The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 98-10; CARLSBAD RACEWAY; TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS; 2001-10-10TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS for CARLSBAD RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK Prepared for CARLSBAD RACEWAY PARTNERSHIP Final Report: May 3, 2001 (With October 10, 2001 Revisions) © URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC PLANNING & ENGINEERING, MARKETING & PROJECT SUPPORT CONSULTANTS TO INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT 4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 106 San Diego, Califomia 92123-1573 (858) 560-4911 Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. 0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3-1 4.0 THE PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 4-1 5.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS 5-1 6.0 SHORT TERM FUTURE (PRIOR TO YEAR 2005) CONDITIONS 6-1 7.0 SHORT TERM FUTURE (YEAR 2005) CONDITIONS 7-1 8.0 YEAR 2010 CONDITIONS 8-1 9.0 BUILDOUT CONDITIONS 9-1 10.0 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 10-1 II. 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11-1 12.0 REFERENCES 12-1 13.0 URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARERS 13-1 APPENDICES A. Existing Conditions Worksheets B. Project Plus Existing Conditions Worksheets C. Project Plus Short Term Future (Prior to Year 2005) D. Project Plus Short-Term Future (Year 2005) Conditions Levels of Service Worksheets E. Year 2020 (Buildout) Conditions Intersection Levels of Service Worksheets 001198 i 1198-50301-2-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 LIST OF FIGURES Number Page 1-1 Project Location Map 1-2 3-1 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes 3-2 3-2 Existing Street Classifications 3-3 3-3 Intersection Number Key 3-6 3-4 Existing Lane Configurations 3-7 3-5 Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 3-10 3- 6 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes 3-13 4- 1 Project Site Plan 4-2 4-2 Year 2020 Project Only Directional Distribution Percentages 4-4 4-3 Project Only Distribution Average Daily Traffic Volimies 4-5 4-4 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) 4-6 4- 5 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes (20% ofProject& CMP Intersections) 4-9 5- 1 Project Only Directional Distribution Percentages on Year 1998 Street Network ... 5-2 5-2 Project Only Average Daily Traffic Volumes on Year 1998 Street Network 5-3 5-3 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes on 1998 Street Network 5-6 5- 4 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes on 1998 Street Network 5-9 6- 1 Prior To Year 2005 Comparison of Average Daily Traffic Volumes 6-4 6-2 Prior to Year 2005 AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes No Melrose Drive / No Faraday Avenue / No Poinsettia Lane 6-5 6- 3 Prior to Year 2005 AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes No Melrose Drive./ No Faraday Avenue / No Poinsettia Lane 6-8 (Cul-De-Sac Ahemative) 7- 1 Year 2005 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 7-2 001198 ii 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Number Page 7-2 Year 2005 Project Only Directional Distribution Percentages 7-5 7-3 Year 2005 Project Only AM Peak Hour (20% of Project and CMP Intersections) ... 7-6 7-4 Year 2005 Project Only PM Peak Hour (20% of Project and CMP Intersections) ... 7-9 7-5 Year 2005 AM Peak Hour Volumes 7-12 7-6 Year 2005 PM Peak Hour Volumes 7-15 7- 7 Year 2005 Intersection Lane Configurations 7-21 8- 1 Year 2010 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 8-2 9- 1 Buildout (Year 2020) Average Daily Traffic Volumes 9-2 9-2 Buildout(Year2020)PlusProject AM Peak Hour Volumes 9-4 9-3 Buildout (Year 2020) Plus Project PM Peak Hour Volumes 9-7 9-4 Year 2020 Intersection Lane Configurations with Mitigation as Needed 9-12 9-5 Year 2020 with Poinsettia Avenue Through and Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue Signal 9-16 9-6 Year 2020 with Poinsettia Avenue Through and Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue Right-Tums-Only 9-17 9-7 Year 2020 with Poinsettia Avenue Cul-de-Sac and Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue Right-Tums-Only 9-20 001198 iii 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 LIST OF TABLES Number Page 3-1 Existing Street Segment Levels of Service 3-4 3- 2 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service 3-16 4- 1 Project Trip Generation 4-3 5- 1 Existing Plus Project Street Segment Levels of Service 5-4 5- 2 Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service 5-12 6- 1 Prior to Year 2005 Street Segment Levels of Service 6-3 6-2 Prior to Year 2005 Intersection Levels of Service 6-7 6- 3 Prior to Year 2005 Intersection Levels of Service 6-9 (Cul-De-Sac Altemative) 7- 1 Short-Term Future (Year 2005) Street Segment Levels of Service 7-3 7-2 Short-Term Future (Year 2005) Intersection Levels of Service 7-18 9-1 Year 2020 Plus Project Street Segment Levels of Service 9-3 9-2 Year 2020 With/Without Project Intersecfion Levels of Service (ICU Analysis)... 9-10 9- 3 Year 2020 Comparison of Intersection LOS with "Cul de Sac" and "Right-Tum-Only" altematives 9-19 10- 1 Buildout (Year 2020) CMP Analysis, Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Summary 10-2 001198 iv 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 1.0 INTRODUCTION rban Systems Associates, Inc. was retained by the Carlsbad Raceway Partnership to evaluate possible traffic impacts from the development of the Carlsbad Raceway Industrial Park in the City of Carlsbad. Figure l-I shows the project location. The project consists of approximately 145 acres of planned industrial uses. In order to evaluate possible project traffic impacts. Existing, Existing Plus Project, Short-Term Future prior to Year 2005, Year 2005, Year 2010 and Build out (Year 2020) conditions were evaluated. Year 2005, Year 2010, and Build out traffic volumes were estimated using the San Diego Area of Govemments (SANDAG) Cities/County Transportation Forecast, City of Carlsbad, assumed built-out in Year 2020. For the purposes of evaluation, the report is divided into the following sections: I. 0 Introduction 2.0 Methodology 3.0 Existing Conditions 4.0 The Project Trip Generation 5.0 Existing Plus Project Conditions 6.0 Short-Term Future (Prior To Year 2005) Condifions 7.0 Short-Term Future (Year 2005) Condifions 8.0 Year 2010 Conditions 9.0 Buildout (Year 2020) Condifions 10.0 Congestion Management Program II. 0 Conclusion and Recommendations 001198 1-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Dr. Hidden . p Valley k Project FIGURE 1-1 Project Location Map CD-K 1198-Fig1-1.dwg 001198 1-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 2.0 METHODOLOGY Described below are the various regional or local guidelines or basis for studies that were used or referenced in the preparation of this report. 2.1 CMP GUIDELINES The Congestion Management Program (CMP) guidelines were developed to provide a set of procedures for completing enhanced CEQA review for certain projects. The guidelines, prepared by the San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG), stipulate that any development project generating 2,400 or more average daily trips, or 200 or more peak hour trips must be evaluated in accordance with requirements of the Regional CMP. This project would generate 10,320 average daily trips, 1,135 AM and 1,238 PM peak hour trips, so that a CMP analysis has been included. The CMP also requires that a traffic impact analysis address fi-eeway links with one hundred fifty of more peak hour project trips (in either direction) or fifty or more peak hour trips (in either direction) on CMP or Regionally Significant Arterials (RSA) roadways. Segments of 1-5 north and south of Caimon Road and SR-78 east and west of El Camino Real are considered regionally significant arterials and are expected to have less than 150 project peak hour trips, so are not required to be evaluated. The SANTEC ITE Guidelines were used to determine which intersections and street segments should be included in the study area. Intersections at which the peak hour trips from either direction where 50 or more are included in the study area. 001198 2-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 2.2 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES The City of Carlsbad Growth Management Plan circulation standards require a level of service "D" or better for street segments and intersections during peak hours. This evaluation includes this standard of performance. If a project causes an intersection or street segment to degrade to level of service "E" or "F" then the project impact is considered to be significant. 2.3 COMPUTER TRAVEL FORECASTS Computer travel forecasts used for the analysis of Year 2005, Year 2010 and Year 2020 (build out) conditions were prepared by the City of Carlsbad and SANDAG. The SANDAG Cities/County Transportation Forecast, City of Carlsbad Year 2020 altemative 5, 2010 and 2005 transportation forecasts were used for evaluation. 2.4 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS PROCEDURES To determine intersection peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) and any needed mitigation measures, as required by the City of Carlsbad Growth Management Plan Guidelines, the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method was used. Also, for Congestion Management Program evaluation purposes, intersection levels of service were also calculated using the latest Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) computer software methodology (the 1997 update to the 1994 HCM). 001198 2-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS This section of the report evaluates existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes on study area street segments (between intersections) and at intersections during AM and PM peak hours. Traffic volumes are based on recent daily roadway traffic counts and peak period manual traffic counts at intersections, conducted in 1999. 3.1 STREET SEGMENTS Figure 3-1 shows existing average daily traffic volumes on street segments within the study area. These volumes were taken from recent traffic counts conducted for the City of Carlsbad 1999 Traffic Monitoring Program. Figure 3-2 shows existing roadway classifications for street segments within and adjacent to the study area. Table 3-1 includes existing street segment levels of service based on the highest peak hour flow per lane and a per lane capacity of 1800 vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL). As shown, all street segments currently operate acceptably. 001198 3-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 190. *fi^14 191 12 .25 \ % % y *** 28^ / f 164' Hidden Volley 12 r53T48 163 14 15 22 0$ l24 34/ 35 16 LEGEND XXX=ADT (bl Thousands) SOURCE 1999 SANDAG TtafBc Flow Mqi; 1999 City of Cadsbad Traffic Nfanitariiig Piugrani (VaUey RcBcatdi & Flammig) 166 34 13 171 FIGURE 3-1 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes CD-K 1198-ng3-1.dwg 001198 3-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Finu^epo^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 6PA 8-Fwy 4C 8-Fwy 8-Fwy -6PA SPA .4MA 8-Fwy 4MA i6PA 4M/r 4M \% 2C 8-Fwy LEGEND 8-Fwy =8-Lane Freeway 6PA = 6-Laiie Pimaiy Aitetial SPA =S-LaiiePiiiiaty Arterial 4PA = 4-Laiie Pimaiy Arterial 4MA =4-LaiiB Major Arterial 4SA = 4-Lanc Secondary ArtErial 4C =4-LaneCQlkctar 2C ==2-Laiie Collector 4MA 6PA 6PA 4MA FIGURE 3-2 Existing Street Classifications CD-K 119a-Fig3-2C.dwg 001198 3-3 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 3-1 Existing Street Segment Levels of Service Average Peak Daily Peak VHPL/ Location Classification Volume VPHPL CPL LOS El Camino Real College Blvd - Faraday Ave. 4PA 25,000 960 0.53 A Faraday Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 31,000 535 0.30 A Palomar Airport Rd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 25,000 385 0.21 A Camino Vida Roble - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 29,000 875 0.49 A Poinsettia Ln. - Aviara Pkwy./Alga Rd. 6PA 29,000 875 0.49 A Palomar Airport Rd. College Blvd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 36,000 605 0.34 A Camino Vida Roble - El Camino Real 6PA 25,000 585 0.33 A El Camino Real - El Fuerte St. SPA 47,000 1305 0.73 C El Fuerte St. - Melrose Dr. 5PA 46,000 1440 0.80 C Melrose Dr. - Business Park Dr. 4PA 46,000 1585 0.88 D Business Park Dr. - Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 6PA 31,000 950 0.53 A San Marcos Blvd. Rancho Santa Fe Rd. - Las Posas Rd. 4MA 34,000 860 0.48 A Las Posas Rd. - Via Vera Cruz 4MA 34,000 850 0.47 A Via Vera Cmz - S. Bent Ave. 4MA 36,000 870 0.48 A S. Bent Ave. - Grand Ave. 4MA 42,000 875 0.48 A Melrose Dr. Cannon Rd. - Shadowridge Dr. 6PA 20,000 550 0.31 A Shadowridge Dr. - Sycamore Ave. 6PA 16,000 605 0.34 A Sycamore Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 3,000 215 0.12 A Palomar airport Rd. - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 3,000 160 0.09 A Poinsettia Ln. - Alga Rd. 6PA 3,000 125 0.07 A Legend 8FWY - 8-lane fi:eeway 6FWY = 6-lane fi^eeway 6PA = 6-lane primary arterial 4MA = 4-lane major arterial 4SA = 4-lane secondary arterial 4C = 4-lane collector 2C = 2-lane collector VPHPL = Vehicles per hour per lane CPL = Capacity per lane @ 1,800 VPH V/C = Volume to capacity ratio 1198-TAB3-lC.vipd/CD-K 001198 3-4 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 3.1 INTERSECTIONS Figure 3-3 shows the key to study area intersections by number. Figure 3-4 shows intersection lane configurations. Figures 3-5 and 3-6 show existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections. Table 3-2 includes the results of the intersection level of service evaluation for existing conditions. The study area intersections are shown to be operating at acceptable levels of service ("D" or better LOS) for existing conditions. Outside the City of Carlsbad, the Melrose Drive/Sycamore Avenue intersection operates at level of service "E" during the PM peak hour, but would operate at "B" with restriping of the westbound approach to accommodate the heavy right tum volumes. Appendix A includes existing conditions traffic counts and levels of service worksheets. 001198 3-5 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Dr. Ave. (20 LEGEND = Future Roadways FIGURE 3-3 Intersection Number Key CD-K 119a-ng3-3.dwg 001198 3-6 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fina^^^ort^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 El Camino Real at College Boulevard © r El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue ® .palomar Airport Rd. Palomar Airport Road at El Camino Real © -iii 'caai Acceaa Waat Camino Vida Robla •411". 