HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-03-08; City Council; 22235; Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 - Beachwalk at Roosevelt to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential condominium unitsCITY OF CARLSBAD-AGENDA BILL
AB# 22,235 APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CT 14-07 DEPT. DIRECTOR <1l-
MTG. 3/8/16 AND MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT RP 14-20-CITY ATTORNEY eve
DEPT. CEO BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT, TO ALLOW FOR THE CITY MANAGER ~ "-,
CONSTRUCTION OF 16 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
CONDOMINIUM UNITS, INCLUDING TWO (2)
INCLUSIONARY UNITS, ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ROOSEVELT STREET
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt City Council Resolution No. 2016-047, approving Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit
RP 14-20 to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2)
inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive and
Beech Avenue, in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1, as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Project Planning Commission City Council
CT 14-07 RA X
RP 14-20 RA X
RA =Recommended approval
X = Final city decision-making authority
On February 3, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended approval (S-1, L'Heureux opposed) of Tentative
Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential
air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of
Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and
within Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
Discussion at the Planning Commission primarily focused on pedestrian access to the four-plex, sound attenuation
features, lack of a common recreation area, access for trash service, and the feasibility for the installation of solar
panels. The applicant, Mr. Geoff McComic, indicated that solar panels could be installed on the roofs in the future
and the addition of air conditioning units in conjunction with the use of certain building materials helped satisfy
the interior noise requirements. In addition, he indicated that he was open to providing pedestrian access to the
rear units of the four-plex, but questioned whether it would be used. He also indicated that the waste
management company would likely back into the site so as to avoid any sight issues that may arise when backing
out of the site and into the street. Finally, he indicated that a common recreation area was not provided since the
Village Master Plan open space requirements could be satisfied through the inclusion of private porches and/or
balconies for each of the units.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Shannon Werneke, 760-602-4621, shannon.werneke@carlsbadca.gov
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. ~ COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC D
DENIED D CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D
CONTINUED D RETURNED TO STAFF D
WITHDRAWN ~ OTHER-SEE MINUTES D
AMENDED
(See Minutes for details)
7
\
Beach walk at Roosevelt
March 8, 2016
Pagel o/2
.. t· •. ·l
The Planning Commission ultimately voted 5-1 (L'Heureux opposed) to approve the project. Commissioner
L'Heureux indicated that he could not support the project given the dense nature of the design and concerns with
respect to vehicular circulation and pedestrian safety.
The Planning Commission resolution recommending approval, along with the Planning Commission staff report
and the draft minutes of the February 3, 2016 Planning Commission meeting, are attached for the Council's review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts to the city regarding public facilities have been identified. All required improvements and
maintenance needed to serve this project will be funded by and/or constructed by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for
Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt
from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 (In-fill
Development Projects) Class 32 of the State CEQA Guidelines ... In making this determination, the City Planner has
found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the stat~(EQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. A
Notice of Exemption will be filed upon approval of the project. · ·
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
Information regarding public notifications of this item such as mailings, public hearing notices posted in the
newspaper and on the City website are available in the Office of the City Clerk.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2016-047 (CT 14-07 /RP 14-20)
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 3, 2016
5. Planning Commission Minutes dated February 3, 2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 1
RESOLUTION NO. _ __.!2~0~1~6~-0:.::::!4:.!_7 __
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CT 14-07 AND
MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT RP 14-20 TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 16 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
CONDOMINIUM UNITS, INCLUDING TWO (2) INCLUSIONARY
UNITS, ON A 0.70-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ROOSEVELT STREET, BETWEEN LAGUNA DRIVE AND BEECH
AVENUE, IN LAND USE DISTRICT 8 OF THE VILLAGE REVIEW ZONE
AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME:
CASE NO.:
BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
CT 14-07/RP 14-20
The City Council ofthe City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on February 3, 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
consider Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 and adopted Planning
Commission Resolution No. 7146, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and
Major Review Permit RP 14-20; and
WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project conducted
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the project was found to be
categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of environmental documents
pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines as an in-fill development project on a
site of less than five acres in an urbanized area that has no habitat value and is served by
adequate facilities.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
California as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 is
approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in
::::2, ----'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 7146 on file in the City Clerk's office and incorporated herein by reference are the
findings and conditions of the City Council, with exception of the following:
Condition No. 16 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 shall be replaced with the
following condition:
16. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by
the City Planner prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the
Developer shall provide the Planning Division with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs
that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the City Planner. At a
minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
a.
b.
c.
d.
General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in
favor of, or in which the City has an interest.
Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided
to the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have
the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be
transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record.
Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event
that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the
Association's Easements" as provided in Article , Section ____ _
the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary
maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give
written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project,
setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required
and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty
(30) days from the giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to
carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's
Easements within the period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be
entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to
reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein.
Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's
Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs
incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and
or Association's Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each
Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay
such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against
the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice
-2-
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e.
f.
shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by
the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the
period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a
late charge in an amount equal to six percent {6%) of the amount of the invoice.
Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by means of any
remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the City, the
City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project
for an equal pro rata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such special
assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien
upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in the
Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special
assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions
and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her
respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance
with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit
owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in
Exhibit ----
Use of Two-Car Garage. To the extent permitted by all applicable laws, adequate
space to park two vehicles in the attached two-car garage shall be available at all
times. The garages shall not be used solely for the purpose of storage.
3. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City
Council. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial
Review" shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review ofthis decision must be sought is governed
by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of
Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review
must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which
this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request
for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or
preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended
to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally
delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for
the preparation ofthe record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad,
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA, 92008.
-3-
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting ofthe City Council of the City
2 of Carlsbad on the gth day of March 2016, by the following vote to wit:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES: Council Members Hall, Wood, Schumacher, Blackburn, Packard.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
Beachwalk at Roosevelt
CT 14-07 I RP 14-20
EXHIBIT 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7146
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP AND A MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 16 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AIR SPACE
CONDOMINIUMS, INCLUDING TWO (2) INCLUSIONARY UNITS, ON A
0.70-ACRE SITE ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET IN LAND USE
DISTRICT 8 OF THE VILLAGE REVIEW· ZONE AND WITHIN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. THE PROJECT QUALIFIES AS A CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15332 (IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS) CLASS
32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION.
CASE NAME: BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
CASE NO.: CT 14-07/RP 14-20
WHEREAS, Vesta Pacific Development, "Applicant," and MR Carlsbad II, LLC, "Owner,"
has filed a verified application with the City of CCl,:rlsbad regarding properties described as:
'/: ·.
Parcell:
That portion of the northeasterly half of Lot 27, Seaside Lands, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, July 28, 1921
Parcel2:
The northeast half of Lot 26, Seaside Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No.
1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
July 28, 1921
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, said verified applicati()n constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract Map and
a Major Review Permit as shown on Exhibits "A-S," dated February 3, 2016, on file in the Planning
Division, CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT,R()OSEVELT, as provided by Title 20 and Chapter 21.35
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on February 3, 2016, hold a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to
the Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACH WALK AT ROOSEVELT based
on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
Tentative Tract Map, CT 14-07
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any applicable
specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map
Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the proposed one lot tentative
tract map for 16 multi-family air-space condominiums subdivision satisfies all minimum
requirements of Titles 20 and 21 with respect to public facilities, access and parking.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since the
surrounding properties are developed, are currently designated as Village (V) in the General
Plan, and are located in Land Use District 8, Residential Support Area, of the Village Master
Plan. The subject property is bordered by a single family home to the north, professional
offices to the south, single-family and multi-family residential uses, as well as and an urgent
care office to the east, and a cabinet-making business, gift shop/boutique and an auto repair
shop to the west. Pursuant to the Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan, the intent is
to provide for a relatively dense urban residential neighborhood, which is compatible with
the Village scale and character. Given the proposed density and design, the proposed project
meets the intent of Land Use District 8.
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density proposed,
in that the Village (V) General Plan Land Use designation allows residential development in
Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan at a density range of 18 to 23 dwelling units per
acre. Based on a lot size (net) of 0.70 acres, the proposed 16-unit multi-family residential air
space condominium project has a density of 22.9 dwelling units per acre. As the proposed
project falls within the allowable density range, the project is consistent with this finding.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the public at large, for
access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in that the developer has
delineated and preserved on the tentative map, all existing easements of record.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land Conservation
Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
PC RESO NO. 7146
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural
heating or cooling opportunities in .the subdivision, in that the proposed multi-family
residential units have (!n east-west ori~Jltation thereby allowing for passive or natural solar
heating and cooling opportunities.
That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed by this
subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs against the
public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental resources in that the
applicant proposes to designate two (2) of the 16 units on-site as income-restricted units. As
required by CMC Chapter 21.85, the project has been accordingly-conditioned to require the
approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement prior to recordation of the final map.
That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat,
in that the subject infill lot is devoid of sensitive vegetation and any natural water features;
therefore, the proposed project does not impact any fish, wildlife or habitat.
That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing California
Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has been designed in
accordance with the Best Management Practices for water quality protection in accordance
with the City's sewer and drainage standards and the project is conditioned to comply with
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
'' "
That the street systems serving the prdposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use, in that primary access to the site will be provided by two 24-
foot-wide driveways off of Roosevelt Street. The proposed project will generate a total of 96
Average Daily Trips (ADTs) for the high density multi-family land use. In addition, the
proposed project would not result in any significant capacity-related impacts to any road
segments or intersections in the vicinity of the project site.
Major Review Permit, RP 14-20
11. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with
the Elements of the City's General Plan, Village Review Zone, and the Village Master Plan and
Design Manual, based on the. facts set forth in the staff report dated February 3, 2016,
including, but not limited to the following:
a. Land Use. The proposed project, which includes the construction of 16 multi-family
residential air-space condominiums, will enhance the vitality of the Village,
specifically Land Use District 8 (Residential Support Area), by providing new
residential land uses in close proximity to the downtown core area, as well as the
train station. The project reinforces the pedestrian-orientation desired for the
' .h.' ' downtown area by providing Jthe residents an opportunity to walk to shopping,
recreation, and mass transit fun·ctrons. The project's proximity to existing bus routes
and mass transit will help to further the goal of providing new economic development
near transportation corridors. Further, the proposed project contributes towards the
overall goal of creating a dense urban residential neighborhood with Village scale and
character. By providing more residential opportunities, the project also helps to
create a lively, interesting social environment by encouraging and increasing the
opportunity for 24-hour life in the Village, which provides the necessary customer
PC RESO NO. 7146 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b.
c.
d.
e.
base to attract complementary commercial and community uses. In summary, the
residential project will contribute towards the revitalization of the Village area and
enhance the Village as a place for living.
Circulation. Roosevelt Street, as well as the nearby intersections, can accommodate
the estimated 96 average daily trips (ADTs). In addition, all required public right-of-
way will be dedicated and improved to serve the development. The circulation has
been designed in relationship to the proposed residential land use and available
parking. Public facilities will be constructed to serve the proposed project. Further,
the project has been conditioned to develop and implement a program of "best
management practices" for the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter
into and/or are transported within storm drainage facilities.
Housing. The proposed project is consistent with the Housing Element of the General
Plan and the City's lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, in that the proposed project
includes the construction of two inclusionary units. In addition, the project has been
accordingly-conditioned to require the approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement
prior to recordation of the final map.
Noise. -The project site is primarily impacted by noise from the train which is located
approximately }1; mile the west of the project site. The proposed project is consistent
with the Noise Element of the General Plan in that the project has been conditioned
to comply with the recommendations of the noise report (Wieland Acoustics, July,
2014) to ensure that the proposed building design adequately attenuates the noise
levels for the new condominiums. The recommendations include the requirement for
mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning units). In addition, a Notice will be
required to be recorded on title to notify future owners that the property is subject to
noise from the railroad.
Land Use District 8 Standards. The proposed project has been designed to comply with
all other requirements pursuant to Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan,
including setbacks, open space,,(building height, lot coverage, and parking.
:· '.
City Council Policy No. 43, Allocation for Excess Dwelling Units .·
12.
13.
That pursuant to CMC Chapter 21.85.030, for any market-rate residential development of
seven (7) units or more units, not less than 15% of total units shall be restricted both as to
occupancy and affordability to lower income households. The proposal to construct 16 multi-
family condominium units includes two inclusionary units which will satisfy the above-noted
requirement. The project has been conditioned to require the approval of an Affordable
Housing Agreement prior to recordation of the final map.
That the project location and density are compatible with the existing adjacent residential
neighborhoods and/or nearby existing or planned uses in that the project is consistent with the
adjacent residential land uses and anticipated uses. Specifically, Land Use District 8 of the
Village Master Plan is intended to be developed as a relatively dense residential
neighborhood with Village scale and character.
PC RESO NO. 7146 ~4'~' . .i-·,,_.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14.
15.
::f.
!:
That the project location and density are in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
General Plan and any other applicable planning document, in that the density range in Land
Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan is 18 to 23 dwelling units per acre. With a net
acreage of 0.70 acres, the proposed project has a density of 22.9 dwelling units per acre;
therefore, the proposed project density falls within the allowable range and contributes
towards the overall goal of creating a relatively dense residential neighborhood in land Use
District 8. The proposed project is consistent with the intent of land Use District 8 of the
Village Master Plan and will contribute towards the overall revitalization of the Village Area.
That there are an adequate number of units in the Excess Dwelling Unit Bank in the northwest
quadrant to allocate 16 units. Per the city's Quadrant Dwelling Unit Report, 764 units remain
available for allocation in the Village.
California Environmental Quality Act:
16. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State
Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is
therefore categorically exempt from/the requirement for preparation of environmental
documents pursuant to Section 15332 'of the State CEQA Guidelines as an infill development
project. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in
Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project.
13 General
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17.
18.
19.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 and all City public policies and ordinances. The project
includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all
facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage;
circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government
administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new
development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically,
a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School District
that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
b. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected
prior to the issuance of building permit.
c. The Local Facilities Management fee. for Zone 1 is required by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 21.90.050 and will be collected prior to issuance of building permit.
That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual and Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50).
