Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-06-21; City Council; 20589 PART4; 2010 UPDATE SD COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLANSECTIONS IX Plan Maintenance SECTION 6 PLAN MAINTENANCE This section of the Plan describes the formal process that will ensure that the Plan remains an active and relevant document. The plan maintenance process includes a schedule for monitoring and evaluating the Plan annually and producing a plan revision every five years. This section describes how the county and cities will integrate public participation throughout the plan maintenance process. Finally, this section includes an explanation of how jurisdictions intend to incorporate the mitigation strategies outlined in this plan into existing planning mechanisms such as the County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Capital Improvement Plans, and Building Codes. 6.1 MONITORING, EVALUATING AND UPDATING THE PLAN 6.1.1 Plan Monitoring The HMWG participants will be responsible for monitoring the plan annually for updates to jurisdictional goals, objectives, and action items. If needed, these participants will coordinate through the County OES to integrate these updates into the Plan. County OES will be responsible for monitoring the overall Plan for updates on an annual basis. 6.1.2 Plan Evaluation The Plan is evaluated by County OES and by each participating jurisdiction annually to determine the effectiveness of programs, and to reflect changes in land development or programs that may affect mitigation priorities. This includes re-evaluation by HMWG leads (or their select jurisdictional representative) based upon the initial STAPPLEE criteria used to draft goals, objectives, and action items for each jurisdiction. County OES and city representatives also review the goals and action items to determine their relevance to changing situations in the county, as well as changes in State or Federal regulations and policy. County OES and jurisdictional representatives review the risk assessment portion of the Plan to determine if this information should be updated or modified, given any new available data. The coordinating organizations responsible for the various action items will report on the status of their projects, the success of various implementation processes, difficulties encountered, success of coordination efforts, and which strategies should be revised. Any updates or changes necessary will be forwarded to County OES for inclusion in further updates to the Plan. The HMWG and each Local Mitigation Planning Team meet annually to discus the status of the Plan. 6.1.3 Plan Updates Since the plan's adoption in 2005 the HMWG has participated in an annual review. The review details all mitigation actions that were deferred, begun, continued or completed during that calendar year. In the past five years there has been considerable progress made with the successful completion of the vast majority of the action items developed by the participating jurisdictions. Appendix D details the status of the action items from the 2005 plan. This review process has been effective in identifying gaps and shortfalls in funding, support, and other resources. It has also allowed for the re-prioritization of specific actions as circumstances change. It allows each participating jurisdiction to maintain the plan as a living document. This __ SECTIONS i\ Plan Maintenance review process has enabled the HMWG to improve the document by eliminating actions that have been completed, adding new actions that have been identified since the plans adoption and reprioritizing other actions to reflect new priorities and/or constraints. The negative side of this review process is that it is time consuming, pulling staff away from their day-to-day responsibilities. County OES will continue to be the responsible agency for updates to the Plan. All HMWG participants will continue to be responsible to provide OES with jurisdictional-level updates to the Plan annually or when/if necessary as described above. Every five years the plan will be updated and submitted to Cal EMA and FEMA for review. 6.1.4 Implementation Through Existing Programs County and local jurisdictions have implemented many of the recommended action items through existing programs and procedures. Participants use the Plan as a baseline of information on the natural hazards impacting their jurisdictions. They have also been able to refer to existing institutions, plans, policies and ordinances defined for each jurisdiction in Section 5 of the Plan (e.g., General Plan, Comprehensive Plan). Participants are incorporating the Hazard Mitigation Plan into their General Plans and/or Comprehensive Plans as those plans come up for review and revision. 6.1.5 Continued Public Involvement The original plan did not allow for the public to comment on the plan online. Although the County and all participating agencies promoted the plan as best they could in both public meetings and on their websites. This meant that few comments were received after the adopted plan was published. The participating jurisdictions and fire agencies continue to be dedicated to involving the public directly in the review process and updates of the Plan. A maintenance committee made up of a representative from County OES and a representative from each participating jurisdiction is responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the Plan as described above. During all phases of plan maintenance the public will have the opportunity to provide feedback. A copy of the Plan is available for review on the County OES website. Participating jurisdictions also have links from their website to the Plan. In addition, hard copies of the plan are catalogued and kept at all of the appropriate agencies in the county. The existence and location of these copies is also posted on the county website. To facilitate public comments, the site contains an email address for the public's use which is monitored on a daily basis by County OES. Any questions or comments received on this website are forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the HMWG for their review and response. County OES also tracks these public comments on the plan. A press release requesting public comments is also issued for each update, and after each evaluation. We are also going to use social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) to notify the public of any changes they should be aware of. These notifications direct people to the website where the public can review proposed changes. Coupled with the dedicated email address for comments, this provides the public a simple and easily accessible to allow them to express their concerns, opinions, or ideas about any updates/changes that are proposed to the Plan. The County OES will continue to be responsible for publicize any changes to the Plan and maintaining public involvement. 6-2 SECTIONSEVEN References SECTION 7 REFERENCES ABAG Dam Failure Inundation Hazards Guide, http://wrww .abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps/damfailure/dfguide.html Bainbridge, David 1997. The Flood Next Time. The San Diego Earth Times Web Page: http://www.sdearthtimes.com/etl097/etl097sl.html California Department of Boating and Waterways and SANDAG, 1994. Shoreline Erosion Assessment and Atlas of the San Diego Region, Volumes I and II. Edited by Reinhard E. Flick, PhD. California Earthquake History 1769-Present Earthquake .usgs .gov/regional/sca/ca_eqs .php City of Fort Collins Dam Failure Webpage, http://www.ci.fort-collins.co.us/oem/dam-failure.php California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology 1990. Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake, San Diego-Tijuana Metropolitan Area. Special Publication 100. California Department of Water Resources, Dam Safety, http://www.water.ca.gov/damsaefty/docs/fault.pdf County of San Diego, Department of Sanitation and Flood Control. Storms in San Diego County. FEMA 2002. State and Local Mitigation Planning How-to Guide. September 2002, FEMA 386-1. FEMA 1999. HAZUS 99 Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology User Manual-ArcView. Developed by FEMA through arrangements with National Institute of Building Sciences. Frankel. Arthur, Mueller, Charles, Barnhard, Theodore, Perkins, David, Leyendecker, E.V., Dickman, Nancy, Hanson, Stanley, and Hopper, Margaret, 1997, Seismic-hazard maps for the conterminous United States, Map C - Horizontal Peak Acceleration with 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-131-C. http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq/html/data.html Governor's Office of Emergency Services 2003. Interim Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance for California Local Governments. Prepared for the DRC April 21-23, 2003. Hawk, R.N., and Christiansen, T.P., 1991, City of San Diego Ordinances and Regulations with Respect to Geotechnical and Geological Hazards, in Environmental Perils, San Diego Region, Abbott, P.L., and Elliott, W.J., editors, San Diego Association of Geologists Institute for Business and Life Safety, Tampa FL, July 2008 Mega Fires: The Case for Mitigation. The Witch Creek Fire. October 21-31, 2007 Leighton & Associates, 1983, Seismic Safety Study for the City of San Diego, City of San Diego General Plan 7-1 SECTIONSEVEN References Journal of San Diego History 2002. Dry Rivers, Dammed Rivers and Floods: An Early History of the Struggle Between Droughts and Floods in San Diego. Winter 2002, Volume 48, Number 1. http://www .sandiegohistory .org/journal/2002-1 /hill .htm National Association of Counties April 2009. "A Snapshot of the Impact of the Recession on Large, Urban Counties". Office of Disaster Preparedness 2000. Unified San Diego County Emergency Services Organization Operational Area Emergency Plan. San Diego Natural History Museum Web Page 2003. Faults and Earthquakes in San Diego County. Thomas A. Demere, Ph.D: Curator of Paleontology. http://www.sdnhm.org/research/paleontology/sdfaults.html South Carolina Emergency Management Division. South Carolina Emergency Operations Plan Appendix 4 South Carolina Dam Failure and Preparedness Plan. February 2009 U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1993. Tsunamis affecting the West Coast of the United States 1806-1992. KGRD 29. 7-2 APPENDIX A Meeting information SECTION 1: HAZARD MITIGATION WORKING GROUP MEETING AGENDAS AND SUMMARIES Group Meeting #1: Wednesday April 1,2009,9:00 AM Meeting Summary Tom Amabile (TA) gave an introduction that discussed the working group goals. The group went around and identified themselves and their agencies. The audience consisted of representatives from various local water agencies as well as from several fire protection districts. Agencies represented at the meeting were: • Alpine Fire Protection District • North County Fire Protection District • Padre Dam Municipal Water District • Rainbow Municipal Water District • Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District • Rincon del Diablo Municipal Water District • San Diego County Water Authority • Vallecitos Water District TA gave a PowerPoint™ presentation discussing the goals of the San Diego County Multi- Jurisdiction Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (Plan), the objectives of DMA 2000, the hazard mitigation planning process and the steps involved in developing the Plan achieving the goals. The presentation included a discussion of the methodology that will be used to revise the Plan for San Diego County. It was stressed that participation from special districts, especially fire protection districts and water districts was strongly encouraged and welcome. As explained in the PowerPoint presentation the hazard mitigation planning process consists of: 1. Organizing Resources a. Assess community support i. Determine the planning area ii. Determine if the community is ready to begin the planning process 1. Knowledge 2. Support 3. resources b. Establish the planning team i. Create the planning team ii. Obtain official recognition of the team iii. Organize the team c. Engage the public - educate citizens on results, findings and progress A-l APPENDIX A Meeting Information d. Assess risk i. Identify hazards within the region ii. Determine their probability of occurrence and what areas they could impact iii. Identify community resources that could be affected iv. Estimate the losses that could result from the hazard v. Conduct a Vulnerability/Risk Assessment 1. Population 2. Buildings 3. Critical facilities and infrastructure vi. Capability Assessment 1. Examine plans, policies and programs a. Development plans, ordinances, regulations b. Funding sources c. Recommendations to increase efficiency 2. Assess previous mitigation activities a. Impact b. Identify benefits, recommended enhancements 3. Identify resources a. Technological b. Informational c. Human resources vii. Evaluate Alternative Mitigation Strategies 1. Goals and Objectives a. Based on vulnerability and capabilities assessment b. Local goals and objectives 2. Alternative Mitigation Actions Research a. Utilize experts b. Identify alternative mitigation actions c. Advantages/disadvantages d. Evaluation criteria (benefits/costs) e. Develop a Mitigation Plan i. Develop Goals and Objectives 1. Assess mitigation capabilities 2. Review the results of the loss estimation 3. Develop goals and objectives (based on the risks and identified gaps in capabilities) ii. Identify and Prioritize Mitigation Measures 1. Identify 2. Evaluate 3. Rank A-2 APPENDIX A Meeting information iii. Types of Mitigation Actions 1. Non-structural solutions (such as stream restoration, vegetation management) 2. Regulatory (Building codes, permits, land use policies) iv. Prepare implementation Strategy 1. Identify who will implement the mitigation measures 2. Identify how the mitigation measures will be funded 3. Identify when they should be completed 4. Write up the implementation strategy v. Document the Plan 1. Make decisions about the document 2. Write the PI an 3. Review the Plan f. Implement the Plan i. Adopt the Mitigation Plan 1. Procure support of partner organizations 2. Have the plan adopted by governing Board/Council ii. Implement Recommendations 1. Confirm and clarify responsibilities 2. Begin to institutionalize mitigation 3. Monitor and document the implementation of your projects and activities 4. Communicate with your constituents and celebrate your successes iii. Evaluate the Results 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of your projects 2. Determine why they worked/didn't work iv. Revise the Plan 1. Prepare to update the plan 2. Examine your community 3. Examine the plan 4. Incorporate your findings into the plan The presentation also entailed an explanation of the benefits and requirements of participating in the Hazard Mitigation Plan process. The special districts were told that this was an excellent time for them to become engaged with the hazard mitigation planning process. Because the plan was set for revision, they could become part of the process and have their plans incorporated into the multi- jurisdictional plan by simply participating and developing a plan. TA went on to describe the A-3 APPENDIX A Meeting Information benefits of having a plan, specifically the ability to apply for hazard mitigation grants. He explained that the grant process was competitive and having a hazard mitigation plan did not guarantee a grant award. The schedule of work group meeting was discussed. The work group will meet monthly to begin with. Thursday afternoon was the time preferred by the majority of attendees. The next meeting date was schedule for May 28, 2009 at 1:30 pm. At that meeting all participating jurisdictions (cities, county and special districts) will begin the actual process of updating and revising the multi- jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan. Attendees were requested to return to their agencies and determine their desire to participate in the process. Group Meeting #2: Thursday May 28,2009,1:30 PM AGENDA Introductions • Local Mitigation Planning Team Schedule • Key Dates/Near-Term, Long-Term GIS's Role in the Planning Process • CIS-Definition • Sources/Matrix • Limitations of Data Planning Process - Where Are We Now? • Assessing Risks - Steps 1-4 • List of Major Disaster/Hazard Events GIS - Assessing Risks - Step 1/Identify Hazards • Coastal Storm/Erosion • Dam Failure • Drought « Earthquake • Flood • Hazardous Materials Release • House/Building Fires • Landslide • Nuclear Materials Release • Terrorism • Tsunami • Wildfire • Liquefaction A-4 APPEKDIK A Meeting Information What's Next? • Step 2: Profile Hazard Events • Step 3: Inventory Assets • Step 4: Estimate Losses Next Meeting - Time and Location June 25,2009 0900-1200 OES Tom Amabile (TA) gave an introduction that discussed the working group goals. The group went around and identified themselves and their agencies. The audience consisted of representatives from the incorporated cities, the County of San Diego, various local water agencies and fire protection districts. Agencies represented at the meeting were: • Chula Vista Fire Department • Chula Vista Police Department • City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security • County Office of Emergency Services • Encinitas Fire Department • National City Fire Department • Oceanside Fire Department • Padre Dam Municipal Water District • Rainbow Municipal Water District • Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District • Rincon del Diablo Municipal Water District • San Diego County Water Authority • San Marcos Fire Department • Vallecitos Water District TA gave a PowerPoint™ presentation discussing the goals of the San Diego County Multi- Jurisdiction Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (Plan), the objectives of DMA 2000, the hazard mitigation planning process and the steps involved in developing the Plan for achieving the goals. The presentation included a review of the planning process provided at the April 1st meeting and a discussion of the methodology that will be used to revise the Plan for San Diego County. The process will be very similar to that used in the development of the 2005 plan, utilizing the FEMA Guidance documents for the step by step process. It was stressed that participation from special districts, especially fire protection districts and water districts was strongly encouraged and welcome. A review of GIS as a tool for identifying and mapping known hazards in SD County, and discussed the need for the working group to network with other people in their city as well as academics and other professionals who might have specialized knowledge on hazards in SD County and the incorporated cities. Data sources were discussed as well as the limitations of GIS data. The presentation reviewed the mitigation planning process and the resources available such as the FEMA A-5 APPENDIX A Meeting information "How To" guides. TA also discussed the roles of the working group emphasizing the importance of having members from a range of disciplines (e.g. planning, public works, general services, etc.) and the importance of them networking with other professionals in their cities. The hazards identified in the 2005 plan were discussed, both those included for mitigation actions and those omitted. Discussion focused on whether the identified hazards were still applicable or of some need to be removed from considerations and replaced by other, newer emergency threats. The group was asked to be ready to discuss this in detail at the next meeting. A meeting schedule was established. 6/25/09 7/30/09 9/17/09 11/19/09 Additional meetings may be scheduled as needed to for the project. Action Items Each member was requested to review the identified hazards and determine their continued applicability to their jurisdiction. They were also asked to determine if any new hazards had been identified that could potentially impact their City or Special District. The following three action items were requested of the Working Group members: 1. Each Working Group member was requested to identify a jurisdiction-level Local Mitigation Planning Team. Members could include: police, fire, emergency services, community development/planning, public works, transportation, economic development, public works and emergency response/services personnel within their City. Special Districts were encouraged to recruit key decision-makers in their working groups. The jurisdiction-level Local Mitigation Planning Team will assist in identifying the specific hazards/risks that are of concern to each City and to prioritize hazard mitigation measures. The member of the Work Group would bring this information to future Work Group meetings. Each jurisdiction should convene these jurisdiction-level Local Mitigation Planning Teams as soon as possible in order to provide City or district-specific input to the multi-jurisdictional planning effort and to assure that all aspects of each City's concerns are addressed. In the absence of input from an individual City, the Plan to be developed will utilize a consensus from the Working Group for risk and mitigation priorities for that City. 2. Working Group members were asked to identify potential meeting rooms in their City that could be used for a future Work Group/Public meet in their area. 3. Compile a preliminary list of major disaster/hazard events that have occurred in each jurisdiction in the recent past (for the past five years since we have data for at least ten years prior to that in the original plan). A-6 APPENDIX A Meeting Information Group Meeting #3: Thursday, June 25,2009,9:00 AM AGENDA Introductions Schedule • Key Dates/Near-Term, Long-Term • Schedule Planning Process - Where Are We Now ? • Assessing Risks - Steps 1-4 • List of Major Disaster/Hazard Events Profiling Hazards • Assessing Risks • Hazards Identified - FOUO and NFOUO What's Next? • Step 3: Inventory Assets • Step 4: Estimate Losses Next Meeting - Time and Location July 30,2009 0900-1200 OES Meeting Summary Tom Amabile gave an introduction that discussed the working group goals. Members went around the room and introduced themselves. Tom Amabile reviewed the time-line for the project. The planning process was reviewed along with current action items. He then presented GIS-generated graphics for each of the hazards identified in San Diego County and each of these hazards was discussed as follows: Coastal Storm/Erosion: A map was presented showing areas subject to high winds and surf during coastal storms and coastal areas prone to erosion. The Working Group agreed that this hazard should continue to be profiled for the Plan and that tsunamis should continue to be consolidated into this category because the same communities in the County would be affected. Dam Failure: A map was presented showing the dams located in the County. TA indicated that OES has dam inundation zones maps and that these maps would again be used unless an individual city provided more current information that the city desired to be used instead. The Working Group indicated that this hazard should continue to be profiled for the Plan. Drought/Water Supply: It was mentioned that all jurisdictions have water conservation plans in place. One team member also mentioned that "water" as a resource is really more of the issue category than "drought". This was generally considered to be a resource management issue and not a hazard mitigation issue. A-7 APPENDIX A Meeting information The Working Group reached consensus that drought would not be included in the revised Plan. Earthquake: A map showing the earthquake zones in the County was presented. The Working Group acknowledged that earthquakes are a major issue in the region and indicated that this hazard should continue to be included in the plan. Flooding: A map was presented showing the 100-year and 500-year flood zones in the County. The Work Group acknowledged that floods are a major issue in the region and indicated that this hazard should continue to be included in the plan. Wildfire/Structure Fire: A map showing the wildfire hazard areas in the County was presented. The Working Group agreed with the recommendation that wild fires and structural fires should continue to be addressed in the Plan as one category. Landslides: A map showing areas of steep slopes, liquefaction/slide prone areas, as well as known landslide areas in the County was presented. The Working Group acknowledged that landslides should continue to be included in the plan Hazardous Materials: The Working Group agreed that since the region continues to have industries and businesses that utilize hazardous materials in their processes and who store those materials on their premises, hazardous materials need to continue to be included in the Plan, in the FOUO Attachment A. Nuclear Material Release: This topic was briefly discussed. The general consensus was that San Onofre and the Department of Defense have their own release prevention and response programs in place. In addition, the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) identified by the NRC for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) was 10 miles. This is, by NRC definition, the area most at risk from an incident at the power plant. The EPZ in San Diego County resides entirely on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. Local jurisdictions have no control over activities onboard MCB Camp Pendleton. The County currently maintains emergency plans dealing with an incident at SONGS. It also works (along with the City of San Diego) with the U.S. Navy regarding their nuclear vessels. It was determined that the Plan would continue to address this issue by identifying the mitigation and regulatory programs that are in place for these entities. Terrorism: The working group consensus was that this would continue to be included in the FOUO portion of the plan - Attachment A. Action Items Public works department to provide flood data if desired. 1. Worksheets 1 and 2 (Inventory of Assets - Confidential/Non-Confidential). 