Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
; San Marcos Landfill Closure & Maint Plan Part 1; San Marcos Landfill Closure & Maint Plan Part 1; 2002-04-01
r c c ^ SAN MARCOS LANDFILL FINAL CLOSURE AND E POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE PLANS c c E DPW#UJ1750 SCH# 2001101126 TECHNICAL APPENDICES April 2002 c E E E E E [ li Draft EIR - April 2002 Technical Appendices SAN MARCOS LANDFILL FINAL CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE PLANS EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL APPENDICES A Environmental Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, and Responses B Traffic Technical Study C Air Quality Technical Study D Noise Technical Study E Alternate Cover Evaluation Technical Study San Marcos Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans EIR APPENDIX A Notice of Preparation, Initial Study, Noticing List and Responses JOHM L. SNYDER DIRECTOR (B58) C94.2233 FAX: (B5B) 268-04(1 LOCATION CODE SSO Count? of ^an IBiego DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS 55S5 OVERLAND AVE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123-1295 COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY AIRPORTS COUNTV ROAD COMUtSSIONER TRANSIT SERVICES COUNTY SURVEYOR FLOOD CONTROL WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT TO: Distribution List FROM: County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego. CA 92123-1295 NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The County of San Diego will be the lead agency and will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information that is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities concerning the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the Environmental Impact Report prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, location, and the probable environmental effects are contained in the attached materials. PLEASE SEND YOUR RESPONSE TO JULIA M. QUINN AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ABOVE. WE WILL NEED THE NAME OF A CONTACT PERSON IN YOUR AGENCY. WE WILL NEED YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER THAN November 21. 2001. PLEASE REFERENCE THE PROJECT NAME WITH YOUR COMMENTS. PROJECTTITLE: SAN MARCOS LANDFILL FINAL CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE PLAN (UJ1750) PROJECT SPONSOR: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: October 23, 2001 SIGNATURE: TITLE: Emr^mJttii, M/hACtA^M^ Coo^cliAo:h*^ Count? of IBiego COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY AIRPORTS omECToT" DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS '°"TRrNs" S°H'!',CES°''^'' (85B) B94.22SS COUNTY SURVEYOR FAX: (858) 288-0461 FLOOD CONTROL LOCATION CODE SSO 5555 OVERLAND AVE, SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92123-1295 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT October 23, 2001 TO: Distribution List FROM: County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego, GA 92123-1295 NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Project Title: San Marcos Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans (UJ1750) PROJECT LOCATION The County of San Diego owns the San Marcos Landfill ("Landfill"). The Landfill is located adjacent to San Elijo (Questhaven) Road between Rancho Santa Fe Road and Elfin Forest Road within the incorporated City of San Marcos in northern San Diego County (Figure 1). The total acreage of the Landfill covers approximately 310 acres of Section 33, T12S, and R3W of the USGS 7.5' Rancho Santa Fe Quadrangle (Rgure 2). The area that has received waste and requires closure is approximately 102 acres (Figure 3). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The County of San Diego (County) Department of Public Works (DPW) is proposing to implement the Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans for the Landfill using a monolithic soil cover system or other similar system as required by regulatory authorities. The soil cover will range in depth from five (5) feet to eight (8) feet. The project will require the importation of approximately 480,000 cubic yards of soil over an approximate 8-month period. The imported soil will be mixed with approximately 120,000 cubic yards of on-site soil and placed over the Landfill surfaces. Closure ofthe Landfill will be in accordance with requirements from Title 27 of the Caiifomia Code of Regulations. The Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans will require approvals from the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors, California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD), and County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health, Local Enforcement Agency (LEA). POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS The potentially significant environmental effects associated with the project are detailed in the attached Environmental Initial Study. All questions answered "Potentially Significant Impacf or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" will be analyzed further in the Environmental Impact Report. All questions answered "Less than Significant Impacf or "Not Applicable" will not be analyzed further in the Environmental Impact Report. The following is a summary of the subject areas to be analyzed in the EIR and the particular issues of concern: Transportation/Traffic The proposed project will require the importation of approximately 480,000 cubic yards of fill. Depending on the number of truck trips per day, the duration of hauling for the project could be approximately 8 months. Potential short-term significant impacts related to levels of service were identified in the Environmental Initial Study. Air Quality There are two issues of concern regarding air quality. Short-term nuisance-level impacts include fugitive dust and truck emissions associated with import and placement of the Landfill cover material. Short-term impacts could also occur with the placement of the Landfill Gas Collection System into the Landfill above the 750-foot elevation. Potential long-term impacts are associated with the Landfill Gas Collection System, which is expected to be active for a period of 20 to 30 years. Noise Landfill closure and post-closure maintenance could generate noise levels that exceed applicable standards. The project has the potential to generate short-term noise impacts related to truck traffic, the importation of soil cover, onsite soil mixing and placing, and modification of the storm water drainage system and access roads. Blasting may be required. Hydrology/Water Quality Potential impacts to surface water could occur with the runoff from the top deck and slopes of the LandfiH. Attachments: Figure 1: Regional Map Figure 2: Vicinity Map Figure 3: Proposed Project Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Form Wl Count? of ^an IBiego COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY AIRPORTS '°O';R'ECTOR" DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ""TRAINS"SE°R"V"^EI'°"" (858) 694-2233 COUNTY SURVEYOR FAXr (B5B) 2B8-0461 FLOOD CONTROL LOCATION CODE SSO 5555 OVERLAND AVE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123-1295 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT INITIAL STUDY FORM 1. Project Name/Number: San Marcos Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans (UJ1750) 2. Description of Project: The project consists of implementing the Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans for the San Marcos Landfill ("Landfill") using a monolithic soil cover system or other similar system as required by regulatory authorities. The soil cover will range in depth from five (5) feet to eight (8) feet. The project will require the importation of approximately 480,000 cubic yards of soil over an approximate 8-month period. The imported soii will be mixed with approximately 120,000 cubic yards of onsite soil and placed over the Landfill surfaces. Closure of the Landfill will be in accordance with requirements from Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations. The Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans will require approvals from the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors, California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD), and County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health, Local Enforcement Agency (LEA). 3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: County of San Diego Department of Public Works Solid Waste Management 5469 Kearny Villa Road, #305 (0383) San Diego, CA 92123 4. Project Location: Hi The County of San Diego ("County") owns the Landfill. The Landfill is located adjacent to San Elijo Road (Questhaven) Road between Rancho Santa Fe Road and Elfin Forest Road, within the incorporated City of San Marcos ("City") in northern San Diego County (Figure 1). The total acreage of the Landfill covers approximately 310 acres of Section 33, T12S, and R3W of the USGS 7.5' Rancho Santa Fe Quadrangle (Figure 2). The San Marcos Landfill Initial Study -2- October 23,2001 area of the Landfill that has received waste fill and requires closure is approximately 102 acres (Figure 3). Thomas Brothers Coordinates: Page 1128, Grid E7 5. Surrounding Land Uses and Environmental Setting: The vicinity surrounding the Landfill is predominantly a blend of vacant land, low-density residential, and planned residential land uses. The San Elijo Ranch Specific Plan Area encompasses approximately 2,149 acres north of the Landfill. Construction of residential units is underway at San Elijo Ranch. The La Costa Meadows Industrial Center is 1.25 miles northwest of the Landfill. Lake San Marcos is approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the Landfill. The Elfin Forest residential development is east of the Landfill and is characterized by large ranch-style homes in an equestrian-and-orchard-oriented environment. The Olivenhain Municipal Water District's Gaty I and II Reservoirs are south of the Landfill. The Landfill configuration is characterized as a mound, with side slopes around the perimeter of the waste fill, which extends from native ground up to a relatively flat deck area. Elevations on the west-facing side slope range from about 540 feet Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) along the west edge to about 780 feet AMSL at the northern and southern extent of the east edge. Much of the area surrounding the former waste deposition area and top deck contains native vegetation, including coastal sage scrub species and chaparral. Primary access to the Landfill is via Rancho Santa Fe Road to San Elijo Road (Questhaven). 6. City of San Marcos General Pian Community Plan: Questhaven/La Costa Meadows Land Use Designation: SWM - Solid Waste Management Area 7. City of San Marcos Zoning Use Regulation: SWM - Solid Waste Management Area 8. Environmental resources either significantly affected or significantly affected but avoidable as detailed on the following attached "Environmental Analysis Form". Air Quality HydrologyAVater Quality Noise Transportation/Traffic San Marcos Landfill Initial Study -3- October 23,2001 9. Lead Agency Name and Address: County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Kearny Villa Road, #300 (0385) San Diego, CA 92123 10. Lead Agency Contact and Phone Number: Julia M. Quinn (858) 874-4054 11. Anticipated discretionary actions and the public agencies whose discretionary approval is necessary to implement the proposal: San Diego County Board of Supervisors - Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report; Approval of funding for closure project; Approval of contract for construction of Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans. California integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) - Approval of the Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans. San Dlego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) - Approval of new Waste Discharge Requirements incorporating the Landfill Fina! Closure and Post- Closure Maintenance Plans. San Diego County Department of Environmental Health, Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) - Approval of the Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans. San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) - Permit for Operation of Methane Gas Control System (existing). Approval of installation of any new Landfill Gas Weils, and any exposure of trash during final closure construction. 12. State agencies (not included in #11) that have jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project: None. 13. Participants in the preparation of this Initial Study: Julia M. Quinn, Department of Public Works Jon Rollin, Department of Public Works Betty Dehoney, P&D Consultants Sophia Habl, P&D Consultants 14. Initial Study Determination: San Marcos Landfill Initial Study -4- October 23,2001 On the basis of this Initial Study, the Department of Public Works believes that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant effect on the environment. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. SIGNATURE: (^Sl^fii (Qcu*^ TmE: Ff\/irtvmJnl Msb^^Mi/ doofdiAoh^ Julia M. Quinn, Environmental Management Coordinator Date: October 23, 2001 County of San Diego, Department of Public Works Environmental Services Unit ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FORM DATE: October 23, 2001 PROJECT NAME: San Marcos Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans PROJECT NUMBER: UJ1750 EXPLANATION OF ANSWERS: The following questions are answered either "Potentially Significant Impacf, "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated", "Less Than Significant Impacf, or "Not Applicable" and are defined as follows. "Potentially Significant Impact." County staff is of the opinion there is substantial evidence that the project has a potentially significant environmental effect and the effect is not clearly avoidable with mitigation measures or feasible project changes. "Potentially Significant Impacf means that County staff recommends the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated." County staff is of the opinion there is substantial evidence that the project may have a potentially significant adverse effect on the resource. However, the incorporation of mitigation measures or project changes agreed to by the applicant has clearly reduced the effect to a less than significant level. "Less Than Significant Impact" County staff is of the opinion that the project may have an effect on the resource, but there is no substantial evidence that the effect is potentially significant and/or adverse. "Not Applicable." County staff is of the opinion that, as a result of the nature of the project or the existing environment, there is no potential for the proposed project to have an effect on the resource. I. AESTHETICS 1. Would the proposal result in a demonstrable, potentially significant, adverse effect on a scenic vista or scenic highway? Less Than Significant Impact. The Landfill is currently unvegetated. The proposed project will improve the existing visual quality of the site through the incorporation of a closure vegetation plan, including the incorporation of landscaping. The City of San Marcos required a revegetation plan in permitting the last expansion of the Landfill. The proposed revegetation plan is directed by the Califomia Superior Court, as modified by agreement with the City of San Marcos. In accordance with the plan, southern mixed and chamise chaparral species will be installed on the north and some northeast facing slopes and Diegan coastal sage scrub (CSS) species will be Environmental Analysis Form - 2 - Project Number; UJ1750 installed on the remaining slopes and the top deck of the Landfill. These species will blend with the native vegetation in the vicinity. 2. Would the proposal result in a demonstrable, potentially significant, adverse visual effect that results from landform modification, development on steep slopes, excessive grading (cut/fill slopes), or any other negative aesthetic effect? Less Than Significant Impact. The site was an operating Landfill. Although substantial import of cover soil is proposed, this fill will be distributed over the site. A substantial topography change wil! not be noted from offsite views, because the plan does not propose to alter the existing slopes. Additionally, the site will be landscaped, as required by the California Superior Court; thus the change regarding visual quality is beneficial. 3. Does the project comply with the Steep Slope section (Article IV, Section 5) of the Resource Protection Ordinance? Not Applicable. The project consists of implementing a closure plan for a previously approved Landfill. 4. Would the project produce excessive light, glare, or dark sky impacts? Less Than Significant Impact. There is no proposed change to the lighting. Any existing security lighting will be maintained. Therefore, the project would not produce excessive light, glare, or dark sky impacts. II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES 1. Would the proposal convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use; or have a potentially adverse effect on prime agricultural soils as identified on the soils map for the Consen/ation Element of the San Diego County General Plan? mm Not Applicable. Since the proposed project site has already been disturbed due to Landfill ^ activities, any lands of agricultural importance would have already been impacted. ^ 2. Would the proposal conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a "* Williamson Act Contract? m m Environmental Analysis Form - 3 - Project Number: UJ1750 mm m Not Applicable. The site is currently zoned Solid Waste Management (SWM) Area, and the project is consistent with the SWM zoning. The project site does not currently ^ support agricultural uses. The proposed project will not impact agricultural activities in the project vicinity, nor will the project conflict with a Williamson Act Contract. ^ 3. Would the proposal involve other changes in the existing environment which, due m to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to a nonagricultural use? gg Not Applicable. IM The proposed project would not result in conversion of existing agricultural ^ operations (primarily orchards) in the project vicinity. ^ III. AIR QUALITY 1. Would the proposal have the potential to significantly contribute to the violation ^ of any air quality standard or significantly contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? Potentially Significant Impact mm The project will require the import of approximately 480,000 cubic yards of cover material, over a period of approximately 8 months. The imported soil will be — mixed with approximately 120,000 cubic yards of onsite soil and placed over the Landfill surfaces. Potential short-term impacts (fugitive dust and vehicle emissions) associated with the importation and placement of cover material «. could occur. Possible ways to mitigate potentially significant impacts on air quality will be analyzed in the EIR. These potentially significant impacts can possibly be mitigated by such measures as covering or dampening transport soil; ••i implementing erosion and dust control measures in the application of cover; and modifying the frequency and timing of truck trips with cover soil. It is possible that " some of the impacts may not be mitigable. m 2. Would the proposal have the potential to significantly increase the exposure of people to any excessive levels of air pollutants? Less Than Significant Impact. mm The Landfill produces methane as waste decomposes. The Landfill has an approved, permitted methane gas collection system. The maintenance and monitoring of this collection system is included as part of the project. The gas Environmental Analysis Form - 4 - Project Number: UJ1750 collection system and the final cover will work together to control emissions through the Landfill surfaces. 3. Would the proposal potentially result in the emission of objectionable odors at a significant intensity over a significant area? Less Than Significant Impact The Landfill produces methane as waste decomposes. The Landfill has an approved, permitted methane gas collection system. The maintenance and monitoring of this collection system is included as part of the project. The gas collection system and the final cover wiil work together to control emissions through the Landfill surfaces. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1. Would the proposal result in potentially significant adverse effects, including noise from construction of the project, to an endangered, threatened, or rare plant or animal species or their habitats? Less Than Significant Impact. Within the Landfill property boundary there are some sensitive biological resources (wetiands and coastal sage scrub); however, the Landfill site itself has been completely disturbed and contains no native vegetation or habitats. Therefore, no endangered, threatened, or rare plant or animai species protected by the County of San Diego or State and Federal wildlife agencies are expected to occur with the area of disturbance. Additionally, the site will be revegetated with native vegetation, including chaparral and coastal sage scrub species. This will improve the biological vaiue of the site. 2. Does the project comply with the Sensitive Habitat Lands section (Article IV, Item 6) of the Resource Protection Ordinance? Yes. While sensitive habitat lands are found within the Landfill property boundary, project activity wiil be confined to areas that do not contain sensitive habitats! Therefore, the project is in compliance with Article IV, Item 6 of the Resource Protection Ordinance. 3. Would the proposal result in potentially significant adverse effects to wetland habitats or wetland buffers? Is the project in conformance with wetiand and wetland buffer regulations within the Resource Protection Ordinance? Less Than Significant Impact Environmental Analysis Form - 5 - Project Number: UJ1750 Copper Creek is located within the Landfill property boundary, but not within the Landfill site. Even though wetlands and/or wetland buffer areas have been identified within the project boundary, the project has been found to have a less than significant impact to wetiands due to the following reasons: (a) the project will not place any non-permitted uses within wetlands; (b) the project will not grade, construct, or place structures within identified wetlands; and (c) the project will not allow any non-permitted uses within wetland buffer areas. The project complies with wetland and wetland buffer regulations within the Resource Protection Ordinance. Therefore, no potentially significant impacts related to wetland habitats or wetland buffers are identified. 4. Does the proposed project have the potential to discharge material into and/or divert or obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, lake, wetland, or water of the U.S. over which the California Department of Fish and Game and/or Army Corps of Engineers maintain jurisdiction? Less Than Significant Impact. There is a stream, Copper Creek, located within the Landfill property boundary, but not within the Landfill site, which will not be impacted. The proposed Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plans does not propose to discharge material into and/or divert or obstruct the flow of Copper Creek, or other wetlands or waters of the U.S. over which the California Department of Fish and Game and/or Army Corps of Engineers maintains jurisdiction. Therefore, no potentially significant impacts related to wetlands or watersheds that are California Department of Fish and Game and/or Army Corps of Engineers jurisdictional waters are identified. 5. Would the proposal result in potentially significant adverse effects to wildlife dispersal corridors? Less Than Significant Impact. Although a drainage exists within the Landfill property boundary and could be an appropriate wildlife dispersal or migration corridor, the drainage is not located within the Landfill site. No potentially significant effects to wildlife dispersal corridors associated with the proposed project are identified. 6. Does the proposed project conform to the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) and Biological Mitigation Ordinance? Not Applicable. The proposed project is outside of the MSCP area; however, the proposed project is located within the boundaries of the Draft Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP). The Landfill area is part of the Southern Focused Planning Area (FPA) of the Natural Community Conservation Plan for the City of San Environmental Analysis Form - 6 - Project Number: UJ1750 Marcos. The Landfill area has been assigned a 100 percent conservation rate and will contribute to the open space of the southern FPA. The revegetated portions of the Landfill wil! also provide biological connectivity to the County Core area and the City of Carisbad. Finally, no biological impacts are associated with the project, so biological mitigation will not be required. The Biological Mitigation Ordinance does not apply to this project. 7. Does the proposed project conform to the Habitat Loss Permit/Coastal Sage Scrub Ordinance findings? Yes. The proposed project will not impact any coastal sage scrub species and is consistent with San Diego County Ordinance 8365. V. CULTURAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1. Would the proposal grade or disturb geologic formations that may contain potentially significant paleontological resources? Not Applicable. The project site is a Landfill and composed of imported trash and soil. The project will "cap" the existing Landfill. Thus, no paleontological resources will be disturbed. 2. Does the project comply with the Significant Prehistoric and Historic Sites section (Article IV, Section 7) of the Resource Protection Ordinance? Not Applicable. The project site is a Landfill and composed of imported trash and soil. The project will "cap" the existing Landfill. Therefore, no significant prehistoric or historic sites will be disturbed. 3. Would the proposal grade, disturia, or threaten a potentially significant archaeological, historical, or cultural artifact, object, structure, or site which: a. Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions; b. Has particular quality or uniqueness (such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type); c. Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person; m Environmental Analysis Form - 7 - Project Number: UJ1750 d. Is listed in, or determined to be eligible to be listed in, the California Register of Historical Resources, National Register of Historic Places, or a National Historic Landmark; or e. Is a marked or ethnohistorically documented religious or sacred shrine, landmark, human burial, rock art display, geoglyph, or other important cultural site? Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not impact significant archaeological resources, since prior grading and filling of the proposed Landfill cover area has eliminated any potential for buried archaeological features within the footprint of the actual Landfill. VI. GEOLOGY/SOILS 1. Would the proposal have the potential to significantly increase the exposure of people to hazards related to fault rupture (Alquist-Priolo Zone), seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure (liquefaction), rockfall, or landslides? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is not located in a hazard zone identified by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, Special Publication 42, Revised 1994, Fault-Rupture Hazards Zones in California. The project is the closure of a Landfill that includes the import of fill, revegetation, and maintenance and monitoring. Minimal human activity will be present once the site is closed, other than routine maintenance and monitoring. 2. Would the proposal result in potentially significant increased erosion? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a Landfill closure. The closure includes importing soil as part of the final cover for the Landfill. Most existing slopes on the older portion of the Landfill are at an overall slope of 3:1 or flatter. With the incorporation of the County-mandated Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, erosion control mechanisms will be required and erosion will be minimized. Additionally, existing sedimentation basins on the site will act to prevent erosion. Postconstruction conditions will be improved because the project proposes vegetation cover, which will reduce erosion. Therefore, this represents a less than significant impact. 3. Would the proposal result in potentially significant unstable soil conditions (expansive soils) from excavation, grading, or fill? Less Than Significant Impact Environmental Analysis Form - 8 - Project Number: UJ1750 The project is a Landfill closure. The closure includes importing soil as part of the final cover for the Landfill. Expansive soils are not proposed to be used in the final cover. No potentially significant unstable soil conditions are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 4. Would the proposal result in a potentially significant adverse effect to unique geologic features? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a Landfill closure. It is assumed that any significant geologic features associated with the project area would have been altered during the creation of the Landfill. Since no unique geologic features are currently present on the site, no adverse impacts will result from the proposed project. 5. Would the proposal result in a potentially significant loss of availability of a significant mineral resource that would be of future value to the region? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a Landfill closure. It is assumed that any significant mineral resources associated with the project area would have been altered during the creation of the Landfill. Since no significant mineral resources are currently present on the site, no adverse impacts will result from the proposed project. VII. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 1. Would the proposal present a significant risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances? Less Than Significant impact Methane, a highly flammable and explosive gas, is generated by decomposing waste. The Landfill Gas Collection System (LFG) that is in place at the project site draws off most of the LFG for controlled burning to prevent air pollution or spontaneous combustion. The gas collection and monitoring system will continue to be maintained by a Contractor during the post-closure maintenance period. Therefore, no significant impact is identified. 2. Would the proposal have the potential to significantly interfere with the County of San Diego Operational Area Emergency Plan or the County of San Diego Operational Site Specific Dam Failure Evacuation Data Plans? Less Than Significant impact. The project lies outside any mapped dam inundation area for major dams/reservoirs within San Diego County, as identified on inundation maps prepared by the dam owners. Environmental Analysis Form - 9 - Project Number: UJ1750 3. Would the proposal have the potential to significantly increase the fire hazard in areas with flammable vegetation? Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not introduce any new uses at the project site; therefore, no new uses will be in jeopardy of wildfires. The project is proposing to landscape the Landfill with native vegetation. It will be necessary to properly maintain the vegetation height near the LFG wells and LFG piping to reduce the potential for accidental wildfires. With proper maintenance of vegetation (as proposed by the project), this is considered a less than significant impact. The landscaping will generate additional 'luel"; however, there is an existing native habitat buffer surrounding the Landfill in proximity to residential uses. Therefore, the proposed project would not significantly increase the not generate a substantial increase in fire hazard. 4. a. Would the proposal expose people or property to flooding? Less Than Significant Impact The project will not alter the hydrology of the project site. Additionally, after project completion, human use of the site will be limited to monitoring and maintenance. b. Does the project comply with the Floodways and Floodplain Fringe section (Article IV, Section 3) of the Resource Protection Ordinance? Not Applicable. The project does not disturi^ any floodways. 5. Would the proposal expose people to any other demonstrable potentially significant health or safety hazard not listed above? Less Than Significant Impact. No additional health or safety hazards have been identified in the review of the project. Vlll. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY 1. Would the proposal create a potentially adverse effect on drainage patterns or the rate and amount of runoff? Less Than Significant Impact Environmental Analysis Form -10 - Project Number: UJ1750 The site currently has limited impen/ious surfaces. Because the project does not propose a substantial increase of impervious surfaces, the amount and rate of runoff will be the same. The project proposes to import fill material; however; the generalized drainage patterns would be the same. 2. Would the proposal result in a potentially significant increase in the demand on the local imported water system? Less Than Significant Impact Temporary irrigation is proposed at the project site to aid in the preparation of the top deck and side slopes for planting, establish erosion controi vegetation, supplement the annual rainfall during dry periods in the rainy season, and to counteract the effects of compaction. Water for irrigation and potentially for dust suppression will come from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. Water collected as a byproduct of the corrective action program wells may also be used to combat fugitive dust during the placement of the cover material. These short- term uses will not pose a significant increase in the demand on the local imported water system; therefore, the impact is less than significant. 3. Would the proposal have a potentially significant adverse effect on surface water quality? Potentially Significant Impact. Potential impacts to surface water could occur with the runoff from the top deck and slopes of the Landfill. Possible ways to mitigate potentially significant impacts will be analyzed in the EIR. These potentially significant effects can possibly be mitigated by incorporating the existing runoff collection system into the final cover design. The existing system of drains, culverts, and catch basins control rainwater and channel it along engineered collection/transmission paths to two collection ponds at the edge of the Landfill. The revegetation of the Landfill and the engineered evapo-transpiration cover system will improve the control of storm water by utilizing it in the maintenance of the plant cover on the Landfill slopes and deck, rather than permitting it to rapidly flow upon nonvegetated slopes. During construction, best management practices for control of storm water are to be designed and utilized. It is possible that some of the potentially significant impacts may not be reasonably mitigable. 4. If the proposal is groundwater dependent, plans to utilize groundwater for nonpotable purposes, or will obtain water from a groundwater dependent water district, does the project have a potentially significant adverse effect on groundwater quantity? Less Than Significant Impact. The project will obtain its water supply for short-term irrigation and potentially for dust suppression from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, which obtains m m Environmental Analysis Form -11 - Project Number: UJ1750 water from surface reservoirs and/or imported sources. The project may also use water collected as byproducts of the corrective action program for dust control during the placement of soil cover. These represent short-term uses and are not anticipated to pose a potentially significant adverse effect on groundwater quantity. 5. Does the project comply with the requirements of the San Diego County Groundwater Ordinance? Not Applicable. The project will obtain its water supply from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, which obtains water from surface reservoirs and/or imported sources or from water collected onsite as a byproduct of the corrective action program wells. The project will not use any groundwater for any purpose, including irrigation or domestic supply. 6. Would the project have a potentially significant adverse effect on groundwater quality? Less Than Significant Impact. Potential impacts to groundwater quality could occur from water percolating through the Landfill. Such water could dissolve contaminants in the refuse, and then carry these contaminants to the groundwater. The purpose of the project is to minimize infiltration of water into the Landfill. With the incorporation of the cover material, water infiltration to the waste material will be minimized. This is an improvement over the existing condition. Therefore, the project will not result in a potentially significant effect on groundwater quality. IX. LAND USE/PLANNING 1. Would the proposal potentially be in conflict with any element of the General Plan including community plans, land use designation, or zoning? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with any element of the City of San Marcos General Plan including community plans, land use designations, or zoning. The site has a General Plan and zoning designation of Solid Waste Management Area (SWM). The project is consistent with these designations; therefore, no significant impact is identified. 2. Would the proposal potentially be in conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? Less Than Significant Impact Environmental Analysis Form -12 - Project Number: UJ1750 The project will be reviewed by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Diego County Department of Environmental Health, Local Enforcement Agency (LEA), and the Air Pollution Control District (APCD). Approvals will be acquired from these agencies. Permits wiil not be required from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, or United States Army Corps of Engineers, since there will be no impacts to sensitive biological resources or jurisdictional waters. No conflicts with environmental plans or policies adopted by these agencies have been identified. 3. Does the proposal have the potential to be incompatible with existing or planned land uses or the character of the community? Less Than Significant Impact The project site already exists as a Landfill. The proposed project will complete the closure of the Landfill. This action will not be incompatible with existing or planned land uses or the character of the community. Therefore, no significant impact is identified. 4. Would the proposal have the potential to significantly disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? Less Than Significant impact. The project site already exists as a Landfill. The proposed project will not significantly disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. Therefore, no significant impact is identified. X. NOISE 1. Would the proposal result in exposing people to potentially significant noise levels (i.e., in excess ofthe San Diego County Noise Control Regulations)? Potentially Significant Impact Landfill closure and post-closure maintenance activities could generate noise levels that exceed the applicable standards. The project wiil require the import of approximately 480,000 cubic yards of soil cover. This soil will be mixed onsite with an additional approximate 120,000 cubic yards of soil. Additional project activities include the modification of the drainage system and access roads on the north and east of the project site. Blasting may be necessary to modify the storm water drainage system and access roads. The tnjck traffic associated with the soil import, as well as other project-related activities, could potentially expose sensitive receptors (residential land uses) to significant noise levels. Possible ways to mitigate potentially significant noise impacts wiii be analyzed in the EIR. Among the possible alternatives may be such measures as altering the Environmental Analysis Form -13 - Project Number; UJ1750 frequency and timing of truck trips transporting cover soil. It is possible that some of the potentially significant impacts may not be reasonably capable of being mitigated. 