The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1817 ASTON AVE; ; CB981998; Permit...- . I \. BUILDlNb Y'EKMI'I' Permit NO: CB982998 09/18/5 { 147 59 Pro3ect No: A9802640 Page 1 of 1 Development No. Job Address: 1817 ASTON AV Suite: Permit Tvpe: INDIJSTRIAL BUILDING I Parcel No: Valuation : 933.885 Lot#: Construction rvne: VN Occupancy Group: B/F-1 Reference#: Description: 33,593 SF SHELL TILT UP -'L--- --. ~ Status: ISSUED Applied: 06/24/98 Apr/Issue: 09/17/98 Fntnr-A R-r. BT ..ILI..LCU YZ. Appl/Ownr : NOGLE ONUFER ASSOC. ARCH. 619-297-8066 2398 SAN DIEGO AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92110 *** Fees Required *** ______________-__--_________ Fees : Adjustments: Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee Enter F.M.F./G.M.F. I Ent.er "Y" to Autocal, Enter Traffic Impact Pass-Thru Fees(Y/N) o Enter #Units & Cc~3e-P Enter "Y" for Plumhina Each Building Sewer Each Rouf Drain &rh Ins t.al liRepa ir Water- Gas Pip1 tiq System Each Vacuum Breaker- Enter ''Y" for Electric Issue Fe Three Phase 480 Per AMP 1200 1273 09/18/98 m1 01 02 C-PRHT L2557.00 1.00 1200. i)0 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ON PLAN CHECK NO. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 kdW&@ - Business Name la1 this address) iSec. 7031.5 Business and Prafersioms Code: Any City or County which iequiies a Permit to ~~n~trun, alter. improva, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's Licsnse ~sw Business and Professions Cadel or that he is exempt thsrsfrom, and the basis for the alleged permit subjects the BPpiiCant to a civil psnaity of not more than five hundred dollars 155001). Address City Statelzip Telephone X Name - - State License X License Class City Business License 11 Designer Name State License a Address City StatelZip Telephone ., . , ,,.,,., ,, , 0 of the work for which this Permit is issued. 0 issued. My worker's compensation insurance Carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. (THIS SECTiON NEE0 NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMiT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 1$1001 OR LESS) to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: thousand dollars ($100,000). In addition to tha cost of compensation, drmaga as pmvlded tar In Ssctian 3706 at mS Lshw &. h1sr-t and Ilttmnw's few. SIGNATURE DATE i have and will maintain a certificate of Consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code. for the performance i haw and will maintain workers' compensation. as required by Section 3700 Of the Labor Code. for thn performance of the Work for which this permit is EXPlfation Date CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION i cenify that in the performawe of the work for which this permit is issued, i shall not emPlov any parson in any manner so as FaIIure to S~EYI. wders' comlmmation coverage Is unlawful. and ahdl sublect an amployer 10 crlminai Panatlles and clvli finas up IO one hundred .~: ~,~; 0 I, as owner of the propsny or my employees with wages as their soie compensation, will do the work and the Structure is not intended or offered for sals ISec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of prOPeRy who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own empioyees. provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If. however, the building o( improvement io sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden Of proving that he did not build or imPlOVB for the purpose of saie1. a I. as owner Of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contraCtOri to Construct the project ISec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of propeny Who builds or improves thereon, and COntlaCtS for such projects with COntraCtOrlSt licensed Pwsuant to the Cornranor's License Law). 0 i am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. 2. i persondiy pian to provide the major ipam and materiais for consvuction of the pmeared PCOPERV improvement. 0 YES ON0 i && have not) sianed an mDiication for a building Demit for tho ProParsd work. 4. number I Contractors license number): 5. of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE i plan to provide ponions of the work, but I have hired the following Person to coordinate, supervise and provids the major Work linciude nams ;add& I phone I will provide same of the work, but i have mtraned Ihiredl the following proom to provide the wovk indicated linciude name I address I phone number I type &@ Is the applicant or future building occupant required to Submit a business plan. aCUteiy hazardous materials registration form 0, risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Prerley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act7 YES 0 NO 1s the applicant or future building ocoupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution Control district or air quality management district? is the faciiity to be constructed within 1,000 feet Of the Outer boundary of LI school site? YES a NO YES NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES. A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AN0 THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information io Correct and that the iflformation on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building mnstructioll. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV Of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned Property for inspection purpo~eo. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CiTY OF CAFtLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIAWLITIES, JUDGMENTS. COSTS AN0 EXPENSES WHICH MAVIN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THiS PERMIT. OSHA An OSHA permit is required for eXCavatiOns over 5'0" deep and demolition or ConrtrUction of Str~ct~re~ over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Buiwing Official under the provisions of this Code Shall expire by limitation and became null and Void if ths building or work authorized by such date of such permit or if the building or work Buthorized by such permit is Suspanded or abandoned et any time ys (Saction 106.4.4 Uniform Building Codel. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE , WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance A -~-- ~- i city ri cadshad Final Bulldlng Inspection Dept: Building Engineering CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check #: Permit #: CB981998 Project Name: 33,593 SF SHELL TILT UP Address: 1817 ASTON AV Contact Person: CRAIG Phone: 6195598413 Sewer Msl: Waler Disl Date: 5/24/99 Permit Type: INDUST Sub Typ: Lot: Inspected By: Disapproved: - Date Inspected: k * q<,5 Approved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: - .................................................... I........... ..... .. ........... ...... ........... . .... .... ............ ...... .......... ........... ....... , Comments: CHY of Carltbad ~ Flnal Bullding Inspection i 1-j I..:. . -.”~ ...... ~.,.~ .... .. I ‘.~‘4r , ..... ; Dept: Building -9ring h. x Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check#: Permit #: CB981998 Pmject Name: 33,593 SF SHELL TILT UP Address: 1817 ASTON AV Contact Person: CRAIG Phone: 6195598413 Sewer Dist: Water Did: Date: 5/24/99 PetmitType: INDUST Sub Type Lot: .......................................................................................................................................................... Date Inspected: 5-26-99 Approved: - J Disapproved: - Inspected By: Inspected Date By: inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: __ Inspected Date Disapproved: - By: Inspected: Approved: - ........................................................................................................................................................... ciar 11 Crrlrbad Flnal BUlldlnB Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD Fire Plan Check #: Permit #: CB981998 Project Name: 33,593 SF SHELL TILT UP Date: 5/24/99 Pmit Type INDUST Sub Type: Address: 1817ASTON AV Lot: Contact Person: CRAIG Phone: 6195598413 Sewer Dist: Water Did: .......................................................................................................................................................... Date ----. Inspected: 6 -& Approved: Disapproved: - Inspect By: - I inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: __ ........................................................................................................................................................... City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For 6/3/99 Permit# CB981998 Title: 33,593 SF SHELL TILT UP Description: Type: INDUST Sub Type: Job Address: 1817 ASTON AV Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT NOGLE ONUFER ASSOC. ARCH. Owner: Remarks: PM PLEASE Inspector Assignment: DH Phone: 6195598413 Inspector: Total Time: Requested By: CRAIG CD Description Entered By: CHRISTINE 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 5/26/99 89 Final Combo CO PD OTHERDEPT 5/25/99 89 Final Combo CO DH 5/24/99 89 Final Combo NR DH 5/18/99 39 Final Electrical AP DH 5/11/99 39 Final Electrical NR DH COMPLETE EXT LIGHT POLES 5/10/99 39 Final Electrical NR DH 5/7/99 39 Final Electrical NS DH 1/26/99 84 Rough Combo AP DH 1/12/99 18 Exterior LathlDrywall AP DH 1/7/99 34 Rough Electric AP DH 12/24/98 15 RcoWReroof CO DH ADDSTRAPONROOF 12/22/98 15 RwWReroof PA DH FIELD NAILING ONLY 12/11/98 11 FtgIFoundationlPiers AP DH POURSTRIP 12/10/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NS DH 11/10/98 12 SteellBond Beam AP DH PANELS 1-5.5A, 6 THRU 11 11/10/98 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP DH 1.19,20,21 11/9/98 12 SteeWBond Beam NR DH I 1/6/98 12 Steel/Bond Beam AP DH 14 THRU 17 -PANELS Inspection List Permit#: CB981998 Type: INDUST Date Inspection Item 6/3/99 89 Final Combo 6/2/99 89 Final Combo 6/1/99 89 Final Combo 5/26/99 89 Final Combo 5/25/99 89 Final Combo 5/24/99 69 Final Combo 5/18/99 39 Final Electrical 5/11/99 39 Final Electrical 5/10/99 39 Final Electrical 5/7/99 39 Final Electrical 1/26/99 84 Rough Combo 1/12/99 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 1/7/99 34 Rough Electric 12/24/98 15 RooWReroof 12/22/98 15 RooWReroof 12/11/98 11 FtglFoundationlPiers 12/10/98 I I FtglFoundationlPiers 11/10/98 12 SteellBond Beam 11/10/98 12 SteellBond Beam 11/9/98 12 SteeVBond Beam 11/6/98 12 SteeWBond Beam 11/5/98 12 SteeVBond Beam 10/23/98 22 Sewerwater Service 10/21/98 22 Sewerwater Service 10/20/98 22 Sewerwater Service 10/16/98 22 Sewerwater Service 10/15/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/15/98 12 SteeVBond Beam 10/15/98 21 Undergmund/Under Floor 10/15/98 22 Sewerwater Service 10/15/98 22 Sewerwater Service 10/13/98 12 SteellBond Beam 10/13/98 22 Sewerwater Service 10/6/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/6/98 12 SteellBond Beam 10/2/98 11 FtgIFoundationlPiers 9/30/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/21/98 21 Underground/Under Floor Inspector DH DH DH PD DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH OH DH DH DH OH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH Act AP NR NR co co NR AP NR NR NS AP AP AP co PA AP NS AP AP NR AP NR AP AP NS AP co co co co AP NR AP AP AP NR PA AP ___~~~~ 33,593 SF SHELL TILT UP OTHER DEPT COMPLETE EXT LIGHT POLES ADD STRAP ON ROOF FIELD NAILING ONLY POUR STRIP 1, 19,20,21 PANELS 1-5,5A. 6 THRU 11 14 THRU 17 -PANELS REBAR FOR STORM DRN BOXE AP FTG AP wc wc PIERS ONLY Sunday, August 29,1999 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD I E (760) 438-3550 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 US PALMAS DRIVE FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 438-3101. @ CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS Date: 1213 1/98 ., *) + ,, Job No: 98-402 Job Name: Address: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT #65/BLDG. 2 1 8 1 7 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 981998 Report No: 1855969 ENGINEER GREGORY SMITH. PE Enclosed are field inspection andor test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 12/24/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected andor tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should 5800. YOU have Reports enclosed (1) questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 715- TestingEngineers -Sa" Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court, Suite18 Sa" Diego. CA. 92111 [619]715-5800 Fax[619]715-5810 ........ INSPECTION co~roto Masonly Flrrd~lroorlllg .. Plla Drlvln) roatross Conc J SlNCl Sloe1 ... .- N~n-Oeelw~llve Ualch Plnnl Solls Tochnlclnn Mosh.wlcxl Eloclrlcal UOll PUII-OUI Raollng wulo,proonng OSHPO Slwclnlly ... U9A ..... ........ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION . conc.: Mix nIp81 ............ .... corn.. MIX nrpal ...... SPECInCaUON - COX.: MIX nipti shas ............ ~ Hlnl.: nabnr ... -- 8lump . .. nm~.: rondons ... Tenlparnturo --__ ... . n1nr.: w.w F. ........... - Alr Conlonl . ._ . GmuI MIX alps1 .......... nll WOW . MO nf. Typdpsl ... __ consonmilon ElocImde Storeom __ - 'rolquo Applppllod . LJIIIIR 81 Stool __ Load (Poundo) ........ .- Molal ~ockhq ....... Flraprooflng ............. -I ....... corrotwa uhn ngurtd __ 01nor .. . .- ........ ~~ ~ - Corr~dona cmplnlad __ . t1.S. Dons ..... Tnicmws - /: EIoclfcdflS Gx . ........ INSPECTOR'S NAME CERT-NO. %3z3 -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNAT __ __ DATE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Established 1946 FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: 12/24/98 98-402 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT #65/BLDG. 2 1 8 17 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 981998 1855913 ENGINEER: GREGORY SMITH, PE Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 12/14/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (1) Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Court. Suite18 Sa" Diego, CA. 92111 [619]715-5800 Fax[619]715-5810 ~. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rid.: Rebar ~ Rid: W.W.F. ~ Rink Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi ~ Monar: Typelpsi ~ Units: Block ~ Units: Block __ Steel __ H.S. Bolls ~ Metal Decking ~ EIectrodes __ Fireproofing ~ Other Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans ~ Specifications - Sizes ~ Slump - Air Content ~ Temperature ~ Unit Weight ~ Consolidation __ Electrode Storage ~ ~ Torque Applied JL Load (pounds$'?bo Ibc. - Thickness - Correclve action required L - Corredions mmpleted - PageLof __ General /Subcontractor n Building Permit # q. A DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other I INSPECTION ~ Concrete ~ Prestress Conc ~ Masonry __ Struct Steel ~ Fireproofing ~ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive ~ Batch Plant ~ Soils Technician __ Mechanical ~ Electrical +I BO11 PUII-OUf ~ Roofing ~ Waterprooling ~ DSA __ OSHPD ~ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - Sail - ~ Base - - Subgrade - - Asphall Concrete ___ ~ Concrete Cylinders ~ Conc Flex Beams ~ - Reinl. Steel __ ~ Tendon (PT Strands) ~ Monar Samples __ Grout Samples __ ~ Masonry Prisms - ~ Masonry Black ~ Steel - ~ H.S. Bolts __ ~ Fireproofing - - Roofing __ - Other 1 rh 7/6*sse+.QA A A&.%$ svy*d X&%A?--C@3 : Yf J19\ ka, - 9 ad18 - baLd " hQS.3 8 A-W a21 - b&d "h - 6AUWLL SA. x I, Lu,-ta,Jl&LP&%. 7 85 *-u A)& : Q-tLdb I 2\119% -tDco ah .&n 1wQiudbAaCGw a. 7.L &bvY.LB L Ss'A pAbu9D LA SA 4dLaUc. Field Representative CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless othe .,. .. . with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTORS NAME m2 < G-LS CERT. NO. ,. I (Pria Clearly) A .. INSPECTORS SIGNATURE DATE 7dl+',/9 r Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: ENGINEER Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. E.1.bll.h.d tw 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO. CA92111 (619) 715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS o& 12/09/98 98-402 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT #65/BLDG. 2 18 17 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 981998 1855749 GREGORY SMITH, PE ATLANTIC cm WAY FT MJDERDALE mw(w SIN DIEGO Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 12/1/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (1) OVER 54 YEARS OF QUALITY SERVICE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT z Page 1of - General I Subcontractor Building Permit # DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION __ Concrete ~ Prestress Conc ~ Masonry __ StNCt Steel __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-De~tr~cti~e __ Baich Plan1 __ Soils Technician - Mechanical __ Electrical - Roofing __ Waterproofing __ OSA __ OSHPD __ Specially & Bolt Puli-out MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - Soil __ Base __ Subgrade - Asphalt Concrete ~ - Concrete Cylinders ~ __ Conc Flex Beams __ ~ Reinf. Steel - Tendon (PT Strands) - __ Mortar Samples __ __ Grout Samples ~ __ w~pnry~risms - - Masonry Block - __ Steel - H.S. Bolts __ Fireproofing __ Roofing __ Other - __ __ - ~ __ __ ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Rinf.: Rebar __ Rinl.: W.W.F. - Rinl.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi - Mortar: Typelpsi __ Units: Block ___ Units: Block ~ Steel __ H.S. Bolts - Metal Decking __ Elecliodes __ Fireprooling ~ Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans Specifications __ Sizes ~ Slump __ Air Content - Temperature - Unit Weight ~ Consolidation - Eieclrode Storage ___ __ Torque Applied - Thickness Load (Pounds) d900 I bs ~ Correcbve acton required __ - Corrections completed __ with the approved plans and specifications and the workrnanship provisions of the applicable code. (Print Clearly1 INSPECTOR'S NAME n INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURA V& * CERT. NO. DATE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 ,?f I ~ 9k/ 95f I Building Permit # DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION L Concrete Prestress Conc Masonry - StNCt Steel __ Fireproofing - Pile Driving Non-Deslructive - Batch Plant __ Soils Technician ~ Mechanical - Electrical - soit PUII-OUt - Roofing ~ Waterproofing DSA OSHPD Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY Soil __ - Base ~ - Subgrade ~ Asphalt Concrete Concrete Cylinders 72- - Conc Flex Beams __ - Reinf. Steel ~ Tendon (PTStrands) ~ - Mortar Samples - - Grout Samples __ ~ Masonry Prlsms ~ Masonry Block ~ Steel ~ - H.S. Bolts - - Fireproofing - ~ Roofing ~ Other - MATERIAL DESCRlPTl K Conc.: Mix #/psi J$-yp ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi - Rinf.: Rebar - Rinf.: W.W.F. - Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi - Mortar: Typdpsi __ Units: Block ~ Units: Block ~ Steel 2 H.S. Bolts ~ Metal Decking __ Electrodes - Fireproofing ~ Other Conc.: Mix Wpsi 3000 INSPECTION CHECKLIST -.