1 ••5 'oins<ttia In. ^ ^^oinsittia In. El Camino Real at Breaai Access West Ei Camino Real at Camino Vida Roble (Future ) El Camino Real at Poinsettia Lane ® Cannon Rd. Melrose Drive at Cannon Road -iii^^ Shadawridgu Jr. Melrose Drive at Shadowridge Drive nGURE3.4 Existing Intersection Lane Configurations CD-K 119a-F!g3-4-lD.dv.g 001198 3-7 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 2 of 3 ® r .^Syeamort Av. ® -iii^i r Faraday Arm. ® o ^ 1 (Fui Melrose Pobisetti r \\\\r "ure) Drive at a Avenue Melrose Sycamori Drive at » Avenue Melrose Faraday Drive at Avenue ® o ^ 1 (Fui Melrose Pobisetti r \\\\r "ure) Drive at a Avenue ® ? © c r ® Atga. Rd. ^ —^ ^^^^ ^ 1 Palomar AIrp Malrost ort Road at > Drive Melrose Poinsett \\\\' Drive at Lane Melrose Alga Drive at Road ® 1 ^JMtomor Aiirport Ud. ® . Paiomar Airport Rd. Palomar Abi Camino V lort Road at Ida Roble m ^ SI §• "51 1' Palomar Airf Loker Ave. / Brei 1 1 1 >ort Road at Mi Ranch Access FIGURE 3-4 Existing Intersection Lane Configurations CD-L 1198-ng3-4-2F.d»(g 001198 3-8 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Fina^e^oi^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © .Palomar J-trpori Ad. © \ a, s Free J r Palamar Airport Rd. © ^ii^i --^ :> i >^ West San Marc Rancho San ? jr. fan Maraam Blvd. OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road Palomar AIrp B Fuert lort Road at B Street Palomar Air| Business 1 ort Road at >ark Drive © ^ii^i --^ :> i >^ West San Marc Rancho San ? jr. fan Maraam Blvd. OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road © ? ^If. Swn, Maraoa BlutL © * 1 -ii^l T ^PoinntfCa Ava. @ . is •'•8 V Hi ^Palomar Air^art Rd. West San Marc Grand OS Boulevard at Avenue -> Business P Poinsetti irk Drive at a Avenue 1 Palomar Alq Palomar Forum Paseo >ort Road at South Access / Vallndo FIGURE 3-4 Existing Intersection Lane Configurations CD-K 119a-ng3-4-3B.dwg 001198 3-9 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 in to •)< in ^ 1 ^iiS College Bbid. in in CO •sl- } Real at loulevard ® _ o o S 00 aa g 20 Faraday Ave. © . d OOO £ (j> in Kl in 00 g -'iiivvi V.915 4 1260 ^460 {r Palomar Airport Rd. El Camint College E in in CO •sl- } Real at loulevard 45:^ 60 El Camini Faraday 0 o tn 01 •< 3 Real at Avenue 125:^ 620^^ 35 Paiomar AIrp El Cami o in o tn ^ o in lort Road at no Real © 1 { Bretei Acceet West ® in g Hii! Camino Vida Roble ^^^ o in o o •«t cn lal at Roble © , a; ^ii^l ? Poinsettia Ln. (Fut El Camm Bressi Ac ^^^ ure) 0 Real at sees West 60^ 80^ El Camino Rc Camino Vida ^^^ o in o o •«t cn lal at Roble (Fui El Camim Poinset ure) 9 Real at tia Lane SOURCE OtyofCaiUad 1999'nafGcMiinilDdiig Fiugiam (Except as Note^ ® . in Tt- ^2 ?' Cannon Rd. © —o in CM ^220 195 ^150 Shadowridge Dr. SOURCE OtyofCaiUad 1999'nafGcMiinilDdiig Fiugiam (Except as Note^ 400 1 Source: TSI Melrose Canno in o to CO CM ai Drive at n Road 40 140 •'S^'^ 185 1 Source: TSI Melrose Shade wr in o CO Drive at dge Drive nOURE 3-5 Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes .CO-K 1198-ng3-S-1D.dwg 001198 3-10 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 2 cf 3 m o in CO * 190 1^:25 ^125 90^^ 35 in lo CM Source: TS/ Melrose Drive at Sycamore Avenue m in 25 ^ n s^ii^ 1 Faraday Ave. 40—^ =^ 0 o o Source; TSI Melrose Drive at Faraday Avenue (Future) Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Avenue © 2700 325 Paiomar ^iijjui't Rd^ 1035- 150 I Source: TSI in o oo ^ CM 2) m o rv o> o i CM »- ••- ''Ui^l Poinrntfto Ln. 210^ o m 50-^ If) -- CM in ^ o <S Atga Bd. 210 0 295 «^ 0 o o OJ -* Palomar Airport Road at Melrose Drive Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Lane Melrose Drive at Alga Road SOURCE City of Carlsbad 1999 TiafBc Monitoring Program (Except as Noted) © U7in in I ^j. 00 ••- » 180-^, 1125—• 510 140 925 170 Paiomar .AirporC Bd. O I CM o 100 2600 Paiomar Airport Rd. 1670. Si o I oo CO Patomar Airport Road at Camino Vida Roble I'l ill ""I. |! Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Bressi Ranch Access FIGURE 3-5 Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes CO-L 119B-Fig3-5-2E.dwg 001198 3-11 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © o o s CM ? 210 2670 Palomar jiirTiort Rd © ^ a, s Free ° m .| Right in 00 3 — O -- «J ^^—•250 '*^1650 Palamar Airport Bd. © o in o S in oo ^ "5 1^ 00 £ ^ii^l 230 :^ 1 420 Source: TSI West San Marc Rancho San 70 ^^1140 W. San Manos Blvd. o inin O CM OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road 350^ 1020^^ 0 Palomar AIrp B Fuert o^^o tort Road at 9 Street > 680^ 540IZ^ Source: TSI Palomar Airj Business 1 0 0 ort Road at >ark Drive © o in o S in oo ^ "5 1^ 00 £ ^ii^l 230 :^ 1 420 Source: TSI West San Marc Rancho San 70 ^^1140 W. San Manos Blvd. o inin O CM OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road © ^ 1 o oo ^ <M ^ 1 ^^400 ^IZ 1795 1^65 Fl S<oi Uarcos Bbid. ai i K) in .a ^-ii^l 105 1^ 345 If Pomeettia Ave. © . Is Ji VA 7 ta.cia paiomar- Airport Rd 1075 ""^ 25 Source: TSI West San Marc Grand in in o CM — m OS Boulevard at Avenue Business Pi Poinsetti o in in CM in CM irk Drive at 1 Avenue 1275—^1 10 1 Palomar AIrp Palomar Forum i Paseo 25 tort Road at South Access / Vallndo SOURCE City of Carlibad 1999 TiafiBc Mkautoring Fiognm ^auept u Noted) nGURE3-5 Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes .CD-K 2198-Fig3-5-3C.dwg 001198 3-12 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 in in n; ^ in 1 College Bbid. \\\ in o CM ••- 3 Real at loulevard © . a _ n in 05 tn O a to e .^ii^l 80 ^^105 ^265 Faaraday Ave. © . a o in o S »0 CM CM ^ IV O) g -'iii^^l ^425 ^335 Paiomar Airport Bd. 4 505^ 40-^ El Camlni College E \\\ in o CM ••- 3 Real at loulevard 195:^ 60 830-^ El Camin( Faraday in in tn -"t 1 Real at Avenue 255^ 1415-^- 85 Palomar AIrp El Cami o in in |v CM hO in ort Road at no Real © 1 Breaax Acccn Weet © % 1 ^ as AW \ Camino 7u£a RohVa o in o tn -- N lal at Roble © , ^ii^! ? Poinsettia £n. > (Fut El Camin Bressi Ac \\\ ure) 0 Real at cess West J 380 605 ^ El Camino Re Camino Vida o in o tn -- N lal at Roble (Fut El Camin Poinset ure ) D Real at tia Lane SOURCE City of Caitalwd 1999 Traffic Mooitaaiig Prognim(Ezcq>t as Noted) © m in lo ^ ^ 10 Cannon iScL © in o tv tn in in I'm- V-225 <4—220 Shadotaridge Dr. SOURCE City of Caitalwd 1999 Traffic Mooitaaiig Prognim(Ezcq>t as Noted) 200-^ 265^ 1 Source: TSI Melrose Canno m in CM tn CM CJ) Drive at n Road 80 . 160 -^'^ 80 1 Source: TSI Melrose Shade wr in in in in CM o Drive at dge Drive FIGURE 3-6 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes CD-K 119a-ng3-6-1D.dv»g 001198 3-13 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © in in in ,: <31 CM 5 ^ii^l 60- 25! Source: TSI 1300 70 ^40 Sycamore Ava. o o CM to Melrose Drive at Sycamore Avenue in .-iii^l 250 Faraday Ave. o o o o 0 Source: TSI Melrose Drive at Faraday Avenue © 4ii^ Poinsettia Ave. (Future ) Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Avenue 1130 165 Palomar Airport Rd 2660 100 Source: TSI in o <j> o> CM Si in in CM CM in ^ Poinsettia £n. JL 150^ 5^^ 50 o in in in CM CM o Alga. Bd. 155 0 385 o o tn in tn Palomar Airport Road at Melrose Drive Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Lane Melrose Drive at Alga Road SOURCE aty of Cariabad 1999 Traffic Mamtaang Program (Excqrt as Noted) o o m • 20; 1215' 195 20 ^—1025 "^^125 Paiomar Airport Rd. ° fc O I '10 4^1375 Paiomar Airport Bd. in o to in Palomar Airport Road at Camino Vida Roble 2770^^ 11 §•1 V I' Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Bressi Ranch Access nGURE3-6 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes CD-K 1198-Fig3-6-2D.dwg 001198 3-14 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fina^ejoor^^^^^^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © O CM £ Ol ? in 25 M 1190 Palomar jiirport Rd. © \ a. Free S ^•iff'i* o m 1 IV Ol 3 |v o CM * ^^460 4z:565 r° Palomar Airport Rd. © moo ^ oo m ro CM — i" -'ii^l 520:^ i 1070 105-^ Source: TSI West San Marc Rancho San 175 ^l575 j^765 IT. iSan Marvoa BhiiL mom CO m DS Boulevard at ita Fe Road 1051^ 2500—»> 0 Palomar AIrp B Fuert O o^-n tort Road at 9 Street 1710^ 1460::^^ Source: TSI ^ Palomar Air| Business 1 00 ort Road at >ark Drive © moo ^ oo m ro CM — i" -'ii^l 520:^ i 1070 105-^ Source: TSI West San Marc Rancho San 175 ^l575 j^765 IT. iSan Marvoa BhiiL mom CO m DS Boulevard at ita Fe Road © o » O IV ^ rv to ^ .-iVV^ ^^145 1665 1^75 Fl San Marcos Rlvd © ^ mo t CM tn a 00 °- ^^i^l 75 V. -«3P» 5 ^ 250 Poinsettia Ave. (Future) Palomar Forum South Aeoeea 1290 palomar Airport Rd. 1185 20 Source: TSI West San Marc Grand o m m ^ ^ OS Boulevard at Avenue °-> Business Pi Poinsetti moo o m 00 CM irk Drive at a Avenue J ' 2925 —1 ^^^^^^ 25 1 Palomar Air| Palomar Forum i Paseo 55 tort Road at 3outh Access / Vallndo SOURCE CSty of CaiMiad 1999 Traffic Miiniloriiig Ftogtam (Except as Noted) nGURE3-6 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes CD-K 119a-Rg3-6-3C.dwg 001198 3-15 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fina^e^or^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 3-2 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service # Intersection AM PM # Intersection ICU ICU # Intersection ICU 1 LOS ICU LOS 1 El Camino Real / College Boulevard 0.51 A 0.61 B 2 El Camino Real / Faraday Avenue 0.67 B 0.71 C 3 El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road 0.62 B 0.78 C 4 El Camino Real / Bressi West Access Future 5 El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble 0.50 A 0.58 A 6 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Lane Future 7 Melrose Drive / Camion Road 0.56 A 0.47 A 8 Melrose Drive / Shadowridge Drive 0.55 A 0.54 A 9 Melrose Drive / Sycamore Avenue 0.50 A 0.69 B 10 Melrose Drive / Faraday Avenue 0.26 A 0.26 A 11 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue Future 12 Melrose Drive / Palomar Airport Rd. 0.83 D 0.64 B 13 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Lane 0.28 A 0.20 A 14 Melrose Drive / Alga Road 0.43 A 0.45 A 15 Palomar Airport Rd. / Camino Vida Roble 0.55 A 0.64 B 16 Palomar Airport Rd. / Bressi North Access Future 17 Palomar Airport Rd. / El Fuerte Street 0.69 B 0.61 B 18 Palomar Airport Rd. / Business Park Drive 0.75 C 0.80 C 19 West San Marcos Blvd. / Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 0.84 D 0.87 D 20 West San Marcos Blvd. / Grand Ave. 0.62 B 0.77 C 21 Business Paric Dr. / Poinsettia Avenue 0.56 A 0.73 C 22 Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S. Access / Paseo Valindo 0.87 D 0.61 B 1198-TAB3-2E.Wf)d/CI>K ICU LOS 0.00 - 0.60 A 0.61 - 0.70 B 0.71 - 0.80 C 0.81-0.90 D 0.91 - 1.00 E Over 1.00 F 001198 3-16 1198-50301-2-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 4.0 THE PROJECT TRIP GENERATION The project will consist of approximately 145 acres of planned industrial uses. Figure 4-1 includes the project site plan as proposed. Table 4-1 includes the vehicle trip generation expected from the site. As shown, the project is expected to generate 10,320 average daily trips (ADT) with 1,135 trips occurring in the AM peak hour (split 1,022 inbound and 114 outbound) and 1,238 occurring in the PM peak hour (split 248 inbound and 991 outbound). Also, the total traffic model average daily traffic volume for the combined Carlsbad Raceway and adj acent Palomar Forum proj ects is 15,547 ADT. The property owners have agreed to a sharing of this ADT volume of9,879 ADT to Carlsbad Raceway, and 5,168 ADT to Palomar Forum (NOTE: This is not a City requirement). No change in project impacts or mitigation would result from this sharing of ADT. Figure 4-2 shows the project only directional distribution percentages at build out. The directional distribution percentages are based on a select zone plot of the project using the SANDAG Cities/County Transportation Forecast, Year 2020, City of Carlsbad. Figure 4-3 shows project only average daily traffic. Figures 4-4 and 4-5 show AM and PM peak hour project only traffic volumes at intersections impacted by 20% or more of project traffic (for Growth Management Plan evaluation) and at Congestion Management Program intersections (50 or more peak hour trips in one direction). The volumes shown in these figures will be used in the following sections of this report for the identification of possible project only traffic impacts. 001198 4-1 1198-50301-2-rpt 4:^ I I ^ g 1\7 T-/ 1 V3 Co I CARLSBAD RACEWAY TENTATIVE MAP © a t C/3 Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 4-1 Project Driveway Trip Generation Use Amount Trip* Rate ADT AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Use Amount Trip* Rate ADT %* # In/Out* In Out % # In/Out In Out Planned Industrial 1,476 KSF 7 /KSF 10,320 11 1,135 9 : 1 1,022 114 12 1,238 2 : 8 248 991 CD-K/1198-Tab4-lD.wpd * = Source: SANDAG Trip Generation Table, July, 1998, "Industrial Park (no commercial)" ** = SANDAG Cities/County 2020 Transportation Forecast, City of Carlsbad, 8-27-99, TAZ 772 KSF = Thousand Square Feet Figures 4-3,4-4, and 4-5 are based on this table. Please note that the total traffic model ADT input for the combined Carlsbad Raceway and the adjacent Palomar Forum Project is 15,547 ADT. The property owners have agreed to a sharing of these ADT based on net pad acres as follows: A. Carlsbad Raceway 9,879 ADT 75.8 Acres B. Palomar Forum 5,668 ADT 43.5 Acres Total 15,547 ADT 119.3 Acres The sharing of ADT between projects does not change the Year 2005 and Year 2020 analysis, mitigation, conclusions or recommendations since the analysis is based on ADT from the combined projects; the sharing of ADT is not a city requirement. 001198 4-3 1198-50301-2-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3. 2001 67a 8% 2%^ Hidden. -VaDay 3% 5% 27a 27a <17a 57a 27a\ 77a 107a 47a 127a, 17a '87a ._ 37a \%. In \l 127a V "1170 --87a\ 267a '67a <17a 37a \57a 37a 37a .87a 5%. 20% 17o 57a 57a 107ao / \\ 57a 57a 47a' 27a LEGE^^P XX7a = Project Only Distributum SOURCE SANDAG Citiea/County 2Q20 TcaniportBtiaa Foncas^ City of Cadsbad-(8-27-99) Sdtect Zone Awrigmnen^ TAZ 772 27a 47a i i47a <17a FIGURE 4-2 Year 2020 Project Only Directional Distribution Percentages CD-K 119B-ng4-2A.dwg 001198 4-4 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 619 Dr. 206 310 310 Hidden VaUe7 I %, 826 516 1,238 2,683 206- 59 _J$S 1,858 722 516 722 619/ 310 1,032 206 \ 310 103, I 1.135 516n -1.858 /1,238 2 2.064^ 1516 .827 516 ^ 516 ^1,032 i516 206 206 413 LEGEND XX = Project Only Average Daily TcafBc 413 i FIGURE 4-3 Year 2020 Project Only Average Daily TraJffic Volumes CD-K 119B-ng4-3B.dwg 001198 4-5 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 a; O a in 1 n College Bbid. © . a; in 1 \l ^,0 Faraday Ave. © . Si ^,0 PaUnmar Airport Bd. El Camlni College E t to 3 Real at loulevard El Camini Faraday ^^/^ tn ta 3 Real at Avenue 50 • Palomar AIrp El Cami r o lOrt Road at no Real © El Camino Real Breeei Aeeeee Weai © a; w Camino Vida Rohle t o to lal at Roble 0 El Camino Beal Poiiu«ftia Ln. El Camin Breeei Ac< \ O a Real at seea West El Camino Rf Camino Vida t o to lal at Roble • El Camin Poinset \ O in D Real at tia Lane © o in i Confum Rd in Melrose Drive at Cannon Road o i Shadautridge Dr. Melrose Drive at Shadowridge Drive nGURE44 Year 2020 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119a-Fig4-4-1.dwg 001198 4-6 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 0 100 Uelroee Dr. r 5 Sycamore Ave. © m ro 1 1 Faraday Ave. © m 0 to cs ^20 M 5 ^20 i>oinMtfia Ave. Melrose Sycamon \r in T— Drive at a Avenue 40 > Melrose Faraday m m ts Drive at Avenue Melrose Poinsetti 00 moo Drive at a Avenue © m •.