2. Would the proposal generate potentially significant adverse noise levels (i.e., in excess of the San Diego County Noise Controi Regulations)? Potentially Significant Impact Landfill closure and post-closure maintenance activities could generate noise levels that exceed the applicable standards. The project will require the import of approximately 480,000 cubic yards of soil cover. This soil will be mixed onsite with an additional approximate 120,000 cubic yards of soil. Additional project activities include the modification of the storm water drainage system and access roads. The truck traffic associated with the soil import, as well as other project- related activities, could potentially expose sensitive receptors (residential land uses) to significant noise levels. The truck traffic associated with the importation of cover material, as well as other project-related activities, could potentially expose sensitive receptors (residential land uses) to significant noise levels. Possible ways to mitigate potentially significant noise impacts will be analyzed in the EIR. Among the possible alternatives may be such measures as altering the frequency and timing of truck trips with Landfill cover soil. It is possible that some of the potentially significant impacts may not be reasonably capable of being mitigated. XI. POPULATION/HOUSING 1. Would the proposal potentially induce substantial growth either directly or indirectly? Not Applicable. The project does not involve the extensions of utilities such as water, sewer, or new road systems into previously unserved areas. The proposed project will not induce substantial growth either directly or indirectiy. 2. Would the proposal displace a potentially significant amount of existing housing, especially affordable housing? Not Applicable. Housing does not currently exist at the project site. XII. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the proposal result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically Environmental Analysis Form -14 - Project Number: UJ1750 altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities? Also, will the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a Landfill closure. The project will not result in the need for new or significantly altered services or facilities. The project will not significantly increase the burden of fire or police protection agencies nor adversely impact response times or performance objectives. The Landfill closure will not increase the burden of schools or park services, since an increase in population is not associated with the project. Landfill operations at the project site ceased in 1997. Since that time, the Sycamore Canyon Landfill has been accepting the waste. Finally, the project will not result in inadequate emergency access. Xlll. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 1. Would the proposal result in a potential degradation of the level of sen/ice of affected roadways in relation to the existing traffic volumes and road capacity? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project will require the importation of approximately 480,000 cubic yards of soil. This requires approximately 32,000 truck trips over an approximate 8-month period. This could pose a significant short-term impact to the local circulation network. Possible ways to mitigate potentially significant impacts upon transportation systems will be analyzed in the EIR. A traffic study will be completed, which will permit an analysis of the level of impact upon traffic associated with the importation of soil by truck. Possible alternatives will be analyzed as part of the traffic study. Included may be such measures as altering the frequency and timing of truck trips, or altering the route taken by the trucks, if possible. It is possible that some of the potentially significant impacts may not be reasonably capable of being mitigated. 2. Would the proposal result in potentially significant impacts to traffic safety (e.g., limited sight distance, curve radii, right-of-way)? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project does not inciude creating structures that would block sight distance or cause any other potential significant traffic safety impacts. The project does not propose to alter the circulation network. mm Environmental Analysis Form -15 - Project Number: UJ1750 mm 3. Would the proposal potentially result in insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite? Not Applicable. ^ The project is a Landfill closure. The project does not propose uses where parking would be required; therefore, this is not applicable. Mi 4. Would the proposal result in a potentially significant hazard or barrier for " pedestrians or bicyclists? m Less Than Significant Impact. ^ The project site already exists as a Landfill. The project will complete the closure of the Landfill. The project will not result in a significant hazard or barrier for m> pedestrians or bicyclists. The project site has already implemented portions of a Site Security Plan, which includes signage with emergency notification numbers and measures to ensure the general public is restricted from the site. These ^ measures will continue under the proposed project. «- XIV. UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the proposal result in a need for potentially significant new distribution systems or mm supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas; ^ Communication systems; Water treatment or distribution facilities; ^ Sewer or septic tanks; Storm water drainage; Solid waste disposal; ^ Water supplies. Less Than Significant Impact " The project is a Landfill closure. The Landfill stopped accepting waste in 1997. The ii Sycamore Canyon Landfill now services the communities that utilized the Landfill. The project does not propose development that would require additional public services. m ^ XV. OTHER IMPACTS NOT DETAILED ABOVE m None. " XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE m 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a Environmental Analysis Form -16 - Project Number: UJ1750 IK plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major " periods of California history or prehistory? ^ Less Than Significant Impact * As discussed in Section IV., Biological Resources, Questions 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., " and 7., and Section V., Cultural and Paleontological Resources, Questions 1., 2., and 3., the project will not degrade the quality of the environment and will not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. The project will not " cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels and will not m threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. Also, the project would not reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal and will not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California ^ history or prehistory. Through the implementation of the revegetation plan coastal sage scrub and chaparral species will be planted, which are beneficial to ^ the wildlife. m 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? * •I Less Than Significant Impact. It has been determined that no significant long-term, unmitigated environmental m impacts will result from the project. Thus, ail long-term environmental goals have been addressed. p 3. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less Than Significant Impact. The incremental impacts of the project have not been found to be cumulatively considerable after an evaluation of all potential impacts. After careful review, there is no substantial evidence that any of the incremental impacts of the project are potentially significant. The impacts of the project have therefore not been found to be cumulatively considerable. The potential combined environmental impacts of the project itself have also been considered in reaching a conclusion that the total cumulative effect of such impacts is less than significant. 4. Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantially adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact Ik m PI mi il IP H Environmental Analysis Form -17 - Project Number: UJ1750 In the completion of this Initiai Study, it has been determined that the project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. This conclusion is based on the analysis completed Sections: I, Aesthetics; III, Air Quality; VI, Geology/Soils; Vlll, HydrologyA/Vater Quality; IX, Land Use and Planning; X, Noise; XI, Population and Housing; XII, Public Services; Xlll, Transportation/Traffic; XIV, Utilities/Service Systems. In totality, these analyses have determined that the project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. XVII. REFERENCES USED IN THE COMPLETION OF THE INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA Guidelines 2001. City of San Marcos General Plan. County of San Diego Groundwater Ordinance (Chapter 7, Sections 67.701 through 67.750). County of San Diego Zoning Ordinance (Performance Standards, Sections 6300 through 6314. Sections 6330 through 6340). Dam Safety Act, California Emergency Services Act; Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code. Groundwater Quality Objectives, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board's Basin Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan for the City of San Marcos. May 2001. Resource Protection Ordinance of San Diego County, Articles l-VI inclusive. October 10, 1993. Special Publication 42, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California. Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, Title 14. Revised 1994. 1 San Diego County Marine Osrps Base Camp Joseph H. Pendelton 76 Vista lisJ Valley Center Dixon Car San Marcos \ Reservoir I fC/l-lake Wohlford . Escondido- Lake Hodges (78t Project Site Rancho Santa ^ Ramona Rancho Bemardo • Poway .Mira Mesa 67 Jiiin Vicente Reservoir Miramar Reservoir laJoBa Santeg San Dlego ^ El Cajon La Mesa (94) Lemon Grove^ fSweelvialer LNationai QtyX Reservoir Wamer Springs LokT' ^ Henshaw ~ Julian Coranatto^ \9A\ Olay Reservoir \ United "'"Mexico Morena Reservoir m Regional Map P&D Environmental Services Figure 1 Source: U.S.G.S., Rancho Santa Fe Quadran^e, Photorevised 1983 Ml m 4 W 1:24,000 Vicinity Map 0 P&D Environmental Services Figure 2 o a> o RP SAN MARCOS LANDFILL CLOSURE NOTICING LIST ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS ESTATE OF LETHA FINCH 405 Avalon Drive Vista, CA 92084 SAN MARCOS NCRRF PO BOX 122283 Fort Worth, TX 76121 GEIS FAMILY TRUST 1835 Seaquest Trail Encinitas, CA 92024 SHEA HOMES 10721 Treena Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92131 PERKINS 1977 FAMILY TRUST 3489 Lone Jack Road Encinitas, CA 92024 MATTHEW HOLDEN 20840 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 PULTE HOMES CORP. 18401 Von Kamnan Avenue Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92612 ALTMANN TRUST 21430 Questhaven Road Escondido, CA 92029 ROE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 230755 Encinitas, CA 92023 AREA M HOMEBUILDING 4141 Jutland Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92117 PENG & SU TAN 20049 Elfin Forest Lane Escondido, CA 92029 DAVID EDERY 20767 Fortuna Del Norte Escondido, CA 92029 ANDREW MASTROTA 1481 Coral Way San Marcos, CA 92078 SHI J GAO 3070 Knickerson Drive San Jose, CA 95148 JACQUELINE SPIZMAN PO BOX 2071 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. 9335 Chesapeake Drive San Diego, CA 92123 ELFIN FOREST LLC 3501 Jamboree Road, Suite 2000 Newport, Beach, CA 92660 21LKA FAMILY TRUST 20721 Fortuna Del Norte Escondido, CA 92029 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 210 Carisbad, CA 92008 JAYNE E OTTUM 20718 Fortuna Del Norte Escondido, CA 92029 DAVID SABBAS 6979 Carib Drive Escondido, CA 92029 pi JAMES SCHNEPP 1480 Coral Way San Marcos, CA 92078 JAN & KAREN GARY 20785 Camino Cielo Azul Escondido, CA 92029 RICHARD NEWTON 6990 Carib Drive Escondido, CA 92029 SCOTT THATCHER 1538 Black Walnut Drive San Marcos, CA 92078 BRENT & LEAH BOOKHAMER 20834 Elfin Forest Lane Escondido, CA 92029 ROBERT & LORI MACKIN 20763 Fortuna Del Norte Escondido, CA 92029 CONTINENTAL HOMES 2237 Faraday Avenue, Suite 100 Carisbad, CA 92008 BENJAMIN ANGUIANO PO BOX 2435 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 THOMAS HENDERSON 20790 Fortuna Del Norte Escondido, CA 92029 P/Arco«D/SMLF/NOP_IS/NOP-Recipients SAN MARCOS LANDFILL CLOSURE NOTICING LIST ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS ROBERT GOETZ 20780 Fortuna De! Norte Escondido, CA 92029 HAROLD FAIRMAN III 7040 Elfin Oaks Road Escondido, CA 92029 THOMAS GIBSON 20596 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 NANCY DANIEL 20784 Fortuna Del Norte Escondido, CA 92029 ROBIRDS FAMILY TRUST 20366 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 KARL & LINDA WATSON 20578 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 WAYNE & SUSAN HILL PO BOX 2482 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 ALBERT ANDERSON PO BOX 297 Patterson, CA 95363 DENNIS CLERKE 20570 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 RONALD & DENISE DUDEK 382 N El Camino Real Encinitas, CA 92024 THOMAS STEPHENSON 20722 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 RICK KORNBLUTH 20442 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 GORDON BLETH 20560 Questhaven Road Escondido, CA 92029 BLH TRUST 20774 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 PHILLIP FAVELL PO BOX 462493 Escondido, CA 92046 m m HOWARD MAUE 2850 Gulf Shore Blvd North Suite 201 Naples, FL 34103 JOSEF & LUCY WEISS 17949 Cypress Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SCOTT MACKINNON 28521 Breckenridge Drive Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 il i * IRENE ENGELSBERGER 371 Traiiview Road Encinitas, CA 92024 BLAKE & LORI CLARK 20740 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 DHARAM AHUJA 7372 Las Palmas Way Dublin, CA 94568 MARCO COCCELLATO 2056 Bamett Road Los Angeles, CA 90032 JAY PATTERSON 20744 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 KIMCEE MCANALLY 6391 Paseo Corono Carisbad, Ca 92009 DORIS WOLFSON 20270 Aquilera Lane Escondido, CA 92029 FRANKEN FAMILY TRUST 20746 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 RICK & JONI OSTEEN 20450 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 DOUGLAS SMITH 20402 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 EDWARD JABLONSKI 20748 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 JOE HERRICK FAMILY TRUST 20462 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 P/A/0o^D/SMLF/NOP_IS/NOP-Recipients SAN MARCOS LANDFILL CLOSURE NOTICING LIST ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS DALE HAMELEHLE 20466 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 GREGORY LIVINGSTON 20403 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 pi E GEIS DEVON 1835 Seaquest Trail Encinitas, CA 92024 PHILIPS JANE YOUNG 20461 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 ODIS GRACE 20503 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 SAM PICKARD 20455 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 MILLER FAMILY TRUST 20461 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 HUNTER THORNE 1115 Monterey Vista Way Encinitas, CA 92024 WOODBURY FAMILY TRUST 20455 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 JOHN & CAROL RAYES 20457 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 MICHAEL MCCULLEY 20445 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 FRANK DESIDERIO 7018 Elfin Oaks Road Escondido, CA 92029 DEBORAH LELEVIER 7030 Elfin Oaks Road Escondido, CA 92029 PAUL SIMMS 2287 Paseo Saucedal Carisbad, CA 92009 GEORGE & ANN SWINK PO BOX 232307 Encinitas, CA 92023 PHILIP MAGISTRO 20561 Fortuna Del Sur Escondido, CA 92029 MARIA MORA 964 Hermes Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 P/A/Co-SD/SMLF/NOP_IS/NOP-Recipients SAN MARCOS LANDFILL CLOSURE NOTICING LIST RESPONSIBLE AND TRUSTEE AGENCIES/INTERESTED PARTIES SAN ELIJO HILLS DEVELOPMENT Attention: General Manager 1903 Wright Place, Suite 220 Carisbad, CA 92008 RANCHO LA COSTA/ELFIN FORREST PARTNERSHIPS 1235 Hotel Circle South San Diego, CA 92108 Michele Stress COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 1255 Imperial Ave, 3rd Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Rich Sommen/ille COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 9150 Chesapeake Drive San Diego, CA 92123-1096 Cheryl Brandstrom VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 Vallecito de Oro San Marcos, CA 92069 Nancy Anson ENCINA WASTEWATER AUTHORITY 6200 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92009 JOSEPH & EVELYN ALEMANNI 20652 Elfin Forest Road Escondido, CA 92029 Nancy Gilbert USFWS 2730 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad, CA 92008 James Royle SAN DIEGO COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY PO BOX 81106 San Diego, CA 92138-1106 Jerry Backoff CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 SAN DIEGO COUNTY LIBI=IARY ENCINITAS BRANCH 540 Cornish Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 LAKE SAN MARCOS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION 1145 San Marino Drive, Suite 125 Lake San Marcos, CA 92069 Ml m U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS San Diego Field Offk» 16885 West Bemardo Drive Suite 300A San Diego, Califomia 92127 William Tippets CDFG 4949 Viewridge San Diego, CA 92123 Lounsbery, Ferguson, Altona, & Peak LLP Kevin Sullivan, Esq. Or Judith Hartwtg, Esq. 613 West Valley Partway, Suite 345 Escondido, CA 92025-2552 • Matthew Emau SAN MARCOS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 333 Firebird Lane San Marcos, CA 92069 ELFIN FOREST/HARMONY GROVE TOWN COUNCIL 20223 Elfin Forest Road Elfin Forest, CA 92029 Steven S. Wall, Esq. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps 600 West Broadway, Suite 2600 San Diego, CA 92101 P CALEPA INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT. BOARD 8800 Cal Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95826 Charies Grimm CITY OF ESCONDIDO 201 North Broadway Escondido, CA 92025-2798 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 1400 Tenth Street, Room 212 Sacramento, CA 95814 Ml John Robertas RWQCB 9174 Sky Park Circle, #100 San Diego, CA 92123 Sandy Holder CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 SAN DIEGO COUNTY LIBRARY SAN MARCOS BRANCH 2 Civic Center Drive San Marcos. CA 92069 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RECORDER/ COUNTY CLERK 1600 Pacific Highway, #260 San Diego, CA 92101 Michael Holzmiller CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Road Carisbad, CA 92008-7314 CARLSBAD CITY LIBRARY 1775 Dove Lane Cartsbad, CA 92009 Eric Gibson COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPT. OF PLANNING AND LAND USE 5201 Ruffin Road San Diego CA 92123 George Briest OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 1966 Olivenhain Road Encinitas, CA 92024 m m P/A/Co-SD/SMLF/NOP_ISffJOP-Recipients im STATE OF CAUFORNIA—BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATIOK AND HOUSING AGENCY <atAY DAVIS. Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTll P. O. BOX 85406, MS 50 SACRAMENTO, CA 92186-5406 PHONE (619)688-6954 FAX (619) 688-4299 Flex your power! Be energy efficient! November 15,2001 ll-SD-078 PM 10.61 (KP 16.98) Ms. Julia Quinn County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 Dear Ms. Quinn: NOP for the San Marcos Landfill Final Closure and Postclosure Maintenance Plans - SCH 2001 lQll2g ^ The Califomia Department of Transportation (Department) District 11 comments are as follows: ^ • Environmental Analysis Form, Page 14: The estimated 32,000 truck trips in an eight month period is a large volume of trucks in a short period of time. On average, the truck volume will be approximately 150-200 truck trips per day. What are the proposed hours of operation for this project? Tmck traffic should be restricted to the off-peak period in order to minimize traffic congestion. — • Preferred routes should be established for trucks to minimize impacts to the area infrastructure. If tiie proposed truck routes include State highway facilities and/or *" intersections, see comments 3, 4, and 5. ^ • Prepare a traffic unpact study in accordance with the Department Guide for the Preparation li of Traffic Impact Studies (TIS Guide). Minimum contents of the traffic impact study are listed in Appendix "A" ofthe TIS guide. ^ • Analyze all State-owned signalized intersections affected by this project using the ^ intersecting lane vehicle (IL^ procedure from the Department Highway Design Manual ^ Topic 406, page 400-21. M 'Caltrans improves mobility across Caiifomia' Ms. Julia Quinn November 15,2001 Page 2 • The level of service (LOS) for operating State highway facilities is based upon measures of effectiveness (MOE) (see Appendix "C-2" of the TIS guide). The Department endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS "C" and LOS "D" (see Appendix "C-3" of the TIS guide). If an existing State highway facility is operating at less than this target LOS, the existing MOE should be maintained. Our contact person for State Route 78 is Erwin Gojuangco, Route Manager, at (619) 688-6610. Sincerely, BILL FIGGE, Chief Development Review and Public Transportation Branch P "Coftrans improves mobility across Califomia' m P m GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION m OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES Ml STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION January 2001 PREFACE „ MM The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed this "Guide for the ^ Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies" in response to a survey of cities and counties in California. The purpose of that survey was to improve the Caltrans local development review process (also known as the Intergovernmental Review/California Environmental Quality Act or IGR/CEQA ^ process). The survey indicated that approximately 30 percent of the respondents were not aware of what Caltrans reguired in a traffic impact study (TIS). wm In the early 1990s, the Caltrans District 6 office located in Fresno identified a need to provide better quality and consistency in the analysis of traffic impacts generated by local development and land use change proposals that effect State highway facilities. At that time District 6 brought ^ together both public and private sector expertise to develop a traffic impact study guide. The District 6 guide has proven to be successful at promoting consistency and uniformity in the identification and analysis of traffic impacts generated by local development and land use changes. The guide developed in Fresno was adaptedfor statewide use by a team of Headquarters and district staff. The guide will provide consistent guidance for Caltrans staff who review local development and land use change proposals as well as inform local agencies ofthe information needed for Caltrans to analyze the traffic impacts to State highway facilities. The guide will also benefit local agencies and the development community by providing more expeditious review of local development proposals. wm Even though sound planning and engineering practices were used to adapt the Fresno TIS guide, it is anticipated that changes will occur over time as new technologies and more efficient practices * become available. To facilitate these changes, Caltrans encourages all those who use this guide to m contact their nearest district office (i.e., IGR/CEQA Coordinators) to coordinate any changes with the development team. P ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The District 6 traffic impact study guide provided the impetus and a starting point for developing the statewide guide. Special thanks is given to Marc Birnbaum for recognizing the need for a TIS guide andfor his valued experience and vast knowledge of land use planning to significantly enhance the effort to adapt the District 6 guide for statewide use. Randy Treece from District 6 provided many hours of coordination, research and development ofthe original guide and should be commended for his diligent efforts. Sharri Bender Ehlert of District 6 provided much ofthe technical expertise in the adaptation of the District 6 guide and her efforts are greatly appreciated. A special thanks is also given to all those Cities, Counties, Regional Agencies, Congestion Management Agencies, Consultants, and Caltrans Employees who reviewed the guide and provided input during the development of this Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, PI IP TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Page Number PREFACE and ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS '> I. INTRODUCTION ^ II. WHEN A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IS NEEDED 1 A. Trip Generation Thresholds 2 B. Exceptions * C. Updating An Existing Traffic Impact Study 2 111. SCOPE OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VI. MITIGATION MEASURES Appendix "A" Minimum Contents of Traffic Impact Study P Appendix "B" Methodology for Calculating Equitable Mitigation Measures Appendix "C" Measures of Effectiveness by Facility Type mm m 9 A. Boundaries of the Traffic Impact Study 2 m B. Traffic Analysis Scenarios 2 ^ IV. TRAFFIC DATA ^ ^ A. Trip Generation ^ I* B. Traffic Counts ^ C. Peak Hours ^ " D. Travel Forecasting (Transportation Modeling) 5 V. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES 5 A. Freeway Sections ^ B. Weaving Areas ^ ^ C. Ramps and Ramp Junctions ^ D. Muhi-lane Rural and Urban Highways 5 ^ E. Two-lane Highways ^ ^ F. Signalized Intersections ^ G. Unsignalized Intersections ^ H. Transit Capacity ^ _ I. Pedestrians ^ J. Bicycles ^ K. Caltrans Criteria/Warrants ^ _ L. Channelization ^ 111 I. INTRODUCTION Caltrans desires to provide a safe and efficient State transportation system for the citizens of Califomia pursuant to various Sections of the California Streets and Highway Code. This is done in partnership with local and regional agencies through procedures established by the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and other land use planning processes. The intent of this guide is to provide a starting point and a consistent basis in which Caltrans evaluates traffic impacts to State highway facilities. The applicability of this guide for local streets and roads (non-State highways) is at the discretion of the effected jurisdiction. Caltrans reviews federal, state, and local agency development projects', and land use change proposals for their potential impact to State highway facilities. The primary objectives of this guide is to provide: • guidance in determining if and when a traffic impact study (TIS) is needed, • consistency and uniformity in the identification of traffic impacts generated by local land use proposals, Q consistency and equity in the identification of measures to mitigate the traffic impacts generated by land use proposals, • lead agency^ officials with the infonnation necessary to make informed decisions regarding the existing and proposed transportation infrastructure (see Appendix A, Minimum Contents of a TIS) • TIS requirements early in the planning phase of a project (i.e., initial study, notice of preparation, or earlier) to eliminate potential delays later, • a quality TIS by agreeing to the assumptions, data requirements, study scenarios, and analysis methodologies in advance of beginning the study, and • early coordination during the planning phases of a project to reduce the time and cost of preparing a TIS. ' "Project" refers to activities directly undertaken by government, financed by govemment, or requiring a permit or other approval from government as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15378 ofthe California Code of Regulations. ^ "Lead Agency*' refers to the public agency that has the principal responsibility for canying out or approving a projecL Defined in Section 21165 ofthe Public Resources Code, the "Califomia Environmental Quality Act, and Section 15367 ofthe Califomia Code of Regulations. ' "Level of service" as defined in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Pi m n. WHEN A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IS NEEDED The level of service^ (LOS) for operating State highway facilities is based upon measures of effectiveness (MOEs). These MOEs (see Appendix "C-2") describe the measures best suited || for analyzing State highway facilities (i.e., freeway sections, signalized intersections, on- or off- g ramps, etc.). Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS "C" and LOS "D" (see Appendix "C-3") on State highway facilities, however, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult j with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS. If an existing State highway facility is operating at less than the appropriate target LOS, the existing MOE should be maintained. ^ P m A. Trip Generation Thresholds m The following criterion is a starting point in determining when a TIS is needed. When a project: L Generates over 100 peak hour trios assigned to a State highway facility 2. Generates 50 to 100 peak hour trips assigned to a State highway facilitv - and, — affected State highway facilities are experiencing noticeable delay; approaching ^ unstable traffic flow conditions (LOS "C" or "D"). 3. Generates 1 to 49 peak hour trios assigned to a State highway facilitv - the following are examples that may require a full TIS or some lesser analysis : *" a. Affected State highway facilities experiencing significant delay; unstable or . forced traffic flow conditions (LOS "E" or "F"). ^ b. The potential risk for a traffic incident is significantly increased (i.e., congestion related collisions, non-standard sight distance considerations, increase in traffic ^ conflict points, etc.). » c. Change in local circulation networks that impact a State highway facility (i.e., direct access to State highway facility, a non-standard highway geometric design, etc.). m Note: A traffic study may be as simple as providing a traffic count to as complex as a microscopic simulation. The appropriate level of study is determined by the particulars of a project, the prevailing highway conditions, and the forecasted traffic. mm B. Exceptions Exceptions require consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans, and those preparing the TiS. When a project's traffic impact to a State highway facility can clearly be anticipated _ without a study and al! the parties involved (lead agency, developer, and the Caltrans district office) are able to negotiate appropriate mitigation, a TIS may not be necessary. C. Updafing An Existing Traffic Impact Study A TIS requires updating when the amount or character of traffic is significantly different from an eariier study. Generally a TIS requires updating every two years. A TIS may — require updating sooner in rapidly developing areas and not as often in slower developing ^ areas. In these cases, consultation with Caltrans is strongly recommended. ^ HI. SCOPE OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ^ Consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans, and those preparing the TIS is recommended before commencing work on the study to establish the appropriate scope. At a minimum, the m TIS should include the following: m A. Boundaries ofthe Traffic Impact Study All State highway facilities impacted in accordance with the criteria in Section II should be " studied. Traffic impacts to local streets and roads can impact intersections with State •• highway facilities. In these cases, the TIS should include an analysis of adjacent local facilities, upstream and downstream, ofthe intersection (i.e., driveways, intersections, and interchanges) with the State highway. * A "lesser analysis" may include obtaining traffic counts, preparing signal warrants, or a focused TIS. etc. B. Traffic Analysis Scenarios ^ Caltrans is interested in the effects of general plan updates and amendments as well as the effects of specific project entiflements (i.e., site plans, conditional use permits, sub- divisions, rezoning, etc.) that have the potential to impact a State highway facility. The complexity or magnitude of the impacts of a project will normally dictate the scenarios necessary to analyze the project. Consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans, and those preparing the TIS is recommended to determine the appropriate scenarios for the analysis. The following scenarios should be addressed in the TIS when appropriate: ^ 1. When only a general plan amendment or update is being sought, the following scenarios are required: ^ a) Existing Conditions - Current year traffic volumes and peak hour LOS analysis of effected State highway facilities. " b) Proposed Proiect Onlv with Select Link^ Analvsis - Trip generation and assignment » for build-out of general plan. c) General Plan Build-out Onlv - Trip assignment and peak hour LOS analysis. Include " current land uses and other pending general plan amendments. m d) General Plan Build-out Plus Proposed Proiect - Trip assignment and peak hour LOS analysis. Include proposed project and other pending general plan amendments. P 1^ 2. When a general plan amendment is not proposed and a proposed project is seeking specific entitlements (i.e., site plans, conditional use permits, sub-division, rezoning, etc.), the following scenarios must be analyzed in the TIS: a) Existing Conditions - Current year traffic volumes and peak hour LOS analysis of effected State highway facilities. P b) Proposed Proiect Onlv - Trip generation, distribution, and assignment in the year the P project is anticipated to complete construction. c) Cumulative Conditions (Existing Conditions Plus Other Approved and Pending * Projects Without Proposed Project) - Trip assignment and peak hour LOS analysis in * the year the project is anticipated to complete construction. d) Cumulative Conditions Plus Proposed Proiect (Existing Conditions Plus Other Approved and Pending Projects Plus Proposed Project) - Trip assignment and peak hour LOS analysis in the year the project is anticipated to complete construction. e) Cumulative Conditions Plus Proposed Phases (Interim Years) - Trip assignment and peak hour LOS analysis in the years the project phases are anticipated to complete construction. 3. In cases where the circulation element of the general plan is not consistent with the land use element or the general plan is outdated and not representative of current or future forecasted conditions, all scenarios from Sections III. B. 1. and 2. should be utilized with the exception of duplicating of item 2.a. ' "Select link" analysis represents a project only traffic model run, where the project's trips are distributed and assigned along the highway network. This procedure isolates the specific impact on the State highvray network. 3 P P P m m IV. TRAFFIC DATA " Prior to any fieldwork, consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans, and those preparing the TIS is recommended to reach consensus on the data and assumptions necessary for the study. ^ The following elements are a starting point in that consideration. A. Trip Generation - The latest edition ofthe Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRIP GENERATION ^ report should be used for trip generation forecasts. Local trip generation rates are also acceptable if appropriate validation is provided to support them. 1. Trip Generation Rates - When the land use has a limited number of studies to support the trip generation rates or when the Coefficient of Determination (R') is below 0.75, consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans and those preparing the TIS is *" recommended. ^ 2. Pass-bv Trips^ - Pass-by trips are only considered for retail oriented development. Reductions greater than 15% requires consultation and acceptance by Caltrans. The justification for exceeding a 15% reduction should be discussed in the TIS. ^ 3. Captured Trips^ - Captured trip reductions greater than 5% requires consultation and acceptance by Caltrans. The justification for exceeding a 5% reduction should be discussed in the TIS. Ml 4. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) - Consultation between the lead agency and Caltrans is essential before applying trip reduction for TDM strategies. NOTE: Reasonable reductions to trip generation rates are considered when adjacent State " highway volumes are sufficient (at least 5000 ADT) to support reductions for the land use. — a. Traffic Counts Prior to field traffic counts, consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans and those preparing the TIS is recommended to determine the level of detail (e.g., location, signal timing, travel speeds, turning movements, etc.) required at each traffic count site. All State m highway facilities within the boundaries of the TIS should be considered. Common rules for counting vehicular traffic include but are not limited to: ^ 1. Vehicle counts should be conducted on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, or Thursdays during weeks not containing a holiday and conducted in favorable weather conditions. 2. Vehicle counts should be conducted during the appropriate peak hours (see peak hour discussion below). 3. Seasonal and weekend variations in traffic should also be considered where appropriate (i.e., recreational routes, tourist attractions, harvest season, etc.). P C. Peak Hours To eliminate unnecessary analysis, consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans and those ^ preparing the TIS is recommended during the eariy planning stages of a project. In general, • the TIS should include a moming (a.m.) and an evening (p.m.) peak hour analyses. Other peak hours (e.g., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., weekend, holidays, etc.) may also be required to 1^ determine the significance ofthe traffiic impacts generated by a project. pp ' "Pass-by" trips are made as intermediate stops between an origin and a primary trip destination (i.e., home to work, home to P '"C^ptlSid Trips" arc trips that do nol enter or leave the driveways of a project's boundaiy within a mixed-use development. D. Travel Forecasting (Transportation Modeling) ^ The local or regional traffic model should reflect the most current land use and planned ^ improvements (i.e., where programming or funding is secured). When a general plan build- out model is not available, the closest forecast model year to build-out should be used. Ifa m traffic model is not available, historical growth rates and current trends can be used to ^, project future traffiic volumes. The TIS should cleariy describe any changes made in the model to accommodate the analysis of a proposed project. V. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES Typically, the traffic analysis methodologies for the facility types indicated below are used by " Caltrans and will be accepted without prior consultation. When a State highway has saturated ^ flows, the use of a micro-simulation model is encouraged for the analysis. Other analysis methods may be accepted, however, consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans and those m preparing the TIS is recommended to agree on the information necessary for the analysis. m A. Freevvav Sections - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)* Chapter 3, operational analysis ^ B. Weaving Areas - Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) Chapter 500 C. Ramps and Ramp Junctions - HCM* Chapter 5, operational analysis or Caltrans HDM Chapters 400 and 500, Caltrans Ramp Metering Guidelines (most recent edition) MI D. Multi-Lane Rural and Urban Highways - HCM* Chapter 7, operational analysis ^ E. Two-lane Highways - HCM* Chapter 8, operational analysis F. Signalized Intersections^ - HCM* Chapter 9, Highway Capacity Software**, operational " analysis, TRAFFIX™**, Synchro**, see footnote 8 G. Unsignalized Intersections - HCM* Chapter 10, operational analysis, Caltrans Trafiic Manual for signal warrants if a signal is being considered H. Transit Capacitv - HCM* Chapter 12, operational analysis m» I. Pedestrians - HCM* Chapter 13 J. Bicycles - HCM* Chapters 14, use operational analysis when applying Chapter 9 and 10 HCM methods to bicycle analysis K. Caltrans Cri teria/Warrants - Caltrans Traffic Manual (stop signs, traffic signals, freeway ^ lighting, conventional highway lighting, school crossings) L. Channelization - Caltrans guidelines for Reconstruction of Intersections, August 1985, Ichiro Fukutome m *The most current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation ^ Research Board, National Research Council, should be used. **NOTE: Caltrans does not officially advocate the use of any special software. However, consistency with the HCM is advocated in most but not all cases. The Caltrans local development review units utilize the software mentioned above. If different software or ^ analytical techniques are used for the TIS then consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans and those preparing the TIS is recommended. Results that are significantly different than those — produced with the analytical techniques above should be challenged. * The procedures in the Highway Capacity Manual "do not explicitly address operations of closely spaced signalized intersections. Under such condittons, several unique characteristics must be considered, including spill-back potential from the downstream intersection to the upstream intersection, effects of downstream queues on upstream saturation flow rate, and unusual platoon dispersion or compression between intersections. An example of such closely spaced operations Is signalized ramp terminals at urban interchanges. Queue interactions between closely spaced intersections may seriously distort the procedures in" the HCM. Scope of Manual, page 1-2, Highvray Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, updated December 1997. 