HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-09-17; City Council; ; Agreement with Glenn A. Rick Engineering Development and Company to update the city's Drainage Master Plan, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project No. 6623.CA Review /qL \'1"
CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
Meeting Date:
To:
From:
Staff Contact:
Subject:
Sept. 17, 2019
Mayor and City Council
Scott Chadwick, City Manager
Daniel Zimny, Associate Engineer
Daniel.Zimny@carlsbadca.gov or 760-602-7551
Agreement with Glenn A. Rick Engineering Development and Company to
update the city's Drainage Master Plan, Capital Improvement Program
{CIP) Project No. 6623.
Recommended Action
Adopt a Resolution authorizing execution of an agreement with Glenn A. Rick Engineering
Development and Company (Rick Engineering) to update the city's Drainage Master Plan (DMP),
CIP Project No. 6623 (Project), in an amount not to exceed $945,000; and approving an
additional appropriation of Planned Local Drainage Area (PLDA) Funds, in an amount of
$306,000.
Executive Summary
The original City of Carlsbad DMP was adopted in 1980 with the goal of assessing the
performance of existing storm drain infrastructure, identifying anticipated drainage
infrastructure needs and developing a funding mechanism to ensure construction of these
planned facilities. The DMP is updated from time to time to reflect changes in city growth,
construction costs, general plan, drainage standards and environmental regulations. The
current DMP was approved by City Council in 2008 with Resolution No. 2008-230. Staff
recommends updating the DMP so that a citywide comprehensive drainage network can be
properly planned and financed. Through publication of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ),
qualification review, ranking and negotiating process, the selection committee has rated Rick
Engineering as the most qualified firm to update the city's DMP.
The Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC), Section 3.28.060 (D), requires City Council to award
professional services agreements (PSA) when the value exceeds $100,000 per agreement year.
The proposed PSA with Rick Engineering is in an amount not to exceed $945,000; therefore, this
Project is subject to this requirement. City staff recommends executing an agreement with Rick
Engineering to update the DMP in an amount not to exceed $945,000.
Discussion
On Sept. 2, 1980, City Council approved Resolution No. 6301-1 to adopt a DMP to assess the
performance of the existing storm drain infrastructure, identify the anticipated drainage
facilities to accommodate storm runoff from the future development and to develop a funding
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 1 of 35
mechanism to facilitate construction of these planned facilities. The DMP is updated from time
to time to reflect changes in city growth, general plan, drainage standards and environmental
regulation. On Nov. 4, 2008, City Council approved Resolution No. 2008-230 to adopt the latest
update to the DMP. The update identified 34 drainage projects across the four drainage basins
within the city: Buena Vista Creek, Agua Hedionda Creek, Encinas Creek and San Marcos Creek.
These projects are funded through the PLDA fee program, which was established in conjunction
with adoption of the DMP and collects fees from new development and redevelopment. The
four drainage basins in the city correspond to the four existing PLDA funds: A-Buena Vista
Creek Basin, B -Agua Hedionda Creek Basin, C -Encinas Creek Basin and D -San Marcos Creek
Basin. These funds are independently financed through impact fees to create a restricted cash
reserve for the sole use of implementing DMP projects within each respective basin. The 2008
DMP update provided a basis for the current PLDA fee structure that is in effect today. These
fees are used to fund projects either through the city's CIP or to reimburse privat~ developers
that construct master planned facilities.
The fee schedule was last adjusted under the 2008 DMP to reflect estimated construction costs
at that time. Due to changes in construction costs and environmental regulations, an increasing
number of projects included in the 2008 DMP are not fully funded and/or the proposed scope
of work is no longer feasible. The DMP update effort will modify the PLDA fee schedule based
on current economic conditions in conjunction with addition of new projects and deletion of
unnecessary or obsolete projects.
On March 3, 2019, staff posted a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) on the city's website to solicit
statements of qualifications from engineering firms to update the DMP. Five Submittals of
Qualifications (SOQs) were received from consultants on April 18, 2019, and copies were
distributed to a selection panel comprised of city staff. The selection panel evaluated and
ranked the responses to the RFQ, pursuant to CMC Section 3.28.060 (A).
On April 30, 2019, the selection panel collectively selected Rick Engineering as the most
qualified firm for this Project. To complete the selection process, staff negotiated the final
scope of work and proposed fees with Rick Engineering. Staff recommends award of an
agreement with Rick Engineering to update the city's DMP, in an amount not to exceed
$945,000.
Fiscal Analysis
The agreement with Rick Engineering is in an amount not to exceed $945,000 inclusive of all
reimbursable expenses. All four PLDA funding sources have appropriated funds for the Project
as shown in the table below:
DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN UPDATE, CIP PROJECT NO. 6623
Current Appropriation -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin A Fund $94,000
Current Appropriation -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin B Fund · $456,000
Current Appropriation -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin C Fund $63,000
Current Appropriation -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin D Fund $126,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN UPDATE, CIP PROJECT NO. 6623 $739,000
Agreement for Design Services -Rick Engineering $945,000
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 2 of 35
Staff Time (estimated) $100,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,045,000
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION NEEDED $306,000
Additional funding appropriation is required to support the contract with Rick Engineering and
associated staff time. The contribution of additional funds from each PLDA account is
summarized below:
DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN UPDATE, CIP PROJECT NO. 6623
Additional Contribution -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin A Fund $68,512
Additional Contribution -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin B Fund $100,000
Additional Contribution -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin C Fund $56,890
Additional Contribution -Planned Local Drainage Area Basin D Fund $80,598
TOTAL ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION, CIP PROJECT NO. 6623 $306,000
Next Steps
Once agreement documents are fully executed and a purchase order is issued, staff will
schedule a meeting with Rick Engineering and issue a notice-to-proceed to update the current
DMP. Once the final draft of the updated DMP is prepared and reviewed, staff will then return
to City Council with a recommendation to approve the updated DMP and to amend CMC Title
15 Chapters 15.04 and 15.08 to update the PLDA fee program. It is estimated that the update to
the DMP will take three years.
Environmental Evaluation (CEQA)
Authorizing a consultant contract does not qualify as a "project" under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it does not result in a direct physical change in the
environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and
therefore does not require environmental review.
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR 04-02) was completed for the Drainage Master Plan
(DMP) Update and Certified by the City Council on Aug. 5, 2008 (Resolution No. 2008-229). An
update to the DMP will require additional CEQA review and may require an Addendum to the
previous EIR depending on what changes are made to the DMP.
Public Notification and Outreach
This item was noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public
viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to scheduled meeting date.
Exhibits
1. City Council Resolution.
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 3 of 35
RESOLUTION NO. 2019-177
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH GLENN
A. RICK ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT AND COMPANY (RICK ENGINEERING)
TO UPDATE THE CITY'S DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN (DMP), CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) PROJECT NO. 6623 (PROJECT), IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $945,000; AND APPROVING AN ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATION OF PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA (PLDA) FUNDS, IN AN
AMOUNT OF $306,000.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has previously appropriated funds
for the Drainage Master Plan (DMP) Update Project, CIP Project No. 6623 (Project); and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Branch has solicited a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to facilitate
the update; and
WHEREAS, staff has received a total of five responses to the RFQ and has conducted a
qualifications-based evaluation of the five responses received, per Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
3.28.060(A); and
WHEREAS, staff has identified Glenn A. Rick Engineering Development and Company (Rick
. Engineering) as the most qualified firm for the Project; and
WHEREAS, staff and Rick Engineering have negotiated the scope of work and associated fee in
an amount not to exceed $945,000 to provide necessary services to complete the Project; and
WHEREAS, an additional appropriation of funds from the PLDA fund in an amount of $306,000
is needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the mayor is authorized and directed to execute the agreement with Rick
Engineering to update the DMP, CIP Project No. 6623, in an amount not to exceed
$945,000, which is attached hereto as Attachment A.
3. That the deputy city manager, administrative services, is authorized to appropriate
funds in an amount of $306,000 to the Project from the PLDA fund with the following
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 4 of 35
contributions: PLDA A -$68,512; PLDA B -$100,000; PLDA C $56,890 and PLDA D -
$80,598.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on
the 17th day of September 2019, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Hall, Blackburn, Bhat-Patel, Schumacher, Hamilton.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: None.
~ llrxwr G,mtz
~/ BARBARA ENGLESON, City Clerk 1
(SEAL)
/)ff"JJ c,;
clen.t
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 5 of 35
PSA20-855TRAN
AGREEMENT FOR CITY OF CARLSBAD DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN UPDATE
GLENN A. RICK ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT & CO.
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the I 7./Jv day of
5~/unpt/ , 2019, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal
corporation, ('~ rty"), and GLENN A. RICK ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT CO., a California
corporation, ("Contractor'').
RECITALS
A. City requires the professional services of a consultant that is experienced in the
preparation of master planning, technical drainage studies, cost estimating and environmental
review processing to complete the update to the City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan.
B. Contractor has the necessary experience in providing professional services and
advice related to these requested services.