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to
mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree
of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
PC RESO NO. 7146 -5-
1
Conditions:
2
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to the recordation of the
3 Final Map.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
If any of the following conditions fail t.~ bctur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or
further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein
granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested
rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Tentative
Tract Map and Major Review Permit.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and
modifications to the Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit documents, as necessary
to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
If any condition for construction of any puqlic improvements or facilities, or the payment of any
fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this appr-oVal or imposed by law on this Project are challenged,
this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such
condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council
determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and
costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly,
from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit
(b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or
nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and
(c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including
without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all
legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not
validated.
Developer shall submit to the Planning .Division a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of the
Tentative Map and Site Plan reflectinf,th~e conditions approved by the final decision-making
body. ·
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Building
Division from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to
provide school facilities.
PC RESO NO. 7146 -6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part
of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to
the issuance of building permits.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within
24 months from the date of project approval.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and
sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water
service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the
application for the building permit, aJld that water and sewer capacity and facilities will
continue to be available until the .time 'ofpccupancy. A note to this effect shall be placed on
the Final Map.
Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the
License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and
CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee
for Zone 1, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building
permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan
and shall become void.
Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan
showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape
Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved Final
Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash,
and debris.
The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape
plancheck process on file in the Planning Division and accompanied by the project's building,
improvement, and grading plans. :( ·
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance
as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Community and Economic Development Department.
Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of
Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be
filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner,
notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a
Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit by Resolution No. 7146 on the property. Said
Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing
complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions
specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute
and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a
showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
PC RESO NO. 7146
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions
and restrictions {CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner
prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide
the Planning Division with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the
Department of Real Estate and the City Planner. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the
following provisions:
a.
b.
c.
d.
General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the obligation,
to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in
which the City has an interest.
Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the
City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to
disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City
within 30 days for the official record.
Failure of Association to Mainta.ih Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event that
the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's
Easements" as provided in Article Section the City shall
have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City
elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the
Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with
particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the
same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty {30) days from the
giving of such notice. ·In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the
period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be
completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the
Owners as provided herein.
\
Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements,
the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the
City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's
Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project,
together with a statement thatcif the Association fails to pay such invoice in full within
the time specified, the City wiiF pursue collection against the Owners in the Project
pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and payable by the
Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If the Association
shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be
deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six
percent {6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection
from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies
available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each
Lot in the Project for an equal pro rata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such
special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien
upon each Lotagainst which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project
hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to
impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue
PC RESO NO. 7146 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
e.
lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes
of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in
Article of this Declaratiqn.
Landscape Maintenance Respontsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner
landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibit ___ _
This project is being approved as a condominium permit for residential homeownership
purposes. If any of the units in the project are rented, the minimum time increment for such
rental shall be not less than 31 days. The CC&Rs for the project shall include this requirement.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that
this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation
Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the City Planner and the City Attorney (see Noise
Form #1 on file in the Planning Division).
Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map is not
being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units, the Developer
shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to provide and deed restrict
two (2) dwelling units (identified as Units 1 and 6) as affordable to lower-income households
for 55 years, in accordance with the. requirements and process set forth in Chapter 21.85 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The draft Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted to
the City Planner no later than 60 days prior to the request to final the map. The recorded
Affordable Housing Agreement shall ·bE!, binding on all future owners and successors in
interest.
Developer shall construct the two (2) required inclusionary units concurrent with the project's
market rate units, unless both the final decision-making authority of the City and the
Developer agree within ·an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for
development.
Prior to issuance of the building permit, verification shall be submitted confirming that the
buildings have been designed to comply with the recommendations of the noise study
prepared for the project (Wieland Acoustics, July, 2014).
No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. When so
required, the Developer shall submit and obtain approval of the Fire Chief and the City Planner
of an Outdoor Storage Plan, and thereafter comply with the approved plan.
Engineering
NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of
this proposed development, must be met priot to approval of a final map, grading permit or building
permit, whichever comes first.
General
23. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within
this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer for the
proposed haul route.
PC RESO NO. 7146 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
24.
25.
26.
27.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for
the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that
adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit issuance and will
continue to be available until time of occupancy.
Developer shall submit to the city engineer an acceptable instrument, via CC&R's and/or other
recorded document, addressing the maintenance, repair, and replacement of shared private
improvements within this subdivision, including but not limited to private drive aisles, utilities,
sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, enhanced pavement water quality treatment measures, low
impact development features and storm drain facilities located therein and to distribute the
costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within
this subdivision.
Developer shall prepare, submit and process for city engineer approval a final map to subdivide
this project. There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project. Developer shall pay the city
standard map review plan check fees.
Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all drive aisles intersections with Roosevelt
Street in accordance with City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this
condition.
Fees/ Agreements
28.
29.
30.
Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for
recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement.
Developer shall cause property owner to submit an executed copy to the city engineer for
recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice i"!( li
Maintenance Agreement.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, developer shall cause
owner to give written consent to the city engineer for the annexation of the area shown within
the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and
Landscaping District No. 1 and/or to the formation or annexation into an additional Street
Lighting and Landscaping District. Said written consent shall be on a form provided by the city
engineer.
Grading
31.
32.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative
map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and
technical studies/reports for city engineer review, post security and pay all applicable grading
plan review and permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule.
Developer acknowledges that, pursuant to Order No. R9-2013-0001 issued by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, new storm water requirements become effective near
the end of 2015, and affect the design of this project. Prior to construction, Developer shall
demonstrate compliance with latest ~t~nn water requirements to the satisfaction of the city
engineer. ' . ·~' l
PC RESO NO. 7146 -10-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
33.
34.
35.
36.
Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are
not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during
construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices,
maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the
discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to
the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the
above requirements.
Developer shall complete and submit to the city engineer a .Project Threat Assessment Form
(PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, developer shall also
submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance. form and appropriate Tier level
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF all to
the satisfaction of the city engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and
inspection fees per the city's latest fee·schedule.
This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare
and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to city engineer approval, to
demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment requirements per the
city's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), latest version. In addition to
new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, latest version or BMP Design
Manual in effect at the time of submittal. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection
criteria in the SUSMP, the developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches
to ensure that runoff from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc.) are drained through
landscaped (pervious) areas prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable SWMP plan
review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule.
Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, improvement plans,
landscape plans, building plans, etc.) incorporate all source control, site design and Low Impact
Design (LID) facilities.
Dedications/! mprovements
37.
38.
Developer shall design the private drainage systems, as shown on the tentative map to the
satisfaction of the city engineer. All private drainage systems (12" diameter storm drain and
larger) shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check
and inspection fees for private drainage systems.
All private utility facilities including but not limited to electrical transformers and fire service
connections shall be located a minimum oftwo feet outside of the public right of way.
39~ Developer shall prepare and process public improvement plans and, prior to city engineer
approval of said plans, shall execute a city standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement to
install and shall post security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 for public
improvements shown on the tentative map. Said improvements shall be installed to city
standards to the satisfaction of the city engineer. These improvements include, but are not
limited to:
A. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches and curb outlets.
B. Street lights.
C. Water services and water meters.
D. Sewer laterals.
PC RESO NO. 7146 -11-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
40.
Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees. Improvements
listed above shall be constructed within 36 months of approval of the subdivision or
development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall install separate sewer services to each unit
proposed by this tentative parcel map. Sewer services shall be provided to the satisfaction of
the city engineer.
Non-Mapping Notes
41. Add the following notes to the final map as non-mapping data:
A.
B.
c.
D.
Developer has executed a city standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement and has
posted security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 to install public
improvements shown on the tentative map. These improvements include, but are not
limited to:
1. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches and curb outlets.
2. Street lights.
3.
4.
Water services and water meters.
Sewer laterals.
Building permits will not be iss'ded for development of the subject property unless the
appropriate agency determines tfiat sewer and water facilities are available.
No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted
to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor as defined by City of
Carlsbad Engineering Standards or line-of-sight per Caltrans standards.
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has
agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may
arise through any diversion of waters, the alteration of the normal flow of surface
waters or drainage, or the concentration of surface waters or drainage from the
drainage system or other improvements identified in the city approved development
plans; or by the design, construction or maintenance of the drainage system or other
improvements identified in the city approved development plans.
Utilities
42.
43.
44.
Developer shall meet with the fire marshal to determine fire protection measures (fire flows,
fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if
proposed, shall be considered public improvements and shall be served by public water mains
to the satisfaction of the district. engineer: .
Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges for
connection to public facilities.
The developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a source
and prepare and submit a colored recycled water use map to the Planning Department for
processing and approval by the district engineer.
PC RESO NO. 7146 -12-
1
45.
2
3 46.
4
5 47.
6
7 48.
8 49.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Developer shall install potable water meters at locations approved by the district engineer. The
locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
The developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the city
engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans or as
directed by the city engineer.
The developer shall design and cons'th.:ld public water and sewer facilities substantially as
shown on the tentative map to the satisfaction of the district engineer and city engineer.
The developer shall provide separate potable water meters for each separately owned unit
within this subdivision.
Prior to using one potable water meter to serve a multi-ownership building, developer shall
apply for and receive approval from the utilities director. Upon application for and good cause
shown, the utilities director may allow a single potable water service connection and meter to a
multi-ownership building within this subdivision provided:
A.
B.
Developer shall record a deed restriction or other such document as approved by the
public works director and general counsel placing future owners on notice that each and
every residential or commercial/office unit is served by a single service connection and
meter, and in the event that the water bill is not paid by the party or entity responsible
for paying the monthly water service charges to CMWD for the respective building
occupied by the multi-ownership , CMWD may at its direction shut off the water service
to such multi-ownership building in accordance with CMWD adopted rules and
regulations.
Developer shall install a private ~ub-meter for each separately established residence or
business within a multi-ownersh:i'p· building having a single potable water service
connection and meter.
If denied, developer shall revise all design drawings to provide separate potable water meters
18 for each separately owned unit within this subdivision per district requirements.
19 Code Reminders:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
so.
51.
52.
53.
Developer shall pay planned local area drainage fees in accordance with Section 15.08.020 of
the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section
13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT} and
floor area contained in the 'staff report and shown on the tentative map are for planning
purposes only.
Developer shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the final map as
required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance ofa building pern;Jit; Developer shall pay a Public Facility fee as required by
Council Policy No. 17. . '; ,.
PC RESO NO. 7146 -13-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Developer shall pay the Local Facilities Management
fee for Zone 1 as required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.90.050.
Developer shall pay a landscape plancheck and inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
This tentative map shall expire two years from the date on which the City Council voted to
approve this application.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance,
except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
Premise identification (addresses) sh~li he provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 18.04.320.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you
protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a),
and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in
accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will
bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT
APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other
similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the
statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. ;: , ..
PC RESO NO. 7146 -14-
1
2
3.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L'
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of
the City of Carlsbad, California, held on February 3, 2016, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chairperson Anderson, Commissioners Black, Montgomery, Segall and
Siekmann
Commissioner L'Heureux
~£)4~w
·vELYN A DERSON, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
(lLt
DON NEU
City Planner
PC RESO NO. 7146
l-' ; .7 ..
. :···.··
-15-
The City of Carlsbad Planning Division EXHIBIT 4
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. G)
P.C. AGENDA OF: February 3, 2016
Application complete date: August 7, 2015
Project Planner: Shannon Werneke
Project Engineer: Steve Bobbett
SUBJECT: CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT-Request for a recommendation of
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the
construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2)
inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street in
Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management
Zone 1. The project qualifies as a CEQA' Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development
Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 to the City Council based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The subject 0.70-acre (gross) site comprises two parcels (APNs 103-101-02, -05) located on the west side
of Roosevelt Street, in between Laguna Drive to the north and Beech Avenue to the south. The
properties are addressed as 2683, 2687, and 2715 Roosevelt Street and are currently developed with
four (4) detached residential structures which are vacant. Based on a review of a Cultural Resources
Survey prepared by Roth and Associates (February, 1990) of potentially historic resources in the city, the
structures are not listed as having any potential historical significance. Given the developed nature of
the site, the project area is devoid of any sensitive vegetation. ;ropographically, the site is generally flat
and slopes from a high point of 41 feet above mean sea level (MSL) along the eastern property line to 39
feet above MSL along the western property line. The project site is located outside of the coastal zone
and within Land Use District 8, the Residential Support Area, of the Village Master Plan.
The proposed project entails a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit
to construct 16 attached air-space condominiums which are arranged on-site as duplexes (3L triplexes
(2) and one (1) four-plex. To comply with the inclusionary housing requirements, two (2) of the 16 units
are proposed to be income-restricted. Five different plan types are proposed, which range in size from
1,291 square feet (SF) to 1,672 SF. Each of the units is three stories tall and will have an approximate
height of 32'-3". Parking is proposed to be provided by an attached two-car garage for each unit; one
open/uncovered accessible parking stall is also proposed on-site.
The proposed density of the project is 22.9 dwelling units per acre. A detailed breakdown of each type
of unit is summarized in Table 1 below.
CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Pa e 2
TABLE 1-DETAILS FOR UNIT TYPE
Unit Type Quantity Size Bedroom/Bathrooms {Gross SF)
A 4 1,638 SF 3/3
B 6 1,624 SF 3/3
c 2 1,599 SF 3/3
D 2 1,291 SF 2/2.5
E 2 1,672 SF 3/3
Garage Private Open
Space/Balconies
Two-car 289 SF
Two-car 287 SF
Two-car 207SF
Two-car 415 SF
Two-car 376 SF
Access to the site is proposed to be provided by two, 24-foot-wide driveways located off of Roosevelt
Street, which will be enhanced with concrete pavers. The primary pedestrian entrance to four of the 16
units is oriented towards the street, while pedestrian aq:ess to the remaining units is either taken from
a perimeter walkway adjacent to the side property line~ 'br a central walkway. In order to ensure that
the site adequately drains, as well as to provide adequate privacy to the adjacent uses to the north,
south and west, a combination retaining/screen wall ranging in height from approximately 3'-6"' to 6'
feet is proposed along the north, south and west property lines. Grading for the proposed project
includes 2,000 cubic yards of fill and 50 cubic yards of cut. As a result, a total of 1,950 cubic yards of
material is proposed to be imported to the site.
