Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-03-08; City Council; 22235; Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 - Beachwalk at Roosevelt to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential condominium unitsCITY OF CARLSBAD-AGENDA BILL AB# 22,235 APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CT 14-07 DEPT. DIRECTOR <1l- MTG. 3/8/16 AND MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT RP 14-20-CITY ATTORNEY eve DEPT. CEO BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT, TO ALLOW FOR THE CITY MANAGER ~ "-, CONSTRUCTION OF 16 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS, INCLUDING TWO (2) INCLUSIONARY UNITS, ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt City Council Resolution No. 2016-047, approving Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1, as recommended by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project Planning Commission City Council CT 14-07 RA X RP 14-20 RA X RA =Recommended approval X = Final city decision-making authority On February 3, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended approval (S-1, L'Heureux opposed) of Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Discussion at the Planning Commission primarily focused on pedestrian access to the four-plex, sound attenuation features, lack of a common recreation area, access for trash service, and the feasibility for the installation of solar panels. The applicant, Mr. Geoff McComic, indicated that solar panels could be installed on the roofs in the future and the addition of air conditioning units in conjunction with the use of certain building materials helped satisfy the interior noise requirements. In addition, he indicated that he was open to providing pedestrian access to the rear units of the four-plex, but questioned whether it would be used. He also indicated that the waste management company would likely back into the site so as to avoid any sight issues that may arise when backing out of the site and into the street. Finally, he indicated that a common recreation area was not provided since the Village Master Plan open space requirements could be satisfied through the inclusion of private porches and/or balconies for each of the units. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Shannon Werneke, 760-602-4621, shannon.werneke@carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. ~ COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC D DENIED D CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D CONTINUED D RETURNED TO STAFF D WITHDRAWN ~ OTHER-SEE MINUTES D AMENDED (See Minutes for details) 7 \ Beach walk at Roosevelt March 8, 2016 Pagel o/2 .. t· •. ·l The Planning Commission ultimately voted 5-1 (L'Heureux opposed) to approve the project. Commissioner L'Heureux indicated that he could not support the project given the dense nature of the design and concerns with respect to vehicular circulation and pedestrian safety. The Planning Commission resolution recommending approval, along with the Planning Commission staff report and the draft minutes of the February 3, 2016 Planning Commission meeting, are attached for the Council's review. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to the city regarding public facilities have been identified. All required improvements and maintenance needed to serve this project will be funded by and/or constructed by the developer. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) Class 32 of the State CEQA Guidelines ... In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the stat~(EQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. A Notice of Exemption will be filed upon approval of the project. · · PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: Information regarding public notifications of this item such as mailings, public hearing notices posted in the newspaper and on the City website are available in the Office of the City Clerk. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2016-047 (CT 14-07 /RP 14-20) 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 3, 2016 5. Planning Commission Minutes dated February 3, 2016 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT 1 RESOLUTION NO. _ __.!2~0~1~6~-0:.::::!4:.!_7 __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CT 14-07 AND MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT RP 14-20 TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 16 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS, INCLUDING TWO (2) INCLUSIONARY UNITS, ON A 0.70-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET, BETWEEN LAGUNA DRIVE AND BEECH AVENUE, IN LAND USE DISTRICT 8 OF THE VILLAGE REVIEW ZONE AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. CASE NAME: CASE NO.: BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT CT 14-07/RP 14-20 The City Council ofthe City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on February 3, 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20; and WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project conducted pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the project was found to be categorically exempt from the requirement for preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines as an in-fill development project on a site of less than five acres in an urbanized area that has no habitat value and is served by adequate facilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in ::::2, ----' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 7146 on file in the City Clerk's office and incorporated herein by reference are the findings and conditions of the City Council, with exception of the following: Condition No. 16 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 shall be replaced with the following condition: 16. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide the Planning Division with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the City Planner. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions: a. b. c. d. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in which the City has an interest. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's Easements" as provided in Article , Section ____ _ the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice -2- 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e. f. shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent {6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal pro rata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibit ---- Use of Two-Car Garage. To the extent permitted by all applicable laws, adequate space to park two vehicles in the attached two-car garage shall be available at all times. The garages shall not be used solely for the purpose of storage. 3. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" The time within which judicial review ofthis decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation ofthe record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA, 92008. -3- 1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting ofthe City Council of the City 2 of Carlsbad on the gth day of March 2016, by the following vote to wit: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AYES: Council Members Hall, Wood, Schumacher, Blackburn, Packard. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: (SEAL) SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE Beachwalk at Roosevelt CT 14-07 I RP 14-20 EXHIBIT 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7146 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND A MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 16 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUMS, INCLUDING TWO (2) INCLUSIONARY UNITS, ON A 0.70-ACRE SITE ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROOSEVELT STREET IN LAND USE DISTRICT 8 OF THE VILLAGE REVIEW· ZONE AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. THE PROJECT QUALIFIES AS A CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15332 (IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS) CLASS 32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION. CASE NAME: BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT CASE NO.: CT 14-07/RP 14-20 WHEREAS, Vesta Pacific Development, "Applicant," and MR Carlsbad II, LLC, "Owner," has filed a verified application with the City of CCl,:rlsbad regarding properties described as: '/: ·. Parcell: That portion of the northeasterly half of Lot 27, Seaside Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921 Parcel2: The northeast half of Lot 26, Seaside Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921 ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said verified applicati()n constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit as shown on Exhibits "A-S," dated February 3, 2016, on file in the Planning Division, CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT,R()OSEVELT, as provided by Title 20 and Chapter 21.35 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on February 3, 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACH WALK AT ROOSEVELT based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: Tentative Tract Map, CT 14-07 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the proposed one lot tentative tract map for 16 multi-family air-space condominiums subdivision satisfies all minimum requirements of Titles 20 and 21 with respect to public facilities, access and parking. That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since the surrounding properties are developed, are currently designated as Village (V) in the General Plan, and are located in Land Use District 8, Residential Support Area, of the Village Master Plan. The subject property is bordered by a single family home to the north, professional offices to the south, single-family and multi-family residential uses, as well as and an urgent care office to the east, and a cabinet-making business, gift shop/boutique and an auto repair shop to the west. Pursuant to the Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan, the intent is to provide for a relatively dense urban residential neighborhood, which is compatible with the Village scale and character. Given the proposed density and design, the proposed project meets the intent of Land Use District 8. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density proposed, in that the Village (V) General Plan Land Use designation allows residential development in Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan at a density range of 18 to 23 dwelling units per acre. Based on a lot size (net) of 0.70 acres, the proposed 16-unit multi-family residential air space condominium project has a density of 22.9 dwelling units per acre. As the proposed project falls within the allowable density range, the project is consistent with this finding. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in that the developer has delineated and preserved on the tentative map, all existing easements of record. That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act). PC RESO NO. 7146 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in .the subdivision, in that the proposed multi-family residential units have (!n east-west ori~Jltation thereby allowing for passive or natural solar heating and cooling opportunities. That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental resources in that the applicant proposes to designate two (2) of the 16 units on-site as income-restricted units. As required by CMC Chapter 21.85, the project has been accordingly-conditioned to require the approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement prior to recordation of the final map. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat, in that the subject infill lot is devoid of sensitive vegetation and any natural water features; therefore, the proposed project does not impact any fish, wildlife or habitat. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has been designed in accordance with the Best Management Practices for water quality protection in accordance with the City's sewer and drainage standards and the project is conditioned to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. '' " That the street systems serving the prdposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that primary access to the site will be provided by two 24- foot-wide driveways off of Roosevelt Street. The proposed project will generate a total of 96 Average Daily Trips (ADTs) for the high density multi-family land use. In addition, the proposed project would not result in any significant capacity-related impacts to any road segments or intersections in the vicinity of the project site. Major Review Permit, RP 14-20 11. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan, Village Review Zone, and the Village Master Plan and Design Manual, based on the. facts set forth in the staff report dated February 3, 2016, including, but not limited to the following: a. Land Use. The proposed project, which includes the construction of 16 multi-family residential air-space condominiums, will enhance the vitality of the Village, specifically Land Use District 8 (Residential Support Area), by providing new residential land uses in close proximity to the downtown core area, as well as the train station. The project reinforces the pedestrian-orientation desired for the ' .h.' ' downtown area by providing Jthe residents an opportunity to walk to shopping, recreation, and mass transit fun·ctrons. The project's proximity to existing bus routes and mass transit will help to further the goal of providing new economic development near transportation corridors. Further, the proposed project contributes towards the overall goal of creating a dense urban residential neighborhood with Village scale and character. By providing more residential opportunities, the project also helps to create a lively, interesting social environment by encouraging and increasing the opportunity for 24-hour life in the Village, which provides the necessary customer PC RESO NO. 7146 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b. c. d. e. base to attract complementary commercial and community uses. In summary, the residential project will contribute towards the revitalization of the Village area and enhance the Village as a place for living. Circulation. Roosevelt Street, as well as the nearby intersections, can accommodate the estimated 96 average daily trips (ADTs). In addition, all required public right-of- way will be dedicated and improved to serve the development. The circulation has been designed in relationship to the proposed residential land use and available parking. Public facilities will be constructed to serve the proposed project. Further, the project has been conditioned to develop and implement a program of "best management practices" for the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter into and/or are transported within storm drainage facilities. Housing. The proposed project is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan and the City's lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, in that the proposed project includes the construction of two inclusionary units. In addition, the project has been accordingly-conditioned to require the approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement prior to recordation of the final map. Noise. -The project site is primarily impacted by noise from the train which is located approximately }1; mile the west of the project site. The proposed project is consistent with the Noise Element of the General Plan in that the project has been conditioned to comply with the recommendations of the noise report (Wieland Acoustics, July, 2014) to ensure that the proposed building design adequately attenuates the noise levels for the new condominiums. The recommendations include the requirement for mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning units). In addition, a Notice will be required to be recorded on title to notify future owners that the property is subject to noise from the railroad. Land Use District 8 Standards. The proposed project has been designed to comply with all other requirements pursuant to Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan, including setbacks, open space,,(building height, lot coverage, and parking. :· '. City Council Policy No. 43, Allocation for Excess Dwelling Units .· 12. 13. That pursuant to CMC Chapter 21.85.030, for any market-rate residential development of seven (7) units or more units, not less than 15% of total units shall be restricted both as to occupancy and affordability to lower income households. The proposal to construct 16 multi- family condominium units includes two inclusionary units which will satisfy the above-noted requirement. The project has been conditioned to require the approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement prior to recordation of the final map. That the project location and density are compatible with the existing adjacent residential neighborhoods and/or nearby existing or planned uses in that the project is consistent with the adjacent residential land uses and anticipated uses. Specifically, Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan is intended to be developed as a relatively dense residential neighborhood with Village scale and character. PC RESO NO. 7146 ~4'~' . .i-·,,_. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14. 15. ::f. !: That the project location and density are in accordance with the applicable provisions of the General Plan and any other applicable planning document, in that the density range in Land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan is 18 to 23 dwelling units per acre. With a net acreage of 0.70 acres, the proposed project has a density of 22.9 dwelling units per acre; therefore, the proposed project density falls within the allowable range and contributes towards the overall goal of creating a relatively dense residential neighborhood in land Use District 8. The proposed project is consistent with the intent of land Use District 8 of the Village Master Plan and will contribute towards the overall revitalization of the Village Area. That there are an adequate number of units in the Excess Dwelling Unit Bank in the northwest quadrant to allocate 16 units. Per the city's Quadrant Dwelling Unit Report, 764 units remain available for allocation in the Village. California Environmental Quality Act: 16. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from/the requirement for preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 'of the State CEQA Guidelines as an infill development project. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. 13 General 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17. 18. 19. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 and all City public policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically, a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities. b. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected prior to the issuance of building permit. c. The Local Facilities Management fee. for Zone 1 is required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.90.050 and will be collected prior to issuance of building permit. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50). The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. PC RESO NO. 7146 -5- 1 Conditions: 2 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to the recordation of the 3 Final Map. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. If any of the following conditions fail t.~ bctur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. If any condition for construction of any puqlic improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this appr-oVal or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated. Developer shall submit to the Planning .Division a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of the Tentative Map and Site Plan reflectinf,th~e conditions approved by the final decision-making body. · Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Building Division from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. PC RESO NO. 7146 -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 24 months from the date of project approval. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, aJld that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the .time 'ofpccupancy. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Final Map. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 1, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Division and accompanied by the project's building, improvement, and grading plans. :( · All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Director of the Community and Economic Development Department. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit by Resolution No. 7146 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. PC RESO NO. 7146 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions {CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide the Planning Division with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the City Planner. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions: a. b. c. d. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in which the City has an interest. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record. Failure of Association to Mainta.ih Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's Easements" as provided in Article Section the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty {30) days from the giving of such notice. ·In the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein. \ Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a statement thatcif the Association fails to pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City wiiF pursue collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent {6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal pro rata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lotagainst which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue PC RESO NO. 7146 -8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. e. lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaratiqn. Landscape Maintenance Respontsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibit ___ _ This project is being approved as a condominium permit for residential homeownership purposes. If any of the units in the project are rented, the minimum time increment for such rental shall be not less than 31 days. The CC&Rs for the project shall include this requirement. Prior to recordation of the final map, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the City Planner and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Division). Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map is not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units, the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to provide and deed restrict two (2) dwelling units (identified as Units 1 and 6) as affordable to lower-income households for 55 years, in accordance with the. requirements and process set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The draft Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted to the City Planner no later than 60 days prior to the request to final the map. The recorded Affordable Housing Agreement shall ·bE!, binding on all future owners and successors in interest. Developer shall construct the two (2) required inclusionary units concurrent with the project's market rate units, unless both the final decision-making authority of the City and the Developer agree within ·an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for development. Prior to issuance of the building permit, verification shall be submitted confirming that the buildings have been designed to comply with the recommendations of the noise study prepared for the project (Wieland Acoustics, July, 2014). No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. When so required, the Developer shall submit and obtain approval of the Fire Chief and the City Planner of an Outdoor Storage Plan, and thereafter comply with the approved plan. Engineering NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this proposed development, must be met priot to approval of a final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever comes first. General 23. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer for the proposed haul route. PC RESO NO. 7146 -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 24. 25. 26. 27. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit issuance and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. Developer shall submit to the city engineer an acceptable instrument, via CC&R's and/or other recorded document, addressing the maintenance, repair, and replacement of shared private improvements within this subdivision, including but not limited to private drive aisles, utilities, sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, enhanced pavement water quality treatment measures, low impact development features and storm drain facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within this subdivision. Developer shall prepare, submit and process for city engineer approval a final map to subdivide this project. There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project. Developer shall pay the city standard map review plan check fees. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all drive aisles intersections with Roosevelt Street in accordance with City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this condition. Fees/ Agreements 28. 29. 30. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement. Developer shall cause property owner to submit an executed copy to the city engineer for recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice i"!( li Maintenance Agreement. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, developer shall cause owner to give written consent to the city engineer for the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1 and/or to the formation or annexation into an additional Street Lighting and Landscaping District. Said written consent shall be on a form provided by the city engineer. Grading 31. 32. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and technical studies/reports for city engineer review, post security and pay all applicable grading plan review and permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule. Developer acknowledges that, pursuant to Order No. R9-2013-0001 issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, new storm water requirements become effective near the end of 2015, and affect the design of this project. Prior to construction, Developer shall demonstrate compliance with latest ~t~nn water requirements to the satisfaction of the city engineer. ' . ·~' l PC RESO NO. 7146 -10- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 33. 34. 35. 36. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. Developer shall complete and submit to the city engineer a .Project Threat Assessment Form (PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance. form and appropriate Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF all to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee·schedule. This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to city engineer approval, to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment requirements per the city's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), latest version. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, latest version or BMP Design Manual in effect at the time of submittal. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, the developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches to ensure that runoff from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc.) are drained through landscaped (pervious) areas prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable SWMP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, improvement plans, landscape plans, building plans, etc.) incorporate all source control, site design and Low Impact Design (LID) facilities. Dedications/! mprovements 37. 