2. Individual jurisdictions may add a level of detail to the hazard analyses to be included in the plan by providing City-specific information. A-8 APPENDIX A Meeting Information Each City was requested to provide this information for their City if they desired it to be included in the Plan. Tom Amabile requested that the Cities and Special Districts advise if this information would be forthcoming for each jurisdiction. Group Meeting #4: Thursday July 30,2009, 9:00 AM AGENDA Introductions Schedule • Key Dates/Near-Term, Long-Term Collect Homework Assignments/Action Item Status Assessing Risk • Inventory Assets • Estimate Loss Developing the Mitigation Plan • Assess Mitigation Capabilities • Develop Goals and Objectives What's Next? • Identify and Prioritize Mitigation Measures • Prepare an Implementation Strategy Homework Assignments Tom Amabile gave an introduction that discussed the working group goals. He then gave a brief overview of the hazard mitigation planning process. Tom explained that the project just passed the risk assessment stage and was in the beginnings of the capabilities assessment process. Each City and Special District was tasked to review their assets and capabilities. The process to be used in determining Loss Estimations was gone over in detail. The steps to be used are: ___ APPENDIX A Meeting Information I. Proportion of Buildings Located in the Hazard Area Step A: Estimate the number of buildings and people in your community 1. Determine the total number of buildings in side you community 2. Determine the total estimated value of the buildings inside your community 3. Determine the total number of people inside your community Step B: Estimate the total number of buildings, their value and the total number of people in the hazard zones 1. Determine the total number of buildings in the hazard zone 2. Determine the total estimated value of the buildings inside the hazard zone 3. Determine the total number of people inside the hazard zone Step C: Calculate the proportion of assets located within the hazard area Divide the number or value in the hazard area by the number or value in the community # buildings in the hazard area # people in the hazard area Total # buildings in the community Total # people in the community Step D: Determine the location of expected growth in your community. Do they live in a hazard area? II. Compile Detailed Inventory of What Can be Damaged Step A: Priorities • Critical Facilities o Essential (to health & welfare of the population) o Transportation Systems o Lifeline Utility Systems o High potential Loss facilities (Nuclear Power Plants, Dams, Military Bases) • Vulnerable Populations • Economic Elements • Special Considerations • Historic/Cultural/National Resource areas • Other Important Facilities (Government, Banks, Major employers, etc.) The working group then reviewed the risk assessments from the 2005 plan. Each hazard was assessed to see if any there were any significant changes in the potential for the hazard to occur, or in the potential damage the hazard would cause, from the 2004 assessment. The resulting discussions found that in the past five years there had been many changes, but none significant enough to alter the risk assessment for the hazards. The team also reviewed the goals from 2005, their associated action items and their impact on the hazards severity today. Specific discussions for each hazard are below. Coastal Storms, Erosion and Tsunami: Actions taken by the local coastal jurisdictions to mitigate these threats include zoning code enforcement, building hazard mitigation into the permit process, development A-10 APPENDIX A Meeting Information of policies to address bluff protection measures, earning a Tsunami Ready City certification, community awareness programs and improved GIS capabilities. None of these mitigation actions has reduced the threat of coastal storms, erosion and tsunami to the coastal jurisdictions. Dam Failure: Local mitigation actions in this area include the update of inundation maps, monitoring and maintenance of dams, zoning limitations on new construction in inundation areas, public education, exercises, emergency notification systems, and improved GIS capabilities. The vast majority of dams within San Diego County are over 30 years old, and many have significant development downstream. This has not changed. The threat of a dam failure, especially of one of the older dams, remains a serious issue because of the potential impact and damage that would result in downstream communities. Earthquake: The earthquake threat to San Diego has not diminished. If anything, the limited seismic activity seen in the San Diego region over the past several years can be considered to have increased the threat by raising the potential for a moderate or large earthquake. The earthquake threat has been dealt with in various ways including building codes, zoning ordinances, changes to the safety element of local general plans, the development of CERT Teams trained in light search and rescue techniques, exercises, public education, seismic safety evaluations of public structures, seismic upgrades to public safety facilities, working with local community groups regarding the retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings and the replacement of public safety facilities with new, seismically resistant buildings. Earthquakes are still one of the most significant threats to San Diego County, with the potential to impact all jurisdictions county-wide. Floods: Floods continue to be a threat to San Diego County. In the past 59 years there have been 10 local emergencies proclaimed due to flooding. In addition, local urban flooding occurs on a regular basis when the region receives any significant amounts of rainfall. The majority (16 of 18) of the incorporated cities within the County participate in the National Flood Insurance Program, as does the County of San Diego for the unincorporated areas. Mitigation actions taken within the last five years include public education, updating the appropriate portions of local general plans, periodically reviewing participation in the NFIP, flood control improvements in areas of new development, developing or upgrading local mapping capabilities, vegetation management within river and creek channels, updating FEMA maps pertaining to flood risk, development of regulations and restrictions aimed at reducing damages/losses due to floods, preventive maintenance and inspections of storm drains, inlets, outlets and channels as well as the review and comparison of existing flood control standards, zoning and building requirements. The terrain and hydrology of San Diego County will continue to make flooding a threat throughout the region. Hazardous Materials Release: The locations and inventories of hazardous materials in use within the San Diego Operational Area have not dramatically changed within the past five years. Those facilities, businesses and residences threatened by a hazardous materials release continue to be, for the most part, still threatened. Mitigation actions taken have included coordination with the County Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Division, zoning ordinances, promoting the safe handling of hazardous materials in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code, exercises and drills, public and community education, providing hazardous materials business plans to local fire agencies, incoiporating hazardous materials use information in the business license process, studies of hazmat transportation routes and practices, requiring the timely disposal of spent material, community emergency notification system, participation in the regional Hazardous Incident Response Team (HIRT) program, equipping and training personnel on the use of hazmat mitigation tools and equipment and developing comprehensive approaches to reducing damage and loss from man-made hazards. Hazardous Materials continue to be used in many industrial processes. These facilities are often located near, or sometimes even in, A-ll APPENDIX A Meeting Information residential areas. They are very often located near essential facilities such as government buildings or hospitals. While businesses have learned to work safely with hazardous materials, the risk of a release remains a potentially large threat to the urban areas within San Diego County. Landslide: The steep slopes that characterize much of the terrain in San Diego County, coupled with the earthquake threat to the region, combine to pose a risk of landslides throughout the Operational Area. We have had two events in recent times that resulted in Proclamations of Local Emergencies. There have been a few other instances of landslides over the last several years, but these have been of a localized nature, not requiring a local proclamation. Mitigation actions taken since the adoption of the 2005 Plan include zoning ordinances, open space management plans, updating of local general plans, restricting new development in landslide prone areas, multiple habitat conservation plans, updating plans and ordinances, implement or update GIS programs, develop plans to prevent and prepare for potential rockslides, developing a comprehensive approach to reducing damage and loss from geologic hazards and the revision/updating of grading ordinances. While these actions have been effective in preventing the expansion of this hazard's risk, they do not, and can not, address the potential for landslides cause by the regions topography. Liquefaction: The threat of liquefaction in the region is the result of our steep slopes and the alluvial deposit soils found in our low-lying areas. Many of these are located in active earthquake zones. Those mitigation actions discussed earlier for flooding and earthquakes also apply here. However, the threat remains and should continue to be addressed in the revised plan. Nuclear Materials Release: The threats to San Diego continue to be the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) and the nuclear powered naval vessel home-ported here. Mitigation actions include planning for an emergency at SONGS (an event resulting in a release of radioactive material requiring protective actions) as well as working with the US Navy on potential accident s regarding their vessels. While this remains a very low probability event, the potentially catastrophic impact of such an event requires us to continue to include it in our revised plan. Terrorism: Terrorism continues to be a threat in every urban and metropolitan area of the United States. Events of the past five years show that the threat could be from domestically grown terrorists as well as those entering the US from abroad. Mitigation actions taken in the past five years include the development of a Regional Terrorism Threat Assessment Center (RTTAC), several table-top, functional and full-scale exercises with terrorism based scenarios, community education programs, regional coordination of planning and training efforts, a pilot program to identify radiological materials being smuggled into San Diego via our port, development and maintenance of communications links for intelligence information, coordination with the local Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), the development and implementation of an emergency mass notification system, development of evacuation plans, development of business continuity plans and encouraging residents of San Diego County to prepare and maintain a three day preparedness kit. While there has been no credible threat to San Diego in the past five years, we continue to be a target rich environment, with multiple military installations, universities and research facilities and a large tourism industry. This hazard must continue to be address in the re vised plan. Wildfire/Structure Fire: Wildfire continues to be one of the greatest threats to San Diego County. There have been eight gubernatorial proclamations of emergencies in San Diego since 1950. Since 2003 there have been two Presidential Declarations, the most recent in 2007. The threat from wildfire is exacerbated by our terrain, dry climate and the annual Santa Ana winds we experience. Mitigation actions taken include weed abatement ordinances and campaigns, open space management plans, zoning and building A-12 APPENDIX A Meeting Information codes, regional cooperation among fire agencies, exercises and drills, implementation of emergency public information systems, development of wild-fire pre-plans, public education campaigns on defensible space, Juvenile Fire Setter programs, development of emergency web-sites. Updated Fire Codes, updates of general plans, developing measures to ensure water for firefighting when water service is disrupted and brush management programs. Considering that San Diego has experienced two devastating firestorms within the past seven years, wildfire must be included in our revision to the plan. For each of these hazards, the most current data available was utilized to determine the extent of the threat. A discussion on regional Goals and Objectives resulted in the HMWG reaffirming the original nine Goals developed in the 2005 plan. They are: 1. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to geologic hazards (includes Earthquakes, landslides, liquefaction, etc.). 2. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to structure fire/wildfire 3. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to flooding/dam failure. 4. Increase public understanding and support for effective hazard mitigation. 5. Improve hazard mitigation coordination and communication with federal, State, local and tribal governments. 6. Promote disaster resistant existing and future development. 7. Build and support local capacity and commitment to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. 8. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to Coastal erosion/coastal bluff failure/ storm surge/Tsunami. 9. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, The Working Group determined that the Goals and Objectives for each of their jurisdictions should be reviewed by their Local Planning Groups. Each LPG would review current goals and objectives, deleting those that had been accomplished or that are no longer appropriate, update those that would be retained in the revised plan from the 2005 plan and add any new goals and objectives as necessary. The LPG would also review their jurisdictions action items and update those as well. OES offered assistance in this process to any of the LPGs that desired it. A-13 APPENDIX A Meeting information The meeting concluded with a discussion of what's upcoming in the planning process. It was mentioned that the County is in the process of updating hazards and critical facilities for input into HAZUS for the Loss Estimation step. OES passed out handouts. The first was a description of loss estimation priorities. The second was federal Replacement value for various assets. The third was a Functional Use Value Chart. The fourth was an example of Goals and Objectives, as found in the original Plan. Action Items * OES will email to work group copies of the Action Items Worksheet, and all Worksheets in excel or * Jurisdictions to review profiling maps, including critical facility information, and contact OES with updates * County will incorporate jurisdictional information on critical facilities and include in profiling. * Jurisdictions to complete and return Goals and Objectives worksheet. * Jurisdictions to prepare preliminary list of mitigation measures for each hazard in their respective jurisdiction and bring with them to the upcoming meeting. Group Meeting #5: Wednesday November 4,2009,9:00 AM This meeting was held to make the County GIS staff (Matt Turner) working on the data and the risk analysis portion of the plan available to the Working Group members to allow them to ask any questions they might have. There was no set agenda. The data analysis process was discussed. As part of this process data sources and analytical tools were explained. The working Group was told that most of the data sources used in the original plan were used for the revision. Much of the data had changed significantly, although certain portions had not. New HAZUS runs were being done to generate the at risk numbers for the tables in chapter five. Several questions were asked regarding specific data for individual layers and jurisdictions (i.e., dam inundation maps, flood plains in individual cities, etc.). The cities' concerns were addressed. Individual Meetings OES staff met with the local planning groups of several cities in order to assist them with the planning process. These meetings were informal working sessions designed to aid the individual jurisdictions with developing goals, objectives and action items. These meetings were held between November 2009 and January 2010. During these meetings the individual cities involved revised their goals and objectives and added or deleted any actions items as appropriate. A-14 APPENDIX A Meeting Information SECTION 2: PRESS RELEASE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE lsto¥erfiber20,2Q09 Contact Yvefe Uirea Moe (868) 245-9366 PUBLIC INPUT SOUGHT ON REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Residents Invited to Review Draft Muhf-Jurisdictiona! Plan Update Have you ever wondered about what the region is dang to prevent serious damage and harm to residents from earthquakes, floods or dam failures? The Couniy is updating the regtan's RWfi- Jurisdicfiorial Hazard Mitigation Plan which evaluates natural disasters and man-made hazards that could potentially impact the San Diego area. San Diego County residents are encouraged to review the daft update and provide input as needed. The yulti-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan was originally developed n 2004 and ts ipdated every five years by the San Diego County UnBed Emergency Services Organization, atong with multiple regional partners, including all 18 incorporated cities and many special districts. In 2007, the County was a recipient of a National Association of Counties fNACQ) Achievement Ayrard forttie current Hazard Mitigation Ran. The pubic can view a drat version of the region's plan onSne at htip:flwwyy.co.san- dieqp.ca.ysloesfefT>eirqefKy manaqemetittoes p rniiplanJitoi. Residents can learn about strategies and actions to reduce the threat and minimize potential damage. Questions have been included in the link to serve as 3 guide while renewing the plan. M comments are! suggestions mK be reviewed and incorporated Wo the plan if appropriate. Residents have until Dec. 31 to submit tt»eir suggestions through e-mail online via the ink above. After the public input period, the Hazard Mitigation Han Working Grotp wiM fmaize the plan and bring it to ihe San Diego County Board of Supervisors far adoption. OFFfCE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES 5555 OVERLAND AV5MUE. SUITE 1811 » SAW DIEGO. CA 92123-1294 FOLLOW US AT TWiTTE R . F A C E S O Q K . MY SPACE - L < M K E E» N . AMD XQ IS TUBE . A-15 APPENDIX A Meeting Information Press releases were sent to the following television stations and newspapers: City News Service Fox 6 KENT KFMB TV KGTV KNSD KOGO Telemundo KSWB KUSI Union Tribune La Prensa San Diego (Bi-lingual newspaper) North County Times Oceanside Union Tribune East County www.Ramona.com Sign-On San Diego Individuals associated with the above agencies and other news sources that received copies of public notices: A-16 APPENDIX A Meeting Information SECTION THREE: Website The draft plan was posted on the OES website for public comment. Screen shots of the website are provided below: fm County of San Diego: Muiti-jurisdii tkmal Hazard Mitigation Pian - Microsoft Internet Explorer File Eat Wsw Favorites Tools Help http; //www. sdcounty, ca. govyoes/emergency jnanagement/oes Jl jwtplan Jitml County of San Diego Multi-j urisclictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Office of Emergency Background: The Plum-hazard Mitigation f-'!an is a county was ptan fiat identities nsks and ways to minimise damage natural and rr-arrnade disaster The plan is a comprehensive resource document that serves many purpose? '.uch as enhancing public awareness, creating a decision too> fcr manaaement, promoting compliance with 5tate a"5d Federal progr^rr, reauirements. enhancing local poises for hazard ' , and p'oyiding intsr-jurtsdrctionaj coordination The federcil Disaster Mitigation Atf. of £000 requires a!! bcsi gov-ernments to create such B disaste: plan in crder to qualifv for funding in the future, Related Links Hazard Mft.cation Grant San Drego Count-,' i£ one of trie nrst m the St-ste to tacMe this planning effort on a rsgton wide basis, and the County's £004 plan has received national recognition in the form of an achievement award from ne National Association of Counties organisation. Hazard Mitigation p;an GIS Data i; r~r~r"iif^i5 A-17 APPENDIX A Meeting Information 3 County of San Diego: Muftt-prisdiclional Hazard Mitigation Plan - Microsoft Internet Explofer He Edit ,Wsiw Favorites • Tools Help .sdcounty.ca.gov/oes/emergency _managemenyoes_jl_fratplan.html 2009 Revision and Public Input; ^**pt tcut p!u \ ars tht- plan i <n ne^d t n° i on Maru of the mitiaa*! n o hen cuthrej in th** plo^ho e beer ccmpietpd -?h!ie th^t hd/e been deterred due to ! <ur cut ide ot uur cent i! "j-r dre in rhe pj ^^Je nf rp i inq thp plan b\ ut ddtino mitiqation trdtpgie^ dd^i u tirp poterfion di tn^t ^no att-f ji tnrts re iPiMf g thn ha ard that cruld r pui-i- the rea un « i" ^Lntinuin^ «tiii"i~!$ to rn int^n i^ur prnqn1 IP rral- nq •t'he an Cir-cK Ccurtt/ Df*1 atonal wrea bef=r <aH!b tj fP p Dnd t «nd re ^ ft f cr ns ur al and man n a'1^ di a ter A itai p sft f thi frQcirdtr q thf tht idtir S tr redutf oce1: i rpcei ng public mpjt S ta ;r q rut rfea nn «nd fot^rt a| imp act of iT"' 5 ha urd Pjsase take the time to review your jurisdiction's portion of the plan, We would like you to answer the following questions: 1. How would you rate .the hasard^ facing San Diego? Please rank them from rnpst irnpad^ntio ieast important, 2. Are there any hazards that should be evaluated in the plan that are not currently included? If so, please rank thern from mcst important to least import-apt. 3. What actions vJguid you add to the strategies discussed in the plan? How would i-£u prioritise thsim? 4. How can we better communicate these risks to the public? 5. Is there anything eise you would like, to see in the P.» | ig|a(HS AppentfecA^oc... 11 .. 11 ^ Uotmty of San Dieg.^ A-18 APPEHOIX A Meeting Information 3 County of San Diego: Multi jurisdirtional Hazard Mitigation plan - Microsoft Internet Explorer f* Hit VWN Favbrtk Tot* MfSp |^ http: //www .sdcounty. ca. gov/oes/emergency jnanagement/oes_J_mitplari.html . Is there anything else >'ou would h^e to s?e in the Your comments will be reviewed by the Hazard Mitigation Plan Working Group and incorporated into the final plan as appropriate. Please send your comments to: Downloads: 2010 HazMit Plan Final Draft Documents (MS Word format) 2D10 Ha;Mit Plan Chapter 1 FINAL DRAFT 2010 HazMit Plan Chapter 2 and 3 FIMAL DRft 2010 HazMit Plan Chapter 4 FIfjfll DRAFT 2010 HasMit Plan Chapter 5 FIMAL DRAFT 2010 HazMit Plan Chapter 6 and 7 FIMAL DPA 2010 HasMit Pian Draft F'-laps (PDF Format, posted as available) » Dam Failure DRAFT • earthquake DRAFT * flood DRAFT » Liquefaction DRAFT' « fiain Induced Landslide DRAFT • Wildfire Threat DRAFT * Tsunami DRAFT Finalised Plan The text contained on the webpage is: "After four plus years the plan is in need of revision. Many of the mitigation actions outlined in the plan have been completed while others have been deferred due to issues outside of our control. We are in the process of revising the plan by updating mitigation strategies, adding fire protection districts and water districts, reviewing the hazards that could impact the region, and continuing actions to maintain our progress in making the San Diego County Operational Area better able to respond to and recover from natural and man-made disasters. A vital part of this process is receiving public input regarding the threats facing our region and potential actions to reduce the impact of those hazards. A-19 APPENDIX A Meeting Information Please take the time to review your jurisdiction's portion of the plan. We would like you to answer the following questions: 1. How would you rate the hazards facing San Diego? Please rank them from most important to least important. 2. Are there any hazards that should be evaluated in the plan that are not currently included? If so, please rank them from most important to least important. 3. What actions would you add to the strategies discussed in the plan? How would you prioritize them? 4. How can we better communicate these risks to the public? 5. Is there anything else you would like to see in the plan? Your comments will be reviewed by the Hazard Mitigation Plan Working Group and incorporated into the final plan as appropriate. Please send your comments to: oeshmp@sdcountv.ca.gov " One public comment was received which resulted in a change to the draft plan. The email is printed below: Hi Tom: I wanted to check in with you about the draft of the HMP and offer any assistance or resources that might be helpful in considering a climate change section in the plan. I'd be happy to speak with you any time about interest in the region around climate change adaptation and resources that we have developed out of adaptation initiatives around the Country. In the meantime, I'm attaching the relevant section from the State Hazard Mitigation Plan—the sort of "placeholder" approach that might be appropriate here as well, given the advanced stage of your plan development. Best regards, Brian Brian Holland Program Officer ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability USA c/o City of Chula Vista Department of Conservation 276 Fourth Avenue, Building 300 Chula Vista, CA91910 Tel:+1 (619)476-5364 Fax:+1 (619)476-5310 www.icleiusa.org A-20 APPENDIX A Meeting Information The document Mr. Holland provided is below: State of California Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Chapter 5 - Part 1-Risk Assessment Overview October 2007 52.8 Response For purposes of this Plan, the term "response" means actions taken to respond to the disaster, such as rescuing survivors, mass evacuation, feeding and sheltering victims, and restoring communications. 52.9 Recovery For purposes of this Plan, the term "recovery" means restoring people's lives and creating new opportunities for the future. It includes such actions as: restoration of essential transportation, utilities, and other public services; repair of damaged facilities; provision of both temporary and replacement housing; restoration and improvement of the economy; and long-term reconstruction which improves the community. 53 Climate Change - An Emerging Issue An emerging topic affecting disaster management is climate change caused by global warming. Scientific literature developing over the past several decades lias confirmed that release of greenhouse gases—such as CO2, methane, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and nitrous oxide—is creating changes to the earth's climate leading to a variety of negative impacts. Impacts of these meteorological changes have been under observation by risk management and natural hazards researchers for several decades. In Understanding Globalization, published in 2003, Robert Schaeffer summarized the recent history of global warming and climate change as both a scientific and public policy challenge. He pointed out that rising temperatures leading to polar ice melt is contributing to sea level rise affecting low lying island countries. Noting that most scientists agreed that global warming was real, Schaeffer attributed automobile dependence as an important cause of rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels contributing to climate change. He pointed out further that the U.S. was not one of the countries signing on to the Kyoto Protocol which set 2012 emissions reduction targets for developed countries, but that some American companies were already pursuing their own technological solutions to greenhouse gas reduction measures in order to lower costs and remain competitive. 53.1 International Panel on Climate Change The most recent scientific literature has confirmed the likelihood that such changes in climate are anthropogenic (human-caused). At its Paris meeting of February 2007, the "Working Group I on physical science of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change A-21 APPENDIX A Meeting Information (IPCC) observed that carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions in the past century and a half have increased more rapidly than in preceding centuries, and that these emissions have resulted in global warming having long-term impacts on the world's climate and environment. Key findings from the IPCC Working Group I report include the following: [1.] ...Global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have increased markedly as a result of human activities since 1750 and now far exceed pre-industrial values determined from ice cores spanning many thousands of years... [2.] .. The global increases in carbon dioxide concentration are due primarily to fossil fuel use and land-use change, while those of methane and nitrous oxide are primarily due to agriculture... [3.] ...Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from obsej-vations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level... [4] .. Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.... [5] .. .Continued greenhouse gas emissions at or above current rates would cause further warming and induce many changes in the global climate system during the 21st century that would very likely be larger than those observed during the 20th century. A more recent report released by the IPCC Working Group II on April 6, 2007, predicts a wide range of negative impacts on the global environment, together with accumulating evidence that changes in many physical and biological systems are linked to anthropogenic warming. Projected impacts of climate change include more severe storms and flooding, food and water shortages, increases in the range of insect pests and diseases presently found in tropical areas, and desertification of presently temperate regions. The Working Group HI report Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change was published in May 2007. It outlines broad short-range, mid-range, and long-range mitigation efforts that will be needed to combat global warming and climate change through proactive countermeasures in the future. 