HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-06-20; City Council; 13201; 1995-96 OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGETS AND ADOPTION OF REVISED FEES\
i Cly OF CARLSBAD - AGEI()A BILL / JG .* 4; z AB # /$, dC / TITLE:
-) i r.“ DEPl
6-20-95 1995-96 OPERATING AND CAPlTAL IMPROVEMENT a
CITY d
CITY
a DEPT. FIN PROGRAM BUDGETS AND ADOPTION OF REVISED FEES
id
4 h 4
rn I
a
rn 0 z
!? *rl u
4 3
0 rn 2
‘d a, u a 0 a (d
a $
a
a a,
d
.n
2 m
:
n 0 h 4
In I
m
g
L
g .I4 u 1 rl 0 rn 2
a a, u a 4 cd
rl 4
L) s
V 0
z 0 F 0 a =! 0 z 3 8
~
I I
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1, Hold public hearing on the City’s 1995-96 Operating Budget and 1995-96
to Buildout Capital Improvement Program, and on the revision of a
development related City fee.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 9 5’ - 130 adopting the final Operating Budget for
1995-96 and appropriating funds for the 1995-96 Capital Improvement
Program.
3. Adopt Resolution No. 95 - i9 I adopting the Gann spending limit for
1995-96.
4. Adopt Resolution No. 95- 19 f3- revising the Drainage Area fees.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
This item is established to allow the public an opportunity to comment on the
the proposed change in the Drainage Area fees. The Council is encouraged to
ask any questions related to the Budgets and fees that may still need clarification.
Following the public hearing, the Council may adopt the Operating and Capital
Improvement Budgets for 1995-96 and”the revised fee schedule.
The proposed 1995-96 budget totals $98.2 million, of which $75.4 million is the
operating budget and $22.8 million the Capital Improvement budget. Operating
revenues total $74.3 million and Capital revenues total $24.1 million for a total of
$98.4 million.
Operatinu Budqet
The effects of the recession and past budget decisions by the State of California
(taking $2.5 million of Carlsbad’s property taxes) continue to impact the City’s
operating budget. Revenues are expected to be flat in most cases with only the
enterprise funds showing any growth. No new programs or services are proposed
City’s proposed Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget, as well as
in the budget for 1995-96.
The General Fund portion of the budget contains $38.9 million in recommended
expenditures which is a decrease of $500,000 from the current 1994-95 budget.
Projected General Fund revenues for 1995-96 total $38.9 million resulting in a
budget which is balanced with current revenues. Revenue projections show a
decrease of .3% or $100,000 over the current 1994-95 projected receipts.
The relatively flat revenue forecasts for 1995-96 have resulted in a proposed
budget which contains similar service levels to those of 1994-95. No additional
reductions or cuts in programs are proposed. However, the General fund
continues to rely upon alternate funding sources and one-time revenues in order
to balance. These include using Police Asset Forfeiture funds and Gas Tax funds
for what were once General fund expenditures. In addition, fifteen positions are
I
r I
6 e 0
I PAGE TWO OF AGENDA BILL NO. 1 3: d G /
not funded in the proposed budget, an increase of three quarters of a position from 19944
Also, no payment to the Golf Course fund is included. Instead, staff is recommending prepayi
the $600,000 in fiscal year 1994-95.
One-time revenue sources used to balance the General fund total $650,000 and include the u
of a surplus in the City's retirement accounts which can only be used to offset retiremc
payments. Also, a transfer of surplus funds from the Workers' Compensation fund to the Gene
fund is anticipated.
A contingency account totaling $550,000 has been included in the budget proposal which
$217,000 higher than the unusually low amount adopted in the 1994-95 budget. In p
recessionary years, the contingency account was typically set at $1 million to $2 million. 1
contingency account provides Council some flexibility to meet unexpected demands
resources which may arise during the coming year. The recommended 1995-96 Budget a
includes .$75,000 in funds for community service programs, and $202,000 for the Carlsk
Convention and Visitor's Bureau.
Additional information in the form of Issue Statements, as well as any comments received frc
the public at the workshop meeting held on June 12th, will be presented to the City Council ai
the close of the Public Hearing on June 20th.
Gann Limit
In addition to adopting the Operating Budget, the Council is also asked to adopt the GE
spending limit as required by Article XlllB of the California Constitution. The Gann Limit crea
a restriction on the amount of revenue which can be appropriated in any fiscal year. 'I
revenues which are subject to the Limitation are those considered "proceeds of taxes." The ba
for calcu!ating the Limit began in fiscal year 1978-79 and is increased based on populat
growth and inflation. The City's spending limit for 1995-96 is $108.5 million with appropriatic
operating margin of $80 million.
Capital Improvement Program
The 1995-96 to Buildout Capital Improvement Program (CIP) totals almost $408 million E
identifies approximately 160 future projects. Forty projects are scheduled for 1995
appropriation at $22.8 million. Revenues for the 1995-96 CIP are projected at $24.1 millit
Major projects programmed for the upcoming year include the Carlsbad Boulevard Shl
Protection seawall, improvements to the Poinsettia] La Costa and Cannon Rd. 1-5 interchang
the widening of Rancho Santa Fe Road, and the final appropriation for the Maerkle Resen
lining project. Total spending on Capital Improvement Projects could total upwards of $54 mill
as approximately $31 million in appropriations for uncompleted projects will be carried forw
into 1995-96.
Fees for Citv Services
One of the City Council's goals is to annually evaluate fees and charges for services
conjunction with the budget. Staff has reviewed all fee schedules and is only recommendin
change in one fee at this time. The recommendation is to increase the Planned Local Drain:
Area fees by .5%. The increase is authorized by ordinance and is based on the change in
Engineering News Record (ENR) construction cost index. The new proposed fee result:
increases to the Drainage Area fees of between 0 and $30 per Equivalent Dwelling U
depending on the drainage area and the level of run-off.
of "proceeds of taxes" of $28.5 million. The result of the calculation provides the City with
r 1
4 e 0
c PAGE THREE OF AGENDA BILL NO. / 3, h c /
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of the proposed budgets is detailed in the attached schedules.
EXHIBITS:
1. Resolution No. 95 - /3 0 adopting the final Operating Budget and Capital lmprovemt
Program for 1995-96. (Technical Appendix available for review in the Finar
Department.)
2. Resolution No. 95- i3 1 adopting the spending limit for 1995-96.
3. Resolution No. 95-172- establishing fees for City services.
.
r I
4
*
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
RESOLUTION NO. 95-170
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OPERATING BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
CITY OF CARLSBAD AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS
ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL
PROGRAM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 FOR THE
FUNDS
~ ~~ ~
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has
reviewed the proposed final Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program
for fiscal year 1995-96 and has held such public hearings as are necessary prioi
to adoption of the final budgets.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Citl
of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That certain documents now on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Carlsbad entitled, "City of Carlsbad, 1995-96 Operating Budget anc
1995-96 to Buildout Capital Improvement Program - Preliminary" as amended ir
accordance with Exhibits A through 0 attached hereto and incorporated b!
reference herein, is hereby adopted as the final Operating and Capita
Improvement Budgets for the City of Carlsbad for the fiscal year 1995-96.
2. That the amounts reflected as estimated revenues for fiscal yea
1994-95 as shown in Exhibits A and B are hereby adopted as the final budgetec
revenues for 1994-95.
3. That the amounts designated as the 1995-96 Budget request il
Exhibits A and B are hereby appropriated to the department or fund for which the
are designated, and such appropriation shall be neither increased nor decrease1
except as provided herein.
b 0
r I
4
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I,
e
4. That total appropriations for each fund may only be increased or
decreased by the City Council by passage of a resolution amending the budget,
5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use anc
transfers of budget funds:
a. No expenditure of funds shall be authorized unless sufficien
funds have been appropriated by the City Council or City Manager as describec
below.
b. The City Manager may authorize all transfers of funds fron
account to account within any department.
c. The City Manager may authorize transfers of funds betweel
departments within the same fund in an amount up to $25,000 per transfer.
d. The City Manager may delegate to department heads th
authority to make budget transfers within their own departments.
e. The City Manager may authorize the expenditure of funds fc
various purposes in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in exces
of $25,000 will he governed by Section 3.28 of the Municipal Code.
f. The City Manager may authorize budget adjustments involvin
offsetting revenues and expenditures; the City Manager may authorize increase
or decreases in an appropriation for a specific purpose where the appropriatio
is offset by unbudgeted revenue whic.h is designated for said specific purpose
g. The City Manager may authorize change orders on pub1
works contracts in amounts not to exceed $25,000 per change order if sufficiel
appropriated funds are available.
h. The City Manager may authorize emergency out of state trav
for public safety or emergency services purposes.
Ili
r
t
I
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I,
a 0
i. The City Council must authorize all transfers of funds from the
budgeted Contingency Account.
j. The City Council must authorize any increase in the number
of authorized permanent personnel positions above the level identified in Exhibii
C. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as
necessary, within the limits imposed by the controls listed above.
6. All appropriations for Capital Improvements Projects remainins
unexpended at June 30, 1994, are hereby appropriated for such capital project:
for the 1995-96 fiscal year.
7. 1994-95 appropriations in the approximate amount of $2,955,38!
are hereby continued into 1995-96 for the purposes shown in Exhibit D. AI
appropriations for outstanding encumbrances as of June 30, 1995, are hereb!
continued into 1995-96 for such contracts or obligations.
8. That a transfer of $600,000 from-the General fund balance to thc
Golf course fund in fiscal year 1994-95 is authorized.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the C+
Council on the 20th day of JUNE , 1995, by the following vote, to wit
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin, Finnila, i
~ I
~
~
NOES: None
ABSENT; None
I
~
ATTEST:
~
(SEAL)
1
1 I * 0 CITY OF CARLSBAD e ' MHlBl
t OPERATING FUNDS
PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1995-96
PROJECTED PROJECTEC
BALANCE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE
FUND JULY 1,1995 REVENUES MPENDtlURES TRANSFERS JUNE 30,lQ 1 GENERAL FUND 3 ~o,w,va 38,aqooo 38,854,637 (200,000) 10,257,s .......................................................................................... ; .................................................. :.: ............ i .............................................................................. ...............................................................................
~ :.: p~UCE.~5SET'F'ORFE,NRE .:.:.:.: .:.:,:.:.:. :.:.:,:.: .:.:,:.:. ......................................... ............................................................ ........................... 1,115,400 150,OW
HOUSING - sH=noN a
AUDIO-VISUAL INSURANCE
GAS TAX
TREE MAINTENANCE
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING
BUENA VISTA CRK CHNL MNT
STATE GRANTS (LIBRARY)
133,082
91,800
2,924,600
41 5,720
26,100
640,260
424,588
197,700
SENIOR NUTRITION
CDBG E~;~TLEMENT/REHAB
57,120
3,235,000
110,OW
1,350,000
533,200
383,300
m,900
108,OOo
=,OW
3,238,794
147,500
1,467,900
531,290
380,380
713,620
6,500
=,m
1,208,2;
129,21
=,x
2,806,7(
41 7,E
29,a
5353
526,a
133,s
6,090 195,900 =,Q=
25,498 647,506 672,066
9!
9!
I ENTERPRISE ......................................................................... WATER OPERATIONS 4,104,000 13,176,200 13,2O1,330
RECLAIMED WATER 360,300 1,208,700 1203,300
SEWER OPERATIONS 3,643,500 4,672,500 4,493,260
SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT 36,850 101,400 108,440
GOLF COURSE 600,000 0 470,000
4,078,s
365,7(
3,822,7
29,81
130,OC
-VICE woR~Rs:::coMpsE~lNsuR~ d
1,245,900 755,020 1,114,500 m,4i
UABIUTY SELF INSUR
HEALTH INSURANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
1,735,900 1,004,990 1,065,360 1,675,5:
1,201,700 1,805,000 1,950,000 1,056,7(
(88,700) 1,335,000 1,291,000 (44,7(
3,325,200 -,m 1,093.500 3,221.7(
625,600 1,088,500 1,070,080 (100,000) 544,a
1 REDEVELOPMENT k 6p'~#AtrBN8 ........... ........... ................................................................................. 7,190 78,100 523,960 450,000 11,3
DEBT SERVICE 905,960 1,275,000 1,077,600 (450,000) 6533
LOW AN'D MOD INCOME HSNG 2,876,800 355,ooo 173,020 3,0!58,7l
TOTAL OPERATING FUNDS $37,038,216 $74,251,210 $75,339,289 ($300,000) $35,590,1:
io
1 I
CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
4
OPERATING FUNDS
PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1994-95
UNRESERVED PROJECTEf
BALANCE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE
FUND JULY 1,1994 REVENUES E"ES TRANSFERS JUNE30.19!
[GENERAL FUND if 11,296,596 38,992,OOO 37,231,418 (1,800,000) 11,257,l' Appropr~a~~n.~ro. .................................. ............................................................................................................................. Fund Ba[mce :p
(800,O
10,457,l p: ;:: ............................................................................................. poL,c~xss~ WRBwRE' ....................... 1 522 400 .......................................................................................................