& Plans ~ Specifications - Sizes L Slump 3.~~- V" - Air Content ___ Temperalure - Unit Wsight __ Eieclrode Storage ~ - Torque Applied Load (Pounds) - Thickness Consolidallon c/ia. ~ CmecBve aclon required ~ ~ Corrections completed . . .. Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. PageLqf - 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 .. INSPECTION REPORT Project Name -Jkf.-s%ld rE&-d rBua Address I b17 k5-brd &lG. CAVZL5iM-A rA - General 1 Subcontractor L-rts L d SPJL f>OrJ&Vn= TESD Project # YP- Ya 2. Building Permit # YF,! ?qp DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION Concrete ze- ___ Prestres J Conc ~ Masonly struct Steel __ Fireproofing ~ Pile Driving ~ Non-Destr~clive ~ Batch Plan1 ~ Soils Technician ~ Mechanical - Electrical ~ Bolt PuII-Out - Roofing ~ Waterproofing - DSA __ OSHPD __ Specialty MAT’L SAMPLING QTY ~ Soil __ - Base ~ ~ Subgrade ~ ~ Asphalt Concrete __ - Concrete Cylinders ~ - Conc Flex Beams ~ ~ Reinf. Steel ~ ~ Tendon (PT Strands) - ~ Mortar Samples - ~ Grout Samples - - Masonry Prisms ~ ~ Masonly Block ~ ~ Steel - - H.S. Bolts ~ ~ Fireprooling - __ Roofing __ Other ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi __. Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rinf.: W.W.F. - Rinf.: Tendons __ Grout: Mi% #/psi __ Monar: Typelpsi __ Units: Block ~ Units: Block ~ Steel - H.S. Bolts __ Melal Decking ~ Electrodes __ Firepmofing ~ Other Rinf.: RebarPbl5- ts &-lob L INSPECTION CHECKLIST & Plans __ Specifications - Sizes - Slump - Air Content - Temperature - Unit Weight ~ Consolidation ~ Electrode Storage ~ - Torque Applled - Load (Pounds) - Thickness ~ Correclve aaim required- & Corrections completed ~ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reporled with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. I CERT. NO. 163 70b-‘// INSPECTOR’S NAME eIk3sy Sfw7-A (Prinl Clearly) INSPECTOR’S SIGNATURE DATE 11’ fla ‘7 f -.- Testing Engineers - San Piego, Inc. E.lab1l.h.d <M6 AWNTIC CIN MAY FI. UUDERDALE ORLWW FAX (619) 715-5810 SAN DlEGO 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO. CA92111 (619) 715-5800 FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No 11/10/98 98-402 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT #65/BLDG. 2 1817 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 981998 1855522 ENGINEER: GREGORY SMITH, PE I: Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 11/5/98-11/6/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our ofice at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (2) OVER SOMARS OF OUAupl SERVICE I’L Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT Page -Loff- SAN DIEGO, CA92111 - Project Name f%d< t%-d &5%2 C hL 0 _b- TESD Project # - Address 1815 &.rod 4 rb 17 W OnJ g.-L-~k+lZ/ d ‘L- General I Subcontractor h5 13 /SP& 6 do2.G- - P>Wkrn c4 6 - Building Permit # 9 8-1 97; Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other DSA # INSPECTION \L: Concrete - Prestress Conc __ Masonry - Rrepmoiing - Pile Driving - Non-Deslructlve __ Batch Plant - Solls Technlclan - Mechanical - Electrical - Bolt PuII-out - Roofing __ Watsrprmling - DSA __ OSHPD - Speclalfy - S1NC1 steel MAT’L SAMPLING QTY - soil - __ Base - - Subgrade - - Asphalt Concrete __ Conc Flex Beams - - Reinf. Steel - Tendon (PT Strands) - - Mortar Samples - - Gmut Samples __ - Masonry Prisms - - Masonry Block - ~ Steel - - H.S. Bolts - - Rreprooflng - - Roofing - __ Other Concrete Cylinders - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION A Conc.: Mix #/psi 3 CCI P Conc.: Mix #Ips1 a __ Conc.: Mix Wpsl Rink Rebar Ab /.Sy6Li - Rinf.: W.W.F. - Rink Tendons - Grout: MIX wpsl - Monar: Typelpsi - Unik Block __ Unlts: Block - steel - H.S. Bolts - Metal Decking - Electrcdes __ Rrepmoflng - Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST x :;:c:fications )c - sizes & ~iump3e CL y“ - Alr Content - Temperature __ Unit Weight ConsoDdatlo~ - Electrode Storage __ - Torque Applied - Load (Pounds) __ Thickness __ Conscm don requbsd - __ Correcllons completed - T Remarks rdspdT& 7Ffo - -Zd.$*. ad (a, ?@ ba ,!y HD&& 2, r,d-a 6a i%+ sJzg, &,p_Pio q Leo. C-BP fi6fc&Z& & -6Ww &* a r2t thcxwGc . ALSO Pi~~%F3BO” P5 zwh4.3- 6 mr”>c-+s-Y P Field Representative with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTORS NAME Z4dW G 1+4 INSPECTORS SIGNATURE DATE //a 6 -8r CERT. NO. bVZok-<R Teating Einginaers - 8an Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT.. SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof - Euildlng Pennil W . DSA W Plan File t OSHPD X w Government Contract # Other Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof - - *. -- Project Name SS~~KSS TESD Project # - Address 1% 1.c a \%TI A-3-k~ W6 Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION 2 Concrete - Prestress Conc - Masonry - Fireproofing - Pile Driving __ Non-Desl~clive - Batch Plant - Soil5 Technlcien - Mechanical - Eleetrical - Roofing - Waterproofing - DSA - OSHPD - Specially - SINCI sled - Boll Pull-oul MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - SOll - - Subgrade - __ Asphalt Concrete - - Concrete Cylinders - - Conc Flex Beams - - Reinf. Steel - - Tendon (PT Strands) ~ - Monar Samples - - Grout Samples - - MaSOnryPrisms - MasonryBlock - - Steel - - H.S. Bolls - - Fireproofing - - Roofing - - Other - Base - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - Conc.: Mix #Ips1 ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: MIX #/psi - Rinl.: W.W.F. - Rinf.: Tendons - Gmut: Mix #/psi - Monar: Typdpspsl ~ Units: Block - Units: Block - steel - H.S. Bolls - ~elai Decking ~ Electmdes - Rrepmofing - Ofher 2 Rinf.: Rebar ~ INS ECTION CHECKLIST Plans spec i n ca u o n s 2- .G sizes - Slump - Air Content __ Temperalure Unit Weight - Consolidation - Eleetmde Storage - - Torque Applled - Load (Pounds) - Thickness - hthe acbn rwuird - - Correcliona armpieled - Field Representative CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE To the best of my knowledge, all of the reporte with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTORS NAME CERT.NO. 4 pqqo 6 - w INSPECTORS SIGNATURE DATE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Am Clpl E.1.bll.h.d 4W WAY Ft UUC€RDM€ SAN DIEGO. CAS2111 FAX (619) 715-5810 i SAN DIEGO '7895 CONVOY CT.. SUITE 18 (619) 715-5800 , .i 7 ORLANW FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS .. ,'?, .' , . ';. I. . I. Date: 11/04/98 Job No: 98-402 Job Name: Address: 18 17 Aston Avenue .. CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT #65/BLDG. 2 Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 981998 Report No: 1855441 ENGINEER: GREGORY SMITH, PE ... .- Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 10/6/98 & 10/27/98-10/29/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (4) OVER 50 YEARS OF OUAUTY SERWCE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof - 1 Address ,815- &5iZ1 f4bWi3. General / Subcontractor &3- Wd ckw K. /S4b &MW& -A . Building Permit # $8/95# ' DSA # Plan File # qg d FLL9 OSHPD # Government Contract # Other I SPECTION -k Concrete ~ Prestress Conc - Masonry - Fireproofing - Pile Driving - Non-Destructive Batch Piant ~ Soils Technician __ Mechanical ~ Electrical __ Bolt PuII-Out - Roofing - Waferprmfing ~ DSA ~ OSHPD ~ Specialty - StNCt Steel MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil ~ Base ~ - Subgrade - Asphalt Concrete - Concrete Cylinders - Conc Flex Beams - ~ Reinf. Steel ~ - Tendon (PT Strands) - __ Mortar Samples - __ Grout Samples - ~ Masonry Prisms - - Masonry Block - - Steel - H.S. Bolts - - Fireproofing __ ~ Roofing - ~ Other - - MAT IAL DESCRIPTION r+" ne.. Mix #/psi 3 fl f - -/ Conc.: ' Mix ' #/psi Conc.: Mix #/psi - Rinf.: Rebar - Rinf.: W.W.F. - Rinf.: Tendons - Gmut: Mix #/PSI - Mortar: Typelpsi - Units: Block Units: Block - Steel - H.S. Bolts - Metal Decking - Electrodes - Fireproofing Other CHECKLIST Plans - Specifications - Air Conlent - Temperature - Unit Welght )c Consolidation ~ EieCtrode Storage - ~ Torque Applied - Load (Pounds) - Thickness - CwrecGvve acbn reguired - - Corrections completed ~ Remarks SPdDTtCE -&2&3 ps 5;^ &- mi% Field Representativ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTORS NAME CERT. NO. JH3 Wb -&' INSPECTORS SIGNATURE DATE /o ' a? - yfl 1 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1of - SAN DIEGO, CA92111 Project Name PYlw RWM Thtm .lo& 645 9.s. Project # BY 02 Address 1597 &W.k€ General /Subcontractor khb ‘!&?.f &iQ v Building Permit # ga I 9% DSA# - Plan File # - OSHPD # - Government Contract # - Other INSPECTION ~ Concrete __ Prestress Conc \/s1ZLel ~ Fireproofing - Pile Driving ~ Non-Destrucllve ~ Batch Plant - Soils Technician ~ Mechanical ~ Electrical - Boil PUiI-OUt __ Roofing __ Waterproofing ~ DSA ~ OSHPD ~ Specialty MAT’L SAMPLING QTY - soil - ~ Base - - Subgrade - - Asphalt Concrete - - Concrete Cylinders - ~ Conc Flex Beams - - Rsinf. Steel - ~ Tendon (PT Strands) - Mortar Samples - - Grout Samples - - Masonry Prisms __ ~ Masonry Block ~ Steel - ~ H.S. Bolts ~ __ Fireproofing __ - Roofing - __ Other . MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Conc.: MIX #/psi Conc.: MIX alps1 - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Rinf.: Rebar - Rinf.: W.W.F. Rlnf.: Tendons ___ Grout Mix #/psi Mortar: Tpelpsl - Units: Block - Units: Block - Sleel - H.S. Boils f- Electrodesc%wk!- - Other Metal Decking Fireproofing CHECKLIST - Specifications __ sizes - Slump - Air Content - Temperalure - Unit Weight nsolidalion Electrdde Storage ~ __ Torque Applied - Load (Pounds) - Corrdve action required - - Corrections wmpleted - w.. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, IS in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. . INSPECTOR’S NAME hfmn / CERT. NO. 339 / INSPECTOR’S SIGNATURE DATE U W Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 PageLof - INSPECTION REPORT MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - Soil - Base Subgrade ~ ~ Concrete Cylinders - - Conc Flex Beams ~ - Reinf. Steel ~ - Tendon (PT Strands) ~ ~ Mortar Samples __ Gmut Samples - - MasonryPrisms ~ - Masonry Block - ~ steei __ ~ H.S. Bolts - Fireproofing ~ - Roofing - __ Other Asphalt Concrete ~ Project Name c/1RLsR%d 2fi,wcfi& c Lj-dr Address I 813 As rod A+L CMSL3rn PA. TESD Project # 4 f-f%OZ General / Subcontractor Pd + 1 S@L &w t? Building Permit # ?//%8 ' DSA # Plan File # 988 f60 OSHPD # Government Contract # Other 9- 27m; MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Conc.: MIX #/psi __ Rinf.: W.W.F. ~ Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi ~ Monar: Type/psi - Units: Block __ Units: Block - Steel ~ H.S. Bolts ~ MeIalDecldng - Fireproofing ~ Other &&!2 Rinf.: Rebar& 6 'A16 Electrodes INSPECTION 1 concrete/&g/~ - Prestress Conc Masonry SfNd Steel - Fireproofing Pile OrivInQ Non-Oestr~~ti~e Batch Plant __ Soils Technician ~ Mechanical Electrical - 80it PUIi.OU1 Roofing Waterproofing __ DSA __ OSHPD - Specialty INSPECTION CHECKLIST X plans ~ Specifications - Sires ~ Simp ~ Air Content - Temperature - Unit Weight - Consolidation ~ Electrdde Storage - ~ Torque Applied ~ Load (Pounds) - Thickness ~ Cmmh &On required ~ ~ Corrections completed - .. INSPECTOR'S NAME Gd / (Pii"l clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE fi Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1of - General I Subcontractor k&& &%A- f/&, //xJ /3/R &&AJ//*,CJ /a 3 Building Permit # 984 9 L/?8/79d DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION ~ Concrete ~ Prestress Conc __ Masonry ~ Struct Steel ~ Fireproofing ~ Pile Driving - Non-Dest&ctive ~ Batch Plant ~ Soils Technician - Mechanical __ Eledricai __ Boil PuIi-Out - Roofing ~ Waterproofing __ DSA MAT’L SAMPLING QTY ~ soii - - Base __ - Subgrade - ~ Asphalt Concrete ~ Concrete Cylinders - Conc Flex Beams __ ~ Reinl. Steel __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ __. Mortar Samples __ - Grout Samples ~ ~ Masonry Prisms - - Masonry Block - ~ Steel - - H.S. Bolts - __ Fireproofing __ ~ Roofing ~ - Other - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Conc.: Mix #/psi Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Rinl.: Rebar - Rinl.: W.W.F. Rinl.: Tendons - Grout: Mix Xlpsi Mortar: Typelpsi Units: Block - Units: Block - Steel - Metal Decking - Eiectrcdes ___ Other H.S. Bolts Fireproofing INSPECTION CHECKLIST Plans - Specifications - Sizes - Slump Air Content - Temperature Unit Welght - ~onsoiidation Elsdro8e Storage - - Torque Applied Load (Pounds) Thickness - Conec6ve anion required __ - Corrections completed - INSPECTOR’S SIGNATURE DATE /o-/-yd Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. EsI.blI*IIQ 1946 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE I8 SAN DIEGO. CA92111 (619) 715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS 10/28/98 98-402 18 1 7 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA. LOT 65-CARLSBAD Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: CB98-1998 1855386 ATLANTIC CITY WAY FT IAUUMRDIUE ORWW SIN DIEGO ENGINEER: GREGORY SMITH, PE Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 10/14/98-10/15/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (4) OVER 50 MARS OF OUAUTY SEFMCE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 Page Lof __ INSPECTION REPORT Project Name I 6TdLs TESD Project # 7%-4=bL Address I813 kAs-rod &\IL. Building Permit # ?g- 07-60 DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSJ!XTION Concrete __ Prestress Conc ~ Masonry ~ Struct Steel Flrepmoling - Pile Driving - Non-Destructive - Batch Plant Soils Technician __ Mechanical - Electrical __ Bolt PUII-OUt - Roofing - Waterproofing DSA OSHPD - Specialty MAT’L SAMPLING QTY ~ Soil - - Base - - Subgrade ~ ~ Asphalt Concrete ~ - Concrete Cylinders ~ ~ Conc Flex Beams - - Reinf. Steel - - Tendon (PT Strands) ~ ~ Mortar Samples - __ Grout Sampler - ~ Masonry Prisms ~ - Masonry Block __ - Steel - - H.S. bits - ~ Fireproofing - Roofing ~ - Other - - Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix nlpsi - Rid: Rebar - Rinl.: W.W.F. ~ Rid.: Tendons - orout: Mix nlpsi - Mortar: Typdpsi ~ Units: Block - Units: Block - Steel ~ H.S. Bolts ~ Metal Decking - Electrodes ~ Fireproofing - Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans ~ Specifications ~ Sizes - Slump ~ Air Content - Temperature ~ Unit Weight ~ $onsolidation - Electrode Storage - - Torque Applied ~ Load (Pounds) - Thickness ~ Correelvs ac6an required - ~ Corrections wmpleted - Fi 73.E&-,%l-74 CERT. NO. 7bIO (Print Clearly) INSPECTORS NAME INSPECTORS SIGNATURE A r&J/ <+ DATE /& 8 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT Page iof 7 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111. I o-r LS Project Name TESD Project # 98 46% Address IRrF Asra-d - General / Subcontractor bd DSA # Building Permit # CR - 74 - I ? 78 Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSP TlON - Prestress Conc - Masonry - Struct Steel __ Firepmofing - Pile Driving - Nan-Destructive - Batch Piant - Soils Technician ~ Mechanical __ Eieclrlcai - Boil Pull-out ~ Roofing ~ Waterproofing ~ DSA __ OSHPD __ Specialty ~ Y Concrete MAT'L SAMPLING QTY ~ soil - - Base __ ~ Subgrade - - Asphait Concrete - - Concrete Cylinders - - Conc Flex Beams - ~ Reinf. Steel - ~ Tendon (PT Strands) ~ Mortar Samples - Gmul Samples __ - Masonry Prisms - - Masonry Block - ~ Sfeel - - H.S. Bolls - ~ Fireproofing - __ Roofing __ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION "i Conc.: MF #/psj 2&~+ Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi Rinf.: Rebar Rinf.: W.W.F. - Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi - Mortar: Typdpsi - Units: Block Units: Bimk Sleei - H.S. Bolts - Metal Decking Eieclrodes - Firepmofing Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans - Specifications - Sizes - Slump - Air Content - Temperature ~ Unit Weight ~ Consolidation ~ Electrode Storage __ - Torque Applied - Load (Pounds) - mickness ~ CcnwUve dn required- ~ Corrections cowieted - with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. fB,B# & &7-B 'y CERT. NO. 7L-d Q I (P,i"I cieariy1 INSPECTORS NAME INSPECTORS SIGNATURE c 7-73 1.d -4. DATE )ac/ C-z fi Date Permit Number /O -/S-$t: PA 6) I I 98-90~ JobNu ber Plan Fire Number Project: TzLh L 3 c?,fcA/LJ 3 Fl - co e' I I I I Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof - 3 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 ProjectName LnT 6 -5 TESD Project # I 92 -PdL Address /A/? AfTU , J Building Permit # a -98 -/ 9 9AJ DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION - Concrele - Masonly ~ SINCI Sleel Fireproofing Pile Driving __ Batch Plant - Soils Technician Mechanical Electrical Prestress Conc - NOn-DeStNCIIVE - Boil PUiI-OUt - Rwfing - Waterproofing DSA ~ OSHPD - Specially MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - Soil ~ Base ~ Subgrade ~ Asphalt Concrete ~ Concrele Cylinders ~ Conc Flex Beams ~ Reinf. Steel ~ - Tendon (PTStrands) - - Monar Samples - Groul Samples ~ Masonry Prisms - MasonryBlock ~ - Steel ~ - H.S. Boils - - Fireproofing ~ - Roofing - - Olher PLi MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Rlnl.: Rebar - Rinl.: W.W.F. - Rid: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi ~ Monar: Typdpsi - Units: Block - Units: Block ~ s1eei ~ H.S. Bolts - Metal Decking ~ Eieclrodes - Fireproofing - Other ? .A- INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~ Plans __ Specifications - sizes - Slump - Air Content - Temperature - Unit Weight ~ $onSolidation - EieCtr6de Storage - - Torque Applied ~ Load (Pounds) - Thickness - Comb adon rquired - ___ Corrections completed __ INSPECTORS NAME F€L/ AJzE /E3sr7 PA% CERT. NO. 7?0fO (Print Clearly) INSPECTOR'S SIGNATU DATE /a-/Fcq$ Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Page- 2- OfL 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 Cl FIELD REPORT 0 NOTICE TO COMPLY Date Permit Number 1a-13 -c: 8 Job Num Plan File cumber R- ea2 ' I Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof 'ic MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil - Base __ Asphalt Concrete __ ~ Concrete Cylinders ~ - ConcFlexBeams - __ Reinf. Steel __ - Tendon (PT Strands) __ - Mortar Samples __ ~ Grout Samples ~ ~ Masonry Prisms ~ - Masonry Block __ ~ Steel ~ H.S. Bolts - Fireproofing ~ Roofing - Other -~ - Subgrade -~ Project Name I r t kS TESD Project # qfl-2 - Address If+ (5- AS70 A \-e MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Conc.: Mix Xlpsi Conc.: Mix #/psi Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rinl.: Rebar ~ Rinl.: W.W.F. ~ Rinl.