C. Contractor has submitted a proposal to City and has affirmed its willingness and
ability to perform such work.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, City and Contractor agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK
City retains Contractor to perform, and Contractor agrees to render, those services (the
"Services") that are defined in attached Exhibit "A", which is incorporated by this reference in
accordance with this Agreement's terms and conditions.
2. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE
While performing the Services, Contractor will exercise the reasonable professional care and skill
customarily exercised by reputable members of Contractor's profession practicing in the
Metropolitan Southern California Area, and will use reasonable diligence and best judgment while
exercising its professional skill and expertise.
3. TERM
The term of this Agreement will be effective for a period of three (3) years from the date first above
written. The City Manager or designee may amend the Agreement to extend it for two (2)
additional one (1) year periods or parts thereof. Extensions will be based upon a satisfactory
review of Contractor's performance, City needs, and appropriation of funds by the City Council.
The parties will prepare a written amendment indicating the effective date and length of the
extended Agreement.
4. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.
5. COMPENSATION
The total fee payable for the Services to be performed during the initial Agreement term will be
nine hundred forty five thousand dollars ($945,000). No other compensation for the Services will
be allowed except for items covered by subsequent amendments to this Agreement. If the City
elects to extend the Agreement, the amount shall not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars
($75,000) per Agreement year. The City reserves the right to withhold a ten percent (10%)
retention until City has accepted the work and/or Services specified in Exhibit "A".
Incremental payments, if applicable, should be made as outlined in attached Exhibit "A".
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 6 of 35
PSA20-855TRAN
6. STATUS OF CONTRACTOR
Contractor will perform the Services in Contractor's own way as an independent contractor and
in pursuit of Contractor's independent calling, and not as an employee of City. Contractor will be
under control of City only as to the result to be accomplished, but will consult with City as
necessary. The persons used by Contractor to provide services under this Agreement will not be
considered employees of City for any purposes.
The payment made to Contractor pursuant to the Agreement will be the full and complete
compensation to which Contractor is entitled. City will not make any federal or state tax
withholdings on behalf of Contractor or its agents, employees or subcontractors. City will not be
required to pay any workers' compensation insurance or unemployment contributions on behalf
of Contractor or its employees or subcontractors. Contractor agrees to indemnify City within thirty
(30) days for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, unemployment
payment or workers' compensation payment which City may be required to make on behalf of
Contractor or any agent, employee, or subcontractor of Contractor for work done under this
Agreement. At the City's election, City may deduct the indemnification amount from any balance
owing to Contractor.
7. SUBCONTRACTING
Contractor will not subcontract any portion of the Services without prior written approval of City.
If Contractor subcontracts any of the Services, Contractor will be fully responsible to City for the
acts and omissions of Contractor's subcontractor and of the persons either directly or indirectly
employed by the subcontractor, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons directly
employed by Contractor. Nothing contained in this Agreement will create any contractual
relationship between any subcontractor of Contractor and City. Contractor will be responsible for
payment of subcontractors. Contractor will bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of
a subcontractor by the terms of this Agreement applicable to Contractor's work unless specifically
noted to the contrary in the subcontract and approved in writing by City.
8. OTHER CONTRACTORS
The City reserves the right to employ other Contractors in connection with the Services.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees
and volunteers from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorney's
fees arising out of the performance of the work described herein caused by any negligence,
recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or
indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable.
The parties expressly agree that any payment, attorney's fee, costs or expense City incurs or
makes to or on behalf of an injured employee under the City's self-administered workers'
compensation is included as a loss, expense or cost for the purposes of this section, and that this
section will survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement.
10. INSURANCE
Contractor will obtain and maintain for the duration of the Agreement and any and all
amendments, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may
arise out of or in connection with performance of the services by Contractor or Contractor's
agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. The insurance will be obtained from an
insurance carrier admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California. The insurance
carrier is required to have a current Best's Key Rating of not less than "A-:VII"; OR with a surplus
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
2
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 7 of 35
PSA20-855TRAN
line insurer on the State of California's List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers (LASLI) with a rating
in the latest Best's Key Rating Guide of at least "A:X"; OR an alien non-admitted insurer listed by
the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) latest quarterly listings report.
10.1 Coverage and Limits.
Contractor will maintain the types of coverage and minimum limits indicated below, unless the
Risk Manager or City Manager approves a lower amount. These minimum amounts of coverage
will not constitute any limitations or cap on Contractor's indemnification obligations under this
Agreement. City, its officers, agents and employees make no representation that the limits of the
insurance specified to be carried by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement are adequate to
protect Contractor. If Contractor believes that any required insurance coverage is inadequate,
Contractor will obtain such additional insurance coverage, as Contractor deems adequate, at
Contractor's sole expense. The full limits available to the named insured shall also be available
and applicable to the City as an additional insured.
10.1.1 Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance. Insurance written on an
"occurrence" basis, including personal & advertising injury, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per
occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply
separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required
occurrence limit.
10.1.2 Automobile Liability. (if the use of an automobile is involved for Contractor's work
for City). $2,000,000 combined single-limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
10.1.3 Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability. Workers' Compensation limits as
required by the California Labor Code. Workers' Compensation will not be required if Contractor
has no employees and provides, to City's satisfaction, a declaration stating this.
10.1.4 Professional Liability. Errors and omissions liability appropriate to Contractor's
profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim. Coverage must be maintained for a
period of five years following the date of completion of the work.
10.2 Additional Provisions. Contractor will ensure that the policies of insurance required under
this Agreement contain, or are endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
10.2.1 The City will be named as an additional insured on Commercial General Liability
which shall provide primary coverage to the City.
10.2.2 Contractor will obtain occurrence coverage, excluding Professional Liability, which
will be written as claims-made coverage.
10.2.3 This insurance will be in force during the life of the Agreement and any extensions
of it and will not be canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice to City sent by certified
mail pursuant to the Notice provisions of this Agreement.
10.3 Providing Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements. Prior to City's execution of this
Agreement, Contractor will furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements to City.
10.4 Failure to Maintain Coverage. If Contractor fails to maintain any of these insurance
coverages, then City will have the option to declare Contractor in breach or may purchase
replacement insurance or pay the premiums that are due on existing policies in order to maintain
the required coverages. Contractor is responsible for any payments made by City to obtain or
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
3
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 8 of 35
PSA20-855TRAN
maintain insurance and City may collect these payments from Contractor or deduct the amount
paid from any sums due Contractor under this Agreement.
10.5 Submission of Insurance Policies. City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete
and certified copies of any or all required insurance policies and endorsements.
11. BUSINESS LICENSE
Contractor will obtain and maintain a City of Carlsbad Business License for the term of the
Agreement, as may be amended from time-to-time.
12. ACCOUNTING RECORDS
Contractor will maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred under this
Agreement. All records will be clearly identifiable. Contractor will allow a representative of City
during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of records and
any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor will allow inspection of all
work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three
(3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.
13. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All work product produced by Contractor or its agents, employees, and subcontractors pursuant
to this Agreement is the property of City. In the event this Agreement is terminated, all work
product produced by Contractor or its agents, employees and subcontractors pursuant to this
Agreement will be delivered at once to City. Contractor will have the right to make one (1) copy
of the work product for Contractor's records.
14. COPYRIGHTS
Contractor agrees that all copyrights that arise from the services will be vested in City and
Contractor relinquishes all claims to the copyrights in favor of City.
15. NOTICES
The name of the persons who are authorized to give written notice or to receive written notice on
behalf of City and on behalf of Contractor under this Agreement.
For City
Name Daniel Zimny
Title Associate Engineer
Department Public Works
City of Carlsbad
Address 1635 Faraday Av
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone No. 760-602-7551
For Contractor
Name Brendan Hastie
Title Project Manager
Address 5620 Friars Road
San Diego, CA 92110
Phone No. 619-908-3555
Email bhastie@rickeng ineering. com
Each party will notify the other immediately of any changes of address that would require any
notice or delivery to be directed to another address.
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
4
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 9 of 35
PSA20-855TRAN
16. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Contractor shall file a Conflict of Interest Statement with the City Clerk in accordance with the
requirements of the City of Carlsbad Conflict of Interest Code. The Contractor shall report
investments or interests in all categories.
Yes~ No D
17. GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Contractor will keep fully informed of federal, state and local laws and ordinances and regulations
which in any manner affect those employed by Contractor, or in any way affect the performance
of the Services by Contractor. Contractor will at all times observe and comply with these laws,
ordinances, and regulations and will be responsible for the compliance of Contractor's services
with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations.
Contractor will be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
and will comply with those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for
employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants whose services are
required by this Agreement.
18. DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT PROHIBITED
Contractor will comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations prohibiting
discrimination and harassment.
19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of the Services the following procedure will
be used to resolve any questions of fact or interpretation not otherwise settled by agreement
between the parties. Representatives of Contractor or City will reduce such questions, and their
respective views, to writing. A copy of such documented dispute will be forwarded to both parties
involved along with recommended methods of resolution, which would be of benefit to both
parties. The representative receiving the letter will reply to the letter along with a recommended
method of resolution within ten (10) business days. If the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory
to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the disputes will be forwarded to the City Manager. The
City Manager will consider the facts and solutions recommended by each party and may then opt
to direct a solution to the problem. In such cases, the action of the City Manager will be binding
upon the parties involved, although nothing in this procedure will prohibit the parties from seeking
remedies available to them at law.