#, 100,ooo 507,000 1,115,4
HOUSING - SECTION 8
AUDIO-VISUAL INSURANCE
131,400 3,225,000 3,223,318
121,800 115,000 145,000
GAS TAX
TREE MAINTENANCE
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
STREET LlGHTlNG
BUENA VISTA CRK CHNL MNT
STATE GRANTS (LIBRARY)
SENIOR NUTRITION
CDBG ENTmEMENT/REHAB
2,811,600
364,400
40,100
986,800
31 2,700
260,400
2,200
47,684
1,360,000
584,200
260,000
660,000
115,000
207,500
195,300
943,730
1,247,000
532,880
274,000
1,006,540
3,112
Z70,2W
191,410
96591 6
133,o
91,8
2,924,6
41 57
26,l
64092
424,5
197,7
6,C
25,4
I ENTERPRISE ::~::::::j::~.j:~:::::~~~~~~:~:~~:~~~~~~~;;~~~~~:::j WATER OPERATIONS 3,635,600 11,851,100 11,382,700 4,104,C
RECLAIMED WATER 131,800 =,m 735,000 360,:
SEWER OPERATIONS 3,299,400 4,674,500 4,330,400 3,643,E
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 69,300 129,800 162,250 36,t
GOLF COURSE 420,000 0 420,000 600,000 60081
I INTERNAL SERVICE .......................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................... WORKER'S COMP SELF INSUR 1,321,200 771,600 846,906
LIABILITY SELF INSUR 1,696,200 1,047.000 1,007,300
1,245,'
1,7355
HEALTH INSURANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
1,336.700 1,815,000 1,950,000
(85,700) 1,230,000 1,233,000
3,606,200 1,019,000 1,300,000
617,500 781,400 773,300
1,201 ,i
(88,i
3,325,:
625J
I REDEVELOPMENT b o~~~~~~~;~.:.:.:~.:.:.:.: .................................................. ...... ::~~~~;~::~:~~~::~~.;~::;::~.:~ 59,600 78,; 00 63031 0 500,ooo 7,
DEBT SERVICE 936,300 1,285,000 81 5,340 (500,000) 905,!
LOW AND MOD INCOME HSNG 2,618,200 360,0oO 101,400 2,876,;
TOTAL OPERATING NNDS %7,560,380 $72,763,730 $71,285,894 ($1,200 ,000) $37,038,
,
11
r I , CITY OF CARLSBAD e
4
OPERATING FUNDS
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1992-93 TO 1995-96
%INCR (D
1994-95 ipi 94-956
1992-93 1993-94 ESTIMATED 1994-95 1995-96 3 TO
DEPARTMENT ACWALS ACTUALS EXPENDITURES BUDGET '2 95-966 BUDGET I GENERAL FUND ............................................................................................... .. ....................
::i
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CITYCOUNCIL 153.747 160,166 168,300 168,548
111,820 CITYTREASURER 71.101 79.595 91,500 101,959
# -1.8 1.021.740 FINANCE 860,207 993,163 999,800 1,041,287
8 2.4 485,410 CITY ATTORNEY 362.318 370,109 462.000 473.619
$ 704.4 329.000 CITY CLERK 20,878 21,554 40.900 40.900
3 -0.2 777,090 CITY MANAGER 679.476 744,963 757,300 779.245
2 1.9 171,890
8 0.1 358,681 PURCHASING 329.101 338.910 348.200 358.057
8 9.€
HUMAN RESOURCES 579,733 571,196 640.162 862.690 784,082 3 -9.1
RESEARCH OFFICE 159,883 0 0 0 0.0
INFORMATION SYSTEMS 359.784 388,402 394,000 397,023 0 ;< :::: - 100.0
RISK MANAGEMENT 177,219 0 0 0 0: 0.0
TOTAL GENEAAL GOVERNMENT 3.753.447 3,668,058 3,902.162 4,223,327 4.039.713 # -4.3
3; o :$
.i. -
:.> -
PUBLIC SAFETY 3
POLICE 8,591,028 8.760,470 8,644,797 8,898,556 3 3.4 9,203,980
FIRE 6.750.721 6.986.554 6,724,671 6.855.812 .::, - 0.2 $: 6.877.675
:?
TOTAL PUBUC SAFRY 15.341.749 15.747.024 15.369.468 15.754.369 $$ 2.0 16.075.655 .. -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2
COMMUNIMDEVELADMIN 458,761 546,406 588,566 608,285 $$ -5.7 573,300
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 124.941 132.1 24 173,714 222.844 196,040
3.061.062 ENGINEERING 3,374.023 3,004240 2,843,994 3231.504
# 57.9 132.640 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 18.403 27,060 68,500 84,000
E -12.0
$ -52
PLANNING 1.807.558 1.793.683 1.828.1 17 2.034.665 1.971.420 4 -3.1 GROW MANAGEMENT 98.945 107,377 75.599 75.599 77.960 2 3.1
HISTORIC PRESERV COMM 3.448 399 4.375 4.375 3,000 2 -31.4
BUILDING INSPECTION 762.082 702.467 735,550 781,950 816.947 : 1 4.1
TOTAL COMMUNIWDEVELOPMENT 6,648.159 6.313.757 6.318.415 7,043,221 i- 6.832.369 1 -2.9
UBRARY/CULTURE
LIBRARY 2,316,029 2.447.865 2.406.670 2,480,284 2.475.040 :; -0.2
CULTURALARTS PRdciftAM 229.042 234.075 231 SO0 248.301 250.480 :$ 0.E
SISTER CllY PROORAM 8,993 8.426 10,200 11,500 6,800 f -4O.e
TOTAL LIB~RYICULTURE 2,554,864 2.690.366 2,648,370 2,740,085 2,732.320 ,j -0.2
.(: -
:.: ___ ..................................................
12
r I
CrrY OF CARLSBAD 0
c
OPERATING FUNDS
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1992-93 TO 1995-96
%INCR (I
1994-95 ik 94-95)
1992-93 1993-44 ESTIMATED 1994-95 1995-96 2 TO
DEPARTMENT ACTUALS ACTUALS EXPENDITURES BUDGET
COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMlN 793,905 716,951 629,900 645.652
PARK MAINTENANCE 1,445,853 1,583,524 1,457,100 1,588,842
RECREATION 1,535,487 1,594,578 1.572350 1,617,095
SENIOR PROGRAMS 217.793 228,591 239.000 245,092
STREET MAINTENANCE 1.809.753 1,378.169 1,534,800 1.629.092
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1.130.429 1,186,463 1292.800 1.377.521
BUDGEl E 95-96
612.870
1,584,860
# -5
g a 245,800
8 - 2 1.584.790
4 -0
1,459,620 1 -la 1,z38.040
; -la
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT 275.924 278,404 308.300 348.550
$ -5 . 7,022,930 TOTAL COMMUNITYSERVCIES 7,209.144 6,966.680 7,034.250 7.451.844
296.950 1 -14 .. -
I-"
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
COMMUNITY PROMOTION (CCVB) 246,205 222.702 205.000 243,902 :$ -13 211,150
BEACH PARKING 36.000 33.668 36,000 36,000 # 0 36,000
COMMUNlWCONTRIBUTlONS 75,990 75,000 77,300 77,300 $ -3 75,000 I HIRING CENTER 76,498 76,967 80,000 80.000
: -42 40,000 AUDIT 41 275 26,823 40,000 69.754
$ -1 802,500 HOSP GROVE PAYMENT 735,051 787,708 802,000 812,500
8 0 80,000
$ 12 140,000 ANIMAL REGULATION CONTRACT 168,224 110.868 125,000 125,000
3. 4 180,Ooo PROPEFTYTAX AOMIN FEE 161,975 154,827 170,000 172.000
OUES 8 SUBSCRlPTtONS 26.008 20,973 23,000 23,000 25.000
MISCIOPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 297.468 1.31 1.502 385,953 385.953
ASSESSMENT SERVICES 7,598 6,268 8,500
io'8oo 1 6.5;
11,500
BOND SERVICES 8.185 5.432 6.000 6,500
GOLF COURSE 565,200 0 0 0
LEASES 130.500 0 0 0
TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 2,575.187 2,832,736 1,958,753 2,042,709 1.607.650
8
-100.
6.
0.
0.
0.
: -21 .- ,-
SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND 38,082.550 38218.621 37,231,418 39,255354 38.310*637 '3 -2 r"i-
CONTINGENCIES 0 0 0 149,821 544.000 .$ 263 u
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 38,082.550 38218,621 37231.418 39,405.375 38,854.637 4 -1. .............................................. ..... .... .. -
13
1 t
CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
L
c OPERATING FUNDS
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
1992-93 TO 1995-96
%INCA @I
1994-95 I= 94-9561
1992-93 1993-94 ESTIMATED 1994-95 1995-98 $ TO
OEPARTMENT ACTUALS ACTUALS EXPENDmJAES BUDGET BUDGET B 95-9681 I SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS /$ ........................................................... $;
i:
POUCE ASSET FORFUNRE 392.997 604,628 507.000 507,702
AUDIO VISUAL INSURANCE 49.41 1 93,326 145,000 168,265
$ 0.; 3,238,794 HOUSING SECTION 8 2.529.978 2,796,680 3223.318 3,229,027
g -88.; 57,120
147.500 $ -12.:
GAS TAX 220.477 1.593,540 1,247,000 2,344.544 1,467.900
STREET LIGHTING 591,575 528,069 1.006.540 1.059.488
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE 236,802 277.490 274,000 274,360
g -4J 531290 TREE MAINTENANCE 536,165 546,738 532,880 558,839
$ -37.<
BUENAVISTA CRK CHNL MNT 198,105 54,215 41 12 14,689 6 500 ?: , :A -55.'
STATE GRANTS (UBRAR/) 286,593 313.138 270,200 356,396
,f -2l.i 7.709.302 5.490.506 8.174.941 8,366,376 9,859,383
g-
$ -41.i 672,000 CDEG ENTITLEMENT/REHAE 268,000 1.1 77,361 965,916 1,146,712
1 .I
3:
,$ 200,998 SENIOR NUTRITION 180,403 189.756 191,410 197,361
:$ - 17.' 293900
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS .e - x
WATER OPERATIONS 10,008242 11.145.830 11,382.700 12,537,874
4,493260 SANITATION OPERATIONS 4,028,391 5.920.427 4,330,400 4,672,977
.$ 43. 1203,300 RECLAIMED WATER 683.007 635,635 735.000 840,660
: 5, 13201,330
.# -3.1
SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT 1 Sa722 112284 162250 121271 108,440 .$ -10.1
GOLF COURSE 0 0 420.000 420.000 . 112 470.000
3
.g
;$
TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 14.873.362 17,814.176 17,030.350 18.592582
Q
4.; 3 19,476.330
.$: -
.-
. I INTERNAL-;
f
:?
::s::x~~::::~:~:::::~:,:.:.: .:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:, ................................................................
$ 35. 1,070,080 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 683.073 725,298 773900 792243
# -18. 1,093,500 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 324.509 542,630 1,300,000 1,=251
.! -1. 1231,000 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1227,137 1,267294 1233,000 1,311,575
g -0) 1.950.Ooo HEALTH INSURANCE 1,824.547 1.856.039 1,950,000 1.962.045
i 5. 1,065,360 , LIABILITY SELF INSURANCE 1,183.895 1,100,915 1,007,300 1,014,870
g 0. 250.000 W C Operatmg Transfer Out 0 0 250.000 250,000
w 1 .' 884.500 WORKERS COMP SELF INSURANCE 639,500 789247 846.900 852.144
.j
3
8
TOTAL INkERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 5.882.661 6281.423 7,360.500 7,526,127 f 7.584.440 0. .:I -
.:. - $
.z:
OPERATIONS 753.104 590,095 630,510 644,650
4 64 173,020 LOW AND MOD INCOME HSNG 81,437 101,494 101,400 105,000
3 32 1.077,600 DEBT SERVICE 1.61 9,643 1,091,749 815.340 815,340
g -18 523.960
1
TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT 2,454,184 1,783,338 1,547,250 1,564,990 13 :I-
f 1.774.580 .......................... .:. - ....................... ...................... , ........
1 TOTAL OPERATING FUNDS 66,783263 72272.498 71,535,894 76,948.657 75.3992119 -2
14
I I
<
0 CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1995-96
ACTUAi PROJECTED 2 AS % DIFFEREN ESTIMATED
REVENUES REVENUE i OF N94-95 1994-95' RNENUE
REVENUE SOURCE 1993-94 1994-95
.................................................................................
1995-96 $ PROJECTED 1995-94
-$ 2;
TAXES
PROPERTY TAX
SALES TAX
TRANSIENTTAX
FRANCHISE TAX
TRANSFER TAX
TOTAL TAXES
$11,123,765 $10,900,000
10,840,115 10,990,000
3,153,089 3,100,000
1,183,310 1,340,000
210,731 220,oOo
26,511,005 26,550,000
~ $10,g(J(J,)t)o ~: ; 0.00%
11,290,000 f 2.73% 300,c
3,23~~00 $ 323% 100,o
1,360,000 3 1.49% at0
.g 1.58% 420,G
a,m $ 0.00%
26,970,000 F
UCENSES AND PERMITS
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS 365,571 550,000
% 1,250,000 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,093,827 1,212.000
E
:2: :x 400 9 000
3 50,Ooo 44,496 75,000 8
;&
UCENSETAX-CONSTRUCTION
OTHER UCENSES & PERMITS 31 8,381 355mo t+ 285,000 2
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 1,822,275 2,192,000 1,985,000 3
6 B
-27.27% (1 50,c
3.1 4% =,c
-33.33% (25,C - 1 9.72% V0,C
-9.44% . (207,C
STATE SUBVENTIONS 11
VEHICLE IN-LIEU 2,628,592 2,073,000 2,200,000 3 6.1 3% 127,c
OTHER
TOTAL STATE SUBVENTIONS
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
PLANNING FEES
BUILDING DER. FEES
ENGINEERING FEES
AMBULANCE FEES
RECREATION FEES
OTHER CHARGES OR FEES
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES
233,887 199,000 I 200,000B 0.50% 1 10
2,862,479 2,272,000 2,400,000 z 5.63% 128,O rr ::::
2:
4-3509 4,o
275,156 434,OOo - 13.59% (59.0 721~000 1 375,~~
725,000 5 0.55%
656,108 743,000 - 1 9.25% (1 43,o
747,043 770,000 775,000 3 0.65% 5,c
m,OOO $
342,829 339,OOo 35QOoo ;$ 3.24% 11,c
g
589,159 543,000 535,000 3 - 1.47% (8,C
3,069,804 3,550,000 3,360,000 f -5.35% (190,C
'.$ Ir
FINES AND FORFEITURES 231,454 244,000 240,000 3 i.:. - 1.64% (4,(
.X
INTEREST 1,465,717 1,177.000 1,200,000 2 1.95% 23,C r INTERDEPARTMENTAL CHARGES 2,393,576 2,157,000 1,800,000 :$ -16.55% (357,C
8
OTHER REVENUE SOURCES 407,155 =x000 5.88% 50,C 900 ooO '.