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix Xlpsl ~ Mortar: Typelpsi ~ Unlts: Block - Units: Block - Steel ~ H.S. Bolts Metal Decking Electrodes Fireproofing Other Building Permit # c R Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other Tfi 6 9 <a DSA # INSPECTION Concrete - Prestress Conc ~ Masonry ~ Struct Steel __ Firepmollng - Pile Driving - Non-Oestructlve - Batch Plant Soils Technician Mechanical ~ Electrical Bolt Pull-out Roofing ~ Waterproofing DSA OSHPD Specialty INSPECTION CHECKLIST - Plans __ Specifications ~ Sizes ~ Slump ~ Aircontent - Temperature - Unit Weight __ Consolidation __ Electrode Storage - ~ Torque Applied ~ Load (Pounds) - Thickness ~ CwrecCe mthn required - - Corrections completed - it-.- RH CERT. NO. 72ald (Print Clearly) INSPECTORS NAME INSPECTOR'S SIGNATU v- DATE 16 r /f- f 8 v, ~ Testing Engineers - San 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 - TO: I Y 720l h Diego, Inc. Page rz of 0 FIELD REPORT 0 NOTICE TO COMPLY Project: I I I L Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: ReDort No: Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Eu.bllsW 1M6 7895 CONVOY CT.. SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO. CA 92111 (619) 715-5800 FAX (619) 715-5810 FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS 1 O/ 14/98 98-402 LOT 65 1817 Aston Street Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 981998 1855247 ATLANTIC CITY WAY FT IAUOERDALE ORUNW SAN DIEGO ENGINEER: GREGORY SMITH. PE Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 10/5/98-10/6/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (2) OVER 50 YEARS OF QUWPI SERVICE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 921 11 INSPECTION REPORT Page lof - Project Name CARLSBAD RESEARCH CTR LOT 65 Address 1817 Aston St Carlsbad General / Subcontractor Keeton Building Permit # 981998 Project # 98-402 Plan File f# I- --_-_-------_-------_--- _---l--_l_- - INSPECTION h4AT'L SAh4PLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST Concrete prestress conc -w SBucI Steel Fveprmfrng Pik Mivlng NmDestructive Batch Plant soils Techniaan Mechanical Ekcirlcal Bolt PUcOut RWfng Waterprmling DSA OSHPO Sp+ciaaU sc4 - Base - Subgrade - Asphaltconaete - ConcreteCyWera l(4) ConcFlexBeams - Reinf. Steel - Tendon (PT Strands) - MortarSamples __ GroutSamples __ MasonryPrisms - Masomy Block - steel - H.S. E& - Fueproofng - Room - Other- - 354P Conc.:MiXlllpJ' 3ooo __ Conc.:Mhtlpsi __ Rinf.: Rebar - Rinf.: W.W.F. __ Rinf.:Tmdons __ Grout: Mi rrpsi - Mortar:typelpsi - Units:Block __ Uni!a:Block __ Steel __ H.S. Bob - MetalDecking __ Faepmofng __ Other - conc.: mupsi __ Elemes Remarks CONCRETE INSPECTION Inspected the reinforcing steel installation for grade beams per details on sheet S4 of the approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations, and clearances. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 25 cubic yards of concrete, mix design # 354P in the following locations: grade beam at line A @ 2.2 to 5.1 , A @ 6.1 to 8.8 One set of four test cylinders were cast from line A @ 5. Slump was 4". Concrete was supplied by Superior ready mix, ticket # 239092 ,truck # 524 . note periodically observed the contractor placing the reinforcing steal on concrete spacer blocks at to days slab on grade concrete pour. APPROVAL SIGNATURE CERTlblC?AMF eRMPLIANCE To the best of my knowledge. all of the reported conformance with the apbrbved plans and specifications and theworkmanship provisions of the applicable de. INSPECTOR'S NAME DANIEL E WN CERT.NO. 088463688 I650 (619)=H55800 ATLIMICCITY'WAY*DRWW* FAX (619) 7155810 MNDIEw*FT'UUDERD/\LE TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS 1817ASTON CONTRACTOR KEETON ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. 981 998 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT HS GROUT 0 PRISMSO OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 10129198 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 10130198 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR READY MIX MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOZZ TYPE OF CEMENT 0 TICKET NO. 240566 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 3.5 MIXING TIME (MIN) 53 PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP eF) 75 AIR TEMP.@) 0 DESIGN STRENGTH (f '3 PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 18- LABORATORY DATA ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: DATE: rill 7 Io7 # 9)=H 55800 ATUNTK: CITY'RIWWAV *ORUNDO * TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO ~~(6j9)71~10 SN4OIEW.Fl UUDERMLE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS 1817 ASTON CONTRACTOR KEETON ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. 981 998 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA FIELD IDENTITY 7 REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 HS GROUT 0 PRISMSO OTHER DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) (IW STRENGTH (psi) 11 530 10/12/98 6x12 28.27 72 nnn 2580 PLACEMENT DATE 1015198 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 1 OW98 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR READY MIX MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK NPE OF CEMENT IIIV TICKET NO. 239092 ADMIXTURE POZZ 322 SLUMP 4' MIXING TIME (MIN) 55 PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP CF) 83 AIR TEMP.(?=) 78 DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'J PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY D. WYMAN LOCATION OF PLACEMENT F~~TINGA~LINE A @ 5 LABORATORY DATA I 28 I 11531 I 11/2/98 I 6x12 I 28.27 I 105,000 I 3710 I I 28 I 11532 I 11/2/96 I 6x12 I 28.27 I 112.000 I 3960 I I 56 I 11533 I 11130/98 I I I I DISC I ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS, *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: CHECKED BY: b * gbl REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: it!L2;/4e DATE: \L/, 7- 4s Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 921 1 I INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof _. PKW Name CARLSBAO RESEARCH CTR LOT 65 Addt’ess 1817 Aston st Carhbgd PW # 98402 Genered I SubconHpdor KeaOn Building Pnmit # 981 998 Plan File # -I_ - MSPECIlON MAT‘L SAMPLING QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST cont.: RM.: iE.bu Rinf.: W.W.F. RM.: T.nbon bart:M&rrpri w- unb: 8&* unb: Bloclr .. RNIWrlu CONCRETE INSPECTION Inspected the reinforcing sbeel instellation for grsde beams per details on sheet S4 ofthe approved drawings. Inspected reinforcing steel for size, grade, lap, locations. and clearances. Inspected the placement and consolidation of 25 cubic yards of concrete, mix deslgn # 354P in the following lacations: grade beam at line A ((8 2.2 to 5.1 , A @ 6.1 to 8.8 One set of four test cylinders were cast from line A @ 5. Slump was 4”. Concrete was supplied by Superior ready mix, Wet # 239092 ,truck # 524. note periodically obwved the contractor wng the reinforcing steal on comb spacer blocks at to days slab on grade concrete pour. INSPECTOR’S SIGNATURE DATE 1045-1088 OCT 26 I- w' -/- e. s. I RcRmrallnm 32-99 Wemational I Conference of Building olftcials FELlR T BELTWN I I CERTIFIED SPEGkAL IlYgPECTOR ~~~~~~~ ~ 1 8. STRUCTURAL WASOW 1994 EDITION ~ UNIFORM BUlLOlNG Cw ?he individual named nereon is CERTIFIED in tlro Wttegory Shown, having been so certified pursuant to succe~sfu~ completion of me Enpiration date: , , prescribed wrmen enaminatiin. 1 No.7BYIS ~ ! i KSO cenifvation auem to competent knowledge of coder and rtandardr. ! AR0)iFlbk expenenre should be verified by local iurirbnrmr. EsGil Corporation Zn Partnership with Government for BuiGfing Safety DATE: August 19, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-1998 SET I1 0 APPLICANT WURIS. ‘0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 1817 Aston Avenue PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 65 Building I1 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. w The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Mail Telephone Fax InPenon w REMARKS: 1. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendation in the soils report are properly incorporated into the plans. 2. The architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building only the plans that are submitted. By: Abe Doliente Enclosures: official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. sheet to include Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 811 0198 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 (619) 560-1468 Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGii Corporation In Partnership with ~ovcnunrnt for guildiingsafcty DATE: July 13, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-1998 SET: I 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 1817 Aston Avenue PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 65 Building I1 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply [7 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes with the jurisdiction's building codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Nogle Onufer Associates Architects 2398 San Diego Avenue, San Diego 921 10 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax InPerson REMARKS: By: Abe Doliente Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 6/29/98 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY: B/F-1 USE: Shell Industrial ACTUAL AREA: 33,593 SF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 24,000 SF STORIES: 1 8,000 X 3 (spr) SPRINKLERS?: Yes OCCUPANT LOAD: “shell” HEIGHT: - 25 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: ESGlL CORPORATION: 6/29/98 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY PLAN REVIEWER: Abe Doliente FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process. please note on this list [or a co~vl where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, sDecification section, etC. Be sure to enclose the marked UD list when vou submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) comforw.dot Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13,1998 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciallindustrial projects . For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculationsheports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1 161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculationsheports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculationsheports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, structures, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included' on the site plan or Title Sheet. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: + Occupancy Group B/F-1 + Description of Use Industrial shell + Type of Construction V-N + Sprinklers: Yes + Stories 1 + Height - 25ft. + Floor Area 33,593 SF. Recheck the area of the building. Building information on sheet A-I shows 33,593 SF while the sum of the areas shown on sheet A-3.2 is 35,775 SF. Please clarify. + Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-B. (if applicable) Provide a note with the building data legend stating that yards used for area increases shall be permanently maintained. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Clearly designate on the site plan existing buildings to remain, existing buildings to be demolished, buildings to be constructed under this permit and any proposed future buildings. Clearly designate any side yards used to justify increases in allowable area based on Section 505. When two or more buildings are on the same property, the buildings shall have an assumed property line between them for the purpose of determining the required wall and opening protection and roof cover requirements, per Section 503.1. An exception is provided if the combined area of the buildings is within the limits specified in Section 504 for a single building. If this exception is used, show how the building(s) will comply with Section 503. When a new building is to be erected on the same property as an existing building, the location of the assumed property line with relation to the existing building shall be such that the exterior wall and opening protection of the existing building meets the criteria of Table 5-A and Chapter 6. Section 503. The exterior walls less than 20 feet to a property line or an assumed property line, shall be one hour fire-rated construction. Section 503. As shown, the building(s) islare over area for the Type of Construction shown. Table 5-B. No single story can exceed the basic area allowed by Table 5-8 plus the increases allowed by Section 505. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model namehumbar. c) Note on the plans: "When serving more than 100 sprinkler heads, automatic sprinkler systems shall be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote, station service, or shall be provided with a local alarm which will give an audible signal at a constantly attended location." Section 904.3. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. ICBO approval number, or equal. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 16. Show floor and roof connections to masonry walls. Connection shall resist 200 pounds per lineal foot or the actual design load, whichever is greater. Cross grain tension or bending in wood ledgers is not permitted. Section 161 1. Where flexible diaphragms provide lateral support for walls, the value of C, for anchorage from UBC Table 16-0 shall be increased 50% for the center one-half of the diaphragm span. See footnote 3 in Table 16-0. 17. STRUCTURAL 18. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION X STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI X FIELD WELDING X DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER 19. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. Provide structural calculations for the roof joists not covered in typical situations. 20. 21. 22. Provide structural calculations for the 56 feet and 52 feet span girders. Show the required reinforcements for panel P8, P9 and PI8 (near ridge) as called on sheet W5 of the structural calculations. Design panels P20 and P21 to comply with UBC section 1914.3.4. Show all the required reinforcements for these panels. Provide structural calculations for GB-I. GB-1A is not the same as GB-I . Refer to sheet F1 of the structural calculations and sheet S4 of the plans. Show the required reinforcements for GB-2 as called out on sheet F-2 of the structural calculations and to the grade beam schedule on sheet S4 of the plans. 23. 24. 25. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Show the required pad footing F2 along grid line B between 7 & 8 as called out on sheet F3 of the structural calculations. Refer to sheet S2.1 and S4 of the plans. Show the limits of diaphragm I and II as called out on sheet L1 of the structural calculations. Refer to sheet S-2.2 of the plans. Show the required reinforcements at the pier ends (4- # 5 at each end min) and at the lintels (4 - # 5 with # 3 ties @ 16 0. C.) for the panels at the front of the building as called out on sheets L2 through L5 of the structural calculations. Show the required reinforcements for the panel at south west corner 8/C as called out on sheet L10 of the structural calculations. Show the required size and reinforcements for GB-3 as called out on sheet L17 of the structural calculations. Refer to the grade beam schedule on sheet S4 of the plans. TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. ADDITIONAL Revise index sheet to include only the plans that are submitted Complete and recheck all the call-outs and cross references to the details. Please see the following corrections for electrical, plumbing, mechanical and energy. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: 0 Yes 0 No Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 37. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 f Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe Doliente at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993NEC PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 98-1998 + PLAN REVIEWER: ERIC JENSEN 1, Show on the plan the location of the service(s) NEC 110-16, 230-2. Electrical floor plans and electrical room plans do not agree with sheet A-3.2. Provide the required access and entrance to working space for equipment rated 1200 amps or more and over 6 feet wide. NEC 110-16(c). Each sheet of the electrical plans must be signed by the qualified designer. 2. 3. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEW NUMBER 98-1998 SET I + PLAN REVIEWER GlenAdarnek PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Provide the site plumbing plans showing the sizes and locations of the gas meters; and the sizes, routes, and slopes of the building sewer, storm drainage system, and site gas lines. Not on the Civil Plans as per notes on sheet P-2 Show 1/4 inch per 12 inch slope on drain and waste lines. UPC Section 708.0 Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. Policy 1. 2. 3. 84-35. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 ENERGY CONSERVATION 4. Provide Shell Building envelope energy designs, ENV-1, ENV-2, and ENV-3 forms. 5. 6. The completed and signed ENV-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. The Documentation Author and the Principal EnvelopeDesigner must sign the ENV-1 form. 7. Complete energy plan check will be done when complete corrected energy designs are provided. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS The following disabled access items are taken from the 1995 edition of California Building Code, Title 24. Per Section 101.17.11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities as follows: Any building, structure, facility, complex, or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public. Any sanitary facilities which are made available for the public, clients, or employees in such accommodations or facilities. Any curb or sidewalk intended for public use that is constructed with private funds. NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code, Title 24. (1) (2) (3) e SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. Clearly show that the site development and grading are designed to provide access to all entrances and exterior ground floor exits, as well as access to normal paths of travel, per Section 11278.1, Where necessary to provide access, shall incorporate pedestrian ramps, curb ramps, stairways and handrails. etc. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13,1998 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Plans show that more than one building is located on the proposed site. Accessible routes of travel shall be shown to be provided between buildings and accessible site facilities, per Section 11276.1. Show, or note that at every primary public entrance, and at every major function area along, or leading to, an accessible route of travel, there is to be a sign displaying the international symbol of accessibility. Signs are required to indicate the direction to accessible building entrances and facilities, per Sections 11176.5.7 and 11276.3. e DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES Revise site plan to show compliance with the required number of accessible parking spaces for new facilities, (or at existing facilities where a change of occupancy occurs). Per Table 11 6-7 the minimum number of spaces is: a) b) c) d) e) Provide a breakdown of parking spaces for the different buildings to be able to check the required handicap parking spaces. Show that a bumper or curb is to be provided, and located at each space, to prevent encroachment of cars into the required width of walkways, per Section 11296.4.3. Show or note that the maximum slope of the parking surface at the accessible space, in any direction, is 5%" per R (2.083%), per Section 11298.4.4. The maximum slope at the passenger loading zone is to be S2%. CURB RAMPS 1 for each 25 spaces up to 100 total spaces. 1 additional space for each 50 spaces for between 101 and 200 total spaces. 1 additional space for each 100 spaces for between 201 and 500 total spaces. For between 501 and 1000 total spaces, a minimum of 2% of the total number of spaces is required. For greater than 1000 spaces, 20 plus 1 for each additional 100 spaces. Revise plans to show that curb ramps shall be constructed at each corner of a street intersection or where a pedestrian way crosses a curb, per Section 11276.5.1. Plans shall show that curb ramps are 248' wide with a slope of <1:12 (8.33%), per Sections 11276.5.2 and 11276.5.3. The lower end of each curb ramp shall have a %" lip beveled 45", per Section 11276.5.5. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Revise plans to show that the landing at the top of the curb shall be level and 248" depth for the entire width of the curb ramp. Section 1127B.5.4. The slope of the fanned or flared sides of curb ramps shall not exceed 21 :lo, per Section 11278.5.3. Show or note that the surface of all curb ramps and the flared sides are to be slip resistant, and contrasting from the adjacent sidewalk finish, per Section 11278.5.6. WALKS AND SIDEWALKS If any proposed walks slope >1:20 (5%) they must comply with ramp requirements of Section 1007, per Section 1023.3. Revise plans to show or note requirements. Walks along an accessible route of travel are required to be 248' minimum in width and have slip resistant surfaces, per Section 1023.1. Revise plans to show corn pl iance. The maximum permitted cross slope shall be <%'I per ft., per Section 1023.1.3. Show or note that any abrupt level changes will be 2%" along any accessible route of travel. When changes do occur, they shall be beveled with a slope of <1:2. Level changes of NOTE: If level changes >%", they must comply with the requirements of curb ramps. may be vertical. If grated openings are to be provided in the path of travel, they are to be limited to 2%" in the direction of travel, per Section 1023.2. Revise plans to show, or note, compliance. Show that a 36' wide detectable warning material is provided at boundaries between walkways and vehicular ways, Material shall comply with criteria of Section 1024.3, per Section 1024.5. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS Show that any path of travel with a slope >1:20 (5%) complies with pedestrian ramp requirements, per Sections 1023.3 and 1007.la. The allowable slope for an accessible ramp is S1:12 (8.33%), per Section 1007.3a. Revise plans to show the least possible slope is being provided for all ramps. The allowable cross slope at pedestrian ramps shall be <%'I per ft (2%), per Section 1007.3.1a. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 0 ENTRANCES AND CIRCULATION 21. 22. Revise plans to show that all entrances, and exterior ground level exits, are accessible, per Section 1001.9.1. Show that an accessible route of travel is to be provided to all portions of the building, to accessible building entrances and between the buildinq and the public way, per Section 11 146.1.2. GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS SIGNAGE 23. Where permanent identification is provided for rooms and spaces, raised letters shall also be provided and shall be accompanied by Braille. Section 11176.5. Provide a note on the plans stating that the signage requirements of Section 11 178.5 will be satisfied. 24. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-1998 PREPARED BY: Abe Doliente BUILDING ADDRESS: 1817 Aston Avenue DATE: July 13, 1998 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/F-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N TOTAL VALUE 199 UBC Building Permit Fee rn Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 3,312.23 0 199 UBC Plan Check Fee rn Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 2,152.95 Type of Review: Complete Review 0 Structural Only 0 Repetitive Fee Applicable Other: 0 Hourly Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 1,722.36 Comments: Sheet1 of 1 rnaovalue.dffi 5196 EsGil Corporation Zn Partnership witfi Government for BuiUing Safety DATE: July 13, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-1998 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1817 Aston Avenue 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center, Lot 65 Building I1 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply c] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes with the jurisdiction’s building codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant‘s copy of the check list has been sent to: Nogle Onufer Associates Architects 2398 San Diego Avenue, San Diego 921 10 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax InPerson REMARKS: By: Abe Doliente Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ PC 6/29/98 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + SanDiego, Caliiomia 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COM M ERClAL OCCUPANCY: B/F-1 USE: Shell Industrial TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N ACTUAL AREA: 33,593 SF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 24,000 SF STORIES: 1 8,000 X 3 (spr) SPRINKLERS?: Yes I HEIGHT: - 25 OCCUPANT LOAD: "shell" DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: ESGlL CORPORATION: 6/29/98 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY PLAN REVIEWER: Abe Doliente FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To weed UP the recheck Drocess. Dlease note on this list lor a cow) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., Dlan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UD list when vou submit the revised Dlans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1694 UBC ) cornfowdot Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 I. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciallindustrial projects . For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculationslreports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1 161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculationslreports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1 468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculationslreports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, structures, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included" on the site plan or Title Sheet. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: pw2. S-r.2llrrBf .S/bdGa 5E 0 &W.r4& 63 A.1,A-Z 4. y. see +30LbVU)b WFO~J'A~ 1 + Occupancy Group BIF-I + Description of Use Industrial shell + Type of Construction V-N + Sprinklers: Yes + Stories 1 Height 25 ft. Floor Area 33,593 SF. Recheck the area of the building. Building information on sheet A-I shows 33,593 SF while the sum of the areas shown on sheet A-3.2 is 35,775 SF. Please clarify. L Adti4 353,5,3 $ I .' ' om7. 5- AtWV LE + Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-8. (if applicable) 4e64 .cXt'*1 wdV@.S ;k b7 ALLPwl'llLC &as+ wm4s e:, 5LCtkT An I 5! Provide a note with the building data legend stating that yards used for area 5 V~CF increases shall be permanently maintained. Carlsbad 98-1998 uly 13, 1998 5GE @'& ot7 E& 0L.8@/ A'Z. Clearly designate on the site plan existing buildings to remain, existing buildings to be demolished, buildings to be constructed under this permit and any proposed future buildings. @ @ When two or more buildings are on the same property, the buildings shall have an assumed property line between them for the purpose of determining the PUkZ required wall and opening protection and roof cover requirements, per Section 503.1. An exception is provided if the combined area of the buildings is within the limits specified in Section 504 for a single building. If this exception is used, When a new building is to be erected on the same property as an existing building, the location of the assumed property line with relation to the existing building shall be such that the exterior wall and opening protection of the existing building meets the criteria of Table 5-A and Chapter 6. Section 503. The exterior walls less than 20 feet to a property line or an assumed property line, shall be one hour fire-rated construction. Section 503. As shown, the building(s) islare over area for the Type of Construction shown. Table 5-6. No single story can exceed the basic area allowed by Table 5-B plus the increases allowed by Section 505. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section Clearly designate any side yards used to justify increases in allowable area 4vw based on Section 505. AshWW? VL. 0w6 SBe ?,,$ show how the building(s) will comply with Section 503. I 9. Fkf. &us AeE ;* 7 ttrz bOWJL.*C @) 0 7 lolro AQAiAIO 7 BU~LOu6 A.7. ORW+ 0Q-I 5% 4.v b 43 13. 5 ML' QQ-= 51 106.3.3: &, e.z /a) Manufacturer's name. db) Model namehumber. Jc) ICBO approval number, or equal. 5w e@€ 06~. ~6e 14. Note on the plans: "When serving more than 100 sprinkler heads, automatic sprinkler systems shall be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote, station service, or shall be provided with a local alarm which will give an audible signal at a constantly attended location." Section 904.3. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. q, A-1. 15. %E EO^^^ Carlsbad 98-1998 uly 13, 1998 Show floor and roof connections to masonry walls. Connection shall resist 200 pounds per lineal foot or the actual design load, whichever is greater. Cross grain tension or bending in wood ledgers is not permitted. Section 161 1. Where flexible diaphragms provide lateral support for walls, the value of C, for anchorage from UBC Table 16-0 shall be increased 50% for the center one-half of the diaphragm span. See footnote 3 in Table 16-0. STRUCTURAL &#$ap *TW'@4' @ On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. 9 bd3' ' ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION X STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI X FIELD WELDING X DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER 19. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. Provide structural calculations for the roof joists not covered in typical situations. Provide structural calculations for the 56 feet and 52 feet span girders. Show the required reinforcements for panel P8, P9 and PI8 (near ridge) as called on sheet W5 of the structural calculations. 20. 21. 22. 23. Design panels P20 and P21 to comply with UBC section 1914.3.4. Show all the required reinforcements for these panels. 24. Provide structural calculations for GB-I. GB-1A is not the same as GB-1. Refer to sheet F1 of the structural calculations and sheet S4 of the plans. 25. Show the required reinforcements for GB-2 as called out on sheet F-2 of the structural calculations and to the grade beam schedule on sheet S4 of the plans. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13,1998 26. 27. 28. 29. 36. Show the required pad footing F2 along grid line B between 7 &8 as called out on sheet F3 of the structural calculations. Refer to sheet S2.1 and S4 of the plans. Show the limits of diaphragm I and II as called out on sheet L1 of the structural calculations. Refer to sheet S-2.2 of the plans. Show the required reinforcements at the pier ends (4- # 5 at each end min) and at the lintels (4 - # 5 with # 3 ties @ 16 0. C.) for the panels at the front of the building as called out on sheets L2 through L5 of the structural calculations. Show the required reinforcements for the panel at south west corner 8/C as called out on sheet L10 of the structural calculations. Show the required size and reinforcements for GB-3 as called out on sheet L17 of the structural calculations. Refer to the grade beam schedule on sheet S4 of the plans. TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. ADDITIONAL Revise index sheet to include only the plans that are submitted. Complete and recheck all the call-outs and cross references to the details. Please see the following corrections for electrical, plumbing, mechanical and energy. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: 0 Yes II No I. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 37. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 ( Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 6191560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe Doliente at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. 4 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW 4 1993NEC 4 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 98-1998 4 PLAN REVIEWER: ERIC JENSEN pLIIy5 EYsw%+~ u+4. 5e 4.7.2 Show on the plan the location of the service(s) NEC 110-16, 230-2. Electrical pz PCCJ c LHZ floor plans and electrical room plans do not agree with sheet A-3.2. Provide the required access and entrance to working space for equipment rated 1200 amps or more and over 6 feet wide. NEC 110-16(c). Each sheet of the electrical plans must be signed by the qualified designer. wbuWeP2' 0.2 AWE 3. 5 16 Web- Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. 4 PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS 4 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER 98-1998 SET I 4 PLAN REVIEWER GlenAdamek *) 36 CAS wm5 * PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) .,u Lt3~ og~~ PJ srV-5. I -- - -L.) ret P*X 1. Provide the site plumbing plans showing the sizes and locations of the gas meters; and the sizes, routes, and slopes of the building sewer, storm drainage s stem, and site gas lines. Not on the Civil Plans as per notes on sheet P-2 ma rulWrnWb5 %? L.7" L'pn %m4J4.1Yc*J. Show 1/4 inch per 12 inch slope on drain and waste lines. UPC Section 708.0 Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. Policy 84-35. Itb u6p K+ r'7f Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 ENERGY CONSERVATION Provide Shell Building envelope energy designs, ENV-1, ENV-2, and ENV-3 forms. 5. The completed and signed ENV-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. t+& 1 b*LL 6 b96s ENV-1 form. 5 eE The Documentation Author and the Principal Envelope Designer must sign the Complete energy plan check will be done when complete corrected energy designs are provided. PULT- L# Note: If you have any questions regarding this Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ;7 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS The following disabled access items are taken from the 1995 edition of California Building Code, Title 24. Per Section 101.17.11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities as follows: Any building, structure, facility, complex, or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public. Any sanitary facilities which are made available for the public, clients, or employees in such accommodations or facilities. Any curb or sidewalk intended for public use that is constructed with private funds. NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code, Title 24. (1) (2) (3) SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS %E WE w'*w mvoe A150Jtt: WqGS 42 5gtCYLL Luw3ux~v LtGK4S Clearly show that the site development and grading are designed to provide access to all entrances and exterior ground floor exits, as well as access to normal paths of travel, per Section 11 278.1, Where necessary to provide access, shall incorporate pedestrian ramps, curb ramps, stairways and handrails, etc. * ah, WlJCdW(3b mlm LtdMZeh2 Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 5 && bJ0'35 dGq/k.z d Plans show that more than one building is located on the proposed site. Accessible routes of travel shall be shown to be provided between buildings and accessible site facilities, per Section 11278.1. Show, or note that at every primary public entrance, and at every major function area along, or leading to, an accessible route of travel, there is to be a sign displaying the international symbol of accessibility. Signs are required to indicate the direction to accessible building entrances and facilities, per Sections 11 178.5.7 and 11278.3. 5% VffE q.6 43- DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES mrnk= @ WWb ts 6Ua. Revise site plan to show compliance with the required number of accessible parking spaces for new facilities, (or at existing facilities where a change of occupancy occurs). Per Table 11 8-7 the minimum number of spaces is: @ a) 'Lqb %US @ b) k# && c) I 1 for each 25 spaces up to 100 total spaces. 