20. TERMINATION
In the event of the Contractor's failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the Services, City may
terminate this Agreement for nonperformance by notifying Contractor by certified mail of the
termination. If City decides to abandon or indefinitely postpone the work or services contemplated
by this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Contractor. Upon
notification of termination, Contractor has five (5) business days to deliver any documents owned
by City and all work in progress to City address contained in this Agreement. City will make a
determination of fact based upon the work product delivered to City and of the percentage of work
that Contractor has performed which is usable and of worth to City in having the Agreement
completed. Based upon that finding City will determine the final payment of the Agreement.
Either party upon tendering thirty (30) days written notice to the other party may terminate this
Agreement. In this event and upon request of City, Contractor will assemble the work product and
put it in order for proper filing and closing and deliver it to City. Contractor will be paid for work
performed to the termination date; however, the total will not exceed the lump sum fee payable
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
5
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 10 of 35
PSA20-855TRAN
under this Agreement. City will make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed
and the compensation to be made.
21. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
Contractor warrants that Contractor has not employed or retained any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee working for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that
Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration
contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation
of this warranty, City will have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or, in its discretion,
to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of the
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fees, gift, or contingent fee.
22. CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS
By signing this Agreement, Contractor agrees that any Agreement claim submitted to City must
be asserted as part of the Agreement process as set forth in this Agreement and not in anticipation
of litigation or in conjunction with litigation. Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is
submitted to City, it may be considered fraud and Contractor may be subject to criminal
prosecution. Contractor acknowledges that California Government Code sections 12650 et seq.,
the False Claims Act applies to this Agreement and, provides for civil penalties where a person
knowingly submits a false claim to a public entity. These provisions include false claims made
with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of
information. If City seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to
recover its litigation costs, including attorney's fees. Contractor acknowledges that the filing of a
false claim may subject Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding as the result of
which Contractor may be prevented to act as a Contractor on any public work or improvement for
a period of up to five (5) years. Contractor acknowledges debarment by another jurisdiction is
grounds for City to terminate this Agreement.
23. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Any action at law or in equity brought by either of the parties for the purpose of enforcing a right
or rights provided for by this Agreement will be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the
County of San Diego, State of California, and the parties waive all provisions of law providing for
a change of venue in these proceedings to any other county.
24. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
It is mutually understood and agreed that this Agreement will be binding upon City and Contractor
and their respective successors. Neither this Agreement nor any part of it nor any monies due or
to become due under it may be assigned by Contractor without the prior consent of City, which
shall not be unreasonably withheld.
25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated by it, along
with the purchase order for this Agreement and its provisions, embody the entire Agreement and
understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter of it. In case of conflict, the terms
of the Agreement supersede the purchase order. Neither this Agreement nor any of its provisions
may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except in a writing signed by both parties.
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
6
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 11 of 35
P SA20-855TRAN
26. AUTHORITY
The individuals executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced in it on behalf of
Contractor each represent and warrant that they have the legal power, right and actual authority
to bind Contractor to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR
GLENN A. RICK ENGINEERING &
DEVELOPMENT CO., a California
corporation
B:
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal
corporation of the State of California
By ~
~attHa~or
ATTEST:
~ I )/ffl~f 6-irne 21 /)l!p~l1
-(~( Barbara Engleson, City Clerk c;-5
If required by City, proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by contractor must be attached.
If a corporation, Agreement must be signed by one corporate officer from each of the following
two groups.
Group A
Chairman,
President, or
Vice-President
Group B
Secretary,
Assistant Secretary,
CFO or Assistant Treasurer
Otherwise, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant
secretary under corporate seal empowering the officer(s) signing to bind the corporation.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CELIA A. BREWER, City Attorney
BY: __ p.,._ep=u_.tf"--c-f....,.ty=A-t_.~e-rns;;;a,,,./'-----
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
7
Cl-t1st
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 12 of 35
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not t.he truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.
State of California
County of San Diego
before me, Corie Leann-Petree Barrigan, A/0:4r/]1hllc
(insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared :::b Q lO aJd L<Jaoll ei ______ ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidenc to be the person(f,) whose nametsr') is/a,€l
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/¢e/tlfey executed the same in
his/hp /th eif authorized capacity(i~), and that by his/h,e'r/th¢ signature(%) on the instrument the
person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the personM acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
(Seal)
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 13 of 35
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.
State of California
County of San Diego
on .ilii<jl,s+ 11 2-ol 9 before me, Corie Leann-Petree Barrigan, J\}v¼:r:::{f u.b\1c.,.
(insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared :n\MD~ YYl./a::~.b~ ' ,
who proved to me on the basis of satis actory evide~ to be the per son(,s')· whose name(~ is/ark
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he!spe!t h,iy executed the same in
his/per/tl;teir authorized capacity(iE;)S), and that by his/hp /th¢r signature~) on the instrument the
person~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(%) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is tru e and correct.
(Seal)
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 14 of 35
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PSA20-855TRAN
City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18
8
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 15 of 35
RICK
ENGI NEERING COMPA Y
July 23, 2019
Mr. Daniel Zimny
Associate Engineer
163 5 Faraday A venue
Carlsbad, California 92008
SUBJECT: SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE CITYWIDE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN FOR THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA
Dear Mr. Zimny:
Rick Engineering Company (RICK) is pleased to submit our proposal for Water Resources
Engineering services associated with the above-referenced project. The following provides an outline
for the Citywide Drainage Master Plan to assess the existing drainage deficiencies, and establish a
Drainage Master Plan with incorporated fiscal analysis and fee analysis along with associated
environmental processing for the City of Carlsbad.
Scope of Work
Task 1. Project Management, Meetings, and Coordination
Coordination with City of Carlsbad staff will be the key in developing the most complete
drainage master plan to meet the City's project goals. Due to the short duration for the project
schedule meetings will be focused on delivery of data, and review by City staff to stay on
schedule and allow for regular input on how the project is developing. The RICK Team will
attend the following meetings with the City staff:
• A ward Meeting
• Kickoff Meeting
• Team Meetings
o Review of Missing storm drain data and surveying needs
o Review of Preliminary hydraulic modeling results & deficient systems
o Review of Draft Drainage Master Plan report
o Up to 2 additional team meetings as needed to facilitate project development
• Public Meetings
o RICK staff will prepare presentations and attend up to 2 public meetings
*Each meeting is assumed to be up to 2 hours with 2 staff from RICK
RICK will provide meeting agendas prior to the team meetings and meeting minutes to the City
within five (5) business days for review and concurrence.
RICK staff will work closely with City staff and sub-consultants to ensure open communication
%20 I ri.m Roo1d • S,111 Diego, C.1lifomi,1 '12 110·2 'i'H, · (6 1 'l) l'l I -0707 • www.rkkl'np,irH'Ning.corn
SAN DIEGO RIVERSIDE ORANGE SACRAMENTO SAN LUIS OBISPO lAS VEGAS DENVER PHOENIX TUCSON
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 16 of 35
Mr. Daniel Zimny
July 23, 2019
Page 2 of 8
during the duration of the project providing monthly progress memorandums, schedule updates,
and invoicing. Weekly internal staff meetings will ensure that project tasks are proceeding as
scheduled to meet the City's needs. Questions requiring City input will be coordinated
immediately to maintain the project schedule. No out of scope work will be performed without
prior discussion and written approval from City staff.
Deliverables
• Meeting agendas and meeting minutes for up to 9 meetings
• Monthly progress memorandums
Task 2. Data Collection and Compilation
Existing Condition Review
The RJCK Team will review the existing 2008 Drainage Master Plan and compile supplemental
data, such as technical studies/reports, FEMA information/maps. The RJCK Team shall also
establish an understanding of the City's existing and proposed drainage condition as well as
identifying completed projects from the 2008 DMP.
Compile GIS Data
The RJCK Team will coordinate with the City to obtain the latest version of all existing digital
GIS data bases available to support the development of the Drainage Master Plan. The data
provided by the City should include the following:
• Current GIS Storm Drain Inventory data, including size, material, shape, flowline elevations,
and plan number references.
• General Plan Land Use database for areas within the City Municipal Boundary.
• Most recent LiDAR topographic data.
• Existing BMP and Detention Basin GIS Databases, including facility characteristics, flowline
elevations, plan references, and maintenance information.
• Records of historic flooding concerns, or maintenance concerns within the City.
• Pertinent reports, studies, plans, or documents related to the City's drainage infrastructure that
would influence the development of the Drainage Master Plan.
Other Data sets that the RJCK Team will compile include:
• Available GIS datasets for adjacent municipalities including the County of San Diego, the
City of Vista, the City of Oceanside, the City of Encinitas, the City of San Marcos, and
Caltrans.