- in 135-^ ^ 135-^ S 1 Palomar Air( Melros Palomar Airpart Rd. \r mm >ort Road at s Drive © m ^\ 1 Pavnsettia. Ln. © 0 ^ ' Sf • * 1 1 Alga lid. © m •.- in 135-^ ^ 135-^ S 1 Palomar Air( Melros Palomar Airpart Rd. \r mm >ort Road at s Drive 35-/ Melrose Poinset t m m Drive at tia Lane Melrose Alga t 0 m Drive at Road 45' Palomar Airpori Bd. Palomar Airport Road at Camino Vida Roble 190' 25 Ailomar Airport Bd. Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Bressi Ranch Access nGURE44 Year 2020 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 1198-Rg+-4-2B.dwg 001198 4-7 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © .a m t « Hw3 •< 25 Palomar Airpoirt RiL © Businees Park Dr. K.100 -*—100 Palomar Airport Rd. © •rf o m £ V 1 to 105 W. San UoTBos Blvd. 185 >• Palomar Airp El Fuert r a lort Road at B Street © Businees Park Dr. K.100 -*—100 Palomar Airport Rd. 1 10^—• 5 West San Marc Rancho San O DS Boulevard at ta Fe Road 185 >• Palomar Airp El Fuert r a lort Road at B Street Palomar Airp Business 1 tort Road at >ark Drive 1 10^—• 5 West San Marc Rancho San O DS Boulevard at ta Fe Road ® Grand Ave. 50 W. San Marcos Blvd. © . m •» cs ^ ^ a. Ponsetiia Ave. @ J vjl a . ^100 Polomor Airport Rd. West San Marc Grand OS Boulevard at Avenue Business Pi Poinsetti O O iric Drive at B Avenue 180 -/ Palomar Air] Palomar Forum >ort Road at South Access FIGURE 4-4 Year 2020 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119a-ng4-4-3.dwg 001198 4-8 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 a: ° 1 n College Bbid. © El Camino Real Faraday Ave. © . VI Hw70 -^—50 Poiomor Airport Bd. El Camin College I t o m 3 Real at loulevard B Camini Faraday OOO ID -- 3 Real at Avenue Palomar Airp El Cami f O CS lort Road at no Real © El Camino Real Breeei Acesss Weet © a; i 1 Cantina Tida Roble t o cs lal at Roble 0 •*— 60 El Camino Real -^—30 /*oiiueffia Ln. El Camin Bressi Ac t O cs 0 Real at cess West El Camino Rc Camino Vida t o cs lal at Roble El Camin Poinset t o D Real at tia Lane © I Canfum jRd. o m Melrose Drive at Cannon Road CM i ShMdxnainAge Br. \ o Melrose Drive at Shadowridge Drive nGURE4-5 Year 2020 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K n9B-Flg4-5-1A.dwg 001198 4-9 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © o i ^ • ^ Syeamoire Ave. © m li Faraday Ave. © m m V ^ lao ^175 PotstMttia Ave. Melrose Sycamor \r o m o Drive at 9 Avenue Melrose Faraday OOO ro Drive at Avenue 10 ^ ^ 5 • 8 50-^ 1 Melrose Poinsetti om — Drive at B Avenue © o lo m 35-/ ^ 35-^ S GB >l Palomar Air| Melros <4 ^130 <-45 Patomar iliiTiorC Rd. \r oo >ort Road at B Drive © mm i m ro -'i 1 Poinsettia in. © m 1^ tn . H A^a R± © o lo m 35-/ ^ 35-^ S GB >l Palomar Air| Melros <4 ^130 <-45 Patomar iliiTiorC Rd. \r oo >ort Road at B Drive IS-'' Melrose Poinset t m Drive at tie Lane Melrose Alga 1 m Drive at Road 10' • 45 Paiomar Aujiort iid. Palomar Airport Road at Camino Vida Roble 45- -•—190 Palomar AitTiort Rd. Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Bressi Ranch Access nGURE4-5 Year 2020 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119a-ng4-5-2A.dwg 001198 4-10 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © m " V K»35 -^—190 ^35 Pofomor Airport Rd. © ^ a, s CB 2 1 V K.25 -•—25 Paiomar Airport Jld. © •rf m " J • -4 25 W. San Mareoe Blvd. 55—^ Palomar Airp El Fuert r m lOrt Road at B Street © ^ a, s CB 2 1 V K.25 -•—25 Paiomar Airport Jld. 50-> 1 100—• S West San Marc Rancho San m DS Boulevard at ta Fe Road 55—^ Palomar Airp El Fuert r m lOrt Road at B Street 100 • Palomar Airp Business 1 ort Road at ^ark Drive 50-> 1 100—• S West San Marc Rancho San m DS Boulevard at ta Fe Road © 1 W. San Uareoa BlviL © . o 1 ro a, Ponseftia Ave. © m o 1 o 1 Vll s . a, CQ Paiomar Airport Rd. 50 • West San Marc Grand OS Boulevard at Avenue 120-/ lOO-^*- 100-^ Business Pi Poinsetti m cs irk Drive at a Avenue Palomar Air| Palomar Forum lort Road at South Acceee FIGURE 4-5 Year 2020 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119a-ng4-5-3.dwg 001198 4-11 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. ^^iii^^^ESil^^^^^^m^^^^immem^^^^^mmm^^^^^^^memmmm^^^^^^^^^eimm^m^^MSi^^^^^ 5.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS This section of the report evaluates traffic conditions with project only AM/PM peak hour and average daily traffic added to existing conditions. The project directional disfribution of trips was determined using the SANDAG Cities/County 1998 Transportation Forecast, City of Carlsbad calibration on the existing street network with only the Carlsbad Raceway project considered to be built out. 5.1 STREET SEGMENTS Figure 5-1 shows the project only trip directional distribution percentages derived from the rerun of the 1998 calibration forecast. Figure 5-2 shows existing average daily traffic volumes with project only traffic added. Table 5-1 includes the street segment level of service tabulation, which shows that with project traffic added to existing daily traffic, all segments evaluated comply with the City's Growth Management Plan level of service criteria of level of service "D" or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, no direct significant project impacts to street segments are expected. This assumes project and City Capital Improvements Program widening of Palomar Airport Road along the project south frontage. 001198 5-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3. 2001 37a 37: mdden r-VaUey ^ \ Rd. 57a ,87a <17a 27a 37a^ 27a 57a 77a 27a LECffiND XX7a = Project Only Distributioa SOURCE SANDAG Citiei/Coiiiity 1998 Tnmqiortatian Forecast, Qty of Cadsbad - Cadflbad Racew^ Select Zone Awrignnient, TAZ 772ailayl2.2000) i47a nGURE5-l Existing 1998 Calibration Forecast Directional Distribution Percentages CD-K l198-ngS-1A.dvig 001198 5-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 = Project Only CD-K 1198-ng5-2A.dwg NO SCALE FIGURE 5-2 nu Project Only Average Daily Traffic Volumes \ On 1998 Street Network 001198 5-3 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fina^emi^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 5-1 Existing + Project Street Segment Levels of Service Average Peak Daily Peak VHPL/ Location Classification Volume VPHPL CPL LOS £1 Camino Real College Blvd - Faraday Ave. 4PA 25,488 1,000 0.55 A Faraday Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 31,875 540 0.30 A Palomar Airport Rd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 25,972 415 0.23 A Camino Vida Roble - Poinsettia Ln. 4PA 29,778 925 0.51 A Poinsettia Ln. - Aviara Pkwy./Alga Rd. 4PA 29,778 925 0.51 A Palomar Airport Rd. College Blvd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 36,486 635 0.35 A Camino Vida Roble - El Camino Real 6PA 25,778 590 0.33 A El Camino Real - El Fuerte St. 5PA 49,625 1,345 0.75 C El Fuerte St. - Melrose Dr. 4PA 49,305 1,460 0.81 D Melrose Dr. - Business Park Dr. 4PA 46,486 1,535 0.85 D Business Park Dr. - Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 4PA 34,304 1,040 0.58 A San Marcos Blvd. Rancho Santa Fe Rd. - Las Posas Rd. 4MA 33,972 910 0.50 A Las Posas Rd. - Via Vera Cruz 4MA 33,972 900 0.50 A Via Vera Cruz - S. Bent Ave. 4MA 36,486 895 0.50 A S. Bent Ave. - Grand Ave. 4MA 42,389 900 0.50 A Melrose Dr. Camion Rd. - Shadowridge Dr. 6PA 20,486 565 0.31 A Shadowridge Dr. - Sycamore Ave. 6PA 16,681 630 0.35 A Sycamore Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 3,000 215 0.12 A Palomar airport Rd. - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 3,000 160 0.09 A Poinsettia Ln. - Alga Rd. 6PA 3,486 160 0.09 A J J98-TAB5-lC.wpd/CD-K Legend 8FWY = 8-lane freeway 6FWY = 6-lane freeway 6PA = 6-lane primary arterial 4MA = 4-lane major arterial 4SA = 4-lane secondary arterial 4C = 4-lane collector 2C = 2-lane collector VPHPL = Vehicles per hour per lane CPL = Capacity per lane @ 1,800 VPH V/C = Volume to capacity ratio 001198 5-4 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 5.2 INTERSECTIONS Figures 5-3 and 5-4 show project only AM and PM peak hour fraffic at the study area intersections. These volumes were added to existing volumes. Table 5-2 shows existing plus project intersection peak hour levels of service. Compared to existing conditions direct project impacts to intersections are expected at the following intersection: Palomar Airport Road/ Palomar Forum South Access/Paseo Valindo However with mitigation and with project only traffic added, this location is expected to meet the City's Growth Management Plan Circulation Level of Service Standard of level of service "D" or better during peak hours. Mitigation includes the third westbound lane on Palomar Airport Road, to be constructed as a frontage improvement by the Palomar Forum project. Appendix B includes peak hour level of service worksheets for existing plus project conditions. 001198 5-5 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © . O q M College Bbid. © . «i a; ° 9 m e il Faraday Ave. © _ ti Gl VI J^IO ^10 palomar Airpart Rd. El Camlni College E t m 3 Real at loulevard 30-^ El Camin) Faraday m m 3 Real at Avenue 80 • Palomar Airp El Cami r m o lort Road at no Real © 1 s \ v = Bressi Acceee Weet © £ 1 Camina Vida Boble t m o tal at Roble © , H K ° 1 \i (FubMre) Poinssttia Ln. El Camh Bressi Aci r m o 0 Real at seas West El Camino Rf Camino Vida t m o tal at Roble El Camin Poinset \ m o 0 Real at tia Lane © o CO i Camnon Rd. m Melrose Drive at Cannon Road o i ghoitotpridy Jr. \ Melrose Drive at Shadowridge Drive FIGURE 5-3 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes At CMP Study Area Intersections, 1998 Street Network CD-K 119a-ng5-3-1.dwg 001198 5-6 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © o 1^ v,„ Sycamore Ave. Melrose Drive at Sycamore Avenue ^ 1 J'arofltay Ave. 0 0 Melrose Drive at Faraday Avenue © ^45 Potrusttia Ave. 400 (FtLiure) Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Avenue o •"tm 45 'olomor Airpart iid. t m CD m •=> 1 1 \ i Poinsettia Ln. \ o m tMro Alga Rd. 20 \ O ro Palomar Airport Road at Melroae Drive Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Lane Melrose Drive at Alga Road 80' 10 'alomar Aivport RA. Palomar Airport Road at Camino Vida Roble 275 • H 30 ^^^alomor Airport RiL Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Bressi Ranch Access nGURE5-3 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes At CMP Study Area Intersections, 1998 Street Network CD-K 1198-ng5-3-2.dwg 001198 5-7 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © m 1^ s V 1 M 30 .Palomar jiirport Rd. © t 2 1 lO iq J -•—320 Polomor Airport Rd. © m ^ ro ^ tn •< 105 W. San Uarcos Blvd. © m 1^ s V 1 M 30 .Palomar jiirport Rd. © t 2 1 lO iq J -•—320 Polomor Airport Rd. 15-^ 1 12 • West San Marc Rancho San o CM OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road © m 1^ s V 1 M 30 .Palomar jiirport Rd. 35-^ 35—^ Palomar Airport Road at Business Park Drive 15-^ 1 12 • West San Marc Rancho San o CM OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road 275—^ Palomar Airport Road at El Fuerte Street 35-^ 35—^ Palomar Airport Road at Business Park Drive 15-^ 1 12 • West San Marc Rancho San o CM OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road ® Grand Ave. M 40 IT. S<m Marcos Blvd. © . i! Poinsettia AIV«. © , is o '^1 ^ 1 0,119 ^630 Patomar jlitTtort Rd. West San Marc Grand OS Boulevard at Avenue Business Pi Poinsetti) t m ro irk Drive at 1 Avenue (Fut Palomar Air| Palomar Forum ure) tort Road at South Access nGURE5-3 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes At CMP Study Area Intersections, 1998 Street Network CD-K 1198-Fig5-3-3.dwg 001198 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 a; ° 1 i^ College Bbid. 0 Sl Camino Real Parodoy Ave. © - a (i s 1 VI ^90 •< 80 ^100 palomar Airport Rd El Camlni College E t o m 3 Real at loulevard El Camini Faraday OOO »o m ^ 3 Real at Avenue 20 • Palomar Airr El Cami f m CM tort Road at no Real © 1 § 1 V^ Prsssi Acesss Ifsst © . 1 0 a; 1 ^ Camino Vida RabU t m CM tal at Roble © . tt o ft; ° 1 il (Future) Poinsettia Ln. El Camin Bressi Ac r m CM 0 Real at Bess West B Camino Rc Camino Vida t m CM tal at Roble El Camin Poinset t m CM 0 Real at tia Lane © m i Cannon Rd. \ o m Melrose Drive at Cannon Road m i gftodoMiridgrs Dr. O 1^ Melrose Drive at Shadowridge Drive HGURE 5-4 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes At CMP Study Area Intersections, 1998 Street Network CD-K 1198-ng5-4-1.dwg 001198 5-9 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © CM ^ tt VI Sycamore Ave. Melrose Drive at Sycamore Avenue L 1 ^-0 Faraday Ave. 0 Melrose Faraday 0 Drhre at Avenue © o ^ 11 Poinssttia £n. Melrose t m Drive at © ^385 Poinssttia Avs. r 100 (Future) Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Avenue m •oo lom 85 'alomar itwport RtL \ oo * cMhO Alga Rd. t Palomar Airport Road at Melrose Drive Melrose Drive at Alga Road 20' •80 'alomar Airport Pd. Palomar Airport Road at Camino Vida Roble 75' •4 270 ^.|.,Patomar Airport BiL Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Bressi Ranch Access nGURE5-4 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes At CMP Study Area Intersections, 1998 Street Network CD-K 119a-ng5-4-2.dwg 001198 5-10 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final^£^or^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © .a O V! <.65 270 .^Paiomar Airport Pd. © 1 S 1 m I 1^ f§ J M 80 Polomor jAirport Rd. © •d m Ji to 25 W. San Marcos Blvd © .a O V! <.65 270 .^Paiomar Airport Pd. © 1 S 1 m I 1^ f§ J M 80 Polomor jAirport Rd. ,30-> 1 100—^ S West San Marc Rancho San m OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road © .a O V! <.65 270 .