1 additional space for each 50 spaces for between 101 and 200 total spaces. , 1 additional space for each 100 spaces for between 201 and 500 total spaces. d) I For between 501 and 1000 total spaces, a minimum of 2% of the total number of spaces is required. e) Provide a breakdown of parking spaces for the different buildings to be able to check the required handicap parking spaces. For greater than 1000 spaces, 20 plus 1 for each additional 100 spaces. Show that a bumper or curb is to be provided, and located at each space, to prevent encroachment of cars into the required width of walkways, per Section 11298.4.3. Show or note that the maximum slope of the parking surface at the accessible space, in any direction, is -%'I per ft (2.083%), per Section 11296.4.4. The maximum slope at the passenger loading zone is to be S2%. CURB RAMPS Revise plans to show that curb ramps shall be constructed at each corner of a street intersection or where a pedestrian way crosses a curb, per Section 11278.5.1. Plans shall show that curb ramps are r48"ide with a slope of S1:12 (8.33%), per Sections 11278.5.2 and 11278.5.3. The lower end of each curb ramp shall have a %" lip beveled 45O, per Section 11278.5.5. Carlsbad 98-1998 - July 13. 1998 Revise plans to show that the landing at the top of the curb shall be level and 248’ depth for the entire width of the curb ramp. Section 1127B.5.4. The slope of the fanned or flared sides of curb ramps shall not exceed 21:10, per Section 11278.5.3. Show or note that the surface of all curb ramps and the flared sides are to be slip resistant, and contrasting from the adjacent sidewalk finish, per Section 11278.5.6. WALKS AND SIDEWALKS If any proposed walks slope >1:20 (5%) they must comply with ramp requirements of Section 1007, per Section 1023.3. Revise plans to show or note requirements. Walks along an accessible route of travel are required to be 248’ minimum in width and have slip resistant surfaces, per Section 1023.1. Revise plans to show compliance. The maximum permitted cross slope shall be <%’I per ft., per Section 1023.1.3. Show or note that any abrupt level changes will be 2%” along any accessible route of travel. When changes do occur, they shall be beveled with a slope of 51:2. Level changes of 5%’’ may be vertical. NOTE: If level changes >%”, they must comply with the requirements of curb ramps. If grated openings are to be provided in the path of travel, they are to be limited to 2%” in the direction of travel, per Section 1023.2. Revise plans to show, or note, compliance. Show that a 36“ wide detectable warning material is provided at boundaries between walkways and vehicular ways. Material shall comply with criteria of Section 1024.3, per Section 1024.5. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS (18. 19. Show that any path of travel with a slope 21:20 (5%) complies with pedestrian ramp requirements, per Sections 1023.3 and 1007.1 a. The allowable slope for an accessible ramp is <1:12 (8.33%), per Section 1007.3a. Revise plans to show the least possible slope is being provided for all ramps. hP tZAW375- klAK ‘L’6Mr 20. The’allowable cross slope at pedestrian ramps shall be S%” per ft (2%), per SLWE Section 1007.3.1a. I. Carlsbad 98-1998 July 13, 1998 0 ENTRANCES AND CIRCULATION RAOS 0,b Lbm4j%’L. 21. ALSO accessible, per Section 1001.9.1. Revise plans to show that all entrances, and exterior ground level exits, are ’‘ ’2$:% ’Show that an accessible route of travel is to be provided to all portions of the wm *e-/kZ building, to accessible building entrances and between the buildina and the public way, per Section 11 148.1.2. 0 GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 0 SIGNAGE 23. Where permanent identification is provided for rooms and spaces, raised letters shall also be provided and shall be accompanied by Braille. Section 11 17B.5. Provide a note on the plans stating that the signage requirements of Section 11 17B.5 will be satisfied. 24. The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information andlor specifications provided in your submittal: therefore any changes to these items afler this date, including fieid modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. Right-of-way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: 0 Improvement Application 0 Improvement Checklist Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with 0. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans andlor specifications to this ofice for review. By: Date: By: Date: By: Date: Address: 2075 Las Palmas Or.. Carlsbad. CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161. ext. 4510 CFD INFORMATION Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application 0 Grading Submittal Checklist 0 Right-of-way Permit Application Recordation: Right-of-way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: Parcel Map No: Lots: and Information Sheet 0 Sewer Fee information Sheet A4 HIWMID~~S~P~n~.~~lsbad, CA 92009-1576 (760) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 431-69 @ . BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 0 0 0 3~0.' 0 0 0 0 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: D/ operty Lines 9 ight-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets asernents 2 Existing Street Improvements rth Arrow xisting & Proposed Structures Driveway widths P P 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1 ,. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." 8. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commerciallindustrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: 2 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: 0 F 3RD' Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications a be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 0 0 0 6b. Construction of the.public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so 3 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST Ll Ll 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 D a a 0 0 Li 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaaed or defective imDrovements found adiacent to buildina site must be reDaired to the satisfaction of the Cik InsDector prior to occuDancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Gradina Permit must be issued and rouah aradinq aDDroval obtained prior to issuance of a Buildina Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) &Grading Permit required. 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. Date: MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 4 H IWORD~OCSICHKLSTlsUlmp PI- C**t BPW4 Form 1J mc R." 1mm 0 0 CA SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. f2"' 3d' D 0/0 LkxVLls OlhGP +-.o--k Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: do a ~PDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs tip. 0 fees are attached D No fees required 063 0 0 0 13. Additional Comments: 5 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 Jstimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. d Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: [B 7 kb h& Bldg. Permit No. f$/$9 6 Prepared by: Date: @/(//9f3 Checked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Sq. FtJUnits: 3 3, sq 3 EDU'S: 6.7 2 Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: AD1 CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. .- I Types of &e: Sq. R./Units: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) PARK AREA & #: 0 NO $ 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE X NO. UNITS: =$ ARAZCZL FEE ADT'slUNITS: /L& X FEEIADT: 22 =$ 3L% #3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE IDIST. #1 - DIST. #2 __ DIST. #3 - ADT'slUNITS X FEE/ADT: =$ ,$ &FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: 5 ASEWER FEE UNIT/SQ.FT.: 33,59 3 X FEEISQ.FT./UNIT: = S \ 7 l/ 3 7 PERMIT No. 3F98o/YY EDU's: 6.72 X FEEEDU: 1 =S 12,,dS7 BENEFIT AREA: F '3'' DRAINAGE BASIN: s% EDU's: 6.3 d X FEE/EDU:??G =$ 6,,693 # 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) =$ ,# f$ 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA HIGH /LOW ACRES: X FEEIAC: =$ ,d TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ 31;. 0 b5 3 +NOTE: This calculation sheet is Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. a complete list of aH fees which may be due. PU)OCS\MSFORYS\CEE CMCUUTloN WORKSHEET REV 7/13/98 r PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST BkP- U Plan Check No. CB %? \44 F Planner h kkmntdq Address I - Phone (61 9) 438-1 161, extension 432 5 APN: >\a 2 2 -0 Type of Project & Use: hroject Density: DUlAC Zoning: t.-M G Facilities Management Zone: -Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) h Leaend: Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 4 C3 Environmental Review Required: YES __ NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES NO - )r TYPE - APPROVALIRESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: & 0 Coastal Zone AssessmentlCompliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES - NO)( CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES- NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200. San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 - Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. - NO - YES .. - NO )r lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES IEflective date Of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) p-• - NO Data Entry Completed? YES - IEMer CB I; UACT: NEXT12 Construct housing Y/N; Enter Fee Amount lSee lee schedule for amount,; Return, Site Pian: @ 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width. dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 17 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: b/b$ Required 30' Shown Interior Side: Required -& Shown Street Side: &n Required e&# Shown Rear: Shown Required e Shown Front: Required Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown 2. Accessory structure setbacks: 309: VSb wo Shown 4 3. Lot Coverage: Required %,/. & OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE 8-17-',& - 98227 . Bureau of Prevention rlsbad City o f Ca Fire Department Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Pian Check Reviewed by: k Date of Report: Friday, August 21, 1998 Contact Name Nogle Onuffer ASSOC. Address 2398 San Diego Avenue City, State San Diego CA 921 10 Bldg. Dept. No. CB981998 Planning No. Job Name Lot 65 CIC 1817 Job Address 1817 Aslon Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. 0 Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire DeDattment Use Onlv Review 1 st 2nd 3rd CFDJoW 98227 File# - Other Agency ID ~ -~ 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 931-2121 98227 . Bureau of Prevention rlsbad City o f Ca Fire Department Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Saturday, July 4,1998 Contact Name Nogle Onuffer ASSOC. Reviewed by: Address 2398 San Diego Avenue City, State San Diego CA 921 10 Bldg. Dept. No. CB981998 Planning No. Job Name Lot 65 CIC 1817 Job Address 1817 Aston Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st 2nd 3rd CFDJoM 98227 File# Other Agency ID 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 931-2121 .... ... ! ""' GOVERNING CODES : ==_===I========== UNIFORM BUILDING CODE .i,....~iii..ii.i1.~)(1)..1.( 1994 AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (3i0-83) ..&, . ......... 1983 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTORS MANUAL ... 9TH EDITIOh ! I .... .. , I.. .4 . ., I ..... , .. ... . .I i .... I- 'SEISMIC ZONE 2- WIND EXPOSURE I .. I 1 f I *;\ .! i 3- MAXIMUM ALLOHABLE SOIL PRESSURE : 2,000 PSF CONT FTG 21500 PSF PAD FTG ' +$ 4- MATERIALS & DESIGN STRESSES (U~OAN) ! - FRAMING LmBER ! DOUGUS-FIR LMtCH (NORTH) - BOLTED CONNECTIONS ! STEEL FMIkG-! A325-N OtoOb Ff\AMING ! A307 - STRUCTURAL STEEL ! A36 (FY e 36 KSI) - REINFORCING STEEL ! #4 & SMZULER ASN 615 (FY = 40 KSI) 1 #5 & LMGER AS"M 615 (FY = 60 KSi) - CONCRETE ! SLm ON GRADE ! (FIC = 2,500 PSI) ALL OTHkRS : (F'C 3,000 PSI) i BASIC LIVE LOADS : ROOF FLOORS : BALCONIES COkRIDORS LIVING SPECIAL . ... . .. . . . , ... .... .. ... . .. . . .,, ?..,1 ,, , ,;, , ... .... .. .. i I I! I 'I i i il I I I. I (,I I - - .. ,. .... .... 4. r L . -. . b- j - . ., ... , , ,z , - ... :t 4 .... L .... ...... 7 [. ............ ........... ........... ............. j: 1. : ..../.. .. ........... ........ ....... .... I ...... I ~ ......... .I_ ...... ....... ...... .......... ,I .......... ......... ......... .......... ............. !- ............. ............ ............ ......... .... I.. .. 4 .... ! I I ......... ....I... ............ ........ i .'.''I ' ' ..I .. i .... - ... .... .. .. - ..... - ... .... 7.. - .... ... .. ... ... .... .. ... ....... i! ii . ............. i ............. I .. ........ ... ! ... ........ .......... I 11 I~il 1-1 I I II It II ........... .................. I I 1 ./'[& I. .,: ...................... .. ...I. ......... ........... c.5 .... CI ......... ................ - .......... e L ....... ................ I ....... ..A ............. ................... I_ .Et..&.. ...... I ?..l .... ? ....... '1 .............. C. ,..! .... .............. ................ ............. ... .. ...... ................... .................. I ...... ..... ............... .............. I .... ........ ,.... . I ....... ....... is ............... ................. .................. ..................... ................. II_ ,or-.-L€&&* -2z-qf3 I A-ZED srmchlral E~~~W~II~YOIWU~MII~ WEIT NO CALCULATEDOV - DATE __ DATE CHECKED EV 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Diego, CA 92126 (619) 549-8998 7275 Rock Canyon bt. san blwa CA @PIP@ cedi ~148~6080 I 1. "'I" ' .. .. I' / ' .. I.' ..... ... I ............I. . I.. ..... ........ ...... .................. ............ ...... .. ...................... ........ i';l .................. ........ I ' .. ...... I. - .. kl .... ... .. .... ... Lr Y !< - .... 1 .... .... .... a - i .... .... 1. ..,, 7 ..,. .... t .... .... 2 .... .... ... .. , .. ... .... .... .... .... m scop: L -1 1 Tilt-Up Wall Panel Design W 1 General Information Descrlptlon Typlcal Panel at Front and Back of B1dg.B Supporting Purlin loads Clear Helght 23.000 fl i-C 3,000.0 psl Salsmlc Zone 4 Parapet Helght 0.000 n FY 80,000.0 pal Min vert Std % 0.0020 Thickness 8.750 in Phl 0.900 Mln Hoth Steel % 0.0012 Bar Slze 5 Width 12.000 la- Babe Fbaty 0% Bar Spaclng 14.000 In Parapel Welght Counteracts Mldd Wail Seismic Fnctor 0.3000 Bar Depth 3.000 in PatSpel 8Urmic Factor 0.3000 Max Den. Ratlo 150.0 LL 6 ST Not Comblned Concrete Weight 745.00 pcf Ucrlng: UBC SBC. 1914.0 method ... Exact, NOn-lt6mted I Loads I ,.Lateral Loada VertlcpI Lard$ Wind Load PSf Uniform DL 380,OO Wfl Uniform LL 800.00 Wfl .. Polnt ioad Ibs ... eccentricity 5.500 In ... helght n .. ... load type Seismic Concehtric DL Wfl Concentric LL Wfl Lateral Load #If7 ... distance to top n ... distance to bot n Seismic "I" Magnifier 1.000 ... load type Seismlc Wind "I" Magnlflar 1.000 I Wall Analvsis h For Facto red Load Slrers~ For SOrvlc(l Load Deflectlone w 0.000 In w salamlo Bask Defl w/o P-Delta 0.239 0.000 In 0.171 sQ!mk Basic M wlo P-Delta 28,700.4 0.0 6% 20,500.3 0.0 In-# Moment Excess of Mcr 17,713.1 0.0 In# 0.0 17,713.1 In# Max. P-Delta Deflection 7.522 0.000 In 0.171 0.000 In Max P-Delta Moment 42.W.7 0.0 In# 22,039.8 42,888.1 In-# Maxlmum Allow Vertical Bar Sbaclna 18.000 In Pataoel Bar Soaclna Rea'd : SEISMIC iLI.000 In ~r~~ s~~~l~~ ~ ...... ... Maxlmum Allow Horkontal Bai Spaing 18.000 In Parapel Bar Spacing Req'd : WIND 18.000 In Wall Dation OK - 23.0M1 clear height, O.OOA parapet, 8.75111 thick with #5 bars at 14.00in on center, d= 3.00111, fc = 3,000.0ps Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 melh od... Exact, Non-ileated Factored Load Bending : Seismlc Load Governs SeNIco Load Defiedlon : Seismic Load Gwarns Maximum Iterated Moment : Mu 42,888.75 In# Maxlmum ita~ad Dd&lon 0.171 In Moment Capaclty 42,777.50 In# Dafiectlon Llmlt 1.840 In Sbirmla Wind Mn Phi : Moment Capaclty 42,777.50 in+ 41,919.82 In4 Applied: Mu @ MidSpan 42.668.75 in4 0.00 In4 Applied: Mu @ Top of Wall 7,823.00 in4 0.00 In4 Max Iterated Servlce Load Deflectlon Actual Deflectlon Ratld 0.17 In 1,814 : 1 Actual Relnforclng Percentage 0.0074 Allowable Max. Rdnf. Percent 0.5 Rho Bel 0.0128 0.00 In 0 :I 0.0074 0.0128 Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Allowable Axla1 Stre$$ 0.4 * fm 16.39 psi 18.30 psi 120.00 mi..-. 120.00 wi 3 LAnalytir Data * n=Es/Ec 1 91.125 In3 9 29 Mcr= S Fr 24,955.8 In-# E 3,122,018.8 psl Sgross Fr = 273 88 psi Rho: Bar Relnf Pct 0.0214 Ht I thk Ratio 40 89 Valuer for Mn Calculrtlon ... We+ [Patot + AsFyyFy a : (AsFy + Pu)1(.85 t'c b) c = a I .85 lgroas lcrackad I-aff (ACI methods only) Phi: Capacity Reductlon Mn = As:&ff Fy (d - m) 1 Saismlc 0.297 In 0.582 in 0.684 In 307.547 In4 18.68 In4 0.00 In4 0.900 47,ao.se in4 .. , . .>I Wind 0.289 in 0.567 in 0.887 In 307.55 In4 15.80 In4 0.00 In4 0.900 4(9,677.38 In-# LAdditional Values 1 - Wind Lad# uwd for rnrlyalr Factored Load; Wall Weight 81.562 pal Wall Wt * Wall Selsmlc Factor 24.469 paf Applied Axlet Load 548.00 409.50 #/ft Wall Wt Parapet Selsmlc Factor 24.469 psf Lateral Wall WeIgM 1,313.18 984.87 m Service Applied Axial Load 390.00 fiwt Total Lateral Loads 1,859.18 1,394.37M Service Wt Max Mom 937.97 MI Total Servlca Awlel Loads 1,327.97 xl(t I ACi Factors (per ACI, applied internally to entered loads) ", 1 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7"1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7"0.9" Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... selsmlc = ST : 1.100 1 .I (c) 1S97 ENERCALC C:-lC\BBM)(m .w kW-o6oalO, v5.0.2.1J~1807 &ope: k13 f ., Tilt-Ur, Wall Panel Desinn I . . -. .. .. -. . . . . . . I Description Panel at High Points Near Ridge without Girder Loading Claar Height Parapet Height Thickness Bar Size Bar Spacing Bar Depth Max Den. Ratio Concrete Weight 24.000 fl rc 3,000.0 psi Seismic Zone 4 60,000.0 psi Min Vert Steel % 0.0020 ' 0.000 Min Hob Stwi% 0.0012 5 Width 12.000 in Bas6 Fixity 0% 14.000 in Parapet Weight Counteracts Midd Wail &eirmic Factor 0.3000 3.000 in Parapet Saismic Factor 0.3000 150.0 LL 6 ST Not Combined 145.00 pcF 1.000 n FY 6.750 in Phi Using: UBC Sac. 1914.0 method ...Exact. Non-iterated - I Loads - L Lateral Loads Vertical Lords Wind Load psf Uniform DL #R Uniform LL MI ... height R ... load type Seismic Concentric DL #in Concentric LL #R Lateral Load #n ... distance to top fl ... distance to bot n Seismic "I" MaaniRer 1.000 Polnt Load ibs ... awentricity in ... load type Seismic Wind "I" Megnher 1.000 I Wall Analysis 1 For Factored Loa d Strassea For Servlw Load Deflactlpnp w 0.006 Ih i%?kolk 0. 189 &&!& m Basic DeR wlo P-Delta 0.265 0.000 in Basic M wlo P-Delta 29.404.6 0.0 in# 21.067.6 0.0 in# ... ... .~ ~ ~ Moment Ereas$ of Mcr 16:859.2 0.0 In+ 0.0 16,858.2 in+ Max. P-Delta Deflection 8.165 0.000 in 0.180 0.000 in MaxP-Delta Moment 41,614.8 0.0 in4 23,103.4 41,614.8 In4 Maximum Allow Vertical Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet eat $pacing R8q'd : ElEiSMiC 18.000 in Mllrimum Allow Hdrizontal Bar Spacing I8 OOO in Parapet Eat Spacing Req'd :WIND 18.bw In Wall Derign 011 24.00R cledr height, 1 .OOR parapet, 8.75111 thick with #5 bats at 14.00111 an center. d= 3.00ln, fc = 3,000.0pe Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 meth od... Exad, Non-Iterated !. 