• USGS Hydrologic Soil Data available from SSURGO
• Vegetative Cover data for open space and undeveloped areas
• General Plan Land Use databases from neighboring City's
• Available Topographic Data & Drainage Master Plans from the adjacent municipalities
• Assessor's Parcel Boundaries & Ownership data
• Aerial Imagery
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 17 of 35
Mr. Daniel Zimny
July 23, 2019
Page 3 of 8
Identify Critical Missing and Incorrect Data
The RICK Team will review the data provided by the City and identify any critical missing data in
the provided data sets, including size, material, shape, and flow line elevations of pipes, culverts,
and channels. Also critical is the storage and outlet rating curves for the regional detention basins
(assuming a total of31 detention basins to be modeled).
Identify Missing Infrastructure
In recognizing that there are likely areas of existing storm drain that are not yet reflected in the
storm drain inventory, RICK is budgeting for collection and modeling of approximately five (5)
percent more storm drain facilities as part of this effort. The RICK Team will visually identify
using the 2014 (or equivalent) LiDAR imagery and Google Street View missing infrastructure,
including inlets, cleanouts, storm drains, and flowlines to create a fully connected drainage
network. Inventory and modeling of facilities in excess of these assumptions are excluded from
this scope of work.
Field Verification
Based on the previously identified missing and incorrect data and infrastructure the RICK Team
will perform automated gap-filling procedures to interpolate missing elevations, size, or material
as applicable based on consistency in upstream or downstream data. However, in areas where data
cannot reasonably be interpolated, field assessments may be required to determine needed
information such as location, size, material, and invert elevations. This can be done by measuring
the depth to invert of the cleanouts and applying the offset to the cleanout using the LiDAR
surface as the rim elevation. For scoping purposes it is assumed that four ( 4) days of field
assessments will be completed by engineering staff during the data collection effort. This will
likely not be enough time to verify all missing critical information so the assets will be prioritized
and verified from a highest priority to lowest priority within the provided time. In addition, one
( 1) week of field surveying will be completed during the recommendations phase to verify critical
information for the selected projects. The results of the field surveys will be incorporated into the
Storm Drainage Infrastructure database for use in the development of the Drainage Master Plan.
This effort will focus on backbone infrastructure with diameters of 36" or larger and specific
focus areas identified by the City (Carlsbad Village, Shoppes at Carlsbad Mall Area, and the area
around Agua Hedionda Creek at El Camino Real).
Compile and Horizontally Correct GIS Data
Once all the available GIS databases are compiled, the RICK Team will generate the distinct
composite datasets formatted for integration into a GIS Based Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model
for the City. Those data sets include:
• Storm Drainage Infrastructure
• Land U seN egetation
• Hydrologic Soil Type
The most critical information for each storm drain conduit is pipe diameter and material, since
flowlines can be assumed at a certain depth. A copy of these datasets will be submitted to the City
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 18 of 35
Mr. Daniel Zimny
July 23, 2019
Page 4 of 8
for review and concurrence prior to initiation of hydrologic and Hydraulic modeling.
Deliverables
• Updated GIS existing storm drain inventory
Task 3. Existing Condition Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis
Compile Hydrologic Data
The RJCK Team will utilize a semi-automated process to generate sub-catchment delineations for
the City based on the available LiDAR or DEM surface to existing drainage infrastructure. This
process will result in delineations to existing inlets (and other collection points, as applicable,
including backbone systems where localized inlet data is unavailable), as well as larger scale
delineations for contributing areas outside of the City. The delineations will include longest flow
path, width, and slope necessary for hydrologic calculations. For the scoping of this effort it is
assumed that the 8,712 inlets in the existing inventory along with up to five (5) percent additional
inlets will be delineated to resulting in up to 9,148 delineations within the City. The remaining
area will be broken into roughly 40 acre delineations resulting in an additional 1,060 delineations.
The delineations will be developed based on the LiDAR surface, drainage infrastructure, and a
global semi-automated review process utilizing GIS based tools. Individual verification of
delineations will be done in the vicinity of the selected CIPs, discussed further below (updates to
approximately 15 previously identified projects and 15 new projects).
In order to mimic hydrologic methodology for local drainage and large watershed conditions,
RJCK will use the nested storm rainfall distribution as outlined in the County of San Diego
Hydrology Manual (2003) with the event peak at 2/3 distribution. RJCK will utilize GIS tools to
intersect the General Plan Land Use Data, Vegetative Cover Data, USGS Soils data, and 2014
LiDAR data. RJCK will then use these GIS parameters and semi-automated procedures to
calculate SWMM parameters for each subcatchment.
The RJCK Team will review the NOAA Atlas 14 data for the study area and develop a rainfall
intensity-duration relationship for the 2-year, IO-year, and 100-year 24-hour storm events. This
rainfall intensity-duration relationship will be used to generate a . rainfall hyetograph for
incorporation into the hydrologic modeling for the City's Drainage Master Plan.
Existing Condition 1D/2D Hydrologic and Hydraulic Models
The RJCK Team will import the developed watersheds, rainfall hyetographs, and GIS Storm
Drainage Inventory database into the hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) modeling software
PCSWMM to develop a dynamically coupled l-Dimensional/2-Dimensional H&H model. The
models will extend from upstream end of the backbone system to the major outfall and will not
include major FEMA mapped channels. The 2-Dimensional surface will be generated for "hot
spot" areas within the City along with areas within the City that are very flat ( <1 % average grade
based on a GIS slope analysis of the DEM) and contain substantial development only (assumed up
to 5% of total City area) and a I-Dimensional dual drainage model will be used to model the
remaining area. The addition of a 2-Dimensional surface mesh will allow the model to provide
surface attenuation, model split flow conditions, a~d provide visual limits of inundation in the
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 19 of 35
Mr. Daniel Zimny
July 23, 2019
Page 5 of 8
most critical areas of the City. Because there are multiple discharge locations within the City,
multiple hydrologically isolated models may be developed. The assumptions used for scoping this
task are as follows:
• City drainage area= 42 sq. mi. and the total drainage area= 108 sq. mi.
o Sub-watersheds within the City will be roughly 1 sq. mi. resulting in approximately 42
sub-watersheds to be modeled in 1D/2D
o For FEMA mapped channels with significant drainage area outside of the City limit
(i.e. upstream) revised H&H modeling will not be performed.
o The remaining area outside of the City will be modeled as ID dual drainage for each of
the 4 major basins
Identify and Summarize of Existing Condition Deficiencies
The RICK Team will review and compile the results of the 2-year, IO-year, and 100-year model
results to identify the area's most frequently prone to flooding. The assessment will make the
following comparisons to aid in the determination:
• Hydraulic grade line vs. ground elevation.
• Calculated discharge vs. pipe capacity,
• Pipe flow depth vs. pipe diameter, and
• Number of structures inundated
These comparisons will be used by the RICK Team to identify which pipes are surcharged,
resulting in flooding at varying storm intervals and where additional infrastructure could alleviate
problematic surface flooding.
Deliverables
• H&H Modeling Results for existing conditions (2-year, IO-year, 100-year), for City review
and concurrence
Task 4. Recommended Improvements
Identify Required Sizes for Deficient and New Facilities
The RICK Team will work closely with the City to identify updates for approximately fifteen (15)
CIP projects and fifteen (15) new CIP projects; based on deficiencies, infrastructure gaps, and
known City "hot spots." This task will be done utilizing existing condition model results to
determine potential CIP locations for upsizing or realigning existing infrastructure and/or adding
additional infrastructure.
Identify Regional Improvement Opportunities
The RICK Team will coordinate with City staff to identify potential locations for regional
improvements including regional detention basins and regional water quality improvements.
Currently planned regional projects will be incorporated into the Drainage Master Plan. The
RICK Team will also leverage GIS tools to identify additional potential opportunities for regional
projects. The approach may include investigating areas of public ownership zoned for open space,
park or other similar land use within sufficient proximity of stonn drain infrastructure. A list, GIS
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 20 of 35
Mr. Daniel Zimny
July 23, 2019
Page 6 of 8
Layer, and Map of additional potential regional improvement projects will be provided to the
City. This effort will also assist the City with State Trash Amendment and/or TMDL compliance
decision making process.
Recommended Condition 1D/2D Hydrologic and Hydraulic Models
Up to thirty (30) CIP projects will be added to the hydrologic and hydraulic model and run to .
determine their impacts on the neighboring facilities. Regional opportunities identified for flood
control purposes will also be incorporated into the H&H model of recommended condition.
The results of these models will be reviewed and summarized in a similar fashion to the results of
the existing condition models to include:
• Calculated discharge vs. pipe capacity, and
• Number of structures removed from inundated as well as number of structures remaining
inundated
The RICK Team will use the results of this exercise to compare the results and recommendations
from the DMP update with those outlined in the 2008 DMP update and provide the City with
comparison summary for review and concurrence.
