Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2350 RUE DES CHATEAUX; ; CB044044; Permit
V City of Carlsbad 1 635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 06-23-2005 Residential Permit Permit No: CB044044 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2350 RUE DES CHATEAUX CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2030101913 Lot #: 0 Applied: 10/29/2004 Valuation: $19,800.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: SB Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 06/23/2005 # Dwelling Units: 0 StructureType: Issued: 06/23/2005 Bedrooms:. 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: Project TitI' SAMUELSON RES 180 SF 2ND STORY Orig PC#: N. ADDITION Plan Check#: SAMUELSON JACK/FAMILY TRUST 09-12-89 5140 JARVJSr" brGANADA FLINTRIDGE CA 91011 Owner: SAMUELSON JACK FAMILY TRUST 09-12-89 5140 JARVIS ST LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE CA 91011 Building Permit $176.69 Meter Size Add'l Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'I Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $114.85 Meter Fee $0.00 Add'l Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $1.98 PFF . $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 BTD #2 Fee $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $20.00 Add'I Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL .' $24.00 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Housing lnLieu Fee $0.00 Meter Size Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Master. Drainage Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $337.52 Total Fees: $337.52 Total Payments To Date: $114.85 Balance Due: $222.67 BUILDING PLANS STORAGE 1247 06/23/05 0002 01 02 I TTACHED COP 22267 FINAL APPR VAL Insni'tnr Date: (' Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that'approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Cadsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any 6c, krJtSO1/) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT APPLICATION ' PLAN CHECK ' ; M", '.." '1 Plan Ck. POS ' /1 JT Faraday Ave:, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Validated B Date_______________ .'.' . . ., j. PROJECT INFORMATION -. ... -. _____ ______________________________ 4398 10/29/04 0 02 01 02 Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) ' . 114jq . Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work . SQ. FT. #of Stories rn. DO ........ ... # of Bedrooms . # of Bathrooms -_I - RSO ji PE t diff rent from appelicant) * ,., -- ., L"W Name Address . City 'state/Zip Telephone # Fax # JAPPLICANT 0 Contrar Dient fCintracfor 0 Owner 0 Aj foiQwneT 4&1 "3e'o kT Tfl5T Name Address City State/ Zip Telephone # 'PROPERTYOWN , . Name Address City State/Zip. Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to Construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the a plicant to a civil penalty f not more than five hu dred dollars ($5001). 'rMt)ILbJ i24U. h L lt,o Name . , Address ' City State/Zip Telephone # State License # ( I License Class I City Business License # ' Lg) . iP-k Ob S b L& C-4 1'tD& I Ob Designer Name , Address City . , 'State/Zip ''Telephone State License # [6WORKERSCOMPENSAON'; Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as requireii by Section 3700-of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company ' Policy No. ' Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT. BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued; I shall not employ any person in any, manner so as to ecome subject to the Workers' .Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Fa o secure worker ' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand doll s 100.0 . in a u on to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE -' DATE 10 -o4- OWN BUHD 7!77 CT DECLAR N T' ___ I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, 'Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement.ES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proosed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address I phone number / contractors license number): I will provide some of the work I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): - . . PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE '&U...4U C- .,, DATE Is the applicant or future buildg occupant, required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0. NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1.000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO' IF ANY OF THE'ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there, is a construction lending agency, fr the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 30970) Civil Code). LENDERS NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS_______________________________________________________ LtAPPLICANtCERTIFICI!!( j ' I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cite" of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned .property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS. COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'O" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issue y the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is n Co menced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized.by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is C enced a pe f 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ' . DATE 10 - WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance . . . City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/02/2006 Permit# CB044044 Title: SAMUELSON RES 180 SF 2ND STORY Description: ADDITION Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 2350 RUE DES CHATEAUX Suite: Lot 0 Location: OWNER SAMUELSON JACK FAMILY TRUST 09-12-89 Owner:• SAMUELSON JACK FAMILY TRUST 09-12-89 Remarks: 760434-2728 Total Time: Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 8185225480 Inspector: Requested By: PHIL Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comment CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Comments/Notices/Hold Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 05/31/2006 89 Final Combo CO PY SMOKE ALARM GFI © COUNTER 12/22/2005 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 12/22/2005 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall WC PY 12/01/2005 16 Insulation AP PY 12/01/2005 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY 11/21/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 11/21/2005 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs AP PY 11/21/2005 34 Rough Electric AP PY 10/20/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PY SEE NOTICE ATTCH. 10/20/2005 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall WC PY 10/20/2005 24 Rough/Topout AP PY 09/26/2005 15 Roof/Reroof AP PD *4365 09/21/2005 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY EsGil Corporation In (Partners flip with government for Bui(iing Safety DATE: June 17, 2005 U APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad . U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-4044 SUPP SET: III PROJECT. ADDRESS: 2350 Rue Des Chateaux PROJECT NAME: Samuelson Addition/ Remodel The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when the two minor deficiencies identified in the attached list are resolved and checked by building department staff. F-1 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list. and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: U Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Lii Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: .0 (9 Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: OK to issue with applican,1placing sheets A-I, A-2, A-3, SP-1 & SP-2 in set II with the new sheets A-I, A-2, A-3, SP-1 & SP-2 marked set Ill. Received one set only. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA fl MB U EJ 0 PC 06/09/05 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 . -' Carlsbad 04-4044 SUPP June 17, 2005 LAST TWO ITEMS 33. All new residential buildings, including additions, requje a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a r9bm addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not fequired. Under this condition, Esgil staff should advise the City (upon final transmittal place their "soils notice" stamp on the plans. Applicant states this item waived by Mil(e Peterson. 55. Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Measures Checklist" and imprint the completed form on the plans. Please initial the required items and change the ceiling insulation to R30 and identify the SHGC and U-factor from Table 3-1. This required R-30 in the ceiling and the applicant proposed R-27.5 Applicant states this item approved by Mike Peterson. END EsGil Corporation In cPartnersliip with government for (Bui&(ing Safety * DATE: May 119 2005 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-4044 SUPP NT JURIS. O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2350 Rue Des Chateaux PROJECT NAME: Samuelson Addition/ Remodel The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected .where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. El The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. U The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. F-1 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Jack Samuelson 5000 Edenhurst Avenue Los Angeles 90039 LII Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. U Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Jck Samuelson Telephone #: 818 500 0155 Date contacted: (by: )- ) Fax #: 818 500 1101 Mail lelephone" Fax -'ln Person I REMARKS: The project has changed designers different corrections are required By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation O GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 05/05/05 tmsmti.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-4044 SUPP May 11, 2005 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-4044 SUPP PROJECT ADDRESS: 2350 Rue Des Chateaux SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 05/05/05 May 11, 2005 REVIEWED BY: FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations.. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints to: See #1 next page. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews.. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? UYes ONo Carlsbad 04-4044 SUPP May 11, 2005 . PLANS NOTE: The items listed below refer to the item numbers from previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of or contained within each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports rdirectly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake•Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). This applies to all subsequent submittals. Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California .who is responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Only the effected sheets need be submitted I will insert them into the plans. 13. Provide roof framing, floor framing and foundation plan. UBC Section 106.3.3. Please size the low roof rafters on the plans. Carlsbad 044044 SUPP May 11, 2005 . FIRE PROTECTION 22. When the valuation of a room additiOn exceeds $1,000, show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction, except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered. UBC Section 310.9.1.2: Or provide a note to this effect on the plans. Inside each bedroom. Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. On each story. In the basement, if part of the dwelling unit. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway.. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 310.9.1. . ROOFING 25. Specify on the plans the following information for the copper roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: Manufacturer's name. Product name/number. ICBO approval number, or equal. 26. Specify copper roof slope. 4. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section 106.3.3: Manufacturer's name. Model name/number. ICBO approval number, or equal. . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 33. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. Under this condition, Esgil staff should advise the City (upon final transmittal) to place their "soils notice" stamp on the plans. 37. The following footing requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4i per UBC Section 1806.7: Please dowel the new to existing footings together. Carlsbad 04-4044 SUPP May 11, 2005 FRAMING 5. The length of each designed shear panel must be dimensioned on the plans. These dimensions should be shown wherever the shear panels are called out. . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 52. Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). These receptacles must be GFCI protected. . ENERGY CONSERVATION 55: Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Measures Checklist" and imprint the completed form on the plans. Please initial the required items and change the ceiling insulation to R30 and identify the SHGC and U-factor from Table 3-1. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with gtwernment for cBui&uing Safety DATE: November 9, 2004 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-4044 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2350 Rue Des Chateaux SET:I O APPLICANT S. O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE PROJECT NAME: Samuelson Addition/Remodel LII The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected wh e r e n e c e s s a r y a n d s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o m p l y with the jurisdiction's building codes. LIII The plans transmitted herewith will substantially compl y w i t h t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n ' s b u i l d i n g c o d e s when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved an d c h e c k e d b y b u i l d i n g d e p a r t m e n t s t a f f . El The plans transmitted herewith have significant defic i e n c i e s i d e n t i f i e d o n t h e e n c l o s e d c h e c k l i s t and should be corrected and resubmitted for a comp l e t e r e c h e c k . U The check list transmitted herewith is for your informatio n . T h e p l a n s a r e b e i n g h e l d a t E s g i l Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for rech e c k . LI The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the j u r i s d i c t i o n t o f o r w a r d t o t h e a p p l i c a n t contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Jack Samuelson 5000 Edenhurst Avenue Los Angeles 90039 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been com p l e t e d . U Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that t h e p l a n c h e c k h a s b e e n c o m p l e t e d . Person contacted: Jack Samuelson Date contacted:Uf/%y(by:.4(E) Mail vieIephone V' Fax Vin Person Telephone #: 818 500 0155 Fax REMARKS: The plans are incomplete and vague. The f o l l o w i n g c o r r e c t i o n s a r e g e n e r a l i n nature and based on the response more corrections m a y f o l l o w . F o r a c o m p l e t e r e v i e w , s u b m i t construction drawings that reflect the scope of work . I n c l u d e f o u n d a t i o n , f r a m i n g , p l u m b i n g , e l e c t r i c a l and mechanical plans and details. By: Bryan Zuppiger Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 11/01/04 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-4044 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2350 Rue Des Chateaux FLOOR AREA: See Below Dwelling addition 150 ft2 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: November 9, 2004 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 211-9; at NE elev. sheet 2. DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 11/01/04 PLAN REVIEWER: Bryan Zuppiger This plan review is limited to the technical requiremen t s c o n t a i n e d i n t h e U n i f o r m B u i l d i n g C o d e , Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, N a t i o n a l E l e c t r i c a l C o d e a n d s t a t e l a w s regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and a c c e s s f o r t h e d i s a b l e d . T h i s p l a n r e v i e w is based on regulations enforced by the Building Depar t m e n t . Y o u m a y h a v e o t h e r c o r r e c t i o n s based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Depa r t m e n t , E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t , F i r e Department or other departments. Clearance from thos e d e p a r t m e n t s m a y b e r e q u i r e d p r i o r t o the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential const r u c t i o n c o m p l y w i t h t h e 2 0 0 1 e d i t i o n o f the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts t h e f o l l o w i n g m o d e l c o d e s : 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/ 1 / 0 2 ) . The above regulations apply to residential construction, r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e c o d e e d i t i o n s a d o p t e d by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification o r c h a n g e . A l l i t e m s m u s t b e s a t i s f i e d before the plans will be in conformance with the cited c o d e s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s . P e r S e c . 1 0 6 . 4 . 3 , 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the pl a n s d o e s n o t p e r m i t t h e v i o l a t i o n o f a n y state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on t h i s l i s t ( o r a c o p y ) w h e r e e a c h correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you subm i t t h e r e v i s e d p l a n s . Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, and (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, and (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review-by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. The person responsible for their preparation must sign all final sheets of plans. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Final plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the engineer or architect licensed by the State of California who is respOnsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 4. Indicate on the Title Sheet of the plans the name of the person responsible for the preparation of the plans. UBC Section 106.3.3. 5. Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project, including dwelling addition and remodel. UBC Section 106.3.3. 6. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 .UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC. 7. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. UBC Section 106.3.3. Include the following: North arrow. Property lines/easements. C) Streets/alleys. d) Existing and proposed buildings and structures. 8. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. UBC Section 106.3.3 . Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 The Conventional Light-Frame Construction provisions of Section 2320 may not be used in Seismic Zones 3 & 4 for "unusually shaped buildings," and design calculations must be provided as per UBC Section 2320.5.4: a) When exterior braced wall panels are not in one plane vertically from the foundation to the uppermost story. See the possible exception in Section 2320.5.4.1 where the cantilever or setback does not exceed four times the depth of the floor joists. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and footings. UBC Section 106.3.3. Based on the response more corrections may follow. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. UBC Section 106.3.3. Based on the response more corrections may follow. Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per UBC Section 1630-1.1. Based on the response more corrections may follow. Provide roof framing, floor framing and foundation plan. UBC Section 106.3.3. Note on the plan that the structural consultant shall provide a letter of review for the truss plans and calculations with their submittal should trusses be submitted. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. UBC Section 106.3.2. . REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with UBC Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION. INSPECTION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI FIELD WELDING EXPANSION/EPDXY ANCHORS 16. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review UBC Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal (trusses, etc.). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per UBC Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." Show on the title sheet all structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included "or provide details for these structures. UBC Section 106.3.3.3. . FIRE PROTECTION Exterior walls closer than 3 feet to property lines shall be one-hour rated construction and have no openings. UBC Table 5-A. Exterior walls closer than 3 feet to a property line shall have 30 inch parapets when the floor area, per floor exceeds 1,000 square feet. See UBC Section 709.4 for possible exception. Projections, including eaves, may not extend more than 12 inches into the 3 foot setback from the property line. UBC Section 503.2.1. When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup in the new and existing construction, except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered. UBC Section 310.9.1.2: Or provide a note to this effect on the plans. Inside each bedroom. Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. On each story. In the basement, if part of the dwelling unit. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 310.9.1. Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 23. Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and a minimum of 5 square feet. In bathrooms and water closet compartments, 1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1.5 sq. ft. UBC Section 1203.3. The--plans do not show the window size or action at the new rooms. 24. Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms and water closet compartments if required openable windows are not provided. UBC Section 1203.3. . ROOFING 25. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: Manufacturer's name. Product name/number. ICBO approval number, or equal. 26. Specify roof slope. 27. Roof coverings, other than wood shakes and shingles, shall be Class A. 28. Wood shakes and shingles are prohibited as a roof covering on all new structures and on all replacement roofs. 29. Show the required ventilation for attics (or enclosed rafter spaces formed where ceilings are applied directly to the underside of roof rafters). The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. UBC Section 1505.3. 30. Where eave vents are installed, insulation shall not block the free flow of air. A minimum of 1" of air space shall be provided between the insulation and the roof sheathing. To accommodate the thickness of insulation plus the required 1" clearance, member sizes may have to be increased for rafter-ceiling joists: UBC Section.1505.3. 31. Note on the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dimension." UBC Section 1505.3. 32. Show a 22"x30" access from the existing attic to the new attic. Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 33. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. Under this condition, Esgil staff should advise the City (upon final transmittal) to place their "soils notice" stamp on the plans. 34. Note on plans that wood shall be 6" minimum above finish grade. UBC Section 1806.1. 35. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. UBC Section 1804.7. 36. Dimension foundations per U.B.C. UBC Table 18-I-C: Floors Footing Supported* - Thickness Width Depth Stemwall 1 6" 12" 12" 6" 2 7" 15" 18" 8" *Foundations may support a roof in addition to the floors. Where only a roof is supported, use foundation for one floor. 37. The following footing reqUirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per UBC Section 1806.7: Foundations with stemwalls shall be provided with a minimum of one No. 4 bar at the top of the wall and one No. 4 bar at the bottom of the footing. Slabs-on-grade with turned-down footings shall have a minimum of one No. 4 bar at the top and bottom. Exception: For slabs-on-grade cast monolithically with a footing may have one No. 5 bar located at either the top or bottom. 38. Show foundation sills to be pressure treated, or equal. UBC Section 23064. 39. Show foundation bolt size and spacing. Foundation bolt size and spacing for shear walls must be clearly Shown on the foundation plan. UBC Section 1806.6. 40. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per UBC Section 1806.6.1: The minimum nominal anchor bolt diameter shall be 5/8-inch (for Seismic Zone 4 only). Note: This will require a minimum distance from the ends of sill plates to be 4-3/8" (and a maximum of 12"). Plate washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on each anchor bolt. Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 41.. Specify size, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. UBC Section 106.3.3. 42. If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. UBC Section 106.3.3. 43. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. UBC Section 108.5.2. 44. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear walls. UBC Section 1806.3. FRAMING 45. Please see items 9-14 at the front of this list. 46. Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJl's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJl flanges. 47. Specify nail size and spacing for all shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. Sections 2315 and 2513. Specify plywood and/or particle board thickness, grade and panel span rating. Table 23-11-E-1. 48. Please detail the "California" framing: Show the flat sleeper size and connection to the roof sheathing supports. Show all member sizes. . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 49. Every habitable room within a dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms. Show basis for compliance. UBC, Sec. 310.11. . .. . . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 50. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. 51. Show on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art. 210-52(a). 52. Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). This receptacle must be GFCI protected. Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 53. Show at least one wall switch-controlled lighting outlet to be installed in every habitable room; in bathrooms, hallways and stairways. At interior stairways show 3-way switching for lighting outlets at each floor level where there are six or more steps. NEC Art. 210(a). 54. Per NEC Art. 210-11(c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. . ENERGY CONSERVATION 55. Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Measures Checklist" and imprint the completed form on the plans. 56. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower). 57. Note on the plans: "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing compliance with the energy calculations." To speed Up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgit Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bryan Zuppiger at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 MANDATORY MEASURES CHECKLIST: RESIDENTIAL (Page 1 of 2) MF-1R Note: Lowrise residential buildings subject to the Standards must contain these measures regardless of the compliance approach used. ltent.S marked with an asterisk (') may be superseded by more stringent compliance requirements listed on the Ceniticale of Compliance. When this checklist is incorporated into the permit documents, the features noted shall be considered by all panics as imnhtnuns component performance specifications for the mandatory measures whether they are shown elsewhere in the documents or an this checklist only. Instructions: Check or initial applicable boxes when completed or enter N/A if not applicable: DESCRIPTION DESIGNER ENFORCEMENT Building Envelope Measures: §150(al: Minimum R-t ceiling insulation. §150(b): Loose till insulation manufacturer's labeled R-Value. §150(r): Minimum R-13 wall insulation in wood framed walls orequivalent (J.Factorin metal frarnowalls 4doec notapolvto e.'steiior masswalls. 150(d): Minimum 15-13 raised floor insolation in framed ('toots. § 150(1): Slab edge insulation - water absorption mate no greater than 0.3%, water vapor transmission rate no wearer than 2.0 permlinch. §115: Insulation specified or installed meets insulation quality standards. Indicate type and form. .4116-17. Fenestration Products, Exterior Doers, and lnfiltration/Exfilutnion Controls; I. Doors and windows between conditioned and uncotiditiond spaces designed to limit air leakage. Fenestration products (except field-febricared) have label with certified LI-Factor, certified Solar heat Otis Coefficient ($HGC), and infiltration certification. Estetior doors and windows weatherstripped; all joints and penetrations caulked and scaled. § ISO(s): Vapor barriers mandatory in Climate Zones 14 and 16 only. l5O(t). Special infiltration hairier installed to comply with § 151 meets Commission quality standards. § 150(e'i: lttsrallation'uf Fireplaces, Decorative Clan Appliances and Gas Logs. I. Masonry and factory-built fireplaces have: a. Closeable metal or ulacs dour It. Outside air intake with damper and control c. Flue damper and control continuous burning gas pilot lights allowed. Space Conditioning, Water I-lending and l'hutinhitig Systs'nt Measures: §110,51 13: HYAC equipment, water heaters, showerheads and faucets certified by the Commission. §150(h): hteatinteandmur coolinu loads calculated in accordance with ASlIRAE. SNtACNA or ACCA. §150(i): Setback thermostat on all applicable healing antt'ar cooling systems. § I 506 Pipe and tank insulation I. Storage gas water healers rated with an Energy Factor less than 0.58 must be externally wrapped with insulation having an installed thermal resistance of 15-12 or greater, FirstS feet of pipes closest to water heater Iattk, non-recirculating systems, insulated (K-4 or greater) Back-up tanks for solar system, unfired storage tanks, or other indirect hot water tanks have 15.12 external insulation or 15-16 combined internal/external insulation. All buried or exposed piping insulated in recirculating sections of hot water systems. Cooling system piping below 5 V F insulated. Piping insulated between heating source and indirect hot water tank. Compliance Forms August 2001 A-5 Carlsbad 04-4044 November 9, 2004 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-4044 PREPARED BY: Bryan Zuppiger DATE: November 9, 2004 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2350 Rue Des Chateaux BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) dwelling addition 150 City Valuation 19,800 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 19,800 Jurisdiction Code ICb IBY Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: 1 Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0 Other. 0 Repetitive Fee Repeats o Hourly Hour * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $176.691 I $114.851 I $98.95 Comments: macvalue.doc - PLANNING/ENGIN]iERING-4PPROVACS----: NuM9ER.ca.Ô.qwg DATE_______________ ADDRESS .,L5O.. -, RESIDENTiAL - . .•.. . TENANT IMPROVEMENT .;. :.RESJDENflALtADDITIONMINOR. . .. -. .PLAZACAM1NOREAE .. (<$10100000) •:. • :CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLACE FAIRE 'I COMPLETE OFFICEBUIj.DjNC. OTHER ENGINE11 DATE - * . .. . I 6., U U PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan ChéckNo. CB OW %botjlf Address _2i9 PVle 1eccflk' Planner fl/li & __ Phone (760) 602- APN: Type of Projt & Use: f 4DP Zoning:____ General Plan: Net Project Density: /1/44' DU/AC ____ Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: " (For non-residential development: Type of. land used created by this Circle One permit:______________________________________________________________ Legend: Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO ____ TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION:_________________ Compliance with conditions of approval? it not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES ____ NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE_____ PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES:________________________________________ Compliance with conditions or approval? if not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance / Project site locatedin Coastal Zone? YES)... NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES___ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them —.7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 - Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or xempt _______________ Coastal Permit Determination Form already comp eted? •YES____ NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal, Permit Determination Log #: FollowUp Actions: • 1) Stamp Building Plans as uempr or uCoastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as, needed. Cl 0 IncIusionary Housing Fee required: YES ____ NO ____ (Effectivedate of Inclusionaly Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? 'YES___ NO____ (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) . Site Plan: H:.AOMlNCOUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChk$st . Rev 91 D 0.00 ' • .. .-•., ••.•....... .... ... 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show:. North arrow, proper4' lines: easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way. 'width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all .side and rear yard• slopes).. 2.. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. . Policy 44— Neighborhood Architect ral Design Guidelines 0E 10 1. 'Applicability: YES NO_______ . 0 0 0 2. Project complies YES NO_______ .1. Setbacks: teá /"D amatmnith4- Front: . .• Required Shown Interior Side: . Required • Shown Street Side:. . Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Top of slope: • Required ____Shown • . 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: / Front: •• Required _______________ Shown Interior Side: Required ________________ Shown Street Side: Required • Shown Rear: • Required _______________ Shown Structure separation: Required _______________. Shown O 3. Lot Coverage: • Required • • Shown O 0 4. Height: Required _____________ Shown O 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required • • Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required . Shown 610 0 Additional Comments 4 eôa~'i I. e1opme Permf will be req vred t'r #1f S pfvr~vs,ow ',n AdMK.TeO'leslNfim4-ENftE,REVA~IROVAL I`NTO OMPUTER /1 jf/L O org ,P DATE H:\ADMINCOUNTER\BIdgPIflChkReVChkISt .. >/ Rev 9101 1afI.. ( pamtm tf foe dei4e4"P (Ct?t*i 7%Ad 4,' :1&312005 TUE 10:51 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 32 ~]L II &Itta,iieers dy', mao 4u,$V moifU . i.ANO suavfvlll PgrACW TIM AND SOIL FISTING 2771 INDUSTRIAL CT. SUITE Al.WSTt CA 92083 619.727-0282 NATIVE SUN DEVELOPMENT 110 Escondido Ave., Suite 103 Vista, CA 92083 q- 'i.-?g- J_.tz c4-7r CLiENT:NATIVE SUN DEV. P/tojQ_e..tFNSp U83-1 v.ce. -16 Aug.. IQR& Subject: Report of Rough Grading for the Pointe San Malo Residential Development located in Carlsbad, CA. Gentlemen: The following report has been prepared. to present the results of our Field and Laboratory Testing and Inspections during rough grading of the above subject site. The enclosures to this report are as follows: Plot Plan - Enclosure (1) Compaction Test Data - Enclosure (2) Expansion Test Data • Enclosure (3) Seismic Hazard Map - Enclosure (4) SCOPE The scope of our work included the following items: Review of previously compiled geotechnical data for the subject site, report prepared by Benton Engineering Inc. dated 8 May 1979, and review of the Grading Plans. Verification of Conclusions and Recommendations of the Preliminary Investigation Report and the Grading Plan. Perform required Field and Laboratory Tests for the verification of compaction, expansion, and bearing values of the native soils used during grading. C60 q qØb(ui hY-31-2005 TUE 10:52 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 35 I&ItRa NEW ae Im. CIVIL AAIO 0114UPY I1QVV3 • ENCOLA T19W io SOt4 'U VIrfQ CONSTal.TIoN ISNCrtON 2111 INDUSTRIAL Cf. SUITE W VsST4. CA 92083 619-M-0282 CLIENT: NATIVE SUN 0EV. P'tojec..:N1i Il83-'E - lcAuq. 1184 - earthquakes may be expected in the future from this system, they should not be significantly stronger than those experienced in the past, ie, magnitude 6.3. (Long Beach, 1933). The relation between earthquake magnitude, M, and ground accel- eration, a, in centimeters per second per second, at the epicenter, may be roughly estimated by the expression: 14 = 2.2+1.8 log a. Based on this relationship, which assumes a point source of energy release, a magnitude 6.3 corresponds to a ground acceleration of 0.199. There are no other geologic hazards such as liquefaction, landslides, tsunamis, or seiches which should affect the project s ite. EXPANSION CLASSIFICATION Samples of the upper -24" 6f surface soi1s for the subject lots were obtained and tested in the laboratory for expansion potential. Locations of these samples and the representative lots tested are shown on Enclosure (1). As indicated by our expansion test results, Enclosure (a) the surface materials of all lots in this project were determined to be very low to non-expansive. FOUNDATIONS Based on the expansion test results, the foundation for the proposed structures shall conform to the design criteria set forth in the Preliminary Investigation Report and the approved Foundation Plans. For' foufldatiOn design purposes, the reãonnended allowable bearing value of the soil In the natural condition •(cut lot) is - 4 - MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:53 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD JAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 36 IbIS £agliwsjat. CIViL 4*0 OU,260V IN0IWIaS s &4hb luawfVtNG p CO 1.4 non i*o SOIL YSSTIOO grjUOi "W11"2777 INDUMIAL C SUITE °A WST4, C4.92083 679-727.0282 CLIEMT: NATIVE SUN 0EV. p!wje.ccrNa 11S3.J Vat,. 