5 m PI m P m VL MITIGATION MEASURES The TIS should provide the nexus [Nollan v. Califomia Coastal Conimission, 1987, 483 U.S. 825 (108 S.Ct. 314)] between a project and the traffiic impacts to State highway facilities. The TIS should also establish the rough proportionality [Dolan v. City of Tigard, 1994, 512 U.S. 374 (114 S. Ct. 2309)] between the mitigation measures and the traffic impacts. One method for establishing the rough proportionality or a project proponent's equitable responsibility for a project's impacts is provided in Appendix "B." Consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans and those preparing the TIS is recommended to reach consensus on the mitigation measures and who will be responsible. ' Mitigation measures must be included in the traffic impact analysis. This determines ifa project's impacts can be eliminated or reduced to a level of insignificance. Eliminating or reducing impacts to a level of insignificance is the standard pursuant to CEQA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The lead agency is responsible for administering the CEQA review process and has the principal authority for approving a local development proposal or land use change. Caltrans, as a responsible agency, is responsible for reviewing the TIS for errors and omissions that pertain to State highway facilities. The authority vested in the lead agency to administer the CEQA process does not take precedence over other authorities in law. Ifthe mitigation measures require work in the State highway right-of-way an encroachment permit from Caltrans will be required. This work will also be subject to Caltrans standards and specifications. Consultation between the lead agency, Caltrans and those preparing the TIS eariy in the planning process is strongly recommended to expedite the review of local development proposals and to reduce conflicts and misunderstandings in both the local agency CEQA review process as well as the Caltrans encroachment permit process. APPENDIX "A" MINIMUM CONTENTS OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY m m MM MINIMUM CONTENTS OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. List of Figures (Maps) B. List of Tables III. INTRODUCTION *" m A. Description of the proposed project ^ B. Location of project C. Site plan including all access to State highways (site plan, map) D. Circulation network including all access to State highways (vicinity map) E. Land use and zoning F. Phasing plan including proposed dates of project (phase) completion ^ G. Project sponsor and contact person(s) ^ H. References to other traffic impact studies IV. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS A. Cleariy stated assumptions B. Exisfing and projected traffiic volumes (including turning movements), facility geometry (including storage lengths), and traffic controls (including signal phasing and multi- signal progression where appropriate) (figure) ^ C. Project trip generation including references (table) D. Project generated trip distribution and assignment (figure) *" E. LOS and warrant analyses - existing conditions, cumulative conditions, and full build of ^ general plan conditions with and without project ^ V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ^ A. LOS and appropriate MOE quantities of impacted facilities with and without mitigation measures M« B. Mitigation phasing plan including dates of proposed mitigation measures C. Define responsibilities for implementing mitigation measures "* D. Cost estimates for mitigation measures and financing plan ^ VI. APPENDICES A. Description of how traffiic data was collected B. Description of methodologies and assumptions used in analyses "* C. Worksheets used in analyses (i.e., signal warrant, LOS, traffic count information, etc.) ^ APPENDIX "B" METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING EQUITABLE MITIGATION MEASURES METHOD FOR CALCULATING EQUITABLE MITIGATION MEASURES The methodology below is neither intended as, nor does it establish, a legal standard for determining equitable responsibility and cost of a project's traffic impact, the intent is to provide: 1. A starting point for eariy discussions to address traffic mitigation equitably. 2. A means for calculating the equitable share for mitigating traffic impacts. 3. A means for establishing rough proportionality [Dolan v. City of Tigard, 1994, 512 U.S. 374 (114S. Ct. 2309)]. The formulas should be used when: • A project has impacts that do not immediately warrant mitigation, but their cumulative effects are significant and will require mitigating in the future. • A project has an immediate impact and the lead agency has assumed responsibility for addressing operational improvements NOTE: This formula is not intended for circumstances where a project proponent will be receiving a substantial benefit from the identified mitigation measures. In these cases, (e.g., mid-block access and signalization to a shopping center) the project should take full responsibility to toward providing the necessary infrastructure. EQUITABLE SHARE RESPONSIBILITY: Equation C-l NOTE: TE < TB, see explanation for TB below. p = '1' » - T c Where: ^ P = The equitable share for the proposed project's traffic impact. ^ T ~ The vehicle trips generated by the project during the peak hour of adjacent State highway facility in vehicles per hour, vph. W TB = The forecasted traffic volume on an impacted State highway facility at the time of general plan build-out (e.g., 20 year model or the furthest future model date feasible), vph. TE = The traffic volume existing on the impacted State highway facility plus other approved projects that P will generate traffic that has yet to be constructed/opened, vph. ^ EQUITABLE COST: Equation C-2 H C = P(CT) Where: C = The equitable cost of traffic mifigation for the proposed project, ($). (Rounded to nearest one j thousand dollars) P = The equitable share for the project being considered. CT = The total cost estimate for improvements necessary to mitigate the forecasted traffic demand on the j impacted State highway facility in question at general plan build-out, ($). NOTES ^ 1. Once the equitable share responsibility and equitable cost has been established on a per trip basis, these values can be utilized for all projects on that State highway facility until the forecasted general plan build-out model is revised. j 2. Truck traffic should be converted to passenger car equivalents before utilizing these equations (see the Highway Capacity Manual for converting to passenger car equivalents). m m APPENDIX "C" MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS BY FACILITY TYPE MM MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS BY FACILITY TYPE TYPE QF FACILITY MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS Freeways Basic Freeway Segments Density (pc/ml/ln) Weaving Areas Density (pc/mi/ln) Ramp Junctions Flow Rates (pcph) Multi-Lane Highways Density (pc/mi/ln) Free-Flow Speed (mph) Two-Lane Highways Time Delay (percent) Signalized Intersections Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Unsignalized Intersections Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Arterials Average Travel Speed (mph) Transit Load Factor (pers/seat, veh/hr, people/hr) Pedestrians Space (sq. ft./ped) m m Measures of effectiveness for level of service definitions located in table 1-2, Chapter 1, of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. m P P li m m m Transition between LOS "C" and LOS "D" Criteria (Reference 1997 Highway Capacity Manual) Basic Freeway Sections LOS Maximum Density (Dc/mi/In) Minimum Speed (mphl Maximum Service Flow Rate (pcphpl) Maximum Volume/Capacity Ratio LOS Free-Flow Speed = 70 mph A 10.0 70.0 700 0.29 B 16.0 70.0 1120 0.47 C 24.0 68.0 1632 0.68 D 32.0 64.0 2048 0.85 E 45.0 53.0 2400 1.00 F var var var var Weaving Areas pi m m P MAXIMUM DENSITY (oc/mi/ln) p LOS Freeway Weaving Multi-lane and C - D p Area Weaving Areas A 10 12 PI B 20 24 28 32 • • D 35 36 m E <= 43 <= 40 F >43 >40 pi Ram )-Freeway Junction Areas of Influence ti Maximum Density Minimum Speed LOS (Primary Measure) (Secondary Measure) (pc/mi/ln) (MPH) A 10 58 B 20 56 m ..C._ 28 .3Z. m D 35 46 E >35 42 m F a a m ' Demand flows exceed limits of table 5-1. Signalized Intersections LOS Control Delay Per Vehicle (sec) A 10 B 20 C 35 D 55 E 80 F >80 Dotted line represents the transition between LOS "C" and LOS "D" Gray Davis Governor Maria Contrcras-Swcct Secretary, Business, Transportation and Housing Agency Jeff Morales Director, Califomia Department of Transportation Kim Nystrom Program Manager, Traffic Operations For additional copies of these guidelines, please contact Tom Persons at, Tom_Pe^so^s@dot.ca.go^ IP il m P P P m P Department of Toxic Substances Control Edwin F. Lowry, Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Winston H. Hickox ^^P^^^^' ^O^SO 3^^^ ^^^.^ Agency Secretary Governor California Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2001 Ms. Julia M. Quinn Environmental Management Coordinator Department of Public Works County of San Diego 5471 Kearny Villa Road, #300 (0385) San Diego, Califomia 92123-1141 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN MARCOS LANDFILL FINAL CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE PLANS (UJ1750) (SCH #2001101126) Dear Ms. Quinn: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has received your Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the above- mentioned Project. Based on the review ofthe document. DTSC's comments are as follows: 1) The draft EIR needs to identify and determine whether cun'ent or historic uses at the Project site have resulted in any release of hazardous wastes/substances at the Project area. 2) The draft EIR needs to identify any known or potentially contaminated site within the proposed Project area. For all identified sites, the draft EIR needs to evaluate whether conditions at the site pose a threat to human health or the environment. 3) The draft EIR should identify the mechanism to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation for any site that may require remediation, and the government agency to provide appropriate regulatory oversight. 4) If it is determined that hazardous wastes are, or will be, generated by the proposed project, the wastes must be managed in accordance with the Califomia Hazardous Waste Control Law (Califomia Health and Safety Code, Division 20, The energy challenge facing Califomia is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at www.dtsc.ca.gov. ® Printed on Recycled Paper Ms. Julia M. Quinn November 20, 2001 p Page 2 10) Additional comments from DTSC's Geological Services Unit are enclosed. DTSC provides guidance for the Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) preparation and cleanup oversight through the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). Also, DTSC is administering the $85 million Cleanup Loans and Environmental Chapter 6.5) and the Hazardous Waste Control Regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5). p HI 5) If it is determined that hazardous wastes are or will be generated and the wastes are (a) stored in tanks or containers for more than ninety days, (b) treated onsite, P or (c) disposed of onsite, then a permit from DTSC may be required. The facility ^ should contact DTSC at (818) 551-2171 to initiate pre application discussions and detennine the pennitting process applicable to the facility. According to your telephone message dated November 19, 2001, San Marcos Landfill is a Class II ^ landfill, and therefore, it may require a DTSC permit. m 6) if it is determined that hazardous wastes will be generated, the facility should ^ obtain a United States Environmental Protection Agency Identification Number by phoning (800) 618-6942. Ml 7) Certain hazardous waste treatment processes may require authorization from the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Information about the m requirement for authorization can be obtained by contacting Ms. Janet Ortiz, San ^ Dlego County at (619) 338-2395. m 8) The proposed project may require soil excavation and soil filling in certain areas. ^ Appropriate sampling is required prior to disposal ofthe excavated soli. Ifthe soil Is contaminated, properiy dispose of it rather than placing it in another p location. Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) may be applicable to these soils. p Also, ifthe project is planning to import soil to backfill the areas excavated, proper sampling should be conducted to make sure that the imported soil is free m of contamination. ^ 9) If during closure or post-closure maintenance of the project, soil and/or p groundwater contamination Is suspected, construction/demolition in the area ^ should cease and appropriate Health and Safety procedures should be Implemented, tf it Is determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, *• the draft EIR should Identify how any required Investigation and/or remediation ^ will be conducted, and the govemment agency to provide appropriate regulatory oversight. p m p Ms. Julia M. Quinn November 20, 2001 Page 3 Assistance to Neighborhoods (CLEAN) program, which provides low-Interest loans to investigate and clean up hazardous materials at properties where redevelopment is likely to have a beneficial impact to a community. The CLEAN program consists of two main components: low interest loans of up to $100,000 to conduct PEAs of underutilized properties; and loans of up to 2.5 million for the cleanup or removal of hazardous materials also at undenjtilized urban properties. These loans are available to developers, businesses, schools, and local governments. For additional Information on the VCP or CLEAN program, please visit DTSC's web site at www.dtsc.ca.qov. If you would like to meet/discuss this matter further, please contact Mr. Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager at (714) 484-5476. SIncerel Halssam Y. Salloum, P.E. Unit Chief Southern California Cleanup Operations Branch Cypress Office Enclosure cc: Govemor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, Califomia 95812-3044 Mr. Guenther W. Moskat, Chief Planning and Environmental Analysis Section CEQA Tracking Center Department of Toxic Substances Control P.O. Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812-0806 Winston H. Hickox Agency Secretary Caiifomia Environmental Protection Agency Department of Toxic Substances Control Edwin F. Lowry, Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, Califomia 90630 Gray Davis Govemor MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Johnson Abraham Hazardous Substances Scientist Site Mitigation Cleanup Operations Brahch Chris A. Guen-e, CHG Senior Hazardous Su Geological Services Unit ineering Geologist November 19,2001 NOTICE OF PREPARATION/NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SAN MARCOS LANDFILL FINAL CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE PLANS Per your request I have reviewed the document Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report (NOI) dated October 23,2001 and prepared by the County of San Diego, Department of Public Works (County). I have prepared the following comments and request that the County address them In the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). It should be determined If hazardous wastes are generated, stored, or treated at this site that would require the Involvement of the Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Permitting Division. Closure/Post-Closure landfill maintenance could involve hazardous waste generation and management (I.e., leachate from a leachate collection system, landfill gas condensate, leachate treatment). It Is suggested that Jose Kou, DTSC Pemiltting Division Branch Chief, Glendale Office be contacted (phone 818-551- 2920) to detennine If any permits are needed from DTSC, Note: It Is assumed that the San Marcos Landfill is a Glass III Landfill that oniy received municipal waste. DTSC's mission is to protect human health and the environment. While DTSC may not have statutory authority over this particular site, the following comments have been prepared so that they may be addressed In the Draft EIR and Improve Its overall quality. Johnson Abraham November 19, 2001 Page 2 The project description contained In the Initial Study Fonn focuses on Final Closure and the Importation of soil cover. Existing environmental monitoring programs and those proposed for Incorporation Into Post-Closure should be cleariy specified and appropriately discussed In the Draft EIR. Transportation/Traffic: The source of fill material will need to be stated and criteria established to ensure It does not contain constituents (e.g., contaminants, elevated metals), either man-made or natural, that could cause an Inappropriate risk to human health or the environment. Air Quality: Potential long-term Impacts associated with the Landfill Gas Collection System are stated to be 20 to 30 years. The rationale for this length of time and time for other potential long-tenn impacts (e.g., groundwater monitoring/remediation) should be discussed. Placement ofthe cap could potentially force landfill gas to migrate laterally away from the landfill closer to residences/other receptors. The Draft EIR should discuss this and mention what mitlgative measures are/will be in place to address this Issue. Hydrology/Water Quality: Potential Impacts to surtace water are discussed, yet potential Impacts to groundwater from "the project" are stated to not result in a potentially significant effect on groundwater quality. Nevertheless, the Draft EIR will need to assess potential Impacts to groundwater as part of long-term Post-Closure monitoring and define the groundwater monitoring system. Any off site water wells (e.g., domestic, agricultural) in the area should be identified to assist in selecting appropriate monitoring weil locations. Due to the close proximity of the San Diego Aqueduct to the landfill (See Figure 2 of the NOI), an assessment regarding potential for the landfill to impact to the aqueduct should be Included In the EIR. The aqueduct's influence on local groundwater hydraulics should also be considered in groundwater monitoring design and the site conceptual model. Note: Figure 1 ofthe NOI appears to Incorrectly locate the landfill on the regional map. ^ Public Services: Enhanced fire suppression measures may be desirable to protect the landfill gas system and might require additional water supply and/or public services. If P the gas collection, monitoring, and treatment system is dlsaipted due to fire, landfill gases could leave the site in an uncontrolled manner until systems are repaired. P hope this Infomiafion is helpful for those Invoh/ed. Questions regarding this memo ^ should be directed to Chris Guen-e at (714) 484-5422 or email at CQuerre@dtsc.ca.gov. P ® Printed on Recycled Paper P . 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, CA 92069-2918 November 19,2001 Telephone (760) 744-1050 Ms. Julia M. Quinn Enviromnental Management Coordinator County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 Re: City of San Marcos Response to NOP for San Marcos LandfiU Final Closure and Post-Closure Mamtenance Plan DEIR (UJ1750) Dear Ms. Quinn: The Cit>- of San Marcos ("City") provides the comments stated below to the County of San Diego's Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for the San Marcos Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan received by us on about October 23, 2001. The City is pleased to see that the preparation of the San Marcos Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Plan is moving forward and that work may soon begin to close the Landfill. In response to the NOP for the Closure Project, the City has the following comments: • Cumulative analysis in the DEIR should include some projects for which City approvals have been recently granted or for which applications for approval will soon be filed. The County may not be aware of these projects. The projects include the University Commons development and a golf coiu*se related to the San Elijo Hills development. Also, the City is aware that the ongomg Olivenhain Reservoir project has resulted in a significant number of concrete and other large trucks on Harmony Grove and Elfin Forest Roads in the County. Other pending or recently approved cumulative projects may be identified by the time environmental studies or analyses for the Closure Project begin. The County should contact the City's Planning Department to obtain a complete list of cumulative projects in the City near the Landfill. • Given the significant number of large truck trips needed to transport vegetative soil cover to the Landfill as part of the Closure Plan, particular attention should be paid in the DEIR to traffic unpacts in the area ofthe Landfill. The City is aware, for example, that even the current light volume of large tmcks waiting to tum eastbound onto San Elijo Road from southbound Ms. Julia M. Quinn November 19, 2001 Page 2 p Rancho Santa Fe Road can cause significant traffic backups. This is due to a short queuing area for the left tum lane from Rancho Santa Fe Road to San Elijo Road. (While this intersection is within the jurisdiction of the City of Carlsbad, it is adjacent to the border of San Marcos and impacts the flow of traffic within the City.) These impacts to the flow of faraffic on Ranch Santa Fe Road may pale m comparison to what will result from the heavy volume of large tmck trips needed to implement the Closure Plan. The DBIR should therefore study traffic impact mitigation measures for the Landfill Closure Project including a Traffic Control Plan that may involve the use of flagmen or specific signal control at or near the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road and San Elijo Road or in other areas, a Tmck Routing Plan that analyzes the best mix or distribution of tmck routes, and other traffic cabning measures. The County should also be aware that the segment of Rancho Santa Fe Road from Meh-ose Drive to Island Drive may be under constmction during the time that the Landfill Closure Plan will be implemented. The City may be prohibiting all tmck traffic on that road segment that is not associated with the construction of the road widening project to mitigate the impacts of traffic delays on the road. Finally as to traffic issues, the County should contact the San Diego County Water Authority for infomiation about water pipeline relocation projects on Rancho Santa Fe Road north of San Marcos Boulevard. Those projects may impact the routing and flow of traffic on Rancho Santa Fe Road. The DEIR should address the mitigation of certain aesthetic impacts from the Closure Project such as screening for any constmction staging areas that may be visible at the base of the Landfill. The description ofthe Project in the DEIR should also be clear that the Court- approved Landfill Revegetation Plan requires that the vegetative soil cover ** depth on the North and East Landfill slopes must be six (6) feet, not "6' max. P vegetative soil" as shown on Figure 3 of the Closure Plan NOP. The recent Settlement Agreement between the City and County on Landfill revegetation ^ matters allows the six feet of cover soil for the North and East Landfill slopes P to be reduced by up to one (1) foot under certain conditions where up to one foot (1) of vegetative soil would be redistributed to the South and West facing slopes to increase their vegetative cover depth from three (3) to foiu (4) feet. The DEIR should indicate that the Landfill site is within the gnatcatcher core habitat area of the proposed Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan, and that the court-approved revegetation plan will provide a linkage between wildhfe corridors provided by adjacent jurisdictions. Ms. Julia M. Quinn November 19,2001 Page 3 Thank you for yoiu review of these comments to the NOP. The City looks forward to reviewing the DEIR and to the progress ofthe Landfill Closure Project. Please contact me if you have any questions about this letter. Sii)^rel^ Paul Malone, Assistant City Manager Copies: Mr. Richard W. Gittings, City Manager Ms. Helen Holmes Peak, Esq., City Attomey Mr. Kevin P. Sullivan, Esq., Asst. City Attomey m Hi P il Lori Clark 20740 Elfin Forest Rd. Escondido, CA 92029, (760) 510-2001 November 19, 2001 Attn: Julia M. Quinn County of San Diego Department of Public Works &iviK»miental Services 5471 Kearny Villa Rd., Ste. 300 MS 0385 San Diego, CA 92123 RE: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report - San Marcos Landfill Final Qosure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (UJ1750) To whom it may concern: I would like the following comments considered when compiling the EIR for tlie San Marcos Closure: 1. With regard to closure noise. Hie community of Elfin Forest directly borders tihe Landfill siteMore than 30 homes are located between 100 yards and a tbird-mile of the southeast comer of the Landfill site, water tank, and Gas Recovery Center. I respectfidly request that closure operations at the southeast comer he minimized to reduce distuifoance to the bordering Elfin Forest neighborhood and, if possible, request relocation of the water tank and access roads amscy fixmi El&i Forest homes. 2. With regard to post-closuie noise. I objea to umoitigated noise from post-closuie maintenance and request that all actions are taken to eliminate ppst-closiire noise from the southeast comer bordering Elfin Forest homes. I respectfiilly request, if possible, relocation of the water tank and access roads aw^ fix>m 0fin Forest homes. If relocaticm is not possible, than I would like to reqt^ a (tense mature landsc^ of trees and shrubs and/or a sound danq)ening wall to serve as a noise barner between the landfill site and the bordering Elfin Forest neigiiborhood. 3. With regard to the Landfill Gas Collection Syst^. I respectfiilly request modification and maintenance of the Gas Recovery System to eliminate noise and a border of dense trees and shrubs and/or a sound dampening wall around center to eliminate noise to bordering Klfin Forest homes. 4. With regard to tbs Coun^-owned residences in San Marcos Ixndering the laodfiU. Though not covered in the Project Pl^ 1 would like to register my dis^iproval of the Fraternity House traffic having access tbrou^ file private road beginning at Elfin Forest Road and Hamilton Stables. I respectfiilly request a separate access road to the Fraternity House fiom San Marcos in the final landfill closure plan should tiie Fraternity House become a permanent operation. Thaiik you for yom considering. Lon Clark cU/Plii:^ of-l^y 2001-2 Board Members: Bill Telesco (chair) Nancy Reed (vice-chair) Evelyn Alemanni Linda Hamilton Mid Hoppenrath Dedicated to a continumg rural atmosphere flfepH Patti Newton 20223 Elfin Forest Rd Elfin Forest, CA 92029 Julia Quinn County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Keamy Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 11/19/2001 Re: NOP San Marcos Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance (UJ1750) Dear Ms. Quinn, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on die Notice of Preparation for the above-referenced project. This response is sent to you on behalf of the Elfin Forest/Harmony Grove Town Council and the communities it represents. Please provide us with an EIR to review when it is available, and notify all of us with the time, date, and location of all public hearings and workshops on this project. In general, we request that a toll-free hotline be set up for the duration of the project, with a hve person answering, which residents can call to report problems. Also, it seems as though the project has already started between 4 and 6 weeks ago, when we began observing large numbers of trucks hauling fill into the landfill. Please explain why this is being done before the EIR is circulated and approved. Specific comments follow: P. 3, m.l. Air QuaUty: Please include the cumulative impacts to air quality of this project and the simultaneous constmction of tiie following projects: Villages of La Costa, San Elijo Hills, University Commons, widening of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. When you talk about dampening the soil to prevent fugitive dust, please be sure that the water used contains no additives or surfactants. The reason is that when otiier chemicals were added to the water while the landfill was operating, tiiere was a detrimental effect to surrounding vegetation. P m m P. 4, in. 3 Please describe the safeguards that will be put in place during constmction and afterwards to prevent damage to the methane collection system. Also describe in detail the maintenance requirements for the system and how you plan to assure that the maintenance occurs as required. P. 5, IV. 5 Biological Resources Please provide details of the impact on wildlife corridors during and after constmction. Please include a map tiiat indicates tiie linkage of the completed project with existing and proposed wildlife corridors. P. 9 VII. 3. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Native vegetation planted at the landfill will result in an increased fuel load. Native vegetation is highly flammable. Because it is growing in "prepared" soil rather than native clay and rocks, we anticipate that it will grow much faster than it otherwise would. Please describe the measures that will be taken for fire prevention. As mitigation, we request fire breaks and scheduled vegetative thinrung. Please provide a map showing the location of fire breaks. How will the methane collection system be protected in case of fire? What is the possibiUty of explosion in case of fire and how do you plan to mitigate it? P. 12, IX. 3. Land Use/Plannmg "~ As assurance that the closed landfill will never be incompatible with the community, we request ta. a mitigation measure which places an irrevocable conservation easement on the landfill and buffer zone area. We suggest that the buffer areas be donated to The Escondido Creek Conservancy, with an endowment for perpetual maintenance. P. 12,13. X. 1,2 Noise •I We request a minimum of 2 hours notice before any blasting occurs. In addition, please include details of how you will handle dust and particles generated by blasting. » If equipment repair is required after hours, please locate it on the west side of the landfill. Perhaps the recycling plant could be used as a repair shop to limit noise? m >• P. 13, XI. 1 Population/Housing ^ As assurance that the closed landfill and surrounding buffer area will never be the site of additional housing, we request a mitigation measure which places an irrevocable conservation easement on the landfill and buffer zone area. m P. 14, XHI, 1,2 Transportation/Trafric ^ Please evaluate this project's cumulative traffic impact in conjunction witii other simultaneous prajects, including Villages of La Costa, San Elijo Hills, Uiuversity Commons, Olivenhain Dam and the widening of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Because tiie constmction traffic will include many large hauling tmcks, we are very concerned about speed limit enforcement. As a mitigation measure, we request additional CHP patrols on San Elijo Rd. during operating hours. Also, because concrete tmcks will be using Harmony Grove Rd. at the rate of every 7 to 10 minutes until 2003, we request that vehicles going to tiie landfill access it only via San Elijo Rd. We request that you put this in the contract documents to help assure that traffic is directed appropriately. Also, we request that traffic on the landfill site be routed to the west side as much as possible. It is often tiie case that tmcks block the traffic on the bridge on Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Please investigate the possibihty of not using tmck convoys and/or changing the timing of tiie traffic light at the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe and San Elijo Rds to better accommodate tiie project's traffic. P. 15, xm, 4. Transportation/Traffic Constmction traffic will be a problem for the many bicyclists who use San Elijo and Elfin Forest Rds. As a mitigation measure, we request that you contact bicycle clubs countywide and warn them of dangerous conditions and encourage them to use other routes. Also, there are increasing numbers of "dirt bike" and off road vehicles illegally using the trails on and around the landfill. We request a mitigation measure that includes effective means of keeping all motorized vehicles off the trails surrounding the project. Sincerely, Evelyn Alemanni Director P m p Evelyn Alemanni 20652 Elfin Forest Rd. Elfm Forest (Escondido), CA 92029 760-471-7224 alemanni @ allea.com Julia Quinn County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Keamy Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 11/19/2001 Re: NOP San Marcos Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance (UJ1750) Dear Ms. Quinn, Pi IH Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Preparation for the above- referenced project. This response is sent to you for my family as well as the hst attached ^ at the end of this letter. Please provide all of us with an EIR to review when it is available, and notify all of us ^ with the time, date, and location of all public hearings and workshops on this project. In general, we request that a toll-free hotline be set up for the duration of the project, with a live person answering, which residents can call to report problems. Im Also, it seems as though the project has already started between 4 and 6 weeks ago, " when we began observing large numbers of trucks hauling fill into the landfill, u Please explain why this is being done before the EIR is circulated and approved. Specific comments follow: IH P. 3, ni.l. Ah-QuaUty: Please include tiie cumulative impacts to air quality of this project and the simultaneous IK constmction of the following projects: Villages of La Costa, San Elijo Hills, University Commons, widening of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. IP Ita When you talk about dampening the soil to prevent fugitive dust, please be sure that the water used contains no additives or surfactants. The reason is that when other chemicals were added to the water while the landfill was operating, there was a detrimental effect to IK surrounding vegetation. As mitigation for 8 or more months of fugitive dust, we would ask that you offer residents the following: compensation for interior and exterior house cleaning and plant washing that will be reqitired. Pressure washing of exteriors of all stmctures after 8 months, and again at the end of the project if it takes longer than 8 months. In addition, we would ask for compensation for window washing at least monthly. If the county prefers, it could make these services available in lieu of payment to affected residents. P. 4, m. 3 Please describe the safeguards that will be put in place during constmction and afterwards to prevent damage to the methane collection system. Also describe in detail the maintenance requirements for the system and how you plan to assure that the maintenance occurs as required. P. 5, IV. 5 Biological Resources Please provide details of the impact on wildlife corridors during and after constmction. Please include a map that indicates the linkage of the completed project with existing and proposed wildlife corridors. P. 9 VII. 3. Hazards and Hazardous Materials m Native vegetation will result in an increased fuel load. Native vegetation is highly " flammable. Because it is growing in "prepared" soil rather than native clay and rocks, we expect that it will grow much faster than normal. Please describe the measures that will be taken for fire prevention. As mitigation, we request fire breaks and scheduled " vegetative thinning. Please provide a map showing the location of fire breaks. m How will tiie metiiane collection system be protected in case of fire? What is the chance P of explosion in case of fire? 1^ P. 10 Vni. 2 Hydrology/Water Quality P 'Temporary irrigation...(will be used) ... to counteract the effects of compaction." This statement doesn't make sense. Please clarify. HI P. 12, IX. 3. Land Use/Planning an As assurance that the closed landfill will never be incompatible with the community, we M request a mitigation measine which places an irrevocable conservation easement on the landfill and buffer zone area. P. 12,13.x. 1,2 Noise m We request a minimum of 2 hours notice before any blasting occurs. In addition, please p include details of how you will handle dust and particles generated by blasting. Please III indicate mitigation measures that will be provided specifically for adjacent residents. ^ Please indicate the hours of operation. m If equipment repair is reqitired after hours, please locate it on the west side of the landfill. Perhaps the recycling plant could be used as a repair shop to limit noise? P. 13, XI. 1 Population/Housmg m As assurance that the closed landfill and surrounding buffer area will never be the site of additional housing, we request a mitigation measure which places an irrevocable ^ conservation easement on the landfill and buffer zone area. M P. 14, xm, 1,2 Transportation/TrafTic m Please evaluate this project's cumulative traffic impact in conjunction with other simultaneous projects, including Villages of La Costa, San EUjo Hills, University ^ Commons, Olivenhain Dam and the widening of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Because the P constmction traffic will include many large hauling tmcks, we are very concerned about speed limit enforcement. As a mitigation measure, we request additional CHP patrols on P San Elijo Rd. during operating hours. Also, because concrete tmcks will be using P Harmony Grove Rd. at the rate of every 7 to 10 minutes until 2003, we request that vehicles going to the landfill access it only via San Elijo Rd. We request that you put this in the contract documents to help assin-e that traffic is directed appropriately. mm Also, we request that traffic on the landfill site be routed to the west side as much as possible. It is often the case that tmcks block the traffic on the bridge on Rancho Santa Fe Rd. ^ Please investigate the possibihty of not using tmck convoys and/or changing the timing ta. of the traffic light at the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe and San Elijo Rds to better accommodate the project's traffic. wm P. 15, xm, 4. Transportation/Traffic P Constmction traffic will be a problem for the many bicyclists who use San Elijo and Elfin P Forest Rds. As a mitigation measure, we request that you contact bicycle clubs countywide and warn them of dangerous conditions and encourage them to use other E routes. Also, there are increasing numbers of "tint bike" and off road vehicles illegally using the trails on and around the landfill. We request a mitigation measure tiiat includes some effective means of keeping all motorized vehicles off the trails surrounding the P project. P P. 16, XVI, 4. Mandatory Findings of Significance m ta Having experienced years of landfill operations, we are very concerned that the closure process, regardless of how much we welcome it, will result in noise, dust, and traffic ta problems which will cause substantial adverse effects on the people living closest to the landfill. We strongly encourage the county to develop creative and effective ways to mitigate these impacts. Submitted for the following: Evelyn and Joe Alemanni 20652 Elfin Forest Rd. Linda and Bmce Hamilton 20774 Elfin Forest Rd. Jayne Bemasconi 20718 Fortuna del Norte Sincerely, Evelyn Alemanni m m m m p Son Diego County Water Authority 4677 Overland Avenue • San Diego, California 92123-1233 (858) 522-6600 FAX (858) 522-6568 www.5dcwa.org November 28, 2001 DELIVERY BY: Facsimile (858) 874-4043 and U.S. Mail Ms. Julia M. Quinn County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5471 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego. CA 92123-1295 RE: RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SAN MARCOS LANDFILL FINAL CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE PLAN (UJ1750) Dear Ms. Quinn: Thank you for providing the San Diego County Water Auttiority (Authority) with a copy ofthe above-referenced document. The Authority has reviewed relevant portions of the document and offers the following concems and comments. The Authority; in conjunction with the Olivenhain Municipal Water District (District), is currently constructing the first phase of Its Emergency Storage Project. The Emergency Storage Project is a part of the Authority's Capital Improvement Program to provide increased local storage for drought and other emergencies and to enhance the operational capability of the Authority's delivery system in order to meet its water supply obligations. The first phase of construction includes the Olivenhain Dam, Olivenhain pipelines, Olivenhain pump station, and other related appurtenant facilities, all of which are located within close proximity to the Count/s San Marcos Landfill Final Closure project. Constmction of Olivenhain Dam is currentiy undenvay and expected to continue through June 2003. As part of the constnjction contract, the Authority required its contractor to utilize designated truck routes in order to minimize impacts to existing residential neighborhoods. These routes include 1-15, Valley Parkway, Auto Park Way (north/south), Andreasen Drive, Enterprise Street and Harmony Grove Road. It is critical that the level of service for designated haul routes to and from the Authority's projects, including existing traffic volumes and road capacities, not be further degraded by the County's project. MEMBER AGENCIES CmES IIUtlGATION DISTRICTS WATER DISTRICTS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICTS • W Mor • Etcondido • NotieiKil Cily • Sonlo fa • Stx* Bay • H«BK • Ofciy • CeaUbod • Ro«noiio • Oi»oraiiJ« • fowo/ • Son OiagD * Vino • San D>*guilo • Olivwhain « Rincon <W Diablo • Vallaciloi • Podra Dam • ^llay CtOt ^ Rainbow • Yuimo COUNTY PUBUC UTILITY DISTRICT FEDERAL AGENCY • Son DM9S * Fallbrooli • Pandbton MMary RMarvoKon PRIN71D ON RECYOED PAPER M3. Julia M. Quinn County of San Diego Department of Public Works November 28, 2001 Page 2 of 2 The County's importation of soil using the same routes as the Authority and District could result in significant impacts to traffic safety due to the sight distance on Harmony Grove Road. Further, the additional tmcks could result in significant unmitigable impacts to the Authority's and the District's project. Additionally, the Authority disagrees with the County's conclusion in the Environmental Analysis Form that there are no potentially significant incremental project impacts. Significant cumulative traffic impacts from the San Marcos Landfill Final Closure project are likely unless the County requires other haul routes to the western entrance ofthe landfill. To minimize these impacts, the Authority recommends that the County designate alternative truck routes for their project that avoid San Elijo Road, Valley Parkway, Auto Park Way (north/south), Andreasen Drive, Enterprise Street, Harmony Grove Road and surrounding feeder streets and connectors to Interstate 15. Finally, the EIR should evaluate the potential for substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Unless the County designates specific routes for transport of the 480,000 cubic yards of material that avoid Authority/District routes, potentially significant noise, air quality, traffic, as well as public safety impacts could cause substantial adverse affects on human beings. Thank you very much for this opportunity to comment. Please retain the Authority on your mailing list to receive other information conceming this project. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Kelley Gage at (858) 522-6763. Sincerely, .aurence J. Purcell, Manager Water Resources Department m Ml P m m p OLIX^iAlN Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road • Encinitas, CA 92024 • Phone (760) 753-6466 • Fax (760) 753-5640 ^ November 21,2001 DELIVERY BY: Facsimile (858) 874^043 and U.S. Mail Ms. Julia M. Quinn County of San Diego " Department of Public Works ~ 5471 Keamy Villa Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 RE: RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SAN MARCOS LANDFILL FINAL CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE PLAN (UJ1750) mm Dear Ms. Quinn: Thank you tor this opportunity to comment on the County's Notice of Intent to prepare a Draft Environmental Report for the San Marcos Landfill Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan. The District wishes to place the County of San Diego on notice that Olivenhain has joined the San Diego County Authority to constmct the first phase of tfie Water Authority's ^ Emergency Storage Project All of the projects being constructed in conjunction witii tiie Emergency Storage Project, including Olivenhain's Ultrafiltration Membrane Treatment Plant, are of substantial regional public benefit The Olivenhain Dam part of the first ^ phase of the Water Autiiority's Emergency Storage Project is a critical project by the nature of its roller compact^ concrete construction. It is absolutely imperative fiiat the " raw cement be available for the constructbn phase of tiiis project via Harmony Grove m Road to the intersection of Via Ambiente, the designated haul route for this project from Intersfeite 15. Any intemjption or interference with the trucking of raw cement to the " project may result in serious and substantial damage to the roller compacted concrete »• dam structure. " The Emergency Storage Project is a multi-year $872 million project There is a system of P reservoirs, interconnecting pipelines and pump stations designed to make water available to the San Diego Regbn in tiie event of an intemiption in tiie imported water delivei^. " The Emergency Storage P||^ is a part of tiie San Diego County Water Autiiority's P capital improvement progrW^roykJe increased kx^al j^pge for drought and ottier emergencies and to enharicelta^^M^^fll^ t|^sMW^pabilit^ of tiie Water ^ Authority's deTrvery system in order to rrieS lfe ffitLltory water supply obligations. P Board of itectors Genendmm^r A public agency proudly serving - M^'la:^"' |-1 wZ^' Bec^J^ncy. Sarua Fe, ta Susan /. Varty, Secretary ^ Sca^ i^i^, Elfin Forest, 4S Ranch Mark Muir, Director Szn Diego and the Olivenhain VaUey. Ms. Julia M. Quinn County of San Diego Department of Public Works November21,2001 Page 2 of 3 The Emergency Storage Project cun^ntiy consists of 17 projects and is being constnjcted in four phases. The first phase is currentiy underway and will continue tiirough the year 2003. The first phase indudes, Olivenhain Dam, Olivenhain pipelines, Olivenhain pump station, and other related appurtenant facilities. An understanding ofthe Emergency Storage Project and tiie Olivenhain Municipal Water District's Ultrafiltration Membrane Treatment Plant clearly demonstrates it serves a vitel public benefit, justifying total commitment by the County of San Diego to avoid any impacts, delays or damages to this project. Virtually all of the water provided to San Diego County is derived from two sources. The first source is the State Aqueduct, which transports water from Northem Califomia tiirough a series of extensive aqueducts to Southem California. The second source ofwater is the Colorado Rh^er. Most public water districts in San Diego County presently only have a few days of water supply. The purpose of tiie Emergency Storage Project is to provide substantial beal storage, which will be available to all of San Diego County in the event of a severe service interruption to avoid the draconian consequences of sendee intenuption preventing the delivery of any water to residents and businesses in San Diego County. The Water Treatment Plant, being consbucted by tiie Olivenhain Municipal Water District, is also vitally needed to protect public healtti and welfare of tiie 60,000 inhabitants ofthe District. To be blunt rt is absolutely imperative that the County of San Diego take all mitigation measures necessary to avokl any impacts to the Emergency Storage Project and tiie Olivenhain Munidpal Water Distiicf s Uftrafiltration Membrane Potable Water Treatment Plant. It is critical ttiat tiie degradation of tiie level of service of the designated haul route for materials, supplies and employees to and from ttiese projects including, existing traffic volumes and road capacities not be affected bythe Court/s project. The County's Environmental Impact Report should teke into consideration tiie designated haul routes for tills project and find appropriate altemative routes to import ttie estimated 480,000 cubicyardsof soil to ttie landfill. These routes shouki be exclusively confined to Rancho Sante Fe Road and San Elijo Road (formerly Questtiaven) to the main entrance of ttie landfill, it is ttie Distiicf s position ttiat absolutely no portion of ttie approximate 32,000 tmck trips, estimated in ttie Notice of Preparation, should be allowed to tiavel over any part of ttie designated haul route for ttie Autiiority/Distticf s projects. Any importation of soil over any routes being utilized by tiie San Diego County Water Auttiority or ttie Disttict wouki result in significant impacts to traffic safety, due to ttie site distance on Harmony Grove Road, and would result in significant unmitigable impacts to the Water Auttiorit/s and ttie Distticf s project as well as public safety. il P Ml P P P m p ii p m P Ms. Julia M. Quinn County of San Diego Department ofPut)lb Works November21,2001 Page 3 of 3 The District also believes ttiat if tmck ti^ffic for ttie closure of tiie landfill is not properly routed, it would result in significant cumulative impacts, including noise, air quality and traffic. The District disagrees witii tiie County's conclusion in ttie Environmental analysis fomi ttiat tiiere are no incremental impacts of ttie project ttiat are potentially significant. The EIR must designate haul routes to ttie westem entrance of the landfill or the combined environmentel impacts of ttie project and the Emergency Storage Project will create significant cumulative impacts. Additionally, ttie project has potential for substantial adverse effects on human beings eitiier directiy or indirectiy. Until tiie County of San Diego designates specific routes to transport ttie 480,000 cubic yards of material to tiie landfill away from ttie Districf s/Auttiorit/s projects, significant noise, air quality, traffic, as well as public safety impacts will cause substantial adverse affects on human beings. In short, it appears to ttie undersigned tiiat tiie County staff has neglected to take into account ttie Emergency Storage Project and ttie Olivenhain Potable Water Treattnent Plant in ttie Environmental Analysis form supplied to ttie District for ttiis project The Olivenhain Munkapal Water Disttict and ttie San Diego County Water Auttrority, ttierefore, strongly advise tfie County tiiat the routing of tmck trips witfi cover soil must indude impM commibiients to stay off of San Elijo Road, Elfin Forest Road, Country Qub Road, Aridreason Street, Auto Parkway, Valley Parkway, Enterprise and Via Ambiente in Escondklo and surrounding feeder stiBets and connectors to Interstate 15. Thank you very much for tfiis opportunity to comment As you can see, the DIsttbt has a very sttong position regarding tiie impacte to ttiese environs ttirough December of2003. If you have any questions regarding ttiese commerrts, please contact ttie undersigned or you may contact Ms. Kelley Gage at the San Diego County Water Auttiority. Sincerely, OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT C Da^ia^. McColtam General Manager APPENDIX B Traffic Technical Study TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAN MARCOS LANDFILL COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Prepared by: LINSCOTT LAW & GREBMSPAN ENGINEERS 1565 Hotel Circle South, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 299-3090 December 10, 2001 Revised: January 22, 2002 JB/JN/jn 3-011124 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. Introduction/Project Description 1 Existing Street System 1 Existing Traffic Volumes 12 Truck Route Discussion 21 Project Traffic Generation 22 Project Traffic Distribution/Assignment 24 Cumulative Projects Discussion 24 Significance Criteria 37 Traffic Analysis Methodology 37 Existing Operations 38 Existing + Project Operations 51 Truck Route 1 Operations 51 Truck Route 2 Operations 52 Tmck Route 3 Operations 52 Truck Route 4 Operations 53 Truck Route 5 Operations 53 Tmck Route 6 Operations 53 Freeway Mainline Operations 54 Significance of Impacts 54 Potential Mitigation Measures 58 Recomnnended Mitigation Measures 59 1124.toc APPENDICES A Manual Count Sheets B Intersection Calculation Sheets C Street Segment Tables D Freeway Levels of Service Thresholds P LIST OF TABLES P P TABLE ~ PAGE P NO. DESCRIPTION NG 1. Existing Daily Traffic Volumes {{Route 1) 13 m la. Existing Daily Traffic Volumes (Route 2) 14 " HI lb. Existing Daily Traffic Volumes (Route 3) 15 •I 1 c. Existing Daily Traffic Volumes {Route 4) 16 ^ 1 d. Existing Daily Traffic Volumes {Route 5) 17 « le. Existing Daily Traffic Volumes {Route 6) 18 2. Project Traffic Generation 23 Jj 3. Signalized Intersection Operations (Route 1) 39 3a. Signalized Intersection Operations {Route 2) 40 3b. Signalized Intersection Operations (Route 3) 41 •* MM 3c. Signalized Intersection Operations (Route 4) 42 m 3d. Signalized Intersection Operations {Route 5) 43 ^ 3e. Signalized Intersection Operations (Route 6) 44 4. Daily Street Segment Operations (Route 1) 45 4a. Daily Street Segment Operations (Route 2) 46 4b. Daily Street Segment Operations (Route 3) 47 m P P p 1124.toc LIST OF TABLES (CONT.) EXHIBIT PAGE NO. DESCRIPTION NO. 4c. Daily Street Segment Operations (Route 4) 48 4d. Daily Street Segment Operations (Route 5) 49 4e. Daily Street Segment Operations (Route 6) 50 5. Freeway Peak Hour Analysis 55 1124.100 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT ' ~ p^G§ NO. DESCRIPTION NO ^ ~ m 1. Project Area Map 2 ^ 2. Truck Route 1 3 2a. Tmck Route 2 4 P 2b. Truck Route 3 ; 5 2c. Truck Route 4 6 ta m m 2d. Truck Route 5 7 m 2e. Truck Route 6 8 * 3. Existing Conditions Diagram 9j0 4. Existing Traffic Volumes 19^20 5. Route 1 Project Traffic Volumes 25 5a. Route 2 Project Traffic Volumes 26 5b. Route 3 Project Traffic Volumes 27 5c. Route 4 Project Traffic Volumes 28 P m P m m W 5d. Route 5 Project Traffic Volumes 29 P ta 5e. Route 6 Project Traffic Volumes 30 6. Existing + Route 1 Traffic Volumes 31 ^ 6a. Existing + Route 2 Traffic Volumes 32 m 6b. Existing + Route 3 Traffic Volumes 33 6c. Existing + Route 4 Traffic Volumes 34 6d. Existing + Route 5 Traffic Volumes 35 P 6e. Existing + Route 6 Traffic Volumes 36 " P IH 1124.toc m IINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAN MARCOS LANDFILL CLOSURE INTRODUCTION This traffic study has been prepared to determine and evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with implementing the final closure for the San Marcos Landfill. The landfill Is located within the City of San Marcos, south of San Elijo Road between Rancho Santa Fe Road and Elfin Forest Road. Included in the Closure Plan is a Revegetation Plan for the closed landfill. Import of soil for cover is necessary to implement the Revegetation Plan and other facets of the Closure Plan. This soil will be imported with trucks. It is expected that a maximum of 400 trucks per day would be entering the site. The source of the soil is unknown at this time. Therefore, the intersections and street segments along six potential routes were analyzed assuming all trucks utilized one of these routes to travel between the source of the soil and the landfill. Figure 1 shows the location of the landfill. Figures 2-2e, graphically shows the six potential truck routes. included in this traffic study is the foiiowing: • Existing street system description; • Existing traffic volumes; • Truck Route discussion; • Project traffic generation; • Cumulative Projects discussion; • Significance Criteria; • Capacity analysis of intersections and street segments; • Freeway Capacity Analysis; • Significance of traffic impacts discussfon; and • Conclusions EXISTING STREET SYSTEM Standards for classification of Public Roads consist of the following. Prime Arterials should provide six thru lanes, a raised median and curiDside parking. Major Roads should provide fourthm lanes, a raised median and curbside parking. Collectors should provide four thru lanes with curbside parking or four thru lanes with a left-turn lane. II r 1 VI VI V i II I ririiiiifiiiiitiiivi'^ W7m SOURCE: San Diego Foto-Map Book NO SCALE 1 1 1NS( Oil I AW \ (.Ul I NSI'A\ PROJECT AREA MAP ENGINEERS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LEGEND SAN MARCOS LANDRLL - Truck Route REV. 1/16/02 NO SCAL£ FIG1124.0WG 1.INSC Ol I LAW \ ENGINEERS Figure 2 TRUCK ROUTE #1 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL m ^•HS^ SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LEGEND - Truck Route REV. 1/16/02 NO SCALE nG1124.DWG [ iNsron LAW \ Ci^LLNSrW ENGINEERS Figure 2a TRUCK ROUTE #2 SAN MARCOS LANDRLL SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LEGEND - Truck Route REV. 1/16/02 NO SCALE RG1124.DWG ENGINEERS Figure 2b TRUCK ROUTE #3 SAN MARCOS b^NDRLL •HS^ SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LEGEND - Truck Route REV. 1/16/02 NO SCALE RG1124.DW6 LINSCOi I LAW \ OUL; \SI'A\ ENGINEERS Figure 2c TRUCK ROUTE #4 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL ^•H!^ SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LEGEND - Truck Route REV. 1/16/02 NO SCALE RG1124.0W6 LINSCOTT LAW ORLLXSt^AN ENGINEERS Figure 2d " TRUCK ROUTE #5 " SAN MARCOS LANDFILL ^HS^ SAN MARCOS LANDRU. LEGEND - Truck Route REV. 1/16/02 NO SCALE RG1124.DW6 I l\S( OI I LAW \ OULL\srA\ ENGINEERS Figure 2e TRUCK ROUTE #6 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL SR 78 WESTBOUND RAMPS/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD SR 78 EASTBOUND RAMPS/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD US =5 © Wr SAN MARCOS BOULEVARD/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD CD MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SAhTTA FE ROAO © SAN ELUO ROAD/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ LA COSTA AVENUE OUVENHAIN ROAD/ EL CAMINO REAL LA COSTA AVENUE/ EL CAMINO REAL .r (D © © r LA COSTA AVENUE/ 1-5 NORTHBOUND RAMPS LA COSTA AVENUE/ l-S SOUTHBOUND RAMPS GARDEN VIEW ROAD/ EL CAMINO REAL ENdNfTAS BOULEVARD/ EL CAMINO REAL ® (D r r ENQNITAS BOULEVARD/ BALOUR DRIVE ENCINITAS BOULEVARD/ 1-5 NORTHBOUND RAMPS ENCINITAS BOULBMRD/ 1-5 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ 1-5 NORTHBOUND RAMPS PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ 1-5 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ COLLEGE BOULEVARD COLLEGE BOULEVARD/ EL CAMINO REAL EAST-WEST STREET/ NORTH-SOUTH STREET © AM/PM •^MI/PM ^AM/PM m b-W SIKbtl ta z NO SCALE R61124.DWG LINsr (^IT I AW \ (:ULL\^i-W ENGINEERS Figure 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM SAN MARCOS LANDRLL p ta Ml PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ EL CAMINO REAL SR 78 WESTBOUND RAMPS/ EL CAMINO REAL © SR 78 EASTBOUND RAMPS/ EL CAMINO REAL @ HARMONY GROVE ROAD/ QUESTHAVEN ROAD gTH AVENUE/ 1-15 NORTHBOUND RAMPS Mr 9TH tmwsu i-15 SOUTIHBOUND RAMPS VALLEY PARKWAY/ AUTO PARK WAY © LEGEND ©-Traffic Signal -o- — Stop Sign EAST-WEST STREET/ NORTH-SOUTH Snfe" ^.AM/PM AM/PM <'AM/F>M E-W STREET I. NO SCALE R61124.DWG I INS( OII LAW \ OUli \S1'A\ ENGINEERS Figure 3 (Cont.) EXISTING CONDmONS DIAGRAM 10 SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LINSCOTT LAW ^ GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Light Collectors should provide two thru lanes with a left-turn lane. Bike lanes add 10 feet to both the road width and the R/W. The following is a brief description of the existing roadway system, which trucks may utilize. Figure 3 shows the existing configurations at each of the affected intersections. Interstate 5 (1-5) is a north/south facility in which extends from the Mexican border to the entire length of California. In the vicinity of the project, eight lanes of divided travel are provided. Interchanges are provided at Encinitas Boulevard, La Costa Avenue, and Palomar Airport Road, among others. State Route 78 (SR 78) Is an east/west facility, which extends from 1-5 to 1-15 as a freeway. In the vicinity of the project there are six lanes of divided travel provided. Interchanges in which trucks may utilize are provided at Rancho Santa Fe Road and El Camino Real. Palomar Airport Road is classified as a Primary Arterial within the City of Carisbad Circulation Element. Palomar Airport Road is generally a six-lane divided roadway with three lanes in each direction, providing striped bike lanes and bus stops. CuriDside parking is prohibited. Palomar Airport Road has a posted speed limit is 55 mph. La Costa Avenue Is classified as a Major Arterial within the City of Carlsbad Circulation Element. La Costa Avenue is constmcted as a four-lane divided roadway with two lanes provided in each direction from 1-5 to El Camino Real. La Costa Avenue also provides striped bike lanes and bus stops with no curbside parking being permitted. The posted speed limit is 55 mph. Encinitas Boulevard Is classified as a Prime Arterial east of 1-5 on the City of Encinitas Circulation Element. Encinitas Boulevard is constructed as either a 4-lane or a 6-lane roadway with portions having a raised median, a Two Way Left Turn Lane (TWLTL) median, and striped median. Striped bike lanes and bus stops are provided on both sides of Encinitas Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Olivenhain Road is classified as a Primary Arterial within the City of Encinitas Circulation Element. It is constructed as a six-lane roadway, providing three lanes of travel in each direction. Olivenhain Road provides striped bike lanes and bus stops on both sides of the road. The posted speed limit is 45 mph and curbside parking is prohibited. El Camino Real is classified as a Primary Arterial within the City of Encinitas and City of Carlsbad Circulation Elements. It is constructed as a six-lane divided roadway with three lanes of travel generally provided in each direction. El Camino Real provides striped bike lanes and bus stops with curbside parking prohibited. The posted speed limit is 55 mph. 11 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS P P Rancho Santa Fe Road is classified as a Prime Arterial within the City of Carisbad and the City of San Marcos Circulation Elements. Rancho Santa Fe Road provides access to the landfill via either Olivenhain Road thru the City of Encinitas or SR 78 thru the City of San Marcos/City of Carlsbad. Rancho Santa Fe Road is constructed as a four-lane roadway between SR 78 and Melrose Drive and narrows to two lanes between Melrose Drive and La Costa Avenue. The speed limit is generally 45 to 50 mph. Traffic signals are provided at various intersections along Rancho Santa Fe Road. San Marcos Boulevard is classified as a Prime Arterial within the City of San Marcos Circulation Element. The roadway provides four lanes of travel near Rancho Santa Fe Road. San Marcos Boulevard extends from the terminus at Palomar Airport Road eastward through the City of San Marcos. San Marcos Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 45 mph west of Rancho Sante Fe Road and 40 mph east of Rancho Sante Fe Road. San Elijo Road is classified as a Collector Road and provides direct access to the project site. It is constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway with curbside parking generally not allowed. Striped bike lanes and bus stops are . not provided. It is p signalized at Rancho Santa Fe Road. San Elijo .Road has a speed limit of 40 mph. Harmony Grove is classified as a Collector Street on the County of San Diego S Circulation Element. It Is constructed as a two lane undivided roadway with no striped bike lanes or bus stops. Since Harmony Grove is a winding road, the posted speed limit ni ranges from 25 to 40 mph. ^ Elfin Forest Road is classified as a Collector Street on the County of San Diego • Circulation Element. It is constructed as a two lane undivided roadway providing no ^ striped bike lanes or bus stops. In addition, Elfin Forest Road has a maximum gross weight of 14,000 pounds from Harmony Grove Road westerly to the San Marcos Limit. m •i EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES •I m m Existing average daily traffic volumes (ADTs) on affected roadways were obtained from the appropriate jurisdictions (City of Encinitas, Carlsbad, etc.) and reflect the most recent available traffic volumes. Tables 1-1e show the existing ADTs on the roadways along the six potential routes. p Figure 4 shows the existing AM/PM peak hour volumes at the key intersections in the ^ project area. Many of these volumes were obtained from City of Encinitas and City of Carlsbad traffic count records. Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG) conducted counts at m the balance of the intersections in October 2001. Appendix A contains the raw count | sheets. 12 [ i\'S( ()i r I AV\ Cikf-ENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE 1 ROUTE 1 - EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES mm mm STREET SEGMENT YEAR 24-HOUR VOLUME {ADT) Rancho Santa Fe Road Hi Descanso Boulevard to Grand Avenue 2000 39,400 Pi La Mirada Drive to Linda Vista Drive 2000 33,600 IMi Security Place to San Marcos Boulevard 2000 25,300 San Marcos Boulevard to Lake San Marcos Drive 2000 30,900 Lake San Marcos Drive to Melrose Drive 2000 27,500 Melrose Drive to San Elijo Road 2000 28,800 SOURCE: Gity of San Marcos and Carlsbad count records. Tabi.1124 1/21/2002 13 LiNSCX)TT LAW- ^; CiRFENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE la ROUTE 2 - EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES STREET SEGMENT YEAR 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) m Ml El Camino Real m Plaza Drive to Marron Road 2000 34,556 m Faraday Avenue to Palomar Airport Road 2000 32,590 m Palomar Airport Road to Alga Road 2000 27,645 Alga Road to La Costa Avenue 2000 37,201 m Levante Street to Calle Barcelona 2000 30,373 m Rancho Santa Fe Road Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 2000 15,600 ipi •1 Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 2000 25,800 Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 2000 28,214 P P SOURCE: City of Carlsbad count records. m Tabl.1122 1/21/2002 P P ta 14 LINSCOTT LAW' CJRELNSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE lb ROUTE 3 - EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES mm STREET SEGMENT YEAR 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) mm Auto Park Way -Sth Avenue to Valley Pkwy 2001 18,800 Harmony Grove Road -Kauana Loa Drive to Elfin Forest Road 2001 2,860E Elfin Forest Road — Harmony Grove to Questhaven Road 2001 2,530E 1 SOURCE: Gity of Escondido and County of San Diego count records. E = A growth factor of 5% per year was forecasted to project 2001 conditions. Tabl.1122 1/22/2002 15 ! INSCOTT LA\\'' 6< GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE Ic ROUTE 4 - EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES in STREET SEGMENT YEAR 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) I* Ml Palomar Airport Road ta Paseo Del Norte to Armada Drive 2000 54,941 •1 Yarrow Drive to El Camino Real 2000 31,070 El Camino Real Palomar Airport Road to Alga Road 2000 27,645 m Alga Road to La Costa Avenue 2000 37,201 Levante Street to Calle Barcelona 2000 30,373 p Rancho Santa Fe Road m Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 2000 15,600 P Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 2000 25,800 • Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 2000 26,214 SOURCE: City of Carisbad count records. m p p Tabl.1122 1/21/2002 P m i P p 16 I INS( ( }"IT I .AW N CikEENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE Id ROUTE 5 - EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES STREET SEGMENT YEAR 24-HOUR VOLUME {ADT) La Costa Avenue Piraeus Street to Saxony Road 2000 29,388 El Camino Real Levante Street to Calle Barcelona 2000 30,373 Rancho Santa Fe Road Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 2000 15,600 Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 2000 25,800 Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 2000 26,214 SOURCE: City of Carisbad count records. Tabl.1122 1/21/2002 17 LINSCOTT I.AW^ GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE le ROUTE 6 - EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES STREET SEGMENT YEAR 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) am m Encinitas Boulevard wm 1-5 to Saxony Road 2000 35,100 •Ml Balour Drive to El Camino Real 2000 26,200 - El Camino Real Encinitas Boulevard to Mountain Vista Drive 2000 39.600 Garden View Road to Olivenhain Road 2000 38,300 Mi Rancho Santa Fe Road • Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 2000 15,600 P Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 2000 25,800 P Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 2000 26,214 P SOURCE: City of Encinitas and Carlsbad count records. P p p p p m Tabl.1122 1/21/2002 18 ta P P P SR 78 WESTBOUND RAMPS/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD II <D<0 A © 214/267 -^3 /I r 1046/449 r»o> too on SAN ELUO ROAD/; RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD on ® ^-177/49 ^192/69 ON S2 ton LA COSTA AVENUE/ 1-5 NORTHBOUND RAMPS m wm 374/406 MM *- 740/803 IP. 164/130 765/677 — mm ® 43/1 0/ ENCINITAS BOULEVARD/ BALOUR DRIVE PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ 1-5 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS .- IO 445/620-* 107/308 SR 78 EASTBOUND RAMPS/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ LA COSTA AVENUE © ^^31/ 47 -^56/ 76 r 10/ 7 275/260 J 107/ 25 — 164/216 "> ) w SAN MARCOS BOULEVARD/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD .—JO.— .-.-CD r».o» — ncD — 196/644_> 523/1641 —*• 40/ 44> © ^_ 53/ 76 942/592 f 428/663 CM«0<0 O*^ OLIVENHAIN ROAD/ EL CAMINO REAL 0 LA COSTA AVENUE/ 1-5 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS ro —IO 365/455—• 89/ 88 ~> ® 363/370 ^ 427/532 ENQNITAS BOULEVARD/ i-5 NORTHBOUND RAMPS in <c •^930/1338 r 481/ 374 374/ 574 854/1000 — ri •^604/743 ^ 357/372 886/1272—• 97/ 43> s s — n 148/222 _> 788/906—^ @ — lO — fO 628/715 102/136 ~> PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ COUEGE BOULEVARD •^452/1011 ^ 489/1066 40 S—3 B76/263_> 1812/1123—* 34/ 75•> ^.59/^ 84 — 927/1878 r27/ 33 ass UOIO N —lO 121/114 •^843/602 f 850/613 196/451_> 517/776—^ Mr 122/250 ~> m —« 122/250 ~> GARDEN VIEW ROAD/ EL CAMINO REAL (O CMca — — ro oueo o»—— 32/ 105^ 94/ 190—* 205/282^ ® K_ 224/261 *— 161/200 f 113/179 ^tr tCOrO oan lOO ENCINITAS BOULEVARD/ 1-5 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS COLLEGE BOULEVARD/ EL CAMINO REAL V.N' ti r- A 0/ 34-> MELROSE DRIVE/ RANCHO SANTyTFE ROAD in — IS IS — o» A 319/359-> 504/312-^ ® <D — N — ISO LA COSTA AVENUE/ EL CAMINO REAL Nor*. A n nJ 237/( 783/1 138/: K_220/ 92 •^413/183 ^65/ 68 A"- K_220/ 92 •^413/183 ^65/ 68 512/^ _> 321/571—^ 237/192 "> © «D —IT •- — CO N® ENCINrTAS BOULEVARD/ EL CAMINO REAL A"- k_ 125/353 420/794 ^314/151 243/264_> 745/661-*- 127/146 > @ PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAO/ 1-5 NORTHBOUND RAMPS ^. 433/1094 802/1858 78/ 176 _^ 1351/952—* ^r II EAST-WEST STREET/ NORTH-SOUTH STREET AM/PM -^«I/PM ^AM/PM E-W STREEF ! z NO SCALE FIG1124.DW6 UN SCO ] ! LAW (iRFLN^.PAN ENGINEERS 19 Figure 4 EXISTING TRAFHC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL PALOMAR AIRI EL CAMINO F f«» o — K)(D N*IO PORT ROAD/ EAL 1057/562 -— 1309/875 ^ 487/412 SR 78 WEST EL CAMINO v> ^5 ^\ [BOUND RAMP/ REAL 402/496 f 995/760 SR 78 EASTB EL CAMINO R —• co\ mm r«.o OUND RAMP/ EAL STH AVENUE/ 1-15 NORTHE OUND RAMPS 182/377 — 854/690 142/232 _^ 176/1151—* 77/ 131^ @ 50/ 63 570/551—* 300/382"> @ ID 200/521J 0/ 9—• 88/223 t/- f«.(D — N CMO> o cam 87/229^ 672/1006—^ -^tr eocMiD ION(D — 9TH AVENUE 1-15 SOUTH — n X}UND RAMPS — 1459/1078 r 182/ 191 VALLEY P AUTO PAI ncoio on ID « jr. ARKWAY/ ?K WAY k_48/ 189 590/339 154/206 HARMONY GR QUESTHAVEN — OVE ROAD/ ROAD V-O /4 738/939 —* 550/830 ~> @ 194/497 371/704—* 303/203 267/316 623/1108-* 96/ 62 1/6^ 70/317 0/ 3 po—^ 00° EAST-WESl NORTH-SO E-W STREET r STREET/ UTH STREET AM/PM z NO SCALE m m p IP P P n61124.DWG 1 1\S(()TT 1 AW \ (,i<i:L\Si-A\ ENGINEERS 20 Figure 4 (Cont.)' EXISTING TRAFRC VOLUMES Z AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LINSCOTT L/WV 6^ GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TRUCK ROUTES DISCUSSION The foiiowing is a description of the six potential truck routes. TRUCK ROUTE #1: Truck Route #1 assumes that trucks would be coming from the east via SR 78 and exit the freeway at Rancho Santa Fe Road. Trucks would proceed south on Rancho Santa Fe Road thru the City of San Marcos and Carisbad until reaching San Elijo Road where trucks would turn east to the landfill. The return trip would be a reversal of this same haul route. According to the City of San Marcos, Rancho Santa Fe Road between Island Avenue and Melrose Drive may be closed to truck traffic between April 2002 and April 2004, due to a major reconstruction project on Rancho Santa Fe Road. TRUCK ROUTE #2: Truck Route #2 would come from the east via SR 78 and exit the freeway at El Camino Real. Trucks would proceed south on El Camino Real thru the City of Carlsbad until reaching the intersection of El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road where trucks would make a left-turn. Trucks would continue on Olivenhain Road (turns into Rancho Santa Fe Road) until reaching the 'T' intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road. Trucks would turn right and go east until reaching the landfill. The return trip would be a reversal of this same haul route. TRUCK ROUTE #3: Truck Route #3 would come from the north via 1-15 and exit the freeway at 9*^ Avenue in the City of Escondido. Trucks would turn from 9*^ Avenue onto Auto Park Way and proceed northwesterly on Auto Park Way until reaching the intersection of Auto Park Way/Howard Avenue where trucks would make a left turn and proceed west until reaching Harmony Grove. Trucks would proceed west on Harmony Grove, which transitions to Elfin Forest Road. Once on Elfin Forest Road, trucks would make a left turn at the intersection of San Eiijo Road/Elfin Forest Road until reaching the landfill. The return trip would be a reversal of this same haul route. TRUCK ROUTE #4: Truck Route #4 would come from the east via SR 78 and merge onto southbound 1-5 and exit at Palomar Airport Road. Trucks would proceed east on Palomar Airport Road 21 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS MM thru the City of Carisbad until reaching the intersection of Palomar Airport Road/ El Camino Real where trucks would make a right turn and proceed south on El Camino Real until reaching the intersection of Ei Camino Real/Olivenhain Road where trucks mm would make a left-turn. Trucks would continue on Olivenhain Road (turns into Rancho Santa Fe Road) until reaching the 'T" intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road. Trucks would turn right and go east until reaching the landfill. The return trip would be a reversal of this same haul route. TRUCK ROUTE #5: • Truck Route #5 would come from the east via SR 78 and merge onto the southbound I- m 5 and exit at La Costa Avenue. Trucks would proceed east on La Costa Avenue thru the City of Cartsbad until reaching the intersection of La Costa Avenue/El Camino Real P where trucks would make a right turn and proceed south on El Camino Real until p reaching the intersection of El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road where trucks would make a left-turn. Trucks would continue on Olivenhain Road (turns into Rancho Santa Fe P Road) until reaching the 'T" intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road. m Trucks would turn right and go east until reaching the landfill. The return trip would be a reversal of this same haul route. P ta TRUCK ROUTE #6: " ta Truck Route #6 would come from the south via 1-5 and exit at Encinitas Boulevard. Trucks would proceed east on Encinitas Boulevard thru the City of Encinitas until g) reaching the intersection of Encinitas Boulevard/El Camino Real where trucks would ta make a left turn and proceed north on El Camino Real until reaching the intersection of El Camino Reai/Olivenhain Road where trucks would make a right turn. Trucks would • continue on Olivenhain Road (turns into Rancho Santa Fe Road) until reaching the T" ta intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road. Trucks would turn right and go east until reaching the landfill. The return trip would be a reversal of this same haul ta route. m m PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION ^ Table 2 shows a summary of the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the m proposed project. The following assumptions were utilized; ta • 400 trucks per day enter the landfill • • 50 trucks enter the site during a one hour period within peak commuter p hours (generally 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM) 22 iririiitiiiririririfititiritiiifiiiii TABLE 2 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION USE AMOUNT (Inbound Only) DAILY TRIP ENDS (ADT) AM PEAK HOUR (7:00-8:00 AM) PM PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM) USE AMOUNT (Inbound Only) RATE VOLUME VOLUME IN OUT VOLUME IN OUT A. Actual Trips B. PCE Trips (*2.0) 400 Trucks 2.0 800 1600 50 50 100 100 50 50 100 100 1) Maximum of 400 trucks per day haul soil to the site. 2) Assumes maximum of 50 trucks enter the site during a one hour period within peak commuter hours (generally 7:00 - 9:00 AM and 4:00 - 6:00 PM). 3) PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent factor. 4) PCE factor of 2.0 applied to trips to account for the fiact that trucks are more impactive to roadway system than cars, per the Highway Capacity Manual (2000). Tab2.1124 12/10/2001 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS IK Passenger Car Equivalence (PCE) is defined as the number of passenger cars that are displaced by a single heavy vehicle of a particular type under the prevailing traffic conditions. Heavy vehicles have a greater traffic impact than passenger cars since: (1) they are larger than passenger cars, and therefore, occupy more roadway space; and (2) their performance characteristics are generally inferior to passenger cars, leading to the formation of downstream gaps in the traffic stream (especially on upgrades) which cannot always be effectively filled by normal passing maneuvers. Ail of the project- generated traffic consists of heavy vehicles (trucks). Therefore, a PCE factor was applied to the generated truck trips. Exhibit 21-8, within the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Passenger Car Equivalents on Extended General Highway Segments) depicts Passenger Car Equivalence for various types of vehicles. LLG adopted a PCE factor of 2.0 for this project, based on Exhibit 21 -8. Assuming that every truck counts as 2.0 cars, the project is calculated to generate the equivalent of 1,600 ADT (800 in/800 out) with 100 inbound/outbound trips during both the AM and PM peak hours. ta PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT P P As previously discussed, six potential truck routes were assessed for potential traffic impacts. All truck traffic was assumed to use one of the six routes since there is the P potential for the source of soil to all be at one location. Figures 5-5e show the ta assignment of project traffic assuming all trucks utilize one of the identified routes. Figures 6-6e show the existing + project traffic for each truck route. P P CUMULATIVE PROJECTS DISCUSSION P There are several other projects (termed Cumulative Projects) ongoing within the vicinity of the San Marcos Landfill. The Olivenhain Dam project is currently underway ta with the preliminary construction phase of building a Dam that will have a storage m capacity of 24 acre-feet of water. October 2001, marked construction of the actual building of the dam. Construction material and supplies are being trucked In Monday m thnj Friday between 7:00 AM and 4:00 PM. Construction trucks use Harmony Grove ^ Road to Via Ambiente. Construction Is expected to last a year with round-the-clock operations. P W Other development projects such as University Commons. La Costa Meadows, and San Elijo Ranch also add or will add traffic to the surrounding roadway system. Since the m Landfill Closure project duration is approximately eight months and Is scheduled to || 24 SR 78 WEST? RANCHO SANl lOUND RAMPS/ rA FE ROAD f 100/100 SR 78 EASTBI RANCHO SANT o o 1 3UND RAMPS/ A FE ROAO SAN MARCOS RANCHO SAN o o 1 BOULEVARD/ TA FE ROAD MELROSE DRr RANCHO SANl o o § o /£/ A FE ROAD 0 © r s o © ^ rtrt 1 ft\f\ 1 © t o o § o SAN EUJO R RANCHO SAN o o o © OAD/ FTA FE ROAD 100/100 r tr REV. 10/29/01 EAST-WEST NORTH-SOl E-W STREET STREET/ JTH STREET V_ AM/PM — AM/PM ^AM/PM \ ^ ^ NO SCALE F1G1124.DWG UNS( {)! ! LAW \ Ck! f \^!