Preliminary Design and Construction Cost Estimates
Once the City has reviewed and approved the additional CIP projects, the RICK Team will
prepare preliminary sizing for up to thirty (30) of these potential CIP projects using design criteria
provided in the San Diego County Hydraulic Design Manual (2014) and in accordance with the
City drainage standard; however, there may be situations where the existing deficiencies are
significant and constraints make doing so impractical and in these circumstances RICK will
review results with the City to identify an acceptable level of service. An opinion of probable cost
will be developed for these projects to reflect the additional analysis. The results will be provided
in a GIS based 11 "xl 7" fact sheet for each CIP, and included in the overall DMP report and web
application.
Prioritization of Recommended CIPs
The RICK Team will provide prioritization scores for up to thirty (30) recommended CIPs to
assist in ranking the benefit of each potential improvement. This will be done using a
prioritization matrix that will take into account modeling results (i.e. deficiency and surcharge) as
well as relevant fields from the existing GIS data (i.e. age of facility and location of facility).
Deliverables
• H&H Modeling Results for recommended conditions (2-year, IO-year, 100-year), for City
review and concurrence
• GIS storm drain inventory with recommendations and prioritization
Task 5. Fiscal Analysis and Fee Analysis
The RICK Team will coordinate with sub-consultant (EFS Engineering, Inc.) and provide GIS
support to accomplish the attached Scope of work (see Attachment A).
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 21 of 35
Mr. Daniel Zimny
July 23, 2019
Page 7 of 8
Task 6. Develop Drainage Master Plan Update
Compile GIS Modeling Results into Web-Application
The RICK Team will compile the GIS and modeling files developed through the Drainage Master
Planning efforts into a GIS based Web-Application to be updated periodically throughout the
project for the City to review milestone deliverables. A GIS geodatabase will be delivered to the
City upon project completion.
Draft Drainage Master Plan
The RICK Team will develop a DRAFT Drainage Master Plan report document summarizing the
hydrologic and hydraulic modeling methodology, results, and deficiencies. The report will
include exhibits documenting hydrologic data, peak discharges, and deficient systems. As
requested by the City the Report will compile results of the various tasks and will include the
following:
• An Executive summary.
• A summary of the city's Drainage Master Plan history.
· • Review and analysis of the city's drainage system and watershed characteristics.
• Discussion of the inputs, assumptions and results provided by the drainage model.
• Discussion of environmental analyses and permitting.
• Identification of newly proposed projects to be included in the program update and
projects in previous DMPs that are to be modified or deleted with the update.
• A summary of scope, proposed improvement, preliminary drainage modeling and cost
estimates for each project proposed in the DMP update.
• A review of the current PLDA fee structure and summary and support of the proposed fee
modifications with this update.
• Other considerations, summary of findings and recommendations.
The DRAFT report will be submitted to the City for review and comment.
Final Drainage Master Plan
Upon receipt of the comments, the RICK Team will generate the FINAL Drainage Master Plan
report with updated exhibits, and with digital copies of all developed GIS data sets and hydro logic
and hydraulic modeling files. This scope of work assumes that the reports and GIS data will be
delivered in a digital format, and that no hardcopies of the Drainage Master Plan report will be
generated.
Deliverables
• GIS Web-Application (available for milestones and throughout to facilitate City reference,
review, and input; updated for deliverables)
• DRAFT Drainage Master Plan Report for City review and comment
o This will include five (5) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy for City review
• FINAL Drainage Master Plan Report with final GIS datasets, Web App
o This will include twenty five (25) bound copies and one (1) electronic copy
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 22 of 35
Mr. Daniel Zimny
July 23, 2019
Page 8 of 8
Task 7. Environmental Processing
The RICK Team will coordinate with sub-consultant (LSA) and provide GIS support to
accomplish the attached Scope of work (see Attachment B).
Our "Consultant" fee for the above-described work would be on a time and materials basis per our
current Schedule of Hourly Rates, not to exceed $945,000.00 without your prior authorization (see
Attachment C).
Task 1. Project Management, Meetings, and Coordination ....................................... $ 34,650.00
Task 2. Data Collection and Compilation ................................... : .............................. $154,320.00
Task 3. Existing Condition H&H Analysis ................................................................ $376,460.00
Task 4. Recommended Improvements ....................................................................... $153,800.00
Task 5. Fiscal Analysis and Fee Analysis .................................................................. $ 49,120.00
Task 6. Develop Drainage Master Plan ...................................................................... $ 72,700.00
Task 7. Environmental Processing ...... : ...................................................................... $ 94,251.00
❖ Reimbursable Expenses ............................. , ........................................................... $ 9,699.00
Total: $945,000.00
General Assumptions and Exclusions
Not included in the above scope of work or fee are the following:
• Hydro logic modeling of land uses other than the General Plan land use.
• Water Quality modeling for pollutant removal
• Continuous Simulation modeling for assessing hydromodification management and storage.
• Inlet capacity calculations/limitations
• Civil engineering plans / construction drawings
• Topographic Mapping/Photogrammetry
• Structural engineering of any kind.
• Traffic engineering.
• Soils/geotechnical engineering.
• Dry utility design and/or coordination of any kind.
• Construction survey/Boundary survey
• Record of survey documents, plats, legals or easement documents.
• Any other services performed at the direction of Client, which are not defined in the above
listed services, shall be in addition to those set forth in this agreement.
• H&H modeling for the three (3) main creeks that are FEMA mapped (Buena Vista Creek,
Agua Hedionda Creek, Batiquitos Lagoon/ San Marcos Creek); however, the applicable side
tributaries w/in the City limits will be analyzed (including hydrology for tributary areas outside
City limits)
Any printing, title company fees, soils reports, blueprinting and miscellaneous expenses are extra and
not a part of this agreement. Also, not included are any items not specifically referred to above.
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 23 of 35
Attachment A
City of Carlsbad Backup for Task 5
Drainage Master Plan Update -Fiscal Analysis & Fee Analysis
"Draft" Scope of Services
(May 25, 2019)
BACKGROUND
The City of Carlsbad (City) has recently selected Rick Engineering Company
(Consultant) to provide engineering and related services for a Drainage Master Plan
Updat~ (Project). As a subconsultant to Consultant, EFS Engineering, Inc. (EFS)
submits the following Scope of Services for fiscal and fee analysis tasks on the Project.
PROJECT TASKS
Task 1 -Initial Project Coordination & Data Collection
1.1 Prepare for and attend project kick-off meeting with City staff and Consultant team
to confirm project objectives, define key program parameters, discuss issues with
current fee program, and identify key project milestones.
1.2 Collect and compile relevant data from City and others, including:
■ Prior program studies, reports, plans, documents and cost estimates related to
any facilities and/or programs intended to be funded by the proposed fee
■ Current City ordinance(s) related to imposition of the subject fees
■ Summary of existing fiscal obligations related to current or/or prospective
facilities (e.g., cost reimbursement agreements, contractual or bonded
indebtedness, etc.)
■ Current fund balances for existing fee program
■ Summary of known issues and/or weaknesses of current fee program
■ Summary of prior challenges (e.g., legal, fiscal, political, etc.) associated with
prior implementation efforts
■ Relevant program materials from other similar jurisdictions
1.3 Review data and identify additional data, as necessary.
1.4 Meet with Consultant team to confirm existing (base year) and ultimate (future
year) development conditions. Confirm spatial limits of program and discuss
intra-jurisdictional issues, if any.
Task 2 -Fee Rate Analysis
2.1 Review identified program facilities and associated costs. With the aid of
Consultant, separate and quantify facilities (costs), or portions thereof, necessary
to accommodate future growth.
1 of 3
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 24 of 35
City of Carlsbad
Drainage Master Plan Update -Fiscal Analysis & Fee Analysis
"Draft" Scope of Services
2.2 Review future development patterns and identified program facilities for spatial
variability. Evaluate whether reasonable or appropriate to modify City's existing fee
rate areas.
2.3 Review current land use equivalency and cost apportionment factors. Compare
and contrast to those found in other similar jurisdictions.
2.4 Develop up to three (3) alternative fee rate scenarios. Summarize strengths and
weakness of each scenario.
2.5 Prepare for and meet with City to discuss preliminary findings.
Task 3 -Proposed Fee Rates
3.1 Prepare draft submittal, to include the following:
■ Description of identified program improvements, including planning'"level cost
estimates provided by Consultant
■ Discussion of facilities subject to inter-jurisdictional issues, and recommended
coordination activities
■ Discussion of facilities and handling of direct versus cumulative development
impacts
■ Discussion of methodology and rationale
■ Schedule of fees for future development, including provisions for annual
cost-indexing
■ Discussion of future (periodic) program updates
3.2 Meet with City to discuss draft submittal.
3.3 Incorporate City comments. Prepare final submittal.
Task 4 -Project Management & Quality Control
4.1 Discuss project progress with City staff at appropriate intervals and prepare written
project status summaries.
4.2 Prepare monthly billings and submit to City with project progress reports .
4.3 Maintain quality control and conduct review of work product at key milestones.
4.4 Prepare for and attend up to five (5) additional project coordination meetings with
City staff and Consultant team.