16 Aug. 1984 - 3000-pounds )- and 2000 psf-for-a-f ill lot This completes our Inspection and testing of the subject Site during Rough Grading. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. B & B Engineers and Associates appreciate this opportunity to be of service to Native Sun Development. Sincerely, Arthur C. C. Beard RCE RQE President ACB: DPB: bjh Enclosures - 5 - MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:53 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 37 i-a cc -............--- . .. . .. .. :::....... . I MAY-31-2006 TUE 10:54 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 38 1141 £,eiI mesa Forthil S C*C1 '1SflC .4- ,,p eaomtn • &..aos.isvao 21111 SNOU.STRSAL CT. SUM 4 visT4. CAM. 9X13 / 714'2702a2 PROJECT * NSD 1183-1 CLIENT NATIVE SUN 0EV. DATE Aug. 1994 rr JDATE JELEV.IMOISTURE IMOISTURE FIELV OPTiMUM 'FiELV PRY MA.XIMUM RELATIVE % % I DENSITY DENSITY ICOMPAMON REMARKS 1 7/6/84 29 2.9 8.5 118.2 128.5 92 Natural 2 " 34 3.1 117.5 II 91 Natural r3 /10/84 36- 9.8 1 122.4 95 FIll 37 10.4 U 124.9 97 1 Is 6 /11/84 32 8.2 125.5 98 6 33 10.3 122.6 95 7 ° 21 8.5 121.1 'I 94 8 Is 22 91 II 121.4 94 9 of20 11.0 'I 122.0 95 10 7/14/84 14 8.7 117.7 'I 92 11 is 14 9.8 116.1 90 12 7117/84 18 7.6 115.5 90 13 1 " 15 10.5 119.2 93 14 " 34 9.8 U 117.2 91 15 " 36 10.9 1 118.8 92 U 16 /19/84 31 5.6 9.5 120.1 125.5 96 Cut 17 of 29 6.5 119.7 I' 95 Cut 18 if 28.5 4:9 122:2 of 97 Cut 19 If 34 7.9 8.5 120.0 128.5 93 Fill 20 ' 37.5 8.8 'S 119.8 " 93 Fill COMPACTION CURVE DATA - OPTIMUM MAXIMUM PRY SOIL DESCRIPTION MOISTURE VEAISZTV Tan Brown Silty SAND 8.5% 128.5 pcf Tan Orange Brown Silty SAND 9.5 1 25.5 pcf COMPACTION TEST DATA Enclosure (2) MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:54 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 39 ( L B&H IAW* CIH adUb OUALIV V EIVG,.vrfvs . i.afvO Su9.tVit.0 (RCQIA110rANO SOIL TfS7I?4C cor.aucr.ot towspOCT-0mv ,21 It INDUSTRIAL CT SUITE A VISTA. CA 92083 619-727-0282 EXPANSION CLASSIFICATION NSD 1183-1 AUG 1984 TEST SOIL EXPANSION EXPANSION NO, TYPE INDEX POTENTIAL E1 ORANGE-TAN 0 VERY Low SILTY SAND F-2 ORANGE-TAN 0 VERY Low SILTY SAND E43Ti:TNERöN VERY LOW SILTY SAND EXPANSION TEST DATA ENCLOSURE (3) LOS ANGELES '.4 S. 1AY-31-2005 TUE 10:55 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD I P SEISMIC FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 40 HAZARDS ¼ S.' MILES SAN DIEGO SOURCE: BUR&LMD AND ASSOCIATES, SEIS'IIC HAZARD 4P MAP ii Enclosure (4) MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:55 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD - FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 41 L7r £L H&H AWV~~ ar lm CVL iWO OuAL1?V mouii 4 WVP SupvfIWG 2??? INDUSTRIAL CT. SUITE A VISTA CA 92093 619-7270282 City of Carlsbad Building Department 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 CLI gwr: NATIVE SUN LDV - Pjcti NSD 11R3.1 - Vo2 Jnly 14R4 Subject: Soil Testing for the Retaining Walls at The Beach" Development located on Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA Gentlemen: Pursuant to your request, we have completed our Inspection and Testing of the foundation soils for the subject retaining walls. The. locations of our test pits are shown on Enclosure (i), and the results of the Unconfined Compression Test are detailed on Enclosure (2). On 9 July 1984, two test pits were excavated on the Easterly Side of the project utilizing a 08 bulldozer. Due to the cemented characteristics of the native subsurface soils, digging was ex- tremely difficult. Undisturbed and bulk samples were obtained for laboratory analysis. The In-place dry density of the native silty sands in the upper 24 inches ranged from 90 to 92 percent relative to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Procedure 0 1557-70. The results of the Unconfined Compression Test Indicated an unconfined compressive strength of the native soil to be 3566 pounds per square foot (psf); however, using a factor of safety of 1.5, the reconinended bearing value of the native material is 2400 psf. Based on the classification of soil type as a silty sand and the fact that the retaining walls have no surcharge, and that the backfill is assumed to be well-drained sand, an angle of friction of 330 40' Is recommended. A soil density of 113 lbs. per cu. ft. is used In the formula to find the equivalent fluid pressure(EFP): EFP = wC4 C4 tan2 (450 - EPP = (113) tan2 (45 - 3367) = 32.4 lb per Cu. ft. 1- IIAY-31-2005 TUE 10:56 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 42 City of Carlsbad RE: Native Sun 0ev. 20 July 1984 Our calculations using 30 lb. per cu. ft. equivalent fluid pressure indicated adequate results for the Intended use of the proposed retaining walls. B & B Engineers and Associates appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely. - r~~~ q-Q~ J.Jruce Golden RCE LS Vi President/Chief Engineer JBG:bjh \.. Enclosures ...- -2- IIAY-31-2005 TUE 10:56 All CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 43 .5 -uauuaasa asa EMMEMEN sasasa EMEMISM No MOM 00,10F 5555! MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:57 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 44 - -. U - ..... --.... i I -..---.--- - 1 - ........ -.. - ---..- ........... .. ---.--- .- . -• ..- - .-- . . .. . ............-... ',.. Anip - __-..-.-.... . _I._.--......... __ ...........• —. : . . _. -c"'i--- I_. ('COW, Nt%. Ig.' .±• .' Q.O-CL4.... rø_':_ '' 'f arc t ;c1—QiLI.d ,._______ ._Ilf'f311 Za-w C.a&. - od e IL a.* /#)C IF. $kc.qJ_4 _p.23_i4T44. _.Zfr-.4L.2s 1 .. _______ -• -. . •. .-,- 'i i4ç 1( - . p . Zjd .I -..-.------.--. - . ..-._._I MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:57 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 45 1-_ ...............4 II ••••••••••••••••-•--___ I je —row JP MOT g #s e4.40 Ift ._. 171 ..Ld'.dath'L_' -#fee A 42sta1 IZc MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:58 All CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 46 'c1.' .—±---------.—. .. r lit 97P ej gin. ti 10 IL IWO . ... - -. .. . ____.... _______. - - _j_ -'..-................... * ' 4 1 1!' rOO ....... 4'. pSd -. c.a3> ca.loZC, Ae Al - - 4 j d . 4: ! 1- $• ___.........--. • / 2.47 .77 ..... ike >..... ;-t -•-- ..... ___ - .......-.- . - t_, _• -......-. . __ ....................._._._H_.._____.---., ...- IIAY-31-2005 TUE 10:58 All CITY OF CARSLBAD to ___............____- ____ I . /qrid q7J4 ............................... ••• V%9-. OL rim "'Pow z 679P M.00 deAv ----..-..— : —I--- ____._._O..7.. -j t. ........ - _ . ,& •pI - . -- - - _ 4L 2ccp4(A1 f.14çur FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 47 tp. 60 ML ...... slr II1... ft ... - ! •—.-------•-- __ _ ............. -4*- .............. 44L - - - - - - -t I I C, -4-•-t---•t —....... 47o eap z p iALM.tL*j,2.w s +ef - -. -. __ .. ,. I JLwWIr vf! Emmmmumm — — — — -- TIAY-31-2005 TUE 10:59 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 48 t i ---.. ...... H . I ! Pr'c ..-.-.-..---- me— oil . A Ilea - ....................O0(JS.$ ,37 C). (%7 U dØ( r ' la- -ewec At E"4~tms V. 'a 10-2A A ... I . . Jv- SR GO U - UsUSSRUl URRaUaUR.RR.UI low MAY-31-2005 TUE 11:00 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 50 -- -_&r. i ... 92 OW ICA AL As -•'---o- _____ .......- ........: I - - ' '- -'f- .-.........-..--... .. ..- ....... pod' xLZ"ifr hQJ~5>C).Z# !Q.rn-o.q1 i2?vii .& W#i.V1ØI. d14?.ø1Pq.92 wsli 2- .z ___ - - .. 1 2...... - ...... .7jg1.o-e1X #2c4 '13'42 9 do 6a ... I I 11 U Ii - - 1.m - 4__ --mML - mommom ONNEEMEN ormommom I - - MAY-31-2005 TUE 11:00 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 : ! P. 52 1'T;c-TftA#• -[i -•---- --.•• I I ....- .. ..- . .. .. .......... JL K(II . ... - (ir 3_P Ao - ago, .-.-...-....--.- .-.-- fr& ra 17 - 40C• . .V 7°Q%if0 e,i_ic.irIL. ifliv Act ' sq.iZ j 1 lie_. (j_I —'•. -toot 1,441 x / g '11 !! ow oval I - __. -. ,— •••d -4i'--"42 *fee _4'd _ - -- .d/,.,, -- .--•- -. 5. dZ __ -H_..- ... 41 ----------r j--4-"H -.. ...- --------T-_ 1- NAY-31-2005 TUE 11:01 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD . FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 53 ITTIII -coo i........- . .......-........._4CLLL_!nm !.. . .27i//78' ........-.-- 1 r'__._.. A4 ow ..:So 16 el . MV-g e4eI• .... . -.--.. ..-... _ ....... .Ii3: . ..Th.......... , .......................... .1 ____ .—... --h- Lf ' —.....-....-- V . ..... .. ... . ......i_...t.__..t...__T ._.r.... . ...............-.---.—.---.- i ; . I .......... -..---..-.-.......-. H 11AY-31-2005 TUE 11:01 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO: 760 602 8558 P. 54 I,&, Iiig1iiecr1iig ms IN0USTRML CZ SUITE '*: D1 iDILIfl?(MlfLIS. VISTA CAQF 22083/ 714.7270282 0MUMV aO SK vrgn cviigr UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST LOCATION "THE BEACH", Ocean St., Carlsbad_- JOB NSD 1183.1 - SOIL DESCRIPTION Tan-Brown silty SAND - -- TEST By D.Beard - DATE 10 July 1984 SAMPLE. DIAII2.!" AREA 6.158 sq.in. LENGTH 3.75" - VOL - WEIGHT g WET UNIT WEIGHT_____________ % WATER 9-8 DR! UNIT WEIGHT____________ TIME DIAL DIAL DEFORMATION UNIT E 1-E AREA/1-E LOAD UNIT SEC UNITS UNITS Co]. 1 x 10-3 STRAIN CORRECTED Co3. 2 LOAD V/ Ft2 10-3 10-4 Co3. 3/I.. AREA x .965 Co17/Co1 6 x 1/.4 20 - 0.6 40 - 0.8 60_ 1.1 801J 100 3.0 110 4 .1 120 5.7 130 7.8 -- 140 10.1 - 150_ 1 12.6 1 160 1 14.7 170 1 16.4 180 1 16.61 _.18 - - .0480_ .952 1 6.469 16.02 3.566 (BROKE) Qu Unconfined Compressive Strength 3.566 Kst-Cohesion Ou/21. 78 JCsf 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 'MAY-31-2005 TUE 11:02 All CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 55 j3Ii&lIzawaeer CHIlL AND OIIAMTV ENOMMOR S lAND SUIVEVING PfaCOATlON AND SOIL rESTINO Cord raMovioN INS.gcrsoa 2711 INDUSTRIAL Cr SUITE A VISTA, CA 92083 619-727-0292 CLIENT: NATIVE SUN P,Lojec.CTN5D 11R3-1 Va.te. 2O Jul y lQ84 City of Carlsbad Building Department 1200 Elm Ai,e.. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Soil Testing for the Retaining Walls at "The Beach" Development located on Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA Gentlemen: Pursuant to your request, we have completed our Inspection and Testing of the foundation soils for the subject retaining wails. The locations of our test pits are shown on Enclosure (1), and the results of the Unconfined Compression Test are detailed on Enclosure (2). On 9 July 1984, two test pits were excavated on the Easterly side of tne project utilizing a 08 bulldozer. Due to the cemented characteristics of the native subsurface soils, digging was ex- tremely difficult. Undisturbed and bulk samples were obtained for laboratory analysis. The in-place dry density of the native silty sands in the upper 24 inches ranged from 90 to 92 percent relative to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Procedure 0 1557.70. The results of the Unconfined Compression Test indicated an unconfined compressive strength of the native soil to be 3566 pounds per square foot (psf); however, using a factor of safety of 1.6, the recommended bearing value of the native material is 2400 psf. Based on the classification of soil type as a silty sand and the fact that the retaining walls have no surcharge, and that the backfill is assumed to be well-drained sand, an angle of friction of 33040' is recommended. A soil density of 113 lbs. per Cu. ft. is used in the formula to find the equivalent fluid pressure(EFP): EFP = wC C - tan2 (450 - ½) EFP = (113) tan2 (46 - 3367) = 32.4 lb per cu. ft. - 1 - IIAY-31-2005 TUE 11:02 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 56 City of Carlsbad RE: Native Sun Dev. 20 July 1984 Our calculations using 30 lb. per cu. ft. equivalent. fluid pressure indicated adequate results for the intended use of the proposed retaining walls. B & B Engineers and Associates appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, J. uce Golden RCE L V1 'President/Chief Engineer JBG:bjti Enclosures -2- MAY-31-2005 TUE 11:03 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 57 71 Ron wx Ll trfi ll ill, ail 1u' _____ I . • I -_____________ . It.. •' \ ) / ;.. \ - .