The architectural design is characterized as contemporary with a coastal influence. Primary building
materials include a light cream-colored stucco and olive-colored horizontal composite siding. Asphalt
shingles cover a 5:12 pitched roof over each unit; and metal awnings adorn some of the windows, doors,
and balconies throughout. A variety of roof planes are included that provide different roof heights and
each elevation includes off-setting building planes.
Table 2 below identifies the General Pla'n designations, zoning and. current land uses of the project site
and surrounding properties.
TABLE 2-SURROUNDING LAND USES
Location General Plan Zoning Village Master Plan Current Land Use Designation Land Use District
Site v V-R · :land Use District 8 Four vacant single-
(Village) (Village Review) . RJ'sjdential Support family homes
North v V-R ! · Land Use District 8 Single-family home Residential Support
South v V-R Land Use District 8 Professional offices Residential Support
Land Use District 8 Single-family, multi-
East v V-R Residential Support family and an urgent
care office
Cabinet-making
West v V-R Land Use District 4 business, gift
Residential Support shop/boutique, and auto
repair.
CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Pa e 3
Ill. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following ordinances, standards, and policies:
A. Village (V) General Plan Land Use designation;
B. Village Review (V-R) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), Land Use District 8 (Residential Support Area,
Village Master Plan and Design Manuai)/Development Standards Modification;
C. lnclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85);
D. Subdivision Ordinance (CMC Title 20); and
E. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90), Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1.
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency
with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above
regulations and policies is discussed in the sections below.
A. Village (V) General Plan Land Use Designation
The subject property, comprising two legal parcels, has a General Plan Land Use designation of Village
(V). As discussed in the Village Master Plan, properties .Within the Village Area do not have an assigned
residential density as it relates to Growth Management P:laln compliance. Therefore, the minimum and
maximum densities for residential development are· established in the Village Master Plan. Table 3
below identifies the permissible density range for properties located outside of the coastal zone and
within Land Use District 8. In addition, the allowable range for the number of dwelling units based on
the size ofthe project site and a comparison to what is currently proposed is included in the table.
TABLE 3-PROPOSED DENSITY
Allowable Density Range; Project Density; Gross Acres Net Acres Min/Max Dwelling Units per
Village Master Plan Proposed Dwelling Units
18-23 du/ac 22.9 du/ac
0.70 0.70 Minimum: 13 dwelling units 16 units
Maximum: 16 dwelling units
As identified above, the project's density of 22.9 dwelling units per acre falls within the allowable
density range of 18 to 23 dwelling units per acre.
Pursuant to the Housing Element of the General Plan, because a Growth Management Control Point has
not been established for residential development in tlte: Village, all residential units approved in the
Village must be withdrawn from the City's Excess Dwellirig·Unit Bank (EDUB). The EDUB is implemented
through City Council Policy No. 43. Pursuant to City Council Policy No. 43, an applicant for an allocation
of dwelling units shall agree to provide the number of inclusionary units as required pursuant to CMC
Section 21.85.050 and shall execute an affordable housing agreement (AHA) prior to recordation of the
final map pursuant to CMC Section 21.85.140. As discussed in Section C below, the proposal to
construct 16 units onsite, including two inclusionary units, is consistent with the inclusionary housing
requirement as set forth in City Council Policy No. 43. In addition, the project is accordingly-conditioned
to require the execution ofthe AHA prior to recordation of the Tentative Tract Map.
CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Page 4
In approving a request for an allocation of excess dwelling units, the project shall meet the findings
identified in City Council Policy No. 43. Specifically, the project location and density shall be found to be
compatible with adjacent land uses and the project is consistent with the General Plan and any other
applicable planning document. As discussed in the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146,
the proposed project meets these findings. As the proposed project requires approval from City Council,
the City Council is the final decision-making authority for1,(h~ allocation from the EDUB.
The following Table 4 describes how the proposed project is consistent with the various elements of the
Carlsbad General Plan.
TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY? OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM
Land Use Goai2-G.29 The proposed project, which includes Yes
Maintain the Village as a center the construction of 16 multi-family
for residents and visitors with air space condominiums, will
commercial, residential, dining, enhance the vitality of the Village by
civic, cultural, and entertainment providing new residential units in
activities. close proximity to the downtown
core area, as well as the train station.
Goai2-G.30 The project reinforces the
Develop a distinct identity for the pedestrian-orientation desired for
Village by encouraging a variety the downtown area by providing an
of uses and activities, such as a opportunity for the residents to walk
mix of residential, commercial, td ~hopping, recreation, and mass
office, restaurants and specialty . tr~~~ilfunctions. 'The project's
retail shops, which traditionally proximity to existing bus routes and
locate in a pedestrian-oriented mass transit will help to further the
downtown area and attract goal of providing new economic
visitors and residents from across development near transportation
the community by creating a corridors.
lively, interesting social
environment. Overall, the residential project will
contribute to the revitalization of the
Policy 2-P.70 Village area.
Seek an increased presence of
both residents and activity in the
Village with new development,
particularly residential, including
residential as part of mixed-use
development, as well as commer-
cial, entertainment and cultural
uses that serve both residents
and visitors.
CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Page 5
TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED)
ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS· OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM
Mobility Goai3-G.3 The proposed project includes the
Provide inviting streetscapes that dedication of eight {8} feet of right-
encourage walking and promote of-way for the development of a
livable streets. sidewalk and street trees along the
project's Roosevelt Street frontage.
In addition, the units facing the street
each include porches which enhance
the,streetscape and promote livable
streets.
The proposed project has been
designed to meet all of the
circulation requirements, which
includes two 24-foot-wide driveways
off of Roosevelt Street.
Sustainability Policy 9-P.10 Each ofthe 16 multi-family air space
Decrease the need for artificial condominiums has its own porch
cooling, heating and lighting, and and/or fenced rear yard and private
promote outdoor lifestyles in balcony areas. The open space
Carlsbad's sunny and moderate provided for each unit ranges from
climate by: 207 to 943 square feet, which
• Ensuring that the Zoning exceeds the requirements of the
Ordinance provides for Village Master Plan.
adequate private and common
open spaces as part of Given the nature of the product type,
multifamily developments. attached multi-family units, not all
• Encouraging residential and units have windows on all four
office buildings to have eleyations. However, the elevations
windows that open to the which;do have sun exposure, include
outside in all habitable rooms, several windows which maximize the
and maximize the use of use of daylight.
daylight.
Policy 9-P.11
Implement the city's Landscape The project includes a landscape plan
Manual to mitigate urban heat which has been determined tci be
island effects through maximum consistent with the city's Landscape
tree canopy coverage and Manual. Perimeter landscaping,
minimum asphalt and paving which includes trees, reduces the
coverage, particularly for denser urban heat island effect throughout
areas like the Village and the the site.
Barrio, shopping centers, and
industrial and other areas with
expansive surface parking. I
COMPLY?
Yes
Yes
CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Page 6
TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED)
ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM
Housing Goai10-G.3 The proposed project includes the
Sufficient new, affordable construction oftwo (2) inclusionary
housing opportunities in all units on-site which will be required to
quadrants of the city to meet the be rented at a low income level.
needs of current lower and The provision for inclusionary
moderate income households housing will contribute towards
and those with special needs, and achieving the city's Regional Housing
a fair share proportion of future Needs. The project has been
lower and moderate income accordingly-conditioned to require
households. the approval of an Affordable
Housing Agreement prior to
Goai10-P.15 recordation of the final map.
Pursuant to the lnclusionary
Housing Ordinance, require In approving a request for an
affordability for lower Income allocation of excess dwelling units,
households of a minimum of 15 the project shall meet the findings
percent of all residential identified in CC Policy No. 43.
ownership and qualifying rental Specifically, the project location and
projects. For projects that are density shall be found to be
required to include 10 or more compatible with adjacent land uses
units affordable to lower income and the project is consistent with the
households, at least 10 percent General Plan and any other
of the lower income units should applicable planning document. As
have three or more bedrooms discussed in the attached Planning
(lower income senior housing Commission Resolution No. 7146, the
projects exempt). proposed project meets these
Policy 10-P.18
findings.
Adhere to City Council Policy
Statement43 when considering
allocation of "excess dwelling
units" for the purpose of allowing
development to exceed the
Growth Management Control : .;}';
Point (GMCP) density, as . "·r.
discussed in Section 10.3
(Resources Available). With
limited exceptions, the allocation
of excess dwelling units will·
require provision of housing
affordable to lower income
households.
COMPLY?
Yes
CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Pa e 7
TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED)
ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM . ·,;
Public Safety Goai6-G.1 The proposed structural
Minimize injury, loss of life, and improvements are required to be
damage to property resulting designed in conformance with all
from fire, flood, hazardous seismic design standards. In
material release, or seismic addition, the proposed project is
disasters. consistent with all of the applicable
fire safety requirements.
Policy 6-P.6
Enforce the requirements of Further, the project has been
Titles 18, 20, and 21 pertaining to conditioned to develop and
drainage and flood control when implement a program of "best
reviewing applications for management practices" for the
building permits and elimination and reduction of
subdivisions. pollutants which enter into and/or
are transported within storm
Policy 6-P.34 drainage facilities.
Enforce the Uniform Building and
Fire codes, adopted by the city,
to provide fire protection
standards for all existing and ',1
'"'
proposed structures. ,, ;·t
•j•
Policy 6-P.39
Ensure all new development
complies with all applicable
regulations regarding the
provision of public utilities and
facilities.
COMPLY?
Yes
CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, ~016
Page 8
TABlE 4-GENERAl PlAN COMPliANCE (CONTINUED)
Noise Goai5-G.2 The project site is impacted by noise
Ensure that new development is from the railroad, which is located
compatible with the noise approximately X mile west of the
environment, by continuing to site. A noise study was prepared for
use potential noise exposure as a the proposed project (Wieland
criterion in land use planning. Acoustics, July, 2014). The project
has been conditioned to comply with
Policy 5-P.3 the re,commendations of the noise
For all projects that require report to ensure that the proposed
discretionary review and have building design adequately
noise exposure levels that exceed attenuates the noise levels for the
the standards in Table 5-1, new condominiums. The
require site planning and recommendations include the
architecture to incorporate requirement for mechanical
noise-attenuating features. With ventilation (i.e., air conditioning
mitigation, development should units). In addition, a Notice will be
meet the allowable outdoor and required to be recorded on title to
indoor noise exposure standards notify future owners that the
in Table 5-2 (45 dBA). When a property is subject to noise from the
building's openings to the railroad.
exterior are required to be closed
to meet the interior noise
.. standard, then mechanical
ventilation shall be provided.
Yes
B. Village Review Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), land Use District 8, Residential Support Area
(Village Master Plan and Design Manual)
'',,
The subject property is located within Land Use Dist.ricr-8, Residential Support Area, of the Village
Master Plan. The proposed project entails a request 'to construct a total of 16 multi-family residential
airspace condominiums. The specific development standards for new development within Land Use
District 8 and the project's compliance with these standards are shown in Table 5 below:
TABlE 5
VIllAGE MASTER PlAN, lAND USE DISTRICT 8, RESIDENTIAl SUPPORT AREA
STANDARD REQUIRED/ AllOWED PROPOSED COMPlY?
Intent Intent The proposed project Yes
Develop Land Use District 8 contributes towards the
with a relatively dense urban overalf goal of creating a
residential neighborhood with dense urban residential
a Village scale and character. neighborhood since the
density is being
maximized and a
contemporary
architectural design is
proposed which
complements the Village
• atmosphere.
r·. ~ .
CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Page 9
TABLE 5
VILLAGE MASTER PLAN, LAND USE DISTRICT 8, RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT AREA (CONTINUED)
STANDARD REQUIRED/ ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLY?
Front Yard Setback 5-15 feet 13'-15' Yes
Side Yard Setback 10% of lot width, 5-10 feet 10' Yes
Rear Yard Setback 5-10 feet 10'-15' Yes
Max Building Height 35' 32'-3" Yes
Building Coverage 60-80% 45.79% Yes. Pursuant to the
Universal Standards in
the Village Master
Plan, the bottom of
the range is
considered the
desired standard. Due
to setback, access and
storm water
requirements, it is not
feasible to meet the
bottom of the range
for the building
coverage. Further, a
Standards
Modification is only
required for projects ·
which exceed the
maximum of the
range (i.e., 80%).
Parking 2 spaces per unit, one of which Two-car garage per unit, Yes
is required to be covered; one 20' x 20'; one accessible
accessible parking stall parking stall
Open Space 20% = 6,098 SF 31.3% or 9,544 SF Yes
*Includes patios/balconies,
landscape planters/pockets
Density 18-23 dwelling units/acre 22.9 dwelling units/acre Yes
C. lnclusionary Housing
Pursuant to the City's lnclusionary Housing regulations, specifically CMC Chapter 21.85.030, for any
market-rate residential development of seven (7) units or more units, not less than 15% of total units
shall be restricted both as to occupancy and affordability to lower income households. To satisfy the
above-noted requirement, the applicant proposes to designate two (2} of the 16 units on-site as rent-
restricted units. As required by CMC Chapter 21.85, the project has been accordingly-conditioned to
require the approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement prior to recordation ofthe final map.
D. Subdivision Ordinance
The Land Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed Tentative Tract Map and has
found that the subdivision for 16 air-space condominiums complies with all applicable requirements of
the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20). The project has been
CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
February 3, 2016
Page 10
conditioned to install all infrastructure-related improvements and the necessary easements for these
improvements concurrent with the development, including the dedication of 8 feet for frontage
improvements adjacent to Roosevelt Street.
E. Growth Management
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest quadrant of
the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted
performance standards, are summarized in Table 5 below.