2 of 3
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 25 of 35
City of Carlsbad
Drainage Master Plan Update -Fiscal Analysis & Fee Analysis
"Draft" Scope of Services
As a subconsultant to Consultant, EFS will complete the services outlined in this Scope
of Services for an estimated fee of approximately $45,000, on a time-and-materials
basis in accordance with the rates contained in Exhibit A. This estimated fee will not be
exceeded without additional written authorization from Consultant. The actual level of
· effort estimated for these services may increase or decrease due to unforeseen factors
or scope changes. Consultant will be informed of any significant changes.
Consultant will pay EFS within fifteen (15) days of receipt of payment from City, but not
to exceed forty-five (45) days from Consultant's receipt of EFS's invoice.
Assumptions
1. City and Consultant will provide all existing project materials, documents and
electronic files to EFS at no cost.
2. Consistent with the professional standard of care and unless specifically provided
herein, EFS shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of data and information
provided by City, Consultant or others without independent review or evaluation.
3. Any opinion of the cost prepared by EFS represents its judgment as a professional
engineer and is supplied for the general guidance of City and Consultant. Since EFS
has no control over the cost of labor and materials, or over competitive bidding or
market conditions, EFS does not guarantee the accuracy of such opinions as
compared to contractor bids or actual cost to City.
4. Documents, drawings, specifications, and electronic information/data, including
computer aided drafting and design, prepared by EFS pursuant to this agreement
are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by City or others on
extensions of the project or on any other project. Any use of completed documents
for other projects and any use of incomplete · documents without specific written
authorization from EFS will be at City's sole risk and without liability to EFS. City
assumes full responsibility for such changes unless City has given EFS prior notice
and has received from EFS written consent for such changes. Electronic data
delivered to City is for City's convenience and shall not include the professional
stamp or signature of an engineer or architect. City agrees that EFS shall not be
liable for claims, liabilities or losses arising out of, or connected with the decline of
accuracy or readability of electronic data due to inappropriate storage conditions or
duration.
5. EFS's work on Project will be limited to providing professional engineering services
related to the calculation, structure and apportionment of reasonable and justifiable ·
drainage fees applicable to future development in the City. EFS will not be
responsible for legal analysis, legal findings, legal opinions or legal interpretations.
3 of 3
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 26 of 35
Rate Schedule for
EFS Engineering, Inc.
Prepared exclusively for
Rick Engineering Company
for use on the
EXHIBIT A
City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan
(Effective January 1, 2019)
Professional Staff Description
Engineers & Analysts
Assistant Analyst
Assistant Engineer
Associate Analyst
Associate Engineer (Registered)
Senior Analyst
Senior Engineer (Registered)
Principal Engineer (Registered)
Technical & Administrative Support
Administrative Assistant
Designer / CAD Operator
Direct Project Expenses
Subconsultant Services
Travel -Vehicle Mileage
Travel -Lodging & Per Diem
Travel -Airfare, Vehicle Rental, Other
Other Direct Charges
(e.g., vendors, reprographic services, couriers, postage, etc.)
Hourly Rate
$ 95.00
$ 100.00
$ 110.00
$ 120.00
$ 135.00
$ 150.00
$ 190.00
$ 75.00
$ 100.00
Rate
Cost+ 10%
Federal Mileage Rate
Per Federal Guidelines
Cost+ 10%
Cost+ 10%
Invoices will be rendered monthly. Payment is due upon presentation. A late payment finance
charge of 1.5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum rate allowable by law) will be
applied to any unpaid balance commencing 30 days after the date of the original invoice.
Rates subject to revision annually on January 1st of each year.
EFS ENGINEERING, INC.
EFS/EFS-Rate Schedule (2019).doc
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 27 of 35
Attachment B
Backup for Task 7
LSA's preliminary review of the proposed project, consultation with the City on July 3rd, and review
of the Addendum prepared for the City's Sewer Master Plan and Water and Recycled Water Master
Plans indicates that an Addendum relying on the previously certified Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan (DMP) Update (December 2007) may be
possible. LSA assumes that the proposed project would include no more than 15 previously
identified projects that have not been implemented from the 2008 DMP Update and would not
include any design changes from the previous design and that no more than 15 new projects would
be proposed with the proposed project for a total project count not to exceed 30 associated with
the DMP Update. LSA also assumes that no project specific analysis will be required (i.e. the entire
DMP Update will be analyzed programmatically). The environmental impact analysis would evaluate
whether or not there are significant new environmental impacts associated with the 2019 Drainage
Master Plan Update Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project No. 6623 (proposed project) that
were not disclosed in the previously certified EIR, or whether new information or circumstances
exist that require substantial new environmental impact analysis.
Under the 2019 State CEQA Guidelines, several sections describe an Addendum (§15164), a
Subsequent EIR (§15162), and a Supplement to an EIR (§15163), defining the circumstances under
which an Addendum can be prepared and the circumstances under which a previous EIR can be
relied upon for CEQA clearance. Based on LSA's assumptions above, the proposed project would be
a similar or less intense plan (i.e., fewer physical improvements) that includes specific drainage
facilities funded by a Planned Local Drainage Area (PLDA) fee program from new developments,
non-PLDA projects (improvements to drainage facilities that are public facilities, but are not required
to accommodate additional storm flows generated from new development), Capital Improvement
Projects (CIPs) involving improvements to existing drainage facilities (non-PLDA), and operation and
maintenance-related activities for both PLDA and non-PLDA project components that would not be
funded through the PLDA. The scope of the proposed project considers up to 30 individual projects
whereas the previously certified EIR considered up to 34 projects. Therefore, environmental impacts
are anticipated to be similar to or less than the project analyzed in the certified Final EIR for the City
of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update (December 2007) under the assumption that the projects
are located in the same areas previously analyzed. However, if the Drainage Modeling task and
subsequent Proposed Infrastructure Recommendations task result in the identification of needed
drainage improvements that would occur in new locations not previously defined, additional
environmental analysis will need to be conducted to formulate the basis of the conclusions to be
provided in the Addendum. The analysis may include, but is not limited to, documenting the existing
condition of the site and surroundings, identification of similarities and differences between the
previously recommended improvements and recommended new improvements where applicable,
providing a quantitative analysis of impacts where applicable, and providing an assessment of the
environmental effect of the improvement for each environmental checklist threshold question.
If, based on the information provided in the technical analysis provided in the Addendum indicate
that the proposed project may result in an impact that cannot be reduced to a less than significant
level, LSA will immediately notify Rick Engineering and the City and work proactively with the project
team to identify: (1) additional measures, project changes, or design features that may reduce the
potential impact to a less than significant level, or (2) the most expedient method of providing
7/19/19 (L:\PROPOSAL\Open Proposals\RKE1901.P CBD DMP\Addendum Scope Carlsbad DMP revised_07-19-19_Final.docx) 1
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 28 of 35
appropriate environmental clearance under CEQA. The tasks identified below comprise LSA's work
program for completion of the environmental analysis and CEQA process for the proposed project.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following Addendum work tasks will be being prepared in order to analyze whether the
proposed project would result in significant new environmental impacts that were not disclosed in
the previously certified EIR, or whether new information or circumstances exist that require
substantial new environmental impact analysis. New technical analyses are included in this scope of
services.
Task 1: Screencheck Draft Addendum
Based on information provided by the City and by Rick Engineering, LSA will prepare a Project
Description defining the project to be evaluated in the Addendum. The Project Description will
include a brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a Subsequent EIR pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 and the explanation will be supported by substantial evidence. LSA will
prepare an Addendum to the Final EIR for the City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update
(December 2007) utilizing data from the project team and/or other sources and information from .
any prior studies for recent projects in the area. In addition, where new project locations would be
proposed as a result of the modeling efforts, supporting technical analysis will be performed, as
described below, to produce the necessary data to substantiate the conclusions of the Addendum.
The supporting technical analysis will only be data and not a standalone report and will be included
as appendices to the Addendum. This scope of services assumes that up to 15 new projects would
require construction emissions modeling to address potential air quality impacts (4 hours per
project); a desktop habitat assessment review from existing available habitat data from the San
Diego Association of Governments (SAN DAG) to determine habitat impacts (4 hours per project);
and construction noise modeling to address potential noise impacts (4 hours per project). LSA will
conduct a standard records search with the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) at San Diego
State University. The records search will provide a list of all previous cultural resources surveys
conducted within a one-half mile of the City limits, as well as the locations for previously recorded
cultural resources in the City. The results of the records search will be included in the Addendum.
The Screencheck Draft Addendum will be submitted to City staff in Microsoft Word and Adobe
Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF) formats for review. The budget included as part of the
proposed scope of services assumes that one set of consolidated comments (i.e., City comments
must be consolidated) will be provided by the City to LSA. No more than one round of review and
comment are assumed, with no substantial new comments or new analysis required for the second
round of revisions.
Per Subsection 15164(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, an Addendum need not be circulated for
public review and would require no response to comments. This scope of services does not include
circulation of the Addendum for public review or responding to public or agency comments.
