Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2848 CACATUA ST; ; 73-1637; PermitPhone 729-1181 ',e 5 It Clo, of work FEW 0 ADDITION 0 ALTERATION 0 REPAIR 0 MOVE 0 R€MOVE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REWIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB- ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONMTtONING. THtS PERMtT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 80 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A MEbJCED. PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK !S COM- ANCEL THE INSPECTOR .-. INSPECTION RECORD I DATE I REMARKS 73- Ib37 FOUNDATIONS: SET BACK I I I I TRENCH I I RE INFORCING FOUNDATION WALL 81 WEATHER PROOFING CONCRETE SLAB FRAMING INT. LATHING OR DRYWALL I EXT. LATHING INSPECTOR e USE SPACE BELOW FOR NOTES, FOLLOW-UP, ETC. 7/11/73 Fdnm Fomsm OmK, B. Nelson 7/12/73 Pour OmKm E. Plude 7/17/73 OmKm to pour slab when closet ring brass bolts are in place (required hold down) Bm Nelson 8-U+-73 Sheathing and Frame OmKm Bm Nelson 8-23-73 Drywall O,K, Bm Nelson 10-17-73 No Final: 1. water heater pop of f drain line mav not be trarmed and 3/4" to end. 2. tin elect. boxes to surface at paneling. 3. Provide cover boxes for exterior sewer cleanouts. 4. Provide anti cvnhon valves on lawn sprinkler systems. Plastic water piping not approved for exposed location. B. Nelson PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION Permit No. a/,j 5- City of CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Amticant to comolete numbered maces onlv. 7 I 1 I PERMIT FEES SPECIAL CONDITIONS: WPLICATION ACCEPTED BY .I PLANS CHECKED BY I APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY NOTICE THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A MENCED. PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM- . -. . . . . . . . - __ I No. I Type of Fixture or Item I Fee a I WATER CLOSET fTOlLETl ISLAG 1 I BATHTUB LAVATORY (WASH BASIN) SHOWER 1 KITCHEN SINK & DISP. 1 I DISHWASHER I r, E--r I LAUNDRYTRAY ~ ---- -~ / CLOTHES WASHER 2 WATER HEATER URINAL I DRINKING FOUNTAIN Ill 1 ~- FLOOR-SINK OR DRAIN I SLOPSINK I I GAS SYSTEMS: NO. OUTLETS - n/L I WATER PIPIP!G & TREATING EQUIP. T I I WASTE INTERCEPTOR Ill I I VACUUM BREAKERS I I -1 LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM .- CESSPOOL SEPTIC TANK & PIT WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE) THlS 1s YOUR PERMIT PLAN CHECK VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH *." INSPECTOR DATE ITEM REMARKS 7/3Q/73 Underground OeKe 8-l-4-73 Gas and Rough 0.K. &-/f-75 F,A / USE SPACE BELOW FOR NOTES, FOLLOW-UP, ETC. lHaEPECmR Be Nelson Be Nelson s ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION City of CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 EW 0 AODlTlON 0 ALTERATION 0 REPAIR . 1 Describework: 1 PECIAL CONDITIONS: @PLICATION ACCECTEO By: I CLANS CHECKED BY. I APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY NOTICE THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WlTHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A MENCED. PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM- EK VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH PERMIT FE ISSUANCE OF EACH PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION, FOR EACH AMPERES OF MAIN SERVICE, SWITCH, FUSE OR BREAKER NEW SERVICE ON EXISTING BLDG.' FOR EA. AMPERE OF INCREASE IN MAIN SERVICE. SWITCH. FUSE OR BREAKER REMODEL, ALTERATION, NO CHANGE IN SERVICE, FOR EA. AMPERE OF INCREASE TEMP. SERVICE UP TO AND INCLUD- ING 200 AMP. TEMP. SERVICE OVER 200 AMP. PER 100 MINIMUM PERMIT FEE S 1 llS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT PERM IT VALlDATl ON CK. M.O. CASH IN SPECTOR ‘73- IQ3b INSPECTION REPORTS 1 DATE ITEM REMARKS 7/l3./73 Pole O.K. /b -/9.73 INSPECTOR B. Nelson c "r i' MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATW~~IT*' MAIL ADDRESS BRANCH I- i ' LkE OF BUILDING NOTICE _A THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- TION AUTHOdlZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCT10 OR WORK ISSUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 1% DAYS AT #NY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM- MENCED. 