The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD; ; 86-22; PermitI hereby affirm that I am IIcesed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commenc)sg with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my-license is in full forc Lic No M&r Class -13--r I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contrac- tors License Law for the following reason (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any city or County which re- quires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior felts issuance also requires the ap- plicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 o the Business and Professions Code) or that is ex- empt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit sub je c ts the applicant tea civil penalty of not more than five hun- dred dollars ($500) I. as owner Of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the struc-ture is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intend-ed or offered for sale If. flowever, the building or improve- ment is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of pruning that he did not build or im- prove for the purpose Of safe) 0 I. as owner of the properly, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044. Business and Professions Code the Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or im-proves thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractor's Licence Law) As a homeowner lam improving my home, and the follow- ing conditions exist 1 The work is being performed prior in sale 2 I have lived in my home for twelve months prior to completion of this work 3 I have not claimed this exemption during the last three years lam exempt under Sec - B & P C for this reason IC w 0 -a lal 0 rLi I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to lt-ronnie or a certificate of Workers Compensation In rance Or a certified copy thereof (Sec: 3800 Labor Code) POLICY NO COMPANY o Copy is filed with the city o Certified copy is hereby furnished CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This Section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars 191001 or less) 0 I certify that is the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner seas to become subject to the Workers Compen- sation Laws of California NOTICE TO APPLICANT If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked 0 I hereby affirm that there in a construction lending agency for the performance 01 the work for which this per- mit is issued (Sec 3097, Civil Code) Lender's Name Lender's Address ICC DAlI DAINT DCN tONI V P DDCCC IlARrO APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Carlsbad, California 9209p,989 (619) 438-5525 APPL8CATIIO z P1 NOT - JOB ADORES AV. ST. RD. ,EAdEST CROSS ST. 1OATE OF APPLiCATiONI BUSINESS LICOJ Anl /7 , CONTRACTORAC LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION ASSE42R PARCEL N CONTRACTOR I 6 VALUATION PERMIT NUMBER ZONE OWNER'S NAME OWNER'S PHONE OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS 4iq,iz-c LLLcw. 7c-3<' ________________ __________________ CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS I57P Ui.Jb (/Ve.. LICENSE NO. ZAO PLAN I 0 # BUILDING SO FOOTAGE DESIGNER DESIGNER'S PHONE /I)7/11flfl i'I-p0rr n i I Q,.1 tJG Not Valid Unless Machine Certified - - DESCRIPTION OF WORK DESIGN DESIGNER'S ADDRESS LICENSE NO -- - F/P FLR ELEV YO NO - NO STORIES I 0CC OP I EDO I CENSUS TRACT GP LAND USE PARKING SPACE RES UNITS GRADING PERMIT ISSUED 10 N 0 REDEVELOPMENT AREA j 'r 0 ND I TVPE I CONST I 0CC LOAD FiRE SPP I YO NO QTY PLUMBING PERMIT - ISSUE 7 S QTY. MECHANICAL PERMIT - ISSUE SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER ad - EACH FIXTURE TRAP INSTALL FURN DUCTS UP TO 100,000 BTU - BUILDING PERMIT 001-810-00-00-8220 EACH BUILDING SEWER ' OVER 100,000 BTU . SIGN PERMIT 001-810-00-00-8221 EACH WATER HEATER AND/OR VENT BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP . PLAN CHECK 001-810-00-00-8806 EACH GAS SYSIEM 1 TO 4 OUTLETS - BOILER/COMPRESSOR 315 HP . TOTAL PLUMBING 001-810-00-00-8222 EACH GAS SYSTEMS OR MORE METAL FIREPLACE - ELECTRICAL 001-810-00-00-8223 EACH INSTAL ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE - - VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT - . MECHANICAL 001-810-00-00-8224 EACH VACUUM BREAKER MECH EXHAUST - HOOD/DUCTS . MOBILEHOME 001-810-00-00-8225 WATER SOFTNER - RELOCATION OF EA FURNACE/HEATER - MOB)LEHOME PARK INSP EACH ROOF DRAIN (INSIDE) ' ' SOLAR 001-810-00-00'8226 TOTAL MECHANICAL I . STRONG MOTION 880-519-92-33 TOTAL PLUMBING FIRE SPRINKLERS 001-810-00-00-8227 OTY - 'ELECTRICAL PERMIT - ISSUE 5'.... OTY SOLAR - ISSUE PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 332-810-00-00-8930 NEW CONST EA AMP/SW) BKR COLLECTORS SCHOOL FEE - DISTRICT I PH 3 PH STORAGE TANKS Carlsbad EXIST BLDG EA AMP/SWT/BKR ROCK STORAGE Encinitas 1 PH 3 PH , PUMP - San Dlegullo REMODELALTER PER CIRCUIT PLAN CHECK FEE San Marcos TEMP POLE 200 AMPS OVER 200 AMPS LICENSE TAX 001-810-00-00-8162 TEMP OCCUPANCY (30 DAYS) MFF 880-519-92-57 CREDIT DEPOSIT TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL SOLAR TOTAL FEES PAYABLE 4—/ 1~-, . 