Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-07-06; City Council; 7073; EIR, SPECIFIC PLAN, PREANNEXATIONAL ZONE CHANGE AND TENTATIVE MAP FOR AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER. (EIR 81-06, SP-181, ZC-250 AND CT 81-46) SIGNAL LANDMARK'e CIlmOF CARLSBAD - AGENC@BILL 0 """ I 1 AB# 7~73 CIT SP-181, ZC-250, CT 81-46) DEPT. PL MTG. 7\6/82 DEf TITLE: EIR, SPECIFIC PLAN, PREANNEXATIONAL ZONE CHANGE AND TENTATIVE MAP FOR AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER. (EIR 81-6, CIT C TPJfJP T T 4E;FBPlA & Y " RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and the Planning Staff are recommend that the City Council CERTIFY EIR 81-6 by minute motion and direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare documents APPRC SP-181, ZC-250 and CT 81-46. ITEM EXPLANATION The proposed project (map attached) involves the consideratj the City Council of four public hearing items. EIR 81-6 an; the proposed impacts on the environment from the development the 333 acre Airport Business Center. Major impacts identif include traffic, crash hazards, grading and noise. Both the Planning Commission and staff feel that all impacts have be( adequately addressed and mitigated by the EIR. The three other actions include a specific plan, a preannex- ational zone change to the PM zone, and a tentative map to c a 77 lot subdivision to be completed in three phases. Throl Planning Commission and staff. review, all major issues on tk project have been resolved. The City At.torney's Office has requested the placement of one additional condition regardir attainment of an agreement from the developer which would hc the city harmless from litigation resulting from any airplar crashes occurring on the property. The condition would reac follows: "Prior to the approval of the final map for this I ject the applicant shall enter into an agreement satisfacto~ the City Attorney to hold the city harmless from liability j personal injury or property damage, or liability resulting j inverse condemnation caused by or resulting from the operat: Palomar Airport or aircraft using Palomar Airport. This cor dition shall apply to that property located within the FAA ' zone" of the airport as identified by the Environmental Inpi Report." The Planning Department has no problem with the addition of this condition. a LlJ > 0 er 0, e 4 z 0 a .. 5 1 0 z s 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW EIR 81-6 addresses the impacts and describes mitigation mea: for the proposed project. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant will provide all required public improvements the project. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a publi( facilities fee to offset the costs of providing all other PI .services. EXHIBITS 1) PC Resolution Nos. 1977, 1975, 1973 and 1974 2) PC Staff Report (EIR 81-6) 3) PC Staff Report (SP-181/ZC-250/CT 81-46 and attachments: 4) EIR 81-6 (previously distributed) - ,L -1 @ .. . II . . b. .- 1 Ed a __q I1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1977 .~ 2 3 4 5 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSICN OF THE CI1 OF CARLSEAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATIC OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR 81-6) FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY INCLUDING A Pl?,EANNEXATLONAL ZONE ACRES L9CATED ON TPHE NORTI4 SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPCRl ROAD APPROXIItfIATELY 3500 FE%T WEST OF EL CAMINO REI CASE NO: EIK 81-6 CHANGE, SPECIFIC PLAN AND TENTATIVE MAP FOR 333 APPLICANT z SIGNAL LAPU'DMA.RK - CARLTON/BROWNE - - .7 WHEREAS, on June 9, 1982, the Planning Commission, 8 hearings; and 12 cormcnts and dscuments of. all those persons testifying at 1 11 WHEREAS, the Planning- Commission has considered tl 3.0 provision,^ cf Title 19 of the Carlsbad Munic-ipaI Code; and 9 city of Carlsbad, held i?. public hearing on EIR 81-6 pursuar 3.3 ' WHEREAS I the Plannhg Cornmission has- received EIR .. 14, according to the requirements of Titj-e 19 of. the Carlsbad I -jE; ,Code; 1 IE .. NOW, TBEREFORE, BE 'IT RESOLVED by the Planning COJ 17 of the ci'ty of Carlsbad as follows: 18 19 .. 20 21 . 22 23 24 . ' 25 '26 21 28 1. 2. 3, .I4 * /I ' That the foregoing reci.tations are 'true and correct. That the Environmental Impact Report EIR. 81-6 will be to include the commr;nts and documents of those testify public, hearing Bnd responses thereto hereby found to b' faith and reason by incorporating a copy of the minute pEblic hearings into the report. That the Plann'intq Comm'ission finds and determines that Environmental Impact Report EIR 01-6 has been complete conformance with the California Envir.onmenta1 Quality state guidelines implementing said Actc, and the provis Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and that the P Comrnis,sion has reviewed, considered and evaluated the' information contained in the report. That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 81-6 as so am evaluated,-is'recommended for ackeptance'and certifica the final. Environmental Impact Report and tl?at the fin Environgiental Impact Report' as re.commended is ade uate provides reasonable information' on the project an2 all reasonable and feasible alternatives thereto, includin pro j eut e .. 4 b .. I1 B -e ' . 1 ' 'v /I a a 3 4 5 I 5. That each and every significant environmental impact id in ihe BnvJronrnental Impact Report w0ul.d .be overruled o which would mitigate against sai.d adverse impacts or, i certain circumskances, that mitigation OF such adverse would not be feasible u.nder the circumskances and under economic and social needs objectives and concerns in'pr . the private improvements all as identified in the Envir Impact Report and which, if the project were to be appr would be included as conditions of approval of project, counterbalanced hy changes or al.teration in the project 6 PASSED, APPROVED'AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting .'% Planning Commission of the city of CarSsbad., California, hc - 8 9th day of June, 1982r by the following votep to wit E 9 AYES: a . Commissioners Marcus, Sehl'ehuber, Jose a: la I/ 1% I x? I NOES: None. ABSENT: Chairnlin Farrow, Cori-nissFoners Friesked-t ABSTijIN : gone e . ' . Rombotis. a3 14 .. (qt U>"".. fli . -- bc pJc .:< ,xi.* .!A 2 -- CLARENCE SClFCk%JBEK, Vic?" - 15 /j CARL~RAD PLANNING cOmms~( 3-6 //ATTEST : :' IrP. -. G ~ .. -. :'.- ... 18 -:- -/4 , Y I/ / J. '4 +.9 64 P?d /, . &+x :;xL<, + ,f4 , ntvl~s C, HAGI~-~N Secretary . i3KLSBAD PLAWNINf'//CO~~~~ISST3N Y if bo 21 22 23 24 25 26 27' _. .. 28 i;fC RESO NO, 1977 -2- II ' "P' x + " I 0 .* 5 Pi 4 .I/ - 'L I/ PLANNING COr4141SSION - ,RESOLUTION NO" 1975 2 3 4 5 6 I A RESOLUTION OF TEE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH5 CI? OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CIT COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING . SP-I 8 1 r k SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A 333 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOXAZ AIRPORT ROAD APPROXIMATELS 3500 FEET WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL p APPLICANT: SIGNAL LANDMARK. - CARLTON-BROhWE CASE NO: SP-181 '. 7 I/ WHEREAS, a verified application for certain proper 8 -9 10 aa i.2 wit: A portion of Lot "G" of Rancho Aqua Hedionda, in t County of San Diego, according to Map thereof No. filed in the Off ice of the County Recorder, Novemk 1896 has. been filed with the city of Carlsbad and referred to tl: Planr.ing Commission; and WAEREAS, said verified application constitutes a L :: la? provided by Title 24 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and .is jj WHEREASp the Planning Commission did on the 9th (32 16 j: %? i 2o I June, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe to consider said request; and la jrel al I WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and 19 I !!eonsidering all teskimon~~ and arguments, if anyI of all per desiring to be heard, said Com,ission considered all factor ating to the SpeciCic Plm; and . 22 1 . .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 'IT HEREBY RESOLVED by.the Planr i 23 // Commission as follows: 24//A) That the above recitations are true and correct. . 25/ 'IS) That based on the evider~ce presenked at the public hear Planning Conmission recommends that. the city ~ounci!. ac Ordinance APP'ROVING SP-184 based. on the following findj . 