TABLE 5-GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE
City Administration 163.4 sq. ft. Yes
Library 87.15 sq. ft. Yes
Waste Water Treatment 16 EDU Yes
Parks 0.33 acres Yes
Drainage 2.11 CFS Yes
Circulation 96 ADTs Yes
Fire Station 1 Yes
Open Space n/a n/a
Schools E: 5.65, M: 1.65, H:/1.53 Yes
Sewer Collection System 3,520 GPO . '. ~ . Yes
Water 4,000 GPO Yes
Properties located within the boundaries of the Village Master Plan do not have a Growth Management
Control Point or an allocation for dwelling units. Therefore, as 16 units are proposed, a total of 16
dwelling units are proposed to be deducted from the City's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank. Pursuant to
Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146, the allocation from the EDUB can be supported.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32
Categorical Exemption. The project is consistent with the Village Master Plan, as well as the General
Plan, the project site is within the City limits, is less than 5 acres in size, and is surrounded by urban uses;
there is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species;
approval of the project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water
quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project is
exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA
guidelines. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the City Planner upon final project approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 (CT 14-07/RP 14-20)
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Statement
4. Reduced Exhibits
5. Full Size Exhibits "A"-"S" dated February 3, 2016
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
Beachwalk at Roosevelt
CT·14-07 I RP 14-20
r,~, ::~f>'C I T Y 0 f
DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT
P-1(A)
Development Services
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www .carlsbadca .gov CARLSBAD
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will
require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission
or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project
cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a
financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership,
include the names, titles; addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned
corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A
I separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Corp/Part V ~ i A P)\[fc te_u~bpfie)f\
2.
P-1(A)
Title. ___________ _
Address. _________ _
OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any
ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal
ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the
ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of
all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE
SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and
addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Corp/Part M R c~rl-sb~t~ l i ' Lt-CI Person __________ _
• I
Title. ___________ _ Title'---------------
Address. _________ _ Address ,., JqV1
Page 1 of2
18/g fS~ Ave-l <-le taV
b1e-1o, C~. tf~}Dl .
d I
Revised 07/10
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1} or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust,
list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-
profit organizatio'kolJ~~~~~ be;W)i)!'l/of the. SWITJJSb'iJ FlU-liLY
Non Profit!Trust:zqvsr b7--"lf:..oo ·Non Profit/Trust TI}.VST 07-/7-00
TitlebotJflL.b Set~tt.Uso.u-r.e.v:si"E£Title C!.HG~J.'fL. SwA-~6b1J to..vsreE.
Address de£ '£31.-(.) FF VIEW Address c;Jt..f '7bt-vF,C Vl£w
:::f={J.IJII-Jf3, C?lf· 9~3 "XI2tJINt=~ OA· 92.~0 3 v ..
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City
staff, Boards, Commissions, CommiTtees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)
months?
.;~ D Yes ~ If yes, please indicate person(s):. __ ........_ ______ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Print oriype name of owner/applica6t•s agent
P-1{A) Page2of2 Revised 07110
'
I
Plan Number Number !st. Type Bedrms, Bntlss FloorS.F.
UNITS A 376S.F. ...... , .
. ~~!.~ .. 362S.F,
UNITS c 361 S.F, '" UNITS D 2.5 140S.F.
UNITS E 396S.F.
OOSEVELT STREB
S34"00'40"E188,66'
UNIT SUMMARY
2od ,,, Total asff.e 1st Fir. 2ndFlr. 3rdFlr. FloorS.F, FloorS.F, LivlngS.F. PntioS.F. BnlconyS.F, BnlconyS.F.
774S.F. 48SS.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. u.6J.~m~<.. 52S.F, 171 S.F.
774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F, 433S,F. mlo.lr?J,!,;I' 36S.F. 171 S.F.
757S.F, 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. 171 S.F.
569S.F. 582S.F, 1:291S.F, 479S.F. 345S.F: 70S.F. N/A
788S.F, 488S.F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F. 33S.F. 171 S.F.
Tota!Priv. Rec,S,F.
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F.
~ ~
SITE PLAN
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/32" = 1'~0"
THI!McKJNU>Y ASSOC., INC.
I 08.27, 15
GENERAL INFORMATION:
'THE SUBOTVISION JS A CONDOWNIUM PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTJON 1350 ET. SEQ. OF THE CMt CODE Of THE STATE OF CAUFOitNIA AND Fit En PUilSUA"l\1 TO TIIF. SllllDIYISION ~AP ACT. THF. TOTAl NtiMAilR OF CONnOMINT\JM DWF.LLING mms IS 16ll.ESIDENTIALCONDOMJNIUMS,DEMOLITJONOF FI\'EH\nt.DJNOS TOTALING 7,2().1 S.l'.(l'IEiiCIVIL 01\'0.)
GENERAL PLAN
ZONING
Villo~oDiM<l!
EXISTING LOT
PROPO~RD LOT
APN
10].10]..02
20J..JOI..OS
PROPOSED NUMBER OF CONDOJviiNIUM
UNITS:
" TOTAL GROSS AREA:
DEDICATION AREA:
SITE ADDRESS:
2715+2G8l,2GS7ROOSEVELTST.
EXISTING USE
PROPOSED USE
PROPOSED DENSITY
BUILDING COVERAGE
BUILDING FOOTPRINT
13,365 S.F (WITH DALCONV AND OVIffiJIANG)
LANDSCAPED AREA
9,6S2SJ'(ll.4%).
IMPERVIOUS PAVINGIHARDSCAPE
H,6SSSJ'.
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA
22,0lOSI'
PARIUNG SPACES
" ACCESSIBlll" 1
WATER DISTRICT
CARLSUAO MUNICII'Al WATER PlSTIUCT
SCHOOL DTSTRICT
SEWER DISTRICT
AREA OF SITE UNDEVELOPABLE PER
ZONING SECTION 21.53.230
FIRE SPRINKLERED
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
V-llw/NI'PA13fln!<prinklm
OPEN SPACE
9,544S.F.
APPROVED
THJ!I.IS 'l'IJE APJII\OV£0'f~N'rA11VBMAI'!SITll PI .... \N FOR P.ROJI:iCTNO. __ rl:ltC01'Dl'riON NO. __
OWNER
MR. CARLS !lAD ll, LLC 1SJR'1STST.STE100 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 CONTACT: GEOFF MCC0t~-11C : 619-481-3830
APPLICANT
VI!STA PACIFIC 1818 FIRST STREET SUITE 100 SAN
DIEGO, fl.A. 92101 619-481-JSJO CONTACT: GEOFF MoCOMJC
CIVIL ENGINEER
PASCO Ll\llET SUITER 535 N.IOI HIGHWAY
SUlTE A SOLANA BEACH, C,\. 92075
858-259-B212CONTAC . .'T:llii.L\.NA!!DOUNO
ARCHITECT
THE McKINLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. ISIS FIRST STREET SUlTE 200 SAN DffiOO, CA. 92101GI9-2l11-ll34CUNTAt:T:KJRKMoKJNLt;Y
LANDSCAPE ARCHITEcr
McCOLLOUGH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 363 5TH AVENUE IJ201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101
6J9-296-J150COI-IT.\CT:D.\VIDM<COLto!]()ll
SOILS ENGINEER
LOT SUMMARY
GROSS LOT AREA: 30,699 S.l',=.70 AC LOT\VlDTH: lS6.6' LOT DEPTH: 125.0'
BUILDING AREA SUMMARY
RU!LDINOAREA; 32,41BS.F. OECKS!BALCONIES: 3,032 S.F.
~
UNIT A: l,(>JHS.I'. UNITR: l,624S.F.
UNITC: l,S')9S.F. UNITD: 1,291 S.F. UNITE: 1,672
UNIT COUNT
UNIT A: 4 UNITB:6 UNIT C: 2 UNIT 2 UNITE 2
PARKING SUMMARY
RI!SIOENTPARK!NG REQUIRED: 32
RESIDENT PARKING PROVlDSD: 32
GUEST: NOT ll.EQUIRED ADA: 1 ACCESSIBLESl'ACEI'ROVIDED
SETBACK SUMMARY
FRONT Y AltO: 5'-15' REQUIRED/13'
PROVIDED REAR YA!l.D: JO' REQUJRE0/10' PROVIDED SIDE YARD: 10' REQUIRED/tO' PROVIDED
LEGAL DESCRTPTlON
THI!NORTHEASE HALF OF LOT 26, SEAS! OJ! LANDS. IN THE CJTV OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDlNO TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1722,
FILED TN 'THE OFFICE OF TilE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAN Dlft00COUNTY,JULY2B, 1921
TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY
PASCO r..AltET SUITElt535 N.IOI HIGHWAY SUITE A
SOLANA DEACH, CA. 92075
CO!IT.\CT:llRIANAltDDWID85H-259-!llt2
PROJECT DATA
SEE CIVIL SHEET C·l FOR INFORMATION
DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS
TENTATIVETRACTMAP: CT-14-07
MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT: RP 14-20
A-1
SHEET I OF 13
Plan Number Type Bednn.s,
~s A
-~~" UNITS c '" ur-;_;;s D
u~_;;s
4!'-4"
:.:20'-1'
PLANA PLANA
,--------~-------+';w""'""""'-'-~-.,':1,....
"'"""''')>
OCGK -~ !11S.f.
LJ ,--L-~H+Ill'-111 S.l". r::=:1 -~1\10~~--.0
~~~~------~~ im.IRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN v
UNIT SUMMARY
Number !st. 2od 3m Tom! Garage lstFir. 2nd Fir. 3tdFlr. Bnths FloorS.F, FloorS.F. FloorS.F. UvingS.F. S.F. PntioS,F. BnlconyS.F. BnlconyS.F.
376S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. \,638S.F. 433S.F. u.~~i~l,, 52S.F. 171 S.F.
362S.F. 774S.F. 488S,F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. ;Jr~s.~~N~·J!:,~ 36S.F. 171 S.F,
361S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F, 427S.F, N/A 36S.F. 171S.F.
2.5 140S.F. 569S,F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F, N/A
396S.F. 788 S.F. 488S.F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S,F. 33S.F. 171 S.F.
TotulPriv. Rec.S.F.
~~Wu~J.:~
•• tJ?lii<~T .. ~ .. IO
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F,
4!'-4'
.20'-1' .20'-1'
PLANA PLANA
~~~~~------~ ~ONDFLOORBUILDINGPLAN v
BUILDING 1
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16"=1'~0"
TIII!MeKTNLEYASSOC.,TNC. I
08. 27. 15
.20'-l'
PLANA
ii[O~J
[0=0)
41'-4'
CT14-07
RP 14-20
PLANA
~~--~ ~OORBUILDINGPLAN v
A-2
SHEET20F 13
EAST ELEVATION
§I I I w -,, I ----II I I Ill ~
~IFBBB , .. ,
BCJCJCJ '
--------DJ51PI66AAII!! -------------·---------------
SOUTH ELEVATION
UNIT SUMMARY
UNITS A 376S.P. 774S.P. 488S.P. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. m~-~i~i.• 52S.F. , ..... ,,
UNITS 362S.P. 774S.F. 48BS.F. 1,624S,F, 433S,F. m~J?J!,;,. 36S.F. 1,M,l~l<,l<
UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. '·"
Ul'!,\(S D 25 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S,F. 479S,F. 345S.F, 70S.F.
UNITS 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F, 172S.P. 33 S.F.
171 S.F.
171 S.F.
171 S.F.
N/A
171 S.F.
TotalPriv. Rec.S.F.
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F.
---------------------------------------
WEST ELEVATION
II I
NORTH ELEVATION
BUILDING 1
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16""" l'-O"
Till! McKINLEY ASSOC., INC. I
08 '27' 15
CT14-07
RP 14-20
MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS I ,79FT, A-3
SHEET3 OF 13
TIDRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN • ~~~~~-------~ ¥ ..... -., ....
UNIT SUMMARY
Plan Number Number 1st. 2od 3cd Total GS.¥,e lstFir. 2nd Fir. Type Bednns, Bntlts FloorS.F. FloorS.F,. FloorS.F. LlvingS.F. PatioS.F. BalconyS.F,
~;,s A 376S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,63BS.F, 433S,F, "'~-~.;~·-· 52S.F.
UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 48SS,F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 1l,1a~?trH~;,, 36S.F. l,;l.:<,ll,l<,.l'
~;s c 361 S.F. .757S,F. 481 S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F, N/A 36S.F.
u~;;rs D 2.5 140S.F. 569S,F, 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F, 345S.F. 70S.F.
UNITS E 396S.F. 7BBS.F. 4BBS.F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F. 33S.F. I, I•
3rdFtr. BalconyS.F.
171 S.F.
171 S.F.
171 S,F,
N/A
171 S.F.
TotalPriv, Rec.S.F.
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F.
l--»t~t~t-
1
SECOND FLOOR BUILDING PLAN . m~~~~------~~ ..,..,. ....... 11<1'
BUILDING2
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'·0"
THEMcKINtEYASSOC.,INC. I
08. 27. 15
s~·-a·
12'-1"
CT14-07
RP 14-20
15'-1"
C g;:o]~~
c o::o]11
..,
I
I
_j
FIRSTFLOORBUJLDINGPLAN . m~~~~-------~ 00MO"·If<l·
A-4
SHEET40F 13
WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
UNIT SUMMARY
~s A 376S.F. 774S.F, 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. ~~~~~i~i,~
UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. ,ll.J,~S,!.;,. :~.;~,!, n.1~. 1!
UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. NIA '·"
u~~;rs D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. l,291S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F.
UNITS 396S,F, 788S.F. 488S.F. t,672S.F, 42SS.F. l72S.F. '·"
52S.F, 171 S,F,
36S.F. 171 S.F,
36S.F. 171 S.F.
70S,F, N/A
33S.F. 171 S.F.
I I I
--------------------------------------------------------mr
TotalPriv. Rcc,S.F,
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F.
EAST ELEVATION
I
SOUTI-1 ELEVATION
BUILDING2
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
THE McKINLEY ASSOC., INC. I
08. 27. 15
CT14-07
RP 14-20
MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FT. A-5
SHEET 50F 13
41'-8'
4'~· 15'-4' 16'-0'
THIRD FLOOR BUILDJNG PLAN ~
UNIT SUMMARY
Plan Number Number }St. 2od ,,, Total Gamge 1st Fir. 2ndFlr. • Type Bedrms. Batl!S FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F, LiviugS.F. S,F, PntioS.F. BnlconyS,F.