38. Developer shall design the private drainage systems, as shown on the tentative map to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All private drainage systems (12" diameter storm drain and larger) shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees for private drainage systems. All private utility facilities including but not limited to electrical transformers and fire service connections shall be located a minimum oftwo feet outside of the public right of way. 39~ Developer shall prepare and process public improvement plans and, prior to city engineer approval of said plans, shall execute a city standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement to install and shall post security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 for public improvements shown on the tentative map. Said improvements shall be installed to city standards to the satisfaction of the city engineer. These improvements include, but are not limited to: A. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches and curb outlets. B. Street lights. C. Water services and water meters. D. Sewer laterals. PC RESO NO. 7146 -11- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 40. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 36 months of approval of the subdivision or development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall install separate sewer services to each unit proposed by this tentative parcel map. Sewer services shall be provided to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Non-Mapping Notes 41. Add the following notes to the final map as non-mapping data: A. B. c. D. Developer has executed a city standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement and has posted security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 to install public improvements shown on the tentative map. These improvements include, but are not limited to: 1. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches and curb outlets. 2. Street lights. 3. 4. Water services and water meters. Sewer laterals. Building permits will not be iss'ded for development of the subject property unless the appropriate agency determines tfiat sewer and water facilities are available. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor as defined by City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards or line-of-sight per Caltrans standards. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any diversion of waters, the alteration of the normal flow of surface waters or drainage, or the concentration of surface waters or drainage from the drainage system or other improvements identified in the city approved development plans; or by the design, construction or maintenance of the drainage system or other improvements identified in the city approved development plans. Utilities 42. 43. 44. Developer shall meet with the fire marshal to determine fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if proposed, shall be considered public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the district. engineer: . Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges for connection to public facilities. The developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a source and prepare and submit a colored recycled water use map to the Planning Department for processing and approval by the district engineer. PC RESO NO. 7146 -12- 1 45. 2 3 46. 4 5 47. 6 7 48. 8 49. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Developer shall install potable water meters at locations approved by the district engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvement plans. The developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the city engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans or as directed by the city engineer. The developer shall design and cons'th.:ld public water and sewer facilities substantially as shown on the tentative map to the satisfaction of the district engineer and city engineer. The developer shall provide separate potable water meters for each separately owned unit within this subdivision. Prior to using one potable water meter to serve a multi-ownership building, developer shall apply for and receive approval from the utilities director. Upon application for and good cause shown, the utilities director may allow a single potable water service connection and meter to a multi-ownership building within this subdivision provided: A. B. Developer shall record a deed restriction or other such document as approved by the public works director and general counsel placing future owners on notice that each and every residential or commercial/office unit is served by a single service connection and meter, and in the event that the water bill is not paid by the party or entity responsible for paying the monthly water service charges to CMWD for the respective building occupied by the multi-ownership , CMWD may at its direction shut off the water service to such multi-ownership building in accordance with CMWD adopted rules and regulations. Developer shall install a private ~ub-meter for each separately established residence or business within a multi-ownersh:i'p· building having a single potable water service connection and meter. If denied, developer shall revise all design drawings to provide separate potable water meters 18 for each separately owned unit within this subdivision per district requirements. 19 Code Reminders: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 so. 51. 52. 53. Developer shall pay planned local area drainage fees in accordance with Section 15.08.020 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT} and floor area contained in the 'staff report and shown on the tentative map are for planning purposes only. Developer shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance ofa building pern;Jit; Developer shall pay a Public Facility fee as required by Council Policy No. 17. . '; ,. PC RESO NO. 7146 -13- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Developer shall pay the Local Facilities Management fee for Zone 1 as required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.90.050. Developer shall pay a landscape plancheck and inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This tentative map shall expire two years from the date on which the City Council voted to approve this application. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. Premise identification (addresses) sh~li he provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.320. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. ;: , .. PC RESO NO. 7146 -14- 1 2 3. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 L' PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on February 3, 2016, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chairperson Anderson, Commissioners Black, Montgomery, Segall and Siekmann Commissioner L'Heureux ~£)4~w ·vELYN A DERSON, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: (lLt DON NEU City Planner PC RESO NO. 7146 l-' ; .7 .. . :···.·· -15- The City of Carlsbad Planning Division EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. G) P.C. AGENDA OF: February 3, 2016 Application complete date: August 7, 2015 Project Planner: Shannon Werneke Project Engineer: Steve Bobbett SUBJECT: CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT-Request for a recommendation of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project qualifies as a CEQA' Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 to the City Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The subject 0.70-acre (gross) site comprises two parcels (APNs 103-101-02, -05) located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, in between Laguna Drive to the north and Beech Avenue to the south. The properties are addressed as 2683, 2687, and 2715 Roosevelt Street and are currently developed with four (4) detached residential structures which are vacant. Based on a review of a Cultural Resources Survey prepared by Roth and Associates (February, 1990) of potentially historic resources in the city, the structures are not listed as having any potential historical significance. Given the developed nature of the site, the project area is devoid of any sensitive vegetation. ;ropographically, the site is generally flat and slopes from a high point of 41 feet above mean sea level (MSL) along the eastern property line to 39 feet above MSL along the western property line. The project site is located outside of the coastal zone and within Land Use District 8, the Residential Support Area, of the Village Master Plan. The proposed project entails a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Major Review Permit to construct 16 attached air-space condominiums which are arranged on-site as duplexes (3L triplexes (2) and one (1) four-plex. To comply with the inclusionary housing requirements, two (2) of the 16 units are proposed to be income-restricted. Five different plan types are proposed, which range in size from 1,291 square feet (SF) to 1,672 SF. Each of the units is three stories tall and will have an approximate height of 32'-3". Parking is proposed to be provided by an attached two-car garage for each unit; one open/uncovered accessible parking stall is also proposed on-site. The proposed density of the project is 22.9 dwelling units per acre. A detailed breakdown of each type of unit is summarized in Table 1 below. CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Pa e 2 TABLE 1-DETAILS FOR UNIT TYPE Unit Type Quantity Size Bedroom/Bathrooms {Gross SF) A 4 1,638 SF 3/3 B 6 1,624 SF 3/3 c 2 1,599 SF 3/3 D 2 1,291 SF 2/2.5 E 2 1,672 SF 3/3 Garage Private Open Space/Balconies Two-car 289 SF Two-car 287 SF Two-car 207SF Two-car 415 SF Two-car 376 SF Access to the site is proposed to be provided by two, 24-foot-wide driveways located off of Roosevelt Street, which will be enhanced with concrete pavers. The primary pedestrian entrance to four of the 16 units is oriented towards the street, while pedestrian aq:ess to the remaining units is either taken from a perimeter walkway adjacent to the side property line~ 'br a central walkway. In order to ensure that the site adequately drains, as well as to provide adequate privacy to the adjacent uses to the north, south and west, a combination retaining/screen wall ranging in height from approximately 3'-6"' to 6' feet is proposed along the north, south and west property lines. Grading for the proposed project includes 2,000 cubic yards of fill and 50 cubic yards of cut. As a result, a total of 1,950 cubic yards of material is proposed to be imported to the site. The architectural design is characterized as contemporary with a coastal influence. Primary building materials include a light cream-colored stucco and olive-colored horizontal composite siding. Asphalt shingles cover a 5:12 pitched roof over each unit; and metal awnings adorn some of the windows, doors, and balconies throughout. A variety of roof planes are included that provide different roof heights and each elevation includes off-setting building planes. Table 2 below identifies the General Pla'n designations, zoning and. current land uses of the project site and surrounding properties. TABLE 2-SURROUNDING LAND USES Location General Plan Zoning Village Master Plan Current Land Use Designation Land Use District Site v V-R · :land Use District 8 Four vacant single- (Village) (Village Review) . RJ'sjdential Support family homes North v V-R ! · Land Use District 8 Single-family home Residential Support South v V-R Land Use District 8 Professional offices Residential Support Land Use District 8 Single-family, multi- East v V-R Residential Support family and an urgent care office Cabinet-making West v V-R Land Use District 4 business, gift Residential Support shop/boutique, and auto repair. CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Pa e 3 Ill. ANALYSIS The proposed project is subject to the following ordinances, standards, and policies: A. Village (V) General Plan Land Use designation; B. Village Review (V-R) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), Land Use District 8 (Residential Support Area, Village Master Plan and Design Manuai)/Development Standards Modification; C. lnclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85); D. Subdivision Ordinance (CMC Title 20); and E. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90), Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1. The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations and policies is discussed in the sections below. A. Village (V) General Plan Land Use Designation The subject property, comprising two legal parcels, has a General Plan Land Use designation of Village (V). As discussed in the Village Master Plan, properties .Within the Village Area do not have an assigned residential density as it relates to Growth Management P:laln compliance. Therefore, the minimum and maximum densities for residential development are· established in the Village Master Plan. Table 3 below identifies the permissible density range for properties located outside of the coastal zone and within Land Use District 8. In addition, the allowable range for the number of dwelling units based on the size ofthe project site and a comparison to what is currently proposed is included in the table. TABLE 3-PROPOSED DENSITY Allowable Density Range; Project Density; Gross Acres Net Acres Min/Max Dwelling Units per Village Master Plan Proposed Dwelling Units 18-23 du/ac 22.9 du/ac 0.70 0.70 Minimum: 13 dwelling units 16 units Maximum: 16 dwelling units As identified above, the project's density of 22.9 dwelling units per acre falls within the allowable density range of 18 to 23 dwelling units per acre. Pursuant to the Housing Element of the General Plan, because a Growth Management Control Point has not been established for residential development in tlte: Village, all residential units approved in the Village must be withdrawn from the City's Excess Dwellirig·Unit Bank (EDUB). The EDUB is implemented through City Council Policy No. 43. Pursuant to City Council Policy No. 43, an applicant for an allocation of dwelling units shall agree to provide the number of inclusionary units as required pursuant to CMC Section 21.85.050 and shall execute an affordable housing agreement (AHA) prior to recordation of the final map pursuant to CMC Section 21.85.140. As discussed in Section C below, the proposal to construct 16 units onsite, including two inclusionary units, is consistent with the inclusionary housing requirement as set forth in City Council Policy No. 43. In addition, the project is accordingly-conditioned to require the execution ofthe AHA prior to recordation of the Tentative Tract Map. CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Page 4 In approving a request for an allocation of excess dwelling units, the project shall meet the findings identified in City Council Policy No. 43. Specifically, the project location and density shall be found to be compatible with adjacent land uses and the project is consistent with the General Plan and any other applicable planning document. As discussed in the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146, the proposed project meets these findings. As the proposed project requires approval from City Council, the City Council is the final decision-making authority for1,(h~ allocation from the EDUB. The following Table 4 describes how the proposed project is consistent with the various elements of the Carlsbad General Plan. TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY? OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM Land Use Goai2-G.29 The proposed project, which includes Yes Maintain the Village as a center the construction of 16 multi-family for residents and visitors with air space condominiums, will commercial, residential, dining, enhance the vitality of the Village by civic, cultural, and entertainment providing new residential units in activities. close proximity to the downtown core area, as well as the train station. Goai2-G.30 The project reinforces the Develop a distinct identity for the pedestrian-orientation desired for Village by encouraging a variety the downtown area by providing an of uses and activities, such as a opportunity for the residents to walk mix of residential, commercial, td ~hopping, recreation, and mass office, restaurants and specialty . tr~~~ilfunctions. 