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 38,763,465 38,992,OOo I 38855OOOl 1 , r:: -0.35% (1 37,c . ... P..... ii ........ /... ..... ..,.. . ..........,...... ?.. .......... ;..
15
I
&
, 0 CITYOF CARLSBAD 0
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1995-96
, ACTUAL PROJECTED vl AS % DIFFEREN,
REVENUES REVENUE REVENUE $ OF N94-95 1994-95 1
REVENUE SOURCE 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 I SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1::
~::~ ................................... ..........
POLICE ASSET FORFEITURE
ASSET FORFEITURES : 107,591
INTEREST 90,569 65,ooo
TOTAL 198,160 100,ooo
35vooo b 150,M)o
I %
,E
I"i , 3:
PROJECTED 1995%
157. i 4% 55,O
-7.69% (50
50.00% =,oi
HOUSING - SECTION 8 3
INTEREST 7,947 9 ,ooo 3 0.46% 14,O 3,037,000 FEDERAL GRANT 2,ma,o74 3,023,000
$5 -11.11% (1 I? ' aoo0 2
OTHER 123,605 193,000 I 190,000 B -1.55% (3.0
TOTAL 2,809,626 3,225,000 3,235,000 $ 0.31 % 10,Q
~~
3
AUDIO-VISUAL INSURANCE 8
INTEREST 7,274 5,000 5,000 2 0.00%
INSURANCE FEES 89,152 1 10,Ooo 1~,W 8 -4,5596 (54
TOTAL 96,426 115,000
;.: 110,~ .$ -4.3596 (5,a
GAS TAX Li GAS TAX REVENUES
INTEREST 141,790 160,Ooo 150,000 g -6.25% (1 0,a
TOTAL 1,327,909 1,360,000 1,350,000 x -0.74% (10Q
3 l,lss,ll9 1,200,000 1,200,000 g 0.00%
.*
3
TREE MAINTENANCE
INTEREST 18,625
TREE MAINTENANCE FEES
506,397 2: 1 "E INTERDEPARTMENTAL 66,143 66,200
TOTAL 591,165 584,200 533,200 - .r. - ....
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
INTEREST 1,945 0
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE FEES 257,670 260,006
MlSC REIMBURSEMENT 328 0
TOTAL * 259,943 =,w
Hi 0 .s '2
383,300 $
o$
383,300 5 :.:(.:.:.:.>: ................................................ :::: .............................................
- 1 6.67% (3,Q
-9.60% (48,O
0.00%
-8.73% (51 ,O
0.00%
47.4296 123,?
0
47.42% 123,3
16
t I -
4 -
0 CITYOF CARLSBAD e
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1995-96
-
AGTUAL PROJKED
1995-96 REVENUE SOURCE 1993-94 1994-95
3 OF N94-95 1994-95' REVENUE REVENUES REVENUE
5 AS% DIFF€R€h ESTIMAED
# PROJECTED 1995-9
STREFT LIGHTING %
INTEREST 50,222 32,000
5 0.00% 28,000 INTERDEPARTMENTAL 74,297 28,000
$ -4.69% (1 ,: 30,500
STREET UAiTING FEES 61 8,104 600,000 3 -8.27% W,6 550,400
MlSC REIMBURSEMENT 525 '0
5 .:.: -7.74% (51,l 608900 I TOTAL 743,148 66o.m
0.00% 02
$$
BUENA VISTA CREEK CHNL MAIM
INTEREST 15,473 15,000'
3 -6.09% (7,C 108,- TOTAL 11 5,099 115,ooo
100,# 3 0.00% BUENA VISTA FEES 99,626 100,Ooo
3 -46.67% Cl#C 8,900
j::
STATE GRANTS
INTEREST 14,554 7,500
229,000 $ 10.36% 21,5 TOTAL 303,744 207,500
8 11.50% 23,O 223,000 GRANTS 289,190 2M),OoO
:c -20.00% (1,5 6,000 3
e.
SENIOR NUTRITION
GRANTS 105,354 110,400
195,900 TOTAL 191,910 195,300
$ 1.30% 1,1 86,000 DONATIONS 86;556 84,900
3 -0.45% (5 109,900
$ 0.31 % E
8
>>
.$ Q
CDBG ENTFfLEMENT/REHAB
INTEREST 944 700 -28.57% G 5oo$
GRANT REVENUE
TOTAL
1,151,152 943,030 1 647,000 [ -31.39% (296,O;
1,152,096 943,730 647,500 ,$ -31,3946 (236,Z
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 7,789,226 7,765,730 7,550,800 $ -2.77% (21 4,9 .......................................................
..
17
f I e CITY'OF CARLSBAD e
OPERATlNG FUNDS
RkNUE ESTIMATES FOR 1995-96
ACTUAL PROJECTED rl:< ESTIMATED 3; AS %
DIFFEREN1
REVENUES REVENUE REVENUE $ OF FY94-95 1994-95 7
REVENUE SOURCE 1993-94 1994-95 8 PROJECTED 1995-96 1995-96
8
WATER OPERATIONS
WAI ER SALES
READY TO SERVE CHARGES
NNV ACCOUNT CHARGES
BACK-FLOW PROGM FEES
PENALTY FEES
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES
ENGINEERING & PIAN CHECK FEES
CONNECTION FEES
9,952,785
1,972,049
76,140
47,322
262,717
260,856
47,084
54,079
9,000,000
2,100,000
~,OOo
48,500
250,000
260,000
49,100
58,600
lO,Oc.?,000
2,440,000
50,066
~,OOo
283,300
200,300
26,500 I 40,000
3
3 $8 2
:z
3
;$ $$ ,%
13 3
11.86%
16.19%
-21.88%
-5.15%
13.32%
-23.08%
-46.03%
-31.74%
1,067,O
340,O
(I 4,0(
(2,51
333
(60D
(=,@
(1 8,@
MISCELLANEOUS 187,023 23,400 .$ 11 96% 2,51
TOTAL 12,860,054 11,851,100 13,176,200 8 11 .18% 1,325,l
20'900 =j
RECLAIMED WATER 8
WATER SALES 665,431
READY-TO-SERVE CHARGE 8,783 8,700 '8
RECLAIMED WATER CREDITS 21 5,642 240,000 304,800 ::
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 12,826 15,000 6,000 $
2
MISCELIANEOUS REIMB EXPEND '650 500
':I1 ~-
888,700 f 1
500$j
TOTAL 903,333 963.560 1,208,766 1
,x
SANITATION OPERATIONS
SERVICE CHARGES 4,708,689 4,400,000
LATERAL CONNECTIONS 10,oOo 9,300
PRE-TREATMENT CHARGES 75,313 65,000
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 181,902 200,000
4,400,000
9,300
=to00
m,OOo
3
$<
g ;:<
MISCELLANEOUS 525
TOTAL 4,976,429 4,674,500 4,672,500 3 5oo ki: 500%
26.96% 188,7
8.75% 7
27.00% 64,8
0.00% (9,O
0.00%
25.45% 245.2(
0.00%
0.00%
-3.08% (29
0.00%
0.00%
-0.04% (2,O
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 4,061 5,000
GRANTS/REBATES 27,727 32,400
5,300 $ 0.00%
0 .$ -1 00.00% (32,4
.i.,
RECYCLING FEE
MISCELLANEOUS
0 92~300 I b o.OO% 96,Oo(J 3 4.35% 4,o
91,004 400 m$
TOTAL 122,792 129,800 +k IOI,4oO 3 -21 $8896 (28,4
TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 18,862,608 17,618,900 I 19,158,800 c 8.74% 1,539.9 ::.:::.;:~~~~.~,~~:~:;~~,~~~~~~~~.:.:,
18
t , 0 CITY'OF CARLSBAD e
c OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1995-96
ACTUAL PROJECTED $ AS % DIFFEREN( ESTIMATED
REVENUES REVENUE
1995-96 $ PROJECTED 1995-96 REVENUE SOURCE 1993-94 1994-95
2 OFpIM-95 1994-951 REVENUE
$$ ...................................................................................................................
WORKERS' COMP SELF -INSURANCE I
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 124,389 80,m
755020 9 :< ::I: -2.15% (16,51 TOTAL 791,682 771,600
;: -25.00% (20D 60,ooo OTHER 55,654 80,000
3 0.56% 394 615,020 INTERDEPARTMENTAL 61 1,639 61 1,600
;j 0.00% 80,MX)
li LIABILW SELF-INSURANCE
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 120,721 95,000
# -4.01 % (42.0 1,0@l,ggt) TOTAL 906,772 1,047,000
$ .:.: 0.00% iOoQ0 I OTHER 19,132 10,000
$ -2.34% (22P 919,990 INTERDEPARTMENTAL 766,919 942,000
2 -21.05% (20,0( 75,000
- .:.: ,;;
3
;*
:$
HEALTH INSURANCE
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 99,717 75,000
340,MX) REIMBURSEMENTS 340,509 340,OOo
INTERDEPARTMENTAL
$$ -13.33% 65,m
# -0.55% (1 0,oI 1,805,000 TOTAL 1,806,384 1,815,OoO
g 0.00%
(1 0,a
1,366.1 58 1 ,m,om $j 0.00096 1,m,oOo
if:
is
:* VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 1,251,777 1,220,000 $$ 8.20% 100,a 1,320,000
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
48,966 la000 1 t [ 50.00% 5,a 15m 2
1,300,743 1,230,000 1,335,000 $ 8.54% 105,a
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 920,628 819,000
:E: -2.85% (29,O , TOTAL 1,112,953 1,019,000
$ -37.50% (1 54 25,000 SALE OF PROPEM 28,776 40,0oO
$ -18.75% (30p ' 130,OOO INTEREST 163,549 160,000
$ 1.95% 16,0 =,m
ma $!
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
3 <$ ..:. .
INTEREST & PORTMU0 SERVICES 34,725 am 1 0.00% m,m
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 707,418 752,600 # 41.97% 31 59 1,068,560
MISCELLANEOUS 0 8,800
$ 39.30% 3O7,l I 1,088,500 TOTAL 742.1 43 781,400
0% 0.00% 3
:L i$ g
.:.::.::.:c.:.:.:.:.K.:.:.:t.:~: TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 6,660.677 6,664,000 8 4.72% 31 43 6,978,510 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19
, 0 CITYOF CARLSBAD e
OPERATING FUNDS
REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1995-96
ACTUAL PROJECTED ESTIMATED 2 AS % DIFFERENC 1 1; REVENUES REVENUE REVENUE $$ OF FYW-95 1994-95TI
REVENUE SOURCE 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 ff PROJECTED 1995-96 I REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS\:$
OPERATIONS
RENTAL INCOME 37,426 40,oOo
INTEREST 8, PORTFOLIO SERVICES 5,683 0
.qoW oz i$
MISCELIANEOUS !57,372 38,100 1 38:1001
TOTAL 100,481 78,100 78100 $i
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
DEBT SERVICE I ~ O.O0% TAX INCREMENT 1,288,269 1,200,000 1,200,000 1
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVICES 61,392 85,W 75,000 $ -1 1.76% (1 0,oc
TOTAL 1,349,661 1,285,000 1,275,Ow $$ -0.78% (l0,OC ,:.:
LOW AND MOD INCOME HSNG
TAX INCREMENT 322,067
INTEREST & PORTFOLIO SERVlCES 58,761
MISCELLANEOUS 162 m*ooo 60,OOO 0 L! TOTAL 38O.m
360*ooo w I
8,
!$$
$
1
0.00%
-8.33% (5P
0.00%
-1.39% (5,N
TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS 1,831;133 1,723,100 1,708,100 $$ -0.87% (1 5,0(
$:
..:.x.: .............................................. .;.. ............................................................
I TOTAL OPERATING $73,907,108 $72,763,730 $74,251,210 2.04% $1,487,4
~ ~~~ ~~
20
I I 0 @ EXHIBIT
,
k CITY OF CARLSBAD
CAPITAL FUNDS
PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1994-95
JULY 1,1994 ESTIMATED ESTIMATED JUNE 30,19!
UNRESERVED ESTIMATED CAPITAL DEBT SERVICE PROJECTE
FUND
GENERAL CPPITAL CONCT.
PUBLIC ART
GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5,13,16 PARKFEE
PILAREA I NW
PILAREA2 NE
PILAREA3 SW
PILAREA4 SE
LETTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNET/BIKE
TRANSNET/STP .
