Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-10-20; City Council; 20003; Agricultural conversion mitigation fee fundingCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 13 AB# 20.003 MTG. 10/20/09 DEPT. PLN AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION MITIGATION FEE FUNDING CORRECTIONS DEPT. HEAD W\^ CITY ATTY. X^y CITY MGR. Ct>— RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2009-260 APPROVING corrections to the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee grant funding amounts specified in Exhibit A of previously adopted City Council Resolution No. 2009-199, which authorized the allocation of grant funds from the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Fund. ITEM EXPLANATION: This proposal corrects a typographical error contained in Exhibit A attached to Resolution No. 2009-199, which was approved by the City Council on June 28, 2009 and authorized the allocation of grants from the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee (ACMF) fund (Fund). Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2009-199 specifies the amount of ACMF funds to be allocated to seven different projects, as recommended by the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Citizens Committee (Committee). However, the funding amounts specified in Exhibit A for two projects are incorrect: the Aquaculture Enhancement at Carlsbad Hatchery project (AGP 09-02) and the Coastal Bluff Restoration - Tamarack and Frazee project (AGP 09-10). The funding amount specified for AGP 09-02 is $7,500 less than the amount the Committee intended to recommend for that project, and the funding amount specified for AGP 09-10 is $7,500 more than the amount the Committee intended to recommend. During the 2009 ACMF grant application review process, the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Program Citizens Committee (Committee) determined that a portion ($7,500) of the Coastal Bluff Restoration project (AGP 09-10) was not eligible for ACMF grant funding. When Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2009-199 was prepared, the $7,500 was unintentionally subtracted from the recommended funding for the Aquaculture Enhancement project (AGP 09-02); however, it should have been subtracted from the funding recommended for the Coastal Bluff Restoration project (AGP 09-10). Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2009-199 is proposed to be corrected to accurately reflect the Committee's recommended funding for AGP 09-02 and AGP 09-10, as shown in Exhibit 2 of this agenda bill. This action will not encumber additional funding from the ACMF Fund beyond the total amount previously awarded. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Kevin Pointer 760-602-4620 kevin.pointer@carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS l/SE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED WITHDRAWN AMENDED *D Dn D CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN RETURNED TO STAFF OTHER -SEE MINUTES D D Da Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Agricultural Conversion Mitigation fees are collected as coastal agricultural lands that are subject to the fee convert to urban uses. These fees have been set-aside in a special city fund (ACMF Fund) dedicated to providing the types of grants the Committee will consider during the project solicitation/evaluation process. On June 28, 2009, the City Council authorized the allocation of grants from the Fund. The total amount of the allocated grants ($847,822) is below the balance that was available in the Fund at that time (approximately $891,971). This proposal does not change the total amount of grants to be allocated from the Fund. Therefore, there is a sufficient balance within the Fund to cover the cost of the grant allocations. The only direct cost to the City resulting from the recommended action will be the staff time associated with the allocation of ACMF funds. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed correction to Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 2009-199 is consistent with and does not change the prior determination that the allocation of ACMF funding is exempt from the requirements of CEQA. The applicable CEQA exemption status for each of the projects that will receive ACMF funding is listed within Exhibit A of the attached City Council Resolution (Exhibit 1 of this agenda bill). EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2009-260 2. Exhibit A: strikeout and bold/underline version of the proposed modifications. 2- EXHIBIT 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-260 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CORRECTIONS TO 3 THE AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION MITIGATION FEE GRANT FUNDING AMOUNTS SPECIFIED IN EXHIBIT A OF 4 PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2009-199, WHICH AUTHORIZED THE ALLOCATION OF GRANT 5 FUNDS FROM THE AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION MITIGATION FEE FUND. 6 CASE NAME: AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION MITIGATION FEE FUNDING CORRECTIONS 7 WHEREAS, on July 28, 2009 the City Council of the City of Carlsbad adopted o Resolution No. 2009-199, which authorized the allocation of grant funds from the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee (ACMF) fund (Fund); and WHEREAS, the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Ad Hoc Citizens Committee intended to recommend that $249,313 in ACMF funds be allocated to ACMF Grant Project (AGP) 09-02 and that $234,830 in ACMF funds be allocated to AGP 09-10; and WHEREAS, the ACMF funding amounts for AGP 09-02 and AGP 09-10 were displayed incorrectly in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2009-199; and 1, WHEREAS, it is necessary to correct Exhibit A to accurately reflect the ACMF . „ funding amounts for AGP 09-02 and AGP 09-10. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does hereby jo resolve as follows: 20 1 • That the above recitations are true and correct. 21 2. That the City Council hereby approves the corrections to the ACMF funding amounts to be allocated to AGP 09-02 and AGP 09-10, as accurately reflected in the attached 22 "Exhibit A - Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Program Committee Recommendation of 2009 Grant Applications and Environmental Review Status." 23 3. All other provisions and requirements of Resolution No. 2009-199 not 24 modified by this resolution shall remain in full effect. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 20* day of October. 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Hall, Packard and Blackburn. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: WOOD, City Clerk s<sxLU EXHIBJIJ200•o cortbe wo1.s(ft O E « 2^ o°S ^5 9 S ^S c5« O CT» >•^ ^s QJ4-> O »(D O >00 (M V 4= M- OC I C »c .8 Eo -P <u e-S |§J g I§ E •!u p c_: o m 3 « J+2 oc < "5 <uu <u K £ ou ; <k_roEoroQ.1<;rHCTl00<J)Q-OU ^^£.ofM /CUP 98-r^.o r-«o <Q. U1 ^^(J3 PTo(N O.l/lu- O troQ. ^ 4->T3Ol^CE<D4-1QJ•oI/)ro5t/i4->C0)E(U>o Q. E e access i.c4-* ^4-O co 4^u3k_4-ft/1Couo>JZ4->iveway.