^Paiomar Airport Pd. 295—^ 305 • Palomar Airport Road at Business Park Drive ,30-> 1 100—^ S West San Marc Rancho San m OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road Palomar Airport Road at B Fuerte Street 295—^ 305 • Palomar Airport Road at Business Park Drive ,30-> 1 100—^ S West San Marc Rancho San m OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road ® Grand Ave. If. San JTorcos Blvd. © * m S 1^ i| Poinsettia Ave. © . g Is o ""a ^ 1 ^ 155 Patomar Airport i2dL 40—•> West San Marc Grand OS Boulevard at Avenue Business Pi Poinsetti \ m CM irk Drive at a Avenue (Fut Palomar Air{ Palomar Forum ure) lort Road at South Accesa nGURE5-4 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes At CMP Study Area Intersections, 1998 Street Network CO-K 119a-ng5--4-3.d«ig 001198 5-11 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 5-2 Existing + Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service # Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour # Intersection Without With Without With # Intersection ICU 1 LOS ICU 1 LOS ICU 1 LOS ICU LOS 1 El Camino Real / College Boulevard 0.51 A 0.51 A 0.61 B 0.63 B 2 El Camino Real / Faraday Avenue 0.67 B 0.69 B 0.71 C 0.73 C 3 El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road 0.62 B 0.65 B 0.78 C 0.81 D 4 El Camino Real / Bressi West Access Future 5 El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble 0.50 1 A 1 0.50 1 A 1 0.58 A 0.60 | A 6 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Lane Future 7 Melrose Drive / Cannon Road 0.56 A 0.57 A 0.47 A 0.48 A 8 Melrose Drive / Shadowridge Drive 0.56 A 0.56 A 0.54 A 0.55 A 9 Melrose Drive / Sycamore Avenue 0.50 A 0.52 A 0.69 B 0.72 C 10 Melrose Drive / Faraday Avenue 0.26 A 0.26 A 0.26 A 0.26 A 11 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue Future 12 Melrose Drive / Palomar Airport Rd 0.83 D 0.84 D 0.64 B 0.86 D 13 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Lane 0.28 A 0.28 A 0.20 A 0.20 A 14 Melrose Drive / Alga Road 0.43 A 0.43 A 0.45 A 0.45 A 15 Palomar Airport Rd. / Camino Vida Roble 0.55 A 0.57 A 0.64 B 0.65 B 16 Palomar Airport Rd. / Bressi North Access Future 17 Palomar Airport Rd. / El Fuerte Street 0.68 C 0.79 C 0.61 B 0.84 D 18 Palomar Airport Rd. / Business Park Drive 0.75 C 0.80 C 0.80 C 0.86 D 19 West San Marcos Blvd. / Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 0.84 D 0.94 E 0.87 D 0.89 D 20 West San Marcos Blvd. / Grand Ave. 0.62 6 0.63 B 0.77 C 0.77 C 21 Business Park Dr. / Poinsettia Ave. 0.56 A 0.82 D 0.73 C 0.89 D 22 Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S Access / Paseo Valindo 0.87 D 0.90 0.86 D 1.03 F® 1198-TAB5-2C.wpd/C[3-K Notes: ® = LOS "C" with full frontage improvements. ® = LOS "B" with full frontage inqjrovements. 001198 5-12 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 6.0 SHORT-TERM FUTURE PRIOR TO YEAR 2005 The possible traffic impacts from a combination ofthe Carlsbad Raceway and the adjacent Palomar Forum projects being developed without the construction of missing segments of Melrose Drive and Faraday Avenue, have been evaluated using the results of the modified SANDAG Cities/County 2005 Traffic Forecast, City of Carlsbad. The SANDAG /Carlsbad Year 2005 Regional Traffic Model assumes the completion of Melrose Drive, Faraday Avenue between El Fuerte Street and Melrose Drive, and Poinsettia Lane between El Camino Real and Melrose Drive. This fraffic model also assumes development of not yet approved but pending projects having access to these roadways. The Year 2005 traffic model was modified to approximate a short-term fiiture scenario by deleting segments of Faraday Avenue, Melrose Drive, and Poinsettia Lane to refiect the existing network. The Year 2005 fraffic model land use files were modified to delete or reduce land use assumptions in Facilities Management Zone 16 and 17. However, the land use assumptions for the surrounding Cities of Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos and within the remaining areas of Carlsbad were not modified in the Year 2005 traffic model. The resulting modified Year 2005 traffic model therefore should approximate a "project plus existing plus background traffic" scenario that could occur prior to Year 2005. 001198 6-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 6.1 STREET SEGMENTS No street segments are projected to fail to meet the City' s Growth Management Program circulation performance standard. Table 6-1 shows street segment levels of service for segments of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road that would be most affected by development of both the Palomar Forum and Carlsbad Raceway projects. Figure 6-1 shows a comparison of average daily traffic volumes with the combined projects prior to Year 2005 with those expected in Year 2005. This assumes missing segments of Melrose Drive, Faraday Avenue, and Poinsettia Lane. As shown in this figure, the volumes prior to Year 2005 would be no less or only slightly over Year 2005 volume projections, except along Business Park Drive and Palomar Airport Road adjacent to the Palomar Forum project. However, these volumes would be expected to decrease once the Melrose Drive connection into Vista is completed. 6.2 INTERSECTIONS Figure 6-2 shows intersection peak hour volumes at key locations that would be most affected by the combined projects development prior to Year 2005 with no roadway improvements assumed. 001198 6-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report iUrban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 6-1 Prior to Year 2005 With Combined Projects Existing Street Segment Levels of Service Average Peak Daily Peak VHPL/ Location Classification Volume VPHPL CPL LOS £1 Camino Real Faraday Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 44,000 690 0.38 A Palomar Airport Rd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 39,000 635 0.35 A Palomar Airport Rd. Camino Vida Roble - El Camino Real 6PA 22,000 430 0.24 A El Camino Real - El Fuerte St. 6PA 58,000 890 0.49 A El Fuerte St. - Melrose Dr. 6PA 56,000 900 0.50 A Melrose Dr. - Business Park Dr. 6PA 53,000 750 0.42 A Business Park Dr. - Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 4PA 43,000 835 0.46 A Melrose Dr. Poinsettia Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 4PA 10,000 505 0.28 A Palomar Airport Rd. - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 16,000 430 0.24 A Legend 6PA = 6-lane primary arterial 4MA = 4-lane major arterial 4SA = 4-lane secondary arterial 4C = 4-lane collector 2C = 2-lane collector VPHPL = Vehicles per hour per lane CPL = Capacity per lane @ 1,800 VPH V/C = Volume to capacity ratio ll98-TAB6-lB.yipd/CD-K 001198 6-3 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Carlsbad Raceway Sc \ Palomar Forum LEGEND XX = Prior to Year 2(K)S Average Daily TrafBc (ADT) in Tliousands XX => Year 2005 Average DaityTrafBc (ADT) in Thousands FIGURE 6-1 Prior to Year 2005 Comparison of Average Daily Traffic Volumes CO-K l198-ng6-1B.dwg 001198 6-4 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 XXX/XXX =AM/PMPeakHoiir 10/105 ^590/565 ^^1470/915 ^25/120 nGURE6-2 NO SCALE Prior to Year 2005 AM / PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes No Melrose / No Faraday / No Poinsettia Lane CD-K 1198-ng6-2B.dwg 001198 6-5 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 Table 6-2 includes intersection peak hour levels of service at key locations that would be most affected by the combined projects. All locations evaluated are expected to be at acceptable levels of service except at the Business Park Drive/ Poinsettia Avenue intersection which is expected to be at level of service "E" in the PM peak with feasible mitigation. However, this level of service would be short lived and would be mitigated by the eventual extension of Melrose Drive across the Carlsbad/Vista City limits (see Year 2005 evaluation with Mehose Drive, Page 7-18, Table 7-2, #21). The Carlsbad Raceway project could possibly be developed with Poinsettia Avenue constructed through the project area as a cul-de-sac sfreet at the easterly end. Approximately 18 acres would have access only to/from Business Park Drive. Non-project through fraffic would not be diverted from Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia Avenue in this circumstance, so that the traffic volumes at the Business Park Drive / Poinsettia Avenue, Palomar Airport Road / Business Park Drive, and Palomar Airport Road / Melrose Drive intersections would be affected. Figure 6-3 shows peak hour volumes for this scenario. As shown in Table 6-3, these affected intersections are projected to operate acceptably under this scenario. Appendix C includes intersection level of service worksheets for this condition. 001198 6-6 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 6-2 Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service Prior to Year 2005 Location AM PM Location ICU LOS ICU 1 LOS El Camino Real / Faraday Avenue 0.73 C 0.68 B El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road 0.78 C 0.81 D Palomar Airport Rd. / El Fuerte Street 0.65 B 0.54 A Palomar Airport Rd. / Mehose Dr. 0.80 C 0.83 D Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S 0.64 B 0.77 C Palomar Airport Rd. / Busmess Park 0.71 C 0.64 B Business Park Dr. / Poinsettia Ave. 0.79 C 0.92 E® 1198-Tab6-2B.wpd/CD-K ® = Includes Mitigation: Add SB right Tum Only Lane; Re-stripe EB for Left / Left - Through Right Tum Only. 001198 6-7 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 ^125/165 5-345/1175 LEGEND XXX/XXX =AM/FMPeakHbnr 10/105 •415/320 •1645/1160 •25/120 HGURE6-3 Prior to Year 2005 AM / PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes No Melrose / No Faraday / No Poinsettia Lane Cul-De-Sac Altemative NO SCALE CD-K 1198-ng6-3B.d*g 001198 6-8 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fjna^Re^ort^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 6-3 Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service Prior to Year 2005 Cul-De-Sac Alternative Location AM PM Location ICU 1 LOS ICU LOS El Camino Real / Faraday Avenue 0.73 C 0.68 B El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road 0.78 c 0.81 D Palomar Airport Rd. / El Fuerte Street 0.65 B 0.54 A Palomar Airport Rd. / Melrose Dr. 0.72 C 0.75 C Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S 0.80 C 0.75 C Palomar Auport Rd. / Business Park 0.84 D 0.78 c Business Park Dr. / Poinsettia Ave. 0.70 B 0.90 D 1198-Tab6-3.wpd/CD-K 001198 6-9 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 7.0 SHORT-TERM FUTURE fVEAR 2005) CONDITIONS This section ofthe report evaluates roadway and intersection conditions assuming at least five years growth in traffic volumes including project traffic. For this evaluation, the Year 2005 traffic volumes were derived from the SANDAG Cities/County 2005 Traffic Forecast, City of Carlsbad, refined to account for approved projects. 7.1 STREET SEGMENTS (Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Lane) Year 2005 includes the completion of Melrose Drive between Faraday Avenue and Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane between Melrose Drive and El Camino Real, and Faraday Avenue between Melrose Drive and El Fuerte Street. Figure 7-1 shows Year 2005 average daily traffic volumes with project traffic included. Table 7-1 shows street segment levels of service predicted for Year 2005. As shovra, all segments evaluated comply with the Growth Management Plan level of service standard of LOS "D" or better during peak hours, so no significant project traffic impacts to street segments are expected in the short-term fiiture scenario. 001198 7-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Or. 14 170. 193 '22 .34 16 10 .8 t % % 40 .37 185' mdden I-VBBBT 1 Rd. 16 8^ .46 201 16^ 60 ^\\^8- 29 ITI I '12 r46T38 13 187 35 26 14. 35 23 21 12 20 23 23 Project 35 8 17 k13 ^16 iy k32 19, 57/ 36 17 29 127 LEGEND XXX=ADT (In nujusands) SOURCE SANDAG Citiea/Caaaly200S TRBupoftalioa FoKcast Ct^ of Carisbad, MandilS,2000 183 35 187 FIGURE 7-1 Year 2005 Average Daily Traffic Volumes with Poinsettia Lane / Melrose Drive CD-K 119B-n97-1.dwg 001198 7-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fuml^Re^or^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 7-1 Year 2005 With Project Street Segment Levels of Service Average Peak Daily Peak VHPL/ Location Classification Volume VPHPL CPL LOS £1 Camino Real College Blvd - Faraday Ave. 6PA 37,000 597 0.33 A Faraday Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 46,000 697 0.39 A Palomar Airport Rd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 36,000 691 0.38 A Camino Vida Roble - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 35,000 917 0.51 A Poinsettia Ln. - Aviara Pkwy ./Alga Rd. 6PA 41,000 1,023 0.57 A Palomar Airport Rd. College Blvd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 26,000 413 0.23 A Camino Vida Roble - El Camino Real 6PA 26,000 395 0.22 A El Camino Real - El Fuerte St. 6PA 60,000 832 0.46 A El Fuerte St. - Melrose Dr. 6PA 48,000 948 0.52 A Melrose Dr. - Business Park Dr. 6PA 33,000 610 0.34 A Business Park Dr. - Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 4PA 38,000 738 0.41 A San Marcos Blvd. Rancho Santa Fe Rd. - Las Posas Rd. 4MA 43,000 1,060 0.59 A Las Posas Rd. - Via Vera Cruz 4MA 27,000 1,060 0.59 A Via Vera Cruz - S. Bent Ave. 4MA 32,000 1,060 0.59 A S. Bent Ave. - (jirand Ave. 4MA 30,000 1,060 0.59 A Melrose Dr. Cannon Rd. - Shadowridge Dr. 6PA 35,000 803 0.45 A Shadowridge Dr. - Sycamore Ave. 6PA 39,000 810 0.45 A Sycamore Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 54,000 980 0.54 A Palomar airport Rd. - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 30,000 782 0.43 A Poinsettia Ln. - Alga Rd. 6PA 13,000 367 0.20 A Legend 8FWY = 8-lane freeway 6FWY = 6-lane freeway 6PA = 6-lane primary arterial 4MA = 4-lane major arterial 4SA = 4-lane secondary arterial 4C = 4-lane collector 2C = 2-lane collector VPHPL = Vehicles per hour per lane CPL = Capacity per lane @ 1,800 VPH V/C = Volume to capacity ratio 1198-TAB7-lA.wpd/CD-K 001198 7-3 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 7.2 INTERSECTIONS (Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Lane) Figure 7-2 shows project only directional distribution percentages for Year 2005. The assumed street configuration includes the completion of Melrose Drive between Faraday Avenue and Palomar Airport Road, and Poinsettia Lane between Melrose Drive and El Camino Real, and Faraday Avenue between Melrose Drive and El Fuerte Street. Figures 7-3 and 7-4 show Year 2005 AM and PM peak hour project only traffic volumes at study area intersections impacted by twenty percent of project traffic, and at CMP study area intersections. Figures 7-5 and 7-6 show AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with project fraffic and Year 2005 background traffic as included in the traffic forecast. Table 7-2 shows intersection peak hour levels of service with and without project fraffic. As shown, all intersections evaluated are expected to operate within the Growth Management Plan criteria of LOS "D" or better during peak hours with project traffic added, and with expected improvements, listed below, at intersections so no significant uiunitigated project fraffic impacts are expected. LOCATION #1 El Camino Real/College Boulevard IMPROVEMENT Add Northbound RTO Lane Add East Leg RESPONSIBILITY Sunny Creek Sunny Creek #4 El Camino Real/Bressi West Access Add East Leg Add Northbound Through Lane Add Northbound RTO Lane LFMP Zone 17 LFMP Zone 17 LFMP Zone 17 #5 El Camino Real/Camino Vida Roble Add East Leg Add Northbound Through Lane Add Northbound RTO Lane Add Eastbound RTO Lane LFMP Zone 10 LFMP Zone 10 LFMP Zone 10 T.I.F. Project 001198 7-4 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 XX7a = Project Only IKstribulum SAND AG Oties/Couaty 2020 TrBmpoctation Vonaxt, City of Carisbad-^27-99) Select Zone AoigniDeBt, TAZ 772 nGURE7-2 Year 2005 Project Only Directional Distribution Percentages