HomeMy WebLinkAbout2286 PLAZUELA ST; ; CB930654; PermitPERMIT APPLICATION l!A. V
PLAN CHECK NO.
City of Carlsbad Building Departaent
2075 Las Pal_,. Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161
I. PE1lMI I hPR
A -U Commercial U New Build mg Li I enanr improvement
B -D Industrial □ New Building D Tenant Improvement
C -□ Residential □ Apartment □ Condo □ Single Family Dwelling □ Addition/ Alteration
□ Duplex □ Demolition □ Relocation □ Mobile Home □ Electrical D Plumbing
U Mechanical □ Pool □ Spa □ Retaining Wall D Solar □ Other
2. PRClJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Address ~ '1.-¼ p (.~ 1,.<J.a..&i --.1{'!'ldmg or Suite No.
Nearest Cross Street
LEGAL DEsCRil"I ION Int No. SulxhVIs1on Name/Number Omt No. Phase No.
CHECK BEWW IF SUBMII IED:
□ 2 Energy Cales □ 2 Structural Cales □ 2 Soils Report □ 1 Addressed Envelope
ASSESSOR'S PARCEi, Q.e plc.., e.
EXISTING USE PBOPOSEP USE
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
SQ. IT. # OF STORIES
3. WN IACI PEJ{S()N (tf duterenl from appJJcanl)
NAME ADDRESS
ZIP CODE CflY STATE DAY TELEPHONE
GiCON I RAC IOR UAlitNl tUKl.UNlKACJUK UUWNtH. DAGEN} FOROWNElt
J\I)DRESS 1~~11:> ,1u1N l'E,._l"-~ P'--.
STATE C-A-ZIP CODE Cf).OI? y DAY TELEPHONE bl 'i-74'!?-"3 II-77
AQ.DRESS ":t ;t -.,. i.. p 1.-A ~ue. 1...A :S. "T '
6.UJN~
NAME
STATEClft ZIP CODE q.t_,:.,O", DAY TELEPHONE
ADDRESS . lt..j ~I'-' TLr> 11-l f"e,\t( --,-0 n l.O A-TT
CITY cJTATE g:~coJ,;. J DAY t~HO~~ ',s'-~ ~-, '7 P~A-'I STATE UC. #b/fr'6)8 LICENSE CI.ASS i3, CITY BUSINESS UC.#
CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE UC.#
7. WORkF.RS' WMPRNSAIION
Workers' Compensation Oeclaratton: I hereby affirm that I have a ceruhcate of consent to self-msure issued by the Director of lndustnal
Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admicted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified
by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C).
INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE
Cemhcace of Exemptmn: I certify that m the performance of the work for which this pernut 1s issued, I shall not employ any person m any manner
so as to become subject to the Work~sation Laws of California.
SIGNATU~,/ _c;t'-~TE 7-/ -'i7:>
8. UWNmt-BOnnmt DF.COOlAMN
□
□
bwner-Bmider Oeclarat1on: I hereby affmn that I am exempt from the Contractor's Lcense Law for the following reason:
I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended. or
offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds
or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided. that such improvements are not intended.
or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner.builder will have the burden
of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.).
I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions
Code: The Contractor's Llcense Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects
with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's Llcense Law).
I am exempt under Section ________ Business and Professions Code for this reason:
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair
any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to tile a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the
provisions of the Contractor's Llcense Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code)
or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit
subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars {$500]).
SIGNATURE ::::::7'~ Q_ t./~ DATE ',-/-'j-3,
COMPil!IE IAIS SECIION FOR NQN.RESIOEN IIAL B0IIDING PERMll'S ONLY:
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and
prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley•Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act?
□ YES □ NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district?
C YES C NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site?
□ YES □ NO
IF ANY OF TIIB ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINALCl!RTIFICATE OF oa:IJPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSllED AITER JULY 1, 1989 UNIJ'.SS TIIB APPLICANT
HAS MET OR IS MEIITING TIIB RF.QUIREMENTS OP TIIB OFFICE OP EMERGENCY SERVICES AND TIIB AIR POILUTION WNTilOL D1511UCf.
9. WNSIKOCIION 11:NDING ACF.Nct
I hereby afhnn that there 1s a construcuon lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit 1s issued (Sec 3097(1) CivU Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS
lb. XPPilCAN I CFltlffiCAfiON
I certify that I have read ihe apphcatmn and state that the above mformauon 1s correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws
relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad co enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection
purposes. I AISO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMIJlSS TIIB CfIY OF CARISBAD AGAINST AIL LIABIUTIES, JUDGMENTS, CDSTS
AND EXPENSES WJDCH MAY IN ANY WAY MilUJE AGAINST SAID CflY IN WNSEQUENCI! OF TIIB GRANTING OP TIDS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the
building or work authorized by such pennit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by
such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced. for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code).