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CFD #3
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG &E
PLANNED LOCALDWNAGE
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECWMED
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
TAX INCREMENT BOND
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
BALANCE
3,382,822
314,000
2,002,392
9,592,776
0
1,728,340
506,450
204,501
742,229
0
2,055,908
521,088
275,449
6,531
237,862
249,805
21,345
843,981
1,656,647
8,480,645
2,646,147
0
0
0
3,259,300
, 11,007,204
3,946,064
1x431 5
4,389,903
7,729,611
2,004,325
239,760
REVENUES EXPENDITURES
1,216,123 1,770,951
w)OO 98,000
1,250,000 861,334
1,535,OOO 575,330
1 ,~,oQ 0
mOOO 0
29,ooo 0
37,000 0
0 0
325,000 604,890
15,000 ' 114,s
1 ,000 144,139.
0 6,402
11,ooo 0
5,000 158,205
125,221 ' 53,489
232,000 0
0 256,989
5,325,000 2,799,675 =J,000 163,288 50,000 0
m,oo 376,238
0 .o
=,000 342,686
935,000 236,698
1,785,000 380,304
1,506,000 1 ,172,342
2,405,000 2,074,849
2,620,000 737,363
190,000 3,900
0 0
82,000 0
& OTHER
0
0
1,731,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
135,300
=9400
50,000
0
0
115,0OO
0
0
170,OOO
1,282,000
244,200
0
0
BALANCE
2,827,!
236J
659,!
10,552:
1,888J
526,
233,i
779,:
1 ,776,(
421 ,:
132,:
248J
964
93,l
1,075,!
1 ,3994
10,8704
2,840;
23,'
2,886,'
11,705,'
5,350,
313,
3,438,
9,368,1
2,190:
239,'
1,810,
OTHER 849,772 1,003,828 961,893 0 891 ,' I TOTAL CAPITALFUNDS 69,045,172 23,476,172 13,893,324 3,750,400 74,877)
156
I 0 e
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CAPITALFUNDS
PROJECTEDFUND BALANCES FOR FY 1995-96
JULY 1,1995 1994 - 95 1995 -96 JL
PROJECTED ESTIMATED CONTINUING NW TOTALCIP P
FUND
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST.
PUBLIC ART GOLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
ZONE 5,13,16 PARK FEE
PIL AREA 1 NW
PIL AREA 2 NE
PIL AREA 3 SW
PIL AREA 4 SE
LElTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRANSNETLOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY
TRANSNETBIKE ':
TRANSNET/STP
TDA
STATE GRANTS
COUNTY GRANTS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1
CFD #2
CFD #3
FEDERAL GRANTS
SDG&E
PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G
SEWER CONNECTION
SEWER REPLACEMENT
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER
WATER - MAJOR FACILITY
WATER - REPLACEMENT
TAX INCREMENT BOND
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
BALANCE
2,827,994
236,000
659,558
10,552,446
1,888,000
1,810,340
526,450
233,501
779,229
0
1,776,018
421,729
132,310
129
248,862
96,600
93,077
1,075,981
1,399,658
10,870,670
2,840,459
0
23,762
0
2,886,614
1 1,705,506
5,350,760
313,973
9,368,048
2,190,425
239,760
3,438,054
REVENUES
1,053,319
3,095
0
684,362
98,100
33,396
0
13,650
19,110
0
309,945
0
400,000
0
0
270,400
2,332,000
191,442
0
. 3,874,747
.605,000
0
3,768,000
0
. 264,732
1,134,421
1,100,000
170,000
3,996,231
2,025,000
0
0
APPROPR.
3,556,098
121,220
440,853
5,548,682
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,164,663
108,992
462,819
0
0
353,000
402,341
0
1,237,097
1,891,840
1,482,743
0
1,783,430
0
119,959
343,403
530,688
0
2,429,087
6,495,113
1,827,100
0
APPROPR.
309,500
7,500
200,000
705,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
419,000
100,000
0
0
0
2,000
2,000,000
50,000
0
5,107,000
1,642,000
0
2,000,000
0
1,000,000
1,723,700
1,100,000
225,000
4,378,957
544,016
0
0
APPROPR.
3,865,598
128,720
640,853
6,253,682
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,583,663
&,992
462,819
0
0
355,000
2,402,341
. 50,000
i ,237,097
6,998,840
3,124,743
3,783,430
0
1,119,959
2,067,103
1,630,688
225,000
6,808,044
7,039,129
1,827,100
0
OTHER 891,707 1,800,000 809,222 1,700,000 2,509,222
[TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 74,877,620 24,146,950 31,108,350 23,213,673 54,322,023
157
, 0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CAPITAL FUNDS REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1995-96
1992-93
ACTUAL
FUND REVENUES
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 374,271
PUBLIC ART 16,999
GOLF COURSE 643,566
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 885,943
ZONE 5,13 & 16 PARKFEE 25,820
PILAREA1 NW 47,247
PILAREA2 NE 37,559
PILAREA3 SW 75,016
PILAREA4 SE 90,736
LETTERS OF CREDIT 0
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 244,478
TRANSNET/LOCAL 42,844
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY 2,%7,794
TFIANSNET/BIKE 0
TRANSNETMP 0
TDA 37,073
STATE G FiANTS 85,690
COUNTY GRANTS 217,138
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 160,985
CFD #1 2,993,587
CFD #2 0
CFD #3 0
FEDERAL GRANTS 0
SDGE 0
PUNNED LOCAL DRAIN’G 164,536
SEWER CONNECTION 918,603
SEWER REPLACEMENT. 0
WATER - RECWMED WATER 0
WATER - MAJOR FAClurY 1,025,568
WATER - REPLACEMENT 2,345,m
1993 -94
ACTUAL
REVENUES
970,364
16,922
105,934
1,524,573
94,639
94,594
28,462
10,781
39,132
0
326,558
147,848
15,427
373,964
255,862
51 2,989
916,396
21 2,305
76,417
3,016,253
2427,995
0
0
0
,372,044
976,197
4,067,123
942,840
876,179
2,304,313
1994-95 (1) 1995-96 (1)
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
REVENUE REVENUE
1,216,123 1,053,319
2070oO 3,095
1,250,Ooo 0
1,535,Ooo 684,362
1,888,000 98,100
82,000 33,396
20IO00 0
29,OOO 13,650
37,000 19,110
0 0
325,000 309,945
15,000 0
1 loo0 ~IW
0 0
11,Ooo 0
5,000 270,400
125,221 2,332,000
232,000 191,442
0 0
5,325,000 3,874,747
380,OOO 605,000
50,000 0
400,000 3,768,000
0 0
~,O00 264,732
935,000 1 , 1 34,421
1,785,000 1,100,000
1 ,~,000 170,000
2,405,000 3,996,231
2,620,000 2,025,000
TAX INCREMENT BOND 84,974 119,137 190,Ooo 0
AFFORDABLE HOUSING 0 0 0 0
OTHER 0 1,245,651 1,003,828 1,800,000
[TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 12,776,013 22,070,899 23,476,172 24,146,950 1
(1) INCLUDES INTERFUND LOANS OR TRANSFERS.
158
$ e 0
CIW OF CARLSBAD
CAPITAL FUNDS DETAIL REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR FY 1995-96
FUND OR
DEVELOPER LOAN OR DEPRECIATION
FUND FEES TAXES GRANTS OTHER BOND ISSUE TRANSFER Rt
GENERAL CPPIJAL GONST, 753,319 3m,m
PUBLIC ART 3,095
GCLF COURSE
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 684,362
ZONE 5,13,16 PARKFEE 98,100
PILAREA 1 NW 33,396
PIL AREA 2 NE 0
PILAREA3 SW 13,650
PIL AREA4 SE 19,110
LETTERS OF CREDIT
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 309,945
TRANSNET/LOCAL
TRANSNET/HIGHWAY 400,~
TRANSNET/BIKE
TRANSNET/STP
STATE GRANTS 2,332,000
COUNlY GRANTS 191,442
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
CFD #1 45,747 3,179,000 650,000
CFD #2 605,000
CFD #3
FEDERAL GRANTS 3,768,000
SDG &E
PLANNED LOCALDRAIN'G 264,732
SEWER CONNECTION 1,084,421 =IO00
SEWER REPLACEMENT l,1oo,o0o
TDA 270,400
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER 170,000
WATER - MAJOR FACIUTY 996,231 31000,000
WATER - REPLACEMENT 725,000 1,300,000
TAX INCREMENT BOND
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OTHER 1,700,000 100,000
TOTAL 4.154,694 4.304.000 7,211.842 2,503.319 3,000,000 2.973.095
159
0 e
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CAPITALFUNDS
BUDGET EXPENDITURESCHEDULE
1992- 1993 TO 1995- 1996
1994-95 1995 -96
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 (1) CONTINUING NEW
FUND ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED APPROPR. APPROPR. 1
GENERAL CAPITAL CONST. 472,030 753,895 1,770,951
402,341 2,000,000 STATE GRANTS 36,762 910,039 53,489
353,000 2,000 TDA 31,397 389,483 158,205
0 0 TRANSNET/STP 0 18,000 0
0 0 TRANSNET/BlKE . 27,162 340,271 6,402
- 462,819 0 TRANSNET/HIGHWAY 89531 3 1,109,800 144,139
108,992 100,000 TRANSNETLOCW 583,659 51,044 1 14,359
1,164,663 41 9,000 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 313,938 959,097 604,890
0 0 LETERS OF CREDIT 0 0 0
0 0 PIL AREA 4 SE 0 0 0
0 0 PIL AREA 3 SW 0 0 0
0 0 PIL AREA 2 NE 0 0 0
0 0 PIL AREA 1 NW 0 0 0
0 0 ZONE 5,13 & 16 PARK FEE 0 0 0
5,548,682 705,O 00 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 1,549,809 798,606 575,330
440,853 200,000 GOLF COURSE 11,647 794,356 861,334
121,220 7,500 PUBLIC ART 15,740 19,980 98,000
3,556,998 309,500
COUNTY GMNTS 118 399,773 0 0 50,000
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 199,426 49,279 256,989
1,891,840 5,107,000 CFD #1 2,465,333 1,487,413 2,799,675
1,237,097 0
530,688 1,100,000 SEWER REPLACEMENT 0 0 380,304
343,403 1,723,700 SEWER CONNECTlON 431,628 36,006 236,698
119,959 1,oO0,000 PLANNED LOCAL DRAIN'G 0 0 342,686
0 0 SDG&E 0. 0 0
1,783,430 2,000,000 FEDERAL GRANTS' 0 0 376,238
0 0 CFD #3 0 0 0
1,482,743 1,642,000 CFD #2 0 . 85,969 163,288
WATER - RECLAIMED WATER 405,732 1,470,983 1,172,342
6,495,113 544,016 WATER - REPLACEMENT 861,091 1,544,070 737,363
2,429,087 4,378,957 WATER - MAJOR FACILITY 568,860 1,033,925 2,074,849
0 225,000
TAX INCREMENT BOND 163,180 2,186,396 3,900
1 31.108.350 23.213.673 [ TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS 9,409,333 . 15,718,250 13,893,324
809,222 1.700,000 OTHER 307,627 1,164,344 961,893
0 0 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 68,681 114,721 0
1,827,100 0
(I) 1994-95 ESTMATED AMOUNT INCLUDES ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ENCUMBRANCES.
160
0 0 EXHIBIT (
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER 1994-95 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
~~~~~~~~~.~.~~~~~~~~~~~ ...................... . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . ...,.. , , ,.. . :.:,:.:.: .,.n.,.(,.~.~.i,.~.n._ ..-.:
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 1 1
TOTAL CITYCOUNCIL 1 1 0
CITY MANAGER
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
SECRETARY TO CITY MANAGER
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 2 2
TOTAL CITY MANAGER 8 8 0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . ..... .. ... . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ... .. . ..<r i..... ... A. ... ......
TREASURER'S ASSISTANT 0.75 0.75
TOTAL CITYTREASURER 0.75 0.75 0
INFORMATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR i 0
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK ' 1 1
MINUTES CLERK 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 0.6 -0.4
SENIOR OFFICE SPECIALIST 1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1 1
TOTAL CITY CLERK 6 4.6 -1.4
-1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ..i . ,
INFORMATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR ?.:.?. R.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .+.. n.. . . . . . . . . 0 1 1
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGER 1 1
SYSTEMS ANALYST 1 1
PROGRAMMEWOPERATOR 1 1
NETWORK SPECIALIST II 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 0 0.4 0.4
TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 4 5.4 1.4
CITYATORNEY 1 1
ASSISTANT ClTYAlTORNEY 1 1
DEPUTYCITYATTORNEY 1 1
SECRETARY TO ClTYAlTORNEY 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 1
TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY 5 5 0
I1I~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~ . . ... . . . . . ". .. . , , FINANCE DIRECTOR 1 1
ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR
ACCOUNTANT
ACCOUNTCLERK II
ACCOUNTING OFFICE ASSISTANT
AUDITOR
1 1
1 1
2 2
4 4
2 2
1 1
1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 1
TOTAL FINANCE 14 14 0
0 e
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
1994-95 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RISK MANAGER 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 1
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2 2 0
~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :~. ... . .. . .. . . . . ... ... ... .. . . . ..
PURCHASING OFFICER 1 1
SECRETARY 1 1
BUYER 2 2
MESSENGER 1 1
TOTAL PURCHASING 5 5 0
:::#&&.$ ~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~: . . s:::::::.:.:.:.:.: .x. :....., .........I.. . .....I................ b::. ._.. , ., , , , , .. , ,:..: ., , .. , .,. ... ......., , .. , .. .................................................................... ..:~.:.:~.:.:~.:.:~.