CD-K ll9a-Rg7-2A.dwg 001198 7-5 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Pags 1 of 3 © 1 in .1 n College BbiiL © . Si as 1 \l Faraday Ave. © . li ^,0 Palomar Airpart SiL El Camim College I t CO } Real at loulevard El Camini Faraday tn to 3 Real at Avsnue Palomar Airp El Cami r o rv tort Road at no Real © 1 i " Breeei Acccn Weet © OS 2 J » ft) Camino Vida Roble t Q (O >al at Roble © El Camino Beal Poinsettia Ln. El Camin BroBSl Act \ O D Real at Bsss West El Camino Rc Camino Vida t Q (O >al at Roble 50 • El Camin Poinset \ O tn 0 Real at tia Lans © o in i Cdmunt Rd. IMelrose Drivs at Cannon Road o rv i Shadowridge Br. l4eirose Drive at Shadowridge Drive nGURE7-3 Year 2005 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119B-FIg7-3-1.dwg 001198 7-6 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © o o i ^ iT 5 Sycamore Ave. © m m i 1 Foraday Ave. © in 0 lO CM '- ^20 ^20 Pobnsettta Ave. Melrose Sycamon \r m Drive at 3 Avenue Melrose Faraday m m cs Drive at Avenue 5 • s 10 >^ 1 Melrose Poinsetti 00 m 00 Drive at a Avenue © m m -'i 135-/ ^ 135^^ 1 Palomar Airp Melros Ailomnr Airport Bd. \r mm tort Road at B Drivs © m ^i 1 Poinnttia £n. © 0 ^ *~ ft 1 1 AXya Rd. © m m -'i 135-/ ^ 135^^ 1 Palomar Airp Melros Ailomnr Airport Bd. \r mm tort Road at B Drivs 35-/ Meiross Poinset t m m Drive at tia Lane Melrose Alga t 0 m Drive at Road 45' Palomar Aiarpixrt Bd. Palomar Airport Road at Camino Vida Robie 190- 25 Palomar Airport Rd. Paiomar Airport Road at Loicer Ave. / Bressi Rsnch Access nGURE7-3 Year 2005 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119B-Fig7-3-2.dwg 001198 7-7 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 ® m ^ T ^ K^3 ^25 Palamar Airport Rd ® \ a. 8 2 1 V K.100 100 Palomar Airport Rd © o "= m £ 1 to M 105 W. San Uareos Blvd. 185 —• Palomar Air|: El Fuert r o tort Road at B Street ® \ a. 8 2 1 V K.100 100 Palomar Airport Rd 10—• -5 West San Marc Rancho San O OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road 185 —• Palomar Air|: El Fuert r o tort Road at B Street Palomar Airp Business 1 lort Road at ^ark Drive 10—• -5 West San Marc Rancho San O OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road ® Grand Ave. ^4 50 W. San Uanstaa Btad, © * in « CM s »- a. -'I Amsettia Ave. © , o o 1 CM • 8 . ^100 Palomar Airport iid. West San Marc Grand OB Boulevard at Avenue Is— Business Pi Poinsetti ^ o o irk Drive at a Avenue 180 -/ Palomar Airf Palomar Forum >ort Road at South Access FIGURE 7-3 Year 2005 Project Only AM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) .CD-K 119a-Fig7-3-3.dwg 001198 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 as O 3 m g i^ CoVUge Bbid. © El Camino Real Farad/ay Ave. © . d ag H^70 -•—50 ^70 Palomar Airport Bd. El Camint College E 1 o 3 Real at loulevard El Camint Faraday ooo (N in X- 1 Real at Avenue Palomar Airp Ei Cami f Q CM tort Road at no Real © El Camino Baal Breeei Acceee Weet © 1 as 1^ 1 i I Camino Vida RobU \ o CM lai at Roble © -*— 60 El Camino Beal Poincettia Ln. El Camin Bressi Ac \ o CM 0 Real at Bess West Ei Camino Rc Camino Vida \ o CM lai at Roble El Camin Poinset \ O 0 Real at tia Lane © m i Cannon Rd. o m Melrose Drive at Cannon Road o CM i Shadxnuriid^e Br. o Melrose Drive at Shadowridge Drive nGURE7-4 Year 2005 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119a-ng7-4-1A.dwg 001198 7-9 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 i Syeamore Ave. o m o Meiross Drive at Sycamore Avenue m ^ .: i Faradau Ave. o o o ^ Melrose Drive at Faraday Avenue © m m V J ^ I 20 5 • 5 50 I V, 80 5 175 Potaucttia Ave. om Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Avenue o tn m J\ 35-/ 35—*' 130 ^45 Palamar Airport RtL mm t mm => ^\ 1 oo 15. Poinsettia in. AlgaBd. m tn i t m t Paiomar Airport Road at Melrose Drive Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Lane Melrose Drive at Alga Road 10' • 45 Palomar Airport Rd. Palomar Airport Road at Camino Vida RoUe 45- 190 Palomar Airport RiL Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Bressi Ranch Access FIGURE 7-4 Year 2005 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 119a-ng7-4-2.dwg 001198 7-10 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © 0] m a VI V.35 -•—190 ^35 Palomar Airport Rd. ® 1 S ° 1 2 1 \. V.25 25 Palomar Ai>7iort Bd. ® m " to -4—25 W. San Uarcos Blvd. 55—*" Paiomar Airp B Fuert r m tort Road at B Street ® 1 S ° 1 2 1 \. V.25 25 Palomar Ai>7iort Bd. 50> 1 100—1 West San Marc Rancho San ^ m OS Boulevard at ita Fe Road 55—*" Paiomar Airp B Fuert r m tort Road at B Street 100 • Palomar Airp Business 1 tort Road at ^ark Drhre 50> 1 100—1 West San Marc Rancho San ^ m OS Boulevard at ita Fe Road ® Grand Ave. W. San Uarcos Bbid. © . o 1 tn a, J 1 -4— 25 Poneettta Ave. @ m o 1 rv o £ ^'vJl ^ti Palomar Aii^Hirt RiL West San Marc Grand OS Boulevard at Avenue 120-/ 100—^ 100-^ Businsss PI Poinsetti m CM irk Drive at B Avenue 45 Paiomar Alr| Palomar Forum lort Road at South Accesa nGURE7-4 Year 2005 Project Only PM Peak Hour Volumes (20% of Project & CMP Intersections) CD-K 1198-ng7-4-3.dwg 001198 7-11 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fina^e^or^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 m K lO o g JiivvS CoUege Bbid 35 ^^45 1^65 © a o ^ (O o S — CM .| 5^ "^60 Faraday Ave. © a O S O O Nl . \n •^ -- % K) <o •>- •! ^Uivvs ^^985 -•—760 j^565 Palomar Airport Rd. 210^ 135 Ei Camint College E ooo ^ CM ^ CM to } Real at toulsvard 65:^ 5^^ 400-^ El Caminc Faraday o m CO o ^ o 1 Real at Avenue 145^^ 510^^ 60 Paiomar Airp El Cami mmm rv o m -- CO ort Road at no Real © . a tt as o m o g CM m (fl •? CM tv. CM 1 vuiv« K.365 ^360 Breemi Aeeeaa Wmat © '5 o S o m a Camim Vida Jio6le 5 -^>-5 © 8 tt mm CD «- g \n — 1 .-iii^S 285 ^^10 j^430 Poineettia Ln. 75> eo-^- 35 El Camint Bressi Ac< m m o 00 Ol Oi m CM 3 Real at ;ess West 115-^ 135^^ El Camim Camino V o m m 03 m ••-tv Gl i Real at Ida Robie 95:^ 40^^ Ei Camini Poinsett O O o >- oo tn rv CM 3 Real at Ha Lane © o m oo m UJ I- ro Cannon Rd. © m o m CM O) 24i^ 325 -^^15 ^255 .SAodoiorid^e Dr. 220-^ ^ 25—• s 480^ 1 Melrose Canno m m 00 ta Drive at n Road ,o> . 125 ^•-4 310 1 Melrose Shadowri m o CM in Drive at dge Drive nGURE7-5 Year 2005 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CD-K 119a-ng7-5-1.dwg 001198 7-12 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fina^Re^ort^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 2 of 3 ©o .-iiVi i 5^125 15 /^375 Sycamore Ave. ® o tn «o o ^ Mli"^ 1 80 -^385 Faraday Ave. © o 00 o o rv CM »- CM 70 -^-5 ^125 PtrfneetWo Ave. 20-/ 35-^ 30 Melrose Sycamor o o tn CJl CJl Drive at > Avenue 570-/ 140 >^ 145 Melrose Faraday m m Ol Ol to Drive at Avenue 10 1 Melrose Poinsettii \\\\r ooo m CM CN Drive at 1 Avenue ® m CM o ro CO O m CM ,^90 ^1540 /^50 Paiomar Airpart Rd. ® m s'iii^l 5 "^"45 PtrinsetKa ht. © m o i: CM m p A^a Bd. 20 .^.20 ^20 940^ * ^ tt 645 1 55=^ ^ Palomar Airp Meirosi ^\\\ r o m o 03 o) rv — N oo ort Road at 1 Drive 1410"/ Melrosa Poinsetl o o to o Ol Drive at ja Lane 275—^ 5"^^ 425-3 Melrosa Alga in m rv rv Drive at Road ® 1 a; ooo 1 '•-moo s ^iVj 180 -< 335 7=70 Paiomar Airpori Bd, ® . m s V-20 M 2160 ..palamar Airport BiL 10'-/^ 520—^ 285 Patomar Ain Camino V m o tn CM CM tort Road at Ida Robie 8 2195 • 1 300-^ 1 1 Patomar Airi Loker Ave. / Brei r o to tort Road at isi Ranch Access FIGURE 7-5 Year 2005 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CO-L 119B-RB7-5-2B.di»g 001198 7-13 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 3 of 3 ® o m m-r- o _ oim r ^205 1995 /^355 Palomar Airport BiL ® ^ m 1 om-r- 5 <OCM CM * ^835 1380 Paiomar AiiTtort Rd. ® o m -i rv m a; oo CM , -/ ^ 800^ 1 845—*• 100^ West San Maro Rancho San 95 "^^955 ^445 Jr W. San Uareos BlviL ooo IO CO o O) (D DS Boulevard at ita Fe Road > 650 ^ 1525^^ 65-^ Patomar Airj: a Fuert O O o> rv oo tort Road at B Street 235^ 1350^^^ 25^ Paiomar Air] Bushiess 1 o O m m ort Road at 'ark Drive ® o m -i rv m a; oo CM , -/ ^ 800^ 1 845—*• 100^ West San Maro Rancho San 95 "^^955 ^445 Jr W. San Uareos BlviL ooo IO CO o O) (D DS Boulevard at ita Fe Road © mo -5 mo « 400 W. Son UareoM Bbid. ® ^ mo -^ m 8 100 "•3^155 ^120 Ponueffia Avew © 1 o *i 8 m- m i4 ^ ll 235 1340 Palomar Airport Bd. 25-/ 195 West San Marci Grand i o o m ro m IS Boutovard at Avenue 75 > 40 • Businees Pi Poinsettii ooo O -"I- to CD CM iric Drive at 1 Avenue 375-/ 1 1150^^ 1 -0^ j Patomv Aiq Patomar Forum i Paseo m o CTl — KMt Road at South Access / VaHndo FIGURE 7-5 Year 2005 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CO-L 1198-Rg7-5-3A.dwg 001198 7-14 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 o m CO CN O 9 CM CD m J CoUege Bbid. 15 ^^10 © . a tt 0 as CD g 01 m 1 .-iii^! 15 ^115 Faraday Ave. © . m a 0 0 (O |3 0 CO 0 ^ -'iiivvi •fl ^995 ^^495 ^485 Palomar Airport Rd. 845;:^ 50^^ 200 Ei Camint CoHege E m mm o IO m ) Real at loulevard 70:^ 40 ii^^ 805-^ B Caminc Faraday in 0 -- 00 10 1 Real at Avenue 320^ 900 160 Palomar Airp El Camii 000 0 Nl CJl to CM ort Road at no Real © . "3 tt ? o g m o rv -g Ol ~ ^ 1 V|j|V= K.350 45 ^385 Breeai Aeeeem Weet © 0 1 to ^ 1 §4iiv 1 Camino Tula Rohle 10 © m • 00 m ^ Nl 0 --CM 1 fi-iii^5 55 '^'75 ^1345 PtnriMettia Ln. 215-/ 70-«i^ 160 El Camini Breeei Aci o o m m (D o a Real at seee West 155-^ 515-^ El Camim Camino V 00m •* m > Real at da Roble 25:^ 25^^ El Camini Poinset m mo m CM m 3 Real at tia Lane © m m -* CD fo m CM -'iii^ ^ 85 50 1^105 Cannon RiL © §0 Nl r^ 370 -^-165 ^115 Shadowridge Br. > 120^ ^ 20 • 8 335-^ 1 Melrose Canno 0 m 0 •* DO Drive at n Road ,0> . 25.^ i 40 1 Meiross Shadowr 0 m 0 00 Kl rv Drive at dge Drive nGURE7-6 Year 2005 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CD-K 1198-FIg7-6-1.dwg 001198 7-15 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 2 of 3 CM m O CN t ^ CM 4 |>-385 -<^25 /^350 5Voamore Ave. ® o m m ^ 1 395 -^285 "^435 Faraday A'oe. ® o -* rv m 120 -^i*5 y^305 Poineettia Ave^ 50> 35-^ 45 Melrose Sycamori m m to Ol cn Drive at 9 Avenue 855-/ 140-^ 60 Melrose Faraday m m •* CM fO Drive at Avenue 10-^ ! 55 1 Melrose Poinsettfa moo CO CN Drive at 1 Avenue ® o o oo O -r- O 00 1- r*. Jb35 -< 890 /^905 PaZomar A^it^ort RtL ® o CN NiiM 5 "*^15 ^10 Fonwetfte Im. ® m oo o i: m Nl 5 l^li^l Alga Bd. 5 .^10 8ior^ ^ 820 y 1 160^^ * Palomar AIrp Melrosi ^^^^^ r o m m oo m rv ort Road at » Drive 430-/ 65 "-\ Meiross Poinsetl tn m •r- OO CM Drive at te Lane 190-/ 25-rt^ 285-^ IMeb-ose Alga o o cn K) CM Drive at Road ® 5 m a ooo a OICOCM S ^ivj 60 -»^535 "^20 Patomxtr Airport Rd.. ® . 9 CM % J ' V.,0 ^^1740 Paiomar Airport iid. 395— 110 Palomar Airj Camino V o m o> •«*• CM )ort Road at Ma Robie • 1895 • 5 365-^ 1 1 Palomar Airf Loker Ave. / Brei f o CM Nl lort Road at ssi Ranch Access FIGURE 7-6 Year 2005 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CO-t 1198Rg7-6-2B.dwg 001198 7-16 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 3 of 3 ® oo m ti moi m IVIV (N 5 ^40 -j 1370 /^330 r Paiomar Airport Rd. ® { 8 1 o m * Nl m ig K.290 1455 ^ 120 Paiomar Airport iidl ® mo -d oo m O at ul Ol — a -'li^l -/ 1 605^ 1 700 340^ West San Marci Rancho San 135 "^"iioo •-885 ir IT. Sm Uaroo* Blvd. ooo to Nl r- DS Boulevard at ita Fe Road > 500 ^ 1490 • 220-^* Palomar Airp Ei Fuert o m CM <o Nl CM ort Road at B Street 95:^^ 1540^^ 150-^ Palomar Airi Business i m m IV CM ort Road at 'ark Drive ® mo -d oo m O at ul Ol — a -'li^l -/ 1 605^ 1 700 340^ West San Marci Rancho San 135 "^"iioo •-885 ir IT. Sm Uaroo* Blvd. ooo to Nl r- DS Boulevard at ita Fe Road o ^ mo -CJl rv g 150 ^65 tr W. San Uarcos Bbid. ® * 1 CM oo , m » 150 "•^130 P^275 PowteetMa Ave^ @ 1 ° ii 270 1445 "^145 Palomar Airport Rd. ,5-/ 1290^^ 265 West San Marci Grand i mmm oo -«*• ••- CN CM IS Boutovard at Avenue 170^ 145 100-^ Business Ps Poinsettii moo Nl O Nl Nl CM irk Drive at 1 Avenue 885^^ s 105->^ 1 Palomar Airp Palomar Forum I Paseo o m CM tort Road at touth Access / VaOndo FIGURE 7-6 Year 2005 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CO-L 1198-ng7-6-3A.dwg 001198 7-17 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 7-2 Year 2005 Forecast (With Poinsettia Lane / Melrose Drive) Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service # Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour # Intersection Without With Without With # Intersection ICU 1 LOS ICU 1 LOS ICU 1 LOS ICU LOS 1 El Camino Real / College Boulevard (a) 0.71 C 0.72 C 0.60 A 0.61 B 2 El Camino Real / Faraday Avenue 0.77 c 0.77 c 0.58 A 0.59 A 3 El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road 0.81 D 0.85 D 0.79 D 0.82 D 4 EI Camino Real / Bressi West Access (b) 0.75 C 0.77 C 0.64 B 0.65 B 5 Ei Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble (c) 0.87 D 0.87 D 0.58 A 0.60 A 6 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Lane 0.65 B 0.65 B 0.69 B 0.70 B 7 Melrose Drive / Cannon Road 0.52 A 0.53 A 0.54 A 0.54 A 8 Melrose Drive / Shadowridge Drive 0.87 D 0.88 D 0.64 B 0.65 B 9 Melrose Drive / Sycamore Avenue (d) 0.88 D 0.88 D 0.76 C 0.80 C 10 Melrose Drive / Faraday Avenue (e) 0.72 C 0.74 C 0.76 C 0.78 C 11 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue 0.54 A 0.66 B 0.46 A 0.61 B 12 Melrose Drive / Palomar Airport Rd. (f) 0.84 D 0.89 D 0.68 B 0.73 C 13 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Lane 0.65 B 0.67 B 0.75 C 0.78 C 14 Melrose Drive / Alga Road 0.50 A 0.50 A 0.74 C 0.74 C 15 Palomar Airport Rd. / Camino Vida Roble 0.42 A 0.42 A 0.32 A 0.33 A 16 Palomar Airport Rd. / Bressi North Access NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 17 Palomar Airport Rd / El Fuerte Street (g) 0.84 D 0.86 D 0.76 C 0.78 C 18 Palomar Airport Rd. / Business Park Drive (h) 0.61 B 0.66 B 0.56 A 0.60 A 19 West San Marcos Blvd. / Rancho Santa Fe Rd. (i) 0.73 C 0.78 C 0.79 C 0.83 D 20 West San Marcos Blvd. / Grand Ave. 0.55 A 0.56 A 0.85 D 0.86 D 21 Business Park Dr. / Poinsettia Ave. 0.36 A 0.41 A 0.39 A 0.47 A 22 Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S Access / Paseo Valindo 0.55 A 0.66 B 0.58 A 0.60 A 1198-TAB7-2A.wpd/CD-K Notes: (a) Add east leg by adjacent project. (b) Add third northbound lane by adjacent project. (c) Add northbound right tum only lane, add east leg by adjacent project. (d) Add northbound right tum only lane. (City of Vista) (e) Add eastbound left tum lane and westbound through/right tum lane. (City of Vista) (f) Add southboimd and northbound rigjit tum only lane, add north leg, add westbound right tum only lane. (g) Add southboimd through lane, ultimate south leg by adjacent project. (h) Add westbound third through lane. (i) With mitigation as shown in San Elijo Trafl5c Study, July 14, 1999. Add westbound right tum only lane, add southboimd right tum only lane. 001198 7-18 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 LOCATION IMPROVEMENT RESPONSIBILITY tti El Camino Real/ College Boulevard Add Southbound Left Tum Lane Add Northbound Through Lane Add Northbound Right Tum Only Lane Add Westbound Dual Left Tum Lanes Add Westbound Through, Through/Right Tum Lanes Add Eastbound Through, Through/Right Tum Lanes Sunny Creek #4 El Camino Real/ Bressi Access West Add Northbound Through Lane Add Northbound Right Tum Lane Add Westbound Left Tum Lane Add Westbound Through/Right Tum Lane Bressi Ranch #5 EI Camino Real/ Camino Vida Roble Add Northbound Through Lane Add Northbound Right Tum Lane Add Westbound Left Turn Lane Add Westbound Through/Right Tum Lane Restripe Eastbound Central Lane for Left/Through/Right LFMP Zone 10 LFMP Zone 10 LFMP Zone 10 LFMP Zone 10 LFMP Zone 10 #6 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Lane Add New Intersection Bridge and Thoroughfare District, LFMP Zone 10 #9 Melrose Drive/ Sycamore Avenue Add Northbound RTO Lane City of Vista #10 Melrose Drive/ Faraday Avenue Restripe for Eastbound Dual Left Tum Lanes, Through/Right Lane Add Westbound Through/Right Lane City of Vista City of Vista #12 Palomar Airport Road/ Add North Leg LFMP Zone 18 Melrose Drive Add Westbound RTO Lane Add Eastbound Dual Left Add Northbound RTO Lane LFMP Zone 18 LFMP Zone 18 T.I.F. Project #16 Palomar Airport Road/ Bressi Ranch Access Add Eastbound RTO Lane LFMP Zone 17 #17 Paiomar Airport Road/ Add Eastbound RTO Lane LFMP Zone 17 El Fuerte Street Add Southbound Through/RT Lane Add Westbound Dual Left Tum Lane Add South Leg LFMP Zone 17 LFMP Zone 17 LFMP Zone 17 001198 7-19 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 LOCATION IMPROVEMENT RESPONSIBILITY #19 West San Marcos Boulevard/ Rancho Santa Fe Road Add Westbound RTO Lane Add Southbound RTO Lane City of San Marcos City of San Marcos #22 Palomar Airport Road/ Palomar Forum South Access Add Southbound Left Tum, Through/Right Lanes LFMP Zone 18 Add Eastbound Left Tum Lane LFMP Zone 18 Add Westbound Through Lane, Right Tum Lane LFMP Zone 18 Figure 7-7 shows intersection lane configuration assumptions for Year 2005 with mitigation as needed. Project mitigation includes participation in the construction of Melrose Drive and Faraday Avenue. Appendix D includes intersection peak hour LOS worksheets for Year 2005 conditions. 