26 1 conditions: 27 /I//// 2'8 1':' ' . I .' ., I %. * 1 , Findings: 4 ' - a i,) The site is physically suitable -in size and shape Fo 3 4 2) .The proposed uses will not be detrimental tr~ adjoining 5 properties for the reasons outlined in the staff repor 3) This project wil% not cause any significant adverse im: 6 the environment because the mitigation measures of EIR ,7 recommended for certification by.. the Planning Com~issi~ been incorporated into the Specific Plan, accommodaie the proposed uses because the Specific Plai provides standards for development which accommodate tl project with the site, 8 9 4) The project is consistent with a11 city publie Eacilit, and ordinances because the Specific Pl&n prohibits any development on 'the site without the proper public irnpr-I 10 . . 3.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 -\ . 22 23 24 I. I 5) The specific plan. is consistent :,;7ith the Carlsbad Gene and with Sections 654.51 and 65452 =-f the Government CO regulate. the .use of specific plans, - Conditions : . 1 ) Approval is granted for SP-181 for the a:-i??~ as shown c! ' ' 7, of the "Airport Business Center Carlsi.-1+3. Specific P dated Ma-y 25, 1982, ,incorporated. by refcj:ei?ce and on f the Plan~.ing Department D 2) All starLdards and provisions established .in the docume Gated Flay 26., 1982, and incorporated- by referencep sha by any future developnent occurring within the boundar this Specific Plan. . entitled "Airport Business Center Carlsisad Specific Pi 3) This project is approved upon the express- condition th applicant shall pay a public facilities Zee as require City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1979, c-TI fi the City Clerk and incorporated herein by referenc2r a according to the agreement signed by the applicant for . .c;f said fee' a copy of that agreemet-ll. dated Octolxr 29 F amended May 28*, 1982, 'is on file with th.e City Clerk 2 incorporated herein by reference. ~f said fee is not promised, this application will k~ot 1x3 cci-lsistent with General Plan and approval for this project shall he vc " //// 'f.4 95 I//// '26 //// 274' //// 28 16<'LESO NO, 1975 .. .. -2- II ' >*>.'' /I ' . I' I .. 4b -0 - . I! , .. 1 Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, h 2 PASSED,-APPROVED AND ADOPTED at .* a regtllar meeting II 3)19th day of Juke, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: 4' 5 AYES : ~~~~isSiOners Marcus p Schlehuber, Jose a: NOES : None. 6 ABSENT: Chairman Farrow, Commissioners Friestedt 7. Romhot is m I ABSTAIN: None, I 8 9 PO @ '/ /(!,/I 4 ,?M></".. - /-.& Y&AJ I c, ,/ ;' CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Vi= CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSI( -~l 12 ATTEST: .. " 13 P-,j " ?S ~%?/.-.. f22. 6 I,,, /:em,./,/ . . 1 ' ~ . . J . .. ... ~. ~ - ,yAMES C e HAGANAN/- Secretary .-- 'CARLSB~~D PLAN~@G COMMISSION l6 i '. 17 X8 19 .20 .- .- " 21 . 2.2 23 .. -. .. r -. .. .. -.. 24 .. . 25 -2 6 27 .. .L 28 PC mso NO. 1975 -3- I I ,. \ t t '.* . I/ 1) a .ZOd Ck4h .a. a 7 3 4 5 6 , 7 PLANNING C9MMISSLON RESOLGT'LON NO, 1973 h RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONt4IS$ION OF THE CI OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOXVENDING APPRDV-GL OF A ZONE CHANGE TO P-'M, PLANNED. INDUSTRIAL, ON PROP GENERALLY LOCATED ON TEE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH AND WEST OF PALOMP-3 AIRPORT p APPROXIMATELU 3500' WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL, APPLICANT: SIGNAL LANDMARK/CARLTON BROYNE CASE NO: ZC-250 I .- WHEREAS, a verified application for certain prope wit: 8 .9 10 11 lfias. been filed with the city of .Carlsbad, and referred to 12 Planning Commission; and A portion of Lot "G" of Rancho Agua Zedionda, in County of Sail Ciego, according to Map thereof No, filed in the Office of the County Recorder, !Cavern 1896 1.3 14 ,z5 ,June, 5982, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescrib to cmsider said request; and 16 Wt3EREAS , at said public hearing, upon hearing and 17 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pe 18'desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all facto WREREAS, the Planning Corr!rrij.ssion did on the 9tk, 1, I o relating to the Zone Change; and 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED .by the Plan 21 Comrnission as follows: 22/A) That the foregoing- recita.tions are true and COrrect, 23 24 25 . 26 27 EJ Thst based on the evidence presented at. the public hea Commission recommends APPROVAL of ZC-250, based 912 the fin.dir;gs and subjxt to the folrfowing conditions: il-.-- Findings: 1) That the zoning to P-t4 is consistent with the PI, tPla I'ncluskrial) designation for -this property as establish Land Use Elenent of. the Gener.al Plan, 28 2) That the subject lots are adequate in size and .shape t( accommodate uses permitted in the zone, 'as discGssd i' staff report, ' 6e , > b* ', , I m. -@ // .. .. I 1 3) That the zoning would not adversely'impact s!lrrounding 2 3 4 5 properties, as discussed in the-staff' report. 4) That the street syskem 'serving 'the project is adequat accsmmadake any increase in traffic generated by thes as discussed in the staff report. 5) ' That 'the project is consistent with all city public f policies and ordinances since: 6 a) 47 8. 9 30 2- x b) x2 1 The Planning Cominission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to th'is zone change insured biilding permits will not be. approved unless the Council finds that s@:=.er service is available to project* Since building cannot occur within the unless sewer service remains available, the Plann Commission is satisfied that the requirements of p~blic facilities element of the General Plan hav met .insofar as they appiy to sew-er service for th change e All. necessary pub1.i.c inprovemerits have been provi will be required as conditions of approval. 13 x4 25 i .. e) The applicmt has agreed. and is, required by the i of an appr0pri.at.e condition to. pay a public facil fee, Performance of .ti?.at contrzet and payment. of will enable this body to find tiiat public facilit be available. concurrmk with. need as reGuired by General Plan, Is ! 6) An Environmental Impact Repo'rt:has been prepared and 19 I Planning Commission has recommended,. by minute motion 18 .Environmental Inipact Report has been amended to illclcl comm.ents and doctiments of those testifying at the pub 19 hearin2 and responses theretc",. The Planning Cornmissi certifies that the Environmental Impact Report has be 20 comple%ed in conformance with ?:he Czl j-Eornia En,vironm 21 Commission has reviewed, considered and evalsated 'the informati.cn contained in the report ., The Environment 22 &:p~t 8.3 so amer;ded and ev.zlua-Led is recommended for acceptance as the Final Environmental Impact ~eport, provides reasonable information on the project arid a1 I certification of the 312 to the City Council. The Gr Quality Act and the Stat? guide]-ines 2nd. that the P1.a 23 reascnablc and feasible alternatives thereto, il?'uiudi 24 the Final Impact Report as recommended is adequate an ///I 25 plfoject,'~ 26, 27 1 ///I //I/ !PC RES0 NO, 5 973 -2- ' .I I 28 I//// ,' - <,. ', ', .* .. 11 II e' ... -eG II r I1 Conditions; 2 3 .. 4 5 6 ,7 8 9 10 a1 '3.2 13 I - 1) AppKoval is granted for ZC-25@., as shown on Exhibit 'I June 9, 1982, incorporated by reference and on file i Planning Department. Devel.opment shall o.ccur substa shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2) . This 'project is approved upon the express condition t building permits will not be issued for development c subject property unless the City Engineer determines facilities are available at the time of application f sewer permits an% will continue. to be available until occupancy D t 3) This project is approved uqon the express condition t applicant shall pay a. public facilities fee as requir Council Policy No. 17r.dated April 2, 1982, on file to the agreenent executed by the applicant for paymen fee a copy of that agreement dated October 29, 1980, amended on May 28, 1982, is on f iie with. the City Cl-e incorporated herein by reference. 'If said fee is not proxised, this application will not be consistent wit Gen.eral Plan and approval for this project shz.1-1 be v PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at' a regular meetin9 City Clerk and incorporated herein by rrinferencep and PlannirLg Commission of the city Of Carl-sbad, California., h 1-5 l4 i . ' 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: JG 3-7 Raw1 ins o PAYES : Commissioners .Marcus p ~chlekuber, ~ose 18 19 2o I 21 22 23 NOES: None o ABSENT: Chair1m.n FELrrme, Commissioners Eriested Rom,So t i s 0 IIBSTAIM : None D CLARENC~~~E~LELlUaER, Vice-=Chairm -__" CARLSBAD PLANNING COMNISSTOid 24 25 xrms'I:; I 26 CARLSEAE mR.rmmG COMMISSION 27 IJA~s C, EAGA~JIAX, Secretary . 'L- I "5 Ir;, io Igmi 1373 . - '. . - ' 2" . . . " I/. . \b ,- e .. . . 7 EN. I! .. 