UNITS A 376S,F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S,F. 1\0~~ .. r.i,. 52S.F. ....... ~
}{'~~l~~ll 362S.F, 774S.F. 488S,F. 1,624S,F, 433S.F. 'lJa.~?Ull8rl;,~ 36S.F.
UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. NIA 36S.F.
UNITS D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. l,291S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F.
UNITS 396S.F. 788S,F, 488S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S,F. 172S.F, 33S.F. '·"
3rdFlr, BnlconyS,F,
171 S.F •
171 S.F,
171S.F.
NIA
171S.F.
u
!I z
a j "i
P-;
TotalPriv, Rec,S,F.
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F.
15'-4'
SECOND FLOOR BUILD !NO PLAN , ~~~--~ """-"'~··W
BUILDING3
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3116"=1'·0"
1lii!McKINLEYASSOC,,!NC. I
08.27.15
~ "'
4'-ol"
!I ~
15'-4'
PATIO "S65.f,
SEEGIVIJ...
:zo·-·~·
------.a-~~~8 ==B~B ~~ FIRST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN-\lY
A-6
SHEET60F 13
~s
UNITS l,),J,I>,I<,Il
UNITS <,I)
UI'!,\(S
UNITS
1---Tr=,~~~f~~~~~~~MnrAtHANnRAIL 2X6 WOOD F."t.SCL<\ STUCCO TO BE SMOOTH TROWEL ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF VINYL WINDOW
COMPOSITE SJDING CT14-07
RP 14~20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=~M ··---------------------------------------------------------------------------------lll'~~.'nl'
NORTHELEVATION W~E\l,ST~,;E~L"'E'-'V<.!A>.!T..,IO"'N"---------------
I I
I I
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ms:r~w ·---------------------------------------------------------------------------r··---------------mmrw
SOUTH ELEVATION
UNIT SUMMARY
Plan Number Number ht. 2od ,,, Total Garage 1st Fir. Typo Bedrms. Baths FloorS.F. FloorS,F. FloorS.F. LivingS.F. S.F. PatioS.F.
A 376S.F. 774S.F, 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. uo~.lti~i,,
362S.F. 774S.F, 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 7lr.I,J?U>I~rfilr.
c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A
D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F.
396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F, l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F.
2nd Fir. 3rdFJr. BalconyS.f. BalconyS.F.
52S.F. 171 S.F.
36S.F. . 171 S.F.
36S.F. 171 S.F:
70S.F. N/A
33S.F. 171 S.F.
TotalPriv. RcC.S.F.
207S.F.
415S.F.
3'76S.F.
EAST ELEVATION ,..,..,.,,.leg'
BUILDING3
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
TIIEM~KINLEYASSOC.,INC. I
08. 27. 15
MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FT. A-7
SHEET70F 13
UNITS ........
UNITS
l,J,J,\l,I<,U
~s
UNITS
u~.~;s
41'-4'
PLANA PLANA
..20'-1"
-~---r==r---------,
f----ir=======illl
I
I
I
I I I I I
I I I I
I
I I I I
P<CK n1::.r.
I II
I II L _jL
PLAND
II -111::.1'.
PLAND
EJ
THIRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~---~ ........ MY•I'<>"
UNIT SUMMARY
Plan Number Number 1st. 2nd 3'd Tollll os~¥.e lstFlr. 2nd Fir. 3rdFlr. Type Bedrms. BatlJS FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F, LivingS.F. PatloS.F. BnlcooyS.F, BnlconyS.F,
A 3 3 376S.F. 774S.F. 488S:F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. ll?~~~i~ .... 52S.F. 171 S.F •
B 3 3 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 1lJa~~~~~ 36S.F. 171 S.F.
c 3 3 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. 1,599S.F, 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. 171 S.F.
D 2 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 419S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F. N/A
E 3 3 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F. 33S.F. 171 S.F.
41'-b"
PLANA
.20'-lo.l'
PLANA
..20'-1"
~ 20'-i' ~ 20'-1'
PLAND PLAND
SECOND FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ilm~~~~------~~ ~~··r-<>'
SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F. Tili!MoKINLEVASSOC.,INC. I
08.27. 15
PATIO &v.;s.F.
5a=CIVIL.
PLANA
.20'-1'
PATIO 11'15,f.
SB:CIVIL.
41'-4'
""'"
PLANA
..20'-1'
PATIO 11'15.1".
!i:ECIYIL.
~ \I--II--IV!~
(O=DL
,.~~ ~ c o::o~~
I
PLAN DL..:.J L..:.J PLAN D
CT14-07
RP 14-20
PATIO
54!;5.1'.
&'EGlVIL.
Fill.ST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~~------~~ l<"o>UoW'•,...,.
A-8
SHEET8 OF 13
11 I
I I
SOUTH ELEVATION
I
I I I
I
---------------------------------------------------------------------t>IOJJl56AAt!O
EAST ELEVATION
= = I I
CT14-07
RP 14-20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTH ELEVATION
UNIT SUMMARY
Plnn Number Number I st. 2od '"' Total Garnge lstFlr: Type BedrJns. Batl!S FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F, L!vingS.F. S,F, PntioS.F.
UNITS A 376S.F. 774S,F, 488S,F, 1,638S.F. 433S.F. no~.u'ii~i,,
l~¥,, 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S,F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. n•ti<~?UNS,;!!:,~
UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S,F. NIA ••• l
u~~;rs D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,29~ S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F.
u~-~;rs 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S,F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. l72S.F.
2nclF1r. 3rdFlr. BnlconyS,F, BalconyS.F.
52S,F, 171 S.F.
36S.F, 171 S.F.
36S.f, 171 S.F.
70S.F. NIA
33S,F, 171 S.F.
TotalPriv. Rec.S.F.
207S.F .
415S.F.
376S.F.
WEST ELEVATION
BUILDING4
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
TIII!McKINlEVASSOC,INC.
I
08.27. 15
MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FT. A-9
SHEET90F 13
41'-8" .. .,. 16'-o" 15'-4' 4'-o.l'
---------~ ~4 r---~--~r--n~~~~~~~==~~-----1~~ I
I I I I
I
I
Ll
I I
PEG< 1115.F.
---[r~-+~=!=!=!=1=!=!=1=!=!#+=====~1$~~~~----~
I
I
r.J
I I I
I
I
I
PEG< 1115,F,
I Lr~~·hp~~nTR*~~====~~~~~=L----~
I -l"'t>QQt~--t
I
r.J
I
I
I
I
I I
"""' l11S.F,
I L----~--~~~~F=~~~~=T~
==~r----'---'j.----'lo-
THIRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN . "'*'~~~~-------~ !<:/Ui-'1"\•I'C'
UNIT SUMMARY
41'-8'
15'-4'
~~~~------~~ ~ONDFLOORBUILDJNGPLAN v
Plan Number Number lst. 2nd 3rd Total Garage 1st Fir. 2nd Flr. 3rd Fir. Total Priv. Type Bedrms. Batlls FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FioorS.F, LlvingS.F. S.F. PatioS.F, BalconyS.F. BalconyS.F. Rec.S.F.
BUILDINGS
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC UNITS ........ 376S,F. 774S.F. 488S.F. A
362S.F, 774S.F. 488S,F, UNITS ~,,,$,I~ ,.,I!
361S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. UNITS <,I!
2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S,F. UNITS
'" D
396S.F. 788S.F. 488S,F. UNITS '·"
l,638S.F. 433S.F. 11168.~\~i.l
l,624S.F. 433S.F. l'l}&~~~·f,:, •.
l,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A
1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F,
l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F,
52S.F. 171 S.F •
36S,F. 171 S.F.
36S.F. 171 S.F.
70S.F. N/A
33S.F. 171 S.F.
207S.F,
415S.F.
376S,F.
SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
THI! McKINlEY ASSOC., INC, I
08.27. 15
PATIO 136SJ', ~CIVIl.
FIRSTF OORBU DlNGP AN
A-10
SHEET 10 OF 13
SOUTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
UNIT SUMMARY
Plan Number Number !st. 2nd ,,, Total GS.~c 1st Fir. Type Bedrms. Baths FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F. ivingS,F. PatioS.F.
A 376S.F, 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. uft~.~N·tfs· .. ~ UNITS , .......
362S.F, 774S.F. 488S,F, 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 1l1J~.!s:,~ UNITS 1,l,l,11.1',1l
361S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A UNITS •.n
D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F, 345S.F.
396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F. 1,672S.F, 428S.F. 172S.F.
2nd Fir. 3tdFJr. Ba!conyS.F. Balcony S.F.
52S,F. 171 S,F,
36S,f. 171 S.F.
36S.F. 171 S.F.
70S.F. N/A
33S.F. 171 S.F.
TotalPriv. Rcc.S.F.
J~u~nf.:.
"fJ1rn~~~~·~·
207S.F.
415S.F.
376S.F.
WEST ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
BUILDINGS
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16"= I'-0"
TilEMcKJNLEYASSOC.,INC. I
08. 27. 15
CT14-07
RP 14-20
MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FA-11
SHEET 11 OF 13
----------, •""" r---
I B I n Dl'cK j::Q 1115F,
l.H!<II'IW«<-1 ~ ~ I I ~ Li ,...,4 '1
I P-<
I I I f-~~
I I I I
r.J P=1 ~ I j I _, n Dl'cK ~ 1115F.
I.Hi<ll'~-1 P-<
I B I L ___
"""'~~~~------~~ THIRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN ~<1'10'•1""
UNIT SUMMARY
Plan Number Number 1st. 2od ,,, Totul Garage 1st Fir. 2ndFlr. Type Bednns, Buths FloorS.F, FloorS.F, FloorS.F. LlviogS.F. S.F. PntioS.F. BnlconyS.F.
UNITS A 376S.F. 774S,F, '488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. u.~~;~; .• 52S.F. ,..,,,,.
UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433 S.F. mlJ?UN~;,I, 36S.F. l,;l,.$,1l,l',ll
UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S,F, •.u
UNITS D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F, 581S,F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F, 70S.F,
u~.~;s 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S,F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F. 172 S.F. 33S,F,
---I I
~
I ---I
3rdFJr. BalconyS.F.
171 S.F.
171 S.F.
171 S.F.
N/A
171 S.F.
I
TotalPriv. Rcc,S,F,
207S.F.
41SS.F.
376S.F.
WE
SECOND FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~~-------~ !41ft!!,¥> or-e>
BUILDING6
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16"=1'~0''
THI!McKINL'EYASSOC.,JNC. I
08. 27. 15
9'1'-10'
CT14-07
RP 14-20
FIRST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~~-------~ ;c;:u;....,.,c;:
A-12
SHEET 12 OF 13
coMPostTEsmrna ~~~~~~~F~~~fll ___ l
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
UNIT SUMMARY
Plan Number Number lst. 2nd 3rd Total Garage 1st Fir. 2nd Fir. 3rd Fir. Total Priv. Type Bedr:JJtS, Baths FloorS.F. FloorS.f. .floor S.F. Living S,F, S.F. Pntio S.F. BalconyS.F. Balcony S.F. Rec, S.F.
~.~s A 376S.F. 774S.F. 48&S,F. 1,63&S.F. 433S.F. m1J.~i~i,, 52S,F. 171 S.F.
UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. :JsV~J.;};;" 36S.F'. 171 S.F. '·"'·l~l<."
UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,S99S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. 171S.F. '" 207S.F,
U"!_\(S D 2.5 140S,F, S69S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F. N/A 415S.F.
UNITS 396S.F. 788S.F. 48&S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.P. 33 S.F. 171 S.F. 376S,F,
I I I
EAST ELEVATION
I I
I I
NORTH ELEVATION
BUILDING6
CARLSBAD VILLAGE
VESTA PACIFIC
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"
'llti!McKINLEYASSOC.,ffiC. I
08.27 .. 15
CT14-07
RP 14-20
MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS !.79 FA.-13
SHEET 13 OF 13
LBGBND
SYMBOL
----56----
-?--------*-
HtlUI~RIRlai»R1MaBPrX:AIE.ot ).·.· .. ·:.·•·. ·.:f';,.J
nom~ RU:m3J f5IVlilB PAm! B}CI{'<'§CH}§3!
Pfa'r1!!81 an;, am 11 runm
~·WCP.I!'E"FmiJiA11«SSr
CONDOMINWMNOTH
APN, 203-/0/-18
TENTATIVE MAP
2685, 2687. & 2715 ROOSEVELT STREET
CARLSBAD CA, 92008
CT 14~07 I RP 14~20
ROOSEVELT Sn<EET
r---------f-:7=------
I
~~ ------I .~ -q rv I
I
I I -~ ,.,.. ""'
':,I 8 I
1.:'
INT2 I ...-. l I ),1 I * (_T il ~~~. .J
~ B ;, ~ APN, 203-/01-14 ; :~ ~ \J 1/ 1~. . ~ •I ~ 1 I ~I I ~ ~ ""' J if ;I I -1+ ~ I tm1 ""'" <C ,p I c I ...,.. l I I '"'~ I 1-1 I
I
·~ I
1.:'
..,.. f....J -· -·u ""u
I, c.~ D ~~I D ~-· .. 0 D " " I
IGfW' 71 1SB
APN, 203-/0/-0/ 4 03 APN, 203-/0/-04 4 15
SITE PLAN
SCALf':j"""2(]'
SECI'ION c-c
N,T.S
Lli >
<C
:t:
\)
Lli
Lli
tl:\
GENERAL NOTES
Sfw.-~~~~~~cm~::~a~=mzue
AP~ B13-101-o2i05
EX.IS1l11GLDTS ~cl~~TS"/lEU f---T---1
""""""""'"TY W1LDIH3 lllw:RolGE'
8JltDINI3Fr10TffliNT '-"'ECN<<-I'Bll'l!XSPAVlNS'
A\lfRAGCilUl.Y 11W'flC GEN:RATEO
mRJSaJ I rF IJ.Im1
""'"""'"""" Pfl1'<SiDZUIOO
CDASTAI..Z'CIE
GE1Ei1W.. FUN tal!iMTJW
FLOOD PAIIEL
~HATERDEIWLJ
1'fllP09:aJSEHAGe'f'i'.I'ERATirH
Plml:SE!ImAINAGC'DlSO-WIGE'
HASTER.fli41N4SESASJN
~uffi'r'AWEcJ4.~~,&'(A.a~~ AC!EPTABLE
m:s: W..tiTIT.IES' AFE AR'mXoon: ANJ N£ ElB.E1:f ro mw:E BASEIJ ~ FJWJ.. EWIIEERIMJ DESifi.IINllETAn..11\G,
LE!W..IEiCRIPT.IQ't
2 '
30,699 SF • 0.7D AC
2!UOO.O SF• 0.61 N1
22.8 WIAC
"'·""
~ HMIUPAL HAJEli DlSlRlCT
CAfl.SBAD LNIFIED SCHJa.. ozsmmr
"'" T.DE HMHiR 001-EVlSlll'l sm HNIClJS aEEK-FmNTAL ru..F W.!W«A C4TALW\
00 7R1PS (JDII 5 ).DT/IX4
" I!Hl
I!Hl
WA
"" 260Gf'O/[JUifJS00•.(000S'{.l
220CD>/I1.JH !6C:V•3,5a:l GPO
1HSIUIT1EASTHAf.F (F LOT2a SE"AS.lml..A.'m IN TIEClTY rF CAil.S!lAQ. w.1f~F1Jf1r/'~t/fdf~~~~J: axMY, ..U.Y 28. 1921.