8, Unit Heaters-B.T.U , Ventilation Fan I I Incinerator .I ,e>? I , iT "3- PERMIT $ TOTAL FEE ? SIGNATIIRL O? OWrER (I? OWNER BUILDCR) (DATE1 r WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT PLAN CHECK VAtlDATlON CK. , -' M.O. CASH PERM IT VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH INSPECTOR I DATE ITEM Heat-Duct 5-u-73 1tW5-73 Fa ~ USE SPACE BELOW FOR NOTES, FOLLOW-UP, ETC. REMARKS INSPECTOR 0.K. B. Nelson A- ! I . *b 'as '1' 2. "' *- . '- Date Signed Redifpm 45 465 SEND PARTS I AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. Date Signed Redifprr SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. 45 465 PHILIP HENKING BENTON PRESIDZNT - CIVIC LNGlNLLll -d r 'I c .. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS - FOUNDATIONS 6741 EL CAJON BOULEVARD SAN DIECO. CALIFORNIA 92115 , La Costa Land Company Costa Del Mar Road Rancho La Costa, California 92008 October l?, 1972 SAN DJLGO: 503-5651 L* MESA: 469-5654 RECEIVED Subiect: Prolect No. 71-7-17D Grading Permit No. L-5930 JdL 9 B73 Final Report on Compuctmd Filled Ground And Classification of Soi I Conditions Lob 413 to W, inclusive And Certain Streut k La Cortu )ukadows Unit No. 3 Carlsbud, California c\~y OF: CARLSBAD Building Department Gent le men : This is to report the results of tests and observations made in order to inspect the compaction of filled gmnd placed on certain meas of La Costa Meadows Unit No. 3 in Carlsbad, California, fomr!y a part of the CwnG of San Diego. The fills were placed during the period between July 15, 1971 and July 20, 1972. The approximate areus and depths of filled ground placed under our inspection in accordance with he appmved c~pcc~ficatlom ore shown on ths ottuched Drawing No. 2, antitfed "Locaiicm of Compacted Fill4 Ground." The grading plan used for the placement of filled ground was prepured by Rick Engineering Cornpony und oppmved March 15, 1971. Tfie approximate locations at which the tests worn taken and the final test resulh are presented on pages T-1 to T-26, inclusive, under the "Table of Test Results.'' The laboratory datumina- tions of he maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the major fill materials are presenhd on pages T-27 and T-28, under the "Laboratory Test Resulh." Some of the maximum dry densities shown in tha "Tabfa of Test RatuIts" were combinations of these. The tats were taken during the wsskly perid indicated below: Test Number 1 to 4, inciusivs 5 to 21, inclusive 22 to 35, inclusive 36 to 63, inclusive 64 to 113, inclusive 114 to 13, inclusive 154 to 218, inclusive 219 to 275, lncludvs 276 to 318, inclusive 319 to 360, Inclusive Week Ending July 17, 1971 July24, 1971 August 7, 1971 August 14, 1971 August 21, 1971 August 28,197'1 Sepbemtkar 4, 1971 Sspteember 11, 1371 Septernbr 18, 1971 Sepkrrrbsr 25, 1971 ! t I 1 I i j I 1 ! t ! f f 1 L 1 . .r ProJect No. 71-7-17D - La Costa Land Company Test Number 361 to 404, inc 405 to 456, inc 457 to 507, inc 508 to 538, inc 539 to 90, inc 571 to 621, inc 622 to 675, inc 676 to 701, inc 702 to 771, inc 772 to 835, inc 836 to 905, inc 906 to 924, inc 925 to 930, inc 931 to935, inc usive usive usive usi ve usive wive usive utive urive usive usive usive urive usive -2- Week Ending October 19, 1972 October 2, 1971 October 9, 1971 October 16, 1971 October 30, 1971 kvember 6, 1971 November 53, 1971 November 20,1971. November 27, 1971 December 4, 1971 December 1 1, 1971 December 18, 1971 December 25, 1971 July 15, 1972 July22, 1972 The final results of tests and observations indicate that he compacted filled ground has been placed at 90 percent of the maximum dry density or greater, It hat been determined that the fill materials, compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density, have a safe bearing value of 1930 pounds pew square foot for one foot wide continuous footings founded at a minlmum depth and placed five feet or mom Inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. If faoiings are placed closer to the exposed slopes than 5 Feet inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes, these should be deepened one foot below a 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical line projected outward and downward from a point 5 feet horizontally inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. Tests indicats