532 California Initiatives In advance, of these most recent international scientific findings, California state government has undertaken several initiatives to address climate change challenges. Governor Schwarzenegger in June 2005 signed Executive Order S-03-05 which established climate change emission reduction targets for the State for the purpose of mitigating global warming. The Executive Order established Greenhouse Gas (GHG) targets as follows: • By 2010, reduce to 2000 emission levels • By 2020, reduce to 1990 emission levels • By 2050, reduce to 80 percent below 1990 levels Subsequent to this, the California legislature in 2006 passed and the Governor signed Assembly Bill 32, known as the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. The law establishes a comprehensive program to achieve quantifiable, cost-effective reductions of A-22 APPENDIX A Meeting Information greenhouse gases on a scheduled basis. It requires the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to develop regulations and market mechanisms that will ultimately reduce California's greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020. Mandatory caps begin in 2012 for significant sources. Specifically, AB 32 requires the ARB, among other things, to: • Establish a statewide greenhouse gas emissions cap for 2020, based on 1990 emissions by January 1, 2008; • Adopt mandatory reporting rules for significant sources of greenhouse gases by January 1, 2009; • Adopt a plan by January ], 2009, indicating how emission reductions will be achieved from significant greenhouse gas sources via regulations, market mechanisms and other actions; • Adopt regulations by January 1, 2011 to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas, including provisions for using both market mechanisms and alternative compliance mechanisms. A report on early action to mitigate climate change in California was published by the California Air Resources Board in April 2007. The ARB received more than 70 suggestions from stakeholders for early action. These have been vetted by appropriate agencies and are initially discussed in this report. Measures similar to AB 32 have been adopted by 11 states, with California leading the way. In response to an industry challenge to one of these state laws, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a recent decision that greenhouse gases should be considered pollutants. This decision emphasized the Court's view that the federal Environmental Protection Agency has a responsibility to pass nationwide regulations governing such emissions. A response from EPA is pending. Meanwhile, California is proceeding with implementation of AB32. Related Emissions Reduction Programs Pursuant to Proposition IB passed by the voters in November 2006, the state Business Transportation and Housing Agency (BTH) and Cal/EPA on January 11, 2007, jointly released the Goods Movement Action Plan (GMAP). The GMPA outlines a comprehensive strategy to address the environmental issues associated with moving goods via the state's highways, railways, and ports. It has been sent to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and the ARB and the Maritime Transportation Security Council for their consideration as they deliberate allocation of the Proposition IB funds. The GMAP identifies projects for consideration in the CTC's allocation of the $2 billion for infrastructure investment. The ARB will allocate the remaining $1 billion for emission reduction projects related to goods movement. A range of funding sources and mechanisms will be used to leverage Proposition IB funds. See url: http://www .orb .ca .gov/gmp/docs/gmap-1-11-07.pdf A-23 APPENDIX A Meeting Information 53 3 Implications for Hazard, Vulnerability, and Risk Assessment These events have a r\vofold implication for emergency management and hazard mitigation. Discussions of climate change and risk management have begun to appear in the professional literature focusing on systematic development of solutions capable of reducing risks to within critical impact thresholds.1? It was not until Hurricane Katrina drew the attention of the news media to scientific evidence on intensification of storm events that climate change was recognized as an emergency management topic. It is now clear that in coming decades natural disasters are broadly expected by members of the scientific community to intensify due to climate change. Emergency managers, planning agencies, private companies, and communities especially affected by climate change will be challenged to adapt their planning to take into account an increasing array of related natural hazards. Disasters expected to be more widely experienced in the future include: avalanches, coastal erosion, flooding, and sea level rise; extreme heat and prolonged drought; mudslides and landslides; severe weather and storms; and wildland fires. In this risk assessment, climate change is recognized somewhat as a place-holder, with more refined understanding of impacts to be forthcoming during the next three-year SHMP planning cycle. For now, climate change impacts are recognized as having an effect on primary hazards such as flooding and wildfires described in Chapter 5, Part 2; secondary hazards such as levee failure and landslides described in Chapter 5, Part 3; and other climate-related hazards described in Part 4, Section 5.9. A second aspect of this emerging issue is the urgency of broadening effective means of minimizing release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This involves not only technological but also life- style changes, including a variety of energy conservation, transportation, power production, and land use changes. Although CO2 emissions can be reduced through automotive technology innovations, the need will intensify for planning innovations reducing greenhouse gas emissions, such as energy-conserving green building design, development of urban areas with greater residential densities, more mixed use, expanded mass transit options, and pedestrian-oriented development. A-24 (N en 1 03 J J s/l J -J y NAME O' SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES Hazard Mitigation Working Group (HAZMITWG) May 28, 2009 SIGN-IN SHEET f AGENCY ^ o. ADDRESS PHONE i.s-1 n c?r Qc/f E-MAIL cs f- -6*. i-«it c, I tvj P <» C, k--f' f-' -AVJ&al Ac i . cor VM "ks\ 3 GO <N cn i09 NAME SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES Hazard Mitigation Working Group (HAZMITWG) May 28, 2009 SIGN-IN SHEET AGENCY Ccfh sp of Of ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL sCO I O) I09 < PRINT NAME JL> Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting June 25, 2009 AGENCY EMAIL ADDRESS =v U -o* 6- INITIAL < APPENDIX A Meeting Information AGENDA May 28, 2009 Introductions Local Mitigation Planning Team Schedule • Key Dates/Near-Term, Long-Term GIS's Role in the Planning Process • CIS - Definition • Sources/Matrix • Limitations of Data Planning Process - Where Are We Now ? • Assessing Risks - Steps 1-4 • List of Major Disaster/Hazard Events GIS - Assessing Risks - Step 1/Identify Hazards • Coastal Storm/Erosion • Dam Failure » Drought • Earthquake • Flood • Hazardous Materials Release « House/Building Fires • Landslide • Nuclear Materials Release • Terrorism • Tsunami • Wildfire • Liquefaction What's Next ? • Step 2: Profile Hazard Events • Step 3: Inventory Assets • Step 4: Estimate Losses Next Meeting - Time and Location June 25, 2009 0900-1200 OES A-28 APPENDIX A Meeting Information AGENDA June 25, 2009 Introductions Schedule • Key Dates/Near-Term, Long-Term • Schedule • Planning Process - Where Are We Now ? • Assessing Risks - Steps 1-4 • List of Major Disaster/Hazard Events Profiling Hazards • Assessing Risks • Hazards Identified-FOUO and NFOUO What's Next ? • Step 3: Inventory Assets • Step 4: Estimate Losses Next Meeting - Time and Location July 30,2009 0900-1200 OES A-29 APPENDIX A Meeting Information AGENDA July 30,2009 introductions Schedule Key Dates/Near-Term, Long-Term Collect Homework Assignments/Action Item Status Assessing Risk • Inventory Assets • Estimate Loss Developing the Mitigation Plan Assess Mitigation Capabilities Develop Goals and Objectives What's Next? • Identify and Prioritize Mitigation Measures • Prepare an Implementation Strategy Homework Assignments A-30 APPENDIX B Data Matrix B-l APPENDIX B Data Matrix This page intentionally left blank B-2 SIS DATA MATRIX CATEGORY Coastal Storm/Erosion Dam Failure Data Layer Eagle Aerial Incorporated City Boundary Streams Freeways Major roads Lakes Transportation Utilities Census population Census tracts Historial data Eagle Aerial Incorporated City Boundary Streams Freeways Major roads Lakes Dam locations Transportation Utilities Census population Census tracts Dam failure risk levels Drought 1" ilff $*rti ittf/A >canncjuaKe Census population Census tracts Faults Liquefaction Landslide AlquisLPriolo Earthquake Fault Zones (EFZ) Geology Faults layer Alquist Geohazards HAZUS HAZUS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS Source SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS HAZUS HAZUS HAZUS HAZUS Sweetwater Authority SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS HAZUS HAZUS HAZUS HAZUS SanGIS 1 of 6 Gio uATA IViM|r\iX Flood CA Faults Slope FEMA Slope SanGIS Soils SANDAG Topography (40-ft contours) SanGIS Eagle Aerial SanGIS Incorporated City Boundary SanGIS Streams SanGIS Freeways SanGIS Major roads SanGIS Lakes SanGIS Transportation HAZUS Utilities HAZUS Census population HAZUS Census tracts HAZUS Essential Facilities HAZUS Peak Ground Acceleration USGS Floodway SanGIS Flood panels SanGIS Flood base flood elevation (BFE) SanGIS Flood -100-yr SanGIS Flood - 500-yr SanGIS Flood SanGIS Slope SanGIS Soils SanGIS Topography (40-ft contours) SanGIS Vegetation -1995 SanGIS Hydrography SanGIS Hydrology SanGIS Eagle Aerial SanGIS Incorporated City Boundary SanGIS Streams SanGIS Freeways SanGIS Major roads SanGIS Lakes SanGIS Existing Land Use - 2000 SanGIS Proposed Land Use - 2020 SanGIS Census population HAZUS Census tracts HAZUS Transportation HAZUS http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/products/conterminous/2008/maps/ 2 of 6 Gio uATA I HAZMAT County hazmat sites County San Diego Parcel coverage SanGIS Existing Land Use - 2000 SanGIS Proposed Land Use - 2020 SanGIS Essential Facilities HAZUS Hazmat HAZUS Transportation HAZUS Utilities HAZUS Census population HAZUS Census tracts HAZUS County San Diego HIRT response table DEH 3 of 6 GiauATAIViAiKiX House/Building Fires Landslide/Liquefaction Nuclear Materials Release Existing Land Use - 2000 Historic SD County Fires Census population Census tracts Essential Facilities Fire Threat Fuels: Fuel Rank Fuels: Surface Fuels Faults Liquefaction Soil Slip Susceptibility Landslide Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones (EFZ) Geology Faults layer Alquist Geohazards CA Faults Steep Slopes Soils Topography (40-ft contours) Eagle Aerial Incorporated City Boundary Streams Freeways Major roads Lakes Census population Census tracts Essential Facilities Landslide-prone areas Census population Census tracts SANDAG CDF-FRAP HAZUS HAZUS HAZUS CDF-FRAP CDF-FRAP CDF-FRAP SanGIS HAZUS + SanGIS + in-house County of San Diego data HAZUS + in-house County of San Diego data SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS FEMA County of San Diego County of San Diego SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS SanGIS HAZUS HAZUS HAZUS County of San Diego HAZUS HAZUS 4 of 6 Gics uATAIViMiwX Tsunami Essential Facilities HAZUS Transportation HAZUS Eagle Aerial SanGIS Incorporated City Boundary SanGIS Streams SanGIS Freeways SanGIS Major roads SanGIS Lakes SanGIS Census population HAZUS Census tracts HAZUS Transportation HAZUS San Diego County Tsunami Inundation Cal EMA-August Maps for Emergency Planning 2009 Historical tsunami event locations NOAA Historical tsunami event effects locations NOAA Tsunami Maximum Runup and Inundation CA OES/CSU Historic SD County Fires CalFIRE - FRAP SD County Fuel Model URS Vegetation-1995 SANDAG Soils SANDAG Topography (40-ft contours) SANDAG Weather Conditions NOAA Climate SANDAG Wind Conditions NOAA Narrow Roadways SanGIS Existing Land Use - 2000 SANDAG Wildland Fire Assessment Map USFS Fire Potential Index (FPI) USFS Essential Facilities HAZUS Transportation HAZUS Utilities HAZUS Census population HAZUS Census tracts HAZUS Federal Fire occurrences database USFS State fire occurences database USFS Fire Threat CalFIRE - FRAP CD http://map.ngdc.noaa.gov/website/seg/hazards/viewer.htm www.tsunami.noaa.gov/observations data.html www.tsunami.noaa.gov/observations data.html www.wfas.net/images/firedanger/fd class.gif http://www.fs.fed.us/land/wfas/exp fp l.gif http://qacc.nifc.gov/swcc/predictive/intelligence/ytd historical data/historical/historial.htm http://ciacc.nifc.qov/swcc/predictive/intellicience/vtd historical data/historical/nistorial.htm 5 of 6 CD M—O CD X C£ 5 § O COo D_ <^o: i LU ^U_ CDO CDcr "o5 LL en CDrs Q.<£ OHu_ LU9?LU CD O CO CD—\ LL CDO CO in CD LL -2"co ^>CO O "o 5 CO "co-aQ- -2"co _co 6 5 CD J —l_l_ CO CM CD October-Novemba. • -<c • •fV i~ LU - - LU - . ^ 'u_ . CO<^:Perimeters* 1$ CO13 i CO "oCD n cz CDCOenLU .2• - "co|> _CD ; :. o ^ ^ S,LU LU .t±LL LL O CO (D "CD Q.3 WindspeedWind conditionsCity of Chula Visl'•£sI J I 9 O enCD "cz "o LU O CD CD-o Q. O CO ^D"c"o "o 5 ,_ CD"CD ^ ^c 3? Q "3 OCO < C£ -2"co-oQ. ^^-*~"i_ •g<c SD County WateiRCS updatesco .2=3 Qfsj _<: CDT: co + *ow >,o "£ CD Oco o Critical FacilitiescB CD1 CO C3 "^CO 51 CT>0O C? "E ion\HAZMIT Plant o 0 co "S3 CO "co o SQ 1 APPENDIX C Letters of Participation c-i APPENDIX C Letters of Participation This page intentionally left blank C-2 CITY OF CARLSBAD Fire Department www.carlsbadca.gov January 19, 2010 Mr. Tom Amabile County of San Diego, Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA, 92123-1294 LETTER OF COMMITMENT AS PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING Dear Mr. Amabile, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Carlsbad is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Carlsbad has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the City of Carlsbad agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of Carlsbad understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders [examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and, > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body [each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; 1./ KevuJ^rawford commit the City of Carlsbad to the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigat Executed this 19th day of January, 2010 ^ >-.. -— JorisdigJiron official's signature .£$. Office of the Fire Chief <£%*& 2560 Orion Way, Carlsbad, CA 92010-7240 T 760-931-2141 F 760-929-0256 ® •55% CITY OF CHUIA VISTA Fire Department January 19,2010 Tom Amabile County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Avenue Suite 1911 San Diego, CA, 92123 Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in San Diego OES Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Mr. Tom Amabile: As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for muiti-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Chula Vista is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that Chula Vista has agreed to participate in the San Diego OES Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; Chula Vista agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego OES to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. Chula Vista understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1 , 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, 447 F Avenue • MS F-200 Chula Vista, CA 91910 rKILJtAT W O R K Phone (619) 691-5055 , . . . Fax (619)691-5057 www.chulav.staca.gov O Post-Consumer Recycled Paper > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officiaily adopt the plan). Therefore, with a fuli understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Fire Chief Dave Hanneman, commit the City of Chula Vista to the San Diego OES Multi- jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this /O day of CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF CORONADO FIRE DEPARTMENT 1001 Sixth Street. Coronado, C A 92118 . (619) 522-7374 . fax (619) 435-2742 January 28, 2010 Thomas Amabile San Diego County Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Ave Suite 1911 San Diego, CA 92123. Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Thomas Amabile, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Coronado is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that City of Coronado has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Multi- jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; City of Coronado agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. City of Coronado understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction.; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictiona! plan; I, E John Traylor Fire Chief for the City of Coronado commit City of Coronado to the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 28th day of January, 2010 /^~^-JMf- /£- vffit^Ud City of De( Februarys, 2010 County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services Attention: Tom Amabile, Sr. Emergency Services Coordinator 5555 Overland Avenue, Ste. 1911 San Diego, CA 92123-1294 Re: Letter of Commitment as a Participating Jurisdiction in the County of San Diego Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Dear Lead Jurisdiction Agent, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Del Mar is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Del Mar has agreed to participate in the County of San Diego Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning, the City of Del Mar agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of Del Mar understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Pian by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). 1050 Camino Del Mar • Del Mar, California 92014-2698 • Telephone: (858) 755-9313 • Fax: (858) 755-2794 • www.delmar.ca.us Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Karen Brust, City Manager, commit the City of Dei Mar to the County of San Diego Multi- jurisdictiona! Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 5th day of February, 2010. Caren Brustrcitylvfanager" City of Del Mar Tel 760/633-2600 FAX 760/633-2627, 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Del Mar, CA 92024 TDD 760/633-2700 CITY OF EL CAJON www.ci.el-cajon.ca.us CITY MANAGER Februarys, 2010 Tom Amabile San Diego County OES 5555 Overland Avenue, Suite 1911 San Diego, CA92123 Re: Letter of Commitment as Participating Jurisdiction in the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services (OES) Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear San Diego County OES: As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of El Cajon is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of El Cajon has agreed to participate in the San Diego County OES Muiti-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the City of El Cajon agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego County OES to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of El Cajon understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). 200 CIVIC CENTER WAY • EL CAJON, CA 92020-3916 • TEL: (619) 441-1716 • FAX: (619) 441-1770 Page Two Februarys, 2010 Letter of Commitment - Muiti-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Kathi Henry, commit the City of El Cajon to the San Diego County OES Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this _ day of _ Kathi Henry ] City Manager KH:tb City of Encinitas January 19,2010 County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services Attention: Tom Amabile, Sr. Emergency Services Coordinator 5555 Overland Avenue, Ste. 1911 San Diego, CA 92123-1294 Re: Letter of Commitment as a Participating Jurisdiction in the County of San Diego Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Dear Lead Jurisdiction Agent, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Encinitas is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Encinitas has agreed to participate in the County of San Diego Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning, the City of Encinitas agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of Encinitas understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (exampies of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Tel 760/633-2600 FAX 760/633-2627,505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024 TDD 760/633-2700 Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Mark Muir, Fire Chief, commit the City of Encinitas to the County of San Diego Multi- jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 19th day of January, 2010. ire Chief City of Encinitas Fire Department Tel 760/633-2600 FAX 760/633-2627, 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024 TDD 760/633-2700 January 14, 2010 Tom Amabii'e, Lead Jurisdiction Agent Office of Emergency Services County of San Diego 5555 Overland Avenue, Suite 1911 San Diego CA 92123-1251 Re. Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in the County of San Diego's Molti-jurisdictionai Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Lead Jurisdiction Agent, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201,6 specifically identify criteria that allow for mutti-jurtsdicticma! mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Escondido is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Escondt'do has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Multi-juriscfctfonaJ Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the City of Escondido agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of Escondido understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard MiiiQation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, bu? not limited to: > identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; y The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction, : >- Demonstration that there has been prosctiveiy offered an opportunity for participation <n the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan, and, > Format adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the pian). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a muiii-jurisdictionaf pian; I Clay Phillips commit the City of Escondido to the San Diego County's Muiii-jurisdietiona' Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 14 day of January 2010 / Clay PhiBips, City Manager Kt>SE Pfes'tei, r*Uvo," Dick Daniels, Mayor rrct Tern Marie W*itt«>r» Sam Afeed Ofga DUz The Citv Of (619)423-8223L UK \^ny vx/ FAX: (619) 628-1489 Imperial DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 865 IMPERIAL BEACH BOULEVARD • IMPERIAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA91932 To Whom it May Concern: Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in City of Imperial Beach Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Lead Jurisdiction Agent, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the [participating jurisdiction] is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that [participating jurisdiction] has agreed to participate in the [Lead Jurisdiction] Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; [participating jurisdiction] agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the [Lead Jurisdiction] to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. [Participating jurisdiction] understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction.; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.}; and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the pfan; and, > Forma! adoption of the Mutti-jurisdictiona! Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictions! plan; E Frank R. Sotelo, commit the Public Safety Department of the City of Imperial Beach Multi- jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 18th day of February CJTYOF LA MESA /EWEL of the HILLS F/R£ DEPARTMENT January 20, 2010 Tom Amabile San Diego County OES 5555 Overland Ave. Suite 1911 San Diego, CA92123 Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services (OES) Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear San Diego County OES, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of La Mesa is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of La Mesa has agreed to participate in the San Diego County OES Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the City of La Mesa agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego County OES to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of La Mesa understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). 8054 ALLISON AVE • LA MESA, CA 9 i 942 « TEL: 619.667.1355 FAX: 619.667.1461 CITY OF LA MESA JEW-EL of t^ H«.ts FIRE DEPARTMENT January 20, 2010 Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Greg McAlpine, commit the City of La Mesa to the San Diego County OES Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 20th day of January 2010 8054 ALLISON AVE • LA MESA, CA 91942 • TEL 619.667.1355 FAX: 6! 9.667.1461 CITY OF Office of the City Manager "9, 2010 Tom Amabile San Diego County OES 5555 Overland Ave. Suite 1911 San Diego, CA 92123 SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services (OES) Muiti-jurisdictiona! Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear-San Diego County OES: As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Lemon Grove is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Lemon Grove has agreed to participate in the San Diego County OES Mutti-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the City of Lemon Grove agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego County OES to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction/not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction.; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictiona! plan; I Graham Mitchell, commit the City of Lemon Grove to the San Diego County OES Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 19th day of January, 2010 6t9.825.3SOO "•",>;. 519825.3804 vwvw.ci.lemon-crove.ca.us CALIFORNIA Tom Amabile Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Avenue, Suite 1911 San Diego, CA 92123 Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in County of San Diego's Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Tom Amabile, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of National City is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that National City has agreed to participate in the County of San Diego's Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; National City agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. National City understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Roderick Juniel, commit the City of National City to the County of San Diego's Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 131'1 day of January, 2010. Roderick Juniel, National City Fire Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950-4302 619/336-4550 Fax 619/336-4562 www.nationaicityca.gov CITY CD R DARRYL A. HEBERT FIRB CHIEF County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Ave. Ste 1911 San Diego, 92123 Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Lead Jurisdiction Agent, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the Oceanside Fire Department is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the Oceanside Fire Department has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Muiti-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the Oceanside Fire Department agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The Oceanside Fire Department understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction.; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by ail community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Darryl A. Hebert, commit the Oceanside Fire Department to the San Diego Office of Emergency Services Muiti-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 29th day of January, 2010 TRAINING DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 760-435-4355 760-435-4101 760-435-4100 CIVIC CENTER 300 NORTH COAST HIGHWAY OCEANSIDE, CA 92054-2885 CITY OF POWAYDON I11GGIN8ON, Mayor CARL KKUSi;, Deputy Mayor MKRKII.KK BOYAOK, Gouncilmcmlx:.- |IM CUNNINGHAM, Councilmcmber BK'ITY RKXI-'ORD. Gnmcilmembcr February 10, 2010 Mr. Tom Amabile County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123-1294 Re: Participating Jurisdiction in San Diego County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) local mitigation plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multijurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Poway is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Poway has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning, the City of Poway agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to San Diego County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of Poway understands that it must engage in the following planning process as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document. > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks where they differ from the general planning area. 'r The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific to each jurisdiction. "r Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process; attending meetings; contributing research, data, or other information; and commenting on drafts of the plan, etc. > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan. > Formal adoption of the Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multijurisdiciton plan, I, Mark Sanchez, commit the City of Poway to the San Diego County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 10th day of February, 2010 Q^ Mark A. Sanchez, Directopef-Safety Services City Hall Located at 13325 Civic Center Drive Mailing Address: P.O. Box 789, Poway, California 92074-0789 www.poway.org Board of Directors James Ashcraft, President Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District P.O. Box 410 • 16936 El Fuego » Rancho Santa Fe • California 92067-0410 Tel. (858) 756-5971 • Fax (858) 756-4799 Fire Chief Nicholas G. Pavone January 19, 2010 Mr. Tom Amabile Senior Emergency Services Coordinator County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Ave., Suite 1911 San Diego, CA 92123-1251 Re: Letter of Commitment as Participating Jurisdiction in San Diego County Multi- jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Mr. Amabile: As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the Rancho Santa Fe Fire District (RSFFPD) is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that RSFFPD has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; RSFFPD agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The RSFFPD understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: • Identification of hazards unique to the Fire District and not addressed in the master planning document; • The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; • The formulation of specific Fire District mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals; « Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by community stakeholders; * Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, • Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the Fire District's Board of Directors. Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in the multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Nicholas Pavone, commit RSFFPD to the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. This commitment has been executed as of the day and year written above. Sincerely, Nicholas G. Pavone Fire Chief THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO January 25, 2010 Tom Amabile, Senior Emergency Services Coordinator County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Avenue, Suite 1911 San Diego, CA, 92123 SUBJECT: LETTER OF COMMITMENT AS PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION IN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING Dear Mr. Amabile, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201 .6 specifically identify criteria allowing for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of San Diego is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm the City of San Diego has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning the City of San Diego agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of San Diego understands it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1 , 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction; > Demonstration there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Forma! adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan I, Javier Mainar, Fire Chief of the City of San Diego, commit the City of San Diego to the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this {&_ day of feS&At-j . 