The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1815 ASTON AVE; ; CB980960; Permit. .- SUILDING PERMIT Permit No: CRY80960 09/17/98 16:13 Project No: A9801263 Page 1 of 1 Development No: Job Address: 1815 ASTON AV Suite : Permit Type: INDIJSTRIAL BUILDING Parcel No: 212-120-11-00 Lot#: 65 Valuation: 987,567 Construction Type: IIIN Occupancy Group: Reference#: Status: ISSUED Description: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Applied: 04/03/98 Apr/Issue: 09/17/98 Entered By : RMA Appl/Ownr : NOGLE ONUFER 619 297-8066 2398 SAN DIEGO AV SAN DIEGO CA 92110 **'A Fees Required x** Fees : 68,190. Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee Enter "Y" to Autocald Enter Traffic Impact Pass-Thru FeeslY/N) ( Enter Enter ,. . Park Fee(2one #Unit.s & Code- Enter #Units & Cocie-Re Enter "Y" for Plumbing .,, II Each Building Sewer Each Roof Drain Each I Enter .nstall/Repair "Y" for Electr cted & Credits *** _____-_____---________ 1 09/17/98 OOOP9)l 02 2.2514M 65931 .oo Ext fee Data 65,931.00 c_______________ ~ ~ * i( ". I I '* * -- "-" . - " 3475.00 2259.00 207. 00 17974.00 Y 3916.00 Y * *,..,*.a I s *I *- 1 .I ' 14209.00 05 10200.0U D1.5 14400.00 TB1.5 20.00 Y 15.00 98.00 7.00 10.110 Y 1400.00 Three Phase 480 Per AMP Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> \cL€AWCE/ I N CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad 06/09/1999 Building Permit Permit No:CB980960 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 Job Address: Permit Type: INDUST Sub Type: Parcel No: 2121201100 Lot#: 65 Status: ISSUED Valuation: $987,567.00 Construction Type: IllN Applied: 04/03/1998 Occupancy Group: Reference #: Entered By: RMA Appr/lssued: 05/04/1999 Project Title: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Inspect Area: DH 181 5 ASTON AV CBAD Applicant: NOGLE ONUFER 2398 SAN DIEGO AV 92110 61 9 297-8066 Owner: ROYAL VILLAGE LLC Total Fees: $59,190.39 Total Payments To Date: $59.190.39 Balance Due: $0.00 Description ___-.___..-..____.--____________________.. * ELECTRICAL TOTAL * PLUMBING TOTAL Additional Adjustment P1 BLDG PLAN CHECK BUILDING PMTS CONTRB SP ASSESS Enter Additional Reclaim LIC TAX ON CONST STRNG MOTION TRAFFIC IMPACT Fee .._.____....___ 1,410.00 140.00 5,400.00 2,258.96 3,475.32 14,209.00 10,200.00 17,913.72 207.39 3,916.00 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your ight to protest the specMd feesiexactons DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer mnnection fees and capactiy J 9533 issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a Signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisio [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel or that he is exempt therefrom. and the basis for the alleged exemption; Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to B civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$50011. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Date (760) 438-1161 Address City Ststelzip Telephone # Fax X %Me Name AXk City StatelZip Telephone X State License 11 License Class CIQ 0usin.u Ucmy X Designer Name Address city Statelzip Telephone 0 of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 issued. My worker's compensation insurance carriw and policy number are: Insuranc~ Compsny Policy No. Expiration Date f~.SECIIMI NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HWDIIED DOLLARS 1$1001 OR LESS1 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I Shall not employ any person In any manner so as to bscome subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws Of California. WARNING: Failure to ascure workws' compensation coverage Is unlawful. and shall subject an amplova to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars i6100.0001. in sddltlon to the cost Of compensation. damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code. interest and attomev'i tees. I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation a9 provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the peTfoimance I have and will maintain worked compensation, as required by Saction 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance Of the work for which this permit is 1 SIGNATURE DATE R&%IDN I hsreby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, BE owner Of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the strUCtUre is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of Property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees. provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden Of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose Of sale). fi I, as owner Of the property, am eXClUsivsly contracting with licensed COntraCtOrS to Construct the projen ISec. 7044. Business and PrOfesOiOns Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of propeny who builds or improves thereon. and contracts for Such projects with cmtractorlsi licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 1. I am exempt under Section I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. YES UNO Business and Professions Code for this reason: I havs not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. number I contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work. but I have contracted (hired) the following persons t?.projida the work indicated (include name I address I phone number I type ' Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, aCUtely hazardous materislS registratiOn form or risk management and prewntion program under Ssnionr 25505. 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? YES NO 1s the applicant or future building occupant required to Obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of B School Site? YES NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES. A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REDUIREMENTS OF THE DFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. YES 0 NO NSMUCTION LEN61NG40EN.C affirm that there is a constrwti LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S AOORESS APPLICANT CERTIRCATIDN- I certify that I have read the application and State that the above information is Correct and that the information on the plans is accwate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State iaws relating to building Construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over SO" deep and damolition or construction of Structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work wthorized by such permit is not cammgnced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the of 180 days Isenion 106.4.4 Uniform Building Codei. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE \ DATd '-z .4-$ WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK: Finance CMI af krlsLld Anal Building Inspmlon Dept: Building Engineering CMWD St Lite Fire L Plan Check #: Permit #: CB980960 Project Name: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Address: 1815ASTON AV Contad Person: CRAIG Phone: 6195598413 Sewer Dist: CA Water Disl: CA Date: 5/24/99 Permit Type: INDUST Sub Type: Lot: 65 .......................................................................................................................................................... Inspected Date By: Inspected: y*c?"r_ Approved: __ /Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: __ Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: __ Disapproved: __ ........................................................................................................................................................... Comments: CMI Bf carislud Flnal Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Pian Check #: Permit #: CB980960 Project Name: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Address: 1815 ASTON AV Contad Person: CRAIG Phone: 6195598413 Sewer Dist: CA Water .%I: CA Dale: 5/24/99 PennitType: INDUST Sub Type: Lot: 65 Inspected Date By: Inspected: 5-26-99 Approved: __ Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: __ Disapproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: __ Disapproved: __ ............................ I., .... * ....... . .... . ..... * ..,..... ..................................... I ......... ....... .... ........... .... .... ..... . ........ , Comments: Cb of Carlsbad Rnal Bulldinfl lnspgctlon z\z - * Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD Fire Pian Check#: Date: 5/24/99 Permit #: CB980960 Permit Type: INDUST Project Name: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Sub Type: Address: 181 5 ASTON AV Lot: 65 Contact Person: CRAIG Phone: 6195598413 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA .......................................................................................................................................................... Inspecp, Date 3-.-&j-- By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: - t_ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: __ Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: __ Disapproved: - Comments: ........................................................................................................................................................... Inspection List Permit#: CB980960 Type: INDUST Date Inspection Item ~ Friday, June 11,1999 6/4/99 89 6/2/99 89 6/1/99 89 5/26/99 89 5/25/99 89 5/24/99 89 5/18/99 39 5/11/99 39 5/10/99 39 5/7/99 39 4/29/99 11 4/28/99 11 4/27/99 11 4/26/99 11 4/20/99 11 2/22/99 21 1/26/99 84 1/22/99 19 1/18/99 16 1/12/99 18 1/11/99 17 1/6/99 14 1/5/99 14 1/4/99 12 12/30/98 14 12/22/98 15 12/17/98 84 12/16/98 84 12/15/98 11 12/15/98 14 12/11/98 11 12/10/98 11 12/9/98 11 12/9/98 15 12/8/98 15 12/7/98 15 11/6/98 12 10/29/98 12 10/28/98 11 10/28/98 12 10/27/98 11 10/15/98 11 10/15/98 12 10/15/98 21 Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Electrical Final Electrical Final Electrical Final Electrical FtglFoundationlPiers FtglFoundationlPiers FtglFoundationlPiers FtglFoundationlPiers FtglFoundationlPiers UndergroundlUnder Floor Rough Combo Final Structural Insulation Exterior LathlDrywall Interior Lath/Drywall FramelSteellBoitingNeldin FramelSteellBoltingNeldin Steel/Bond Beam Frame/Steel/BoltingNeldin Roof/Reroof Rough Combo Rough Combo FtglFoundationlPiers FramelSteeVBoltingNVeldin FtglFoundationlPiers FtglFoundationlPiers FtglFoundationlPiers RooWReroof RooWReroof Roof/Reroof SteeWBond Beam SteeVBond Beam FtglFoundationlPiers SteellBond Beam FtglFoundationlPiers FtglFoundationlPiers SteeVBond Beam Underground/Under Floor Inspector Act DH DH DH PD DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH DH AP NR NR co co NR AP NR NR NS AP NR PA NR NR AP AP NR AP AP NS NR AP NR NR AP co NR AP AP AP NR NR AP NR CA AP AP co co co co co co 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP OTHER DEPTS SEE NOTICE ATTACHED EMR COMPLETE EXT. LIGHT POLES LIGHT FTGS LIGHT POLE FTGS LOCATIONS ON CARD LIGHT POLES EXCEPT ELECTRICAL RM DRYWALL FRAMING PREVIOUSLY AP ON 12/9 NEED 3 X NAILER POUR STRIP SHEATHING PANELS 8 THRU 11 PNLS REBAR OK-I THRU 7&1 SPECIAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR REPAIR CORRECT SPECIAL INSPECTR AP-FTGS AP WC Page 1 of 2 10/15/98 22 Sewerrwater Service DH co wc 10/13/98 22 Sewerrwater Service DH AP SEWER AND STORM DRAiN 10/5/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers DH AP 10/2/98 11 FtglFoundationlPiers DH NR 9/30/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers DH PA SEE CARD 9/21/98 21 Underground/Under Floor DH AP Friday, June 11. 1999 ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ Page 2 of 2 UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INS PECTION INSPECTOR b!! PLAN CHECK # -. DATE PERMIT# ,9f09d0 JOBADDRESS -/ f'/s ASTON /Yl( DESCRIPTION fiLf d4 CODE DES CRTPTION ACT PP - COMMENTS f City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For 5/24/99 Permit# CB980960 Title: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Description: Type: INDUST Sub Type: Job Address: 1815 ASTON AV Suite: Lot 65 Location: APPLICANT NOGLE ONUFER Owner: JETWJONES L L C <LF> ROYAL VlLL Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural Inspector Assignment: DH Phone: 6195598413 Inspector: D! Requested By: C I [? 29 Final Plumbing I 39 Final Electrical I 49 Final Mechanical I / I Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 5/18/99 39 Final Electrical AP DH EMR 5/11/99 39 Final Electrical NR DH COMPLETE EXT. LIGHT POLES 5/7/99 39 Final Electrical NS DH 5/10/99 39 Final Electrical NR DH 4/29/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP DH LIGHTFTGS 4/28/99 11 Flg/Foundation/Piers NR DH LIGHTPOLEFTGS 4/27/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA DH LOCATIONS ON CARD 4/28/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR DH 4/20/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR DH 2/22/99 21 Underground/Under Floor AP DH LIGHTPOLES 1/26/99 84 Rough Combo AP DH 1/22/99 19 Final Structural NR DH 1/18/99 16 Insulation AP DH 1/12/99 18 Exterior LathlDrywall AP DH EXCEPT ELECTRICAL RM 1/11/99 17 Interior Lath/Drywall NS DH 1/6/99 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingNelding NR DH 1/5/99 14 Frame/Steei/BoltingNelding AP DH DRYWALL FRAMING 1/4/99 12 SteeVBond Beam NR DH CITY OF CARLSBAD ’ ’ . BUILDING DEPARTMENT (760)438-3550 2075 US PALMAS DRIVE PERMIT NO. jY~96O FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 438-3101. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT n YES 43t-//6/ /x y9YY @ BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For 4/29/99 Permit# CB980960 Title: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Description: Type: INDUST Sub Type: Job Address: 1815 ASTON AV Suite: Lot 65 Location: 4PPLICANT : NOGLE ONUFER Owner: JETMJONES L L C <LF> ROYAL VlLL Remarks: AM PLEASE Total Time: Inspector Assignment: DH Phone: 6195598413 Inspector: DF Requested By: CRAIG Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 4/27/99 4/26/99 4/20/99 2/22/99 1/26/99 1/22/99 1/18/99 1/12/99 111 1/99 115199 1/6/99 1/4/99 12/30/98 12/22/98 12/17/98 1216198 12/1 5/98 12/15/98 12/11/98 12/10/98 12/9/98 129198 1 2/8/98 11 Ftg/Foundatlon/Piers 11 FtgIFoundationlPiers 11 FiglFoundatim/Piers 21 UndergmundlUnder Floor 84Rough Combo 19 Final Structural 16 Insulation 18 Exterior LathIDrywall 17 Interior LathlDrywall 14 FramelSteellBoltingMlelding 14 FramelSteellBoltingMleIding 12 SteelIBond Beam 14 FramelSteellBoltingIding 15 RoofIRerwf 84Rough Combo 84 Rough Combo 11 FtgIFoundationlPien 14 FramelSteellBoltinglding 11 FtgIFoundatimlPiers 11 FtglFoundationlPiers 11 FtglFoundation/Piers 15 RooflReroof 15 RoofIReroof PA DH NR DH NR DH AP DH AP DH NR DH AP DH AP DH NS DH AP DH NR DH NR DH NR DH AP DH CO DH NR DH AP DH AP DH AP DH NR DH NR DH AP DH NR DH LOCATIONS ON CARD LIGHT POLES EXCEPT ELECTRICAL RM DRYWALL FRAMlNG PREVIOUSLY AP ON 12/9 NEED 3 X NAILER POUR STRIP SHEATHING ltbe 743 BlOY V.UL P.03 City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For 1/25/99 Permit# CB980960 Title: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP Description: Type: INDUST Sub Type: Job Address: 1815 ASTON AV Suite: Lot 65 Location: APPLICANT : NOGLE ONUFER Owner: JETT&JONES L L C cLF> ROYAL VlLL Remarks: Inspector Assignment: DH Phone: 6195598413 Inspector: & Total Time: Requested By: CRAIG Entered By: ROBIN CD Description 14 FramelSteellBoltingMlelding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 44 RoughlDuctslDampers InspectionHistory Date Description Act lnsp Comments 1/19/99 AP DH 1/13/99 AP DH EXCEPT ELECTRICAL RM 1/12/99 NS DH 1/6/99 AP DH DRYWALLFRAMING 1/6/99 NR DH 1/5/99 NR DH 12131 198 NR DH 12122198 15 RoofIReroof AP DH PREVIOUSLY AP ON 1219 12/17/98 84 Rough Combo CO DH NEED3XNAlLER 12/16/98 84Rough Combo NR DH 12/15/98 11 FtglFoundationlPiers AP DH 1211 5/98 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingNelding AP DH 1211 1/98 11 FtgIFoundationlPiers AP DH POURSTRIP 12110198 11 FtgIFoundationlPiers NR DH 12/9/98 11 FtgIFoundationlPiers NR DH 12/9/98 15 RooWReroof AP DH SHEATHING Fwxl : a-2ED WGISERS PMEE NO. : 1619 549 69% Dec. 24 1998 02:31PH F02 Twrting Engineere - 8an Diio, Inc. 7885 CONVOY CT., SUITE 16 SAN OIEQO, CAS2111 INSPECTJON REPORT PaQe 101 - ................ ..-.... L.., L(yT 65 JOB #Be009 - BID0 #2 (SITE OSERVATXON VISIT) PAGE 2 OF 2 DEC 24TH,1998 2- DETAIL l3/S5: WE WERE IF A307 BOLTS CAET 88 USED IN LIIU OF A325 N HIGH STRBNGTH BOLTS AT TEE ANGU LED-. A307 BOLTS WRY BE USED AT "HIS PARTICULAR LCKXTION, IN ADDITION, TO 1/4" FILLET WBLD OF THE STEBL ANGLB TO TUB TOP CHORD OF THE PURLIN. 3- QOTAXL 3/SJ : SOWE OF THE STXXL TRUSS JOIST6 WIL OBSERVED WERE NOT CONCENTRIC WITR THP EMBED ANOLE SUPPORT. WI BA- PpRPoRHeD ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS IN ORDER TO VERIFY THE WIW ECCENTRICITY TBAT CAN BE nTZD WITR OUT VIOUTING TBI MINIHUM RpwIRLpHpNTS OF TES u13IpQRH BUILDING CODE. TBE FOLLOWIN0 ARE OUR FfNDINC& : MW HII(L1N SPAN WIWM ECCENTRLCITY 60' ................... 0.50" 55' ................... 1.00" k4' .................. -2.50" 40' .................. .2.?5" ANY -IN UXTW BCXKNTRICITT EXC2mIUG THE ABOVE, NSEDS M BE FURTHER CONSIDERED FOR POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT XEINw3\cEneNP; OUR OFFICE NEEDS TO BE CONTACTED FOR ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION. PLBASP, CALL IF YOU BAVE AWI QOSSTIONS OR CONCBRNS. IOURS SfHCRtlLY; L DouaAR S.E.#33?0 PRESIDENT. C.C. QUID coNNE&Lx CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB980960 FOR 12/15/98 INSPECTOR AREA DH DESCRIPTION: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP PLANCK# CB980960 TYPE: INDUST CONSTR. TYPE IIIN JOB ADDRESS: 1815 ASTON AV STE : LOT: 65 APPLICANT: NOGLE ONLIFER PHONE: 619 297-8066 CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OCC GRP OWNER: PHONE : REMARKS: C/CRAIG/918-6926 AM PLEASE INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: __ --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS SE980072 SWOW ISSUED AS980155 ASC ISSUED RW980310 ROW ISSUED CB9 8 2 10 2 RETAIN ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ap ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 121198 121098 120998 120998 120898 120798 110698 102998 102898 102898 102798 101598 101598 101598 101598 101398 100598 100298 093098 092198 DESCRIPTION Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roo €/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roo€/Reroo f Roof/Reroof Steel/Bond Beam Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Underground/Under Floor Sewer/Water Service Sewerpater Service Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor ACT INSP AP DH NR DH AP DH NR DH NR DH CA DH AP DH AP DH co DH co DH co DH co DH CO DH CO DH co DH AP DH AP DH NR DH PA DH AP DH COMMENTS POUR STRIP SHEATHING PANELS 8 THRU 11 PNLS REBAR OK-1 THRU 7&12-22 SPECIAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR REPAIRS CORRECT SPECIAL INSPECTRS RPT AP-FTGS AP WC WC SEWER AND STORM DRAIN SEE CARD FOR OTHER NOtES SEE DETAIL ON PUNS. ALTERNATE PANEL TO FTG. AT PANEL JOINTS & AT CORNERS NosCFuJi CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB980960 FOR 12/10/98 INSPECTOR AREA DH DESCRIPTION: 35,524 SF SHELL TILTUP PLANCK# CB980960 TYPE: INDUST CONSTR. TYPE IIIN JOB ADDRESS: 1815 ASTON AV STE : LOT: 65 APPLICANT: NOGLE ONUFER PHONE: 619 297-8066 OCC GRP CONTRACTOR: PHONE : OWNER : PHONE : REMARKS: B/CRAIG/918-6926 PM INSP INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS SE980072 SWOW ISSUED AS980155 ASC ISSUED RW980310 ROW ISSUED CB982102 RETAIN ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ****; DATE DESCRIPTION 120798 Roof/Reroof 120898 Roof/Reroof 110698 Steel/Bond Beam 102998 Steel/Bond Beam 102898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 102898 Steel/Bond Beam 102798 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 101598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 101598 Steel/Bond Beam 101598 Underground/Under Floor 101598 Sewer/Water Service 101398 Sewer/Water Service 100598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 100298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 093098 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 092198 Underground/Under Floor ACT INSP NR DH CA DH AP DH AP DH co DH co DH co DH co DH co DH co DH CO DH AP DH AP DH NR DH PA DH AP DH COMMENTS PANELS 8 THRU 11 PNLS REBAR OK-1 THRU 7&12-22 SPECIAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR REPAIRS CORRECT SPECIAL INSPECTRS RPT AP-FTGS AP wc wc SEWER AND STORM DRAIN SEE CARD Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof - Project Name mh/@d &,Nesk 6s" TESDProjectt yf -$Go2 Address 18 /3 44 To& General I Subcontractor w w * /me &we Building Permit # ?//%l ' DSA # Pian File # 980f6:O OSHPD # Government Contract # Other Y@ 27m; Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT Pagelof _L SAN DIEGO. CA92111 Project Name /h&S 17- 6s" TESD Project # !?f-y0 2- Address l&K &mA #wG - PA General I Subcontractor /k d 02 K. /S##Ie cd Building Pennlt # wPT# , DSA # Plan File #_fzgo 9'6D Government Contract # Other OSHPD # Field Representatlv CEFRlFlCAflON OF COMPLIANCE To thcs best of my knowledge, all of the repotted with the approved plans and specificattons and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. R CERT. NO. /&m -w INSPECTOR'S NAME _. Testing Engh - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT.. SUITE 18 SAN DIEQO, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page of _pl, Genetal/tkrbcomractor> Building Permit t DSA y: Plan File t OSHPD # Qovemment contract t other with the oppmved plans and SPedficatkNJ and the workmanshi provisions of the ekabk, code. Testing Enginwrs 8an Diego, Inc. paw2 ofzl 7885 COWY CT.. SUITE 18 0 FIELD REPOFIT fl NOTICE TO COMPLY SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 I cs&. I TWhg Em 8en Dbgo, I=. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO. CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof - t ceRTyIc*TKIN OF COUPUANCE: To the bast of my knowledge. alld the rep0 with the epprwod plans and spedflcations and Mo wortmanship provisiis of the applka6fa code. TIIsdngl hnghoem 8an c)iago, lnc, 7885 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 9 FIELO REPORT 0 NOTICE TO COMPLY TO I t I I I Geneml/Subcontractor & Building Permit t DSA t Plan File t OSHPD t Government Contract t Omer Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lot 1 Building Permit # ?A=/ 59cv DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION ~ prestress conc ~ StrUCl Steel ~ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Oestructive ~ Batch Piant ~ Sails Technician ~ Mechanical __ Electrical concrete/&tg+3jL __ Masonry ~ Bolt PUII-OUt ~ Roofing ~ Waterproofing ~ OSA __ OSHPD ~ Specially MAT’L SAMPLING QTY ~ Soil ~ __ Base __ ~ Subgrade __ __ Asphalt Concrete __ __ Concrete Cylinders __ __ Conc Flex Beams __ ~ Reinl. Steel ~ ~ Tendon (PT Strands) ~ ~ Monar Samples ~ __ Grout Samples __ ~ Masonry Prisms ~ __ Masonry Block __ __ Steel __ ~ H.S. Bolts __ ~ Fireprooling ~ ~ Roofing ~ ~ Other MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ___ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #psi __ Rinf.: W.W.F. ~ Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi ~ Moner: Typelpsi __ Units: Block __ Unils: Block ~ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Metal Decking ~ Electrodes ~ Fireproofing __ Other 2 Rinf.: Rebar A 6 /rGh‘ c 1 INSPECTION CHECKLIST Plans __ Specifications __ Sizes ~ Slump ~ AirCOntent ~ Temperature ~ Unit Weight __ Consolidation ___ Electrode Storage __ ~ Torque Applied ~ Load (Pounds) ~ Thickness __ Coneclve aciion required ~ ~ Corrections completed ~ Field Representative CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reporte with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. tu SM~I CERT. NO. L&97&Yf (Pm Clearly) INSPECTOR’S NAME Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. I MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil ~~ ~ Ease ____ ~ Subgrade ~ Asphalt Concrele __ __ ~ Concrete Cylinders __ __ ConcFlexBeams ~ ~ Reinf. Steel ____ ~ Tendon (PT Strands) __ ~ Mortar Samples __ 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Conc.: Mix #/psi Conc.: Mix #/psi Conc.: Mix #/psi ZRinf.: Rebar- __ Rinf.: W.W.F. ~ Rinf.: Tendons Grout: Mix #/psi __ Monar: Typelpsi Units: Block PageLof L INSPECTION REPORT Project Name SMb2\ c SfiAr,. CA Address 1915 hd AVK DSA #- OSHPD # - - Plan File # Government Contract # Other f &TI __ Prestress Conc asonry Stiuct Steel __ Fireproofing ~ Pile Driving __ Non-Destr~~live ~ Balch Plant __ Soils Technician ~ Mechanical __ Electrical __ Boll Pull-Out __ Roofing ~ Waterproofing ~ DSA ~ OSHPD __ Specialty TION CHECKLIST Plans PapRO Vf?D Specificalions \/Sires ~ Slump ~ Unit Weight I/ Electrdde Storage@%& __ Torque Applied %- Load (Pounds) Consolidation __ Fireproofing Fi<eprooflng ~ Roofing Other __ Other __ Corrections completed __ with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME A CERT. NO. 337 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE /o -28-78 W +6197155800 TESTING ENGINEERS SD 156 P11 MU 06 '98 08:34 Testing Engineers - San Ohgo, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT.. SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 82111 INSPECTION REPORT PaOe 1of - --- PmJect Na Address General / Subconlractor hh Building Permit w ~70 I 99~ DSAY- OSHPD t Other 3pmM: - Plan File t - Government Contract Y - L Fleld Representative CERflPICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all oi the reported work, u&s otherwise $taxi8 in confomaa, wllh Ihe approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions ol lhe applkable code. INSPECTORS NAME CEFiT. NO. -339 INSPECTOR'S GIGNATURE DATE t I I I I 1 1 I. - I I i Te! 'ne Enginwrr, - 8m Dbgo; w. laod CONVOY CT., sum 18 BAN DIEGO, CAW111 INSPECnON REPORT Page Lof 74 I I I 1 - I I mas couvov CT.. SUITE ia INSPECTION REPORT SAUOIEOO. CAgZ111 Tsrting E- - 8an Diego, Inc. 7898 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT Pegs 1of _L SAN OIEGO, CAS!2lIl Government Contract a other T-ting En@nem = San Uqo, lnc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 82111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lot - PmiectName TESDP~~# 9& -4bZ ~ddres~ lgf7 nl*. c*htlLsw LA- - General I Subcontractor Leta A/ Building Permit t qpl? DSA t Plan File # OSHPD # Testing Engineera = 8an Dkgo, Inc. 7885 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEQO, CA 92111 INSPECMlN REPORT PageLd 1, It INSPECTOR’S NAME 4 CERT. NO. ,%&&,, he 6 J &stin# Engineers - Son Diego, Inc. 7896 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT PapeLd L , Tsgtkrg Engii - Sen Diego, Inc. 7895CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN OIEGO. CA 921 11 INSPECTION REPORT Page &of I CEAT. NO. INSPECTOR'S NAME FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS Date: Job No: Job Name: Address: Report No: ENGINEER 12/31/98 98-469 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT #65/BLDG 1 1815 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 980960 1855976 GREGORY SMITH, PE Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 11/30/98 & 12/24/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our ofice at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (1) Testing Engineers -Sa" Diego, Inc., 7895 Convoy Courl, Suite18 Sa" Diego, CA. 92111 [619]715-5800 Fax[619]715-5810 ............. INSP TlON CHECKLIST -!- ~ .~. Speclflcd11ans mans ............. Shen .... .- wump ..... ~ AlrCOnlanl .... .- Tamparntura . I__. ConeolldalMn .____ Eloarode Slnwa __ rorquo Appllad Load (rounaa) ....... ~- , . . TMCYIIBSS - nlI Wnlght ............ ~- ........ , ...... wllh lhe approved plans and specificatlons and the workmanshlp provlslons of tho appllcabfe code. INSPECTOR'S NAME - CERT.NO. %SZ> - -.- .. INSPECTOR'S SIGNAT p__ ~ DATE Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. Eqtablished 1916 FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS Date: 12/24/98 Job No: 98-469 Job Name: Address: 18 15 Aston Avenue CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT #65/BLDG 1 Carlsbad, CA. Plan Number: N/A Permit Number: 98096 Report No: 1855924 ENGINEER: GREGORY SMITH, PE Enclosed are field inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 12/14/98. These reports cover the locations of work inspected andor tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or project control. These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes. Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 715- 5800. Reports enclosed (1) Testing Engineers -Sa" Dicgo, Inc.. 7895 Convoy Court, Suite18 San Diego, CA. 9211 I [6191715-5800 Fax [619]715-5810 ~~~ Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof ~ d Project Name AkkW @% I TESD Project # 4 4~7 " Address \8\? OM. ; c,u General I Subcontractor Building Permit # DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION ~ concrete ~ Prestress Conc ~ Masonry ~ SlnJCt Steel ~ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving ~ Non-Destructive ~ Batch Plan1 __ Soils Technician ~ Mechanical ~ Electrical & BO11 PuII-Out ~ Roofing ~ Waterproofing ~ DSA __ OSHPD __ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil __ __ Base __ ~ Subgrade ~ __ Asphall concrete __ __ Concrete Cylinders __ ~ Conc Flex Beams ~ __ Reinf. Steel ~ Tendon (PT Strands) __ ~ Mortar Samples __ __ G~OU~ Samples ~ __ Masonry Prisms ~ __ Masonry Block __ ~ Steel __ __ H.S. Bolls __ __ Fireproofing ~ ~ Roofing __ __ Other ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Rinf.: Rebar __ Rinl.: W.W.F. __ Rinf.: Tendons __ Groul: Mix #/psi __ ort tar: Typeipsi ~ Units: Block __ Units: Block __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts ~ Metal Decking ~ Eleclrodes __ Fireproofing ~ Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST __ Plans __ Specifications __ Sizes __ Slump __ Air Conlent ___ Temperalure __ Unit Weigh1 __ Consolidalion __ Electrode Storage __ __ Torque Applied 2 Load (Pounds)&Qdk5 ___ Thickness __ Correcuve action required __ __ Corrections completed __ CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. CERT. NO. (Print Clearly) INSPECTORS NAME %%Z> n INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE Date Permit Number P} Iq /qg Job Number Plan File Number 98 -q6 9 Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof __ z SAN DIEGO, CA92111 General / Subcontractor KoLt& Building Permit # DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION __ concrete __ Prestress Conc __ Masonry __ Struct Steel __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving ~ N~n-Destru~li~e __ Batch Plant ~ Soils Technician ~ Mechanical ~ Electrical & Boll Pull-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing ~ DSA ~ OSHPD ~ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Sail __ Base __ Subgrade __ __ Asphalt Concrete ~ __ Concrete Cylmders ~ __ Conc Flex Beams ~ __ Reinf. Steei ~ __ Tendon (PT Strands) ~ __ Mmar Samples __ __ Grout Samples ~ ~ Magpnry Prisms ~ __ Masonry Block __ __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Fireproofing ~ __ Roofing __ __ Olher __ __ __ ~ ~~~ ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rinf.: Rebar ~ Rinf.: W.W.F. __ Rini.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi ~ Mortar: Typelpsi __ Units: Block ~ Units: Block __ Steel __ H.S. Boils __ Metal Decking __ Electrodes __ Fireproofing __ Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST __ Plans 4 Specifications -- Sizes ~ Slump ~ Air Content __ Temperature ~ Unit Weight __ Consolidation __ Electrode Storage ~ ~ Torque Applied Load(Pounds) dqOO IbS __ Thickness - __ Carreclve action required __ __ Corrections compleied __ with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME - I bhh.1ZS E5-2-s (Pml Clearly) CERT. NO. n INSPECTORS SIGNATUR DATE /L///?g Date /I/ 1 /q k TO: Job Number 98-46? 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I # I I 1 I I I I I I t I I I # I I I I I I I I I !ji I I I I I I I I I I I I d i Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof L Project Name L*J l? LICalrcl c-7- TESD Project # 98- 46 9 Address /8/s &Sfi~ &cC/-C C~~/~ABJ ezSt General I Subcontractor /&&,.J /kshcuc+.- ,/> 6,.qrn;d,4 fi-.&. #~~flw+~)hod Building Permit # 48 0 9 6 0 DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION ~ Concrete __ Prestress conc L/ strucr steel __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving __ Non-Destr~~tive __ Batch Plant ~ Soils Technician __ Mechanical ~ Eleclrical __ Masonry ~ Bolt P"il.0"t __ Roofing __ Wateipmofing __ DSA __ OSHPD ~ Specially MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil __ Ease ~ Subgrade __ __ Asphalt Concrete __ __ Concrete Cylinders __ __ Conc Flex Beams __ __ Reinf. Steel __ __ Tendon (PT Strands) __ __ MonarSamples __ __ Grout Samples __ __ Masonry Prisms __ __ Masonry Black __ __ steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Fireproofing __ Roofing ~ Other __ __ __ __ __ __ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #ipsi __ Conc.: Mix #ipsi __ Rinf.: Rebar __ Rinf.: W.W.F. __ Rinf.: Tendons ___ Grout: Mix#lpsi __ Manar: Typeipsi __ Units: Biock __ Units: Block L Sfeel A.34 __ H.S. Bolts __ Metal Decking __ Fireproofing __ Other __ J Ekctrodes INSPECTION CHECKLIST J Pian5 L Specifications -L Sizes ~ Slump ~ Air Content __ Temperature __ Unit Weight - Consolidation Electrode Storage e ~ Torque Applied __ Load (Pounds) __ Thickness - __ Correciive action required ~ ~ Corrections completed ~ Field Representative CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1of __ I SAN DIEGO, CA92111 Building Permit # 9 RLJ9 LO DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other __ Prestress Conc ~ Masonry J struct steel A3 b __ Fireproofing ~ Pile Driving ~ NO”-OeSlrUCtiYe __ Batch Plan1 __ Soils Technician __ Mechanical __ Eleclricai __ Boll PuII-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing __ DSA ~ OSHPO _rL specialty MAT’L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil ~ ~ Base ~ __ Subgrade ~ __ Asphalt Concrete ~ ~ Concrete Cylinders ~ Conc ~lex Beams __ ~ Reinf. Steel __ ~ Tendon (PT Strands) __ ~ MoltarSamples ~ __ Grout Samples ~ __ Masonry Prisms ~ ~ Masonry Block ~ __ Steel __ __ H.S. BO115 __ ~ Fireproofing __ __ Roofing ~ __ Other __ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rinf.: Rebai ~ Rinf.: W.W.F. ~ Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi ~ Mortar: Typeipsi ~ Units: Block ~ Unils: Block __ Steel ~ H.S. Bolls ~ Metal Decking ~ Fireproofing __ Other Electrodes &- .072 INSPECTION CHECKLIST L Plans SiGte h A Specificalions _- Sizes __ Slump __ Air Content __ Temperature ~ Unit Weigh1 ~ Consolidation L Electrode storage L __ TorqueApplied ~ Load (Pounds) __ Thickness ~ Corrective aclion required __ __ Corrections completed ~ Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page Lof ~ I Project Name &,.p/~&d @%?McA && / TESD Project # qf- 46 9 Address /8/ r A5nu A Ljc 6 /J bAJ e8. General / Subcontractor /de few @-7h r.7)- Building Permit # 9 PO 9 6 f9 DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSP CTION ~ Prestress conc 2 concrete Iz :t:::tn:eel ~ Fireproofing ~ Pile Driving ~ Non-Destructive ~ Belch Plant ~ Soils Technician ~ Mechanical ~ Electrical ~ Bolt PuII-Oui ~ Roofing ~ Waterproofing ~ DSA ~ OSHPD ~ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY ~ Soil ~ ~ Base ~ ~ Subgrade ~ ~ Asphalt Concrete ~ ~ Concrete Cylinders ~ ~ Conc Flex Beams ~ ~ Reini. Steel ~ ~ Tendon (PT Strands) ~ ~ Mortar Samples ~ ~ Grout Samples ~ ~ Masonry Prisms ~ ~ Masonry Block ~ ~ Steel ~ ~ H.S. Bolts ~ ~ Fireproofing ___ ~ Roofing ~ ~ Other MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rinf.: Rebar ~ Rinf.: W.W.F. __ Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi ~ Mortar: Typelpsi ~ Units: Block ~ Units: Block ~ steei ~ H.S. Boils ~ Metal Decking __ Eiectiodes ~ Fireproofing ~ Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST ~ Plana 4 Specifications ~ Sires ~ Slump ~ Air Content ~ Temperature ~ Unit Weigh1 ~ Consolidation __ Electrode Storage ~ ~ Torque Applied ~ Load (Pounds) ~ Thickness 57 ~ Correc!he actio" required ~ ~ Correciions completed ~ Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof I Building Permit # 9 zoci/,o DSA # Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other __ Prestress Conc J :t:::tnL __ Fireproofing __ Pile Driving ~ Nan-Destructive ~ Batch Plant __ Soils Technician __ Mechanical ~ Electrical __ Roofing __ Waterproofing ~ DSA __ OSHPD __ Specially L Bolt PuII-Out MAT'L SAMPLING QTY ~ Soil __ __ ~ase ~ __ Subgrade __ __ Concrete Cylinders ~ __ Conc Flex Beams __ __ Reinf. Sleei ~ __ Tendon (PT Strands) ___ __ Moltar Sampl0s ~ __ Grout Samples __ ~ Masonry Prisms __ __ Asphaif Concrete __ __ Masonry Block __ __ Steel ~ __ H.S. Bolls __ Fireproofing __ __ Roofing ~ __ Other ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~ Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rinf.: Rebar __ Rinf.: Y/.W.F. __ Rinf.: Tendons __ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Moltar: Typdpsi __ Units: Block ~ Units' Block __ Steel ~ H.S. Boils __ Metal Decking __ Electrodes ~ Fireproofing __ Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST / Plans _\L Specifications __ Sires __ Stump __ Air Content __ Temperature ~ Unit Weight ~ Consolidation __ Electrode Storage __ __ Torque Applied __ Load (Pounds) __ Thickness J "S27Ci c, rrrn'0h) StROJ~ T,m - l5po.z L1 ~ Carrecsve action required __ __ Corrections completed __ - f./- ALL Ti/GVflD fld IWS~TALLF~\ - n ea'c er e+,=/ 1 eku Rpn m S<;en+ b.-.QcG-tr. NU srcrrc.-r-r,-~~ weLhjuL B-J KP~LY ZM, 2 c-Le.#-E jJOP-. / // Field Representative CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless othewise stated, is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME d (TON V/doCooEL/ CERT. NO q-8 SRAIi),dC 0 I I (Print Clearly) INSPECTORS SIGNATURE , DATE /f,h7./?? (srs)-7r5-5sw AlUNTtCCIlY*R.NWAY*ORUNDO* TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619) 7155810 SlUlDlEW*Fl.UUDERDaLE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST FIELD DIMENSIONS 7 13434 11/18/98 6x12 28 13435 12/9/98 6x12 IDENTITY LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65. BUILDING I1 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR SPUR CONCRETE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER N/A BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO. N/A 181 7 ASTON AVE SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR GROUT c] HS GROUT c] PRISMS~ OTHER TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (sq. inches) (W STRENGTH (psi) 28.27 75,500 2670 28.27 126,000 4460 PLACEMENT DATE 1 1 /I 1/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB N/A SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK W/POZZ TYPE OF CEMENT N/A TICKET NO. 241353 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 3.5" MIXING TIME (MIN) 1 HR. 17MIN. PERCENT AIR N/A CONC TEMP (OF) N/A AIR TEMP.(OF) N/A DESIGN STRENGTH (f '3 PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 12- LABORATORY DATA I 28 I 13436 I 12/9/98 1 6x12 I 28.27 I 125,500 I 4440 I I H I 13437 I 1/6/99 I I I I DISC I ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. REVIEWED BY R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: I I6 190 CHECKED BY: DATE: \ z/\d ATLANTIC CITY*RAWAY 'ORUNW' (619)-715-5800 TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FAX 619 7j5-5810 SANDlEGO.Fl.LAUDERD~LE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSEAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT65, BUILDING II PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS 1817 ASTON AVE CONTRACTOR SPUR CONCRETE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER N/A BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 HS GROUT PRISMSO OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 11/11/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB N/A SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOZZ TYPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO. 241 343 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 4" MIXING TIME (MIN) 1 HR. 20MIN. PERCENT AIR N/A CONC TEMP (OF) NIA AIR TEMP.(OF) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'J PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT ~- PANEL 6 - LABORATORY DATA I FIELD I I 1 DIMENSIONS 1 TEST AREA 1 MAXIMUM LOAD 1 COMPRESSIVE I IDENTITY I LAB NO. LDATE TESTED I (inches) I (sq. inches) 1 (IW 1 STRENGTH (psi) 20.27 I QC nnn I 301 0 1 28 I 13431 I 12/9/98 I 6x12 1 28.27 I 13( , I 4740 I 1 28 I 13432 I 12/9/98 I 6x12 1 28.27 I 134,000 1 I I I I I I I I 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAYS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 . DATE: k\ [[a (48 DATE: .{% ,,b Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. .. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 Page 1of - SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT General /Subcontractor /(EL A, /%A- C,74/Sd /,LJ /SPUR &LJnJ//. led Ja 3 Building Permit # 924 9 6 /?I/99d Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other DSA # INSPECTION - Concrete - Prestress Conc - Masonry - Str~ct Steel - Fireproaling __ Pile Driving - Non-Destruclive __ Batch Plant ~ Soils Technician __ Mechanical - Eiectrical ~ Bolt PuII-Out - Roofing __ Waterproofing - DSA MAT’L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil ~ - Base ~ ~ Subgrade - - Asphalt Concrete ___ ~ Concrete Cylinders __ - Conc Flex Beams - - Reinf. Steel __ - Tendon (PT Strands) - ~ Monar Samples __ __ Groul Samples - ~ Masonry Prisms - ~ Masonry Block __ - Steel __ - H.S. Bolts - ~ Fireproofing - ~ Roofing __ __ Other MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi - Conc.: Mix #/psi ~ Rinf.: Rebar - Rinf.: W.W.F. - Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout: Mix #/psi - Monar: Typelpsl - Units: Block - Units: Block __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts - Metal Decking - Electrodes __ Fireprooling ~ Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST ___ Plans - Specilicatlons - Sizes ~ Slump - Air Content - Temperature ~ Unit Weight __ Consolidation - Electrode Storage - - Torque Applied __ Load (Pounds) __ Thickness - Carreceve aclion required- - Carreciions completed __ INSPECTOR’S SIGNATURE ATLANTIC CIlY*RLHWAY 'ORLANDO* (61 9)-715-5800 TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO 715-5810 SANDlEGO*FT LAUDERDALE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65, BUILDING I1 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR SPUR CONCRETE ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER N/A BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO. NIA 181 7 ASTON AVE SAMPLE DATA ucDnDr nE I\LI VI\, VI CONCRETE MORTAR GROUT HS GROUT c] PRISMSO OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 1111 1/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB NIA SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOZZ TYPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO. 241 343 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 4" MIXING TIME (MIN) 1 HR. 20 MIN. PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP (OF) NIA AIR TEMP.(OF) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f '3 PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT __- PANEL 6 LABORATORY DATA I I I I I I I I 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY S COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CHECKED BY: DATE: ' la\ \b(q$ - REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: \Z\!S kg (6, 9)-715-5800 ATldNTlC CW-RAWAY*ORUIIDO* TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619) 715-5810 WDIECO.FT LAUOERDALE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST DATE TESTED 11118/9a I z1919a 12/9/98 1/1/99 PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65, BUILDING I1 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS 1817 ASTON AVE CONTRACTOR SPUR CONCRETE ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER N/A BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR GROUT 0 HS GROUT PRISMSO OTHER DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (inches) (sq. inches) (W STRENGTH (psi) 6 x 12 28.27 80,000 2830 6x12 28.27 128,500 4550 6x12 28.27 130,500 4620 DISC PLACEMENT DATE 1 1 /I 1198 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB NIA SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOZZ TYPE OF CEMENT N/A TICKET NO. 108863 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 4" MIXING TIME (MIN) 1 HR. 4MIN. PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP (OF) NIA AIR TEMP.(OF) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'J PSI ~- 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 4 LABORATORY DATA 13426 - 13428 I I I I I I I I ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TESTMETHODS. 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. PUP CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 ATMTIC CIM*RMVJAY*ORM00. (61 9)-715-5800 TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FAX 619 715-5810 SANDlEGO.FT LAUDERDALE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS 1815 ASTON AVE CONTRACTOR SPUR CONC ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. 981998 PLAN FILE NO. NIA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR GROUT HS GROUT PRISMSO OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 10/29/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 10/30/98 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOZZ TYPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO. 240586 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 3.5" MIXING TIME (MIN) 40 PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP (OF) 76 AIR TEMPfF) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'J PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT __- PANEL 3 FIELD IDENTITY LAB NO. DATE TESTED 7 12754 11/5/98 28 12755 11/26/98 28 12756 11/26/98 5 12757 11/3/98 DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psi) (inches) (sq. inches) (IW 6x12 28.27 95,000 3360 6x12 28.27 132,500 4690 6 x 12 28.27 132,500 4690 6x12 28.27 79,500 2810 *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: lZ( $5 \qS CHECKED BY: DATE: ' { ?h/T/?b (61 9)=H 5-5800 ATTUNTIC CIW*R.WWAY'ORL*NDO * TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DlEOO FAX (619) ,155810 SIWDlEGO*FT UUDEROUE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST FIELD IDENTITY LAB NO. 7 13265 28 13266 PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65. BUILDING I1 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS 1817 ASTON AVE CONTRACTOR SPUR CONCRETE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO. N/A SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 HSGROUT PRISMS OTHER DIMENSIONS TEST AREA (sq. MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DATE TESTED (inches) inches) (W (PSI) 3040 11/13/98 6x12 28.27 12/4/98 6x12 28.27 128.500 4550 86,000 PLACEMENT DATE 1 1/6/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 11/9/98 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOU TYPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO. 320380 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 3 1/2 MIXING TIME (MIN) 50 PERCENT AIR N/A CONC TEMP (OF) 75 AIR TEMP.