'The project's retail shops, which traditionally proximity to existing bus routes and locate in a pedestrian-oriented mass transit will help to further the downtown area and attract goal of providing new economic visitors and residents from across development near transportation the community by creating a corridors. lively, interesting social environment. Overall, the residential project will contribute to the revitalization of the Policy 2-P.70 Village area. Seek an increased presence of both residents and activity in the Village with new development, particularly residential, including residential as part of mixed-use development, as well as commer- cial, entertainment and cultural uses that serve both residents and visitors. CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Page 5 TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS· OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM Mobility Goai3-G.3 The proposed project includes the Provide inviting streetscapes that dedication of eight {8} feet of right- encourage walking and promote of-way for the development of a livable streets. sidewalk and street trees along the project's Roosevelt Street frontage. In addition, the units facing the street each include porches which enhance the,streetscape and promote livable streets. The proposed project has been designed to meet all of the circulation requirements, which includes two 24-foot-wide driveways off of Roosevelt Street. Sustainability Policy 9-P.10 Each ofthe 16 multi-family air space Decrease the need for artificial condominiums has its own porch cooling, heating and lighting, and and/or fenced rear yard and private promote outdoor lifestyles in balcony areas. The open space Carlsbad's sunny and moderate provided for each unit ranges from climate by: 207 to 943 square feet, which • Ensuring that the Zoning exceeds the requirements of the Ordinance provides for Village Master Plan. adequate private and common open spaces as part of Given the nature of the product type, multifamily developments. attached multi-family units, not all • Encouraging residential and units have windows on all four office buildings to have eleyations. However, the elevations windows that open to the which;do have sun exposure, include outside in all habitable rooms, several windows which maximize the and maximize the use of use of daylight. daylight. Policy 9-P.11 Implement the city's Landscape The project includes a landscape plan Manual to mitigate urban heat which has been determined tci be island effects through maximum consistent with the city's Landscape tree canopy coverage and Manual. Perimeter landscaping, minimum asphalt and paving which includes trees, reduces the coverage, particularly for denser urban heat island effect throughout areas like the Village and the the site. Barrio, shopping centers, and industrial and other areas with expansive surface parking. I COMPLY? Yes Yes CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Page 6 TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM Housing Goai10-G.3 The proposed project includes the Sufficient new, affordable construction oftwo (2) inclusionary housing opportunities in all units on-site which will be required to quadrants of the city to meet the be rented at a low income level. needs of current lower and The provision for inclusionary moderate income households housing will contribute towards and those with special needs, and achieving the city's Regional Housing a fair share proportion of future Needs. The project has been lower and moderate income accordingly-conditioned to require households. the approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement prior to Goai10-P.15 recordation of the final map. Pursuant to the lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, require In approving a request for an affordability for lower Income allocation of excess dwelling units, households of a minimum of 15 the project shall meet the findings percent of all residential identified in CC Policy No. 43. ownership and qualifying rental Specifically, the project location and projects. For projects that are density shall be found to be required to include 10 or more compatible with adjacent land uses units affordable to lower income and the project is consistent with the households, at least 10 percent General Plan and any other of the lower income units should applicable planning document. As have three or more bedrooms discussed in the attached Planning (lower income senior housing Commission Resolution No. 7146, the projects exempt). proposed project meets these Policy 10-P.18 findings. Adhere to City Council Policy Statement43 when considering allocation of "excess dwelling units" for the purpose of allowing development to exceed the Growth Management Control : .;}'; Point (GMCP) density, as . "·r. discussed in Section 10.3 (Resources Available). With limited exceptions, the allocation of excess dwelling units will· require provision of housing affordable to lower income households. COMPLY? Yes CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Pa e 7 TABLE 4-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM . ·,; Public Safety Goai6-G.1 The proposed structural Minimize injury, loss of life, and improvements are required to be damage to property resulting designed in conformance with all from fire, flood, hazardous seismic design standards. In material release, or seismic addition, the proposed project is disasters. consistent with all of the applicable fire safety requirements. Policy 6-P.6 Enforce the requirements of Further, the project has been Titles 18, 20, and 21 pertaining to conditioned to develop and drainage and flood control when implement a program of "best reviewing applications for management practices" for the building permits and elimination and reduction of subdivisions. pollutants which enter into and/or are transported within storm Policy 6-P.34 drainage facilities. Enforce the Uniform Building and Fire codes, adopted by the city, to provide fire protection standards for all existing and ',1 '"' proposed structures. ,, ;·t •j• Policy 6-P.39 Ensure all new development complies with all applicable regulations regarding the provision of public utilities and facilities. COMPLY? Yes CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, ~016 Page 8 TABlE 4-GENERAl PlAN COMPliANCE (CONTINUED) Noise Goai5-G.2 The project site is impacted by noise Ensure that new development is from the railroad, which is located compatible with the noise approximately X mile west of the environment, by continuing to site. A noise study was prepared for use potential noise exposure as a the proposed project (Wieland criterion in land use planning. Acoustics, July, 2014). The project has been conditioned to comply with Policy 5-P.3 the re,commendations of the noise For all projects that require report to ensure that the proposed discretionary review and have building design adequately noise exposure levels that exceed attenuates the noise levels for the the standards in Table 5-1, new condominiums. The require site planning and recommendations include the architecture to incorporate requirement for mechanical noise-attenuating features. With ventilation (i.e., air conditioning mitigation, development should units). In addition, a Notice will be meet the allowable outdoor and required to be recorded on title to indoor noise exposure standards notify future owners that the in Table 5-2 (45 dBA). When a property is subject to noise from the building's openings to the railroad. exterior are required to be closed to meet the interior noise .. standard, then mechanical ventilation shall be provided. Yes B. Village Review Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), land Use District 8, Residential Support Area (Village Master Plan and Design Manual) '',, The subject property is located within Land Use Dist.ricr-8, Residential Support Area, of the Village Master Plan. The proposed project entails a request 'to construct a total of 16 multi-family residential airspace condominiums. The specific development standards for new development within Land Use District 8 and the project's compliance with these standards are shown in Table 5 below: TABlE 5 VIllAGE MASTER PlAN, lAND USE DISTRICT 8, RESIDENTIAl SUPPORT AREA STANDARD REQUIRED/ AllOWED PROPOSED COMPlY? Intent Intent The proposed project Yes Develop Land Use District 8 contributes towards the with a relatively dense urban overalf goal of creating a residential neighborhood with dense urban residential a Village scale and character. neighborhood since the density is being maximized and a contemporary architectural design is proposed which complements the Village • atmosphere. r·. ~ . CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Page 9 TABLE 5 VILLAGE MASTER PLAN, LAND USE DISTRICT 8, RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT AREA (CONTINUED) STANDARD REQUIRED/ ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLY? Front Yard Setback 5-15 feet 13'-15' Yes Side Yard Setback 10% of lot width, 5-10 feet 10' Yes Rear Yard Setback 5-10 feet 10'-15' Yes Max Building Height 35' 32'-3" Yes Building Coverage 60-80% 45.79% Yes. Pursuant to the Universal Standards in the Village Master Plan, the bottom of the range is considered the desired standard. Due to setback, access and storm water requirements, it is not feasible to meet the bottom of the range for the building coverage. Further, a Standards Modification is only required for projects · which exceed the maximum of the range (i.e., 80%). Parking 2 spaces per unit, one of which Two-car garage per unit, Yes is required to be covered; one 20' x 20'; one accessible accessible parking stall parking stall Open Space 20% = 6,098 SF 31.3% or 9,544 SF Yes *Includes patios/balconies, landscape planters/pockets Density 18-23 dwelling units/acre 22.9 dwelling units/acre Yes C. lnclusionary Housing Pursuant to the City's lnclusionary Housing regulations, specifically CMC Chapter 21.85.030, for any market-rate residential development of seven (7) units or more units, not less than 15% of total units shall be restricted both as to occupancy and affordability to lower income households. To satisfy the above-noted requirement, the applicant proposes to designate two (2} of the 16 units on-site as rent- restricted units. As required by CMC Chapter 21.85, the project has been accordingly-conditioned to require the approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement prior to recordation ofthe final map. D. Subdivision Ordinance The Land Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed Tentative Tract Map and has found that the subdivision for 16 air-space condominiums complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20). The project has been CT 14-07 /RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT February 3, 2016 Page 10 conditioned to install all infrastructure-related improvements and the necessary easements for these improvements concurrent with the development, including the dedication of 8 feet for frontage improvements adjacent to Roosevelt Street. E. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest quadrant of the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table 5 below. TABLE 5-GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration 163.4 sq. ft. Yes Library 87.15 sq. ft. Yes Waste Water Treatment 16 EDU Yes Parks 0.33 acres Yes Drainage 2.11 CFS Yes Circulation 96 ADTs Yes Fire Station 1 Yes Open Space n/a n/a Schools E: 5.65, M: 1.65, H:/1.53 Yes Sewer Collection System 3,520 GPO . '. ~ . Yes Water 4,000 GPO Yes Properties located within the boundaries of the Village Master Plan do not have a Growth Management Control Point or an allocation for dwelling units. Therefore, as 16 units are proposed, a total of 16 dwelling units are proposed to be deducted from the City's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank. Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146, the allocation from the EDUB can be supported. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption. The project is consistent with the Village Master Plan, as well as the General Plan, the project site is within the City limits, is less than 5 acres in size, and is surrounded by urban uses; there is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; approval of the project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project is exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA guidelines. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the City Planner upon final project approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 (CT 14-07/RP 14-20) 2. Location Map 3. Disclosure Statement 4. Reduced Exhibits 5. Full Size Exhibits "A"-"S" dated February 3, 2016 SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE Beachwalk at Roosevelt CT·14-07 I RP 14-20 r,~, ::~f>'C I T Y 0 f DISCLOSURE STATEMENT P-1(A) Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www .carlsbadca .gov CARLSBAD Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles; addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A I separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part V ~ i A P)\[fc te_u~bpfie)f\ 2. P-1(A) Title. ___________ _ Address. _________ _ OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Corp/Part M R c~rl-sb~t~ l i ' Lt-CI Person __________ _ • I Title. ___________ _ Title'--------------- Address. _________ _ Address ,., JqV1 Page 1 of2 18/g fS~ Ave-l <-le taV b1e-1o, C~. tf~}Dl . d I Revised 07/10 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1} or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organizatio'kolJ~~~~~ be;W)i)!'l/of the. SWITJJSb'iJ FlU-liLY Non Profit!Trust:zqvsr b7--"lf:..oo ·Non Profit/Trust TI}.VST 07-/7-00 TitlebotJflL.b Set~tt.Uso.u-r.e.v:si"E£Title C!.HG~J.'fL. SwA-~6b1J to..vsreE. Address de£ '£31.-(.) FF VIEW Address c;Jt..f '7bt-vF,C Vl£w :::f={J.IJII-Jf3, C?lf· 9~3 "XI2tJINt=~ OA· 92.~0 3 v .. 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, CommiTtees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? .;~ D Yes ~ If yes, please indicate person(s):. __ ........_ ______ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. Print oriype name of owner/applica6t•s agent P-1{A) Page2of2 Revised 07110 ' I Plan Number Number !st. Type Bedrms, Bntlss FloorS.F. UNITS A 376S.F. ...... , . . ~~!.~ .. 362S.F, UNITS c 361 S.F, '" UNITS D 2.5 140S.F. UNITS E 396S.F. OOSEVELT STREB S34"00'40"E188,66' UNIT SUMMARY 2od ,,, Total asff.e 1st Fir. 2ndFlr. 3rdFlr. FloorS.F, FloorS.F, LivlngS.F. PntioS.F. BnlconyS.F, BnlconyS.F. 774S.F. 48SS.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. u.6J.~m~<.. 52S.F, 171 S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F, 433S,F. mlo.lr?J,!,;I' 36S.F. 171 S.F. 757S.F, 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. 171 S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F, 1:291S.F, 479S.F. 345S.F: 70S.F. N/A 788S.F, 488S.F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F. 33S.F. 171 S.F. Tota!Priv. Rec,S,F. 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F. ~ ~ SITE PLAN CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/32" = 1'~0" THI!McKJNU>Y ASSOC., INC. I 08.27, 15 GENERAL INFORMATION: 'THE SUBOTVISION JS A CONDOWNIUM PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTJON 1350 ET. SEQ. OF THE CMt CODE Of THE STATE OF CAUFOitNIA AND Fit En PUilSUA"l\1 TO TIIF. SllllDIYISION ~AP ACT. THF. TOTAl NtiMAilR OF CONnOMINT\JM DWF.LLING mms IS 16ll.ESIDENTIALCONDOMJNIUMS,DEMOLITJONOF FI\'EH\nt.DJNOS TOTALING 7,2().1 S.l'.(l'IEiiCIVIL 01\'0.) GENERAL PLAN ZONING Villo~oDiM<l! EXISTING LOT PROPO~RD LOT APN 10].10]..02 20J..JOI..OS PROPOSED NUMBER OF CONDOJviiNIUM UNITS: " TOTAL GROSS AREA: DEDICATION AREA: SITE ADDRESS: 2715+2G8l,2GS7ROOSEVELTST. EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE PROPOSED DENSITY BUILDING COVERAGE BUILDING FOOTPRINT 13,365 S.F (WITH DALCONV AND OVIffiJIANG) LANDSCAPED AREA 9,6S2SJ'(ll.4%). IMPERVIOUS PAVINGIHARDSCAPE H,6SSSJ'. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 22,0lOSI' PARIUNG SPACES " ACCESSIBlll" 1 WATER DISTRICT CARLSUAO MUNICII'Al WATER PlSTIUCT SCHOOL DTSTRICT SEWER DISTRICT AREA OF SITE UNDEVELOPABLE PER ZONING SECTION 21.53.230 FIRE SPRINKLERED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-llw/NI'PA13fln!<prinklm OPEN SPACE 9,544S.F. APPROVED THJ!I.IS 'l'IJE APJII\OV£0'f~N'rA11VBMAI'!SITll PI .... \N FOR P.ROJI:iCTNO. __ rl:ltC01'Dl'riON NO. __ OWNER MR. CARLS !lAD ll, LLC 1SJR'1STST.STE100 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 CONTACT: GEOFF MCC0t~-11C : 619-481-3830 APPLICANT VI!STA PACIFIC 1818 FIRST STREET SUITE 100 SAN DIEGO, fl.A. 92101 619-481-JSJO CONTACT: GEOFF MoCOMJC CIVIL ENGINEER PASCO Ll\llET SUITER 535 N.IOI HIGHWAY SUlTE A SOLANA BEACH, C,\. 92075 858-259-B212CONTAC . .'T:llii.L\.NA!!DOUNO ARCHITECT THE McKINLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. ISIS FIRST STREET SUlTE 200 SAN DffiOO, CA. 92101GI9-2l11-ll34CUNTAt:T:KJRKMoKJNLt;Y LANDSCAPE ARCHITEcr McCOLLOUGH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 363 5TH AVENUE IJ201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 6J9-296-J150COI-IT.\CT:D.\VIDM<COLto!]()ll SOILS ENGINEER LOT SUMMARY GROSS LOT AREA: 30,699 S.l',=.70 AC LOT\VlDTH: lS6.6' LOT DEPTH: 125.0' BUILDING AREA SUMMARY RU!LDINOAREA; 32,41BS.F. OECKS!BALCONIES: 3,032 S.F. ~ UNIT A: l,(>JHS.I'. UNITR: l,624S.F. UNITC: l,S')9S.F. UNITD: 1,291 S.F. UNITE: 1,672 UNIT COUNT UNIT A: 4 UNITB:6 UNIT C: 2 UNIT 2 UNITE 2 PARKING SUMMARY RI!SIOENTPARK!NG REQUIRED: 32 RESIDENT PARKING PROVlDSD: 32 GUEST: NOT ll.EQUIRED ADA: 1 ACCESSIBLESl'ACEI'ROVIDED SETBACK SUMMARY FRONT Y AltO: 5'-15' REQUIRED/13' PROVIDED REAR YA!l.D: JO' REQUJRE0/10' PROVIDED SIDE YARD: 10' REQUIRED/tO' PROVIDED LEGAL DESCRTPTlON THI!NORTHEASE HALF OF LOT 26, SEAS! OJ! LANDS. IN THE CJTV OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDlNO TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1722, FILED TN 'THE OFFICE OF TilE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN Dlft00COUNTY,JULY2B, 1921 TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY PASCO r..AltET SUITElt535 N.IOI HIGHWAY SUITE A SOLANA DEACH, CA. 92075 CO!IT.\CT:llRIANAltDDWID85H-259-!llt2 PROJECT DATA SEE CIVIL SHEET C·l FOR INFORMATION DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS TENTATIVETRACTMAP: CT-14-07 MAJOR REVIEW PERMIT: RP 14-20 A-1 SHEET I OF 13 Plan Number Type Bednn.s, ~s A -~~" UNITS c '" ur-;_;;s D u~_;;s 4!'-4" :.:20'-1' PLANA PLANA ,--------~-------+';w""'""""'-'-~-.,':1,.... "'"""''')> OCGK -~ !11S.f. LJ ,--L-~H+Ill'-111 S.l". r::=:1 -~1\10~~--.0 ~~~~------~~ im.IRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN v UNIT SUMMARY Number !st. 2od 3m Tom! Garage lstFir. 2nd Fir. 3tdFlr. Bnths FloorS.F, FloorS.F. FloorS.F. UvingS.F. S.F. PntioS,F. BnlconyS.F. BnlconyS.F. 376S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. \,638S.F. 433S.F. u.~~i~l,, 52S.F. 171 S.F. 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S,F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. ;Jr~s.~~N~·J!:,~ 36S.F. 171 S.F, 361S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F, 427S.F, N/A 36S.F. 171S.F. 2.5 140S.F. 569S,F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F, N/A 396S.F. 788 S.F. 488S.F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S,F. 33S.F. 171 S.F. TotulPriv. Rec.S.F. ~~Wu~J.:~ •• tJ?lii<~T .. ~ .. IO 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F, 4!'-4' .20'-1' .20'-1' PLANA PLANA ~~~~~------~ ~ONDFLOORBUILDINGPLAN v BUILDING 1 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16"=1'~0" TIII!MeKTNLEYASSOC.,TNC. I 08. 27. 15 .20'-l' PLANA ii[O~J [0=0) 41'-4' CT14-07 RP 14-20 PLANA ~~--~ ~OORBUILDINGPLAN v A-2 SHEET20F 13 EAST ELEVATION §I I I w -,, I ----II I I Ill ~ ~IFBBB , .. , BCJCJCJ ' --------DJ51PI66AAII!! -------------·--------------- SOUTH ELEVATION UNIT SUMMARY UNITS A 376S.P. 774S.P. 488S.P. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. m~-~i~i.• 52S.F. , ..... ,, UNITS 362S.P. 774S.F. 48BS.F. 1,624S,F, 433S,F. m~J?J!,;,. 36S.F. 1,M,l~l<,l< UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. '·" Ul'!,\(S D 25 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S,F. 479S,F. 345S.F, 70S.F. UNITS 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F, 172S.P. 33 S.F. 171 S.F. 171 S.F. 171 S.F. N/A 171 S.F. TotalPriv. Rec.S.F. 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F. --------------------------------------- WEST ELEVATION II I NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16""" l'-O" Till! McKINLEY ASSOC., INC. I 08 '27' 15 CT14-07 RP 14-20 MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS I ,79FT, A-3 SHEET3 OF 13 TIDRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN • ~~~~~-------~ ¥ ..... -., .... UNIT SUMMARY Plan Number Number 1st. 2od 3cd Total GS.¥,e lstFir. 2nd Fir. Type Bednns, Bntlts FloorS.F. FloorS.F,. FloorS.F. LlvingS.F. PatioS.F. BalconyS.F, ~;,s A 376S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,63BS.F, 433S,F, "'~-~.;~·-· 52S.F. UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 48SS,F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 1l,1a~?trH~;,, 36S.F. l,;l.:<,ll,l<,.l' ~;s c 361 S.F. .757S,F. 481 S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F, N/A 36S.F. u~;;rs D 2.5 140S.F. 569S,F, 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F, 345S.F. 70S.F. UNITS E 396S.F. 7BBS.F. 4BBS.F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F. 33S.F. I, I• 3rdFtr. BalconyS.F. 171 S.F. 171 S.F. 171 S,F, N/A 171 S.F. TotalPriv, Rec.S.F. 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F. l--»t~t~t- 1 SECOND FLOOR BUILDING PLAN . m~~~~------~~ ..,..,. ....... 11<1' BUILDING2 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16" = 1'·0" THEMcKINtEYASSOC.,INC. I 08. 27. 15 s~·-a· 12'-1" CT14-07 RP 14-20 15'-1" C g;:o]~~ c o::o]11 .., I I _j FIRSTFLOORBUJLDINGPLAN . m~~~~-------~ 00MO"·If<l· A-4 SHEET40F 13 WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION UNIT SUMMARY ~s A 376S.F. 774S.F, 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. ~~~~~i~i,~ UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. ,ll.J,~S,!.;,. :~.;~,!, n.1~. 1! UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. NIA '·" u~~;rs D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. l,291S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. UNITS 396S,F, 788S.F. 488S.F. t,672S.F, 42SS.F. l72S.F. '·" 52S.F, 171 S,F, 36S.F. 171 S.F, 36S.F. 171 S.F. 70S,F, N/A 33S.F. 171 S.F. I I I --------------------------------------------------------mr TotalPriv. Rcc,S.F, 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F. EAST ELEVATION I SOUTI-1 ELEVATION BUILDING2 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" THE McKINLEY ASSOC., INC. I 08. 27. 15 CT14-07 RP 14-20 MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FT. A-5 SHEET 50F 13 41'-8' 4'~· 15'-4' 16'-0' THIRD FLOOR BUILDJNG PLAN ~ UNIT SUMMARY Plan Number Number }St. 2od ,,, Total Gamge 1st Fir. 2ndFlr. • Type Bedrms. Batl!S FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F, LiviugS.F. S,F, PntioS.F. BnlconyS,F. UNITS A 376S,F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S,F. 1\0~~ .. r.i,. 52S.F. ....... ~ }{'~~l~~ll 362S.F, 774S.F. 488S,F. 1,624S,F, 433S.F. 'lJa.~?Ull8rl;,~ 36S.F. UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. NIA 36S.F. UNITS D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. l,291S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F. UNITS 396S.F. 788S,F, 488S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S,F. 172S.F, 33S.F. '·" 3rdFlr, BnlconyS,F, 171 S.F • 171 S.F, 171S.F. NIA 171S.F. u !I z a j "i P-; TotalPriv, Rec,S,F. 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F. 15'-4' SECOND FLOOR BUILD !NO PLAN , ~~~--~ """-"'~··W BUILDING3 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3116"=1'·0" 1lii!McKINLEYASSOC,,!NC. I 08.27.15 ~ "' 4'-ol" !I ~ 15'-4' PATIO "S65.f, SEEGIVIJ... :zo·-·~· ------.a-~~~8 ==B~B ~~ FIRST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN-\lY A-6 SHEET60F 13 ~s UNITS l,),J,I>,I<,Il UNITS <,I) UI'!,\(S UNITS 1---Tr=,~~~f~~~~~~~MnrAtHANnRAIL 2X6 WOOD F."t.SCL<\ STUCCO TO BE SMOOTH TROWEL ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF VINYL WINDOW COMPOSITE SJDING CT14-07 RP 14~20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=~M ··---------------------------------------------------------------------------------lll'~~.'nl' NORTHELEVATION W~E\l,ST~,;E~L"'E'-'V<.!A>.!T..,IO"'N"--------------- I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ms:r~w ·---------------------------------------------------------------------------r··---------------mmrw SOUTH ELEVATION UNIT SUMMARY Plan Number Number ht. 2od ,,, Total Garage 1st Fir. Typo Bedrms. Baths FloorS.F. FloorS,F. FloorS.F. LivingS.F. S.F. PatioS.F. A 376S.F. 774S.F, 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. uo~.lti~i,, 362S.F. 774S.F, 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 7lr.I,J?U>I~rfilr. c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F, l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F. 2nd Fir. 3rdFJr. BalconyS.f. BalconyS.F. 52S.F. 171 S.F. 36S.F. . 171 S.F. 36S.F. 171 S.F: 70S.F. N/A 33S.F. 171 S.F. TotalPriv. RcC.S.F. 207S.F. 415S.F. 3'76S.F. EAST ELEVATION ,..,..,.,,.leg' BUILDING3 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" TIIEM~KINLEYASSOC.,INC. I 08. 27. 15 MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FT. A-7 SHEET70F 13 UNITS ........ UNITS l,J,J,\l,I<,U ~s UNITS u~.~;s 41'-4' PLANA PLANA ..20'-1" -~---r==r---------, f----ir=======illl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I P<CK n1::.r. I II I II L _jL PLAND II -111::.1'. PLAND EJ THIRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~---~ ........ MY•I'<>" UNIT SUMMARY Plan Number Number 1st. 2nd 3'd Tollll os~¥.e lstFlr. 2nd Fir. 3rdFlr. Type Bedrms. BatlJS FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F, LivingS.F. PatloS.F. BnlcooyS.F, BnlconyS.F, A 3 3 376S.F. 774S.F. 488S:F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. ll?~~~i~ .... 52S.F. 171 S.F • B 3 3 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 1lJa~~~~~ 36S.F. 171 S.F. c 3 3 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. 1,599S.F, 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. 171 S.F. D 2 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 419S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F. N/A E 3 3 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F. 33S.F. 171 S.F. 41'-b" PLANA .20'-lo.l' PLANA ..20'-1" ~ 20'-i' ~ 20'-1' PLAND PLAND SECOND FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ilm~~~~------~~ ~~··r-<>' SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F. Tili!MoKINLEVASSOC.,INC. I 08.27. 15 PATIO &v.;s.F. 5a=CIVIL. PLANA .20'-1' PATIO 11'15,f. SB:CIVIL. 41'-4' ""'" PLANA ..20'-1' PATIO 11'15.1". !i:ECIYIL. ~ \I--II--IV!