0 .- --- I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED 'APPLICATION AND PERMIT' AND DO HEREBY Expiration Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this I Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void If the building or work CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE I authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT IS I permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit iu suspended or ISSUED TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CON- I abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days STRUCTION, WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND PRO APPLIC URE * OWNERD CONTRACTOF KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT 2_-.--- PHONE. 0 * AN OSHA PEiT IS REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER 5'0" DEEP AND DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF ST OVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT A ED BY I TYPE I DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUNITE OR GROUT SUB FRAME 0 FLOOR U CEILING SHEATHING U ROOF 0 SHEAR FRAME EXTERIOR LATH I INSULATION INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL PLUMBING U SEWER AND BUC U PL/CO __ AA UNDERGROUND '(WASTE U 'WATE ___ ______ TOP OUT U WASTE U -WATER TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST I U WATER HEATER 0 SOLAR WTER ELECTRICAL I O ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 01 UFFER ROUGH ELECTRIC I 0 ELECTRIC SERVICE U TEMPORARY O BONDING U POOL MECHANICAL U DUCT & PLEM., 0 REF. PIPIJG HEAT - AIR COND. SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS I !' , '*' ________ CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED FINAL PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL GAS BUILDING I SPECIAL CONDITIONS &2 2a LkJ FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS . INSPECTOR'S NOTES REO IF INSPECTOR'S INSPECTION CHECKED APPROVAL DATE -' SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP STRUCTURAL CONCRETE - OVER 2000 PSI PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POST TENSIONED CONCRETE FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOL1S SPECIAL MASONRY PILES CAISSONS City of Carlsbad MISCELLANEOUS 1200 ELM, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • TEL. (619) 438-5525 RECEIPT Job Address Jj MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT PLAN CHECK FEE 001-810-00-00-8806 LI VALUATION______________________________ LI DEMOLITION_____________________________ LI HOUSE MOVING LI PARKS AND RECREATION FEE_________________ LI PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE___________________ El FEE - DISTRICT__________________ LI Carlsbad LI Encinitas_______________________ El San Diego LI San Marcos LI CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY_______________ Owner p— Mailing Address jt4 I4ti4f J jf .ç Cit Zip - Tel Contractor Lds,440 / ef ' Address C,, Z72,_g -Tel q_ State Lic S Classif 77Z.!7 , / City Lic No44/7_6 COMPLETE FOR PLAN CHECK ONLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ASSESSORS PARCEL NO LI______________________ DESCRIPTION OF WORK (/6L/c.. LI_____________________________________ PLAN ID NO U1A0AJL_ DESIGNER ADDRESS 7'O ø"X 17,2 er6aaaz,00 LI________________________________ PHONE TOTAL FEE $ CONTACT PERSON 6/LT *WARNING: PLAN CHECK FEES. WHERE NO ACTION IS APPLICANT IN 180 DAYS AND NO BUILDING PERMIT IS FORFEITED TO THE CITY COMMENTS:________________________________________________ TAKEN BY THE ISSUED. ARE Signature of Apphcad.2~~~te ~/J~ J White - Applicant Yellow - File Pink - (1) Finance (2) Data Process Gold - Assessor Lb HCH S AS5001ATES LAND PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING 4877 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123-1667 • (619) 278-5750 July 24, 1986 Mr. Jeff Anderson Lusardi Construction Co. 1570 Linda Vista Drive San Marcos, California 92069 Project: Kaiser Center Carlsbad HCH&A Job #09591 Subject: Clarification #6 Dear Jeff: Regarding the diagonal connection plate at the braced frame l/S-7, Paul Imirie has informed me that the plate is about an inch short of the horizontal W16X26 beam. Our structural engineer recommends that a piece of plate the same thick- ness as the connection plate be cut to fill the gap and that the filler plate be " fillet welded both sides to the horizontal beam and to the connection plate. Sincerely, HCH & ASSOCIATES V. Scott Cairns Project Architect VSC:mab cc: Mr. Timothy