Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010-11-30; City Council; 20407; LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# MTG. DEPT. 20,407 11/30/10 CED LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 PUD 05-11(B) DEPT. DIRECTOR^rety CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council hold a public hearing and ADOPT Resolution No. 2010-261 APPROVING Planned Development Permit Amendment No. PUD 05-11(8) for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.1 as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project Application(s)Administrative Approvals Planning Commission City Council PUD 05-11(B)RA RA = Recommended Approval * = Final City decision-making authority s = requires Coastal Commission approval On October 20, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval (4-0-3) of a Planned Development Permit Amendment application for the floor plans, plotting and architecture for 80 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.1 located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street. The lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT 05-14 and Planned Development Permit PUD 05- 11, both of which were approved by the City Council on September 26, 2006. The project complies with all of the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the Planned Development Ordinance, and City Council Policy 66 for Livable Neighborhoods. The project is designed with four (4) floor plans (Plan 1, 2, 3 and 4), one (1) variation to Floor Plan 3 (Plan 3X), and three (3) different architectural styles for each floor plan including: Santa Barbara, Craftsman Bungalow, and Italian/Tuscan. The total living area ranges in size from 2,078 to 3,332 square feet. No public comment was received at the Planning Commission hearing. A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's actions and a complete project description and staff analysis of the proposed project are included in the attached minutes and Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission and Staff are recommending approval of the proposed discretionary action. FISCAL IMPACT: All public infrastructure required for this project will be funded and/or constructed by the developer. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Van Lynch (760) 602-4613 van.lvnch@carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED WITHDRAWN AMENDED * D D D CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN RETURNED TO STAFF OTHER -SEE MINUTES D D D D Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time, CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for EIR 98-07 which are applicable to the proposed project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2010-261 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6730 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 20, 2010 5. Excerpts of Draft Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 20, 2010. EXHIBIT 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-261 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED 3 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE 4 DEVELOPMENT OF 80 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 5 NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD, SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND 6 NORTH OF CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. 7 CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 CASE NO.: PUD 05-1 KB) 8 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as 9 follows: 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 11 Commission did, on October 20, 2010, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law 12 to consider a Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD 05-11 (B)); and 13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 30tb day of Novpmbpr , 2010, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Planned Development Permit Amendment and at that time received recommendations, objections, protests, and 16 comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 05-11 (B). 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 1 of Carlsbad as follows: 19 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 20 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of the Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD 05-11(B)) is approved by the City Council and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning 22 Commission Resolution No. 6730 on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 3. The action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. 24 The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 30th day of November, 2010, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Hall, Packard and Blackburn. NOES: ABSENT: None. None. EWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, Ci (SEAL) 7 o""!,".1!'/.o-"$SS?&-N.O/VV^'-.'V c.- *i= 0? %*> • ••:;, •• • v''/, •* ^. x . s^s '"/..Tfu^ -2- EXHIBIT 2 V NOT TO SCALE SITEMAP Villages of La Costa Neighborhood 3.1 PUD05-11(B) 5 EXHIBIT 3 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6730 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 4 AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 80 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE 6 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE 7 ROAD, SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND NORTH OF CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ' ' 8 . ZONE 11. 9 CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 CASE NO.: PUD 05-1 KB} 10 WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corp, "Developer," and "Owner," has filed a , ~ verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as 13 Lot 1 through 80 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-14, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.1, in the City of Carlsbad, 14 County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15595, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County 15 August 22, 2007 as file No. 2007-0560435 16 ("the Property"); and 17 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned18 19 Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" - "XX" dated October 20, 2010, 20 on file in the Planning Department, LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1, as provided 21 by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 22 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on October 20, 2010, hold a duly 23 noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 24 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 26 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 27 relating to the Planned Development Permit Amendment; and 28 WHEREAS, on September 26, 2006, the City Council approved PUD 05-11, as described and conditioned in City Council Resolution No. 2006-287. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 3 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 4 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 6 3.1, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 7 Findings: / > ° 1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan, and complies with all applicable q provisions of Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the project is for the approval of architecture and plotting for 80 10 single-family detached units located on previously approved lots (CT 05-14) with a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet. In addition, the project achieves the General 11 Plan's Residential Objectives through providing a variety of safe and attractive housing that preserves the neighborhood atmosphere and identity of existing residential areas. The single-family residential development complies with all 13 development standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan as shown on Attachments 5 through 8 (Tables 1 - 4). 14 2. The proposed project will not be detrimental to existing uses, or to uses specifically 15 permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings, or traffic, in that the'project has been designated for single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. 17 The single-family residential neighborhoods to the north and west of the site are also similar in character and density. Lands to the south of the project site will remain 18 open-space as approved under the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Traffic has been previously analyzed for compliance through the approval of Tentative Map 19 No. CT 05-14 and Planned Development Permit No. PUD 05-11 (Planning 2Q Commission Resolutions No. 6146 and 6147). 21 3. The project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, in that the 80 single-family residential homes have been analyzed for consistency with all 22 applicable city codes, policies and regulations. o-i3 4. The project's design, including architecture and plotting: 24 a. Contributes to the community's overall aesthetic quality, in that the project consists 25 of a high quality residential design through the use of a variety of floor plans, exterior building planes, roof planes and color schemes, as well as a variety of 26 design elements distinctive to the 3 proposed architectural styles: Santa Barbara Mediterranean, Craftsman Bungalow, and Italian Tuscan. 20 b. Includes the use of harmonious materials and colors, and the appropriate use of landscaping, in that the project's distinctive architectural styles includes twelve PC RESO NO. 6730 -2- different color schemes with a variety of design elements such as: accent colors, 2 window/door trims, roof tiling, decorative stucco, wood accents, stone veneer and wainscoting. The proposed materials and colors contribute to the distinctive 3 architectural styles while the previously approved landscaping will highlight all proposed architectural designs. 4 <. c. Achieves continuity among all elements of the project, in that the project's high quality architectural design helps create interest and character for the entire 6 neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed homes have been carefully plotted to avoid any identical homes (including floor plans, color scheme and architectural 7 styles) from occurring side-by-side, thereby avoiding a monotonous residential street scene yet still providing a sense of continuity through design. ' f8 9 5. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 and all City public facility policies and 10 ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection *1 and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational 12 facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. 13 6. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will 14 be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the 16 Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. 17 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B).18 8. The Planning Director has determined that: 2Q a. The project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, a project for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been 21 given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for the 22 purposes of CEQA; [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and/or -^ b. This project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and c. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified by the City Council 24 on October 23, 2001 in connection with the prior project or plan; and d. The project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in 2 5 the prior EIR; and e. None of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and 27 f. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, which are 28 appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for this Subsequent Project. PC RESO NO. 6730 -3- 9. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 2 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 3 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 4 Conditions: Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a 6 building permit. 7 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, tp be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to fbe so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 9 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy 10 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer 12 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Planned Development Permit Amendment. 