001198 7-20 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © 1 * 1 Free • • • • E RightJ \ \\^^ College Blvd. ^ ) © , tt r faradav Ave. © , Qt a; V EI Caminc College E * 3 Real at loulevard Exis Ei Caminc Faraday tmg 1 Real at Avenue Paiomar Airp El Cam] patomar .ilirport iid tort Road at no Real © 1 O s^Brean Acceaa Weet Camino Cida RobU ^ © , * * g ^ Poinsettia £n. El Caminc Bressi Ae< ) Real at :ess West Ei Caminc Camino V t Real at da Roble El Camini Poinsett * > Real at ia Lane ^Mitigation Responsibility A ^-A^'acent Project B Bridge &Thcnou^i£ne District P = Project Mitigation T = City-Wide TraflSc Intact Fee © vilivv ^ Cannon iZcL © ^ Shn.dQvrridjge Dr. ^Mitigation Responsibility A ^-A^'acent Project B Bridge &Thcnou^i£ne District P = Project Mitigation T = City-Wide TraflSc Intact Fee —^ =" u (Exva Melrose Cannon Drive at Road 1 Melrose Shadowri) ^^^^ Drive at dge Drive FIGURE 7-7 Year 2005 Intersection Lane Configmations (With Poinsettia Lane/Melrose Drive) With Mitigation As Needed CO-K n98-Fiq7-7-1B.dwg 001198 7-21 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © i: r ^ Sycamore Ave. © -^livl r ^ Faraday Ave. © Melrose Sycamor * * Drive at 9 Avenue * ^ Melrose Faraday Drive at Avenue ^^^^ ^ft SI ca 1 Melrose Poinsettii Drive at 1 Avenue © ***** ^* ^Palomar Airpart Rd © r <^ Poinsettia Ln. © Algra RiL r r Paiomar Airp Melros * >ort Road at 9 Drive (Exis Melrose Poinsetl ting) Drive at tia Lane (Exxt Melrose Alga Drive at Road ^Mitigation Responsibility A =A4'acent Project B =Biid^&Thoroag|ifiie District P = Project Mhigatioa T = City-Wide TrafHc Impact Fee V = City of Vista © i •a palomar Airport Rd. © . •r >• « J ' Palomar Airport lid. ^Mitigation Responsibility A =A4'acent Project B =Biid^&Thoroag|ifiie District P = Project Mhigatioa T = City-Wide TrafHc Impact Fee V = City of Vista (Exit Palomar Airj Camino \ sting) )ort Road at Ida Robie « Palomar Alri Loker Ave. / Bre r * jort Road at ssi Rancli Access nOURE 7-7 Year 2005 Intersection Lane Configurations (With Poinsettia Lane/Mehrose Drive) With Mitigation As Needed CO-K H98-F;g7-7-2B.dwg 001198 7-22 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © * 1 ^Paiomar Airport iid. © * 1 S u VIVV^ PtUamar Airpori Rd. ©^ * : Ti IF ^V. 5an Uarcos BlvtL Palomar Airp EI Fuert **** ® lort Road at e Street Palomar Air| Business 1 ) ort Road at 'ark Drive :^ ^ a; West San Marc Rancho San ^^^^/l„ OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road @ ^VV^ ? V. San Uaretis Bbid. © « Poinssttia Ave. ^ * .Polomor Airport fid. (Exis West San Marci Grand i ting) )S Boulevard at Avenue oJ "> Business Pe Poinsettii irk Drive at I Avenue CD ^ Paiomar Airp Paiomar Forum ort Road at South Access ^Mitigation Responsibility A -A^acent Project B Bridge&T1ioioi]i^]&re District P = Project Mtigatian T =Cily-WuieTiafl5c Impact Fee V =a^cf Vista SM City of Saa Marcos FIGURE 7-7 Year 2005 Intersection Lane Configurations (With Poinsettia Lane/Mehrose Mve) With Mitigation As Needed CO-K 1198-Fig7-7-3B.dwg 001198 7-23 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 8.0 YEAR 2010 CONDITIONS Figure 8-1 shows average daily traffic volumes for Year 2010. Previously, the Carlsbad Raceway Industrial Park project traffic, at Year 2005, was evaluated and assumed to be built out, and background traffic from other projects and regional growth was shown to be accommodated on the mitigated street network assumed for Year 2005. Therefore, the project's participation in ultimate roadway improvements to Melrose Drive and Faraday Avenue to accommodate Year 2020 traffic and payment of City-wide Traffic Impact Fees for fimding future transportation improvements should be considered as the project's fair share toward mitigating traffic impacts expected to occur between Year 2005 and 2020. The project only improvements include the participation in the construction of Melrose Drive north of Palomar Airport Road along the project's westerly property line, the construction of Poinsettia Avenue east-west through the project, and a southerly connection to the adjacent Palomar Forum project. 001198 8-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Fina^e£ot^^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Hr. 170. 210 12 21 f .24 131 i18 8, 34 .16 '12 201 0 T~ addon VaUey 16 14 14 34 16 .43 28 19- 23 '12 54 41 145X44 30"^^ 30 29/ 32 34 13 .12 204 16 35 v38 18 22 23 26\ ^Project 13 35 43 19 16 i/ 24> 12 29^ 20V 49/ 31 15 10> LEGEND XXX=ADT (b Tliansands) SOURCE SANDAG atiea/Comily2010 Tnnqmtatuin FofBcaat of Carisbad, >^S,2000 34 40 204 28 '43 HGURE8-1 Year 2010 Average Daily Traffic Volumes CO-K 119B-ngB-1C.dwg 001198 8-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 9.0 BUILDOUT (YEAR 2020) CONDITIONS The SANDAG Cities/County 2020 Transportation Forecast City of Carlsbad Altemative 5 (8-23-99) was used to determine Year 2020 (build out assumed in the City of Carlsbad) traffic volumes. 9.1 STREET SEGMENTS Figure 9-1 shows Year 2020 average daily traffic volumes for study area street segments. Table 9-1 shows street segment levels of service for Year 2020. As shown, all segments evaluated are expected to meet the Growth Management Plan criteria of level of service "D" or better during peak hours, so no significant unmitigated project traffic impacts are expected in Year 2020. 9.2 INTERSECTIONS Figures 9-2 and 9-3 show the AM and PM peak hour volumes, at study area intersections, expected in Year 2020 and at build out for the City of Carlsbad. Table 9-2 shows intersection levels of service. As shown all evaluated intersections within the City of Carlsbad are expected to operate at level of service "D" or better during peak hours as required by the City's Growth Management Plan, so that no significant unmitigated project traffic impacts are expected. 001198 9-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 18 i38 15 Dr. r39 17 V 30 133 .24 24 14 44 21 f22 6 29 41 39 36 54 27 51. 31 20. r%19 fo 248' ^20 34 28 Hidden r-Valloy 17 66 29. 242^ 33 ^ 28 20 43] 44 14 Ai \ 4li 47 -13 64 -10\27 13 f48 14^ 11 19. .47 19 \ 24 32^ (41 39> 39 247' /60 36 17 10 143 LEGEND XX ^ADTCIallioiuands) SOURCE SANDAQ CitieB/Coimty 2Q20 TrsmpottBliQaFoieoaa^ City of Cailabad - Altemative 5,8/23/99 .247 44 48 39 55 FIGURE 9-1 Buildout (Year 2020) Average Daily Traffic Volumes \ (City Altemative) CD-K 119a-ng9-1A.d*g 001198 9-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 9-1 Year 2020 (Alternative#5) Street Segment Levels of Service With Project Average Peak Daily Peak VHPL/ Location Classification Volume VPHPL CPL LOS ' - . ' EI Camino Real College Blvd - Faraday Ave. 6PA 54,000 977 0.54 A Faraday Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 49,000 845 0.47 A Palomar Airport Rd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 44,000 795 0.44 A Camino Vida Roble - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 50,000 903 0.50 C Poinsettia Ln. - Aviara Pkwy ./Alga Rd. 6PA 47,000 865 0.48 C Palomar Airport Rd. College Blvd. - Camino Vida Roble 6PA 33,000 513 0.29 A Camino Vida Roble - El Camino Real 6PA 29,000 528 0.29 A El Camino Real - El Fuerte St. 6PA 66,000 770 0.43 A El Fuerte St. - Melrose Dr. 6PA 61,000 932 0.52 A Melrose Dr. - Business Park Dr. 6PA 41,000 675 0.38 A Business Park Dr. - Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 4PA 47,000 875 0.73 C San Marcos Blvd. Rancho Santa Fe Rd. - Las Posas Rd. 4MA 64,000 1,200 0.67 B Las Posas Rd. - Via Vera Cruz 4MA 43,000 1,200 0.67 B Via Vera Cruz - S. Bent Ave. 4MA 49,000 1,200 0.67 B S. Bent Ave. - Grand Ave. 4MA 48,000 1,200 0.67 B Melrose Dr. Cannon Rd. - Shadowridge Dr. 6PA 45,000 893 0.50 A Shadowridge Dr. - Sycamore Ave. 6PA 39,000 1,022 0.57 A Sycamore Ave. - Palomar Airport Rd. 6PA 51,000 948 0.53 A Palomar airport Rd. - Poinsettia Ln. 6PA 27,000 838 0.47 A Poinsettia Ln. - Alga Rd. 6PA 17,000 615 0.34 A '. - ' --. ^ 1 Legend SFWY = 8-lane freeway 6FWY = 6-lane freeway 6PA = 6-lane primary arterial 4MA = 4-lane major arterial 4SA= 4-lane secondary arterial 4C = 4-lane collector 2C = 2-lane collector VPHPL = Vehicles per hour per lane CPL = Capacity per lane @ 1,800 VPH V/C = Volume to capacity ratio 1198-TAB9-JE.ivpc!/CD-K 001198 9-3 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © . o € mm 04 o o g OJ 00 -S ColUge BbiiL 25 ^1595 j^730 © a mo 5 mo g ^355 ^^530 ^85 Faraday Ave. © a a a; moo 00 00 S -* 1^ 1^ -2 yjUVVf r ^970 -^—890 jp590 palomar .iirpori Bd. 215^^ 305^^ 170 El CanwK College E o in in m o> o •.- Ol ID ) Real at loulevard 60-/ 90^^ 360-^ El Caminc Faraday o m m oo 1 Real at Avenue 190^ 690^^^ 100^*" Palomar Airp El Cami 0 o m CO oo o 01 « ort Road at no Real © . a • in o 5 Ol o 1^ -g Ol ^ 1 ^111 v= 300 -^»-25 ^ 145 Brem^ Acceee Went © a o 5 OJ o CD tn g i4\^ \ Cttmifw nda JZoble 25 <^1^15 © « o 280 '^*180 j^370 jPoinaetiia Xn. 110-/ 50^^ 40 Ei Camint Bressi Aci o in o to m m Ol Ol 3 Real at :ess West 135::^ lOi^^ 155 B Camini Camino V 0 m m 1- O Kl 01 OJ OJ ) Real at ida Robie 300^ 320^^ 80 Ei Camini Poinaat mmm to ol oo 00 CO a Real at tia Lane © o o OJ o m C3 m Ol 1- ^Z390 j^305 Cwnmm Rd. © m in m in Ol Ol ^355 ^290 Shadaurhdige Br. 430—t 505-^ 1 Melrose Canno m o m o Drive at n Road 100-/ . 160-^1^4 250 1 Melrose Slwdowri 0 m 01 m Ol Drive at dge Drive nOURE 9-2 BuHdout (Year 2020) + Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Alternative 5 CD-K 119a-ng9-2-1A.dwg 001198 9-4 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway FinaLRe^or^^^^ ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © m o m IV r» OJ ^ Am ^340 -^35 j^915 Sycomxrre Ave. © m m rv o m O K) IV ^ 45 300 ^ 110 Faraday Ave. © o Ol o m |v f,4\^ 70 -^5 ^115 AlinnMia Ave. 45 Melrose Sycamori moo (Jl m oo Ol Drive at » Avenue > 420^ 395 • 505-*^ Melrose Faraday o m o — -<»• Drive at Avsnue 10 1 Melrose Poinsettii o o m m tN Drive at 1 Avenue © mmm 0> (N CN 00 K) 4iivv I- ^^535 1610 /^45 .^alomair Airport Rd. © m m CJl O Jf CN CN ••- ^ V«10 30 PoinaetHtt Lru © m m <S Alga. Bd. 20 J^15 ^30 780^ -5 1200 • 1 65^^" * Palomar Airp Melrosi o o m in tn ^ CN IV m ort Road at 1 Drive > 740 10 • 20-^ Mslross Poinsetl o m oo m rv Drive st lis Lane 455-/ 890-^ Melrose Alga o o m tn to -- Drive at Road ® 1 m a ooro a 340 ^ 600 "^90 ^f^ttofTuif* Aii^ort Rd^ © . ! i J ' r 2310 ..Palomar Airport BiL 90"/ 600 330 Palomar Air) Camino \ O O CO CO )ort Road at Ida Robie 8 1615 • j 560-V 1 1 I Palomar Airf Loker Ave. / Brei r m rv >ort Road at isi Ranch Access FIGURE 9-2 BuHdout (Year 2020) + Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Altemative 5 CO-U 1198-Rg9-2-2B.dw3 001198 9-5 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © mo S O CN CN - 1 -AM ( ^•210 1870 ^550 ^Palomar Airpart Rd. © \ a, S in o 1 tv in 3 CN CM * 55^ %,1260 1750 Ailomor liTjiort iid. © O O TS OJ m a; oo m , M\H 445:5^ 1 ^ a; 1250—»- 160-^' West San Marc Rancho San K»uo 1555 ^635 {r W. Son Uarcos Bbid. 0 m m m Ol 01 CD •— OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road 455^ 1775^^ 100-^ Palomar Airp El Fuert m o Ol m CN tort Road at a Street 570^ 1300 • Paiomar Airp Business i o o m m lOrt Road at >ari( Drive © O O TS OJ m a; oo m , M\H 445:5^ 1 ^ a; 1250—»- 160-^' West San Marc Rancho San K»uo 1555 ^635 {r W. Son Uarcos Bbid. 0 m m m Ol 01 CD •— OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road © O O (O CN .g §4i^v^ ^125 ^—1610 ^595 W. San Marcoa Blvd. © . 0 o « 01 CJl s CM CN 0. 155 ^ 310 Ponsettia Ave. © , o 1 O 6 m - 1 m^ Vll ^ 235 -^—1855 r Palamar Airport Rd. JL \00^^ 970^^ 215 West San Marc Grand ooo •.- CO CO CN CN OS Boulevard at Avenue 75 -/ 40 —^ 15 Bushess PI Poinsetti a mm O Ol fO " CN sric Drive at a Avenue 375 -/ 1655—»• 10 -"^ Palomar Air] Palomar Forum m o Ol jort Road at South Access nGXJRE9-2 Buildout (Year 2020) + Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Altemative 5 CD-K 1198-ng9-2-3A.dwg 001198 9-6 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 © , o 2 O g m cn m •« ColUge Bbid. 25 ^Ullsoo j^535 © a O SL « rv s •^ m 1 ^765 "1 17'i ^310 Faraday Ave. © a O ^ o -* m ^ CN ro 1 mM ^915 620 j^855 .Palamar Airpart Rd 585^ 650!^^ 175 El Camini College E \\\\r 0 mo 01 N- DO m CD 1 Reel at louisvard 160-/ 400^^ 590!^ El Caminc Faraday o o oo Tt-CM rv > Real at Avenue 325^ 970^^ 195^ Paiomar Airp El Cami o m m CM CO Ol to CM ort Road at no Real © a li ^ at m m o g -- tji CM 1 ^U|v= 250 -^^60 ^280 Bremi Aooeae Weet © o g as CM O CN ro g Camino Fula HobEe 25 .^^10 © "3 m It mmm ^ IV rv o 1 4H 50 "^^195 1^805 PoinnMia Ln. 200-/ 50^^ 150 El Camim Bressi Aci \\\\r moo m o oo to a Rsal at :sss West 175:^ 10-^ 475 El Camini Camino V o m m IV ro «- .- (O ) Real at ida Robie 10-:^ 275 55 El Camhi Poinsetl \\\\r m m o to CN 00 to 3 Real at tia Lans © m mmm Ol CN IV •«*••.- CN ^220 ^^460 Cimnon Rd © "I -o m IO CO g^VV ^355 <4 195 ^145 Shadowridge Br. 4 450 > ^ 620—^ . 