1 /I ' PLA?WING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1974 . ". - 2 3 4 5 6 A RESOLUTION CF THE PLANNING COMP;IISSION OF THE CI? OF CARLSBAD, CALLFOXNIA, RECOiQ5ENDING APPROVAL PROFEiiTY GENERALLY LQCATED Old TBE. NORTH SIDE OF PALOXAR AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTEI A.ND WEST OF PALOMAR W&RPORTI, APPROWIPiATELY 3508' WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL 0 APPLICANT : SIGNAL LANDIUIAXR/CWRLTBN BROhWE CASE NO: CT 81-46 OF A.TEPJT&"TiVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO CREATE 77 LOTS C ,7 WHEREAS! a verified applicagion for certain propel 8 wit: 9 10 a portion of Lot "GI! of &mcho Agua Hedionda, in t County of 'San Diego, according to Flap thereof No. filed in the Office of the County Recorder, Novernb 1896 . ax !laas .been fil5:d .with the city of Carlsbid-, and referred to i ,. 12 13 Planning Commission; and WHEREAS , said ve.rif Fed application c'op.stitutes a I I4lip;ovided by Title 21 of .the CarXsbad :Municipal. Code; and 15 11 WBET?EAS, the Planning Commis.sion did, on the 9th ( 1611 ' JuneB 1982, hold a duly nQticed public hearing as prescribe 17 j to consider said request: and l8 I ' NHEREAS ,- at said pub; ic. hearing, upon hearing and 319. Ijconsidering all testimony and arguments, if ~ny, of all pe: %.I /Idesiring. <o be heard, said Commission considered all facto. 21 . 22 relal;in.g to the Tentative Tract Map,. ; NOWl THEREFORE, BE IT EIEREBY RESOLVED by the Plan 23 //Commission is follqws: 24 j '26 I A) That tjle above recitations are true and corr@c$. IB) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea Commission recommends APPROVAL 02 CT 81-46! based on t , . 25 "" following findings and subject kd the following condit 27 ' 28 //// I/// .. I '1 ' .. ,\ .. .1 2 3 .4 5 6 'r' 8 L 9 1.0 3.1 12 13 a 4: 1.5 1.6 3- 7 18 0 -0 .. - .. 1) The project is consisteE'i with the city's General Plan the proposed- indus,trial subdivision is consistent with Planned Industrial 'designation for the site as indicatc Land Use Element oE the General-Plan. 2) The site is physically suitable for the type and densil development since. the site is adequate iil size and shaf ' accornrnodate indi;strial development at the density prop 3) The project is consistent with ail city public faci1it.l; icies and ordinances since: a) . . b) c) '1 ! The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an ap] condition to this project, Pnsured.that the final I not be approved unless the City Ccui*lcil finds that service is available to serve the project. In add the Planning Conmission has added a condition tha. shall. be .placed on Chne final map that building per not he issued for the project unless the City Engil determines that sewer service is available, and bu cannot occur *within the project unless sewer servil remains available, the PI-anniiig Comnission is sati that iihe requirements of the public facilities elel the General Plan have been net insofar as they app sewer service cor this 'project. AI.1 necessary ptiblic improvements have been provid will be required as conditions of ay?proval. '='ne applicant has agreed and is required by the in of an appropriate condition to pay a public facili Performance of that contract and payment of the f enable this body'to find that public facilities wi available concurrent with need as reqcired by the Plan o 19 1 d) Assurances have been qi.ve1-1 that adequate sewer for project will be provided by the city of Carlshad. 20 21 22 23 2 4 25 $6 27 28 1 1 I 4) The. proposed project is. compatible with '&e surroixifin land uses since surrounding properties are designated ~ industrial development 0.2 the General Plan. 5). An Environmental Impact Report has been prepzred and 'c Planning Cornmissiorl has .recommended; by minute motior,, certification of the EIR to the City Council. The Erz Environmental' 'Empact Report has been amended to inchd comments and documents of those testifying at the pub3 hearixg and respnses thereto. The Planning .Cornmissic certiEies that the Environmental Impact Report has bee completed in conformance with the California Environrne Quality Act and the State cjuidt39ines and that the Plar Commission has reviewed, considered and' evaluated the information contained in the report e The 'Environment; Report as so amended and evaluat.:.od is recommended for PC RESO h'o, 5974 -2- ,X, ' . 11 0 0 .' -1 2 3 acceptance as the Final Environmental- Impact Report, E the Final Inqact RepGrt as recornmended is adequate and e provides reasonable information on the project and all reasonable and feasible alternatives thereto, includir project," 4 General Conditions 5 1 Conditions: " . 6 "I ~~py;?:ova~ is granted for CT 81-46, as shown on Exhibit dated June 9, 1982, incorporated. by reference and on f -7 stantially as shown unless otherwise noted i.2 these co I the Pla.nning Department.. Devel-opment shall occur sub 1.1 tions. -9 10 %Z 12 13 3-4 j. 5 X6 IT 3.8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 . 26 27 28 2) .. 3) This project is approved upon the express condition th final map shall not be approved unless the City Counci as of -the tine of such approval that sewer service is to serve the subdivision. This project is approved upon tlie express 'condition th build.ing permits will not be issued for development of subject property unless the City Enginaer dit.ernir,es t. facilities are avail.abPe at the tine of application fo sewer pernits and will cant-inue to be available ur,tik occupancy. This note shall be placed on,the final nap I1 I, 4) This project is approved upon the express condition th applica.nt shall pay a public facilities fee as require Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file w City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and a to the agreement executed by the applicant for paplent fee a copy of that agreement dated October 29, 'i980, a1 amencted on May 28, 1982, is on file with the City Clerl incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is cot I promised, this appli'cation will not be consistent with General Flan and approval for this project shall be vo: "" P1 anning Department 5) The applicant shall establish 8- :property oyrner's assoc. and corresponding covenBntsr conditions and restrictiol . CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the Plann: Department prior to final map approval for each phase. 6) The applicant shall prepare .i! detailed landscape and irrigation pram, for all special. landscaped streets, mi parks and cemmon areas, which shall be submitted to ant approved by the Planning Director prior to approval of final map for each phase, '7) All approved 1.andscaping fo? special landscaped streets common areas shall he i!?stalled -prior to OccuPancY of c I' phase. I/ i PC RES0 EO- 1974 -3- \.I .1 I 2 3 4 I 0 0 8) A11 landscaped are,?s shall be. maintained'in a healthy khriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris 9) Approved landscaping and facilities for .mini-parks she installed by the developer prior .to building developlne 60% of the acreage of the entire phase within which th located as they are shown on the tentative map, !. 5 6 '7 8 .9 310 21 22 13 1 4. ,15 I I I 10) Any si.gn.s proposed for this development shall be desi; conformance with the city's Sign Ordinance and approve specific plan and shall require review and approval of Planning Department prior to in'staLlati.on of such sigr 41) A uEiform siyn program for this. development .shall be E to the Plannlng Department for their review and approt to occupancy of any building. 12) The applicant shall submit a street name list consist€ the city's street name policy subject to the Flaming Director's approval prior to final map approval, 43) The project shall provide bus stop facilities at Locat subject to the satisfact.ion of the North County Transj. trict, Said facilities shall at a mini,mum inclcrde a k free from advertising a~d a pole for the bus stop siqr bench and pole shall be designed in a manner SD as to detract fron? the basic architectural thqne of the pro: said design shall be subject: to the approval of the PI Director and Ncrth County Trans'it District. .. 1 161114) The pro2ccrt. shall attempt to develop a ride to oork ar prograa for its employees with the North County Transj trict.. Furthermore, the project shall attempt to 1iEj staggering of worker shifts so as to facilitate the st said program. it7 I/ l8 20 I I of 'chis property ko the city of CarlsSad.. I 2-g /IS) Approval of Tentatiire Tract NG, 81-46 is granked subjc approval of Zone Change 250 and to approval oE the anr 211 x2 23 24 .2 5 . 