7/19/19 (L:\PROPOSAL\Open Proposals\RKE1901.P CBD DMP\Addendum Scope Carlsbad DMP revised_07-19-19_Final.docx) 2
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 29 of 35
Task 2: Draft and Final Addendum
LSA will revise the Screencheck Draft Addendum in response to the consolidated set of comments
received from City staff,.and will submit the proposed Draft EIR Addendum for Planning Commission
recommendation and City Council approval. At this time, LSA will also prepare a revised and updated
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program, should any refinements to existing mitigation measures
be proposed. Preparation of an Addendum assumes that no new mitigation would be identified. LSA
will provide 10 hard copies of the proposed Draft EIR Addendum to City staff. The Draft EIR
Addendum will also be provided to the City in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat PDF formats.
Once approved by the City Council, a Final Addendum would be provided to the City and would
become a part of the administrative record to be kept on file with the Final EIR for the City of
Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update (December 2007) for future discretionary approvals. LSA will
provide five hard copies of the Final EIR Addendum to City staff. The Final EIR Addendum will also be
provided to the City in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat PDF formats.
Task 3: Notice of Determination
Upon adoption ofthe Final EIR Addendum, LSA will provide the City with the Notice of
Determination (NOD) for submission to the San Diego County Clerk. While LSA will prepare the NOD,
it is the responsibility of the City to file the NOD and pay the appropriate filing fees with the County
Clerk. It will be the responsibility of the City to pay any applicable NOD fees, including California
Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees, if applicable.
Task 4: Project Management and Meeting Attendance
This task includes regular and effective coordination among the LSA Project Manager, LSA technical
staff, and the City staff. The project management role provides a mechanism to ensure that there is
adequate exchange of information during project start-up and preparation ofthe Addendum. This
task includes notifying the City of problems as they are encountered and working expeditiously to
resolve problems. Important elements of this task will be to maintain the proJect schedule, oversee
the budget, and coordinate efforts with other consultants. To facilitate dissemination of
information, LSA's Project Manager will maintain ongoing verbal and email communication with the
City.
LSA staff will attend one kickoff meeting, one Planning Commission hearing, and one City Council
hearing. A total of three meetings have been budgeted in this Scope of Work.
7/19/19 (L:\PROPOSAL\Dpen Proposals\RKE190LP CBD DMP\Addendum Scope Carlsbad DMP revised_07-19-19_Final.docx) 3
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 30 of 35
Optional Task 5: Assist with AB 52 Native American Consultation. AB 52 establishes a consultation
process with all California Native American Tribes on the Native American Heritage Commission
(NAHC) List. The provisions of AB 52 apply to those projects for which a lead agency has issued a
Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an EIR or notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration on or after
July 1, 2015. Although a reissued NOP is not required for the completion of an Addendum to an EIR,
it is recognized that the City may desire to conduct consultation. LSA can assist the City with Native
American consultation per the City's guidelines, if requested. This assistance would be optional and
would not be initiated unless the City directs LSA to proceed. If the City elects to proceed with this
optional task, a scope and budget will be provided following the request.
7/19/19 (L:\PROPOSAL\Open Proposals\RKE1901.P CBD DMP\Addendum Scope Carlsbad DMP revised_07-19-19_Final.docx) 4
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 31 of 35
RKE1901.P LSA
Rick Engineering Company
Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update Addendum
] 'la /;, ~ iii 1 "jj • ~ ~ ·E ~ ·a
L SA ~ e -5 ~ J i ! {.; ~ .15 a i i .,
1.: .S! ~] . ll 0 . ~ ·g C iE ! ~iii C ] ·a ~ ~ '!! ~ :; 7/19/2019 ~ 0: 0. ~ z "' "' C Total LSA Fees
Employee Name .,,,,,,,,.,,,., 1: :::::?; t: im: itrn1m1 :ITT' Billing Rate $240 $155 $190 $145 $110 $95 $185 $160 $175 $140 $135 $145 $150 $100 $80 :,: .. :,,,,,.,
Escalation S% , .. ,,,,,,.,::;:,,::•: •.,,:••::; .. ,,,,,,..,,,,,·;:; .. ~m:;,r;:
Phase 01 Screencheck Draft Addendum
1.1 Screencheck Draft Addendum 16.001 40.001 8.001 0.001 0.001 . 100.00 60.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 12.00 •0.001 24.DDI 24.001 4.00 448.00 $63,900.00
Phase 01Screencheck Draft AddendumSubtotal 16.ool 4o.ool s.ool 0.001 0.001 100.00 60.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 12.00 40.001 24,001 24.001 4.00 448.00 $63,900.00
Phase 02 Draft and Final Addendum I
2.1 Draft and Final Addendum I 4.001 20.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,001 8.001 4.001 16.001 0.001 82.00 $10,270.00
Phase 02Draft and Final AddendumSubtotall 4.001 20.001 0.001 0.001 0.00 30,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 8.001 4,001 16.001 0.001 82.00 $10,270.00
Phase 03 Notice of Determination
3.1 Notice of Determination 1.001 2.001 0.001 0.001 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 1.001 1.00 11.00 $1,300.00
Phase 03Notlce of DetermlnatlonSubtotal 1.001 2.001 0.001 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 1.001 1.00 11.00 $1,300.00
Phase 04 Project Management and Meetings
4.1 Project Managerment and Meetings 16.ool 32.001 I I I I 48.00 $8,800.00
Phase 04Project Management and MeetlngsSubtotal 16.00I a2.ool 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.00 48.00 $8,800.00
Subtotal Labor: 37.00 94.00 8.00 0.00 0,00 136,00 60.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 12,00 48.00 28.00 41.00 5.00 S89.00 $84,270.00
Reimbursable Exoenses
lodging/Meals ::>-<: .:::><:: ---------------~ ~ >-< >-< >-< >-< >-< >-< >-< ::::>-< >-< $0.00
Records Search ::::>-< ::::>-< ::::>-< >-< ::::>-< >-< ::>-<: ::>-<: ::>-<: ::>-<: .:::><:: .:::><:: ---------------->-< $4,000.00
Reproduction ::::::>-<: ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::>-<: ::>-<: ::>-<: ::>-<: ::>-<: ::>-<: ;:><: ~ ::><: $777.50
Aerial Drone :::::>< ::::::>-<: ::><:: ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: >-< >-< >-< >-< ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::::>-< >< $0.00
Mileage ----------------- ------ ------
::><:: ::::::>-<: >-< >-< >-< >-< >-< >-<:: ::::>< >-<:: ::::>-< $SB.OD
GPS Units -------------------------~ -------~ ----------------::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::::::>-<:: :>-< $0.00
Total Station Surveying Equipment ::>-<: >-< ~ >-< ~ >-< .:::><:: .:::><:: .:::><:: .:::><:: ---------------- ------::><:: >< $0.00
laser level ::::>-< ::::>-< >-< >-< >-< ::>< ::>-<: :::>-<: :::>-<: ;:><: ;:><: ::>-<: ~ -----~ ~ $0.00
laser Rangefinder ::::>< ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: ::::>-< ::>-<: ::>-<: :::>-<: :::>-<: >-< ~ ::><:: ::>-<: ::><: $0.00
Sound Meter ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<:: ::::::>-<:: ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: >-< >-< ::::>< ::::>-< ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: >-< >< $0.00
Sound Meter w/Velocity Transducer ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: ::::>-< ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<: :::::>< >-< >-< >-< >-< ::::::>-<: ::::>-< ::::>-< ::><:: >< $0.00
Aerial Photo ------------------------------------_......__ -------__,...._ >-< ::::>-< ::::::>-<: ::::::>-<:: ::::::>-<:: ::::::>-<:: :>< $0.00
Boat Rental ::>-<: .:::><:: ~ ::>-<: ~ ::>-<: ------.:::><:: -----::>-<: ~ ~ ::><:: ::><:: ::><:: >< $0.00
Water Quality Meter :::>'< ::>-<: -----::>< ::>-<: ;:><: ;:><: ;:><: :::><:. ;:><: ---------------~ ------~ $0.00
Postai:1e/Deliverv ::>-<: ::>-<: ::>-<: ==-= =-<: =-<: =-<: =-<: :::::,,-c::::: =-<: ----------------------------$105.00
Subtotal Reimbursable Expenses $4,940.50
Total $89,210.50
Select Yes/No
(dropdown)
BUI at Project level~ (No Phases)
Bill at Phase Level
Open Project with Tasks
Bill at Task Level
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 32 of 35
7/23/2019
c: It .; t, ~ b C. ·;:; .. ~: .; C: e ..
C. .t 0.. al ~ 1:i
·;:; -C: $ C: ·-.5 "' C) .t "' -C: ·;:; -~ w .. 0 <I) _g .... <I) <I) <I) <t
j i <t
Task Billing Rates + $ 245.00 $ 230.00 $ . 160.00
= CCC ..... , ' < ,-
Task 1: Project Management, .,
Meetings, and Coordination /
:ms
36 72 Project Manaaement (-18 months!
rm 27 54 Meetings with City 1-9 meetings!
Sub-Total '· 63 126
Task 2: Data Collection and ...
Compilation
4 24 Existing Condition Review H·
1 4 Compile GIS Data
Identify Critical Missing and Incorrect 2 8 Data
: 2 4 Identify Missing Infrastructure
i'.' 4 12 Field Verification
Compile and Horizontally Correct GIS 12 60 Data
ISub-lotal fr 25 112
$
Attachment C.