201 0. Javier Mainar SAN DIEGO FERE RESCUE EXECUTIVE COMPLEX, 1010 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 400 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 PHONE (619) 533-4301 Fire Department 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, CA 92069-2918 January 14, 2010 Ron Lane, Director San Diego County Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Drive, Suite 1911 San Diego, CA 92123-1294 Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in San Diego County Multi- jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Tel: 760.744.1050 Fax: 760.744.5213 Web: www.San-Marcos.net Dear Mr. Lane, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201 .Q specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of San Marcos is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the city has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the City of San Marcos agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of San Marcos understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the San Marcos City Council (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Todd Newman, commit the City of San Marcos to the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 14 day of January, 2010 Todd Newman, Fire Chief City of San Marcos MAYOR Randy VoepdL CITY COUNCIL Jack E. Dale Brian W. Jones John W. Minto Hal Ryan CITY MANAGER Keith Till CITY OF SANTEE January 20, 2010 San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Tom Amabile, Senior Emergency Services Coordinator 5555 Overland Avenue Building 19, San Diego, CA 92123 San Diego, CA. 92123 Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Lead Jurisdiction Agent, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201,6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictionai mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Santee has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning, Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; the City of Santee agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of Santee understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A.range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction.; > Demonstration that there has been proactiveiy offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Mike Rottenberg, hereby commit the City of Santee to the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed 10601 Magnolia Avefme Santee, Califofefe 92071 * (619) 2584100 • r^T'Printed on. recycled paper www.ci.santeexa.us CITY OF SOLAN A BEACH FAX case) 792-651 a/ (868)755-1782 635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101 » SOLANA BEACH « CALIFORNIA 92075-2215 • (858) 720-2400 Tom Amabiie San Diego County Office of Emergency Services 5555 Overland Ave Suite 1911 San Diego, CA, 92123 Re; Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear Mr. Amabiie, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the Soiana Beach is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that Soiana Beach has agreed to participate in the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; Soiana Beach agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201,6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. Soiana Beach understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals, A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction.; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I __David Ott, commit the City of Soiana Beach to the San Diego County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 4th day of February, 200 Office of Emergency Services County of San Diego 5555 Overland Drive Building 19 San Diego, CA, 92023 January 20, 2010 Re: Letter of Commitment as participating jurisdiction in County of San Diego Multi-jurisdictionai Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services, As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Vista is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that the City of Vista has agreed to participate in the County of San Diego Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning, Further, as a condition to participating in the mitigation planning; City of Vista agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201,6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the County of San Diego to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements. The City of Vista understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance dated July 1, 2008, including, but not limited to: > Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; > The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area; > The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction,; > Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and > Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, > Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan). 600 Eucalyptus Avenue, Vista, California 92084-6240 1an-o[vrem" P: (760) 726-1340 i F: (760) 639-6132 I www.cityoMsta.com Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a rnulti-jurisdictionai plan; I Gary Fisher. Fire Chief, commit The City of Vista to the County of San Diego Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort. Executed this 20th day of January 2010 Fisher, Fire Chief . 600 Eucatvolus Avenue, Vista, California 92084-6240 cm. at VISTA" P; {760j 726-1340 i F: {760} 639-6132 lwww.cityofvista.com APPENDIX D Implementation Status 2005 - 2009 Priority Action Item Implementation Status City of Carlsbad Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number LA. 3 2.A.1 1 .E.2 6. A. 3 6.A.1 6.B.1 1.B.2 2.C.1 3. A.I Attach. A LB.l 1.A.1 4. A. 3 Description Work with Communications Officer to create public awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practices. Coordinate production of brochures. Continue with Hosp Grove trimming and replanting effort. Review and evaluate City Landscape Design Manual (remove fire suppression zone and move to Fire Code) Continue to maintain the City's Weed Abatement Ordinance to facilitate the removal of annual weeds/vegetation or habitat, placing existing properties in a fire safe condition. Develop, implement and support an Open Space Management Plan (database) Incorporate GIS mapping and modeling in to EOC Update inundation maps every 10 years. Coordinate with County Hazardous Materials Division (previously Hazardous Materials Management Division) Maintain hazardous materials business plans in duty battalion chief vehicles Continue periodic updates of local building codes, public works construction codes, zoning and grading ordinances to reflect legislative changes. Status A preparedness section has been added to the City's website. Delayed Manual was reviewed. It was decided to leave the fire suppression zone language in the manual. Ordinance updated August, 2006. Annual weed abatement schedules developed. Delayed Delayed On-going Completed. On-going Completed D-l APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-2 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Chula Vista Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number 1.A.1 5.A.3 5.D.1 5.D.3 I.E.I 2.B.2 5. A .4 2.A.2 5. B.I Attach. A 1.B.2 Description Update City's General Plan periodically and recommend improvements to the Safety Element, as funding is available. Update Drainage Element of General Plan based upon actual, developed conditions (General Plan, GMOC Section) as funding is available. Periodically review City compliance with NF1P requirements as funding is available. Update flood layers in GIS upon FEMA approval of LOMRs/LOMAs. Use hazard overlays to identify hazard-prone new development, as funding is available. Actively participate in the San Diego County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan process. Continue to review applications for new development within the City in compliance with CEQA provisions set forth by the State of California, thereby requiring individualized studies for flood hazards on an as-needed basis and establishing mitigation measures for the development project before construction begins. Provide Chula Vista citizens with CERT training opportunities to increase public awareness of hazards and response to hazards, as funding is available. Continue to require structural flood control improvements of new development where flooding is already a problem. Fire Department via it's Fire Prevention Bureau, will continue to cooperate with the County Department of Environmental Health in promoting the safe handling of hazardous chemicals in compliance with the Unified Fire Code and applicable hazardous materials regulations. Status Completed, on-going Completed, on-going. On schedule, on-going. Completed. Completed. Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going. Completed. CERT program established in 2006 and is on- going. Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going. D-3 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-4 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Coronado Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number 7.A.1 Attach A 1.A.2 Attach. A I.B.I 2.B.1 2.A.2 2. E.I 4.B.1 4.B.2 3.C.1 3.A.1 Description Provide public education through CERT training. Inspections to verify accuracy of existing Hazardous Materials database. Pre-incident plan to mitigate hazards and maximize response. Participate in Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan planning process. Adopt and implement as much of the plan as practical. Use an emergency preparedness newsletter to educate the public. Community forum to educate the public on hazardous materials and terrorism. SEMS training for City personnel. Conduct EOC drills Update Emergency Preparedness information on the City of Coronado website. Include other agencies in the EOC drills. Status Complete, on-going On-going. Completed. Hardcopy in each first responder vehicle. On-schedule, on-going. Completed. Distribution on- going. Delayed Completed, on-going Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going. D-5 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-6 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Del Mar Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Action Item Number 5. A.I 5.A.2 5.B.1 5.B.2 4.B.1 4.A.1 4. A. 2 4. A. 3 Attach A 1.A.1 1.A.2 3.D.1 3.D.2 3.D.3 Attach A 2.A.1 2.A.2 1.D.1 1.D.2 I.E.I 1 JE.2 Description Explore strategies to develop an early warning/public emergency notification system. Finish development of a comprehensive evacuation plan. Continue efforts to relocate the train tracks off the coastal bluff region. Develop plans to retrofit the coast highway bridge to existing EQ standards. Monitor existing protective measures to assure continued improvement and effectiveness in addressing the effects of geological hazards local land mass and infrastructure. Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfire hazards. Develop mitigation measures to enhance protection of homes along And in Crest Canyon area. Work in conjunction and cooperation with the applicable regulatory governmental agencies. Coordinate with other agencies to ensure consistency among standards. Annually review and update wildland pre-plans for fire-fighting forces. Maximize utilization of outside firefighting equipment and staff resources. Implement Fire Code enhancements for wildland-urban interface. Coordinate with other agencies on training and planning for terrorist related activities. Maintain communications links with regards to threat assessments and dissemination of information. Work with regional agencies to accurately map affected areas . Share and train with acquired information with all City departments and personnel. Coordinate with City of Solatia Beach joint training opportunities between staffs. Evaluate access levels to public facilities, restrict access where necessary. Evaluate infrastructure and facilities for additional security measures as required. Utilize City newsletter, press releases and public meetings. Train and review with staff implemented programs as part of regular training. Make hazard mitigation part of the planning and approval process. Step up Code Enforcement activities targeting these conditions. Status Complete. On-going. On-going. On-going On-going. Del Mar now partnering with City of Encinitas for joint training. Completed, on-going. Del Mar participates in the CIPP. Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going. D-7 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Del Mar (cont) Priority 10. Action Item Number 2.C.1 2.C.2 2.C.3 Description Find additional training opportunities for staff. Establish training schedule for tabletop exercises. Make this institutional for the staff. Status Completed, on-going. D-8 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of El Cajon Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Action Item Number 3. A.I 2.C.1 2.C.2 2.A.1 2.A.3 3.B.1 Attach A 2.C.1 4.B 8.A.5 Description Evaluate security for City-owned facilities and provide plans for protecting assets Train employees in potential hazards. Provide public education to area service groups. Include hazard mitigation information in business license documents. Include hazard mitigation information in public education activities. Use established media including web page, newsletter, and City correspondence to educate the public. Inform public regarding hazard mitigation activities. Include on City's website methods for hazard reporting. Establish a GISD component in the City EOC, including site-specific information. Improve the City's capability and efficiency at administering pre- and post- disaster mitigation. Evaluate all City-owned facilities for seismic stability and recommend for mitigation if so indicated. Status Completed. Initial training completed, on- going. Completed, on-going. On-schedule, on-going. Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going Completed. City added a PIO position. Completed. Completed. Completed. Completed. D-9 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-10 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Encinitas Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Action Item Number 3.B.1 3.B.4 4. A. 2 4.E.1 3.E.2 3. A. 3 4.E.3 Attach A 1.D.2 Description Seismically upgrade Fire Stations #\,#2 (originally constructed in 1957 and 1960, respectively) to meet existing building codes As identified in the San Dieguito Water District Master Plan (June 2000), construct a parallel 54-inch joint transmission main to provide water should the existing 54-inch transmission main fail in a seismic event. Institute a wildfire hazard reduction pilot project that reduces fuels in high-risk areas. Conduct a series of workshops that educate residents about wildfire defensible space actions and make them aware of possible reductions in insurance premiums for implementing mitigation strategies. Develop and provide the managers of mobile home parks and owners of multi-unit buildings with an EQ mitigation and safety guide, with information on how to improve the seismic performance of mobile homes and buildings. Establish a task force comprised of business owners, Downtown Encinitas Mainstreet Association (DEM A) representatives and city officials to educate owners about potential safety risks of unreinforced masonry buildings and identify low cost options to retrofit unreinforced masonry buildings. Develop A CERT curriculum for training volunteers to assist evacuation efforts in their neighborhoods. As funding becomes available, conduct a study to determine the types and amounts of materials transported by rail through the City. Status Station 2 is currently in the design review process with construction expected to be completed in 20 1 1 . Reconstruction of Station 1 is contingent on available funding after completion of Station 2. Completed. Completed. Completed, on-going. On schedule for completion Summer of 20 10. On-going Completed, on-going. Completed. D-l APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Encinitas (cont) Priority 9. 10. Action Item Number 2.A.2 2.A.3 Description Develop business resumption plan for city operations. Develop SOPs and checklists for recovery operations for use by city's emergency management team with the EOC. Status On schedule for completion Summer 20 10. Delayed D-12 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Escondido Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Action Item Number 6.B.4 6.C.1 6.C.2 I.C.I Attach A I.C.I Attach A l.C. 2 Attach A 1.D.2 Attach A 1.D.3 Attach A 1.F.1 6. A .4 Added in 2008 Added in 2008 Description Ensure the City's Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP) Sub-area Plan maintains current allowances for the removal of habitat as may be necessary to protect existing structures. Ensure the City's MHCP Sub-area Plan maintains incorporates current fire protection measures and implement fire measure in Daley Ranch, consistent with the existing Conservation Agreement and the Daley ranch Master Plan. Coordinate prescriptive burns in conjunction with CALFire in accordance with the City's MHCP, Daley Ranch Conservation Agreement and the Daley Ranch Master Plan. Develop timeframes and funding mechanism for the ultimate replacement or renovation of the Dixon and Wohlford dams. Encourage use of alternate technologies . Require the "timely" disposal of spent material. Limit transportation to hours of less traffic congestion as determined necessaiy through the environmental and developmental review process. Inspect all transports for compliance with any measures identified by the environmental or developmental review processes to mitigate a potentially significant effect. Perform annual "table top" exercise. Improve emergency vehicle access in Daley Ranch Monitor and maintain Wohlford and Dixon dams Implement a community emergency notification system. Status Delayed due to environmental concerns and cost of project. Delayed due to unrealistic expectations regarding environmental monitoring. Not completed. Replaced by #10. Deleted due to prohibitive cost. Replaced with #11 Deleted. Replaced with #12. Deleted. Considered duplicative with County efforts. Replaced by #13. Never implemented. Replaced with #14 Completed. Delayed due to funding On-going. Completed. D-13 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Escondido (cont) Priority 13. 14. Action Item Number 2.E.1 4.B.1 Description Continue the current Juvenile Fire Setter Intervention Program to provide intervention for juveniles determined to have demonstrated an interest in playing with and/or setting fires. Continue to assist local residents and businesses with their disaster preparedness plans, including regular disaster education presentations. Status Completed Not implemented due to lack of staff. D-14 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Imperial Beach Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number Attach A I.F.I 1.F.2 Attach A 1 .C.2 8.D.3 2.A.2 6.D.3 2.A.8 3. B.I 4.A.1 8.C.2 3.B.3 Description Develop plan for upgrading City EOC. Install emergency management software in the City EOC. Incorporate GIS mapping and modeling into the City EOC. Conduct training and exercises for all employees. Seek pre-disaster mitigation funding. Provide information to the public on the City website. Newsletter, Cityvvide mail outs, Prevention Program and in conjunction with Special Events. Encourage the public to prepare and maintain a 3-day preparedness kit for home and work. Establish and maintain CERT program for the City, Coordinate the development of a multi-jurisdictional plan. Encourage and assist in development of multi-jurisdictional/multi-functional training and exercises to enhance hazard mitigation. Improve hazard warning and response planning. Form City Working Group to update and monitor the HMP. Status Completed. Completed, on-going. Completed. Completed, on-going. On-going Completed, ongoing. CERT established April, 2006 On-going. Completed, on-going Completed. Not implemented due to lack of staff. D-15 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-16 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of La Mesa Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number I.A.I 2. A .2 2.B.1 6.B.1 6.C.] Attach A 1.A.1 Attach A 1.A.2 8.A.1 3. A. 2 3.B.1 Description Continue to update plans and ordinances to stay current with mitigation responsibilities. Through print media and the City website, continue to make available information regarding hazard mitigation in the City of La mesa. Continue to use County and State OES (now CalEMA) to coordinate and assist in implementation of mitigation awareness and efforts. Continue current practice of weed abatement in all city areas that are vulnerable. Continue to participate in Zone, County and State mutual and automatic aid agreements. Coordinate with other agencies and departments on training and planning for terrorist activities. Maintain communication links that disseminate intelligence information. Continue use of Uniform (now California) Building Code in all areas of new construction and remodel activity within the City. Continue to conduct annual EOC drills at the city level. At the regional level, continue to be a part of the development of the regional plan. Status Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going. On-going. On-going. Completed, on-going On-going. City has participated in several regional terrorism exercise. On-going. Completed, on-going On-going On-going. D-17 APPENDIK D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-18 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Lemon Grove Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number 2.A.1 2A.3 2.C.1 3.A.2 3.B.2 3.B.3 4A.1 4. A .2 5.A.1 5.A.2 Description Build and support local partnerships, such as the Unified Disaster Council (UDC) and the Homeland Preparedness Coordination Council (HPCC) and the coordination of mutual aid agreements. Build hazard mitigation concerns into City of lemon Grove planning and budgetary process . Publish educational information in the City newsletter and on the City's website. Encourage development of standardized Emergency Operations Plans within the City of Lemon Grove that coordinate with countywide Emergency Operations Plans. Streamline policies to eliminate conflicts and duplication of effort. Exchange resources and work with other agencies. Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning and building requirements. Adopt policies that discourage growth in flood-prone areas. Update Building Codes to reflect current standards. Identify hazard-prone areas. Status On-going. On-going Newsletter established 10/06. Website up 3/07. On-going. On-going On-going. On-going On-going On-going Completed, on-going On-going. D-19 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-20 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of National City Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number 7.B.1 7.A.7 Attach A 1 ,E.3 1.B.3 6.A.2 2.E.1 7. A. 3 7.D.1 1.A.1 1.A.2 Description Maintain response times, pumping capacity and apparatus and equipment deployment objectives. Maintain/update all Arson Registrants with required registration and conditions of probation or parole. Work with the Anti-terrorism Advisory Council (AT AC) Adopt and implement lead based paint ordinance. Continue maintenance of the storm water system in operable conditions. Implement code enforcement for buildings without permits. Maintain a fire prevention program. Implement CIS Program. Continue to update General Plan periodically. Continue to update Land Use Code periodically. Status On-going. On-going Completed. Began participating in the Joint Terrorism Task Force in 1/06. On-going. Completed. Delayed Completed. Completed, on-going Completed, on-going. D-21 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-22 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Oceanside Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number I.A.I I.B.I 2.A.1 2.A.2 2.A.3 4.A.1 4. A. 2 5.A.2 5. A. 3 5.A.1 Description Adoption of most current Building, Engineering and Fire Codes. Pursue vegetation management within river and creek channels Enhance public awareness of hazard mitigation efforts utilizing Oceanside 's local public access channel (K.OCT) and available print medias. Increase awareness of individual homeowners, other property owners, the business community and others in the importance of taking proactive steps to mitigate the risk of hazards. Use of the City's quarterly magazine. Promote "Personal Preparedness" by production and distribution of video and print materials through public access TV and local libraries. Plan, practice, exercise and operate the City's Emergency Operations Center (EOC) following the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the Incident Command System (ICS). Encourage further refinement and updating of the City's Emergency Operations Plan coordinated with bordering community's emergency plans and the County- wide Emergency Operations Plan. Replacement of Oceanside Fire Stations #1 and #1 with modern, hazard resistant, emergency self-supported, facilities. Replace underground fuel storage tanks with above ground tanks at all City facilities. Develop an integrated communications/notification plan utilizing GIS technology and the Emergency Broadcast System (BBS) including information about road closures, evacuation routes, shelters, emergency medical access, updated event information. Includes development of a countywide damage assessment team. Status On-going On-going annual production. On-going quarterly production. On-going annual production. On-going. Cancelled. Delayed. Cancelled due to lack of space at city facilities for the above ground tanks. Cancelled. D-23 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-24 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Poway Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number Attach A I.C.I 3.A.3 3.B.3 3. A. 6 3.C.4 3.C.5 3.C.1 3. A .5 3.A.1 1.A.2 3.C.10 Description Update Emergency response Plan. Initiate plan to acquire access and evacuation routes in City, particularly in the High valley area. Remove excess sediment from channels and make structural improvements. Update Water Master Plan including fire protection upgrades if necessary. Purchase emergency generators for Public Works Department. Evaluate and implement a plan to make the Public Works Operations site into a second EOC in addition to the City Hall/Fire Station 1 location. Develop and initiate an action plan to prevent and prepare for potential rockslides on Poway Grade and Pomerado Road. Develop and initiate an action plan to create defensible space in areas prone to wildfire, review General Plan/Municipal Code policies regarding vegetation, clearing, construction and control burns. Update FEMA maps and planning overlay maps regarding flood risk and potential wildfire areas. Acquire treated water connection from San Diego County Water Authority for use in emergency. Status Completed. On-going. Completed. On-going annual project. Completed. Completed. In progress. On-going annual project. Completed. On-going. This was determined to be a routine staff effort. Cancelled. D-25 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-26 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of San Diego Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Action Item Number 2.A.1 5.A.1 3. A.I 8.A.2 3.A.3 5.A.3 8. A.I 5.A.2 2. A. 2 Description Enhance the public's awareness of hazard mitigation efforts utilizing the City of San Diego's cable TV channel and other electronic media, as well as through traditional print media. Develop an integrated communication/notification plan, including information about road closures, evacuation routes, unified command post locations, staging areas, and shelters. This includes coordination between police and fire personnel for evacuations, and a County-wide damage assessment team. Build and support local partnerships, such as the Unified Disaster Council (UDC) and Homeland Preparedness Coordination Council (HPCC), and the coordination of mutual aid agreements to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. Develop a means of providing water for firefighting when water service is disrupted Build hazard mitigation concerns into the City' of San Diego planning and budgetary processes. Provide to critical City of San Diego facilities backup electrical power, fuel, and necessary supplies in case of major power outages. Coordinate efforts within the City of San Diego to develop a seismic report of the City and how it affects City facilities and infrastructure. Develop a post-disaster construction and demolition ordinance, which includes alternate recycling and disposal sites. Increase awareness of individual homeowners, other property owners, the business community, and others in the importance of taking proactive steps to mitigate the risk of hazards. Status* Completed. Anticipated completion Fall 2009 Completed Anticipated completion Fall 2010 Completed Anticipated completion Fall 2010 Anticipated completion Spring 2010 Completed. Completed * As of June 30, 2009 D-27 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of San Diego (cont) Priority 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Action Item Number 4.C.1 4. B.I 4.A.2 4.A.1 1.A.1 5. A. 4 3. A .2 2.B.1 Description Participate in the development and execution of Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Department Operations Centers (DOC) table top and functional disaster exercises (addressing the response and recovery phases), which include Federal Military and State representative participation. Work with local chambers of commerce, trade associations, and employee unions to encourage them to promote hazard mitigation as a part of safe work practices. Encourage development of standardized Emergency Operations Plans within the City of San Diego that coordinate with County-wide Emergency Operations Plans. Operate the City's Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Department Operations Centers (DOC) following the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and Incident Command System (ICS). Update the Public Facilities, Services, and Safety elements of the City's General Plan. Replace all underground petroleum storage tanks with above ground tanks at critical City facilities. Build a team of community volunteers to work with the community before, during, and after a disaster. Utilize SANDAG to assist in gathering and/or providing information for regional hazard mitigation. Status Anticipated completion On- going Anticipated completion Fall 2009 Anticipated completion Spring 2010 Completed Completed. Completed Completed. Anticipated completion Fall 2009. D-28 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of San Diego (cont) 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 2.B.2 6.A.1 7.A.1 9.A.1 9.A.2 Work with San Diego's legislative delegation to develop legislation to require the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to develop guidelines for the preparation of public safety elements to include hazard mitigation and model hazard mitigation planning. Work with Federal and State authorities regarding regulations that add expense and time to flood control measures and maintenance activities. Utilize SANGIS to develop GIS-based severe weather zone mapping. Enhance the Open Space Brush Management Program to ensure compliance with brush management requirements. Establish an urban/wild land fire technical working group in conjunction with County and State representatives. Determined could not be completed Completed Anticipated completion Summer 2009 Completed Completed. D-29 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-30 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of San Marcos Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number 6.A.1 6. A. 2 6. A. 5 6.B.1 8.A.1 5.C.1 Attach A 1.A.5 6.B.7 Attach A 1.B.3 5.A.1 Description Implement a public education program to increase the awareness of the public to the threat of wildfire to the City of San Marcos. Increase fuel modification requirements for new development from 100 feet to 150 feet. Increase Fire Prevention Staff as appropriate Develop pre incident plans for high vulnerability wildland urban interface areas. Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to geological hazards by continuing to apply the City's Grading Ordinance, which requires preparation of geologic and soils studies in preparation of grading plans. Work to adopt the San Marcos Creek Specific Plan and coordinate with the US Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego County Regional Water Quality Control Board, US Fish and Wildlife, and California Fish and Game to implement a plan to minimize potential impact to future development along the Reaches 2,4, and 5. Pursue State and/or Federal grants as available to assist in reducing losses due to other manmade hazards. Develop map showing parcel ownership information to assist with identifying available funding for vegetation clearance. Equip and train personnel on use of hazardous materials release mitigation tools and equipment. Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to floods by continuing to implement development regulations and restrictions identified in the City ordinances and in accordance with FEMA requirements. Status On-going Completed. Completed. Delayed. Delayed. Completed. On-going. Completed. Cancelled. Delayed. D-31 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-32 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Santee Priority Action Item Number Description Status 1.6. A.3 City will work to ensure that all proposed and future development satisfies the minimum structural fire protection standards contained in the adopted edition of the Uniform Fire and Building Codes. Where it is deemed appropriate, the City shall enhance the minimum standards to provide optimum protection. On-going. 6.B.2 The City will continue to aggressively enforce the existing weed abatement law, and modify and enhance where necessary, modifying fuel types and providing a defensible space around all structures On-going. 6.C.1 City will continue to maintain active membership and participation in both the San Diego County Mutual Aid Agreement, and the State of California Master Mutual Aid Agreement, and maintain a separate agreement with the U.S. Forest Service, to ensure adequate resources are available in the City for any future anticipated wildland incidents. Completed, on-going. 7.A.1 7. A .2 7.A.3 City will continue to perform preventative maintenance and inspection of existing storm drains, inlets, outlets and channels; continue to require that drainage facilities are designed to convey the 100-year storm predictions; and continue to require new construction to adequately convey all water from structures and construction sites. On-going. 5.8.A.I 8.A.2 8.B.2 City will continue to work with the County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services to maintain and update dam failure inundation maps; continue to maintain a dam failure action plan as part of the City's Disaster Preparedness Plan; and continue to include a dam failure scenario in City Emergency Operations Center exercises. Delayed. D-33 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Santee (cont) Priority Action Item Number Description Status 6.9.A.1 9. A.2 City will continue to implement the City's geologic/seismic hazard regulations and review related procedures identified in the City's General Plan; and continue to ensure that any proposed projects in areas identified as seismically and/or geologically hazardous, shall demonstrate through appropriate geologic studies and investigations that either the unfavorable conditions do not exist in the specific area in question or that they may be avoided and/or mitigated through proper site planning, design and construction. Completed, on-going. 7.9.A.3 9. A.4 Continue a California Environmental Quality Act level review on all new projects that require all significant effects of a proposed project, including geologic and soil conditions, to be identified and discussed, and identified significant effects are adequately mitigated; continue to require that all geotechnical studies of critical facilities should be performed in accordance with "Guidelines to Geologic Seismic Reports," California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), Notes Number 37 and "Recommended Guidelines for Determining the Maximum Credible and the Maximum Probable Earthquakes," CDMG Notes Number 43. On-going. 9.B.1 9.B.2 The City will continue to utilize existing and evolving geologic, geophysical and engineering knowledge to distinguish and delineate those areas that are particularly susceptible to damage from seismic and other geologic conditions; and continue to require retrofits to existing building construction as part of any major renovations. On-going. D-34 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Santee (cont) 9.Attach A 1.A.1 1.A.2 1.A.3 Continue to use the City's Development Review Ordinance procedures and the Uniform Fire Code to regulate and limit the manufacture, storage, and/or use of hazardous materials within the City; continue to participate as a member of the San Diego County Joint Powers Authority utilizing the Hazardous Materials Response Team to mitigate hazardous materials incidents; and continue to use the San Diego County Hazardous Waste Management Plan as the primary planning document for providing overall policy on hazardous waste management within the City. Completed, on-going. 10.Attach A 2.C.1 2.C.2 Continue to coordinate and support existing efforts to mitigate other manmade hazards within the City, cooperating and sharing information with other agencies including but not limited to the Department of Homeland Security, California Department of Public Safety, San Diego County Office of Emergency Services, San Diego County Department of Water Resources, Bureau of Reclamation, California Department of Justice, California Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Department of Defense Completed, on-going. D-35 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-36 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Solana Beach Priority Action Item Number Description Status 1.5.A.1 5. A .2 5.B.I Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to geological hazards. Continue to explore strategies and opportunities for sand replenishment. Finish development local coastal plan and/or other coastal bluff policies. 2.5.B.1 5.B.2 Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of geological hazards. Continue efforts to develop local coastal plan and/or other coastal bluff policies to address bluff protection measures. Monitor existing protective measures taken to assure their continued effectiveness. 4.B.1 4.B.2 4.B.3 Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfire hazards (e.g., County or San Diego & State of California). Develop mitigation measures to enhance protection of homes along San Elijo Reserve. Work in conjunction and cooperation with San Elijo Lagoon Conservancy to achieve mitigation efforts. Coordinate with other agencies to ensure consistency among standards. 4. A.I 4.A.2 4. A.3 Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to wildfires. Annually review and update wildland pre-plans for firefighting forces. Maximize utilization of outside firefighting equipment and staff resources. Implement Fire Code enhancements for wildland-urban interface. Attach A I.A.I 1.A.2 Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to other manmade hazards. Coordinate with other agencies on training and planning for terrorist related activities. Maintain communications links with regards to threat assessments and dissemination of information. D-37 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Solana Beach (cont) Priority Action Item Number Description Status 3.D.1 3.D.2 3.D.3 Address identified data limitations regarding the lack of information about relative vulnerability of assets from floods. Work with regional agencies, (ODP, SanGis) to accurately map affected areas. Share and train with acquired information with all city departments and personnel. Coordinate with City of Del Mar joint training opportunities between staffs. 7.Attach A 1.B.1 1.B.2 Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of other manmade hazards. Evaluate access levels to public facilities restrict access where necessary. Evaluate infrastructure and facilities for additional security measures as required. I.A.I I.D.I 1.D.2 Monitor and publicize the effectiveness of mitigation actions implemented locally. Utilize City newsletter, press releases and public meetings. Train and review with staff implemented programs as part of regular training. 9.1.E.1 1.E.2 Discourage activities that exacerbate hazardous conditions. Make hazard mitigation part of the planning and approval process. Step up Code Enforcement activities targeting these conditions 10.2.C.1 2.C.2 2.C.3 Improve the City's capability and efficiency at administering pre- and post-disaster mitigation. Find additional training opportunities for staff. Establish training schedule for tabletop exercises. Make this institutional for the staff. D-38 APPENDIX D Implementation Status City of Vista Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number 4.A.1 4. A. 2 4.A.3 2.A.1 2.B.1 3.A.4 Attach a 1.A.2 1.E.1 7. A. 5 5.B.1 Description Establish a City Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Department Operations Centers to act as command and control coordination centers during disasters. Train city employees and volunteers to operate the City EOC following the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the Incident Command System (ICS). Update City Emergency Plan Develop public education cuiriculum to increase awareness of disasters and pre- existing hazards. Promote cooperative vegetation management programs that encompass hazard mitigation in the city and unincorporated areas that threaten the city. Build a team of community volunteers to work with the community before, during, and after a disaster. Ensure city personnel are properly equipped for emergency response and self- protection from incidents of terrorism. Develop Geographic Information Systems (GIS) eapabilities to identify hazards and general hazard areas. Develop a City Government Continuity Plan. Develop project proposals to reduce flooding and improve control of storm waters in flood-prone areas. Status Delayed due to funding. Completed, on-going. On schedule to be revised with County-wide EOP during 2010. Completed, on-going. On-going. Completed. Completed, on-going. Completed. In progress . On-going. D-39 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-40 APPENDIX D Implementation Status County of San Diego Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Action Item Number 3.B.1 4.E.1 10.A.1 2.B.3 2.A1 6.A.1 9.A.1 Attach A I.C. 3 10.C.2 Attach A I.E.I Description Coordinate the development of a multi-jurisdictional plan. Develop two Multi -hazard Assessment Teams (MAT). Update the County Consolidated Fire Code every three years. Promote cooperative vegetation Management Programs that incorporate hazard mitigation Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions. Update Building Codes to reflect current earthquake standards. Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning and building requirements. Develop a Business Continuity Plan for each county department. Develop partnerships for a county wide vegetation management program. Encourage the public to prepare and maintain a 3-day preparedness kit for home and work. Status Plan completed 2006, will be revised 20 10. On-going. On-going. Completed, on-going. Completed. On-going. Completed. Completed, on-going. Completed, on-going. D-41 APPENDIX D Implementation Status This page intentionally left blank D-42 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLE! Forms Sample STAPLEE Forms APPENDIX E Sample STAPLE! Forms This page intentionally left blank APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Carlsbad Goal #1: Increase public understanding and support for effective hazard mitigation. Objective 1 .A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions. (Social}(Mmlnlstrat (Political) ; Considerations for 1 i-Altertiatlve. Actions, • «> "'!'*"'• '** • ""'i"S3 ' 0 • •s F*•JS- 1:••&sS-•~si ! U : I.A.I Carlsbad Emergency Management Administrative Team (CEMAT) develop hazard mitigation public awareness strategies. 1 .A.2 Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions E-l APPENDIX 1 Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Carlsbad Alternative Actions 1 .A.I Carlsbad Emergency Management Administrative Team (CEMAT) develop hazard mitigation public awareness strategies. 1 .A .2 Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions 1 .A. 3 Provide information to the public on the City website and through public education opportunities '•' "' ' •• • ! ._•••-•-• ":> :„.-, , ' ~ TCommettts^"""^ ',', . "''"""'""" ••!..,.•'." V" 1- ••••'•..•>.• ---Wl,-^ ' 1 .••'-•'' '.-•:: ' "•• f'' ' •••=•;•;•/.. '- ."' V'"' ' '"' ' -- X.;'.-'' ~ ••-•.• /•''.' "''-;•',' •-.!, \' ':>; Public education is a cost-effective way of gaining public support for mitigation actions Provides for political and institutional support of actions Helps win popular support for mitigation actions Could require large amount of staff time Requires staff to develop materials for the webpage. Good way to reach the public E-2 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Carlsbad Goal #5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to structural fire/wildfire. Objective 5.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to structural fire/wildfire. STAPLEE CRITERIA Considerations for b. , '-•Altern&ilve A^on*' ',h/ '*"'}' -"': 5 .A. 1 Update structural fire/wildfire response actions in Emergency Operations Plan 5. A .2 Review and update city- wide Evacuation Plan 5. A .3 Periodically exercise structural fire/wildfire response actions 5.A.4 Participate in amendments to Fire Protection programs, policies, and requirements; ref. Section IV. F. City Landscape Manual. ..' S , (Social) !1 M jp^ § 0U < + + + + *4~jO 4«# i« J s, + + + + T (Technical) > SN.j£^ S3 i I + + + + f*"i 1 ! + + + + i '•I 1 + + + + A (Adntinistr ative) ^ f - - - „ "^ I f - - - „ ri it - - - + p , (Pctlltical) ;f 'v| + + + + * j~&" T 13a - - - _ 1 (Legal) ;f 1s + + + « " I? 1 + + + + & || + + + + •- - E - - (Economic) |^ S fCteu 0 - - - . et 'f' !C < P + + + + -* I 1 Ou + + - + ;, _ _" , B; V (Environmental!. '> -. 15 CJ W - - - . / fe O CK + H- + + ^ s «3 «irt.N i?*"" *•$•; s1u + + + + t t i^ * «. n 'f w J? + + + + at ^$&^' ' ' TJ& * °. ,11* ,f|» W pEj + + + + ' , S5 * ^'S?$| 111 + + + + - c -s*11 + + + + E-3 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Carlsbad Goal #5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to structural fire/wildfire. Objective 5.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to structural fire/wildfire Considerations ' ' for' Alternative Actions .§• I (•«§•3 es- tw . soJ <fee •-§-B *\t.e S-: i 05 ,3 H"i 2 *» °S w5 -a.c ,i S oo Qu.-ia ft.,-s '*' • "wfr S, •* 33£ •:1,1 5.A.5 Continue with Hosp Grove trimming and replanting efforts. 5.A.6 Continue to provide for annual vegetation management/maintenance, as necessary, in Hosp Grove defensible space 5.A.7 Provide fire public education materials as requested or needed E-4 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Carlsbad Alternative Actions Comments 5 .A. 1 Update structural fire/wildfire response actions in Emergency Operations Plan Need to coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions/mutual aid partners Requires significant staff commitment 5.A.2 Review and update city- wide Evacuation Plan Needs to be a regional effort - evacuation of one city impacts neighboring cities Requires significant staff time 5.A.3 Periodically exercise structural fire/wildfire response actions Helps ensure responders are ready for a fire response 5.A.4 Participate in amendments to Fire Protection programs, policies, and requirements; ref. Section IV.F. City Landscape Manual. Amending existing fire protection programs, as opposed to establishing new programs, is a simpler, more cost effective way of gaining additional mitigation results Institutionalizes changes 5.A.5 Continue with Hosp Grove trimming and replanting efforts. Trimming and replanting effort is a long-term solution that has both political and public support. 5.A.6 Continue to provide for annual vegetation management/maintenance, as necessary, in Hosp Grove defensible space May have resistance from some homeowners Could be staff intensive 5.A.7 Provide fire public education materials as requested or needed Material needs to be developed and/or obtained. Limited funding available E-5 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms This page intentionally left blank E-6 APPENDIX E Sample STAPIEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Chuia Vista Goal 4:Improve hazard mitigation coordination and communication with federal, state and local governments. Objective: 4.C: Improve the State's capability and efficiency at administering pre-and post-disaster mitigation. STAPLEE Criteria .»-. Considerations for Alternative • ' '• i ^ Actions '-' <'"•',-•' ,' 'V ' "' ' *"\' ':'• . . .' ' Y ','•' *?"•"• Establish standard GIS products that contain all spatial data likely to be needed in an EOC and make these projects available to all local, regional and State governments, as resources are available. Safeguard the projects by storing in multiple locations . Promote the sharing of these projects and data with other agencies. Support regional planning efforts for hazard mitigation and disaster planning recovery S (Social) 'a'1 1 '£ 1 •'•' B •' '• rWiliii + + B ••-' (/j ££1 3•§' §>jg 3 ,;£'£':, + + T (Technical) i1 u. !>"S ,• «•' nhniil + + O•c 'O .1 SiP'ff ' i'^r + + i f I "''§ '''• w + + A (Administra five) i3 !g: :!'. _ _ 1 o»c~2'.', if _ _ M o • I I Jl'••;S , : ;f •_ _ P (Political)' • ^ •CO 'S"'"•Yw4fS»-( -fe. + + '=/• '"' '1:• 2,-,•>P- '_ <^RSi Tffr' + L (Legal) •'o m?A'~''B"*' ''•ffi'i + + 1 •'•J '.^11 "Sit/3,1- + + ''a-*c i-£ ••'« •'<§•-"''!i; + + E (Economic) 1 1 & c- SsS'..g-! .&.Q + _ L•s .s, x C '' ii™ n + + i^. "S .. f T Y _ _ (Environmental) !'•UJ •§ , ; ' •frji'"S''^f 0 O + + a'"'LL », •*•"!'JjhjH1. n';rr + + •'}• '$' ' 'S' ' J,5x| ^ffffi,*,^-* + + i*:ft ' S ''« 'f2pfbfx &..;Sw + + '• ca •!;t i-'te;.'2'S'/: •t:ii S*^fraE^ + + ' 1 |'-J 1 *i"M •;£*'' 8> S •* aOVL + 3 13 !.5'£ *." fi(D 1 £ •P •"a••'§' 8>:o'J" + + E-7 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Chula Vista Alternative Actions .r Establish standard GIS products that contain all spatial data likely to be needed in an EOC and make these projects available to all local , regional and State governments, as resources are available. Safeguard the projects by storing in multiple locations . Promote the sharing of these projects and data with other agencies. Support regional planning efforts for hazard mitigation and disaster recovery planning '::' •'•'••;"*"''.* •"-:*•' xX^tvii'*;.- ;:>;.;^-< - vuCommerrt^^^-;':^;'^'v'f:: :~:^;:^'^^^^&f:^^,t " ,:-v> • ";•• . ,;? - ,N .;., !S,'i'";-. -1 •••"'-., '*>••- • •".'-;cl>" -,-,-"':"•-,,.-":»•-.' ",. .-,:•„ -% • •;;f"\?t|*%t^a**»«^(^^:*te;Wfci'5^«{^,'-'A.v:--.,l-*, ' ",°'V~\ ;•-'"' ' -f-- ' ','*•'."''.' • •'•' '.; ' ' V='-A;' !,'.,;, v;,f '•->:.'"•'-;--'*..: -:.,1-' '."^K"'^'''1' \''^ ; '^•"f!''^^^*^'^^^f^^l'^:iyir^\^r:^l^i-'!-• ••'••' • • / ' *•" - ' ' ' ' •>- " ' ' ^ • " " s - 'j- . ", • "'"- ''*'•' • • '-.-- 'sS-!*- / s "> tfvs&i"-"'- >'—; i.s<i*^'^v **v -•*-.*/ . ' s ?r^'-" ' ^^\VV' ' i^i' "•• ' This project will allow real-time mapping in the EOC during a response to an emergency or disaster. The hazard's identified for the City of Chula Vista impact multiple jurisdictions. It makes sense that mitigation efforts should be coordinated on a regional basis. E-8 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLE! Forms Jurisdiction: City of Chula Vista Goal 2:Promote public understanding, support and demand for hazard mitigation Objective: 2.E.: Discourage activities that exacerbate hazardous conditions STAPLES Criteria «k- Considerations - ,— '~v*v for ; . ' - ' Alternative i ^ ° ? ' *'* '^'V m. . Actions •'*&?. r Promote an increased level of security of facilities storing hazardous materials Ensure land uses that do not conform to this Plan are not permitted In the event non-conforming land uses are damaged or destroyed in a disaster, ensure the reconstruction is consistent with Chula Vista MC Chapter 19.64 Provide guidelines in the usage of hazardous materials specifically in approved locations, as available resources are S, (Social) J~ '•'%''' 1 + + 4. + ^' vi|';,v |f <U' CX LU Ck + + + 4. T (Technical) .,-'; JT 1 + 4 + + ••;;- •!•' I1 + + 4. + _il 'i' CO + + + + A (Administra ttve) f + 4. _ ¥• f 1IL _ + 4- _ -fio ••«; F s _ + 4. _ p (Political) CO 1- 4. + 4. 4. -"-/:• 1 + 4. 4. L , I ^ .,, »- -\ . ' '.'"^•' CO -tt"Z, 30. _ + _ 4. -.">\.'< jom 03ito + + 4. + 4-. f , o> 1_ y ) + + 4. + E (Economic) >* •".- 5 g* £ o: _ - _ 4. ,, :>1 • ,v ; '"8 ff¥* '..S 4. + 4. 4. ••*•. •<x-li B o _ + 4. + E •' -... \ (Environmental) : i . '* f:l .|r:: O 0 4. + 4. 4. !>i»*f.. LL 4j ^j ^ 4. + 4. 4. ;£: ^1« LU 4. 4 4. + ,te- v,r- "i'-"';': w^ 'i''' LU t/3 + + 4. 4. ,;% -•:'-.i^-,.. 1 4. + 4. 4. ' ^ f ' •"'•^^l''- O O iS + + + 4. 1••.i!' ' - O frtO _1 4. + 4. + E-9 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Chula Vista Promote and increased level of security of facilities storing hazardous materials This could increase operating costs to permitted businesses Ensure land uses that do not conform to this Plan are not permitted This will minimize new construction in hazard areas and ensure the construction that does occur is resistant to the hazard In the event non-conforming land uses are damaged or destroyed in a disaster, ensure the reconstruction is consistent with Chula Vista MC Chapter 19.64 This will minimize new construction in hazard areas and ensure the construction that does occur is resistant to the hazard Provide guidelines in the usage of hazardous materials specifically in approved locations, as resources are available Will coordinate this activity with the regional Hazardous Incident Response Team (HIRT) E-10 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Chula Vista Goal 6: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to wildfires and structural fires. Objective: 6.B: Prevent the loss of life in wildland fires STAPLEE Criteria Considerations • .-.-. w ^ ; . .for '-••' " '^sr IWI V >", yy; ^ ,.;.' ;*"'• ' . :'';''; Alternative i '"' ,- •' *• , -' <y~N" ^ t, , /,-s ; * , ' J^^ , ' \ s - •' - . ^""' •-*-.:..<v'{,,',--,'xl''"f.,^',,?'. Actions <^u*^: ** ' * " '"-' ' ''"'^ df ' ' ' • -wJ t Develop and promote public education programs , including Fire Safe Councils, in wildland fire safety and survival for all residents adjacent to wildland areas, as resources are available Develop and publicize evacuation plans and routes in areas threatened by wildland fires, as resources are available s (Social) 1"'%."U. BiA* •*:J£" iff»!••" E" V ' + + x,,,,. t-'g 'Hlo" ' \*OLA &I -2 My 2 S'.f. + + T (Technical) ''&'tffl1-'''!'"$ s£ h+ + 5£>- ^S?-'3.-- ^ + + '•:. ''•" r, £3i. M\ ^"§'" '"'f': eo 0)03 + + A (Administra live) "' r • ""^ S*v. "•f>: ,gj; £ &w „ + , .=;•* . VH^'• IB "K .1" '•s*P £ _ _ •l« * .-ffii '" SU,,sr *:!'?• E- c*ffl _ _ P (Political) '* *,"."•!"''s^v^ ' , vg^f •^2;f,; Q. + - •k' '"- ' s'^;%w^"^'"l.: 'i|^: O " • 18 . ._§ + + L (Legal) + '>V:' ;' j' • i v«^,' *|: ' a" 'g •£'• + + /v:- , ;^, ,, ; \>sr '%•<«£ ;., , Jj> ^ ' + + ;,t; £~5 '¥"•:.|r ::0*- '§'S+ + 'E (Economic) '?T.':.>f-\v^ _ t;.;;/' W'f erJI® "S O <£»Q. O + _ !- .,-,,, .' -^r"; "'.| ' :%Ts:' OJ •f+ + '*• ^':«,.' '',''?'•, \s;> - •|i 1''K+ ~ E • .- {Envlrorwnentalj • '.- "e ..' S "^ O1 V"%^" 'Sv;'-' jS- ^' c ™ ftffl + + •;:: «; v, " f- «- •-- -a*81 fe 18 S"-S s. n'l + + 4. Vi'S^, ; 'SE'"^ ,mj;«|.;, '••'S*'"§ nl' + + ^ ,;j&" ,."•d ^P>- u•iW-l-fv: f •• lil CO+ + ,,:J;; »"**/> Si • ' "itft *^vf %P'i • S- m'RE± + + •-'-^4'<x t-( ' *l g " <**!£;."i' f'tf •«'• 1 ' s C " E "§o o t5 + + j sa. • •i " :f "• ''$> E § ^5 j + + E-ll APPENDIX I Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Chula Vista Alternative Actions V_ t ' '"• 't < Develop and promote public education programs, including Fire Safe Councils, in wildland fire safety and survival for all residents adjacent to wildland areas, as resources are available Develop and publicize evacuation plans and routes in areas threatened by wildland fires, as resources are available . , .,.:.., . .". -, /Comments \. \:. ,,,-.;>. .;<^« ^.: /V^:i>' > - " j • ~ • .'..•*<.- '._, ^ <"i--*>V ^. "JWj-V. :,St- „ ,. . %>f '", -J•-; -- ".••;. • '„.';'. - ; , ^- -'„,. ?;,-":;V/i« -v^|^f <*?-.-- -^\- :• -,v,,/, ^- •• Public education is a very cost effective way to gain acceptance and support for mitigation actions This effort should be coordinated with neighboring jurisdictions E-I: APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Goal 3: Objective 3.A: City of Coronado Build and support local capacity and commitment to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practice among the local officials STAPLES' Criteria Considerations for Alternative Actions -03 m 1 05 . '-I U- ..§ • . C-1 ..PS. w\"'£$ §• tf;Sik Increase and enhance EOC Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E-13 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Coronado • •. ''.AitemaWve.^ctto'n^'iv,!- : ."•- 4, f - ^-:^^>,t^-'^. . . v- •' ,;''~V"' ':~'-. .'•':,? 1"-,«Atjp; •>• 1 . Increase and enhance EOC Operations Train City staff in EOC operations Cost effective Has both political and public support Accomplished through training and exercises E-\4 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Goal 2: Objective 2.A: City of Coronado Promote public understanding, support and demand for hazard mitigation Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions STAPLEE Criteria' 2.A.1 Continue to support and maintain Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.A.2 Release pertinent information through an Emergency Preparedness newsletter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.A.3 Conduct Learn Not to Burn Classes in local schools 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.A.4 Release public education information on local cable TV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E-15 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Coronado -' --"*i-i-*i-*'^i^:^^^^^^^^^ 2.A.1 Continue to support and maintain Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program 2. A. 2 Release pertinent information through an Emergency Preparedness newsletter 2.A.3 Conduct Learn Not to Burn Classes in local schools 2.A.4 Release public education information on local cable TV Supports the community's ability to be self-sufficient Popular and cost-effective Has both political and popular support Simple and cost effective way to keep mitigation in the public's awareness An excellent way to get information to parents is to teach their children Simple and cost effective way to keep mitigation in the public's awareness E-16 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Goal 1 (FOUO): City of Coronado Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure and City- owned facilities due to hazardous materials Objective 1.B:Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of hazardous materials STAPLEE Criteria S, (Sociaf) T (Technical) A (Administra five) '•-.. P (Political) L (Legal) E - . v ' (Economic) '" . (Environmental) >x,'*f\-'' 1.B.1 Continue to develop pre-incident plan to mitigate hazards and maximize response 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E-17 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Coronado Alternative AetforitH ' '» • ' .: ! ' •" '-'C •- < :i'', 1.B.1 Continue to develop pre-incident plan to mitigate hazards and maximize response ^-fel: :- •>:•>,.;' \ -'• "& '• •:'¥,^:^^^^ y •:; •;.;. '-\-»'-- •"•^••••.