26 27 28 I! 1 I 1 I I I 16) Approval oE this tentative tract. nap shall- expire twe; mont.hs from the date of City Council. approval unless 2 map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the aFplicant, Said extension shall be approved or deniei discretion of the City Council.- In approving an exter city Council may impose new conditions and may rzvise cond it ions * .. 47) The developer shall'offer short-,tem leases of a5ricul viablle parcels as feasible until such time as these ; are developed u 'i8) Development of the project site shall conform to FAA -5 regarding kleight ijmitations- which may apply to constr of builclings within Airport Busi.ness Center CarlSbad e 1pc. RESO NOD '1 (37 4 I". 4 - ,\ I/ 0 ... ' . *. /1 .. . 1 /i Engineering- . .. 1 2 19) The applicant shall agree to make provision to utilize 3 reclaimed water, on the subject, property in all eonumr as approved by .the Citl; Engineer. ' 4 20) The reclaimed water irrigation system shall be nlaintai Carlsbad, under B contractual agreement with the hornec association that is to give the city total assur&rtce t would always have the ability to discharge the effluer I operated consistent with the requirements of the city 5 6 7 8 9 ' 10 12.. 1% 21) Irrigation systems to accommodate future reclaimed wat be designed consistent with Titie 17 of the California Administrative Code. Offsite future reclaimed water distribution systems shculd be anticipated by the inst of adequately sized sle,eves at crossing, points to mini streek exc.avakion. Grading 22) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to t "- commenccme'nt of any clearing or gradiag of the site, 13 23) x4 15 ' . 18 17 . 16 39 j 24) 20 21 . 22 23 . 25) The grading for this prcijeci is defined as "controlled by Section 11.05.i70(a) of the Carlsbad Xu-nicipal Code Grading shall be perEormed under: the obsexvation of a I engineer whose responsibility it shall be .to coordinatl inspection and testir,g to insure' compl-iance of the wor' the approved grading plan, submit required reports to Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11,06 of tl Carfsbad Municipal Code, Upon completion of grading, the developer shall insure "as-graded" geologic plan shall bembmitted to the Cit Engineer, The plan shall c1,earl.y show all the geology exposed by the grading operation, a.il ge.ologic correct! measures as actually constzucted and must be based on i map which represents both the pre and post site.gr.adin< plan. sha13. be signed by both.thc soils engineer and thc engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on 2 or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent e No Grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdiv unless 3 letter of permission is'obta-ined: fron the owne the affected properties. 24 25 2.6 21 I 26) No cut or fill slopes shall be steeper than a ratio of horizontal. to 1 vertical (2: 4 ) e, 27) Additional drainage easements and drainage strc?ct-ures s provided og izstalled as mzy be required-by the County Depa~tmerat of Sanitation and Flcmd Control or the City necr o 28 (I ." /PC HESO NO. 1974 - 5" 11 .. I\ I/ >. 0 0.. /I .. 1 1 28) The developer shall pay 'the current. 1cca.l'drainage arc prior to .approval' of the final map or shall construct systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan 2 of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City Engineel 2 3 4 5 6 4 4 29) band for all public streets and easements shown on tht tative map shall. be dedi.ca.ted on the Eina5. map and sh, ' graated to city free and clear of all liens and en cum^ 30) Direct access rights for all lots abutting Palomar Ai: Road. and all lots abutting College Roulcvardd, except joint driveway access to lots 25 and 26 of Phase 3 sh( waived on the final map. 4 31) Direct access rights for lots 12 and 13 in Phase 1 c a1 8 1 I'D'' Street shall be waived on the finzl. map. Direct , 9 rights for lot 1 in Phase 4 and lot 3 in Phase 2, abu Carnino Vi.6a Roble shalt be waived on the final map, .o Pub]. ic Improvements . i II "" , 21 12 23 I 32) All pubhi:: streets shall be improved by the developer the typical sections shown on tlle tentative map and i conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior to of any buildings withill t.he phase for which the impro . are required, I. a4 3- 5 16 . improv5,ments within a phase shall be constructed by t; 17 134) Except 2s indicated in the conditions below, a19 stre Streets 33) Unless ctherwise stated in the cojlditicl2s belowp ~1.1. . developer to full-widt-h, improvements will occur in con j unction with ad j acent. 18 1 development. as. Vida Roble for Palonar Airport Road inproved to the 21 incl~.ding a raised median, along the Phase 1 frontage 20 1 135) The developer shall cons'cruct half-street improvement Palomar Airport Road an6 provide a transition east oF . 0 satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy 22 1 phase o 23 136) The developer shall constkuct half-street improvement including a raised median, along the Phase I1 frontag 24 Palomar Airport Road prior to occupancy of Phase II,, , ~3 137) Colleqe Boulevard shall he imprcved full-width withir Phase '1x1 boundaries prior to occupancy -of that phase the final- map for Phase 1x1 with gyadiirg being done f ul.timate street width. 26 27', full 102-€00t right-of-way shall. he dedicated at the I1 .. 28 !I /PC RES0 NO, 1974 -6- I .. .i ': ' I/ e- .* ., '% 2 3 4 5 6 7 38) College Boulevard shall'be improved off-site, from the southern boundary of Phase III to Paloaar Airport Road . 32-foot width including curbs p-rio? to occupancy of Pk The full 102-fo3t right-of-way shall' be dedicated. 39) Notwithstanding conditions 35 and 36 the City Enqineer request cdnstruction of College Boulevard to city star prior to occupal?cy of Phase XI1 based. .on the followin< , occuryences: a) Increase of 5,000 VDP in BDT (based on Fall 1980 i counts) OG El Camino Real between Tamarack Avenue Palomar Airp9rt Road. '8 9 b) Ehcrease in 5,000 VDP in ADT. (based on Fall 1980 i coun'ir;) on Falomar AiYpolzt Road between El Camino . Paseo del Norte. lo I/ 40) Prior to occupancy of Phase 1 F Camino Vida Roble shal: constructed full-width between Palomar Airport Road ar 11 j' street. - 12 41) "D" Street shall. be constructed to full-ividth improves from Pziomar Airport Road to the w&st en6 of Phase I j 13- occupancy of that phase. .. 14 142) IrD" Street shall. be constructed to .fulI-wi.dth inprovex occupancy of Phase 111. . . from the west end of Phase I to College Boulevard, pr: 1.5 16 43) Sidewalks shall be constructed to city staildards on LC of the following streets: College Boulevard, Camino 1 rninilrrurn, sidewalks constructed .'to city standards on o; of the street,. . 3-7 . ~oble.ar,d r8~11 Street, AI^ other streets will llaveF a. 18 Traffic Signals 19 1 . . 20 144) I 'rile developer shall enter in<<> a traffic signal agree] tine city and post., aa bond to in'sure construction of tl 22- required traffic signals prior .to tl-ie approval of thz .map for each phase, 22 45). The required signals and the percentage of the cost o 23 signa.]-s, to be borne by the developer is as follows: 24 I/ Intersectian Developer . Cost 25 1. Palomr Airport Rd 2nd Camino Vida Roble * . 26 College Boulevard. 3.113 "D" Street 11)0% 23' /Camino Vida Roble- and rrO" Street , . 100% Palomar Airport Rd and "D"- Street' . .k 281 "" *cost of this signal shall b13 the dif-ference between tharcri-way intersection and a four-way 'interszction e I -/PC. RES8 NO, 1974 -7- b, .. \, 1, 2 3 4 5 6 7 €3 9 a 3.0 la 12 13 a4 35 3.6 17 18 E9 20 27. 0 ,. ' . .. 46) The developer shall install the required traffic sign; th-e City Engineer, determines that such signals are wal and so notifies the developer in writing, 47) The developer shall comply with a11 the rules, regula1 design requir-ements of the respective. sewer and water regarding services to the project. 48) The retention basins sbaLl be constructed in the init: of grading for the phase in which they occur, These 2 shall be maintained by the prpDerty.owner@s associatic responsibility shall be clearly stated in the CC&R'S. 49) This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No buil permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel until further subdivided pursuant to the provisions of Titlc the Carlsbad Nunicipal Code, This note shall be plaec final map, . . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED aE a regular nieeting Planning Commission of the city of CarPsbad, California, he 9th day Q€ June, 7982/ by the following vote, to wit: AYES : Commissioners Marcus, Schlehuber, Jose and I; .. I/ ' ' NOES : None O AGSENT: Chairman Farrow, Commissioners Friestedt and Rombctis. AESTAIN : None e "" " CLARENCE SCHLEBLTRER F Vice" CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMI.SS10 IIRTTECT: 22 11 .. 