• iø'Y / \ \ , .\. \ j ' p -_- I ell Wtu 1 •'\ /( " II Xkk IN — Ax4i igs ,Wl - - - 00, I 9 I. • I1AY31-2005 TUE 10:36 All CITY OF CRRSLBAD FAX NO. 760 6028558 P. 02 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. A?PI.ItD SOIL MECHANICS - FOUNDATIONS 5540 CUPPIN ROAD MAN OIQO. CAkIVORNS* 93122 PI1I6I00 NINKIS4Q •NVON May 8, 1979 PSISN • CiVil. ..*iui.0 Homes by John Lyttle 100 WestMain, Suite 10 Tustin, California 92680 TcPuoNI 1714) loS-less Attention: Mr. John Lyttle Gentlemen: This Is to tmnsmet to you six copies of our report of Project No. 79-329Arentitj North of Ocean Street ondSouP1iiUBuino Visto Lagoon, Carlsbad, California", dated May 8, 1979. If you should have any questions concerning any of the data presented in this report, please contact us. Very truly yours, ENTQN ENGINEERING, INC. RPpH. ton, Civil Engineer MAY31-2005 TUE 10:36 AM CITY OF CARSLBRD FAX NO. 760 802 8558 P. 03 SOILS INVESTIGATION PR0SED1WO- STORY-RESIDE 1AL1BU1LD I NGS NOR1HOFOCEANSTREETAND SOTHQ BUENA VTALAGOO N cC AR IB A-D # CALIFORNIA Propcirod For HOMES BY JOHN LYTTLE by BENTON ENGINEERING • INC. PROJECT NO. 79-3-29A MAY 8, 1977 MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:36 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 6028558 P. 04 TABLE OF CONTENTS ftl9e NOS. SOILS INVESTIGATION Introduction . . . . . •1 • ..........•1S• .......•e•••,• • 1 Field Investigation . . . . . . . ....... . • • • • • .......... . . . . • • 1 and 2 Laboratory Tests . . , . . . . .........• . . . . . . . ......s e • • • • . . • . 2 and 3 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Soil Strata . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . 3, 4 and 5• ¼ , . • , . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusions . , . •1• • .........•1••••• ......5 ............. Recommendations: Foundation Support For Soil Conditions Smilar to Those ....... 6 Found at Borings I and 3 Foundation Support for Soil Conditions Similar to Those . .. . . . . . 6, 7 and B Found at Borings 2, 4 and 6 Foundation Support for Soil Conditions Similar to Those . . . . . . is Band 9 Found in Baring 5 Site Grading (in the Area of Baring s) . DRAWING TITLE Drawing -No, Allowable Vertical Supporting Capacities of Driven 12" Square ......a a A Cancrota of 12" Square Steel H-Piles Location of Test Borings........ . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . • . 1 SummaryShoots: Baring. No. 1 .......... . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . • • e 2, 3, and 4 Boring No.2 ........ 41I0III .........•ssss.s •i•• 5 Boring JsJ0.3 ........ .,•...as •1• • . 6 .......55•5I Boring No. 4 . . . . . . ....... • a . • • • .........7, B and 9 Boring No. 5 . • . . ......... . . . . ........ . . 10 Boring No. 6 . . . . . ....... . . .. . . . . ....... a a • a a • ii and 12 Consolidation Curves ...........• ........•........ 13,14,15 and 16 APPENDICES Standard Specifications For Placement of Compacted Filled Ground . • .... AA (ASTM D1557-70 - 25 61ows/3 layers 90 percent) Unified Sall Classification Chart 1 .55 .........••,,,....-.. A Sampling, etc. B ......SI•I5 IS I ...........,Isi ......•. .-.. .swsu rerierrarion cesisrance rests were talcen in the more gravelly soils and where undisturbed samples could not be recovered. 11111"T41M SNOs*1ICINe. INC. MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:37 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 05 with rootlets to 10.5 feet, than loose gravelly slightly silty fine to medium sand to 12.0 feet. Compact fine to medium sand was then found to 15.0 Feet and was underlain by compact gravelly fine to medium sand to the depth of-exploration at 41.5 feet. Ground water was encountered below a depth of 10.0 feet at this location. Conclusions It is concluded from the results of fluid exploration and laboratory tests that - I • In the areas where fill and natural soil conditions similar to Borings '1 and 3 are determined to exist, then a mat type or post- tensioned reinforced concrete slob type foundation design system could be safely used. The limits of these better soil conditions should be established if this system is used. The existing fill sails at Borings 2,4 and 6 areas were immediately underlain by loose to medium compact and soft compressible natural soil strata containing rootlets. The areal extent of the presence of these compressible soil strata should be established to determine the horizontal limits of these soils, unless driven piles are used throughout the entire lower area. In areas where fill and natural soils exist similar to those found in Borings 2,4 and 6, It is recommended that the proposed housing .units be supported by driven piles, designed to distribute the structural loads into the deeper natural soils by shear along the length of the driven puss. In the areas of Boring 5 where natural soils exist, all of the in-place soils below theupper 1.6 Feet of loose silty fine to medium sand topsoil have favorable load-settlement and strength 2 characteristics and will provide adequate support for normal depths and sizes of footings below the 0. lowest adjacent final graded surface. If filled ground is required, the removal and recompaction of the upper loose topsoil should be accomplished before placing and Compacting filled ground as described in the "Site Grading" section on page 9. uNION VNQINUCIFqQ. INC. IIAY-'31-2005 TUE 10:37 AN CITY OF CARBD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 06 -6- Rocammendati ans Foundation Support for Soil Conditions Similar to Those Found at Borings 1 and 3 Where areas of man-made fill soils exist that are uniformly compacted to on the order of 90 percent of maximum dry density or greater, that are In turn underlain by suitable bearing medium firm or firm natural soils, then the recommended type of foundation system Is either a reinforced concrete mat type or a post-Pensioned concrete slab on grade. These types of foundations may be designed to distribute the structural loadi over the entire concrete stab and a safe allowable bearing value up to 1,500 pounds per square foot may be used for combined dead, live, wind and seismic loads. The estimated settlement 01 such concrete mat or post-tensioned concrete slabson grade are estimated to be less than 1/4 inch. Foundation Support far Soil Conditions Similar to Those Found at Borings 2, 4 and 6 In these areas, It is recommended that pile foundations be used to support the structures. The use of driven piles is recommended to transmit the structural loødi to the more competent soils existing at depths below Elevation 0 feet. The allowable vertical supporting capacities of driven piles shown an Drawing No. A may be used to estimate the required depth of penetration below final ground surface. The vertical supporting capacities shown an Drawing No. A are based an the surface area of the Pile in contact with the soils below the bottoms of pile caps times the shearing resistance at the soils divided by a factor of safety of 2. The downward vertical supporting capacities shown on Drawing A are for dead plus live loads only, and may be Increased one-third when the wind and seismic loads are combined. The allowable uplift resistance of the plies may be assumed to be one half of the downward supporting capacities of the piles shown on Drawing No. A. UN?ON INOINUPINQ. INC. MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:38 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 07 -7- 1%e vertical supporting capacities of the pilot shown an Drawing No. A arc assumed that the supporting capacity of each single pile will net be adversely influenced by the overlapping of the loading zones from the nearest adjacent piles. lithe spacing between adjcicent piles Is len than 8 diameters center to center, then It is recommended that suitable efficiency factors be applied to allow For the overlapping of the lending zones between adjacent piles. A suitable efficiency Formula to allow for this overlapping I. presented as follows: E 1 - 2J (ri-1)+n(m s] -1 +41 (rn-i) (n-i lr_n Bearing capacity of pile In group Where E = Efficiency =Bearing capacity of isolated pile D = Diameter of pile in Feet S = Space between plies, center to contero In Feet m = Number of rows n = Number of plies per row Recommended efficiency Factors for various groups of plies driven at 3 diameters center to center are as follows: Number of Number of Rows Piles per Row Efflciecy Ii 2 0.947 1 3 0.929 Triangular 3 Pile Group 0.911 2 2 0.857 The lateral loads distributed into the foundations may be resisted by (a) passive resistance of soils In direct contact with the pile caps and/or grade beams, (b) by bending in vertical piIs that may be assumed to be Fixed below a depth of S feet, (PflON INQSNUIIG. INC. MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:38 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 08 To compute compute the passive resistance of the soils at the sides of pile caps and grade beams, cast directly against the undisturbed existing Fill soils, on allowable passive earth pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 100 pounds per cubic Foot may be used starling From the undisturbed surface of the soils to the bottom of pile cop and/or grade booms. The passive resistance of soils on the sdes of pile caps and the resistance of the soils on the sides of the of the piles may be combined to compute total lateral resistance. To estimate the lateral supporting capacities of driven vertical piles, a horizontal subgrade reaction (or the coefficient of variation of soil modulus of elasticity with depth) of 9 pounds per square inch per inch of horizontal deflection is recommended. 3. Foundation Support for Soil Conditions Similar to Thos. Found in Bering 5 Conventional square and continuous footings may be usod to support the proposed buIldIrs to be located in the area of Boring 5. An allowabie bearing value of 3,000 pounds per square Foot may be used for the design of both square and continuous footings Founded one Foot Into the very Fi,m on site natural soils, such as those encountered below a depth of 1.6 feet at Boring 5 provided that: (a) Both square and continuous footings are founded at least 1.0 Foot into vary firm natural bearing soils and are at least 2.0 Feet below the undisturbed final ground surface around the footings and th) The bottom edges of the footings are located at least 10 fact inside the undisturbed final sloping ground surface and (c) The minimum widths of square and continuous footing. oro 2.0 feet and 1.0 foot, respectively. IINYON INSINUNINO. INC. I MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:39 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 09 -9- The allowable bearing valve presented above is for dead plus li ve loads only and may be increased one third for the combined total of dead, live, wind and Seismic loadings. The total settlements of footings, which are founded on the very firm natural bearing sofls and loaded to a unit foundation pressure of 3,000 pounds per square fool, are estimated to be less than 1/2 inch for square footings less than 6 feet in width and for continuous Foot;ngs Ion than 4 feet in width. For lateral resistance, an allowable passive earth pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 800 pounds per cubic foot may be assumed for the portion of Fooling in direct contact with the very firm natural bearing soils. A friction factor of 0.4 may be used to compute frictional resistance between the footings and the supporting soh. 4. Site Grading (in the Area of Boring 5) It Is recommended that any 9r0difl9 at the site be conducted under continuous engineering inspection and in accordance with the applicable sections of the attached Appendix AA, entitled "Standard Specifications for Placement of Compacted Filled Ground" 'and the specified maximum dry density described therein shall be obtained by the compaction method described under "Laboratory Tests" of this report. Footings placed on non-expansive silty sand or clayey sand fill soils uniformly compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density may be designed For an allowable bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot For one loot wide Footings. The settlements of continuous footings up to 2 foot wide and square footings up to 4 feet in width and supporting 2,000 pounds per square foot are estimated on the order of 1/4 inch. Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. Distribution: (6) Addresses 11100004 INQINI(WNQ. tNC. Pl4/V!AMr mmonomm ad am onammeno Smumlommosomm -- - on mamommon: •••• ''" --:- INEEMEMEMMMUMMM '-' E:u imm a oniii:mm HBO l:!Ell:I:I! ..•• ... .... .. :: ..as .i.......... u • ••I U 0 Is HOMES 'U...... • •• U..... moommossom on BEEN a UUUUUUUU •• ...•..IIS••U•UU .uuei..U.SUU --------- -- - lown: Oman I.Ia••.m.11•UU.U.luIU•.'1'•'u1.Uhhh'hh1. •m.•Ems SEEMS a.. .....UI*......•.... .u......u..*useu.u*uauIuuNINuNUPu' U..UIIUUUUiliaISUPUU•UI .....,..NUIUSIlUl•UUSlIlUIU ....p..UI.aUpU•UIUU• I...... I*UUUUUUPaUUUUNU•UIUII•UPPI UUIUUuUUUUU .i..I.U.lSlIlSlUIUUNlUIll*S Ill ..PU.SUUUI UI•UIUUUUI ••U •US I •UU•USUUU•I US UIUIR U p9UUUlUURSS •••• iiIIIiIIIIllhII1II1I1II!11 IIiI:Iil!EIPI!!1ii!Ian .. •:. .. a.. • us I • p II!iIIIiiIEII!h11Ii1lIlihIiIIII 111IuIiIII!!!I!I!fliiiPi .•..ua.auuIIIUuSlI .uua.UuIUUSU uuullUl uUU 101 S..UU .l..I.UNlUSUUUIS•lUb1*U11111h1U IIlUIIUU•IS11UIS•1SStUU .....P.SS*USSRRUUURUbIU0UUUUU ..IPUUMPPI•I0UUNUI•UN m.... p..iiøiSiSUpUSUU*UUD'SIU111lU •auIaauulUumuUIIIU01$IU1 i...U..Ul$U0U0PUUI1UPU11U1 .upp..Sa..ss0aUpIuIa1•Iml ...U..iI$lUUlUUUSU0*UR*S1U .SS$UU*UUU.IUUUIUUUUIUI ,U••••a•uIUIUS.U.S1l111hhh1h1mhh1h11 ..U.a.U••. famm"Emosumsluau...... leiUUPP sommom IUUI 1 III III lU lSIllUl USS ...•..•.u..p..u.au.ssuusu..I ul.'1IU1•1,1U.hbP'0'1'h1' SENSE ..IUBEEN 5UlNUS0ISSU1UUUU0 N..IUIIIPPPIU•NU•UINIUUIUU HOMES EN as me . 111.11111111w. UU••UUuU!!! _____________________________________ sç p Y •..• NAY-31-2005 TUE 10:40 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 11 Q. .0 Q. - SM SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 14.0116.81111.011.19 CLAYEY FINE SAND CLAYEY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND FINE SAND 12.3 9.6 107.4 2.63 Fill 13.7 19.4 1100. 1.49 —L MAY-1-2005 TUE 10:41 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD p. SUMMARY SHEET iø BORING NO. 1 a FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 12 30. a .p. . WIC r v"• ZZ 0.2 . IL ] Z1 Brown, Moist, Loom 1 [fl Compact 2 (J) Ei: Light Gray to Gray, Moist, - CompoctwUh Clay Lenses and Chunks 4: Light Gray to Gray, Moist, Compact 6- 7- own, Moist, Medium Compact, With Clay Chunks Gray, Moist,Modium Compact :: Water. Saturated With ROQFIOtI Darker Little Finer Sand 12 13 - Dark Grciy,Saturated, Compoct, 14- 'iC.• 30% Well Rounded Gravel to 3",wlth Sea Shells 15 Few Sand Lenses Without - Gravel '6 .- - Gray,Saturctod,Compoct,With Few Gravel Lenses - 17 - - FINE TO MEDIU SAND 6.0 -- 11 .9 -- -- 16.5 25.8 99.4 1.48 GRAVELLY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND FINE TO MEDIUM SAND I 10 -1 .. ---i ,__._,__ ,_ ' Continued on i#ruwur 'iu. Indicates Undisturbed Drive Sample Indicates Loose Bag Sample R Indicates Sample Not Rccovered Indicates the Blawcount of a Standard Splitspoon Sampler for each 6" of Penetration 0" to 6"1 6" to 12" and 12" to 18". The Standard Penetration Resistance is Based on Adding the Number of Blows Between 6"and 12" to the Blows between 12"and 18" ___ - PROJECT NO. i. re n ash DRAWING NO. MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:41 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD -- FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 13 o z SUMMARY SHUT w. w SORINONO. _1(Coni.) ! o II at Gray, Saturated, Compact, 19- With Scattered Gravel Layeri 311 to 4" Thick 20- 21=@ 22- 23- 24- 25- am 38 46.9 118.51107.612.90 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND Continued on Dmwire No. 4 NO. I PROJECT NO. I BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. ONAWING 79-3-29A I MAY31-2005 TUE 10:42 AM CITY OF CRRSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 14 0 E 4. 4- 4, 4, Vi E h Lot 0I - - z - SUMMARY SHEET 30 BORINONO._I (Cant It W6 .) Gray, Saturated ,Compact, With Occasional Gravel Lenses 391- 40- 41- 42- 43- FINETOMEDIUM SAND 44- 45- 46- 47- 46- 49- I :•:• PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. 79-3-29A BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. NRY31-2005 TUE 10:42 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD - FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 15 - - - I- auI . t e t SUMMARY SHEET N6 IL J WS ILL RORINQNO.2 W Va— 90 sit * E 15 16 17 rawn, Moist ,Loose SLIGHTLY siir' FINE TO MEDIUM #'edtum Compact SAND - C3my Brown, Moist,Compact Few Pea Grovel CLAY it Groy,Moist,Compoct, SILTY 1 1.19 With Clay Binder FINE SAND _ Gray Brown, Moist, Mcdurn CLAY Compact Light Gray,Moist.Medium SILTY Compact SAND —_FINE Light Gray, Moat, Loose CLAY Dark Gray Brown, Moist, Loose, Mixed with Cloy,With Thin FINE SANDY Layer of Weeds at the Bottom CLAY of ThL Layer Dark Gray, Saturated, Loose, with Small Gravel and Rootlets SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 3— 4- 6- 7-0 8- 9 - - 11- 12 13 Dark Gi'ay,Sarurated,Medium Comixict,wlth Scattered Well C) Rounded Oroval to 2" 4.9 t15.0110.f 1. 2.8 tio.3t107.51 1. Fill I 3.5 117.51106.51 1.31 5.3 126.9 1101.01 1.37 15.8 22.7105.02.52 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 1 - witn.uo - No Clay 23 PROJECT NO. 79-3-29A BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. 2.8 120.21111.712.03 ONAWINO NO. 5 FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 16 - U,. - -- u og its a MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:42 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD SUMMARY SHEET SORINONO.3 rin, Moist, Loose SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - - - W- - 11.6 -- - - - brown,Moiit,Medum Compact SLIGHTLY CLAYEY :INETOMEDIUM 11,9 14.1118.9 3.11 SAND 8rawn,M&st,Compact, CLAYEY Mottled with 30% Clay FINE TO MEDIUM SAND Gray, Moist, Compact FINE TO MEDIUM 11.8 -- -- SANDY CLAY Dark GroVry Moist,Medium GRAVELLY SILTY Canipact,with 15 to 20% Grovel FINE TO MEDIUM to 1 "Subangular and Angular SAND 5.3 -- -- -- Saturated, with A.C.Chunks Gray, Saturoad,Medium Firm CLAYEY 04 111. 4 1. W, F INE TO MEDIUM -- SAND Light Gray, Saturated, Very Firm SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TOMEDIUM I Merges SAND Light Gray,5arurted,Very Firm 01 -- I - I -- SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 12 13 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- .913.11 PROJECT NO. 79-3-29A BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. ORAIIINO tdo. MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:43 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 17 SUMMARY SHEET H ego IL "nine NO. 4 t spin ! - - Brown , Mal st,Loe to Medium 1 - Compact JimLight Gruy,MoIt,MedIum Compact - SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 2.1 112.51110.4 0. 3.5 116.91109.212.52 4- ::-4 Pocketof Clayey Fine To - MedlumSand ' row n, - .... La !ye! ofSiItFirIe to Medium Si 6 : Gray, MoIst,Compact - 3ray,Melst,Looieto Medium 6 ompact,OcsionaI Small 8 Sea 9eIIs 9 - Saturated 11- - T-... Dark Saturated Soft. (j) Rootl ootl ets Dark Gray, Saturated, Loose, Rootlets, AAerges at 13 Medium Compact,with Few - Rounded Gravel to 1-1/2" 14- - Gray,Saturated,Compact, '15- :: Ocs1cmoI Gravel to 3" 16: S CLAYEY FINE SAND 16.3121.21100.911.13 6.0 6.0 19.5 19.104.7 96.0 0.89 0.87 F [I I 3.5 8.8 93.7 1,11 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 3.9 19.7 98.4 1.20 FINE SANDY I 112.6 26.8 100. 1.20 CLAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND FINE TO MEDIUMI I SAND 122.41 -- I -- I -- Continued on Drawing No. 8 DRAWING NO. I I MAY 31-2005 TUE 10:43 AM CITY OF CRRSLBAD . FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 18 a MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:44 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD - FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 19 9$ BORINQNO.4(Coflt.) 4 fA as Gray, Saturated, Compact 37_ - FINE SAND 39 Gray, Saturated, Compact SLIGHTLY SILTY 40 rra FINE SAND 41 Gray, Saturated, Compact 42- 43 - FINE TOMEDIUM 44 SAND 45 "° - AL - - DRAWING NO. PROJECT NO. BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. 9 79-3-29A a 0 11RY31-2005 TUE 10:44 AM CITY OF CARSL8AD . FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 20 w SUMMARY SHEET Lu . Doric Brown, Slightly Moist, - Loose, Topsoil 10.2 5.6 105.1 0.57 Brown Very Finn, With Slight Clay , . inder SILTY 12.6 5.9 113.2 1.36 " FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 6: - 13.: 7.4114.22.02 7 - ____ Brown and Gray, Moist, Very CLAYEY Firm, Wth Marginal Fine to FINE 10 MEDIUM 8 - : Medium Sandy Clay SAND Brown, Moist, Very Fm - SILT 19.6-18.2 100.7-5.58- 10 Brown, Maist, Very Firm SILTY CLAY 11: Brown, Moist, Very firm SILTY 12 FINE TO MEDI UM SAND - •. Light Brown, Moist, Very Firm, With Few Scattered Gravel and ® Few Coarse Sand Grains 28.0 2.3 96.4 1.80 - 16-- SLIGHTLY SILTY 17 FINE TO MEDIUM - .. ... . 18 - AND 19 35.0 4.2 08.0 3.5 -- . I ORawaNO PROJECt NO. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. ( 10 rdo 79-3-29A J MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:45 tii CITY OF CRSLB •D - SUMMARY SHEET BONINONO. _6 - La w 0 FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 21 0. • U. I! 'H 0 0 1: Brown, Moist, Loose - -L 2 Gray Brawn, Moist, Medium - - Compact Occasional Pocket 3 - of Silty Fine Sand 4@ .... '-jDirlc Gray, Saturated, Soft, Rootlets ii- Gray, Saturated, Loose to - 12— Medium Compact Gray, Saturated, Compact 14 15 - Gray, Saturated, Compact, th 40 to 50% Gravel to 3", 16 - NIth Many Sea Shells 17 - X.: with Few Coarse Sand Grans, Occasional Lenses With Less :f. Gravel SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 4.9121.0197.910.96 Fill CLAY 4.2 19.4 08.8 1.04 - FINE SANDY CLAY GRAVELLY. SLIGHTLY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND FINE TO MEDIUM SAND GRAVELLY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 31.51 -- I - I -- Continued on Drawing No. 12 - PROJECT NO. 79..349A I BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING NO. 11 GRAVELLY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 50.41--I--I-- 113.71 -- I -- I -- MAYL31_2005 TUE 10:45 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 22 ot It -' SUMMARY SHEET 02 x1m: BORING No. _6(Co nl.) ISO a >1IL - Gray, Saturated, Compact, Interbedded With Fine to 21: Medium Sand, With 40 to 50% Grovel to 3" 22- c i j i ...c..i. 23 - VU With 15 to 20% Grovel to 'I 1/21', Subangular .• : 25- q::0:7 :4 2&- 27- Gray, Saturated, Compact, - With 20% Gravel to I', u ongu or 29'- 31- ':v- 33- 34- 4' :q - 36- - - 38 - 39' '..... I. - .. 40 - P!I .. 41- t GRAVELLY FINE SAND PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. 79-3-29A BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. 12 I 2 3 4 MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:46 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 F CONSOLIDATION CURVES I LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT - Ar. ,n "rrrr ni"hn J ill[ i1I11TU JTJT11IH 11T1 fliT ITTT '1111111111111111 I I I I Boring: 1 Sample: 2 - — — - Dcptk; 4' - ___ _ --- - - I r4i3 M ;'. ?i*4 • : • Boring: 2 — Sample: 2 : Depth: 4' • — — - - Boring: 2 Sample: 3 Depth; 7' - 3 - - .4 - 5 PROJECT NO. 79-3-29A o INDICATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATION AT FIELD MOISTURE INDICATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATION AFTER SATURATION BENTON ENGINEERING INC. 1 13 DRAWING NO. P. 23 6 a 10 II 4 z 0 MAY31-2005 TUE 10:46 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 24 CONSOLIDATION CURVES LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 0.2 0.4 0.6 08 I 2 4 6 lilT Tfl 8 10 16 11Ti1II1u1iii 1 I III llTT 11111FF ETIl11II1hIll%II11I1TTT Boring: 2 0 iuii 11111T[ -- 7F— Sample: 4 _____ ____ ________ ______ ____ - - Depth: 1--- - 2 ------.----------- :IIII1 7 W ?'T • !. . ..... •• 4 JJI P/ ' 2 4 ___ Boring: 2 Sample: 6 ——Depth: 20' 2 ti -- . -------------------.