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 1 1
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 2 2
HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT 1 1
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1 1
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 7 7 0
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
SECRETARY
POLICE CAPTAIN
POLICE LIEUTENANT
POLICE SERGEANT
SENIOR POLICE OFFICER
POLICE OFFICER
COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR
RECORDS SUPERVISOR
COMMUNICATION OPERATOR II
POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST II
PUBLIC SAFEPl SYSTEMS SPECIALIST
JUVENILE JUSTCE PROGRAM COORD
CRIME PREVENTION TECHNICIAN
POLICE SERVICES AIDE
TOTAL POLICE
1
1
1
3
2
5
10
21
41
1
1
13
5
1
I
1
1
1
1
3
2
5
10
19 -2
43 2
1
1
13
5
1
1
1
2 2
110 110 0
0 * ClTYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96 '
BY DEPARTMENT AND GLASSIFIGATION
REQUEST
OVER
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
1994-95 (UNDER)
... ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
.,.. , , , ... , . , , , , .............................................................................................................................................. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FIRE CHIEF 1 1
DIVISION CHIEF 2 2
FIRE BATTALION CHIEF 3 3
FIRE CAPTAIN 18 18
FIRE CAPTAIN SPECIALIST 1 1
FIRE ENGINEER 18 18 FIRE FIGHTER 9 9
FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER II 21 21
3 3
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1
SECRETARY 1 1 1
TOTAL FIRE 79 79 0
PARAMEDIC-FIRE FIGHTER
PRINCIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR 1 1
SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR 0 2 2
BUILDING INSPECTOR II 5 2
BUILDING INSPECTOR I
-3
0 1 1
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II 1 1
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I 1 1
BUILDING TECHNICIAN II 1 0
BUILDING TECHNICIAN I 0 1 1
-1
SENIOR OFFICE SPECIALIST 1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1 1
TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTION 11 11 0
''%j&$lffk4.~~~~IEPTr~~l." ..I...... ... ::: 4: + .. ' 3 :a, ,,,. , ., ri' ,,: , , ; ; $..' :. *, . ; ; .. ,. : .; :. , ;$@Z# ... . .. . . .. . ...............
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 1 1
MUNICIPAL PROJECT MANAGER 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST I 1 1
TOTAL COMM DEV ADMINISTRATION 4 4 0
:::&?JyJq#&@@~&jp&#g~ ..: .'.. . ~:~~~~ . . . . . . . . ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 1 0
...... ...................................
1 1
.:.: . . . . . . . . .,. . . . . ... ... . . ... . .. . , . . . . . . . . . . ... , . . .. . ... .. ...(,.,.. , ,.,., ... , , , , , , , . , , , ,.,., ,._.,.,: . , , ~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEM COORD
TOTAL GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
1 1
1 1 0
0 0
ClTYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
1994-95 (UNDER)
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED ~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l 1.......1111...11.11111.1111 .Il.l,,ll.(ll.l,,.,.,..., .,,.,......,.....,. (,..........(.... .,,,
CITY ENGINEER 1 1
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
PRINCIPALCIVILENGINEER
PRINCIPALCONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
SENIOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
SENIOR ENGINEERING INSPECTOR/WD
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR I1
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I1
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
1
1
4
1
2
2
4
12
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
2
3
12
5
1
1
2
1
-
/
.1
1
SENIOR OFFICE SPECIALIST 4 4
TOTAL ENGINEERING 41 41 0
$ern ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:.:~ ...,... , .. , ...,.,...,. ........................... .... :*.:.:.?E$<
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1
TOTAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT 1 1 0
. . . . . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . ,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PLANNING DIRECTOR 1 1
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
SENIOR PLANNER
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
ASSISTANT PLANNER
PLANNING TECHNICIAN II
PLANNING TECHNICIAN I
GRAPHIC TECHNICIAN
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
1
1
2
4
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
5
2
1
1
1
1
SENIOR OFFICE SPECIALIST 3 3
TOTAL PLANNING 23 23 0
q@,$.@@; .......................................
LIBRARY DIRECTOR
........................................................... .,.,. ~ ..,. x.:.s:ss:
1 1
ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR 1 1
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1
GRAPHIC ARTIST 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK II 1 1
SENIOR CIRCULATION SUPERVISOR 1 1
LIBRARY ASSISTAM I1 8 8
LIBRARY ASSISTANT I 2.75 2.75
SENIOR LIBRARIAN 6 6
LIBRARIAN II 5 4
LIBRARIAN I
MEDIA PROGRAM SPECIALIST 1 1
COMMUNITY LIBRARY SERVICES SUPERV 0.75 0.75
LIBRARY SERVICES SPECIALIST 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1 1
TOTAL LIBRARY 32.5 32.5 0
-1
0 1 1
e 0
CITYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
1994-95 (UNDER)
ARTS MANAGER 1 1
COMMUNllY ARTS COORDINATOR 1 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1 1 TOTAL CULTURAL ARTS 3 3 0
. . . . .,. . . . .. . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,.,.,.(,.,.....,_ . . . . .,.,.,.,., l~~~~~~~~~,~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
ADMlN SERVICES/PROJECTS MANAGER
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
PARK DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
SECRETARY
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
0.75
8 7.75 -0.25
-0.25
PARK MAINTENANCE
PARK SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
PARK SUPERVISOR 1 1
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER 111 5 5
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER II 10.75 9.75
PARK MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 1
-1
1
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE 18.75 17.75 -1
TREE MAINTENANCE
PARK SUPERVISOR
TREE TRIMMER LEADWORKER
TREE TRIMMER II
0.5 0.5
2 2
2 2
TREE TRIMMER I 1 1
TOTAL TREE MAINTENANCE 5.5 5.5 0
MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
PARK SUPERVISOR
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER II
0.5 0.5
1 1
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER I 0 1 1
TOTAL MEDIAN MAINTENANCE 1.5 2.5 1
RECREATION
RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
RECREATION SUPERVISOR II 3 3
RECREATION SUPERVISOR I 2 3 1
RECREATION SPECIALIST I 1 0
RECREATION ASSISTANT
-1
2.25 2.25
AQUATIC SUPERVISOR 1 1
AQUATIC SPECIALIST 0.75 0.75
OFFICE SPECIALIST I1 3 3
TOTAL RECREATION 14 14 0
SENIOR PROGRAM
SITE MANAGER
SENIOR COORDINATOR
1 1
1 1
SECRETARY 1 1
TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAM 3 3 0
I I 0 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
1994-95 (UNDER)
STREET MAINTENANCE
STREET MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT
STREET MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER 111
STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER II
1 1
2 2
6 6
11 11
MAINTENANCE WORKER I 3 3
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 23 23 0
STREET LIGHTING
ADMlN COORDINATOR - SPECIAL DISTRICTS
SENIOR ELECTRICIAN
ELECTRICIAN
1 1
1 1
1 1
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I1 1 1
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING 4 4 0
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAIM SUPERINTENDENT
BUILDING MAIM SUPERVISOR
SENIOR BUILDING MAINTWORKER
BUILDING MAIM WORKER II
CUSTODIAN II
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 1
CUSTODIAN 9 9
TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15 15 0
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 0.75 0.75
TOTAL SOLID WASTE 0.75 0.75 0
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENTMECHANIC SUPERVISOR EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I1
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
FLEET SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
1 1
4 4
1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST I1 1 1
TOTAL FLEET OPERATIONS 8 8 0
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 101.5 101.25 -0.25
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .... /.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT DIR
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
HOUSING PROGRAM MANAGER
HOUSING SPECIALIST II
HOUSING SPECIALIST I
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST II 2 2
TOTAL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT 10 10 0
0 0
- CITYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96
BY DEPAATMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
1994-95 (UNDER)
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
:::w&Tg#f.TmpM7 ,, , :.. .A. .................. /.......,.....,. ........
..i . ,, (, , :. ,, ,, ,, . ; ; ;,; .,,, ,*,......,.. ii..i...i.. ............................... ..,., . ..,.. . .i., .. ........................... :x.: ..5 'X...*...........:Q ..,.....,.....,. :. ..,.... ............................................................................
WATER OPERATIONS GENEFiAL MANAGER 1 1 DISTRICT ENGINEER
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER
OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT
WATER MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTSUPERVlSOR
CONSTRUCTION/MAINT WORKER I
ENGINEERING OFFICE ASSISTANT II
ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
ACCOUNT CLERK II
ACCOUNT CLERK I
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 111
ENGINEERING SECRETARY
EQUIPMENTOPERATOR
FACILITYMAINT LEADWORKER
METER SERVICES WORKER 111
METER SERVICES WORKER II
METER SERVICES WORKER I
CROSS CONNECTION CONTROLTECH
SERVICE COORDINATOR
SR CONSTRUCTION/MAINT WORKER
SENIOR SYSTEMS OPERATOR
STOREKEEPER
WATER CONSERVATION SPECIALIST
SYSTEMS OPERATOR II
VALVE TECHNICIAN
SENIOR VALVE TECHNICIAN
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
OFFICE SPECIALIST II
OFFICE SPECIALIST I
TOTAL WATER OPERATIONS
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
43
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
I
43 0
RECLAIMED WATER
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II 1 1
TOTAL RECLAIMED WATER 1 1 0
TOTAL WATER ENTERPRISE 44 44 0
MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
SANITATION SUPERVISOR 1 1
METER SERVICE WORKER I1 2 2
UTILITY MAINTENANCE WORKER 111 2 2
UTILITY MAINTENANCE WORKER II 3 3
UTILITY SYSTEM OPERATOR 111 1 1
UTILITY SYSTEM OPERATOR II 1 1
OFFICE SPECIALIST I 1 1
TOTAL SANITATION 12 12 0.
526.75 526.5 -0.25
0 e
CITYOF CARLSBAD
PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS FOR 1994-95 AND 1995-96 .
BY DEPARTMENT AND CLASSIFICATION
REQUEST
OVER
NUMBER 1995-96 1994-95
ALLOCATED BUDGET ALLOCATED
1994-95 (UNDER)
~~:#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .
POLICE 0.99 0.99 0
PURCHASING
HUMAN RESOURCES
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYS
RISK MANAGEMENT
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
BUILDING INSPECTION
LIBRARY
PARK MAINTENANCE
TREE/MEDIAN/ST LGHT MAINTENANCE
RECREATION/AQUATICS
SENIORS
CULTURALARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
0.5
0.07
0
0.5
1
0
0
34.68
2
2
28.25
8.75
0.5
0.03
0.5
0.24
0.5
0.5
0
1
0.1 3
34.39
2.5
2.3
28.74
5.73
0.5
0.03
0
0.1 7
0.5
0
-1
1
0.1 3
0.5
0.3
0.49
-3.02 0
0
-0.29
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.5 0.5 0
79.77 78.55 -1.22
~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 606.52 605.05 -1.47
*
I I 0 0
CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS
1994-95 TO 1995-96
DEPARTMENT/PURPOSE ACCOUNT #
Citv Manaaer
State of City Video
City Picnic Supplies
00 1 - 1 020-2479
001 -1 020-2660
Finance
Cost Allocation Plan/Fee Study 001 -1 31 0-2479
Alarm Billing 001 -1 31 0-2673
Software - Ambulance & False
Citv Clerk
PBX Upgrades - Supplies 00 1 - 1 030-2220
PBX Upgrades - Capital Equipment 00 1 - 1 030-3900
Police
Purchase Police Dog 00 1 -2 1 20-3900
- Fire
Cal-OSHA Training/Equipment 001 -2220-2660
Hosp Grove Fire Hazard Abatement 001-2250-2489
Enaineerinq
BEC Sand Survey Program 001 -31 10-2479
SanDAG Traffic/Circulation Model 001 -31 10-2479
Traffic Signal Design 00 1 -31 1 0-2479
Facilities Maintenance
City Hall & CSD Telephone and
Computer Line Installation 00 1 -5 1 1 0-2489
Major Building Maintenance 00 1 -5320-2462
Computer Work Order System 00 1 -5320-2673
Street Maintenance
Brush Removal from Cannon Lake 001 -51 1 0-2489
Handrail Repair on Carlsbad Blvd. 00 1 -5 1 1 0-2489
Traffic Signal Projects 001 -541 0-241 4
SUBTOTAL -
- GENERAL FUND
EXHlBl
AMOl
$ 8!
4,
12
8
5.
92,
6
10
15
12
25
5
20
159:
5:
10
4
10
$41 3
% 0 DEPARTMENT/PURPOSE .
Police Asset Forfeiture
Capital equipme.nt and special
supplies
Communitv DeveloDment Block Grant
Various community projects
Gas Tax
Cement Replacement, Chip Seal,
Slurry Seal & Overlay
Street Liqhtinq & Landscaping District
Street Light Repairs
Assessment District Attorney Fees
Li braw
Library CSLA
Risk Manaaement
Insurance Manual Revisions
Fleet Maintenance Two Replacement Backhoes Replacement Fire Engine
Replacement Heavy Rescue Engine
Software Upgrades and
Network Management Software
Safety Center Computer System
Upgrade
Data Processinq
0 ACCOUNT #
1 21 -xxxx-xxxx
(available balance)
391 -XXXX-XXXX
(available balance)
152-51 10-241 11241 2
161 -621 0-241 3
161 -621 0-2474
180-81 01 -2671
61 2-1 91 0-2479
620-5220-3900
620-5220-3900
620-5220-3900
640-1 720-2673
640-1 720-3900
SUBTOTAL -
OTHER FUNDS
GRAND TOTAL -
ALL FUNDS
AM01
$1 15,
$585,
.1,332,
9,
2,
6,
4!