APPL!~~
DATE: 7-/-<;"3
WI-DTE: File YEIJ..OW: Applicant PINK: Finance
CITY OF CARLSBAD
INSPECTION REQUEST
PERMIT# CB930654 FOR 07/13/93
DESCRIPTION: REPLACE EXISTING GARAGE SLAB
PER GEO-TECH REPORT# 102049-02
TYPE: MISC STE:
INSPECTOR AREA TP
PLANCK# CB930654
OCC GRP R-3/M-l
CONSTR. TYPE NEW
LOT: JOB ADDRESS: 2286 PLAZUELA ST
APPLICANT: RIZZUTO, MICHAEL
CONTRACTOR:
OWNER:
REMARKS: MH/TOM/530-6387
SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SLAB
PHONE: 619 75F3~-4507 PHONE:
PHONE:
INSPECTOR -,c.-=------------
TOTAL TIME:
CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS
11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers A:.. trl9/(H-{.,,$'iJII~ /U,/?t,11¢
-------------------------------------------------------
***** INSPECTION HISTORY*****
DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS
December 31, 1992
Project No. 102049-02
Ms, Joyce Almeida
Allstate Insurance Company
P.O. Box 289001
San Diego, California 921 :28-9001
Subject: Limited Subsurface Evaluation of Garage Slab
Riz,;uto Residence, l286 Plazuela Street
Carlsbad, California
Claim No. 47090550'-6-D!i!i
Reforence: Report titled "Limited Ceotechnkal Evaluation, Rizzuto Residence,
2286 Plazuela Street, Carlsbad, California, Claim No. 47090!J5026-D55,"
by Nlnyo & Moore, dated May 16, 1991.
Dear Ms. Almeida:
In ar.:cordance with your letter dated December 11, 1992, we hnve completed a limited
subsurface evaluation of the garage slab at the subjed residence (Figure 1). As you know,
we conducted a preliminary geotechn.ical evaluation of tlw propci·ty in May 1991 a1,d
prepared the above-referenced report. The purpose of our additional :;tu<ly <l«s<:dbcd herein
was to evaluate the cause(s) of the geotechn.ically n:lat"'d di~lr1..-i;s lo the garage slab at the
sile and 10 provide rccommend11tions for the construction of a new garage slab. A
subsurface evaluation of the subject resi<le111.:e and the exterior site Improvements, and the
formulation of repair recommendations pertaining to these structures, was not induded in
the scope of uur study,
SCOPE
The scope of our subsurface evaluation of the garage slab cunsisheu of the following:
•
•
•
♦
•
Review of the above-rds:n;:ncc:d reporl and project file .
Coring of the garage slab, and logging and sampling of thte furn1<1lional m~lerial
el\COUl\tercd bcncnlh the slab.
Laboratory testing of samples of the fonnational makrial ol,tained from our excavation .
Compilation .. md analysi~ of the accumul.ited datti.
Preparation of this report providing our findings, conclusions, and recommendatio1,s .
T.>~G5"t/
J n77'i r-Mrnf"'i c.,,nyon 1<uc1t1 , ~ .... 2 • sant,l,:qD,C.:1/ifv111i,:1 ')71/1 r Phom.•(t.,l'>J-4 1,/-()400. Fox/619/GGOl236
hvilll~. c .. 1li/u1n,~=r '///IH • (-'horn: (714) 7?7-0!~!~2 .. Fd.K. (71-1/ 7,{7-05!33
~. ·~ l
AllBl~I~ Tn~urancc Company
flNDJNCS1\ND CONCLUSION~
December 31, 1992
Project No. 102019-0Z
As discussed in our earlier report, during our in.ilia! 5ile visit on Aprill 8, 1991, we observed
several .cracks in the garage slab, up to approximately 1/4-lnch wide with up to approximate-
ly 3/32-inch of vertical offset, at th!;! Rizzuto property. We also 1rnted that a small piece of
the garage &lab adjacent lo the driveway slab hnd been removed and patched. The
homeowner, Mr. RLt.zuto, stated that the portion of the garage slab had been removed to
allow tht< garage door to dose. An .ipproximately 1/16-inch wide sep~rAtion with
approximately 1-inch of vertical offs<!:! was also observed between the garage slah ,md the
driveway slabs.