Cost Allocation
City of Carlsbad DMP Update
RICK ENGINEERING .. t, .... .. .. C: ·e 0 -Cl :;; -<I) "'·-0.. .. <I) ;: ill Cl >, 'i: "' <fl .. .; .. ., C C: -Cl C: C. .; <I) "' C) "' <t ::, ·-.. ::,;; -C: CJ CJ C:"' <fl <fl 0 .. <fl !l ::,;; "C <I)::, a <I) a ;; <I) 0
<t ill 'iii u:: <I) a: <t
130.00 $ 185.00 $ 140.00 $ 125.00 $ 190.00
'' .. u /, '
-
60
16 2 40 80
80
80
64 8
420 4 40
720 2 44 120 8
Sub-Consultant Cost
T' -.. k< ii: 0 ,., .; h C: 0 C: Cl ti -
0 "' I · 0 ci f-~ 3: -ti (.) C: C: 9-g> ' .; 1,,; ·.::: ~ vi 0
0 "' <t i (.) N :.= .. <fl ::, 0 C: .; i '~ f-I .J ~ (.) '5, i.r ,. 0
111
ls:: C: 0 i:: ~ (.) w (.) Ii f-
::, C. ii: 1, i:,. <fl 1u <fl LL ::, -Im w <fl L .
$ 350.00 l)Ll : .. .. , ... ,, + .......... ,, /
I,;$ -: ,, $ -$
I'm' :,
.. $ $ 19,800 -$ 19,800
I,;; $ 14,850 Ir: • I $ -$ 14,850
L•· $ 34,650 ••. , $ " $ 34,650
l:t $ -$ -$ -
' ; $ 12,560 I> IH $ -$ 12,560
$ 18,920 •• rn $ -,, $ 18,920 •
I $ 12,140 I;< $ . -' $ F 12,140
' $ 11,500 ; .. ' $ 11,500 ,< $ -'
40 Im $ 26.680 l:m IC $ -Fi $ 26,680
~:! $ 72.520 II I i $ -1: $ 72,520 i
40 : $ 154,320 : -$ 154,320
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 33 of 35
7/23/2019
1·<
c: H• ni .!2 I'\ Q. ~ :+ ·u
C: ni ·-:, ~ ll.i
Q. d: ·u ~ t'l .5 d: ·u ,._ 0 ~ I:: "' "' <( ..J
F<
Task Billing Rates rm $ 245.00 $ 230.00 $
. .... :••·
Task 3: Existing Condition H&H <
Analysis
Compile Hydrologic Data & Inlet 4 Delineations
8 Existing Condition 1D/2D H&H Models
Identify and Summarize of Existing 4 Condition Deficiencies J.
Sub-Total 16
Task 4: Recommended Improvements
Identify Required Sizes for Deficient & I,\ 12 New Facilities
Identify Regional Improvement 11? 8 Opportunities
Recommended Condition 1D/2D H&H t[ 6 Models
Preliminary Design and Construction 8 Cost Estimates
HI 8 Prioritization of Recommended CIPs
!Sub-Total :. 42
Task 5: Fiscal Analysis and Fee 4 Analysis
Sub-Total U: 4
ti (I) e ~
0. :ll
-C: C: ·-
"' Cl -C: .!!? w "' "' <(
160.00 $
40
100
32
172
40
16
32
32
16
136
20
20
Attachment C.
Cost Allocation
City of Carlsbad DMP Update
RICK ENGINEERING
ti ~ ~ (I) (I)
(I) C: ·e 0 ~ 1a .21 ti "' (I) 0. ~ ·2: :,: Xi Cl >, "' en "' "'C C: -Cl ni (I)
1;j"' "' (!) "' C: Q.
<( ::, ·-(I) ::;; -C: en "" C:"' en 0 ~ en !l::;; ,, a "'::, a "' .; "' 0 <( Xi 'iii u: "' 0:: <(
130.00 $ 185.00 $ 140.00 $ 125.00 $ 190.00
. ••·······
400
1,950
280 24
2,630 24
280
120
200
240 4 16 40
40
880 4 16 40
Sub-Consultant Cost
II! H' ..; I+ ~ F -~ C: C: Cl lji ti ' -0 I•<: 0"' ci IP I-0 -~ ;: (.) ·E C: ;> "' w. 9-g, ~ ti 0 ~ (I) <( (.) ~~ 0 (I) en • ::, 0 C: ni l;i: I-·5, .J ~ (.) I< •·: n 0 (I) > l<: C: 0 ~ ~ I-(.) w (.) ....
::, Q. il: .... .6 en 1;j en
l:l u. ::, -hi w en I+
$ 350.00 ll ,... r I : ... ' . , ........... ; ,_ .. ,-.;-,~:;:-,c', .. _-,cc:
In: $ -·: I · $
I< I $
$ 59,320 •. } $ -·• $ 59,320 .
) $ > 211,340 I :? $ $ 271,340
; $ 45,800 /: :m $ -i/ $ 45,800
..... $ 376,460 ... $ $ 376,460
1II $ -$ $ -
w $ 45,560 l1 $ $ 45,560
1.::
,., $ 20,000 j I• $ -$ 20,000 k
A $ 32.500 m \: $ -$ 32,500
F '. :
I> $ 46,140 j $ -I $ 46,140
l:i $ 9,600 ;) I $ $ 9,600 I ··
·•• $ 153,800 U: $ $ 153,800
\ $ :•:
4,120 45,000 1! $ 45,000 I> $ 49,120
!( $ 4,120 "'"' 45,000 ')\, $ 45,000 < $ 49,120
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 34 of 35
7/23/2019
+
C: < ;;; ~ : C. 'ij
;;; ·= ~ !i C. a: ! 'ij J!l C ;f .. 'ij
~ i,11
0 "' "' <(
Task Billing Rates $ 245.00 $ 230.00
. ·• .
Task 6: Develop Drainage Master Plan I
Compile GIS Modeling Results/Web-8 Application
[' 16 Draft Drainage Master Plan
.. , ... 8 Final Drainage Master Plan
Sub-Total ?i -32
Task 7: Environmental Processing 4
!Sub-Total ·•< 4
••
Reimbursable Expenses i
>> '·' •:,: irn:t:t:\.,. r ... ..
Pu ····•······ •' j ,.+·
,.· . ,
T Total Hours :; 372
Total Cost . $ $ 85,560
Attachment C.
Cost Allocation
City of Carlsbad DMP Update
RICK ENGINEERING
ti ~
ti ~ Q) Q) 0 Q) C ·e Q) -C) ~ 1n "' 'e' 41 .. ·-Q) 3: :(l C) Cl. ~ >, 'i: Cl. Q) a, C .. (J) .. ;;; Q) C -C) -C 1ii"' .. (!) .. C C. C •-<( :, .. C) ·-Q) :;; -C -C .., .., C IO (J) (J)
,!Q w 0 ~ (J) !!:;; 'C a "' "'::, a .; "' "'0 "' <( <( "' 'iii u: .. "' a: <(
$ 160,00 $ 130,00 $ 185.00 $ 140.00 $ 125.00 $ 190.00
,, "'' ..
12 40 8 24 120
40 120 2 8 20
20 40 2 8 20
72 200 12 40 160
8 12 2 8
8 12 2 8
H\'< ':•·•11:i',,[j( ;c:i:Im:1,;111:1 •>;iI[1i1[1;l .. •!f\i lillj"[:: ' •> Ii,\,;,,., 1:s;;u ... ,,
1,292 8,884 36 252 656 16
$ 206,720 $ 1,154,920 $ 6,660 $ 35,280 $ 82,000 $ 3,040
Sub-Consultant Cost
!: > u i/• I<
--;;-~ C I• I • C Cl 1n ' -0 .. 0 ci I-I!! 3: I> (.) C E 1n 9-g> 2 ~ (; I< ~'t;; 0 Q) <( (.) ~= Q) (J) :, 0 ·c ~ ,. I-.J ~(.) >, .. '6, Q) > :.: 0 ~ 2! '. C ,, I-(.) w ~ ::, C. a: Ul 1ij (J) .c .. : LL ::, -'.i w (J) h
$ 350.00 ., . ..
$ -; :: $ -$
'
,i!• $ 28,800 ::,: $ -$ 28,800
'. $
:,,. l.•t $ ..
29,670 -$ 29,670
$ 14,230 I\ $ -$ 14,230
$ 72,700 i·' $ ; ]$ 72,700 '
$ 5,040 . 89,211 $ 89,211 $ 94,251
$ 5,040 89,211 $ 89,211 $ 94,251
$ ' $ $ -,, ... ,, , ..
$ 9,699 $ $ 9,699
:]:::';"'.:'"_,, >• • j, ;''''j,:"Ui; '"' ?\? : i; ,m ,. , .. ,, ''
•, .
80 A' ... ,
$ 28,000 $ 801,090 $ 45,000 $ 89,211 $ 134,211 $ 945,000
September 17, 2019 Item #4 Page 35 of 35