- ---- I, -4 0 4 o INDICATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATION AT FIELD MOISTURE INDICATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATION AFTER SATURATION NAYL31_2005 TUE 10:47 AM CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 25 t1AY31-2005 TUE 10:48 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 26 0 U MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:48 AN CITY OF CARSIBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 27 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPLIED ROIL MCCHANICR - FOUNOATIONU 4540 RuFYU4 ROAD PAN D,LGO CALIFORNIA 92123 PPIII.IP ngNIcsese UEIITON PRISIOSNY • CIVIl. INRINIES TSl.CaHONS I714 ISU-IPSU APPENDIX AA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF COMPACTED FILLED GROUND General Description. The objective is to obtain uniformity and adequate internal strength in filled ground by proven engineering procedures and tests so that the proposed structures may be safely supported. The procedures include the clearing and grubbing, removal of existing structures, preparation of land to be filled, Filling of the land, the spreading, and compaction of the Filled areas to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. The owner shall employ a qualified soils engineer to inspect and test the filled ground as pL.ed to verify the uniformity of Compaction of filled ground to the specified 90 percent of maximum dry density. The soils engineer shell advise the owner and grading contractor immediately if any unsatisfactory conditions are observed to exist and shall have the authority to reject the compacted filled ground until such time that corrective measures era token necessary to comply with the specifications. It shall be the sole responsibility of the grading contractor to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Clearing, Grubbing, and Preparing Areas to be Filled. All brush, vegetation and any rubbish shall be removed, piled, and burned or other- wise disposed of so as to leave the areas to be filled free of vegetation and debris. Any soft, swampy or otherwise unsuitable areas shall be corrected by draining or removal, or both. The natural ground which is determined to be satisfactory for the support of the Filled ground shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least six inches (6"), and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. Where fills are made on hillsides or exposed slope areas, greater than 10 percent, horizontal benches shall be cut into firm undisturbed natural ground in order to provide both lateral and vertical stability. This is to provide a horizontal base so that each layor is placed and compacted on a horizontal plane. The initial bench at the Foe of the fill shall be at least 10 Feet in width on firm undisturbed natural ground at the eleva- tion of the toe stoke placed at the natural angle of repose or design slope. The soils engineer shall determine the width and Frequency of all succeeding benches which will vary with the soil conditions and the steepness of slope. MAY31-2005 TUE 10:49 All CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 28 APPENDIX AA -2- (d) After the natural ground has been prepared, i t shall then bc brought to the proper mois- ture Content and compacted to nor less than ninety percc-nt of maximum density In accordance with A.S.T.M. D-11557-70 method that uses 25 blows of 10 pound hammer falling from 18 Inches on each of 3 layers in a 4" diameter cylindrical mold of a 1/30th cubic loot volume. 3. Materials and Special Returemants. The fill coils shall consist of select materials so graded that at least 40 percent of IT material passes a No. 4 sieve. This may be obtained from the excavation of banks, borrow pits of tiny other approved sources and by mixing soIls from one or more sources. The material uses shall be Free From vegetable matter, and other de- leterious substances, and shall not contain rocks or lumps of greater than 6 inches in diameter. If excessive vegetation, rocks, or soils with inadequate strength or other unacceptable physical characteristics are encountered, these shall be disposed of in waste areas as shown on the plane or as directed by the soils engineer. If during grading operutions, soils not encountered and tested In the preliminary investigation are found, tests on these soils shall be performed to determine their physical characteristics. Any special treatment recommended in the preliminary or subsequent soil reports not covered herein shall become on addendum to these specifications. The testing and specifications For the compaction of subgrade,subbose, and base materials for road;, streets, highways, or other public properly or rights-of-way shall be in accordance with those of the governmental agency having jurisdiction. 4. PlacIng, Spreading, and Compacting Fill Materials. The suitable fill material shall be placed in layers which, when compacted shall not exceed six inches (6"). Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be throughly mixed during the spreading to ;Iisuie unilosmity almuterkil and moisture in each layer. Wh.,i the moisture content of the fill material is below that specified by the soils engineer, water shall be added until the moisture content is near optimum as specified by the solli engineer to assure thorough bonding during the compacting process. When the moisture content of the fill material is above that specified by the soils engineer, the fill material slinll be aerated by bloding and scarifying or other $atis- factory methods until the moisture Content Is near optimum as specflcd by the soils engineer. After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than ninety percent of maximum dsislsity in accordance with A.S.T.M. D-1557-70 modified as described In 2 (d)above. Compaction shall be accomplished with sheepsloot rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other approved types of compaction equipment, such as vibratory equipment that Is specially designed for certain soil types. Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able OgN?ON INOIPigEIuP4G, INC. MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:49 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD - FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 29 APPENDIX AA -3- to compact the 1111 material to the specified density. Rolling shall be accomplished while the Fill material is at the specified moisture content. Roiling of each layer shall be continuous over Its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to Insure that the desired density has been obtained. The entire areas to be filled shall b. compacted. (.) Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsFoot rollers Or other suitable equip- ment. Compacting operations shall be continued until the slopes are stable but not too dense For planting and until there is no appreciable amount of loose soil on the slopes. Compacting of the slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling the slopes In Increments of 3 to 5 feet in elevation gain or by other methods producing satisfactory results. (F) Field density tests shall be taken by the soils engineer for approximately each foot in elevation gain after compaction, but not to exceed two feet in Vertical height between tests. Field density tests may be taken at intervals of 6 inches In elevation gain if required by the soils engineer. The location of the tests In plan shall be so spaced to give the best possible coverage and shall be taken no farther apart than OO feet. Tests shall be taken on corner and terrace lots For each two feet In eleva- tion gain. The soils engineer may take additional tests as considered necessary to chock an the uniformity of compaction. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the tests shall be taken In the compacted material below the disturbed surface. No additional layers of Fill shall be spread until the field density tests indicate that the specified density has been obtained. (g) The fill operation shall be continued in six Inch (6") compacted layers, as specified above, until the Fill has been brought to the Finished slopes and grades as shown on the accepted plans. Inspection. Sufficient Inspection by the soils engineer shall be maintained during the fill- ing and compacting operations so that he can certify that the Fill was constructed In accord- ance with the accepted specifications. Seasonal Limits. No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled if weather conditions Increase the moisture content above permissible limits. When the work is interrrupted by rain, fill operations shall not be resumed until field tests by the sails engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of the fill are as previously specified. All recommendations presented in the "Conclusions" section of the attached report are a part of these specifications. MAY-31-2005 TUE 10:50 All CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 •P. 30 BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPI.ISD SOIL. MECHANICS - POUND*TIOHI 0040 RUYPIN ROAD SAN DirGe CAIIPONIA 02123 PHILIP HtNkIH0 UCNtON PSEUID$N? • r1VIL SNSINSSU TUI.IPNON& 17141 555.1505 APPENDIX A Unified Soil Clossficotion Chart' SOIL DESCRIPTION . GROUP TYPICAL SYMBOL NAMES I. COARSE GRAINED, More than half of - material is larger than No. 200 sieve size.' GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS GW Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, Ms,r than half of little or no Fines. coarse fraction is GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel-sand larger than No. 4 mixtures, little or no fines. i.,. ;e but smaller GRAVELS WITH FINES. GM Silty gravels, poorly graded grovel- than 3 :. chas (Appreciable amount sand-silt mixtures. of Fines) GC Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel- sand-clay mixtures. SANDS CLEAN SANDS SW Well graded sand, gravelly sands, little Morethan half of or no fines. coarse fraction is SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, smaller than No. 4 little or no fines. sieve size SANDS WITH FINES SM Silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt (Appreciable amount mixtures. OF fines) . Sc Clayey sands, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures. II. FINE GRAINED, More than half of material is smaller than No. 200 seve size.** SILTS AND CLAYS ML Inorganic silts and very Fine sands, rock Flour, sandy silt or clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plasticity. Liquid Limit CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plus- Less than 50 tcity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. 01 Organic silts and organic ifity-cloys of low plasticity. SILTS AND CLAYS MM Inorganic silts, mkacooua or dlotomaceøui fine sandy or silty soils, elastic CUts. Liquid Limit CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, Fat Greater than 50 clays. OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity - Ill. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and other highly organic soils. * Adopted by the Corps of.Engineers and Bureau of Reclamation in January, 1952. ** All sieve sizes on this chart ore U. S. Standard. NAY31-2005 TUE 10:50 AN CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8558 P. 31 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APLI5O SOIL MSCHANICS -- rOUNOATIONI ISIS SU?YIN P0*0 SAN OIIGO. CALIFORNIA 5212 PRILIP MCNIIINO •EPIVON PU(SIOUNT • CIVIL SNOINUIS VgtN...S •I4 see-isle APPENDIX B Sampling The undisturbed soil samples are obtained by forcing a special sampling tube into the undisturbed soils at the bottom of the boring, at frequent intervals below the ground surface. The sampling rube consists of o steel barrel 3.0 inches outside diameter, with a Special cutting up on one end and a double ball valve on the other, and with o lining of twelve thin brass rings, each one inch long by 2.42 inches inside diameter. The sampler, connected to a twelve Inch long waste barrel, is either pushed or driven approximately 18 inches into the soil and a Six inch section of the center portion of the sample is taken For laboratory tests, the soil being still confined in the brass rings, after extraction From the sampler tube. The samples are taken to the laboratory in close Fitting waterproof containers in order to retain the field moisture until complet!ci of the tests. The driving energy is calculated as the overage energy in Foot-kips required to Force the sampling tube through one Foot of soil at the depth at which the sample is obtained. Shear Tests The shear tests are run using a direct shear machine of the strain control type In which the rate of deformation is approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The machine Is so designed that the tests are made without removing the samples From the brass liner rings in which they are secured. Each sample Is sheared under a normal load equivalent to the weight of the sail above the point of sampling. In some instances, samples are sheared under various normal loads in order to obtain the internal angle of Friction and cohesion. Where considered necessary, samples are saturated and drained before shearing in order to simuloic extreme field moisture conditions. Consolidation Tests The apparatus used for the consolidation Pasts is designed to receive one of the one inch high rings of soil as it come: From the Field. Loads are applied in several increments to the upper surface of the test specimen and the resulting deformations are recorded at selected time intervals for each Increment. Generally, each increment of load is maintained on the sample until the rote of deformation Is equal to or lass than 1/0000 inch per hour. Porous stones are placed in contact with the top and bottom of each specimen to permit the ready addition or release of water. Expansion Tests One inch high samples confined in the brass rings are permitted to air dry at 105° F for at least 48 hours prior to placing into the expansion apparatus. A unit I00d of 500 pounds per square foot is then applied to the upper porous stone in contact with the top of each sample. Water is permitted to contact both the top and bottom of each sample through porous stones. Continuous observations are made until downward movement stops. The dal reading is recorded and expansion is recorded until the ,ate of upward movement is less than /0000 inch per hour. - . 