~ (O=DL ,.~~ ~ c o::o~~ I PLAN DL..:.J L..:.J PLAN D CT14-07 RP 14-20 PATIO 54!;5.1'. &'EGlVIL. Fill.ST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~~------~~ l<"o>UoW'•,...,. A-8 SHEET8 OF 13 11 I I I SOUTH ELEVATION I I I I I ---------------------------------------------------------------------t>IOJJl56AAt!O EAST ELEVATION = = I I CT14-07 RP 14-20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NORTH ELEVATION UNIT SUMMARY Plnn Number Number I st. 2od '"' Total Garnge lstFlr: Type BedrJns. Batl!S FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F, L!vingS.F. S,F, PntioS.F. UNITS A 376S.F. 774S,F, 488S,F, 1,638S.F. 433S.F. no~.u'ii~i,, l~¥,, 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S,F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. n•ti<~?UNS,;!!:,~ UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S,F. NIA ••• l u~~;rs D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,29~ S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. u~-~;rs 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S,F. l,672S.F. 428S.F. l72S.F. 2nclF1r. 3rdFlr. BnlconyS,F, BalconyS.F. 52S,F, 171 S.F. 36S.F, 171 S.F. 36S.f, 171 S.F. 70S.F. NIA 33S,F, 171 S.F. TotalPriv. Rec.S.F. 207S.F . 415S.F. 376S.F. WEST ELEVATION BUILDING4 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" TIII!McKINlEVASSOC,INC. I 08.27. 15 MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FT. A-9 SHEET90F 13 41'-8" .. .,. 16'-o" 15'-4' 4'-o.l' ---------~ ~4 r---~--~r--n~~~~~~~==~~-----1~~ I I I I I I I Ll I I PEG< 1115.F. ---[r~-+~=!=!=!=1=!=!=1=!=!#+=====~1$~~~~----~ I I r.J I I I I I I PEG< 1115,F, I Lr~~·hp~~nTR*~~====~~~~~=L----~ I -l"'t>QQt~--t I r.J I I I I I I """' l11S.F, I L----~--~~~~F=~~~~=T~ ==~r----'---'j.----'lo- THIRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN . "'*'~~~~-------~ !<:/Ui-'1"\•I'C' UNIT SUMMARY 41'-8' 15'-4' ~~~~------~~ ~ONDFLOORBUILDJNGPLAN v Plan Number Number lst. 2nd 3rd Total Garage 1st Fir. 2nd Flr. 3rd Fir. Total Priv. Type Bedrms. Batlls FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FioorS.F, LlvingS.F. S.F. PatioS.F, BalconyS.F. BalconyS.F. Rec.S.F. BUILDINGS CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC UNITS ........ 376S,F. 774S.F. 488S.F. A 362S.F, 774S.F. 488S,F, UNITS ~,,,$,I~ ,.,I! 361S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. UNITS <,I! 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S,F. UNITS '" D 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S,F. UNITS '·" l,638S.F. 433S.F. 11168.~\~i.l l,624S.F. 433S.F. l'l}&~~~·f,:, •. l,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F, l,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.F, 52S.F. 171 S.F • 36S,F. 171 S.F. 36S.F. 171 S.F. 70S.F. N/A 33S.F. 171 S.F. 207S.F, 415S.F. 376S,F. SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" THI! McKINlEY ASSOC., INC, I 08.27. 15 PATIO 136SJ', ~CIVIl. FIRSTF OORBU DlNGP AN A-10 SHEET 10 OF 13 SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION UNIT SUMMARY Plan Number Number !st. 2nd ,,, Total GS.~c 1st Fir. Type Bedrms. Baths FloorS.F. FloorS.F. FloorS.F. ivingS,F. PatioS.F. A 376S.F, 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. uft~.~N·tfs· .. ~ UNITS , ....... 362S.F, 774S.F. 488S,F, 1,624S.F. 433S.F. 1l1J~.!s:,~ UNITS 1,l,l,11.1',1l 361S.F. 757S.F. 481S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A UNITS •.n D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F, 345S.F. 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S.F. 1,672S.F, 428S.F. 172S.F. 2nd Fir. 3tdFJr. Ba!conyS.F. Balcony S.F. 52S,F. 171 S,F, 36S,f. 171 S.F. 36S.F. 171 S.F. 70S.F. N/A 33S.F. 171 S.F. TotalPriv. Rcc.S.F. J~u~nf.:. "fJ1rn~~~~·~· 207S.F. 415S.F. 376S.F. WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION BUILDINGS CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16"= I'-0" TilEMcKJNLEYASSOC.,INC. I 08. 27. 15 CT14-07 RP 14-20 MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS 1.79 FA-11 SHEET 11 OF 13 ----------, •""" r--- I B I n Dl'cK j::Q 1115F, l.H!<II'IW«<-1 ~ ~ I I ~ Li ,...,4 '1 I P-< I I I f-~~ I I I I r.J P=1 ~ I j I _, n Dl'cK ~ 1115F. I.Hi<ll'~-1 P-< I B I L ___ """'~~~~------~~ THIRD FLOOR BUILDING PLAN ~<1'10'•1"" UNIT SUMMARY Plan Number Number 1st. 2od ,,, Totul Garage 1st Fir. 2ndFlr. Type Bednns, Buths FloorS.F, FloorS.F, FloorS.F. LlviogS.F. S.F. PntioS.F. BnlconyS.F. UNITS A 376S.F. 774S,F, '488S.F. 1,638S.F. 433S.F. u.~~;~; .• 52S.F. ,..,,,,. UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433 S.F. mlJ?UN~;,I, 36S.F. l,;l,.$,1l,l',ll UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. 1,599S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S,F, •.u UNITS D 2.5 140S.F. 569S.F, 581S,F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F, 70S.F, u~.~;s 396S.F. 788S.F. 488S,F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F. 172 S.F. 33S,F, ---I I ~ I ---I 3rdFJr. BalconyS.F. 171 S.F. 171 S.F. 171 S.F. N/A 171 S.F. I TotalPriv. Rcc,S,F, 207S.F. 41SS.F. 376S.F. WE SECOND FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~~-------~ !41ft!!,¥> or-e> BUILDING6 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16"=1'~0'' THI!McKINL'EYASSOC.,JNC. I 08. 27. 15 9'1'-10' CT14-07 RP 14-20 FIRST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN , ~~~~~-------~ ;c;:u;....,.,c;: A-12 SHEET 12 OF 13 coMPostTEsmrna ~~~~~~~F~~~fll ___ l WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION UNIT SUMMARY Plan Number Number lst. 2nd 3rd Total Garage 1st Fir. 2nd Fir. 3rd Fir. Total Priv. Type Bedr:JJtS, Baths FloorS.F. FloorS.f. .floor S.F. Living S,F, S.F. Pntio S.F. BalconyS.F. Balcony S.F. Rec, S.F. ~.~s A 376S.F. 774S.F. 48&S,F. 1,63&S.F. 433S.F. m1J.~i~i,, 52S,F. 171 S.F. UNITS 362S.F. 774S.F. 488S.F. 1,624S.F. 433S.F. :JsV~J.;};;" 36S.F'. 171 S.F. '·"'·l~l<." UNITS c 361 S.F. 757S.F. 481 S.F. l,S99S.F. 427S.F. N/A 36S.F. 171S.F. '" 207S.F, U"!_\(S D 2.5 140S,F, S69S.F. 582S.F. 1,291 S.F. 479S.F. 345S.F. 70S.F. N/A 415S.F. UNITS 396S.F. 788S.F. 48&S.F. 1,672S.F. 428S.F. 172S.P. 33 S.F. 171 S.F. 376S,F, I I I EAST ELEVATION I I I I NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING6 CARLSBAD VILLAGE VESTA PACIFIC SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 'llti!McKINLEYASSOC.,ffiC. I 08.27 .. 15 CT14-07 RP 14-20 MAXIMUM DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE IS !.79 FA.-13 SHEET 13 OF 13 LBGBND SYMBOL ----56---- -?--------*- HtlUI~RIRlai»R1MaBPrX:AIE.ot ).·.· .. ·:.·•·. ·.:f';,.J nom~ RU:m3J f5IVlilB PAm! B}CI{'<'§CH}§3! Pfa'r1!!81 an;, am 11 runm ~·WCP.I!'E"FmiJiA11«SSr CONDOMINWMNOTH APN, 203-/0/-18 TENTATIVE MAP 2685, 2687. & 2715 ROOSEVELT STREET CARLSBAD CA, 92008 CT 14~07 I RP 14~20 ROOSEVELT Sn<EET r---------f-:7=------ I ~~ ------I .~ -q rv I I I I -~ ,.,.. ""' ':,I 8 I 1.:' INT2 I ...-. l I ),1 I * (_T il ~~~. .J ~ B ;, ~ APN, 203-/01-14 ; :~ ~ \J 1/ 1~. . ~ •I ~ 1 I ~I I ~ ~ ""' J if ;I I -1+ ~ I tm1 ""'" <C ,p I c I ...,.. l I I '"'~ I 1-1 I I ·~ I 1.:' ..,.. f....J -· -·u ""u I, c.~ D ~~I D ~-· .. 0 D " " I IGfW' 71 1SB APN, 203-/0/-0/ 4 03 APN, 203-/0/-04 4 15 SITE PLAN SCALf':j"""2(]' SECI'ION c-c N,T.S Lli > <C :t: \) Lli Lli tl:\ GENERAL NOTES Sfw.-~~~~~~cm~::~a~=mzue AP~ B13-101-o2i05 EX.IS1l11GLDTS ~cl~~TS"/lEU f---T---1 """"""""'"TY W1LDIH3 lllw:RolGE' 8JltDINI3Fr10TffliNT '-"'ECN<<-I'Bll'l!XSPAVlNS' A\lfRAGCilUl.Y 11W'flC GEN:RATEO mRJSaJ I rF IJ.Im1 ""'"""'"""" Pfl1'<SiDZUIOO CDASTAI..Z'CIE GE1Ei1W.. FUN tal!iMTJW FLOOD PAIIEL ~HATERDEIWLJ 1'fllP09:aJSEHAGe'f'i'.I'ERATirH Plml:SE!ImAINAGC'DlSO-WIGE' HASTER.fli41N4SESASJN ~uffi'r'AWEcJ4.~~,&'(A.a~~ AC!EPTABLE m:s: W..tiTIT.IES' AFE AR'mXoon: ANJ N£ ElB.E1:f ro mw:E BASEIJ ~ FJWJ.. EWIIEERIMJ DESifi.IINllETAn..11\G, LE!W..IEiCRIPT.IQ't 2 ' 30,699 SF • 0.7D AC 2!UOO.O SF• 0.61 N1 22.8 WIAC "'·"" ~ HMIUPAL HAJEli DlSlRlCT CAfl.SBAD LNIFIED SCHJa.. ozsmmr "'" T.DE HMHiR 001-EVlSlll'l sm HNIClJS aEEK-FmNTAL ru..F W.!W«A C4TALW\ 00 7R1PS (JDII 5 ).DT/IX4 " I!Hl I!Hl WA "" 260Gf'O/[JUifJS00•.(000S'{.l 220CD>/I1.JH !6C:V•3,5a:l GPO 1HSIUIT1EASTHAf.F (F LOT2a SE"AS.lml..A.'m IN TIEClTY rF CAil.S!lAQ. w.1f~F1Jf1r/'~t/fdf~~~~J: axMY, ..U.Y 28. 1921. VICINITY MAP 40 60 OWNERS STATI1MBNT: I IEIBJYWEEHTTll 1JEFILJ1B rF 1HlS l'EHTAT.nE'HU' ~~ ·(; I ~ t§~l!l -u~1i ~iil~.! ~~ j i. !iTl :s ~" ~ •"• Q !!i;; u I 9 ~ ~H a.; B'il. ~ 1:1:) i g ~ lr) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ li:i 1:-' ~ ~ t) I ~ ~ I E'i ~ ~ ~ I 0 ~ • " ~ :,; .. .( SHEET 1 OF i3 SHEETS TENTATIVE MAP SPECIAL NOTES, I. CURB-SIDE TRASH PICK UP IS PROPOSED. BIORBTBNTIONLANDSCAPBBMP N.TS SEcriONB-B N,T.S GRAPHIC SCALE 1~=10' ----I 10 20 30 SHEET 3 OF i5 SHEET Pl.SA 2!!0 STR.EETTR.EES AND OTHER. TREES SHALL. BE SPACED 1, 8 FEET FROMTMNSFORMERS, CABLE AND FULl. BOXES, 2. SFEETFROMMJ\ILBO)(ES, 3, SFEETFROMFIREHYOAANTS. 4, 10 FEET FROM CENTER UNE OF ALL tmLlTY UNES (WITHOUT "ASEMENl) (SE\o\IER, WATER, STORM DRAINS, DOUillE CHECK DETECTORS, AIR AEUEFVALVES AND GAS), 10 FEET FROM "ASEMW BOUNDARIES (SEWER, WATER, STORM DRAINS, ACCESS OR OTHER UT!UTIES) 6. 10 FEET FROM DRIVEWAYS (UNLESS A UNE OF SIGHT IS DETERMINED BY THE TAAFAC DIVISION10 BE OTHEFI'MSE), 10FEETFADMTflAFFICANODIRECTIONALSIGNS, 15 FEET (MINIMUM) FROM STREETUC:.HTS, OTHER UTILITY POLES, (OETEAM!NED BY SPECIFICATIONS). 9. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED r1 OUTSIDE RIGHT OF WAY IF THE RIGHT OF WAY DOES NOT ALLOWS PACE, SUBJECT TO THE CtrY ENGINEERS APPROVAL 10. UNE: OF SIGHT AT ARTERIAlS, COLlECTOR AND LOCAL STRE!illl SHAlL BE REVIEWED AND DETERMINED BY TflAFFlC ENqllNEI>R. A flo\INIMUM OF 25' FROM STREET INT~llONOA/>SAPPADVEDBYTHETMFflCENGINEER, 11, MINIMUM 15' STREEllJGHT AND STOP SIGN OR ClEARANCE DEJERMINED BY SPECIFICATIONS. 12. SCREEN AlL tmUTIES ACCORDING TO SPECIFIC AGENCY REQUIREMENTS, NOTE: I AM FAMIUAR WITH THE REQUIREMEMTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED INTHECITYOFCAALSBAD'SLANDSCAPEMANUALANDWATEREPFICIENTLANDSCAPE REGULA11DNS, I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPUANCEWITH TliOSE R.EGULAl10NS AND THE LANDSCAPE W.NUALAND AefiEE TO COMPLY WITH AlL REQUIREMENTS WHEN SUBMITTING CONSTRUCllON DOCUMEN'!S.I CEATIFYTHATTHE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER OAV!O MCCUllOUGH, Rl.A r FENCE AND GATE PATIO CONCEPTS CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILfll' !~~~{~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~ e;..T:n~~~~E.::.:~~~~~~':f:I~T~Jr:.U.BE Efl'WTWElV$CROi:NI!D'MfHMIT 11. flf<AliANPSCAPEPI.ANSSHIIU.ACCUMTELY&HOWPI.AOEMfNTOFTnEES,SHRUilS, ~ND~~~~CE~ii!TEOTSHIIllBCAWAAEOFtlllll!Y,GEWEA,STOR~DAAtNEO.sEI.IE!IT ~~~~~~~~gU~~~.AMORO!N<lWTOI&ETCIIYOFOARlSIIAO IRRIGATION NOTE PLANTING NOTE LEGEND LIGHTING SCHEDULE ~ MANUFACTURERIMODEUDESCRlPTlON .QI:( )!!{ FXLUMINAIREDMPATHUGHT ;I( FXLUM!NAIREFBUP-LIGHT REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE 03CONCRErE ~DESCRIPTION ~ CONCRETEBANDING(TYPJINTEGRALCOLOR. OOVIOODS PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES ~pESCR.IPTION --~ ~g~~AILFENCE(TYP,)SfAINEDTOMATCHBUILDING.4Z' -=---::t~ ~ OOODPRJVACYFENCEWTHGATE.B'HE!GHT. ~ ~ 'M::IODPRIVACYFENCE.6'HEIGHT. ~ ~ COMPOSITEWOODDECK. ~ 32EXTERIORIMPROVEMENTS ~QESCRIPTION ~ ~ FLA.GSfONEORSfABIUZBJDECOMPOSEDGRANITE(TYP.) ~ g~g:~~~AVlNG D JB:§ NEWSITECONCRETEWALK(TYP.)NATURALGRAYBROOM FINISH, UNIT PAVING ~ SYMBOL Df§CRIPTION ~ ~ PERVIOUSPERMEABLEPAVERS(TYP.) 0 0 0 STREETTREE·2~-BOX CASSIALEPTOPHYLtA/GOLDMEDALLIONTREE FRAXINUS OXYCARPA 'RAYWOOD' TM I RAYWOOD ASH LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS I BRISBANE BOX PISTACIACHINENSISICHINESEPISTACHE PDOOCARPUSMACROPHYLLUSIYEWPINE 'TABEBUIAHETEROPHYLLA/PINKTABEBUIA SMALLCANOPY/SIREETTREE-24"BOX ARBUTUSX'MARINA'IARBUTUSSTANDARD LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA I CRAPE MYRTLE METROSIDEROS EXCELSUS I NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE *~~ag~:~~~~;~E~U~~~~~~i~~~~/MULTl-TRUNK KING PALM OYATHEA COOPER!/ AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN HOWEAFORSTERIANAII<ENTIAPALMSTANDARD SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANA I QUEEN PALM SMALL B!!ffiGREEN ACCENT SHRUB-ff!l% 5 GAL. MIN. ABELlA X GRANCIFLORA 'KALEIDOSCOPE' !GLOSSY ABEUA CALANDRINIAGRAII.IDIFLORA!ROCKPURSLANE CLIVIAMINIATAIKAFFIRLILLY GAILLARDIA X GRANDIFLORA 'FANFARE' I BLANI<ETFLOWER GREVIlLEAX't.IOELlii'/GREVJLLEA HEBESPEC!OSA 'VARIEGATA' /VARIEGATED HEllE ROSAFLORIBUNDA/ROSE RUSSELIAEOUISETIFORMIS/FIRECRACI<ERPLANT SALVIA GREGGII/ AUTUMN SAGE MEDIUM EVERGREEN BORDER SHRUB·50o/o 5 GAL MIN. EUONYMUS JAPONICUS 'GREEI\ISI'IRE' I GREEN SPIRE UPRIGHT EUONYMUS LEONOTISLEONURUSILION'STAIL LEPTOSPERMUM SCOPARlUM I NEW ZEALAND TEA TREE RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELlATAIYEDDA HAWTHORN RDSARUGOSAIRUGOSAROSE ROSMARINUS OFFICI NALlS 'BAftBEQUE'/ROSEMARY SALVIA CLEVELANDII'WINIFRED GILLMAN' /CLEVELAND SAGE MRGREENSCREENINGSHRUB-50%5GAL.MIN, BAMBUSA MULTIPLEX 'ALPHONSE KARR' I ALPHONSE KARR BAMBOO LIGUSTRUMTEXANUMITEXM PRIVET LOROPETALUM CHINENSEI GREEN tOROPETALUM PITTDSPORUMTENUIFOLIUM 'SILVER SHEEN' ITAWI-HWHI PRUNUS CARCliNIANA 'BRIGHT 'N TlGHr TM I BRIGHT 'N TIGHT CAROLINA LAUREL SMAll EVERGREENVERTICALSHRU8-5(l%5GAL OIANELLA CAERULEA 'LriTLE BECCA' TM/LITTLEBECCA FLAX LILY OIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LOTLE REV JLmU: REV FLAX LILY DIANELl.ATASMANICA/FLAXLILY OIANELl.A TASMANICA 'TAS RED' I FLAX tiL Y LANTANA CAMARA 'MONIKE' /TEENIE GENIE LANTANA MUHLENBERGIA L!NCHEIMERI'AUTtiMN GLOW' TM/llNDHEJMER'S MUHL Y PHORMIUM TENAX I NEW ZE:ALAND FLAX SANSEVIERIA TRIFASCIATA I MOTHER-IN-LAW'S TONGUE VUJSS-5!!'6fiGAl.MIN BOUGAINVlLLEA X 'OO.LA-LA' TM I OO·LA-LA BOUGAINVIlLEA CL YTOSTOMA CALl.ISTEGIOIDES IVlOLETlRUMPETVINE DISTtCTlS BUCCINATORIAIBLOOD RED TRUMPET VINE FICUSPUMILAICREEPINGFIG GREWIAOCC!DENTALISII.AVENDERSTARFLOWER.ESPALIER MACFAOYENA UNGUIS-CATIIYELLOWTRUMPETVINE WISTERIASINENSISICHINESEWISTERIA. BIQ.ftETENllONAR!!APLANTs-100%1GAL. CAREXSFISSA/SANDIE1GOSEDGE JUNCUS PATENS I CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH MUHLENB!ORGIA CAPILLARIS 'REGAL Mlsr TM I MUHLY GROUNOCOVERs-FLATS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS X' PACIFIC MlSr I PACIFIC MIST MANZANITA BoUGAINVlltEA X "MONSAM' I GOlDEN JACKPOT BOUGAINVILLEA IIOUGA!NV!LLEA X 'OD-LA-I.A' TM I OO·LA-LA BOUGAINVILLEA OYMONDIA MARGARETAE I DYMONDIA ROSMARINUS OFFICI NALlS I ROSEMARY SENECIO MANORALISCAE I BLUE FINGER THYMUS PRAECOXARCTICUS 'COCCINEUS'/RED CREEPING THYME TRACHELOSPERMUM ASIATICUM I STAR JASMINE 100%@12'oc 100o/,@24"oc 100%@35"oc 100%@4B"oc 100%@46'oc 100%@40'o~ 100%@12'oc 100%@12"oc 100%@20"oc 100%@12"cc 100%@92"cc THE CO~CS'TUA!. W.Tl.lf\0 ,<J/0 GC.O.lE OF l!iiS Pt..ll'l SEI' I~ Olfl'ICUlT TO ~S'RES!WT PIIOPI,.ED PlloCfMENT& OF 1'LANT TMTE~Lo.l ACCUFIATElY AA NEEDED fDA OOMPI.