Yeun Fir. Paul Imirie Mr. John Burke File No. p.....553 NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST REPORT Date 7/15/86 AEL No. 6—H073 Client: KAISER DEVELOPMENT CO. Attn: John Burke 2121 Palomar Airport Rd., Suite 201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project: KAISER CENTER CARLSBAD 2011 Palomar Airport Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 Type of Testing: Ultrasonic Fabricator or Erector: Contractors Steel Contractor: Lusardi Construction Co. Shop Field Page 2_cf 2 Part No./Location No./Type Welds Tested ACC. Rej. Remarks rid 1v1 me 2.1 (F—G) South 2/Beam—to—Beam X 3 (G) East 2/Beam—to—Beam X 3.2 (G) 4/Beam—to—Beam X Rejection Rate 0% Retests of Repaired Welds Hours CC: 2—Client AMERICAN ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC. 2—Architect Reviewed by: 1—Engineer 1—Contractor 1—City of Carlsbad Building Department ROBERT L. HOFFMAN AUG 81986 Bldg. Dept. CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Department tm American Engineering Laboratories, Inc. INSPECTION 7574 Trade Street, San Diego, California 92121 Telephone (619) 695-3730 REPORT Date 8/6/6. Project No. ReportNo.AEL 61-1104 Client KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Attn: John Burke Client Address 2121 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Name (per plans) SBAD Building Permit No. 8622 Project Address (legal) C 2011 Palomar Airport Rd., Carlsbad, CA 92QPW' Plan File No._______________________ Architect '11614—As.sn.ciates Govt. Contract No. Engineer Burkett and Wang Census Tract No. Contractor Lusardi Construction Company Other INSPECTION CODE MATL SAMPLiNG CODE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _.L Reinforced Concrete SIC - Concrete Cylinders CC - Reunf.: Reber - Steel: -- Prestressed Concrete SIPC - Mortar Samples MS _X.. Reinf.:WWF.ASTM 444 - Metal Decking: - Reinforced Masonry SIN Grout Samples GS ___.. Reunf.: Tendons - Shear Connectors: - Struct Steel Assembly - Fireproofing FP - Conc.: Mix #/psi - H.S. Bolts: - I.-Shop Fabrication SlSS-i - Units (block or brick) UB - Cons.: Mix #flsi - Electrodes* Field Welding SISS-2 - A.C. Concrete ACC Cons.: Mix */psi - Electrodes: H.S. Bolting SISS-3 - Roofing RS Conc. Mix #si Cert. Welders: - Pile Driving SlPD - Reinf. Steel RSS - Grout: Mix #fljsi - Fireproofing: - Nondestructive Testing - Steel SS - Mortar: Type/psi - A.C. Concrete: - 1. Shop SINDT-1 - Tendon (PT Strands) IS - Units. Block - Other- 2. Field SINDT-2 - Other Units Brick - Other, Fireproofing SlFP - Other -- - - Roofing IA - Other Waterproofing lWP - Other - Asphalt Paving lAP - Other ____________ID CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building laws. This report covers the locations of the work inspected. Contact this office if you need more specific information regarding inspection procedures. INSPECTOR Steve West (C-271) INSPECTION DATE 7/28/86 Special Inspection - Reinforced Concrete Inspected reinforcement and monitored concrete placement, consolidation and finishing of 11", 3000 psi topping over plywood and tar paper membrane 2nd floor line #1 to #8, NA" to "J". No discrepancies noted. Obtained 3 sets of concrete cylinders for testing. 2-Client RECEIVED 2-Architect 1-Engineer 1-Contractor 1-City of Carlsbad HCH G ASSOCIINjVED 77 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING 4877 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123-1667 (61900(2 1986 May 20, 1986 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Mr. John Burke Kaiser Development Company 2121 Palomar Airport Road Suite 201 Carlsbad, California 92008 Project: Kaiser Center Carlsbad HCH&A Job No. 09591 Subject: Streetlight Relocation Dear John: I received a telephone response from our engineers request to the City of Carlsbad to relocate the streetlight in the driveway. Clyde Wickham from Carlsbad Engineering said the City does not move streetlights and the process to have it moved is the following: Get a blueline print of the street improvement drawings showing the streetlight in question. Mark in red the new proposed location of the streetlight and have the new location approved by one of the City Engineering Plan Checkers. Request the original mylar from the City and make a plan change on the original. Contact a company that specializes in moving this type of fixture. Contact SDG&E for deactivation before work begins. This is the process Clyde outlined, and we will proceed with the required plan change. This will be considered an additional service and will be billed at our standard hourly rates. Sincerely, HCH & ASSOCIATES 4- A46- g4~Z4~ V. Scott Cairns Project Architect VSC:cg cc: Mr. Dan Reid Mr. Clyde Wickham Mr. Joe Gerry HCH S A55001ATE5 LAND PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE o ENGINEERING • SURVEYING 4877 