VICINITY MAP
40 60
OWNERS STATI1MBNT:
I IEIBJYWEEHTTll 1JEFILJ1B rF 1HlS l'EHTAT.nE'HU'
~~ ·(;
I ~
t§~l!l -u~1i ~iil~.! ~~ j i. !iTl :s ~" ~ •"• Q !!i;; u I 9 ~ ~H a.; B'il.
~ 1:1:)
i g
~ lr) ~ ~
~ ~ ~ li:i 1:-' ~ ~ t) I ~
~ I E'i ~
~
~ I
0 ~ •
" ~ :,; .. .(
SHEET
1
OF i3 SHEETS
TENTATIVE MAP
SPECIAL NOTES,
I. CURB-SIDE TRASH
PICK UP IS PROPOSED.
BIORBTBNTIONLANDSCAPBBMP
N.TS
SEcriONB-B
N,T.S
GRAPHIC SCALE 1~=10' ----I 10 20 30
SHEET
3
OF i5 SHEET
Pl.SA 2!!0
STR.EETTR.EES AND OTHER. TREES SHALL. BE SPACED
1, 8 FEET FROMTMNSFORMERS, CABLE AND FULl. BOXES, 2. SFEETFROMMJ\ILBO)(ES, 3, SFEETFROMFIREHYOAANTS. 4, 10 FEET FROM CENTER UNE OF ALL tmLlTY UNES (WITHOUT "ASEMENl) (SE\o\IER, WATER, STORM DRAINS, DOUillE CHECK DETECTORS, AIR AEUEFVALVES AND GAS),
10 FEET FROM "ASEMW BOUNDARIES (SEWER, WATER, STORM DRAINS, ACCESS OR OTHER UT!UTIES)
6. 10 FEET FROM DRIVEWAYS (UNLESS A UNE OF SIGHT IS DETERMINED BY THE TAAFAC DIVISION10 BE OTHEFI'MSE),
10FEETFADMTflAFFICANODIRECTIONALSIGNS, 15 FEET (MINIMUM) FROM STREETUC:.HTS, OTHER UTILITY POLES, (OETEAM!NED BY SPECIFICATIONS).
9. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED r1 OUTSIDE RIGHT OF WAY IF THE RIGHT OF WAY DOES NOT ALLOWS PACE, SUBJECT TO THE CtrY ENGINEERS APPROVAL
10. UNE: OF SIGHT AT ARTERIAlS, COLlECTOR AND LOCAL STRE!illl SHAlL BE REVIEWED AND DETERMINED BY TflAFFlC ENqllNEI>R. A flo\INIMUM OF 25' FROM STREET INT~llONOA/>SAPPADVEDBYTHETMFflCENGINEER, 11, MINIMUM 15' STREEllJGHT AND STOP SIGN OR ClEARANCE DEJERMINED BY SPECIFICATIONS.
12. SCREEN AlL tmUTIES ACCORDING TO SPECIFIC AGENCY REQUIREMENTS,
NOTE:
I AM FAMIUAR WITH THE REQUIREMEMTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED
INTHECITYOFCAALSBAD'SLANDSCAPEMANUALANDWATEREPFICIENTLANDSCAPE REGULA11DNS, I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPUANCEWITH TliOSE R.EGULAl10NS AND THE LANDSCAPE W.NUALAND AefiEE TO COMPLY WITH AlL REQUIREMENTS WHEN
SUBMITTING CONSTRUCllON DOCUMEN'!S.I CEATIFYTHATTHE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER
OAV!O MCCUllOUGH, Rl.A
r
FENCE AND GATE PATIO CONCEPTS
CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE
MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILfll'
!~~~{~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~
e;..T:n~~~~E.::.:~~~~~~':f:I~T~Jr:.U.BE Efl'WTWElV$CROi:NI!D'MfHMIT
11. flf<AliANPSCAPEPI.ANSSHIIU.ACCUMTELY&HOWPI.AOEMfNTOFTnEES,SHRUilS, ~ND~~~~CE~ii!TEOTSHIIllBCAWAAEOFtlllll!Y,GEWEA,STOR~DAAtNEO.sEI.IE!IT
~~~~~~~~gU~~~.AMORO!N<lWTOI&ETCIIYOFOARlSIIAO
IRRIGATION NOTE
PLANTING NOTE
LEGEND
LIGHTING SCHEDULE
~ MANUFACTURERIMODEUDESCRlPTlON .QI:(
)!!{ FXLUMINAIREDMPATHUGHT
;I( FXLUM!NAIREFBUP-LIGHT
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
03CONCRErE ~DESCRIPTION
~ CONCRETEBANDING(TYPJINTEGRALCOLOR.
OOVIOODS PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES ~pESCR.IPTION
--~ ~g~~AILFENCE(TYP,)SfAINEDTOMATCHBUILDING.4Z'
-=---::t~ ~ OOODPRJVACYFENCEWTHGATE.B'HE!GHT.
~ ~ 'M::IODPRIVACYFENCE.6'HEIGHT.
~ ~ COMPOSITEWOODDECK. ~ 32EXTERIORIMPROVEMENTS ~QESCRIPTION
~ ~ FLA.GSfONEORSfABIUZBJDECOMPOSEDGRANITE(TYP.)
~ g~g:~~~AVlNG
D JB:§ NEWSITECONCRETEWALK(TYP.)NATURALGRAYBROOM FINISH,
UNIT PAVING ~ SYMBOL Df§CRIPTION
~ ~ PERVIOUSPERMEABLEPAVERS(TYP.)
0
0
0
STREETTREE·2~-BOX CASSIALEPTOPHYLtA/GOLDMEDALLIONTREE
FRAXINUS OXYCARPA 'RAYWOOD' TM I RAYWOOD ASH LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS I BRISBANE BOX
PISTACIACHINENSISICHINESEPISTACHE PDOOCARPUSMACROPHYLLUSIYEWPINE 'TABEBUIAHETEROPHYLLA/PINKTABEBUIA
SMALLCANOPY/SIREETTREE-24"BOX ARBUTUSX'MARINA'IARBUTUSSTANDARD LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA I CRAPE MYRTLE
METROSIDEROS EXCELSUS I NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE
*~~ag~:~~~~;~E~U~~~~~~i~~~~/MULTl-TRUNK KING PALM OYATHEA COOPER!/ AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN HOWEAFORSTERIANAII<ENTIAPALMSTANDARD SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANA I QUEEN PALM
SMALL B!!ffiGREEN ACCENT SHRUB-ff!l% 5 GAL. MIN.
ABELlA X GRANCIFLORA 'KALEIDOSCOPE' !GLOSSY ABEUA CALANDRINIAGRAII.IDIFLORA!ROCKPURSLANE
CLIVIAMINIATAIKAFFIRLILLY GAILLARDIA X GRANDIFLORA 'FANFARE' I BLANI<ETFLOWER GREVIlLEAX't.IOELlii'/GREVJLLEA HEBESPEC!OSA 'VARIEGATA' /VARIEGATED HEllE ROSAFLORIBUNDA/ROSE RUSSELIAEOUISETIFORMIS/FIRECRACI<ERPLANT SALVIA GREGGII/ AUTUMN SAGE
MEDIUM EVERGREEN BORDER SHRUB·50o/o 5 GAL MIN. EUONYMUS JAPONICUS 'GREEI\ISI'IRE' I GREEN SPIRE UPRIGHT EUONYMUS
LEONOTISLEONURUSILION'STAIL LEPTOSPERMUM SCOPARlUM I NEW ZEALAND TEA TREE RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELlATAIYEDDA HAWTHORN RDSARUGOSAIRUGOSAROSE ROSMARINUS OFFICI NALlS 'BAftBEQUE'/ROSEMARY
SALVIA CLEVELANDII'WINIFRED GILLMAN' /CLEVELAND SAGE
MRGREENSCREENINGSHRUB-50%5GAL.MIN,
BAMBUSA MULTIPLEX 'ALPHONSE KARR' I ALPHONSE KARR BAMBOO LIGUSTRUMTEXANUMITEXM PRIVET LOROPETALUM CHINENSEI GREEN tOROPETALUM PITTDSPORUMTENUIFOLIUM 'SILVER SHEEN' ITAWI-HWHI PRUNUS CARCliNIANA 'BRIGHT 'N TlGHr TM I BRIGHT 'N TIGHT CAROLINA LAUREL
SMAll EVERGREENVERTICALSHRU8-5(l%5GAL OIANELLA CAERULEA 'LriTLE BECCA' TM/LITTLEBECCA FLAX LILY
OIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LOTLE REV JLmU: REV FLAX LILY DIANELl.ATASMANICA/FLAXLILY OIANELl.A TASMANICA 'TAS RED' I FLAX tiL Y LANTANA CAMARA 'MONIKE' /TEENIE GENIE LANTANA MUHLENBERGIA L!NCHEIMERI'AUTtiMN GLOW' TM/llNDHEJMER'S MUHL Y PHORMIUM TENAX I NEW ZE:ALAND FLAX SANSEVIERIA TRIFASCIATA I MOTHER-IN-LAW'S TONGUE
VUJSS-5!!'6fiGAl.MIN BOUGAINVlLLEA X 'OO.LA-LA' TM I OO·LA-LA BOUGAINVIlLEA CL YTOSTOMA CALl.ISTEGIOIDES IVlOLETlRUMPETVINE
DISTtCTlS BUCCINATORIAIBLOOD RED TRUMPET VINE FICUSPUMILAICREEPINGFIG GREWIAOCC!DENTALISII.AVENDERSTARFLOWER.ESPALIER MACFAOYENA UNGUIS-CATIIYELLOWTRUMPETVINE WISTERIASINENSISICHINESEWISTERIA.
BIQ.ftETENllONAR!!APLANTs-100%1GAL. CAREXSFISSA/SANDIE1GOSEDGE JUNCUS PATENS I CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH MUHLENB!ORGIA CAPILLARIS 'REGAL Mlsr TM I MUHLY
GROUNOCOVERs-FLATS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS X' PACIFIC MlSr I PACIFIC MIST MANZANITA BoUGAINVlltEA X "MONSAM' I GOlDEN JACKPOT BOUGAINVILLEA
IIOUGA!NV!LLEA X 'OD-LA-I.A' TM I OO·LA-LA BOUGAINVILLEA OYMONDIA MARGARETAE I DYMONDIA
ROSMARINUS OFFICI NALlS I ROSEMARY SENECIO MANORALISCAE I BLUE FINGER THYMUS PRAECOXARCTICUS 'COCCINEUS'/RED CREEPING THYME TRACHELOSPERMUM ASIATICUM I STAR JASMINE
100%@12'oc
100o/,@24"oc 100%@35"oc
100%@4B"oc
100%@46'oc 100%@40'o~ 100%@12'oc 100%@12"oc 100%@20"oc 100%@12"cc 100%@92"cc
THE CO~CS'TUA!. W.Tl.lf\0 ,<J/0 GC.O.lE OF l!iiS Pt..ll'l SEI' I~ Olfl'ICUlT TO ~S'RES!WT PIIOPI,.ED PlloCfMENT& OF 1'LANT TMTE~Lo.l ACCUFIATElY AA NEEDED fDA OOMPI.£1E CtlY ~i;VIEW.TIIE CtlY AE~fii\IE$ THE RIO.HT TO ~fQ'-'£ST DIFFERENT PI.M'T MATEI\IA!. ON lH~ F!ITURE lANDSCAPE IMF'Ilo~eMENT PlANS ('IIORKII"/0 ORAIWI~S) ASSOCIATED WITH !Ht:l CL!' DUE TO I.I!SGEO on UNfOR8EEAIII.EII!'MS&IIaHIISN!>TW.~TEDTO:DI5TANCETOIIo\ROSc:APf,lOCIIT!ONOFEASEMft.ITS, DtsTAI/CHDUTlli!IES,INOOMPATlai.I!TREECiiiiRAcnlli5TlC5fDAAPROI'DSEDlOCATIOii,ETC.
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN FOR:
ROOSEVELT
R~ision4; R.wlslon3: RevJslon2:
R~ls1on1:
ltVI5$H5 8/25/@15 S/f/l/?015 ~ PRWATELYW.INTAINEDAREA,3"DEEPBARKMULCH
~ PROJECTAAEAOUTSIDEOFTHISHATCH AREIISTOBEMAINTAINEDBYHOA,3"0EE.f'BARKMUlCH 10/lfi/2014
Shaat __ t __ ot--'--
UNIT? UNIT10
UNIT11
10
GRAPHIC SCALE
~.-• .J_t .. r Y
()>!fEET]
IINOH•IOFT.
rma.-sn
?><"f£.""7" /-:51-r f.~ ....