Our exploratory core through the garage slab was performed on December 15, 1992. Al the
lor.:11llon of the core (Pigure 2)1 the garage slab wns :ipproximat<?ly 3-1/2 inches thick and no
slab relnforcem,mt was observed, The ~lab was underlain by fine co"dy clayey siltstone of
the Scripps Formation. Additional descriptions of the materials encountered in the
excavation are provided on the attached geut1:<1:hnkal log (Figw·e 3).
Laboratory tests were performed by our firm lo evaluate the in-situ moisture content and dry
density, the degree of saturation, and the expansion polenlial of representative samples of
the formational material obtained from tht< garage 6lab excavation. The in-eitu moisture
content of the tested samples ranged from approximately 19 to 20 percent and averaged
approximately 19 percent. The in-situ dry dei,slty ranged from approximately 94 to 101
pounds per cubic foot and averaged approximately 97 pow11.ls per cubic foot, The degree
of saturation ranged from approximately 65 to 82 percent aml averaged approximately 73
percent. The expansion potential of the tested samples rangt<d frurn negligible lo less than
3/4 percent. Laboratory test results are provided cm the geolechnkal log (rigure 3) 1,nd on
Figure 4.
Based on the findings of our sub~urface .:!valuation, It is our upi11.iun thal lhe cr.:,cks in the
garage slab were primaiily c:au~ed by 50111<? cxpansiun of llw near surface formationnl
material and the ab5ence of appropriate slab un<li:erlaymenl. Our opinion is based
particularly on our laboratory test results, as wdl as 01, the pattern of \hie garage slab cr~cks
and separation,.
2
·-------
-·---A• ,:..-,.,,,-,.._.,,.-r-., :;;g,._,
; ...,GARA,9B SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
•To i:epair the distress to the garag"' Blab and reduce \he potential for future soil rela\e<i
distre&s, we recommend that the existing garage slab be removed. ln addition, approxi-
mately 7 inches of the subgrade soils should also be removed to allow the placement of
appropriate slab underlayment, The new concrete garage slab should be 4 inches or greatE'r
in thickness and reinforced with Nu, 4 reinforcing 8teel bars ploced at 12 inches on-center,
both ways. The reinforcement shuultl be located In the middle one-third of the slab height
and "chalrs11 should be utilized to ald in the proper ~IM~m~nt of thg reinf orc@m@nt. r1ior
to the placement of thi: ~lab underlaymc:nl, the oubgrodc ohould b8 moisture condiHnnP..-1.
The underlayment ~huuld cons!st of 2 inches of dcnn moist sand underlain by a 6-mil pla~tic
(Visqueen) moisture barrier. The moisture barrier should bi: w1derlah, by 4 inchte~ o{ moist
clean sand o~or equivalent crushed rock). The concrtele utilized in the new slnb
should be placed with a slump not exceeding 4 lnches. We further 1·ecommend that the new
garage slab be constructed independently from the garag" foundalio1, (i.e., the slab t:hould
not be structurally connected to the existing foulings).
We recommend that Ninyo & Moore ubs.,rve the repair operation~ tu cvruua(e adherence to
the recommendations provided in this report. If another geotechnlcal consullanl fo Ge!ected
to evaluate the repairs, we recommend that the consultant bo: provided with a copy of our
report and that he cont~~l Q1.lf fim1 to discuss the recommended rt:pi:iirb, In the c:vc:nt that
il.llOther tEOtcchnicnl conoul\iml J;>f~Yl~~~ ~',lillity control, observ~tions, al'ld testln6, we
recommend lhal !he consultanl indicate lo our firm in writing that our recomm@ndat1ons are
fully underotood and that they will b« appropriately implemented.
LIMITATIONS
The tield evaluation, laboratory testing, and geotrchnic.il dllaly~1:~ pre~en\c:d in th.is report
have been conducted in accordanc" with currer,t l'J\t;ineerin~ pra,li.:c ,:md lhe st,mdard of
care exercised by reputabl" seo1echnlcal consullont5 r~rfmming similar tasks in th.is arcn.
No other warranty, e:xprcsscd or implied, is made regarding the conclusio11s, recommenda-
tions, and professional opinions expressed In this report. Vari~\jons may exist a1,d co1,ditions
not lJbserved or described in this report may be encountt"n:d during co1,sfruetion. Our
rP.c:cm1mendations arc based on an analysis of 1hc observed conditions. If cuw.llli~,n~ dlfferenl
3