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123-1667 • (619) 278-5750 May 18, 1987 Mr. Emile Plude Building Inspection Dept. City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project: Palomar Triad (Kaiser Center) &/I i'' HCH & A Job No.09591 (Plan Check #86-22) Subject: Fountain Pit Access & Ventilation Dear Emile: Attached is a copy of the new access hatch entryway. Also, a sheet showing the additional vent inlet at the east side of the pit. It is my understanding that if Bedford Properties agrees to complete these improvements within 90 days you will release the fountain to be plastered and made operational immediately. Sincerely, HCH & ASSOCIATES '7741ci 'e" V. Scott Cairns Project Architect VSC : ab cc: Carol Coleman LETTER of TRANSMITTAL: TO: W fol- N px,Vt 1 DATE: 20t) PIônor Airpo rt ?4. CarNvb&d, c.. q,4do b ATTN: Can I 64r tt M4'.1 JOB# VW11 SUBJECT: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE HEREWITH TRANSMITTED VIA: - U I LII - 11 11 It 1' 'I REMARKS:/01&jot vr& AmIlt re1U( hi BY: COPIES TO: ijo,riur I uuri; ô v 1 re' / tag' tIe iV U (5 ',f/Lr/t7 ttf& , 117/ FtM4p &AN1I1- . ''Lupt-Iw i5y owN44HIN1 ON cO t1S. Wr &oTW40 :vcTGDUrUQI TQNE. Ur W/JO1t.41 N. -ii orr1vN -'/ wi va-- 00M MOPLIPJ V-01 *ALUHft.1UM W/YNAi 'A L! :PAi NT I'rc'. ''/kl &A1V.Th. IciN(- Is) IIJ OFTXIT'&I VAUC OU1AI riirNN ov%i rLAN - 1L-o 'ao -tZO 1 MIH. cA"T IN LA&E LAH &MtsU1. *4 60K. Are C#t9IN' I,aHIi. W4- VT, I'2)PVt/P'L2X'1' 10 xWr'(. 6TNJ21 ''LA' I°& rir vI/ 100 <XIT iI -TL- cUW WH O&LJ'S I ::QAL,OMATkIA 'OTION 11•1. -I-O :t7a potvri :5 H ~-A-"MIATW 019011 :== I tikrr IAUt*I1& I2WAL4c- .P 10 4AT6H "IT. I II ii oUN1AIi.i i.r vr .Jv& ULa 10 r r. w/ N' 'AP,' r6W"TF, 'POOP., LI1IFO.HLY .W/F1iN. I00 /'rØ HL 4' - IW1ATA11..L#AL M H PANT :iN'w &IA2 -OKF,.HA&'p49HMY WALt - 'AI ic :WA1NZF 4:3 .C/flQN - PAL-a HA -rIA OPTIS HC+I 4 A'06'IA1' !Q94I /Ii/87 S J. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CIIESAI'EAKE I)R., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560 1468 [)APPLICANT DL 9 PLAN CHECKER 9 FILE COPY U UPS []DESIGNER DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: SC' Z2 I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2.6 11 ?;l..ôviA-c€. d-. PROJECT NAME: C2.\?j D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- al des identified - are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is the jurisdiction's U copy for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. U The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: IN Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that t plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has 0 been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone # REMARKS: bo — \ 9E-c.r0 UjALU i3i uu Wo COW. UjTh .5 flj•• BY :A, ENCL : P. E9IL CORPORATION Date Jurisdiction CAD. .L 4r) Prepared byt Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE j Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. _SC-2--J BUILDING A DD Es S 2 \ o vv rri Yc\ a APPLICANT/CONTACT 1€&cr PHONE NO. -1108 BUILDING OCCUPANCY - DESIGNER PHONE______________ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION N CONTRACTOR PHONE___________ BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE , ) 0 t7ZO Air Conditioning Commercial - - Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers -- Total Value Fee Adjusted To Reflect 0 Energy Regulations (Fee x 1.1) []Handicapped Regulations (Fee x 1.065) Fee L3 0 Building Permit Plan Check Fee $ $ CO M MEN TS 8/4/82 PLAN CHECK NUMBER IZZLi) ADDREESS /1 4,ç/DATE I PLANNING 1711 7 SCHOOL FEES: (AN DIEGUITO CARLSBAD ENCINITAS SAN MARCOS SETBACKS: FRONT tD/(-.. SIDE REAR DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS: REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIRED: LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIRED: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (A Z a gel— OK TO ISSUE: DATE: ENGINEERING LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFIED? _jo- - APN CHECKED? 9G— P.F.F.,: - PARK-IN-LIEU QUADRANT: FEE PER UNIT:_________ RIGHT-OF_WAY:a)/A- - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PER UNIT:d))4 - EASEMENTS: O I(.4Af Lm f V., DRIVEWAY: - A) 1k L _- -'I --- IMPROVEMENTS: i'_) - - FIELD CHECK DATE: INITIALS:ui - - 5 -- E.D.U.:&)/A SEWER: AJ1- cr LATERAL: ON - -- INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT: Aflkq ________________ z GRADING PERMIT: O__ _7 - ------- ----- - ___________ GRADING COMPLETION CERTIFIED: Lu DRAINAGE:/)/' lz 43 0 elm ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:________________________________________________________ OK TO ISSUE DATE:- -- -- DPD2:DPD6:01/86 CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY: Robert A. Basye, PE 8298 Retaining Walls Company Post Office Box 2129 Escondido, California 92025 (619) 489-1108 Sheet /i__T Date: _________ Scale 1" = I .......