23 I/ Ij 24 JAbfIES C o HAGZQIAN, Secretary CARLSRAD PLANNING COMMISSION 25 /I I 2.6 27 . 28 PC RESO NO. 1974 -8- .. .. .. '. 0 .e ' . STAFF REPORT . .* DATE: June gr 1982 TO : planning Commission FROM : ' Planning Department SUBJECT: EIF, 8i -6 z SIGNAL LASDMARK - CARLTON/BKOhJb?E - E c BACKGROUND "._1 Environmental Impact Report 81-6 addresses the pcssible impact: created by the propcsed annexa-tion, zone charige ,(County to P-M) speciFic plan and tentative map (77 lots) on 333 acres located . the ncrtl? side of Palonlar Airport Road approximately 3500' west of El Ca.mino Real (location maps attached) Q ' EIR 81-6 is compri3ed of tv:o parts. The first part is the drai EIR, which idelzkifies possible impacts from the proposed actior a'nd describes pcssible. mitigation measur'es to lessen the effect of these Impacts. The secor;d park is the (icarmenkss' seckion which lists reviewing zgencie?, includes conntents on the draft EIR, an3 also contains the cityts response to comments from thc public and from other agencies. I1 D IMPACTS " I-, -~_" Topogr~phy: The natural topography of the site is thi -of iuy-ye6 hills r steep slopes, and ,small vall.eys. Tht EIR indicates that the project as-proposed will creatc significant, hut unavoidable impacts to the visual quality of the site. The project will substantially alter the existing topography by provid,ing the large flat pads necessary for ird~strial development. Mitigation cari be provided by special landscaping and reducing cut and fill s'lopes to less visible areas of the site, .* 2. -,"""" Archaeologlcdl Resotlr'cesr "- An exke.nsive number of archaelogical sitcs exist near the northwest end of tl site and are part of an extensive 22. acre complex of sites. The EIR has recommended a recovery program fo. this afea utiiizing mapping, post-hole excavation surface collection, and' where necessary. excavation of these sites prior to any grading on the site.' part o this excavation has been completed, . .. .a .. a ..e ' . 1. 3. Trz,ffic: The EIk indicates that the project will "4 generate.~pproxim~~,ely 23,202 trips per day. 'Et was determined that, though the streets have the capacity for handling project traffic, intersections will suffer lower levels in service. These impacts can be mitigated by improvements to the intersections. Circulation within the project ha.s also been redesignec ' to lessen impacts, 4, Airport Impacts a. Crash hazard: The EIR identifies a crash hazard area over the prcject and rgcommends that either n( development or low intensity development occur in this area. Staff feels that this impact can he mitigated through development restrictions provide. in the specific plan. I_ L b. Noise: Noise levels created by overhead aircraft exceed 80 dS ,in certain areas of the project, The EIR indicates that these impaqts can be mitigakeeci using .appropriate design featGres in structures within affected areas. Staff feels that these mitigation measures can, be adequately. provided through design restrictions in the required specif plan e .. Staff feels that EIR 8 1-6 has been prepared in compliance with the city's Environrnentai Protection Ordinance and adequately identifies and recommends mitigation measures €or potential impacLs on the enviroilnent. I11 ., RECOXMEKDATION It is reconmended that the Planning Cornmiss-ion APFROVE Resoluti No. 1977, recommending to the Cit.y Council CERTIFICATION of EIE __" 51-6. " ATTACHNENTS 1. PC Resolution No, 1977 2, Location i"ia.p . 3.. EIR 81-6 (previously distkibuted) CDG; ar 6/2/82 .. -2- * .. .. a .. _. $,', T,,' - I,, I -x.: ,., ~ a I\ . I ,, .). ?r:-:::--*. . I ..*.>< c. . >\J,. .. , .r I.>.:-_ v e .-e ' .- .. r;..,-., cv>., . .;., .:.; :.___ I-:-.. ,, ,e:,-.;, ,-.;; ,. ,~.:.;~..".,z " ..-" ..,,.. -z~-;-...""I -.. ,,.. ..- ";:. :.. . >,._ .;,>.:.:. . ,;-; ",,.,. ~ -.."-,.,...= :... ...,,, ~.. "... ~ ."__ .. .___ ~ ... . . .. . .-. i_ . , , .- . ,. :. p- ,___" ,,.""^___" ,______ ~ _.,_"" ^______" _""_,l..l. _."_ "... ._ _..__"_"" ._".. "" I"_.-,....1"..."..-. - .I" -.-.._.-._- -..."..-." I "...._"".._."".. ,. I .. _.C__ ".".x .,._.." II.".",^ "-.-. ~ ". ..., *"" ".. I .,,. ___"__.i___.' """" .". ", ._",-" "._ -. ."" ._.." "1.1.. ""... ._" ,._.I_" _,."_."" I -....-.. r 1:. i: I . : r r :. !: L :" ~ 1: - ;. i I:: .~ ..' 1 ., ,' (i i-(2:;,;.<i<,z ;:!.;{-; '~';~:~,~.~,~~~;,':~:... .-,( Ti,: t'icj;;ci si;;. ;:(;:! \/+;;i:r,J !: I . f. iW' ' 1; ri I :fFJI. r, (7: .. . ;,' :: I:.< i. ; ' , .<, ;; ' b. L ""_._.^' ,_.- ,._"_ ". ,.-,-,, ~ _,_.__...____ " .."... ~ ..-...,.. ._... ._ - .,_ . ..._ "-.-..."...-."_..I ...."l " "-""." .-.. _-... _..'." -.-I-... .... -.-.--, I .-: ,,,~- ,,-:, z:,,,,: ,_., . .. 2.' '... ., .*>.:;: ;.., "j . . . .. , .. .__...,.,., ../ . .." .. ...._.. ..,':> ...:','.>::...: -.:.' : .".. :... .~'~.."..-':.'~';.~., .. . . . . . . . . , . , . 1. ? co 03. :) ,. e APPLICA*:t'l *. I ..J SUBMITTAL DATI .""" "" November 5 I '7 98'1 (w/EIR) .- .. .. STAFF REPORT " DATE : June 9, 1982 -TO: ~La.nning Conmission FRQM: . Planning Depa-rkrnent SUBJECT: " SP--?$I/ZC-25@/CT 31-46 - SIGNAL LANDMARK/CARLTON ___""_ El?OT.IWE - Request for approval of preannexaticnal and a- Tenkative Subdivision N.ap to create 77 lots o the north side of Palomar Airport Ro.ad, south and w of Palomar Airpcrt, approximately 3500' west of El Camino Real. zoning to P-M (Planned Industrial) B a Specific P1a.n I e PROJECT DESCRIPTION ."- The applicant is requestipg approval of three actions to permi development of the Airport Bqsi!:ess Cen'celr,, on 333 acres, loca as described above. and shown on the attached location map, Th applicant is requesting preannexational zoning- of .P-M, Planned Industrial, approval of a Specific Plan 'to provide for the dev opment of the ir,dustrial complex and a Tentative Subdivision I4 to create 77 Lots in three phses, SI?-181 Specific Plan for khe development oC the industrial complex.. ANALY S X S Planning Issues I__ """* 1.. Does the Specific F1.a; properly address the impacts created by the close proximity of .this .project to Palomar Airport? 2. Does the Specific Plan provide fcr compatibility Getn the proposed project 2nd Macari.0 Cariyon Park? .. 3. Are the development Standards provided in the Specif i. Plan adequate to ensure development of a quality busi ness park? lIiscussioi1 """ The su5ject property is located in a special treatment area ' ' designated by the Genera:t P3,an as the A.irport 'InEluence Area. Developraent within this area must be processed in conjunction with a Spc2clfi.c Pl.an; The proposed Spec:ific Plan (SP-181, att-achedi) 6a.s a joint. effort by the developer and the city st; .. 3 ., i$ 0 01 ' . .. The Specific Plan is designed to provide specific locations fo. varims land US~~S~ developmen% standard6 tailsred to the characteristics of the site, and mitigation measures designed reduce or eliminate project impacts ori the environment as .. identified in ,the EIK. The subject property is highly impacted by Palomar Airport. T runway, i.f projected west.w.ard F would extend thravgh the west- central area of ?he project? directly under the flight path, making this portion of the site a high crash hazard area, The Specific Plan (fig. 7) designates a "Flight-Path Restricted Us Zone" which is. an area 250 feet to each side of the centerline the runway (extending over the sutc\-ject pfoperty) in which uses are restricted to warehouse and offi,ce type uses. The Specifi Plan a%lows greater building coverage for warehouse type uses (75%) and is very restrictive (35%) for .office u.se coverage. purpose is to milnimize the number of employees in the crash hazard area. The "~~.1j.ght-Fath Restricted Use Zone" also corresponds very closely to the high noisd (greater than 75 dBAs CNEL) impact a as id3rxtified in the EIR, Because noise inpacts from the airp are especially severe in this area the Specific Plan requires to 70 dBA and internal noise levels €or off,ice uses shall be reduced to 50 dB&. Various construction techniques for reduci interior noise levels are reeommended in the .Specific plan, The pkoject also abuts the proposed Macario Canyon Pzrk at the northwest corn.el: of the property. Because of topography and access problems to this section of the project, the Specific F has designated this area for future planning, The Specific PI. indicates that before this property is developed, the develope must process a Specific Plan Amendment showing how any propose . development is cornpztible with tne Macario Canyon Park area an that inz'cemal. noise levels for wa.rehou.se type uses be mitigate adjacent open space, Because of this-ilrovision staff feels th the project adequa.'cely considers compatibility with the ad-jace park area, The devel.opment standards provided i-n the Specific Plan were $ posed by both staff and 'the developer, Many o€ the deveiopmer mini-parks, signing, etc. ) and were also used in the Roll Specific Plan (SF-180). There are no issues involving the development standards as both the applicant and staff concur t the proposcd docusiient will help provide a high a,ua.lity industr sta,nda.rds exceed ,the requirements of the. existing code (parkir project 0 -2 .