13 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections 14 and modifications to the Planned Development Permit Amendment documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on - the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. 15 Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 17 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 19 4. If any conditions for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the 20 payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code 21 Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be „, invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 23 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold 24 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims, and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, 25 directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Planned Development Permit Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or 27 action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the ~° facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. PCRESONO. 6730 -4- 6. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and 2 Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as 3 shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 4 <- 7. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the 6 project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 7 8. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decisioii-rfiaking 8 - body. 9 9. Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plancheck, a 10 reduced legible version of all approving resolution(s) in a 24" x 36" blueline drawing format.11 12 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the San Dieguito Unified School District that this project has satisfied its 13 obligation to provide school facilities. 14 11. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 16 12. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by MP 98- 17 01(G) in Resolution No. 6127, CT 05-14 in Resolution No. 6146 and PUD 05-11 in Resolution No. 6147, which are incorporated by reference herein. ,Q i 13. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final 20 Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010, including but not limited to Mitigation 21 Measures regarding the adherence to the applicable foundation recommendations ~~ contained in the geotechnical report and the fire protection plan for manufactured slopes. 23 14. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this 24 project within 36 months from the date of project approval. 25 15. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address 25 change from that which is shown on the permit application. 27 16. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer PC RESO NO. 6730 -5- shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the 2 existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning 3 Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information 4 regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained. 17. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to 6 the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and 7 existing schools, parks and streets. / :'' 8 . 18. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which o special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain posted until ALL of the units are sold. 10 19. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing 11 water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and j 3 facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 14 20. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 15 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 11, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such j7 taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 18 21. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice " of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is 2Q to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of 21 Carlsbad has issued a Planned Development Permit Amendment by Resolution No. 6730 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, 22 location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice 24 which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 25 Fire:26 27 22. No combustible patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes shall occur within the first 20 feet (Zone 1) of the 60-foot Fire Protection Zone unless fire rated or 28 heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of said materials shall be obtained PCRESONO. 6730 -6- prior to installation from the Building Department and must be identified within the 2 CC&Rs. 3 23. Unless the Fire Protection Zone begins at the property line, trees and shrubs shall be prohibited in the first 20 feet of the 60-foot zone and must be identified within the 4 CC&Rs. 24. All submittals including architectural submittals shall reference that all lots are to 6 include the installation of Automatic Residential Fire Sprinklers. It is expected that all submittals will reflect this requirement, so that this requirement is not lost 7 between submittals. / ; . Engineering: 9 Note: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the 10 approval of this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a building or grading permit whichever occurs first. 11 , ~ General 13 25. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer 14 for the proposed haul route. 26. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be jg issued for the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit 17 issuance and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 1 R Fees/Agreements 19 27. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for 20 recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement. 21 28. Developer shall cause property owner to process, execute and submit an executed copy to the city engineer for recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Maintenance Agreement for the perpetual maintenance of all 23 treatment control, applicable site design and source control, post-construction permanent Best Management Practices prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, 24 whichever occurs first for this project. 25 Grading 26 29. Based upon a review of the proposed grading shown on the site plan, a grading permit for 27 this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and technical studies/reports, for city engineer review, and shall pay all applicable grading plan review 28 fees per the city's latest fee schedule. PC RESO NO. 6730 -7- 30. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the city engineer. Developer 2 shall pay all applicable grading permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule and shall post security per City Code requirements. 3 3 1 . Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include , but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and 6 educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to storm water, receiving water or 7 stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements.8 32. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, developer shall submit to the city engineer receipt of a Notice of Intent from the State Water Resources Control Board. 10 33. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, developer shall submit for city approval a Tier 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 12 (TIER 3 SWPPP). The TIER 3 SWPPP shall comply with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and City 1 3 of Carlsbad Requirements. The TIER 3 SWPPP shall identify and incorporate measures to reduce storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project to the maximum 14 extent practicable. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 34. This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to city engineer 17 approval, to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment requirements per the city's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), latest version. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the , Q SUSMP, the developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches to ensure that runoff from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc) are drained through 20 landscaped (pervious) areas prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable SWMP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 21 35. Developer acknowledges upcoming hydromodification (runoff reduction) requirements may impact how this project treats and/or retains storm runoff. Hydromodification 23 involves detailed site design and analysis to reduce the amount of post-development run- off by mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site, preserving natural open- 24 spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing use of new impervious surfaces, and promoting onsite infiltration and evaporation of run-off. During final design, developer shall demonstrate compliance with storm water requirements to the satisfaction of the city 27 36. Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, improvement plans, landscape plans, building plans, etc) incorporate all source control, site design, 28 treatment control BMP, applicable hydromodification measures, and Low Impact Design (LID) facilities. PC RESO NO. 6730 -8- 1 Utilities 2 37. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges 3 for connection to public facilities. 4 Code Reminders: 38. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to 6 prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction 7 of the City Engineer. ,' :! 8 . 39. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and 9 Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the Site Plan are 10 for planning purposes only. 11 40. Developer shall pay a landscape plancheck and inspection fee as required by Section j 2 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 13 41. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building 14 permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 42. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal 16 Code Section 18.04.320. 17 43. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning 1 ° Director to installation of such signs. NOTICE 20 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as 22 "fees/exactions." 23 You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for 25 processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or 26 annul their imposition. 27 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions 9S DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this PC RESO NO. 6730 -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on October 20, 2010, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Acting Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Montgomery, Nygaard and Schumacher ' ; ABSENT: Chairperson Douglas, Commissioners Dominguez, and L'Heureux ABSTAIN: JULIE CARLS ATTEST: , Acting Chairperson ANNING COMMISSION DON NEU Planning Director PCRESONO. 6730 -10- The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: October 20, 2010 Application complete date: September 9,2010 Project Planner: Van Lynch Project Engineer: Tecla Levy SUBJECT: PUD 05-1 KB) - LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. \ I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6730 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05- 11(B) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04 subdivided the area into open space areas and established the neighborhood development area boundaries. A Tentative Map (CT 99-04) and final map have been recorded for the Oaks; grading and improvement plans have been approved; and construction is presently ongoing. The proposed project is also located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of approval of CT 05-14 (La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.1 Subdivision). III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 80 single-family dwelling units located in the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 05-14) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 05-11), approved by the City Council on September 26, 2006. A Planned Development Permit was required for Neighborhood 3.1 because the minimum lot sizes are less than 7,500 square feet. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and pursuant to PUD 05-11(B) - LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 Novembers, 2010 PAGE 2 Section 5.2.8 of the Master Plan and PUD 05-11 Condition of Approval No. 7, could be processed at a later date through a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. This PUD amendment application (PUD 05-11(B)) is for the architecture and plotting of Neighborhood 3.1. At over 50 units, this project also requires City Council approval pursuant to the Planned Development Ordinance (Section 21.45.050(B)(1)). The proposed one and two-story homes consist of 4 separate and distinct floor plans (Plan 1, 2, 3 and 4) with living areas ranging in approximate size from 2,078 square feet to 3,332 square feet. Plan 3 has a variation (Plan 3x) which is 80 square feet smaller. Plan 1 is the only one-story plan. Plans 2, 3, and 4 are two-story plans. The project incorporates three distinct architectural styles including: Santa Barbara Mediterranean, Craftsman Bungalow, and Italian/Tuscan, as we'll j as 12 different color schemes to provide street scene variation throughout the project site. Plans 1, 2, and 4 have a proposed two-car attached garage and Plan 3 proposes two single-car attached garages. The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS PLAN NO. 1 2 1 4 1ST FLOOR SQ. FT. 2,078 1,440 1,440 1,582 2ND FLOOR SQ. FT. n/a 1,590 1,722 1,750 *LIVING AREA SQ. FT. 2,078 3,030 3,162 3,332 GARAGE SQ. FT. 485 2 car 580 2 car 712 2 single- car 606 2 car TOTAL BLDG. SQ. FT. 2,563 3,610 3,874 3,938 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES Santa Barbara Mediterranean Craftsman Bungalow Italian/Tuscan Santa Barbara Mediterranean Craftsman Bungalow Italian/Tuscan Santa Barbara Mediterranean Craftsman Bungalow Italian/Tuscan Santa Barbara Mediterranean Craftsman Bungalow Italian/Tuscan * Living area excludes garage square footage. IV. ANALYSIS A. Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(G)) The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and PUD 05-11(B) - LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 November 3, 2010 PAGE 3 the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan Villages. As previously discussed, the subject neighborhood was divided into residential lots through CT 05-14 and PUD 05-11, and complies with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision that was analyzed at that time. The proposed project meets all applicable development standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Please see Attachments 5 through 8 (Tables 1-4) for project compliance. B. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 11 The project is located within Local facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities were assessed during the review of the tract map CT 05-14 for the original subdivision of the property. Adequate services and facilities are in place to serve the project. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed herein. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Neighborhood 3.1 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6730 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Disclosure Statement 5. Table 1 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance PUD 05-11(B) - LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 November 3, 2010 PAGE 4 6. Table 2 - Front Yard Setbacks 7. Table 3 - Individual Lot Data 8. Table 4 - Building Elevation Design Elements 9. Reduced Exhibits 10. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "XX" dated October 20, 2010 NOT 70 SCALE S/7E M/\P Villages of La Costa Neighborhood 3.1 PUD05-11(B) BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO:PUD 05-1KB) CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 APPLICANT: Standard Pacific Corp./Jack Henthorn & Associates _ REQUEST AND LOCATION: Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 through 80 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-14. Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.1. in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15595, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 22, 2007 as file No. 2007-0560435. _ APN: 223-830-01-00 through 41and 223-831-01 through 39. _ Acres: 16.8 Gross Acres Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 80 lots GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: RLM _ Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: 4 du / acre and 16) Density Proposed: 2.8 du / ac avg. (CT 05-14, 15. Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: General Plan Site North South East West P-C RLM P-C OS P-C RLM P-C RMH P-C RLM Current Land Use Vacant graded lots Open Space Village 3.4 vacant lots Rancho Santa Fe Rd/RV Parking/Vacant Child Care Facility lot Open Space/Recreation Facility LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: | | Yes [X] No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: [~] Yes [X] No Coastal Development Permit: | | Yes Local Coastal Program Amendment: | | Yes [X] No No Revised 01/06 Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: San Dieguito Unified Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 80 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT I | Categorical Exemption, N/A I | Negative Declaration, issued N/A Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated N/A Other, prior compliance with EIR 98-07. Revised 01/06 DISCLOSURE Development Services STATEMENT Planning Department CITY OF P- 1 (A) 1635 Faraday Avenue I CD AR (760)602-4610 *— OD/-\L/ www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. ? ;- Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit. Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person See Attached Corp/Part Standard Pacific Corp. Title_ Title Address Address 26 Technology, Irvine, California 92618 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person See Attached Corp/Part Standard Pacific Corp. Title Title Address Address 26 Technology, Irvine, California 92618 P-1 (A) Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/09 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)' months? D Yes ffl7* No If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ' 7-14-10 /-til 1 -^1 0(J 7-14-10 Signature of owr(£r/date Signature of ap|licant/date Edward T. McKibbin, Authorized Representative _ , , _ ,, T^.. ...,,.,„r Edward T. McKibbin, Authonzed Representative Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent P-1 (A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 04/09 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE OF STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am John P. Babel, Secretary of Standard Pacific Corp., a company duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company"). I further certify that the following Resolutions were duly adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company on February 1, 2010, are now in full force and effect, and have not been amended, modified or revoked: Standard Pacific of Orange County RESOLVED, that notwithstanding the fact that the Orange County division of this Company is not a separate legal entity, the following individuals will serve as officers of the division indicated, in replacement of any and all officers previously designated: Edward T. McKibbin Division President Neil A. Weiderhaft Vice President - Finance Michael C. Battaglia Vice President-Project Development Brian K. Bencz Vice President - Purchasing & Land Development David J. Bulloch Vice President - Operations Suzanne Ek Vice President - Sales & Marketing Gary A. Jones Vice President - Land Acquisition Douglas G. Campbell Director of New Home Warranty Kama L. Pryor Director of Design Studio Margie DeRuyter Controller Laura D. Massas Sales Manager Kelly Moore Sales Manager Larry T. Atkinson Purchasing Agent Brenda Echternach Purchasing Agent Connie Phillips Purchasing Agent Sandra D. Mindt Purchasing Agent Stephanie Yee Offsite Purchasing Agent Leslie A. Goodale Escrow Manager RESOLVED FURTHER, that the above-listed persons be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to negotiate, approve, execute and deliver, either as designated officers of the division or as authorized representatives of the Company, grant deeds, warranty deeds, land purchase and option agreements, joint venture agreements, financing agreements, development, land use and other entitlement applications and agreements, and all other agreements and documents relating to the real estate development and construction business conducted by this Company, in such counties or areas in which such division may from time to time conduct business; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that the above-listed persons be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to execute, deliver and file, as appropriate, such certificates, affidavits, agreements and other documents, including a Fictitious Business Name Statement identifying such person's division as a division of this Company, and such other documentation as may be deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate to effectuate the purposes of these resolutions. 1007007MS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto subscribe my name and affix the seal of the Company on this July. 12, 2010. JriKnP. Babel, Secretary 1007007MS ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1 - RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Front Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.a) 15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages). Please refer to Attachment 6 -Table 2 "Front Yard Setbacks" for the 15' minimum setback compliance. Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 22.01.' All units comply with the front yard setback requirements. Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.e & 7.7.3.3.1) 15' minimum setback. Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15.' All units comply with 15' minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to Attachment 7 - Table 3 "Individual Lot Data" for individual lot rear yard setbacks. All lots provide the required 15' x 15' usable rear yard area. Side Yards (4.6.2.B.2.C) Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less than 60' wide. • Minimum combined side yard setback: 12.5.' • Minimum of 5'per side. • Maximum setback does not need exceed 20' in aggregate. • Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5'. At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7'. Please refer to Attachment 7 -Table 3 "Individual Lot Data" for side yard setbacks. All lots comply. Plan type 2 incorporates side yard offsets. This plan type is plotted on 20 lots or 25.0% of the unit mix. The remaining 25% is met by lots with side yards of 7 feet or greater. Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d) 10' minimum.All units comply with the minimum 10' street side setback. Slope Edge Building Setback (4.3.4) All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements. All proposed units will meet the required slope edge setbacks by maintaining the minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback Exhibit "C" (full size plans) of the enclosed site plans for further details. ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Lot Width (4.6.2.B.1 & 7.7.3.3.g) Minimum lot width shall be 50'.All lots were previously approved by CT 05-14 and have a minimum width of 50'. Building Coverage (4.6.3.B.2) 1-story units: 50% of net pad area. 2-story units: 40% of net pad area. Includes: • Garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes: « Exterior structures: covered porches; « Overhanging balconies that project < 8' from the building (or similar structure); « Porte Cochere's not > 22' length and 8'width; • Roof eaves not extending 30" from the face of any building; Awnings; Open parking areas; « Structures under 30" in height; and Masonry walls < 6' in height (wing- walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). Lot Coverage: Plan 1:2,563 sq.ft. Plan 2: 2,020 sq. ft. Plan 3: 2,152 sq.ft. Plan 3X: 2,110 Plan 4: 2, 188 sq.ft. Plan 1 is a single-story structure and does not exceed the maximum 50% building coverage of net pad area as required. Plan types 2, 3 and 4 are two-story structures and do not exceed the maximum 40% building coverage of net pad area as required. Please refer to Attachment 7 - Table 3 "Individual Lot Date" for building coverage. All lots comply. Planl = 18'-2" max and 1 story Plan 2 -25'-3" max and 2 stories Plan 3 and 3X = 27'-l" max and 2 stories Plan 4 = 24'-8" max and 2 stories Building Height (4.6.3.B.1 & 7.7.3.3.J) Maximum of 30' and 2 stories. Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.C& 4.6.3.B.4.f) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10' between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. 33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan * 1 2 3and 3X 4 SB 2 2 6 5 CB 4 2 6 5 IT 3 2 6 5 Plan types IB, 3, 3X, and 4 incorporate the minimum 4 front building planes. These plan types are plotted on 57 lots or 71.3% of the unit mix. * SB - Santa Barbara, CB- Craftsman Bungalow. IT - Italian Tuscan ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Rear Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.g) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3' between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan * 1 2 3and 3X 4 SB 2 1 4 4 CB 2 1 4 4 IT 2 1 4 4 Plan types 3, 3X and 4 incorporate the minimum 4 rear building planes. These plan types are plotted on 55 lots or 68.8% of the unit mix. Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.B.6) Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used. Please refer to Attachment 8 - Table 4 "Building Elevation Design Elements" and, the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each front elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Side & Rear Elevations (4.6.3.B.7) Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to public/private roads. Please refer to Attachment 8 - Table 4 "Building Elevation Design Elements" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each side and rear elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Elevations Fronting Circulation Element Roads(4.6.3.A.l.a) Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated into the proposed elevations fronting Rancho Santa Fe Road. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Floor Plans (4.6.3.B.5.C& 4.6.3.B.5.d) Minimum of 3 per neighborhood. Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan. The proposed project includes four floor plans with three distinctive elevation types for each plan. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans. ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Single-story units (4.4&4.6.3.B.4.1) For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single-story. • Single-story shall be defined as a plate-line maximum of 15', (10' preferred) This neighborhood is located on a ridgeline that is visible from a circulation element roadway (Rancho Santa Fe Road). There are 24 homes along the ridgeline and 5 of those homes are single- story units which is 20% of the total homes located along the ridgeline. Plan 1 single-story homes do not, exceed the plate-line maximum cif 15 feet. Two Story Units (4.6.3.B.4.n& 4.6.3.B.5.b) Must include some single-story features. The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square footage, including all garage area. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the single story features provided for the two-story units. All proposed plans comply. Plan 2: .78.7% Plan 3: 80.0% Plan 3X: 79.8% Plan 4: 80.0% Where three two- story units occur in a row situated less than 15 feet apart- (4.6.3.B.4.b) One of the three units must have a single- story building edge at least 10' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan type 2 incorporates a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of the building. This plan type is plotted where there are three (3) 2-story homes in a row with less than 15' between them. Where three two- story units occur in a row situated between 15 and 20 feet apart - (4.6.3.B.4.c) One of the three units must have a single- story building edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan type 2 incorporates a single story building edge that is at least 5' wide and runs the length of the building. This plan type is plotted where there are three (3) 2-story homes in a row with 15' to 20' between them. Single-Story Elements (4.6.3.B.4.d) 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3' which is 40% or greater of the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify. Plan types 2, 3, 3X, and 4 incorporate a single story building element that is greater than 40% of the front elevation width and a minimum depth of 3 feet. These plan types are plotted on 75 lots or 93.8% of the unit mix. Percent of the front elevation width that is a single-story element with a minimum depth of 3': Plan 2: 47% Plan 3: 100% Plan 4: 100% ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Entries, Front Porches, Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9& 4.6.2.B.f) 25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style. Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10.' Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'. A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony over a porch may also serve as this purpose. The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of the architectural guidelines. Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap around the side of the building. Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard setback. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may encroach standard distances into the required yard areas. 56.3% of the elevations incorporate a porch (Elevation styles B and C for Plans 3 and 3X and all Styles of Plan 4). Please refer to the enclosed site plan for setback compliance. All porches comply. Plan 3, 3X:6.5'Dx 13'L , „ Plan 4: 6'Dx 17'L ; All porches comply. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans for porch design compliance. All porches comply. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans for porch design compliance. All highly visible corner lots have porches and/or porticos seen from the street side. Please refer to the enclosed site plan for setback compliance. All porches comply. No courtyard walls are proposed. No courtyard walls are proposed. Octagonal or Round Entry Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a) May encroach into the required side yard setbacks a maximum of 2'. The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required setback. A minimum 5' setback must be maintained. None are proposed within the side yard setback. ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Projections (4.6.2.B.3) Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. No projections extend into the side, rear or front yard setback. Recreation Parking (4.6.2.B.4.b) Common recreation areas: Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking. « "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide parking. Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units. • More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) The common recreation area for the subject neighborhood is located within Neighborhood 3.1. Recreation parking will be provided in Neighborhood 3.1. Resident Parking (4.6.2.B.4.a) Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' by 20'. Two one-car garages each having interior measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative. Plan types 1, 2, and 4 include a minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' x 20.' Plan types 3 and 3X propose two single-car garages with an interior dimension of 12' X 20'. Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.B.4.H, & 4.6.3.B.13) 20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the street. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of the home. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit's frontage. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). All setbacks for garages that face the street are no less than 20 ft. Not Applicable No floor plan provides three-car in a row garages. Plans 2, 3, and 4 have a three-car garage with a tandem space configuration; therefore, only one garage door is required. .30 ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.B.4.H, & 4.6.3.B.13), Cont'd. A variety of garage configurations should be used within each neighborhood to improve the street scene. Roll-up garage doors are required. Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum on 18" for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. All garages and garage doors have been designed to fit the proposed elevation. All garage doors comply. All homes comply. Roofs (4.6.3.B.4.k& 4.6.3.B.8) Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood. • Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest. • Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel the slope. • A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood. • Minimum roof pitch of 3:12. A variety of roof forms and ' ? massing are proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. All roofs provide change in roof direction, top of slope-compliance, a variety of roofing tiles and colors, and have a minimum roof pitch of 3:12. Colors (4.6.3.B.12) Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred; however other color combinations are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. Each plan type plotted on the site plan includes a color scheme designation to match the proposed architectural style. There are four color schemes for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. Please refer to the attached plotting plan. All homes comply. Accessory Structures (4.6.3.B.3) Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. All plan types comply. ATTACHMENT 5 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Architectural Styles Permitted (4.6.3.C & 7.6) Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following Architectural Styles: « Santa Barbara Mediterranean . Craftsman Bungalow « Spanish Colonial . Monterey Ranch . Italian/Tuscan European Country The architectural styles included are as follows: Santa Barbara Mediterranean • Craftsman Bungalow • Italian/Tuscan Design Standards (4.6.3.B.4.i & 4.6.3.B.5.e) 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall be used (no mill finishes). "Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of 2" and are trimmed » with either wood or raised stucco. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Chimneys (4.6.3.B.11) The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the structure. 2- chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF. All chimneys and their caps comply with proper scale and proportion. Window Detailing (4.6.3.B.10) The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features: . Deeply recessed windows • Paned windows Decorative window ledges • Accent and varied shape windows • Window boxes and planters with architecturally evident supports • Exterior wood trim surrounds Accent colors on shutters or other elements Arched elements • Shutters • Raised stucco trim around windows Window lintels Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT 6 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Floor Plan 4R 3 2 1 3 4 1 4 3 4 1 3 2 4 1 4 R 3 4 2 R 2 3XR 4 R 1 R 3 R 4 3 2 R 4 2 R 4 3X 2 R 4 R 3 R 4 R 4 R 2 R 4 R 3 R 4 R 3 R 2 R 4 R 3 R 2 R 4 R 3 3 Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 21.30 23.20 23.30 32.80 22.70 20.20 24.70 20.50 21.40 22.20 31.80 21.60 19.10 20.40 19.10 20.90 20.70 20.00 22.00 31.60 21.30 20.90 22.30 19.50 21.00 20.90 31.40 20.90 20.30 24.80 21.00 23.00 20.00 21.50 21.40 22.80 21.70 31.70 21.20 22.20 21.10 18.40 22.90 17.80 22.80 20.00 30.00 20.00 19.40 20.00 16.50 20.20 22.10 30.90 20.20 16.00 21.00 28.40 32.20 20.00 15.00 29.40 23.90 21.50 18.50 23.00 19.00 21.00 20.30 30.80 20.30 16.40 21.20 18.80 21.50 21.80 32.40 23.00 20.30 21.40 21.10 23.10 17.70 22.20 19.50 21.30 20.40 31.00 21.60 17.30 20.10 20.00 30.60 20.70 16.00 21.50 19.30 20.50 21.00 31.50 22.00 16.00 21.10 19.40 20.00 20.90 30.90 21.00 20.20 30.20 20.20 Weighted Average 22.33 26.39 20.75 20.94 25.32 19.81 19.98 20.32 25.09 21.66 20.'23 24.53 20.84 22.09 20.73 22.16 24.99 21.60 19.12 18.85 23.45 19.73 18.31 24.52 18.72 26.96 15.00 22.59 19.21 20.09 23.93 17.47 20.27 25.85 20.90 22.19 18.49 20.48 24.45 18.82 23.89 17.49 19.95 24.95 17.27 19.73 24.39 23.65 8/27/2010 Neighborhood 3.1 Section B Table 3 Page 3 of 6 - TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT 6 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ' 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Floor Plan 2 4 3 4 2 4 3X 2 3X 2 4 R 3 R 4 R 3 R 4 R 2 R 3 R 4 R 3 4 3 4 2 3X 4 2 4 2 R 2 4 R 2 R 3 R Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 18.90 23.60 20.30 21.50 22.10 31.60 21.30 20.20 20.10 20.90 24.90 19.90 21.10 23.10 33.00 22.30 19.80 23.80 22.00 32.00 22.00 17.10 22.10 20.10 22.30 21.90 30.90 20.60 19.50 20.60 21.50 31.10 20.20 20.50 21.10 22.70 26.80 31.50 35.00 20.10 27.70 20.00 25.20 30.80 20.00 17.90 20.40 34.00 38.80 26.20 19.20 20.00 17.40 21.90 22.20 32.20 22.20 18.10 22.00 17.00 23.50 40.70 34.50 18.20 22.70 19.20 23.70 22.90 24.40 18.50 23.40 23.50 33.40 23.00 NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGE: Weighted Average 19.68 20.95 25.12 20.15 21.12 20.55 26.26 20.12 25.45 ,18,22 21 '.30 24.58 20.10 24.39 20.83 22.80 28.98 23.51 25.43 19.26 33.11 19.64 18.22 25.65 20.22 18.94 37.33 18.94 19.85 23.72 19.43 26.76 22.01 8/27/2010 Neighborhood 3.1 Section B Table 3 Page 4 of 6 TABLE 3 ATTACHMENT 7 Individual Lot Data La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.1 Lot* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 Plan 4 R 3 2 1 3 4 1 4 3 4 1 3 2 4 1 4 R 3 4 2 R 2 3X R 4 R 1 R 3 R 4 3 2 R 4 2 R 4 3X 2 R 4 R 3 R 4 R 4 R 2 R 4 R 3 R 4 R 3 R 2 R 4 R 3 R 2 R 4 R 3 3 2 4 3 4 2 4 3X 2 3X 2 4 R 3 R 4 R 3 R 4 R 2 R 3 R 4 R 3 4 3 4 2 3X 4 2 4 Elevation A C B B A C A B C A C B A C B A C B C B A C A B A C B B C A B A C A B A . C B A C B A B C C B A B B A C B A A B C A B C A B 8 A B C B A C B A C A C B A Color 1 9 5 7 3 10 1 7 10 3 12 7 2 10 5 4 9 6 11 8 2 10 1 6 3 11 5 7 9 1 5 3 12 1 8 4 11 6 2 9 5 4 8 11 12 6 2 7 6 2 11 8 1 3 5 9 1 8 9 4 6 5 2 8 11 5 3 12 7 1 9 4 10 7 3 Setbacks (ft) Average Side Yard Front Rear Left Right Combined Garage 22.33 26.39 20.75 20.94 25.32 19.81 19.98 20.32 25.09 21.66 20.23 24.53 20.84 22.09 20.73 22.16 24.99 21.60 19.12 18.85 23.45 19.73 18.31 24.52 18.72 26.96 15.00 22.59 19.21 20.09 23.93 17.47 20.27 25.85 20.90 22.19 18.49 20.48 24.45 18.82 23.89 17.49 19.95 24.95 17.27 19.73 24.39 23.65 19.68 20.95 25.12 20.15 21.12 20.55 26.26 20.12 25.45 18.22 21.30 24.58 20.10 24.39 20.83 22.80 28.98 23.51 25.43 19.26 33.11 19.64 18.22 25.65 20.22 18.94 37.33 19.9 27.4 24.1 22.5 22.6 21.3 17.3 21.1 21.2 21.3 20.9 21.9 23 20.9 18 25.3 18.5 26.4 24.7 23.1 17 15 15.6 15 45.4 30.5 49.4 54.5 43.7 27.8 79.4 74.1 63.4 51.4 52.5 48.1 48.3 43.7 42 49.7 45.8 53 45.3 41.8 50.2 47.5 48.3 15 17.3 15.1 15.2 15 15.6 15.4 15 17.6 15.1 19.2 15 15 15.2 20.2 22.3 29.6 40.1 27.7 15 18.6 39.7 24 29.4 L 24.9 31.2 31.2 53 6.8 7.3 15.2 9.4 11.6 11.3 7.3 9.1 11.4 12.5 11.2 9.1 7.3 8.6 8.5 6.5 11 8.9 6.1 7.4 6.2 6 6.3 7 5.3 12 5.3 5.9 5.3 6.3 7.2 7.8 11.7 9.2 22 13.4 11.5 9.8 9.3 9.4 9.2 10.4 8.8 9 10.5 10.1 28.2 8.5 9.8 7.5 8.2 5.5 10.6 7.7 8.9 8.3 5.3 29 10.8 7.6 9.1 7 12 10 11 8.5 24 16.7 17.1 10.1 6.7 5.1 7.6 6.7 20.4 11.4 10 15.5 11.5 13 13 14.5 11.7 11.9 12.5 12 8 11 11 12.5 16.7 8.6 10.7 6.7 5.3 6.5 8.4 6.3 7.2 9.8 7.8 7.4 6.8 7.4 6.4 5.3 6.3 7.3 8.5 10.9 37 7.5 7 5.6 10.8 6.8 6.4 8.4 6.2 7.1 6.3 9 21.8 10.4 10.2 8 11.9 9.8 10 9 12.7 8.8 8 27.5 9.3 8.9 11 8.6 12.3 11.2 10.6 12.5 13 6.5 10 6.4 7.8 8.4 7.5 21.8 18.2 17.3 30.7 20.9 24.6 24.3 21.8 20.8 23.3 25 23.2 17.1 18.3 19.6 21 23.2 19.6 19.6 12.8 12.7 12.7 14.4 12.6 14.2 15.1 19.8 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.5 14.1 19 17.7 32.9 50.4 19 16.8 14.9 20.2 16 16.8 17.2 15.2 17.6 16.4 37.2 30.3 20.2 17.7 16.2 17.4 20.4 17.7 17.9 21 14.1 37 38.3 16.9 18 18 20.6 '22.3 22.2 19.1 36.5 29.7 23.6 20.1 13.1 12.9 16 14.2 42.2 23.2 22.7 24.7 21.4 21.6 20.4 20.9 20 21.3 22.3 21 20.9 24.8 23 21.5 22.8 21.2 21.1 22.9 22.8 20 20 20.2 20.2 21 20 29.4 21.5 23 21 20.3 21.2 21.5 21.8 21.4 23.1 22.2 21.3 20.4 20.1 20 21.5 20.5 21 21.1 20 20.9 20.2 23.6 21.5 21.3 20.1 24.9 21.1 22.3 23.8 22 22.1 22.3 20.6 20.6 20.2 21.1 26.8 20.1 20 20 20.4 24.8 20 21.9 22.2 22 23.5 34.5 Porch 15.3 20.8 13.3 24.9 12.9 19.9 13 19.6 14.8 16.5 24.6 15 12.9 14.9 19.3 14.6 23.2 13 24.1 10 20.3 16.3 13 24 12.8 25.5 12.5 15.1 12 24.2 .11.4 23.9 11.7 19.5 11.8 24.1 23.4 14.1 19.6 12.7 13.7 26.1 25.2 14.1 24.1 11.7 24.2 14.1 24.5 18.4 24.1 11.9 32.1 12.6 25.4 12.2 33.3 Net Pad Area (SF) 5,468 6,330 7.178 6,666 6,725 6,353 6,412 6,211 6.488 6,725 6,596 6,018 5,838 5,968 6,430 5,917 6,076 6,691 5,345 5,271 5,271 5,760 5,656 5,374 7,054 7,231 7,393 7,334 6,592 5,827 5,319 5,147 5,731 5,765 5,849 7,909 5.999 5,708 5,611 5,940 5,647 5.593 5,654 5,581 5,676 5,561 5,643 5,995 5,745 5,811 5,761 5,766 5,741 5,803 5,344 5,176 5,357 5,428 6,203 5,925 6,029 6,511 6,824 7,424 8,173 7.080 9,888 10,593 9.762 6,780 5,044 5,311 5.888 5,046 9,982 Building Coverage" Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 2,188 2,152 2,020 2,563 2,152 2,188 2,563 2,188 2,152 2,188 2,563 2,152 2,020 2,188 2,563 2.188 2.152 2,188 2,020 2,020 2,110 2,188 2,563 2.152 2,188 2,152 2.020 2,188 2.020 2,188 2.110 2,020 2,188 2,152 2,188 2,188 2,020 2.188 2.152 2,188 2,152 2,020 2,188 2,152 2,020 2,188 2,152 2,152 2,020 2,188 2,152 2,188 2,020 2.188 2,110 2,020 2,110 2,020 2,188 2,152 2,188 2,152 2,188 2,020 2,152 2,188 2,152 2,188 2,152 2,188 2,020 2,110 2,188 2,020 2,188 40.0% 34.0% 28.1% 38.4% 32.0% 34.4% 40.0% 35.2% 33.2% 32.5% 38.9% 35.8% 34.6% 36.7% 39.9%; 37.0% 35.4% 32.7% 37.8% 38.3% 40.0% 38.0% 45.3% 40.0% 31.0% 29.8% 27.3% 29.8% 30.6% 37.5% 39.7% 39.2% 38.2% 37.3% 37.4% 27.7% 33.7% 38.3% 38.4% 36.8% 38.1% 36.1% 38.7% 38.6% 35.6% 39.3% 38.1% 35.9% 35.2% 37.7% 37.4% 37.9% 35.2% 37.7% 39.5% 39.0% 39.4% 37.2% 35.3% 36.3% 36.3% 33.1% 32.1% 27.2% 26.3% 30.9% 21.8% 20.7% 22.0% 32.3% 40.0% 39.7% 37.2% 40.0% 21.9% 8/27/2010 Neighborhood 3.1 Section B Table 4 Page 5 of 6 TABLE 3 ATTACHMENT 7 Individual Lot Data La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.1 Lot* 76 77 78 79 80 Plan 2 R 2 4 R 2 R 3 R Elevation C A C B A Color 12 2 10 7 4 Average Neighborhood Setback: Average Front 18.94 19.85 23.72 19.43 26.76 22.01 Rear 19.9 20.2 78.1 74.3 55.1 Setbacks (ft) Side Yard Left Right 8.2 6.8 8.7 8.2 37.2 » .. * " 7.4 6 5.5 5.4 8.2 Combined 15.6 12.8 14.2 13.6 45.4 Garage 22.7 23.7 24.4 23.4 23 Porch 16.4 26.8 Net Pad Area (SF) 5.170 5,159 5,507 5,905 5,452 Building Coverage " Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 2,020 2,020 2,188 2,020 2,152 39.1% 39.2% 39.7% 34.2% 39.5% .„, 1/ "Building Coverage" = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8 ft. from the building, and ports cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open parking areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining waHs. 8/27/2010 Neighborhood 3.1 Section B Table 4 Page 6 of 6 TABLE 3 ATTACHMENT 7 Front Building Plane Data Floor Plan 1 2 3 3X 4 # '/o of total '/o of total % of total '/o of total % of total Plane #1 Frontage Frontage Frontage Frontage Frontage Frontage Frontage Frontage Frontage Frontage 19.9 51.03% 13.5 36.19% 12.6 32.73% 12.6 32.73% 17 45.58% Plane #2 19.1 48.97% 20.3 54.42% 13.3 34.55% 13.3 34.55% 20.3 54.42% Plane #3 0.00% 3.5 9.38% 12.6 32.73% 12.6 32.73% 0.00% Plane #4 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Plane #5 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Plane #6 Frontage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 39.0 100.0% 37.3 100.0% 38.5 100.0% 38.5 100.0°/o 37.3' 100.0% 8/27/2010 Neighborhood 3.1 Section B Table 2 Page 2 of 6 TABLE 3 ATTACHMENT 7 Unit Summary Table 1st Floor 2nd Floor Garage % of 2nd Floor Total Building' Plan Area Area Area vs. 1st Floor 1/ Area Height2' 1 2 3 3X 4 2,078 1,440 1,440 1,398 1,582 1,590 1,722 1,684 1,750 485 580 712 712 606 0.0% 78.7% 80.0% 79.8% 80.0% 2,563 3,610 3,874 3,794 3,938 18'-2" 25'-3" 27'-1" 27'-1" 24'-8" 1/ The 2nd story of any house does not exceed 80% of the 1st story square footage, including all garage area. 21 Building heights shown indicate the maximum building height for each proposed plan type. Plan 2 includes an additional 30 sf for the for cantilever area and Plans 3/3X includeds an additional 12 SF. 8/27/2010 Neighborhood 3.1 Section B Table 1 Page 1 of 6 La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.1 BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS DESIGN ELEMENTS a. Variety of Rod Planes b. Deeply Recessed Windows and Doors c. Paned Windows and Doors d. Exposed Roof Beams or Raller Tails e. Decorative Window Ledges Accent Materials such as Stucco, Wood, ' Siding and Stone y. Window and Door Lintels h. Dormers I. Accent arid Varied Shape Windows . Window Boxes and Planters witli Architecturally Evident Supports k. Exterior Wood Elements Variations in Colors ol Stucco and Oilier Elements Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or Other Elements n. Stucco Wainscoting o. Covered Balconies p. Arched Elements q. Shutters Raised Stucco Trim around Windows and '' Doors PLAN ONE Santa' Bar'l'ar'a Mediterranean Front I Side Rear y' v' S s s s s s s •/ s s •/ V s s •s •/ s / s s Craftsman Bungalow F™t Side s s •/ s s v1 s — •/ s s s s s •/ s s V s / / Rear •/ s s •/ s — s s •/ s Italian Fioni Side S S •/ •/ •/ ,-v / / / / ^ s s •/ s •/• / s s Rea S S s s s V / ^ PLAN TWO Simla Barbara Mediterranean Front 1 Side Rea y' V S S S •/ S s s s •/ •/ s s s •s •/ /• v' </ s •s •/ -/ s •/ Craftsman Bungalow Front 1 Side •/ S S s s s s s •/• •/ / s s s V s s s s s /• / y' S t\«t S •/ •/ •/ V / v' V •/ S S Italian Front 1 Side V S Y •/ •/ •/ S S S S S •/ S S S s s /• •/ </ s s s s Rear •/ S S s s s s s s s PUN THREE AND THREE X Tarita Barbara Mediterranean "Front v' y' •/ S •/ S S S S s s Side Rea V S •/ s / y' •/ s •s •/ •/ •/ s V s Craftsman Bungalow Front •/ / •/ y' y' y' S •/ S S V S s|de y' y' y' S s S S S S S S S S •/ •/ s •/ s s •s Ulan ftml •/ S •/ S V •/ s s s s s Side 1 Rea y' y' y' y' y' V S S s •/ s s s s •/ s s s s PLAN FOUR SantTBaiBaTa Mediterranean Front I Side 1 Rea v' •/• S S s s •/ s •/ s s s s s s s s •/ s y' /• y' y' y' y' y' y' y' y' •/ Iraftsman Bungalow Frooi •/ •f S S S V V •s s •s •/ *ims s s •s •s s s •s s s s •/ Rea y' y' y' y' • S S / / y' / Italian T»nf S </ •/ s s s s s s •s /• y' i|g» y' y' S •/ •/ •/ •/ S S V S Rea S •/• S S •/ s s s — y' COr~m oX Sm -c: 4/26/2010 Section A, Item #9 00 50.00' M I N SO. 00' M1N 50.00' MIN PLAN I 2,078 S.F. PLAN 2 3,000 S.F. FLOOR PLAN COMPOSITE - COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT LA COSTA OAKS 3. I PLAN 3 & 3X 3,150 S.F. PLAN 4 3,332 S.F.SECOND STORY (463B4F& 1.6.3 B4.G) FRONT & REAR BUILDING PLANES SEE CIRCLED NUMBERS IVSSSENAN CARLSBAD ,CA I 52. 1017808.30.10 39'-0" REAR YARD irxirMW S'-2' IpPlflzizi 50.00' MIN Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION PLAN IA 2,078 S.F. TOTAL 2,078 S.F. GARAGE- 485 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2,563 S.F. OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB LA COSTA OAKS 3. I L«CONI TANDARD[\CIFIC CARLSBAD ,CA ? 1 f 'i SCALE I/I' « f-ff J:\GHOUmiSJ10i73WI79FLaiAJ3WG FRONT SANTA BARBARA A ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. AT EAVE 8" OH AT RAKEr 3" \/ /* /' s 1 — 'C "^^ s* '-- \ / \ / \ ' V' 1.j k X' ' /\ / ^N. ^' \ s XN /./ ^•fc. Vv t' -^^ t x' NV— -i<•' ix\ i^ \ ! v%- ' : • t *a ELEMENTS OF SANTA BARBARA A. S- TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED EAVE DETAIL E. DECORATIVE TILE AT ENTRY OR PRINCIPLE OPENING OR WINDOW F. WROUGHT IRON DETAIL (PLANS 3 » 4) G. ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO COLLAR TRIM K DECORATIVE VENT RECESS DETAIL I. DECORATIVE STUCCO CORBELS AT PRINCIPLE OPENINGS J. CLEAN WHITE STUCCO COLORS TO WARM SANDY HUES ACCENTED WITH EARTHY WOOD TONES AND TRADITIONAL TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING K. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN I A SANTA BARBARA LA COSTA OAKS 3. I l/GONI STA.VDA&DPACIIHOAfES CARLSBAD,CA J.\GttXJP2\r51IOI7*0!7BaVI.DWG t/L/ 39'-0"5'-2" PLAN IB 2,07 S.F FIRST: 2,071 S.F. GARAGE: -485 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2,556 S.F. OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' MIN Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3 . I B«6SEN1AN gJSeggCTSgRSB LA33NI CARLSBAD ,CA I 52.10 I 78 08.30. 10 FRONT CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOWSi/f-r-tr ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. ATEAVE: 24" O.H. ATRAKt 18" PLAN I B CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW LA COSTA OAKS ELEMENTS OF CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS SAND FINISH STUCCO 6X6 WOOD RAFTER TAILS RECESSED GABLE END VENT DECORATIVE WOOD OUTLOOKERS WOOD POTSHELVES WOOD SIMULATED HEAD & SILL TRJM AT WINDOWS DECORATIVE SHUTTERS WOOD SIMULATED SIDING OR SHINGLE AT GABLE END WOOD POST ON BATTERED PEDESTALS Wf STONE VENEER EARTHY TANS TO KHAKI GREEN STUCCO COLOR RANGE ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD TONES AND FLAT BRUSHED TILE ROOFING METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR BASSEMAN ^ffTTTflHB LACONJ CARLSBAD,CA ? ? ? "i 152.1017308.30. 10 PLAN 1C 2,071 S.F. FIRST: 2,071 S.F. GARAGE- 485 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2.556 S.F. OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' M IN FIRST FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3 iy\SSENlAN gBg*^**P3Bgg^ b«CONl CARLSBAD ,CA =S 151.1017808.30.10 FRONT ITALIAN C 1/4'. I'-O" '•ill HI REAR ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. AT EAVE: 18" O.H. AT RAKE 4" r PLAN 1 C ITALIAN LA COSTA ( s* \ /7«1>'1\ j*— -^-^ DAKS 3. 1 ' ELEMENTS OF ITALIAN A. S- TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY HIP ROOF FORMS C SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED CORBELS AT EAVE E. SAND FINISH STUCCO CORNER BAND F. STONE VENEER (PLANS 344) G. ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO TRIM (PLAN 2) H. ARCH OR ARCADE AT ENTRY 1. WROUGHT IRON RAIL OR POT SHELF (PLANS 2. 3. * 4) ]. DECORATIVE SHUTTERS K. BUTTERY GOLD TO EARTHY MEDIUM STUCCO TONES ACCENTED WfTH RICH WOOD HUES AND RED / TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING L METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR MSSEN1AN l/GONI ,, CARLSBAD ,CA 152.1017809.30.1 0 SCALE ur • lljr JflGKOUPlu SI 1017»017BELV1 .DWG 50.00' M I N Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I CARLSBAD ,CA fit ! PLAN 2A 3,000 S.F. FIRST: I.4IOS.F. SECOND: 1,590 S.F. TOTAL: 3,000 S.F. GARAGE:580 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2,020 S.F. FIRST: MIOS.F. GARAGE: 580 S.F. CANTILEVER: 30 S.F. OPT. HOBBY SPACE +93 S.F. (TOTAL 3.093 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB BASSEMAN ^ff?t^9££^ LACQM JAG«OUf7\ISliOI7SlOESIGN\ARCH/VE\PLAN 2 DESIGNS 178RJUA-JST.DWG --€> PLAN 2A SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I sri=^= CARLSBAD , C A HOMES „ - - , J^gENtAN ^?^T?^^^^^* 152.10178 08.30.10 \ I S! 101 TS-,01 78FLRlA-3h4D-DV>'G FRONT SANTA BARBARA A IM'-I'-O' I I I—HI ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. AT EAVE 8" O.K. AT RAKE 3" ELEMENTS OF SANTA BARBARA A S-TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C. SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED EAVE DETAIL E. DECORATIVE TILE AT ENTRY OR PRINCIPLE OPENING OR WINDOW F. WROUGHT IRON DETAIL (PLANS 3 1 -4) G. ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO COLLAR TRIM H. DECORATIVE VENT RECESS DETAIL 1. DECORATIVE STUCCO CORBELS AT PRINCIPLE OPENINGS J. CLEAN WHITE STUCCO COLORS TO WARM SANDY HUES ACCENTED WITH EARTHY WOOD TONES AND TRADITIONAL TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING K. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 2A SANTA BARBARA LA COSTA OAKS L^COM ™™^™ CARLSBAD ,CA .„ ? t J '* 152.10173 08.30.10 2 DESIGNS! 7SO.V1AI>WG 7'-6"37'-4"I S'-2" 50.00' M1N FIRST FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION PLAN 2B 3,000 S.F. FIRST: SECOND: TOTAL I.4IOS.F. I.590S.F. 3,000 S.F. GARAGE 580 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2,020 S.F. FIRST: I.4IOS.F. GARAGE 580 S.F. CANTILEVER: 30 S.F. OPT. HOBBY SPACE +93 S.F. (TOTAL 3.093 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB LA COSTA OAKS 3. I B^SSE^I1ANwwf*^& L/>GCNI CARLSBAD ,CA 152.1017803.30.10 -9 PLAN 2B ©-- SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION --€> LA COSTA OAKS 3. I *^-ElJifJ^g^'e;-g.*tTEJ b^CONl nHOMES c CARLSBAD ,CA J:\CROUP2\ISltOl78\Ol78rLR2e-IND-DWG 152.1017808.30.10 FRONT CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOWS ROOF PLAN 4M2U.N.O. O.H.ATEAVE- 24" O.H.ATRAKE: 18" ELEMENTS OF CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW A. FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C. SAND FINISH STUCCO D. 6X6 WOOD RAFTER TAILS E. RECESSED GABLE END VENT F. DECORATIVE WOOD OUTLOOKERS G. WOOD POTSHELVES H. WOOD SIMULATED HEAD & SILL TRIM AT WINDOWS I. DECORATIVE SHUTTERS J. WOOD SIMULATED SIDING OR SHINGLE AT GABLE END K. WOOD POST ON BATTERED PEDESTALS W/ STONE VENEER L EARTHY TANS TO KHAKI GREEN STUCCO COLOR RANGE ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD TONES AND FLAT BRUSHED TILE ROOFING M. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 2B CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW LA COSTA OAKS 3. 1 LACON1 CARLSBAD ,CA I 52. ! 0 I 7808.30. I 0 50.00' M I N Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION PLAN 2C 3,000 S.F. FIRST: I.4IOS.F. SECOND: I.S90S.F. TOTAL 3,000 S.F. GARAGE:580 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2,020 S.F. FIRST: MIOS.F. GARAGE 580 S.F. CANTILEVER: 30 S.F. OPT. HOBBY SPACE- +93 S.F. (TOTAL 3,093 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB LA COSTA OAKS c CARLSBAD , C A ..,, :^ SCAl£ !/<• = I'-O- JAGROUPtt I SI 1017S\D€SICN\ARCHIVE\n-A.N I 5ES/GN10173F1JUC- i STDWG LA30NI 152.1017808.30.10 PLAN 2C SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION E2lid "SSSSf LA A K L i> CO BAD, —3 ST C A A O A K S 3. 1 L/CCNl 152.10178 iJI ):\GROUP2\ f 5210178(017BR.UC-1ND.DWG IAS FRONT ITALIAN CiM" • r-<r ROOF PLAN 4H2U.N.O. O.H. ATEAVE: 18" ELEMENTS OF ITALIAN A S-TILEROOHNG B. PREDOMINATELY HIP ROOF FORMS C SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED CORBELS AT HAVE E. SAND FINISH STUCCO CORNER BAND F. STONE VENEER (PLANS 3 i 4} G. ARCHED WINDOW WTTH STUCCO TRIM (PLAN J) H. ARCH Oil ARCADE AT ENTRY L WROUGHT IRON RAIL OR POT SHELF (PLANS 2.3, & 4) J. DECORATIVE SHUTTERS K. BUTTERY GOLD TO EARTHY MEDIUM STUCCO TONES ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD HUES AND RED / TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING L METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 2C ITALIAN LA COSTA OAKS 3. I BASEMAN LACCN CARLSBAD ,CA 152.10178 08.30. 10 FOOTPRINT: 2.IS2S.F. FIRST: M28S.F GARAGE: 7I2S.F. CANTILEVER: 12 S.F. I28S.F. OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' M I N Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I BASEMAN^^g^B^^BBgB L^COJI 152.1017808.30.10 JAGROUPJVf Sit 017BMJI «FUUAJ3WC —© SECON D FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I &\SSENHAN ^^^^^^^"^ L»CONI sr CARLSBAD , C A 152.1017808.30. I 0 : 2.I52S.F. I.428S.F. 7I2S.F. I2S.F. OPT. HOBBY: I28S.F. (TOTAL 3.278 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' M I N FI RST FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I CARLSBAD ,CA ._—«__™ SCALE IM'= I'-C' a*iSSENIAN^^*^3H£BHEBHi IXXNI 152.10178 08.10. 10 SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION J:\GftOUP2\ISIlol 7^0178FUUB.DWG BASEMANm ""BSS" L nc C n A ARLS -?— ( CO BAD , =,' ST CA A 0 A K S 3. 1 IAXN1 1 52. 1 0 1 7808.10. 10 FRONT SANTA BARBARA A!«'- I'-O- ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. AT EAVE 8" O.H. AT RAKE: 3" ELEMENTS OF SANTA BARBARA A. S- TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C. SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED HAVE DETAIL E. DECORATIVE TILE AT ENTRY OR PRINCIPLE OPENING OR WINDOW f. WROUGHT IRON DETAIL (PLANS 3 8, 4) G. ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO COLLAR TRIM H. DECORATIVE VENT RECESS DETAIL I. DECORATIVE STUCCO CORBELS AT PRINCIPLE OPENINGS ]. CLEAN WHITE STUCCO COLORS TO WARM SANDY HUES ACCENTED WITH EARTHY WOOD TONES AND TRADITIONAL TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING K. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 3A SANTA BARBARA LA COSTA OAKS 3. I J^SSEMAN "L/>CCM" " CARLSBAD,CA I 52. I 0 I 7808.30.10 SCALE I/T = t'4T FRONT CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW B\nr-r-ir 1 ill! ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.K. AT HAVE: 24" O.H.ATRAKE- 18" ELEMENTS OF CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW A. FIAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C. SAND FINISH STUCCO D. 6X4 WOOD RAFTER TAILS E RECESSED GABLE END VENT F. DECORATIVE WOOD OLTTLOOKERS G. WOOD POTSHELVES H. WOOD SIMULATED HEAD & SILL TRIM AT WINDOWS I. DECORATIVE SHUTTERS J. WOOD SIMULATED SIDING OR SHINGLE AT GABLE END K. WOOD POST ON BATTERED PEDESTALS W/ STONE VENEER L EARTHY TANS TO KHAKI GREEN STUCCO COLOR RANGE ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD TONES AND FLAT BRUSHED TILE ROOFING M. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 3 B CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW LA COSTA OAKS EA55EMAN ' LACCNl' ' CARLSBAD ,CA I S2. I 0 I 7808.30.10 „„— «*—-.,„ SCALE 1/B" = I'-iT lAGROUP2\l5!IOI79\0!7aELV3.DW a' FOOTPRINT: 2.I52S.F. FIRST: I.428S.F GARAGE 7I2S.F. CANTILEVER: I2S.F. OPT. HOBBY: I28S.F. (TOTAL 3,278 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' M I N Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I ST,-AXDAHDR"'ACIFI'CARLSBAD,CA ? i i ! ™—^^1.-.,- SCALE \>4m* r'-O' I-ACROUPH15110178\0179FLAJCDWG £2*5225^LACGNI 152.10178 08.30.! 0 SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I ™ CARLSBAD,CA ±± f ? f I C=_~ SCALE I/4--I-.C- ^SEMAN ^^^^^^^^^L*CCN1 152.10178 08.30. 1 0 J:\GROUTOIHIO! 7S\0!79FUUC3WG FRONT ITALIAN C1/4"- r-o" ROOF PLAN 4.-I2U.N.O. O.H. AT HAVE: 18" PLAN 3C ITALIAN LA COSTA OAKS 3. 1 ELEMENTS OF ITALIAN A. S - TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY HIP ROOF FORMS C. SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED CORBELS AT EAVE E SAND FINISH STUCCO CORNER BAND F. STONE VENEER (PLANS 3 & -4) G. ARCHED WINDOW WTTH STUCCO TRIM (PLAN 2) H. ARCH OR ARCADE AT ENTRY I. WROUGHT IRON RAIL OR POT SHELF (PLANS 1 3, 4 4) J. DECORATIVE SHUTTERS K_ BUTTERY GOLD TO EARTHY MEDIUM STUCCO TONES ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD HUES AND RED / TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROORNG L METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR a^BsTAN auEQEEZBQsL"CCN1 Lc CARLSBAD , C A 152.1017803.30.10 SCALE \n- * r-tr 2.IIOS.F. I.386S.F. 7I2S.F. I2S.F. OFT. HOBBY: I28S.F. (TOTAL 3,198 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' M I N Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3.1 ^ IAXM ™ CARLSBAD , CAt 1 i g SCALr !«*» I'-O* I 52.I 0178 08.30. I 0 SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3 MCONI rinc CARLSBAD ,CA J^GROUPHI SI 1017»Q17 152.1017808.10. I 0 FRONT SANTA BARBARA A 1/4- - I'-O- ROOF PLAN 4:12 U.N.O. O.H. AT EAVE 8" O.H. AT RAKE 3" ELEMENTS OF SANTA BARBARA A. S - TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED EAVE DETAIL E. DECORATIVE TILE AT ENTRY OR PRINCIPLE OPENING OR WINDOW f. WROUGHT IRON DETAIL (PLANS 3*4) G. ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO COLLAR TRIM H. DECORATIVE VENT RECESS DETAIL I. DECORATIVE STUCCO CORBELS AT PRINCIPLE OPENINGS J. CLEAN WHITE STUCCO COLORS TO WARM SANDY HUES ACCENTED WITH EARTHY WOOD TONES AND TRADITIONAL TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING K. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 3XA SANTA BARBARA LA COSTA OAKS 3. ! B*iSSENlAN LA3CNI IDAflDPACIF!LC CARLSBAD (CA 152.1017308.30.10 2.IIOS.F. I.386S.F. 7I2S.F. I2S.F. I28S.F. OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' MIN FIRST FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3 B^SSEN1AN^B<EW&**&& ISCONI i,c CARLSBAD ,CA tit —• SOLE l/<" - r-0' l:\GftOUPT\ISllol78\OI78aR3XiDWG 152.10178 OS.30. I 0 0—--—e SECON D FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION I SI 10179\0179FIWXS.DWG E^SSENIAN IS?IkiJ ANDAHDR«T L nc C A A R L S 4— J CO BAD, ST C A A O A K S 3. 