('F) N/A I DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'c) PSI LOCATION OF PLACEMENT I 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH =I6 BmNG # 2 LABORATORY DATA 1 28 I 13267 1 12/498 I 6x12 I 28.27 I 132,000 1 4670 I I H I 13268 1 1/1/99 I I I I DISC I CHECKED BY REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: lZ( L5\* \ Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT PageLof' Project Name TESD Project # q()i qww Plan File # OSHPD # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION 2 concrete k4w- Prestress Conc - Masonry __ struct Steel ~ Fireproofing Pile Driving - Nan-Destructive __ Balch Piant __ Soils Technician __ Mechanical - Electrical __ BO11 PuIi-oUl __ Rooting ~ OSA - OSHPO - Specialty Waterprooling MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil __ Base __ Subgrade __ __ Asphalt Concrete __ __ Concrete Cylinders __ __ Conc Flex Beams __ __ Reinf. Steel __ __ Tendon (PT Slrands) __ __ Monar Samples __ __ Groul Samples __ __ Masonry Prisms __ __ Masonry Block __ __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ __ Fireproofing __ __ Roofing __ __ Other __ __ __ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION __ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #/psi __ Conc.: Mix #psi 2 Rinf.: Rebar k6fT 6f2. b __ Rinf.: W.W.F. __ Rinf.: Tendons __ Grout: Mix #/psi __ Monar: Typelpsi __ Units: Block __ Units: Black __ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Metal Decking ___ Electrodes __ Fireproofing __ Other ~~~~~ INS ECTION CHECKLIST Plans Specifications Sizes __ Slump __ Air Content __ Temperature - Unit Weight __ Consolidation ___ Electrode Storage __ __ Torque Applied __ Load (Pounds) __ Thickness 2 __ Cerrec6ve ac#oon required- __ Corrections completed __ A Field Representative -. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of my knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise statewn conformance with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. CERT.NO. "UCi';?O~*ecd I (Prinl Clearly) INSPECTOR'S NAME INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE 1 i Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. 7895 CONVOY CT., SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA92111 INSPECTION REPORT Page 1of Project Name , Ism f2.G S&%ifu# Pb -rJk-/7, TESD Project # - Address 1815 MTOd & rb 17 md ELlk& I 4 -2.- mls.&m c4 ' General / Subcontractor h -7Zot-J /SPL)R 6drAm= c Building Permit # qg -/7?f Plan File # OSHPD # DSA # Government Contract # Other INSPECTION \L Concrete __ Prestress Conc ~ Masonry ~ StNCt steei ~ Fireproofing ~ Pile Driving __ Non-Destructive ~ Batch Plan1 ~ Soils Technician __ Mechanical ~ Electrical ~ Boll PuiI-Out __ Roofing __ Waterproofing ~ DSA ~ OSHPD __ Specialty MAT'L SAMPLING QTY __ Soil ~ Base ~ Subgrade __ __ __ Asphalt Concrele Concrete Cylinders ~ Conc Flex Beams ~ __ Reinf. Steel __ ~ Tendon (PT Strands) ~ ~ Mortar Samples ~ __ Grout Samples __ ~ Masonry Prisms ~ ~ Masonry Block ~ ~ Steel ~ ~ H.S. Boils ~ __ Fireproofing __ ~ Roofing ~ __ Other MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 2 Conc.: Mix #/psi 3 91 P X Conc.: Mix #/psi fMzcL __ Conc.: Mix #/psi Rinf.: Rebar &b G6nl ~ Rinf.: W.W.F. ~ Rinf.: Tendons ~ Grout Mix #/psi __ Mortar. Typdpsi __ Units: Block ~ Units: Block ~ Steel __ H.S. Bolts __ Metal Decking ~ Ele~tmdes ~ Fireproofing ~ Other INSPECTION CHECKLIST % Plans 1 Specifications ~ Air Content ~ Temperature __ Unit Weight Consolidatio~ ~ Electrode Storage __ __ Torque Applied ~ Load (Pounds) ~ Thickness ~ Corrdve acton required ~ ~ Carreclions campleled __ with the approved plans and specifications and the workmanship provisions of the applicable code. INSPECTOR'S NAME CERT. NO. &?3Zd6-Jei IN SPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE /[.6 -,ZK ATMTIC CITI*RI\HWAY *ORLANDO. TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO (619)-715-5800 FAX (619 715-5810 SAND1EGO'FT.WJOERDALE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65. BUILDING II PROJECT NO. 9s-402 PROJECT ADDRESS 1817 ASTON AVE CONTRACTOR SPUR CONCRETE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO, NIA SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 HSGROUT 0 PRISMS 0 OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 1 116198 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB 1 1 /9/98 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOZZ NPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO, 320372 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 4 MIXING TIME (MIN) 45 PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP (OF) 75 AIR TEMP.('F) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f'J PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL10 BE#1 LABORATORY DATA ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. 'ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: 28-DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. *L REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS. RCE 56018 DATE: 3 ~EC (9W CHECKED BY: DATE. ATLANTIC CITI*RIHWAY*ORLANW- (61 9)-715-5600 TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO 6,9 7,5-58,0 GANDECO-FT IAUDERDALE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR SPUR CONC ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. 981998 PLAN FILE NO. NIA 181 5 ASTON AVE SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE [7 MORTAR 0 GROUT HS GROUT [7 PRISMSO OTHER PLACEMENT DATE 10129198 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB io130198 SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK WIPOZZ TYPE OF CEMENT NIA TICKET NO. 240605 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 4 MIXING TIME (MIN) 33 PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP (OF) 76 AIR TEMP.(OF) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'c) PSI 3000 @ 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY R. SMITH LOCATION OF PLACEMENT PANEL 13- LAB 0 RATORY DATA ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: TWO 28 DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 6@ DATE: !d -.\.a CHECKED BY: DATE: (61 9)-71 5-5800 ATLANTIC CITi*RAMwA"*ORLI\ND0. TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FAX (619) 715-5810 SANDIEGO'FI UUDERDNE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST FIELD IDENTITY 28 28 PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65 PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR KEETON ARCHITECT1 ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO. N/A 181 5 ASTON AVE SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE 0 MORTAR I7 GROUT c] HS GROUT PRISMSO OTHER DIMENSIONS TEST AREA MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psi) LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) (W 12671 11112198 6x12 28.27 96,000 3400 12672 11/12/98 6x12 28.27 100,000 3540 PLACEMENT DATE 1011 5198 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB NIA SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK TYPE OF CEMENT II TICKET NO. 239789 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 4 314" MIXING TIME (MIN) 44 MIN. PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP (OF) NIA AIR TEMP.(OF) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f '3 PSI 3000 (iol 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY F BELTRAN . . - - - . . .. .. . - m'C' ATINE 7, GB2 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT LABORATORY DATA I 56 I 12673 I 12110198 I I I I I ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. .ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: 28-DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. CHECKED BY: .E, /46& REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: L1\%$ I yY DATE: ,$ [ z5 TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN DIEGO 7895 CONVOY COURT, SUITE 18 SAN DIEGO, CA 921 11 ORDERED BY ~ULL TEST 0 TORQUE TEST FIELD TESTING REPORT P"E NUMBER Date 5-18 1.77 (6, 9)-715-5800 ATLANTICCIN'RWWAY*ORUNDO. TESTING ENGINEERS SAN DIEGO FAX ,619) 715-5810 SANOIEGO-FT LAUOEROALE REPORT OF COMPRESSION TEST PROJECT CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 65, BUILDING II PROJECT NO. 98-402 PROJECT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR KEETON ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER NIA BLDG. PERMIT NO. CB 98-0960 PLAN FILE NO. NIA 181 7 ASTON AVE SAMPLE DATA REPORT OF CONCRETE MORTAR 0 GROUT 0 HS GROUT PRISMS~ OTHER FIELD DIMENSIONS TEST AREA IDENTITY LAB NO. DATE TESTED (inches) (sq. inches) PLACEMENT DATE 1011 5/98 DATE RECEIVED IN LAB N/A SUPPLIER SUPERIOR MIX DESIGN PSI 3000 MIX NUMBER 354P MIX DESCRIPTION 5.4 SK TYPE OF CEMENT II TICKET NO. 239766 ADMIXTURE POZZ SLUMP 3 112" MIXING TIME (MIN) 85 MIN. PERCENT AIR NIA CONC TEMP (OF) NIA AIR TEMP.(OF) NIA DESIGN STRENGTH (f 'J PSI 3000 @? 28 DAYS SAMPLES MADE BY F. BELTRAN LOCATION OF PLACEMENT GRlDD ATNE 4 MAXIMUM LOAD COMPRESSIVE (W STRENGTH (psi) LABORATORY DATA I 7 I 12203 I 10/22/98 I 6x12 I 28.27 I msnn I 2850 I 1 28 I 12204 I 11112198 I 6x12 I 20.27 I 115,000 I 4070 I 1 28 I 12205 1 11/12/98 I 6x12 I 28.27 I 119,000 I 421 0 I I 56 I 12206 I 12110198 I I I I DISC I ALL SAMPLING AND TESTING PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM TEST METHODS. *ACTUAL MEASURED AREA. REMARKS: 20-DAY TESTS COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. eor CHECKED BY: &\ fdbCLQ REVIEWED BY: R. DOUGLAS PROVINS, RCE 56018 DATE: \&l'f[.( DATE: ,/?/qy Corporate Office Branch Office 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A 904 Rancheros Dr., Suite L Anaheim, CA 92806 San Marcos, CA 92069 Tel: (714) 632-2999 Tel: (760) 735-5060 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Fax: (760) 735-8979 PLAN FILE NO I TYPE OF RACTURI REMARKS 4 AIR x UNIT WUQWT PCF CONCRETE TEMP SF AMBl DIT TEMP SF ADMIXTURES Respectfully Submitted, Corporate Oflice 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Sulte A Anaheim, California 82806 A Branch Ofllce 904 Rancheros Orlve, Suite L San Marcos. California 92069 MONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, Inc. ~, . -. . .-. . . .- .__ -. Tal: (714) 632-2999 Tal: (760) 735-5060 SUBMITA COPY WITHYOUR WEEKS REPORTS TESTS REQUIRED Date of Report ICBO CeMcation Number Branch Olfi~, 904 Rancheros Orlve, Suite L San Marcos, Callfornia 92069 HONTANA Testing & Geotechnical, inc. corporate Office 2992 E. La Paima Ave., Suite A Anaheim, California 92806 TESTS REQUIRED: LUNCH PERIOD: Dale of Report ICE0 Cetiiicalion Numbsr _. c#?Z;s &@?County Cariilication Numb% D"... ,m, ~~ ~~. ~~~ ~ ~ EsGil Corporation ln l'artmrship with S;ouemnt for ~ui&fing&afety DATE: May 15, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 0 PLAN REVIEWER FILE SET I1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply H The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Lot 65 with the jurisdiction's building codes. and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. contact person. H Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: Fax #: Mail Telephoy H REMARKS: 1. he electrical plans must be signed. 2. "program" (per UBC Sec. 106.3.5) must be submitted by the designer to the City. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 5/8/98 trnsmtl.dot 9320 ChesapeakeDrive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporatlon In Partnership with ~mnuncnt for 9uiGfiwSafety DATE: April 20, 1998 JURISDICTION : Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 SET I 0 FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes Lot 65 with the jurisdiction's building codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Nogle Onufer Assoc. 2398 San Diego Ave. Also, fax to architect: 297-8055 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: San Diego 921 10 Mail Telephone Fax InPenon 0 REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 4/7/98 trnsrntl.dd 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (619) 560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 Cilsbad 98-960 April 20, 1998 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL "X JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 OCCUPANCY: B/F1 USE: Shell Industrial TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 111-N ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 36,000 (12,000 x 3 (spr.)) SPRINKLERS?: Yes REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 4/3/98 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW ACTUAL AREA: 35,524 STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: -28' OCCUPANT LOAD: "shell" DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 4/7/98 PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1994 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed UQ the recheck process, please note on this list (or a cow) where each correction item has been addressed, Le.. plan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO, 22. GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1594 UBC) wmfowdot ’ Carisbad 98-960 April20, 1998 GENERAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciallindustrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculationsheports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (61 9) 438-1 161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculationsheports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculationsheports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. PLANS All sheets of the plans are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the Plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. Please revise the “F-2” occupancy classification shown on the cover sheet. It is a very restrictive occupancy. Additionally, an occupancy separation would be required if an F-2 was present. Simply show the “F-I” classification only. SITE PLAN Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and and structures on the site plan. .. LOCATION ON PROPERTY When two or more buildings are on the same property, the buildings shall have an assumed property line between them for the purpose of determining the required wall and opening protection and roof cover requirements, per Section 503.1 . Carlsbad 98-960 April20, 1998 GLASS AND GLAZING 6. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. THE DOOFUWINDOW ELEVATIONS DON'T SHOW THIS CORRECTLY. ROOFS 7. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model namelnumber. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. FOUNDATION 8. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (required by the soil report). STRUCTURAL 9. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. 0 REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS * SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE * FIELD WELDING * HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS * EXPANSlONlEPOXY ANCHORS Carkbad 98-960 April 20, 1998 IO. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. Sheet A-3 shows that some of the concrete panels will have displaced concrete due to the roof drains. The structural engineer should review this. On sheet S-I .2, is detail 3lS6 intended to apply on Line 6? On sheet S-I .2, what provides lateral restraint for the top of the column on Line 7 (in the eastlwest direction)? Show rebar, etc. on the panel elevations on sheets S-I .3 and S-1.4. At detail 3IS5, show the weld of the 318" stiffener plate to the bent plate. Show a flare bevel groove weld at detail 8lS5. Provide design to justify the 96" spacing shown at detail 4lS6. Show on the plans all the call outs from the calculations. Dimensions are required on sheet S-I .4 of the plans to verify the assumed panel widths on sheet L3 of the calculations (and elsewhere). Show compliance with UBC Sec. 1914.3.4. Provide a "drag" design for Lines 4 and 6. ADDITIONAL See the following sheets for PME corrections. Please recheck the referencing system used throughout the plans. For example, sheet A-3 refers to detail 8lA7 at Line 7. That detail doesn't exist. There are quite a few other examples of this. Please finish the incomplete notes on sheet A-5, etc. Fill in the empty reference bubble at 51A-6, etc. Caribad 98-960 April 20, 1998 26. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: 27. 0 Yes 0 No The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 61 9/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver Esgil Corporation. Thank you. 28. at + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS + PLAN REVIEWER GlenAdamek 1. 2. 3. PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Correct the building sewer system shown on sheet P-2. As per UPC, Section 312.0 "The drainage system of each new building ... shall be separate and independent from that of any other building and when available, every building shall have an independent connection with a public or private sewer." Provide the complete corrected Site Plumbing plan showing the locations of the water meters, gas meters, and the sizes, routes, slopes, and points of connections of the building sewer, storm drainage systems, site water lines, and site gas lines. Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. Policy 84-35. Carisbad 98-960 April 20, 1998 ENERGY CONSERVATION 4. Clearly note on the plans "Shell building only, no heating or cooling proposed, complete energy designs will be required when heating or cooling equipment is proposed at tenant improvement, including envelope energy designs." Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. + ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW + 1993 NEC 6 PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Show the location of the house panel(s) meterlmain on the electrical room layouts. Note that the pull-section taps are factory installed, field installed per factory specifications (available at the site), or to be certified by a third party (NRTL certified) testing laboratory. Note on the single line diagram that the 100 ampere disconnects shall be labeled as a "Service Disconnecting Means". (Disregard this correction if the tap is behind the service disconnecting means and not from the Utility pull section.) Please specify the wiring methods that will be used at this facility. Local ordinance restricts the use of armored and NM cables to residential uses only. Clearly specify on the electrical plans that AC and NM cable shall not be used as a wiring method. (AC cable may be installed if a full sized equipment grounding conductor is installed interior of the cable). Rebar is not an acceptable grounding electrode for commercial applications in the City of Carlsbad. Please describe what the "UFER' ground will be. ( footage, conductor material and size, depth in footing. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list ( or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. . .. .- - .; . Carlsbad 98-960 AprU 20, 1998 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM I.$lS ASTOd - ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the -t/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the spe+al inspector(s) as Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located s$ed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineerlarchitect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. .L1 r-.d Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation inspection Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI Field Welding High Strength Bolting ExpansionEpoxy Anchors 0 Sprayed-On Fireproofing z 0 Prestressed Concrete 0 Structural Masonry 0 Designer Specified 0 Other 2. Name(s) of individual($) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: A. &d LO ULZl .o r3 e6 / tzo 8 E&&- 8. C. 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: B. Special inspsctDrs shall check in with the Cky and presant Wir credentials for approval Dri(uto beginning work on Uw job site. SIP 4997 ~~ ~ SEP-16-98 UED 09:06 CITY OF CkRLSEhD COM DE FAX NO. 4380894 P.09 ___ e. C. Cblsbad 98-960 April 20, 1998 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. DATE: April20, 1998 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B/F1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 111-N n BUILDING PORTION VALUATION VALUE 1 (per applic.) I I I 0 199 Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: 5 3472.88 0 199 Plan Check Fee by ordinance: 5 2257.37 Type of Review: Complete Review 0 Structural Only (7 Hourly 0 Repetitive Fee Applicable UBC Building Permit Fee UBC Plan Check Fee 0 Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: 5 1805.90 Comments: Sheet1 of 1 rnacvalue.doc 5196 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB qg-740 IJT. - Ru ;\J>fi\ T, 3~,5,~y sf .- .f 67 c7- 2?5--24 - 4 YST. GALUE: 987; 5s7 -15- AS+^,, k. DATE: BUlLDlNGA DRE S: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TM)JFM* I 13 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: Jl?, - I 40 I The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information andlor specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications. must be reviewed by this ofke to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review / Please se attached report of deficiencies marked wB ke necessary corrections to plans or speci s for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans andlor specifications to this oftice for review. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ob QV SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: Property Lines m Easements Sa dhh-d (oMM.\IJ Vt Existing & Proposed Structures Right-of-way Width & Adjacent Streets / North Arrow ,,d Existing Street Improvements ,6 Driveway widths 0 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address C. Legal Description . 6. Assessor's Parcel Number For commerciallindustrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 0 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for qLGw,,Project No. I,. - ,. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 1STx *NO/ 3RDx 0 0 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS @ @ 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: QU A\ 9\%f ' b- **) \ JA $*v( - ,)+. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public fi nI 'i) improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. "Y P ,! r. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 0 0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 *' 0 0 0 0 Q l9 0 El 2ndd 0 0 D D 3d' 0 0 0 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: Please return 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaqed or defective imorovements found adiacent to buildinq site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Write "No Grading" on plot plan if none is required. 