120. 250,
100,
14,
%
$2,541 ,
$2,955,
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
LO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 95-171
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE 1995-96 APPROPRIATION LIMIT AS REQUIRED
BY ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
CONSTITUTION AND STATE LAW
WHEREAS, Article XlllB of the California State Constitution requires tt
governments annually establish a limit on the appropriation of proceeds of taxes; and
WHEREAS, State law requires that this limit be presented to the governil
body of each entity each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, State law also requires that this limit be published in a newspar
of general circulation to allow public response to the limit as adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the- City Council of the City
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does herel
establish and adopt the 1995-96 appropriation limit of one hundred eight million, fi
hundred and fdteen thousand, nine hundred and ninety-three dollars ($108,515,993)
computed in Exhibit A attached hereto.
2. That the City Clerk is directed to publish this Resolution in a newspap
of general circulation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Coun
on the 20th day of JUNE , 1995, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members-Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin, Finnila, I
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
AtETHA L, MUTE (SEAL)
*
b e 0
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
EXH I BI
The Appropriations Limitation imposed by Proposition 4 and modified by Proposition
creates a restriction on the amount of revenue which can be appropriated in any fi:
year. The revenues which are subject to the Limitation are those considered "proce
of taxes." The basis for calculating the Limit began in fiscal year 1978-79 anc
increased based on population growth and inflation.
The major change made by Proposition 11 1 allows the City to annually choose am
the following options for calculating its Gann Limit:
b Growth in California per capita income, OR
b Growth in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction in
City,
AND
b Population growth of Carlsbad, OR
b Population growth within San Diego County.
The factors used to calculate the 1995-96 Limit were:
b Population growth in San Diego County, AND
b Growth in California per capita income.
The formula is outlined below:
1994-95 Expenditure Limit $102,261,801
% County Population Growth
Growth in California per capita income
Net Increase Factor
1.01 33
X 1.0472
I .0612
1995-96 Limit (1 994-95 Limit X Factor) $108,515,993
Current Appropriation of Proceeds of Taxes $28,537,854
The spending limit for the City of Carlsbad for 1995-96 is $108.5 million with appro
tions of "proceeds of taxes" of $28.5 million. The result of the calculation provide:
City with an operating margin of $80 million.
.
';.
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
' 27
28
e 0
RESOLUTION NO. 95-172
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE FEES
FOR CITY SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has the authority tc
establish fees for City services: and
WHEREAS, from time to time said fees are reviewed and evaluated tc
maintain an adequate fee structure recovering costs for City services; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the cost of providinl
general and development-related services; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to recover costs for Cit
services; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the fees shown i
Exhibit A attached hereto are fair and reasonable in relation to the service
received; and
~ WHEREAS, the City Council has held the necessary public hearing an
~ allowed for public comment on the establishment of said fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cii
of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1. That the fee schedule shown in Exhibit A attached hereto is herelc
adopted.
~
~ Ill
2. That all other general City fees and development-related fees she
' ~ remain under the control of previous resolutions adopted by this City Council.
3. That the Drainage Area fees for fiscal year 1995-96, as shown
Exhibit A, shall become effective on September 1 , 1995.
1 I I
- . - I /I 0 0
i
L
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
2 I/ Council of the City of Carlsbad held on the 20th day of JUNE , 1995,
3 by the following vote, to wit;
4 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin, Finnila,
5 NOES: None
6
7
ABSENT: None
8
9
10 11 ATTEST:
11
12 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk (SEAL)
13
14 /I
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
) 0
> Ext
- I Recommended Change to City Fee Schedule 1
PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGEAREA FEES
AreaA Area B AreaC Area D
Current Fee
Base Rate - Low $1,564 $3,362 $251 4 $34
Base Rate - High $2,560 $5,502 $4,114 $56
Proposed New Fee
Adjusted Rate .- Law $1,572 $3,380 $2,528 $34
Adjusted Rate - High $2,574 $5,532 $4,136 $56
Increase
Adjusted Rate - Low $8 $18 . $14 $0
Adjusted Rate - High $1 4 $30 $22 $0
Percentage increase = -5%
t
a '., 1
>Y
e
June 15, 1995
I&,... . -a FQR THE lNtrORMATli3~I ( THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE Clri MANA
I
"-& cp1
R
TO: CITY MANAGER
VIA; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR.? 3ifl
\i
FROM: Finance Director py' 1
COMMENTS RECEIVED AT PUBLIC FORUM ON THE 1995-96 BUDGET
Approximately 10 -1 2 people attended the Public Forum on the budget which was held on J
12 at noon in Council Chambers. Among the attendees were the Monroys, John Jones, Marg
Bonus, John Payne John Moffit, Renata Mulry and daughter, and several reporters from the I(
news media. The actual presentation by staff was short (about a half hour), however, the fo
lasted almost 2 hours due to the questions and comments by the attendees. The following
some of the comments and discussion points:
1. Sales Tax - Some concern was expressed about the increasing dependence by the
on the sales taxes to pay for general fund services since this revenue source ma)
usurped by the State or reallocated differently. They felt property taxes were a n
stable source and less vulnerable to redistribution.
Someone noted that residents in the southern part of Carlsbad are more likely to m
purchases in Encinitas, especially with the development of Ecke Ranch. Concern
expressed that Encinitas may be taking sales tax from Carlsbad.
2. Unfunded Positions -The meaning and reasons for the unfunded positions were not c
to those attending the meeting. Citizens were concerned that the Library staff was bl
cut back and that service levels may be further affected. After explanation that posit
were currently vacant, questions were raised about why the positions were not
eliminated.
3. Libraw - Several attendees suggested that we address the issue of non-residents u
the Carlsbad libraries. The full cost of non-residential use of Carlsbad libraries is
reimbursed by the State.
Also, some attendees felt that Council should discuss publicly the whole issue oi
construction and operation of the south Carlsbad library. A suggestion was mad
close the branch library for the next several years and set aside the savings to pay
the operations of the new library when built.
Other concerns were expressed about issuing debt in the face of the current
'delinquency rate and low property values. For example, even if the City did forecl
the value may not be sufficient to pay the special taxes.
-*I 0 0
,>
June 15, 1995
Page Two
4. Averaae Emplovee Cost - A question was raised as to the average cost of an emplc
in the City. The amount was researched after the meeting and found to be $55,000 w~
includes all costs (PERS, workers’ compensation insurance, health insurance, etc.)
average gross salary per employee is $42,000.
5. City Services Provided to Private Citizens - Attendee had observed City crews trimr
trees and performing other services on what was thought to be private property. 1
explained services may be for weed abatement or street tree program and requested
contact the Community Services department with the specific incident if they
questions in the future.
6. CCVB Contribution - Several attendees questioned the correlation between City fun
and CCVB’s effectiveness. They asked whether funding CCVB actually resulted in r
tourism to the City. Citizens expressed dissatisfaction with method and amount of
contributions to CCVB and called for the CCVB to be self-supporting or change
perhaps a percentage of TOT revenue. One suggestion was made to cut the C
funding in half and use the money for additional police, fire and library services inst
7. Recreation Proarams - Attendee questioned whether recreation programs were
supporting and felt that users should pay for these programs.
8. Fireworks - A request was made to reinstate the Fourth of July fireworks as they ar
event that can be enjoyed by the whole community. Several citizens said they woulc
to have the City support the fireworks.
9. Sale of Water ProDertv - A suggestion was made that the City consider the sale of SUI
water district property with the proceeds used to decrease the debt required fol
Maerkle Dam lining and covering (ultimate result - lower water rates).
10. Low Income Dwellina Units - Attendee thought that building bachelor apartmeni
residences over business properties in the downtown area would provide additiona
income dwelling units (possible use of affordable housing money). It would alsc
down on crime in the business area and allow employees to. live close to work.
1 1, CaPital Projects Delavs - Attendee was concerned that certain projects are being del; and that the CIP is not complying with the original intent of growth management.
only example given to support the concern was the delayed opening of the s
Carlsbad library.
12. Water Travel Budaet - One individual stated that he thought the travel budget was to(
for the department and should be increased so that the commission members
department head can attend more meetings related to water activities.
13. Sacramento Lobbist - One individual was in favor of obtaining an advocate for the
.in Sacramento - possibly by banding together with neighboring cities.
t
' J. ' 0 0 \.
June 15, 1995
Page Three
14. Fleet Maintenance Savinus - A suggestion was made for the City to investigate gas0
and parts savings that are available by obtaining "Reporting Rebate for Sale" from
manufacturer. Purchasing will follow up on this suggestion.
15. Publicity for Buduet WorkshoD - Attendees suggested various ways to publicize fu
budget workshop meetings with the public including announcements to homeov
associations and mobilehome groups and a message on the water bill. One citi
suggested allocating a set amount of money to be spent on publicity for the p~
workshop.
16. Praise for What The Citv Is Doinu Riuht: . City library has more hours and better library than just about any other city.
b City streets set model for region and are an example of Carlsbad's sewicl
homeowners.
work.
t Grateful to Treasurer Jim Stanton for investment strategy and appreciate his g
Other topics discussed included:
- Golf course funding - Use of volunteers and interns in City - Expenditures to organizations (confused about relationship and City funding to CI
- Projections of assessed valuation decreases due to reassessments by prop
- Economic development and the use of Industrial Development Bonds - Use of low & moderate income housing funds
and Chamber of Commerce)
owners
2. ,/L
L-L
-1
LISA HILDABRAND
Finance Director
LH:emr '.
F\USERS\EROP~WPDATA\EUOG~S!5.~PUEL-FOR.MEM
. . . .*
4 4
1 l 0 l ‘q &<
June 14, 1995
TO: CITY COUNCIL
Vl A:
FROM:
CITY MAN
9 / ?z-, \
Finance Director
1995-96 ISSUE STATEMENTS
Attached are the 1995-96 Issue Statements that have been prepared. This information
was presented during the City Council Budget Workshop meeting of June 6th. Council
will be asked to address these issues after the Public Hearing on the budget on June
20th.
If you have any questions, please-feel free to contact me at extension 2872 or 2867.
LISA HILDABRAND
LH:emr
Attachment
'. . - -0 0
To achieve a City Council goal of providing quality family cultural events and in respom
a Council request, the Cultural Arts Office is proposing a new event called "HooteE
Concert. 'I This free, three-hour event will be held on a Sunday afternoon in late Septembc
one of two possible sites; a City park, or at the "water retention basin" located in the Carl industrial park,
Three musical groups will perform folk and traditional music in a "hand.+clapping, sing-alc
type of format. This event is expected to attract an audience of approximately 1,200 peo]
Staff is not recommending fund raising or charging for admission to this event as there ar
suitable locations in the City that can be fenced to allow for controlled admission (Le., ti
sales). If the water retention basin is used, it will allow the City to evaluate the potential of
site with the possibility of fencing it for future events so that admission tickets could be 5
The proximity to the airport is a drawback, however, as there may be some noise disturb
during the event.
Fiscal Impact
The Hootenanny Concert will cost $3,060. In addition to the producer's fee, there are logis
costs of a shuttle bus, printing, security and stage crews. Costs for City staff time are
included in the estimate. Should the City Council wish to sponsor this event, it would incr
total funding to the General Fund ' - Cultural Arts Program and decrease the Coun
contingency account.
Alternatives
1. Provide funding for a Hootenanny Concert as described above.
2. Offer one or more noontime concerts offering folk music. This alternative w
technically not be a "hootenanny, I' but would offer the same type of music. Each cor
would cost an estimated $1,000 and could serve the industrial park area and/or
downtown Village area.
3. Take no action; maintain the cultural arts program as presented in the proposed buc
H\LIBRARYIFINANCE\WPDATA\%BUDUSARTS
- .- . - ,. 0 e
ISSUE STATEMI
Background
The Carlsbad Police Department has a small volunteer program that has been in place for se'
years. There are currently five volunteers participating in this program. Assignments inc
filing, citation entry and other clerical duties in the Records Division (two volunteers) and
entry along with other clerical duties in the Investigations Division (two volunteers).
addition, the department has had one volunteer during the past year assisting the departm(
Rangemaster and Reserve Program. This volunteer was recently hired as a Police Off
Volunteers also make up the Reserve Officer Program and Juvenile Justice Panel.
The volunteer programs have no formal coordination or recognition systems.
Costs associated with the current volunteer program are nominal. The expenses includt
fingerprint fees for the background check and a small $5.00 gift for each volunteer dl
program, these are no staff time expenses incurred.
"National Volunteer Recognition Week." Since there is no significant coordination of
ProDosal
To enhance and expand the Police Department's delivery of community law enforce^
services, the following programs are proposed:
I. Enhanced Volunteer Program
The proposed enhancement of the current volunteer program would formalize the proces
which volunteers are recruited and assigned, starting from the initial citizen inquiry, tc
screening, application, approval and assignment to a division. The background investigatic
applicants and issues involving liability and insurance will also be improved. The matc
between the volunteer and the assignment, and expansion of the list of assignments should
be improved.
To ensure the success of a volunteer program, a "Police Volunteer Recognition Prograr
proposed. The recognition of volunteers in the Juvenile Justice Panel and the Reserve 01
Program should be incorporated into the overall volunteer program.
Costs would include $2,000 for the Volunteer Recognition Program (e.g., a recogr
reception or dinner, an appreciation gift, etc.) and $1,000 for increase in expense:
background fingerprinting and miscellaneous supplies. As the program expands in size,
costs will increase.
Total ongoing costs = $3,000.
a. . ..
I 1
L 0 0
11. Citizens Police Academy
A Citizens Police Academy is a six- or eight-week program in which a group of PI
employees and citizens (usually 15 - 25 members per group) meet weekly to learn about va~
aspects of law enforcement and increase the department’s understanding of citizens’ conct
needs and perspectives, and identi0 areas where there is a need to improve education ar
-
service.