- I 1) m. .* -. .. ZC-250 - Preannexational zoning to I?-PI, Planned Industrial. - ANALY S 1 S " P1anrii.n'q ~ssues d .- I. Is the requested zoning consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan? 2. Is the property suitable in size and shape to L accommod-ate development Fermi-tted in the proposed zon 3; Is the requested zoning consistent and compatible wit surrounding land uses?. 4. Is th'e street systex serving the project adequate to , e handle any increase in t~affic generated by the zone? Discussion In February 1981, the City Council approved a General Plan Amend.ment, on the subject property, from NRR (Non-Residential Reserve) to PI (Planned Industrial) e The applicant is proposi P-M, Pl.anned Industrial, zoning for the project site. The requested zone would be consistent (rith the PI designation of Land Use Element of the General Plan €or this property. Typic PI I planned industrial, uses xould includie manufacturing, warehousing and research and development, uses permitted in th P-EIII zone, Further developnent standards for ail uses allowed khe center will be provided by the pi-opo~ed specific plan, The 333 acre project site is adequate in size to accommodate t characterized by numerous hills, 'ridg<:s and canyons, . Considerable grading will. ,be required to provide the large flc pads necessary Eor industrial developme?t. FXafZ has worked v the applicant to -minimize this grading in reviewirq the tentat map. Additional. grading and drainage controlsF set forth in t grading ordinance and proposed specific plan, are anticipated mitigate environmental concerns, Stsff,: therefore, considers site adequate in size and shape to accornmoGate development permitted in the P-M zone. . propose6 industrial developmznt. The property itself is Staff believes that the proposed zoning would be compatible w! surrounding and anticipated zoning 2n.d development D The subjc property adjoins the Carlsbad Research Centerp an approved industrial development, to the north. , Land across Palomar Airport Koad, to the south, includes' the Palomar Airport Husir Pd~k and additional vacant property also designated for plannc industrial development. d L .I j- ,1 e 0 L The project site adjoir,s the Macario Canyon Park pro-,erty at F northvi2st boundaries, This portion of the project, Cesignatd for Oper, Space and a Future Planning Area, is characterized by severe topography which may p-reelude any developxent in this .area, Should futl;re development oeeur, it is anticipated that the .topography wo~lc‘! provide a physical bufEer between the tc;o differe’nt land use designations. The project site is impacted by noise frGm Pa1onz.r Airport azd . portion is within a limited hazard zone? The City’Ccmei.1, in granting the Generai Plan 2m.endrneD.t from ERR to PI, fowd t.hat the proposed industrial park constituted the most appro2riate for the site as other uses are less compatible vith khe airpor C~nditions of the Specifi.c Plan are anticipated to mitigate ’c‘n impacts. Overall, staff believes that khe requested ?-:ti zonj-r~ . is consistent a-nd compatible wit-h surrounding land US~S, Finall-y, staff beiieves that the street systec serving the pro ject will be adequate to accommodate traffic gerLerate3 by uses pennl’ited in the zoael, Access to the site would be provided f Palomar Airport Road, a prime artr.er:i.aJ.. AithouGh so~e congest presen’ciy exists, a’c peak hours i-r, tinin-qroved sectio;s, ~a1or.a Airport Road j-s operating under capacity, Ii- is anticipated that street improvements, associated with the tentative map 1-72 improve the overall circulation system, The internal circulzt has been evaluated in the tentative map ‘review, . Overall, staEf believes that, the proposed zone is appropriate, consistent with the General Plan and would not adverszly impzc the surrounding properties or street system, Ck’ 81-46 Ten.tative subdivision map to create 77 lotg, ATL’ALY s I s ““e ” PLaming Lssces ”” 1. Does the proposed tentakive map sa.tisfy.al1 reqoirercc of the P” zone? 2, Does the proposed. tentative map satisfy all rcc;trire:af of the Carlsbad Subdivision Qrdinancr.md the State I. Act? .. 3, Does the design of .the proposed subdivision address t environmental constraints of the project site? -4- I\ .@ . e' -, ... Discussion - The proposed subdivision would create 77 *total lots comprised o 68 industrial lots, 4 mini-park lots and I Future Planning Area .lot. The project is proposed to be developed in three phases. Phase 1 would include 22 industrial lots; 2 open space lots and mini-park, Phase 2 would involve 22 industrial lots, 1 open space lot and 1 mini park. The final phase would contain 24 industrial lots, 1 open. space lot, 2 mini-parks and the Future improvements and circulation system. Approximately three yearE aTe estimated 'for development of each phase. Each of- the proposed industrial lots .would exceed the minimum I size established in the P-M zone. All of the proposed lots WOI satisfy the requirements of the Carlsbad ,Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act. Each of the designated industrial lots would be adequate in size and shape to accommodate development perm: .i-. ..cd pursuant to the ?--E4 zone and the proposed Specific Plan, Eac.1 phase of the proposed development has been designed to COI 'cain all necessary public facilities including drainage. facil- ities, landscaping, internal circulation system, off-site strel improvements and B dual water system for dontestj-c and recLairne1 waste water and recreationil facil.ities, for the occupants of developent I in the form of mini-parks, A sc.hedu1-e for improv ments, re:a'c-ing to each phase, is corrkained within the ~YO~OSQ specific pian, and are also included as conditions of approval the tentat. ive map o Planning Area, Each phase would be developed v&h associated P .. Fi.nally, staff believes. that the proposed. subdivision addresse the environmental constraints of the project site. The site i characterized by raumeroas hills, ridges. and canyons and is travesed by an SDGEiX easement. A eon.sidera.ble amount of gradi will be necessary to facilitate indirsCriaI. development o The . applicant h.as adjusted this grading t-o avoid ?Larqe slopes alor Palomar Airport 'Road 2nd preserved 3 na.Cural eeanyan areas in ( space. These areas would provide aesthetic relief along Pal-01 Airport Road while preserving a natural drainage area and mati oak trees. The applicant has also designated large lots in tl areas most con.strained by slopes and the SDGStE easement to maximize the useable area of these lots. The western portion of -the project, west. of College Avenue, i: constrained by severe slopes, Approximately 20 acres 0f.thi.s area has beei? designated as Open Space. An additional 16; acr have been designated as a ''Ffiture P1anni.ng Area". The extrem topography of this area precludes feas.ible access at this tim an,d may preclude eventual deveWoprnent. .Should proper access . demonstrated, and uses.compatible with the adjacent cpcn spac and Macario Canyon Park prcposea, future development of this may occur. -5- ,\ e ..e 1. .. Overall., staff believes thdt. the tentative nsp satisfies all requirements of the .E"M zone, the Carlsbad Subdivision Ordipanec and the State Map Act while addressing the environmental constraints of the' site. ENVIRONMENTAL REVTEW Staff had envircnmental concerns regarding the proposed development, The RIOS~ significa-nt cE these pertained to airpor safety and crash hazards, traffic circulation, topography and visual aesthetics and archaeological, biological and agricultur resources. This project is being heard in conjunction with an Environzental LML~~C~ Regort 0. If the Planning Commission certifies the EIR at tonight's meeting then the preject meets 2 the requirements of the City's Environmental Protection Ordinance 5 " ""- e RECOMMENDATlON It is reeon-mend.ed that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resoltitior Eo. 1973, recornxiending APPROVAL of ZC-250, ADOPT Resolution Nc 1974, recommend in^ APPI?GVAiL or' CT 81--4Cr based on 'the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, , " 1975, recommending APPROVAL of SP-181 an$ ADOPT Resolution No. "- " .. ATTACEKENTS "" I. PC ResoPuCion Ne. I975 (SP-1Elj 2, PC Resol.ution No, '1973 (ZC-250) 3- PC Resolution No, 1974 (CT 81-46) 4. Location Wap 5. Background Datg Sheet 6. Disclosilre Form 7. Letter .from Rick Engineeri.ng dated Ha.