£1E CtlY ~i;VIEW.TIIE CtlY AE~fii\IE$ THE RIO.HT TO ~fQ'-'£ST DIFFERENT PI.M'T MATEI\IA!. ON lH~ F!ITURE lANDSCAPE IMF'Ilo~eMENT PlANS ('IIORKII"/0 ORAIWI~S) ASSOCIATED WITH !Ht:l CL!' DUE TO I.I!SGEO on UNfOR8EEAIII.EII!'MS&IIaHIISN!>TW.~TEDTO:DI5TANCETOIIo\ROSc:APf,lOCIIT!ONOFEASEMft.ITS, DtsTAI/CHDUTlli!IES,INOOMPATlai.I!TREECiiiiRAcnlli5TlC5fDAAPROI'DSEDlOCATIOii,ETC. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN FOR: ROOSEVELT R~ision4; R.wlslon3: RevJslon2: R~ls1on1: ltVI5$H5 8/25/@15 S/f/l/?015 ~ PRWATELYW.INTAINEDAREA,3"DEEPBARKMULCH ~ PROJECTAAEAOUTSIDEOFTHISHATCH AREIISTOBEMAINTAINEDBYHOA,3"0EE.f'BARKMUlCH 10/lfi/2014 Shaat __ t __ ot--'-- UNIT? UNIT10 UNIT11 10 GRAPHIC SCALE ~.-• .J_t .. r Y ()>!fEET] IINOH•IOFT. rma.-sn ?><"f£.""7" /-:51-r f.~ .... 7!l316!hSI!oe~SUlle 100 SonDiogc,CoUiomlolltlOI t~I(D19)21li!-315D 1«(6\Q)£01·7725 www.mtud,eom Ccityof Carlsbad WELO WORKSHEETS LANDSCAPE MANUAL APPENDIXE P-25{0) ShowC•IouloU~": 1!11\!11 • lUI I~,UI 1(0.1 ~ ll7ll t IO,) >< O)) ~~f,!U/ofAPPUEPWATI!fiA\.J.OWANC~• 145,321 WATER USE MAP FOR CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN FOR: ,l!POSEVELT Rowi51cn3: Rwl•lon2: l¥2;[12015 R~VI$ioh1: OriJJinal O~to: WIIGIPOU Sh.,.,t __ 2_ cl 2 --"l!il"--. {IN FEET) 11NCH•10Ff, IDI.a:SD ~~~fo/ ~f§~~~~~~:_:~~ l!411lDMCCUli.Oi/GH,ASlA HYDR.OZONE DIAGRAM ZONE1 • ZONE2 •. ZONE3 • ZONE4 • ZONES • ZONE6 ZONE7 WATER USE MAP FOR CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN FOfl: ROOSEVELT Ravls1o~4: ~~iiE~ RBVIsk>n3: Revisicn2; li/P5/?Mt; RBVIsicn1: 6fftJ12015 orlglna]D3te: 10(/M?0/4 SheM-'-"-'- Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2016 EXHIBIT 5 Page 3 2. CT 14-07/RP 14-20-BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT-Request for a recommendation of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Associate Planner Shannon Werneke would make the staff presentation. Chairperson Anderson stated the Commission was in receipt of an errata sheet for the project. Ms. Werneke gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Chairperson Anderson asked about the unit numbering shown on the landscape plans. Mr. Werneke stated landscape plans have the units labeled incorrectly. Chairperson Anderson asked about homeowners renting out the bottom floor bedroom. Ms. Werneke stated it is possible for the first floor bedrooms to be rented out. Chairperson Anderson asked if the units would be built to allow for stacked washer/dryer units. Ms. Werneke stated she would need to defer to the applicant. Chairperson Anderson also asked about noise attenuation for the project. Ms. Werneke stated that prior to the issuance of building permits, she will receive certification from the acoustician that the project meets the noise requirements. Commissioner Segall asked about the first floor bedrooms being used as office space. Ms. Werneke stated it can be used as a personal office but it cannot be used as a mixed-use retail office space. Chairperson Anderson asked if there any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Geoff McComic, Vesta Pacific Development, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions ,of the applicant. Chairperson Anderson asked about the washers and dryJrs.1 Mr. McComic stated the washers and dryers will be stacked with space for shelving on either side. Commissioner Montgomery commented that units 4 and 13 are the only units that do not have at grade porches or outdoor space and asked if that was the intent. Mr. McComic stated that because of the 1 0 foot setback requirements, there is no space to accommodate any ground level outdoor space; however those units do have balconies on the upper levels. Commissioner Montgomery stated he has a concern about the 4-plex at the end of the driveway as homeowners will have to walk down the driveway to access the unit. Mr. McComic stated that that is the way it is designed although there is the possibility of having a sidewalk go all the way down the back of the end units. He added the project's design was driven by the two corner units. Commissioner L'Heureux requested the CC&Rs permit for a homeowner to install solar or EV charging stations in the garage. Mr. McComic stated the project will be prewired for solar as it is required by state law to make it easy for homeowners to install both. Commissioner Siekmann supports Commissioner L'Heureux's suggestion and asked if it can be included in the CC&Rs. Mr. Kemp stated the applicant is correct in that the state law takes precedence regarding solar requirements. As the applicant has stated, the units will be owned as condos and the HOA cannot prohibit the installation of solar. It might be difficult but it cannot be precluded. Mr. Neu added that HOAs generally have guidelines on the best placement of equipment as long as it does not diminish the output of the system. Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2016 Page4 Commissioner Black asked Mr. Kemp if the installation 9pn be refused if the actual roof is owned by the HOA. Mr. Kemp stated the individual homeowner has tHefight to install solar. Commissioner Segall asked about EV stations. Mr. McComit stated that will be an option as the project is being constructed. · Chairperson Anderson asked about the storage of trash cans. Mr. McComic stated the garages will be large enough for two trash bins and two cars. Chairperson Anderson asked if he has any concerns regarding delivery trucks. Mr. McComic stated no as the driveways will be wide enough. Commissioner Black asked about trash pick-up. Mr. McComic stated that some of the units will have to leave the trash bins on the other side of the driveway. It will be an HOA issue and the issue will be included in the CC&Rs. Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if any person in the audience wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Chairperson Anderson opened and closed public testimony on Agenda Item 2. DISCUSSION Commissioner Montgomery commented that he likes the varied architecture and that the project meets all of the requirements. He stated he is concerned with the safety of homeowners accessing the 4-plex at the rear of the property. Commissioner Black commented that he likes the archit~cture and the colors and stated he can support the project. / Commissioner Siekmann commented that she likes all th·~ windows and the patios and can support Commissioner Montgomery's idea of adding a sidewalk for the units at the back of the property. She stated she can support the item. Commissioner L'Heureux commented that he has concerns with the design of the project but does not know if they can be solved. He commented that the project appears to be too dense for the site and he is concerned with the driveways as well as the· garages being so close together. Commissioner Segall stated he can support the project as he likes the design and feels that in terms of density the project is what the city is looking for. Chairperson Anderson commented that she would like to see an outdoor recreational space. She stated she can support the project. Chairperson Anderson further stated that she is undecided on the suggestion of having a sidewalk at the back of the property. Commissioner Montgomery stated that he did not feel strongly about the issue as it would reduce the landscaping. He commented that it can be left to the developer's discretion as long as staff supports it. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Segall and duly seconded by Commissioner Black that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7146 recommending approval of TentatiVe tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20 to the City Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including the errata sheet. VOTE: 5-1 AYES: Chairperson Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Segall, and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: Commissioner L'Heureux ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ro: rnrrc~~ DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: __ __...:::347/_~=--+;;j----". /__::::b=-------,----- SUBJECT: 8eodtva-{k, wr Kooseve..J-t LOCATION: . /8--0o 4-r{sba.d _ 1/£ r{tLJer< ,l)rc:ve_ . _ DATE NOTICES MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS: d-1/i?..t..f.jr b NUMBER MAILED: ~..:....!fi~J~----- I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State .of California that I am employed by the City of Carl~bad and the foregoing is true and correct. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ~-··. ~lrs/ti!l:> {00 SENT TO FOR PUBLICATION VIA E-MAIL TO: fiunion Tribune . . ( 0 CoastNews PUBLICATION DATE: Union Tribune ;:< 7 / ~G /r b --~~--~~~~--------~--- CoastNews ~ I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I arn employed by the City of Carlsbad in the City Clerk's Office and the foregoing is true and 00~ . Date: c?--(t '6 /t G I I Attachments: 1) Mailing Labels 2) Notice w/ attachments NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING NOTlCE IS HERtBY GIVEN to you, becau~ your lntE!res.t may bun~te-d, that th(! City Council cf the C a.rbbad will ho~d a public hearing at the Council Cham be~ 1200 Canlsbad VI rl:sbad, California, at 6:00p.m. on t..Jesday; Mau:h 8, 2016, to ton>fder approvat o.f a Tentative Tract Map and a. Major Review Pennit to allow for the construcrion of 16 multt·famlly te$ide!'ltial. air space condomtni~..uns, ln,- duding two {21 incl1u1sionary unlb, on a 0.70"'<!cre site •located on th~ W~$l s.lde of Roo" sevelt Street, betweern Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, ln Land Use District a or the Village Review zone and within loca1 Faciliti~:; Management lone I and rnore partie· ular!Y described as~ Parcell: That portion of the northeaUedy ha'f of Lot 2.7, Seasld<:l Lam;ls;, In the Cl:ty ol Carlsbad, County of San Dreg.. o, State of Califomla, acc.mding to map tht>reof .. No. 1722, filed in the omce of the Cour~ty Recorder ct San Dlego CounTy, J:u ly 28,. 1921 Parc:el2: The norlheasr h<\lf of lot Se.aslde laftd'!i, in the Crty of Ci!!rlsbad, Colmty of San Diego, State ·Of Califomi;a, according to map thereof No. 1 712. filed In tell~ Office of the County Retordel ol San Diego County, .July 28 .. 1921 Wherea$,1Jfl february 3, 2016 the Cit~ of C:lrlsbad Pl.!!nning Commis.slon vo~ed 5·1 {l'Heoreu:~~:) to r&:ommend approval of aTeotati~ Tra<t Map <Jf!d a Major Review Pe:r~ mit to.· allo~ for the co~stfi.!'~tlon of 16 multi-family testc3~ntial ai1 spac!l' condomini- ums, mdodmg t'lro (2) mdus~onary units, on a 0:70-acre s1te located on the wen side of Roosevelt Street, between lagun<~ Dt~ve iHld Beech Avenue,. In laald Use District B of the Village llievlew zone and within local Facilitle~ Management Zone 1 .. The pro· j~tquallfies as. a CEQA Guidelines Section 1'5332 (In-fill Oeve:toprnentPmj&U/ Class 32 Categorical Exemption. Those wishing to $~ak, on ~hi;: proposal ate cordially Invited [O ~neod the publl;r: Copies of the agenda bill will be available on a:nd after Marc:h 4, 20 l6. 1r yo!J havii! any que~tlom;, pl¢aSJ! ccmtad Shannon Werneke ln the Plarn11lng Dlvislon a<t (760)602-4621 orsbannon.wernekeBt;ad:sbadca.goa The time wfrhin which you may [odi· dally challenge this Carlsbad ltact Map and!or M~Jor Re'vl~t>w Permit, [,f approved, is e:stabl1$hed by state law i.ll'ld/or d~y o1·dinance, aod i~ wry short ilf you challenge the Carlsbad Tract Map andio( Major Review Permit in court, you may be tlmited to rai:~>ing only tho$~:' Issues you 01 ~omiieone el~e rai'$ed at the publk hearing described ln. this notlc:e or ln written correspond- ence delivered to the Chy o:f C.:ubbad. Attn: City Clerk'~ Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carl~bad, CA92000:, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE filE: a 14-0llRP l4-20 CASE NAME: BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT CITY Of CAALSBAIJ CITY COUNC~l 11<'!<>~:n.'''illi>i<J!Roo~,,1!111 C1i 14-(lt i ~p !if.iJ.4) 4001835 CITY OF CARLSBAD city clerk -CU00469209 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr Carlsbad,CA 92008-1989 NOTICE Of PUBliC HEABING NOTICE I'S HEREBY GIVEN to you. be<au~ your lnt~res~ ma,y bll' affected, th~t the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hoJ.d a public hearing at the Council Cltambe-F, l2'1J.O Carlsbad Village Orl.ve, Carlsbad, C.iillfmnia, at 6:00 fLIT!. on Tuesday, Ma.rcl1 8, 2016, to ~mufder .appwovat of a Tentative Tract Map and a MaJor Re'll'iew Permit to aHow for the con~~rucliOt'l of 16 multi-family re.s.iderui.a.l air .space c.orldbmlnlums, lrt- duding two (2) inc h:J,siooary unn s,. on a 0.70"'illcre s~te ,Jocat!KI on t~ west ~ide of ·Roo· sevelt :Street, betwe~n tagun:a Drht:e and Beech Avenue, ln land Us.e Oistric:t 8of the Village· Review zone artd within Local Fa,Uitles Management Zone l and more parti'· ufarly described as~ Pam~:ll: That portion of the nc:nthear~terly half of Lot 27, Seaside Lands, In lhe ctry .of Carlsbad, County oi San , State of Califomla, according to map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of th~ c my fle(order of' S.aniJlego county, Jtily 28, 1921 Pa~rceJ2: The norlheast half of lot Seaside Lands, In thE! Clty of C:.u!~b.ad, County of San Oiego,. State of California, ac(o~ding to map thereof No. 1 711, filed in rhe Office of the County Fl:ec.ord~r of San Diego Counw, July 26, l92: 1 Wheteas, on febru.aty 3, 2016 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commi.sslon voted 5·1 >{l.'}leuretn(} to recommend Toval of a Ten!atlve Tra<:t Map and a Major Revi:ew Pe:· mit to allow for 'th£ coll$tt . . of 16 molu-tamtly •residential air spate cc::n'ldomlf\t- IJf'llS, in.dudlng two m lnc.lusionary un.lt~, on ~ 0,70·acre site JO(a:t!KIJ on the west sldt! of Roosevelt Street, berween Laguna Drive and Beech AvertU!t\ lr1 l<md U!.e Dls;trict B o1 the Vlll~ge Review zone and withinloc~l F;:~cilitie$ Manag~merllt Zone 1, The pro· jec:tqoallfles as a CEQA Guideline$ Section 153.:12 (I ~>fill Oevetopment P:rojects) Class 32 Categorical Exerl1pti1ln. Those p.er$00~ wishing to speak on Eh!s, propos.al arill' cordially lnwitl!!d to attend the publl:c hea.ring. Copies of !!he a gMda bill will be a)lailabl eon. and after Ma~ch 4, 20 16. U you ha\1'@ any questions, pl;eas,e conta~;]: Shannon Wti!meke in the Plannlllg; Dlvislon at (760} 602-.4621 orshannon.