^_ Q 9SQCLUCroQ.u£4-'u0)Q.to£UcroQC T3ro-Ouo 5•g <4= t! Olu>. (/I3 O ^o>k_Q. OJ -C 4-* •5 01Q. 8woqjjz•M go>'>o>"ro4-f0)Eco '> 0>dditionalro Olt_ '5ITOlk_ 4-1 Oc to01 OT3 tjOl 'o1 Q. 01 4-J 14-O ™ SP d- =coOlj:: 4-^OlO)•4-J<T3i—! ro!§>;fe? ^"l&: oT s not authoriz!§TJ •sis! a. i O' < i£ !| ;l•. *^ : 100;SP Awardil4-13tnOli_4-*OcJinT3C^QO1roro"5>•4-t '> ttro Because the4J U<D '§ Q. 01 ^4-o o tt construcvH'S"2ro$ro0)JZ4-»ironment,Olo> 4-* CostOl 4Jcrou<<r 'cOD'm ro OlCO3 S T3 OU 4->ro£4-> 5" '>'t;ro £1^Tn"IDOLT>rHC0t30)totoGuidelinecSLUU O 4-*4-*Cro 3 i review pursvironmentalo> 8t»_ 4->Q. Eo>X01 uO)'o"Q.Ol^:4-*>^UcOJ00rmitting a01Q.73ro_OJ k_ 0)_c 4^o k-o 4^u OlJZ4-<o submitted tilans areu. 01i O•*-•co'+-»roE|4-*nsufficien_U10)OJ 4-* oT E V)lc+-*< s rsuant to CEQ. •oOl4-*ro ^5ai OlJ2 *-;oroa.E;'.ro ;C !•onme> ,c0) ,4-« irolu t in any signifl3Jto ; £! 1!tn01! I!li^ *<u-C :ine whetdetermwOltot/>OJ"oj•D'5(Jc!LUUO+-*+-»CTO3(/)i*_3Q. 2 LU U E : Exempt froing Studies)sign of trails01T3 T3Crou Planninccro Q. •acro;>•FeasibilH(Nus<N LTI rH m iHro couOltoinOlC"53T3'313cSLUUo4-J Exempt from CEQA pursuantAvers property acquisition:rot_34-»roZ;erve Existinghip of Interest in Land to Pres; 15325 (Transfers of Ownersii_£I/)•acro_jM—(Acquisition csources), and Section 15313 iConditions and Historical Re"^01to \ Wildlife Conservation Purpo73Ct*_4«lCroMOJOPemoval: awaHiding, and invasive species r; Wetland restoration, trail bi<Nr-uo oo"CD 4^uOl'cfQ.Ol£"Scohe construct!lorize, permit, or guarantee tfor AGP 09-02 does not authTOa>i/>3rou33^84-*rony activity thding funds will not result in aBecause the activity of awarEo*a.101.—00 ironment, the award of fundisignificant effect on the envil/)roQ.cO1SI5rnon 15061(b)(ant to CEQA Guidelines Sectienvironmental review pursuT5ro3ro>QJ0)JD1tj01's1Q.014~t other lead permitting agencvare submitted to the City ork_o>.c3Olc'Et_Ol4^01T3O4->04Wro me, there is insufficient inferpursuant to CEQA. At this tito4-JUroQ.significant environmental im= 1ro i _C | 4-* 3l/lO)L_ 3 1o" 0. 5 •<— ' % goo73*CDOC c E ^ 4-*•3 ro ro C Ol = « 3 a .° 3 .h ro3 $ ~ 3 i 11t; .£ 3 3 c =5 l :js ^ o ci Q. 5 CO |- &1 = >•4-1k_o>Q. O 0. toh_Ol^I acquisition;^ OlQ.; Mitsuuchi procro co 4Jrow j wetland restogTO '5_Q 14-* >O 0) toO)1 Invasive specicro \ at Rosalena/SrHorH >.ro | Pacific/Highw,\ areas.o := (L) j_,k_ p- .^^ 13 Q; "O C* 0 dJ J£ U 1 ro 51 <« 50^2•- o 'S a- §>"S « J3 ia> £ I 1 J .2" § S« 15m ro3^ COEX o"5uo4-»roOmLfl<Hco O)c LUO cro I3a. u Eo a. 01x ooo j >• .!£!; | 'gsr! .E ^5 ~; oi *; c £i: "*"* to **~ (Tt! 01 Ol *- o; S ^~ ° S If!l» C cO. O tro c < a.C X:o **oi aio TJ *3 £T£C CSo *i™ SoTox:=iro O aio (N roro**_O>. '>t5ro 01 4-» O>to s:'>Ol01XI cotj.01 01 •£ c •- *io .5 pLU T3U ro 01EcoS<£00 :8a. co ST£E .2 £3 S I |£i 11S <•F oi £ <, C j ao Q \J o) 1/1 4^ "" 2 Z, Uu ro c ^ «.Si, oi £ S 2o to c +•• . ,b 3>*> « •* r-•a Q- ro = £-0-5r = c * 8 " ! ob O ro oi QO '*-' x: >. C O *••*— •-» J_l cro ">C . — "&2-I43 ~ E" C TO U) > E 01 m 5 c '4_. oi x: M^ O o x > oi< u ro O) 5 XI OSo LO 0)'TJ 8 «N(M00 CT1Oa.O01_Q)a.E01 c3 O Ol•a Iro •acro T301 Ero a. 01 O)XI OlT3COlEEo 01O(N00•aai</)aien QO C4_»1 of exis01T3O Olcc ro 1 roai u O Oo 00c«O)E ro co 7301X QDC 4-1S Eoot_totoro u OOQO X) — . Ol 4-t COc TJ Cro Eoo cg 4-»roTJ 3 O ro 1edionda X co §>roI CL <iscoveryQ at o o 'k_Ol4-<C k_Ol c01u 4-»rovemenQ. E s^ Cg ro^_ O c" _ S -B 2>- ro 4-p t = -a 5- — c 2ro 4j — x: M 3+5 S C i; S T3 1 S 3 ro * 8 ro ^. E ro pT ^ = S3 isw to i =S ">m .2 ^Ol" •+: 15 oi 2 2 £ ro W) O ro ,V"s s E u S £ a. S 00 E .