$' 28, '1982 8 o Exhibits A. CT 51-46 B. SP-181 CG;CDN:ar . 6/3/83, .. I I .. .. -6- .. ,'.',, , \. : . > I\ I \* .. ..e ' : '..,:, . ;;. jj ypz~;; c;. +Is.-,.\ I:::, p/c>...*-:.y .... r"X:,a&" ".r;)L,sZL*r? ~~,~"~,".~~~~~.-.~,~-,.-~~-~~:'.-.~~~~~:~~~~~~~~.~.~~~~~"~~~~~~~.,~;,~?~!~~::~~~~~~~~~~~',~~~~-..~.-~.~~~::~:~~~,~~~~~~~~~,~~~~*~~.~~--,;~~-~~~~~.~. 4 ;_.._~"-." __ _"." _- "-."-.- ."~ "_"" """"~.~._..""~*""" .. 1: .{I __"""..._~""""_.. ".".._ ".."_I ".""""". *"." .""-.. ""A .-._ y ."."' .""". r1-1 I( .I.., I, c c- ' It k- ( $;;; y, ;l: .I I - I' ,,,(,. .- -., i i r.lt-, .- - z:::: ~~-~ji;q~~r~?y~hy 0; ;!I 3 i':cj(:ct sj ic ai;(! Vj~ini~; !I i; I . .> ' .4q' I-.- fF-3 , .*. >2 !.a g:. 6;" . ;.* C', i; __ _""" ~ "_ ""_""_..""""__".~_." -."- -_ ".._ ~ "" """L-, 222 ""e" - "-." k,.. :.~",~,~,,~~..,~,~.-,~,~,,~,~.~~~,..~~,~~,~~,~~,.~ ," >>.J,%X"> ".,, ~..,~.~~~~~~~.-".~~~~'".~~~:,.~"~-.~.~,.~~.~~~~.~~~~~..~ ?"%%.,*4-.L***r.~.-** Ti~~)~..-.3Lvr;="1~'.~.~. 13 Q-& '. 5, 0 BLqcgG3D"yg Dh-TIA S!-j,ZET __ + ".,_ " cyyr;z I*! E . ZC""253{/CT 8 7 "4 Fj/Z?" 1 81 ___". ".," ~,~j?~,~C>~~~ : ~~~~~,~ ~~~~~~.~~~~~~/~~~~~~~~ 3Lm$<E ""__I_ ""_. "_"_ _I E:{>;,,..>7jW /?i.;;-J Gd\,,$;j.A()!\: r z?, :z,cr;e Cln&7;3e tc; P"2.1 (p3-cTLz:2<j lEcj:J:3t:ri3j-) p T-?ntc?ti!7e IT',7c;,* _Ti l-,.>".7z!r~,v- c,.*!-.,? I ,Y?, PS a,> !EZ;,;, tc c~eatr? -/.T I-o~s Z;:.;..I~ 2 s~~~~j~:~,~~ l~-~~~~~ tc ~>~~:~:l~~e XQ~ -~..~~,.~,-~~-~"=" ~ .... %"*"."d .... X I. ....- n..Y.~I-~-.~.-""- ~^..i".I-".~.~l-.I..~li......II".,..I.D.*-) "J- ,..,. 2. . "2 - 0 .I L _., .. .. 3 ., * ."_ ____" _.._.""_" _""""__"__."._" __ ."._ "-."""".- .i- ~"_".i"~."l.-"""""" &~~~o;y~~~y; cJ:f 2- 3J2 - -97 cLc;y(+ );:usinecs ypzjz cr1 ti?:e ;.-:.zyfil Slae sf yaJ.cy.a;: ,!;3.?-?3b;;:t . -. _. "_I _,""_ __.I_ "_".,"_""""."" "__.-..""""".".""""""""-~~ p).>d 1 !*,,*c L $30i-'l r*, ?.:-,3 ,,"*L~L, yF:ast. ,Ic <;,- <,A. T'-.?r-.rnq.< !..<A& ,,,, :: ,,,- i fi,3.r;;a:t:tr -I ' ~-~~=c.J~.Il~.aiJ.c'j.y . .. 35:'s:)' :;?s: OF ;:;- (-2"" __ .._," i_."" .,-.. I,",",' ,.,-. *#,?,",..*.*~,%, .r"."- """-I". ..""I".~1III""nl"TliY.I.~I"-:-~I.UIC.".*ITC.L"-I...-"UI".~"".i."- I_ .><ulii I l?e&.[. c "" w~s& GES~~,,T'~TI~L~: & ~~~:~;-.~~ or. 1,o.L "Gi' ii- cf R&?ci>;~ +&JG~ ]-<~$~,o:+fj~, j~: '&e .* r ._ Cz;yIt17 of +X! cic:7D i. ~,(-~,y$.'l.ns kc &.> 1T:-c,~- A[j&eaf >;,J,. 823 '~ fij-i?<j -in .-:-3 1- "J- .. . .._.b dE.c>-C? of *le 0;u;gl;y &,LQj+$Z 8 g~j.7~;::~~~ .j 5 r 7 596 c __ """"" II .""""" __ ""."" I """. ,. - _."."""_. ~.~ -." ~ "11__1. .. """"""-I_."-."- "".^ -__" "-. ".-~-~"" -. "...- AH<: 213-020-39f 213-020-07, 2"r-O3ii--c13 -~"- Acres 333 'prupsed :;ae of l;ots/~iy~ts 77 ""- " -.""~_1.".1__" Guqzgyc! p-Jz< ,g&rjrj z.~;q~~;.~ "~ ""_ ""1 "-.- L*a;zd Use &s j-g;-Lation p-1 D3;j.S ity $.I ~.OVXX~. -yP E,;& &nsFty :!?mpsed N/A - "" """"" % is t i ng ZCXE l?/A Pzopsed Zme -.- - ". p" - "I__ Su;-irou.,dirtg Zc?ni.Qg &Id L.2.23 us2 2 ma irq Lxd Use " Site "." -~"- VaCLTt mrth M/CM &irpxt/Car:~sbz6 R~search Ccnb --_I_ ". muth PI F a 1 -O:L~~L .--.T-L Airprt Busizess ?ark East ?.I ____" Palomr Airprt , I$ZSt --- Va.zn.nt ( ~4aca.ri.o can>zn PXk I "- ""- PUBLIC FFlCILITIES - Sd?0!!9. E)is.krrict" N/A - Water" "" City Sewer City EW's K,/A "" -." Public Faciiities Fee Agreement, dated OctaSer 29, 1980 (* !he city of Carlsbd wLll provid water service to all projects in Carlsb except those :iocated in the Olivenhziia and San i%arcos Sewer Districts) ~~~/:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~ T-p..p$AcT pgs~:ss[..~-qJ~ "_.".__ """"II" -" qat i.~ mdxat ion I ~SSUC~ "- - - X E e 2: e R L_ (:c-3rtifi.ed p d;;te?i ",""" "~" m:h!L?r p . . . . .%-I7 - L1 .<\h; turther ~iaZ~rna.t~ " - required, 170u will. be so P- -esed, I. .Ls .a . . .. . I ,. *. palomar uusiness Park r d. b. a o k~p~.,~~~~~~. >,irp~r.;-. ELJ.~$E.~SS Center-Carlsba.6, a joint. venture "."" I_ .. ~X~CE (individuaa p pztnasship, joint venture, cor,wsation, SI .~ I 17890 Sky Park C..ircl2-IrvineF Ca!!ifcrlzi.a 92714 """"" """_ Business .MC~XP_SS -.-. (714) 973-6990 "".."" _".. "., a.,."-"_i ~.~"~.~-~~.,~-~..~.~-~. y&apj::@j$& ~.Jjy?~~~ >.e E NT : Gegrqe I) ,, Strinrser - .- - ""_y___.~",y""""- N amc """"">~~""- 1.7890 sky park Circle, Irvine, ~al.ifornLa 92714 "" -... a." _l__"""."'.lr.~__ylDll""~-~-~"_~ Busfn.?.ss ?*d&=-ecs (73.41 979-6900 "_l_ll__"""-__"-~-~" ".-j LL"Gp'.clrie <,,- t: Nu2i3er- p-~I"p2G~p~ *, srigr1al_ L,and.r:,a.rk, Inc. r joint Ven-LureJ- "."- ~ "" "-""".""""-,." ""."","-"".-~" N31c,c "f j n&.'i.tjyr-,-. -i ."-..^"I venturep corporation, syncZicskion) .. . " *.G& t +LL L,t@Tg jcint KGY!IC. ,$&sx& s s 17890 sky p?c;rk Circle-Irvinz, ~~..Til'or:>j.a 32714 ___l_l__-.__",".-~""~" B'.:ssinrss h65,;:L,Ss _I___" I L7uIs-?.::o"": "" ""- _I"_L_" 'i"zXepl20ne ?;;LTb2Z Tefc~33l=ie >i?.y&%]: .. I_ D9n.a 16. c o ~c:ione p joint vcntvrC?:?r ~------"-"-. __II_-.- ".I -l_l" "- :;?22e Eoi:ie Add.~ess 17890 Sky Park Circl e-Irviner Ca.lifoj:?lia 92714 "__l ;-:slness ]>Ajj--sss " " "- ,. (71-4) 979-6900 - " - -ienhol.ie xu_?,jc-.- __l_ll I " - " Telcpkom >iwie-r ""---_-.-"."" """" "ll". " " " ____""" I_. ""- -" """- (~ttach ~OYE sheets iZ necessary) ]:/Ne declL-z xder penalty 3f perjury that the informatian ronta.ined in th closure is Cr-Ge al-,d correct arid 'chat i-k will remain true and correct and E relied u~c:. 23 5ei.1-q true and cozrcct: until amended ~ /&)-! &< y i": /& -. j*:e ""J d k;-. ?C>L - I ., ,f?$ Qp 1.7.' ";:. ;,< -ZF@-J ".-".-."""--~ Aplc'.t i.cant .. /&9 19 A$;y:> B 'i' ~~:~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~-.~~~~~~~~~~~.~. &Ai<; c &: r c'<TL-rc.T? A2 ",.+ .:;-,. r t . y L r< I. ..,A . ._ - // PROJECT DESCRIPTION The original design for this project has been amxtdcd a number oi times at 'ihe ~?xquest of the Planlniny and Engineering staff and also as E. result of tqing tc address the mitigation measures of the Envi.rondrtenta.l Impact Repart prepared. ,Lor the p:rOj ect D The major changes have Occcre.3 in the area Of traffic circ!JLation, phasing and grading F along with an attempt tc -mitigate the impacts assoc.iat.cd with t'he airport- The revised design has a total of T-j lots, 68 of which are industrial/retail with 4 mini-parks, 4 open space lots, and. a future planning area- The net usable acreaqe for the site is 168, UsoF 44‘4 acres being reserved for 0pSl space 0 The mayor traffic changes occurinq were the re- alignment of 'r.D" Street. to align with PaZomar Oaks Way on the projects lying south of Palomar Airport Road, This realignment h- -S l&&+x?d Chc staf$; s xajor cPon@e;"n as it relates to traffic, we are aXso e.xtecding Camir;o Vida ~l?ob~-:~ into the site and it forms the northerly boundary of Phase I, Each of the three phases within the project form an& complete their 0~5:. iooping street system. k 1 s '0 f the grading for each phase generaPly balances and there is no major off-site grading required for each individual phase, The first phase is generally~ the IlOXer port:io;l Of -the project ai?_d f~@ili-ka-tes the construction.of the major utilities that will be used for the balance of the project. S'caf%"s original concern for the grading has been mitigated by the re- configura.tion of and eniargement:of .the natural op.en space areas in an effort to retain m3re of the larger trees wi-thin the property o City staff has also been instrumenta l.in improving the visuaL appearance along Palomar Airpor,t Read, This has been accomplished by reducing slope heights, requiring 'a number of breaks in the .. !* .. h .. m ..a , . Projec'c Description Psge two slopes 'with. natural open sr~z..ce arcas and grading with 17ariabl.e s3.ope r.atigs, en the fandsca.ping is coixpletcd, as each pro-je ~.~~~~~-ops p {:',le ap~e;if:~2l;.~~ aic-ng .L~G fj;cjr;tage of .tj~.e propell"ty ~il be an~ t]-lzf-- y,aj-PL ]Je I-., p 7- v;,,~~.lly pleasing ~md- be ccns~s-~;en-k ~~i-th .th ._ 2- .. sce~lic corridor requi.rcments c A ma.jar siz;afi? conc:crn \.cas tihe knp~c'c or' the ai~:p~~t OE the proje~:t 2s it y~la-tes to crash hazar.d,s and majcr c~n~entr~.~~~~ons pecple D T' L2~ appl j_can:c j-s propclsj-~g 2 500 ' ~3.de strip nt the we 'Ly extensior: of kh.e ~1?::?\$2y be 2%m"- __ L.\.* as a .".>a- J.. 1 - 3- * f .io? 1rfl j ufi";.-pzt~-i res"r; us& zc;ne" &Yi^2&, kJ].-:at 'chis mca2s j.s tha.-ic -in an at;te:npt to reduc t--:e c;cnceE.txetion of people j-x this s-~ez.~ thzre .c..?~.tl.Ld be sn inc j-11 t]---e l~t c*:j-geracje for ~~arehcusing and 2 rqrAir.en.e;lf:, kc rec'ucc lot coverage fo:~ cffice usec He fet.;.l this is ax2. excellen5 way e'ncourage varehousi~ig iri this area and reduce an.)