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Gradinq Permit must be issued and rouqh srading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Buildinq Permit. ,%\ Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may 'be required even MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS D 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: BUILDING PIANCHECK CHECKLIST 1stJ 2nd' 3M a 0 0 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 0 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can LJ\ 11 SP r b~=kp( +cxGqT) f"oseprovide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is 1 *?f-*'htl 6r on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722. extension 153, for QC cyvcr assistance. c/o Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. @ 0L p+c., Lor sp lo' a a 2. 0 Required fees are attached /" 0 Nofeesrequired @ @ & 13. Additional Comments: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 0 Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: fJ$+bh Ad. Bldg. Permit NO. cz 98-460 Prepared by: .?:CLC Date: y);?q,hr Checked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ~drPhL)Uu? Sq. Ft./Units: 3s y2.f EDU's: 7. 10 ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: HffhoJa Sq. Ft./Units: 3x 5 24 ADT's: /78 FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FACILITIES E REQUIRED: 0 NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFD: &(no bridge &thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Feel 0 NO wl . PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA: X NO. UNITS: =$ @,UNITS: 17% X FEVADT: 22 =$ ,7414 &. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT'slUNITS: X FEE/ADT: UNIT/SQ.FT.: 3 5 q2Lf X FEE/SO.FT./UNlT ' A. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. gg 746 72 EDU's: 7- 10 X FEEIEDU: 1: $24 7,012 BENEFIT AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN: r@ 31 EDU's: 7. (0 X FEEIEDU: 946 =$ K. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA niGn /LOW ACRES. X FEEIAC. =$ w. SEWER LATERAL l$2.500\ TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES+: $ 36: 1q7 *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\~OCS\MISF~~MS\RPO~~?FRH REV 01/22/97 i T- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 D Address: If(( A$%P. Bldg. Permit No. c6? 98-460 Prepared by: 'D. 7:CU Date: 4 /q,ht Checked by: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: &J&rf hUVd Sq. Ft./Units: 35: rJq EDU's: 7, io Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. OAY Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Date: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: p?ffhUJJ-e- Sq. FtJUnits: 3% f 24 ADT's: 17s' FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FACILITIES E REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: &(no bridge & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO (See Building Depanment for amount1 0 NO Wl. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA: X NO. UNITS: =$ @,UNITS: 17% x FEwADT: JZ &. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT'sRINlTS: X FEWADT: UNITISCLFT.: 3% SI4 x FEUSQ.FT.IUNIT: Ed. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. 5f5 lL EDU'S: 70 10 X FEUEDU: I! $24 =$ BENEFIT AREA: F DRAINAGE BASIN: r@ 3 EDU's: 7. 10 x FEUEDU: 996 =$ & SEWER LATERAL ($2,5001 =$ ,M &. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA HIGH /LOW ACRES: X FEUAC: =$ TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ 36; I L17 *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. SEP-15-9- 07:0B FROPI: KEETON CONSTRUCTlON ID: 6197449330 6Lf--I9-7= TIOU LI:Z* 1I.CHCDW~LC LMNV aURVEI6 907 *UI %444 -. CALDWELL.LAND SURVEYS 13N AVENIDA -A. MN JACUVTO, CA. 9wO min-rua i6, losl . PACE 4 *-Sa 07.09 FROM: KEETON CONSTRUCTION ID: 6197449330 .... ._ ........ a - SOGEJ’ San Diego Gas & Electric An Enova Company P0.BOX 1831 ~SANDIEGO,CA92112-4150.619/6%-2WO June 29,1998 Mr. T. Lawrence Jett, Manager Royal Village LLC P.O. Box 9672 Rancho Santa Fe. CA 92067 FILE NO. LETTER OF PERMISSION FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS Dear Mr. Jett: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) is the owner of a twenty foot (20’) Gas Transmission Easement located in and around the following legal description; Carlsbad Tract No. 85-24 Unit 4, (Carlsbad Research Center), being a subdivision of a portion of Lot F of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to and as shown on partition map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said county, November 16, 1896. (SDG&E Right of Way No. 81509) Recorded September 24, 1983 as Document No. 83-343293. We have reviewed the precise grading plans for LOT 65 OF Carlsbad Tract No. 85-24 Map No. 1181 1, received May 4, 1998, dated April 9,1998, revised June 25, 1998, which shows the proposed grading and improvements on the property subject to our easement, attached hereto as Exhibit ‘A’. Permission is hereby granted to Royal Village LLC, to grade within the SDG&E 20’ easement, grading is subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. i This permit to grade shall be effective for six (6) months from the date of this letter. This letter is subject to Royal Village LLC, obtaining the necessary grading and improvement permits from the City of Carlsbad. At least twenty-four (24) hours notice, whether by telephone, telefax or otherwise, must be given to SDG&E before start of work or making field changes to plans within said easement. Notice is to be given to the undersigned. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. A representative of SDG&E must be invited with at least forty-eight (48) hours prior notice, whether by telephone, telefax or otherwise, to any ore-construction meetings held before the start of construction. This letter shall not be construed as approval of any field changes. Specific approval of any changes within SDG&E easements must be obtained from SDG&E. All applicable laws and regulations of local, state and federal governments and their agencies shall be complied with. All disturbed and created slopes, within the SDG&E gas transmission easement, shall be hydroseeded or planted with an SDG&E approved mix. Erosion control measures shall be designed and implemented and maintained through the normal rainy season for San Diego County. Landscape and electrical plans are to be submitted to SDG&E Real Estate Operation Department for review prior to construction. No trees or shrubs will be allowed within the 20’ gas easement. No light standards or irrigation controllers will be allowed within 20’ wide easement. A minimum of three feet (3’) of cover shall be maintained over the 20” transmission gas line at all times during construction. SDG&E shall not be responsible in any manner for any maintenance or repair of the proposed grading or improvements. The Cathodic test station at the westerly end of project at the proposed curb line, will require relocation out of the parking space to maintain 24 hour access. Notice to be given to Bob Millard @ 619-696-4145 when location is at subgrade. All utility crossings including the two eight inch water lines will maintain a minimum of 18” vertical separation. Royal Village LLC, shall indemnify and hold SDG&E harmless from any and all injuries or damage to persons or property in any way arising from the proposed grading or construction of improvements. -3 Royal Village LLC, agrees to sign and have signed all consent agreements between SDG&E and any agencies who encroach upon the twenty foot (20’) gas easement. Royal Village LLC, agrees to keep access open to SDG&E facilities 24 hours a day during construction. All security gates erected by Royal Village LLC, or contractors for Royal Village LLC, shall be required to have SDG&E locks installed. crcd5.doc 17. 18. 19. Final signed, approved plans must be submitted to Mr. Robert Millard, Senior Field Engineering Rep. of our gas Engineering Department, by calling (619) 696-4145, a minimum of 15 working days before commencing any grading or construction within SDG&E’s prior easement. The contractor shall be responsible to contact “Underground Service Alert” (USA) at 1- 800-422-4133, at least 48 hours prior to grading or construction of their pipeline to schedule an SDG&E “standby” when working within SDG&E’s easement. The proposed excavation will cross SDG&E’s 20” (800 PSI) gas transmission line, in order to comply with Federal & State Safety regulations, the SDG&E “standby” will be responsible for enforcing the following safety precautions below, and are authorized to halt the ercavation if these precautions are not followed: The excavator shall carefully HAND DIG within Z-feet of the pipeline. - NO power operated equipment shall be allowed within 2 feet of any portion of the natural gas pipeline. If ANY contact of the pipe is made, even if there is no visible damage, the contact area must be immediately inspected by an SDG&E welding inspector. This may significantly delay your job if shoring or other safety precautions are needed to allow the inspection. This permission letter shall be posted on the job site at all times. 20. Should you have any questions or require additional assistance, please call me at (619) 696-2738. Property Management Representative &4* oyalVi age T. Lawrence Jek, Manger I ACCEPT THE AFOREMENTIONED CONDITIONS: By: T. L&ence Jett crc-6S.doc NORCALENGINEERING May 8. 1898 562 799 9459 05/08 ‘98 12:17 N0.737 01 NorCal Engineering Soils and Gcotc~hnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562)799-9460 Fax (562)799-9459 Project Number 7101-98 Nwle Onufer Associates Architects 2398 San Diqo Avenue San Diego. California 921 10 Attn.: Mr. Joseph Holasek RE: Revtcw of Building Plans - Proposed Calsbad Research Center - Located at the Southeast Corner of College boulevard and Aston Avenue - Lot 65 - Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Holasek: Pursuant to your request, this firm has reviewed your latest structural and grading plans dated May 7, 1998 tor the above referenced proJect. The plan is acceptable for the proposed bevelopment and conforms with recommendations provided in our geotechnical report dated December 5, 1897. We appreciate this opportunity to be of ServIC. to you. It you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, /- , *!.OFi NORCAL ENGINEERING & L) Scott D. Spensiero Project Manager May 21,1998 Lany Jett P.O. Box 9672 Rancho Santa Fe, Ca 92067 SUBJECT: CB 98-960 - Lot 65 of Carlsbad Research Center (1815 Aston Ave.) Dear Mr. Jett: Per our recent telephone conversation and by reference of the aforementioned building plans, we agreed that the driveway proposed on Aston Avenue nearest the intersection of College and Aston Avenue may be designed without restricting ingress and egress to a right-idright-out circulation. This agreement was made with the understanding that if and when the future road to abut the south end of the property is constructed, this road will provide an additional means of access to Lot 65. You agreed that you will connect a driveway to this future road when access is available and concurrently redesign and reconfigure access to the driveway nearest the intersection of College and Aston to a right-idright-out design only. Plans and permit applications for the creation and alterations of these driveways must be submitted and approved by the City before work can commence. If you have any questions, please contact David Rick at 438-1 161 ext. 4324 or myself at ext. 4333. Sincerely, Robert J. W&ik Principle City Engineer c: David Rick, Engineering Technician Buiding Permit file 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 431-5769 @ Date: July 7, 1998 To: Mr. T. Lawrence Jett P.O. Box 9672 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 RE: Permission to grade on property located at 1815, 1817, and 1819 Aston Avenue and more particularly described as Lot 65 of Carlsbad Tract No. 85-24, Unit No. 4, in the City of Carlsbad, according to map 1 18 1 1, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County., May 19, 1987. In accordance with Building Plan CB 98-960, on file with the City of Carlsbad Building Department, the City finds that (1) a grading permit is not required for grading of the aforementioned property per Section 15.16.060(A)(8) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and that (2) all issues from all departments concerned have been satisfied regarding said application for building permit with the exception of obtaining graded pad certification. Therefore, authorization is hereby granted to Mr. T. Lawrence Jett, property owner of the above described property, to grade said property in conformance with Building Plan CB 98-960. As a condition of said grading, the person or company doing the grading shall maintain all safety and erosion control measures until the grading work is complete and stabilized against erosion in accordance with City Standards. Sincerely, Robert J. Wojcik, P.E. Principle Civil Engineer c: Engineering Department - Inspection Division Building Department - Inspection Division @ 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1161 - FAX (619) 438-0894 SEP-IS-SB 07~08 FROM: KEETON CONSTRUCTION ID: 6137443330 SEf-bT^78 VIVN b7zZ4 Vl.LCLDWLCC LHNE 8URVEYS 90- TV. VC11 PAGE 2 r r -04 CALDWELL'LAND SURVEYS KEETON CONSTRUCTION CO. 334 Rancheros DrIva, SUM 110 8rin Yarce8, CI. 02000 ' IO: 6197449330 SEP-15-98 07:08 FROM: KEETON CONSTRUCTION -... - PAGE 3 SEP-15-96 . .. . PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST k., k 3 3 3 Plan CheckNo. CB ym 9b0 Address 181 skill 6L /LrtL.s CRC tG9lkdJ-l Phone (61 9) 438-1 161, extension 452s' I Planner mi/m/~ APN: 2-12 -(Lo -I/ Type of Project & Use: &A IS \ . Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: C!-M General Pian: Fz Facilities Management Zone: Date of participation: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by Remaining net dev acres: Clrcle One AAA ma9 G2Z 0"; .)(x rr PYP this permit: ) ccc Item Incomplete - Needs your action NO\( - TYPE YES - m2m bah Leaend: Item Complete @ 0 c] Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions whtch require actibn. Conditions of Approval: TYPE - 17 Discretionary Action Required: YES __ NO APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: PRE 4Y-02- Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions whlch require action. Conditions of Approval: c rnk& @ 0 17 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES- NO& - CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES- NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES- NO Coastal Permit Determination Log #: If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. @ 0 0 lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES ~ (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (Enter CB #; UACT; NEXT12; Construct housing YIN; Enter Fee Amount (See fee schedule for amount): Return1 Site Plan: 9 0 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: [7 0 1. Setbacks: Front: ad' b Required 30' Shown > 30' Street Side: (Mc) Required 2 0' Shown 3-50' Interior Side: Required 0 Shown 6 Rear: Required Shown @ 0 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: N/)+ Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required Structure separation: Required 0 3. Lot Coverage: a 0 0 4. Height: mlnlhy Shown 37 '/* Y Required Required 35' ktm Shown 2 g' @n 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required 400 e %a Shown 331 0 Guest Spaces Required bpiy pAwk &zs,Shown g'(o ( ?? MW) \ - Additional Comments 5,eC -&&CAY&. 5Pfz fL4 mmh- &fa S-76- ??- OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER E. I I I PLAN CHECK REVIEW CB980960 (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CONTINUED) 7-I?-98 &I& ,/ Provide a biological analysis and vegetation map for the areas of off-site grading and WQ include areas immediately adjacent to the proposed slopes. Include a survey of the California Gnatcatcher. See &&a - h off >[& r.-&2 ppv obtained from the City. p/A /. if off-site grading impacts any Coastal Sage or Chaparral, a 4(d) permit must be ,d The project will require approval of a Hillside Development Permit for the proposed off-site grading. p//s. / As we discussed, if off-site grading can be eliminated through the use of a retaining wall items 1,2 and 3 will not apply. if the slope to be retained does not exceed 15 feet and 40% gradient, then d The maximum height for retaining walls is 6 feet. The proposed walls exceeding this height shall be redesigned as terraced walls or crib walls with landscape for screening. Shell buildings which do not provide parking at the rate of 11250 s.f. must have a ' deed restriction placed on the property which limits the uses based on the number of spaces provided. Contact me for the form. - or HAV. d- pc C*;b Ud( ib 1s' t + ~LLJ p.o(oWJ h% 1 ph'Kfld 66 aM-4 5d * 7 A maximum of25% ofthe parking may be compact spaces. / Is it possible to design the slope along College without a retaining wall? Will the wall be used for si age7 The wall is not shown on the landscape plan. Please clarify. oK.tfg=J.' Landscape plans must be submitted to the Engineering Department and must be approved prior to issuance of building permits. #Signs require separate permits. ,Jd Any proposed roof equipment will require screening PLAN CHECK REVIEW CB980960 (SECOND PLAN CHECK 5/26/98) 1. Please verify the number of parking spaces proposed for the site. I count 213 standard, 8 h.c., and 73 compact for a total of 294. Sheet A-1 shows 307 spaces. 2. Provide a theoretical breakdown of the uses within the building. The proposed uses may not exceed the number of parking spaces provided on the site. 3. Please submit a deed restriction to be recorded against the property which limits the use of the building based on the number of parking spaces provided. The draft deed restriction shall be submitted for review by the City Attorney. 4. Reduce the height of the retaining wall to 6 feet maximum. 5. Any roof equipment screening will require approval by the Planning Director. 98130 Fire Department . Bureau of Prevention City o f 'Carlsbad Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Thursday, May 21 I 1998 Contact Name Nogle Onuffer ASSOC. Reviewed by: Address 2398 San Diego Avenue City, State San Diego CA 921 10 Bldg. Dept. No. CB980960 Job Name Job Address 181 5 Aston Ste. or Bldg. No. Planning No. Lot 65 Carl. Ind. Cn Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. 0 Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans andlor specifications to this office for review. For Fire Deoartment Use Onlv ~ Review 1 st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD JON 98130 File# - ~ ~ ~ ~ 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 931-2121 981 30 . Bureau of Prevention City of Carlsbad Fire Department Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Friday, April 17, 1998 Contact Name Nogle Onuffer ASSOC. Reviewed by: Address 2398 San Diego Avenue City, State San Diego CA 921 10 Bldg. Dept. No. CB980960 Planning No. Job Name Lot 65 Carl. Id. Cn Job Address 1815 Aston Ste. or Bldg. No. 0 Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessaty to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1 st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD Job# 98130 File# - 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92008 * (619) 931-2121 ~~ ~~ , A 2 ZED Structural Engineers JOB 96 00 9 Le7 7920 Mikamar Rd 1127 i San Deigo Ca 92126 (619) 549-6996 CONTENTS : DESIGN LOADS ..................................... D1 --> D2 ROOF FRAMING ..................................... R1 --> R3 COLUMN DESIGN .................................... C1 --> C1 WALL DESIGN ...................................... W1 --> W6 FOOTINGS ......................................... F1 --> F2 LATERAL ANALYSIS ................................. L1 --> L12 SPECIAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN ........................ SS1 --> SS -~ GOVERNING CODES : _____________-___ _________________ UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ............................. 1994 AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (318-83) .............. 1983 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTORS MANUAL ... 9TH EDITION $ . DESIGN CRITEREA : --__-----________ -___---__________ 1- SEISMIC ZONE :4 3 2- WIND EXPOSURE . SlBtl 3- MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE : 2,000 PSF CONT FTG 2,500 PSF PAD FTG 4- MATERIALS & DESIGN STRESSES (U.0.N) : ! , .,. I.. - FRAMING LUMBER : DOUGLAS-FIR LABCH (NORTH) - BOLTED CONNECTIONS : STEEL FRAMING : A325-N - STRUCTURAL STEEL : A36 (FY = 36 KSI) - REINFORCING STEEL : #4 & SMALLER ASTM 615 (FY = 40 KSI) #5 & LARGER ASTM 615 (FY = 60 KSI) ALL OTHERS : (F'C = 3,000 PSI) WOOD FRAMING : A307 7 CONCRETE : SLAB ON GRADE : (F'C = 2,500 PSI) 5- BASIC LIVE LOADS : ROOF FLOORS : BALCONIES CORRIDORS LIVING SPECIAL r - t LO7 #. CS 01 OF AR 0 DATE 3- 7- 9B Jon ?r SHEET NO A-ZED Struc~ral Engineering Consult.nts CALCULATEDnv CHECKED nv 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 (819) 549-6996 , . ..! . . ......... ...~... .. .. . . ~ ..I.. - JoBL2Z.@t- b7 kJ 65 A-ZED struaunl ewimcring condtw WEE1 NO 02 OF CALCULATEDW &A f3 DATE .? - 7-38 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 CHECKED ny - DATE (819) 549-6998 La7 #65 ' CALCULATEDBY- DATC 3 -- 7 9& . ... A-ZED Stnrctunl Engineer& Coasultlnts WEE1 NO. AI OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Diego, CA 92128 CHECKED nv __ DATE '' (819) 549-8998 8CALE :, ., mnac Lo7 ;# 6.5 A-ZED ~tnraud eqinCeri6 Consultants San Dlego. CA 92126 wEEi N0.L OF 1215 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDBY kA47 DATE 2- 7- 90 ..-. CHECKED nv DATE (619) 549-6996 Lo7 #65 \c A-ZED smruaunl ~nginceru;p consultants (JHEET NO 441 OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED DATE 3 - I o - 9 a San Dlego. CA 92128 CHECUED 111 - DATE 1618b 549-6998 - . .I I .... + ....... L I i ... I ..... ,. i ! i ... ,. ...... ,.. ..I.. .... ....~. . ..I. ... ,, ! i ...I. .. i ..... ..... ..... j ........ Ld7 # GS A-ZED Structural Engineering Condtmts OHEET NO. OF 1215 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED~YA~~ DATE 3- 7-98 CHECKED BY - DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 ... ....... ~ ..,.... I' ntl. : CARLSBA~, r % Job#- Dwnr: AMAD DOUDAR Me: 1:WPM. I APR 98 bmrlp(lon: TYPICAL CONC TILT-UP PANEL Tilt-UD Wall Panel Design p.ge tb. Description TYPICAL PANEL AT FRONT AND BACK OF BLDG SUPPORTING PURLIN LOADS. Clear Height 25.000 fl fc 3,000.0 psi Seismic Zona 4 Parapet Height 0.000 fl FY 60,000.0 psi Min Vert Steel % 0.0020 Thickness Phi 0.900 Min Horiz Steel % 0.0012 i Parapet Does Not Reduce Momen Wall Seismic Factor 0.3000 Parapet Seismic Factor 0.3000 Bar Size Bar Spacing Bar Depth Max Defl. Ratio 150.0 LL (L. ST Not Combined Concrete Weight Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 method ... Deflections are Iterated Width 12.000 in Base Fixity 0% 145.00 pcf Loads I Lateral Loads Vartlcal Loads Wind Load 15.000 psf Uniform DL 390.00 Wfl Uniform LL 6CO.00 Wfl -' PohtLoad ibs ... eccentricity 5.750 in ... height R ... load type Seismic Concentric DL Wfl Concentric LL Wfl ... distance to top fl ... distance to bot fl Seismic "I" Magnifier 1.000 ... load type Seismic Wind "I" Magnifler 1.000 i Lateral Load Wfl , .. 