£5 o . _ .E •- e ^ 8*- 4-1 C IA UQ- ro oi ro ">o E ooxi $ ro c TJ '§ CO Olk_ 34->ro = J3XI 2 S <U 00 ._•< c JB <4-» 4-1_ « C9 X OJ< 01 U S m '§ ° -c c E E i! _5 c oi i S: to JS 01 Oi § S? r5 a. 3 < S a. 3 ^ o CHIBITAJE VERSION OF AMENDMENTS TO:•*> —UJ _] ucz D C Cm STRIKE OUT/ion Mitigation Fee Programition of 2009 Grant Applicationsental Review Status(/) f~L_ "O ElQ} ^ i^ c c •- S §"°JJ3 f^ ~S 38<— $2 *!O on Mitigation Fee Programtion of 2009 Grant Applicationsental Review StatusI As part of SP 207(G)/LCPA 07-07/CUP 98-20(B)/CDP 98-91(A) - Palomar Airport Road\ Driveway, the construction of the access improvements was determined to be within1 the scope of the previously certified Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan EIR 94-01. The funding: of the project does not require additional environmental review.•S TO C If V V *y* ^5 c >.*' , i t-»<n J~ c y * £• * o > 5 S * ,' rn*E «^ *— ( w > . ' lH ^ Q UJ "-.*• i: w "c ''*^ k +- - •-$ cc < ^:- o ^ & CUD *^" t * I o "n '~ ro f f E P (/) •— i-t/^ O TO „ „ (j ^_ 'C ro ^ o u , ' 1 S •& § ™ S s,• '§111111> (/) «3 <= 0) CC Tl !/) J= s C 'Cm a. 00 4-1u £V. vs i"* "'|K\y "•'' * QJ Jj^;-i- 1 UKJ* . | -o c ^t * I, i ro uj u 'W ^ M .£33 »-r .% ro .3) ,\ ;' — "- ^ " ' a 9^ O)Awarding grant funds for AGP 09-02 does not authorize, permit, or guarantee theconstruction of the project. Because the activity of awarding funds will not result in anyactivity that could cause a significant effect on the environment, the award of funding isexempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).When plans are submitted to the City or other lead permitting agency, the project willbe evaluated pursuant to CEQA. At this time, there is insufficient information todetermine whether the project will result in any significant environmental impacts.oh m rl «Ho> m ;? § <• i r>j•utv v>Planning and design of trails: Exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section43 QD ti \Modifying two flow-through raceway uni; into one re-circulatiri unit for propagationwhite sea bass.^l-g i S *oo a: - -^ TOai 4-, 3 |T33 £ -o 8 S •=z%s <•§ ... ,. ...UJ, , ^ O QJ | C £•OJx:u TOI ,3P <G•o T3Cnj DOc 'cc(D CL 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies)Avers Drooertv acquisition: Exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sectionro « 5 ! ofMurphy Trail By paBoardwalk and RosalTrail;15325 (Transfers of Ownership of Interest in Land to Preserve Existing NaturalConditions and Historical Resources), and Section 15313 (Acquisition of Lands forWildlife Conservation Purposes)Wetland restoration, trail building, and invasive species removal: awarding grant fundsfor AGP 09-02 does not authorize, permit, or guarantee the construction of the project.Because the activity of awarding funds will not result in any activity that could cause ai significant effect on the environment, the award of funding is exempt fromi environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). When plansare submitted to the City or other lead permitting agency, the project will be evaluatedpursuant to CEQA. At this time, there is insufficient information to determine whetherthe project will result in any significant environmental impacts.Revised: 8/27/09rsips, I LO oo" j w s "i 1 i TO O £! 1 S S ro « c >>. OL i_ 01 to nj it O O .. 'o^S^c s.|3? &ll 00 xi'-TJ ">STH 111 ill, S. 1 •= S 1 S « a 81>*tj ^^Ii_: ?4-»TOk-i< ro <i s .5 i ro Q- ro i « S0 c .2.*ti rt •*"* &|^ ! '« 3 i '60 £ I ^zw C ~ |li = o- c J) .— Q ^ ™ Oj?60 ro ^ i — 1 ! S?<§ CO z LU Q Z111 < LL O Zg <2buj ii UJ (£UJ Oz o CO Q- O UJ 5: c/p rampplicationst_ - 8>-l<$ CO Hiro 2 rn CO l>°| I'S^ ^ c rac .2 c II m 0 oO 15 c 0) E .2 $^- 7^O)'^<ioO -ro4-<COJ£QJ"5.E he Fund•a01•s(D m T3Cnj "S E IQ. Olu. OlJ3 S rsioo•b9!i