^A\ ENGINEERS ROUTE #1 25 Figure 5 PROJECT TRAFRC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS SR 78 WESTl EL CAMINO F BOUND RAMPS/ iEAL r 100/100 SR 78 EASTBC EL CAMINO RE o o o )UND RAMPS/ AL COLLEGE BO EL CAMINO F o o § 1 JLEVARD/ EAL t o o 1 PALOMAR AIR EL CAMINO F o Q •\ O o I PORT ROAD/ EAL @ ® r o JLEVARD/ EAL t o o 1 @ 100/100—* LA COST> EL CAMIN o o o ] ^ AVENUE/ 0 REAL OLIVENH> EL CAMII o o § o MN ROAD/ ^0 REAL k_ 100/100 RANCHO SAN" LA COSTA AV o o 1 i PA FE ROAD/ :NUE SAN ELUO R RANCHO SAN © •OAD/ ITA FE ROAD ^100/100 © ••• uu V / uu V ® © _ nn1/nni ^— OOl/OOl SAN ELUO R RANCHO SAN © r o o o EAST-WEST NORTH-SOU E-W STREET STREET/ FTH STREET v.. AM/PM — AM/PM ^AM/PM ti it = NO SCALE FIG1124.DWG LINSCOn LAW \ CkEENsl'AN ENGINEERS Figure 5a ROUTE #2 26 PROJECT TRAFRC VOLUMES S AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL * p IP ta 9TH AVENUE/ 1-15 NORTHE 30UND RAMPS 9TH AVENUE 1-15 SOUTH S o J 30UND RAMPS VALLEY P AUTO PAI o o 1 ARKWAY/ ?K WAY HARMONY GB QUESTHAVEN •OVE ROAD/ ROAD — 100/100 100/100^ @ 100/100—* @ @ ^ n 1 /nn i ^— OOl/OOl 100/100-*- EAST-WEST NORTH-SOl E-W STREET STREET/ nn STREET K_ AM/PM — AM/PM ^AM/PM ^ NO SCALE F1G1124.DWG LiNsron LAW \ CRbh\s!'A\ ENGINEERS Figure 5b ROUTE #3 - PROJECT TRAFRC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS 27 SAN MARCOS LANDRLL PALOMAR AIR 1-5 NORTHB< PORT ROAD/ DUND RAMPS 100/100 PALOMAR AIR 1-5 SOUTHBC §^ o PORT ROAD/ lUND RAMPS PALOMAR AIR COLLEGE BO PORT ROAD/ JLEVARD — 100/100 PALOMAR AIR EL CAMINO R PORT ROAD/ EAL 100/100—• @ I ® 100/100—* 100/100-^ @ o o \ o o LA COST/ EL CAMIN o o o 1 ^ AVENUE/ 0 REAL OUVENH^ EL CAMIh o o o JN ROAD/ JO REAL 100/100 RANCHO SANl LA COSTA AV o o \ o o I rA FE ROAD/ 3JUE SAN EUJO F RANCHO SAN © OAD/ ITA FE ROAD ^100/100 © 4 nn L /nn L ® © 100/100—* SAN EUJO F RANCHO SAN © 100/100"> EAST-WEST NORTH-SOU E-W blHht.1 STRET/ (TH Sn^ET k.AM/™ — AM/PM ^AM/M4 z NO SCALE FIG1124.DW6 \ INSCOJ T LAW \ ENGINEERS Figure 5c ROUTE #4 28 PROJECT TRAFRC VOLUMES 3 AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL " LA COSTA AS 1-5 NORTHB /ENUE/ OUND RAMPS 100/100 LA COSTA / 1-5 SOUTHl o o t' WENUE/ BOUND RAMPS LA COST; EL CAMIN ^ AVENUE/ 0 REAL OUVENH^ EL CAMI S 1 WN ROAD/ HO REAL k_ 100/100 100/100—* © I ® 100/100-^ © '^ o o 1 © RANCHO SAN U COSTA AV o o o TA FE ROAD/ :NUE SAN EUJO R< RANCHO SAN © DAD/ TA FE ROAD ^100/100 © 1OO/10O—* SAN EUJO R< RANCHO SAN © r o o 1 EAST-WEST NORTH-SOL E-W STREET STREET/ rTH STREET V.^ AM/PM — AM/PM ^AM/PM i ~ z NO SCALE nG1124.DW6 LINSCCITT I AW \ (:RLL\S['\\ ENGINEERS ROUTE #5 29 Figure 5d PROJECT TRAFRC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDHLL ENCtNrrAS BO 1-5 NORTHBO ULEVARD/ UND RAMPS — 100/100 ENCINfTAS B( 1-5 SOUTHB( JULEVARD/ 3UND RAMPS ^100/100 ENCINrTAS BC BALOUR DRIV JLEVARD/ — 100/100 ENCINTTAS BC EL CAMINO R o o t J ULEVARD/ EAL @ r o o o o 100/100—* 100/100 _> @ GARDEN VIEV EL CAMINO o o 1 V ROAD/ REAL OUVENHA EL CAMIN JN ROAD/ 0 REAL ^ 100/100 RANCHO SAN LA COSTA AV o o § o TA FE ROAD/ SAN EUJO F RANCHO SAT © ?OAD/ •JTA FE ROAD ^100/100 —OOl/OOl © r o o o © •»— 001 /oo I SAN EUJO F RANCHO SAT © 100/100"> EAST-WEST NORTH-SOL E-W STREET STREET/ ITH STREET K_ AM/PM — AM/PM ^AM/PM 5 ^ Z NO SCALE F1G1124.DWG LINSCOTT I AW' \ CULbXsi'AN ENGINEERS ROUTE #6 30 Figure 5e " PROJECT TRAFRC VOLUMES • AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL SR 78 WEST RANCHO SAN OO'- ;^ ro* (D(0 CM* BOUND RAMPS/ ITA FE ROAD 214/257 — 3/1 ^ 1146/549 SR 78 EASTB( RANCHO SANT KS 3UND RAMPS/ A FE ROAD SAN MARCOS RANCHO SAN 0)0) r» — (D — — •-CO BOULEVARD/ TA FE ROAD ^53/76 — 942/592 r 428/663 MELROSE DRIV RANCHO SANT 030 A 'E/ A FE ROAD -^t ISO CMN (OO N 0> IS © too oon 393/406 _> 0/ 2—* 748/630 ~> © tr oo lam CO(D 0O-* It) 198/644> 523/1641—* 40/ 44^ © NOO to o^%. T-in ^ 319/359-^ 504/312--^ © 'E/ A FE ROAD -^t ISO CMN (OO N 0> IS EAST-WEST NORTH-SO E-W STREET STREET/_ UTH SIKLLI AM/™ — AM/PM ^AM/PM td z NO SCALE F1G1124.DW6 1 l\S( (^TT LAW \ (.UttNSl'AN ENGINEERS Figure 6 EXGIING + PROJECT (ROUTE ^WFnC^VOLUM^ SAN MARCOS LANDRLL SR 78 WESn EL CAMINO \> CM* *rO fO — 30UND RAMPS/ EAL 402/496 f 1095/860 SR 78 EASTBC EL CAMINO^ RE !n in* ^ co\ mm coo — ro )UND RAMPS/ AL COLLEGE BO EL CAMINO F *o Nro ID — A JLEVARD/ EAL to PALOMAR AIR EL CAMINO F ro —a> r>.a)p«. — neo — roto P^ooto CM toro A"- PORT ROAD/ EAL K_ 1057/562 — 1309/875 f 487/412 ••o — * — CO to 200/521> 0/9—* 88/223^ tr to — <M NO oto lOtO 44/547^ 0/ 34^ JLEVARD/ EAL to 142/232^ 176/1151 77/ 131 (DiQco oPo LA COST; EL CAMIN to * oo> CM orv _N r^ioo rotoro NBO"- A"- ^ AVENUE/ 0 REAL ^_ 220/ 92 — 413/183 ^65/ 68 OLIVENH> EL CAMII * CM (Dom CM —lO rox^ m A^ m ROAD/ >J0 REAL 221/214 — 843/602 ^850/613 RANCHO SAN^ LA COSTA AV o oin mor^ o>»* — r^w A"- FA FE ROAD/ :NUE 31/ 47 — 58/ 78 r 10/ 7 SAN EUJO R RANCHO SAN h. r» O) 0)I0 v.— s> — ti © OAD/ ITA FE ROAD ^177/49 ^292/169 512/559^ 321/571 —* 237/192^ © -^\r — •- CO ss-a 196/451^ 517/726—* 122/250^ © flD ^ CO S«lO 275/260 J 107/ 25-* 164/216"^ © -^tr COOlO Nr..— — (O lOrO — — in — NO SAN EUJO R RANCHO SAN h. r» O) 0)I0 v.— s> — ti © tr ON ON NCM OOVD" 00 — EAST-WEST NORTH-SOL L-W SIKLLI STREET/ ITH STTREET K_ AM/PM — AM/PM rAM/PM z NO SCALE nG1124.DWG LINSCOn LAW \ CRE i NSPAN ENGINEERS Figure 6a • EXISTING + PROJECT (R0UTE#2) TRAFRC VOLUMES • 32 AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL " Ml P li 9TH AVENUE/ 1-15 NORTHE lOUND RAMPS 182/377 — 654/690 9TH AVENUE 1-15 SOUTH tOOlO * N N ro \ rtf».io — *o> 30UND RAMPS — 1459/1078 r 182/ 191 VALLEY P AUTO PAI roeoro *«ro Neo — Oiroco io*r>. too» — A"- ARKWAY/ ?K WAY ^^48/ 189 — 590/339 f 154/206 HARMONY GR QUESTHAVEN t^OrO A^ OVE ROAD/ ROAD ^0/4 — 374/161 n /I 187/329^ 672/1006—* @ 752/548 J 27/ 2-*-183/218 838/1039 550/830 ~> @ 194/497 J 371/704 —* 303/203 ^ Mr lOtON — OtD toro to NC<IO> 1/6^ 170/417 —* 0/3^ -^tr o oo° EAST-WEST NORTH-Sd E-W STREET STREET/ JTH STREET K.m/9>k — AM/PM AM/PM ID \ ^ z NO SCALE RG1124.DWG L!NS( (^I 1 1 AW' \ CkLLXSPAN ENGINEERS Figure 6b EXISTING + PROJECT (ROUTE #3) TRAFRC VOLUMES 33 AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDHLL PALOMAR AIR 1-5 NORTHB PORT ROAD/ 3UND RAMPS fc^ 533/1194 — 802/1858 PALOMAR AIR 1-5 SOUTHBC rv — ro cn to \o"i rv to PORT ROAD/ UND RAMPS — 452/1011 ^489/1066 PALOMAR AIR COLLEGE BOI CO CO o> o > —(O NW *rOiO PORT ROAD/ JLEVARD "k^ 59/ 84 — 1027/1978 r27/ 33 PALOMAR AIR EL CAMINO R to —Ol rvoirv — IVIO — rO(0 rvDOiD CM*rO PORT ROAD/ EAL 1057/562 — 1309/875 ^487/412 78/ 176> 1451/1052—* '^r ro CO 1 • o i — IV — * to — — lO 445/620 —«- 107/308"> ® 876/263 J 1912/1223—* 34/ 75^ -^tr NO* c^ —ro CM — 142/232^ 176/1151—^ 177/ 231 •> @ opo LA COST/ EL CAMIN DD *OOI NOr* to —CM t^rno rOIDIO NOO — k AVENUE/ 0 REAL ^ 220/ 92 — 413/183 /" 65/ 68 OUVENH/ EL CAMlh * N (OO m N —to ¥?- * —N JN ROAD/ JO REAL 221/214 — 843/602 r 850/613 RANCHO SANl LA COSTA AVI o OIO lOOfv OIO)* — rvio PA FE ROAD/ 3^UE 31/ 47 — 58/ 78 SAN ELUO R RANCHO SAN r» _OT^IO Sv. OO) — to © OAD/ rTA FE ROAD 177/49 ^292/169 512/559^ 321/571 237/192 "> © Mr 196/451^ 517/726—* 122/250^ © '^tr tor-ID — Ol 275/260 _> 107/ 25—*- 164/216^ © '^tr lOOrO Nr.- — — to roro — — IO — NO SAN ELUO R RANCHO SAN r» _OT^IO Sv. OO) — to © tr CMN IO — EAST-WEST NORTH-SOl E-W srraET SIKU-I/ ITH STREET K_ AM/PM — AM/PM ^AM/PM z NO SCALE p IN ta F1G1124.DWG LiNS(OI I LAW X CkL[\srA\ ENGINEERS Figure 6c EXISTING + PROJECT (R0UTE#4) TRAFRC VOLUMES 34 AM/PM PEAK HOURS SAN MARCOS LANDRLL LA COSTA A> 1-5 NORTHB /ENUE/ OUND RAMPS 474/506 — 740/603 LA COSTA / 1-5 SOUTHl ro o £NS ooro CO ro —ID A'^ WENUE/ 30UND RAMPS — 363/370 f 427/532 LA COST/ EL CAMIN *eoo> Norv CO 0> N rsiocD rotoro NPv — ^ AVENUE/ 0 REAL 220/ 92 — 413/183 f 65/ 68 OUVENHA EL CAMIN * CM (Don N —m POV^^ (0 Ol — ** — * —CM IN ROAD/ 0 REAL ^221/214 — 843/602 ^850/613 164/130_> 865/777—* © Mr eo*io — * 365/455 —* 89/ 88^ 512/559 J 321/571 —* 337/292 ~> © ^tr 2-5 ^0»fv Q —N 196/451 _> 517/726—* 122/250^ © -^^r aiTTiD C—ff Iv^N toQcM RANCHO SAN LA COSTA AV o OIO oorv Bo'm^ o)0)* — rvio TA FE ROAD/ tNUE V-31/ 47 — 58/ 78 r 10/ 7 SAN EUJO R RANCHO SAN Pv PvO) ^lO Pi's. 0<3) — to © 3AD/ TA FE ROAD ^177/49 ^292/169 275/260 J 107/ 25 —* 164/216 •> © -^tr lOoro — » fOro — — IO — NO SAN EUJO R RANCHO SAN Pv PvO) ^lO Pi's. 0<3) — to © tr CMN CO — EAST-WESl NORTH-SO E-W STREET • STREET/ UTH STREET K.^ AM/PM — AM/PM AM/PM td \ ^ z NO SCALE nG1124.DWG LINSCOl I I AW' \ (.ki LNSi'AN ENGINEERS Figure 6d EXISTING + PROJECT (R0UTE#5) TRAFRC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS 35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL ENCINITAS BOULEVARD/ 1-5 NORTHBOUND RAMPS ENCINrTAS BOULEVARD/ t-5 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS 628/715—* 102/136^ — 604/743 f 457/472 ENCtNtTAS BOULEVARD/ BALOUR DRIVE — 1030/1' r 481/ 3- ENCINrTAS BOULEVARD/ EL CAMINO REAL GARDEN VIEW ROAD/ EL CAMINO REAL OUVENHAIN ROAD/ EL CAMINO REAL DO to rooo — — ro rO\N — tD\ \<» O orvDO or —— 32/ 105^ 94/ 190—* 205/282 ^ K_ 224/261 — 161/200 r 113/179 N tOOtfl CM —lO 10 "X:- (DO> — ** — 21^ •^tr coon OOIDO Nrv 196/451 _> 517/726—* 122/250> © RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD/ LA COSTA AVENUE SAN ELUO ROAD/ RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD 121/114 — 843/602 r 950/713 o OIO tooh" am — 0>0)* — rvio ^tr ID7ZIO OJl^lO — — O <0°N SCM *(0 275/260 J 107/ 25—* 164/216 © ^^31/ 47 — 58/ 78 r 10/ 7 -.tr (DOrO Nr.— — (O roro-— in. MO ro-v. — to © ^177/49 ^292/169 tr OCM ON NN mto o* DO — m m m m ii EAST-WEST STREET/ NORTH-SOUTH STREET k_ AM/PM — AM/PM ^AM/PM E-W STREET NO SCALE RG1124.DWG LINSCCnT LAW X (=Rt[:\Si'A\ ENGINEERS Figure 6e " EXISTING + PROJECT (R0UTE#6) TRAFRC VOLUMES 1 AM/PM PEAK HOURS 36 SAN MARCOS LANDRLL 1 INSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS begin In January 2003, the cumulative traffic of the ongoing Olivenhain Dam project and other development projects are included in the existing traffic volumes. SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA The Significance Criteria is based on the Public Facility Element of the San Diego County General Plan (October. 1993), This document states that Level of Service C (LOS C) is considered to be the desired level of service on County Roads. Therefore, if the project causes a degradation from LOS C or better to v^^orse than LOS C at an intersection or on a street segment or adds traffic to an intersection or street segment currently operating at LOS D or worse, the project is considered to cause a significant traffic impact. This criteria was applied to roads both within and outside the County's jurisdiction. Any traffic added to a freeway segment operating at LOS D, E, or F Is considered significant. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The traffic analysis assesses the key intersections, street segments, and freeways in the project area. There are different methodologies used to assess signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections, street segments, and freeways as described below. The signalized intersections were analyzed during the AM and PM peai^ hours by determining the average delay per vehicle entering the intersection. The delay was determined using a computer program that utilizes the methodology found in Chapter 9 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The delay values (seconds) were qualified by giving a Level of Service (LOS) or "Grade" to the corresponding delay values for the intersection as a whole. Levels of Service for signalized intersections vary from A (free flow, little delay) to F (forced fiow, significant delays). Appendix B provides a more detailed explanation of the methodology, a full description of Levels of Service and the intersection calculation sheets by truck route. For unsignalized intersections, level of service is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor street movement. Level of service is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Level of Service F exists when there are insufficient gaps of suitable size to allow side street traffic to safely cross through or onto a major street traffic stream. This level of service is generally evident from extremely long 37 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS control delays experienced by side-street traffic and by queuing on the minor-street approaches. The method, however, is based on a constant critical gap size; that is, the critical gap remains constant no matter how long the side-street motorist waits. LOS F may also appear in the form of side-street vehicles selecting smaller-than-usual gaps. It is important to note that LOS F may not always result in long queues but may result in adjustments to normai gap acceptance behavior, which are more difficult to observe in the field than queuing. In most cases, at Two-Way STOP controlled (TWSC) intersections, the critical movement is the minor street left-turn movement and the delay and Levels of Service are based on Chapter 10 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). As such, the minor street left-turn movement can generally be considered the primary factor affecting overall intersection performance. The lower threshold for LOS F is set at 50 seconds of delay per vehicle. There are many instances, particularly in urban areas, in which the delay equations will predict delays of 50 seconds (LOS F) or more for minor street movements under very low volume conditions on the minor street (less than 25 vehicles per hour or vph). Appendix C contains a full description of intersection LOS and the HCM calculation sheets by truck route. MR P il Tables 3-3e show a summary of the intersection operations in the project area by truck • route. *• The street segment analvsis was done by comparing the street segment volume to the * theoretical capacity of the roadway. Since the study area is within the Cities of San Marcos, Encinitas, Carisbad, and the County of San Diego, the appropriate jurisdictional roadway capacities were utilized. Since Carlsbad does not have street segment ADT p capacities. City of San Marcos criteria were utilized. Tables 4-4e show a summary of ii the existing street segment operations in the project area by truck route. Appendix C provides a full description of Levels of Service tables by jurisdictions. H The freewav segment Level of Service analysis is based on the procedure developed by CALTRANS District 11 based on methods described in the Hiohwav Capacity Manual. W The procedure involves comparing the peak hour volume of the mainline segment to the theoretical capacity of the roadway. This traffic study utilizes 2,000 vehicles/hour and 1,200 vehicles/hour capacities for main-lanes and auxiliary lanes, respectively, as used in the Central 1-5 Corridor Study (BRW Inc., October 2000). The volume/capacity (V/C) m ratio Is then calculated, and compared to LOS thresholds shown in Appendix D. IP il EXISTING OPERATIONS Tables 3-3e shows a summary of the existing AM and PM peak hour operations at the S key intersections affected by the identified truck routes. This table shows that the 38 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE 3 ROUTE 1 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING EXISTING + 400 TRUCKS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 1. Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps AM 53.8 D r £ PM 108.1 F 114.1 2. Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 EB Ramps AM 98.5 F 7137^6 - - PM 86.3 F 118.g. 3. Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Marcos Boulevard AM 64.0 E 'i PM >150 F >i5o;: L ^ 4. Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive AM 41.0 D 43.8 D PM 29.9 C 30.3 c 5. Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road AM 26.3 C 34.8 c PM 34.2 C 62.1/ DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service WB = Westbound, etc. SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Notes: Intersections 1 -3 are in the City of San Marcos jurisdiction. Intersections 4 and 5 are in the City of Carisbad jurisdiction. DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY LOS 0.0 < 10.0 A 10.1 to 20.0 B 20.1 to 35.0 G 35.1 to 55.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E > 80.1 F Tab3.1124 1/22/2002 39 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE 3a ROUTE 2 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING EXISTING + 400 TRUCKS PEAK HOUR DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 1. El Camino Real/SR 78 WB Ramps AM 43.4 D 49 Jo" D PM 39.7 D 41.9 D 2. El Camino Real/SR 78 EB Ramps AM 17.9 B 18.6 B PM 42.3 D |L.I ] P ] 3. E! Camino Real/College Boulevard AM 10.3 B 11.0 8 PM 25.8 C 26.3 c 4. El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road AM 68.6 E 73.1 ^ • -PM 62.3 E 64.6 B 5. Ei Camino Real/La Costa Avenue AM 27.2 C 29.1 C PM 30.0 C 31.7 C 6. El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road AM 43.4 D " -" D ' PM 60.7 E 77.7 7. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue AM 28.0 C 28.3 C PM 29.4 C 30.1 C 8. Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road AM 26.3 c 34.6 c PM 34.2 c 51 ' DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service WB = Westbound, etc. SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Notes: Intersections 1 and 2 are in the Gity of Oceanside jurisdiction. Intersections 3-5, 7,8 are in the City of Carlsbad jurisdiction. Intersection 6 is in ihe Gity of Encinitas jurisdiction. DELAY / LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY LOS 0.0 < 10.0 A 10.1 to 20.0 B 20.1 to 35.0 c 35.1 to 55.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E > 80.1 F Tab3a.n24 1/22/2002 40 LINSCOTT LAW &i GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE 3b ROUTE 3 - INTERSECTION OPERATIONS EXISTING + INTERSECTION PEAK MOI in EXiSTING 400 TRUCKS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 1. 9th Avenue/1-15 SB Ramps AM 7.0 A 9.0 A PM 15.6 B 19.8 B 2. 9th Avenue/1-15 NB Ramps AM 15.8 B 18.1 B PM 15.9 B 17.8 B 3. Valley Parkway/Auto Park Way AM 38.4 D 407 0 PM 34.5 c 35^3 D 4. Harmony Grove/Queslhaven Road' AM 10.2 B 11.4 B PM 11.5 B 14.1 B DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS ^ Level of Service SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS WB = Westbound, etc. DELAY / LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY / LOS THRESHOLDS 1. Unsignalized intersection SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 0.0 < 10.0 A 0.0 < 10.0 A Notes: 10.1 to 20.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 B Intersections 1-3 are in the Gity of Escondido junsdiction. 20.1 to 35.0 c 15.1 to 25.0 c Intersection 4 is in the County of San Diego jurisdiction-35.1 to 55.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 E > 80.1 F > 50.1 F Tab3e.ll24 1/22/2002 41 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE 3c ROUTE 4 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING EXISTING + 400 TRUCKS PEAK HOUR DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 1. Palomar Airport Road/1-5 SB Ramps AM 15.2 B 15.5 B PM 14.3 B 15.4 B 2. Palomar Airport Road/1-5 NB Ramps AM 33.1 C 34.8 C PM 33.1 C 34.6 C 3. Palomar Airpoit Road/College Boulevard AM 18.9 B 19.1 B PM 32.6 C 34.2 C 4. Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real AM 68.6 E 707 PM 62.3 E 65.3 E 5. El Camino Real/La Costa Avenue AM 27.2 C 29.1 C PM 30.0 C 317 C 6. El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road AM 43.4 D • 44.5 D PM 60.7 E 77.7 E 1 7. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue AM 28.0 C 28.3 C PM 29.4 C 30.1 C 8. Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road AM 26.3 C 34.6 c PM 34.2 C 51 1 DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Levei of Service SB = Southbound, etc. SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Note: intersections 1-5, 7,8 are in the Gity of Carlsbad jurisdiction. Intersection 6 is in the City of Encinitas jurisdiction. DELAY / LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY LOS 0.0 < 10.0 A 10.1 to 20.0 B 20.1 to 35.0 c 35.1 to 55.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E > 80.1 F Tab3b.1124 1/22/2002 42 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE Sd ROUTE 5 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING EXISTING + 400 TRUCKS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 1. La Costa Avenue/1-5 SB Ramps AM 26.8 C 27.0 c PM 25.8 C 26.9 C 2. La Costa Avenue/1-5 NB Ramps AM 21.9 c 22.5 C PM 23.4 c 25.8 C 3. La Costa Avenue/E! Camino Real AM 27.2 c 28.2 C PM 30.0 c 33.4 c 4. El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road AM 43.4 D 44.5 D PM 607 E 77.7 E 5. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue AM 28.0 c 28.3 C PM 29.4 c 30.1 C 6. Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road AM 26.3 c 34.6 C PM 34.2 c st.i D DE1_AY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service SB = Southbound, etc. SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Note: Intersections 1-3,5,6 are in the City of Carlsbad jurisdiction. Intersection 4 is in the City of Encinitas jurisdiction. DELAY / LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY 0.0 < 10.0 10.1 to 20.0 20.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 55.0 55.1 to 80.0 > 80.1 LOS A B C D E F Tab3c.n24 ^!22/2Q02 43 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE 3e ROUTE 6 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR EXISTING EXISTING + 400 TRUCKS INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 1. Encinitas Boulevard/l-5 SB Ramps AM 31.2 C 34.8 C PM 32.7 C 37.9 b 2. Encinitas Boulevard/1-5 NB Ramps AM 20.3 c 24.0 c PM 31.0 c 42.2 D 3. Encinitas Boulevard/Balour Drive AM 21.2 c 23.0 C PM 25.3 c 29.3 c 4. Encinitas Boulevard/El Camino Real AM 60.7 E 65.1 PM 63.2 E 7G.2 E ' 5. El Camino Real/Garden View Road AM 27.8 c 28.6 c PM 43.8 D 46.4 6. El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road AM 43.4 D 45 2 ••:'b 1 PM 60.7 E 72 9 7. Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue AM 28.0 C 28.3 C PM 29.4 C 30.1 c 8. Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road AM 26.3 C 34.6 c PM 34.2 c 51.1 D LOS = Level of Service SB = Southbound, etc. DELAY / LOS THRESHOLDS SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact DELAY LOS 0.0 < 10.0 A Notes: 10.1 to 20.0 B Intersections 1-6 are in the City of Encinitas jurisdiction. 20.1 to 35.0 C Intersections 7 and 8 are in the City of Carlsbad jurisdiction. 35.1 to 55.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E > 80.1 F Tab3d.n24 1/22/2002 44 TABLE 4 ROUTE 1 - DAILY STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY^ (at LOS E) EXISTING EXISTING+ 400 TRUCKS STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY^ (at LOS E) VOL V/C LOS VOL V/C LOS V/C INCREASE RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD Descanso Boulevard to Grand Avenue 40,000 39,400 0.99 E 41,0057 1.03 La Mirada Drive to Linda Vista Drive 40,000 33,600 0.84 D 35.200 0.88 E Security Place to San Marcos Boulevard 40,000 25,300 0.63 C 26,900 0.67 C 0.04 San Marcos Boulevard to Lake San Marcos Drive 40,000 30,900 0.77 D 32.5(ip 0,81 b ' 6.04 Lake San Marcos Drive to Melrose Drive 15,000 27,500 1.83 F 29.100 L94 Melrose Drive to San Elijo Road 15,000 28,800 1.92 F 30.4QP 2.03 * ' 0.11 See FIGURE 2 for Truck Route. 1. Capacity and LOS based on City of San Marcos Standard Street Segment Classification Table. VOL - Volume V/C - Volume over Capacity ratio LOS - Level of Service SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Tab4.1124 1/22/2002 TABLE 4a ROUTE 2 - DAILY STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY' EXISTING EXISTING+ 400 TRUCKS (at LOS E) VOL v/c LOS VOL v/c LOS v/c INCREASE El Camino Real Plaza Drive to Marron Road 60,000 34,556 0.58 c 36,156 0.60 C 0.02 Faraday Avenue to Palomar Airport Road 60,000 32,590 0.54 c 34,190 0.57 C 0.03 Palomar Airport Road to Alga Road 60,000 27,645 0.46 B 29,245 0.49 B 0.03 Alga Road to La Costa Avenue 60,000 37,201 0.62 c 38,801 0.65 C 0.03 Levante Street to Calle Barcelona 60,000 30,373 0.51 c 31,973 0.53 C 0.02 Rancho Santa Fe Road Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 60,000 15,600 0.26 B 17,200 0.29 B 0.03 Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 15,000 25,800 1.72 F 27;400 1.83-F 0-1*1 Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 15,000 26,214 1.75 F 27,814 1.85 • ;F 0.10 " See FIGURE 2a for Truck Route, 1. Capacity and LOS based on City of San Marcos Standard Streel Segment ClassHicalion Table. Gity of Carlsbad does not have a segment analysis table. VOL - Volume V/C - Volume over Capacity ratio LOS - Level of Service SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Tab4a.1124 1/22/2002 TABLE 4b ROUTE 3 - DAILY STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY' EXISTING EXISTING -^400 TRUCKS STREET SEGMENT (at LOS E) VOL v/c LOS VOL v/c LOS INCREASE Auto Park Way 9th Avenue to Valley Parkway 34,200 18,800 0.55 B 20,400 0.60 B 0.05 Auto Park Way N (1-Way) Andreasen Drto Howard Avenue 15,000 12,300 0.82 D 13,900 0.93 D 0.11 Harmony Grove Road Elfin Forest Road to Kauana Loa Drive 16,200 2,860 0.18 A 4,460 0.28 B 0.09 Elfin Forest Road Hamiony Grove to Questhaven Road 16,200 2,530 0.16 B 4,130 0.25 B 0.09 See FIGURE 2b for Truck Route. 1. Capacity and LOS based on County of San Diego or Cily of Escondido Standard Street Segment Classification Table. 2. City of Escondido and County of San Diego traffic count records. VOL - Volume V/C - Volume over Capacity ratio LOS - Level of Service SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Tab4e.1124 2/21/02 TABLE 4c ROUTE 4 - DAILY STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY' EXISTING EXISTING+ 400 TRUCKS STREET SEGMENT (at LOS E) VOL V/C LOS VOL v/c LOS v/c INCREASE Palomar Airport Road Paseo Del Norte to Armada Drive 60,000 54,941 0.92 E 56,541 0.94 E 0.02 Yarrow Drive to El Camino Real 60,000 31.070 0.52 C 32,670 0.54 C 0.02 El Camtno Real Palomar Airport Road to Alga Road 60,000 27,645 0.46 B 29,245 0.49 B 0.03 Alga Road to La Costa Avenue 60,000 37,201 0.62 C 38,801 0.65 C 0.03 Levante Street to Calle Barcelona 60,000 30,373 0.51 C 31,973 0.53 C 0.02 Rancho Santa Fe Road Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 60,000 15,600 0.26 B 17,200 0.29 B 0.03 Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 15,000 25,800 1.72 F 1.83 Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 15,000 26,214 1.75 F 1.85 '"-''":70;l0v?:7 See FIGURE 2c for Truck Route. 1. Capacity and LOS based on City of San Marcos Standard Streel Segment Classification Table. City of Carlsbad does not have a segment analysis table. VOL - Volume V/G - Volume over Capacity ratio LOS - Level of Sen/ice SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Tat)4b.1124 1/22/2002 TABLE 4d ROUTE 5 - DAILY STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY' EXISTING EXISTING+ 400 TRUCKS STREET SEGMENT (at LOS E) VOL V/C LOS VOL V/C LOS V/C INCREASE La Costa Avenue Piraeus Street to Saxony Road 40,000 29,388 0.73 D 30,988 0.77" b ^ '0,04" El Camino Real Levante Street to Calle Barcelona 60,000 30,373 0.51 C 31,973 0.53 C 0.02 Rancho Santa Fe Road Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 60,000 15,600 0.26 B 17,200 0.29 B 0.03 Caile Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 15,000 25,800 1.72 F 27,400 1.83 ilJSo^iin^g: Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 15,000 26,214 1.75 F 27.814 1.85 F See FIGURE 2d for Truck Route. 1. Capacity and LOS based on Gity of San Marcos Standard Street Segment Classification Table. Cily of Carlsbad does not have a segment analysis table. VOL - Volume V/C - Volume over Capacity ratio LOS - Level of Service SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Tab4c.1124 1/22/2002 TABLE 4e ROUTE 6 - DAILY STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS ^ <" LT) [5 n 5 H STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY* (at LOS E) EXISTING EXISTING+ 400 TRUCKS STREET SEGMENT CAPACITY* (at LOS E) VOL V/C LOS VOL V/C LOS INCREASE Encinitas Boulevard 1-5 to Saxony Road 35,200^ 35,100 0.99 E 36700 1.04 F 0.05 • Balour Drive to El Camino Real 57.000' 26,200 0.46 C 27,800 0.49 C 0.03 El Camino Real Encinitas Boulevard to Mountain Vista Drive 57,000^ 39,600 0.69 C 41,200 0.72 C 0.03 Garden View Road to Olivenhain Road 57,000' 38,300 0.67 C 39,900 0.70 c 0.03 Rancho Santa Fe Road Olivenhain Road to Avd La Posta/Calle Acervo 60,000^ 15,600 0.26 B 17,200 0.29 B 0.03 Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue 15,000^ 25,800 1.72 F 27.40"P 1.83 -f -0.11 Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road 15,000^ 26,214 1.75 F 2^.014 1.85 F 0.10 See FIGURE 2e for Truck Route. * Capacity and LOS based on City of San Marcos or City of Encinitas Standard Street Segment Classification Table. City of Carlsbad does not provide segment analysis table, 1. City of Encinitas jurisdiction. 2. City of Carlsbad jurisdiction. VOL' Volume V/G - Volume over Capacity ratio LOS - Level of Service SHADING = Represents a Significant Impact Tab4d.1124 1/22/2002 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS majority of the intersections are currently operating at LOS D or worse during one peak hour or during both peak hours with a few intersections operating at LOS C or better. The following intersections are currently operating at LOS E or LOS F: • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps (LOS F - PM peak hour) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 EB Ramps (LOS F - AM & PM peak hours) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Marcos Boulevard (LOS E - AM peak hour, LOS F - PM peak hour) • El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road (LOS E - AM & PM peak hours) • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road (LOS E - PM peak hour) • Encinitas Boulevard/EI Camino Real (LOS E - AM & PM peak hours) Tables 4-4e show a summary of the existing daily street segment operations in the project area. This table shows that the majority of the street segments are calculated to currently operate at LOS C or better on a daily basis with a few exceptions, notably along Rancho Santa Fe Road. EXISTING + PROJECT OPERATIONS The following is a description of the intersection and street segment operations with the addition of project traffic (400 trucks). Six routes were analyzed for each scenario. The significance of project impacts are discussed later in this report. Truck Route 1 Table 3 shows that with the addition of project traffic, LOS D, E, or F is calculated at the following locations. • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps (LOS E/F - AM/PM peak hours) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 EB Ramps (LOS F - AM & PM peak hours) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Marcos Boulevard (LOS E/F - AM/PM peak hours) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive (LOS D - AM peak hour) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road (LOS E - PM peak hour) 51 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table 4 shows that with the addition of project traffic, five of the six segments on Rancho Santa Fe Road operate at LOS D, E, or F. The foiiowing segment continues to operate at LOS C. • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Security Place to San Marcos Boulevard) Truck Route 2 Table 3a shows that with the addition of project traffic, the following intersections operate at LOS D, E, or F. • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps (LOS D - AM & PM peak hours) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 EB Ramps (LOS D - PM peak hour) • El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road (LOS E-AM & PM peak hours) • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road (LOS D/E-AM/PM peak hours) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road (LOS D - PM peak hour) Table 4a shows that with the addition of project traffic, the segments on El Camino Real are calculated to operate at LOS C or better. The following segments are calculated to operate at LOS D, E, or F. • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) Truck Route 3 Table 3b shows that with the addition of project traffic, the foiiowing intersections operate at LOS D, E, or F. • Valley Parkway/Auto Park Way (LOS D - AM & PM peak hours) Table 4b shows that with the addition of project traffic, all segments are calculated to operate at LOS D or better. The foiiowing segment is calculated to operate at LOS D. • Auto Park Way N. (Andreasen Drive to Howard Avenue) 52 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Truck Route 4 Table 3c shows that with the addition of project traffic, the following intersections are calculated to operate at LOS D, E, or F. • El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road (LOS E - AM & PM peak hours) • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road (LOS E - PM peak hour) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road (LOS D - PM peak hour) Table 4c shows that with the addition of project traffic, the majority of the segments are calculated to operate at LOS C or better. The following segments are calculated to operate at LOS D, E, or F. • Palomar Airport Road (Paseo Del Norte to Armada Drive) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) Truck Route 5 Table 3d shows that with the addition of project traffic, the following intersections are calculated to operate at LOS D, E, or F. • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road (LOS D/E-AM/PM peak hours) • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road (LOS D - PM peak hour) Table 4d shows that with the addition of project traffic, the following segments are calculated to operate at LOS D, E, or F. • La Costa Avenue (Piraeus Street to Saxony Road) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) Truck Route 6 Table 3e shows that with the addition of project traffic, the following intersections are calculated to operate at LOS D, E, or F. • Encinitas Boulevard/l-5 SB Ramps (LOS D- PM peak hour) • Encinitas Boulevard/l-5 NB Ramps (LOS D - PM peak hour) • Encinitas Boulevard/El Camino Real (LOS E - AM & PM peak hours) • El Camino Real/Garden View Road (LOS D - PM peak hour) • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road (LOS D/E - AM/PM peak hours) 53 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road (LOS D - PM peak hour) Table 4e shows that with the addition of project traffic, the foiiowing segments are calculated to operate at LOS D, E, or F. • Encinitas Boulevard (1-5 to Saxony Road) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) FREEWAY MAINLINE OPERATIONS Table 5 shows that based on the significance thresholds, the freeway segments on 1-5, 1-15, and SR 78 are calculated to operate at LOS E or F under existing conditions with the exception of SR 78 between El Camino Real and College Boulevard which is calculated to currently operate at LOS D. With the addition or project traffic, all freeway segments are calculated to operate at LOS E or F. A significant impact is calculated at each location. SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS Based on the established significance criteria, the following significant impacts are calculated at the intersections, street segments, and freeways for each truck route. A. TRUCK ROUTE 1 INTERSECTIONS: • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 EB Ramps • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Marcos Boulevard • Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road SEGMENTS: • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Decanso Blvd. to Grand Avenue) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (La Mirada Drive to Linda Vista Drive) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (San Marcos Boulevard to Lake San Marcos Drive) 54 TABLE 5 PEAK HOUR FREEWAY SEGMENT SUMMARY STREET SEGMENT STATE ROUTE 78 Between El Camino Real & College Boulevard Between Rancho Santa Fe Road and San Marcos Boulevard INTERSTATE 5 Between Santa Fe Drive and Encinitas Boulevard Between Palomar Airport Road and Cannon Road INTERSTATE 15 Between Valley Parkway and 9th Avenue ONE DIRECTION CAPACITY 7,200 6,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 EXISTING VOL V/C LOS 6,600 0.917 5,640 0.940 8,700 1.088 8,400 1.050 8,040 1.005 EXISTING+ 400 TRUCKS VOL V/C LOS v/c INCREASE 6.700 0.931 5,740 0.957 8,800 1.100 8,500 1.063 8,140 1.018 SOURCE: Existing Traffic Volumes - CALTRANS Traffic Volumes Book for Stale Highways, 1999 SB = Southbound, etc. V/C = Volume over Capacity DIR = Direction LOS = Level of Service Capacity based on 2,000 vehicles per hour per main lane, 1,200 vehicles per hour per auxiliary lane See Appendix D for LOS Thresholds. SHADING = Repesents a Significant Impact 0,014 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.013 Tabs. 1124 1/22/2002 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Lake San Marcos Drive to Melrose Drive) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Melrose Drive to San Eiijo Road) FREEWAY SEGMENTS: • SR 78 (Rancho Santa Fe Road to San Marcos Boulevard) B. TRUCK ROUTE 2 INTERSECTIONS: • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps • Rancho Santa Fe Road/SR 78 EB Ramps • El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road SEGMENTS: • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) FREEWAY SEGMENTS: • SR 78 (El Camino Real to College Boulevard) • SR 78 (Rancho Santa Fe Road to San Marcos Boulevard) C. TRUCK ROUTES INTERSECTIONS: • Valley Parkway/Auto Park Way SEGMENTS: • Auto Park Way N. (1-Way) (Andreasen Drive to Howard Avenue) FREEWAY SEGMENTS: ith 1-15 (Valley Parkway to 9'" Avenue) 56 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN m ENGINEERS D. TRUCK ROUTE 4 li INTERSECTIONS: • El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road P -El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road ^ • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road m m SEGMENTS: • Palomar Airport Road (Paseo Del Norte to Armada Drive) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) FREEWAY SEGMENTS: • 1-5 (Palomar Street to Cannon Road) • SR 78 (El Camino Real to College Boulevard) • SR 78 (Rancho Santa Fe Road to San Marcos Boulevard) E. TRUCK ROUTE 5 mm INTERSECTIONS: • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road ^ • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road SEGMENTS: ^ •La Costa Avenue (Piraeus Street to Saxony Road) ^ • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) ^ • Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) p, FREEWAY SEGMENTS: ^ • 1-5 (Palomar Street to Cannon Road) • SR 78 (El Camino Real to College Boulevard) PI • SR 78 (Rancho Santa Fe Road to San Marcos Boulevard) ib p F. TRUCK ROUTE 6 INTERSECTIONS: IH • Encinitas Boulevard/I-5 SB Ramps in • Encinitas Boulevard/l-5 NB Ramps • Encinitas Boulevard/El Camino Real fa 67 UNSCOTT LAW 6.: GREENSPAN ENGINEERS • El Camino Real/Garden View Road • El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road • Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road SEGMENTS: • Encinitas Boulevard (1-5 to Saxony Road) Rancho Santa Fe Road (Calle Barcelona to La Costa Avenue) Rancho Santa Fe Road (Truck By-Pass to San Elijo Road) FREEWAY SEGMENTS: • 1-5 (Santa Fe Drive to Encinitas Boulevard) • 1-5 (Palomar Street to Cannon Road) m • SR 78 (El Camino Real to College Boulevard) ^ • SR 78 (Rancho Santa Fe Road to San Marcos Boulevard) •I POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES H Significant impacts are calculated at several intersections and on several street segments for all six-truck routes. The following Is a brief discussion of potential, but not recommended mitigation measures. 1. Add travel lanes. In theoiy, all significant impacts could be mitigated by adding lanes at the impacted intersections and on the impacted roadways. However, since the project duration is only about eight months, this type of mitigation Is not considered practical or feasible. m 2. Impose peak hour restrictions. *** "I Truck traffic could be limited to off-peak hours. Again, this would serve to lengthen the overall construction period. Nighttime trucking is not feasible due to significant noise impacts that would occur. ^ None of these potential mitigation measures would fully mitigate the significant traffic impacts associated with the project. ^ m m n P H Mi m In P IP Ml IP m m m m WW LINSCOTT LAW ^< GREENSPAN W ENGINEERS RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES Significant impacts are calculated on all six-truck routes. The following measures are recommended to partially mitigate project impacts. However, the measures would not mitigate impacts to below a level of significance. 1. Prohibit accepting trucked soil at the landfill between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. 2. Inform local bicycle clubs of the proposed project. 