1 L 8 -. A i . ,..,. I__- -,_._____P_ i t Maximum Iterated Moment : Mu 4i,814.60 in-# Meximum Nmtud DofieAion 0.189 in Moment Capacity 42,086.37 in# DefldOh Llmlt 1.020 in -. Mn 'Phi : Moment capacity Applied: Mu QD Mid-Span Applied. Mu @ To@ of Wail Saitrnlc 42,088.37 in4 41,614.80 In4 205.54 in-6 Mar iterated Service Load Deflection Actual Deflaction Ratio 0.19 in 1,521 : 1 Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0074 Allowable Max. Reinf. Percent = 0.5 Rho Bai 0.0126 Wlnd 41,307.81 in4 0.00 in+ 0.00 in4 0.00 in 0 :I 0.0074 0.0128 Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po 1 I Ag Allowable Mal Stress 0.4 rm 13.09 psi 13.09 psi 120.00 psl 120.00 psi 4. (c) 198397 ENERCALC a:-- .Icw W.C602610, '6.0.2.1 JudBg7 si Tilt-Up Wall Panel besign -2 - .. -. LAnalyslr Data 1 sgross 91 125 in3 E 3.122.018 8 psi n = Es I Ec g 29 Mcr = S Fr 24,955 6 in4 Fr = 273 88 psi Rho Bar Reinf Pct 0.0214 Ht I Thk Ratio - 42 67 Values for Mn Calculation ... As:&= [Pu:tot + AsFyyFy a : (AsFy + Pu)1(.65 fc b) c = a I .85 Seismic 0.290 In 0.570 in 0.670 in igrois 307.547 in4 hacked 15.85 in4 i-eff (ACI methods only) 0.00 in4 Mn Sheff Fy (d - cln) 46.762.03 In4 Phi: Capaclty Reduction 0.900 Wind 0.284 in 0.557 In 0.655 in 307.55 in4 15.64 in4 0.00 in4 0.800 46,007.67 in4 Seisin 1 ic Wind FlctaMd Lords Loads uwd for analpia Wail Weight 81.552 psf Wail Wt Wail Seismic Factor 24.489 D9f AD~iied mal Load 0.00 0.00 XM Wall Wt Parapet Seismic Factor 24.489 psf Lbieral Wail Weight 1.484.44 1,113.33rVn Service Applied Axial Load 0.00 ain Total Lateral Loads 1.484.44 1.113.33#/Il Service Wt @ Max Mom Total Sarvica Axial Loada 1,060.31 #/ft 1 MI0 31 Wfl I LAC1 Factors (par Acl, a rnaily to mterd loads) ! I -.-.- ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ACI 9-1 8 9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Grouo Fndor 0.750 UBC 1821.2.7"1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 LL 1.700 ACl 9-3 DeadLoad Factor 0.900 UBC 1821.2.7 "0.W Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 a 9-2 ST I. 700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... seismlc=ST*: 1.100 (c) 198597 ENERCALC c:bncmkWWB#2.ecw KwQBo2810, vS.0.2.1 JmlQB7 J TilbUD Wall Panel Deaicln ~m ib LGenerai information Description Panel at Hlgh Points Near Ridge with Glrder Loading c Clear Height 24.000 fl PC 3,000.0 psi Seismic Zone 4 80,Ooo.O psi Min Vert Steel % O.OO20 0.900 Mln Horlz Sted % 0.0012 Parapet Height 1.000 n FY Bar Size 5 Wldth 12.000 In Bar6 FMly 0% Bar Spacing 8.000 In Parapet Welght Counteracts Midd Wall Selrmlc Factor 0.3000 Bar Depth 4.000 in Parapet Seirmic Factor 0.3000 Max Del. Ratio 150.0 LL (L ST Not Combined Concrete Weight Thlckness 8.750 In Phl 145.00 pcf Uslng: UBC Sac. 1914.0 method ... Exact, Nowiterated . .,.., [ Load8 c Lateral Load8 Vertical LMdr Wind Load PSt Uniform DL 6,850.00 #/n Unlform LL 5,850.00 #/fl Point Load Ibs ... ecccmntricity 2.000 in ... height n ... load type Seismlc Concentric DL MI Concentric LL XM Lateral Load #/R ... dlstance to top fl ... distance to bot n ... load Woe Selsmic Seismlc 'Mgnlflw 1.000 Wind "I" Maanlflc 1.000 For Factored Load StMssw For Swlce Load Detifieotlplll m!l 0.Ooo In alQm!4 0.253 w 0.000 In !M.wlk Basic Defl w/o P-Delta 0.354 -' Bask M w/o P-Delta 38,228.9 0.0 lnf 27,308.4 0.0 inf Moment Excess of Mcr 77,732.8 0.0 In4 15,471.7 tt,732.8 In4 Max. ,P-Delta Deflection 8.701 0.000 in 1.201 0.600 In Max P-Delta Moment 102,888.4 0.0 In4 46,427.3 102,688.4 I# Maximum Allow Vertlcal Bat Spaclng 18.000 In Parapet Bet Spaclng R6q'd : SEISMIC 18.000 in Maximum Allow Horkontal Bat Spaclng 18.000 In Parapet Bat Spaclng Raq'd : WIND 18.000 in 24.0Wt clear helght, 1.0Oft parapet. 6.75ln thlck with #!I ban at 8.Win on center, d= 4.001n, fc - 3,000.Ops1, Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 meth od... Exact. Non-iterated Factored Load Bendlng : Seismic Load Qwerns Senrice Load Deflectlon : Seismic Lord Qovems Maximum Iterated Momant : Mu 102,888.42 in8 Mmamum Itdmted DQectlon 1.281 In Moment Capacity 109,083.77 In4 Mcrdian_li.mlt 1.920 In Mn Phi : Moment Capacity 108,083.77 in# 104,304.10 In# wait Design OK I Wrrnlo Wind Applled: Mu @ MldSpan 102,688.42 In# 0.00 in# Applied: Mu @ Top of Well 32,965.52 In# 0.00 In# Actual Deflectlon Ratio 228 : i Max iterated Senrice Load Deflection 1.28 in 0.00 In 0 :I. .. Actual Reintorclng Percentage 0.0097 0.0097 Allowable Max. Rant. Percent = 0.5 Rho Bal 0.0128 Actual Axial Strass : (Pw + Po ) / Ag 0.0128 85.31 psi 85.31 psi Allowable Axlal Stresr = 0.4 tm 120.00 psi 120.00 psi (c) lW97 ENERCALC c:bnucakWCOW2 .am KW4302310, V5.0.2.1 Jm-1997 scope : L Tilt-Up Wall Panel beslgn klpe2 I I Analysis Data E 3,122.018.8 psi n = Es I Ec 9.29 Fr= 273.88 psl Ht I Thk Ratlo 42.67 Vatu@ for Mn calculrtlon ... As:eW= [Pu:tot + AsFyyFy a : (AsFy + Pu)/(.85 fc b) c = a I .85 lcracked I-aff (ACl methods only) Phl: Capacity Rbduction Mn = heff Fy (d - an) .I lgross Seirrnlc 0.628 In Sgross 91.125 In3 Mcr = S * Fr 24,955.8 in-# Rhb: esFRelnf Pd 0.0214 Wind 0.588 in 1.228 In 1.149 In 1.445 In 1.352 In 307.547 in4 307.55 In4 50.04 in4 48.05 in4 0.00 In4 0.00 In4 0.900 0.900 121~181.B7 Inf 116.8BJ.U In4 LAdditloilal Values I Seirmlc Wlnd Loads uwd for rnrlyMs Flctond Lour Wall Welght 81.562 psf Wall Wt 'Wall Selsrnlc Factor 24.469 psf Applled Axlal Load 8,180.00 6,142.50 M Wall Wt Parapet Selsrnlc Factor 24.489 psf Lateral Wall Welght 1,484.44 1,113.33M Service Applled Mal Load 5,850.00 WR Total Lateral Loads 9.874.43 7,255.83 M Servlce Wt dl Max Mom 1.080.31 WR Total Sawlc~Axlal Loads 8.910.31 Xl(t I ACI Factors (per ACI, applied Internally to anterad loads) 1 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 GrOUD Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7"1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 DeadLoad Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7 "0.V Factor 0.800 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... sslsmlc = ST.: 1.100 I 4 I I 7275 Rock Cnnyon Or. . Sen blego. CA 82128 (818) 648-8888 *, &l, ...... I ......... - .I I- .c I I ................ ii" !I' : >!/I I ' 1'' I ,h,& ......................... I ....... ..... 1 .......... !. I I j..,./J ........ ....... il - - I.C - .. 91 'e t .. h I .,.? - .... .. 1 .... '. - ., ....... - - .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .* .- -I I ... ,.- ... ,." ... -4 w w 4 .., -I ..I .. d. .u. * I Y I I - I.- i A i ................ ............ * '. bT - lHkCT NO A OF CALCULATED BY- DATE Y - 22- A-ZED srmctunl EN- -d m~~tm 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED BY __ DATE (619) 549-8996 JOI l.Q7 br FLM.7, CALCULATED IlY 2- DATE L/ -23-qB A-ZED srmaunl e*- wmb BHECT NO. I Of $ 7275 Rock Canyon br. San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED IY DATE (619) 549-6996 .. - A ..;. , .. i..: ... i lAT bs- Rlffi 2 DATE 4- 22-qB ewer no OF A-ZED struchlnl EW~ dtw J"B-=%-A CALCULATEDBY ZPD .d' 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Diego, CA 92126 CHECKED BY DATE (619) 549-6996 ., I: 1, , ..... 1 .......... 8. ..... ...... ..,........... .......... , ... , . ..; .... 4 ... ;. ....I ....... : ... i ...... I.. .....I... 4. ......... ...,..,... .................... 1.... ..... i .......... I .......... .......... .......... ....... ,, ,/. ............... ./.. . ....... .........> ..... 1; ........ 1 ......... 1.. '' i I1 ....... 1 ........,...... $1 ....... 4 ........ i. ... i, I) .... ..... ........I... ....... ..... .... bt. i .I WIeT NO -23- 90 A-ZED strumvll ~~mdmdw 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BV DATE 4 San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED BY DATE (619) 549-6996 ___ - I ..... I ."'' i i ....... ...... I ........ j, .. j ~ ....... i.. .. ........ 1 ....... i ....... , ..... j ................ Dy Il '''''''~I ' "".I .............. ........... ........I... . I ....... t ........,...... ! ........ 1. ........ 1 ...... I 1 .... ............ ........ 1 I i ............. i ........ 1 ..... I ............. ." .....y, ............. ............. ............ I .. .I.. i, A-ZED struetunl ~-$-t.t,b 1)HCI!T NO. 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED Bv DATE DATE -. CHECKED BY 8CALE San Diego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 , ... i LDr LL e A-ZED srm*unl E%- daab (IHECt NO. OF .. .c' CALCULATEDnv & DATE c - 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. . !:.. San Diego, CA 92126 - DATE CHECKED BY (619) 549-6096 /,: ,:,i - I 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I .i t i I ! I I I I I i 'i ! ! +-t- i li ..... !ill 1 .... ~ ................. '-1 I ! I !L:, i :I/ i i.1 j:!i !: I II I t 4- I ! .. I- _L I .. ... _I .. I l .. 1 ... I .... ..... .... .. ..... .... i ! ” JOE 2- LO7 &- WEet NO or - - DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED nv DATE CALCULATED ny z&D A-ZED struaunl ~qm .d‘ durn 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. I619) 549-8996 - ........ 1 ..... i I, ........I ............... !; .: ...... * ......... 1 ...... i .................. f.. i !j .......I .......... i ...... ......... + ..... i .. I I 'I ,. j .I I .I ... ! "" I I I I ,. . 'I ,. I 'I i I I I I .. I I 7275 Rock Canyon br. Sen blego. CA 92126 (619) 648-6866 I/ $ I ~ I I i i I I I I I , ............................... j - ... ... ~.~ .., . , -L ... I 1' ... .... ! ........ ............ - 1 4 7275 Rock cenyon Or. Sen Dlego. CA 92126 (6lP) 84@-8@96 I T k t I I I ! .......... .................. .... ---L- w~ yll 'e fr -- .......... ....... ...... 2- ...... 9 .... -- .... ...... n ..... .... ....... - .... ... ... ... ..... . \ .. ..., . b K L '' "' .. .. ...... ..... 2.- I ..... - ! I 1 I I I 1 i I I .......... .. a-1, I I I I I CALC ................ 3. ..... 41 .e... . ;& - - I e c.., - ...... .. ..... ... ..,.. ... ..... .... .... ...... .... 1. ..... I,. .... 1 ..... ! ...I ........ .! .... ~ .... a, I 8.. fbJ3.P. .. ...iH.i&. ... I. .. '""l I t d@i ii I .. , I /il.,.. i'.. i',. , A II - ! i I .. i I ! i .I .I i I I i i/ .. I I I ! ..i 1 - il I i I I ! ! I ! I I i I i I !.. i I Ij/ 'I 11' I i !! jj 11 I, :I 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San'Dlego, CA 82128 (618) 648-6886 -I. *. f I ii ii 11 i i 1 ! I I I I ! i I I cHCcllCD Bv 1 DAtC i ,. 2. ,. .~ .. 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED nv 2,- DATE 4 - 2u.44 CHECkEO BY DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. Sen Dlego, CA 92128 (819) 549-6998 CALCULATEDBV DATE Y - 29- 98 cnEcuED BY - DATE I ! I .I I 1 ! I ..... F ! ,I I 7275 Rock Cnnyoll Or. Sen Dlego. CA 02128 (e101 640-e~~ .... C3 ... ! .. ... i ... ... ?-; Iii j//i ..... ......... ....... E ........... ....... a,. ... .......... t~ ......... v ........ I .. .> 7 ......... 4 4 .... .IL 4' .... !. .... J ............ ....... ........... ., ... "I I ' - - .. -! .. ..... ... .... ..... .... ...... ,I ..... .... ..... ..... P. .... ...... 7 ..... I.. r ...... ..... ..... ... .... ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...- ...... ..... - I ; .I I i' j i .. t ... 89/17/1998 zz:3z 7687449330 KEETCN CONS P4GE 81 FAX #t c To: LfN D/ &@'SA- 94 Am: r/ I JOB: -m . LOT & RE: PA>. -71 )r cd+zd M4 PAP 7 PROMX Total number of pagu i% including this cover sheet. IF any pages aro missing or 11- ble, pleaso contact our oftice as soon as posmlble. ( ) Please acknowledge receipt of documents. ( ) original / Copy to follow via mail. ( ) YZS, ( ) NO, reply requested. I2 yes, by (date/time) contact: Keeton Construction Co., Inc. 334 Rancheros Drivet suite 110 Ban narcom, CA 92069 Phone : (760) 744-9500 FAX: (760) 744-9330 334 RANCHEROS DRIVE, SUITE iio SAN MAFIC&?, CA ~069 . (760) 744-esw MX (760) 744-9330 LE. ~5492 89/17/1998 22:32 7687449338 -. . KEETON CONS PAGE 82 CALDWELL LAND SURVEYS 13M A-A nOraUn& MAW JAC-, CA. 9IU) .. SEP-I~-S~ 10105 FROMI KEETON CONSTRUCTION ID. 6197449330 .. PAGE 1 SEP-17-199E is58 NOW NorCal Endneering P.02 Soils and Wa& Condlmtmts 10641 Humbolt Stm tar W~tos, CA 90720 (562)799-9469 Ftx (562)799-9459 3ptember 17,1998 Project Numbor 7101-97 NW Onufer Adates Architecls 2398 Sm Diego Avenue Sen Dimgo, California 921 10 Am.: Mr. Joseph Holasek RE: WvWw of Stmslurd Phrn - P- Carlrbd Business Park Devebpment - Lot 65 - Culobad, Calimia Dear Mf. Hobs& Purwmt to your request, this firm hr revi6weU yow lalest StruCIufal pkvrs dated August 13, 1998 for the above refsfencod project The plans are acceptable for the proposed development and conforms with retommendations provaed in our geotechnlcal report dated December S. 1997. We appmaate !his opporwnlry ta be of servia 10 you. If you hew any funhsr questions. do noI herilrne to conlaet the undersigned. Rerpecthatly submitted, NORCAL ENGINEERING ft&b Keith D. Tucker ptolect Engimf R.G.E. 641 TOTW P.02 U7I If 70 U7. I I I'1w..tvv la NOR~CALENGINEERING 5bZ (99 Y4W -. s NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street 1.0s Alamitoq CA 90720 (562) 199-9469 Fax (562) 199-9459 September 15, 1998 Project Number 7101-97 Lanikai Management Corporation P.O. Box 9672 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 Altn: Mr. Lawrence Jett RE: Observation and Teotlng of Rough Grading Operations - Proposed Carlsbad Research Center - Lot 65 - Located at the Southeast Comer of College Boulevard and Aston Avenue, in the City of Cadsbad, California Dear Mr. Jett: Pursuant to your request, this firm has observed and tested rough grading operations at the above referenced project. Results of the compaction tests are attached and locations of these tests are shown on the accompanying Site Plan. All work was peflormed in accordance with our Geotechnical Investigation dated December 5, 1997, Project Number 7101-97 and all present day standards of the Geotechnical Engineering Industry. Slte Gradlng Ail vegetation and demolition debrls was stripped and removed from the All area pdor to gradlng operations. The existing low density soils were removed to bedrock material and/or prevlously approved fili soils, the exposed subgrade scarified. moisture condltloned and then recompacted to a minimum of 90% relatlve compaction. All excavatlons were observed and approved by thls flrm prior to placement of fill material. The overexcavation consisted of a minlmum of five horizontal feet or to the depth of fill placed, whichever is greater beyond the outside edge of all proposed foundations. Foundalion areas within transition of bedrock and engineered fill were also overexcavated in order to permit the placement of a two feet thick compacted fill blanket beneath the bottom of all proposed foundations. 562 799 9459 UYIIf 'YO UY:IL NU.YY0 IY NORCALENGINEERING .- September 15,1998 Project Number 7101-97 Page 2 Fill soils were compacted to a minimum of 90% of the laboratory standard in lifts not in excess of eight inches In thickness. The maximum depth of flll placed was 5112 feet. Conventional earhmoving equipment was utilized lor compaction control. A water truck provided molsture control. The approximate limits of gradlng operations are indicated on the attached Site Plan. Fleldlleboratow Tests The relative compactlon was determined by Sand Cone Method (ASTM: 01556-82) and by the Drive Tube Method (ASTM: D2937). The maximum denslty of the fill soils was obtained by the laboratory standard (ASTM: D 1557-78) with results shown on Table 1. Tests were performed a mlnimurn of every 500 cubic yards and every two feet in depth of fill placed. Results of field density tests are presented in Table 11. Foundation Oesinn All foundations may be deslgned utlllzlng the following safe bearing capacities for a embedded depth of 24 inches into approved compacted flil soils or bedrock with the corresponding widths: Allowable Safe Bearlna Capaciht (psQ Continuous Isolated width (fl) Foundation Foundation 1.5 2.0 4.0 5.0 2000 2075 2275 2375 2500 2575 2775 2875 A one third increase may be used when considering short term loading and seismic forces. All continuous foundations shall be reinforced a minimum of one No. 4 bar, top and bottom. Isolated foundations may be relnforced at the discretion of the proJect structural engineer. NorCal Engineering WIIf 'YO UY:IC flU..lWJ I.) NORCALENGINEERING 562 IW Y4W - *- September 15, 1998 Page 3 Project Number 7101-97 All foundations located near adjacent slopes shall meet all setback criteria per the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The bottom of foundations located adjacent to descending slopes shall maintain a safe horizonlal setback consistlng of 1/3 the height of the slope from bottom of the footing to the face of the slope. Slab Recommendation$ AD concrete floor slabs shall be a mlnlmum of five Inches in thickness reinforced a minlmum of No. 3 bars, elghteen inches In each direcUon positloned in the center of the slab and placed on approved subgrade soils. Prior to placement of slabs, the subgrade soils shall be moisture conditioned above optimum maislure content to a depth of eighteen inches. A vapor barrier overlain by four Inches of approved sand shall be utilized beneath all floor slabs sensltlve to the Infiltration of moisture. All conctete slab areas to receive floor coverlngs should be molsture tested to meet all manufacturer requirements prior to placement. Concturlono The geotechnical engineering aspects of the grading have been observed anU are in compliance with the geotechnical engineer's recommendations. The development has been graded to the approval of this firm and is suitable for its intended use. We appreciate this opportunlty to be of sewice to you. If you have any further questions, pleaie do Respectfully subm NORCAL ENGINE KkkL Keith D. Tucker Project Englneer R.G.E. 841 Scott 0. Spensiero Project Manager NORCALENGINEERING mi IYY Y43Y - September 15, 1998 Page 4 Project Number 7101-97 Optimum Maxlmum Dry Sample Classification Moisture Density I1bs.lcu.ft.l 1 Siltstone 16.0 111.0 II CIAY, rllty 15.5 109.6 111 CLAY, sandy silty 13.0 115.0 IV Siltstone 14.5 110.0 NorCal Engineering NORCALENGINEERING 562 799 Y4>Y - September 15, 1998 Page 5 Uyllf .YO u7; IC I.IU.