335-^ 1 Melrose Canno O O rv m to Drhre at n Road 50-/ 40i^r*> 4 40 1 Melrose Shadowri o in rv CM oo Drive at dge Drive nGURE9-3 Buildout (Year 2020) + Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Altemative 5 CD-K 119a-ng9-3-1A.dwg 001198 9-7 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Page 2 of 3 © m m — O c CJl lO Cl {S-860 -**-65 j^675 SVoomore i4ve. © ^ o m <ji IV C-J O Jf m tji 300 615 ^340 Faraday Av*. © m m Ol m 110 ^240 Potnocitia ilvc 70^ 60 80 o m m |v o m rv 765 165 • 385-^ m m t — 20-/ 5"-«^ * 50 1 o o •i- to CN Melrosa Drive at Sycamore Avenue Melrose Drive at Faraday Avenue Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Avenue © o 0 rv m 01 ro CO 1375 j^700 .^alomar Airport BtL © m m »- 13) CO o ^ AIM V.5 15 ^10 Potnm(«o Ln. © o CN t- CM <5 Alga Rd. 5 J^5 785^ « 1200^^ 1 375=^ ^ o in o m m Ol 265^^ 35 • 95 o o ro ro •<i- 80-/ 655^ m m f- to CJl m Palomar Airport Road at Melrosa Drive Melrose Drive at Poinsettia Lane Melrose Drive at Alga Road O a mo-- 3 mcjiio s 105 ^^550 ^^20 .^alomar Airport BiL © . S 1 ;' /• ^^^2135 .^alomar Airport Rd. 525—^ 130 J m o o> rv CN 8 a* a o 1980 • 1 £ r m to ro Palomar Abport Road at Camino Vida Roble Palomar Airport Road at Loker Ave. / Breasi Ranch Acceas FIGURE 9-3 Buildout (Year 2020) + Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Altemative 5 CO-L 1198-Rg9-3-2B.dv»g 001198 9-8 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © o m S IV to ro OJ f AM ^ 155 '^— 1535 ^400 ^Paiomar .Aioport Bd. © \ a. 8 o in i IV o o) 3 rv in to <s %.425 ^^1430 "^^120 Palomar .iirport Rd. © m m ro t) OJ •.- O as UJ , 190:3' i 1215— 445-^* West Ssn Marc Rancho San ^"255 1365 •"1340 W. San Mareoa Bhids moo CN oo <- UJ to as Boulevard at ta Fe Road 215:^ 1720^^ 410-^ Paiomar Airp El Fusrt Q m ro m CN — tort Road at a Street 275^ 1470—• 150 Palomar Airp Business i mm rvoi lort Road at 'ark Drive © m m ro t) OJ •.- O as UJ , 190:3' i 1215— 445-^* West Ssn Marc Rancho San ^"255 1365 •"1340 W. San Mareoa Bhids moo CN oo <- UJ to as Boulevard at ta Fe Road © mm to IV „ ro rv 1 g^jVV^ ^75 '^—1050 ^375 W. San Uarctte BbiiL © », i So* ^ 235 "^P^ 130 ^ 300 Ponicttia ilve. © , o i o Ol t - CN S. ^ • Ito ^ 270 ^ZZ 1785 145 Palomar ilirport Rd. JL 100^^ 2510^^ 305 West San Marc Grand ooo oo lO CN OJ 00 OS Boulevard at Avenue 170 -/ 145 — 100 Businsss Pi PoinssttI \\\r m m o mmm -t CM irk Drive at a Avenue 75 >^ 1495—• 105 Paiomar Aiq Palomar Forun o m Ol lort Road at South Access nGURE9-3 Buildout (Year 2020) + Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Altemative 5 CD-K 119B-ng9-3-3A.dwg 001198 9-9 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 9-2 Year 2020 City Alternative 5 Forecast Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service With / Without Project (ICU Analysis) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Without With Without With # Intersection ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 El Camino Real / College Boulevard (a) 0.82 D 0.82 D 0.88 D 0.88 D 2 El Camino Real / Faraday Avenue (b) 0.87 D 0.87 D 0.86 D 0.87 D 3 El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road 0.80 C 0.83 D 0.85 D 0.85 D 4 El Camino Real / Bressi West Access 0.63 B 0.65 B 0.72 C 0.74 C 5 El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble 0.88 D 0.88 D 0.79 C 0.80 C 6 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Lane 0.63 B 0.64 B 0.73 C 0.74 C 7 Melrose Drive / Cannon Road 0.87 D 0.88 D 0.81 D 0.81 D 8 Melrose Drive / Shadowridge Drive 0.88 D 0.90 D 0.71 C 0.72 C 9 Melrose Drive / Sycamore Avenue (c) 0.87 D 0.87 D 0.70 B 0.72 C 10 Melrose Drive / Faraday Avenue (d) 0.85 D 0.87 D 0.79 C 0.82 D 11 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue 0.59 A 0.68 B 0.49 A 0.60 A 12 Melrose Drive / Palomar Airport Rd. (e) 0.85 D 0.90 D 0.78 C 0.82 D 13 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Lane 0.61 B 0.63 B 0.54 A 0.57 A 14 Melrose Drive / Alga Road 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.90 D 0.90 D 15 Palomar Airport Rd. / Camino Vida Roble 0.53 A 0.53 A 0.46 A 0.47 A 16 Palomar Airport Rd. / Bressi North Access NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 17 Palomar Airport Rd. / El Fuerte Street 0.70 B 0.70 B 0.73 C 0.75 C 18 Palomar Airport Rd. / Business Park Drive (f) 0.72 C 0.73 C 0.61 B 0.64 B 19 West San Marcos Blvd. / Rancho Santa Fe Rd. (g) 0.85 D 0.87 D 0.90 D 0.91 E 20 West San Marcos Blvd. / Grand Ave. (h) 0.72 C 0.73 C 0.92 E 0.93 E 21 Business Park Dr. / Poiasettia Ave. 0.76 C 0.80 C 0.52 A 0.60 A 22 Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S Access / Paseo Valindo 0.63 B 0.74 C 0.54 A 0.63 B 1198-TAB9-2A.wpd/Ct>J Notes: a. Add third southbound through lane. b. Add westbound right tum only lane. c. Add dual northbound right tum only lanes; add westbound and southbound dual left tum lanes. d. Add southbound and eastbound right tum only lane. e. Add northbound right tum only lane. f . Add westbound right tum only lane; Add westbound through lane (City of Vista). g. With mitigation as shown in San Elijo TrafBc Study, July 14,1999: Add through lane all legs; add right tum only lane southbound, eastbound and westbound. h. With mitigation shown in San Elijo Ranch Traffic Study, July 14,1999: Add third through lane eastbound, westbound and southbound; Add eastbound dual left tum lanes. 001198 9-10 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 Shown in Figure 9-4 and listed below are ultimate lane configurations at intersections that would be expected at build out. These intersection improvements are assumed to be provided when needed by adjacent development as frontage improvements or by Traffic Impact Fee projects, or by city- wide Bridge and Thoroughfare Fee projects, as indicated. LOCATION IMPROVEMENT RESPONSIBILITY #1 El Camino Real/College Boulevard Add Third Southbound Through Lane Adjacent Project #2 El Camino Real/Faraday Avenue Add Westbound RTO Lane City of Carlsbad T.I.F. #9 Melrose Drive/Sycamore Avenue Add Westbound and Southbound Dual Left Tum Lanes City of Vista #10 Melrose Drive/Faraday Avenue Add Southbound and Eastbound RTO Lane. City of Vista #12 Melrose Drive/Palomar Airport Road Add Fourth Northbound Through Lane City of Carlsbad T.I.F. #18 Palomar AirportRoad/Business Park Drive Add Westbotmd Through, RTO Lane City of Vista #19 W. San Marcos Boulevard/ Rancho Santa Fe Road Add Eastbound and Westbound RTO Lane Add Westbound Through Lane Add Northbound Through Lane City of San Marcos #20 W. San Marcos Boulevard/ Grand Avenue Add Westbound Through Lane Add Eastbound Through Lane Add Eastbound Left Tum Lane Add Southbound Through Lane City of San Marcos The Carlsbad Raceway Industrial Park project traffic, assumed to be built out in Year 2005, and background traffic firom other projects and regional growth, was shown to be accommodated on the mitigated street network assumed for Year 2005. The Carlsbad Raceway Industrial Park's contribution to the construction of nearby roadway and intersections to their ultimate configurations (i.e., Meh-ose Drive, Faraday Avenue, Palomar Airport Road) should be considered the project's fair share contribution to mitigating roadway improvements meant to accommodate Year 2020 City of Carlsbad and regional cumulative traffic impacts at these nearby intersections and roadways. 001198 9-11 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 1 of 3 4\M College Bbid. © , aa Faradjoy Ave. © , tt y|||vv! ? palomar .Airport Bd. El Camini College E ) Real at loulevard El Caminc Faraday 1 Real at Avenue Paiomar Airp El Cami ort Road at no Real © 1 1 Breaex Acoeee Went © 1 Comfno VidxL Rohle © , a; 4\A ? Poiiuctfia Ln. -/ El Camin Bressi Ac 0 Real at seaa West El Caminc Camino V \\\\r 1 Real at Ida Roble El Camini Polnaett \\\\r 9 Real at tia Lane ^ Mitigatioii Responsibility A =A$aceiit Project B - Bridge &Tlioioug}ifiae District P = Project Mitigatiaa T = City-Wide TiafBc Intact Fee V = Qty of Vista © Connon Rd^ © SKadmaridge Dr. ^ Mitigatioii Responsibility A =A$aceiit Project B - Bridge &Tlioioug}ifiae District P = Project Mitigatiaa T = City-Wide TiafBc Intact Fee V = Qty of Vista ^^^^^ V > 1 ai (Exia Mslross Canno ting) Drive at fl Road (Exit Melrose Shsdowr iting) Drive at dge Drive nGURE9-4 Year 2020 Intersection Lane Configurations With Mitigation As Needed CO-K 119a-ng9-4-1A.dwg 001198 9-12 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. October 10, 2001 Mikg4 i! 6\ 3 © -ill^^l Sycamore Ave. -MIM r Faraday Ave, © -'lU^ Poinsettia Ave. -/ Melrose Sycamori * CD Drive at 9 Avenue Melrose Faraday Drive at Avsnue -/ •1 1 Melrose Poinsettii Drive at I Avenue © ^Uivv ? .^'alomar Airport JUL © -'111^ i r PtrinaetHa Ln. © -ili^l Alga Rd. r Palomar AIrp Meirost lort Road at > Drive > Melrose Poinsetl Drivs at tia Ijam IMeirose Alga \\\^ Drive at Road '^Mitigation Responsibility A = Adjacent Project B = Bridge & Thoroughfare District P = Proj ect Mitigation T = Cily-Wide Traffic Impact Fee V = City of Vista ^|Vj ^Patomar .4in>ort Ad. © . Poiomor .4ii7iort JliL '^Mitigation Responsibility A = Adjacent Project B = Bridge & Thoroughfare District P = Proj ect Mitigation T = Cily-Wide Traffic Impact Fee V = City of Vista Palomar Ain Camino V >ort Road at ida Roble z ^ o ^ 1 a; 1 PsIomar Ain Loker Ave. / Bre r )ort Road at ssi Ranch Access FIGURE 9-4 Year 2020 Intersection Lane Configurations With Mitigation As Needed CO-L 1198-Fig9-4-2C.ch»9 001198 9-13 1198-rpt-lOlOOl Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 Page 3 of 3 © 3! 4M ^Patomar .Airport /Id. © \ a, S 1 -'IVV r © F. San Uarcos BlvtL Palomar Air; El Fuert )ort Road at a Street T Palomar Air; Business PatonuKr Airport Rd. lort Road at >ark Drive i ^ ai West San Marc Rancho San * OS Boulevard at ta Fe Road © «' * i 4ivv^ W. San Uareos BtotL © . 4^ Poinsettia Ave. © . Q B k. V • I -i^ II Ir Palamar Airpttrt Rii. d West San Marci Grand 3S Boulevard at Avenue (Exis Business Ps Poinsettii ting) irk Drive at 1 Avenue Paiomar Airp Palomar Forum ort Road at South Access ^ Mitigation Responsibility A ^A^acent Project B > Bridge &Tharoi^ifiae District P = Project MitigatioQ T = City-Wide TiafiHc Intact Fee V = City of Vista SM "CityofSaaMarcos nGURE9-4 Year 2020 Intersection Lane Configurations With Mitigation As Needed CO-K 1198-Fig9-4-3B.dw9 0011V8 9-14 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 9.3 POINSETTIA AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC AND RIGHT-TURN ONLY ALTERNATIVES The intersection at Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue could possibly be restricted to right-tums-only because of the City of Carlsbad's intersection spacing criteria (2,600 ft. spacing for prime arterials). An evaluation of this condition has been provided in the following four paragraphs. Figure 9-5 shows Year 2020 peak hour conditions with full access at the Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue Intersection. Under these conditions, acceptable levels of service are expected at the three intersections shown on Melrose Drive: Melrose Drive/Palomar Airport Road, Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue, and Melrose Drive/Faraday Avenue. Figure 9-6 shows the altemative with right tums only allowed at the Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue intersection. As shown, a raised median through the intersection on Melrose Drive would divert southbound left tums southbound on Melrose Drive to eastbound Poinsettia Avenue to the Melrose Drive/Palomar Airport Road intersection as either u-tums or left tums. The result of diverting these left tums would be to increase the intersection capacity utilization at this intersection and would result in decreasing the future level of service from "D" to "E." Westbound to southbound left tums at the Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue intersection could be diverted to the Melrose Drive/Faraday Avenue intersection. Although this would increase the intersection capacity utilization, the peak hour levels of service are expected to remain at acceptable levels of service. 001198 9-15 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 175/235 155/130 310/300 Year 2020 AM / PM Peak Hour Traffic With Poinsettia Avenue Through and Mehx)se Drive / Poinsettia Avenue Signal CD-K 1198-ng9-S.dwg 001198 9-16 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 in m (N CM in o> N .1- „ o in Ol CM in ^ o in in \. o m O M 1^ 20/75 .190/490 o o oo in tN j- 420/765—^ 395/165—» 505/385-^ .45/300 -300/615 -110/340 .175/235 -155/130 -310/300 in in tn Ol CM CM to-* tn 780/785' 1200/1201 65/375-^ LEGEND AM/PM ® .335/95 •1610/1375 •50/700 Mr o in o in in a> \\in 2 ° ^ o> m in C^ 1^ o S m - 375/75—^ 1655/1495—• 10/105-^ = CityLiiiiils = AM/PM Peak Hour TraflBc =TrafBc Signal Locatiaa .235/270 •1855/1785 •15/145 o in o CM \ro in in o in 1-^ cn ID in o CM Nl J I I "^1260/425 V X 1.*—1750/1430 570/275- 1300/1470- nGURE9-6 Year 2020 AM / PM Peak Hour Traffic With Poinsettia Avenue Through and Mehose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue Ri^t Tums Only NO SCALE CD-K 1198-Fig9-6.dv»g 001198 9-17 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 Table 9-3 shows the comparative levels of service expected with and without restricted access at the Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue intersection. Additionally, Poinsettia Avenue could possibly be prevented fi-om being constmcted as a through street if required to avoid an open space canyon area. This could result in a cul-de-sac street without accommodating through traffic. Figure 9-7 shows this altemative and the expected diversion of traffic. Tums that would be made at the Business Park Drive/Poinsettia Avenue intersection would be diverted to the Business Park Drive/Palomar Airport Road and the Palomar Airport Road/Palomar Fomm South access intersection. Table 9-3 also shows the comparative levels of service with and without Poinsettia Avenue as a cul- de-sac street at the eastem end. As shown in this table, acceptable levels of service could be provided at all locations shown, but delay to motorists would increase at certain locations. In summary, restricting the Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Avenue Intersection to right tums only is not recommended because of the detrimental effect of diverted tums at the Melrose Drive/Palomar Airport Road intersection. Poinsettia Avenue, with the cul-de-sac configuration, would cause additional delay to adjacent intersections as a result of diverted traffic, and therefore, is not the preferred altemative. Appendix E includes intersection peak hour LOS worksheets for Year 2020 conditions. 