1124.rpt 1/22/02 APPENDIX A MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNTS PI m m m m m m il m m m City : 0CISIT&S n/B Direction : I-S SB RAMPS S/S Directioa : ESCIKITAS BOULEVARD Client : CIH 0? EHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92755 Study Name: H0010091 ^ Site Code : 000D0976 Start Date: 11/08/00 - Page : 1 mm H07EHEHTS 1-5 SB OFF RAHP BNCIKITAS BOUI.BVARD 1-5 SB OK RAMP EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Southbound Hestbound Sorthbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Riaht TJirv t Riaht Thru Lf}f t Right Lef t Rioht Thru Lef Total 11/08/0 0 07:0 D 40 0 9 0 110 6 \ 0 0 3 34 110 451 07:1 ; 45 0 7 ) 0 111 7 0 0 22 114 ] 449 07:3 40 0 6' 0 156 9] 0 0 28 132 511 07:4i 3B 0 7 0 H2 fiJ 0 (1 28 148 ( 528 Houi 163 0 3 0 539 314 0 0 112 504 1939 08: (1 32 0 94 0 174 91 0 0 0 31 178 0 600 08:15 56 0 71 0 131 97 0 0 0 21 151 0 527 08:3 62 0 91 0 137 0 0 22 151 0 551 08:45 36 0 0 142 7 0 • 0 18 146 0 506 Hour 1B6 0 341 0 584 355 0 0 0 92 626 0 2184 09:0 72 0 12 0 164 ^77 ' 0 0 0 20 142 0 603 09:15 57 0 94 0 150 66 0 0 0 33 125 0 525 fBEBAIi Hour 129 0 -222 0 314 143 0 0 0 53 267 0 1128 15:30 61 0 102 0 200 88 0 0 0 25 189 0 665 15:45 42 (1 • 9fi 0 186 ^7 0 0 0 36 188 [1 645 Hour 103 0 198 0 '386 185 0 0 0 61 377 0 1310 16:00 63 0 102 0 190 92 0 0 0 43 178 0 668 16:15 58 0 105 0 177 87 0 IJ 0 34 169 0 630 16:30 47 0 111 0 186 96 • 0 0 0 27 191 0 658 16:45 67 0 , n 0 190 97 0 fl 0 32 177 0 Hour 235 Q 416 0 743 372 0 0 0 136 715 0 2617 17:00 61 0 104 0 169 103 0 0 0 38 173 0 648 17:15 53 0 107 0 175 91 0 0 0 25 162 0 613 17:30 50 0 92 0 177 90 0 0 0 36 197 0 642 17:45 69 . 0 m 0 n 0 0 0 36 223 p flour 233 0 407 0 677 377 0 0 0 135 755 . 0 2584 Total 1049 0 1891 0 3243 1746 0 0 0 589 3244 0 11762 • V Apr. 35.6 -64.3 -65.0 34.9 ---15,3 84.6 -- V Int. . 8.9 16.0 27.5 14.8 5.0 27.5 p m m p m m m Ml m wm m City : BKCIKITAS R/S Direction : 1-5 SB RAKPS E/1! Direction : KBCIKITAS BOULEVARD Client : CITY OF BNCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 B. Garry AveOue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 TURKIHG HOVBHBKTS Study Naie: H0010091 Site Code ; 00000976 Start Date: 11/08/00 Page : 2 Start 1-5 "SB OFF RAMP Southbound Right Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbound Right Thru ii££t 1-5 SB OM RAMP northbound Bight Thru lifiit EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Eastbound gjght Thru Left Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 11/08/00 to 09:15 on 11/08/00 IP m m m Tine 07:45 07:45 m Vol. 188 0 327 0 M Pet, 36.5 D .0 63.4 0,0 Total 515 961 m High 08:30 08:00 m Vol. 62 0 .91 0 m Total 153 265 PHF 0.841 0.906 ^ 604 62.8 174 357 37.1 91 07:45 0 1.000 07:45 102 13.9 730 0S:00 31 209 0.873 628 86.0 178 Intrvl. Total I-S SB OFF RAIQ* 327 188 515 11/08/00 87:45aM 08:3BaH 2206 N 459 >!. 459 1-5 SB ON KflMP <— 684 357 1916 ^ -> 955 ENCINITAS BOULSVftKD City : 5HCIKITAS H/S Direction : 1-5 SB RAMPS E/W Direction : EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Client : nTY OF EHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 TURHIH6 HOVBHEHTS Study Hane: HOO10O91 Site Code : 00000976 Start Date: 11/08/00 Page : 3 Start Tiffle r-5 SB OFF RAMP Southbound Rioht Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbouud Right Thru Left 1-5 SB OH RAMP northbound Riaht Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Eastbound Rioht Thru Left Intrvl. Peak Houi ' Analysis By Entire Inti irsection for the Period 15:30 on il/08/00 to 17:45 on 11/08/00 Tine 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 235 0 416 0 743 372 0 0 0 136 715 0 mm- Pet. 36.0 0 .0 63,9 0.0 66.6 33.3 0,0 0.0 0.0 15.9 84.0 0.0 Total 651 1115 0 851 High 16:00 16:45 16:45 16:00 mm Vol. 63 0 102 0 190 97 0 0 0 43 178 0 Total 1G5 287 0 221 PHF 0.986 0.971 0.000 0.962 ENCINITAS BOULEUflRD 978 715 "-^ 1829 136 1-5 SB OFF RAMP 416 235 651 11/08/00 04:00l>M e4:45vM 2617 N 508 508 1-5 SB ON RANP 2246 4— 743 372 1131 ENCINITAS BOULEVARD m m m City : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction : 1-5 HB RAMPS B/K Direction : EHCIHITAS BOEBVARD Client : CITYOF EHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 B. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 TURHIHS MOVEHBHTS Study Hane: H0D1O090 Site Code : 00000976 Start Date: 11/08/00 Page : l P Pi IH m m m P pi m p il Start I-S HB OH RAHP Southbound Bicht Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbound Rioht Thru Left 1-5 HB OFF RAHP northbound Rioht Thru Left SHCiniTAS BOULEVARD Eastbound Ritfht Thru Left Intrvl. ml 11/oe/o 07:00 07:15 07:30 07-45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 168 0 72 157 0 86 233 0 no 2^1 0 58 0 23 67 0 21 102 0 22 q2 0 31 0 163 40 0 153 30 0 155 21 n 180 38 506 500 619 Hour 08:00 08:15 08:30 06-45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 322 789 0 86 246 0 90 202 0 88 175 0 70 182 0 319 0 97 91 0 27 83 0 23 87 0 34 71 0 31 0 651 129 0 192 41 0 208 32 0 208 37 (1 197 32 2307 683 638 629 555 Hour 09:00 09:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 334 805 0 71 160 0 87 203 0 334 0 115 116 0 47 123 0 33 0 805 142 0 201 30 0 210 31 2535 625 687 iBRSAII Hour [BREAK] 15:30 15*45 0 0 0 158 363 0 239 0 80 0 411 61 1312 iBRSAII Hour [BREAK] 15:30 15*45 0 0 0 fl 0 0 122 219 0 264 0 121 0 47 107 0 47 0 212 69 fl 234 52 790 855 Hour 16:00 16:15 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 273 483 0 140 226 0 153 261 0 130 249 0 136 228 0 228 0 94 111 0 43 95 0 47 110 0 54 97 0 42 0 446 121 0 229' 61 0 215 56 0 228 53 fl 249 50 1645 810 827 824 802 Hour 17:00 17:15 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 559 964 0 138 225 0 134 235 0 103 199 0 m 2n 0 413 0 186 124 0 44 119 0 46 118 0 40 111 0 37 0 921 220 0 260 39 0 248 61 0 223 44 0 244 63 3263 830 843 727 769 iiiii. Hour Total \ Apr. I Int. 0 0 0 0 0 0 496 872 0 2142 4276 0 33.3 66.6 15.0 30.0 472 0 167 2005 0 739 73.0 - 26.9 14.0 - 5.1 0 975 207 0 4209 860 82.7 17.2 - 29.5 6.1 3169 14251 p II li 10 City : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction ; 1-5 HB EAHPS E/B Direction : EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Client : CITYOF EHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 TURHIHG MOVBHEKTS Study name: H0010090 Site Code : 00000976 Start Date: 11/08/00 Page : 2 Start 1-5 nB OH RAMP Southbound Right Thru Left EnCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbound Bioht Thru Left 1-5 HB OFF RAMP Horthbound Rioht Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Eastbound Right Thru Left Intrvl. Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 .on 11/08/00 to 09:15 on U/OB/OO Time Vol. Pet. Total High Vol. Total PHF 07:45 07:-1 0.000 07:45 07:45 07:45 0 0 374 854 0 353 0 115 0 788 148 0 0.0 30.4 69.5 0.0 75.4 0 .0 24.5 0.0 84.1 15.8 1228 468 936 07:45 07:45 08:30 0 0 110 231 0 92 0 31 0 208 37 341 123 245 0.900 0.951 0.955 ENCINITAS BOULEUARP 969 *~ 148 1905 788 —> 1-5 NB ON RAMP 522 t 522 ii/tra/oo 87:45aM B:30aR 2632 N 't- 374 2369 ^— 1141 468 I* 353 1-5* HB OFF RAMP ENCINITAS BOULEUARD P P m p p p City : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction : 1-5 HB RAMPS E/H Direction : EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Client : CITYOF EHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 TURHIHG MOVEHBHTS Study Hane: H0010090 Site Code : 00000976 Start Date: 11/08/00 Page : 3 Start 1-5 HB OH RAMP Southbound TiQhf. Thru Ij£it EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbound l^jghf. Thru Left 1-5 HB OFF RAMP Horthbound Piqili- Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Eastbound pigllt Tbni Left Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:30 on 11/08/00 to 17:45 Time Vol. Pet. Total High Vol. Total PHF 15:45 08:30 15:45 574 36.4 1574 15:45 151 415 1000 63.5 264 15:45 423 68.8 614 16:30 110 164 0.935 0 0.0 191 31.1 54 on 11/08/00 :45 0 906 0.0 60.3 1128 16; 229- 222 19.6 61 290 1.972 Intrvl. Total P li ENCINITAS BOULEUABP 1191 ^ 222 2319 906 1-5 NB ON RANF 796 796 11/08/00 B3:4|pM 04:3mt 3316 N 614 423 I-V NB OFF RAMP "t- 574 2903 ^ A0O0 1329 ENCINITAS BOULEUARS P Hi m 1^ NOV 14 '01 08:39AM CITY OF ENCINITAS Transportation Studies, inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 City : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction : BALODB DRIVE E/H Direction ; BHCIRITAS BOULEVARD Client : CITY OF EHCIHITAS TURSING HOVEMBHTS P. 5/7 Study Hane: E0D1OD84 Site Code : 00000920 Start Date: lo/n/oo Page : 1 EHCIHITAS SOUL BALOUR DRIVE EHCIHITAS BOUL Hestbound Horthbound Eastbound Start Intnl. Tine Thru L§ft Rioht Left Rioht Total wm 10/17/00 07:00 143 46 60 16 21 168 454 07:15 158 89 70 33 33 169 552 07:30 190 172 119 69 39 161 7SD 07:45 247 57 2^ 30 259 80S Hour 738 457 346 144 123 756 2564 08:00 263 106 73 24 11 238 717 08:15 230 51 62 19 17 229 606 00:30 222 44 55 22 13 210 566 08:4S 239 fl7 68 \x 18 228 S31 Hour 954 270 258 76 59 905 2522 - 09;00 236 78 96 16 26 254 708 mm 09:15 211 48 66 18 9 268 620 rBEElKl mm Hour 447 126 164 34 35 522 1326 m •b 15:30 325 75 71 18 8 279 776 15:45 322 74 75 ?1 11 m 789 P Hour Ul 149 146 39 19 565 1565 HI 16:00 343 78 78 19 12 2BB 818 16:15 362 109 93 23 10 294 891 PI 16:30 329 103 94 25 12 372 935 IP 16:45 304 89 13 9 m Hour 1338 374 354 80 43 1272 3461 17:00 294 73 71 17 17 320 792 m 17:15 269 80 86 12 19 345 811 17:30 315 90 76 15 17 340 853 17:45 279 7il 90 17 11 m p Hour 1157 314 323 61 64 1341 3260 18:00 284 72 76 22 11 371 838 Total 5565 1762 1669 456 354 5732 1553B 75.9 24.0 78.5 21.4 5,8 94.1 - \ Int. 35.8 11.3 10.7 2.9 2.2 36.8 - Mi ii i NOV 14 '01 08:39ftM CITY OF ENCINITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Aia, Ck. 92705 City : BHCIHITAS H/S Direction : BALOUR DEIVB S/H Direction : BHCIHITAS flOUlEVARD aient : CITY OF EHCIHITAS P. 6/7 Study Hase: 10010084 Site Code : 00000920 Start Date: 10/17/00 Page : 2 TURHIHG MOVEHBHTS PI BHCIHITAS BOUL BALOUR DRIVE EHCIHITAS BOUL Start Mestbound Horthbound Eastbound mtrvl. m Thru Left Right Left Right Thru Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for tbe Period: 07:00 on 10/17/DO to 09:15 on 10/17/00 IP m m m Time 07:30 07:30 07:30 Vol. 530 461 351 138 97 886 Pet, 65.9 34.0 71.7 28.2 9.8 90.1 Total 1411 469 983 High 07:45 07:30 07:45 Vol. 247 150 119 69 30 258 Total 397 168 288 PHF 0.888 0.650 0.853 m ENCINITAS BQULEUflKD 1068 886 97 "O- 2051 10/17/00 07:3asu« ea:l5aH 2883 N 1067 138 BAItOORraXUE P P Pi li P ii NOV 14 '01 08:39flM CITY OF City : BHCinnAS H/S Direction : BAIOUR DRIVE E/l Direction : BHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Client : CITY OF BHCIHITAS Start EHCIHITAS BOUL Hestbouud jm Mt Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for Che Period: 15:30 on 10/17/00 to 17:45 on 1O/17/0O BALOUR DRIVE Horthbound liaiu itfifi ENCINITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Sasta Ana, CA. 92705 TURHIHG HOVEHSHTS BHCIHITAS BOUL Eastbound iBtrvl. liakt Thrill Total P. 7/7 Study Same: H00100e4 Site Code : 00000920 Start Date: 10/17/00 Page : 3 Titte 16:00 16:00 16:00 IM* Vol. 1338 374 354 80 43 1272 •MM Pet. 78.1 21.6 81.5 18.4 3,2 96.7 Total 1712 434 1315 High 16:15 16:30 16:30 Vol. 362 109 94 25 12 372 Total 471 119 384 PHF 0.908 0.911 0.856 1418 1272 ~^ 2733 43 "^V 10/17/00 04:00PM 04:45PM 3461 N 4— 1338 3338 3''* 1626 851 417 354 80 BALOIIR raiUE ENCIHITAS BOULEUARB P m m m NOV 14 '01 08:38AM CITY OF ENCINITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Sariy Avenue Suite 116 Saata Ana, CA. 92705 City : EHCIHITAS S/S Direction : BL CAHIHO mt. E/H Direction : BHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Client : CITI OF EHCIHITAS P. 2/7 Study Nans: HOOlOOeo Site Code : 00000977 Start Date: 11/08/00 Page : 1 TURHIHS HOVBHEHTS (P P pi P Start BL CAHIHO REAL Southbound ftioht Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbound STqlil: Thru Left EL CAHIHO REAL northbound Rioht Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULBVAM Eastbound ifi^ht Thrn Left Intrvl. TPt9l DM 11/08/00 07:00 07:15 07:30 45 201 53 42 217 63 49 319 79 fiK 272 Ifli 24 35 46 19 60 60 39 87 69 ^4 111 52 37 76 12 35 71 17 26 79 20 4fi 107 17 15 138 29 17 140 36 13 151 50 12 no 66 711 777 981 mo Hour 08:00 08:15 08:30 192 1009 303 62 293 98 58 303 69 69 331 119 ii5 118 79 116 293 267 27 86 89 34 93 96 38 107 101 1^ IR 78 144 333 66 43 no 22 53 107 18 51 101 24 47 123 20 67 506 181 28 147 62 22 135 52 31 162 71 U 142 58 3579 1067 1060 1205 xm. Hour 09:00 05:15 241 1245 385 45 326 68 35 309 56 125 384 365 32 111 70 29 104 64 194 441 84 46 127 28 41 123 26 117 586 243 29 217 64 31 224 50 4410 1163 1092 fBRSAEl Hour [BBBAI] 15:30 80 635 124 61 215 134 87 250 54 60 441 114 fBRSAEl Hour [BBBAI] 15:30 33 233 37 il 24 36 23B 33 47 259 .11 24 297 19 n 313 21 26 179 31 162 45 1234 lour 16:00 16:15 U;30 74 463 61 46 242 31 53 256 36 51 277 42 c? 791 48 85 497 64 67 163 36 69 177 28 78 212 33 fll ?(n 41 46 610 40 38 184 29 42 218 37 53 271 41 293 46 65 341 76 28 162 49 41 166 59 44 159 62 U 186 7t 2422 1075 1182 1329 m Xb,4i Hour 17:00 17:15 17:30 1 ?>iE 212 1066 157 60 293 47 61 270 48 63 278 39 £A 2G3 11 295 813 144 88 148 32 106 173 39 97 157 33 101 ifil 37 172 966 153 46 212 51 33 20B 61 42 221 56 IS 193 S3 151 673 244 27 157 69 37 159 59 39 191 77 p 1.78 52 5046 1230 1254 1293 ,, lliXi Hour Total i Apr. \ Int. 248 1104 177 1047 5522 1207 13.4 71.0 15.5 4.6 24.3 5.3 392 639 141 1074 2841 1115 21.3 56,4 22.1 4.7 12.5 4.9 156 833 221 799 3433 618 16.4 70.7 12.7 3.5 15,1 2.7 130 665 257 590 3334 1115 11.7 66.1 22.1 2.5 14.6 4.9 4983 22695 NOV 14 '01 08:38AM CITY CT ENCINITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Amue Suite U6 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 City : BHCIHITAS H/S Direction ; EL CAMIRO REAL K/H Direction ; BHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Client : CITY 0? BHCIHITAS TURHIHG MOVEHBHTS P. 3/7 Study Haiae: H0010O80 Site Code ; O0000977 Start Date: ii/DS/OO Page ; 2 Start EL CAHIHO REAL Southbound -Eisifc ma EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbound Right Thm Left EL CAMIKO REAL Horthbound _gj5ht Thru Left EHCIHITAS BOULEVASD Eastbound Biobt Thru Left Peak Hour Analvsis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on U/08/00 to 09'.15 on 11/08/00 . .r .... nit Ifl fiD.in Tine Vol. Pet. Total High Vol. Total PHP 08i30 201 11,1 1807 06:30 69 519 0.870 1284 71.0 331 322 17.8 119 08:30 • 125 14.5 859 08:30 38 246 0.872 420 107 314 36.5 101 08:30 IBS 24,4 757 09:00 46 201 0.941 474 62.6 127 12.9 26 06:30 127 11.3 1115 09:00 29 310 0.899 745 66.8 217 243 21.7 64 Intrvl. Total Ell CAMINO REAL ^ i ^ 2649 ENCINITAS BOULSyARP I 719 243 745 127 1834 11/O8/O0 08:3aaM B9 :ISAM 4538 N 2482 21X1 ^ 125 4— 428 -> 1252 4. ^ 1725 T 474 EL CAMINO REAL EHCIHITAS BOUL^ARD P P m p p p P p NOV 14 '01 08:38AM CITY OF ENCINITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. flarty Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 City : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction : BL CAHIHO RSAL B/H Direction J BHCIHITAS flOULBVAED Client :' CITY OF EHCIHITAS P. 4/7 Study Kame: HOOIOOSO Site Code ; 00000977 Start Date! ll/08/OO Page ; 3 TURHIHS HOVEHEHTS Start Tine EL CAHIHO REAL Southbound MM llua ^ EHCIHITAS BOULEVARD Hestbound im to—L££i BL CAMIHO REAL northbound Tjighf. Thru Left Peak Hour Analysis By Entire intersection for the Period 15:30 on 11/08/OC to 1 Tine Vol. Pet, Total High Vol, Total PEF 16:30 234 15.D 1550 16:45 62 401 0.966 1131 72.9 291 185 11.9 48 16:30 353 27.1 1296 16:45 81 383 0.841 794 61.1 261 151 11.6 41 16:30 171 12,6 1354 16:45 39 378 Q.895 984 72.6 293 199 14.6 46 ESCIHITAS BOULEVARD Eastbound 2m to :45 on U/08/Ofl 16:30 146 13.S 1071 15:45 38 298 661 G1.7 186 264 24.6 74 Intrvl, Total P MM BMCTNITAS BOULEUARP EL CAMINO HKAL 1131 1601 234 1$5 ^ ^ 1 i> 3151 1227 ^ 264 661 —' 146 ~^ 2298 11/08/00 Q4;3^M es:ISpM 5273 N 2782 2315 't_ 353 ^ 794 ^ 151 1017 1428 t 984 Ell. 199 171 amiNO BEAL ENCINITAS BdUI*EUARP P PI city : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction : EL CAHIHO REAL E/ff Direction : GARDBH VIEH ROAD Client : CITY OF EHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Ine. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 TUMIHG HOVBHEHTS Study HaiBe: H0010075 Site Code : 00010917 Start Date: 10/17/00 Page : l Start Tine BL CAHIHO REAL Southbound Rioht Thru Lef GARDEH VIER ROAD Hestbound t Rioht Thru Lef •EL CAMIHO REAL Horthbound t Rioht Thru Lef GARDEH VIEH ROAD Eastbound Rioht Thm Lef Intrvl. t Total " 10/17/0 07:0 07:1 07:3 07_L1 0 0 14 249 1 5 15 317 4 D 18 389 5. 22 436 3 5 149 25 2 117 30 3< 86 56 21 62 46 IS 1 6 172 5 130 ^ 5 134 2: 1 U7 13 22 7 41 25 50 32 ^7 24 1 6 698 S 772 ^ ) 879 868 HOU] 08:OC 06:15 08:30 69 1391 152 28 409 37 17 492 38 18 424 37 27 371 7 414 159 104 68 36 24 52 39 38 48 46 27 .56 40 24 21 573 45 10 163 14 e 158 15 15 198 31 Ifi 187 24 165 88 3f 54 22 IE 49 34 3 42 18 7 60 20 12 3217 JOT 875 ^ 943 911 — n? Hour 09:0 09:15 90 1696 18 21 365 43 40 306 44 224 161 113 37 35 31 51 40 48 49 706 64 6 165 21 15 223 22 205 94 32 57 42 12 53 • 21 26 3642 ** 837 B89 w iBR&kk} Hour [BiEAE} 15:30 15-45 61 671 67 88 75 79 23 388 43 110 63 38 1726 iBR&kk} Hour [BiEAE} 15:30 15-45 5 258 53 6 285 46 63 40 45 74 45 40 27 352 55 18 347 46 68 41 26 72 43 36 1033 ^ 1080 ^-^ • Hoar 16:00 16:15 16:30 16-45 11 543 99 7 255 54 16 288 53 22 236 54 74 269 52 137 85 85 70 44 43 47 57 47 50 50 41 U 57 53 65 699 101 26 417 55 28 395 63 25 361 64 20 427 44 140 84 64 84 37 24 81 55 '3B 78 47 33 <i9 54 27 2113 - 1116 • 1168 ^ 1081 m _ Hour 17:00 17:15 17:30 17-45 119 1048 213 12 304 45 19 336 63 26 359 78 IC .325 62 231 206 164 64 62 ' 46 71 43 34 62 36 46 60 40 39 99 1620 226 28 421 59 13 443 60 22 399 43 IS m 39 302 193 122 69 58 "'Jl 86 40 22 48 38 25 cn .'i7 21 4565 W P 1219 1230 P 1184 ^ Hour Total \ Apr. \ Int. • 73 1324 248 423 6673 987 5.2 82.5 12.2 2.1 33.3 4.9 257 183 ' 165 1351 871 730 45.7 29,5 24.7 6.7 4.3 3.6 61 1662 201 338 5648 700 5.0 64.4 10.4 1.6 28.1 3.4 283 193 99 1205 715 391 52.1 30.9 16.9 6.0 3.5 1.9 20032 •* •Mt p p City : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction : EL CAHIHO REAL E/K Direction : GARDEH VIEH ROAD Client : Cin OF BHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Study Hane: HD010075 Site Code : 00010917 Start Date: 10/17/00 Page : 2 Start EL CAHIHO REAL Southbound BiQht Thru Left TURHIHG GARDBH VIER ROAD Hestbound Bight Thru- Left HOVBHEHTS EI CAHIHO REAL northbound Right Thru Left GARDEH VIE? ROAD Eastbound pight Thru Left Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 10/17/00 toD9:15 on 10/17/00 -Tine Vol. Pet. Total fligli Vol. Total PHF 90 4.5 1974 08:15 17 547 0.902 1696 85.9 492 188 9.5 38 06:00 224 44.9 498 18:15 52 129 0.965 161 32.3 39 113 22.6 38 08:00 49 5.8 639 08:30 15 244 0.859 706 84.1 198 84 10.0 31 08:00 205 61.9 331 [)8:45 60 92 0.899 94 28.3 20 32 9.6 12 Intrvl. Total P ii CftRPEN tflBJ BOAP 335 ^ 32 94 -> 205 -q. 666 EL CAMINO REAL <J J, 1> ^ 2936 10/17/00 08:OOaM 08:4SaM 3642 /K N 829 t- 224 ^ 161 331 2853 ^ t f> EL CAMINO REAL GARDEN UIEU ROAD P City : EHCIHITAS H/S Direction : BL CAHIHO RBAl E/H Direction ; GARDEH VIEH ROAD Client : CITY OF EHCIHITAS Transportation Studies, Inc, 1820 E. Garry Avenue . Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Study Hane: E0fllDU7^ Site Code : 0001091 •iStart Date: 10/17/0*- Page : 3 Start Time EL CAMIHO REAL Southbound sight Thru Left TURHIHG GARDEH VIBR' ROAD westbound Right Thru Left HOVBHEHTS EL CAHIHO REAL northbound Right Thru Left GARDBH VIES ROAD Eastbound Right Thru Left Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:30 on 10/17/00 to 17:45 on 10/17/00 Tine •Vol. Pet. Total High Vol. Total PHF 16:45 131 8.0 1637 17:30 26 463 0.883 1266 77.4 359 2-38 14.5 78 16:45 261 40.7 640 16:45 64 174 0.919 200 31.2 57 179 27.9 53 16:45 63 4.1 1979 17:15 13 516 0.958 1690- 85.3 443 206 10.4 60 16:45 282 48.6 577 17:00 89 176 0.810 190 32.9 58 105 18.1 31 Intrvl. Total EL CAMINO REAL 4i i l» t 3693 1^17/00 04:45PM 05:30PM 4833 N 1690 4- 1729 „ 286 83 EL CAMINO REAL MR P P P P P IP DEC-12-01 05:39 PM TRAFFIC_DATft_SERVICE_SW 619 390 8495 i«r : Clear ft Dry ted by : S. Potter ft S. Rector Board « : Dl-1430 & D1-1431 Site: h El Camtno Real ft Leucadia Slvd Traffic Dat« Service SouthwKt 9773 Maine Avonue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 P. 0 1 Study Kame: Ol5;^Q30. Site Code i 003241^0 Start Date: 10/16/01 Page : 1 =Start N El Camino Real SoutT) bound olievhafh Road Westbound Unshffted |N El Camino Real Northbound Thru Rioht Pedsj left Thru RlHflt Pedsl Left Thru Riflht Pedsj Left Thru Riflht Pedsl Total iO/16/01 ,07:00 [ 07:15| ; 07t30| 07:451 34 26 26 27 295 376 357 431 70 116 127 102 0| oj (•1 2| 162 214 227 211 148 196 301 171 a 23 23 38 i 01 o| 21 13 20 17 11 60 96 145 111 174 209 108 103 oj o| oj 3l 43 50 50 43 122 182 128 108 18 21 25 32 oj ij a{ 41 1147 1530 1534 1389 Hourl 113 1449 415 2j 814 816 92 i\ 1 61 412 594 3| 186 540 96 5| 5600 .V. 08:001 r 08:15] , 0S:45| 32 24 41 55 343 438 376 369 101 102 108 128 oj oj 0| oj 198 204 209 223 175 214 209 201 37 41 33 51 1 o| 0| o| o| 19 19 27 26 128 149 149 134 102 97 104 102 0| oj oj 01 53 32 39 59 99 110 83 113 44 27 50 49 0| oj Oj Ql 1331 1457 1428 H«ur| 152 1526 439 Oj 834 799 162 o| 1 91 560 405 0| 183 405 170 0{ 5926 Leucadia Boulevsrd Eastbound Intvi. i • r Totali 265 2975 854 zj 1648 1615 254 21 152 972 999 3t 369 945 266 51 11326 i-- • if Apr- I 6.4 72.6 20.8 'j 46.8 45.8 7.2 -1 7.1 45.7 46.9 O.lj 23.2 59.6 16.7 0.31 X Int. 1 2.3 26.2 7.5 -j 14.5 14.2 2.2 -1 1.3 6.5 8.8 -j 3.2 8.3 2.3 -1 pMk Mour Analysis By Entire Tine I 07:15 Vol. I 111 1497 446 -Pet. j 5.3 72.8 21.6 Total i Z056 . Mfgli I 07:45 V9l. j 27 421 102 total { 552 :.m 1 0.931 Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 10/16/01 to 08:45 on 2 9.7 07:15 850 46.6 1816 07:30 227 551 0.823 843 46.4 301 121 6.6 23 21 0.11 07:15 67 6.2 1072 07:15 20 325 0.824 480 44.7 522 48.6 3 0.2 96 209 10/16/01 07:15 196 23.3 840 07:15 50 254 0.826 517 61.5 182 122 14.5 21 5 0.5 4V. •if*.'' pf': ..r iV. DEC-12-01 05:39 PM TRAFFIC_DATA-SERV ICE_SW 619 390 S495 pji^iiwitr [' Board » \ site: 1 CItar t Dry by : B. Potter ft S. Rector ! 01-1430 ft D1-1431 M El Csmrno Real & Leucadia Blvd Traffic Data Service Southwest 9775 Nalne Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 (N £t Camino Xeal (Southbound :«tart lOllevhatn Road iwe.<itboi^ I Unshifted |N El Camino Real INorthbound i P . 02 Study Nam: 0132^030 Site Code : 00324030! Start Date: 10/16/01 Page : 2 iLaucadia Boulevard I Eastbound Th^y Riaht Pedsj ^gfT Thru Riaht Pedaf Left Thru Riaht Pedsl Left Thru Right Ped»( jlntvt. I if:;-:- Leucadia BoulcuayJ 1356 2196 N El CaMino Redl 4« 111 «J i ^ 2853 lB/i6/Ql e7:iSftM 88:O0an 5784 /N N 3541 ^ T 2469 488 67 522 N £1 CftHino Re^l Ml P P P •i •m Kf-- p riEC-12-01 05:<40 PM TRAFFIC_IIATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 03 Ithcr : Clear I Dry ;ed by : B. Patter ft S. Rector «e«rd $ t 01-1430 ft 01-1431 site: N Et Camino Real & Leucadia Blvd p;;li' P':i/ Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fflx (619) 390-8427 Unshifted Study NMK! Site Code i Start Date: Page 0132^031 mzm. lo/ii^of 1 N El Camino Real Olievhain Road M EL Camino Real Leucadia Boulevard Southbound Uestbound Horthbound Eastbound ;-start 1 Intvl. Left Thru Riaht Peds Left Thru Rl4ht Pcds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thr^ Rioht T^^tal to/u/oi : 16:001 33 240 75 0 176 184 33 0 49 292 231 0 96 152 49 0 1612 : ,• .-16:151 29 238 102 2 167 184 47 0 52 237 190 0 99 174 54 3 1578 .•v.'1.6:301 35 250 66 0 154 158 32 2 60 287 239 0 97 145 99 7 1631 48 ^^4 77 10 155 149 28 e 40 294 2^ 0 111 178 50 ii iour 1 143 982 320 12 654 675 UO 4 201 1110 904 0 403 649 252 12 6461 '.\: 17:00| 37 226 98 0 136 152 31 3 50 280 245 1 138 203 51 t; 1652 ; \il7:i5| 37 294 85 3 168 143 23 0 48 290 228 0 105 200 50 2j 1676 I7s»j 45 247 71 0 161 154 26 0 46 251 212 116 210 48 2| 1589 .j .-^ i(7:4S[ 51 200 74 0 147 177 32 1 57 255 194 1l 96 58 1| : HOUr| 150 967 328 3 612 626 112 4 201 1076 879 2| 455 861 207 6| Vrotiij 293 1949 648 15, 1266 1301 252 a 402 2186 1783 2{ 858 1510 459 181 Iii950 ' •' 10.0 67.0 22.3 0.5| 44.7 46.0 8,9 0.2 9.1 49.9 40.7 -j 50.1 53.0 16.1 0,6j , - \i Int. I 2.2 15.0 5.0 0.1| 9.7 10.0 1.9 -3.1 16.8 13,7 - 1 6.6 11.6 3.5 O.lj ';' ~" •''.'P9»Y Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 10/16/01 to 17:45 on 10/16/01 TiM ) 16:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 vol. 1 155 1024 326 131 613 602 114 7 196 1151 956 451 726 250 12| ; fCt. j 10.2 67.4 21.4 0.8j 45.8 45.0 8.5 0.5 S.S 49.9 41.4 4.3j 31.3 50.4 17.3 o.sj Total 1 1S18 1336 2306 1439 .Nish i 17:15 16:30 16:30 17:00 ..*9t. 1 37 294 85 3| 154 158 32 2| 60 287 239 oj 138 203 51 ij fptal { 419 346 586 393 • PHF 1 0.905 0.965 0.983 0.915 ri'.. DEC-12-01 05:40 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERV ICE_SW 619 390 S495 P . 04 ^|||t*«.r ! Clear ft Ory ^>H^'-'-^fiW by : B. Potter ft S. Rector • : 01-1430 & 01-1431 i\Xt: N El Camino Real & Leucadia Blvd Traffic Data Service Southueat 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Study Nama: 0132^1 Site Code : 0032^)^1 Start Date: lO/16/Ol Page : 2 )0lievhain Road juestbourvd Unshifted |M El Camino Real Northbound ;>: |N El camino Real • Southbound .1 ygf^ Thru Right Peds| Left Thru Riaht Peds[ Left Thru Riaht Pedsl Left Thru Right Pedsl T9tqj |Leucadia Boulevard [Eestbound I mtvl. •Jr.'' N £1 Canino Real 32* 155 «J i t 3234 i/ife/ei : i5pM 6599 /N N 4193 ^ ^ t I* 198 «S N El CaMino Real Olleuhain Road P -P m m RH Rancho Santa Fe Road at La Costs Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of3 Pk. Hr. Time Period ; South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB) 7;30 AM to 8:30 AM Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thni Rieht Left Thru Right Lan& Inside I ! Config- (left) 2 J urations 3 1 I 4 5 6 Outside 7 Free-flow 1 1 1 ] 1 1 1 ] 1 1 1 Lane Settings 1 2 0 1 2 0 I 1 1 1 2 0 Capacity Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 1800 4000 0 N N 1800 4000 1800 2000 1800 1800 4000 Hourly Volume 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Adjusted Hourly Volume 126 583 0 17 HOG 0 260 25 216 7 125 0 Utilization Factor 0.07 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.00 Critical Faaors 0.07 0.28 0.14 0.03 ICU Ratio = 0.62 LOS B Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue PI m P P P w e s • t A P P r Time : 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM Date: 8/16/00 Day: Wednesday Name: Stephanie, Keith Totals 855 Sub- jQtals. 354 501 North Approach 1117 150 950 260 25 216 Subtotals Total 1173 North Sou^ Approach Rancho Santa Fe Road 1994 0 17 877 J I u ^ ! r 126 570 . 13 0 709 1882 Total Sub- totals "* 78 132 55 Ls Costa Avenue Tntak 187 E a s t A P P r Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. Rancho Santa Fe Road at La Costa Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of3 Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr fSB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB) 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Inside 1 I ] 1 1 Config - (left) 2 1 1 i 1 urations 3 4 c 1 1 1 I I ] 1 Outside J 6 7 Free-flow - Lane Settings 1 2 0 1 2 0 I 1 I 1 2 0 Capacity ISOO 4000 0 1800 4000 0 1800 2000 1800 1800 4000 0 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the East^Vest phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 213 953 11 54 698 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 Adjusted Hourly Volume 213 964 0 54 896 0 275 107 164 10 89 0 Utilization Factor 0.12 0.24 0.00 0.03 0.22 0.00 0.15 0.05 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.00 Critical Factors 0.12 0.22 0.15 0.02 ' ICU Ratio = 0.61 LOS B Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue W e s t A P P r Time : 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Date: 8/16/00 Day : Wednesday Name: Stephanie, Keith North Approach 950 Totals 1015 Sub- totals 469 546 0 275 107 164 Total North 872 Rancho Santa Fe Road 2209 0 198 698 54 J i u 1 ! r 213 953 11 0 1177 . 2049 1259 31 58 10 Tntal Subtotals Sub- totals 99 172 La Costa Avenue Totals 271 E a s t A P P r P P South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. P P P Rancho Santa Fe Road at Questhaven Road Lane Configuration for Intersection C^acity Utilization Page 2 of3 P P m p m P Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB) 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Left Thru Right Left Thm Right Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 Config- (left) 2 1 1 1 urations 4 Outside 6 7 Free-flow Lane Settings 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 edacity 0 2000 1800 ISOO 2000 0 0 0 0 1800 0 1800 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.43 0.03 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.I I 0.00 0.10 Critical Factors 0.00 0.52 O.OO 0.00 o.n ICU Ratio = 0.73 LOS C Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Rancho Santa Fe Road and Questhaven Road P P P W e s t A P P r Time : 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM Dale: 8/17/00 Day: Thursday Name : Vlad, Brandon Totals Sub- Tntals 0 0 Subtotals .Total North Approach • ~1' 1223 1100 North 0 0 2137 S68 914 South Approach Rancho Santa Fe Road 2145 0 1031 69 J i L 1 ^ 1 r 46 1045 Total Sub- totals 177 0 192 369 115 Questhaven Road 484 Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. m P Rancho Santa Fe Road at Questhaven Road Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of3 Pk. Hr. Time Period ; South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr fWB) 5:00 PM to mm 6:00 PM Left Thru Right Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Left Thm Right Lane Inside I 1 1 J Config - (left) 2 1 I J 1 mm urations 3 4 5 6 •Hltl Outside 7 Free-flow Lane Settings 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 I edacity 0 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? 2000 1800 N 1800 2000 0 0 0-0 1800 0 1800 Are the EastWest phases split (Y/N)? Efficiency Lost Factor 010 N - Hourl)' Volume Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 1200 1200 122 122 159 159 977 977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 69 0 0 49 49 - Utilization Factor Criticai Factors 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.03 wm ICU Ratio = 0.83 LOS D m Tuming Movements at Intersection of: Rancho Santa Fe Road and Questhaven Road W e s t A P P r Time: 5:00PM to 6:00 PM Date: 8/17/00 Day: Thursday Name: Vlad. Brandon Totals Sub- totals 0 0 STThmtals Total North Approach 1046 1136 North t 0 1200 0 1322 2368 Rancho Santa Fe Road 2385 1249 977 159 J i u ^ 49 0 69 r Tntal Subtotals Sub- totals 118 281 Questhaven Road Totals 399 E a s t A P P r P P P South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. P Ill p OCT-23-01 02:44 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW 619 390 S495 p;i^ ''^ttitr : Clear 8 Dry ^iCf)jeced by ; D, Wellman jic^rdff : 01-1433 Sftte; Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Melrose Or Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Unshifted P . 06 Study Nome: 01324P70 Site C<x$e : 00324^70 Start Date: 10/17/01 Pase : 1 ft P;f:«-; nil'? i ••'- [ start Time 10/17/01 07;00 07:15 •7:30 07:45 Hour 08:00 08:15 08:30 Hour Total •X Apr. % Int. Peek Hour Time Vol. Pet. Total High Vol. Total PHF Rancho Santa Fe Road Southbound Thru Riaht Peds 119 235 242 _2?9 1 5 6 35 835 223 242 228 258 47 41 44 59 41 951 1786 88.1 33.2 185 232 11.4 4.3 8 0.3 0.1 Analysis By Entire Intersect 08:00 951 83.5 1138 08:45 258 299 0.951 185 16.2 41 2 0.1 Rancho Santa Fa Road Horthbound Left Thru Peds 16 U 53 61 155 184 174 80 62 61 61 636 161 163 218 264 790 438 1426 23.4 76.4 8.1 26.5 ion for the Period 08:00 790 1 74.8 9.4 264 25.0 1055 08:45 61 309 0.853 246 Helrese Drive Eastbourxi Left Right Peds 30 90 83 60 40 132 145 82 263 70 73 88 66 399 111 137 142 114 319 582 39.1 10.8 504 903 60.7 16,7 07:00 on 10/17/01 to 08 08:00 504 61.1 319 38.7 824 08:30 88 230 Q.89S 1 0.1 142 2360 686 725 796 810 3017 5377 :45 on 10/17/01 OCT-23-0 1 02:45 PM TRAFFIC_EATA_SERVICE-SW 619 390 S495 P . Traffic Data Service Southueat T I Clear ft Dry 9773 Maine Avenue itedby: D. Wellman Lakeside. CA 92040 Ipartlf : P1-K33 t619> 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 ifte: Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Melrose Dr Unshifted Rancho Santa Fe Road iRancho Santa Fe Road |McLrose Drive Southbound jworthbound |eastbound Study Name: 01324070 site Code : 00324070 Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 2 'Start .Jim Hi-: in', • .tv . • V ••- it" ; X'. .1, Thru Risht Peds! Left Thru Pedsl [Intrvl. Left Right Peds] Total 1ftane)u> Santa Fe JWad 1,5 1189 4 1^ 2247 449 ^ 319 504 1273 4. iB/17/ai as: Q0at4 08:45an 3817 N 2518 264 T 799 ^ifw? Santa Rpa(a P rl. y. • • OCT-23-01 02:45 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P. 0S •:. iwrd^» 1 Traffic Data Service Southwest Claar ft Ory ^773 Maine Avenue D. "oilman ^ '^L (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Melrose Or Unshifted aancho Santa Fe Road [Rancho Santa Fe Road jHclrosc Drive southbound |Horthbound {Eastbound 10/17/01 16:00 m:m-::: ^^--^^ P P p: ki H: Hour 17:00 17:15 17:30 Hour Thru Right Pedsl Lgft Thru Pedsj Left Right 200 192 212 -212. 40 36 44 47 0| 0! Oj 84 74 53 67 273 261 361 J96. 01 0| 61 70 66 82 64 55 55 Ji. 816 174 158 200 167 46 58 52 -JS- II 11 3t .01 278 63 58 69 1211 292 231 317 270 744 1560 80.2 26.0 211 378 19.4 6.3 51 266 1110 1| I Oi -Oi 279 76 112 80 91 228 71 97 69 75 Ol 359 51 0.21 544 18.9 9.0 2321 80.9 38.7 -I 638 54.1 10.6 312 540 45.8 9.0 Study Name: 01324971. site Code : 0OS24071 Start Date: 10/17/01 page : 1 [intrvl. pgdsj Totet Ol 0| o| .01. 01 o| o| o| IZZ 709 791 758 2980 723 715 790 779 01 3007 5987 Analyala By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16=00 on 10/17/01 to 17:45 on 10/17/01 17s00 744 77.5 960 17:45 212 267 0.896 211 21,9 55 51 0.51 0| 17:00 266 19.3 1376 17:30 69 386 0.891 1110 80.6 317 01 •o| 01 17:00 359 53.5 671 17:15 112 209 0.802 312 46.4 97 o| 0.0| I 1 01 .>r.'i' OCT-23-0 1 02:4T PM TRAFFIC_IJATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 0 1 /;:::-^er • . • .Cjtolted by Clear ( Dry D. Vellmsn 01-1433 Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 'Site: Rancho Santa Fe Rd 8 Melrose Or Study Naoe: 01324071 sue Code : 00324071 Start Datet 10/17/01 Page : 2 Unshifted iRencho Santa Fe Road |Rencho Santa Fe Rosd [Melrose Drive ISouthtiound Horthbound Eastbound ^:^^:i'v'/(j;>>'H Tlwe I Thru Rioht Pedsf Left Thru Pedsj Left Right Pedsj Total ^ I I Start I jIntrvl, Ranclw Santa Fe Road Melrose Pyive 211 1469 744 t 2429 477 ^ 359 312 -;^ 1148 lC/17/01 as:45PM see? N 2432 t *1 266 R^ncTib" S an t a FiT Ro aid 1BS6 111_B cho P P th- P p E OCT-25-01 02:24 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERV1CE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 05 P i Cl«r ( Cry feo^Bd by : B, Potter & S. Rector •Ipart # ! OV1430 & 01-1431 site: Rancho Santa Fe Rd/San Marco5 8lvd Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-B495 fax (619) 390-8427 p:;.|)|^/i7/o Rancho Santa Fa Road Southbound ^yf^ Thru Right Ped£ P ;;^67;15 ^^^-^,•^••.o7!3o Nour ^.;|«!?:00 V{'iv.-'.' llour .Total .m Unshifted San HarcoB Boulevard jRencho Santa Fe Road Westbound jHorthbound I iftft Thru P^^^'t P^sl Left Thru Right 50 42 8 169 174 195 152 186 138 95 118 691 6 13 19 153 103 170 J2L 571 79 75 108 94 59 550 356 177 1241 927 7.4 52.3 39.1 l.a 12.9 9.6 24 1.0 0.2 Hour Analysis By Entire Intersect 07:00 691 49.4 118 8.4 1397 07:15 42 404 0.864 571 40.8 17 1.2 174 186 73 128 116 109 176 302 249 215 17 24 8 4 I 121] 50j 0| —SJ- 28 16 38 38_ 103 107 105 139 136 179 161 428 120 80 110 J31 942 172 196 191 .258. 53 7 7 7 15 171 0| 3! 120 48 34 24 30 454 714 103 108 123 J36. 179 157 167 181 441 817 869 1759 30.0 60.8 9.0 16.3 36 89 3.0 0.9 ITSj 6.0j 1.8j 136 256 9.6 2.6 470 684 924 1398 54.7 52.5 9.6 14.5 Study Name: 01324080 Site Code : 00324080 start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 1 Peds Palomar Airport Road Eastbound 47 33 3 0 83 0 0 0 83 3.1 0.8 Son for the Period: 07:00 on 10/17/01 to 08:45 on 10/17/01 07:00 428 26.8 1594 07:15 128 504 0.790 942 59.0 302 53 3.3 24 171 10.7 07t00 120 8.7 1 1371 I 07:45 Soj 38 1 I 0.825 454 33.1 139 714 52-0 238 83 6.0 43 53 46 J^ 198 249 447 26.8 4.6 07:00 198 25.8 765 07:45 56 208 0.919 123 120 137 143 7 16 8 _£. 523 58 137 60 126 51 165 M 131- 40 40 15 14 19 559 1082 64.9 11.2 523 68.3 143 88 126 7.6 1.3 40 5.2 8 0.4 4 0.5 Intvl. Total 1260 1435 1214 5127 1105 979 1lS2 4460 9587 OCT-2S-01 02:25 PM TRAFFIC_IIATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 06 Traffic Data Service Southueat 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 '^i'^.mi&htr t clear 8 Dry i*^ 'ISitad by : B. Potter & S. Rector ^•V..;;|^-f ; D1-1430 & 01-1431 site; Rancho Santa Fc Rd/San Marcos Blvd Unshifted Rancho Santa Fa Road jsan Marcos Boulevard iRancho Santa Fe Road Southbound iuestbouod jtiorthbound eh'-.': '/j - •'. l-f. Thru R^flK. P^^\ Le4f Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Right Ppds. 1 I Rancho Santa Fe Road Study Name: 01324080 site Code ; OO324080 Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 2 Palomar Airport Road Eastbound [Intvl. iftft Thm Riahr Pedsl Total 17 691 ^ 7B5 571 118 ^ *J i ^ 2102 1633 196 5Z3 —^ 40 4 2398 ie/17/01 B7:egdn 07:45aM 5127 139S N 2530 i <i T ^ 1159 454 RancJto Santa Fe Boad San Mapoos Baulewapd 83 .m P P m p OCT-25-01 02:26 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 0T tr : Clear ft Ory ited by : B. Potter S S. Rector ii^a' # : DM430 ft D1-1431 ' Stiei Rancho Santa Fe Rd/San Marcos BL Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 vd Study klaiw; 01324081 Site Code : 01324C85T Start Date: 10/17/01 Page ; 1 Unshifted Rancho Santa Fe Road Northbound jpalomar Airport Road IEastbound Left Thru Rteht Pedsj Left Thr^j flight Pfi^ mm. • 0 48 291 223 Oj 188 384 9 Ol o: 26 306 234 6| 197 387 6 01 1 47 nr 23S n 154 395 13 1| 5 38 305 245 21 1^ 356 6 11 6 159 1139 937 9i 1 704 1522 36 21 0 U 277 192 ! o| ITS 345 6 2| 0 36 294 210 o| 161 360 3 oj 1 39 295 257 1l 166 438 18 oj 0 93 352 257 01 142 498 ir, Ol 1 212 121S 916 1 644 1641 44 z| 7 371 2357 1853 1 101 1348 3163 80 4[ 1 0.2 8.0 51.3 40.3 0.2| 29.3 68.8 1.7 "I -2.7 17.4 13.7 •1 10,0 23.4 0.5 '' 16:00 on 10/17/01 to 17:45 on 10/17/01 17:00 1 17:00 1 1 212 1218 916 644 1641 44 2j 7.5 9.0 51.8 39.0 4.2| 27.6 70.3 1.8 8.5] 2347 1 2331 1 17:45 1 17:45 t 0 93 352 257 o| 142 498 17 0| 702 1 657 i 0.835 1 0.886 1 Intvl. 1678 1695 1567 6587 1607 1641 1754 lafa 6890 13477 OCT-25-01 02:26 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 0S Traffic Data Service Southueat 9773 Maine Avenue lakeside^ CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 f^^>/jM||)^r I Clear ft Dry 'ljf \|^tipd by : B. Potter i S. Rector § : PM430 t 01*1431 : Rancho Santa Fe Rd/San Marcos 8lvd Unshifted jRancho Santa Fe Road |san Marcos Boulevard jRancho Santa Road jPalrtnar Airport Road [westbound jtiorthbound jEastbound Study Haiaa: O1324081 Site Code : 01524081 Start Oate: 10/17/01 Page : 2 • jsouthbound ^^^iiart I [Intvl. I Left Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Risht Pedsj Left Thru Right Peds [ Left Thpu Right Pe<fel J9\9\ Si'- Rancho Santa fe Road 549 1938 179 147 ^ *i i 1^ t 2818 i8/17/ai 5: aaiE^H es: 45x^14 6890 /N N 3603 1256 212 „ 916 .ncho Santa Fe T 1218 Sin Harcos Bouleuapd Road P P •P m mm 45 m OCT-23-01 02:4S PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERV ICE_SW. 619 390 S49S P . 02 1 ltr : Clear ft Ory ;^ted by : C. Parish .|^rd# i D1-1425 tite: Rancho Santa Fe Rd/SR-78 Rancho Santa Fe Road Southbound .Hour Hour Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 39Q-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 E/B Ranips Unshifted SR-7B E/B Off Ramp [Rencho Santa Fe Road Westbound jHorthbound Study Nanei O1324O90 Site Code : 00324090 Start Date: 10/17/01 Pase i 1 141 857 278 2230 0 11,0 88.9 4.1 33.2 Analysis By Entire 07:00 1373 0 90.9 0.0 Intersection 137 9.0 1510 07:00 31 406 0.929 0 0.0 375 lSR-78 E/B On Ranp [Eastbound Left Thru Right Pedsl L^ft Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Riflht Pe^s 61 21 21 Ol lOl 01 11 0 12i - 100.0) . 0.1| for the Period: 07:00 on 10/17/01 to 08:45 on 10/17/01 129 84 Ol 75 0 169 21 871 160 95 01 96 0 180 oj 908 133 92 0! 112 0 211 890 166 89 ol 110 0 188 31 95! 588 360 Oi 1 393 0 748 11| 3620 156 75 1 o| 104 0 193 3] 752 136 85 01 108 0 171 zj 709 151 82 Di 120 0 142 sj Tfti 162 97 01 145 0 H7 21 607 339 01 1 477 0 653 lOf 3Q«6 1195 699 1 o| 870 0 1401 211 6706 63.0 56.9 37.9 -61.1 0.9j 17.8 10.4 -f 12.9 -20.8 O.sj 07:00 0 0.0 10 07:00 0 6 0.416 0 0.0 0 0.0 10| 100.0[ 07:00 Q 0.0 948 07:15 0 255 0.929 588 62.0 160 360 37.9 95 I 0| 0.0] Oj 07:00 393 34.1 1152 07:30 112 329 0.875 0 0.0 748 64.9 211 11 0.9 Intyl. Total OCT-23-01 02:4S PM TRAFFIC_IJATA_SERVICE_SW 619 390 S495 P . 