-t-tO II Project Number 7101-97 TABLE II COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Date of - Test 9/3/98 9/3/98 9/3/98 9/3/98 9/3/98 9/4/98 9/4/98 918198 911 1/90 911 1/98 9/11/98 911 1/90 911 1/98 9/12/98 9/12/98 9/12/98 Test HQi 101 102 103 104 105 108 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 Elevation 4.0-4.5 2.0-2.5 3.0.3.5 2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5 1.0-1.5 0.5-1 .O 5.0-5.5 5.0-5.5 4.0-4.6 3.0-3.5 2.0-2.5 4.0-4.5 3.0-3.5 2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5 Percent Moisture 18.3 17.4 17.0 16.1 18.3 18.6 14.8 15.0 14.8 18,l 17.9 17.2 15.3 17.4 18.3 12.7 Unit Wt. Ibs.lcu.fl. 106.5 103.9 101.7 103.4 99.7 101.3 108.0 111.3 103.7 109.2 105.2 110.9 106.7 102.2 104.0 103.8 Relative ComDactlon 96 95 92 94 91 93 94 97 94 98 96 96 93 92 94 90 *Depth below finlsh grade (In feet) '*Retest of failing tests after area reworked Soil DE! I II I II II II 111 111 IV I II 111 111 I I Ill NorCal Engineering 562 799 9459 09/11 'YU UY:13 N0.448 'IO NORCALENGINEERING ._ September 15,1998 Project Number 7101-97 Page 6 Date of Ted gii219a 911 2/98 9/12/98 9/12/98 9/12/98 9/12/98 9/12/98 9/72/98 9/12/98 9/14/98 9/14/98 9/14/98 9/14/98 9/14/98 Test - No. 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 126 126 127 128 129 130 JABLE ll, COMPACTION TE ST RESULTS Elevation 1.0-1.5 0.51.0 2.0-2.5 2.0-2.6 1.0-1.5 1 .O-1.5 0.51.0 1.0-1.5 5.06.5 3.0-3.5 2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5 0.5-1.0 1.0-1.5 Percent Molsturg 15.8 13.1 13.1 15.4 15.8 14.8 14.3 13.6 13.3 17.2 16.3 16.1 14.8 17.0 Unit wt. Ibs./cu,ft. 101.9 107.9 111.4 101.4 100.2 105.4 109.4 104.8 102.4 107.5 104.0 101.6 108.9 100.0 Relative FomDaction 93 94 97 93 92 92 98 91 93 97 95 92 95 91 'Depth below finish grade (in feet) "Retest of failing tests after area reworked Soil II 111 111 II II 111 I 111 IV I IV I 111 I NorCal Engineering 562 799 9459 09/1/ ‘91) OY:l5 N0.446 1Y NORCALENGINEERING mils FAX CONSISTS OF AAGES, ~CIAID~NG TWS COVER smm I COlbsMEmsr I. . .. .. .. . .. ,. ., . THIS FAX NUMBER IS (619) 756-9837 IF TIIERR IS A PROBLEM IN RJXEIVING ANY OF TllESR PAGES, PLEASE CAU (619) 756-9810. OPERATOR; .; .. .. ,.- .. . ., ... .. .. . .,. .. :.. . .. .. . .. :. .. .., ,. ,. , . . .. 02/08/08 YON 12:41 FAX 8197583831 iC LANIKAI NnRCALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 02/09 '98 09:20 ~0.854 01 NorCal Engineering Soits agid C~OWMCJ COawiCatS 1064 I Humbolt Sm LOS Alamitos, CA 90720 (562)799-9469 FAX (S62)79944S9 February 6,1998 Project Number 7101-87 Lankti Management Corporation P.O. Box 3872 Rancho Santa, California 92067 Ann: Mr. T. Lawrencu Jott RE Addendum Ne. 2 Preliminary Geetechnical Inwatigatidn Report dad December 5, I997 - Proposed Mul(i-Vnit Structures - Locatod at the Souwlerst Comer of College Boulevard and Aston Avenue. in the City of Cariabd. Cilifomia Deer Mr. JeU: As requested. <@id pavement section design Is being provided for the above refemmxkl project. The SactionS given are based upon an astimated R-VelUe of 30 for pavement area. Type of rrltfic u%iG m Light Vohicle Parking Light Vdrid. Circulation Areas Medium Truck Heavy Truck 4 5 8 7 .5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 Conerote may be pbcsd directly upon subgrade roils compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction in the upper 12 inches. Subgrade soils should k moisture condiiiorted to 130% of optimum moistum Iovelo irndiatdy prior to plaament concnte. Wo appreciate this opportunity lo bo of seMw to you. If you have any act the undersigned. . .I5 Wih D. Tucke Scott D. Spentiero Project Manager further Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Multi-Unit Structures College Boulevard & Aston Avenue Carlsbad, California Project Number 7101-97 December 5,1997 NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 Project Number 7101-97 Lanikai Management Corporation P.O. Box 9672 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 Attn: T. Lawrence Jett RE: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Multi-Unit Structures - Located at the Southeast comer of College Boulevard and Aston Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Jett: Pursuant to your request, this firm has performed a Geotechnical Investigation for the above referenced project in accordance with your authorization of proposal dated October 29, 1997. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the geotechnical conditions of the subject site and to provide recommendations for the proposed project. This geotechnical engineering report presents the finding of our study along with conclusions and recommendations for development. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, NORCAL ENGINEERING Keith D. Tucker fl '. '-de '* December 5,1997 Page 2 Project Number 7101-97 ct DescUptiQn The purpose of the investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions and to provide preliminary geotechnical engineering design parameters for evaluation of the site with respect to the proposed project. It is anticipated that the proposed development will consist of officeharehouse buildings on the 27 acre property as shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan by Robert Stocton dated November 20, 1985. Other improvements will consist of asphaltic paved parking and driveway areas, concrete loading areas and landscaping. The subject site consists of two bi-level mass graded located within Carlsbad Research Center. The site is situated at the southeast comer of Aston and College, in the City of Carlsbad. The generally rectangular shaped site is elongated in an north to south direction with topography descending from west to east. An approximately 4 feet high graded slope separates the two lots. The parcel is currently undeveloped and covered with a sparse to moderate growth of vegetation consisting of natural grasses and weeds. The site is bordered by ascending slopes along the east property line and descending slopes along the south, north and west property perimeter ranging in height from 25 to 220 feet. - The Carlsbad Research Center development consists of several individual lots located within the tract which had been recently mass graded for future development. The earthwork operations were performed and were geotechnically observed and tested by San Diego Consultants, Inc., as described by their report tilted, As-Graded Geotechnical Report. Phases, dated April, 1988, Job No. 05-2863-006-00-10 The subject parcel consists of a graded transition lot with a maximum fill depth of 22 feet located at the southwest comer. The cut slope are generally on the east side of the lot. NorCal Engineering , I 1 >.%( 1' .. December 5, 1997 Page 3 Project Number 7101-97 The investigation consisted of the placement of ten subsurface trenches by a backhoe to a maximum depth of 20 feet placed strategically in proposed areas of development. The explorations were visually classified and logged by a field engineer with locations of the subsurface explorations shown on the attached Site Plan. The exploratory excavations revealed the existing earth materials to consist of an engineered fill and bedrock. A detailed description of the subsurface conditions are listed on the excavation logs in Appendix A. These soils are described as follows: Fill: An engineered fill was encountered consisting predominately of a brown to tan brown, CLAY, silty sandy clay and clayey SANDS. These soils were noted to be denselstiff and damp and moist. Native Soils: A reddish brown CLAY, sandy with gravel and rock were encountered in a portion of the excavations. These native soils were very stiff and dry to damp. Bedrock: A grey siltstone with fine grained interbeds was encountered in test excavations 4. 6, and 8. The bedrock was noted to be moderately hard to hard and moist. The upper 1.5 to 3.0 of the surface soils were noted to be disturbed and loose from the existing surface vegetation and past discing operations. These upper soils were very moist due to recent rains. No groundwater was encountered to the depth of our excavations and no caving occurred. ' NorCal Engineering * .. ., 1' .\ December 5,1997 Page 4 Project Number 7101-97 - Relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained to perform laboratory testing and analysis for direct shear, consolidation tests, and to determine in- place moisture/densities. These undisturbed samples consisted of one inch rings with inside diameter of 2.5 inches. Bulk bag samples were obtained in the upper soils for expansion index tests, maximum density tests, atterberg limits and sulfate tests. All test results are included in Appendix 9, unless noted otherwise. A. The field moisture content (ASTM:D 2216) and the dry density of the ring samples were determined in the laboratory. This data is listed on the log of excavations. B. Maximum density tests (ASTM: 0-1557-78) were performed on typical samples of the upper soils. Results of these tests are shown on Table I. C. Expansion index tests in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2 were performed on remolded samples of the upper soils to determine the expansive characteristics. Results of these tests are provided on Table 11. D. Soluble sulfate tests in accordance with EPA Method 9038 were performed on representative soils samples to estimate the potential for corrosion of concrete in contact with the on-site soils. Results are provided in Table IV. E. Direct shear tests (ASTM: D-3080) were performed on undisturbed and disturbed samples of the subsurface soils. These tests were performed to determine parameters for the calculation of the safe bearing capacity. The test is performed under saturated conditions at loads of 500 Ibs./sq.ft., 1,000 Ibs./sq.ft., and 2,000 Ibs./sq.ft. with results shown on Plate A. NorCal Engineering I' 9. , .I December 5, 1997 Page 5 Project Number 7101-97 F. Consolidation tests (ASTM: D-2435) were performed on undistubed samples to determine the differential and total settlement which may be anticipated based upon the proposed loads. Water was added to the samples at a surcharge of one KSF and the settlement curves are plotted on Plate B. Based upon our evaluations, the proposed development is acceptable from a gebtechnical engineering standpoint. By following the recommendations and guidelines set forth in our report, the structures will be safe from excessive settlements under the anticipated design loadings and conditions. The proposed development shall meet all requirements of the City Building Ordinance and will not impose any adverse effect on existing adjacent structures. In addition, this firm has reviewed the previous geotechnical reports by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., and concurs overall that the geotechnical conditions of the subject site are currently representative of the conditions encountered during the described rough grading report. It is our opinion that the planned grading is geotechnically feasible provided that all of the recommendations presented in our geotechnical report is implemented and the information in the San Diego Consultants, Inc. is accurate. The following sections present a discussion of geotechnical related requirements for specific design recommendations of different aspects of the project. It is recommended that site inspections be performed by a representative of this firm during all grading and construction of the development to verify the findings and recommendations documented in this report. Any unusual conditions which may be encountered in the course of the project development may require the need for additional study and revised recommendations. NorCal Engineering I. t * Project Number 7101-97 .\ December 5,1997 Page 6 All slopes impacting the subject site are considered to be grossly and surficial stable. The slopes constructed during mass grading operations were built at a slope ratio no greater than 2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) and appear to be in accordance with previous project plans and specifications. These slopes would appear to possess safety factors of 1.50 or greater for gross stability. In addition, an observation of these slopes appear to perform adequately with respect to sutficial stability. However, to minimize future erosion, the slope maintenance recommendations should be implemented. The landscaping shall consist of a suitable proportion of deep rooted slope plantings classified as being drought resistant. The possibility of construction delays, weather conditions and plant growth may require additional erosion control measures such as matting, netting and plastic sheeting. Any vegetation shall be removed and hauled from proposed grading areas prior to the start of grading operations. Any removed soils may be revtilied as compacted fill once any deleterious material or oversized materials (in excess of eight inches) is removed. All grading operations shall be performed in accordance with the attached “Specifications for Compacted Fill Operations”. All upper disturbed soils (upper one foot) shall be removed, the exposed surface shall be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% of the laboratory standard (ASTM: D-1557-78) prior to placement of any additional Compacted fill soils. In building areas of transition between bedrock, native soils and engineered fill, additional overexcavation of bedrockhative soils consisting of a depth of three feet below proposed foundations including floor slab areas is required to mitigate the potential of differential settlement. Otherwise all foundation for each individual building shall be embedded into engineered fill or all into bedrock. This fill shall extend a ,minimum of five horizontal feet or to the depth of vertical overexcavation, whichever is greater, beyond the outside edge of the perimeter foundation. All parking subgrade NorCal Engineering .~ December 5, 1997 Page 7 Project Number 7101-97 areas will require the removal of all disturbed soils (upper one foot) prior to placement of any additional fill or pavement. Results of our in-place density tests reveal that the soil shrinkage will be on the order of 8 to 12% within the engineered fill soils, based upon the assumption that the fill is compacted to 92% of maximum dry density per ASTM standards. Subsidence should be 0.25 feet due to earthwork operations. The volume change does not include any allowance for vegetation or organic stripping, removal of subsurface improvements or topographic approximations. Although these values are only approximate, they represent our best estimate of lost yardage which will likely occur during grading. If more accurate shrinkage and subsidence factors are needed, it is recommended that field testing using the actual equipment and grading techniques should be conducted. - Temporary unsurcharged excavations in the existing site materials less than 5 feet high may be made at a vertical gradient unless cohesionless soils are encountered. Temporary unsurcharged excavations from 5 to 10 feet high may be trimmed at a 1 to l(horizonta1 to vertical) gradient. In areas where soils with little or no binder are encountered, where adverse geological conditions are exposed, or where excavations are adjacent to existing structures, shoring, slot-cutting, or flatter excavations may be required. The temporary cut slope gradients given above do not preclude local raveling and sloughing. All excavations shall be made in accordance with the requirements of CAL- OSHA and other public agencies having jurisdiction. Care should be taken to provide or maintain adequate lateral support for all adjacent improvements and structures at all times during the grading operations and construction phase. All foundations may be designed utiliiing the following safe bearing capacities for a embedded depth of 24 inches into approved compacted fill soils or bedrock with the corresponding widths: NorCal Engineering December 5, 1997 Page 8 !LYahm 1.5 2.0 4.0 5.0 Project Number 7101-97 Safe Continuous Isolated 2000 2500 2075 2575 2275 2775 2375 2875 A one third increase may be used when considering short term loading and seismic forces. All continuous foundations shall be reinforced a minimum of one No.'4 bar, top and bottom. Isolated foundations may be reinforced at the discretion of the project structural engineer. All foundations located near adjacent slopes shall meet all setback criteria per the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The bottom of foundations located adjacent to descending slopes shall maintain a safe horizontal setback consisting of 1/3 the height of the slope from bottom of the footing to the face of the slope. The following values may be utilized in resisting lateral loads imposed on the structure. Requirements of the current Uniform Building Code should be adhered to when the coefficient of friction and passive pressures are combined: Coefficient of Friction - 0.35 Equivalent Passive Fluid Pressure = 200 Ib./cu.ft. Maximum Passive Pressure = 2,000 Ibs./sq.ft. The passive pressure recommendations are valid only for compacted fill soils and/or competent bedrock materials. NorCal Engineering December 5, 1997 Page 9 Project Number 7101-97 Resultant pressure curves for the consolidation tests are shown on Plate B. Computations utilizing these curves and the recommended safe bearing capacities reveal that the foundations will experience settlements on the order of 3/4 inch and differential settlements of less than 1/4 inch. Settlements will occur due to foundation loads and area fill surcharge pressures. Existing fill soils will incur additional settlement over time with the area subsidence on the order of a IQ inch across the length of the structures. The associated angular rotation of wall footings should be less than 1/2 inch over 40 linear feet at the site. Thus, shallow building foundations should be designed for these differential settlements during the design life of the structure. Active earth pressures against retaining walls will be equal to the pressures developed by the following fluid densities. These values are for granular free draining backfill material placed adjacent to the walls at various ground slopes above the walls. Surface Slope of Retained Materials Level 5tO 1 4tO 1 3 to 1 2 to 1 Equivalent Fluid 30 35 38 40 45 Any applicable short-term construction surcharges and seismic forces should be added to the above lateral pressure values. A backtill zone of non-expansive material shall consist of a wedge beginning a minimum of one horizontal foot from the base of the wall extending upward at an inclination no less than 3/4 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). All walls shall be waterproofed as needed and protected from hydrostatic pressure by a reliable permanent subdrain system. NorCal Engineering Project Number 7101-97 December 5,1997 Page 10 - All concrete floor slabs shall be a minimum of five inches in thickness reinforced a minimum of No. 3 bars, eighteen inches in each direction positioned in the center of the slab and placed on approved subgrade soils. Prior to placement of slabs, the subgrade soils shall be moisture conditioned above optimum moisture content to a depth of eighteen inches. A vapor barrier overlain by four inches of approved sand shall be utilized beneath all floor slabs sensitive to the infiltration of moisture. All concrete slab areas to receive floor coverings should be moisture tested to meet all manufacturer requirements prior to placement. osion b&Gtk& Representative samples of the surficial soils, typical of the subgrade soils expected to be encountered within foundation excavations, revealed low levels of sulfate concentrations. Therefore, no special cement foundations are deemed necessary and a Type II cement shall be utilized for building foundations at this time. Additional sulfate tests shall be performed at the completion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with the recornmendations stated in this design. Sulfate test results may be found on the attached Table 111. The table below provides a preliminary pavement design based upon an estimated R- Value of 30 for the proposed pavement areas. Final pavement design may need to be based on R-value testing of the subgrade soils near the conclusion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with those assumed in this preliminary design. of Tra& Light Vehicle Parking Traffic Asphaltic Base lo5kx Concrete Linl 4.0 3.0 3.5 Light Vehicle Circulation Areas 5.0 3.0 4.5 Med. Truck Parking & Circulation Areas 6.0 3.5 6.5 (GVW 42,000 Ibs.; 3 axle) Heavy Truck Areas 7.0 3.5 (GVW c 90,000 Ibs.; 5 axle) NorCal Engineering .