- .-. 1..-----. PWARED,FCR: LUSiM I -~OOKSTMJC rJON ....157:oLINDA VISTA !vE....... SAt MX 9206r3880 _77-71 - ::.TTT44 IHEI!T :L:IH ... 1 SER CENTER GRLSBAD' ........ -- .... ... ...... —T:TT7:wThTr AND 4TTtT. :cITT ....... / c1ARLSBAD,"cALiFUNIA . . ....... :.: 1_ --SOILS £ J DATA FTQ .. SA1' DIOT1NICAL LFAN1S:,1IC j;645"NANCY . CA - 619/587-0250' 11 • : :2 :HiLrnWt; •-- .......:: REPcRT.DATED: . 2 I. •••..:_ .......r. .LO3MJrBER: - . ... I- - / I --I / 1- (. j.:. .............H ........:. ......•• .• - . - .. :. : :•. - Jt.: T : .........• I 1. 1- --NOTE: - SPIAL -INSPR1iKI RP.'JIRHY -. . . ::i ....................... 1 •••• ..::: :- . ... STh1iC11JRA1 c JLATIONTHATAMER OF • • .. RETA1141w,"vous OC~VANY -ENGINEERING STAFF. I - -FIELD —INSPECT—AND AP)VE TEE GJ1WJCTION - - ....-OF THIS CRIBWML PROJE)CM, --4WrAIN.l-1C-VALlS ......- - . .1 .1• - . -FINAL 4})[TJ4J -FWIVI-A RETAINING WALLS (ThPANY 47 - , ENGINEERING INSPBICR 2 ?%O CSSio* The desn, çjcpIa.tJQns, rLd - -- - - Engr'signature on! this ieetarp:pro. IO298t 'isa-with • •• - ...... : •Illy are the prdpertyof Rpta" ing-, WiAls(npy Sheet 5_ Date: - Scale l"= Aldf- Reg :- --.-- ngrneer s-ig1 gr' tisstie . PrT1T- -peary n fus jAse- Iht HHT -- CRIBLXK ibbingmat ariafs- manuf td- -andjpjtajle WE, et4in& WáIICotht are-the-pro f1I(eti IL _ _L:+i 1 _.._-L-j--f. • iJ_.4 1_L. i±ti* Ti'1 __.-•-- 4J •_: i -.--- TO :rJ I. Ii TrT4t ki ±LI -- -- -*-1--•i±: 1 ____ --- --- j 24 _.-L 1 7 1 I • '/1/JJ7TT±T/ J rT 4-1 -. •__I___Li _J_L.41._i-_.__. .IT4___j1_j__.i..__i 1 .4_1_J.;1F:____L_.1_ - -02-37 CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet _ I Date:________ Scale 1" = jovqr4 ' : J C4lThii o V)LL3 p i '4L S)4 ) i -7f 'T' 1 4 iiL 41L.4 .-----i---. _j-------_. Hr-- -------------- I JIj__j f,g Fa 3j > i r4 o74 LU 4 2c iR€ ~u 1 ft t. ------- JPY-L. TiiT 2Q)74L*!! $ E0 - -'-X The EuI fi : :j::: r:cJ/ Enginpf's signatupr-this1e prletalflforniorexte-us wtthT CRBI.00KCr,bbirg ntmanuffidL I I - and 4stafled by R _ __ tninj,WaUsCompany arethe_propertyofRetaining Walls Company. .LSG - _02 -. CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet _4 i Date: 4'-7--c27 Scale l"= y. 40 8' - 7G7 oL'L7e7'rt-i, ---4 /—iH-5-vT--H 2-7 ET1 Ttiedeign cac atins, andor. Ret eredl 14 rnd 14 7ZR / /rf L14 ±•---'#4'-'-1----' ------- _j ----H-l-- --r-i----.-r-:---H- L'.: _/jjI/iT 4i7L -1--iy /: - ----1 - p:- TI - io' T7Tirw i=__i T4 ±H± -4 - 4tEri:/ ' Tf 4 - —z--- _ CTt_4L_ 02-S7 Engin priet CRIB are the property of Retaining Walls Company. L._I '.IIA. :n 'i tJT::r:I_:; I ut 0TLJ:17 92. I .-... :j41: 9 .7' j 3 L.:4if I ± : e4 -W2ih i -r FH t ;'i---= 1 4 r itE -it€ PL37 _ Q - T-i- 71 tLe Lkt Y—, Li7 I Ti- -- L :T1 tE 27 Lb Th JI4.LJ JI_L 00.31, Il 1 (17I The c Inf4Or1 fiZZ I Rjredj 1-i---+f -4--4--#----4- j-j IH SC and i 81O2T37 - CRIBWALL STABILITY CALCULATIONS Sheet _/ 3 Date: 4- 7- Scale 1" = &Saz C\n & _O2-37 " )qp- 19 ep jo-7-7 PAC us p - I'Iz / I . + 1- ~ csLE:.4arwa. k`= .5 22Or 210— %O ESSi0 Co. _.111 101#'!i SAN DIEGO GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS. INC. SOL ENGINEERING & ENGINEERING GECLOGY February 20, 1986 Kaiser Development Company Job No. 30023-00 2121 Palomar Airport Road Log No. 6-3854 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Dan Reid SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Kaiser Center Carlsbad Lots 1 and 4 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: In response to your request, we have revised the foundation and grading plans for the subject project. In consideration of the site geotechnical conditions and the proposed footing design, footings may be founded at a depth of 24-inches below lowest adjacent finish subgrade in lieu of the 30-inches recommended in our previous report. Our review indicates that the project grading and foundation plans are in general agreement with the recommendations of the project Soils Report by this office. Very truly yours, SAN DI GO. GEO ECbN1 A CONSULTANTS E. 28110 President MJM:gs Distribution: (2) Addressee (4) HCH & Associates U I 1. ._, I • a SAN DIEGO GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, INC. SOIL ENGINEERING & ENGINEERING GEOLOGY February 13. 1986 Kaiser Development JoD No. 30023-00 2121 Palomar Airport Road Log No. 6-3835 Carlscad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. John Burke SUBJECT: FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Kaiser Center Carlsbad Lots 1 and 4 Palomar Airport Business Park Carlsbad, California Reference: "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Site Evaluation of Lots 1 and 4 of the Palomar Business Park, City of Carlsbad, California", by Testing Engineers, San Diego; dated May 6, 1985. Gentlemen: This report presents the results of our Preliminary Soils In- vestigation at the subject site. Our investigation was per- formed in January, 1986, and consisted of field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis of the field and labora- tory data, and the preparation of this report. 