001198 9-18 1198-50301-2-rpt C2 Oo I TABLE 9-3 Year 2020 Comparison of Intersection Level of Service With "Cul-de-Sac" and "Right Turn Only" Altematives Intersection With Poinsettia Ave. Through; With Mehose / Poinsettia Signal With Poinsettia Ave. Through; Without Melrose/ Poinsettia Signal With Poinsettia Ave. Cul-de- Sac; Without Melrose / Poinsettia Signal Intersection AM PM AM PM AM PM Intersection ICU LOS ICU 1 LOS ICU LOS ICU 1 LOS ICU 1 LOS ICU 1 LOS Palomar Airport Rd. / Melrose Dr. 0.90 D 0.82 D 0.98 E 0.82 D * * Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S. Access 0.74 C 0.63 B * * * * 0.79 C 0.74 C Palomar Airport Rd. / Business Park Drive 0.74 C 0.61 B * * * 0.73 c 0.65 B Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue 0.68 C 0.53 A * * * * * * * * Melrose Drive / Faraday Avenue 0.72 C 0.83 D 0.77 C 0.90 D * * * * Business Park Dr. / Poinsettia Ave. 0.78 C 0.55 A * * * * 0.79 c 0.51 A ^ p Co § a. 119B-TAB9-3B.wpd/CD-K VO Oo I a * = No Change Conclusions: 1. With signal at Melrose Dr. / Poinsettia Ave., acceptable levels of service are expected, with or without Poinsettia Ave. cul-de-sac. 2. With right tums only at Melrose Dr. / Poinsettia Ave., tums diverted to U-Tums are expected to reduce capacity and LOS to "E" at Palomar Airport Rd. / Melrose Dr. 3. Poinsettia Avenue, with the cul-de-sac configuration, would cause additional delay to adjacent intersections as a result of diverted traffic, and therefore is not the preferred altemative. i O S t Co 3 • o < o »• re Co 'L Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 oo o I O Q oo I CM .— T— 1 ui'in'o'l •* fO Ol 1 tn CM 20/45 10/35 — 5/25 .175/235 • 40/35 •455/395 AM/PM = Ci^ limits = AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic = TiafBc Signal Locatum -1185/400 •1825/1455 655/520- 1310/1545- FIGURE9-7 Year 2020 AM / PM Peak Hour Traffic With Poinsettia Avenue Cul-de-Sac and Mehose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue Right Tums Only lALE CD-J 119B-ng9-7.dwg 001198 9-20 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 10.0 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) As required by State of Califomia Law {Proposition Ul, June 1990 , Congestion Management Program), an analysis of the Regionally Significant Arterials (RSA) in the study area are required. Palomar Airport Road, El Camino Real, and Melrose Drive are listed as RSA through the study area and have been evaluated in previous sections of this report. Both street segments and intersections are expected to operate at LOS "D" or better and therefore comply with CMP regional guidelines for Year 2020. 10.1 FREEWAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION The project traffic contribution to Interstate 5 and State Route 78 main lanes is less than the 150 peak hour trips established in the CMP Guidelines, so that a freeway main lane analysis is not needed for this project. 10.2 INTERSECTIONS Study area intersections were evaluated using the 1997 update to the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual software. As shown in Table 10-1, all intersections comply with CMP requirements using this methodology. Appendix E includes these LOS worksheets. 001198 10-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 TABLE 10-1 Year 2020 City Alternative 5 Forecast Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service (CMP Analysis) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection HCS HCS # Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 El Camino Real / College Boulevard (a) 44.9 D 53.4 D 2 El Camino Real / Faraday Avenue (b) 52.6 D 48.7 D 3 El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road 49.8 D 42.4 D 4 El Camino Real / Bressi West Access 30.6 C 41.3 D 5 El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble 50.2 D 43.8 D 6 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Lane 32.9 C 39.6 D 7 Melrose Drive / Cannon Road 54.6 D 46.1 D 8 Melrose Drive / Shadowridge Drive 39.8 D 45.8 D 9 Melrose Drive / Sycamore Avenue (c) 40.6 D 38.6 D 10 Melrose Drive / Faraday Avenue (d) 53.0 D 53.1 D 11 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue 40.4 D 21.8 C 12 Melrose Drive / Palomar Airport Rd. (e) 52.2 D 46.1 D 13 Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Lane 36.0 D 20.4 C 14 Melrose Drive / Alga Road 28.2 C 28.2 C 15 Palomar Airport Rd. / Camino Vida Roble 33.2 C 37.9 C 16 Palomar Airport Rd. / Bressi North Access NA NA NA NA 17 Palomar Airport Rd. / El Fuerte Street 48.3 D 52.1 D 18 Palomar Airport Rd. / Business Park Drive (f) 32.8 C 34.5 C 19 West San Marcos Blvd. / Rancho Santa Fe Rd. (g) 31.8 C 52.9 D 20 West San Marcos Blvd. / Grand Ave. Ol) 28.9 C 43.8 C 21 Business Park Dr. / Poinsettia Ave. 43.4 D 34.0 D 22 Palomar Airport Rd. / Palomar Forum S Access / Paseo Valindo 28.4 C 46.0 D 1198-TAB10-1A.wp(i/CD-K Notes: a. b. c. d. e. £ h. Add third southbound through lane. Add westbound right tum only lane. Add dual northbound right tum only lanes; add westbound and southbound dual left tum lanes. Add northbound, southboimd, and eastbound right tum only lane; add westboimd dual left turn lanes. Add northbound right tum only lane. Add westbound right tum only lane; Add westbound throu^ lane (City of Vista). With mitigation as shown in San Elijo Traffic Study, July 14,1999: Add through lane all legs; add right tum only lane southbound, eastboxmd and westbound. With mitigation shown in San Elijo Ranch Traffic Study, July 14, 1999: Add third through lane eastbound, westbound and southbound; Add eastbound dual left tum lanes. 001198 10-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 11.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS An evaluation of existing conditions, existing plus project. Year 2005, and Year 2020 conditions have been provided. Conclusions are provided below. 11.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Both street segments and intersections within the City of Carlsbad study area currently operate acceptably within the Carlsbad Growth Management Plan circulation performance standard of level of service "D" or better during peak hours. 11.2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS With project traffic added to existing traffic, street segments and intersections within the City of Carlsbad both would continue to operate acceptably and within Growth Management Plan circulation performance standards, except at the Palomar Airport Road/Paseo Valindo intersection which would be operating at level of service "E" or "F" during both peak hours, without the planned improvement of the third westbound lane on Palomar Airport Road. 001198 11-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 11.3 SHORT-TERM (PRIOR TO YEAR 2005) CONDITIONS An evaluation of short-term future condifions prior to Year 2005 was conducted assuming the combined projects of the Carlsbad Raceway and Palomar Fomm projects and assuming no constmction of missing segments of Melrose Drive, Faraday Avenue or Poinsettia Lane. Projects not yet approved adjacent to these missing segments were also deleted or reduced for this evaluation. Based on this evaluation it can be concluded that traffic from the two combined projects and background growth can be expected to be accommodated on the existing roadway system with only project frontage and intersection improvements prior to Year 2005. Key intersections that would most be affected by this scenario are expected to operate acceptably at level of service "D" or better, except at the Business Park Drive/ Poinsettia Avenue intersection that is projected to be at level of service "E" during the PM peak hour with feasible mitigation. However, this would be a short lived condition since constmction of Melrose Drive would provide mitigation. With the Poinsettia Avenue cul-de-sac altemative street segments and intersections are expected to operate acceptably at level of service "D" or better with only frontage improvements along Palomar Airport Road. 001198 11-2 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway Final Report ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. May 3, 2001 11.4 SHORT-TERM (YEAR 2005) CONDITIONS An evaluation of short-term future (Year 2005) conditions indicates that study area street segments and intersections with improvements shown on Figure 7-9 would operate acceptably and within the Growth Management Plan circulation performance standards, so no project mitigation would be needed nor is recommended for the short term fiature, beyond the planned participation in constmction of Melrose Drive fi-om the City of Vista city limits south to Palomar Airport Road, and Faraday Avenue between Melrose Drive and Orion Street. Mitigation measures at off-site intersections to be provided as adjacent projects build out or by Traffic Impact Fee projects are also shown in Figure 7-9, Year 2005 Intersection Lane Configurations. Off-site locations in Vista and San Marcos that would need mitigation as a result of cumulative increases in regional and local traffic volumes have been identified in previous traffic studies in those jurisdictions. 11.5 BUILDOUT (YEAR 2020) CONDITIONS As planned, study area intersections are expected to accommodate Year 2020 peak hour volumes at acceptable levels of service and within the Growth Management Plan circulation performance standards, with mitigation consisting of ultimate planned lane configurations and normal intersection improvements such as added left or right tum only lanes. The City of Carlsbad General Plan Circulation Element roadways as planned, can accommodate the projected peak hour volumes by the planned cross-sections and intersection lane configurations. Figure 9-4, Year 2020 Intersection Lane Configurations show needed mitigation to be provided by adjacent projects by Bridge and Thoroughfare Districts, or by Traffic Impact Fee Program projects as they are needed. Off-site locations in Vista and San Marcos that would need mitigation as a result of cumulative increases in regional and local traffic volumes have been identified in previous traffic studies in those jurisdictions so that feasible mitigation has been identified or findings of over riding considerations have been made. 001198 11-3 1198-50301-2-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 The project's contribution to city-wide circulation improvements will be made through the City's Traffic Impact Fee and a separate funding district for Melrose Drive north of Palomar Airport Road and Faraday Avenue west of Melrose Drive. 11.6 YEAR 2020 CONDITIONS WITH CUL-DE-SAC AND RIGHT TURN ONLY ALTERNATIVES An altemative analysis assuming right tums only at the Melrose Drive / Poinsettia Avenue intersection has been provided. Restricting tums to right tums only is expected to divert traffic as u-tums to the adjacent intersections on Melrose Drive. These diverted tums could be detrimental to the peak hour levels of service at these locations, and therefore is not recommended. An altemative analysis assuming Poinsettia Avenue as a cul-de-sac street has been provided. Poinsettia Avenue, with the cul-de-sac configuration, would cause additional delay to adjacent intersections as a resuh of diverted traffic, and therefore is not the preferred altemative. 11.7 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Interstate 5, SR-78, Palomar Airport Road, El Camino Real and Melrose Drive are portions ofthe Regionally Significant Arterial or Freeway Systems. A Congestion Management Program evaluation was conducted for the study area arterial street segments and intersections. Intersections and street segments in the study area expected to comply with CMP level of service requirements of level of service "D" or better. The project's addition of traffic to the fi-eeway systems is expected to be less than 150 peak hour trips so that a fi-eeway main lane evaluation is not required, according to Regional CMP Guidelines. 001198 11-4 1198-50301-2-a-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 11.8 SUMMARY In summary, an evaluation of existing, short-term future, and long-term fiature conditions indicates that with intersection mitigation planned by adjacent project or Traffic Impact Fee study projects, or Bridge and Thoroughfare District projects, study area intersections and road segments would operate acceptable at level of service "D" or better during peak hours. 001198 11-5 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3. 2001 12.0 REFERENCES San Diego Region Traffic Engineer's Council (SANTEC) and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Califomia Border Section, Guidelines for Congestion Management Program (CMP) Traffic Impact Report. San Diego, CA (1993) Transportation Research Board, 1994 Highway Capacitv Manual Special Report, Washington, D.C. (1994) (and 1997 update) City of Carlsbad Traffic Impact Fee Study prepared by O' Rourke Engineering, July 18, 2000. San Elijo Ranch Traffic Study. Transtech Engineers, Inc., July 14, 1999 001198 12-1 1198-50301-rpt Carlsbad Raceway ©Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Final Report May 3, 2001 13.0 URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES INC. PREPARERS Principal Planning Director Sandee Witcraft-Schlaefli; J.D. Juris Doctor, Graduate courses Urban Planning, B.A. Political Science/Social Welfare Principal Engineer Andy P. Schlaefli/ M.S. Civil Engineering, B.S. Civil Engineering Registered Civil Engineer, Licensed Traffic Engineer Proiect Engineer Sam P. Kab, II; Licensed Traffic Engineer Senior Technical Support. Graphics and Illustrations Mark A. Schlaefli Word Processing. Report Production and Compilation Lyndi Williams This report is site and time specific and is intended for a one-time use for this intended project under the conditions described as "Proposed Project". Any changes or delay in implementation may require re-analysis and re-consideration by the public agency granting approvals. California land development planning involves subjective political considerations as well as frequently re-interpreted principals of law as well as changes in regulations, policies, guidelines and procedures. Urban Systems and their professionals maice no warrant, either express or implied, regarding our findings, recommendations, or professional advice as to the ability to successfully accomplish this land development project. Traffic is a consequence of human behavior and as such is predictable only in a gross cumulative methodology of user opportunities, using accepted standards and foiiowing patterns of past behavior and physical constraints attempting to project into a future window of circumstances. Any counts or existing conditions cited are only as reliable as to the time and conditions under which they were recorded. As such the preparer of this analysis is unable to warrant, either express or implied, that any forecasts are statements of actual true conditions which will in fact exist at any future date. Services performed by Urban System professionals resulting in this document are of a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members ofthe profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. No other representation expressed or implied and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended in this report, document opinion or otherwise. Any changes by others to this analysis or re-use of document at a later point in time or other location, without the express consent and concurrence of Urban Systems releases and relieves Urban Systems of any liability, responsibility or duty for subsequent questions, claims, or damages. 001198 13-1 1198-50301-rpt