1 Wall Analysis I For Factored Load Stresses For Service Load Deflect ionp WId Selsmlc w Basic Defl w/o P-Delta 1.321 0.152 in 0.205 0.121 in Basic M w/o P-Delta 36,071.5 19,125.4 in# 25,785.3 15,206.1 in# Moment Excess of Mcr 17.21 3.5 0.0 in# 0.0 0.0 in-# Max. P-Deita Deflection 4.805 0.154 in. 0.207 0.123 In Max P-Delta Moment 46,003.2 19,385.5 in-# 26,072.3 15,388.1 in# Maximum Allow Vertical Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : SEISMIC 18.000 in Maximum Allow Horizontal Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : WIND 18.000 in SQhIk .. . Using: UBC Sec. 1814.0 meth od... Deflections am Iterated Factorad Load Bending : Seismic Load Governs Selvica Load Deflection : Seismic Load Governs Maximum iterated Moment : Mu 46,003.21 in# Maximum Iterated Deflection ' 0.207 in Moment Capacity 53,496.01 in# Deflection Limit .. , Seismic Wind Mn Phi : Moment Capacity 53,496.01 In# 52,463.27 In# Applied Mu @ Mid-Span 46,003.21 In# 19,365.48 In# Applied: Mu @Top of Wall 7,969.50 in-# 2,354.62 In-# Actual Deflection Ratio . . .. Max Iterated Service Load Dalection 0.21 in 1,449 : 1 Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0079 0.0079 Allowable Max. Reinf. Percent = 0.5 Rho Bel 0.0128 Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Allowable Axial Stress = 0.4 ' fm 0.0128 17.07 psi 120.00 psl (c) 1983-97 ENERCALC c:kanerCak\98009.nw KW-WX610, V5.0.2.1-J~l697 .. me : CARLSBA~ T m Jobn#$mW Dqnr: AMAD DOUDAR Date: 1:50PM. 1 APR 93 brdm: NPlCAL CONC TILT-UP PANEL w- SCopr : L Tilt-Up Wall Panel Design 1 Analysis Data .- page 2 - . -" 1 E 3,122,018.6 psi n = Esl Ec 9.29 Fr = 273.86 psi Ht I Thk Ratio 41.38 Value8 for Mn C8icuiatlon... .. As:eff= [Pu:tot + AsFyYFy a : (AsFy + Pu)/(.85 fc b) c =a I .85 lgross lcracked I-eff (ACi methods only) ,. ... Phi: Capacity Reduction Mn = As:eff Fy (d - an) I Seismic 0.345 in 0.676 in 0.795 in 381.078 in4 21.30 In4 0.00 in4 0.900 69,440.01 in4 Sgross Mcr = S FI 105.125 in3 28.789.7 in4 Rho: Bar Reinf Pct 0.0214 Wind 0.336 in 0.659 in 0.775 in 381.08 In4 20.98 in4 0.00 In4 0.900 58,292.52 in-# I Additionai Values I Seismic Wind Loads used for 8naiy.l~ F&Od LO48 Wail Weight 87.604 psf Wail Wt Wall Seismic Factor 26.281 psf Applied Axial Load 546.00 409.50 Wft Wall Wt Parapet Seismic Factor 26.281 psf Lateral Wail Weight 1,533.07 1.149.80 Wft Total Lateral Loads 2,079.07 1,559.30 Wft Service Applied Axial Load Service Wt @ Max Mom Total Service Mal Loads -. . 390.00 Wft 1,095.05 Wft 1.485.05 ;Mlt 1 ACI Factors (per ACI. applied internally to entered loads) I ACI 9-1 a 9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7 "1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 a 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7 "0.9" Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 a 9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... seismlc=ST*: 1.100 , .. , , . . ,.. *, A * c:kmkWOD0.w KWMw2810. v5.0.2, 1Jun-1697 (0) 1983.97 ENERCALC i ink : CARL JobcU9802D Ma: 2:24PM. 18 MAR 98 &T#?35 Dsgnr: AMAD DOUDAR OeCrlPtiOn : TYPICAL CONC TILT-UP PANEL scope : I Description PANEL AT HIGH POINTS NEAR RIDGE W1 NO GIRDER LOADING Clear Height 27.000 fl fc 3,000.0 psi Seismic Zone 4 Parapet Height 2.000 fl FY 80,000.0 psi Min Vert Steel % 0.0020 Thickness 7.250 in Phi 0.900 Min Horiz Steel % 0.0012 ' Bar Size Width 12.000 in Base Fixity 0% Bar Spacing -Hc Parapet Weight Counteracts Midd Wall Seismic Factor 0.3000 Bar Depth in Parapet Seismic Factor 0.3000 Max Den. Ratio 150.0 LL 8 ST Together Concrete Weight 145.00 pcf Using: UBC See. 1914.0 method ... Deflections are iterated Loads -- Lateral Loads Vertical Lords Wind Load psf Unlform DL Wfl Uniform LL WR ... height n ... load type Seismic Concentric DL WR Concentric LL Wfl Lateral Load WR ... dlstance to top R ... distance to bot n Seismic "I" Magnifier 1.000 ... load type Seismic Wind "I" Magnifler 1.000 Point Load ibs ... eccentricity in I Wall Analysis I For Factored Load Strasses For Service Load Deflections &ig& Wind &&I.& Basic Defl wlo P-Oeita 2.007 O.OO0 in 0.280 0.000 in Basic M w/o P-Delta 39,792.4 0.0 in# 28,423.2 0.0 in# Moment Excess ot Mcr 21.084.5 0.0 in4 0.0 0.0 in# Max. P-Delta Deflection 5.801 0.000 in 0.264 0.000 In Max P-Delta Moment 50,774.2 0.0 in# 28,781.3 0.0 In# Maximum Allow Vertical Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parepet Bar Spacing Raq'd : SEISMIC 18.000 in Maxlmum Allow Horizontal Bar Spacing 18,000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : WIND 18.000 In Wall Design OK 27.00fl clear height, 2.00fl parepel, 7.25in thick with #5 bars at 10.00in on center, d= 3.25111, Pc = 3,000.0ps Factored Load Bending : Seismic Load Governs Service Load Deflection : Seismic Load Governs Maximum Iterated Moment : Mu 50,774.18 in-# Maxlmum Iterated Deflection 0.284 in Moment Capacity 81.577.55 In# Deflection Limit 2.180 in Using: UBC Sac. 1914.0 melh od... Deflections are Iterated .- Mn Phi : Moment Capacity *. Applied: Mu QP MidSpan Applied: Mu @ Top of Wail Selrmk 81,577.55 in-# 50,774.18 In# 883.05 In# Max iterated Servlce Load Deflection 0.26 in 1,228 : 1 Actual Deflection Ratio Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0095 Allowable Max. Reinf. Percent = 0.5 Rho Bai 0.0128 Wlnd 80,883.07 in-# 0.00 in# 0.00 In-# 0.00 in 0 :I 0.0095 0.0128 1 Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Alloweble Axlai Stress = 0.4 tm 15.61 psi 120.00 DSI 15.61 psi 120.00 mi m: CARLS~AL~ JobzlgBo09 Dsgnr: AMAD DOUDAR ~~~~~ : TYPICAL CONC TILT-UP PANEL Me: 2:24PM. 18 MAR 98 scope : - L Tilt-Up Wall Panel Design pe 2 Analysis Data c E 3.122.018.6 psi Sgross 105.125 in3 n = Es / Ec 9.29 Mcr= S Fr 28,789.7 in4 Fr = 273.86 psi Rho: Bar ReinF Pct 0.0214 Ht / Thk Ratio 44.69 Values for Mn Calculation ... Seismic Wind As:eFF= [Pu:tot + AsFyyFy 0.404 in 0.396 In a : (ASFy + Pu)/(.85 fc b) 0.778 in csa1.85 0.931 in 0.913 in lgross 381.078 in4 381.08 in4 lcracked 23.39 in4 23.12 in4 I-eff (ACI methods only) 0.00 in4 0.00 in4 Mn = As:eff Fy (d - an) 66,419.50 in# 67,426.64 in# 0.792 in Phi: Capacity Reduction 0.900 0.900 LAddltlonal Values I Wind ~oads used for rnrlyalr FWod Lords Wail Weight 87.604 pot Seismic Wail Wt Wail Selsmic Factor 28.281 DSF A~~iied Axial Load 0.00 0.00 XM Wail Wt Parapet Seismic Factor 28.281 psF Laieral Wail Weight 1,901.01 1.425.78 #/It Service Applied Axial Load 0.00 un Total Lateral Loads 1,901.01 1,425.78XM Service Wt @ Max Mom Total Service Axial Loads 1,357.86 XM 1,357.86 XM [ ACI Factors (per ACI. applied internally to entered loads) I ACI 9-1 & 9-2 DL 1.400 ACI 9-2 Group Factor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7 '"1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 & 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7"0.9" Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 & 9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... seismic- ST': 1,100 A f i (c) 1GS3-97 ENERCALC C:WlE&Cm.UX Kw08M810. v5.0.2.1 JwlW Title: CARLSBALbTMS Job##s3ooe Dsgnr: AMAD DOUDAR ~~~Pti~ : TYPICAL CONC TILT-UP PANEL Ma: 227PM. 18MARIY) GJr scop : tilt-UD Wall Panel Desian I General Information 1 Description PANEL AT GIRDERS Clear Height 27.000 n rc 3,000.0 psi Seismic Zone 4 Parapet Height 1.000 n FY 80,000.0 psi Min Vert Steal % 0.0020 Thickness 7.250 in Phi 0.900 Min Horiz Steal % 0.0012 Bar Slze 5 Width 12.000 in Bass Fixity 0% Bar Spacing 12.000 in Parapet Weight Counteracts Midd Wall Seismic Factor 0.3000 Bar Depth 5.000 in Parapet Saismic Factor 0.3000 Max Den. Ratio 150.0 LL 8 ST Not Combined Concrete Weight 145.00 DCf Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 method ... Deflections are iterated Lateral Loads Vettlcrl Loads Wind Load psf UniformBt- 5,900.00 wfl Uniform LL 5,900.00 wfl Point Load ibs ... eccentricity 2.000 in ... height fl ... load type Seismic Concentric DL wfl Concentric LL wfl Lateral Load wfl _I ,..distance to top fl ... distance to bot fl Seismic "I" Magnifier 1.000 ... load type Seismic Wind ''I" Magnifier 1.000 i [Wall Anelysls I For Factored Load Stresses For Satvice Load Deflections Seismic Wind Wind Basic Defl wlo P-Delta 1.447 0.000 in 0.328 0.000 in , " c ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ Basic M wlo P-Delta 48.782.2 0.0 in4 34,844.4 0.0 in# Moment Excess of Mcr 57,717.7 0.0 in4 14,818.8 0.0 in# Max. P-Delta Deflection 3.789 0.000 in 1.210 O.Oo0 in Max P-Delta Moment 88,507.4 0.0 in# 43,406.2 0.0 in#, Meximum Allow Vertical Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : SEISMIC 18.000 in Maximum Allow Horizontal Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapet Bar Spacing Req'd : WIND 18,000 in 1 Wall Design OM Summary 27.00R clear height, I .OOR parapet, 7.25in thlck with #5 bars at 12.00ln on center, d= 5.00in, fc = 3,000.0ps Using: UBC Sec. 1914.0 meth od... Defledlons ere Iterated Factored Load Bending : Seismic Load Governs Service Load Deflection : Seismic Load Governs Maximum iterated Moment : Mu 88,507.35 in# Maximum Iterated Deflection 1.210 in Moment Capacity 104.389.04 in# Deflection Limit 2.180 in Mn Phi : Moment Capacity Applied Mu @ Mid-Span Applied: Mu @ Top of Wail Max Iterated Sawice Load Deflection Actual Deflection Retio Seismlc 104,389.04 In-# 88,507.35 In-# 33.280.75 in# 1.21 in 288 : 1 Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0052 Allowable Max. Reinf. Percent = 0.5 Rho Bai 0.0128 Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Allowable Axial Stress = 0.4 fm 82.42 psl 120.00 El Wind 98.222.72 In-# 0.00 In# 0.00 In# 0.00 in 0 :I 0.0052 0.0128 120.00 psl 82.42 psi (c) lW97 ENERCALC c:'enucakWQ39.aw KW4802810. vS.0.2. 1 Jm-1997 Y ink : CARLSEAL Joba#D8ws Dsgnr: AMAD DOUDAR b.Cdp(lMI : TYPICAL CONC TILT-UP PANEL Me: ZZ'PM, 18 MAR S9 a6 scope : Tilt-Ub Wall Panel Deslan I Analvsls Data 7 E 3,122,018.6 psi n = Es I Ec 9.29 Fr = 273.86 psl Ht I Thk Ratio 44.89 Values for Mn Calculation. .. As:eff= [Pu:tot + AsFyYFy a : (AsFy + Pu)l(.85 fc b) c = a I .85 lgross I-eff (ACI methods only) Phi: Capacity Reduction Mn = As:aW Fy (d -a) -. icracked Seismic 0.477 in 0.938 in Sgross 105.125 in3 Mcr = S Fr 28,789.7 in# Rho: Bar Rainf Pct 0.0214 Wlnd 0.435 In 0.854 in 1.101 in 1.005 in 381.078 in4 381.08 in4 72.74 in4 68.63 in4 0.00 in4 0.00 in4 0.900 0.900 115.967.82 in# 109.136.38 in# .. I Additional Values I Saismic Wind Loada used for rnalyslr Factored Loada Wall Welght 87.604 psf Wall Wt Wall Saismlc Factor 26.281 DSf ADDlled Axlal Load 8.260.00 6.195.00 Wft Wail Wt Parapet Seismic Factor 26.281 psf Laieral Wall Weight 11778.36 11333.77 Wft Servlce Appiled Axial Load 5,900.00 Wfl Total Lateral Loads 10,038.36 7.528.77 Wft Sawlca Wt @ Max Mom Total Service Axial Loads 1,270.28 Wft 7,170.26 Wft I ACI Factors (par ACI, applied internally to entered loads) 1 ACI 9-1 a 9-2 DL 1.4W ACI 9-2 Group Factor W50 UBC 1921.2.7"l.c'Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 Dead Load Factor 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7 "0.9" Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 8 9-2 ST 1.700 ACI Q-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 ... salsmic=ST*: 1.100 / (c) 198397 ENERCALC c:\smncakWCQB.aw KwOBMB10, V5.0.2.lJun-19B7 4 tb7 Hd5 -&ZED Stluaunl Engineer& Codhnts dHEET NO PI Of CALCULATEDW Ah 0 DATE 3-26-98 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego. CA 92126 CHECKED nv DATE (619) 540-6996 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92128 (819) 549-8996 CALCULATED BY A40 DATE 3- zd -9p, CHECKED nv - DATE '. , :,. , : $.......... j ....... I... , . ,. ..I ... ! ..; ..... i ' ! : ,.I!! ' ,I //.,, .. &T d J' A-ZED Shuaunl Engineni~'CConsultant8 WEE1 NO l-1 Of CALCULATED BV A/L- DATE 3- J8- 96 CHECKED EV - DATE 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 i A i Lo7 4s v A-ZED struaunl ~ngimwiG~tana (IHIET NO LZ- Of CALCULATED BVA DATE 3 - r-78 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. __ DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 CHECKED 0V i 986 9 LT dci A-ZED Structural Engineer& Consultlats JoB--7zL BHEET NO L'L A OF CALCULATED BY nn a DATE 3 -31 90 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. 16101 549-6006 San Dlego, CA 02126 CHECKED BY __ DATE JO.-TG$-=- A-ZED Smaud Enginerig Consultmu nncn NO L3 OF 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BY /9 Ad, DATE &?- / -?r CHECKED BY DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-8996 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Diego. CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 A-ZED smraunl ~n8i-G; cona~~tlnts SHECT NO - 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BY Ann Dl,E 3- 31 - 38 San Dlego. CA 92128 CHECKED 81 - DATE (619) 549-8998 JtI.--2%2 " &7 65 WEIT NO L, L4R a$ 2 A-ZED ~tnraum~ Engineering ~wsu~tlats 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEOW DATE 3-?1-38 CHECKED BY - DATE San Dlego. CA 92126 1619) 549-6996 !I .... I.. .... ~ .... ....... ., .... .~., .... ji ~ !" 1; ...... 1 ..... i.. .. !I ........ ! ......... i ....... ij .I I ........ 1 ..... ...I .... iI ............ ...... i ....... I ...... !i &I !; I ............... ........ I ................. ! ..... I ....... I... ........ j ................. !, !j .......... I .......... ...... :I .......... 1 ......... I ...... ........ +.. ...... 1 ....... !, !I , ~ ......... ....... I ...... !I ........ +~... ...i... ...... ! .! ,I I 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 6494996 *. ~ DATE a- 18- 90 DATE CALCULATEDBV &rZ 3 CHECKED BY A-ZED ~huaud Engbri<CoIISUltlnrs OHCCT NO. Ld OF CALCULATED DV n 12 4 DATE 3- /Y- 98 CHEWED nv 1215 Rock Canyon Dr. __ DATE San Dlego. CA 92126 (819) 549-6996 WALE . . . . ... , .. . , . ..j.. . LOT #6S \u (IHEET NO c+ 01 d A-ZED struaunl ~nginening consulants - - 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDIIV /B Lln DATE - DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED 111 (619) 549-6996 - kr Cs A-ZED structunl eqineeri;;8comultmb OHEET NO LB o* 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULAIEDEY A ll C, DATE 7- /&-?a CHECKED EY OAlf San Dlego, CA 92128 (819) 549-8996 k7 14r6-S L OHEET NO i A-ZED Smraunl Engineering Cwsultlnts 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. San Dlego. CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 CALCULATEDIIV - /i” /r CY DATE f- 10 -96 CHECKED BY __ DATE 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. ,Sari Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 1 . . .. , . . . . .. i n ! ,, ., .~. i . ,. Jon-d@< .-. I A-ZED structunl ~nBineerii$~-lhntsh& bHE€T NO. L/l QI 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BY 4' Q- DATE 3 - /f-?f __ DATE San Diego, CA 92126 CHECKED BV (619) 549-6996 ...... I ...... i . .{... 1,; ~ ii ,I .........,.. ...... + .......... ! ... I/ ! ........ 1 .......I. . ..I .. il! i j[/ ....... i ..........,. ... ...... ...... .f ...... I.. ..... ,.... . .. ....,.......... 4 ....... ...... ........... .... ........ .................. /' ............ .+ ..... ..: ... ~ I..... ./ ; 1, ...... .......,. ! A. JMAc bo7 H /s 8HEET NO Ll2- or .J A-ZED Strua~nl Enginecrix Cannrltrnts 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BV /qrzq DATE 3- zu-yg - DATE CHECKED BV San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996 ++-/- RBRiSgan. and Associates RECEIVED 5 June 1998 Mr. Chris DeCerbo Planning Department City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad CA 92009 JUN 08 1998 CITY OF CARLE-BAD PLANNING DEPT. Reference: Carlsbad Research Center Lot 65 - Crib Wall Construction Adjacmt to Hieatt Parcel (RBR Job Number 1662.36A) Dear Mr. DcCerbo: As you are aware, San Dieguito Engineering had prepared final grading plans for the Carlsbad Research Center (CRC) Lot 65, on behalf of Mr. Lany Jett. Some discussion has occurred as to the treatment of the small slope that is located at the common boundary between CRC Lot 65 and the adjacent parcel referred to as the Hieatt property. Initially, off-site grading had been proposed but when it was determined that portions of the adjacent Hieatt property still supported native vegetation, it was determined that the Lot 65 ‘‘interfad’ accoraplished with a crib wall that resulted in no disturbance to the existing native plant associations. Specifically, the factual situation: 1. The edge of the Hieatt property adjacent to Lot 65 supports ruderal vegetation (with no particular biological value), Southern Maritime Chaparral, Coastal Sage Scrub, and a disturbed native grassland. Clearly, intrusion into these sensitive native associations by activities on Lot 65 is inappropriate. Roughly 240-feet of the common property line between the Hieatt property and Lot 65 is occupied by native vegetation, the balance being ruderal vegetation on previously accomplished off-site grading. In order to prevent any direct impact to the native material, the developer of Lot 65 has proposed a crib wall that will be constructed entirely on the Lot 65 “side” of the property lie. No physical incursion by equipment or work crews onto the Hieatt side of the property line is required for the construction of the crib wall. In order to assure no intrusion by work crews into the adjacent native vegetation, an orange plastic construction “fence” will be erected at the property line prior to any grading. With the design of the crib wall and the construction fencing, there will be no direct impacts to the existing native vegetation on the Hieatt property. Any potential indirect impacts @rimarily noise) would be insignificant given the existing sources of indirect effect already located in the vicinity of 11228 Zapata Avenue, San Dw, CA 92126 IWerde office: (939)351-0803 San Diego Gffim: 1619)2335454 professional environmental services 2. 3. 4. ’. .. . h4r. Chris DeCerbo 5 June 1998 pagetwo the Hieatt property (for example: air operations at Palomar Airport, traffic flows on College, the existing development along other sides of the Hiean parcel). If we can provide any additional information, or elaborate on any aspect of the above, pleased do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Royce B. Riggan, Jr., AICP Principal RE3Rct , . . .- [:\I 662-lct.W2] , D2 January 20, 1999 mar Eltinay SnI Joiat Nevada 2121 Trento Lane Ballon, NV 89406 I have rea6 your letter to Ihnnir Davis and I agree 1001 with your statenents reference the knee bracas. Since them is no net vplift, there is no bottom chord ccnprasmion on the trusses. The only critsris th8t oxists is to limit bottom chord L/R to less than 240. Siacuely, Sic 1822 State of California EXp. 12-31-2000 CCt D.m)is D8Vi. .. . . '* . facsirml e- . 2 33Wd .......................... R0.E M. : 1619549 63% Nou. 18 1998 05:m w3 FRL31: +ZED ENGIbEEf5 PHOM M. : 1619 549 6996 Nw. 18 1998 0s:m pB4 \ NO. : 1 619 544 69% Nov. 18 1998 a5:48Rl Fa5 NORCALENGINEERING 09/17 '98 09:2a ~0.449 01 I= 562 799 9459 NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Namitos, CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 September 15. 1998 Peed Number 7101-97 Lanikai Management Corporation P.O. Box 9872 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 Attn: Mr. Lawrence Jett RE: Observation and Testing of Rough Grading Opetations - Proposed Carisbad Research Center - Lot 65 - Located at the Southeast Comer of College Boulevard and Aston Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad. California $its Gndinp All vegetation and demolition debris was stripped and removed from the fill area prior to grading operations. The existing low density soils were removed to bedrock material andlor previously approved fill soils, the exposed subgrade scarified, moisture conditioned and then recompacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction. All excavations were observed and approved by this fin prior to placement of fill material. The ovemxcavation wnaisted of a minimum of five horizontal feet or to the depth of fill placed, whichever is greater beyond the outside edge of all proposed foundations. Foundation amas within transition of bedrock and engineered fill were also overexcavated in order to permit the placement of a two feet thick compacted fill blanket beneath the bottom of all proposed foundations. Dear Mr. Jett: Pursuant to your request. this firm has observed and tested rough grading operations at the above mfefenced project. Results of the compaction tests are attached and locations of these tests are shown on the accompanying Site Plan. All work was performed in accordance with our Geotechnical Investigation dated December 5, 1997, Project Number 7101-97 and all present clay standards of the Geotechnical Engineering Industry. NORCALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 09/17 '98 ow9 ~0.449 02 September 15, 1998 Page 2 Project Number 7101-97 Fill soils were compacted to a minimum of 90% of the laboratory standard in lifts not in excess of eight inches in thickness. The maximum depth of fill placed was 51/2 feet. Conventional earthmoving equipment was utilized for compaction control. A water truck provided moisture control. The approximate limits of grading operations are indicated on the attached Site Plan. FiddLabor8tnw Tests The relative compaction was determined by Sand Cone Method (ASTM: D1556-82) and by the Drive Tube Method (ASTM: D2937). The maximum density of the fill soils was obtained by the laboratory standard (ASTM: D 1557-78) with results shown on Table I. Tests were performed a minimum of every 500 cubic yards and every two feet in depth of fill placed. Results of field density tests are presented in Table II. Foundation -inn All foundations may be designed utilizing the following safe bearing capacities for a embedded depth of 24 Inches into approved compacted 611 solls or bedmck with the corresponding widths: Continuous Isolated Width (ft) Foundation Foundation 1.5 2.0 4.0 5.0 2000 2075 2275 2375 2560 2575 2775 2875 A one third increase may be used when considering short term loading and seismic forces. All continuous foundations shall be reinforced a minimum of one No. 4 bar, top and bottom. Isolated foundations may be reinforced at the discretion of the project structural engineer. NorCal Engineering NORCALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 09/17 '98 09:29 N0.449 03 September 15. 