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services provided during the preparation of this Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation include: i 1.1 Review of previous geologic, soils engineering and se i smological reports pertinent to the project area; 1.2 Suosurface exploration including 7 bucket auger borings to a maximum depth of 30-feet J 6455 NANCY RIDGE DRIVE SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 • (619) 5870250 .-.---..-..--- Kaiser Development Job No. 30023-00 February 13, 1986 Log No. 6-3835 Page Two 1.3 Logging ana sampling of exoloratory exc a vations to evaluate the geologic structure and to obtain ring and ulk samples For laboratory testing; 1 .4 Laboratory testing of samples reoresentative of those encountered during the field investigation; 1.5 Geo1ogc and soils analysis of field and laboratory data, which proviue the basis for our conclusions and recommen- oat ions. - 1.6 Preparation of this report and accompanying maps, pre- senting our Findings, conclusions and recommendations. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The 9-acre site consists of two previously Flat graded lots, bounded by Palomar Airport Road on the north, Camino Vida Roble on the west and Core Del Nogal on the south. Variable height, 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) fill slopes surround each pad with an approximately 8-foot high 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) fill slope separating lots 1 and 4. These slopes are planted and irrigated. At the time of our investigation, the pads were covered with grasses and small bushes. Small piles of construction debris had been dumped on the lots. This site is also described as lots 1 and 4 of the Palomar Air- port Business Park. These lots have been previously mass graded under the testing and observation of Robert Prater Associates. The approximate location of the cut/fill transition is as shown on our attached Plate I . The location of this transition is approximate and should be verified in the field during grading. -- ----- ,•, - - I - - as A GU A H D 1, 0 N D A / - p as SITE ----=---- \ - / 27 LGbov . , -:--- BA .I J Q(JITOS ipA 33 4VE, -- --- __S• --- -- 35 . t - --.- - -,, 0 2000 4000 ADAPTED FROM U.S.G.S. 7.5o ENCINITAS FEET QUADRANGLE (1975) LOCATION MAP J08 NO.: 30023-00 1DATE: FEBRUARY 1986 1FIGURE: 1 SAN DIEGO SOILS ENGINEERING. INC. APO-- Kaiser Development Job No. 30023-00 February 13, 1986 Log No. 6-3835 Page Ten 8.0 CONSLUSIONS A ND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 General Te proposed construction is feasible from a soils engineering standDolnt. The grading and foundation plans should take into account the appropriate soils engineering features of the site. 8.2 Site Grading 8.2.1 Site Clearing The site should be cleared of existing vegetation. Holes resulting from the removal of any buried obstructions, which extend below finished site grades, should be backfilled with compacted fill. 8.2.2 Prearatjon of Surface Soils The loose and dry surface soils within the build- ing area (and to 5-feet beyond) and paved parking areas should b removed and recompacted to com- petent fill soils a minimum of 12 inches below ex- isting grade prior to placing new fill. The final depth of removal should be reviewed by the Soils Engineer during grading. Prior to placing fill, the exposed subgrade soils should be scarified to a depth of 8 to 12 inches, brought to near optimum moisture conditons and compacted to at least 90 f per-cent relative compaction. 8.2.3 Transition Between Cut and Fill The cut/fill line shown by Testing Engineers in- dicates the possibility that there is a transition on the southern side of the Phase [ building. Our boring No. 6 encountered Only formational material Kaiser Development Job No. 30023-00 February 13, 1986 Log No. 6-3835 Page Eleven (see Plot Plan). A non-uniform bearing condition may exist on the corner of the proposed building. This cut/fill transition has been created during previous grading operations. The location of the transition should be located by the geotechnical consultant at the time of grading. To mitigate the differential bearing conditons created by the cut/fill transition, we recommend that all •footings for the Phase I building be founded in competent bedrock. The may necessitate deepening footings on the south side of the building. For all other buildings, we recommend that the cut portion of the pad be overexcavated to a min- imum depth of 4 feet beneath the deepest foot- ing. The lateral extent of overexcavation should be 5 feet beyond the building line. 8.2.4 