-.. ' r «,;>:•. / "- "' •'•::y;;-^^-^^J:>:3%^^^V--=^^^^i;. To maximize the response in the event of a HazMat incident Provides for close cooperation between City responders and the regional Hazardous Incident Response Team (HIRT) E-J8 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Del Mar Goal 3: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to floods. Objective: 3.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to floods. STAPUBE Criteria Considerations for Alternative Actions Clear identification of potential flood prone areas Promote monitoring and maintenance channels of flood control Develop pre-inctdent action plans for affected areas Complete the Flood hazard Mitigation Plan Investigate the feasibility of moving the Public Works Yard to a site outside of the Hood zone s (Social); ;i •3E Qo + + + + + 0 1 f 8 |;1 ^; ^E3!Q. + _l_ + + + r (Technical) & u. I-Mi— + + + + + p 1 I 0 s_|' + + + + + .• . E fr | " <Sw + + + + + & (Administra live) eo _ _ _ „ S l3 U, _ _ _ _ 05 .1 2.8. if-- wjjS „ _ + _ P (Political) c&•••a • I--'o •. a. • + + + + + 1 .•.•a. rt ^1 _ _ _ _ ,L (Legal) : • •- t ••M i * 3 0.. + + + + _ -t » . '> «S CO + + + + + t :l 1•s '«3 ' + + + + + E .-.-;. (Economic) "5 •il S, o + + + _ i,,i-^• ca + + + + + .§ '«'"OQ _ _ _ _ •E {Environmental) .•„>, ' " ' •• ' •>% ' •' ' • ,tt , i B- 1"!O Qo (5 + + + + + CD . "^ •1 &5 ' 05O OC + + + + _ i: ef•o- $i' Ul' •' + + + + + <D k •B-'S tfy , *Km (/) + + + + + m £ fcO ^«VI H '•>»y ^X, UJ I + + + + + ,'l ill1 1-^-O O ' SO O UJ + + + + + 1 u_ 1" ,'m in ' O mQ 2 + + + + + E-19 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Del Mar Alternative Actions ^:. ,- , • -v^ Clear identification of potential flood prone areas Promote monitoring and maintenance of flood control channels Develop pre-incident action plans for affected areas Complete the Flood hazard Mitigation Plan Investigate the feasibility of moving the Public Works Yard to a site outside of the flood zone ^'%- v-;-. •-•"., 4; «;.%.'; :;:; v^'C^:;.>^^ E-20 APPENDIX £Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Del Mar Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to geological hazards. Objective: 5.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to geological hazards. STAPLEE Criteria ' • ... fc. Considerations „!, lor Alternative ^tbns^^J-i*- i f '' ,'C s ..•-,, • " ""'"';' " 1 ' '• Continue to explore strategies and opportunities for sand replenishment Implement the certified local coastal program Continue efforts to relocate the train tracks off the coastal bluff region Implement plans to retrofit the first of three coastal highway bridges while pursuing funding for the retrofitting of the remaining two Monitor existing protective measures to iissure continued improvement and effectiveness in addressing the effects of geological hazards, local land mass and infrastructure S (Social) 1 i m>. .§...fa'8S + + _l_ + + $ !•••- •I":' ' , K •§'«'•f ,;*3••in S '•£.' + + _^_ + + T (Technical) - 1-4 V %i£ + + + + + f ,|, |? a _ + + + + •1 : * - "2 r;| 03 _ + + + A (Administra live) -; ,-'- •^> fti i8? _ _ _ _ 1, f 'f? 'I if _ _ _ _ 52 ; |j d;J|.. §-~ '1-s \_ _ _ + p (Political) • -f ^= k|;' "$'"~'i ' CL. + + ^_ + + A.c.. ^1;, '•-§,; '1 ' 3 + L (Legal) \ \", ||j ", ^ •'• "3 •Q." + + j^_ + + '^v.m ••'•Is,": ~"n- Tn + + _l_ + + f; ,1•^: •""Q}'>. "f"'2 + + ^_ + + E (Economic) W..- - ^ §• 52* :§ | Q.'O _ _ + + 'R-' ^"*<•".fe- rn + + ^_ + + ; 1- ; S' * .15_ _ _ + E (Environmental) \ ILp... 1;.. fv? '«'"''- 1 i o <5 + + _(. + + jj'-V J^« _m, ffi |-'| O DC „ _ _ + !•• :Ia '? •§ '"• 1-S' + + ^_ + + |, ; I,- '%f "8-Jf8- 'S<a'- © § W + + ^_ + + -1:-..,'5.-«/|:; • S' S*":'1 1 " § ± + + + + + •' » ' "-:1? •S §•*•§ l.l:,l O O'll + + ^_ + + I .,1 '. $*• ' H ' "8 1 o 5 + + ^ + 4. E-21 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Del Mar Continue to explore strategies and opportunities for sand replenishment Shirt to medium term solution only Implement the certified local coastal program Continue efforts to relocate the train tracks off the coastal bluff region Need to coordinate with track owner Implement plans to retrofit the first of three coastal highway bridges while pursuing funding for the retrofitting of the remaining two Monitor existing protective measures to assure continued improvement and effectiveness in addressing the effects of geological hazards, local land mass and infrastructure APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Del Mar Goal:Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to wildfires. Objective: 3.A: Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfire hazards (e.g.. County of San Diego & State of California) STAPLEE Criteria S (Social) T {Technical} A (Administra tlve) P (Political} L (Legal)(Economic)(Environmental} •„!&"< u. •3 0) 3 jfSF&t. ^ ' '.'?i* V ™* 03 '«•*•.8 Implement mitigation measures to enhance protection of homes along and in the Crest Canyon area and the wild land-urban interface Work in conjunction and cooperation with the applicable regulatory governmental agencies Coordinate with other agencies to ensure consistency among standards E-23 APPENDIX E Jurisdiction: City of Del Mar Alternative Actions Implement mitigation measures to enhance protection of homes along and in the Crest Canyon area and the wildland-urban interface Work in conjunction and cooperation with the applicable regulatory governmental agencies Coordinate with other agencies to ensure consistency among standards Sample STAPLE! Forms E-24 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Goal 3: City of El Cajon Build and support local capacity and commitment to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. Objective 3.C:Develop a new Emergency Operations Center (HOC) for the City. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations "" For Alternative Actions i Actions 3 and 3. C. 3 equip and r .C.1.3.C.2 Construct, train staff on the proper operation of a new Emergency Operations Center (EOC) S Social 8 I 1 £> | 1 + •s f . c O '£3 is+ ^T Technical j5> 1 £ 1 -. £ + j : '$ J J I.i+ i . ii •+ A Administrative * I • 1- + " 1 1 |. I:+ iT3 -. O |; 1 1, + P ; . , .Politicals "11 1 • i' . + •..,.;' 1 1 J..- ..I-' • + ; ! 1 : « :i'+ L . ; .Legal •' S? "8" 1 in + ;$• '. 1<c. J 1A ', + 1i •&', .•a • j; '-i+ E . .Economic1- - •I ^. i"+ iI, .J+ i |;V' 8" 8 S ' + ' » f. i1" + E , • ^. ' Bnviroiunentsl ^ ; , >• 1 C ' J § "1... + •i 08 1 " J 1 I 1 ' + • -,-,;' V 1 g' § , I'l + a- 1 1 -a , ^ » - 1 I 1 •U S3 + S 5 1 •8 1 J ' + E-25 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of El Cajon Alternative Actions Action 3. C.I Construct, equip and train staff on the proper operation of a new Emergency Operations Center (EOC) -.-'."'".-•-'.-' ;-,;• , ''••. , - '••-'.• Comments ••• • '• ' _'-'-•- ..''•"•"'•'•',"• ' . ~. •;.'.-. Coordination with appropriate City Departments required. E-26 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction:City of El Cajon Goal 3: Build and support local capacity and commitment to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. Objective 3.A:Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practices among City employees. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations "*" For Altcrna ., > tive Actions t , :„ ' ' Action 3. A.I Train Employees in potential hazards. s Social 1 " J — fr . o + . ._, '\' m'f ~:~W"a ita & + T Technical = ,§••;• ': £ ' !-' + :jV .1 :," p " H 'ta> • • 5 + 'i' •' §• •""i. '"•••!'* + A Administrative ' .'1 to - .-IB-.1, — '{' s - 1 1-•• * ' . 1 *• 1 ' S - P -.. Palitical • • ^ ^t:'i:I ; ' 1--"fi . ; + ';•' . ^'•'•" a*'' " |; .3 • + ': ' i f'v" ':"' t'• £ + L Legal f ,,,. • •I '" • tn + f" |. ., f„,„,,, 'I" ' a + '* •|^-,,,__r,rr 3;|- £- + E Hconomio : .... .- c. ,- J ;-,-•- < § . + :%' ',. '1 ' t) o •' - ^ :.!-• •|;f • 8 '-; ' 1 • ' O, na A1>::- 1.' 'Vif; , • ••'P ' 1'O , - E Environmental ;|, .^ • 'trr 3*' ' I"'a na t •". •?v. r •'!""•'•'J ;. Bj. . - !'.a na '!' 'iM9 -'-.-•» ' >;8 '" a 9, na ,f;, "Ifvia 2 « 1 •IIO ti + 1 -'I/:'-j •'- 1 •:|> u + E-27 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of El Cajon Alternative Actions Action 3. A.I Train Employees in potential hazards. Comments Maintain NIMS, ICS and other mandated training. E-28 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of El Cajon Goal 2: Objective Promote public understanding, support and demand for hazard mitigation. 2.C: Promote hazard mitigation in the business community. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations "" For Alternative Actions i \ •< ."•''•• ;•'•''-: -*,\'X> F... ' .-•;iV .._.)>• ; '?•;'; i ,";,." ;''" '" 'i£*J;,,\ Action 2.C.1 Provide public education to area service groups. Action 2.C.2 Continue to include hazard mitigation in business license renewal documents S, Social 1 }.. 1,; ;",':• 'U;. ; + + *£ ^xS-tS -,§„*: + + T . - Teckttical JfS ^ ~ ?^ + + , g viC" V« ffj^; .' _i3L-+ + i:^;' ?fe ,.^'j;+ + , A . Administrativfi ^ '%••' $$>•• - - | . j|;;; "p;11, ••' - + 1 i liV *i?,? : •- - P I ' Political ; • I:-''%fb:"$£I* •„„+ + i i-•«,".?•„,+ + .*"•'?$&H%». , ,v + + L . • • l ' '' Legal' ":*;, i- j|g" .^-v- + + •1" 1£t^ US;.Js^: + + f ' •1 :sfc,4p ..#},; + + E • - - BcottojBi6 •• • c ,^:*riy r^i. + + •s'A,, •^JNJ*8 ./ + + - • "1 i'I : -+ + 1 i° 'ifc ^ •''-• ," + + . , E ,; ' ' t. •i ,.|,;, 45-a + + ''1f • I'•tx 1:S'*;;•';„ + + »'• ' I,. f* ^ fe-.^./ , SS -ftsL, + + . ft, 1 ;|1:yf-^j!^i_ «jiIi3 ii ' 'I:4;i-!N'J^r£_ N/ A N/ A E-29 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of El Cajon Alternative Actions Action 2. C.I Provide public education to area service groups . Action 2. C.I Provide public education to area service groups. ""-; . "":\ • '"" "." '• ."'";,' : Comments - • " "• ' • """ • .7 ." /""'•:••; , ~~~ ; Integrate training schedules with current Public Education programs. E-30 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Encinitas Goal 3: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to earthquakes. Objective: 3.B: Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of earthquakes. STAPLEE Criteria ^ Considerations for Alternative i Rebuild Fire Actions > Stations #1 and #2 (originally constructed in 1957 and 1960 respectively) to meet existing building codes (i.e., seismic, fire) Rebuild Moonlight Beach Lifeguard Tower to meet existing building codes, as part of the Moonlight Beach Master Plan As funding becomes available, evaluate whether mitigation measures are necessary to protect city facilities and infrastructure from seismic events and implement reasonable mitigation measures S (Social) "| fS E • O + + + •8 ' IcSi1 ajj= Jy111 EL + + + T (Technical) >. 1 I -I o£ + + + 1' 1 St1 + + + I £<0 1 fl + + + A (Administra Uve) S3 1ros?_ _ _ "S 1 S d LL _ _ _ £O 1. -1 1 *""!ro _ _ _ P (Political) c 3 "3- E a. + + + e "I- O- ~B • 3- + + L (Legal) 13<0 S £• + + + •f 1 HSo + + + f1-:I 9: • !g ' (I + + + E (Economic) 1 "•3 jo_g S£ o + + _ e "teoe <B $ + + + 'S "B o _ _ _ E - • (Environmental) .9 I ' i>s ••• p. B lio o0 O + + + jf , 1 ,_«. T3<B *"S ~ 2 &3 ©O OC_ _ _ S:*1' i; ii- •- UJ + + + 1 "-. .&•':' 'w'. ^ '1S.'s UJ CO + + + f I±£ .. - ® 1 ' 0 < Q> MIts *£E i + + + -i £ - - I ffrl.1 1 sc 6 •§3 S iS' + + + s ,14- '1 " 1§ SS 5 + + + E-31 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Encinitas Rebuild Fire Stations #1 and #2 (originally constructed in 1957 and 1960 respectively) to meet existing building codes (i.e., seismic, fire) Funding to come from Fire Mitigation Fees and Lease Revenue Bonds Rebuild Moonlight Beach Lifeguard Tower to meet existing building codes, as part of the Moonlight Beach Master Plan Funding source needs to be identified As funding becomes available, evaluate whether mitigation measures are necessary to protect city facilities and infrastructure from seismic events and implement reasonable mitigation measures as necessary Funding source needs to be identified E-32 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Encinitas GoaM:Promote disaster resistant future development Objective: 1 .A: Encourage and facilitate the continuous review and updating of general plans and zoning ordinances to limit development in hazard areas. STAPLEE Criteria S (Social) T (Technical) A (Administra tlvg) (Political) L (Legal) E ,• , (Economic)(Environmental) for-' • V.j;\ -, Alternative Actions I *: 12 1 ^•C' to a'So oc O 111 Rely on Floodplain. Coastal Bluff and Hillside/Inland Bluff Overlay Zones to prevent future development or redevelopment that will represent a hazard to it's owners or occupants Continue to establish and implement standards based on 50 and 100 year storm for flood control drainage improvements Continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the goals developed in the public Safety Element that minimize risks E-33 APPENDIX E Sample STAPUE Forms STAPLES Criteria s ... (Social) T (Technical) A (Administra five) P (Political) L (Legal)E:(Economic)(Environmental) - Considerations for Alternative Actions associated with natural and man-made hazards Except as provided in Public Safety Policy 1.1 ,no development or filling shall be permitted within any 100 year flood plain Setbacks, easements and access necessary to assure emergency services can function shall be required and maintained In areas susceptible to brush or wildfire hazard, the City shall provide for construction standards to reduce structural susceptibility and increase protection Comprehensive update of the City of Encinitas General Plan and Public Safety Element E-34 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Encinitas Alternative Actions Comments Rely on Floodplain, Coastal Bluff and Hillside/Inland Bluff Overlay Zones to prevent future development or redevelopment that will represent a hazard to it's owners or occupants Continue to establish and implement standards based on 50 and 100 year storm for flood control drainage improvements Continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the goals developed in the public Safety Element that minimize risks associated with natural and man- made hazards Except as provided in Public Safety Policy 1.1, no development or filling shall be permitted within any 100 year flood plain Setbacks, easements and access necessary to assure emergency services can function shall be required and maintained E-35 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Encinitas Alternative Actions :;> In areas susceptible to brush or wildfire hazard, the City shall provide for construction standards to reduce structural susceptibility and increase protection Comprehensive update of the City of Encinitas General Plan and Public Safety Element '--£' ?.-.' •'-"*••' -, '1 • '•" ..;.;"i>'- ..v.v ••-•• .-* ::^. GommaMX^V- -• ^^:^.- ^'^^•^•^:^:a^^-^^ •"• ' :•'.' " • \> >"","'• . -,\^-",' ". '...'£*'••• ' ,'.^.;'-t>\" • '• - '•= "frv "«-,-'•••'•'•*'-.'. -!^v''x;;5t';"~ V-" « I v^l?*'- - ^v-'Jr.;^'^, JT?**^.;":^'^ . «v: -.<A E-36 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Encinitas Goal 4: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to wildfires. Objective: 4.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to wildfires/structural fires STAPLEE Criteria t Considerations for Alternative Actions . - • •',/• 1 r Work with Olivenhain MWD.Rancho Santa Fe FPD and Elf in Forest/ Harmony Grove FD to secure grant funding to add additional hydrants in wild! and/urban interface areas Complete installation of approximately lOto 150 new fire hydrants in older areas of the city S (Social) 1 8- 1'*c 6 I' + + "5' , 1,§! m £ + + T (Technical) 1 1 1 o"tu + + 13 S J, f. + + 1 t | |:, + + A (Administra live) ? I-57_ _ "8<so_o F | _ _ iS1dj i!••.: ;€ _ _ P (Political) I" ''I'-|:;-: + + •':.••• . 1 •6'.'. ;|n + + L ' i (Usgal) i . co.ff3 , '1^ + + 'T•I- %+ + IJ ' o 'S^ if + + ,E ', , (Economic) H-3. «- |f" + + c'i 2 \|^ + + 11 'Sjf _ - E (Environmental) O IMJ I-'"' o' OO ©• + + 0) ' 1. u. „ fa» 3 o ffi _ + •fe: I' at-J C,O ; |f + + 1 1 1U4 ff + + •i '« 1 '« tO *C ; ;|/|'' + + J2as. o at 3 111 llf + + 103 . U.JZ'1 c %\ + + E-37 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Encinitas 1 • -•• • Alternative Ae tJ<Jftt^>5 • ., $ ^"•--;^^-S"^v^;'^:^^ Complete installation of approximately 10 to 150 new fire hydrants in older areas of the city Work with Olivenhain MWD, Rancho Santa Fe FPD and Elfin Forest/ Harmony Grove FD to secure grant funding to add additional hydrants in wildland/urban interface areas San Dieguito Water District Master Plan project number HP-5 No funding identified E-38 APPENDIX I Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Escondido Goal 6: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses.to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure and City-owned facilities due to wildfires Objective 6.B: Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of wildfires. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations ** For Alternative Actions = " , ':' ^1 ! . ','.',":• > .' .- /- \ ' • •* ''•") Proactive enforcement of City's weed abatement ordinance Ensure all materials used during remodeling in WUI areas are compliant with new building and fire codes Update existing prc-fire plans for neighborhoods in Plan Ensure the MHCP Sub- Area Plan maintains current allowances for the removal of habitat necessary to protect existing structures s Social 8 ,f : "I ' 1 " "0 . - . + •|x: Vjiv-j' J Q' 33 "Itp;&, - + + T Technical 'f; ' !"> •• I"'"&~ + + + + • . l:i4|V:-- ;4?-j. ' + + + + —^ •'I*"•,!";.; ;|i:."1 + + + + A Administrative •IV -1 '• + + - + '$' ''1 :"*&l_. + + - + ...1 I" "1""- _<a J. + + + + P. Political TV T v ':l"1- + + + + 4:'; 5-'|V •T: r • + + + + "I"" | '7 <2 ' + + + + L- Legal /ySIk' .•f:a "- + + + + •M ''I;'': ;•!';. ';- •IP''"3" ' + + + + _'_ I; , IV -»:-/•i'-: :'!'•' + . + + . E . . Economic = •:':'•:"' m^:- .'';fci" fc"*r~ + + + + ^::>- •;i";'•;1 .- "3 • + + + + . * •1 =•••!'-'Ji •'l''i ''fe' '•«§/' + + + + "I:v :fl -l^-! •;|f; 5 ':' - + - E, Environmental t-., •*- r«- ;.,|,,,,, ^f*1 + + + + t*. . ;/if ;4'. ::|;C 8 + + + 1 'v >•;".. J|| :',,|.f: ;|^ ^§'85 + + + + ! ' ..-. ... 1 ''I : J.'i .0 ( II £ | i - - - + •1' •1'•i'f '!"'it • •G-V + + + + E-39 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Escondido Alternative Actions Comments Proactive enforcement of City's weed abatement ordinance Continue current program and grant funding sources Require defensible space around all habitable structures in Plan Continue to require the application of California Fire Code Article 86 pertaining to Fire Protection Plans in all Wildland-Urban Interface areas Update existing pre- fire plans for neighborhoods in Plan Continue the maintenance of pre-fire plans for all existing structures in the MHCP Ensure the MHCP Sub-Area Plan maintains current allowances for the removal of habitat necessary to protect existing structures Partnership with State Fish and Game to mitigate exposure of protected habitat areas. E-40 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Escondiclo Goal 6: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure and City-owned facilities due to wildfires Objective 6.C: Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfire hazards STAPLEE Criteria Considerations ^ For Alternative Actions i , t "^ ,°- "... **j > .-., Ensure the City's MHCP, Sub-Area Plan incorporates current fire protection measures and implement fire protection measures in Daley Ranch, consistent with the Daley Ranch Master Plan Participate in mutual aid agreements related to wildfires S Social 8 1 J + + o IS <f gC2 O5 J3 + + T Technical f 1 + + S 1, + + ! !:• + + A Adminisffative SB£ + + ] i + + 0 1 1"8•£ + + P, • Political ' 1 I + + g I + + S !•• + + L Legal I .!;.' + + •g 1. It + + ft 1 1, + + • • E Economic %<Q .i'L, -••,.•, + + a o "I + + io i a I: + + '§•< ;}.. •f .:• + + ; ' E Bnvitontnental fe i. L + + Id?- 1 o + + 1& a: _ li + + I 1 i! O (3 + + | 1 { •a ',,- + + E-41 APPENDIX E Sample STAPIEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Escondido Alternative Actions Ensure the City's MHCP, Sub-Area Plan incorporates current fire protection measures and implement fire protection measures in Daley Ranch, consistent with the Daley Ranch Master Plan Participate in mutual aid agreements related to wildfires Comments ; Coordinate and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfire hazards with Federal, State, and Local agencies such as the US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, etc. Continue to participate in the California Fire Master Mutual Aid agreement, the San Diego County Fire Master Mutual Aid Agreement, and the North Zone Automatic Aid Agreement E-42 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Escondido Goal 6:Reduce the possibility of damage and Josses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure and City-owned facilities due to wildfires Objective 6.D: Address identified data limitations regarding the lack of information related to wildfires STAPLEE Criteria Considerations *" For Alternative "Actions \ 1 Develop a f Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) for the City's Local Responsibility Area (LRA) S Social 8 ^•§i J- + "Sii g S 'S ^ 0,as £ + T Technical 3?1I *"•! 1 ' 1 + c* 1 '*otn g | + 1 | ?"• •3 1 + A Administrative . eo 13 SC • , 1 ' I <•s '•S1 - g ,° p 'ff i ao 1 - P Political 138.Bt •5•a-a1 + c/I S^ .u 13J + • $> &> + L ' Legal ' .6* •S '3*^ I + &•g *^ < ' • 1" a + n J *»6 3•3*-£3 £ + • E Economic § •1 - «HO ^'t3 + 5 1 + i o'i -s JaS» •1u + ?';a .' ^ ' ^1 r§ i>S - E Environmental * - 1. ' g4 '*. 1 ' J § 1 + ••2it-CO $3i 1 w Si + <u 'S 'f* • ^«4 ji<(E § | Ipa 35 + >, 'Ii§ "H6 J 1 ^ S MS g a ">3 S + $213DS 1 jf 1 + E-43 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Escondido Alternative Actions"Comments .> •, .i , ,«<<" >AA,"*'' * ,*V-V""* -,-,*•'&°$ ^t/~ ^ * ^ *•& *^~ ^ ^^x * ^ ^ o*l x i• . l'«• V* ^ J»,T »' i " ji»*»s^- j**1 «> < Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) for the City's Local Responsibility Area (LRA) Address issues through a comprehension database of California wildfires, a California wildfire risk model, and other applicable sources Assist in the development of adequate emergency response capability Continue to plan for additional reserve equipment and staff during emergencies when surge capacity is reached E-44 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Imperial Beach Goal"!: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure and public facilities due to man made hazards (FQUQ). Objective: Reduce the risk of injury or loss of life to persons in City facilities related to manmade hazards STAPLEE Criteria S.. , (Soclat)(Technical) A (Administra P (PoHtleal) L (Legal) i-. • -- . (Economic)(Environmental) \r ,,„:;- Ill Alternative Actions: - * .& i * ' • •*%-&*.- ~\/*-,£- -.' - <a .•Q CO.o- II IE V 5' Update Site Emergency Response Plans (SERF) Continue to conduct training and exercises for all employees Maintain Business Continuity Plans for each City department E-45 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Imperial Beach Alternative Actions Update Site Emergency Response Plans (SERF) Continue to conduct training and exercises for all employees Maintain Business Continuity Plans for each City department - , • • '' • Comments1 ' • . ' ' ~ '\ ,., , , ,;••-. ' 1 ,„„ , ,„,, , . - ; ;„,,' , ,,„„, 5 _, ,> ,. ' , ,;, i,;,-' For all city office locations Continue to participate in County-wide HSEEP program. Take advantage of County's EMPP program. Templates and training available form County OES E-46 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Imperial Beach Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to dam failure Objective 5.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to dam failure STAPLEE Criteria ^~ Considerations for Alternative 1 *< Update dam maps Actions »•-.".. inundation s (Social) (D § fic "6 c C9 © II T (Technical) ^ 1 if 1 I 1i 1 tn s 8 A (Administra tive) I 1 'if' S "fji •|' s p, _ . (Political) -« s» .-%„ c 'a. 6 L (Legal) •e . i'n t •>l ' ?f 1 i yj E (Economic) ,| , 18 g» ci 4«» C ;j E ... (Environmental) o E™ in ,, S ' It MJ t" » §•3^ (jj ^1 , \ .0 • UJ 1p> 1 UJ en •- .to- I , O < J2' i -1 ' H III '13; i if *i "35 to (§J E-47 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Imperial Beach Alternative Actions Update dam inundation maps i- ' . • .. T- ', : U.'-"- " Comments ; — - - • — , •- •-•• '••'•;• -,-.v; These need to be revised periodically to reflect new construction Coordinate with County OES E-48 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Imperial Beach Goal 2:Increase public understanding and support for effective hazard mitigations Objective 2.A:Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions STAPLEE Criteria Considerations for Alternative i Actions r Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions Provide information to the public on the City website , Newsletter, Citywide mail outs, Prevention Program, and in conjunction with Special Events Heighten public awareness of hazards by using City Publicist Gain public acceptance for avoidance policies in high hazard areas Identify hazard specific issues and needs S (Social) SB i Q. 1' &" •£•a 'EoO + + - + "S IE''!•- of 'ee ,2b g U Bas a.tfc OUU Q. + + + + T (Technical) r> £ 'S • -'c 1® + + + + ' Sijjjjt c5 f§ •p + + + + '•••§ •1 xS 8 + + + + A (Administra live) 11 - + - - « I&<c CJft "^n 1? + - - - § '$ 05 •0- • '1 ; w,-c CO - - - - f» _ (Political) to • 1 •o + + + + •&• -i" . iiZO : 1o + + + + L {Legal} "S• 1:. 3- .CO )?' + + + + 1 1 + + + + >"S 5 < , 1•2 ,c yl + + + + E . - (Economic) "•'• a*-.' n°n + + + + ir<~ "R "tH m + + + + c *C « ;o:- + + + - E (Environmental) St c o ' ' . M llo o + + + + : • S1 • 3 ', .u ,^ m <jj 0 f^ + + + + 4"fe '|. 3 •-co jfj + + + + ?t , % •-• HI , il S w + + + + • f'• -^tfi '-"••'I'''• 31'c H • ||, S i + + + + , ;.jt •••••' S i '.| 5 s* ic "5 c III O O LU + + + + •a •.• 1 i§ cQ31 <5 2 + + + + E-49 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLES Criteria S (Social) T (Technical) A (Adminlstra tive) P ! (Political) E (Economic) E (Environmental) Considerations for Alternative Actions Im o-: t•o C; >Hw. * I I' ,CO 0) I Create demand for hazard resistant construction and site planning Maintain CERT program E-50 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Imperial Beach : Alternative Ac$ems>^ Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions Provide information to the public on the City website, Newsletter, Citywide mail outs, Prevention Program, and in conjunction with Special Events Heighten public awareness of hazards by using City Publicist Gain public acceptance for avoidance policies in high hazard areas Identify hazard specific issues and needs Create demand for hazard resistant construction and site planning Maintain CERT program ^•Vv,u>iU — ' ^ ?*^\v*;c*^-^ ' - "^ V**^"' -'^/-v' >'"-.V'" ; ' >- '- ^r^r^A^;: v V^r'r: [ >-"v^^^v.;4\ Effective way to gain public acceptance and support Information available from County OES, CalEMA and FEMA Popular program that keeps public involved. E-51 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms This page intentionally left blank E-52 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction:City of La Mesa Goal 1:Promote disaster resistant future development. Objective l.A:Encourage and facilitate the updating of general plans and zoning ordinances to limit development in hazard areas. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations *" For Alternative Actions Action 1.A.1 Continue to update plans and ordinances to stay current with mitigation responsibilities Action 1 .A.2 Update City's general plan. S Social i•fl 8 f a + + (u.o K E § | j!1 J? + + T Technical rtg '1r*1 1 I + + ps '§ •q (7 4 J + + 1 H I 1 + + A Administrative so 1 - + H3 fefj*s 1 - + 1 f* JL O cs 1 - + P Political S B. 1 1 + + BiS 6 1 + + S I- 1 + + L Legal j? 1 2 + + f Is «?-j f 3 + + 1'«!o•a i i+ + ' E Economic 0•S • "S 1 + + ai ou + + J8j 1 | JSj8 P I•ggu - + + •d ' SS | i+ - E Mnviraooierttal fe ^> •S § J + + 1 1" ^ M 'i 8 1 + + s 1 .&•* S9as•8 ll + + •f3 „§ "s o ^^§ 1 g£ BS g ii+ + 1iM ,MM* I + + E-53 APPENDIX B Sample STAPIEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of La Mesa Alternative Actions Action I.A.I Continue to update plans and ordinances to stay current with mitigation responsibilities Action 1 .A .2 Update City's general plan. Comments Currently being done On-gong Community Development Department General Fund Ongoing E-54 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction:City of La Mesa Goal 2:Promote public understanding, support and demand for hazard mitigation. Objective 2.A:Educate the public the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations •-=* For Alternative Actions i r Action 2.A.1 Continue to make available information regarding hazard mitigation in the City of La Mesa through print media and the City website. Action 2.A.2 Continue to increase awareness through public contacts in City facilities and field opportunities • S Social ft. U + + ;•£.,' §j *.a + + T Technical •|": 1 H + + O ' ' •j + + T I + + A Administrative ; ^ C" ,* c 1tSl + + I 1 - + i i+ + p Poliflcai |: 1 + + •i: a + + T 4j I' + + L Legal - :r i • + + 1f+ + e'--| 1+ + E. Economic i"1' 1 + + ^"S u - + :to is Su • + + "9S a O + + • E , Knviroamental }••• i+ + .a f9 + + '"l IEi.i+ + .*- .6 | o iS + + 1 I ' u + + E-55 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of La Mesa Alternative Actions Action 2. A.I Continue to make available information regarding hazard mitigation in the City of La Mesa through print media and the City website. Action 2. A. 2 Continue to increase awareness through public contacts in City facilities and field opportunities Comments Fire Department General Fund Ongoing On-going E-56 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction:City of La Mesa Goal 2:Promote public understanding, support and demand for hazard mitigation. Objective 2.B:Promote partnerships between state, counties and local and tribal governments to identify, prioritize and implement mitigation actions. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations '*' - For Alternative Actions •• ' • -1. •- - v;" ~ .. . , "!r • ', . ".' ," • '. • ;*•;'! •; •'&,, -, •' " ; :;;:,::;ix..v;--' 'Ijfe^ • • ^ v^rT*,*? •' <| ' \^ '• • *•$<§£ ~< . * '/''?:^'' ' : ',- -., Action 2. B.I Continue to use County and Cal EMA to coordinate and assist in implementation of mitigation awareness and efforts. S Social 83•,f '••!^ -if- » j :'.-' si'./«g,,. + •sw- ., § • S:if»-•e'S',j^£ + T Technical >i 1, 1"? •;'•. -K§ ';-i|,|^'«ju ,-, + g • *1•S->•'§"•" ,|*r•:«w:;. ' •? ;-j, + -Sft'. . • &'••' ' r"'"»'{"'' vf •+ ; A • Admiftistrative , •» .. •'; '' •f ":: ',J|^,\& - ""I ''•§• -• < •• $V •••I"'--'•s :-,:-; - S " 1" ",| =, J'-.. 'i'^T ,?'-.-' + ! P Political t; '&'-•- w 'v 'I--'-•¥ ;/*' '«''' '•i ' 1 ' ~:~®'K .vl- .-'-"&&. + E --\. '•f'3,- '•%»•?;••s_ + L Legal : v f , ' ... .a •'fe?m • + B»§, ' ' «j • - 1'""""is ~":' f -J-•-. /*-. + «, ,_a . 6 ''--.'' ,1 • --J 'll"* *7 .- + E Economic .§• 2"!,,'o • ^:M;:,% s* ' • + i; '•:!'•'•4' ;.•;,:J \ U,' • - H o - "1 1 J, V.' a : : '!••>•g ^, "g ^.*-'3sr •« "s|.\<j * » j :;|^ 3§":':-..;o- . + E. Environmental h - B &s' 1 '3'- *i • •/J ;. , .8J-;-, + .1 t« "8 i' : Hs ,§':.,:• 1 "'a + i '.'^ i F* S <S '••-:|«- '. g ';! ££} W5 + t' I1 "§c3 | 'I'l** 1 1 p,*i io m + I •aMS ^ •' «•: '1 ' ;--l^, O • + E-57 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of La Mesa Alternative Actions Action 2. B.I Continue to use County and Cal EMA to coordinate and assist in implementation of mitigation awareness and efforts. 1 Comments Fire Department General Fund Ongoing E-58 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction:City of Lemon Grove Goal 3: Improve hazard mitigation coordination and communication with federal, state and local governments. Objective 3.A:Establish and maintain closer working relationships with federal, state and local governments. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations ** For Alternative Actions 1f Action 3. A.I Continue to build and support local partnerships, such as the Unified Disaster Council (UDC) and Urban Area Working Group (UAWG), and coordination of mutual aid agreements. Action 3. A. 2 Continue to encourage development of standardized Emergency s Social 8 Jg 10> f u + + fi*«o I §£*5 cigo 1^j. S3 + + T Technical ^*•1 Iffi 1 1 + + € '3 If , ift' «6 + + iF '1 1+ + A.. Administrative . - • •» to- -. - - 1i . . M>K O, - - 1i ra E< ? 1 a '3 + - ; P Political : fi' K If ' 1¥ + K ' '1* 1 j ' V + + | . 1' |, + + L "- Legal » 1ift + + »• • •045 » a + + t ' *^3 Q ' % '•m 1 + 4- .' ,; -. E • . IiconaHilc a ^ • *S 2 1 + + ,§ 1*s - - „ "1 2"1 Q- i a J'B B + + '1 I'<5a: 1" B, 'I + + ;,.J ,;,„ ' Mnvitoniiiental Isi =3 . fi,,. + + *fi '1of"O i 1 S + + u 1P ^~* i'< g M ^ S 35 + + 6< '1 1 b>H rsft5 JS'i I I 0 H + + g 3.. ^B1 ^ •f ' u + + E-59 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLEE Criteria Considerations *" *" For Alternative Actions i If Operations Plans within the City of Lemon Grove that coordinate with countywide Emergency Operations Plans Action 3.A.3Continue to develop multi- functional training and exercises to enhance hazard mitigation Action 3. A .4 Continue to maintain working relationships with agencies providing resources and expertise that further hazard mitigation efforts S Social « 1 | ""6 + + v»o • 1iWS a 8 j w £ + + T , Technical " is-ys *if 1JS f~ + + a . 1 1 <c* '-j' ' + + : I, t l ; f.' "~W + + • • A ; Administrative so 1& - - . , 1 1 • ,*"* "S. '"" - - ' \ f ,. -.?•• • Political ' • I.i2 + + '. , •*• • '• '' ;|, 'a;.- -3 "I + + 1 '| S, •" + + L Legal • /; 'I* ' J. M " + + 'I* •S '' % 1 1 « ' + + ' j&f 's6 'i ; |j- IX + + . E Economic c 1 1 1 + + 1 o "u """ - - ^3 ' 1 ' '18 '1 ; S i:{: 0 , + + "g ,-S"3?04 3>&,5 1o . + + E Hnvitonmeatal t. '11 ••1 -8 ', •« + + i ", Q» 'S 1 '1 ; .' § %1 :§ ' + + |; ^ -.'f, y,| • I'' O) !/) + + -fr 1g S 6'(§i ii| u S + + :| 1S 1 •f • i'o + + E-60 APPENDIX B Sample STflPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Lemon Grove Alternative Actions Comments 1. Action 3.A.I Continue to build and support local partnerships, such as the Unified Disaster Council (UDC) and Urban Area Working Group (UAWG), and coordination of mutual aid agreements. Fire Department General Fund Ongoing Action 3.A.2 Continue to encourage development of standardized Emergency Operations Plans within the City of Lemon Grove that coordinate with county wide Emergency Operations Plans Operational Area EOP currently under revision Action 3.A.3Continue to develop multi-functional training and exercises to enhance hazard mitigation On-going through HSEEP and EMPP Action 3.A.4 Continue to maintain working relationships with agencies providing resources and expertise that further hazard mitigation efforts On-going E-61 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Lemon Grove Goal 2: Objective Build and support local capacity and commitment to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. 2. A: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practices among local officials. ^^^S?'SiR For Alternative Actions (r Action 2. A.I Continue to build support and local partnerships such as the UDC and UAWG and the coordination of mutual aid agreements Action 2. A. 2 Build a team of community volunteers to work with the community before, during and after a disaster js^'S: 8_ 8 •i* 8 + + •/•.'•:*'" "0 Q | § O ** tK o£l) Qu + + <• ' '!'\,- I i.+ + *J\ i 1+ + ••'?•: tv- & i+ + ', f /• ., • 3to - - .5^*-* •s tt. - - ':^ 1 s- - - ^? 1 + + '£% 1 1. + + *SHL -.^s-va*. |^ I' + + S 5'' + + Y:i: .a--+ + '%/T^v- '.-a 1 + - ;:«&? § t 1 ;+ + ^^ 1•g u + - T ,s • 5 + + T- I p+ - 'Sf *: I 1 + + Y<;' 1-w , .. g : 1: + + ;s" K g" » M£ 2B S5 + + T •u J 11 + + j.1 1 u • + + E-62 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLEE Criteria Considerations "" *" For Alternative Actions 1 F Action 2 A. 3 Continue to incorporate hazard mitigation concerns in to the City of Lemon Grove planning and budgetary processes . S • • Social S *3aH4! 1 •S u + Va SM)c8^*« G *-* (^ "1 &(13 £ + T Technical ?** *S2" 'rg 1 1 .•gI + a -•§ai *T I + 1 &Hi"+ A Administrative . MC t/5 + *s?2* I- ?«iS U-- _ 08 ' ' fig Js* '*"? aS*i+ p Political ti "8£> | + gj f '•'' u ' !•" + Iiiu 1'" + ; L Legal fr'C • 'Q 1 '*c.1 + 't- :^g B --<£, .| .:.. »•H 1' + f m 'Jf, £,/ !.'•V• M '•§ 1" + E; -• , • Economic - '. fi '1 I'' *±i 1 ' + 1'^•.."S• «5 - i.** Sa iif• s..: 1 ^ 1$ + 1f . tefi f •s - E HnvironmentaJ '' •H*>^ 1 ': 'S. 1 + 1* ' 4?p & 1 g 1 + 1' •1 IT* ^!^;| §-*j ' il + & : 1- R "^Q S w .1 1 1 i*^ -B Ji+ •i 1S*' H**-« ••I; ,|. *S205 •• 1 + E-63 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Lemon Grove Alternative Actions Comments Action 2.A.I Continue to build support and local partnerships such as the UDC and UAWG and the coordination of mutual aid agreements Same as Action 3.A.I Action 2.A.2 Build a team of community volunteers to work with the community before, during and after a disaster Need to identify funding Action 2.A.3 Continue to incorporate hazard mitigation concerns in to the City of Lemon Grove planning and budgetary processes. Community Development Department General Fund Ongoing E-64 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction:City of Lemon Grove Goal 2: Build and support local capacity and commitment to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards. Objective 2.C:Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practices among local officials. STAPLEE Criteria Considerations * For Alternative Actions f Action 2. C.I Continue to publish educational information in the City newsletter and on the City's website. 5, Social 8 *! it* • '! '!6 + £*•<O ^1' ' g'| t2^ Q.*^ Ou-! a. + T Technical i5* J53 ? J" 1 K + n<S S I ' + *3 1 '• 1 1 + A • • • Adtninisitative I w . + ! ' 1? 1 '•I;!•• - 1 . 11. + p . Political- • - 1 ' t•a ,1 + ,| 'I' 'I' • + S : i; .1+ L , -'Lega! •- •— - ' f- •? /• C*'ii+ •t'- *!! ^, -f .1+ &i siJ2 ' 1 1, ' 1- + E • Ecoftoniic-™ --• •J '1 -a + 8 13 u - <e 1 -| - SH..:»'/ 1;" -3 + >t tt. •-s 3 - E Environmental - - - t$St 1 s ••1 '. + 1Jr g P 1 | 1 + I£I**•*£ '1E . il+ "iSo 5 1 ! 1 gi "S3 -S ^ J + . P ,.| M ^.•§ 1 'u + E-65 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Lemon Grove Alternative Actions Action 2. C.I Continue to publish educational information in the City newsletter and on the City's website. Comments Community Development/Fire Departments General Fund Ongoing E-66 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of National City Goal 1:Promote disaster resistant future development Objective 1 .A: Continue to address hazards in future general plan updates STAPLEE Criteria " Considerations for Alternative ApUon$:".' '•• _,.- ,. -., -;-"', ' ' -;:- , '„ ''' " ! v ' Continue to update the General plan periodically Continue to update the Land Use Codes periodically S (Social) S i 1 f:*; I + "8- • •E w g- ' *' n13 3 + J (Technical) ••>, 1 .'*w:r %c o + • : 1 I'' '-§- 1 + I. ;|;:, •'^S ' 1 + A (Administra •'»» ''J ' W 1CO + 1 'I- ..0 1u. + I '"1 .* 11 "; I"'* i-- p (Political) . '• < "S-- ^v;:>i,-' •| + ,g r|'.r §'"* 1+ L (Legal) , i- *f-r•"<»•, 3- 'a. + '"" ''''f'- - •< '"' 1 + f^ 0 .3- "$';~ vSf' s + E (Economic) •*"!" st;^^.-2*,; 11 + , - ->' 'S^r e^~'. •a'+ •J-*•''*i+ E (Environmental) "1 ' 12" S •B"'"1'^' 5 O,05 + ?ts-jLjj! liQ. CC + •i:l' '-I'S,-rf "6f- + 1 1 : R;^ fe**58 .S..CO + -'•;J' , '•• =>^5 '•• ':1 •?-' ;l . ,:S gc' .. UJ X + ' '-M• - yj> £ '-^.i"i|- :i'l Hi + 13' 1 ' 2' ''•f -'•:" - 1 - • ' " 55 + E-67 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of National City Alternative Actions Continue to update the General plan periodically Continue to update the Land Use Codes periodically . j -.-.,.." • . ,-. • ••Comments , •. ; • ' • - , • .••J-\f:vvir-» • v '"'V- | ,. ^'*<'v\^w->^;^*^"i^^A-i'Jft - ^f^Sfri^i- '":j"'^- .'•'." \'V '•'-\^i^.)1*i<*^k.>»:v-V' •>;«*>:'%?>WI:.-*,,;^^ -'- v E-68 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of National City Goal 7: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people and critical facilities/infrastructure due to structural fire/wildfire Objective 7.B: Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of structural fire/wildfire STAPLEE Criteria S (SDCtal) T -,-. (Technical) A . ; • (Administra five) ' (Political)(Legal) E _,-«;-.. V (Economic): v,/(Environmental) Considerations for; \ '' Maintain response times, pumping capacity and apparatus and equipment deployment objectives + Annually assess staffing levels and ensure adequate staffing is available to meet fire suppression objectives Maintain standard operating procedures for fire ground operations Conduct annual wildland fire fighting and ICS training to ensure operational readiness E-69 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of National City Alternative Actions Comments Maintain response times, pumping capacity and apparatus and equipment deployment objectives Essential for public safety Annually assess staffing levels and ensure adequate staffing is available to meet fire suppression objectives Staffing levels may be restricted due to budgetary issues Maintain standard operating procedures for fire ground operations Conduct annual wildland fire fighting and ICS training to ensure operational readiness E-70 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of National City Goal 7: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people and critical facilities/infrastructure due to structural fire/wildfire Objective 7.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses to a structural fire/wildfire STAPLEE Criteria »»<> Considerations for " " Alternative ,„ , ,, • ,: , 1 """ "" " Actions f Maintain Fire Prevention Program Maintain a Pre-Fire Plan Program Regularly maintain a Fire Suppression Program Assess staffing levels of Fire Prevention Staff and increase as appropriate Maintain a Housing Inspection Program S (Social) 1 jj. 1 |_ + + + + + •8 tr S^E « f ijt J» Q.•frff+ + + + + J (Technical) J*= JS5 - |2 , if. 8'£ 1,+ + + + + -c-f - 11 f; + + + + + "•'% ^c "#••f ' 8 + + + + + A (Administra tfve) jB"' 1 + + + + + W ,|g tQ I g> U- + + + - + S2 1"""i" ti'T* '!''-1 "S + + + + + P (Political) : = _, t£f . ' '1 I" + + + + + a.' O "3 .u3 + + + + + L (Legal) "^ " " ' CO S- + + + + + &1 sse ' CO + + + + + f 5 *H* • 1 g> 'S-+ + + + + E ' . (Economic) , „„. „ „ ,,.v,..,.. *&W'g ll. - + + + + ', Cf - •fcj 1' + + + + + V _. B •R- . J . - - - - - E. (Environmental) 'E ®-: UJ i S ' II + + + + + •jOj) .is • 1' 0) 0>•O JB "^ §• O cS + + + + + fe S ' »^' »5§ !„ + + + + + I-|r ^<§ ,. S'--'--: B SI I'l + + + + + -v I "cB " -5c hr0 £ jjf.$- + + + + + „"I CP£ • *«3 1.^1'1 1-| r* I*™ *»^& C > '"O o uL + + + + + S '. a> 'if '•J3 '1* ' J| + + + + + E-71 APPENDIX E Sample STAPUE Forms STAPLEE Criteria Considerat for Alternative i ,miimmmm,- ^ ions Actions r Conduct a Housing outreach Program Maintain/update all Arson Registrants with required registration and conditions of probation or parole s (Social) &c•3 . ', O + + 2 ; W e O /?< oj £*ySs 0CD a. + + T (Technical) £• f— + + 1 + + ,.£>' (O \ + + A (Administra tive) '? " 3•i1 i?" + fi1 -I'., « ••s" + P (Political) % . « "1 f + + o , + + L iLegal) '« <0 3cu + + -y 31 + + i I + + E | (Economic) "3 ' f -- j—i Qj -S 1.j£ o + + •c * '•s - £B + + ' c <'2 " E ! {Environmental) o 1 . 2«*' • i* + + .? iL -jm w "M2- §•±1 50 fff + + I•i•|'eo J + + <5' •8'. 8' Ui W + + to• £> <ol' 'iti'Sasr -<CB3 I + + -.'• ' j» + + '1 uu'- 'S3' + + E-72 APPENDIX £Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of National City Alternative Actions Comments Maintain Fire Prevention Program Maintain a Pre-Fire Plan Program Regularly maintain a Fire Suppression Program Assess staffing levels of Fire Prevention Staff and increase as appropriate Funding needs to be identified Maintain a Housing Inspection Program Conduct a Housing outreach Program Maintain/update all Arson Registrants with required registration and conditions of probation or parole E-73 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms This page intentionally left blank E-74 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Oceanside Goal 6: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure and City of Oceanside owned facilities due to floods Objective A: Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of floods within the 100-year floodplain STAPLE||>it^ Considerations "" ** For Alterna i tive Actions t ' '" *' "-. -T'\!<-V 'j, £'." r* 6. A.I Seek state and federal agency cooperation in the control and management of vegetation within river and creek channels 6. A .2 Work with state and federal authorities regarding regulations that add local expense and time to flood control measures and maintenance activities 6. A .3 Participate in the NFIP '•-"$&'' o t -.' X, + .-" + o S Ji+ + + ." J'^ii^".- '&• ;fc+ + + •*^3 Jj + + + J- jx + + + ;;'';:^«h^£S- $- - - j IK - - - •fiE * J* - - - ';' . 'fyitldai- ***'' j ;|f + + + , •i; L-sCv. + + .,-.. :'P + + + •"] \ - Legaf '""'-' ft- I" + + + I J + + + ' B "0«," - - - ^:>*£2lfftS s tl+ + + .;. ''U-'rl + - - JS ' Q tf + + + 1'"« 1/ + - + y^^^^A | ' SH-- ' + + + J ;ti+ + + j; '|"i + + + _&• m+ + + t-1~i If + + E-75 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Oceanside Alternative Actions 6. A.I Seek state and federal agency cooperation in the control and management of vegetation within river and creek channels 6. A. 2 Work with state and federal authorities regarding regulations that add local expense and time to flood control measures and maintenance activities 6.A.3 Participate in the NFIP Comments Complete removal of vegetation for river and creek channels best for floodwater flows and fire dangers of vegetation overgrowth but not practical and appropriate for ecological and native species and animal habitat Cooperation with state and federal agencies will ensure effectiveness and efficiency State and federal regulations often make it difficult for local government to maintain effective flood control programs. Working with those authorities will help them see the local perspective This is consistent with City plans, policies and procedures E-76 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLE! Forms Jurisdiction: City of Qceanside Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure and City of Oceanside owned facilities due to identified hazards including flooding, earthquake, coastal storms/erosion/ tsunami, wildfire and human caused hazards Objective A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to identified hazards including flooding, earthquake, coastal storms/erosion/tsunami, wildfire and human caused hazards STAPLES Criteria Considerations- *"•- - Fof Alternative Actions 1f 5. A.I Develop an integrated mass Communications/ notification plan utilizing GIS technology 5. A. 2 Replacement of Oceanside Fire Stations #1 and #7 with modern, hazard resistant emergency self-supported Facilities S Social 8 t• 8 «t; 'tg U + + .0 1 &•' W 0 S 1t"35 K + + T Technical t 1i& 1 1 + + Si ' 1 I + + '•pi B &io1 • + + A Admlnistotive • -"""" - 01)K W - + , ,„,„ „ •51 1 O §SID 1 - - •.- "1.•'l'-'; o> • '1g 1 - - p . Political __,. M 1 + + g; 1 - 0 1 + + s iV) ..9 1 + + L Legal : ''••• •Iff • J" • ' 1 f + + ,„, t . "i " '>;'<! - ' "3 1 1 : + + - — ••• ' f '•' J '0 , H 1 - - ..- .. -E- Economic" • •:;.--,. .8 *€ 1 + + J •' ',, , ^O •8 <J ' - - ;J3 'i ''i1 's3 '•'"2 " I '• id U , + + — — ! . ' " i 1 - - E ' • '-, • Environittental: — , , 1 - £ g '5 I 1 + + J • Jr 1s '-§ m 1 - 03 + + s •• I •1 -^*; 5ag 1 1<*«* »53ta «3 + + fr"" I ' 1 ^ 0 Q 3 S ** 11 | u w + + 1| 1 tw s 111 + E-77 APPENDIX E Sample STAPUE Forms STAPLEE Criteria , Considerations * For Alternative Actions i t ' : 5. A. 3 Replace underground fuel storage tanks with above ground tanks at all City facilities 5. A .4 Protect the Oceanside Pier from severe weather, earthquake, storm surge and corrosion salt-water 1s 1e< 1e•J o S Social 4 1 (u» O € 1ti M :g.| 'H I1 S ft. + + T Technical • •&*s 1.£ . 1>. : | -- f~ + + S • 1 • ' 31 1^'.!•"'f""-3 + + J 1"JMlf "'If.''' ' '1 "'•' « , • + + A Administrative If''14 "'1 • "'f » + - ]• --• -;^;- -vjj'*.,;.•a - - i S Jlo -' I'--'- "'|,V^.'!.»*., ^- - P ' PoEtical t; ' E-J* •:-= '•,*<•;«• ;1 ':, , & + + £ "1 -•' §••'' '••• :;"6V^' • 1 ••-•••.'s + + t' ; ' -,, .'^. z: "'<2 + + L ' Legal 'I* •'» ' •virr- 1'.'"'+ + S ' i "•:''j '-" ''^•^'I' '"» + + j-s6 ' ^ ',11';^ 'I' >& - - E Economic B J•' 2r'''" *"!*'"":!'•"'' M + + • •'•; ;;<gv;'' 1 :'"' O ' - - „ 11 §J .A •• -;|:?''' ;i ' . ,Q' + + • "Ji •- i " •'• f;.-- .--i^ ''; _. - + E Environmental 4>S 1•••-3 -'•','<£'- to "•S + + 1 '1 w|, J !, A,-'-::g.^ I-. 'a + + S I , IN s • < xR/-"' :•>%.•! '-'«"' 1B K + + & 1 ' x "SO g ! " O P3 + + i •I ^2.J "''*""1f:$r- o •u + + E-78 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Oceansicle Alternative Actions Comments 5.A.I Develop an integrated mass Communications/ notification plan utilizing GIS technology Outside funding source needs to be identified May be able to utilize the County's system 5.A.2 Replacement of Oceanside Fire Stations #1 and #7 with modern, hazard resistant emergency self-supported facilities To be funded by combination City and Grant funds 5.A.3Replace underground fuel storage tanks with above ground tanks at all City facilities Funding source needs to be identified 5.A.4 Protect the Oceanside Pier from severe weather, earthquake, storm surge and salt-water corrosion To be completed within a five year period Grant funded Will coordinate with the County of San Diego E-79 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Poway Goal 3: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people and critical facilities/infrastructure due to wildfires, flooding, geological hazards (landslide, rockslide, earthquake) and man-made hazards Objective 3.A: Plan and prepare for damage and loss from wildfire. '.**>,:••• -'.,--?'^v-,,,T --.;••,„ 5fMliLiara,}" -;?s«tj^'jfc, M ' .-~.~^ ;.. 2 s Is 3.A.I Update maps of potential wildfire areas. 3.A.2 Update fire control and evacuation plans for areas near wildland vegetation. 3.A.3 Implement existing safety plan for the High Valley area. 3.A.4 Upgrade road access for fire safety equipment at identified locations E-80 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLEE Criteria Considerations "~~ *" Far Alternativc Actions 3. A. 5 Update Water Master Plan. Evaluate adding hydrants, creating loops and other means to improve water pressure and volume 3. A. 6 When possible, work with SDG&E to replace wood utility poles with metal poles in areas of high risk of wildfire 3.A7 Evaluate use of certain City trails as auxiliary routes in emergency S Social "|" I + + + •s t/5 g; p ~® l-l££j ;Q- + + + ' T Technical J? 1'E + + + \ % + + + I + + + A . ' Administrative WJ - 4- - f - + - 3 •'•a \ - + + P Political 1 + + + 6' + + + i + + + k ,• • Legal • : !+ + + I;;- f: + + + 1 i+ + + - E, ; Bccmomic 1 + + + "g u' - - + A 1 3s. + + + i 1•§1 - - + 1 E. : V. § ' + + + .!>. !'• + + + •| B) IA + + + II .1 1 U J§ -f + + !• iou + + + E-81 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Poway Alternative Actions Comments 3.A.I Update maps of potential wildfire areas.Will require additional staffing and outside funding. 3.A.2 Update fire control and evacuation plans for areas near wildland vegetation. May not address all areas within the City in a timely manner. 3.A.3 Implement existing safety plan for the High Valley area. 3.A.4 Upgrade road access for fire safety equipment at identified locations 3.A.5 Update Water Master Plan. Evaluate adding hydrants, creating loops and other means to improve water pressure and volume 3.A.6 When possible, work with SDG&E to replace wood utility poles with metal poles in areas of high risk of wildfire 3.A7 Evaluate use of certain City trails as auxiliary routes in emergency NOTE:Priority Action Item #1 - Maintain improved wildfire defensible space strategies incorporates Action Items 3.A.I through 3.A.7 E-82 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Poway Goal 2: Promote public understanding, support and demand for effective hazard mitigation Objective 2.A: Educate the public to increase their awareness of hazards and ways to mitigate damage STAPLEE Criteriai Considerations *" For Alternative Actions i r '.' 2. A.I Conduct annual NEVIS/ SEMS/ ICS review and training for City Staff 2.A.2 Continue and enhance public education and outreach activities 2, A. 3 Maintain CERT Program 2. A.4 Partner with organizations focused on disaster preparedness - S"~~ Social 8' !••t 3- OU + + + + &w O 1 |l 4S n>*•* S fS + + + + ..T. .... _ Technical £> 1 1 y£j 1 + + + + i- 1 J + + + I 1oI- + + + + A Administrative Mlcg3ts> + + + + "•~j'Cj•1 1-tf ^tt.' + + + 1 ' 1 f •• •1 s + + + p ., , PoMfical :- 1(/J It* 1 - + + • .-,.. '.I 6 - + + + i1 Yt«c 1 + + + T : ™ ' ' 'l^gai ' f \ . + + + '•§"'" "15. 1?ti•1 + + + + •ft ' ,.M . : l"' 3 M 1 ' + + + „ g „ - Economic •i ,!•• pi ' + + + + g' 1 -g j - + + JS 1 '1 'l'-: a . 1 li '<§• + + + + 1I • !"• 1"^ 0 + + + + I -:'' 1§ s1 + + + + .1\ :e 1•II I' 1 E Httvinuunental •<, i ' + - + - $' J. "N |- IH" "*f I + + + + & 1II *§ « 1 1o *SIs + + + + P5.. ;1 .f .'-' 4-1 1 w + + + + E-83 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Poway Alternative Actions Comments 2.A.1 Conduct annual NIMS/ SEMS/ ICS review and training for City Staff 2.A.2 Continue and enhance public education and outreach activities Builds understanding of and support for mitigation efforts 2.A.3 Maintain CERT Program Effective way of conducting public outreach/education while promoting community preparedness Grant Funded 2.A.4 Partner with organizations focused on disaster preparedness Regional efforts more effective than individual efforts E-84 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms This page intentionally left blank E-85 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: _City of San Diego Goal 6: Reduce the high probability of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and State-owned facilities due to floods Objective 6.A.: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the high probability of damage and losses due to floods. 6.A.I.Work with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), and other Federal, State, and local agencies to maintain the required channel cross section in the Tijuana River Valley Pilot Channel to carry flow resulting from a 25-year storrn event. 6.A.2. Continue to participate in the NFIP and meet the requirements for conformance with NFIP standards. E-86 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of San Diego Alternative Actions (In Order of Priority) 6.A.I. Work with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), and other Federal, State, and local agencies to maintain the required channel cross section in the Tijuana River Valley Pilot Channel to carry flow resulting from a 25-year storm event. 6.A.2. Continue to participate in the NFIP and meet the requirements for conformance with NFIP standards \ '.; • •, • \. - : :. -Comments .'/ :] .' V- ' • ' :! • ••'•"'• . ;;.: :,.,-:,.*H ...,-.*-.-., 1 :*V ':-s4-J -/^v-.-X .b. ! Y> ;.:,-.... --^'i, A. '^^^K;/ .X,,r5:':':-;?-,X Storm Water Department 1-10 year time frame Operating Budget/Augmented with Grant Funding Engineering and Capital Projects Department On-going project Operating budget E-87 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Worksheet #3: Evaluate Alternative Mitigation Actions _ STAPLEE CRITERIA Jurisdiction: City of San Diego Goal 5: Reduce the high probability of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and State-owned facilities due to geological hazards Objective 5. A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the high probability of damage and losses due to geological hazards. STAPLES Criteria 5.A.I. Stabilize the City of San Diego's water delivery system during seismic activity to ensure rapid recovery of the water system for critical services, such as fire, drinking water, commercial and residential uses. .8'-. E.-ivSK^ 'M ^vX^fea*^'-^ v* •:.. ,-^-.KS:*>.-tfc.Lj*?-, *?J#sf» -Si*- •- •.'K- 5.A.2. Develop a means of providing water for firefighting when water sei-vice is disrupted. E-S APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of San Diego Alternative Actions (In Order of Priority) Comments 5.A.I. Stabilize the City of San Diego's water delivery system during seismic activity to ensure rapid recovery of the water system for critical services, such as fire, drinking water, commercial and residential uses. Public Utilities Department 1-3 year time frame Grant Funded 5.A.2. Develop a means of providing water for firefighting when water service is disrupted. San Diego Fire/Rescue and Public Utilities Departments 1-5 year time frame Need to obtain Federal or State Grant Funding E-89 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms SAN MARCOS STAPLEE EVALUATION - Priority Action 1 Goal 2: Promote public understanding, support and demand for hazard mitigation. Objective2.A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions STAPLEE Criteria For Alternative Actions i r 2.A.1 Provide public information brochures that discuss the hazards and mitigation actions the public may take. 2.A.2 Maintain public education efforts to increase awareness of the public to the threat of wildfire to the City of San Marcos 5 ,; 1 D O - - ,o Is - - T;_ *'•* P *Vt + + •«?£',=' j - - M&V • •*,£- . ., j - - - • .,e,& , ;; , Wl + + "'*''''"'; ' JtS ' + 4- '1 1: + + .-;., p ' " •*•> • -.", Cfl - - '-';;•• 1 - - •.-'«:,._ I - - : i-.'/iiil-''-- : j:- + + 'f ""i ' + + I'. I n/a n/a •:"A-'--^BoJLte.-,^'A 1 + + (3O 1 - •S 1 + + •J. 1 & •O n/a n/a .;• -.-.' 1 1" ' tt. + + viW^Arttti^^^' . 8 1 - - t'to 1 - - "'.'' 1 •• |5 g bi 35 - - "j, 1 11 - - i,. T?' j n/a n/a E-90 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLE! Forms Jurisdiction: City of San Marcos Alternative Actions Comments 2.A.1 Provide public information brochures that discuss the hazards and mitigation actions the public may take. Brochures are available through the County, State and FEMA as well as several non-governmental organizations such as the American red Cross 2.A.2 Maintain public education efforts to increase awareness of the public to the threat of wildfire to the City of San Marcos Public education is the most cost effective way to build awareness of and support for hazard mitigation efforts Note: Action 2.A.I is incorporated into Action 2.A.2 E-91 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms SAN MARCOS STAPLEE EVALUATION - Priority Action 2 Goal 6: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure and City-owned facilities, due to wildfires. Objective 6. A: Continue the comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to wildfires. STAPLEE Criteria , . Social"' A L •Legal; .. E Economic Biwkoamental r "a2 ;•-•->, ,*:•', 6 . I I;£ ./••«*•$• § < •' 6.A.I Continue WUI fire prevention public education campaign 6.A.2 Enforce the new 150 foot fuel clearance ordinance 6.A.3 Require fuel modeling for all new development located within the WUI 6.A.4 Continue to ensure required street widths, paving and grades can accommodate E-92 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLEE Criteria Considerations ~ * For Alternative Actions 1f emergency vehicles 6.A.5 Increase Fire Protection Staff as appropriate 6. A .6 Procure and deploy a back-up HOC and communications vehicle 6. A. 7 Evaluate the fire department's readiness to respond to and mitigate wildfires 6.A.8 Continue to evaluate service level needs and part of the process of projects impacts as review major 6.A.9 Design new City owned critical S Social 8 § 1* •i 11 ^ , ' + + + + + 2 1 §^0'2 |.|«.&, + + + + + T Technical 5- P1 1~l f. + + + + + , c •| , 1 ,§.. ,& I ' + + + + + I.i : i vr•-$ . + + + + + A Administrative .S. , ws + - - - + 1 5 1 1 "*-"•' - - - - - GQ )*; '3 JL2 -1IT.". g. - - - - - p Political 1 i~.f~ "§ + + + + + •I 1." 13 . + + + + + I 1 ' it •-(£ + + + + + L Legal •ti"i" + + + + + i?'G JB 1 ' If 1-' 1 " .« ;, + + + + + • . •,,1. „!_ 6, + + + - + - E Economic ": a '1 •8 1« + + + + + i «s „ u . - - - + - 1 +v a ' J S 1 ', !