Participants would be selected at random to obtain a cross-section of Carlsbad residents.
participants, ixluding citizens and police department employees, will tg surveyed before
after the academy as part of the program’s evaluation. After the successful completion o
first academy and positive evaluation, it is expected that two to four academies per year w
be conducted.
Costs for the citizens academy would include supplies of $500 per academy (materials, bin(
etc. for each participant). Coordination would be absorbed by current staff. Overtime expe
of approximately $2,000 per academy would be incurred for employee presentations at acad
sessions.
Total cost per academy = $2,500.
III. Citizen Patrol Program
Citizen patrols are teams of specially trained volunteers who enhance crime prevention ser,
and help increase services to the community. Citizen patrol members do not take enforce1
action, carry weapons or make arrests. They conduct proactive crime prevention and servj
and only observe and report any suspicious activity they encounter. While performing :
duties, citizen patrol volunteers would be paired in teams and in a specially designated veh
Citizen patrol volunteers attend a special citizen patrol training academy (usually 40 hours 11
to receive training in various crime prevention duties and services. In addition, Citizen pi
members are required to pass a thorough background check and volunteer a specified minir
number of hours per week.
The range of responsibilities for a citizen patrol volunteer could include:
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
,o
Vacation checks for Carlsbad residents
Senior citizen welfare checks
Handicapped parking enforcement
Special events assistance
Provide citizen assistance such as information, directions
and community resources
Police Department tours
Parking citation assistance
Observation patrol in specially marked vehicles
Graffiti patrol
1. .. , 0 0
-
Assist Crime Prevention with presentations and
Assist the police in emergencies and/or disaster
Fingerprinting for citizens
residential security survey.
situations
Program evaluations would be conducted before, during and after the academy as well as 1
regular basis after the volunteers have had field experience. Training and operations 01
program may be modified as needed.
Volunteer Program Coordinator. To ensure the success of the program and to avoid redu
service levels in other areas of the department due to the use of existing staff to coordinatt
program, the addition of one full-time Volunteer Program Coordinator position is necess
A coordinator is recommended for the coordination of not only the citizen patrol program!
also to coordinate the other volunteer programs within the department. Although it mti
possible to eventually use a volunteer to help coordinate the program, staff has determined
it will be very difficult to get an unpaid volunteer coordinator for a start-up program.
Costs associated with a Citizen Patrol Program would include the following:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Capital Outlay for one fleet vehicle - $20,000
Annual vehicle maintenance & repair - $10,000
Two "handi-talkie" radios - $3,000
Miscellaneous supplies including f'ingerprinting - $2,000 per year
Recognition expenses - $2,000 per year
Uniforms - $1,000 (depending on uniform purchase policy)
Department staff overtime expenses incurred for instruction of the citizen pi
academy - $1,000 per academy
One full-time Volunteer Program Coordinator - $32,000 per year
Total Start-up Costs = $23,000
Total Ongoing Costs = $49,000
H:\LIBRARMRNANCE\WPDATA\%BUD\ISFOLICE
4. .. . -
k 6
-I 0 8
Fiscal ImDact
The following is a summary of total costs for each proposed volunteer program:
First-Year Ongoing costs costs
I. Enhanced Volunteer Propram $ 3,000 $ 3,000
II. citizens Academy (two academies uer year) 5,000 5,000
III. Citizen Patrol (two academies Der year) 72,000 49,000
TOTAL ANNUAL PROGRAM COSTS $ 80,000 $ 57,000
These volunteer programs could be funded from Asset Forfeiture dollars during the first 4
need to be paid out of the General Fund. Maintenance, operations and capital equipn
expenses may remain in Asset Forfeiture fund accounts.
However, after the first year of operation, personnel expenses (approx. $36,000 per year)
Alternatives
1. Develop and implement any combination of the three proposed volunteer programs 7
all first year costs and any ongoing maintenance & operations and capital outlay c
being funded through the Asset Forfeiture fund.
2. Enhance the existing volunteer program only; implement no new programs.
3. Take no action; maintain the existing volunteer program under its current structure,
HUIBRAR~FINANCE\WPDATA\%BUD\ISPOLICE
.. 0
, ISSUE STATEMI
Background
The Public Art program was initiated in 1985 with the creation of the Carlsbad Arts Commission w
purpose is to advise the City Council on the implementation of the Arts element of the General 1
Stated in the General Plan is the policy "The City will provide, when possible, for the siting selec
installation and maintenance of works of art within or upon public facilities and land. It
The first public artwork, Crownlair, was installed in Stagecoach Park in 1989. Subsequently, ten p
have been added to the permanent collection. Designed artwork for the South Carlsbad Library an
Shore Protection Wall are pending.
Proposal
There are basically three methods by which public art may be pursued. One way would be to encou
and support artwork on private property throughout the City. This avenue is currently being expl
by staff. Another would be through integration of artwork into public works projects. This coul
either as an integral part of the project at a minimal additional cost or as a separate component o
project. The third method would be through the purchase of completed art work which coul
displayed on public property.
In the past several years, there has been much discussion regarding the best process to use in meetin
public art goals and policies in the general plan recognizing both the need for public input an(
inherent controversial aspect to public art. As a result, staff has developed a method by which Co
may want to proceed. The suggested process provides for the development of a long-range plar
allows the City to focus its current efforts on the acquisition of works already on exhibit I
encouraging private sources to pursue the commissioning of original works of art.
As a means of achieving these goals, staff is proposing the following plan:
1. Undertake a Public Art Master Plan.
This would be a long-range plan to provide a method for achieving the Council's goals from
until buildout. The plan would include a method to incorporate public art into appropriate ca
projects anticipated to be built by the City in the future. In addition, it would identify exi;
sites where public artwork would be desirable such as in the Scenic Corridor Study 01
addition of street furniture in the Village area. Sites in private development would als
considered and methods for encouraging the display of artwork developed.
The master planning process would include obtaining input from the public and the ar
thereby, allowing the citizens of Carlsbad to express their views on the process and the typ
artwork they would like to see in their City. In addition, the master plan allows the Ci
develop a comprehensive strategy for public art which will ultimately achieve Council's goal;
abide by the policies stated in the General Plan.
H:\LIBRARWFINANCE\WPDATA\%BUD\[SARTS
.,
I ,.. 0
..
2. Acquire works of art from the temporary art exhibit.
One of the components of the master plan would be the acquisition of completed artwork
displayed on public property. There are presently two temporary art exhibitions per
consisting of five works of art. Each art piece is exhibited for approximately six months.
is proposing that Council allocate funds from the Public Art fund to purchase one or seve
these works. With the art already on display, the opportunity will be provided for the corn
to comment on the artwork before a recommendation to purchase is made. This would allo
public arts program to proceed while the master plan is being developed.
While the cost of the artwork to be purchased is unknown, staff is recommending that Cc
appropriate $22,500 towards these purchases for the upcoming fiscal year. This would all0
City to purchase one large work of art or several smaller pieces. The "Mother Earth/Father
piece by Alber de Matteis now on display at the fountain on the corner of State and Granc
example, costs $5,000. If no pieces were of interest to the City this year, the funds cou
carried over to the next year until appropriate artwork is found.
In addition, staff is recommending that a budget be established to pay the artists that partic
in the temporary art exhibit. Currently, the City does not pay anything for the temporar
of the artwork. Staff feels that they may be able to attract more interest in the program
City were to pay a small amount ($500) to each artist to defray the artist's expenses. P
current level of displaying 10 pieces of artwork per year, the total cost of the program wot
$5,000.
Fiscal ImDact
The majority of the costs of developing the Arts Master Plan would absorbed in the current Arts bu
Most of the work would be done in-house by the Arts staff. An additional $2,500 is requested tc
for facilitators, printing and mailing costs related to the Plan.
In addition, staff is requesting $5,000 for the temporary art exhibition and $22,500 to purchase v
of art.
It is staffs recommendation that all funding be appropriated from the Public Arts Fund which h
available fund balance of over $lOO,OOO. Thus, the addition of this program would have no effe
the General fund.
Alternatives
1. Appropriate $30,000 from the Public Art Fund for the program as outlined above.
2. Implement only one or two of the item discussed above at the following costs:
._
c
Master Plan $2,500 Enhance Temporary Art Exhibition $5,000
Acquire A-rtwork $5,000 to $22,500
4. Take no action; continue Arts program as is.
H:\LIBRARWFINANCE\WPDATA\%BUD\ISARTS
I,, 0 a
B"
-.
-,
ISSUE STATEM
Backaround
In 1990, the Carlsbad Municipal Water District prepared the water system master plan. The 1
of the report was the distribution system for the City's water supply, with various improven
needed for the distribution system identified at that time. Alternative water resources inform
was not presented, and the water supply was assumed to be totally imported water to me€
buildout water demands within the City of Carlsbad.
Since that time, District and City operations were consolidated. Factors not considered in
need to be incorporated into an overall local water resources development plan for the \
system. In addition, other important external changes affecting water demand and the (
supply of imported water have occurred.
F General Plan -. In 1994, the General Plan was updated outlining the land uses, maxi1
dwelling units, and population for the "horizon year" 15 or 20 years in the future.
information provides a new basis for estimating water demands.
b Growth Management - Incorporation of the City's growth management plan intc
water development plan will provide assurance that the infrastructure will be in pia'
meet the development needs of the City.
b Habitat - The City is developing a habitat management plan that identifies existing ha
preservation areas and a program to facilitate the permitting process for water pro
that might impact those areas. In addition, federal and state environmental considera'
pose severe constraints on the future water distribution system.
b Reclaimed Water - In 1990, the City adopted a reclaimed water master pla
demand for imported water, It also utilizes the treated waste water rather than plac supplement the available water supply. Reclaimed water has the benefits of reducin!
in the ocean and provides a more reliable source of Water to irrigate agriculture, p
golf courses, and roadway landscaping.
b Imported Water Supply - The reliable supply of imported water available since 198(
been reduced 35% during normal rainfall years as a result of environmental mitiga
and other States beginning to take their full entitlement to the Colorado River W
During drought conditions, imported water can be further reduced resulting ir
poszible need to ration the available supplies.
MWD Response to Imported Water SUPD~V Reduction
In responding to the increasing need for imported water and reductions in available supplg
Metropolitan Water.District (MWD) in 1993 began pursuing an integrated water resources
(IRP). The MWD Board of Directors will begin the process of adopting the findings contain
the IRP in May 1995. The conclusions in the IRP state that MWD will provide 100% o
wholesale water demand 90% of the time during normal rainfall years and 80% of the time dl
drought years through the combined development of six targeted programs including: wi
conservation, reclaimed water, groundwater programs, Colorado River Water, State Project Wa
and Central Valley water transfers.
With the adoption of the IRP, and assuming full implementation of its programs, the impor
water supply will be reliable for 80% to 90% of Carlsbad’s demand for water. Alternative sour
of water or other options should be considered to make up the difference.
Council Water Goals and Plans
Council developed two goals for 1995: evaluation of a desalination program and alternative WE
supply projects. These goals are partially in response to the imported water supply situati
increases in water rates at the wholesale level, and recent developments in water produc
projects such as desalination through the capacitive deionization process. However, it is no
that local water resource projects, including reclaimed water, have a high cost and are relati\
complex to construct, operate and maintain.
In 1990, Council adopted the Reclaimed Water Master Plan which implements a reclaimed Wi
system in five phases. Phase I was recently completed and supplies reclaimed water to rr
irrigation needs for agriculture, golf courses, and landscaping in La Costa and Aviara. The Ph
II expansion calls for a $20 million expenditure that includes a tertiary treatment plant adjac
to the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility.
Water Resources Development Plan
The purpose of the water resources development plan is to provide an orderly, cost-effec
improvement program designed to meet the City’s present and future water needs. The 1:
would tie water, reclaimed water, and sewer plans together with the General Plan, activitie:
environmental constraints, and the cost of various options.
The estimated cost of the water resources development plan is $250,000 to be shared by
water and sewer enterprise funds. Water replacement funds and water major facilities fees wc
each contribute $100,000, with a sewer contribution of $50,000.
Alternatives
At this time, Council may wish to consider two water supply alternatives.
1. Establish overall pian for future water needs which will identify sources and potel
development of local water resources to make up for the imported water supply shor
and bring waier availability up to a specified degree of reliability.
MWD and San Diego County Water Authority, local water sources, existing facilit
2. Proceed on the current path of developing a reclaimed water system combined \
imported water.
F:\USERS\EROPQWPDATA\BUDGET95.96\iSSUE.H20
* \ '. 0 0
8- .\
ISSUE STATEMI I ' '. ',: , :'. .. . . . . .. .,. .. . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . .. ..." .. .. . . ' .CONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH.-CARLSBAD LIBRA .. .. ..
Backaround
The Cole library is very popular with both residents and non-residents. It is one of the most 1
libraries in the State with an average daily traffic of 2,000 people and each year the &man(
services at the Cole library continues to increase. The Director reports that it cannot cant
to operate effectively and will become more and more inefficient over time.
The South Carlsbad Library is optimistically scheduled for construction in the proposed 199
Capital Improvement Program in 1996-97. Funding for building the library is currently avail
utilizing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 revenues. Construction of the library
postponed due to projections of insufficient operating funds for next few years. The libraq
take approximately two years to construct and considering current scheduling would open tc
public in the Spring of 1999.
There are issues regarding construction of the South Carlsbad library which impact grc
management and the City's operating and capital budgets.