Compaction and Method of Filling Fill placed at the site should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, based on ASIM Laboratory Test Designation 0 1557-78. Fill should be compacted by mechanical means in uniform lifts of 6 to 8-inches in thickness. Rocks greater than 6-inches in dimension should not be placed within the compacted fill. Fills constructed on existing slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal :vertical) should be keyed and benched into bedrock or compacted fill. Compaction of slopes should be achieved by overbuilding the slopes laterally and then cutting back to the Kaiser Development Job No. 30023-00 February 13, 1986 Log No. 6-3835 Page Twelve compacted core at design line and arae. Although overbuilding and cutting back is trie preferred method, fill slopes may be back roiled at intervals not greater than four feet as the fill is placed, followed by final compaction of the entire slopes. Feathering of fill over the tops of slopes should not be premitted. Fills should also be placed and all grading per- formed in accordance with the City of Carisbac Grading Ordinance and the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. 8.2.5 Import Fill Material Any soils imported to the site for use as fill or subrade materials should be predominantly granular and approved by the Soils Engineer prior to import- ing. Laboratory testing required for approval of import sourcesmay require 24 to 48 hours. The Soils Engineer should be notified of import loca- tions a minimum of two (2) days prior to its pro- posed use. 8.2.6 Shrinkaae and Subsidence Shrinkage due to removal and recompaction of the on-site soils may be expected to be 0 - 5 percent. j These are preliminary estimates which may vary with depth of removal, stripping loss, and field conditions at the time of grading. Shrinkage and subsidence figures are considered to be rough .1 11 / Kaiser Development Job No. 30023-00 / February 13, 1986 Log No. 6-3835 Page Thirteen estimates based on available geotechnical infor- mation and should be confirmed in the field during grading. 8.2.7 Fill Slopes We recommend that fill slopes be constructed with slopes no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal :vertical). Fill slopes so constructed will exhibit a fac:or of safety in excess of the generally accepted min- imum engineering criteria of 1.5 for gross and surf icial stability to a maximum height of 20 feet. Slopes should be planted as soon as possible. Sloughing, ruling and slumping of surfical soils may be anticipated if the slopes are left unpianted for a long period of time, especially during rain y seasons. Erosion control and drainage devices should be installed in compliance with the requir e - ments of the City of San Diego. 8.2.8 Temporary Excavation and Slopes Temporary unsurcharged and unsupported excavation slopes in the existing fill or bedrock may be made near vertical for cuts of less than 5 feet. For deeper cuts, temporary excavation slopes should be made not steeper than 1:1 (horizontal:vertical) t o a maximum height of 15 feet. These recommended slope ratios do not preclude local raveling and sloughing. Cut surfaces should be kept moist to retard raveling and sloughing. Kaiser Development February 13, 1986 Job No. 30023-00 Log No. 6-3835 Page Fourteen Water should not be allowed to flow over t h e : o p of the excavation in an uncontrolled mann e r . Stockpile materials and equipment shoul d b e k e p t back a minimum of 15 feet from the top o f t h e c u t . Workman should be protected from falling r o c k s , sloughing and raveling of the cut in acc o r d a n c e with the OSHA requirements. We recommend that all cut slopes be observed b y t h e Geotechnical Consultant during excavati o n s o t h a t appropriate recommendations may be provi d e d . 8.3 Foundation and Slab Recommendations 8.3.1 General Our investigation indicates that the ex i s t i n g s u r - face soils exhibit a very low expansion p o t e n t i a l . The following recommendations are provi d e d f o r t h e design of footings and slabs based on th i s e x p a n s i o n potential of the soils presently at the s i t e . T h e s e preliminary recommendations should be co n f i r m e d b y additional expansion testing at the comp l e t i o n o f fine grading. However, the siltstone bedrock encountered a t a depth of 2-feet below existing grade in b o r i n g 7 exhibits a high expansion potential. Pad g r a d e f o r this structure should not be cut below exis t i n g grade. Our recommendations are considered genera l l y c o n - sistent with the Standards of Practice. The / ser Development ruary 13, 1986 Job No. 30023-00 Log No. 6-3835 Page Fifteen potential for favorable foundation performance can be further enhanced by maintaining uniform moisture conditions. The footing configurations and reinforcement recom- mendations herein should not be considered to pre- clude more restrictive criteria by the governing agencies or by structural considerations. A Structural Engineer should evaluate configurations and reinforcement requirements of structural con- siderations. 