03 ^4" I^tiier Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Haina Avenue Lakeside, CA 92O40 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 ! Clear I Dry ':-:^t^fHf)CBd by : C. Parish '•jl^ f t 01-1425 ;$;it:e: Rancho Santa Fe Rd/SR-78 E/B Ranps ; unshifted jRencho Santa Fe Road tSR-78 E/B Off Ramp ]Rancho Santa Fe Road Study Hame: Q13240M Site Code : O0324O90 Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 2 jsouthbound [Westbound jHorthbound [SR-7a E/B On Ranip [Eastbound Ep« .1 I Intvl. I left Thru Bight Peds] Left Thru Right Pedsj left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsl Total mm: Rancho liR-7fl E/B On RaN«> 748 1152 Santa Fe Road 1373 981 i 2491 10/17/01 87:O0aH 87:45AH 362G N 587 497 3069 i t ^ 588 2121 _ _36a cho Rancho Santa Fe Road SR-78 E/B Off RaHP ii p p p m txr- r.-<. •• -. • ?KS-'i.--rA-:- m p w p OCT-23-01 02:49 PM TRAFFIC-DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S49S P . 04 teM"" ' Clear 8 Dry --^''y'---''^6^tt^ W ! C. Parish Ranchg Sante Fe Rd/SR-78 E/B Ramps Traffic Data Service South»*eBt 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 C619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Study Heme: 01324091 Site Code : 01324oi>1 Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 1 17:00 •17:15 17:30 MmM -Uour 656 327 1278 20.3 79.6 4.5 17.9 Kancho Santa fe Road Southbound Left Thru Rioht Peds 35 38 52 41 143 148 180 151 166 622 43 186 33 174 44 151 41 145 SR-78 E/fl On Ramp Westbound unshifted jRancho Santa Fe Road [Horthbound L^ft Thru Right Pedsl left Thru Right P^lg] l?f; Jhru Ri^Jht P»fe 0 1 3] 0 212 149 oj 73 0 130 01 745 0 21 0 281 164 oj 90 0 161 2! 886 0 91 0 278 167 oj 107 0 169 01 962 0 1 11 D 288 175 oj 95 1 156 sj 911 0 ' 1 15] 0 1059 655 0] 365 1 616 5] S!i04 0 1 5] 0 312 169 oj 93 0 171 2f 981 0 oj 0 282 179 ij 111 1 134 4| 919 0 <\ 0 286 156 oj 107 0 150 *I 902 0 1 31 0 278 142 Ol 91 0 ij m 0 121 1 0 1158 646 1[ 402 1 584 11] 3&32 0 1 27j 0 2217 1301 ij 767 2 1200 16 j 7136 loo.oj -63.0 36.9 -j 38.6 0.1 60.4 0.8] • 0.3] -31.0 18.2 •1 10.7 -16.8 0.2j Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 10/17/01 to 17:45 on 10/ 16:30 1 16:30 1 j 0 oj 0 0 0 15] 0 1160 690 1 j 0 o.oj 0,0 0.0 0.0 100.0] O.D 62.6 37.2 5.4j 15 1 1851 16:30 1 17:00 0 oj 0 0 0 0 312 169 oj 9 i 481 0.416 ! 0.962 SR-78 E/B Off Ramp Eastbound 7/01 16:30 406 38.7 1047 16:30 107 276 0.948 2 0.1 630 60.1 169 9 0.8 intvl. lUll If!;': OCT-23-01 02:49 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 05 ii ^mutci'^ : Clear < Dry l?,ed by : C. Parish '(i t I 01-1429 Jfixf: Rancho sante Fe Rd/SR-78 E/B Ramps ^y.f./. jSancho Santa Fe Road (Southbound Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Study Nam: 01324091 Site Code : 01324091 Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 2 unshifted jSR-78 E/B on RaiTp jRancho santa Fe Road [SR-78 E/s Off Ramp [Westbound Northbound [Eastbound rt i I 1 I 1Intvl. I Left Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Riaht Pedsl Left Thru Right P^s\ Left Thru "ig^'t—pedg] Tgtftk ''-V:'. '••"', .•••V -iw'i!^- '-'•i-' '-It . /h '4'.- Rancho Santa Fe Road £91 1566 gR-78 E/B Off RaHg i 2426 406 630 1^ 1047 10/17/01 04:3apM 05:15pH 3773 /N N 876 861 3172 T 1160 690 SR-78 E/B On Raw Rancho Santa Fe Ro^d 1 m m p p p OCT-23-01 02:50 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 8495 P . 06 il^^K^k I Clear ft Dry ^^i^tdby : P. Scully i 01-1424 itte: Rsncho Santa fc Rd/SR-7S w/B Ranps Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Study Hame: 01324100. Site code : 00324100 Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 1 ISencho Santa Fe Road jsouthbound SR-78 U/B Off Ramp Westbound Unshifted jRancho Santa Fe Road [Northbound SR-78 W/8 On Ran^s Eastbound OCT-23-01 02:51 PM TRAFF1C_BATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 07 Traffic Date Service Southwest Clear ft Ory 9773 Maine Avenue P. Scully Lakeside, CA 92040 D1-1424 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Rancho Santa Fe Rd/SR-78 W/B Ramps Unshifted fSR-78 W/B Off RaiTp [Rancho Santa Fe Road jwestbound jnorthbound Study Name: 01324100, Site Code : 00324100. Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 2 jRancho Santo fe Road V jsouthbound I Left Thru Right [SR-78 W/e On Ramp jEastbound Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Rioht Pedsl Left Thru Right IIntvl. Pedsi Total •Mm:. till- Rancho' Santa Fe Road SR-78 Hf^g <fn ff^W 263 464 i 1605 877 t 10/17/01 07:oOaH 07:45aH 2975 /N N 2491 T 318 1510 663 ino Santa Fe Ros^d SR-78 U/B Off RaMP pi- i P P P P E F p OCT-23-01 02:51 PM TRAFF I C_I1 ATA_SERV I CE_SW 619 390 S495 P . 0S 4ef I Clear ft Ory ySPj^ftd by : P. Scully "\ iM*. ! 01-1424 'i^te: Rencho Santa fe Rd/SR-78 w/B Ramps Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Study Name: 01S24101 Site Code ; 00324101 Start Date: 10/17/01 Page : 1 Unshifted P ^;^';V?^i7:00 ' '17:15 :^v?:;-^i7:30 'i--^:'".'Hour Rancho Santa Fe Road SouthboUTKl [SR-78 U/B Off Renp [Westbound left Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Right Pg^E 0 93 0 90 0 108 0 TOO 125 113 113 94 0[ 85 oj 96 0[ 124 M 2L 0 57 0 54 0 81 _0 66 391 U5 0 100 129 0 103 112 0 97 103 SLSL 21. oj 0] 0] 397 129 104 98 89 0 258 0 60 1 60 1 57 ^ i2- 397 435 0] 420 780 47.2 13.2 880 52.7 14.7 817 63.0 13.7 2 0.1 219 477 36.8 8.0 411 47.8 100 448 52.1 129 1 0.1 0 0.0 P'g-^^^:iiCTi*(|i Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 16:30 0 0.0 859 17:00 0 229 0.937 16:30 Oj U9 O.oj 62.6 1 717 j 16:30 oj 124 j 205 I 0.874 267 37.2 81 Rancho Santa Fe Road Northbound jSR-78 W/B On Ramp jEastbound i Left Thru Riflht Pedsl Left Thru Biaht Peds 167 207 193 118 164 192 194 0] 0 oj 0 oj 0 .OJ o_ 756 668 177 198 199 184 228 195 194 0] 0 oj 0 oj 0 .OJ o_ 758 1514 50.7 25.4 802 1A70 49.2 24.7 Oj I 0| -1 -1 on 10/17/01 to 17:45 on 10/17/01 16:30 757 48.3 1566 17:00 177 405 0.966 809 51.6 228 0 0.0 J 16;30 oj 0 O.oj 0.0 I 0 j 17:00 oj 0 I 0 I 0.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Intvl. Tots' 645 724 811 2915 923 773 749 M 5948 'Sr.; mi- OCT-23-01 02:52 PM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW . 619 390 S495 P . 09 Traffic Data Service Southwest 9775 Heine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 4^'}^^^«r I Clear ft Dry f¥^-PPtd by : P. Scully : 01-1424 W^.'/lfje: Rencho Santa Fe Rd/SR-7B U/B Ramps r,./,. Unshifted jRancho Santa Fe Road ]5R-78 W/B Off ftaffp jRancho Santa Fe Road jsouthbound jwestbound jtiorthbound S#|iKl^> 111! jlntvL. \ i lef^, Thru R'flht Peds| Left Thru Right Peds[ Left Thru Right Pedsj L,fft Thru Riaht Pedsl T,fft;^l Study Name: 0132«10l Site Code : 003241Q1 Start Pate! 10/17/01 Paje : 2 ]SR-7S w/B On Rainp jEastbound ii Rancho Santa Fe Road 448 1076 411 SH-78 M/B On Ra>i»> 1206 *- 1206 4- t 1935 L0/17/01 :i5s»H 3142 N 2426 t 757 860 809 Rancho Santa Fe Road 717 't- 267 449 SR-7a U/B Off Rawp 'P P lis - p. p MM.. Mm wm- p p. p • J 0 P p Mi RP P m m 1-5 Soudibound Ramps at Palomar .Airport Road Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacit>' Utilizarion Page 2 of3 Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (HB) North Appr (SB) Wesi Aopr fEB) East Appr (WB) 7:15 AM 10 8:15AM Left Thru Risk Ufi Thru Riaht Left Thru Risht Left Thm Risht Lane' Inside 1 1 Config -(left) 2 1 urations 3 1 I I 4 1 I 5 6 1 1 . Outside 7 Free-flow 1 Lane Settings 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 Capacity 0 0 0 3500 0 1800 0 6000 0 0 4000. 0 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the EastWest phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 0 0 0 960 0 207 0 445 107 0 489 452 Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0 960 0 207 0 552 0 0 489 0 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0^7 O.OO 0.12 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.12 O.OO Critical Factors 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.12 ICU Ratio = 0.49 LOS= A Tuming Movements at Intersection of; 1-5 Southbound Ramps and Palomar .Airport Road m m w e s I A P P r Totals 1248 Time; 7:15AM to 8;15AM Dale: 7/18/00 Day: Tuesday Name: Caren, Dariene Sub- 696 552 0 445 107 Subtotals Total North >^proach 1-5 Soudibound Ramps 1619 Total 1167 107 0 0 107 North 452 0 207 0 960 J i L n ] r 0 0 0 Sub- totals 452 489 941 0 0 1405 Palomar Airport Road 2346 E a s t A P P r South Approach Note: Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. 1-5 Southbound Ramps at Palomar Airport Road Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacit>' Utilization Pase3 of3 Pk. Hr, Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) ^S«JWJjr(EB) Ea»t^(WB) 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Left Thru Riaht Left Thru Riaht Left Thru Riaht Left Thru Riehl Lane, Inside 1 ] mm Config-(left) 2 1 urations 3 ] 1 1 —" 4 1 -1 5 6 I 1 Outside 7 Free-flow 1 Lane Settings 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 mm Capacity 0 0 0 3600 0 1800 0 6000 0 0 4000 0 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the EastWest phases split (Y/N)? N Mt EfBcicncy Lost Factor 0.10 Houriy Volume 0 0 0 537 0 191 0 620 308 0 1066 101! Adjusted Hpurly Volume 0 0 0 537 0 191 0 928 0 0 1066 0 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 O.ll 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 mm Critical Factors 0.00 O.OO 0.15 0.00 0.27 IM. ICU Ratio = 0.52 LOS = A Turning Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound Ranips and Palomar Airport Road W e s t A P P r Totals 2185 Time : 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Date: 7/18/00 Day ; Tuesday Name : Caren, Anh Sub- totals 1257 928 0 620 308 <;iihtr.tflk Total North Approach 191 728 0 308 0 0 308 North 4. 1-5 Southbound Ramps 1739 0 537 n r 1011 1011 1066 0 i/ Tola] Subtotals Sub- totals 2077 Totals 3234 1157 Palomar .Airport Road E a s t A P P r P P South Approach Note ; Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. P m p m H P p II m 1-5 Norftibound Ramps af Palonur Airport Road Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period ; 7:15 AM to 8:15 AW South Appr (NB) Left Thru Right Lane Config - urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow North Appr (SB) Left Tliru Right West Appr (EB) Left Thru Rieht Lane Settings 0 I 2 0 0 0 I 3 Capacity 0 2000 3600 0 0 0 1800 6000 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the EastAVest phases split (Y/N)? N EfBcicncy Lost Factor 0.10 Houriy Volume 161 0 1314 0 0 0 . 78 1351 Adjusted Houriy Volume 0 161 1314 0 0 0 78 1351 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.08 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.23 Critical Factors 0.37 • 0.00 0.23 ICU Ratio = 0.70 LOS = B Page 2 of3 East Appr (WB) Left Thru Right 0 3 2 0 6000 3600 0 802 433 0 802 433 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.00 Tuming Movements at Intersection of: I-S Northbound Ramps and Palomar Airport Road P m m m P w e s ,1 A P .P r Time : 7:15 AM to 8;I5 AM Date': 7/18/00 Day: Tuesday Name; Vlad, Jose Totals 2392 Sub-- 963 1429 North Approach 78 1351 0 Subtotals Total 1 North 161 0 1475 0 1475 South Approach 1-5 Northbound Ramps 511 0 0 511 JiL n t r 1314 433 802 0 0 Total Sub- totals 1235 2665 JEdtals. 3900 Palomar Airport Road Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. E a s t A P P r P 1-5 Northbound Ramps at Palomar Airport Road Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period : 4:30 PM to 5;30 PM South Appr (NB) Left Thru Risht Lane Config- urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow Lane Settings 0 12 Capacit)' 0 2000 3600 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the EastWest phases split (Y/N)? N EfBciency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 142 1 706 Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 143 706 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.07 0.20 Critical Factors 0.20 North Appr (SB) Left Thru Right 0 0 0.00 0.00 West Appr (EB) Left Thru Rishi 0.00 0.00 1 3 1800 6000 176 952 176 952 0.10 0.16 0.10 Page 3 of3 East Appr (WB) Left Thru Right 0.00 0.00 3 2 6000 3600 1858 1094 1858 1094 0.31 0.30 0.31 ICU Ratio 0.7! LOS= C Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Northbound Ramps and Palomar Airport Road W e 5 t A P P r Time; 4:30PM to 5:30 PM Date: 7/18/00 Day; Tuesday Name: Vlad. Jose Totals 3128 Sub- totals 2000 1128 0 176 952 0 Siihtntak Total North j^proach North 142 1 0 849 849 I-S Northbound Ramps 1271 0 0 1271 J i L 1_ n t r 706 1094 1858 0 1ml Subtotals Sub- totals 2952 1658 Palomar .Airport Road Totals 4610 E a s t A P P r P P P South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes, include U-tums. U-tums in bold. P am RH m m P m m m P PR P Palomar Airport Road at College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period : 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Left Thru Right Lane Config- urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow Lane Settings 2 Capacilj' 3600 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? EfGciency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 44 Adjusted Hourly Volume 44 Utilization Factor 0.01 Critical Factors 0.01 1 0 1 1 4000 1800 1800 0 3600" 3600 6000 1800 3600 6000 1800 N N 23 23 30 30 44 44 13 0 142 155 27 27 927 927 59 59 S75 1812 34 875 1812 34 0*^01 0X12 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.24 0.30 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.03 0.04 0.24 0-15 ICU Ratio 0.54 Tuming Movements at Intersection of: W c s I A P P r Time: 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Date: 8/22/00 Day: Tuesday Name: Stephanie, Aimee LOS= A Palomar Airport Road North Approach and Coflege Boiile^-afa/Aviara Parkw^ College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway Totals 3835 Sub- 1114 2721 199 142 13 875 1812 34 North Subtotals Total 74 44 23 0 97 171 Sou* Approach 1157 2 44 958 J i L 59 927 27 Total Sub- totals 1013 2897 1 1 r 1884 30 at Palomar Airport Road Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. P IM Palomar Airport Road at CoUege Boulevard/Aviara Parkw ay Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period : 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM South Appr (NB) Left Thru Right Lane Config - urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow Lane Senings 2 Capacity' 3600 Are the Nortb'Souih phases split (Y/N)? Are the EastAVest phases split (Y/N)? Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 50 Adjusted Hourly Volume 50 Utilization Factor 0.01 Critical Factors . 0.01 North Appr (SB) Left Thru Right I 1 West Appr (EB) Left Thru Right Page 3 of3 East Appr (WB) Left Thru Right 2 3 1 40"00 1800 1800 0 3600 ' 3600 6000 1800 3600 6OO0 1800 N 10 10 N 13 13 59 19 766 263 1123 75 33 1878 84 59 0 785 263 1123 75 33 1878 84 ha 0.03 0.00 0.22 0.07 0.19 0.04 0.01 0.31 0.05 0.22 0.07 0.31 Ri ICU Ratio = 0.71 LOS = Tumina Movements at Intersection of: W e s t A P P r Time : 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Date: 8/22/00 Day: Tuesday Name: Stephanie, Aimee Palomar Airport Road and CoUege Boulevard/Aviara Park«-ay CoUege Boulevard/Awara Parkway North Approach Totals 4155 844 Sub- totais 2694 I 0 263 ' 1461 1123 • 75 *:">'tntak 127 Tota] 1202 766 19 59 J I u • > • North n t r 50 10 13 0 73 • 200 JoiaJ 358 Subtotals Sub- totals 84 1878 1995 33 0 1194 Totals 3189 Paiomar Airport Road P m South j^proach Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. m P m P El Camino Real at Palomar Airport Road Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period : 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM South Appr (NB) Left Thru Right Lane Config - urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow Lane Settings 2 Capacity . 3600 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Are the EasfWest phases split (Y/N)? Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Houriy Volume 49 Adjusted Houriy Volume 49 Utilization Factor 0.01 Critical Factors 1 North Appr (SB) Left Thru Right West Appr (EB) Left Thru Right 2 3 1 6000 1800 ' 3600 6000 1800 3600 60O0 N N 570 570 0.10 300 300 363 363 483 483 271 271 ICU Ratio TOO Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 0.17 0.10 LOS= E El Camino Real 140 140 0.04 0.04 676 753 77 0 Page 2 of3 East Appr (^^^) Left Thru Right 2 1 3600 6000 1800 487 1309 1057 487 f309 1057 0.14 0.22 0.59 0.59 and Palomar Airport Road p ii W e s t A P P r Time: 7:30AM to 8:30 AM North Approach Date; 1/20/00 Day; Thursday Name : Caren, Vlad, Dariene, Corey Totals 2523 Sub- tntals 1630 893 2 140 676 77 Subtotals 1048 Total 1967 EI Camino Real 2885 . Total 1117 271 483 363 J i u • t Nortii n t r 49 570 300 1 919 1768 Sub- totals 1057 1309 2853 487 0 1336 Tntak 4189 Palomar Airport Road South Approach Note; Left-tum volumes include. U-tums. U-tums in bold. El Camino Real at Palomar Airport Road Lane Configuralion for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period : 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM South Appr (NB) Left Thru Right Lane Config - urations Inside Ceft) Outside Free-flow Lane Settings 2 Capacity 3600 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume - 61 Adjusted Hourly Volume 61 Utilization Factor 0.02 Critical Factors 1 North Appr (SB) Left Thru Right 1 West Appr (EB) Left Thru Right Pages of 3 East Appr (WB) Left Thru Right 2 3 0 6000 1800' 3600 6000 1800' 3600 6000 0 3600 6000 1800 N N 232 1151 131 412 875 562 232 1282 0 412 875 562 0.09 0.21 0.24 0.13 0.10 0.06 0.21 0.00 0.11 0.15 0.31 0.21 0.24 0.06 0-51 551 551 382 382 877 791 877 791 173 173 ICU Ratio = 0.92 LOS= E Tuming Movements at Intersection of: El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road W e s t A P P r Time: 4:45PM to 5:45 PM North Approach Date: 7/20/00 Day: Thursday Name : Caren, Vlad, Dariene, Corey 1841 Sub- Totals totals 1107. 2621 0 232 1514 1151 131 North giihtntal-; 1336 Total - - 2330 £1 Camino Real 3188 173 791 877 J i u t 61 551 382 2 994 1347 562 875 412 0 Subtotals Sub- totals 1849 2408 Totals 4257 Palomar Airport Road E a s t A P P r •I South Approach Note : Left-tim volxmies include U-turas. U-tums in bold. P p p p El Camino Real at U Costa Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period : 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM South Appr (NB) Left Thru Right Lane Config- urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow Lane Settings Capacity Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 197 Adjusted Houriy Volume 197 Utilization Factor 0.05 Critical Factors 0.05 2 3 3600 6000 North Appr (SB) Left Thru Right 619 646 ICU Ratio 0.62 0 0 N N 27 0 LOS= B 2 3 3600 6000 West Appr (EB) Left Thru Right Page 2 of3 F.asi Appr (WB) Left Thro Right 3600 4000 1800 1800 4000 0 134 763 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 134 1000 0 512 321 237 65 633 0 0.04 0.17 0.00 0.14 0.08 0.13 0.04 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.17 0.14 0.16 Tuming Movements at Intersection of; £1 Camino Real and La Costa Avenue r w e s t A P P r Time; 7:45 AM tb 8:45 AM HotCa. Approach Date: 8/15/00 Day: Tuesday Name : Vlad, Corey. Mike, Brandon El Camino Real Sub- Totals rra9,U 841 1911 0 512 1070 321 237 Subtotals 1071 Total 1914 2487 1134 1353 237 763 134 J i u 1_ North •1 t r Total Sub- U>t8lS 197 619 27 6 843 220 413 698 65 " 0 480 La Costa Avoiue T^Tnltr 1178 South Approach Note ; Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. El Camino Real at La Costa Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of3 Pk. Hr. Time Period : 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM South Appr(NB) Left Thru Right Lane Config- urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow Lane Settings 2 3 0 Capacity 3600 6000 0 Are the North/Soutii phases split (Y/N)? N Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiency Lost Factor O.IO Hourly Volume 291 911 81 Adjusted Hourly Volume 291 992 0 Utilization Factor 0.08 0.17 O.OC Critical Factors 0.08 North Aoor f SB) West Appr (EB) F^r Appr (WB) Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right mm 1 1 1 mm 1 1 1 1 1 1 I MU 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 0 2 2 i 1 2 0 3600 6000 0 3600 4000 1800 1800 4000 0 nt 277 908 624 559 571 192 68 183 92 277 1532 0 559 571 192 68 275 0 0.08 0.26 0.00 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.04 0.07 0.00 wm 0.26 0.16 0.07 ICU Ratio = 0.67 LOS Tuming Movements at Intersection of: EI Camino Real and La Costa Avenue W e s t • A P P r Totals 2395 Time : 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM North j^proach Date: 8/15/00 Day; Tuesday Name : Vlad, Corey, Mike, Brandon Sub- totals EI Camino Real 3373 1809 1073 1322 0 559 571 192 Total 624 908 277 J i u North n t r 1193 291 911 1283 2476 81 1564 92 183 68 Jbial Subtotals Sub- totals 343 927 La Costa Avenue Totals 1270 P P 1^ P P South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. l^tums in bold. P P P p p M P P P I-S Southbound Ramp at La Costa Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of3 Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB) 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Left Thru Right Uft Thru Right Left Thru Rieht Left Thru Right Lane Inside 1 I I I Config-(left) 2 1 I 1 I 1 urations 3 1 -1 4 5 6 1 Outside 7 Free-flow Lane Settings 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 Capacity 0 0 0 3600 0 1800 0 4000 0 3600 4000 0 Are the North-'South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the EastAVest phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 0 0 0 582 13 381 0 365 89 427 363 0 Adjusted Houriy Volume 0 0 0 595 0 381 0 454 0 427 363 0 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.21 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.12 0.09 0.00 Critical Factors 0.17 0.11 0.12 ICU Ratio 0.50 LOS = i p'' Ito Turning Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Southbound Ramp and La Costa .Avenue P W e s t A P P r Totals 1198 Time : 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Date: 8/10/00 Day: Thursday Name: Mike, Binh Sub- 744 454 0 365 89 Subtotals Total North Approach 976 529 0 0 529 North I-S Souttibound Ramp 976 381 13 582 J i L 4^ 0 363 427 0 n t r Total Sub- totals 790 0 0 0 . 947 La Costa Avenue 1737 E a s t A P P r South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. , P 1-5 Southbound Ramp at La Costa Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Pk. Hr. Time Period 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Soutii Appr (NB) Left Thru Right Lane Config - urations Inside (left) Outside Free-flow North Appr (SB) Left Thru Right Lane Settings 0 0 0 2 0 Capacity 0 0 0 3600 0 Are the Nortii/South phases split (Y/N)? N Are the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiaicy Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 0 0 0 400 2 Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 0 0 402 2 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 O.OO Critical Factors 0.00 0.00 0.11 ICU Ratio = 0.49 LOS = A 1 1800 153 153 West Appr (EB) Left Thru Rishi 2 4000 445 533 Page 3 of3 East Appr (WB) Left Thru Right 0.00 0.13 2 2 0 3600 4000 0 532 370 0 532 370 0 0.15 0.09 0.00 0.15 Ml Turning Movements at Intersection of: Time : 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Date: 8/10/00 Day: Thursday Name: Mike, Binh W e s t A P P r Totals 1056 Sub- totals 523 533 1-5 Soudibound Ramp North Approach and La Costa .Av enue 0 445 88 Total 555 153 2 622 0 0 622 Nortii 1-5 Souflibound Ramp 555 0 400 J i L • r n ! r 0 370 532 Xolai Subtotals Sub- totals 902 845 La Costa Avenue Totals 1747 P South Approach Note : Left-tum volumes inciude U-tums. U-^ms in bold. 1-5 Northbound Ramp at La Costa Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of3 Pk. Hr. Time Period : South Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB) \ 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Uft Thm Right Left Thn3 Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right m Lane • Inside 1 1 1 ] 1 m Config - (left) 2 I ] 1 Hi ' urations 3 A 1 1 I T 5 6 i • Outside 7 - Free-flow p Lane Settings 0 1 2 0 0 0. 1 2 0 0 3 I p edacity 0 2000 3600 0 0 0 1800 4000 0 0 6000 1800 p Are tiie Nortii/Soufe phases split (Y/N)? N Are tiie East/West phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiency Lost Factor O.IO p Houriy Volume. 43 0 474 0 0 0 164 765 0 0 740 374 Adjusted Hourly Volume 0 43 474 0 0 0 164 765 0 0 740 374 wm Utilization Factor 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.21 P Critica] Factors 0.13 0.00 0.09 0.21 wm ICU Ratio = 0.53 LOS A Tuming Movements at Intersection of: 1-5 Nordibound Ramp and La Costa Avenue P H p ii w e s t A P P r Time ; 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Dale: 8/10/00 Day: Thursday Name : Mike, Cor^, Angela North Approach Totals 1712 Sub- _tQials- 783 929 164 765 0 Subtotals Total 43 0 517 North South Approach 1-5 Northbound Ramp 538 0 0 J i L 1 I r 0 . 474 517 538 374 .740 0 Total .t^iThtotak Sub- totals 1114 1239 La Costa Avenue Tntftls 2353 Note: Left-turn volumes include U-tums. U-tums in bold. E a s t A P P r 1-5 Northbound Ramp at La Costa Avenue Lane Configuration for Intersection Opacity Utilization Page 3 of 3 Pk. Hr. Time Period : Soutii Appr (NB) North Appr (SB) West Appr (EB) East Appr (WB) 5:00 PM to mm 6:00 PM Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thra Right Lane Inside 1 1 1 1 1 Config- Oeft) 2 1 1 1 urations 3 1 1 1 4 1 5 6 mm Outside 7 kMP Eree-flow Lane Settings 0 I 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 1 rm, Capacity 0 2000 3600 0 0 0 1800 4000 0 0 6000 1800 Are the North/South phases split (Y/N)? N Arc the East/West phases split (Y/N)? N Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10 Hourly Volume 118 4 593 0 0 0 126 677 0 0 803 406 Adjusted Hornby Volume 0 122 593 0 0 0 126 677 0 0 803 406 Utilization Factor 0.00 0.06 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.23 wm Critical Factors 0.16 0.00 0.07 0.23 •i ICU Ratio = 0.56 LOS A P Tuming Movements ai Intersection of; 1-5 Northbound Ramp and La Costa Avenue W e s t A P P r Time: 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Date: 8/10/00 Day: Thursday Name : Mike, Corey, Angela North Approach 1-5 Northbound Ramp Totals 1728 Sub- totals 925 803 532 0 0 532 J I L 4 126 677 • 0 406 803 0 Subtotals Sub- totals 1209 Totals m m 2479 North 1 1 - r Total 118 0 715 4 715 593 1270 La Costa Avenue E a s t A P P r South Approach Note: Left-tum volumes indude U-tums. U-tums in bold. P m p IIEC-06-01 11:41 AM TRAFFIC_DftTA_SERVICE_SW 619 390 8495 P.1© P P in P IN p P ,^3^«fSptfi#f 1 Clear { Dry ;:• .i^jiLiited by: P. Scully ii^rif t t D1-1429 Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 C619) 390-S495 fax (619) 390-8427 location : 1-15 H/B Rattp& & West ?th Ave Unshifted [1*15 Northbound Off SiS^n.-/^;-^'•, • IKcstDouna Northbound |^i^^^;J^;|tBrt I ( , I Left Thru gi<jht Pcdfil Left Thru Right Peds| Left Thru ftiahr 1/27/01 I I , O7:00| 0 0 0 B[ 0 171 78 0) 123 0 22 .:. 07M5| 0 0 0 71 0 192 59 0| 166 1 41 0 0 0 17| 0 251 40 Oj 205 2 39 5 0 0 5[ 0 229 4T 0| 203 6 Study Name: 0134^29 Site Code ; O03^2?0;..'. Start Oate: 11/27/01 Paae : 1 11-15 Northbound Dn Rairp (Southbound IWest 9th Avenue IWestbound Raa^ "jUest 9th Avenue jEastbound I Peds[ Left , Thru Right 07:301 Hourl 5 U-' ' • I 3^1 08:001 ,08;15j 0 1| 0 1| 0 1| .2 ol Hour] K^^-.^^ jot* 11 g;-.v'.^.Apr. t 0 843 0 1B2 0 135 0 12S 0 m 0 549 8| 20 [ 22 17 23 J*. 100 86 173 218 42 56 80 Of 697 I 0| 178 0| 107 oj 90 01 116 9 154 18 SI 0 47 0 42 0 40 53! 76 621 4j 33 151 oj 48 154 IJ 20 121 M !5 152_ 263 491 18 180 116 578 40 j loo.oj 0.8| 1392 481 74.3 25.6 28.3 9.7 DJ 1188 27 334 -( 73.8 1.6 20.7 -| 24.1 0.5 6.7 59i 3.6| 1.2| 3.9 192 1199 13.8 86.1 24.4 IIntvl. Pedsl Total I oj 532 0| 590 01 770 OJ ,81^. Oj 2708 Oj 660 . oj 548:: 0| 2204 OJ >i2 fwk Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 11/27/01 to 08:45 on 11/27/01 •.;TiiBe :..Pct. iHigh '••Vii. 07:15 j 0 } 0.0 j 30 1 07:30 I 0 I 17 j 0.441 D 0.0 0 0.0 30| 100.01 17| 07:15 0 0.0 1036 07:30 0 291 0.890 654 82.4 251 182 17.5 40 0| O.oj 07:15 752 74.3 1011 07:30 205 266 0.950 27 2.6 1S3 18.1 39 49( 4,8| 201 07:15 87 11.4 759 07:45 14 276 0.687 672 88.5 262 0 0.0 0.0| •-it?-- ' ma<T-".t"-:'•• • '-i • ..'S^ ),•.'.•• -, • '. : .••Ti .• -1 '. • -•.rl •j • :• •••-j . S:" •; •• • ••^•v'.r' • • '( P-,'..."^ •• . .-i . . •" r . •'^ . . ."f '.. •/ ,'•/ • ; :| PJ^-1 •. DEC-ee-ei 11:42 AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW . 619 390 S495 P . 1 1 Clear & Dry ited by: P. Scully ,l:<io^<i # : 01-1429 '-Location : I-T5 N/B Ramps & West 9th Ave Traffic Data Service southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619J 390-8495 fax (619) 390-S427 11-IS Northbound On Ramp [Southbourxi I West 9th Avonue jwestbound y-.:.- - K' - : • ^^^^^ |5 -i-. •: •• p>--. • i i r>"-: Study Um; 0134^220 Site Code : MS63Z^M start Date: 11/27/01 Page : 2 unshifted |1-15 Northbound Off Ramp [Uest 9th Avenue jNorthbound jEastbourxJ I I I I mtvl. Left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsl Left. Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsj To^al X-iS Nurthboun<l On 296 t 326 §7:15aH 2836 182 1891 8S4 859 N leii ^ t 1^ 27 752 183 Northk.ound Off UftSt 9th Auenue Ramp P • V m i i ... .p Ui.:': !•(•• •-•,• •• fe?.":': •; - J p I DEC-06-S1 11:42 AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERV1CE_SW. 619 390 S495 P. 12 P f^'*'^'^|Stt!er : Clear & Dry ..^^.Wited by: P. Scully ..^^•••^:,p|?ttIon ! I-t5 Ramps £ west 9th Ave. ^'fcij-'jjjj;.,,', jl-15 Northbound On Ramp jwest 9th Avenue ^^'^•-•'.'v' jsouthbound jwestbound ^^?6yf«rt j I •!!: ^^--/T^l^i6 I Left Thru Bloht Pedsl Left Thru Rioht Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 Study Neine: 01363221 Site Code : 00363^1 Start Date: 11/27/01 Page ; 1 Unshifted |I-15 Northbound Off jNorthbound RilJIp l^^SX 9th Avenue jEastbound Ped!>[ Left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right jIntvl. P^l Met i>::'.. - -.11/27/01 ¥ 1A:00J 0 0 Q M 0 161 83 01 138 1 52 M 53 233 0 oj 729 ' '16:151 0 0 0 o| 0 140 68 o| 113 1 48 U 237 0 Oj 652 j,,... ";>?3oj 0 0 0 o| 0 165 97 01 150 0 59 31 55 247 0 0| 776 •V-.-^;^ 46:451 0 0 0 2| 0 161 79 o| 129 0 56 o| 46 251 0 Bj m ••t;---^Kour| 1 0 0 0 6I I 0 627 327 o| 1 530 2 213 81 1 198 968 0 0| 2S79 17:00 j 0 0 0 1 01 0 1S3 113 1 o| 123 0 53 j o| 76 256 0 1 . Oj 0 0 0 5! 0 181 88 01 146 2 52 o| 52 252 0 o| . m 0 0 0 0 157 100 Oj 117 3 41 2| 38 257 0 Oj Tie ^i'^^^yi45l 0 0 p 11 0 123 66 oj no ? 42 Of 49 196 0 01 '.iif Hourl 1 0 0 0 9] 1 0 644 367 o| 1 496 7 -^88 2| I 215 961 0 Oj -iSB/f', \ -i Tota IJ 0 0 0 I 151 0 1271 694 1 o| 1026 9 401 1 lOj 413 1929 0 1 oj 5768 ---100.Oj -6^.6 35.3 '1 70.9 0 .6 27.7 0.6[ 17.6 S2.3 --1 ->^/-:^i•»,lnt. i ---0.2| -22.0 IZ.O -1 17.7 Q .1 6.9 O.lj 7.1 33.4 --1 - .ifwak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 11/27/01 to 17:45 on 11/27/01 '• 1 16:30 1 16i30 I 16:30 1 16:30 1 • 0 0 0 0 690 377 Oj 548 2 218 3[ ZZ9 1006 0 !*•'•; 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.Oj 0.0 64.6 35.3 O.OJ 71.0 0. ,2 28.2 0.3| 18.5 81.4 0.0 O.oj •, ..;>:tofel 1 7 1 1067 1 771 ! 1235 1 '"'••, ^?viHsh 1 17:15 1 17:00 1 16:30 i 17:00 1 't'S 0 0 0 0 183 113 o| ISO 0 59 3| 76 256 0 ^• •^J^i^stai 1 5 1 296 1 212 1 332 1 i 0.350 I 0.901 1 0.909 1 0.929 1 WW II P P m p^ P: DEC-06-01 11:43 AM TRAFFIC_DATft_SERV ICE_SW. 619 390 S49S P . 1 3 ?!*:^J|jiPtfier ! Clear t Dry ^'^•^CS^ted by: P. ScuUy ''v '';jgird* : D1-U29 .Location ; l-15 Ramps & West 9th Ave. Traffic Data Service Southriest 9773 Maine Avenue Laieeeide, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-6427 M5 Northbound On Ra(r«> Southbound jWeet 9th Avenue I Westbound Study Name: 0136?i|21 Site Code : O0363221 Star; Pate: 11/27/01 Page : 2 Unshifted tl-15 Northbound Off Ran^j jWest 9th Avenue (Northbound jEastbound Untvl. y}.'>i'J^(\^'' •! ^^^^ ^^^'^ Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Rijjht Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsj Jo^y^ ^•=::-; , *.••• 1-15 NortlikouniS On JtaHP 698 t 615 11/27/01 95:iSpn 3B8Q /N N 2291 ^ 377 690 1224 771 ^ T r> 548 218 Nopthl>aun<I Off Uest 9th Auenue •P P U p 'It p p DEC-06-01 11:39 AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 .B-^^lfiMtlier ' Clear t Dry ifSiited by: T. Basham Koard H ; 01-1424 Location : 1-15 S/S Ran^s & West 9th Ave Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Mslne Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax <619) 390-8427 jl-iS Southbound Off Ran^ jsouthbound , .Start ] jUest 9th Avenue jwestbound Unshifted jl-15 Southbound On Rwrp [Northbound P. 06 Study Ni»ne: OlSSJeiO. Site Code : OOSSM^lb!" Start Deter 11/27/01 Pase jWest 9th Avenue |Eastbour>d :•'.11/27/01 07:001 07:15J 07:30) ^^rH Rtqht Pgdsl Left Thru KiHht Pedsl left Thru Right P^sl Left Thru Rioht 1 {intvl. Pedsl Total 14 7 11 .52- 13 10 13 13 15| 54 244 Hour I P P >.e8:15l M:30| 82 27 45 43 85 49 11 19 10 _2L 11 19 25 11 18 • Nourj I .. ToralJ X Int. 1 200 282 SS.8 5,1 47 96 19.0 1.7 73 B4 16.6 1.5 42 321 58 415 M 44 386 40 ( 1 198 1366 1 1| 38 337 1| 33 213 IJ 30 190 ?? ?04 3| 123 944 0| 0 oj 0 oj 0 _oj g_ Si 221 131 41 0 104 0 124 0 191 0 249 154 153 140 128 Oj 0 i Oj 0 oj 0 0] 0 ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43j a.sj 0.71 321 12.2 5.9 2310 87.7 42,5 0[ I 0| 47j I 0| _0L 0 668 0 174 0 151 0 110 .0 2L. 129 111 110 JliL 521 100.Oj 0.9| PwBiL Hour Analysts By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 11/27/01 to 08:45 on 11/27/01 07:15 95 47.5 2O0 07.-4 5 50 70 0.714 47 23.5 13 30 15.0 281 14.Oj *1 07:15 182 11.0 1641 07:30 56 473 0.867 1459 SS.9 415 0 O.D 01 o.ol 07; 15 0 O.D 43 07:15 0 22 0.688 0 0.0 0 0.0 «1 100.Oj 221 07:15 0 0.0 1291 07:45 0 377 0.856 529 467 1197 53.3 22.0 738 57.1 1042 46.4 19.1 550 62.6 249 128 oj 604 1| 693 Of S9 91 Ml 575 1| 3037 2| 742 oj 598 Oj 506 I .11 -^^ 31 -21 Oj i5.-' •. i DEC-06-01 11:40 AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW 619 390 S495 P . 0T ipr.^gftf.thar I Clear ( Ory Ifir^.'-fiipgnted by; T. Bashaffl 99a7d » : 01-1626 Cbcatlon : 1-15 S/B Ranps & Uest 9th Ave Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619> 390-8427 " ~ n»r I ciaar L nru ««« .... Study Name: OlSjSJJIO..;, Site Code : OO^10^.|. start Date; 11/27/01' ' ""'^ Paae : 2 unshifted |I-15 Southbound Off Ramp fwest 9th Avenue |i-15 Southbound On Ran^. |West 9th Avenue «i^.^.;'.,v. • IWcstbound |Northbound lEastbound ^jJ:>-.jStart lij IiffjjlffC L-Lsti Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Right Pads) Left IIntvl. Thru Rioht Pcdsf Left Thru Right Peds) TotAl I-IS Southbound Off RAMP 47 « ^ i h 200 /37/01 SAM 3175 /N ^ 1459 3474 ^ i82 833 N 822 0. 779 43 1-15 Southhound On RaiMp Uest 9th Avenue •0 E III • 'J f^^i-.'r.- •-'£ ;*r( p DEC-06-01 11 :40 AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERV ICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 0S P -"^:::\}tt^ted by ,• -ittard # l^atlon : I Clear & Dry : c. Miller : D1-U24 1-15 S/B Ranpe fi West 9th Ave Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92060 (619) 390-8695 fax (619) 390-S427 |l-15 Southbound Off Ran^ {Southbound (West 9th Avenue {Westbound Unshifted fl'15 Southbound Northbound ^^"•y Kiqht—Peds! Left Thru Rfpht Pedsl Left Thri^ R I I 28 Oj 29 276 0 Oj 0 0 31 Ol 24 249 0 ij 0 0 25 oj 41 276 0 0| 0 0 M. 21 ^2 259 0 2f 0 Q Study Nome: 01363.211 Site Code : OOS^^'li; Start Date: 11/27/01' Page : 1 On Ramp jUost 9th Averwje {Eastbound 1 Iintvl. ight Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsf Tptpi 17:001 gpi^r^isi ^^7^301 86 74 79 124 45 36 31 _2£. 136 1060 01 59 3| 69 2| 41 01 34 256 287 258 31 0 J Ol 0 oj 0 21 0 -OJ £L OJ Of .OL 0 220 0 216 0 241 0 214 168 194 191 ij 801 oj 790 oj 864 893 752 OJ OJ 0 248 218 0 236 222 0 223 166 -fi m 256 Ij 3286 I oj 912 Oj , 907 oj ..fm" JiLM mK(y Nwrj 303 .: Total j 613 XApr. I 69.5 -% int. 9.3 137 261 29.6 3.9 183 1007 0.71 O.U 319 13.3 4.8 2067 86.4 31.3 2J I 5| 0.21 P P Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 11/27/01 ;Tfine -Vol. "Mai* ifttal : m taSSv^ •':•*• • - '.li '.,.• 16:30 323 68.1 474 16:45 93 135 0.877 0 0.0 144 30.8 40 5| I.Ol 2| 16:30 191 15.0 1271 17:15 49 336 0.945 1078 84.8 287 0 0.0 21 0.11 OJ 16:30 0 0.0 0 17:15 0 0 0.000 Oj I 51 100.Ol to 17:65 on 11/27/01 1 16:30 0 0,0 0 0.0 o| 0.0| o| 0 0.0 1769 17:00 0 466 0.949 898 1791 54.1 27.2 939 53.0 762 1514 45.7 22.9 830 46.9 Oj m I iJ 6583 248 218 fll 0.0} 01 mu P DEC-06-01 11:41 AM TRAFF I C_I3 AT A_SERV1 CE_SW . 619 390 S495 P . 09 i ^few : Clear S Dry ;«Wted by : C. Miller .;i(^rd # : D1-1624 .:l«cation : 1-15 s/B Raiips & West 9th Ave Traffic Data ServJce Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8695 fax (619) 390-8427 Study Name: 013^^11 Site Code : COS^^II Start Date: 11/27'/01 Pase : 2 Unshifted . . 11-15 southbound Off Ramp jUest 9th Avenue ll-15 Southbound On Rarv IWest 9th Avenue I Southbound j Westbound {Nor t hbound j Eastbound •^f'P*?rt I { I j jlJl^yl. i—UiS TJirU Riflht Pedsl Left Thru Right Podaj Left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsf Total 1- 5 TS Uest 9th Avenue 1224 ^ 939 —> 2993 830 Southbound Qtt 474 11/27/01 e4:3epM 05:15PM 3514 /K N 1021 1021 1-1*5 Southl>ouncl On Rj^wp i— 1078 2533 ^ i91 -> 1262 Mest 9th Avenue :p -m m m m .A m m m m p DEC-06-01 ll:3T AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW 619 390 S495 P . 02 P P P P P ii !iT.:/'.=:"i«inted by Clear & Dry s. Mcckler Board # : D1-1433 Location: valley Parkway S Auto Park Way Traffic Data Service southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-8427 jVBilay Parkyay jsouthbound •Start f JM LASU Thru Right 11/27/01 |Auto Park Way jwestbound Unshifted jValLey Parkway Northbound Ped^l Left Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Right Study Noine; 013tf313£! Site code : OO34Sl30 Start Date: 11/27/01 Page : 1 |Auto Park Way jEastbound i IIntvl. Pgdsl t-gft Thru Right Pedsf Total 07:001 07:151 07:30I -firasL 23 27 45 46 190 102 199 118 206 103 216 171 0| 13 2j 18 lij 62 9l 49 97 122 150 142 4 11 9 13 Hourl "^^1 809 08:001 43 205 08:15j 42 218 08:301 27 218 P8:«| 30 1»6 494 153 142 77 _2S_ 22| t 2| 11 i! 101 5| 46 47 70 .IL. 129 n 121 6 157 22 209 53 OJ 61 9| -£L 35 42 53 97 67 115 _25_ 1Z2 511 52 49 77 46 183 17 115 16 82 Jl SL 37 14 12 9 13 22 250 11 59 oj 51 01 53 _lj 44. 616 125 132 126 129 92 241 167 18 3 8 7 4{ 54 21 50 1| 60 _4J 7L 394 1O0 61 81 S3 259 76 69 S3 35 oj 800 21 867 6J 1080 211 3981 I 21 1091 sj 921 1| 813 01 ,,.817 p i p &?•:-.•••, fWv:,-. • • Hour] i • retail ..jS.*pr. 1 :•% Int. I 142 283 9.6 3.7 837 1646 56.2 21.5 467 961 32,8 12.6 12 3^1 l.lj 0.4[ 96 218 16.7 2.8 667 978 74.9 12.8 48 S5 6.5 1.1 21 207 512 1 261 1.81 0.31 457 26.1 5.9 1128 64.5 14.7 36 128 7.3 1.6 111 239 325 35| 2.01 0.6j 606 26.6 5,3 ^l»eek Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: •;-Tliiie Vol, Pet. Total High Vel. Total 07:30 176 10.8 1618 07:65 46 440 843 52,1 214 569 35.1 171 1 301 1.81 91 PHF 0,919 07:30 154 19,1 806 08:00 46 244 0.823 590 73.3 183 48 5.9 14 D7:00 on 11/27/01 to 08i45 [ 07:30 12] 267 623 96 1.4i 26.4 61.6 9.5 j 1010 j 07:45 Ij 87 209 53 I 358 1 0.705 on 11/27/01 { 07:30 241 2.3j 194 21.7 894 07:30 53 I 251 1 0.890 I ^1 719 43.6 9.6 371 61.4 115 233 692 29.8 &.4 303 33.8 77 8| 3662 29( 1.71 D.3| 261 2.9| 6| 7623 pl DEC-06-01 ll:3T AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW. 619 390 S495 P . 03 ^t^^aiher 1 Clear ft Dry :?0;';:-'^tlrtted by ; S, MockLer Board l|f : Dl-1433 Location: Valley Parkway & Auto Park Way Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 92040 <619) 390-8495 fax <619) 390-8427 .Start jvalley Parkway [Southbowxi I I Left Thru Right Peds Auto Park Way Westbound Unshifted Ivallcy Parkway jNorthbound Study »jon«: 01363130 Site Code ! 003^130 , Start Date; 11/27/01 ' • - Page : 2 jAuto Park Way jEastbound IIntvl, Left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pede{ Total %y'-'-- • 'fi'-' • r>-^'-. Vallew Parkway 843 fi£5 569 176 ^ i t 2483 ll/27/ai O7:30aN B8:l5aM 4326 1447 643 26 Auto Park Uau N •\ -. 2310 >^ ^ T 1300 623 267 96 24 1 Ualley Parkway 24 P .p P P P p DEC-06-01 11:3S AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERV ICE_SU. 619 390 S495 P. 04 •^^'jjV,-.-:':-..-.:-,.-. Traffic Data Service Southwest ' '^^"^ * ^''^ Avenue Study Nome: 013^131 ^ ^Cr'l^ted by: S. Noeklar Lakeside, CA 92040 Site Code : 003^131^ li : ; - ..l9ard# ; D1-U33 ( 619) 390-6695 fax (619) 390-5427 Start Pate: 11/27/01 : ,t«;:ation: Valley Parkway S Auto Park Way pgge : 1 um '-^^^ Urwhifted ^ fej^l'l'^. :' JValley Parkway jAuto Park Way jValley Parkway |Auto Park Way • . 1 Southbound j Wes tboutxi j Mor t hbound | Eas tbound W-J:!^^""- llli 1 intvl. P |g:--'-(i----'iTt(IIC ! iSil Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Pedsj left Thru Right Pedsj Left Thru Right Peds! Total Itt. Ife. ; 11/27/01 IIII 16:00| 37 206 66 1] 43 95 40 0 83 2B6 9 01 109 193 60 ll 1231 I6:15j Z5 185 SO 01 40 97 47 IJ 82 277 15 M 134 183 67 f>\ 1263 - 16:30] 27 196 60 01 39 72 66 11 82 276 13 21 105 155 47 31 1126 16!45j 37 200 46 3| 65 91 40 1| 79 270 17 ^j 124 177 50 61 1?19 liourj 1 126 787 254 M 1 187 355 173 31 1 326 1109 56 10] 1 672 708 224 16j t 4808 ••' . ; 1 :;, 17:00| 44 207 57 1 o| 62 79 56 1 01 73 265 17 1 Ol 134 189 39 I 1| 1263 17:isj 26 210 42 3J 47 91 54 11 69 226 26 OJ 101 219 37 2( : 1156 •:V 17:30| 33 228 44 o| 47 60 38 71 72 295 17 11 106 200 52 21 1202 ; -'i:- 17f45) 37 168 27 o| 41 66 65 3| 74 264 17 OJ 93 128 50 1{ Hour I 1 140 813 170 3} 1 197 296 213 111 1 268 1070 77 1l 1 634 736 178 61 1 4633 1 : Total 1 266 1600 424 1 n 364 651 386 j 161 616 2179 131 1 11J 906 1444 402 1 221 9661 • MP^- 1 11.5 69.6 18.4 0.3] 26.7 45.3 26.8 0.9] 20.9 74.2 4.4 O.SJ 32.6 52.0 16.4 0.71 - X Jnt. j 2.8 16.9 4.4 -1 4.0 6.8 4.0 O.lj 6.5 23.0 1.3 0.11 9.5 15.2 6.2 0.2{ - ,P9ak Hour Analysi a By Entire Intersection for the Perfod; 16:00 on 11/27/01 to 17:65 on 11/27/01 • •• Jine { 16:15 1 16:15 1 16:15 J 16:15 1 -Vol. 1 133 788 243 3| 206 339 189 31 316 1108 62 101 497 704 203 16| :P«. j 11.3 67.5 20.8 0.2| 27.9 45.9 25.6 0.41 21,1 74.0 6.1 0.6] 35.0 69.5 16.2 l.ll , Total 1167 1 737 1 1496 1 1420 1 .'