9404 Li &L KERMIT D Z j&D&cCb,4r&4 ....__SHET.NO..L / FERGUSON - JOB NO Ceoo CONSULTING -.- —DATE_________ STRUCTURAL ....... BY- E N.. G I N E E R . . OA .. ILr- 7 .. No. 801 C c_ 'L, - Ex . 12/31/2006 /4, ' 4UCT L OF CAUO#. - k- j(I44Z2*(I LL-. L(j 37" U- //IP6&,41'4ç; 116/ 'I- -30 ' VI11..00ai H1 ,_—..D r, L._1- Uc.. 4, 7L. cloq q (JG C- Sc,J KERMITD. FERGUSON --JOB NO. OO CONSULTING . . DATE _/F8á. O(S STRUCTURAL •. .. BY___________ ENGINEER •. LokO . Joc~rj £<- v4-L 0' 5ic i.—/ 94s-- It 131 OL_-. LL .!.g?" Us&. 2(4Q Cj-c(c $'q41 23 ' /2-,-?.. 4- (14)?;j- -7 DL. ( (14-) .4 tiL LC-- (;,(4.c) Z-4-o *1 Z4-S (I O- KERMIT D. FERGUSON, Inc. Consulting Structural Engineer 333 N. Santa Anita Ave., #5 Arcadia, California 91007 Title: SAMUELSON Dsgnr: KDF Description: ADDITION Job # 6000 Date: 5:37PM, 18 FEB 05 Scope: 3, I Oct.20 Timber Beam & Joist Page A' Description FRAMING I umber Member information are designed to 1997 NDS and 1997 UBC Requireme - Calculations R-1 - RB-I H-I H-2 i-I EX.BM. Timber Section 2x6 4x8 4x6 4x6 2x14 6x12 Beam Width in 1.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 1.500 5.500 Beam Depth in 5.500 7.250 5.500 5.500 13.250 11.500 Le: Unbraced Length ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Timber Grade Fb - Basic Allow psi 900.0 900.0 900.0 900.0 900.0 1,350.0 Fv - BasicAllow psi 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 85.0 85.0 Elastic Modulus ksi 1,600.0 1,600.0 1,600.0 1,600.0 1,600.0 1,600.0 Load Duration Factor 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.000 1.000 Member Type Sawn Sawn Sawn Sawn Sawn Sawn Repetitive Status Repetitive No No No Repetitive No Center SpanData Span ft 4.00 4.00 6.00 5.33 12.30 8.00 Dead Load #Ift 28.00 56.00 81.00 19.00 248.00 Live Load #/ft 32.00 64.00 72.00 53.00 291.00 Point #1 DL lbs 672.00 LL lbs 852.00 ftj 1.750 Cantilever Span Span ft 4.00 Uniform Dead Load #Ift 44.00 Uniform Live Load #/ft 64.00 Point #1 DL lbs 148.00 LL lbs 170.00 ft 4.000 I Results Ratio = 0.1426 0.5716 0.3201 0.8321 0.3996 0.4620 Mmax @ Center in-k 1.44 0.00 8.26 21.47 16.34 51.74 It 2.00 0.03 3.00 1.75 6.15 4.00 Mmax @ Cantilever in-k 0.00 -25.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 lb : Actual psi 190.4 836:0 468.2 1,217.0 372.3 426.8 Fb :Allowable psi 1,681.9 1,462.5 1,462.5 1,462.5 931.5 1,350.0 Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK fv:Actual psi 16.9 41.6 30.3 79.8 27.5 39.3 Fv : Allowable psi 118.8 118.8 118.8 118.8 85.0 85.0 Shear OK Shear OK Shear OK Shear OK Shear OK Shear OK Reactions @Left End DL lbs 56.00 -124.00 243.00 451.36 116.85 992.00 LL lbs 64.00 -170.00 216.00 572.26 325.95 1,164.00 Max. DL+LL lbs 120.00 -294.00 459.00 1,023.62 442.80 2,156.00 @ Right End DL lbs 56.00 672.00 243.00 220.64 116.85 992.00 LL lbs 64.00 852.00 216.00 279.74 325.95 1,164.00 Max. DL+LL lbs 120.00 1,524.00 459.00 500.38 442.80 2,156.00 Deflections Ratio OK Deflection OK Deflection OK Deflection OK Deflection OK Deflection OK - Center DL Dell in 1 -0.005 0.008 -0.030 -0.040 -0.021 .0.020 L/Defl Ratio 9,903.5 6,261.5 2,366.8 1,591.2 7,018.1 4,684.7 Center LLDell in -0.006 0.010 -0.027 -0.051 -0.059 -0.024 UDefi Ratio 8,665.6 4,854.5 2,662.7 1,255.0 2,515.9 3,992.5 Center Total Defi in -0.010 0.018 -0.057 -0.091 -0.080 -0.045 Location ft 2.000 2.384 3.000 2.430 6.150 4.000 L/Defl Ratio 4,621.6 2,734.5 1,253.0 701.6 1,852.0 2,155.5 KEBMIT D. FERGUSON, Inc. Consulting Structural Engineer 333 N. Santa Anita Ave., #5 Arcadia, California 91007 Title: SAMUELSON Dsgnr: KDF Description: ADDITION Scope: Job # 6000 Date: 5:37PM, 18 FEB 05 Timber Beam & Joist Description FRAMING Cantilever DL Defi i -0.088 Cantilever LL Defi in -0.110 Total Cant. Defi in -0.198 LJDefl Ratio 485.7 KERMIT D. FERGUSON, Inc. Consulting Structural Engineer 333 N. Santa Anita Ave., #5 Arcadia, California 91007 Title: SAMUELSON Dsgnr. KDF Description: ADDITION Job # 6000 Date: 5:3713M, 18 FEB 05 Scope: -ç I User: KW.060109,Ver5.6.1.25.Oct-2002 G''I Timbr Bm Page Timber II . - - - - . . -. Description HB-1 General Information Calculations are designed to 1997 NDS and 1997 USC Requiremej Section Name Center Span 5.70 It .....Lu 0.00 ft Beam Width 1.500 in Left Cantilever ft .....Lu 0.00 ft Beam Depth 7.500 in Right Cantilever It .....Lu 0.00 It Member Type Sawn Fb Base Allow 900.0 psi Load Dur. Factor 1.250 Fv Allow 95.0 psi Beam End Fixity Pin-Pin Fc Allow 625.0 psi E 1,600.0ksi I Trapezoidal Loads #1 DL @ Left #/ft LL @ Left #/ft Start Loc 0.000 ft DL @ Right 39.00 #Ift LL @ Right 45.00 #/ft End Loc 5.700 ft Beam Design OK Span= 5.70ft, Beam Width = 1.500in x Depth = 7.5in, Ends are Pin-Pin Max Stress Ratio 0.124 : I Maximum Moment 0.2 k-ft Maximum Shear * 1.5 0.2 k Allowable 1.6 k-ft Allowable 1.3 k Max. Positive Moment 0.18k-ft at 3.283 It Shear: @ Left 0.08 k Max. Negative Moment -0.00k-ft at 5.700 It @ Right 0.16k Max @ Left Support 0.00 k-ft Camber: @ Left 0.000 in Max @ Right Support 0.00 k-ft @ Center 0.008 in Max. M allow 1.58 Reactions... @ Right 0.000 in lb 149.39 psi Iv 14.76 psi Left DL 0.04 k Max 0.08k Pb 1,350.00 psi Fv 118.75psi Right DL 0.07k Max 0.16k Deflections Center Span... Dead Load Total Load Left Cantilever... Dead Load Total Load Deflection -0.005 in -0.012 in Deflection 0.000 in 0.000 in ...Location 2.964 ft 2.964 ft ...LengthlDefl 0.0 0.0 ...LengthlDefl 12,439.0 5,77527 Right Cantilever... Camber ( using 1.5 * D.L. Defl ) ... Deflection 0.000 in 0.000 in @ Center 0.008 in ...LengthlDefl 0.0 0.0 @ Left 0.000 in @ Right 0.000 in LStress Calcs Bending Analysis Ck 30.585 Le 0.000 ft S,oc 14.063 in3 Area 11.250 in2 Cf 1.200 Rb 0.000 Cl 0.000 Max Moment Sxx Regd Allowable lb @ Center 0.18 k-ft 1.56 in3 1,350.00 psi @ Left Support 0.00 k-ft 0.00 in3 1,350.00 psi @ Right Support 0.00 k-ft 0.00 in3 1,350.00 psi Shear Analysis @ Left Support @ Right Support Design Shear 0.12 k 0.17 k Area Required 0.973 in2 1.398 in2 Fv: Allowable 118.75 psi 118.75 psi Bearing @ Supports Max. Left Reaction 0.08 k Bearing Length Req'd 0.085 in Max. Right Reaction 016 k Bearing Length Req'd 0.170 in 504 V-V .... . . KERMIT D FERGUSON .. ----- JOB NO._______ CONSULTING STRUCTURAL V ..- - BY_________ ENGINEER 1,._3 - o_i,) C& o44 Ma-. N / L 4-7 . .. . ....... V 3Co. )Q) ) O t2 k4. -. V IV•• 1. 1414.64_5 to L-A,,tOL. 1 V U' V Th' 1'J5s7 C-L ILAI _-1,s. U/Fl .O L. 1 5-7 - -Z4 FILL- _j PjiS7_G:u&o,. /g-go,&, 7iL• G€ci7 PLt5' 2Qic 5zf STYROFOAM Square Edge Page 1 of wool BuiItding& Coe nsfruction U.S. ARCHTECT STYROFOAM* Square Edge North America Home I Global Home VISIT US i.AT,* .c. UPCOMIN M'111 WALLS OF CAD Details for STYROFOAM* STYROFOAM SE Perimeter Foundation Guide SP99 (70KB PDF) SIYJO. Product Information Sheet (201KB PDF) STYROFOAM* Square Edge is an extruded polystyrene foam insulation board with square edges on four sides. Offers superior water resistance, long-term thermal performance and high compressive strength. Nominal Board R- Board Edge Mm Thickness* * Valuet Size Treatment Compressive Strengtht 75" 3.75 124"x96" SquareEdge 125ps! 1.5" 5 7.5 24" x 96" 24" x 96" Square Edge 25 psi Square Edge 25 psi 2.0' 10 24" x 96" Square Edge 25 psi 2.5" 12.5 24" x 96" Square Edge 25 psi _...._..__._ .?__ 24" x 96" Square Edge 125 psi 4.0" 20 24" x 96" Square Edge j 25 psi .75" 3.75 48" x 96" Square Edge 25 psi 1.0" 5 48" x 96" Square Edge 25 psi 1.5" 17.5 48" x 96" Square Edge 125 psi 2.0" 10 48" x 96" Square Edge 25 psi 2.5" 12.5 48" x 96" Square Edge 25 psi 2!! Square Edge 25 psi Building Code Compliance Complies with ASTM C 578 Type IV. Meets IBC/IRC requirements for foam plastic insulation. See ICBO-ES ER 2257, BOCA-ES RR 21-02, NES NER 699, Und. Lab. Inc.® Classified, see Classification Certificate D369. Factory Mutual Approved - Subject to the conditions of Approval as a roof Insulation when installed as described in the current edition of the FM Approval Guide t iiRL&icth!ough Idea Improving performance and longevity. Sustainable Roof Insulation A better engineered roof system with STYROFOAM. Roof Assemblies: PMR and Conventional The key difference. ResidentiaFPoured in Place Learn more about Insulated Concrete Systems solutions. **Not all product sizes are available in all regions. tR means resistance to heat flow. The higher the R-value, the greater the insulating power. R-values are expressed in 1t2.h."F/Btu. T*VeIjcai compressive strength is measured at 10% deformation (5% for STYROFOAM PLAZAMATE insulation and for STYROFOAM HIGHLOAD 40, 60 and 100 Insulation products) or at yield, whichever occurs first. Since STYROFOAM extruded polystyrene http://www.dow.comlstyrofoam/na/pro-us/products/squareecjge.htm 5/18/05 Bristolite Skylights - Standards CommerciAS/ Res Page 1 of 1 S Residential Products Prey I Residential Menu I Next ACS Models Circular Therm-o-weld® Skylights Bristolite's unique Circular Therm-o-weld® skylight has the acrylic glazing permanently bonded to the fiberglass frame. It allows absolutely no water, air, or debris to infiltrate into the structure. PLEASE NOTE: Low White and High White acrylic domes are no longer available for this model. MODEL NO. MODEL DESCRIPTION SINGLE DOME - CURB-MOUNTED ACS-CM-1 Fixed Dome Formed Acrylic DOUBLE DOME - CURB-MOUNTED ACS-CM-2 I Fixed Dome Formed Acrylic SINGLE DOME - SELF-FLASHING ACS-SF-1 Fixed Dome Formed Acrylic DOUBLE DOME - SELF-FLASHING ACS-SF-2 Fixed Dome Formed Acrylic HOME PRODUCTS ICC/ICBO SPECIFICATIONS COMPANY CONTACT TERMS OF USE © 1999-2005 Bristolite® Skylights. All rights reserved. Any use, reproduction, modification, distribution or display of this material without Bristolite Skylights' prior written consent is prohibited. (-&4-ty fe7 http://bristolite.com/SKYLIGHTIRES/ACSIHTMLIMENU-ACS.HTM 5/25/05 H OPENING ENSONS . . ..... ACRYLIC CIRCULAR SELF—FLASHING SKYLIGHT OUAL. ACRYLIC D FAStENER Car 0i cLEAI (CC) 0 SROPZ•E (BT) 0 GREY (CT) 0 0TKER -. USH lIE PART(WP) 0 OThEB ________ 0 iU flNI$t$ (MF). 0 8RONZ ANODIZED (ass) 0 VAWMW oir • Bristolite Skylights - Standards Residential Standard Residential Products <<Previous Model ACS-SF-2 Model Double Dome Circular Therm-o-weld® Self Flashing Page 1 of I Return to Model Menu Next Model>> Print to Scale (Adobe PDF) Photo DWF 2000 DWG 200.0 DXF 2000 FIBERGLASS C ALUMINUM Sftl-FLASHING FRE w/2.-3/4 NAILING amc AF#41;jkeat~ dabe HOME PRODUCTS ICBO SPECIFICATIONS COMPANY CONTACT TERMS OF USE © 1999-2002 Bristolite® Skylights. All rights reserved. Any use, reproduction, modification, distribution or display of this material without Bristolite Skylights' prior written consent is prohibited. http://bristolite.com/SKYLIGHT/RES/ACSIHTMLIP-ACS4D.HTM 5/25/05 9 L%J 35) g" & a, J,,~ I d.-s. L) Krl 42Aoi V/7 cPf /L tL)/Otd JrCJ 7 cf., -Fo W c,^ CAW U 4i tL ) j-Lc /J1L SAMUELSON RES 180 SF 2ND STORY ADDITION RESDNTL RAID Lot#: SAMUELSON JACK FAMILY TRUST 0 --oq- /cs-1 !PL H1OS J&tL ie- gso-f. '2 J4i22 7; wfoC "(j.o.k -57 PLN*41N0 - IHIIIIE APFORM - IALTh DEPT - OTIM SEWER DIM TO omm HOOL FORM WORM E & N WORKS 41 El DG FEES COM?i: FE AN cORR GCORR 5GtCORR