7!l316!hSI!oe~SUlle 100
SonDiogc,CoUiomlolltlOI
t~I(D19)21li!-315D 1«(6\Q)£01·7725
www.mtud,eom
Ccityof Carlsbad
WELO WORKSHEETS LANDSCAPE MANUAL APPENDIXE
P-25{0)
ShowC•IouloU~": 1!11\!11 • lUI I~,UI 1(0.1 ~ ll7ll t IO,) >< O))
~~f,!U/ofAPPUEPWATI!fiA\.J.OWANC~• 145,321
WATER USE MAP FOR
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN FOR:
,l!POSEVELT
Rowi51cn3: Rwl•lon2: l¥2;[12015
R~VI$ioh1:
OriJJinal O~to: WIIGIPOU
Sh.,.,t __ 2_ cl 2
--"l!il"--.
{IN FEET) 11NCH•10Ff,
IDI.a:SD
~~~fo/ ~f§~~~~~~:_:~~
l!411lDMCCUli.Oi/GH,ASlA
HYDR.OZONE DIAGRAM
ZONE1
• ZONE2
•. ZONE3
• ZONE4
• ZONES
• ZONE6
ZONE7
WATER USE MAP FOR
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN FOfl:
ROOSEVELT
Ravls1o~4: ~~iiE~ RBVIsk>n3: Revisicn2; li/P5/?Mt; RBVIsicn1: 6fftJ12015
orlglna]D3te: 10(/M?0/4
SheM-'-"-'-
Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2016
EXHIBIT 5
Page 3
2. CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT-Request for a recommendation
of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the
construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2)
inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street in Land
Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects)
Class 32 Categorical Exemption.
Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Associate Planner Shannon Werneke would make the staff
presentation.
Chairperson Anderson stated the Commission was in receipt of an errata sheet for the project.
Ms. Werneke gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions.
Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of staff.
Chairperson Anderson asked about the unit numbering shown on the landscape plans. Mr. Werneke stated
landscape plans have the units labeled incorrectly. Chairperson Anderson asked about homeowners
renting out the bottom floor bedroom. Ms. Werneke stated it is possible for the first floor bedrooms to be
rented out. Chairperson Anderson asked if the units would be built to allow for stacked washer/dryer units.
Ms. Werneke stated she would need to defer to the applicant. Chairperson Anderson also asked about
noise attenuation for the project. Ms. Werneke stated that prior to the issuance of building permits, she will
receive certification from the acoustician that the project meets the noise requirements.
Commissioner Segall asked about the first floor bedrooms being used as office space. Ms. Werneke stated
it can be used as a personal office but it cannot be used as a mixed-use retail office space.
Chairperson Anderson asked if there any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if the
applicant wished to make a presentation.
Geoff McComic, Vesta Pacific Development, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available
to answer any questions
Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions ,of the applicant.
Chairperson Anderson asked about the washers and dryJrs.1 Mr. McComic stated the washers and dryers
will be stacked with space for shelving on either side.
Commissioner Montgomery commented that units 4 and 13 are the only units that do not have at grade
porches or outdoor space and asked if that was the intent. Mr. McComic stated that because of the 1 0 foot
setback requirements, there is no space to accommodate any ground level outdoor space; however those
units do have balconies on the upper levels. Commissioner Montgomery stated he has a concern about
the 4-plex at the end of the driveway as homeowners will have to walk down the driveway to access the
unit. Mr. McComic stated that that is the way it is designed although there is the possibility of having a
sidewalk go all the way down the back of the end units. He added the project's design was driven by the
two corner units.
Commissioner L'Heureux requested the CC&Rs permit for a homeowner to install solar or EV charging
stations in the garage. Mr. McComic stated the project will be prewired for solar as it is required by state
law to make it easy for homeowners to install both.
Commissioner Siekmann supports Commissioner L'Heureux's suggestion and asked if it can be included
in the CC&Rs. Mr. Kemp stated the applicant is correct in that the state law takes precedence regarding
solar requirements. As the applicant has stated, the units will be owned as condos and the HOA cannot
prohibit the installation of solar. It might be difficult but it cannot be precluded. Mr. Neu added that HOAs
generally have guidelines on the best placement of equipment as long as it does not diminish the output of
the system.
Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2016 Page4
Commissioner Black asked Mr. Kemp if the installation 9pn be refused if the actual roof is owned by the
HOA. Mr. Kemp stated the individual homeowner has tHefight to install solar.
Commissioner Segall asked about EV stations. Mr. McComit stated that will be an option as the project
is being constructed. ·
Chairperson Anderson asked about the storage of trash cans. Mr. McComic stated the garages will be
large enough for two trash bins and two cars. Chairperson Anderson asked if he has any concerns
regarding delivery trucks. Mr. McComic stated no as the driveways will be wide enough.
Commissioner Black asked about trash pick-up. Mr. McComic stated that some of the units will have to
leave the trash bins on the other side of the driveway. It will be an HOA issue and the issue will be included
in the CC&Rs.
Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked
if any person in the audience wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Chairperson Anderson opened
and closed public testimony on Agenda Item 2.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner Montgomery commented that he likes the varied architecture and that the project meets all
of the requirements. He stated he is concerned with the safety of homeowners accessing the 4-plex at the
rear of the property.
Commissioner Black commented that he likes the archit~cture and the colors and stated he can support
the project. /
Commissioner Siekmann commented that she likes all th·~ windows and the patios and can support
Commissioner Montgomery's idea of adding a sidewalk for the units at the back of the property. She stated
she can support the item.
Commissioner L'Heureux commented that he has concerns with the design of the project but does not know
if they can be solved. He commented that the project appears to be too dense for the site and he is
concerned with the driveways as well as the· garages being so close together.
Commissioner Segall stated he can support the project as he likes the design and feels that in terms of
density the project is what the city is looking for.
Chairperson Anderson commented that she would like to see an outdoor recreational space. She stated
she can support the project. Chairperson Anderson further stated that she is undecided on the suggestion
of having a sidewalk at the back of the property.
Commissioner Montgomery stated that he did not feel strongly about the issue as it would reduce the
landscaping. He commented that it can be left to the developer's discretion as long as staff supports it.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Segall and duly seconded by Commissioner Black that the
Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146
recommending approval of TentatiVe tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit
RP 14-20 to the City Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein including the errata sheet.
VOTE: 5-1
AYES: Chairperson Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner Montgomery,
Commissioner Segall, and Commissioner Siekmann
NOES: Commissioner L'Heureux
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ro: rnrrc~~
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: __ __...:::347/_~=--+;;j----". /__::::b=-------,-----
SUBJECT: 8eodtva-{k, wr Kooseve..J-t
LOCATION: . /8--0o 4-r{sba.d _ 1/£ r{tLJer< ,l)rc:ve_ . _
DATE NOTICES MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS: d-1/i?..t..f.jr b
NUMBER MAILED: ~..:....!fi~J~-----
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State .of California that I am
employed by the City of Carl~bad and the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
~-··. ~lrs/ti!l:> {00
SENT TO FOR PUBLICATION VIA E-MAIL TO: fiunion Tribune . . (
0 CoastNews
PUBLICATION DATE: Union Tribune ;:<
7
/ ~G /r b --~~--~~~~--------~---
CoastNews ~
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I arn
employed by the City of Carlsbad in the City Clerk's Office and the foregoing is true and
00~ .
Date: c?--(t '6 /t G
I I
Attachments: 1) Mailing Labels
2) Notice w/ attachments
NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING
NOTlCE IS HERtBY GIVEN to you, becau~ your lntE!res.t may bun~te-d, that th(! City
Council cf the C a.rbbad will ho~d a public hearing at the Council Cham be~
1200 Canlsbad VI rl:sbad, California, at 6:00p.m. on t..Jesday; Mau:h 8,
2016, to ton>fder approvat o.f a Tentative Tract Map and a. Major Review Pennit to
allow for the construcrion of 16 multt·famlly te$ide!'ltial. air space condomtni~..uns, ln,-
duding two {21 incl1u1sionary unlb, on a 0.70"'<!cre site •located on th~ W~$l s.lde of Roo"
sevelt Street, betweern Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, ln Land Use District a or the
Village Review zone and within loca1 Faciliti~:; Management lone I and rnore partie·
ular!Y described as~
Parcell:
That portion of the northeaUedy ha'f of Lot 2.7, Seasld<:l Lam;ls;, In the Cl:ty ol Carlsbad,
County of San Dreg.. o, State of Califomla, acc.mding to map tht>reof .. No. 1722, filed in
the omce of the Cour~ty Recorder ct San Dlego CounTy, J:u ly 28,. 1921
Parc:el2:
The norlheasr h<\lf of lot Se.aslde laftd'!i, in the Crty of Ci!!rlsbad, Colmty of San
Diego, State ·Of Califomi;a, according to map thereof No. 1 712. filed In tell~ Office of the
County Retordel ol San Diego County, .July 28 .. 1921
Wherea$,1Jfl february 3, 2016 the Cit~ of C:lrlsbad Pl.!!nning Commis.slon vo~ed 5·1 {l'Heoreu:~~:) to r&:ommend approval of aTeotati~ Tra<t Map <Jf!d a Major Review Pe:r~
mit to.· allo~ for the co~stfi.!'~tlon of 16 multi-family testc3~ntial ai1 spac!l' condomini-
ums, mdodmg t'lro (2) mdus~onary units, on a 0:70-acre s1te located on the wen side
of Roosevelt Street, between lagun<~ Dt~ve iHld Beech Avenue,. In laald Use District B
of the Village llievlew zone and within local Facilitle~ Management Zone 1 .. The pro·
j~tquallfies as. a CEQA Guidelines Section 1'5332 (In-fill Oeve:toprnentPmj&U/ Class
32 Categorical Exemption.
Those wishing to $~ak, on ~hi;: proposal ate cordially Invited [O ~neod the
publl;r: Copies of the agenda bill will be available on a:nd after Marc:h 4, 20 l6.
1r yo!J havii! any que~tlom;, pl¢aSJ! ccmtad Shannon Werneke ln the Plarn11lng Dlvislon
a<t (760)602-4621 orsbannon.wernekeBt;ad:sbadca.goa
The time wfrhin which you may [odi·
dally challenge this Carlsbad ltact
Map and!or M~Jor Re'vl~t>w Permit, [,f
approved, is e:stabl1$hed by state law
i.ll'ld/or d~y o1·dinance, aod i~ wry
short ilf you challenge the Carlsbad
Tract Map andio( Major Review Permit
in court, you may be tlmited to rai:~>ing
only tho$~:' Issues you 01 ~omiieone el~e
rai'$ed at the publk hearing described
ln. this notlc:e or ln written correspond-
ence delivered to the Chy o:f C.:ubbad.
Attn: City Clerk'~ Office, 1200 Carlsbad
Village Drive, Carl~bad, CA92000:, at or
prior to the public hearing.
CASE filE: a 14-0llRP l4-20
CASE NAME: BEACHWALK AT
ROOSEVELT
CITY Of CAALSBAIJ
CITY COUNC~l
11<'!<>~:n.'''illi>i<J!Roo~,,1!111
C1i 14-(lt i ~p !if.iJ.4)
4001835
CITY OF CARLSBAD city clerk -CU00469209
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr
Carlsbad,CA 92008-1989
NOTICE Of PUBliC HEABING
NOTICE I'S HEREBY GIVEN to you. be<au~ your lnt~res~ ma,y bll' affected, th~t the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hoJ.d a public hearing at the Council Cltambe-F,
l2'1J.O Carlsbad Village Orl.ve, Carlsbad, C.iillfmnia, at 6:00 fLIT!. on Tuesday, Ma.rcl1 8,
2016, to ~mufder .appwovat of a Tentative Tract Map and a MaJor Re'll'iew Permit to
aHow for the con~~rucliOt'l of 16 multi-family re.s.iderui.a.l air .space c.orldbmlnlums, lrt-
duding two (2) inc h:J,siooary unn s,. on a 0.70"'illcre s~te ,Jocat!KI on t~ west ~ide of ·Roo·
sevelt :Street, betwe~n tagun:a Drht:e and Beech Avenue, ln land Us.e Oistric:t 8of the
Village· Review zone artd within Local Fa,Uitles Management Zone l and more parti'·
ufarly described as~
Pam~:ll:
That portion of the nc:nthear~terly half of Lot 27, Seaside Lands, In lhe ctry .of Carlsbad,
County oi San , State of Califomla, according to map thereof No. 1722, filed in
the Office of th~ c my fle(order of' S.aniJlego county, Jtily 28, 1921
Pa~rceJ2:
The norlheast half of lot Seaside Lands, In thE! Clty of C:.u!~b.ad, County of San
Oiego,. State of California, ac(o~ding to map thereof No. 1 711, filed in rhe Office of the
County Fl:ec.ord~r of San Diego Counw, July 26, l92: 1
Wheteas, on febru.aty 3, 2016 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commi.sslon voted 5·1
>{l.'}leuretn(} to recommend Toval of a Ten!atlve Tra<:t Map and a Major Revi:ew Pe:· mit to allow for 'th£ coll$tt . . of 16 molu-tamtly •residential air spate cc::n'ldomlf\t-
IJf'llS, in.dudlng two m lnc.lusionary un.lt~, on ~ 0,70·acre site JO(a:t!KIJ on the west sldt!
of Roosevelt Street, berween Laguna Drive and Beech AvertU!t\ lr1 l<md U!.e Dls;trict B
o1 the Vlll~ge Review zone and withinloc~l F;:~cilitie$ Manag~merllt Zone 1, The pro·
jec:tqoallfles as a CEQA Guideline$ Section 153.:12 (I ~>fill Oevetopment P:rojects) Class
32 Categorical Exerl1pti1ln.
Those p.er$00~ wishing to speak on Eh!s, propos.al arill' cordially lnwitl!!d to attend the
publl:c hea.ring. Copies of !!he a gMda bill will be a)lailabl eon. and after Ma~ch 4, 20 16.
U you ha\1'@ any questions, pl;eas,e conta~;]: Shannon Wti!meke in the Plannlllg; Dlvislon
at (760} 602-.4621 orshannon.~idstwka.gor.