~idstwka.gor. The time wlthln which yoo· may Judi- cialty challenge ehi.s Carlsbad Tract Map and/or MaJor Reltiltl<w Pe~tmit, If appr.over.t Is established by slate law and/or dW ordinance., a11d is wry s:hort. If you challenge the Carlsbad Tract Map and:lor MaJo• Revl~w Permit in comt,. you may be Umit&l to raising Q~ ly lhose ls:SIJe:S r(JI.j 1:)( :oo~ eone. ell~@ t~11sed at the publlo~;; hearmg descrtbed In thi$ notice or in w1itten correspond- eoce dellwred to the Clty ocf Ca~lsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Offlce, 1200 Carlsbad Village DfiVe, Carbbad, CA 92000, al or pfior to the publi<: hearing. CASE Fll£:: a 14-07/R.P 14-20 CASE NAME: BEACH WALK Al ROOSEVELT CITY OF CAfiiLSBAD CITY COUNCil !J.I!Iadiwili!lt o~Jt Ri;lQ~,,~II C'l" 1-uil' i l';P M-21::~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chamber, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 8, 2016, to consider approval of a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0. 70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 and more particularly described as: Parcel1: That portion of the northeasterly half of Lot 27, Seaside Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921 Parcel2: The northeast half of Lot 26, Seaside Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 1722, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July28, 1921 Whereas, on February 3, 2016 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 5-1 (L'Heureux) to recommend approval of a Tentative Tract Map and a Major Review Permit to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air space condominiums, including two (2) inclusionary units, on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue, in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after March 4, 2016. If you have any questions, please contact Shannon Werneke in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4621 or shannon.werneke@carlsbadca.gov. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Carlsbad Tract Map and/or Major Review Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Carlsbad Tract Map and/or Major Review Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad. Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CT 14-07/RP 14-20 CASE NAME: BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT PUBLISH: February 26, 2016 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL J .,.~· SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE Beachwalk at Roosevelt CT 14-07 I RP 14-20 t I AH3AV-m.>-oos-~ WOJ"Al9AB"MMM CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT 710 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF VISTA 200 CIVIC CENTER DR VISTA CA 92084 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 3883 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SAN DIEGO LAFCO STE 200 9335 HAZARD WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92123 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE STE 250 2177 SALK AV CARLSBAD CA 92011 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5934 PRIESTLEY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY CLERK CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD, CA 92008 r Jwdn-dOd pJoqaJ <!1.16!9A9A I ep U!~e eAI'I!.pli!i.J e1 ~ Z6!Jd<~H ~uawafiAln.p I apsuas ... SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT STE 250 255 PICO AV SAN MARCOS CA 92069 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DISTRICT TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AV CARLSBAD CA 92009 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069J .. 2.949 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD STE 100 2375 NORTHSIDE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-2700 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 10124 OLD GROVE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92131 -----.. ·---~ .. CA COASTAL COMMISSION ATTN I(ANANI BROWN,.j:· STE 103 .... / 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 MICHAEL MCSWEENEY-BIA SD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 r W.L66j)3 dn·dOd 9SOdX6 i' ............. Jo~~d paa:1j 1 o~eu!J6uoje pues : llliiiDIIIIIII y 1 r I I I ®091.5 ~l:I:IAV ~!.1eqe6 ar zasm:m .1a1ad I? saJ!JI;!:§. sauanb!~~ ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 _____ ........ _, CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE 110 5510 OVERLAND AV SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1239 SANDAG STE 800 401 B ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 ·---...... --.. -"--· _ .. _ -.. -- AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION SAN DIEGO CO. AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 r I ! ---________ .. ®09~S eleidWal ~eA'o' asn slill:11:f1 '"'aaad kie3 Easy Peel® labels Use Avery® Template 5160®f8160'~'M NVISION CAPITAL LLC 4040 MACARTHUR BLVD #307 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PEACOCK & PEACOCK '403 PARKWOOD LN LEUCADIA CA 92024 RALPH A STRAESSER 1997 TRUST 1518 AVOCADO RD OCEANSIDE CA 92054 ROGELIO S & KEELY C ALBA P 0 BOX2711 CARLSBAD CA 92018 S D G PROPERTIES L L C 2155 RAMONA LN VISTA CA 92084 SCANLON FAMILY TRUST 7306 BORLA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 "' -FeedPaper-!Bend along line to !1 expose Pop-up EdgeT!IJI ~ ONE RAIL YARD LOFTS L L C P 0 BOX 7050 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 PEDRO E & MYRNA Y RECINOS 2566 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 RICHARD L JONES TRUST 10- 25-06 2608 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ROOSEVELT TAMARACK INVESTMENTS L P 6 VENTURE #215 iRVINE CA 92618 S D P B HOLDINGS LLC 4629 CASS ST #255 SAN DIEGO CA 92109 SETH HOENIG P 0 BOX 232401 ENCINITAS CA 92023 \i\ AVERY® 6240'~'M 1 OSTRIE FAMILY INC P 0 BOX8 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 QUONSET DEVELOPMENT LLC 125 MOZART AVE CARDIFF CA 92007 ROBERTO F & SARA G ROJAS LIVING TRUST 12-28-91 2650 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 RYAN LLEWELLYN 2562 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC co PO BOX 25111 SANTA ANA CA 92799 SEVILLE HOLDINGS L L C 1630 VALDES DR LA JOLLA CA 92037 I Easy Peel® Labels I Use Avery® Template 5160®f8160TM l ~ HARRIS FAMILY TRUST 10-17-97 I 722 ARBUCKLE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 HYSPAN PRECISION PRODUCTS INC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST P 0 BOX636 VISTA CA 92085 JEANIE SCHEXNAYDER 2578 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 I JOE p & FRANCES L APODACA TRUST 10-19-95 327 HILL DR VISTA CA 92083 JOSE & MARY F MORENO FAMILY TRUST 06-08-04 2605 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 KENT R PATERSON 4751 RIM ROCK RD OCEANSIDE CA 92056 LUISA LOPEZ 2570 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 I MADISON SQUARE j CONDOMINIUMS L L C P 0 BOX669 POWAY CA 92074 MARKJ NOLAN 20322 CAROL LN SARATOGA CA 95070 MICHAEL A & KIMBERLY A CHAMBERLAIN 2004 TRUST 2653 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ~tlquettes f<iic::iles a peler 1[ Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160®/8'161)Mc j HOWARD-JONES MARITAL TRUST 03-31-81 20440 KEYSTONE CT BEND OR 97702 J K S G EDWARDS FAMILY TRUST 02-15-01 3980 ADAMS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 JEFFREYS & KAREN M FULLER 605 LAGUNA DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 JOHN P & GWEN E ROBINSON 725 ARBUCKLE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 KAREN C ROBBINS 2568 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 LAGUNA BREEZE CONDOMINIUMS L L C 1868 CREST DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 M R CARLSBAD 11 LLC 1818 1ST AVE #100 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 MAR VISTA TRUST 06-26-92 PO BOX 1481 CARLSBAD CA 92018 MARTIN V & MARIA I ALCANTAR 2560 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD 2647 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 A Sens de chargement I Replle:t a Ia hachure <~fin del weveler le rebord Pop-upMC . @ AVERY® 6240TM 1 HUSTON FAMILY TRUST 05-18- 92 P 0 BOX 547 CARLSBAD CA 92018 JACK D PHILLIPS 2667 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 JENNIFER BOLAND 2576 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 JOHNSON FAMILYTRUST 12-27- 85 4513 COVE DR #12 CARLSBAD CA 92008 KAREN J BARLOW TRUST 07-11- 90 2727 ROOSEVELT ST #A CARLSBAD CA 92008 LANCER INDUSTRIES INC 1547 AVENIDA LA POSTA ENCINITAS CA 92024 M S BROWAR FAMILY TRUST 02-09-88 P 0 BOX 81007 SAN DIEGO CA 92138 MARK BENJAMIN P 0 BOX 7050 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 MICHAEL & SANDRA FRANKLIN 2323 KIMBERLY CT CARLSBAD CA 92008 NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD 399 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 www.avery.com lal:iOO-GO-AVIERY Easy PeeJ® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160®J816()TM 2621 ROOSEVELT L L C P 0 BOX 1707 FALLBROOK CA 92088 ANGELINA VASQUEZ 2564 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 BENCHMARK PACIFIC LTD II 550 LAGUNA DR #B CARLSBAD CA 92008- BRENT & DENISE BEAZLEY FAMILY TRUST 10-18-04 16633 . VENTURA BLVD #1 030 ENCINO CA 91436 ~ ----- f CARLSBAD VILLAGE THREATRE LLC 4028 PARKDR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CHRISTA DWYER 2580 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 DAVIS JAMES R TRUST 05~20-02 13215 PENN ST#610 WHITTIER CA 90602 DONALD K & LAEL J DEWHURST 3425 SEACREST DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 I EDMUND & EDITH SMITH I FAMILY TRUST 05-28-96 3271 WESTWOOD DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ' GARY L & JESSICA L JACKSON . 1 . 2718 ROOSEVELT ST #F CARLSBAD CA 92008 ~tiquettes fadles li peler 11 Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160®/8160Mc Jl A feedPaper- jef!d along line to I ex:pose Pop-up EdgeTM ~ ·~--·--- 2755 JEFFERSON BUILDING 2755 JEFFERSON ST #200 _ CARLSBAD CA 92008 ARMY & NAVY ACADEMY CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA P 0 BOX 3000 CARLSBAD CA 92018 BEVERLY A ST AVRON 257 4 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CANTABRANA 2005 TRUST 02- 19-05 2639 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CASTENS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 2381 JEFFERSON ST #A CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 DENNIS J OSULLIVAN . 755 LAGUNA DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 DUFF ROBERT A 2003 TRUST 451 HUDSON ST NEW YORK NY 10014 EISLER FAMILY SURVIVORS TRUST 09-17-87 6631 LITTLER DR SAN DIEGO CA 92119 GP-SD LLC 652 CAPILANO DR BRENTWOOD CA 94513 A Sensde chargement Replle:Z ~ I<~ haehure afin de 1] reveler ie rebord Pop-upMC l fbhl AVERY® 6241)TM II ~ J. ANA M CABO 2568 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 · BEECHTREE OFFICE BUILDING PARTNERSHIP 2653 ROOSEVELT ST #D CARLSBAD CA 92008 BLACKBURN 2000 TRUST B 06- 13-00 202 RAINBOW LN OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CARLSBAD STATE STREET L L c 2739 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CHARLES & LORRAINE WULLENJOHN 1259 DISCOVERY ST SAN MARCOS CA 92078 --------- CSTATE L L C 2244 S SANTA FE AVE #B2 VISTA CA 92084 DEWHURST FAMILY ·_REVOCABLE TRUST 03-13-90 3425 SEACREST DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 E R E PROPERTIES L L C 1054 LA SOMBRA DR SAN MARCOS CA 92078 ELLEN SPEERT FAMILY TRUST 11-02-87 2633 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 H S ERGIN P 0 BOX 218 CARLSBAD CA 92018 www.svery.com 1-SOIHiO-AVERY I Easy Peel® labels I. Use Avery® Template 5160®f81601M .. J VENSTROM FAMILY TRUST 08- 03-04 2933 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 WILSON JANE RESIDENCE TRUST 10-11-01 2710 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ~tlquettes faclles ~ peler 11 Utilisez le abarit AVERY® 5160®/S160Mc } A llll!ll!l!lilll l'eedPaper- Bend along line to I expose Pop-up EdgeTM J I VICTOR & ANGELA BALAKER 3811 ALDERAVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ... Sens de charaement I Replle:Z li laluu:hure <~fin dtll I reveler le rebord Pop-upMC 1 @ AVERY® 6240TM 1 WARD FAMILY TRUST 01-20-89 945 S ORANGE GROVE BLVD #D PASADENA CA 91105 www.<wery.eom 1-800-GO-AVERY Beachwalk at Roosevelt City Council, Item No. 7 March 8, 2016 Staff: Shannon Werneke, Associate Planner Location Map S TA T E S T ROOS EV E L T S T MAD I SO N S T S T A T E S T A L L E Y BEEC H A V CT 14-07 / RP 14-20 Beachwalk at Roosevelt SITE MAP JE L C AMINO RE ALLA COSTA AV A L G A R DCARLSBAD B L S TA T E S T ROOSE VE L T S T BEEC H A V S T A T E S T A L L E Y MADISON S T COAS T E R S T A TI O N D Y ICT 14-07 / RP 14-20 Beachwalk at Roosevelt 0 200100 Feet SouthNorth East West Project site Roosevelt frontage Site Plan 16 units 22.9 du/ac Two car garage per unit Two inclusionary units onsite No standards modifications requested Floor Plan Duplex, 3 bedroom/3 bath 1st 2nd 3rd Roosevelt frontage North (side) elevation Planning Commission Action February 3, 2016: Recommended approval 5-1 (L’Heureux opposed) Discussion regarding site design, access to the units, density, opportunity for solar panels Analysis Consistent with the Village Master Plan Falls within the allowable density range Enhances the Village as a place for living Walking distance to the commercial core Inclusionary housing provided on-site Categorically exempt from CEQA (§15332) Recommendation Adopt City Council Resolution No.2016-047,approving Tentative Tract Map CT 14-07 and Major Review Permit RP 14-20,to allow for the construction of 16 multi-family residential air-space condominiums,including two (2) inclusionary units,on a 0.70-acre site located on the west side of Roosevelt Street,between Laguna Drive and Beech Avenue,in Land Use District 8 of the Village Review zone and within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1,as recommended by the Planning Commission. Inclusionary Housing Two units designated as inclusionary units to satisfy affordable housing requirements 2 bedroom/2.5 bath Two-car garage 1,291 SF Condition No. 19 of PC Resolution No. 7146 requires recordation of AHA agreement Deed-restricted for 55 years