Operating Costs - With the scheduled opening of the larger library, operating costs tc
General Fund would increase. Although the Cole library would close for its scheduled rem
and current employees would move to the new library, several positions would need to be f To contain costs, six positions are unfunded in the Library budget; filling those positions w
add $230,000 to the General Fund operating budget. In 2001, after the Cole library is reope
additional staffing would be required at a estimated cost of $775,000. Thus, the cost to stafl
operate the South Carlsbad library and remodeled Cole library would increase the challen<
balancing the General Fund budget.
Capital Expenditures - The cost to construct the new library is $1 1.2 million and will requirc
CFD's first issuance of bonds. In order to issue debt for the library and to continue the pal
street and interchange projects scheduled in the CIP, projected increases to the CFD vacant
tax rates would need to be implemented. For example, at the end of two years the tax rate
undeveloped property with residential medium (RM) land use may need to be increasc
$1 ,152, up from the current $1,004 per developable acre. Industrial vacant land tax rates c
almost double, rising from their current $483 per developable acre, to $943 per acre.
Estimates show that the CFD will support the bond issue, even though the district has a cu
delinquency rate of 18%. Recovery of CFD tax delinquencies is calculated into projected
tax rates, After five years, the County will move to collect delinquent property taxes throug
sale and the C3y would recover its proportionate share from the praceeds. CFC
delinquencies would be disclosed when the bonds are issued. It is likely the City would cove
with bondholders to foreclose on any new CFD delinquencies. Sufficient bonds to construc
new library could be issued since the taxes paid by most of the district property owner
current.
Growth Management Standards - Library standards in the Growth Management Plan reql
.8 square feet of library space per capita. The Library performance standard calls for schedul
"construction within a five year period." In other words, when the demand for the facility read
a certain level, 'the City has a "five year period" in which to finance and construct additio
facilities.
In 1986, Citywide Plan performance standards used the assumption of 1,250 units per year. -
"five year period" means the demand equal to 1,250 units per year for five years, for a tota
6,250 units. The actual number of units issued since November 1986 totals 3,270 units, slig
more than half of the original assumption used in the Citywide Plan. Translating this into dem;
for facilities, it is clear that the actual demand created since 1986 is significantly less than u
was originally projected.
Demand for library facilities can be allowed to accumulate for longer than five calendar years '
still be in compliance with the intent of Growth Management, provided that the total numbe
dwelling units issued after November 1986 does not exceed 6,250. The same concept car
applied to parks and City administrative facilities. This finding is especially important for facili
that have a financial guarantee for construction but which must be delayed for other reasc
such as a shortage of operating funds.
Alternatives
At this time, Council may wish to consider the following alternatives to the planned yea
construction of the South Carlsbad library and subsequent remodel of the Cole library:
1. Move the planned library improvements back one year, which will defer the openin
the South Carlsbad library to 2000.
2. Upon opening the South Carlsbad library, plan to close the Cole library until its reopel
is required to meet growth management standards.
3. Maintain the planned construction of the new library beginning in fiscal year 1996-97
subsequent remodel of the Cole library in 1998-99 as shown in the proposed CIP.
F:\USERS\EROPE\WPDATA\EUDGEr95.96\lSSUE.LIE
i
t ,,I 0 0
-\ .-
General Fund Balance
Water District
Sewer Fund
Information Systems
$ 580,000
50,000
50,000
320.000
Total $1,000,000
F:\USERS\EFlOPE\WPDATA\BUCGETS5,gG\INFOSTAT.flS
INFORMATION STATEME
SEWER AND WATER FlNANClN I
The sewer and water enterprise funds are financed and operated like a private busin!
enterprise. The cost (expenses, including depreciation) of providing sewer and water semi1
on a continuing basis to the citizens of Carlsbad will be recovered primarily through u
charges. Sewer or water connection fees represent new development’s fair share of the exisi
system or the cost of increasing capacity.
For budgetary purposes, the City’s enterprise funds are divided into capital and opera
budgets. All water and sewer operations are processed with the annual operating bud1
Council receives quarterly Financial Status Reports which report only operating revenues
expenses. Capital expenses to replace or expand facilities are included within each ye
Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The City’s audited annual financial statements corn
revenues and expenses for operations and capital into a cohesive whole so that the e
enterprise can be viewed.
The graphics on the following pages depict the revenue sources and funds used by the st
and water funds.
F:\USEAS\EROPf\WPDATA\BUDGET95.96\1NFOSTAT.ENT
b :,I a e
-.
gL -42 aog 2s
ti
Z 0
v) Z
-
a 8
a 17 - 0 I 4 2
LL
W
-
a
G s
I- z w 9 E5 a a 32 -
R w U
if w a
PP
& ot'
@v &*
P P
PD
v) z 0
I-
w
- s
8
v) w m 4 I 0 OI 3 n a W 5
I i" KO LuLum 3=; E% 0
+
\
1 !
i
(
(
I
(
I
! i
c3 z
0 Z
z
L oe
-
a
I
s W cn
urn
Lua c/)E
$2
,.$!GOV <p
0%
lllj
I- z
Q LLI tr
cn z 0 2 LI: W 0- 0
1
I
I I I
(
I
1 I 1
(
q
I
(
I !
I
* Iz.
I -, e e
&L
THE CITY COUNC
GIN M
CG
June 20, 1995
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: Finance Director
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX INFORMATION
Attached is the break down of the sources of our TOT revenues as
requested by the Mayor. We will have an overhead available at the
meeting tonight if he would like to use it in his discussions.
<
&.,( G-"
LISA HILDABRAND
LH:emr
Attachment
F:\USERS\EROPRWPDATA\MEMOS\TOT.RAY
+ It.
-,
2 I- + 0 z a n
o? 3-
0g Om F + 2 W
v) z
PL +
-
a
0
L a, c 6
a a, 2
(D cn 0
CI
0
(u -I
I 1.
t 0 .- - - .- 2
ccj
7
e3
II
m
0 I-
-
+
LC)
B
I
w 11 w
~~)&&. ~a&LA/L&3 flkw9.. EL*$ ""15" F CL$ &&(61
Two Uniqu
The Shores (
Rick Smock, CHA
General Manager
Best Western Beach Terrace Inn
2775 Ocean Street
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
June 12,1995
Mayor Claude Lewis
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Dear Mayor Lewis,
Best Wt Beach Ter
2775 Oceal Carlsbad, C
(619) 729
Fax (619) 7
Best Wt Beach Vie1
3180 Carlsbad
Carlsbad, C,
Fax (619) 4:
(619) 729.
I am writing to state my support for increased hnding for the Carlsbad Convention and Visitors
Bureau.
As a member of the Executive Marketing Advisory Committee of Best Western International, I
am very aware of the level of support and cooperation Best Western Hotels receive from local
chambers of commerce and visitors bureaus throughout the United States and Canada.
Considering the size and budget of the Carlsbad ConVis, their accomplishments are unsurpassec
Just consider what they could accomplish with a budget that keeps up with inflation. I know yc
want TOT revenues to grow. y+&L ck S ock, CHA
General Manager
Best Western Beach Terrace Inn &
Best Western Beach View Lodge
cc: Carlsbad Convention and Visitors Bureau
Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce
I IIL
\="
cr;s'.- b&&. ii .i
a,.-? & &+ 13 +/
June 12, 1995
Mayor Claude Lewis
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Dear Mayor -is,
I am writing to ask your support in increasing the funding
for the Carlsbad Convention and Visitors Bureau.
The Con Vis is doing a terrific job. Virtually all of our
advertising is done cooperatively with the Con Vis and the
results are excellent.
I have worked closely with the Con Vis staff for mre than
eight years and have observed the grawing iqact of their
marketing programs -
They provide a valuable service to the hotels, restaurants
and merchants in Carlsbad by bringing in tourist dollars.
Your supprt will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Bm&%
Bonnie Tekstxa
Assistant Manager
A HELM MANAGED RESORT
3200 Carlsbad Boulevard 0 Carlsbad, California 92008
1-800-334-2199 0 619-729-3500 FAX: 619-4%-5942
) I,.
-.
t
carlsbad BEACH -z$!!!= RESORT Qjsp: E-- @L$ /,
June 12, 1995 @+ I I
L
Mayor Claude Lewis City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr. Carlsbad, CA 9200%
Dear Mayor Lewis,
I understand the City Council will soon be deliberating the funding for the Carlsbad Convention and Visitors Bureau.
The ConVis marketing programs certainly assist us in
generating business for the Carlsbad Inn and other hotels in
Carlsbad. Our small properties do not have resources nor
expertise to individually promote our City to a worldwide marke
Having a healthy tourist industry is certainly advantageous to all the merchants and services in the community and having a te
approach with ConVis being an important part Of that team has
been an advantage, Our guests dine in Carlsbad’s restaurants, shop in its stores to name the obvious. --and certainly the TO
tax generated is being used not only to benefit tourists, but f
community projects such as soccer, baseball and tennis courts,z we1 1.
Success is difficult to measure. However, I can tell you from personal experience that during the past few years, in a very depressed economy, hotel people in San Diego greeted our occupancy figures with awe and admiration. Together, we must have been doing something right!
Please support increased funding for Convis. Do not cripple t!
goose that generates the TOT and enhanced sales tax revenues f( the City!
Sincerely, Q. Qk AR SBAD INN BEACH RESORT
-42” ’.
Carol DuDeck
Director of Sales & Marketing
3075 Carlsbad Boulevard Carisbad, California 92008
(6 19) 434-7020
*I,. -
.) 0 0 ...
Jolie Lucas 1029 Walnut %rest, Apt. 6 5an Luis Obi5
CA 93401 (805) 541-8234
January 24,1995
Mayor Buddy Lewis
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
ALL REC @J: &$
ei-
Re: 1995/96 CIP Budget
Dear Mayor Lewis:
I just completed my Master’s in Business Administration, but bdore that 1 rec
my Bachelor‘s degree in Architecture from Cal Poly. For my senior project, I st1
the Carrillo Ranch, performing a superficial master plan and designing two aux
buildings. My study of the ranch has convinced me that it is indeed in critical
of planning, protection and utilization! To say I am astounded that the fundin
the master plan is being delayed would be an understatement.
I oppose any delay in the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan. I support inclusion of th
second $125,000 in the 1995/96 budget. Please stand by your original vote i
support the Carrillo Ranch - it is a jewel in your backyard. If you are not vigilal
its care, you will lose an important part of Carlsbad’s architectural and social
history.
I f,I - * 0 a
-I
June 19, 1995
TO: MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Bonnie Dominguez
SUPPORT FOR CARRILLO RANCH
Mrs. Laughery called and would like to go on record supporting the inclusion of
$125,000 in'the budget for Carrillo Ranch:
Mrs. Eleanor Laughery
7927 Los Pinos Circle
Carlsbad 92009
cc: City Manager
City Clerk
a< IW
4t
-b e
6
e
e
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF CARLSBAD
The City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 20, 1995, at 6:
p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsb;
California, to discuss the 1995-96 Operating Budget and the 1995-96 to Buildout Cap
Improvement Program Budget. Also included will be discussion on the Carlsk
Municipal Water District Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets as \I
as discussion on behalf of the Housing and Redevelopment Board regarding
Redevelopment Budgets. The City Council will also discuss selected City developm
fees and general fees.
Interested parties are invited to attend this meeting and present their views 2
comments to the City Council.
Copies of the Budget and Fee Schedules are available for public inspection at
City Clerk’s office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, or the two libraries: 1250 Carlsbad Vilk
Drive, Carlsbad, and La Costa Branch Library, 6949 El Camino Real, Suite 200, Carlsb
Written and telephone inquiries may be directed to Lisa Hildabrand of the Final
Department, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, 434-2867.
PUBLISH: June 5, 1995
R I I)
r 9
-& 0 ..
q
PROOF OF PUBLOCATiON
(2Ql5.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALfFOHNIA County of San Diego
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing !
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years,
and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. i am the principal clerk of the printer of
Proof of Publication of
a newspaper of generai circulation, printed and published daily in the City of Oceanside and qualified for the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial district with subs?antial circulation in Bonsail, Fallbrook,
of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged
a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of June 30,1989, case number 1.71349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed mpy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been pubfished in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not 'in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
June 5, 1995
i certify (or declare) under penaity of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
leucaclia, Encinitas, Cardiff, Vista and Cartsbad, County
Dated at Oceanside,Califomia, this E; day -8 "I June, 1995 -
"0"""-
Signature /4)
Public Hearing
""_-"""""""""~"""~""""-",
""". NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA
CITY OF CARLSBAl
The City of Carlsbad will hold a public hea
Tuesday, June 20, 1995, at 6:OO p.m. in the I
Chambers of City Hall, 1200 Carlsbad Wllage
Carlsbad, California, to discuss the 1995-96 Q
Budget and the 1995-96 to Buildout
Improvement Program Budget. Also included wi
discussion on the Carlsbad Municipal Water
Operating and Capital Improvement Program But
well as discussion on behalf of the Housi
Redevelopment Board regarding the Redevel
Budgets. The CitL Council will also discuss selec
development fees and general fees.
Interested parties are invited to attend this meel
present their views and comments to the City Co
Copies of the Budget and Fee Schedules are a
for public inspection at the City Clerk's offic
Carlsbad Village Drive, or the two libraries
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, and La Costa
Library, 6949 El Camino Real, Suite 200, Carlsb
Written and telephone inquires may be directec
Hildabrand of the Finance Department, 1200 (
. Village Drive, Carlsbad, 434-2867.
LEGAL 42387, June 5, 1995 d
I BLADE-CITIZEN
Legal Advertising
5722 South Hill Street P.0. Box 90 Oceanside, CA 92054
(61 9) 433-7333