that the compacted filled ground is adequate to sdisfocbrily support the proposed wood frame dwellings without detrimental settlements. Expansive clery, silty clay, and smdy clay soils wm pluced in the upper thm but in -rimin compacted fill areas and also exist in the upper three fcat below finished grads in certain cut areas. The final classifications OF the soil conditions existing on each lot are presented us folloM: Type A - Critically Expansive Soils Lots lots 413 to 430, inclusive 432 to 435, inclusive 437 to 441, inclusive 446 to 450, inclusive 459 to 466, inclusive 470 to 487, inclusive 512 to 527, inclusive 531 to 534, indusivu 536 to 540, inclusive 543 to 552, inclusive 554, 556, 59, 553 563,564,570, n4 575, S6 !578 to 581, incIusive 584 452 to 454, fnclusive - 1189 to 510, inclusive BENTON ENGlNEERtNG. INC. ' 6ojecf No. 71-7-170 La Costa Land Company -3- October 19, 1972 Type B - Marginally Expansive Soils Lots Lots 431 and 436 442 to 445, inclusive 451, 455 to 458, inclusive 467 to 469, inclusive 488, 511 528, 529, 530, 535 542, 555, 560, 565 566, 568, 569, 571 92 and 573 Type C - Nonexpns ive Soils lots It is recommended that the following special design and precautions be taken for the hauses to be constructed on the above lots in order to minimize the possible dumaging effects due to differential movements of the potentially expansive soils: Type A Lots 1. Avoid the use of isolated interior piers. Use continuous interconnected reinforced footing throughout, and place these at a minimum depth of hvo feet below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface. 2. Reinforce and interconnect contlnuowly with steel ban all interior and exterior footings with one #5 bar at 3 inches above the bottom of the footings and one #5 bar placed 1 1/2 inches below the top of the stem of the footings. Exercise every effort to assure that the moisture content of the soils in the uppr 18 inches below finished grade is 1 percent to 3 percent greater than optimum at the time of placing Foundations and slabs. Raised wooden floors that span between continuous footings are bst, or use concrete slabs with at least 6x6 -10/10 welded wire reinforcement and a minimum of 4 inches of crushed rock 3/4 to 1 inch in sixe beneath all concrete slabs. A moisture barrier should be provided over the crushed rock and this should be covered with 2 inches of sand below concrete slabs. . ' "* i 4. ' 5. Separate garage slabs from perlmebr footings by a 1/2 inch thickness of construction felt or equivalent, to allow independent movement of garage slabs relative to perimeter footings. Assure complete separation by extending the felt over the full depth of the front thickened edge of the gcrmga slab. Also, cut off the garage door sfbps at leust 1/2 inch above the slab. BENTON ENGINEERING. (NC. . .Project No. 71-7-17D La Casta Lad Company -4- October 19, 1972 6. Provide positive drainage away from all perimeter footings with a vertical full of at least 6 inches in a horizontal distance of 5 to 6 feet outside the house walit. Type 8 Lob Those lots listed as Type B lots should follow all the above-Iisted recommendations with ha tvK, fool i owing excep t ions : 7. The continuous footings may be placed at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface rather than the two Feet recommunded for Type A lots. 2. Single #4 bar placed as dimtsd (above) nAr tops and botbms of ulf interior and exterior footings may be substituted for the #5 ban recommended for Type A lots, Recommendations 3 to 6, inclusive, as fisted for the Type A lots, are also applicable to the Type B lok. Only nonexpansive soil conditions were observed in the upper three feet on the Type C lots and therefore specially designed footings and slats will not be required on these lob. Respecffull y subrni tkd, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. R.C. Remr reviewed by Philip H. Ben&, Civil Engineer Addressee Rancho La Costa, lnc. Attention: Mr. Burton L. Kramer Rick Engineering Company San Diego County Building intpectm, Department of County Engineer . (1) Attention: Mr. H. M. Taylor (1) Attention: Mr, Joe Sovella City of Carlsbad Department of Building Inspection 'isfa Office BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Re R/PHB/ew