing of every homeowner involved that they could
send notices to. He stated that the newspapers did a very good job notifying the public. In the future,
maybe e-mail would be an option. Staff would do its best in the fkre under these circumstances.
Mr. Lee stated that he was the owner/operator of the La Costa Breeze Newspaper. He understood
how difficult it was to notie the citizens. He suggested that perhaps the City could post flyers on
every house in an attempt to noti@ residents.
Mr. Lee gave the Commission several petitions in the form of lettede-mails hm concerned citizens
requesting that Calle Barcelona not be designated as a truck route.
Cindy Cesena, 6439 Cayenne Lane, Carlsbad, La Costa Valley Preschool and Kindergarten stated
that she was relieved and appreciated the fact that Calle Barcelona was not on the agenda today as
they had thought it would be. She wanted the Commission to know how concerned she and her
neighbors were that Calle Barcelona not become a truck route in the future. She gave the
Commission a petition containing 277 signatures from concerned citizens making this request.
Leonard Steinberg, 7932 Sitio Abridor, Carlsbad. h4r. Steinberg stated that he, too, was relieved that
Calle Barcelona was not going to be designated as a truck route at this time. But like the other
concerned citizens was concerned that it may be in the future. If Calle Barcelona is not designated as
a truck route, can trucks use it? He stated that starting at 5:OO a.m. Monday through Friday, large
vehicles over seven tons traversed up and down the grade on Calle Barcelona. School bus sites are
located on Calle Barcelona. He felt strongly that this posed an enormous risk to residents and wanted
to know how to prevent these vehicles from traveling on this street.
November 7,2005 Trafiic Safety Commission Meeting Page 7
Chair Dorsey stated that with his testimony, the Police Department now is aware and they would do
their best to put an end to this.
Mr. Steinberg asked about fbture notification for the citizens if Calle Barcelona did become an
agenda item, and further requested that if it did become an agenda item that the meeting be held in
the evening because it was difficult for many citizens to get off work to attend during the middle of
the day.
Vice-Chair Gardner stated that the Circulation Plan has been available to the public in the past.
Mr. Johnson stated that the Circulation Element of the General Plan is available at the City of
Carlsbad, 1635 Faraday Avenue. Mr. Johnson announced that DonNeu, Assistant Planning Director,
was in the audience and was available to answer any questions the Commissioners may have.
Commissioner Bradshaw asked if Calle Barcelona would become a truck route in the future.
Mr. Johnson stated that Calle Barcelona was not on the staffrecommended list. It is not classified as
a residential street on the Circulation Element, but it is a secondary arterial road.
Commissioner Cress stated that there were no homes facing Calle Barcelona.
Mr. Johnson stated that in theory those type of roads have higher speed vehicles and Circulation
Element roads generally don’t have homes hnting directly on them. There were several exceptions,
including La Costa Avenue, Alga Road, and Tamarack Avenue. Some homes take direct access to
these Circulation Element roads. It is not good planning, but they are on the Circulation Element
from past practices many years ago. The City tries not to designate streets where homes are fionting
the street.
Commissioner Bradshaw was concerned that this dialogue would not be going away in the future.
She was trying to understand the issues.
Don Neu, Assistant Planning Director, stated that the traffic volume from the proposed or permitted
land use is a part of the criteria for designation of a Circulation Element Road. The roadway is sized
to serve the adjacent land uses in addition to projected area traf3ic.
November 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Korrected Page 8
Vice-Chair Gardner asked which came first: the chicken or the egg. What does the Planning
Department do to assure the Circulation Plan is correct?
Mr. Neu stated that traffic studies are regularly prepared for new developments to make sure the
planned circulation system is adequate. Also in the last ten to fifteen years, the City has required
disclosures for new development regarding the proximity to a Circulation Element road.
Chair Dorsey closed the Public Testimony.
MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Cress 43mkbmy , and duly seconded by
Vice Chair Gardner, to recommend revisions to section 10.32.091
that address existing truck routes, and also designate new truck routes
to be incorporated into section 10.32.091 as Melrose Drive - Palomar
Airport Road to the northerly city limits, Faraday Avenue - Cannon
Road to the east city limits, and College Boulevard - Palomar Airport
Road to El Camino Real. Revisions are to extend the truck route
designation on Cannon Road to El Camino Road, revise wording in
10.32.091(f) to remove reference to part of Palomar Airport Road
being in the county and adjacent to the Carlsbad Raceway, clarify in
10.32.091(j) that Rancho Santa Fe Road is a truck route in both
directions, and to delete 10.32.09 l(1) that references the truck bypass
road.
Dorsey, Gardner, Cress, Roney, Bradshaw
VOTE: 5-0-0
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
Chair Dorsey stated that he was glad that Melrose Drive south of Palomar Airport Road and Calle
Barcelona had not be on the agenda today, because he would not have approved it.
Vice-Chair Gardner mentioned that she also was glad Melrose Drive south of Palomar Airport Road
was not recommended as a truck route.
November 7,2005 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 9
ITEM 8: REPORT FROM TRAFFIC ENGINEER
Mr. Johnson stated that the next regular meeting of the Traflic Safety Commission would be held on
December 5,2005 at 3:OO p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion Chair Dorsey adjourned the Regular Meeting of November 7,2005 at 3:47 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Steckdaub
Minutes Clerk