1998 Page 3 Project Number 7101-97 , All foundations located near adjacent slopes shall meet all setback criteria per the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The bottom of foundations located adjacent to descending slopes shall maintain a safe horizontal setback consisting Of 113 the height of the slope from bottom of the footing to the race of the slope Slab Recommendations All concrete floor slabs shall be a minimum of five inches in thickness reinforced a minimum of No. 3 ban, eighteen inches in each direction posi!ioned in the center of the slab and placed on approved subgrade soils. Prior to placement of slabs. the subgrade soils shall be moisture conditioned above optimum moisture content to a depth of eighteen inches. A vapor barrier overlain by four inches of appmved sand shall be utiliid beneath all floor slabs sensitive to the infiltration of moisture. All concrete slab anas to mceive floor coverings should be moisture tested to meet all manufacturer requirements prior to placement. Conclusions The geotechnical engineering aspects of the grading have been observed and are In compliance with the geotechnical engineets recommendations. The development has been graded to the approval of this firm and is suitable for its intended use. We appredate this opportunity to be of s- to you. questions, pleaie do notm If you have any further Respectfully submi! NORCAL ENGINEd Keith D. Tucker \\*' Scott D. Spensiem Project Manager NORCALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 September 15,1998 Page 4 09/17 ‘98 09:29 N0.449 04 Projed Number 7101-97 Optimum Maximum Dry Clawification Moisture Density (Ibs./cu.f!.~ I Siltstone 16.0 111.0 II CLAY, silly 15.5 109.5 111 CLAY. sandy silty 13.0 115.0 IV Siltstone 14.5 110.0 NorCal Engineering NORCALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 September 15, 1998 - Page 5 09/17 '98 09:29 N0.449 05 Project Number 7101-97 IABLE II COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Date of Ter;t 9/3/98 9i3/98 9/3/98 9/3/98 9I3m 9/4198 91496 9tm 811 1/98 911 1/98 9/1f/98 911 1/98 8111198 9/12/98 giime wime Test & 101 1 02 103 104 1 05 106 107 108 109 I10 ill 112 113 114 115 116 4.0-4.5 2.0-2.5 3.0-3.5 2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5 1.0-1.5 0.5-1.0 5.0-5.5 5.0-5.5 4.0-4.5 3.rb3.5 2.0-2.5 4.0-4.5 3.0-3.5 2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5 Percent Moisture 18.3 17.4 17.0 16.1 18.3 16.5 14.8 15.0 14.8 18.1 17.9 17.2 15.3 17.4 18.3 12.7 Unit Wt. Ibs.lw.ft. 106.5 103.9 101.7 103.4 99.7 101.3 1oa.o 111.3 103.7 109.2 105.2 110.9 106.7 102.2 104.0 103.8 Relative Compaction 96 95 92 94 91 93 94 97 94 98 96 96 93 92 94 ' 90 'Depth below finish grade (in feet) "Retest of failing tests after area reworked Soil TIYs?!? I II I II II II 111 111 IV I II 111 111 I I 111 NorCal Engineering NORCALENGINEERING September 15, 1998 Page 6 Date of 9/1 2/98 9/12/98 9112/90 9/12/98 9/12/90 9/12l98 9/12/98 9/12/98 9/12/98 9/14/98 9/14/99 9/14/98 9/14/98 9/14/98 Test - No. 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 562 799 9459 09/17 '98 09:30 N0.449 06 Project Number 7101-97 TABLE II COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Elevation 1.0-1.5 O.ll.0 2.0-2.5 2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5 1.0-1.5 0.51.0 1.0-1.5 5.0-5.5 3.0-3.5 2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5 0.5-1.0 1.0-1.5 Percent Moisture 15.8 13.1 13.1 15.4 15.8 14.8 14.3 13.6 13.3 17.2 16.3 16.1 14.8 17.0 Unit Wt. Relative Ibs./cu.ft. Commction 101.9 93 107.9 94 111.4 97 101.4 93 100.2 92 105.4 92 109.4 90 104.8 91 102.4 93 107.5 97 104.0 95 101.6 92 108.9 95 100.0 91 'Depth below finish grade (in feet) "Retest of failing tests after area reworked Soil m It 111 111 II II 111 I 111 IV I IV I 111 I NorCal Engineering NORCALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 09117 $98 09:m ~0.449 07 c In YI c ASTON ROAD I 02'00/08 YON 12:41 FAX 8197580837 1C WNIMI -. WKAl -cMlpoRATloN GgOOl TELECOPlER COVER PAGE FROM: 8 . TIIIS FAX CONSISTS OF -&PACES, INCLUDING THIS COVER SttegT COMMENTS: n I Y . THIS FAX NUMBER IS (619)756-9837 lF TflERE IS A PRODLEM IN RECEIVING ANY OF TIIESE PAGES, PLWE CAW, (619) 7569820. OPERATOR: ! I :, . .. . .. .. .. /. .. .. .. . . , .. .. . . ., . .. .. .. .. .. . .. -. ... : -. ., .. ~. - :. .. . . ; .. . .. .. . .. , . .: , .. .02/0Y98 YON 12:41 FAX NORCALENGINEERING 6137569837 iC LANIKAI 562 799 9459 02/09 '98 09:20 N0.854 01 NorCal Engineering Soils and Ckotcchaicd Comullaats 1064 I Humhnlr Sveet Los Alunitor;, CA 90720 (562)799-9469 FAX (562)799-9459 February 6,1998 Project Number 7101-97 -_ -. - Lanikai Management Corporation P.O. Box 3872 Rancho Santa, California 92067 RE Addendum Ne. 2 -Preliminary Geobehnil lnmtiiatian Report dated December 5, 1997 - Proposed Multi-Unit Structures - Locatad at the Southeast Corner of College Boulevard and Arton Avenue. in the Ci of Garbbad, Celiiornia Deer Mf. JM: As requested. rigid pavement section design is being provided for thb above referad project. The sections given are based upon an estimated R-value of 30 for pavement areas. Type of Traffic liilfns IQdfa Light Vohicle Parking L&ht Vehii Circulation Amas Madium Truck Heavy Truck 4 5 6 7 5.5 8.0 6.5 7.0 Concrote may be pkwd directly upon subgrade soils compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction in the upper 12 inches. Subgrade soils should be moisture conditioned to 130% of optimum moisturn Iovelo imnnrdiatsly prior la placement concrete. We appreciate this opportunity to bo of .enrice to you. If you have any act the undersigned. '1 Keith D. Tucke Scott 0. Spem.ero Projed Manager further @oar Preliminary Geotechnical investigation Proposed Multi-Unit Structures College Boulevard & Aston Avenue Carlsbad, California Project Number 7101-97 December 5,1997 NorCal Engineering NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 December 5,1997 Project Number 7101-97 Lanikai Management Corporation P.O. Box 9672 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 Attn: T. Lawrence Jett RE: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Multi-Unit Structures - Located at the Southeast corner of College Boulevard and Aston Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Jett: Pursuant to your request, this firm has performed a Geotechnical Investigation for the above referenced project in accordance with your authorization of proposal dated October 29, 1997. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the geotechnical conditions of the subject site and to provide recornmendations for the proposed project. This geotechnical engineering report presents the finding of our study along with conclusions and recommendations for development. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Scott D. Spensiero Project Manager I December 5,1997 Page 2 Project Number 7101-97 The purpose of the investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions and to provide preliminary geotechnical engineering design parameters for evaluation of the site with respect to the proposed project. It is anticipated that the proposed development will consist of officeharehouse buildings on the 27 acre property as shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan by Robert Stocton dated November 20, 1985. Other improvements will consist of asphaltic paved parking and driveway areas, concrete loading areas and landscaping. - The subject site consists of two bi-level mass graded located within Carlsbad Research Center. The site is situated at the southeast comer of Aston and College, in the City of Carlsbad. The generally rectangular shaped site is elongated in an north to south direction with topography descending from west to east. An approximately 4 feet high graded slope separates the two lots. The parcel is currently undeveloped and covered with a sparse to moderate growth of vegetation consisting of natural grasses and weeds. The site is bordered by ascending slopes along the east property line and descending slopes along the south, north and west property perimeter ranging in height from 55 to 520. feet. The Carlsbad Research Center development consists of several individual lots located within the tract which had been recently mass graded for future development. The earthwork operations were performed and were geotechnically observed and tested by San Diego Consultants, Inc., as described by their report tilted, As-Graded Geotechnical Report, Phases, dated April, 1988, Job No. 05-2863-006-00-10 The subject parcel consists of a graded transition lot with a maximum fill depth of 22 feet located at the southwest comer. The cut slope are generally on the east side of the lot. NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 3 Project Number 7101-97 The investigation consisted of the placement of ten subsurface trenches by a backhoe to a maximum depth of 20 feet placed strategically in proposed areas of development. The explorations were visually classified and logged by a field engineer with locations of the subsurface explorations shown on the attached Site Plan. The exploratory excavations revealed the existing earth materials to consist of an engineered fill and bedrock. A detailed description of the subsurface conditions are listed on the excavation logs in Appendix A. These soils are described as follows: Fill: An engineered fill was encountered consisting predominately of a brown to tan brown, CLAY, silty sandy clay and clayey SANDS. These soils were noted to be denselstiff and damp and moist. Native Soils: A reddish brown CLAY, sandy with gravel and rock were encountered in a portion of the excavations. These native soils were very stii and dry to damp. Bedrock: A grey siltstone with fine grained interbeds was encountered in test excavations 4, 6, and 8. The bedrock was noted to be moderately hard to hard and moist. The upper 1.5 to 3.0 of the surface soils were noted to be disturbed and loose from the existing surface vegetation and past discing operations. These upper soils were very moist due to recent rains. No groundwater was encountered to the depth of our excavations and no caving occurred. NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 4 Project Number 7101-97 - Relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained to perform laboratory testing and analysis for direct shear, consolidation tests, and to determine in- place moisture/densities. These undisturbed samples consisted of one inch rings with inside diameter of 2.5 inches. Bulk bag samples were obtained in the upper soils for expansion index tests, maximum density tests, atterberg limits and sulfate tests. All test results are included in Appendix B, unless noted otherwise. A. The field moisture content (ASTM:D 2216) and the dry density of the ring samples were determined in the laboratory. This data is listed on the log of excavations. B. Maximum density tests (ASTM: D-1557-78) were performed on typical samples of the upper soils. Results of these tests are shown on Table I. C. Expansion index tests in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2 were performed on remolded samples of the upper soils to determine the expansive characteristics. Results of these tests are provided on Table II. D. Soluble sulfate tests in accordance with EPA Method 9038 were performed on representative soils samples to estimate the potential for corrosion of concrete in contact with the on-site soils. Results are provided in Table IV. E. Direct shear tests (ASTM: D-3080) were performed on undisturbed and disturbed samples of the subsurface soils. These tests were performed to determine parameters for the calculation of the safe bearing capacity. The test is performed under saturated conditions at loads of 500 Ibs./sq.ft., 1,000 Ibs./sq.ft., and 2,000 Ibs./sq.ft. with results shown on Plate A. NorCal Engineering December 5, 1997 Page 5 Project Number 7101-97 F. Consolidation tests (ASTM: D-2435) were performed on undisturbed samples to determine the differential and total settlement which may be anticipated based upon the proposed loads. Water was added to the samples at a surcharge of one KSF and the settlement curves are plotted on Plate B. and Reco- Based upon our evaluations, the proposed development is acceptable from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. By following the recommendations and guidelines set forth in our report, the structures will be safe from excessive settlements under the anticipated design loadings and condaions. The proposed development shall meet all requirements of the City Building Ordinance and will not impose any adverse effect on existing adjacent structures. In addition, this firm has reviewed the previous geotechnical reports by San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., and concurs overall that the geotechnical conditions of the subject site are currently representative of the conditions encountered during the desm'bed rough grading report. It is our opinion that the planned grading is geotechnically feasible provided that all of the recommendations presented in our geotechnical report is implemented and the information in the San Diego Consultants, Inc. is accurate. The following sections present a discussion of geotechnical related requirements for specific design recommendations of different aspects of the project. It is recommended .that site inspections be performed by a representative of this firm during all grading and construction of the development to verify the findings and recommendations documented in this report. Any unusual conditions which may be encountered in the course of the project development may require the need for additional study and revised recommendations. NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 6 Project Number 7101-97 Fvalm All slopes impacting the subject site are considered to be grossly and surficial stable. The slopes constructed during mass grading operations were built at a slope ratio no greater than 2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) and appear to be in accordance with previous project plans and specifications. These slopes would appear to possess safety factors of 1.50 or greater for gross stability. In addition, an observation of these slopes appear to perform adequately with respect to surficial stability. However, to minimize future erosion, the slope maintenance recommendations should be implemented. The landscaping shall consist of a suitable proportion of deep rooted slope plantings classified as being drought resistant. The possibility of construction delays, weather conditions and plant growth may require additional erosion control measures such as matting, netting and plastic sheeting. P Any vegetation shall be removed and hauled from proposed grading areas prior to the start of grading operations. Any removed soils may be reutilied as compacted fill once any deleterious material or oversized materials (in excess of eight inches) is removed. All grading operations shall be performed in accordance with the attached "Specifications for Compacted Fill Operations". All upper disturbed soils (upper one foot) shall be removed, the exposed surface shall be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% of the laboratory standard (ASTM: 0-1557-78) prior to placement of any additional compacted fill soils. In building areas of transition between bedrock, native soils and engineered fill, additional overexcavation of bedrockhative soils consisting of a depth of three feet below proposed foundations including floor slab areas is required to mitigate the potential of differential settlement. Othetwise all foundation for each individual building shall be embedded into engineered fill or all into bedrock. This fill shall extend a minimum of five horizontal feet or to the depth of vertical overexcavation. whichever is greater, beyond the outside edge of the perimeter foundation. All parking subgrade NorCal Engineering December 5, 1997 Page 7 Project Number 7101-97 areas will require the removal of all disturbed soils (upper one foot) prior to placement of any additional fill or pavement. Results of our in-place density tests reveal that the soil shrinkage will be on the order of 8 to 12% within the engineered fill soils, based upon the assumption that the fill is compacted to 92% of maximum dry density per ASTM standards. Subsidence should be 0.25 feet due to earthwork operations. The volume change does not include any allowance for vegetation or organic stripping, removal of subsurface improvements or topographic approximations. Although these values are only approximate, they represent our best estimate of lost yardage which will likely occur during grading. If more accurate shrinkage and subsidence factors are needed, it is recommended that field testing using the actual equipment and grading techniques should be conducted. - Temporary unsurcharged excavations in the existing site materials less than 5 feet high may be made at a vertical gradient unless cohesionless soils are encountered. Temporary unsurcharged excavations from 5 to 10 feet high may be trimmed at a I to l(horizonta1 to vertical) gradient. In areas where soils with little or no binder are encountered, where adverse geological conditions are exposed, or where excavations are adjacent to existing structures, shoring, slot-cutting, or flatter excavations may be required. The temporary cut slope gradients given above do not preclude local raveling and sloughing. All excavations shall be made in accordance with the requirements of CAL- OSHA and other public agencies having jurisdiction. Care should be taken to provide or maintain adequate lateral support for all adjacent improvements and structures at all times during the grading operations and construction phase. All foundations may be designed utilizing the following safe bearing capacities for a embedded depth of 24 inches into approved compacted fill soils or bedrock with the corresponding widths: NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 0 !b!kwa 1.5 2.0 4.0 5.0 Project Number 7101-97 Continuous Isolated 2000 2500 2075 2575 2275 2775 2375 2075 A one third increase may be used when considering short term loading and seismic forces. All continuous foundations shall be reinforced a minimum of one No.'4 bar, top and bottom. Isolated foundations may be reinforced at the discretion of the project structural engineer. All foundations located near adjacent slopes shall meet all setback criteria per the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The bottom of foundations located adjacent to descending slopes shall maintain a safe horizontal setback consisting of 1/3 the height of the slope from bottom of the footing to the face of the slope. The following values may be utilized in resisting lateral loads imposed on the structure. Requirements of the current Uniform Building Code should be adhered to when the coefficient of friction and passive pressures are combined: Coefficient of Friction - 0.35 Equivalent Passive Fluid Pressure = 200 Ib./cu.ft. Maximum Passive Pressure = 2,000 Ibs./sq.ft. The passive pressure recommendations are valid only for compacted fill soils and/or competent bedrock materials. NorCal Engineering December 5.1997 Page 9 Project Number 7101-97 Resultant pressure curves for the consolidation tests are shown on Plate E. Computations utilizing these curves and the recommended safe bearing capacities reveal that the foundations will experience settlements on the order of 3/4 inch and differential settlements of less than 1/4 inch. Settlements will occur due to foundation loads and area fill surcharge pressures. Existing 611 soils will incur additional settlement over time with the area subsidence on the order of a 1M inch across the length of the structures. The associated angular rotation of wall footings should be less than 112 inch over 40 linear feet at the site. Thus, shallow building foundations should be designed for these differential settlements during the design life of the structure. Active earth pressures against retaining walls will be equal to the pressures developed by the following fluid densities. These values are for granular free draining backfill material placed adjacent to the walls at various ground slopes above the walls. Surface Slope of Retained Materials tal to Vew Level 5 to 1 4tO 1 3 to 1 2to1 Equivalent Fluid 30 35 38 40 45 Any applicable short-term construction surcharges and seismic forces should be added to the above lateral pressure values. A backfill zone of non-expansive material shall consist of a wedge beginning a minimum of one horizontal foot from the base of the wall extending upward at an inclination no less than 314 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). All walls shall be waterproofed as needed and protected from hydrostatic pressure by a reliable permanent subdrain system. NorCal Engineering December 5, 1997 Page 10 Project Number 7101-97 - All concrete floor slabs shall be a minimum of five inches in thickness reinforced a minimum of No. 3 bars, eighteen inches in each direction positioned in the center of the slab and placed on approved subgrade soils. Prior to placement of slabs, the subgrade soils shall be moisture conditioned above optimum moisture content to a depth of eighteen inches. A vapor barrier overlain by four inches of approved sand shall be utilized beneath all floor slabs sensitive to the infiltration of moisture. All concrete slab areas to receive floor coverings should be moisture tested to meet all manufacturer requirements prior to placement. - Representative samples of the surficial soils, typical of the subgrade soils expected to be encountered within foundation excavations, revealed low levels of sulfate concentrations. Therefore, no special cement foundations are deemed necessary and a Type II cement shall be utilized for building foundations at this time. Additional sulfate tests shall be performed at the completion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with the recommendations stated in this design. Sulfate test results may be found on the attached Table 111. The table below provides a preliminary pavement design based upon an estimated R- Value of 30 for the proposed pavement areas. Final pavement design may need to be based on R-value testing of the subgrade soils near the conclusion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with those assumed in this preliminary design. Tvpe of Traftic Light Vehicle Parking Base .. Traffic Asphaltic kdex nal (in) 4.0 3.0 3.5 Light Vehicle Circulation Areas 5.0 3.0 4.5 Med. Truck Parking 8 Circulation Areas 6.0 3.5 6.5 (GVW c 42,000 Ibs.: 3 axle) (GVW c 90,000 Ibs.; 5 axle) Heavy Truck Areas 7.0 3.5 NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 11 Project Number 7101-97 Pavement section thickness should be increased for areas where heavier vehicular use or larger wheel loads are anticipated. All concrete slabs to be utilized for pavement or utilized for forklift use shall be a minimum of six inches in thickness and placed on approved compacted subgrade soils. Any approved base material shall consist of a Class II aggregate or equivalent and should be compacted to a minimum of 95% relative compaction. All pavement materials shall conform to the requirements set forth by the City of Carlsbad. The base material and asphaltic concrete should be tested prior to delivery to the site and during placement to determine conformance with the project specifications. A pavement engineer shall designate the specific asphalt mix design to meet the required project spedfications. The recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based upon the soil conditions uncovered in our test excavations. No warranty of the soil condition between our excavations is implied. NorCal Engineering should be notified for possible further recommendations if unexpected to unfavorable conditions are encountered during construction phase. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that all information within this report is submitted to the Architect and appropriate Engineers for the project. This firm should have the opportunity to review the final plans to verify that all our recommendations are incorporated. This report and all conclusions are subject to the review of the controlling authorities for the project. A preconstruction conference should be held between the developer, general contractor, grading contractor, city inspector, architect, and geotechnical engineer to clarify any questions relating to the grading operations and subsequent construction. Our representative should be present during the grading operations and construction phase to certify that such recommendations are complied within the field. NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 12 Project Number 7101-97 The geotechnical investigation has been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the Southem California area. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. NorCal Engineering .. December 5. 1997 Page 13 Project Number 7101-97 Preparation Any existing low density soils and/or saturated soils shall be removed to competent natural soil under the inspection of the Soils Engineering Firm. After the exposed surface has been cleansed of debris and/or vegetation, it shall be scarified until it is uniform in consistency, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78). Material For Fill The on-site soils or approved import soils may be utilized for the compacted fill provided they are free of any deleterious materials and shall not contain any rocks, brick, asphaltic concrete, concrete or other hard materials greater than eight inches in maximum dimensions. Any import soil must be approved by the Soils Engineering firm a minimum of 24 hours prior to importation of site. Placement of Compacted Fill Soils The approved fill soils shall be placed in layers not in excess of six inches in thickness. Each lift shall be uniform in thickness and thoroughly blended. The fill soils shall be brought to within 15% of the optimum moisture content, unless otherwise specified by the Soils Engineering firm. Each lift shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78) and approved prior to the placement of the next layer of soil. Compaction tests shall be obtained at the discretion of the Soils Engineering firm but at a minimum of one test for every 500 cubic yards placed andlor for every two vertical feet of compacted fill placed. NorCal Engineering December 5,1997 Page 14 Project Number 7101-97 The minimum relative compaction shall be obtained in accordance with accepted methods in the construction industry. The final grade of the structural areas shall be in a dense and smooth condition prior to placement of slabs-on-grade or pavement. No fill soils shall be placed, spread or compacted during unfavorable weather conditions. When the grading is interrupted by heavy rains, compaction operations shall not be resumed until approved by the Soils Engineering firm. Grading Obsewatiohs The controlling governmental agencies should be notified prior to commencement of any grading operations. This firm recommends that the grading operations be conducted under the observation of a Soils Engineering firm as deemed necessary. A 24 hour notice must be provided to this firm prior to the time of our initial inspection. Observation shall include the clearing and grubbing operations to assure that all unsuitable materials have been properly removed; approval of the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas where excavation has resulted in the desired finished grade and designate areas of overexcavation; and performance of field compaction tests to determine relative compaction achieved during fill placement. In addition, all foundation excavations shall be observed by the Soils Engineering firm to confirm that appropriate bearing materials are present at the design grades and recommend any modifications to construct footings. NorCal Engineering . .. Project Number 7101-97 (in order of appearance) x A - Loa of Test Fxtcavations Test Excavations 1-10 R - I ab-w Testa Table I - Maximum Density Tests Table II - Expansion Index Tests Table 111 -Sulfate Tests Plate A - Direct Shear Tests Plate B - Consolidation Tests NorCal Engineering . ! ! i i i I I ! I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FIELD EXPLORATIONS Project Number 7101-97 APPENDIX A NorCal Engineering I MAJOR O/V/S/ONS 5’;193L5 TYF/CAL NAMES Nor Cal Engineering SOU AND GEOTECHMCU CONSULTAhTS rPD0 I mn COARSE GRAINED SO/LS UYIFIED SOIL CUSSIFICATIOI( SYsm t moat ma iom OC YAT#R#AL IS YrALLtU Wly zoo SICY.? suc I - 14.1 12.' 8.9 10. - .. - 109.6 105.1 106.8 107.5 ccmpacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5' stiff belm Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty,grey to dark brawn, msdiun stiff to stiff, diatmceous DATE DRILLED: 11-14-97 MEI I MTL I Canpaaed Fill Soils CUE and sandy, silty clays loose and wet in upp& 1.5' stiff belaw Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragements silty, grey to dark brawn, &m stiff to stiff, diatamaceous NorCal Engineering IIX: OF TEST =K4l" # 2 AND GE(KEQINICAL CONSULTANTS MTE DRIUTO: 1 1-1 4-97 Bulk -14 EpuIRun Umr: Extended Backhoe NorCal Engineering I - 3 a' - 13. 3s F oescnicnm oc wwunmce MATERIALS Surficial Fill Soils Sandy, silty clays, loose and wet gative Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brown, medium stiff to stiff, diaturaceous SILTSTONE Grey, stiff aamp to mist MTE DRILLED: 11-14-97 Bulk *le Jar *le NorCal Engineering IIX; OF TEST mamTIm I4 i0lU AND GEmCHMCAL CONSULTANTS 4 Surficial Fill Soils Sandy, silty clays, loose and wet - 5- - - - - 10 - Native Soils - Clay sandy with rock and shale framts silty, grey to dark bm, stiff and mist - - - 15 - - - - NorCal Engineering . IOU AND GEOTEaWKAL CONSULTANTS OjlCT 1 ME UX OF TEST EI@AvATIoN # 5 S i l[\ 15 Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brown, medium stiff to stiff belw upper 1.0, diatcnnceous D i Is ~ NorCal Engineering LCG OF TEST -VATICN # 6 OlLs AND GE~CHNXCAL CONSULTANTS ZY I Canpacted Fill Soils aYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belaw Native Soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brawn, medim stiff to stiff, aiatcln3ceous MTE OUW: 11-14-97 LEVEL: None Encountered Ccmpacted Fill Soils ~YS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belm NorCal Engineering ;OILS AND GE0TECXNICA.L CONSULTANTS MCT I Mll? Native soils Clay sandy with rock and shale fragments silty, grey to dark brawn, nedium stiff to stiff, diatamceous IIX; OF TEST WlcAvATIoN $8 .. . .. Eult -10 €QUI- USED: Extended Backhce Capacted Fill Soils CLAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belaw NorCal Engineering IIX; OF TEST ElacRvATIcN # 9 SOILS AND GEOTECHMCAL CONSULTANTS ,cMcr I MTE 9.' - I 1 7 108.6 Ccmpacted Fill Soils CtAYS, sandy silty clays, loose and wet in upper 1.5 stiff belcrw NorCal Engineering Ux; OF TEST mVATICM # 10 SOILS AND GEOTECHMCAL CONSULTAMS ". Project Number 7101-97 PPENDIX B NorCal Engineering . . December 5,1997 Page 15 2saoUk T6 @ 3-5' Siltstone TI @O-2' CLAY, silty T9 @ 0-2' CLAY, sandy silt Optimum Mpistllce 16.0 15.5 13.0 SQUm T6 @ 35' T1 @ 0-2' T9 @ 0-2' IA6lu - Siltstone CLAY, silty CLAY, sandy silt 2saoUk T6 @ 3-5' TI @O-2' T9 @ 0-2 Project Number 7101-97 Maximum Dry - 111.0 109.5 115.0 Expansion index 87 66 54 540 268 374 NorCal Engineering . s- X A 0 0 -2 I DRY WOISNRE LIWID PUSTICITY DEI(SITY Carmtr LIMIT IIOEX (D (I) (Z) mR (FEET) tPcF) 1 5.0 105.1 17.7 6 10.0 104.6 11.5 9 12.5 105.4 9.7 3 2.5 107.4 a. a NorCal Engineering I OILS AND GEOTEC"I& CONSUL TAG^ I COllSOLIDATIOll TEST RESULTS 'ROJECT I DATE I .. DRY MOISTURE 8oRIN6 DEPTH 0 c w(S1TY COllTEllT snBoL NUBER (FEET) (DE6REES) (PSF) 1 2.5 23 450 109.6 14.8 X 0 6 3.0 19 375 105.9 13.7 A 9 3.5 26 325 107.6 12.8 ~ , 2500 .... ... ...... . . . . . . . . . g 1500 0 ul E lo00 500 0 . _. . - - STRESS (PSF) .. NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS PROJECT I DATE SEP-16-98 WED 09:05 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO. 4380894 P. 06 2.12- \xo-\\-oo q+=%kd Amwssefs Pd Numb, or APN cnd MNumberif notyetwbdivided. 9%- 960 &ilding Permit Number As- by hdnnce No. NS-155 md 0dOpt.d by the C4ty Coundl &the City of Cwl0b;KI. CaMofria, the Cily h~bI.yro.p.cidTocinCommuriFlF~~diabictNo. I. Allmn-nsidenW -,uponthe isrsnadthe Rnt WMng pnrit. shall harathe oplian to (1) pay the SPECIAL DMLOPMEMTTAX ONE- TIMorn~~heANNUALSPeCWTAX-DRIU~PAOPERPlfora~notto~cdhwentr- tive (25) yt93. Please inckato pu chdcc by irjfiding the appmpriae lim WOW: OPTION (1): I elect to pay me SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT TAX ME ~ym. as o am-tirne payment Arna.int d One-lirne Spajal Tax: $ . ormer's 1-6 L e)& ta p.r me SPECIAL 0eveiOpME~~ TAX ANNUALL fa ar nm to exceed OF PERJURY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS ME PROPERTY OWNER OF ME SUBJECT PROPERN AND THAT I UNDERSTAND AND WLL COMPLY WlTH THE PROVlSIONS AS STATED m. 4 opno~ (2): ~mum~Spsci.dTacs 7!, 0 0 .owner NON-RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE 36 s w @ x L-ZqI6 =48=, 239 SEP-16-98 WED 09:04 CITY OF CARLSBAD COHH DE FbX NO. 4380894 P. 04 ~RTIFICATE 0 F COM PUN= issuing building pefmit. The Cny will no! LSM any building pemril without a camp)eted sen001 fee (on Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: qR- q60 A.P.N. : 2\2- \za- \\-ab pmied Applicant (Owner’(s’) Name@) Prom Description: Residential: .. TVO@ Wer of New Dwllina Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Owelling Square Feet of Living Area in SOU S’econd Dwelling Unit Res. Additions: Net Square Feet New Area C0rnerc.l Ind.: Square Feet Floor &ea 3s. srq Date: L ij 48 N THE ClTy OFCA RlseAQ City Certification: JL\A P*\ vD1SUnCfSWnHl $an M.rcaa Untied School District 215 M.a Way Sari mnos. CA sm9 173622001 San Ovgruto Union High GOhow Oisbicl 710 Encinilaf Blvd. Enciniis. CA -4 (755.6491 Encinitar Union School DkWR 101 South Ranch Sa& Fc Rd EmMr. u\ 92024 f944-4300) Certification of npDItanC /oumns. The DUSM wecutms this dadadin (‘Own&) co~Mn under omlty of murv that (1) me informahon Dr0Wd.d le awrec( and true to t+m rrnmnded ccrtificsbon of payment Md pay Ihe addhod lee it Ormor rquam an incrcd01 n the number of Mmg unltr 01 square foohgt after tho OUIM ng pmd IS IUW or d me mmal ddanninatlon of unm or square footage 16 found to ba inconed and that (2) the Ownw IS the omerl doveloper of the above d..cnbed prgat(s). or M.( ma pnun sycu(mg this declanuon IS auinaruw to togn on behalf of the mer of the ~rmetr mmiedge ana that the O~~.WII nldai Signature: Date: 613 2075 Las Palmas Or. Carlsbsd. CA 92009-1 576 - (~19) 438-w6i FAX (610) 438-0804 SEP-16-98 WED 09:05 CITY OF CARLSBAD COHN DE FAX NO. 4380894 - '~av.oxie GOV- hernment pror Existing Exemot fmm 53080/gS995 65970 Code 5331 1 MitigationAgreement fee (AB 181) (SB 201) (MuIIo-Roos) Note. requirements SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be com~I8ted bv the &ooI di&nct(sU P. 05 - Total Number of DweUing Units Amount per Wetling Unit Amount collected SCHOOL DISTRICT This is to cwrtify that the applicant lied on page 1 millgation determined by the infomation presenIed above building permits for this pmject. SIGNATURE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL nATF TITLE ~~ PHONE NUMBER fmh as Chapter 549. StaMeS of the State of Cabfwnu. rw.ra that all Khool dnblcb. lncludmg ma C.rkbod UniIied and (hr Encinttn Umon School Distncts, pmde a wntt.~~ nobsr to th8 pfqed applmnt at mC time of payment ol ttm school fees mgation payments. or other aadm Thm no(lce IS to Vie pfopct applhant that thr pM panod regard to such amounts or the valid#y Weof m acawesneewth 8gl(w, 86020 OtmC Oovcmmrn cod. and oh appliubk law commmces mth such payment or pcr(arrnance of any atnn rcquir-t as dncnbcd in Seam de020 o( the Government Cede Mdaionally. this notice admas that the protest thenot mud occur Whin W calendar days thereafter #' _. . '< . .. , .: 9' a. _. .. . .. BUILDING PERMIT PCR No: 09/17/98 16:16 Project No: Page 1 of 1 Development No: Job Address: 1815 ASTON AV Suite: Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 212-120-11-00 Lot#: 65 Valuation: 0 Construction Type: Occupancy Group: Reference#: CB980960 Status: Description: REVISE-SHORTENED BLDG-SEE ORIG Applied : : PERMIT #CB980960 Apr/Issue: Entered By: I Appl/Ownr : NOGLE ONUFER 619 297-8066 2398 SAN DIEGO AV PCR98 12 b A9801263 IIIN ISSUED 07/20/98 09/17/98 RMA *** - - - - - - - CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palms Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92039 (619) 438-1161 ~~~~ ____-__-_---- PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE OTen7fL PLAN CHECK NO. - EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit r'u\ - I .- (I ,,I 1. PROJECT INFORMAllON 6& ISec. 7031.6 BusLness and Professions Code: Any City or Countv which requires a Permit to COnLrUot. aiter. improve. demolish 01 repair any structure. prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed Pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9. commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Businnss and Professions Codel of that he is exempt therefrom, and the bad6 for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a Permit subjects the applicant to a civil Penalty Of not mora then five hundred dollars 1$50011. Name Address City Statelzip Telephone X State License I License Class City Business License X Designer Name Address City Sfate/Zip Telephone State License X Workers' Campanration Oadaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjurv one Of the following declarations: .8. WOAKERS' COMPENSATION:,: % :L ...~ :.. .. . . . . .. .,... , . of the work tor which this permit is issuad. 0 issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number era: Insurance Company Policy NO. (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 1$1001 OR LESS1 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I Certify that in the performance Of the Work for which this permit is issued, I shill not employ any person in my manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compenslltion Laws of California. WARNING: Fallvn to aecw workan' compmatbn COYH.~ 18 UnlawM. and .hall subject .n omplover to crimh.1 Wnaltles and clvll fines up to one hundred thousand doll." 18100.0001, In addnlon to the cost of COmWnrmion. damwas ms provided for In Ssctlon 3106 of ths Labor cod.. Interest and attomay's ferns. SIGNATURE DATE I hereby affirm that I am (Ixempt from the Contractor's License Law for the foliowing reelon: I. as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation. will do thn work and the structure is not intended or Offered far 1.18 ISsc. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law doer not apply to an owner of PIoPertv who builds or improver thereon, and Who does such work himself or through his own employ8es. provided that such improvamantr me not intended or offered for sale. If, however. the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am excIusivdy contracting with licensed COntreCtolD to construct the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Profassions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner Of piopeRv who builds or improves thereon, and COntraCtS for such piojb~ts with Contractorlsl licensad Pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 1, 2. 3. i have and will maintain a certificae Of consant to salt-inrurs for workers' compensation IS provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code. for the performance I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 Of the Labor Code. for the performance of the work for which this permit is Expiration Date .,, -~~aul~R~~cLnRpnoN.. ,, . , ,. *. ,.-* , ., . ,, . , I am exempt under Section i pwsonaliy plan to provid~ the mew hboi and materiais fw conhti~th of the prwossd piopwtv improvsmanl. YES ON0 I (haw I have not) signed an application for a building permit far the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm1 to provide the proposed Construction linclude name I address I phone number I contractors license number): Business and PmfesIOM Code for this reason: ~~~~ 4, number I Contfactors license number): 5. I plan to provide portions Of the work, but i have hired the foliowing Parson to coordinate, supervise and provide the major Work (include name I address I phone I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted Ihiredl the following parsons to provide the work indicated linclude name I address I phone number I type PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPETETHIS SECTION FOR ~~~~BUlLDINOP~.~NLY~': ' 1s the applicant or futura building Occupant required to submit LI business plan, acutely hazardous miterials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Prssley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES NO 1s the applicant or future building occupmt required to obtain II permit from the air poilution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1.000 feet of the outer boundary of a School site? YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. . , ,. .. ... I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit io issued ISec. 3097li) Civil Code), LENDERS NAME LENDERS ADDRESS ,. . . , . ,,, .. I certifv that I have read he appiication and state that the above information is Correct and that the intofmation on the plans is accurate. i agree to comply with all City ordinances and State iaws relating to building EOnltmction. I hereby authorize repraaantativae of the CitV of Carisbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, iNDEMNlFV AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SA10 CITY IN CONSEOUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excw lions over 5'0- deep and demolition or construction of strUCtUres over 3 Stories in height. EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the But ding Offtc,al under the provisions of this Code ahall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such from tho date Of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time of 100 days ISsction 106.4.4 Uniform Building Codel. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE f. .. 3 WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation ln Tartncrsfiip witfi 5ouenun~nt for ZluiUiy Safety DATE: September 1, 1998 JURIS DICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 REV 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE SET I1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center; Lot 65; Bldg. 1 Revisions 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: contact person. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed IXI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Joe Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: REMARKS: The structural sheets must be signed. By: Kurt Culver Telephone #: 297-8066 4% Mail Telephone Fax InPerson Enclosures: City-approved plans Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC log tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 (619) 560-1468 Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation ln !PartnersKip witti ~ovcnuncnt for 9uilaiWSafcty DATE: August 18, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 PLAN REVIEWER PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 REV SET I1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center; Lot 65; Bldg. 1 Revisions 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes 0 APPLICANT J u R I s . 0 FILE with the jurisdiction's building codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. contact person. Fax to Nogle Onufer Assoc. IXI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: 297-8055 Mail Telephone Fax InPerson REMARKS: PCR98126 By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA CM 0 EJ 0 PC 811 3/98 irnsrntl.doi 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + SanDiego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 ~~~ ~ Carlsbad 98-960 REV August 18, 1998 RECHECK LIST PROJECT ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGlL CORPORATION: 8/13/98 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: August 18, 1998 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGlL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? 0 Yes 0 No D. The following are the outstanding corrections for this revision: 6. proposed revisions. The "approved" plans have still not been submitted (to compare against the 7. The structural sheets weren't signed. IO. Additional fees are due. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 98-960 REV August 18, 1998 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 REV PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: DATE: August 18,1998 I I I I I I TOTAL VALUE 0 199 UBC Building Permit Fee 0 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Structural Only Hourly 0 Repetitive Fee Applicable 0 Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 0 Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 0 Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 522.90 Comments: Additional fee to review the proposed revisions: Esgil fee = 6 hours @ $87.15/hr. Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 .. I DATE: July 27, 1998 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad EsGil Corporation In Partnersfiip witfi +vemmmt for BuiUiqSafcty 0 JURIS. PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 REV PROJECT ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. SET I 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Research Center; Lot 65; Bldg. 1 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes Revisions with the jurisdiction's building codes. when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list [XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant [XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. contact person. Nogle Onufer Assoc. 2398 San Diego Ave. Also, fax to architect: 297-8055 San Diego 921 10 [XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: REMARKS: PCR 98126. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Mail Telephone Fax InPerson Esgil Corporation GA 0 CM EJ 0 PC 712019a tmsmtl.dol 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 c. .. bcarlsbad 98-960 REV July 27, 1998 GENER PL N CORRECTION IST JU Rl SDl CTl ON : Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-960 REV PROJECT ADDRESS: 1815 Aston Ave. I DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/20/98 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: July 27, 1998 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. 2. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? 3. 