6.3.2 Foundations The recommended type of foundation to support dead and live loads is spread footings, either square or continuous. No footings should straddle a cut/fill interface. All footings for a given building should be founded either entirely in bedrock or entirely in compacted fill. 8.3.2.1 Columns Columns may be supported or spread footings founded a minimum of 30-inches below lowest adjacent finish subgrade. Reinforcement should be based on structural loading. i 8.3.2.2 Continuous Footings Exterior continuous footings should be founded at a minimum depth of 30-inches below lowestadjacent finished subgrade. Interior continuous footings may be founded j I I / Kaiser Devleopmenz February 13, 1986 Job No. 30023-00 Log No. 6-3835 Page Sixteen at a depth of 18-inches below lowest ad- jacent finish subgrade. Reinforcement should ccnsst of a minimum of two No. 5 reinforcing bars, placed one at the top and one at the bottom of the footing. 8.3.3 Allowable Bearing Pressure for Footings Footings may be designed for an allowable dead plus live load bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per squar foot with a one-third increase for short-term wind or seismic loads. Footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches and, where located adjacent to utility trenches, should extend below a one-to-one plane projected upward from the inside bottom corner of the trench. 8.3.4 Lateral Load Resistance Lateral loads against buildings may be resisted by friction between the bottom of footings and the supporting soils. An allowable friction coefficient1 of, 0.35 is recommende. Alternatively, an allowable ir'bearing pressure equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot acting against the footings may be used, provided the foot- ings are poured tight against undisturbed soils. j 8.3.5 Footing Setback If footings are proposed adjacent to slope areas, I we recommend that the footings be deepened to pro- vide a minimum horizontal distance from the outer -I Kaiser Development Job No. 30023-00 February 13, 1986 Log No. 6-3835 Page Seventeen edge of footings to the adjacent scpe face. The recommended setback from the slope face IS as follows - Height of the Slope Footing Setback - 2 (minimum 10'; maximum 20') Footings' planned under the influence of this recommendation should be provided specific review by the Geotechnical Consultant pr.ior to construction. 8.3.6 Exoected Settlement If footings are supported by compacted fill and are sized for the recommended bearing pressure, total post-construction settlement, under the pro- posed column loads, is not expected to exceed 1-inch. Differential settlements are not expected to exceed 1/2-inch. 8.3.7 Retaining Walls Restrained and cantilevered retaining walls may be designed in accordance with the following design criteria. Soil Pressure, Equivalent Fluid pressure (P.C.F.) Backfill Restrained Walls Cantilevered WalIsi Soil Level 2: Level 2: 4 Type Backfill Back fill Backfill Backfill On-site I granular soils 35 48 30- 43) j Walls subject to uniform surcharge loads shoulo be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one-third the anticipated sur- charge pressure in the case of cantilevered walls. Wall design should also consider surcharge from any adjoining structures or traffic located within a zone defined by extension of an imaginary 1:1 line-up from the level of the wall footing. To include the effects of additional lateral pressure caused by vehicle traffic, we recommend that re- taining walls be designed to resist an additional uniform pressure of 125 pounds per square foot for a distance down the wall equal to the width of the driveway or traffic area behind the wall. Retaining wall footings should be founded at a min - imum depth of 18-inches below lowest adjacent grade or at a depth that provides a minimum of 5 feet of horizontal distance between the face of any slope and the front toe of the footing, whichever is deeper. Footings should be reinforced as recommend- ed by the Structural Engineer. Flooding or jetting of backfill should not be per- mitted. Backfill placed behind the walls should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78. It should be noted that the use of heavy compaction equipment in close proximity to retaining structures can result in excess wall movement (i.e., strains greater than those normally associated with the development of active conditions), and wall Kaiser Development Job No. 30023-00 February 13, 1986 Log No. 6-3835 Page Eighteen