? heaq~ CC~XC~II- way 0 his par]< 'i;*zl.i. also hc;ve s. series cf T,ini-parks tkL3.t have been sLzc,slttveiy :re?-ocaficd, acrezge increased amd rn2-d.e aceessi.hI.c tt larger nunber cx 3espI.e.- ~5.i~ pFoject alsc: cc;1*Lzins special L scape6 serea.::s ~qhich j-nclude specia.1 sctbaclcs a115 planting req- r0crlt-s ~ncj. IGL.~~. ~r~7~rx.c~e a picas,ing at.~~ospht=lrc for 'the public: to drive thrc,ucjh and cor -th.e e~fip.~-cqrees z.nd users Wikhii? the ii,irpo ~usiness Pzyk &re.?.* r-' 1ncuL ,Cc, L3f c:,<,-. LLLaL -: land.scap~d streets wil: be t.." Lo.ti..on .. of people along the r.c.:esterLy. ext.ensi.on o? th;. airport 1 51- .D c . .. . ." - ..~ l,,c:i,r:taincd. _. c?t:hctr by SF. association or by ;? speci;il inaintenanc 9, a2.:;krLct Ci7eatc.d. for ssrvlcll:g 'tklis ar'ea n f. The applicant .feels that this .is a much imp?:Oved desirjn over t 0ri.rjina.l submittal and credits the staff and.. the environrnext.al process for these ch-ancjes. * /PS .. _1 i / -_ k i r- <,- ,,i .< ,. .' -~ bL- ..~ ... '- -?C 'I I Ll'ICE OF PUBLIC HEARING bWTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City OE Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 EL? Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:OO p.m. on Wednesday, June 9, 1982, to consider approval of an Environmental Impact Re,oort, Preannexationdt Zoning to P-M (Planned Industrial) a Tentative Subdivision Map to create 77 lots and a Specific Plan on appoximately 333 acres on property generally located on the north side of Palonar Airport Road approximately 3500' west of El Cmino Red arfi more particularly described as: A portion of Lot G of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the county of San Diego, according to map thereof No. 823, filed in the off ice of the County Recorder November 16, 1896 Those persons wishing to speak on this prqosal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions please call the Planning Department at 438-5591. WE FILE: ZC-25O/EIR 81-6/CT 81-46/SP-181 APPLICANT: Signal Landmark PUBLISH: May 29 r 1982 CITY OF (XRLSBAD PLANNIa C0"ISsIW f *' '. *gFi " Q 7 %- G p5 ii? d 0- 3" c: . . .=- z'ii - , ""- Dm a - <-- w a?' Em Eer I- c C C 9% o0 0 -In 4-9 * * h I r ! < I I I l+dP t3 4l-+ c -xJ t-l- a w- 3 oo - rnb ";d x 0% 33 PW c -e H Pur wxz 4M "nm AP-m no WM fiz e! m w nus pl or- Y mc1 PcoX u1 r Tl ?l CII r-3 QOQ - r- 0 P- (D w3 Pam 06 a P- NUS 0-19 # 0' 03- m 6 P- t-t CD 0. N 0 p3 c$S&% qJ a">"/ I! j I /I . ". /I ;!: >'" , ., I ,. 5. L .' -..-."_.,,""-l"-_r___ """"- . . . ,-.- ",L.z.. _." 5Y"___l__"rl._-.-"-.-"ri 1 ' .. ., . C' ' , . \-' / ,'-, .. '.y-yJ5- " W! q '.,e . ,,i" ; >-,' /i: /'i :x+-,, .;-% : ..._-. . I. ,. p !-,$"" , ,' #9- J :> ! , L'3 .. ,J '5 : "' /- -.. ,... : . .. _, ", . .. .., I .. . e e James L. Hieatt 604 14th Street Elanhattan Beach, CA 90266 J'apatul Corp. P. 0. Box 849 San Diego, CA 92112 .. .. .. . .. ~ .. .. . " . - .. """". ""."__ _"_____ __"_ Huntington Beach Corp. 2110 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . . . ...." . - .- ._ .- " "_~ ...- -. "" __ ~ . . . .. I .. Judy Land*Tahnee Corp. 916 Begonia Court. Carlsbad, CA 92008 .~ .~ ~. ..." ..,-. Richard C. Keliy Robert P. Kelly William Borsum P. 0. Box 175 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Birtcher Business Center- Corporate Palomar 27611 La Paz Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Fudosan Mitsui Inc, 611 W. Sixth Street Suite 2198 Los Angeles, CA 90017 G. .B. P. Investment Group 135 W. Mission Avenue Suite 209 Escondido, CA 92025 fIiroshi & Miwako Ukegawa Joe & Irene Ukegawa 4218 Skyline Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 .\ ''. 'Carl~bad Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Sun Diego County 3 138 ROOSEVELT ST. P.O. BOX 248 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 0 729-2345 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitle( I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general c published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general char which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription lis1 subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding next rsrecedina the date of Dublicat NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZC-2501EIR 81-WT 81-46SP-181 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carls- bad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, Julys, 1982, to consider an applicatlon for approval of an Environmental hi- ing to PM (Planned Industrial) a pact Report, Preannexational Zon- Tentative Subdivision Map to cre- ate 77 lots and a Specific Plan on approximately333acresonproper- notice hereinafter referred to; and tha, ty generally located On the north of which the annexed is a printed copy side of Palomar Airport Road ' approximately 3500' west of El published in each regular and entire is Camino Real and more particularly described as: newspaper and not in any supplement Agua Hedionda, in the County OF San Diego. according to map there- of No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder. November la, " A Portion of Lot G Or Rancho . the following dates, to-wit: 1886. Applicant: Signal Landmark : .I;Tuy-e. .? 2 ......... ............. CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL : ............................... LOCATIOi'J MAP. ... '. .............................. ............................... .............................. I certify under penalty of perjury that the for and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County State of California on the 2 3rd day of ._TI I~P 1 9P.7 p /i 42-e EL -(i e 1M ' Clerk C;>;SE ~.]0.~~=2~~~~~~-~7-~/~T27"~~/~~~87 AppLiCAE)T s:rcat~mmnRx_ CJ W312 June 23,1982 \ . ,' * e , L * @ NOTICE OF PUBLIC J3EAEUtJG ZC-250/EIR 81-6/CT 81-46/SP-181 TJOTlCE IS =BY GIm that the City Council of the City of Carlsbadwill hold a hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at G on Tuesday, July 6, 1982, to consider an application for approval of an Envirmc Poport , Preannexational Zoning to €N (Planned Indwtrial) a Tentative Shdidsior create 77 lots and a Specific Plan on approximately 333 acres on property general on the north side of Palomar Airport Road approxtmtely 3500' west of El Cmino I more particularly described as : A portion of Lot G of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the Ccunty of San Diego, according to map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder, November 16, 1896. APPLICANT: Signal Lanctmark PUELISH: June 23, 1982 CAREBAD CITY COUKIL I, (,-j l; ;j -h i Q >I p../lt j4 p .~ . 4 63 .' .\ * . .- :, . .. .. . .-. , .. , , I i I I .. - .. CASE ;.1n.~~-25i)/~fR-Z37-~//C78?-~~/SFZ-t8t "_ - .. .. n]2p?-tcA>]i d>L~L,j.h: !-A?>i!C%;%.Rx C'?OI\ - "" NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING e NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Cornmission of the City of Carlsbad will 1 a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Avenue), Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, July 17, 1991, to cons approval of a request to reduce the total amount of land designated for commercial and to reassign the locations of commercially designated lots within Specific Plan 181 industrial and commercial uses on property generally located between El Camino F Palomar Airport Road, north of College Avenue and McClellan-Palomar Airport in the Zone, and in Local Facilities Management Zone 5 and more particularly described a5 CT 81-46, Unit 1, Map No. 11287, CT 81-46, Unit 2, Map No. 11288, and CT 81-46, Unit 3, Map No. 11289. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the pi hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after July 11, 1991. If have any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn in the Planning Department at 438-1 ext. 4471. If you challenge the request to reduce the total amount of land designated for commc uses and to reassign the locations of commercially designated lots within Specific Plar for industrial and commercial uses in court, you may be limited to raising only those i! you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in WI correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: SP 181 (A) APPLICANT: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE PUBLISH: JULY 3, 1991 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION EB:vd * e rl (Form A) m TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice - SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE (SP- for a public hearing before the City Council. 1 Please notice the item for the council meeting of Thank you. MARTY ORENYAK 9/10/91 Assistant City Manager Oat