The time wlthln which yoo· may Judi-
cialty challenge ehi.s Carlsbad Tract
Map and/or MaJor Reltiltl<w Pe~tmit, If
appr.over.t Is established by slate law
and/or dW ordinance., a11d is wry
s:hort. If you challenge the Carlsbad
Tract Map and:lor MaJo• Revl~w Permit
in comt,. you may be Umit&l to raising
Q~ ly lhose ls:SIJe:S r(JI.j 1:)( :oo~ eone. ell~@
t~11sed at the publlo~;; hearmg descrtbed
In thi$ notice or in w1itten correspond-
eoce dellwred to the Clty ocf Ca~lsbad,
Attn: City Clerk's Offlce, 1200 Carlsbad
Village DfiVe, Carbbad, CA 92000, al or
pfior to the publi<: hearing.
CASE Fll£:: a 14-07/R.P 14-20
CASE NAME: BEACH WALK Al
ROOSEVELT
CITY OF CAfiiLSBAD
CITY COUNCil
!J.I!Iadiwili!lt o~Jt Ri;lQ~,,~II
C'l" 1-uil' i l';P M-21::~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chamber, 1200 Carlsbad Village
Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 8, 2016, to consider approval of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family
residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0. 70-acre site
located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, in Land
Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 and
more particularly described as:
Parcel1:
That portion of the northeasterly half of Lot 27, Seaside Lands, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921
Parcel2:
The northeast half of Lot 26, Seaside Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No.
1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
July28, 1921
Whereas, on February 3, 2016 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 5-1 (L'Heureux)
to recommend approval of a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the
construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary
units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive
and Beech Avenue, in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities
Management Zone 1. The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill
Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing.
Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after March 4, 2016. If you have any questions,
please contact Shannon Werneke in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4621 or
shannon.werneke@carlsbadca.gov.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Carlsbad Tract Map and/or Major Review
Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you
challenge the Carlsbad Tract Map and/or Major Review Permit in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice
or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad. Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 14-07/RP 14-20
CASE NAME: BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT
PUBLISH: February 26, 2016
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
J .,.~·
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
Beachwalk at Roosevelt
CT 14-07 I RP 14-20
t I
AH3AV-m.>-oos-~
WOJ"Al9AB"MMM
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92011
SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT
710 ENCINITAS BLVD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AV
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
200 CIVIC CENTER DR
VISTA CA 92084
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
3883 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
SAN DIEGO LAFCO
STE 200
9335 HAZARD WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
STE 250
2177 SALK AV
CARLSBAD CA 92011
CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
5934 PRIESTLEY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY CLERK
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
r Jwdn-dOd pJoqaJ <!1.16!9A9A I ep U!~e eAI'I!.pli!i.J e1 ~ Z6!Jd<~H
~uawafiAln.p I apsuas ...
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT
STE 250
255 PICO AV
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DISTRICT
TIM JOCHEN
1960 LA COSTA AV
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069J .. 2.949
VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT
201 VALLECITOS DE ORO
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL
BOARD
STE 100
2375 NORTHSIDE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-2700
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
10124 OLD GROVE RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92131
-----.. ·---~ ..
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
ATTN I(ANANI BROWN,.j:·
STE 103 .... /
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
MICHAEL MCSWEENEY-BIA SD
STE 110
9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407
r W.L66j)3 dn·dOd 9SOdX6 i' ............. Jo~~d paa:1j
1 o~eu!J6uoje pues : llliiiDIIIIIII y 1
r I I I
®091.5 ~l:I:IAV ~!.1eqe6 ar zasm:m
.1a1ad I? saJ!JI;!:§. sauanb!~~
ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT
1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
_____ ........ _,
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN
STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE 110
5510 OVERLAND AV
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1239
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
·---...... --.. -"--· _ .. _ -.. --
AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO CO. AIRPORT AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
r I !
---________ ..
®09~S eleidWal ~eA'o' asn
slill:11:f1 '"'aaad kie3
Easy Peel® labels
Use Avery® Template 5160®f8160'~'M
NVISION CAPITAL LLC
4040 MACARTHUR BLVD #307
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
PEACOCK & PEACOCK
'403 PARKWOOD LN
LEUCADIA CA 92024
RALPH A STRAESSER 1997
TRUST
1518 AVOCADO RD
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
ROGELIO S & KEELY C ALBA
P 0 BOX2711
CARLSBAD CA 92018
S D G PROPERTIES L L C
2155 RAMONA LN
VISTA CA 92084
SCANLON FAMILY TRUST
7306 BORLA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
"' -FeedPaper-!Bend along line to !1
expose Pop-up EdgeT!IJI ~
ONE RAIL YARD LOFTS L L C
P 0 BOX 7050
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
PEDRO E & MYRNA Y RECINOS
2566 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RICHARD L JONES TRUST 10-
25-06
2608 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROOSEVELT TAMARACK
INVESTMENTS L P
6 VENTURE #215
iRVINE CA 92618
S D P B HOLDINGS LLC
4629 CASS ST #255
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
SETH HOENIG
P 0 BOX 232401
ENCINITAS CA 92023
\i\ AVERY® 6240'~'M 1
OSTRIE FAMILY INC
P 0 BOX8
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
QUONSET DEVELOPMENT LLC
125 MOZART AVE
CARDIFF CA 92007
ROBERTO F & SARA G ROJAS
LIVING TRUST 12-28-91
2650 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RYAN LLEWELLYN
2562 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC co
PO BOX 25111
SANTA ANA CA 92799
SEVILLE HOLDINGS L L C
1630 VALDES DR
LA JOLLA CA 92037
I
Easy Peel® Labels I
Use Avery® Template 5160®f8160TM l ~
HARRIS FAMILY TRUST 10-17-97
I 722 ARBUCKLE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HYSPAN PRECISION
PRODUCTS INC EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS TRUST
P 0 BOX636
VISTA CA 92085
JEANIE SCHEXNAYDER
2578 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I JOE p & FRANCES L APODACA
TRUST 10-19-95
327 HILL DR
VISTA CA 92083
JOSE & MARY F MORENO
FAMILY TRUST 06-08-04
2605 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KENT R PATERSON
4751 RIM ROCK RD
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
LUISA LOPEZ
2570 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I MADISON SQUARE
j CONDOMINIUMS L L C
P 0 BOX669
POWAY CA 92074
MARKJ NOLAN
20322 CAROL LN
SARATOGA CA 95070
MICHAEL A & KIMBERLY A
CHAMBERLAIN 2004 TRUST
2653 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
~tlquettes f<iic::iles a peler 1[
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160®/8'161)Mc j
HOWARD-JONES MARITAL
TRUST 03-31-81
20440 KEYSTONE CT
BEND OR 97702
J K S G EDWARDS FAMILY
TRUST 02-15-01
3980 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JEFFREYS & KAREN M FULLER
605 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOHN P & GWEN E ROBINSON
725 ARBUCKLE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KAREN C ROBBINS
2568 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LAGUNA BREEZE
CONDOMINIUMS L L C
1868 CREST DR
ENCINITAS CA 92024
M R CARLSBAD 11 LLC
1818 1ST AVE #100
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
MAR VISTA TRUST 06-26-92
PO BOX 1481
CARLSBAD CA 92018
MARTIN V & MARIA I ALCANTAR
2560 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY
TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT
BOARD
2647 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A
Sens de
chargement
I
Replle:t a Ia hachure <~fin del
weveler le rebord Pop-upMC .
@ AVERY® 6240TM 1
HUSTON FAMILY TRUST 05-18-
92
P 0 BOX 547
CARLSBAD CA 92018
JACK D PHILLIPS
2667 OCEAN ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JENNIFER BOLAND
2576 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOHNSON FAMILYTRUST 12-27-
85
4513 COVE DR #12
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KAREN J BARLOW TRUST 07-11-
90
2727 ROOSEVELT ST #A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LANCER INDUSTRIES INC
1547 AVENIDA LA POSTA
ENCINITAS CA 92024
M S BROWAR FAMILY TRUST
02-09-88
P 0 BOX 81007
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
MARK BENJAMIN
P 0 BOX 7050
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
MICHAEL & SANDRA FRANKLIN
2323 KIMBERLY CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY
TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT
BOARD
399 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
www.avery.com
lal:iOO-GO-AVIERY
Easy PeeJ® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160®J816()TM
2621 ROOSEVELT L L C
P 0 BOX 1707
FALLBROOK CA 92088
ANGELINA VASQUEZ
2564 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BENCHMARK PACIFIC LTD II
550 LAGUNA DR #B
CARLSBAD CA 92008-
BRENT & DENISE BEAZLEY
FAMILY TRUST 10-18-04
16633 . VENTURA BLVD #1 030
ENCINO CA 91436
~ -----
f CARLSBAD VILLAGE THREATRE
LLC
4028 PARKDR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHRISTA DWYER
2580 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DAVIS JAMES R TRUST 05~20-02
13215 PENN ST#610
WHITTIER CA 90602
DONALD K & LAEL J DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I EDMUND & EDITH SMITH
I FAMILY TRUST 05-28-96
3271 WESTWOOD DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
' GARY L & JESSICA L JACKSON
.
1
. 2718 ROOSEVELT ST #F
CARLSBAD CA 92008
~tiquettes fadles li peler 11
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160®/8160Mc Jl
A
feedPaper-
jef!d along line to I
ex:pose Pop-up EdgeTM ~
·~--·---
2755 JEFFERSON BUILDING
2755 JEFFERSON ST #200
_ CARLSBAD CA 92008
ARMY & NAVY ACADEMY
CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA
P 0 BOX 3000
CARLSBAD CA 92018
BEVERLY A ST AVRON
257 4 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CANTABRANA 2005 TRUST 02-
19-05
2639 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CASTENS FAMILY REVOCABLE
TRUST
2381 JEFFERSON ST #A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DENNIS J OSULLIVAN
. 755 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DUFF ROBERT A 2003 TRUST
451 HUDSON ST
NEW YORK NY 10014
EISLER FAMILY SURVIVORS
TRUST 09-17-87
6631 LITTLER DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92119
GP-SD LLC
652 CAPILANO DR
BRENTWOOD CA 94513
A
Sensde
chargement
Replle:Z ~ I<~ haehure afin de 1]
reveler ie rebord Pop-upMC l
fbhl AVERY® 6241)TM II ~ J.
ANA M CABO
2568 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
· BEECHTREE OFFICE BUILDING
PARTNERSHIP
2653 ROOSEVELT ST #D
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BLACKBURN 2000 TRUST B 06-
13-00
202 RAINBOW LN
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CARLSBAD STATE STREET L L
c
2739 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHARLES & LORRAINE
WULLENJOHN
1259 DISCOVERY ST
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
---------
CSTATE L L C
2244 S SANTA FE AVE #B2
VISTA CA 92084
DEWHURST FAMILY
·_REVOCABLE TRUST 03-13-90
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
E R E PROPERTIES L L C
1054 LA SOMBRA DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
ELLEN SPEERT FAMILY TRUST
11-02-87
2633 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
H S ERGIN
P 0 BOX 218
CARLSBAD CA 92018
www.svery.com
1-SOIHiO-AVERY
I
Easy Peel® labels I.
Use Avery® Template 5160®f81601M .. J
VENSTROM FAMILY TRUST 08-
03-04
2933 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92010
WILSON JANE RESIDENCE
TRUST 10-11-01
2710 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
~tlquettes faclles ~ peler 11
Utilisez le abarit AVERY® 5160®/S160Mc }
A llll!ll!l!lilll
l'eedPaper-
Bend along line to I
expose Pop-up EdgeTM J
I
VICTOR & ANGELA BALAKER
3811 ALDERAVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
...
Sens de
charaement
I Replle:Z li laluu:hure <~fin dtll I
reveler le rebord Pop-upMC 1
@ AVERY® 6240TM 1
WARD FAMILY TRUST 01-20-89
945 S ORANGE GROVE BLVD #D
PASADENA CA 91105
www.<wery.eom
1-800-GO-AVERY
Beachwalk at Roosevelt
City Council, Item No. 7
March 8, 2016
Staff: Shannon Werneke,
Associate Planner
Location Map
S
TA
T
E
S
T ROOS
EV
E
L
T
S
T MAD
I
SO
N
S
T
S
T
A
T
E
S
T
A
L
L
E
Y
BEEC
H
A
V
CT 14-07 / RP 14-20
Beachwalk at Roosevelt
SITE MAP
JE
L
C
AMINO
RE
ALLA COSTA AV
A L G A R DCARLSBAD B
L
S
TA
T
E
S
T ROOSE
VE
L
T
S
T
BEEC
H
A
V
S
T
A
T
E
S
T
A
L
L
E
Y MADISON
S
T
COAS
T
E
R
S
T
A
TI
O
N
D
Y
ICT 14-07 / RP 14-20
Beachwalk at Roosevelt
0 200100
Feet
SouthNorth
East
West
Project site
Roosevelt frontage
Site Plan
16 units
22.9 du/ac
Two car garage
per unit
Two inclusionary
units onsite
No standards
modifications
requested
Floor Plan
Duplex, 3 bedroom/3 bath
1st 2nd 3rd
Roosevelt frontage
North (side) elevation
Planning Commission Action
February 3, 2016:
Recommended approval
5-1 (L’Heureux opposed)
Discussion regarding site
design, access to the
units, density, opportunity
for solar panels
Analysis
Consistent with the Village Master Plan
Falls within the allowable density range
Enhances the Village as a place for living
Walking distance to the commercial core
Inclusionary housing provided on-site
Categorically exempt from CEQA (§15332)
Recommendation
Adopt City Council Resolution No.2016-047,approving
Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP
14-20,to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family
residential air-space condominiums,including two (2)
inclusionary units,on a 0.70-acre site located on the west
side of Roosevelt Street,between Laguna Drive and Beech
Avenue,in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone
and within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1,as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
Inclusionary Housing
Two units designated as
inclusionary units to satisfy
affordable housing
requirements
2 bedroom/2.5 bath
Two-car garage
1,291 SF
Condition No. 19 of PC
Resolution No. 7146 requires
recordation of AHA agreement
Deed-restricted for 55 years