< December 5, 1997 Page 11 Project Number 7101-97 Pavement section thickness should be increased for areas where heavier vehicular use or larger wheel loads are anticipated. All concrete slabs to be utilized for pavement or utilized for forklift use shall be a minimum of six inches in thickness and placed on approved compacted subgrade soils. Any approved base material shall consist of a Class II aggregate or equivalent and should be compacted to a minimum of 95% relative compaction. All pavement materials shall conform to the requirements set forth by the City of Carlsbad. The base material and asphaltic concrete should be tested prior to delivery to the site and during placement to determine conformance with the project specifications. A pavement engineer shall designate the specific asphalt mix design to meet the required project specifications. The recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based upon the soil conditions uncovered in our test excavations. No warranty of the soil condition between our excavations is implied. NorCal Engineering should be notified for possible further recommendations if unexpected to unfavorable conditions are encountered during construction phase. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that all information within this report is submitted to the Architect and appropriate Engineers for the project. This firm should have the opportunity to review the final plans to verify that all our recommendations are incorporated. This report and all conclusions are subject to the review of the controlling authorities for the project. A preconstruction conference should be held between the developer, general contractor, grading contractor, city inspector, architect, and geotechnical engineer to clarify any questions relating to the grading operations and subsequent Construction. Our representative should be present during the grading operations and construction phase to certify that such recommendations are complied within the field. NorCal Engineering .. '. .. December 5,1997 Page 12 Project Number 7101-97 The geotechnical investigation has been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the Southern California area. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. NorCal Engineering I. ., December 5, 1997 Page 13 Project Number 7101-97 Preparation Any existing low density soils andlor saturated soils shall be removed to competent natural soil under the inspection of the Soils Engineering Firm. After the exposed surface has been cleansed of debris and/or vegetation, it shall be scarified until it is uniform in consistency, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78). Material For Fill The on-site soils or approved import soils may be utilized for the compacted fill provided they are free of any deleterious materials and shall not contain any rocks, brick, asphaltic concrete, concrete or other hard materials greater than eight inches in maximum dimensions. Any import soil must be approved by the Soils Engineering firm a minimum of 24 hours prior to importation of site. Placement of Compacted Fill Soils The approved fill soils shall be placed in layers not in excess of six inches in thickness. Each lift shall be uniform in thickness and thoroughly blended. The fill soils shall be brought to. within 15% of the optimum moisture content, unless otherwise specified by the Soils Engineering firm. Each lift shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78) and approved prior to the placement of the next layer of soil. Compaction tests shall be obtained at the discretion of the Soils Engineering firm but at a minimum of one test for every 500 cubic yards placed and/or for every two vertical feet of compacted fill placed. NorCal Engineering .- December 5.1997 Page 14 Project Number 7101-97 . The minimum relative cornpaction shall be obtained in accordance with accepted methods in the construction industry. The final grade of the structural areas shall be in a dense and smooth condition prior to placement of slabs-on-grade or pavement. No fill soils shall be placed, spread or compacted during unfavorable weather conditions. When the grading is interrupted by heavy rains, compaction operations shall not be resumed until approved by the Soils Engineering firm. Grading Observations The controlling governmental agencies should be notified prior to cornmencement of any grading operations. This firm recommends that the grading operations be conducted under the observation of a Soils Engineering firm as deemed necessary. A 24 hour notice must be provided to this firm prior to the time of our initial inspection. Observation shall include the clearing and grubbing operations to assure that all unsuitable materials have been properly removed; approval of the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas where excavation has resulted in the desired finished grade and designate areas of overexcavation; and performance of field compaction tests to determine relative compaction achieved during fill placement. In addition, all foundation excavations shall be observed by the Soils Engineering firm to confirm that appropriate bearing materials are present at the design grades and recommend any modifications to construct footings. 1 NorCal Engineering Project Number 7101-97 (in order of appearance) A - LOU Of Tat Excavations Test Excavations 4-10 IX R - I sbo-w Testa Table I - Maximum Density Tests Table II - Expansion Index Tests Table 111 - Sulfite Tests Plate A - Direct Shear Tests Plate B - Consolidation Tests NorCal Engineering Project Number 7101-97 PPEN,DIX A NorCal Engineering I MAJOR OIVISIONS 5 -93i 5 TYPICdL NAMES NorCaI Engineering OnS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTAhTS - lplDcl I m11 WIFIED SOIL CUSSIF1UTIO)I SYsm - 32 1- - 14. 12. 8.9 10. $2 i - 109.6 105.1 106.8 107.5 I ccmpacted Fill Soils aAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5' stiff belw Native Soils clay sandy with nxk and shale fragnmts silty,grey to dark brwn, medim stiff to stiff, diatamceous #YE Dum: 11-14-97 L - Canpacted Fill Soils CLAYS and sandy, silty clays loose and wet in ub 1.5' stiff belm Native Soils Clay sandy with rcck and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brawn, redim stiff to stiff, diatotMceous NorCal Engineering IDGoFTEsTmanv?trIai# 2 OILS AND GEOTECHMCAL CONSULTAMS * 12.9 108 8.8 107. I dYS and sandy, silty clays, loose and wet in upper 2. o stiff belaw Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fraqwnts silty, grey to dark brown, mdim stiff to stiff, diatamceous ME DRILLED: 11-14-97 . NorCal Engineering 1 IIX; OF EMCAVATION #3 SOILS AM) GEOTEa3NICA.L CONSULTANTS , . I MTE I Surficial Fill Soils Sandy, silty clays, loose and wet Vative Soils clay sandy with rock and shale fmpents silty, grey to dark bm, medim stiff to stiff, diataMceous SJLTS7XX.E Grey, stiff darq to mist MTE DRIU: 11-14-97 Bulk -1. EpUIRlaT m: Extended Backhce -MER W: None Encountered a Jar -18 NorCal Engineering IKG OF TEST m~l'XCN # 4 ;Om AND GEma-D4ICAL CONSULTANTS .. , I .. NorCal Engineering rrx; OF TST EI@AvA1?cN # 5 SOU AND GEORa3NICAL CONSULT^ _mbmr I mn! . - ._ .. . aCrcNvollmaai -0 ’ . Surficial Fill Soils - Sandy, silty - clays, loose and wet - 15 .j Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fxagrmts silty, grey to dark brown, stiff and mist 25 ‘r i 30 ME DUU: 11-14-97 - - 13.7 11.5 gig Qu 47 r '0 Native Soils clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brawn, medim stiff to stiff below upper 1.0, diatamceous SILTSTONE Grey stiff and damp ~~ MTE ORIUFD: 11-14-97 8 Bulk -le EQIIPIENT uSm:Extended Backhoe a J Jar -1. 6wuIDlllilER ma: None Encountered n 15 Ccmpacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff below Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragnent-s silty, grey to dark brm, meaim stiff to stiff, diatanaeous MI% DRIUED: 11-16-97 NorCal Engineering Ilx; OF BCAVATICN #7 OILS AM) GE0'IE~CA.L CONSULTANTS 1 Ml€ I 8.1 - 115. - ~- canpact& Fill Soils (3LAys, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belaw Native Soils clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brown, n&im stiff to stiff, diatumce~~~ NorCaI Engineering ICG OF TEST mVATIUJ #8 OaS AND GEolEcHMcAL CONSULTANTS 1. . . .. 3 v - 12.8 13.4 9.7 .i 15 Capacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff below m Bulk frcl. EaUIAoTT usm: Extended Backhoe mm LE~EL: None Encountered NorCal Engineering ICG OF m EazWATIm I 9 OILS AND GEOIEQIMCAL CONSULTANTS 3 - 9.. Canpacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belaw PATE ORIUED: 11-1 4-97 =wm NorCal Engineering LCG OF TEST mVATICN # 10 OILS AND GEUTECHNICAL CONSULTAMS Project Number 7101-97 APPENDIX B NorCal Engineering .- r.. ~ . .' December 5.1997 Page 15 Project Number 7101-97 Optimum samole Mpistvre T6 @ 3-5' Siltstone 16.0 TI @ 0-2' CLAY, silly 15.5 T9 @ 0-2' CLAY, sandy silt 13.0 SQiLme T6 @ 3-5' TI @ 0-2' T9 @ 0-2 sample T6 @ 3-5 TI @O-2 T9 @ 0-2 IlUJa - Siltstone CLAY, silly CLAY, sandy silt Maximum Dry 111.0 109.5 115.0 Expansion IukX a7 66 54 540 268 374 NorCal Engineering .... 1 .” DRY MOISTURE m116 - DENSITY CarrmT X 1 5.0 105.1 17.7 0 3 2.5 107.4 8. a (I) ’- mR (FEET) (PCF) A 6 10.0 104.6 11.5 0 9 12.5 105.4 9.7 NOMU PRESSURE (KSF) LIpuIP PUSTICITY LIMIT INDEX 0) (L) COlJSOLIDATIffl TEST RESULTS NorCal Engineering ;OILS AND GE0TEC”ICAL CONSULTANTS 1ROJECT I MTE I 500 loo0 1500 Moo *a . _- . 0 . -- WORYU STRESS (PSF) snBoL X 0 A I DRY )ox- 0 DulsITv m DEm s6R (FEET) (DEGREES) (PSF) (pcF) 1 2.5 23 450 109.6 14.8 6 3.0 19 375 105.9 13.7 9 3.5 26 325 107.6 12.8 I YI I I I I I I NOTE: TESTS PERFOPMD ON SATURATED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. TESTS PERFOPHED Ow UNDISTURBED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. (R) SAUPLES REMLDED AT 90% OF MXIMUM DRY DENSITY (mi FIELD WISTURE NorCal Engineering ' I SOLS AND GEOTECHNI~L CONSULTARS, I DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS PROJECT I DATE I NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE: Non-Reddenlid and OMW, please read thk op4ia1 cardully and be we you thrwgMy understand the options before signing. The oplion you choose will affect yw payment of the developed Special Taw assessed on yw proper*/. This option is svdlable only at the time of the first kilcfrg permit issuance. Property owner signature is reqrired before a bdding permit dl be issued. Your signalure is umhning the accwacy of all parcel and ownemhip informaiion shown. LL c &4 ~~-47 rao fQqd b$L% Telephone hebfowrmr dl2 - 120-//00 Asseesds Pprcd Number, or APN and Lot Number 1 not yet subdvided. Asdkd byO&mce No. NSl55;ndadoptcd bytha City council dthe City of catsbad. CM-. the City i3aJnmued . to levy a spe& Tax in Comrnudty Fadli(ics dtstrkt No. 1. AI1 mesidsnlid property, upon the bsuaa d the fnsl brildrrg permit, shall have the optkm to (1 ) pay the SPECIAL DMLOPMENT TAX ONE- TIME or (2) - the ANNUAL SPEc1ALTAX- DEVELOPED PROPERTY fora period not to exceed twenty- five (25) years. Please indcate yw &&e by iritiahg the appropMte line below: OPTION (1): 1 dect to pay the SPEUAL DEVELOPMENT TAX E-TIME now. as a &me paymerit 1- I elect b pay the SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ANNUALLY for a period not to exceed I~al, Amount of One-mme Sped& Tax: $ 7 3 . ownefs (25) yaen Madmum AMud SpedalTpx: $ (0, YV 1 .Owlel OPTION (2): I DO HEREBY CERnFY -%- DER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS ME PROPERTY OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT I UNDERSTAND AND WU COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS AS STATED ABOVE. The City of crlsbad has not independently verified the information shovvn above. Therefore. we accept no resporabilii a?, to the accuracy or completeness of this informalion. NON-RESIDENTRL CERTIFICATE eaYMENT OF SCHOOL FFFS OR OTHFR MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Lar& c &/ Building Permit Plan Check Number: fa2 a- IIOA - A.P.N. : Project Applicant +,I U&Llv c (Owner'@') Name(s) 0 \/k VI LU%L LLC Hu,& Project Description: 51 TJ Lr //P fnc Residential: er of New Dwellina Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Second Dwelling Unit: Res. Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Cornerc./ Ind.: Square Feet Floor Area 33, 54 2 City Certification: Date: ()&X) - i I x/ -- / / OOL DISTRICTS WITHIN TH~CIN OF CARI SBAD Gsbad Unified Schoo '\%Isbad CA 92009 (43 San Maws Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas. CA 92024 (753-6491) 801 Pine Ave. Encinitas Union School District 101 South Ranch Santa Fe Rd Encinitas. CA 92024 (9444300) Certification of Applicant /Owners. The person executing this declaration ('Owner) certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect. and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s). or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: Date: '2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 @ Gov. Code 53080/65995 (AB 181) Date and Number or name of Agreement) I Gov. Code Government Prior Existing Exempt from 65970 Code 5331 1 Mitigation Agreement fee (SB 201) (Mello - Roos) Note: requirements Total amount of (new) floor area within the building Fee Amount per Square Foot Amount Collected \(-N \?I .33 335% A -Or if subject to Prior Existing Mitigation Agreement: For Detached Residential Dwelling Units or Attached Dwelling Units > 1600 Square Feet Total Number of Dwelling Units Amount per Dwelling Unit Amount Collected For Attached and Detached Dwelling Units < 1600 square feetl per dwelling (If applicable) Total Number of Dwelling Units Amount per Dwelling Unit Amount Collected -and/or- SCHOOL DISTRICT: mitigation determined by the information presented building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL DATE 41 \ 1 104 This is to certiv that the applicant listed on page 1 has applicable school I Djstrict. The City may issue ~ TITLE n Zyrik PHONE NUMBER The Carisbad Unified School District has elected to imDosed the fees andlor amounts herein upon a findina that those NOTlCF OF 90 DAY PERIOD FOR PROTFST OF FFFS facilities described in the School Impact Mitigation Fee Justification Study for Carlsbad UnifiedSchool Distkt, prepared by David Taussig & Associates for the District. Section 66020 of the Government Code enacted as Assembly Bill 3061, set forth as Chapter 549, Statutes of the State of California, requires that all school districts, including the Carlsbad Unified and the Encinitas Union School Districts. provide a written notice to the project applicant at the time of payment of the school fees, mitigation payments, or other exaction. This notice is to advise the project applicant that the protest period regard to such amounts or the validity thereof in accordance with Section 66020 of the Government Code and other applicable law. commences with such payment or performance of any other requirement as described in Section 66020 of the Government Code. Additionally, this notice advises that the protest thereof must occur within 90 calendar days thereafter. FAX # (760) 438-0894 . TELEPHONE # ( 760) 438-1 161 XT 4331 TocLARRY JET ' .- RAENETTE ABBEY Fuo (619) 756-9837 -2 F&mma 9/17/98 .- Larry- Mike Peterson spoke with me this morning and brought 2 things to my attention that we missed at permit issuance yesterday for 1817 Aston Av. The letter that you submitted for the pad certification does not include the information that they are looking for. Engineer or Soil Engineer is certifying that the pad has been graded per approved plans and that the finished pad elevation matches the approved gradinglsite plans. individual. In addition, Mike had not entered the information for the plumbing, electrical or mechanical yet, nor the impact fee for the water meter. I have entered this information on the permit and the balance due is shown. I spoke to Gary yesterday and he indiacated that there will be only 1 irrigation meter for all 3 buildings but that each building will have it's own potable water meter. The irrigation meter impact fee was paid for on the permit for 1815 Aston Ave. Aston Ave. is for the potable meter. permits to the Water District when you go to purchase the actual meters, as proof that the impact fees were paid. /It needs to state that either the Civil This letter needs to be stamped and signed by this - So the only impact fee that I added to 1817 You will need to take copies of the paid Please call if you have any questions. to pay these additional fees and I will try to have them ready for you and inform Mike that they have been paid so that inspections can proceed. Let me know when you are coming in a- '4 ! t i . " -I,-$ I Bb