0 Yes 4B No . CarYsbad 98-960 REV July 27, 1998 12, Submit an explanation sheet, with a complete narrative of all proposed changes. Bubble or cloud all revisions on the plans. Otherwise, every note, every detail, every dimension, etc. must be compared against the previously-approved plans and this will take too many hours. Submit the set of approved plans (to compare against the proposed revisions). A set marked "Owner 111" was provided to Esgil Corporation, but it does not appear to be the set we last reviewed (in fact, it includes some sheets that are dated after we last saw this project). Each sheet must be signed. The permit application refers to the building being shortened to 25 feet. Please explain this. It does not appear to be reflected anywhere. Submit the corresponding plumbinglmechanicallelectrical sheets. Much time was wasted trying to figure out the above. Additional plan review fees will be charged once the basic plan review can begin. The structural engineer should provide a narrative at the front of the revised calculations, explaining what has been changed. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. '4I-tJO ROO NOCLE ONUFER ASSOCIATES no0 ARCHITECTS August 10,1998 Telephone: (619) 297-8066 FAX: 16191 297-RO55 Mr. Kurt Culver Esgil Corporation 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208 San Diego, CA 92123 Re: Plan Check No. 98-960 Rev. Summary of Proposed Changes Kurt, Per your request, the following is a brief summary of the plan changes proposed under Plan Check 98-960 Rev.: I. The overall height of the buildings has been reduced from 28'-0" to 25'-0". This change is reflected on the Architectural elevations and sections, and in the Structural panel elevations and calcs. The roof has been changed from a flat ledger roof with crickets to a sloping ledger roof. Additionally, the roof originally had 2 vertical steps which corresponded to two floor slab steps; the roof steps have been deleted. The glazing height has been reduced by 2 feet to be better proportioned to the shortened building. 2. 3. In all other regards the building is the same as it was when originally submitted as P.C. 98-960. Should you have any questions please contact me immediately at (619) 297-8066. Thank you, NOM, Inc. Associate From: AMAD DWDAR (619) 5446996 To: NOGLE ONUFER ARCHITECTS Date: 8/10/98 lime: 6:39:16 PM Page 2 of2 A - ZED Structural Engineers (619) 549-6996 7920 Miramar Rd #I27 SanDiego Ca 92126 NOGLE ONUFER AND ASSOCIATES 2398 SAN DIEGO AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92110 AUGUST 10TH,1998 ATTENTION: MR JOSEPH HOLASEK PROJECT : LOT 65 CARLSBAD JOB #98009 - BLDG #l SUBJECT : MAIN CHANGES IN CALCULATIONS FOR REDUCING THE BLDG HEIGHT FROM 28' TO 25'. DEAR JOE; IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR RQUEST, WE HEREBY PROVIDE YOU WITH A NARRATIVE TO EXPLAIN THE MAIN CHANGES IN THE CALCULATIONS. THIS LETTER SHOULD BE APPENDED TO THE FRONT OF THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS : THE REDUCTION IN BLDG HEIGHT LED TO REDUCING THE PANEL THICKNESS BY 0.5" (FROM 7.25" TO 6.75"), WHICH IN TURN REDUCED THE LATERAL LOADS ON THE BLDG WHICH IN TURN REDUCED THE DIAPHFUiGM REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION DETAIL OF THE STEEL JOIST PURLIN TO THE CONCRETE PANEL AND HENCE THE CALCS CHANGED. THYE THINNER PANEL NECESSIATED REVISING THE ITEMIZED MAIN CHANGES TO CALCS : 1- SHT # R3 : ANCHON BOLT W/ WASHER PLATE. 2- SHT # C1 : SHORTER COLUMN MEANT SMULER SIZE. 3- SHT # W1 : SHORTER PANEL MEANT THINNER PANEL. 4- SHT # L1 : REDUCED LATERAL LOADS ON DIAPHRAGM. PLEASE CALL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. YOURS SINCERELY; AMAD DOUD- S.E. PRESIDENT. #3370 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS pep ? 8 126 PERMIT NUMBER 1 8 0360 DATE 7 -21- 7v ADDRESS @AP ~ I43 (..T - 18 1s YL RESIDENTIAL TENAM IMPROVEMENT RESIDENTIAL ADDmON MINOR ( < s 1 O.MK).Oo) PLAZA CAMINO REAL VILLAGE FAlRE 98130-1 Fire Department . Bureau of Prevention City of Ca rlsbad Plan Review: Requirements category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Thursday, July 30, 1998 Contact Name Nogle Onuffer Assoc. Reviewed by: Address 2398 San Diego Avenue Diego CA 921 10 Planning No. Job Address 1815 Aston Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information andlor specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. 0 Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire DeDatfrnent Use Onlv Review 1 st 2nd 3rd CFD Job# 98130-1 File# Other Agency ID 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 931-2121 . , , ~. .~ '1" _-_.-., ..... _" ..... ".," -,,.. ............ .............. i,r':I1I,.IL~,,~,I.~~~mUI~,.~~~~ . JOB 9fad., LUl# 65 CMCftWe ssar m, C@V &A OY 3-4 It ' A - ZED Structura ngineere 7920 Miramar Rd #127 San Deigo Ca 92126 CAI.mmTmFI AAr, bAn 5 -- / qR (619) 549-6996 MIL. CONTENTS : I -r . __________ __________ DESIGN LOADS ..................................... D1 --> D2 ROOF FRAMING ..................................... R1 --> COLUMN DESIGN .................................... C1 --> C1 WALL DESIGN ...................................... W1 --> W6 FOOTINGS ......................................... F1 --> F2 LATERAL ANALYSIS ................................. L1 --> LIT SPECIAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN ........................ SS1 --> SS GOVERNING CODES : _________________ _________________ UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ............................. 1994 AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (318-83) 1983 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTORS MANUAL 9TH EDITION .............. ... DESIGN CRITEREA : %. _________________ _________________ 1- 2- 3- 4- SEISMIC ZONE :4 WIND EXPOSURE . llgll . -. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE : 2,000 PSF CONT FTG 2,500 PSF PAD FTG MATERIALS & DESIGN STRESSES (U.0.N) : FRAMING'LUMBER : BOLTED CONNECTIONS : STRUCTURAL STEEL : REINFORCING STEEL : CONCRETE BASIC LIVE LOADS : ROOF FLOORS : BALCONIES : CORRIDORS : LIVING SPECIAL DOUGLAS-FIR LARCH (NORTH) STEEL FRAMING : A325-N WOOD FRAMING : A307 A36 (FY = 36 KSI) #4 & SMALLER ASTM 615 (FY = 40 KSI) #5 & LARGER ASTM 615 (FY = 60 KSI) SLAB ON GRADE : (F'C = 2,500 PSI) ALL OTHERS : (F'C = 3,000 PSI) .. 1. . I. .~ . @d ? LOT fS bI Of 3' ,. Job 9s Y A-ZED structunl cansuleurts WEE1 NO 7275 Rock Canyon br. CALCULATIO MY- DATC 5 - 1- 98 CUECUED I~Y - DATE San Olego, CA 92f 28 (619) 649-6998 ,. 1' Lo7 dd65 A-ZED struaunl coasulturts enen NO Da Of 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATCDBV DATE 5-1- 76 CHECKED nv - DATE San Diego, CA 92126 .. . (619) 548-6996 La7 HjfS ,,d .I Job-: A-ZED sm~etunl cons~lonts WEE1 NO. AI Of J' 7275 Rock Canyon br. CALCULAtlDW A n 0 DATE 5 -1- 48 CHECltCD EV DATE Sen Dlego, CA 02126 (619) 649-6906 . ... .. &7 -# (S 7 &MI v, OWLET No.h *t A-ZED smctunl E- consultrna 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDBV &A47 D&,C .5 - I- 923 CHECKED IV - DATE San Diego. CA 92128 (810) 540-8006 ,. . ... ~. . .. , .. .. .... r ,. I i . .. ,' Job-- bT 6 $lIMTNO -- 4 OF 3 A-ZED struc~kl cdmm 7275 Rock Canyon br. CALCULATCDIIV + DIT6 != -1- sa CHECKED BY __ DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 16191 549-6996 ,I Jon 9 got, Ld7 # GS =I OF \lJ WEIT NO J A-ZED smaunl ~~imc~ c@mm 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED0VA DATE 5 -- I 9fi CHECKED IV - DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 1819) 849-8996 J m: L tilt-Up Wall Panel Design [General Information Description TYPICAL PANEL AT FRONT 6 BACK OF ELDG. SUPPORTING PURLIN LOADS L+I I ... Clear Height 23.000 n fc 3,000.0 psl 8(llsmic Zone 4 Parapet Height 0.000 n FY 60,000.0 psl Mln Vert Steal % 0.0020 Thlckness 8.750 In Phi 0.m Min Horiz Steel % 0.0012 Bar Slze 5 Wldth 12.000 In Bclsa FMty 0% Bar Spacing 14.000 In Parapat Does Not Redu~ Moma wall 8clismlc Factor 0.3000 Bar.Depth 3.000 In Panpet Selsmk Factor 0.3Wo Max Defl. Ratio 150.0 LL (1 8T Nat Comblnad Concrete Weight 1 Loads I 145.00 pcf Urlng: UBC Sec. 1914.0 mathod ...Exact, Non-iteratad Lateral Load8 Wind Load PSf Polnt Load Ibs .. . helght n ... load type Seismic Lateral Load wit ... distance to top n ... dlstance to bot n :..load h’D0 Seismlc * V6rtlerl Lord8 Uniform DL 390.00 Wfl UnltmAL 600.00 Wh ... OceWMty 5.500 In Concantric DL CO~MC LL Soitmio “11’ Mdgniflar 1.000 Wind *I* Maaniflot I .ooo wn XM .. ... I Wall Analyslr For Factorad Lead 6hMo& WM 0.006 in Bask M w/o P-balta 28,766.4 0.b inn 20,500.3 0.0 In4 Max. P-Delta Deflection 7.522 0.606 in 0.171 0.m tic Max P-Dah Momeht 12,688.) 0.0 in+ 22,930.8 42,868.9 in4 Baiarmo 0.171 YYLnQ 0.Oob in ssllrmp Basic Den wlo P-DbIta 0.239 Moment Excesb of Mer 17,743.1 0.0 inn 0.0 17.143.1 In4 23.m clear helght, O.OOff parapet. 8.75111 thick with #5 bars at 14.00in on center, de 3.00111, fc * 3,bt)O.Ops Using: UEC Sec. 1914.0 math od... &ad, Non-lterr\ted Factored Load Bending : SelSmlc Load oovems S6Nld Lead DefietIon : Seiemic Load Oovams Maximum iterated Moment : Mu 42,868.75 In1 Maximum IaMtM Mactlon 0.171 In Moment Capacity 42.777.50 inn D6fWlen UMI 1.840 In Maximum Allew vertical Bar Spaclng 18.000 in Parapet Bar Spadng Req’d : SEISMIC 1a.m Id Maximum Allow Herkontai Bar Spacing 48.606 in Wail LMrlgn OK 18 OOO In Parapet Bar 8pacing Req‘d : WIND - Mn Phl : Moment Cclpaclty Applled: Mu Cp Mld-Spdn Appiled: Mu @ Top ef Wall Sbismk 42.868.76 m-# ?,b23.00 in# 42,777.60 I+# Max iterated Sawlca Land Deflactlon Actual Dandlon Ratlo 0.47 in 1,614 : 1 Actual Rainforcing Percentage 0.0074 Allowable Max. Reinf. Parcent = 0.5 Rho Sal 0.0128 Wind 44,919.82 In-# 0.00 in# 0.00 In# 0.00 in 0 :I 0.0074 0.0128 Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Allowable Axial Stram = 0.4 fm 16.39 psi 120.00 osl 16.39 psl 120.00 Mi (0) 1SS-97 ENERCALC c:bh-cdkWKKMt 8.m KW-C€02810, vJ.0.2, lJurrN97 .. (Leopr: 1 flit-Up Wall Panel Deblgn E n = Esl Ec Fr = kit I Thk Ratio 3,122,018.8 psl 9.29 273.86 psi 40.89 sgress 91.125ln3 ' Mcr S' Fr 24,955.6 in4 Rho: Bar Relnf Pct 0.0214 .. Wind 0.289 in Valuer for Mn Calculation. .. 0.587 in As:eff= [Pu:tot + AsFyYFy a : (AsFy + Pu)/(.85 Cc b) c = a I .85 0.68) in 0.887 In igross 307.547 In4 307.55 in4 lcrecked 18.06 In4 15.80 in4 I-eff (ACI methods only) 0.W in4 0.00 in4 Phi: Capacity Reduction 0.900 0.900 Mn = kMFy (d -a) 4t,bJO.58 In-# 46,577.38 in4 seirmic -. . 0.297 in 0.582 In .. .. ~. LAddltlOnal Values I Wall Weight 81.582 pst Seismic Wind Wall Wt Wail Sbismic Factor 24.469 pd Applied Axial Load 546.00 409.50 Mh ., , Wail Wt Parkpet Salsmic Factor 24.460 pst LatMel Wall Weight 1,313.16 084.87 xlft Service Appiled Axial Losd 390.00 MI Total Lateral Loads 1,859.16 1,394.3?MR 937.97 wt 1,327.97 #M rrctored LOMS LoMr urcrd for rnalyelr .. I Setvice Wt IQ Max Mom Totel Servlco Axial Load) - .:I_. J 1.400 ACI 9-2 Gtoup Foetor 0.750 UBC 1921.2.7"1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 & 9-2 LL 1.700 ACI 9-3 bead Lbed Factot 0.900 UBC 1921.2.7 "0.0' Factor 0.906 ACI 9-1 & 9-2 ST 1.700 ACI 9-3 Short TaMi Factor 1.340 1.100 .... sehmic = ST : ::;;,.;. r j," . ., ..I A i . ,.." L Tilt-Up Wall Panel Deslgn [General information Descrlption -NEAR RIME WINO Icc' '. GIRDER LOADING Clear Height 24.060 h rc 3,boo.o psi Sdrmic Zone 4 60,000.0 p8l Min Vert 8twi % 0.0020 0.900 Mln Hot& Steal % 0.0012 Parepet Helght 1.000 n FY Thlckness 6.750 in Phl Bar Sbe 5 Width 12.000 In Base fbflty 0% Bar Spacing 14.000 In Parapet Welght Counteract8 Mldd Wall fidsmlc Factor 0.3000 Bar Depth 3.000 In .- Pa~pd Seismic Factor 0.3000 Max Deft Retio 150.0 LL & ST Not Cbmbined Concrete Welght 1 Loads b 145.00 pcf Using: UBC Sac. 1914.0 method ...Ex&+, Non-ltert3ted ~ Later81 Loadr VMlul bar Wlnd Load P$f Uniforfn DL Wft ., Uhiferm LL m Poini Load ibs ... OiYMltfICity in .. . helght n ... load type Seiamlc Concentric DL Xm concentric LL #m . . . dlstance to top ... distance to bot n Seismic *ita MaQniflw 1.000 ... load type Seismic Wind *I* Magnller 1.000 .. Laterel Load wfi ft [wail Analyrls - -\ w 0.006 In Baslc Del wlo P-Delta 0.266 BESIC M W/O P-DbltcL 29,484.6 0.0 in-# 21,067.6 0.0 In+ Moment Excess of Mcr 16,650.2 0.0 Inill.. 0.0 ' 16,659.2 ihl Max. P-Delta Deflection 11185 0.000 In 0.189 0.000 in Max P-Daita Moment 41,iii4.0 0.6 in+ 23,103.4 41,614.8 It14 Meximum Allow VeItlcSi Bar Spdclng ia.ooo in PiINpOt Bet SpWlng Rq'd : SEISMIC 18.006 In Horlzontai Bar Spacing 18.000 in Parapa Bat Spllcihg Aeq'd : WIND 18.OOO in Wall Design OM 24.obft clear height, 1.m parapet. 6.75111 thick with CS ban at 14.00in on center, d= 3.001ri, Pc = 3,000.0ps Uslng: UBC Sec. 1914.0 meth &...Exact, Non-iterated Factored Load Bendlng : Selmlc Load Qovemi ServlcO LoaU D6flactiOfI : Seismic Load Governs Maximum iterated Moment : Mu 41,614.80 in4 Madmum IfcLratod befledion 0.188 In Moment Capacity 42,088.3'1 in# Delactlon Llmn 1.920 In Mn Phi : Moment Capacity 42,088.31 in4 41,397.81 In4 Applied: Mu (rp Mid-Spdn 41,644.80 In-# 0.00 In4 Appiied: Mu (D top of wail 205.54 in4 0.00 In+ salltnlo 0.189 11Y1IIp 0.000 in &!Bm!i 86l)mIa Wind. Max Iterated SeNIcd Load batlection 0.19 In 0.00 In Actual Rdnbmlng Perdmtage 0.0074 0.0074 Allowable Max. Rdlnf. PdMnt = 0.5 Rho Bal 0.0128 Actual Axial Strezs : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Allowable Mal Stress = 0.4 Cm Aguai odection RMIO 1,521 : 1 0 :I 0.0128 13.69 psl 13.09 psl 120.06 psi 120.00 psl d Tilt-Up Wall Panel Dwlgn kp( 2)1 E 3,122,018.8 psl n = Eo I Ec 9.28 Fr = 273.86 PSI Ht I Thk Ratio 42.67 Value. for Mn CalcUl&loh ... As:eff= [Pu:tOt + AsFyyFy a : (AsFy + Pu)/(.85 fc b) c = a/ .e5 lgross I-eff (ACl method:, only) Phi: Capaclty Reductlon Mn = AsWFy (d - (v2) , ... kracked AdSJllL 0.290 In 0.570 In 0.670 In 307.547 In4 15.85 In4 sgmrs 91.125 In3 Mcr S Fr 24,955.6 In4 Rho: Bar Ralnf Pd 0.0214 .- Wind 0.284 In 0.557 In 0.658 In 307.55 In4 15.M In4 0.00 In4 0.900 4LI,Qo1.67 In4 i ,. ... [Additional VaIU6L 1 -Wind LOM8 UWd br 8hdYd8 FIOtarrwl Lad8 Wall Welght 81.582 psf Wall Wt Wall Selsmlc Factor 24.469 psf Applld Mal Load 0.00 0.dOxM . Well Wt Parapet Selamlc Factor 24.468 prf Letarsl WaIIWdgM 1,484.44 1,113.33Mt Sawbe Applied Mal Load 0.00 Mn Total htarnl Load8 1,484.44 1,113.33xM Servlce Wt @ Max Mom Total Servlce Mal Load# 1,080.31 n/n 1,080.31 MI I ACi Facton (pv ACI, appll , ,. , , ACI 9-1 8 9-2 DL 1.400 ACl9-2 QmUp F3ctbt 0750 UBC 1921.2.7 "1.4" Factor 1.400 ACI 9-1 EL 9-2 LL 1.760 ACI 8.3 Dead Load Factor 0.000 UBC 1021.2.7 "0.V Factor 0.900 ACI 9-1 EL 9-2 ST 1.700 ACl9-3 Short Term Factor 1.300 .... selsmlc = Sf : 1.100 , .. . ~ .!I (c) 1-7 ENERCALC o:'raMklb)(10091 lb KWMWzB10. v5.0.2.1 Jm1087 -, . .~ . .. , . ., , I i ., ... I.. d L pq.1 Tilt-Up Wall Panel Deshn I Oeneral Informattlon L L Dwcrlption CONC. PANEL AT HIGH POINT NEAR RIDGE WITH GIRDER LOADING I Clear Height Parapet Height Thickness Bar Size Bar Spacing Bar Depth Max Defl. Ratio Concrete Weight I Loads 24.000 1.000 fl 8.750 in 5 8.000 in 4.000 in 150.0 145.00 pcf rc 3,000.0 psi Salrmic Zone 4 60,000.0 psi Min Vwt Steal % 0.0020 0.800 Min Hork Steal % 0.0012 FY Phi Width 12.000 in Ease Fbaty 0% Parapel Wdght Countera& Midd Wail Seirmic Factor 0.3000 PilMpat Salsmic Fador 0.3000 LL 6 Sf Net Combined Using: UBC Sac. 1914.0 math od... Exact, Non-ltareat8d b I Lateral bade Vartlcrl Low Wlnd Load PSf Uniform DL 5,600.00 Wfi Unlbm U 5,800.00 Irm Point Load Ibs ...crcMntriClty 2.000 In ... helght n ... load type Selsmic Concantric t)L wfl Concenttic LL Wit ... dlstance to top n ... didenca to bot n Seismic “I” Magnlfler 1.000 ... load type S e l a m I c Wind *In.J&n#er 1.000 Lateral Load Wft LWall Analysis .,. ,. . .. , . , , , - - w 0.OOO In aQmuc 0.252 YYLnp 0.000 in SQbmk Baslc befl w/o P-Delta 0.363 Moment Excass of Mcr 77,188.15 0.0 In4 15,322.3 77,188.6 In4 Max P-Delta Moment 102,142.2 0.0 IMI 40,277.9 102,142.1 1114 . Basic M w/o P-Deita 36,156.5 0.0 in4 27,250.4 0.0 In# *’ MAX. P-Delta bekition 6.701 0.000 In 1.263 6.000 in Mexihum Allow V#tlcal Bet Spacing 18.060 in Parapat Oat spndnij Rq’d : SEISMIC 18.bbo In Hdtkofital Bet Spacing 16.000 in Pardpet Bar Spalng Req’d : WIND 18.600 In Wall OIsign OM 24.0M Elem height, 1.m parapet, 6.75111 thlck ah fi bars at 8.00111 on center, d= 4.00111, fc * 3.MNl.Opd. using: UBC sec. 1814.0 met had... Exad, Nan-IteWed Factored Load Bending : Seillmic Load Qwemr S(HVIC0 Load Daflactiah : Selsmic Load Getems Maximum Iterated Moment : Mu 102,142.18 id Madmum ItCrMta D6flnc)ction 1.253 in Mn Phi : Moment capaclty 108,928.43 In#-’ 1M.lB8.87 In4 AppiiBd: Mu Q, Micl-Opan 102,142..18 In4 0.00 In4 Applied: Mu 8 Top af Well 32,685.52 in+ 0.00 In4 Moment Capacity 108,928.43 In4 DeNWen Llmlt 1.920 In 8alrmIe Wlnd Max iterated SMvIca Lodd Deflection Actual Reinforcing Percentage 0.0097 Allowable Max. Reinf. Parcant = 0.5 Rho Bal 0.0128 1.25 in Actual Dt%cHon Ratio 230 :I Actual Axial Stress : (Pw + Po ) I Ag Allowable Mal Stress = 0.4 fm 84.70 psl 120.60 mi 0.00 in 0 :I 0.0097 0.0128 84.70 psi 120.00 Dsl .i i i .i 1 i ,:: .( ., (c) lga3-97 ENERCALC c:WW&WXW1 C Kw-OoMBlO, V5.0.2.14~1997 A 1 ,. .. L. Tilt-Up Wall Panel beUgn LAnalysls Data E 3.122.018.6 psi sgmsr 01.125 IM n=EslEc 0.20 Mcr = S Fr 24,055.8 In# Fr = 273.86 psi Rho: Bat R6lnf Pct 0.0214 Ht I Thk Ratlo 42.67 Value# (or Mn Calculation ... As:eff= [Pu:tot + AsFyFy a 1 (AsFy + Pu)/(.85 Cc b) lgmss Ictacked I-eft (ACI methods only) Phi: Capacity Reduction Mn = A%effFy (d - a) *' c = a I .e5 AQb!nL 0.625 In 1.226 in 1.442 In 307.647 In4 49.09 In4 0.M in4 0.001) 121.631.50 in-# Wind 0.585 In 1.147 in 1.350 In 307.55 in4 48.01 in4 0.00 In4 0.901) llS.776.53 in# lAddltiona1 Valws " I -Wind Load* uud rot rnrlytir rretond Load* Wall Wdght 81.582 psf Wall Wt Wall Selsmlc Factor 24.460 psf Applied Awlel Load 8,120.00 6,000.OO fiwt Wall Wt Parapel Selsmic Factor 24 460 psl LatetEI Wall Walght 1,484.44 1,113.33 XM Service Applied Axial Load 5.800 00 XM Total Lateral Loads 8,604.43 7.203.33 #it Total Service Axial Loads SeFvlce Wt @ Max Mom 1,060.31 #,'It - 6,880.31 M LAC1 FMon (pet ACI, applied intamally to I ACI 0-1 a 0-2 DL 1.400 ACI 0-2 Qmup fnctot 0.750 UBC 1021.2.7"1.4"F~ctar 1.400 ACI 0-1 a 0.2 LL 1.700 ACI E3 tMaU Load !=actor 0.000 UBC 1021.2.7"O.B" Factor 0.800 ACI 0-1 a 0-2 ST 1.700 ACI 0-3 Short farm Fabtor 1.300 .. sefsmic = ST : 1.100 i I. ..I 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDW Rh 0 DATE 5 -I- 96 CHECKEO nv DIT€ San Dlego. CA 92128 18191 649-6996 . .,. , .I , , .. . i , ,. "'.'. 1. .I *. I .I .. .. .. .. .. , Jo.-2&4~ k7 #d5 A-ZED struaunl EW- d consulhats San Dlego, CA 92126 wset NO..- op 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDBY #4c- DATE 5 -1- QR CUECUED BV DATE I6191 649-6896 hT c\ * I, ,' A-ZED srmchvrl41eting d ctn~~~motr 01 7275 Rock Canyon Or. (619) 548-8896 CALCULATED Or- DATE Y- a-qs San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED 111 DATC L.37 65 OF 3 A-zF,~ ~trurmd Enginteting comdmm San Dlego, CA 92126 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BY-- DATE Y -29-98 CHECKED ny DATE (619) 549-6BQ6 Job2 , I. A-ZED srmaunl EW- J cauultrnts lHCCT NO k5 OP 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. 1819) 549-6998 CALCULATED BV- DATE San Diego, CA 92128 CHECKED OV DATC .. WALE .. . 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. Sen Dlego, CA 02126 (610) MS-6986 CALCULATED Bv~-q D~TE q- 29- 98 CHECKED OV DATE Lof L< (IWCkt NO bt c 29-76 J6a-'-=Y2 ,I. , d A-ZED shuaunl ~nsinserlne caanrltuar 7275 Rock Canyon Dt. CALCULATEDBV + DAlC 4 CHECKED BY DATE San Dlego, CA 92128 (619) 549-8996 ."" . -- -..- ----*-- - WtCT no O* - 29- 98 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED sr- L.I Jan-=-=L rrl , J A-ZED struaunl E- cdtm CUECRED MV DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 16191 549-6906 i , ,, , .. , /, .. . .., .. . .; .. . ,*I , OF 4 A-ZED struchvll E-* cwrultm 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED DY DATE Y-w - c)r3 CHECKED ny DATE San Dlego, CA 92128 1819) 549-6998 .. /!. ,... . ... ,'I I , JOE Lor L< inem NO w&3 or d A-ZED SWMI bicl~sne conarltrna - 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BY z,eD DATE CHECKED BY - DATE San Dlego, CA 92128 (819) 549-6998 bT 6A cc ,'I I * 0, d A-ZED srmmvll wineeriry COW- 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDBY - DAIC 4-B- "zs - DATE . -. San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 649-6996 CHWKED EY 4 i , ~~. . ., h ... ,,'a. ,: , I. ,. n i . .. '. A-ZED htruehlnl EW- d cm~~t~te 6HkRf NO LIO 61 7275 Rock Canyon br. CALCULATeD 0"- DATE 4- bo- San Dlego. CA 92126 CHECKED nv DATE (619) 549-6996 LQT &c OI (I, A-ZED struaont -wring I/ cmmlmrn lUCkt NO 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. (819) 549-8898 CALCULATED nv- Dm Y - SO - YA San Diego, CA 92128 CHECKED )Y __ DATE J6b98cr- 9 LDT 65 CALCULAT€DW SR Dale q-m-?% A-ZED smrchvrl 3 cmu~unta M!CT Mb v 12 OP *I 1 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. 16191 549-6906 San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED BY DATE ,'.. , &Y7 65 OP 3 @HEST NO. w L/3 A-ZED strucnvrl ~qina~ COMUI~M~ 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDBV R DITE 5-1- San Dlego. CA 92126 CHECKED BV DATE .. , (619) 549-6996 WALE 7275 RW Canyon Dr. San blego, CA 92128 (619) 549-8996 CALCULATEDBY- ?/ - 30-93 - DATE CHECKED OY J0lI-Y Lor &j- 3 bncei 1L Is' D? .a , A-ZED smcctunl E- com~tm 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATED BY-- 4- 30- 98 San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED BY DATE 1619) 549-8996 LQT t3L - JO.A-7 ., .. 'I , - A-ZED S-nl E- v' COMUI~W &l(CCT NO. L OF I 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDW OAT^ 4- 30 %% CHECKED BY DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 . ,..,. (619) 649-6996 i.1 JOl---2&?- 9 &7 CG weef NO b Lr7 OC *. I v' A-ZED srmctunl minering consu~tm 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. CALCULATEDBV AI2 13 DATE 5-1- 98 San Dlego, CA 92126 CHECKED BY DATC (619) 549-6996 8CALE TRANSMITTAL A-ZED Structural hgineerd Cfansultafits ':', ' San Diego, CA 92126 'v' 7720 MIRAMM R3. #lZ7 . Phone No. (619) 549-6996 TO:.- DATE: Ll,z 28 - l79B 24 370 &d DEGa AVE ~* , , PROJECT: LoT 65 RLffi 62 Qtd n/ffia - 92/10 Hni nsFK JOE NO. . . ?..em9 - ATTN: Me. .jut= -rd (6mJ zq2,snL+ TRANSMITTING @, STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS COPES. SETS, 0 STRUCTURAL BLUE PRINTS 0 OTHER - L RETURNING 0 REDMARKED DRAWINGS, SHEETS 0 REDMARKED SPECIFICATIONS, SECTIONS 0 SHOP DRAWINGS - STAMPED 0 OTHER TRANSMlTTINC ORIGINALS ..,,,," , , ...., . * , , . . ,, . .,,. , . . . .., . . __ I *. i\ ,.,. .. .. , .- .._& ,. ., .. SEWBY: , C.C. v TRANSMITTAL A-ZED Structural Engineer‘> Consultms 8 7 79ro mmmn?/rh( e,, M/~ San Diego, CA 92 126 1 .: RETURNING .. RED~ARKED DRA~NGS, SHEETS - 0 REDMARKED SPECIFICATIONS, SECTIONS i , ... 0 SHOP DRAWINGS STAMPED . ., , , .). ., , .. :.. . 0 OTHER , . , ... . . . >’ ,. .. i,. .. - TRANShIITTING ORIGINALS San Dlego. Cd 02126 (610) 549-6896 ! CHLCKED BV - DATE - - ....... 1 ...... i +... " ............ 1 ....... 1 ...... 1 ........ t .... ........ 1 ...... 1 j .. I i i ....... I ..... ........ i... .. ....... 1 ....... 1 ....... ~ ..... , .............. YO.. I-- .... ........ ./ ...... I ............... 1 *I ........I...... ......... + I I ......... L..... ..... ! ...... :.i ..... ........I... ......... ........ i 1 -1.- I I ..... ...... ~ ...... .............. ,.. ,J.. -L I *# e Joe--- IMtCr no 2 Of 7- CALCULATEDBY- DATE 9 - 9 9 -98 d 7275 Rock Canyon Dr. A-ZED StrUaunl- COti#Jhh CIlECrED nv DATE San Dlego, CA 92126 (619) 549-6996