1 HCONI 152.1017808.30.1 0 FRONT CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOWS 111 RIGHT ENHANCED ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. AT HAVE- 24" O.H.ATRAKE- 18" ELEMENTS OF CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW A. FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C SAND FINISH STUCCO D. 4X6 WOOD RAFTER TAILS E. RECESSED GABLE END VENT F. DECORATIVE WOOD OUTLOOKERS G. WOOD POTSHELVES H. WOOD SIMULATED HEAD & SILL TRIM AT WINDOWS L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS J. WOOD SIMULATED SIDING OR SHINGLE AT GABLE END K. WOOD POST ON BATTERED PEDESTALS W/ STONE VENEER L EARTHY TANS TO KHAKI GREEN STUCCO COLOR RANGE ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD TONES AND FLAT BRUSHED TILE ROORNG M. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 3XB CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW LA COSTA OAKS BASSEMAN ^^^^^^^^ L«CONI CARLSBAD , C A I 52. 101780 3.30. I 0 SCALE \V - IMT J.-SGROUP!\ 15110178\0 tTSELVJXJJWC 50.00' M I N Fl RST FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION FOOTPRINT: 2.IIOS.F. FIRST: I.386S.F. GARAGE 7I2S.F. CANTILEVER: liS.F. OPT. HOBBY: (TOTAL-3.I98S.F.) I28S.F. OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB LA COSTA OAKS 3. I I1^SSEN1AN CARLSBAD ,CA >_i f 'iSCALE iflr»nr I SI. 10 I 7808.30.10 J AGROUPiV 1511017B\0173FLRJXCDWG —© SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3.1 : „ C A R L S B A D , C A ? ! ! —1 IV\SSMAN BCT»^g^^^C^ 152.10178 03.30. ! 0 SCALE I/B-- r-<r FRONT ITALIAN C!/«• - ixr ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.K. AT HAVE 18" PLAN 3XC ITALIAN LA COSTA OAKS 3. I ELEMENTS OF ITALIAN A, B. C. D. E. f. G. H. I. J. K. S-TILE ROOFING PREDOMINATELY HIP ROOF FORMS SAND FINISH STUCCO SHAPED CORBELS AT EAVE SAND RNISH STUCCO CORNER BAND STONE VENEER (PLANS 3 S 4) ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO TRIM (PLAN 2) ARCH OR ARCADE AT ENTRY WROUGHT IRON RAIL OR POT SHELF (PLANS i 3, * 4) DECORATIVE SHUTTERS BUTTERY GOLD TO EARTHY MEDIUM STUCCO TONES ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD HUES AND RED / TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR BASEMAN ^^3232HEs LACONI CARLSBAD ,CA 152.1017808.30. I 0 JAGROUTOI yt \ QI lys, 178ELV3XDWG 4A S.F. FIRST: I.582S.F. SECOND: 1,750 S.F. TOTAL- 3,332 S.F. GARAGE:606 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2,188 S.F. FIRST: I.582S.F. GARAGE 606 S.F. OPT. PLAY SPACE +138 S.5. (TOTAL 3,470 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' M I N FIRST FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I 5*£SEN1AN ^HHESHELA33M »T,™*>C,™HOMES CARLSBAD ,CA SCALE IM' - I'-O- 152.10178 08.30. I 0 OPT. BEDROOM 5 / BATH 4 AT BONUS ROOM PLAN 4A 6----O SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3.1 ST^MDISC,™ CARLSBAD , CAHOMES . , , , SCALE IH'- I'-O" t^ssEMANE^^^sB5^3! 152.1017808.30.10 1511017ffiO 178f LR+A.DWG FRONT SANTA BARBARA Aiw-r-o" ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.K AT EAVE 8" O.H. AT RAKE: 3" ^-\.{ ;"]iV - - / 3 IO: 11 {{ - \ /( \ }\^ — i } J± SANTA BARBARA A. S -TILE ROOFING I B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOFr -D. E. F. G. H. 1. J ' K. FORMS SAND FINISH STUCCO SHAPED EAVE DETAIL DECORATIVE TILE AT ENTRY OR PRINCIPLE OPENING OR WINDOW WROUGHT IRON DETAIL (PLANS } & 4) ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO COLLAR TRIM DECORATIVE VENT RECESS DETAIL DECORATIVE STUCCO CORBELS AT PRINCIPLE OPENINGS CLEAN WHITE STUCCO COLORS TO WARM SANDY HUES ACCENTED WITH EARTHY WOOD TONES AND TRADITIONAL TERRA COTTA BARREL TILE ROOFING METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 4A SANTA BARBARA LA COSTA OAKS 3. MSSENTAN ^SWfVF LACCNI L CARLSBAD,CA SCALE i;r = ivr JsGROUmi Slf 01 /Bio 178RV4 RU —E ft Z]—nU FIRST: I.582S.F. SECOND: I.750S.F. TOTAL: 3,332 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2.I88S.F. FIRST: I.582S.F. GARAGE 606 S.F, '6- OPT. PLAY SPACE: +138 S.F. (TOTAL 3,470 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' MIN FIRST FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION E^SENIANm VfTDARDPACl L c ?- A ARL-^— f— CO S BAD , ! ST CA A 0 A K S 3. 1 g.ggg! gg Jgg^^g 152.10178 08.30.10 OPT. BEDROOM 5 / BATH 4 AT BONUS ROOM PLAN 4B --e SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATION B^SSENIAN Hi -VKD.AJIDPAC LA ™ CARL fc-i — f— CO SBAD , _, ST CA A O A K S 3. 1 L/*CCM 152.10178 08.30.10 — J:\GROUP1VI 5210179\0 l79aR4B.DWC FRONT CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOWSw - r-v ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. AT HAVE: 24" O.H. ATRAK& 18" ELEMENTS OF CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW A. FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY GABLE ROOF FORMS C SAND FINISH STUCCO D. 6X6 WOOD RAFTER TAILS E RECESSED GABLE END VENT F. DECORATIVE WOOD OUTLOOKERS G. WOOD POTSHELVES H WOOD SIMULATED HEAD & SILL TRIM AT WINDOWS I. DECORATIVE SHUTTERS J. WOOD SIMULATED SIDING OR SHINGLE AT GABLE END K. WOOD POST ON BATTERED PEDESTALS W; STONE VENEER L EARTHY TANS TO KHAKI GREEN STUCCO COLOR RANGE ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD TONES AND FLAT BRUSHED TILE ROOFING M. . METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR PLAN 4B CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW LA COSTA OAKS 3. I BASEMAN ^^^^^^•^ LACONI CARLSBAD ,CA IS2.I 0!73 08.3 0.10 — SCALE t/r * tvr HLJ .,Lf-«—••"• -" "-- — j .,HLJ TYPICAL MEDIA / FIREPLACE INTERIOR ELEVATION TYPICAL MEDIA / FIREPLACE INTERIOR ELEVATION OPT. PLAY SPACE AT TANDEM GARAGE PLAN 4C 3,332 S.F. FIRST: I.582S.F. SECOND: 1,750 S.F. TOTAL 3,332 S.F. FOOTPRINT: 2,188 S.F. FIRST: I.582S.F. GARAGE 606 S.F. OPT. PLAY SPACt +138 S.F. (TOTAL- 3,470 S.F.) OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB 50.00' M I N FIRST FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3. I EASSEN1AN ^TTT^ff^^FL*CON1 F,c CARLSBAD ,CA, ; ; j 152.10178 08.30.10 J.-\GROUP2\ IS210179\0178I:!JWC-DWG 9-"9 PLAN 4C e----e SECOND FLOOR REFLECTS ITALIAN ELEVATION LA COSTA OAKS 3 . I MSSEMAN ^^^^^^^^^" l/CONI ANDARDPAHOMES nc CARLSBAD,CA 52.1017808.30. 1 0 FRONT IT A L IA N C ROOF PLAN 4:I2U.N.O. O.H. ATEAVE: 18" ELEMENTS OF ITALIAN A. S-TILE ROOFING B. PREDOMINATELY HIP ROOF FORMS C. SAND FINISH STUCCO D. SHAPED CORBELS AT EAVE E. SAND FINISH STUCCO CORNER BAND F. STONE VENEER (PLANS 3 8,4) G. ARCHED WINDOW WITH STUCCO TRIM (PLAN 2) H. ARCH OR ARCADE AT ENTRY I. WROUGHT IRON RAIL OR POT SHELF (PLANS 2, 3, i 4) J. DECORATIVE SHUTTERS K. BUTTERY GOLD TO EARTHY MEDIUM STUCCO TONES ACCENTED WITH RICH WOOD HUES AND RED / TERRA COTTA BARRa TILE ROOFING L. METAL ROLL UP CARRIAGE GARAGE DOOR B3lid PLA ITA A N LI 4C AN u A o A K . 1 IViSSENIAN l/COM 152.10178 "fiSS EXHIBIT 5 Planning Commission Minutes October 20,2010 Page 5 Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she opened and closed public testimony. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Nygaard, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6726 recommending approval of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05-13(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 4-0 AYES: Acting Chairperson Baker, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Nygaard, and Commissioner Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Chairperson Douglas, Commissioner Dominguez, and Commissioner L'Heureux ABSTAIN: None Acting Chairperson Baker closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 4 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. 5. PUD 05-11 (B) - LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 5 and stated Senior Planner Van Lynch would make the Staff presentation. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if the applicant wished to continue with only 4 Commissioners present. The applicant stated yes. Acting Chairperson Baker opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 5. Mr. Lynch gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthorn and Associates, PO Box 237, Carlsbad, representing Standard Pacific Homes, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Commissioner Nygaard asked Mr. Henthorn to relate the same concern regarding the windows used in the European Country style homes. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she opened and closed public testimony. Planning Commission Minutes October 20,2010 Page 6 MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Nygaard, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6730 recommending approval of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05-11(6) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 4-0 AYES: Acting Chairperson Baker, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Nygaard, and Commissioner Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Chairperson Douglas, Commissioner Dominguez, and Commissioner L'Heureux ABSTAIN: None Acting Chairperson Baker closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 5 and thanked Staff for their presentations. COMMISSION COMMENTS None. PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMENTS Mr. Neu commented that the Commission received Working Paper #2 prepared for use with the Envision Carlsbad Committee. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of October 20, 2010, was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. DON NEU Planning Director Bridget Desmarais Minutes Clerk This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 CCP.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: November 19th, 2010 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Escondido, California This 19th, of November 2010 Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Qt!i HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affect- P ed, that the City Council of the City ofCarlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carls- bad Village Drive, Carlsbad, Califor- ~~ nia, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, No- vember 30, 2010, to consider ap-proval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family de- tached homes within the Villages ofLa Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1 generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone11 and more particularly described as: Lot 1 through 80 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-14, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North- Neigh-borhood 3.1, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Cali- fornia, according to Map thereof No. 15595, filed in the Office of the Coun- ty Recorder of San Diego County August22,2007asfileNo. 20074)560435. Whereas, on October 20, 2010 theCity of Carlsbad Planning Commis- sion voted 4-0-3 to determine thatthe project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Pro-gram EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and recommend approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans,elevations and plotting for the devel- opment of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Cos- ta Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone11. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited toattend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after November 24, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact Van Lynch in the Planning Division at 760-602-4613 or van.lynch@cartsb- f you challenge the Planned Devel- opment Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising onlythose issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing de-scribed in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the CityofCarisbad,Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carls-bad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: PUD 05-11(6) CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 CITY OF CARLSBADCITY COUNCIL net 2275745-11/19/2010 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 30, 2010, to consider approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1 generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lot 1 through 80 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-14, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.1, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15595, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 22, 2007 as file No. 2007-0560435. Whereas, on October 20, 2010 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 4-0-3 to determine that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and recommend approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after November 24, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact Van Lynch in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4613 orvan.lynch@carlsbadca.gov. If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CASE NAME: PUBLISH: CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL PUD 05-11(B) LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 November 19, 2010 NOT TO SCALE Villages of La Costa Neighborhood 3.1 PUD05-11(B) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 30, 2010, to consider approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1 generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lot 1 through 80 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-14, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.1, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15595, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 22, 2007 as file No. 2007-0560435. Whereas, on October 20, 2010 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 4-0-3 to determine that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and recommend approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after November 24, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact Van Lynch in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4613 or van.lynch@carlsbadca.gov. If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CASE NAME: PUBLISH: CITY OF CARLSBAD PUD 05-11(B) LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 November 19, 2010 /•I NOT TO SCALE Villages of La Costa Neighborhood 3.1 PUD05-11(B) AH3AV-OD-008H pjoqai a| ja|?A?j j ep inje ainipeq B| ? zaj|da^ap suas ©09I.S ®AM3AV iueqeS a) 4a|ad ^ saipej sauanbj)- CARLSBAD PRESCHOOL LTD PTNSHI 100 W BROADWAY 1100 GLENDALE, CA 91210-1216 CIC LA COSTA L P 5993 AVENIDA ENCINAS 101 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4459 REAL EST 1903 WRIGHT CARLS REAL 1903 WRIGH CAR [AGI CENTER FOR NATURAL LANDS MAW 215 W ASH ST FALLBROOK, CA 92028-2904 ROBERT & ALICE SMITH 1687 LA PLAZA DR SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-4841 LULU LAND COMPANY LLC 1740 LA COSTA MEADOWS DR 500 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-2114 LA COSTA OAKS COMMUNITY ASSN 600 W BROADWAY 2600 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3372 KOLLPER LA COSTA MEADOWS L L 4343 VON KARMAN AVE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-1200 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING INC 2280 WARDLOW CIR CORONA, CA 92880-2878 *** 11 Printed *** REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY STE 300 2131 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 HENTHORN AND ASSOCIATES STE 200 1902 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 f HiaBpa dn-doj asodxa i o; aui| 6uo|e pueg 0,0915 eie|d reel Lac»«=«» Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160®j^Feed Paper see Instruction Sheet j for Easy Peel Feature^IAVBRY®5160® CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT STE 250 255 PICO AVE SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT 701 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT 1966OLIVENHAINRD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA 600 EUCALYPTUS AVE VISTA CA 92084 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AV SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 10124 OLD GROVE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92131 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5934 PRIESTLEY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER STEVE MACIEJ - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160®Sens de chargement Consultez la feuille d'instruction www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Villages of La CostaVillages of La CostaNeighborhood 3.1Neighborhood 3.1PUD 05PUD 0511(B)11(B)PUD 05PUD 05--11(B)11(B) Villages of La Costa Master PlanVillages of La Costa Master PlanCity Council approved on Oct 23 2001City Council approved on Oct 23 2001City Council approved on Oct 23, 2001City Council approved on Oct 23, 2001Adopted Ordinances NSAdopted Ordinances NS--604 and NS604 and NS--605 605 codifying the Master Plancodifying the Master Plancodifying the Master Plancodifying the Master PlanEstablished guidelines and standards for future Established guidelines and standards for future dl ihihM Pldl ihihM Pldevelopment within the Master Plan areadevelopment within the Master Plan area Villages of La CostaVillages of La CostaLa Costa Oaks VillageLa Costa Oaks VillageLa Costa Ridge La Costa Ridge VillageVillageNeighborhood 3.1Neighborhood 3.180 Single80 Single--familyfamilyNeighborhood 3.1Neighborhood 3.1VillageVillage80 Single80 Singlefamily family Detached HomesDetached Homes4 Primary Floor Plans4 Primary Floor PlansLa Costa Oaks La Costa Oaks VillageVillageyy3 Architectural Styles3 Architectural StylesNeighborhood 3.1Neighborhood 3.1 Site PlanningSite PlanningProposed Plan Types:Proposed Plan Types:Plan 1: Plan 1: 2,078 SF2,078 SFPlan 2:Plan 2: 3,000 SF3,000 SFPlan 3: Plan 3: 3,150 SF3,150 SFPlan 3X: Plan 3X: 3,070 SF3,070 SFPlan 1Plan 1Plan 2Plan 2Plan 3Plan 3Plan 3XPlan 3XPlan 4Plan 4,,Plan 4:Plan 4: 3,332 SF3,332 SFNeighborhood 3.1Neighborhood 3.1Plan 1 Plan 1 ––5 du5 duPlan 2 Plan 2 –– 20 du20 duPlan 3 Plan 3 –– 20 du20 duPlan 3X Plan 3X ––5 du5 duPlan 4 Plan 4 –– 30 du30 duCraftsman ElevationCraftsman ElevationSanta Barbara ElevationSanta Barbara ElevationItalian ElevationItalian ElevationCraftsman ElevationCraftsman ElevationSanta Barbara ElevationSanta Barbara Elevation ArchitectureArchitectureSanta BarbaraSanta BarbaraIntroduced to San Diego during the Exposition of 1915, thisIntroduced to San Diego during the Exposition of 1915, thisIntroduced to San Diego during the Exposition of 1915, this Introduced to San Diego during the Exposition of 1915, this style is adapted from the architecture of Andalusia in style is adapted from the architecture of Andalusia in southern Spain and was popularized in Santa Barbara during southern Spain and was popularized in Santa Barbara during the 1930’s.the 1930’s.the 1930 s.the 1930 s.CraftsmanCraftsmanThe Southern California adaptations of this style were The Southern California adaptations of this style were inspired by the work of Greene and Greene in Pasadena, as inspired by the work of Greene and Greene in Pasadena, as well as the Craftsman movement of the 1920’s.well as the Craftsman movement of the 1920’s.ItalianItalianItalianItalianIn the Italian architectural style the massing is a more ornate In the Italian architectural style the massing is a more ornate adaptation of the Mediterranean vernacular, with details adaptation of the Mediterranean vernacular, with details d i d f th h d ill f th It li i fd i d f th h d ill f th It li i fderived from the houses and villas of the Italian region of derived from the houses and villas of the Italian region of Tuscany.Tuscany. Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraThe Santa Barbara Mediterranean architectural style is The Santa Barbara Mediterranean architectural style is characterized by simple massing of stucco walls, barrelcharacterized by simple massing of stucco walls, barrelcharacterized by simple massing of stucco walls, barrel characterized by simple massing of stucco walls, barrel tile roofs and deeptile roofs and deep--set openings.set openings.Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Iron DetailsIron DetailsArched ElementsArched ElementsGableGableend Treatmentsend TreatmentsPlan 2Plan 2 Plan 4Plan 4Plan 1Plan 1 Plan 3/3XPlan 3/3XGableGable--end Treatmentsend TreatmentsWindow TreatmentsWindow Treatments CraftsmanCraftsmanCraftsmanCraftsmanThe Craftsman architectural style features shallow The Craftsman architectural style features shallow pitched roofs exposed beam ends windows and doorspitched roofs exposed beam ends windows and doorspitched roofs, exposed beam ends, windows and doors pitched roofs, exposed beam ends, windows and doors trimmed with wood, and accents of stone.trimmed with wood, and accents of stone.Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Stone AccentsStone AccentsGableGable--end Treatmentsend TreatmentsPlan 2Plan 2 Plan 4Plan 4Plan 1Plan 1 Plan 3/3XPlan 3/3XWindow TreatmentsWindow Treatments ItalianItalianIn the Italian architectural style the massing is generally In the Italian architectural style the massing is generally more simplified than the other Spanish influencedmore simplified than the other Spanish influencedIn the Italian architectural style the massing is generally In the Italian architectural style the massing is generally more simplified than the other Spanish influencedmore simplified than the other Spanish influencedmore simplified than the other Spanish influenced more simplified than the other Spanish influenced architectural styles.architectural styles.Design Elements include:Design Elements include:more simplified than the other Spanish influenced more simplified than the other Spanish influenced architectural styles.architectural styles.Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Entry DetailingEntry DetailingWindow Detailing Window Detailing Design Elements include:Design Elements include:Entry DetailingEntry DetailingWindow Detailing Window Detailing Plan 2Plan 2 Plan 4Plan 4Plan 1Plan 1 Plan 3/3XPlan 3/3XggHip RoofsHip RoofsggHip RoofsHip Roofs Villages of La CostaVillages of La CostaNeighborhood 3.1Neighborhood 3.1PUD 05PUD 0511(B)11(B)PUD 05PUD 05--11(B)11(B) La Costa Oaks Neighborhood 3.1 PUD 05-11(B) Location Map SSAANN EELLIIJJOO RRDD SSIITTIIOO CCAALL IIEE NN TT EEXXAANNAA WWYY SSIITTIIOO CCOOLLIINNAASS IITT IIOO DDEESSTTIINNOOSS IITTIIOO AAVVEELLLLAANNAASSIITTIIOO TTOORRTTUUGGAASS II TT II OO CC OORRAAZZOONNFF IILL OO LLII CCRRPPAASSEEOO PPLL OOMMOOSS II TT II OO FF RROONNTTEERRAASSIITTIIOO CCAABBAA LL LLEERROOCC OO RRIINN TTII AA SSTTVVAALLLLEE CC IITTOO SS WWDD DD YY RR AA NN CC HH OO SS AA NN TT AA FF EE RR DDPUD 05-11(B) Villages of La Costa Neighborhood 3.1 SITE MAP EL CAMINO REA L LA COSTA AVCOLLEGE BLCARLSBAD B L AVIARA PY MELROSE DR R AN C H O S AN T A F E R D SITIO CORAZONS I T I O F RO N T E RACORINTIA STSAN ELIJO RDSITIO TORTUGA FILOLI C R VALLECITOS WD DYSITIO COLINASITIO C A LI E N T E SITIO DESTINO0 400 800200 Feet PUD 05-11(B) Villages of La Costa Neighborhood 3.1 Project Background •September 26, 2006 -City Council approved the project site to be subdivided under Tentative Map (CT 05-14) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 05-11). Site Plan •Planned Development Permit Amendment for: •Building Floor Plans; •Elevations; and •Plotting •80 single-family detached homes located on the northern portion of Villages of la Costa Oaks North •Lot Size: 5,000 square foot minimum Project Design •4 Floor Plans (Plan 1, 2, 3, 3x & 4)•3 Architectural Styles: •Santa Barbara •Craftsman Bungalow •Italian/Tuscan•9 Color Schemes•Building Plane and Roof Variation •Variety of Design Elements Included •Window/door trims, roof tiling, decorative stucco, wood accents, stone veneer, wainscoting, etc.•3-Car Garages Project Consistency •Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98- 01(G)) –Master Plan Site Standards and Guidelines •Site Plan Standards •Architectural Controls –Neighborhood 3.1 Standards and Guidelines •Carlsbad Municipal Code Title 21 –Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45) •California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Recommendation That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2010-261 APPROVING of Planned Development Permit Amendment No. PUD 05-11(B) as recommended by the Planning Commission.