„, ° + + + + + "H '3' ' g*-S ,•€ I' I"o - - + + - E . KtwkGnffliefltai - ^:S ;5e 1 •8 , 1m + + + + + .1 Q,W }'' ' § S'" M + + + + + 4!H* p" i•< § 1 1S K + + + + + fr• -a §3 "3^ ,o 1 1 il-|-| o w + + + + + i3 a M ' { • "l ' O + + + + + E-93 APPENDIX E Sample STAP1EE Forms STAPLE! Criteria Considerations ** For Alternative Actions i r facilities located in wildfire prone areas to minimize damage due to wildfires 6. A. 10 Acquire and deploy a local AM radio station for emergency public information S Social 8 8 1 'ig o - "3^ ^ sp o <-. « J S, + T Technical &i T§*BI + •g "1 1 Sr-< -S + if t/» + A Administrative f i tefie 1 - S I . bO 1' - Sif1 ' 11 "8 - P Political ts1 „,_8 1 + c 1sw 1 i ill_o 'i - L Ugal 5 1 5<C 1 + ' ^ H5 '1 ' 1sa•S 1 + Oie5 5 6 I•3•a 1 - E Economic g • T§ ft-< ^Si + 1"$•g1 - 1 "w •g g 8 a 5 'fi 1 + ii'I 1a, _ ^I - • E BnvironmentM ' a >: ' j; g ' 1 + J$L^3 1- 1 •' § 1'' + 0I •1 i S- .g; ta 3 + fr•i •£i 'S *-j S 1.a 2 O <$ + $ _^_, , • g 1 • ;.| ' 1 + E-94 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of San Marcos Alternative Actions * 6. A.I Continue WUI fire prevention public education campaign 6.A.2 Enforce the new 150 foot fuel clearance ordinance 6.A.3 Require fuel modeling for all new development located within the WUI 6. A .4 Continue to ensure required street widths, paving and grades can accommodate emergency vehicles 6.A.5 Increase Fire Protection Staff as appropriate 6. A. 6 Procure and deploy a back-up EOC and communications vehicle 6.A.7 Evaluate the fire department's readiness to respond to and mitigate wildfires 6. A. 8 Continue to evaluate service level needs and impacts as part of the review process of major projects 6.A.9 Design new City owned critical facilities located in wildfire prone areas to minimize damage due to wildfires 6.A.10 Acquire and deploy a local AM radio station for emergency public information ••-: , — Comments, Builds awareness of and support for hazard mitigation Maximum benefit Could be costly for builders/developers Ensures access Funding needs to be identified Funding needs to be identified Funding needs to be identified E-95 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms SAN MARCOS STAPLEE EVALUATION - Priority Action 3 Goal 9: Reduce the possibility of loss of City government services due to pandemic influenza. Objective 9.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of losses of public service due to pandemic influenza. STAPLEE Criteria ForAltemj •• ' • i crtig ""'**"•""'•,•>•'.' *"- • , tf '.::;. •„. , •-,. : ^ •„,.'•<._ 9. A.I Retrain department heads in the Continuity of Operations Plan 9.A.2 Continue liaison with County Health and Human Services regarding pandemic procedures 9. A .3 Update the City's Pandemic Influenza Contingency Plan s ,','.. •(_, (3 •V;. • 8 » 3 & T; ., • ' fa . f I A •^:*j •Mil !« •?^..v-s :; 1 f ' P ;*i- £•"_; -';;-;^ ; 1 *" '^ i L , ~ • , , - \ • ••;,&£}. >;:';;/!',•„• f E • ^ccsioinic^, ,, ""^ / u %&ff ';/2^, f U ' ^ /^'j;.:^™taf"\r: :v' , , *?/", ' -^t\tf , • i'-fei 8 23 >r* '* E-96 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of San Marcos Alternative Actions Comments 9.A.I Retrain department heads in the Continuity of Operations Plan COOP will allow City to maintain service levels with reduced staffing 9.A.2 Continue liaison with County Health and Human Services regarding pandemic procedures County HHSA has the latest information regarding Pandemic Influenza treatment and prevention 9.A.3 Update the City's Pandemic Influenza Contingency Plan To incorporate latest prophylactic measures, treatments and public education efforts E-97 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Santee Goal:6. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and state-owned facilities due to wildfires Objective: 6.A Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to wildfire STAPLEE Criteria •>. " ? "7 'f \ ;- f-J ,J: , • I,," , -x; . Considerat lor ^-*v- " Alternative i Action 6 A. " J'*X--U 4,- - t'£< *>?' V \ "\;^ "• ^ -,-< , " , , -, , k. i^-"f jiTi , !*• " - , ' tv • ^ &- \jrnk >,,y* j|,.y * Sv^t.jB"; Actions f 1 Continue to maintain automatic aid agreements for emergency response with all surrounding communities Action 6 A. 2 Continue to require that proposed developments be approved only after it is determined that there will be adequate water supply and pressure to maintain the required fire flow at the time of development. s (Social) ^ ,x^ % X i* *1:*•;|: I I oo ^> tfcsi ^? ,ffecfin-fSffoputation|;:::|LU Q. + T (technical) - ^V^; ^, «p*,1''-:1^1 fflo"e + + • -1 Tm' '""S e T Co + + <r f$ * f * co 1 OT + A (Admlnistra tlve)-" / 44 "* •U- "" c. tn + '^ •&!. -*£ 1 D)C 1u. CN 1-- o 1ta 'c'to2 P (Political) X- ^ik* 't ?" -• '-? * 4 * 3 1 3Q. + + | U ^1Q 13o + + L . , (Legal) * -js. *v,,ifN «v JL.S.-.S; ,,I -"* >? „ " y, •c5 1C/3 3CL. + „ J- 9* f. V« \ - 13 IC/3 + A>,;.S.; *s * '**|;, o •>. cu 1 'X + + E (Economic) *'„',»*" 1 a,1 i . \ ^ ' t« * T€ 'otentiatilephaltengel^Q. O + , 0^' •'^' !|- Q 1 + + » *;* fsi 1 o + + E > (Environmental) ^ - ,f •* f ^ -- ; ^ , ^^^J^-^^^S1 ^ _£ ^_ _^ " ^»_J^_,i t si* '"If> C fto oO CD + ' i-'™" " $" ?? E~- " e*<0 03T3 ,5= 1 §-3 0)O IT ,11 ,* l|*•|;; o•sCD8=LU + §- - ,i,~i >T'K LU fs0 O<U CDfc a.LU C/3 + ,?,\C| | "{ fj ' CQ " ^ d3 il LU X + -' I* t-**5 !, ;| "*i" J?f C •=1 SI s 1'to § 2c t >o o £O O LU "18' 'S i s • + E-S APPENDIX E Sample STAPIEE Forms STAPLEE Criteria Considerat for Alternative • ^ w ions Actions r . '""'• 6.A.3 Ensure that all proposed and future development satisfies the minimum structural fire protection standards contained in the adopted edition of the Uniform Fire and Building Codes. Where it is deemed appropriate, the City shall enhance the minimum standards to provide optimum protection. Action 6. A .4 Continue to require fire sprinklers in all new construction identified in the Santee Municipal Code. Action 6. A .5 Continue to require that emergency access routes in all developments be adequately wide to allow the entry and maneuvering of emergency S (Social) CDOCCOH.sW 2?c3E "| + + ^1E I1 OT ec .95 SO 3CD Q.3= OLU Q. + + T (Technical) *S>»1? la •'w05 13.0'cJCo + + o 315CO i 6) 1 + + S D. !o3 + A (Administra tive) 1 + tsS = ,!£• I + ,S 1 1co 'c"to + + p (Political) ^Q. 1 1 I- + + •r C• O"o. 6 ,o + + L (Legal) r 3C/3 B tx. + + o 3 I + + + |, £ I I, X + + E (Economic) "5D3 1 1 Is + C.g •5 1 a>CD + + O 1 o''o + E -. : (Environmental) o o o 3 1 £! "l-s 93€ "So oO O + + + O)_c c: cp CD"Q .— 11 O DC + + fe I'. 1 ; 1 + "O >'m2CD ?i LU 1.1O «0} S>£ Q.LU C/3 + + + 0} t/5 Q)1 s| LU I + + to COo •« S1 03 || | 8ol + + s TJo>u.istint witHCO W + + E-99 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLER Criteria Considerations for Alternative i vehicles, as Actions r . necessary. Action 6. A .6 Investigate permanent placement of fire fighting aircraft in San Diego East County. Action 6. A. 7 Evaluate under-grounding of utilities in areas that of wildfires Action 6. A. have high risk 8 Investigate use of "controlled burns" in high-risk areas S (Social) Q) g f t 1 oO + + + *&Effecl:0n • SieejfrienCPtfpUl^f6r);::v%::; ::|;:;:%+ + + T (Technical) •1 1 1cJCo0} + + + c_o'S"o 86>S + + + 1 TJ 1<O + + + A (Administra tive) I - + . to •| c3IL - . ttlc,215ii 1o1 J>.H 2. - + + P (Political) I• Q. • m '•1E + + + o"S.-e + + + L (Legal) •c8.Q. 5 + + . • o' f S •'25' • + + + •co 1 •g ,, -^ 111 + + + E (Economic)Pfetlfip '|i|H"'"|§+ + . c_o "o •is! 1 + + + O 1 - + E (Environmental) o Eo 1s •••ws • f «,C 03o oO 0 - + + 1 «"B 11o fr + + d) CO *X3 1 oItil + + + •R !LU • o M 1 1111 U3 + + . 03 (n I UJ I + + + en CofetSteWrfhl,.;;:::,.;.':;Gopftmctqiir....^ . :" '=EnvftonmeKitai :Gb'a+ + + w .C n. to '<fl <fl 8 1 + + + E-100 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLE! Forms Jurisdiction: City of Santee Alternative Actions Action 6.A.1 Continue to maintain automatic aid agreements for emergency response with all surrounding communities Action 6. A. 2 Continue to require that proposed developments be approved only after it is determined that there will be adequate water supply and pressure to maintain the required fire flow at the time of development. Action 6.A.3 Ensure that all proposed and future development satisfies the minimum structural fire protection standards contained in the adopted edition of the Uniform Fire and Building Codes. Where it is deemed appropriate, the City shall enhance the minimum standards to provide optimum protection. Action 6.A.4 Continue to require fire sprinklers in all new construction identified in the Santee Municipal Code. Action 6. A .5 Continue to require that emergency access routes in all developments be adequately wide to allow the entry and maneuvering of emergency vehicles, as necessary. Action 6.A.6 Investigate permanent placement of fire fighting aircraft in San Diego East County. Action 6.A.7 Evaluate under-grounding of utilities in areas that have high risk of wildfires. Action 6.A.8 Investigate use of "controlled burns" in high-risk areas Comments Currently in place Could be opposition from developers and land-owners Provides for optimum structural resistance to fire Adds to cost for homeowners and/or developers Could potentially impact fire-fighting water supply Adds cost to new construction Aircraft are expensive to own/lease and maintain. Out side funding would be required. Local utility (San Diego Gas and Electric) currently exploring this. City staff will work with SDG&E Controlled burns often not popular with general public E-101 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Santee Goal:6. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and state-owned facilities due to wildfires Objective: 6.B. Increase Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of wildfires LCrltepaV',,-. ,-:y":•' *• r •**•%'"&?&•:•:&<* for Alternative Action 6.B.I The City should support State legislation that would provide tax incentives to encourage the repair or demolition of structures that could be considered fire hazards. 6.B.2Continue to aggressively enforce the existing weed abatement law, and modify and enhance where necessary, modifying fuel types and providing a defensible space E-102 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLES Criteria S (Social) T (Technical) A (Adminlstra live) P (Political) L (Legal) E {Economic)(Environmental) \ Considerations - , - fnr * '" **** - <'- - .v^s, - . • « -^ -': >7 -*-; ^ Alternative Actions..14*. 1 .-8if around all structures Action 6.B.3 Continue lo ensure that all construction materials used for renovating or remodeling existing structures meet current fire and building codes. E-103 APPENDIX E Jurisdiction: CityofSantee Alternative Actions Action 6.B.1 The City should support State legislation that would provide tax incentives to encourage the repair or demolition of structures that could be considered fire hazards. 6.B.2Continue to aggressively enforce the existing weed abatement law, and modify and enhance where necessary, modifying fuel types and providing a defensible space around all structures Action 6.B.3 Continue to ensure that all construction materials used for renovating or remodeling existing structures meet current fire and building codes. Sample STAPLEE Forms Comments E-104 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Santee Goal:6. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and state-owned facilities due to wildfires Objective: 6.C. Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfire hazards (e.g., US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management) STAPLEE Criteria Considerat for Alternative ''• ' . i ^ ons Actions • • ,, r ,- 6. C.I Continue to maintain active membership and participation in both the San Diego County Mutual Aid Agreement and the State of California Master Mutual Aid Agreement, and maintain a separate agreement with the US Forest Service, to ensure adequate resources are available in the City for any future anticipated wildland incidents S (Social) 0)8to"5.0) 'c3E oo + 1OT c ° CO 0) Q.tfc OUJ Q_ T •„ (Technical) 3 1 x:o o•433 1 ii 1 t/3 I CO"E.8as,. + A (Administra live) f 55 Allocated^•F"8 U. ""SU. (1)CLO CO, c CO5 + P (Political) is• oCLOL3 CO TO 1' .2Q. 1O L , •- (Legal) 1D. CO1 if + I f:; to •> IS .1I-s E • (Economic) — * <B I IE ®12 «£,g Q 1"o •; "f CD C_O ^B 1 E • • '. (Environmental) o"E ...o£oti <o«S •ja •S Sc toa«s 1 tU ..«j3g J2 CT3- (CO D: t_! CO O s + •-d' o> CO"Eiu t3 'DCD 03 lii CO w to OJ, •-"I ?l9= <C,LU I - + JO |j: •§ | g 88 m + SYl 1 .-'I:•e1"w g 0 3 + E-105 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Santee . Alternative Actions " -. ^ ^ " <*% "' ^ v < s >V ** ' JV X >. f *t * * * ' 6. C.I Continue to maintain active membership and participation in both the San Diego County Mutual Aid Agreement and the State of California Master Mutual Aid Agreement, and maintain a separate agreement with the US Forest Service, to ensure adequate resources are available in the City for any future anticipated wildland incidents -. - '-; s.\ „ , ;,.• .;'V - -^ 'jDomjrnents - -, ^ -: ;. s</ . , ^ .%,^f .-*.«' ; ">:;-.s*:* ' «4!;/"F^ YWV^ 'SVX:^-x«-^>:,^ v-\^^*^Cirf,W» ^Z^^f^? ....... i \-..,i.^i,^.... t ^". .,..»...!." \.%- .. .IKn^&uA. .... .».,, i^iMS&aL .sst,..^^ >..«>... .,1±. $&*.••. *ixSl**s>&i**z"*. — ^ii^, A»_. .,.-i.,i_ .w.tu>JUkJiu^ J3K^£ E-106 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms This page intentionally left blank E-107 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Solana Beach Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to geological hazards. Objective: 5.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to geological hazards STAPLES Criteria :•-. :-A •••,--• (Adtninistra Considerations for Alternative Actions c ED)(0 in a."O '•'.ts.. CO '*s-J. C 3VJ8 O tc- if ,i;is £ 1 •&. O UJ 5.A.I Continue to explore strategies and opportunities for sand replenishment 5.A.2 Finish local coastal plan development E-108 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Solana Beach Alternative Actions 5.A.1 Continue to explore strategies and opportunities for sand replenishment 5.A.2 Finish local coastal plan development ': - " ' : , Comments , ., '••»,'' ' , . ; Sand replenishment is a short to medium term solution Coastal plan will provide framework for future mitigation actions Note: Priority Action #1 incorporates Actions 5.A.1 and 5A.2 E-109 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Solana Beach Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to geological hazards. Objective: 5.B: Protect existing assets with the highest vulnerability to the effects of geological hazards. * SSKMw^-™ Considerations, for '•'' Alternative Actions V* cr r- O O 13as CL8= oHI Q- 5 s a. oo. a. to .9 I •to I C 5 .B. 1 Continue to develop local coastal plan to address bluff protection measures 5.B.2 Monitor existing protective measures taken to ensure their continued effectiveness E-110 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Solana Beach Alternative Actions 5 .B . 1 Continue to develop local coastal plan to address bluff protection measures 5 .B .2 Monitor existing protective measures taken to ensure their continued effectiveness -.._-• .-- Comments- , "';-./•. •'•.',•••. '•-' ,. -jr.? ';*;.*" •••',. '• ' • . - • • •:-',• • •• '"-'• :'. : ',-.*' „ • • '• •'.-.'-,-'.*.<• ', • ' '• '••"•;".^',, L.:' li-""5;" r. ..•'*<:', '•'"/":.••" --,- -^; -' •• , - ;•<- -;:}>- Priority for coastal residents Ensures City doesn't continue with actions that are no longer effective. Note: Priority Action #2 incorporates Actions 5.B.1 and 5.B.2 E-lll APPENDIX E Sample STAPIEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Solana Beach Goal 4: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, particularly people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and City-owned facilities, due to wildfires. Objective: 4.A: Coordinate with other agencies and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfire hazards STAPLBE Criteria s ; (Social) T • ; {Technical} p (Political) E'.--.._ •(Economic)(Environmental) Considerations for Alternative Actions ' . jfej.™ ;''=r 14.-;,., c,.• o '•0'" 4.B.1 Develop mitigation measures to enhance protection of home along San Elijo Reserve 4.B.2 Work in conjunction and cooperation with San Elijo Lagoon Conservatory to achieve mitigation efforts 4.B.3 Coordinate with other agencies to ensure consistency among standards E-112 APPENDIX E Sample STflPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Solana Beach Alternative Actions 4.B.1 Develop mitigation measures to enhance protection of home along San Elijo Reserve 4.B.2 Work in conjunction and cooperation with San Elijo Lagoon Conservatory to achieve mitigation efforts 4.B.3 Coordinate with other agencies to ensure consistency among standards >-' ;': '• ; Comrnents, •" . ' -•./ ,-*'•• •••" ,;--;,l '-,..- ,.'f Consistent with local WUI efforts Ensures local support Maximizes response capabilities Note: Priority Action #3 incorporates Actions 4.B.1,4.B.2 and 4.B.3 E-113 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Vista Goal:4. Improve hazard mitigation coordination and communication with Federal, State, local, governments Objective: 4.A. Establish and maintain closer working relationships with state agencies and local governments STAPLEB.Criteria ; 4.A.1 Complete construction and equipping of a new City Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Departmental Operations Centers to act as command and control coordination centers during disasters. 4.A.2 Continue efforts to train City employees and volunteers to operate the City EOC following the National Incident Management System (NIMS), the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the Incident Command System (ICS) E-114 APPENDIX I:Sample STAPLEE Forms STAPLES Criteria S (Social) T (Technical) A (Administra P (Political) L {Legal) £• (Economic)(environmental) Considerations for "X-v *'" Alternative Actions * e^ m5 'b I Q_ 1tn 4.A.3 Update City EOF to include coordination with County wide EOF E-115 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Vista Alternative Actions Comments 4.A.1 Complete construction and equipping of a new City Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Departmental Operations Centers to act as command and control coordination centers during disasters. Essential for the management of City-wide emergencies 4.A.2 Continue efforts to train City employees and volunteers to operate the City EOC following the National Incident Management System (NIMS), the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the Incident Command System (ICS) Required to comply with NIMS guidelines 4.A.3 Update City EOF to include coordination with Countywide EOF Countywide plan currently undergoing revision E-116 APPENDIX E Sample STAPIEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Vista Goal:3. Improve Build and support local capacity and commitment to continuously become less vulnerable to hazards Objective: 3.A. Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practice among local officials STAPLEE Criteria . Considerati for Alternative -" . '" ,-'•<! ons ." Actions t, '• " -. 3. A.I Continue to update City Emergency Plan every five years 3. A. 2 Emergency Operations training with City Staff 3.A.3 Build and support local partnerships 3. A .4 Continue to build a team of community volunteers to work with the community before, during and after a disaster by maintaining the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program. B (Social} + + + 5 ".- Sff* Offl a. + + + T {Technical) 1 + + + '•a' :8- + + + \ + + + A (Administra CO - 1 - 1! 1 •'• - ,F ... . (Political) CO I - + + + | + L • (Legal) . ; - tr ,<g".:.a " i;CU'+ + + "f + + + •'*;. + + + E '• - •'-'' (Economic) ; "-"'¥ CL' O' + + + "' ':•"' + + + '1- - -.£/ / -^ .•:/"..,{Environmental) : ,> '': 'i. •''. ;_. •'_ e,C.te •-. _- + + + lJ»'-rt + + + O,? + + + t + + + I + + + 1 + + + + ;'i*-.'/."'h »,;-'.. ., •S3 + + + E-117 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: City of Vista Alternative Actions 3. A.I Continue to update City Emergency Plan every five years 3, A .2 Emergency Operations training with City Staff 3.A.3 Build and support local partnerships 3. A .4 Continue to build a team of community volunteers to work with the community before, during and after a disaster by maintaining the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program. , - '••„,,,_ ••'-.•.;••••'' c^rtimetrti^. ,;•--,-.-- :. , -. • . •;_..-v';:.v';j> ;_ : ;„:; _,, ;^-.:\ c^ :\ '. ,* . '"','' •; I-.,, ':j>< fc .';•., -''--'v- -?•'-** '-,'; '•'' *'•••' *:''~'~'?'- "• , .'- - <:'»: '; '""'':•,-...<;', -vj V-' ^: ^-'..V'?55-. ^^V'-i^' • , ' x""'i'''^ , _^;':. ••; ''v '"•^'>\.l iL;1- _I;! ,^ \,r;'' S: - i '"'•*•". '"'.' " 1 ":'..!,jVLv>-'x-"'':^;'T-7;. ?i^:_'' .>'"'' ^ll'^"'~'^' Will complete after revision of Countywide plan On-going Effective way to promote readiness among the public May be able to augment city staff during emergencies Grant funded E-118 APPENDIX E Sample STAPIEE Forms This page intentionally left blank E-l 19 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: County of San Diego Goal"!: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and Public facilities due to man-made hazards Objectivel.D: Increase government and public knowledge of safe extremely hazardous substance handling procedures and terrorism awareness .(Soelaljf (AdmlhJstra {Politi Considerationsa, tor. .;• • .,:.. ,•:'.. '. Alternative Actions : c .>-> I.D.I Update Operational Area Plan 1 .D.2 Develop and maintain public education and outreach programs E-120 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: County of San Diego Alternative Actions I. Update Operational Area Plan Strong support from local governments 2. Develop and maintain public education and outreach programs Requires significant amount of staff time E-121 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: County of San Diego Goal 2:Increase public understanding and support for effective hazard mitigation Objective2.A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions STAPLEE Criteria 2.A.1 Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions s (Social) T ' -.< (Technical) A (Adminislra P (PolUlcai) L, '{Legal} .£•'' . (iconomtc){Environmental) 2.A.2 Continue to provide information to the public on the County website 2.A.3 Heighten public awareness of hazards by using the County Media & Public Relations Office 2.A A Gain public acceptance for avoidance policies in high hazard areas. E-122 APPENDIX E Sample STAPlEE Forms STAPLE! Criteria s , (Social)(Technical) E'/ Considerations *°r - : :* ' ' Alternative Actions *<'£#£*'' 2 A.5 Identify hazard specific issues and needs 2.A.6 Help create demand for hazard resistant construction and site planning 2.A.7 Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local and tribal governments to identify, prioritize and implement mitigation actions 2 A.8 Support the County Fire Safe Council E-123 APPENDIX £Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: County of San Diego Alternative Actions 2. A.I Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions 2.A.2 Continue to provide information to the public on the County website 2.A.3 Heighten public awareness of hazards by using the County Media & Public Relations Office 2.A.4 Gain public acceptance for avoidance policies in high hazard areas. 2. A .5 Identify hazard specific issues and needs 2. A .6 Help create demand for hazard resistant construction and site planning 2. A .7 Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local and tribal governments to identify, prioritize and implement mitigation actions 2.A.8 Support the County Fire Safe Council .-••,- ... . Comments • • . - . .-'....-••' Public education campaigns well received Requires significant staff resources - may become difficult to accomplish if number of student interns decreases Via County media Office Note: Priority Action Item #2 incorporates Action Items 2.A.1 through 2.A.8 E-124 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: County of San Diego Goal 10:Promote disaster-resistant future development ObjectivelO.A: Facilitate the adoption of building codes that protect existing assets and restrict new development in hazard areas STAPLEE Criteria s (Social)(Technical) A ; (Administra live) P (Pol (Economic) . E ' :: ^ -.-. . (Environmental) . Considerations Alternative Actions •3 8 as O. 1 -•.. wj§: ..#': 10 A.I Update the County Consolidated Fire Code every three years 10 A.2 Develop model Weed Abatement and Fuel Modification Ordinances 10.A.3 Utilize GIS and the internet as information tools 10 A.4 Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate structural/wildfire 10.A.5 Continue to develop partnerships for a countywide vegetation management program 4- E-125 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: County of San Diego Alternative Actions Comments 10.A.I Update the County Consolidated Fire Code every three years On-going effort. 10.A.2 Develop model Weed Abatement and Fuel Modification Ordinances Some resistance may be encountered in the back-country 10.A.3 Utilize GIS and the internet as information tools Not every department has trained GIS staff 10.A.4 Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate structural/wildfire County coordinates closely with regional fire agencies. May encounter resistance in back-country 10.A.5 Continue to develop partnerships for a countywide vegetation management program May encounter resistance in back-country E-126 APPENDIX E Sample STAPIEE Forms This page intentionally left blank E-127 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District Goal 7: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to floods. Objective B: Protect existing assets with the highest relative vulnerability to the effects of floods within the 100-year floodplain. STAPLEE Criteria A Administrative P Political L Legal E Economic E '. Environmental Considerations" For Alternative :JfT,;s& .£,*.' -S,. I'"3 ' I $' •"S 1. Replace RSF Fire Station #3 2. Improve hazard warning and response times. Alternative Actions 1 . Replace Fire Station #3 2. ALERT warning system and table top exercise Comments ,r „ . . ",•-,„; , \ Existing Fire Station built in 1986, did not comply with current earthquake standards and was in the 100 year flood plain. Replacing and building a new fire station will raise it above the 200 floodplain and comply with current building construction codes. 15% construction costs are funded with fire mitigation fees that have already been collected. County of San Diego has developed an ALERT system. Table top training exercises need to be conducted so that all agencies are prepared for a flooding in San Dieguito River watershed; 5,000 residents could potentially be impacted by a flood. E-128 APPENDIX B Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District Goal 1:Promote safer development in hazard area. Objective A: Facilitate the adoption of building and fire codes that protect existing assets and manage new development in hazard areas. STAPLEE Criteria Consiclerati For Alterfla Actions ons *" .- tive i r 1 . Review Fire District codes every 3 years 2. Adopt County building codes 3. Participate in local and State building code development .. S Social 1 5 + + 1'£ '"S*-* S 1 + + Technical a, 'i+ * i+ + 1"+ + Administrative - *se1 "U) 1 as ^ = 1 '§ 1 S :+ + • -. Political .£ 'i*c 1 + + 1, 6 + + 4- f + + L.. . .:. 3 1""" + + ] + + 1' + + Economic - i = 1"o + + aQ-8' ' ' o '' U + + cf S. S + + .- ... . E ' : EnvirofHitental |. 8 + + ia + + X 'S' |- + + i + + o + + E-129 APPENDIK E Sample STAPLE! Forms Jurisdiction: Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District Alternative Actions Comments 1 .Review Fire District codes every 3 years Controversial, could increase building construction costs. Codes set forth minimum requirements to protect health and safety of residents. Additionally, property losses have been reduced. Increases the responsibility for enforcement by the Fire District. 2. Adopt County building codes Adoption of 2009 County Consolidation Codes is required. The County Fire and Building code is adopted for the protection of the public health and safety. 3. Participate in local and State building code development Allows Fire District a voice in code development. E-130 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District Goal 8: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to Structural/Wildfire. Objective C: Prevent the ignition of structures by wildland fires STAPLEE Criteria Considerations *~ ** For Alternative Actions ; • :- i ; ' / • '"•'• /~T'CS ' •/"-'•- ™ 1 Ignition-resistant building materials and construction methods 2. Partnerships for District-wide vegetation management programs 3. State and Federal cost share grants to eliminate combustible roofs S • SMUT S "ft"'" 1 ^^ •'.' ' '§' 1 1 u + + + E "12 »*•£- 1"""" iwj »5 '.' 8 t| S + + + rj, ' ~" Technical •1 -8 '* 'i^' j£| "g 3-1 • + + + "' J™ '"•*i ' '^^ *,.^I+ + + .a' " i, , .§ h •>» : m ~> a -I + + + A AteinLffirative bf) l@ 3OS - - - ,_. !•: «• ** <ee«§ •'« - - - .„,| ,„, O 'J " c B 1 - - - : P '" Pditjcal • "" E .'- a ' >' TB ' 'S 1 + + + i •<1 ' 'Q*. ^ - s ' ' S *S'!+ + + f'-'^".^ -,ls; + + + . L ; " 'Legal "' —V .„>> i;*M e •'••'A , V- '« 1 '' + + + * ' J'' J -' '- ••at',-. • O ' 'J W • '" •8.: 1 + + + f - .;!•' " f ',,' ';"•: '• "S' fi I ' - + + E .: """ ' " Economics" ' i / .. . """' ' ' «^4 . -> 2 '"^', ,Oi ,. *§!I!+ + + S 'Q •B5'° '1 i - + + I».': i,'f "". - & ''"•,' **' 'f ~• ' •»- + + + "I--, "&' - '<M •'•"'" ^ Jf " '-; *S'"i-% • sP * • -*» ' !S .. J' + + - ' E "' '"finvte&arritol. •-.-• ' '"S W '•• p ':»M ''V '•3',' ' '§ -,tj', •- !'•. + + + J« i£* • a'1 '•J 1ei ^ v S .g: 's 1 + + + 1y> &' S'"'5"'""'S<(* X 8.S1 + + + ." •g 1 -a = o 1 « -a'S ^ rJ 1 S 1 >S ' fi aia + + + .. „ • &1 •' ' J "" ^ " a V u + + + E-131 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLEE Forms Jurisdiction: Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District Alternative Actions Comments 1 Ignition-resistant building materials and construction methods 2. Partnerships for District-wide vegetation management programs 3. State and Federal cost share grants to eliminate combustible roofs E-132 APPENDIX E Sample STAPLE! Forms This page intentionally left blank E-133