.Miah j 17:00 1 17:00 J 16:15 1 16:15 . 1 -Vol. { 44 207 57 OJ 62 79 56 01 82 277 15 M 136 183 67 •-Total 1 308 I 197 I 378 1 390 1 • '. fHf j 0.947 1 0.935 \ 0.989 1 0.910 ( P;' Pl P P DEC-06-01 ll:3S AM TRAFFIC_DATA_SERVICE_SW €-1'^ 390 3495 P . 05 :^;L.-i^.c|B|8j(her : Clear ft Dry Vested by: S. Mwckler Board # ; 01-1433 Location: VaUey Parkway & Auto Park Way Traffic Data Service Southwest 9773 Maine Avenue Lakeside, CA 9206Q (619) 390-8495 fax (619) 390-S627 iStart jValley Parkway jsouthbound lAuto Pork Way Iwestbound Unshifted IValLey Pflrkway jNorthbound Study Name: 01363131 Site Code : 0036?131 Start Date: 11/27/01 Page : 2 • lAuio Park Way 1Eastbound Intvl. UiSfl Thru ^}<fi\\ Pedal Left Thru Right Pedg[ Left Thru Right Pedsl Left Thru Right Peds] J<f^q\ 'S'J '• Is ^ i % 2961 11/27/ax 04:15PH 05:eepN 4820 /K N 2693 ^ t r» 1197 1108 , 316 62 Ualletj Parkwau P P P P 12/05/2001 16:38 FAI @I002 SOUTHIiAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUJ^L COUNTS N-S STREET: E-W STREET: QUESTHAVEN RD. HARMONY GROVE RD. DATE: S/22/2000 DAY: THURSDAY CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECT* 0598003A NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL IiANES : 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5:00 AM 15 AM 30 AM 45 AM 7 :00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 19 0 1 71 0 98 15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 G2 0 76 30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 17 0 0 67 0 87 45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 74 0 95 8:00 AM 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 16 0 1 58 0 80 15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 38 0 4.6 30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 14 0 0 22 0 39 45 AM 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 14 0 0 22 0 40 00 AM 15 AM 30 AM 45 AM 10 :00 AM 15 AM 30 AM 45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR . TOTAL VOLUMES = 1 0 1 6 0 13 2 122 0 2 414 0 561 AM Peak Hr Begins at 700 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 0 0 0 3 0 7 1 70 0 1 274 0 356 NM ADDITIONS:2-WAY STOP NORTH/SOUTH m P 12/05/2001 16:38 FAX ©003 6P SOUTHLAIQD CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUOTS N-S STREET E-W STREET QUESTHAVEN RD. HARMONY GROVE RD. DATE: 6/22/2000 DAY: THURSDAY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECTS 0.'^98003P WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2:00 PM aw , 15 PM mm 30 PM 45 PM 3:00 PM 15 PM mm 30 PM HO 45 PM 4:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 70 0 1 8 1 87 wm 15 Pl^ 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 75 0 0 18 2 100 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 94 0 0 15 0 111 Mi 45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 76 0 0 14 1 95 00 PM 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 72 3 1 14 1 95 M 15 PM 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 64 0 1 18 3 91 30 PM 0 0 2 4 0 1 2 59 0 0 16 1 85 mm 45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 47 2 2 15 1 73 6:00 PM 15 PM aa 30 PM 45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL P VOLUMES = 0 0 4 17 0 8 13 557 5 5 118 10 737 PM Peak Hr Begins at 415 PM PEAK VOLUMES ^ 0 0 1 317 61 401 ADDITIONS:2-WAY STOP NORTH/SOUTH p RR p r 1 if m-m Bl El Rl II II II II li Kl Bl B I B I B I II 11 CITY OF CARLSBAD Primary Street PASEO DEL NORTE PASEO DEL NORTE PIO HCO DR PIO PICO DR PIO PICO DR POINSETnA LN POINSETHA LN POINSETTIA LN POINSETOALN POINSETnA LN POINSETnA LN RANCHO SANTA FB RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD ROOSEVELT ST ROOSEVELT ST ROOSEVELT ST ROOSEVELT ST/MAGNOLIA AVE STATE ST STATE ST STATE ST TAMARACK AVE TAMARACK AVE Average Weekday Traffic Volumes (Thousands) First Cross Street PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS LAS FLORES DR CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD BLVD AVENIDA ENCINAS INTERSTATE 5 PASEO DEL NORTE BATIQUITOS DR AVIARA PKWY MELROSE DR QUESTHAVEN RD LA COSTA AVE CALLE BARCELONA OLIVENHAIN RD LAGUNA DR GRAND AVE CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD BLVD LAGUNA DR GRAND AVE CARLSBAD BLVD JEFFERSON ST Second Cross Street 1996 1997 1998 1999 2O00 1999-2000 Chanee CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS 8.1 8.7 8.4 9.0 9.0 0% POINSETTIA LANE 6.0E 8.8 8.9 9.5E 10.5 11% CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 2.2N 2.2E 2.4 2.4N 2.4 0% CHESTNUT AVE 2.8N 2.7 2.7N 2.7N 2.9 7% TAMARACK AVE 4.2N 4.1 4.1N 4.1N 4.4 7% AVENIDA ENCINAS 5.4 4.1 6.1 6.1N 5.6 -8% INTERSTATE 5 13.4 15.0 18.1 18.1N 17.6 -3% PASEO DEL NORTE 18.4 22.5 26.7 26.7N 27.3 2% BATIQUITOS DR 15.1 18.8 21.5 20.4 20.6 1% AVIARA PKWY 10.6 14.3 13.8 13.8N 13.7 -1% BLACK RAIL RD O.ON O.ON O.ON 1.6 2.(L, 25% QUESTHAVEN RD 23.6 23.3 25.5 26.2 1 28.8 1 10% LA COSTA AVE 21.9 22.7 24.4 25.1 26.2 4% CALLE BARCELONA OLIVENHAIN RD 18.8E 20.5E 24.0 25.0E pn 3% CALLE BARCELONA OLIVENHAIN RD 21.0 21.6 26.6 27.5E 31.8 16% AVD LA POSTA/CALLE ACERVO GRAND AVE 11.4 6.5 11.8 7.0E 11.5 7.0N 14.2 7.0N o 6.7 10% -4% CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 7.0 5.5 5.9E 5.9N 5.4 -8% CHESTNUT AVE 4.2N 5.1 5.9 5.9N 6.5 10% JEFFERSON ST . 4.7N 4.7E 4.7 4.7N 4.8 2% LAGUNA DR 6.2N 6.3 6.3N 6.3N 6.5 3% GRAND AVE 5.7 5.8E 5.6 5.6N 5.9 5% CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 5.0 5.3E 5.3N 5.3N 5.3 0% JEFFERSON ST 10.9 10.5 ll.OE 11.ON 10.2 -7% INTERSTATE 5 15.5E 15.5N 16.0 16.0N 15.5 -3% p p p p p p p p p p 2000 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Figure B-1 Legend: p ii Mid-Blodc Count Location XX,XXX Mid-Block Average Daily Traffic (ADT) II B i B 1 B i 11 I I f ] I I r I L-J II Bl Bl Bl Ki Bl Kl Bl L-.^ L-i L-J < I t--J 1-^' t^i t j K I COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IMmary Street DEL DIOS HWY DEL RIO RD DEL RIO RD DELU2RD DI GIORGIO RD DUNBAR LN DYERD EAST GRADE RD EAST LAKEVIEW RD EAST VISTA WAY EL CAMINO DEL NORTE EL CAMINO REAL/LA NORIA EL CAMINO REAL ELFIN FOREST RD ELKELTON BLVD ELM ST ELMIRLO ELMONTBRD EL MONTEVIDEO EL NOPAL/RIVERFORD RD ENGINEERS RD EUCUD AVE FALLBROOK ST FEUQTARD FUNN SPRINGS RD Average Weekday Traffic Volumes (Thousands) First Cross Street VIA RANCHO PKWY SWEETWATER SPRINGS BLVD CALAVO DR SANDIA CREEK DR HENDERSON CANYON RD OLD HIGHWAY 80 ROUTE 67 PALOMAR MTN LAKEVIEW RD ROUTE 76 VIA DE FORTUNA LA BAJADA UNEA DEL CIELO QUESTHAVEN RD PARADISE VALLEY RD HAVERFORD RD RANCHO SANTA FE/LA BAJADA LAKE JENNINGS PARK RD VIA DE FORTUNA SANTANAST BOULDER CREEK RD 24TH ST MAIN AVE HAMILTON LN BLOSSOM VALLEY RD Second Cross Street EL CAMINO DEL NORTE CALAVO DR AUSTIN DR MISSION RD PALM CANYON DR ALPINE BLVD RAMONA ST ROUTE 76 HWY 8 BUISNESS RT OSBORNE ST DEL DIOS HWY UNEA DEL CIELO VIA DE LA VALLE HARMONY GROVE RD JAMACHA RD OLIVE ST VIA DE FORTUNA EL MONTE CO PARK PASEO DEUCIAS RIVERSIDE DR ROUTE 79 SWEETWATER RD STAGE COACH LN VIA RANCHO PKWY OLD HIGHWAY 80 1999-2000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Change 17.8 17.8N 18.6 18.6N 21.8 17% 2.2N 2.6 2.4 2.6 1.1 -58% 3.4 3.4N 4.4 4.4N 2.9 -34% 2.8N 2.8N 2.8N 2.8N 2.8N 0% 0.5N 0.5N 0.5N 0.5N 0.5N 0% 3.4N 3.4N 3.4N 3.4N 3.4N 0% 5.2N 4.8 4.8N 5.0 5.8 16% 0.3N 0.3N 0.3N 0.3N 0.6 100% 2.6N 2.6N 2.6N 2.6N 2.6N 0% 13.8N 14.7 14.7N 14.7N 14.7N 0% 3.4N 3.7 3.7N 3.7N 6.9 86% 5.0 5.0N 6.0 6.0N 6.0N 0% 3.8N 3.8N 3.8N 3.8N 3.8N 0% 1.9N 1.9N ED 2.2N 2.2N 0% 7.8N 7.8N 11.1 ll.lN ll.lN 0% 2.6N 2.6N 2.3 2.3N 2.3N 0% 2.7N 2.7N 2.7N 2.7N 3.3 22% 2.6 2.6N 2.8 2.8N 2.8N 0% 3.6N 3.6N 3.8 3.9 3.7 -5% 13.7N 13.7N 9.6 9.6N 9.6N 0% 0.1 O.IN O.IN O.IN O.IN 0% 9.2N 9.2N 9.2N 9.2N 9.2N 0% 13.3N 13.5 13.5N 13.5N 13.5N 0% 3.3N 3.3N 3.3N 3.3N 3.3N 0% 1.8N 1.8N 1.8N 1.8N 1.8N 0% COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO K3 Primary RtrfPt GUNN STAGE RD HANSON LN HANSON LN HARBISON CANYON RD HARBISON CANYON RD HARMONY GROVE RD HARNESS ST HAVERFORD RD HELDCST HEUX ST HEUX ST HENDERSON CANYON RD HICHLAND VALLEY RD HIGHLAND VALLEY RD HILLSDALE RD HILLSDALE RD HONEY SPRINGS RD HUMPHRIES RD HWY 8 BUSINESS RT HWY 8 BUSINESS RT/E MAIN IDAHO AVE IDAHO AVE INDUSTRY RD JACKSON HILL DR JAMACHA BLVD Average Weekday Traffic Volumes (Thousands) First Cross .q^^PP^ SAN VICENTE RD RAMONA ST SAN VICENTE RD ARNOLD WAY FRANCES DR ELFIN FOREST RD SWEETWATER RD ROUTE 76 KENWOOD DR LAMAR ST KNOB MLL DR BORREGO SPRINGS RD BANDY CANYON RD ARCHIE MOORE RD JAMACHA BLVD VISTA GRANDE RD ROUTE 94/CAMPORD ROUTE 188 LAKE JENNINGS PARK RD LOSCOCHESRD SAN PASQUAL VALLEY/RT 78 BEAR VALLEY PKWY ROUTE 67/WINTER GARDENS B PEPPER DR SWEETWATER RD/ROUTE54 Second Cros.'i Rh-oof NORTH SAN VICENTE RD KEYESRD FRANCES DR DEHESA RD KAUANA LOA DR HELIX ST ELM ST LAMAR ST KNOB HILL DR JAMACIU RD PEG LEG RD ARCHIE MOORE RD ROUTE 67 VISTA GRANDE RD WILLOW GLEN DR LYONS VALLEY RD EMERY RD LOS COCHES RD PEPPER DR BEAR VALLEY PKWY CITRUS AVE CHANNEL RD HWY 8 BUSINESS RT GRAND AVE ITP 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 4.1N 4.1N 4.1N 4.1N 4.1N 6.0 6.0N 6.0N 6.0N 9.2 2.8 2.8N 2.8N 2.8N 3.7 5.0N 5.0N 3.8 3.8N 3.8N 2.3/ 2.2N 1.8N 2.2N 1.7 2.2N 1.7N 2.2N 1.7N 2.2N 4.IN 4.1N 4.1N 4.1N 4.1N 1.6 1.6N 1.6N 1.6N 1.6N 5.3N 5.3N 5.3N 5.3N 5.3N 2.5 2.5N 2.5N 3.0 3.0N 4.1N 4.1N 4.1N 4.1N 3.1 0.2N 0.2N 0.2N 0.2N 0.2N . 1.2 1.2N 1.2N 1.2N 1.3 2.0 2.0N 2.0N 2.0N 3.0 n.9N n.9N 11.9N n.9N 11.9N 3.1N 3.1N 5.4 5.4N 5.4N 0.7N 0.7N 0.7N 0.7N 1.7 0.4N 0.4N 0.4N 0.4N 0.4N 8.1N 8.1N 8.1N 8.1N 8.1N 10.7 10.7N 10.7N ia.7N 10.7N 2.3N 2.3N 2.3N 2.3N 2.3N l.ON l.ON l.ON l.ON l.ON 6.0N 6.0N 6.0N 6.0N 6.0N 2.0N 2.0N 2.0N 2.0N 2.0N 25.5 25.5N 25.5N 25.5N 25.5N 1999-2000 Chanpe 0% 53% 32% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -24% 0% 8% 50% 0% 0% 143% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% L^m.^9^.H 11 11 il KB mm ii ii i IIII i I Bl H J B^ B^ B^ i 1 11 1 ] g 1 I ] K 1 B:II »I mm a n m B B a^j ILJ LJ Ll i-j aLj ii..^ i^j CITY OF ENCINITAS Average Weekday Traffic Volumes (Tliousands) Primary Street First Cross Street Second Cross Street 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 1999-2000 Chanee AMARGOSA DR/ORCHARD WOOD OLIVENHAIN RD VILLAGE VIEW RD 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8N 1.6 -11% AVENIDA LA POSTA WANDERING RD VILLAGE VIEW RD 1.4 2.1 1.1 I.IN 1.1 0% AVENIDA LA POSTA VILLAGE VIEW RD RANCHO SANTA FE 2.4 2.9 1.7 1.7N 1.3 -24% BST 3RD ST COAST HWY 101 3.0N 3.0N 3.0N 3.0N 3.0N 0% BALOUR DR ENCINITAS BLVD SANTA FE DR 7.5 8.2 8.2N 8.2N 8.8 7% BIRMINGHAM DR SAN EUJO AVE MACKINNON AVE 12.3 13.5E 13.5N 13.5N 11.7 -13% BIRMINGHAM DR MACFQNNONAVE INTERSTATE 5 15.4 16.9 16.9N 16.9N 12.9 -24% BIRMINGHAM DR INTERSTATE 5 FREDA LN 8.7 8.7 8.7N 8.7N 8.4 -3% BIRMINGHAM DR FREDA LN LAKEDR 5.9 5.7 5.7N 5.7N 6.1 -7% CERROST ENCINITAS BLVD WILLOWSPRING DR 3.2N 3.2N 3.2N 3.2N 3.2N 0% CERROST WILLOWSPRING DR EL CAMINO REAL 2.3 2.6 2.6N 2.6N 2.0 -23% CHESTERHELD DR COAST HWY 101 MANCHESTER AVE 19.0N 19.0N 19.0N 19.0N 19.0N 0% (N) COAST HWY 101 LA COSTA AVE LEUCADIA BLVD 14.3 15.6 15.6N 15.6N 14.3 -8% (N) COAST HWY 101 LEUCADIA BLVD ENCINITAS BLVD 15.7 16.3 16.3N 16.3N 15.9 -2% (S) COAST HWY 101 ENCINITAS BLVD HST 18.0 18.7 18.7N 18.7N 17.2 -8% (S) COAST HWY 101 HST CHESTERFIELD DR 13.3 14.2 14.2N 14.2N 14.9 5% (S) COAST HWY 101 CHESTERHELD DR OCEAN ST 22.0 21.0 21.0N 21.0N 20.3 -3% CREST DR EL CAMINO REAL SANTA FE DR 2.6 2.2 2.2N 2.2N 2.5 14% EL CAMINO DEL NORTE RANCHO SANTA FE RD VIA DE FORTUNA 5.2 5.0 5.0N 5.0N 6.5 30% EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL OLIVENHAIN RD GARDEN VIEW RD GARDEN VIEW RD- MOUNTAIN VISTA DR 35.2 36.9 36.4 38.2 36.4N 38.2N 36.4N 38.2N 39.5 5% 3% EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO RBAL MOUNTAIN VISTA DR ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS BLVD SANTA FE DR 38.7 26.4 39.5 27.6 39.5N 27.6N 39.5N 27.6N ED 24.3 0% -12% EL CAMINO REAL SANTA FEDR MANCHESTER AVE 18.6 19.2 20.1 20.1N 18.2 -9% ENCINITAS BLVD COAST HWY 101 VULCAN AVE 18.8N 18.8N 18.8N 18.8N 18.8N 0% CITY OF ENCINITAS o Primary street First Cross Sh-eet ENCINITAS BLVD VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS BLVD INTERSTATE 5 ENCINITAS BLVD SAXONYRD ENCINITAS BLVD DELPHINIUM ST ENCINITAS BLVD BALOUR DR ENQNITAS BLVD EL CAMINO REAL ENCINTTAS BLVD CERRO ST ENQNITASBLVD VILLAGE PARK WAY GARDEN VIEW RD LEUCADIA BLVD GARDEN VIEW RD VIACANTEBRIA GARDEN VIEW RD EL CAMINO REAL LA COSTA AVE COAST HWY 101 LA COSTA AVE VULCAN AVE LAKEDR SANTA FE DR LAKEDR BIRMINGHAM DR LEUCADIA BLVD COAST HWY 101 LEUCADIA BLVD VULCAN AVE LEUCADIA BLVD ORPHEUS AVE LEUCADIA BLVD INTERSTATE S LEUCADIA BLVD SAXONY RD LEUCADIA BLVD QUAIL GARDENS DR LEUCADIA BLVD GARDEN VIEW RD LEUCADIA BLVD TOWN CENTER PL LONE JACK RD RANCHO SANTA FE MACKINNON AVE SANTA RE DR Average Weekday Traffic Volumes (Tliousands) 2000 22.5 Second Cross Street 1996 1997 1998 1999 INTERSTATE 5 26.0 23.2 23.2N 23.2N SAXONY RD 39.0E 43.0E 43.0N 43.0N DELPHINIUM ST 37.6 42.4 42.4N 42.4N BALOUR DR 31.6 38.2 38.2N 38.2N EL CAMINO REAL 27.4 27.8 34.6 34.6N CERRO ST 26.1 26.1N 26.1N 26.1N VILLAGE PARK WAY 22.6 24.1 24.1N 24.1N RANCHO SANTA FE RD 19.0 19.8 19.8N 19.8N VIA CANTEBRIA O.ON O.ON 2.5E 2.5N EL CAMINO REAL O.ON O.ON 2.0E 2.0N WILLOWSPRING DR 6.9 7.9 7.9N 7.9N VULCAN AVE 8.2E 8.2N 8.2N 8.2N INTERSTATE 5 10.3 10.7 10.7N 10.7N BIRMINGHAM DR 5.5 5.7 5.7N 5.7N SEA VILLAGE PL 2.4 2.4 2.4N 2.4N VULCAN AVE 12.0N 12.0N 12.0N 12.0N ORPHEUS AVE 12.1 12.8 12.8N 12.8N INTERSTATE 5 17.6N 18.0E I8.0N 18.0N SAXONY RD 6.7 7.3 7.3N 7.3N QUAIL GARDENS DR 2.1 2.1N 2.1N 2.1N GARDEN VIEW RD O.ON O.ON O.ON O.ON TOWN CENTER PL O.ON O.ON O.ON .•• EL CAMINO REAL 0.0N 32.2 30.0E 28.0 24.8 21.4 8.3 9.2 8.9 8.2N 10.4 5.8 2.2 14.0E 15.1 1999-2000 Change -3% -18% -24% -21% -24% 7% 3% 8% 232% 360% 13% 0% -3% 2% -8% 17% 18% 11% 258% ! 106^ JACKIE LN VILLA CARDIFF.DR: B1 I I 1 Bl Bl Kl II 11 fl li II il II II 11 11 ri Bl Bl 81 92 93 84 85 85 87 88 sg BO 01 92 93 94 95 9B 97 Q8 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 NORDAHL RD NORDAHL RD NORDAHL RD OLEANDER/ALM/DSCNSO OLIVE ST PACIFIC ST Primary Street KNOB HILLRD PACIFIC ST PICO AVE PICO AVE POPPY QUAH. HIU QUESTHAVEN RD RANCHEROS DR RANCHEROS DR RANCHEROS DR RANCHEROS DR RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD From CENTER DR MONTIEL RD SMILAX RD TWIN OAKS VALLEY RD GRAND AVE LINDA VISTADR RICHMARAVE MISSION RD APPLEWIDE VIA VeVV CRUZ RANCHO SANTA FE RD SAN MARCOS GLVD VAIPREOARD ROUTE 78 RAMPS WOODLAND PKWY MISSION RD To CENTER DR MONTIEL RD ROUTE 78 LAS FLOFIAS DR MULBERRY DR UNDA VISTADR SAN MARCOS BLVD 1996 Vol. 10700 19400 25000 3500 2200 3300 MISSION RD SAN MARCOS BLVD WINDRIDGE CANARY ELFIN FOREST RD VALPREDA RD ROUTE 78 RAMPS WOODI-AND PKWY MISSION RD CAPALINARD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RO RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RANCHO SANTA FE RD RICHLAND RD RICHLAND RO RICHMARAVE ROADRUNNER ROCK SPRINGS ROAD ROCKSPRINQS ROAO ROCK SPRINGS ROAD ROCK SPRINGS ROAO (CO) ROSE RANCH ROAD SAN MARCOS BLVD SAN MARCOS BLVD SAM MARCOS BLVD ROUTE 78 DESCANSO AVE GRAND AVE LA MIRADA DR LINDA VISTADR SECURITY PL SAN MARCOS BLVD LAKE SAN MARCOS DR BORDEN RD ROCKSPRINQS RD PICO AVE POINSETtAAVE RICHLAND RD WOODLAND PKWY WOODLAND PKWY SENNETAVE MULBERRY DR BUSINESS PARK DR RANCHO SANTA FERD DISCOVERY ST CAPALINA RD ROUTE 78 DESCANSO AVE GRAND AVE LA MIRADA DR LINDA VISTADR SECURITY PL SAN MARCOS BLVD LAKE SAN MARCOS DR LA COSTA MEADOWS ROCK SPRINGS RD END TWIN OAKS VAUEY RD ALAMITOS WOODLAND PKV/Y BENNETAVE WOODS NORDAHL RD BORDEN RD RANCHO SANTA FE RO DISCOVERY ST LAS POSAS RD 2200 S900 11100 3000 4600 4000 9500 9O0O 13700 27800 43700 35800 32700 SOfiOO 1997 Vol. 10990 28000 2000 Vol. 9640 Z3172 23172 3568 4165 2001 Vol. 96-97 Voluma Changs 5000 11800 31800 27400 35300 31000 leoo 50 9000 3300 sooo 6000 1900 19300 33700 32900 2BSQ0 4B00 28070 41600 3943 4664 752B 5228 16352 12816 22459 36999 1987 712 mm 27521 187 4244 4501 2933 37525 5829 96-97 % Chango 200 3000 400 -1900 -4300 2% 12% 9% -14% -10% -2400 1300 9770 7900 -0% 97-00 Volu Change 39% 53% 23% Page 3 of 4 APPENDIX B INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEETS BY TRUCK ROUTES ii P P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:12:54 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-AM Command: Default Command Volxime: Ex-AM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration m p * p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P p p p Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:08:20 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.874 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.3 Optimal Cycle: 95 Level Of Service: c ****•********-************* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include I I I I Protected Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 im Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 D 1 0 0 0 1 D 0 0 0 1 1 D 0 0 1 P Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Initial Bse: 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p PHP Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volvmie: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm Final Vol,: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustiment: 1.00 0,91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.83 1,00 0.74 Lanes: 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 Wm Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.56 0.03 0.05 0.66 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,14 0.00 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** MM Green/Cycle: 0.00 0,70 0.70 0.06 0.76 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.80 0.05 0.80 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.87 Delay/Veh: 0.0 15.2 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0,0 15.2 5.2 87.6 16,4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75.1 MM DesignQueue: 0 21 1 5 20 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:12:55 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********-*********,k******,k*tt***,^***,k*,k***iif** ************************************* Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/Melrose Drive ****************** tt************************************************** *********** Cycle (sec): 131 Critical Vol./Cap, (X): 0.910 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y-HR = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 41.0 Optimal Cycle: 122 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include I I Protected Ovl Split Phase Include i I Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 10 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 D 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 mw Volume Module: mw Base Vol: 264 790 0 0 951 185 319 0 504 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 Initial Bse : 264 790 0 0 951 185 319 0 504 0 0 0 m User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0,90 0 .90 0. 90 m PHF Volume: 293 878 0 0 1057 206 354 0 560 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mw Reduced Vol : 293 878 0 0 1057 206 354 0 560 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 wm MLF Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 Final Vol.: 293 878 0 0 1057 206 354 0 560 0 0 0 m Saturation Flow Module: p Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.77 0.95 1 .00 0.85 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0 .00 1.00 0.00 0 .00 0, 00 m Final Sat.: 1641 3281 0 0 3281 1468 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 m Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0. 18 0. 27 0, 00 0. 00 0. 32 0. .14 0. 20 0. 00 0. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0. .00 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 20 0, 55 0. 00 0, 00 0. 35 0, ,74 0. 38 0. 00 0. 38 0. 00 0, 00 0, .00 Volume/Cap: 0. 91 0. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0. 91 0, .19 0. 51 0. 00 0. 91 0. 00 0. 00 0, .00 Delay/Veh: 79 .9 18 .3 0 .0 0 .0 50 .9 t ).4 31 .9 0 .0 56 ,0 0 .0 0 .0 c ).0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. .00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1, .00 AdjDel/Veh: 79 .9 18 .3 0 .0 0 .0 50 .9 E }.4 31 .9 0 ,0 56 .0 0 .0 0 .0 c 5.0 DesignQueue: 18 31 0 0 54 4 17 0 27 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** p p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P IP P P P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:12:55 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 5-1 P P m Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Voliame Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Marcos Blvd/P.A.R. A*-***********-******************************************************************* Cycle (sec): 121 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.101 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 64.0 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E *******!************************************************************************* Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Protected I I Protected I I II Protected Protected p Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm Lanes: 2 0 1 2 0 1 ...... 1 1 1 c 1 2 0 1 , 1 2 1 1 .... D 2 0 1 ...II 2 0 1 1 0 P 1 Volume Module: 1 1 1 1 II P Base Vol: 120 454 714 118 691 571 198 523 40 428 942 53 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 IMI Initial Bse: 120 454 714 118 691 571 198 523 40 428 942 53 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 133 504 793 131 768 634 220 581 44 476 1047 59 •i Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 504 793 131 768 634 220 581 44 476 1047 59 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 133 504 793 131 768 634 220 581 44 476 1047 59 I Saturation Flow Module: I I Sat/Lane: Adjustinent: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.84 0.86 2.00 2.00 3183 3281 1900 0.77 1.00 1468 1900 1900 0.86 0.86 1.00 2.00 1641 3281 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.15 0.54 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.31 70.0 18.7 I I II 1900 1900 1900 0.77 0.92 0.95 1.00 2.00 2.00 1468 3502 3610 II• II 1900 1900 1900 1900 0,85 0.92 0.94 0.94 1.00 2.00 1.89 0.11 1615 3502 3390 191 II * * * * 0.49 1.10 95.4 0.95 90.6 31 0.08 0.23 0.43 **** 0.07 0.51 1.10 0.46 168.3 19.5 0.95 0,95 159.9 18.5 8 27 0.06 0.16 0.03 * * * * Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: 0,95 0.95 AdjDel/Veh: 66.5 17.7 DesignQueue: 9 18 ******************************************************************************** 0.56 0.06 0.18 0.77 1.10 0,88 24.7 150.3 61,1 0,95 0.95 0.95 23.5 142.8 58.0 20 14 33 0,18 0.15 41.7 0.95 39 .7 2 0.14 0.31 0.31 **** 0,15 0.28 0.28 0,88 1.10 1.10 65.3 104 103,7 0.95 0.95 0.95 62.0 98.5 98.5 28 55 3 li Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P k Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:12:55 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********************************************************^************^*^j,^^.^^^^ Intersection #4 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR-78 EB Ramps ***************************************************************************^*^*^ Cycle (sec): 98 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.166 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 98.5 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F **********************************************************************^***^.^j^^^j^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I I il Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 D 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 588 360 137 1373 0 393 0 748 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 0 588 360 137 1373 0 393 0 748 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0. 90 PHF Volume: 0 653 400 152 1526 0 437 0 831 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 653 400 152 1526 0 437 0 831 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1, 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol.: 0 653 400 152 1526 0 437 0 831 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.86 0.77 0.86 0.86 1.00 0.87 1. 00 0.68 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1,00 0. 00 2.00 0.00 0, 00 0. 00 Final Sat.: 0 3281 1468 1641 3281 0 1644 0 2584 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.27 0.09 0.47 0.00 0.27 0. 00 0.32 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.28 0. 00 0.28 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.85 1.17 0.23 1.17 0.00 0.96 0. 00 1.17 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 45.0 139.4 19.7 113 0.0 67.9 0 ,0 125.1 0.0 0 .0 0 .0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 45.0 139.4 19.7 113 0.0 67,9 0 .0 125.1 0.0 0 .0 0 .0 DesignQueue: 0 29 18 5 56 0 18 0 35 0 0 0 ***********************************************************************^***^*^^^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ml P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:12:55 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) **************l^*«***« ***************************************************** *****! Intersection #5 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps ************************************•*******************************************! Cycle (sec): 97 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.019 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 53.8 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D ************************************lk**************-****************************i Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R II Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 1 ( ) 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 0 p 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 318 663 0 0 464 263 0 0 0 1046 3 214 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Initial Bse: 318 663 0 0 464 263 0 0 0 1046 3 214 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m PHF Adj: 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 353 737 0 0 516 292 0 0 0 1162 3 238 mm Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 353 737 0 0 516 292 0 0 0 1162 3 238 •HI PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Final Vol.: 353 737 0 0 516 292 0 0 0 1162 3 238 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 j -•1 1 . - - 1 1 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 1.00 1,00 0.86 0.77 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0,86 — Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0,00 2.00 1.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.01 0,29 Final Sat.: 1641 3281 0 0 3281 1468 0 0 0 2802 6 475 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 " • 1 I Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.50 0,50 Crit Moves: * * * * **** * *** Green/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.98 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.81 1.02 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.84 1.02 1.02 Delay/Veh: 78.3 76.0 0.0 0.0 44.6 97,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 53.7 53.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 78.3 76.0 0.0 0.0 44,6 97.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 53.7 53.7 P DesignQueue: 16 33 0 0 23 13 0 0 0 35 0 7 *****************************************************************ilt*'*ilr*********** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:13:19 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-PM Command: Default Command mm Volume: Ex-PM Geometry: Ex-AM m Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Hi Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration wm p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P m ^m p p p ^m m m p p P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:08:58 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rsmcho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.010 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.2 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: C *********-*********************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Boxind L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include II I I Protected Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 D 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 D 0 0 1 mm Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Initial Bse: 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 I.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 m PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 wm Final Vol.: 0 1 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 Saturation Flow Module: m Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0,86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1,00 0.74 wm Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.77 0,09 0.11 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,05 0.00 0.04 Pi Crit Moves: **** **** **** ik Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.76 0,76 0.11 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0,00 0.05 ik Volume/Cap: 0,00 1.01 0.12 1.01 0.72 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.79 Delay/Veh: 0.0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 159.1 0.0 97,9 p User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 159.1 0.0 97.9 DesignQueue: 0 24 2 10 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:13:19 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) *******************************************************************^*****^^^^^^^ Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/Melrose Drive ******************************************************************************^^ Cycle (sec): 131 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.702 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.9 Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C *******************************************************************^*******^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T -R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase M Rights: Include Ovl Include Include mm Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 10 2 0 0 0 1 D 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 WW Volume Module: Base Vol: 266 1110 0 0 744 211 359 0 312 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Initial Bse: 266 1110 0 0 744 211 359 0 312 0 0 0 m User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 wm PHF Volume: 296 1233 0 0 827 234 399 0 347 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Reduced Vol; 296 1233 0 0 827 234 399 0 347 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 296 1233 0 0 827 234 399 0 347 0 0 0 m Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 1. 00 1,00 0.86 0.77 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0. 00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P Final Sat.: 1641 3281 0 0 3281 1468 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 Ml Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0. 18 0. 38 0. 00 0. 00 0. 25 0. 16 0, 22 0. 00 0. 21 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Crit Moves: * * * * ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 26 0. 62 0. 00 0. 00 0. 36 0. 67 0. 32 0. 00 0. 32 0, 00 0. 00 0. 00 Volume/Cap: 0. 70 0, 61 0. 00 0. 00 0. 70 0. 24 0. 70 0. 00 0. 68 0. 00 0. 00 0, 00 Delay/Veh: 49 .3 16 .0 0 .0 0 .0 37 .9 8 .4 43 .4 0 .0 42 .9 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 User DelAdj: 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 49 .3 16 .0 0 .0 0 .0 37 .9 8 .4 43 ,4 0 .0 42 .9 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 DesignQueue: 17 38 0 0 41 6 21 0 18 0 0 0 ************ * * * ***** *** *** * ** *** ***** **• **** *** *** ****** ****** *** *** * ** * * * ** *** **• Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM ^m P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:13:19 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *ilr****ilf****ifcifc******************ilr******r********************** ************** ****** Intersection #3 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Marcos Blvd/P.A.R. ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 121 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.674 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 192.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F ***************************************************]!(**************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Protected Protected II II Protected Protected p Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Lajies: 2 1 D 2 0 1 10 2 0 1 2 1 D 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: 1 1 - - - -•1 1 Base Vol: 212 1218 916 147 549 179 644 1641 44 663 592 76 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P Initial Bse: 212 1218 916 147 549 179 644 1641 44 663 592 76 P User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 236 1353 1018 163 610 199 716 1823 49 737 658 84 mw Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 236 1353 1018 163 610 199 716 1823 49 737 658 84 Wm PCE Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm Final Vol,: 236 1353 1018 163 610 199 716 1823 49 737 658 84 Saturation Flow Module: II 1 1 •1 1 " • wm Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.86 0.77 0.86 0.86 0.77 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.93 0.93 MM Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2,00 1.77 0.23 Mi Final Sat.: 3183 3281 1468 1641 3281 1468 3502 3610 1615 3502 3147 402 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.41 0.69 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.41 0.41 Volume/Cap: 0.55 1,00 1.67 Delay/Veh: 50,4 58.6 346.1 User DelAdj: 0.95 0,95 0.95 AdjDel/Veh: 47.9 55.7 328.8 DesignQueue: 14 59 47 0.10 0.19 0.14 0.20 0.50 0.03 **** **** 0,06 0.34 0.55 0.21 0.30 1,67 0.55 0.25 0.97 1,67 00.8 33,1 14.3 72.6 350 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 80.8 31.5 13.6 69.0 332 11 28 6 40 98 0,21 0.21 0,21 **** 0.30 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.10 1.67 0.97 0.97 30.5 366.2 71.7 71.7 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 29.0 347.9 68.2 68.2 2 46 37 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:13:19 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) **************************************************************************^j^^j^^^ Intersection #4 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR-78 EB Ramps ***********************************************************************^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 98 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.173 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 86.3 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F *************************************************************************^****^* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include I 1 Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 D 2 0 0 0 10 0 2 0 1 D 0 0 0 wm Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1160 69 0 169 691 0 406 2 630 0 0 0 ••i Growth Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1160 690 169 691 0 406 2 630 0 0 0 p User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 1289 767 188 768 0 451 2 700 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1289 767 188 768 0 451 2 700 0 0 0 MP PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1289 767 188 768 0 451 2 700 0 0 0 Ml Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 mm Adjustment: 1.00 0,86 0.77 0.86 0.86 1.00 0.77 0.77 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0,00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.99 0,01 2.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 wm Final Sat.: 0 3281 1468 1641 3281 0 1462 6 2584 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: wm Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.39 0.52 0.11 0.23 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.27 0.00 0.00 0,00 Crit Moves: **** **** *-*** P Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 m Volxime/Cap: 0.00 0.88 1.17 0.57 1.17 0.00 1.17 1.17 1,03 0.00 0,00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 31.4 120.5 37.9 133 0.0 138.0 138 78.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mi AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 31,4 120.5 37.9 133 0.0 138.0 138 78,4 0,0 0.0 0,0 DesignQueue: 0 43 26 8 35 0 19 0 30 0 0 0 mm *******************************************************************************^ Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:13:19 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 7-1 P Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps *************************************************************************ik****** Cycle (sec): 97 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1,331 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 108.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F **************************************************************************ih***** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include II Split Phase Include II Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pi Lanes: 10 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 1! 0 0 p Volume Module: 1 1 1 1 Base Vol: 757 809 0 0 411 448 0 0 0 449 1 267 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IM Initial Bse : 757 809 0 0 411 448 0 0 0 449 1 267 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0 ,90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 841 899 0 0 457 498 0 0 0 499 1 297 wm Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol : 841 899 0 0 457 498 0 0 0 499 1 297 m PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 mm Final Vol.: 841 899 .1.......... 0 1 1 0 457 498 ...... 1 0 1 ..... 0 0 , . . 1 499 1 ...., 1 297 Saturation 1 Flow Module: 1 1 1 1 I 1 "•• Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 1 .00 1.00 0.86 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 f— Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0 .00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 0.01 0.54 Final Sat.: 1641 3281 .1 0 1 1 0 3281 1468 0 1 0 0 r 2240 1 3 835 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.51 0.27 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.39 0.39 0.00 Volume/Cap: 1.33 0.71 0.00 Delay/Veh: 189.5 27.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 189.5 27.2 0.0 DesignQueue: 32 32 0 ***************************** 0.00 0.14 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 * * * * 0.22 0.36 0.36 **** 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0,27 0.00 0.55 1.33 0.0 32.0 202.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 32.0 202.4 0 19 21 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.83 1,33 1.33 0.0 0.0 0,0 39.9 196 195,7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0,0 39.9 196 195.7 0 0 0 21 0 13 *************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rtel-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:18:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex+Rtel-AM Command: Default Command m Volume: Ex+Rtel-AM Geometry: Ex-AM wm Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation WW Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths m Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration wm m m m m m p Ml Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA m m i m Ex+Rtel-AM Ml Wed Dec 12, 2001 15:40:11 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ************************* *****************«-***«******ik**il(************ilr********** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.960 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.8 Optimal Cycle: 159 Level Of Service: C ************ik******************************************************************* Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Permitted Include Permitted Include Permitted Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 p 1 Volume Module: [ 1 •I 1 1 1 p Base Vol: 0 868 46 169 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 277 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1. 00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 0 868 46 169 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 277 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 964 51 188 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 308 wm Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 964 51 188 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 308 Ml PCE Adj: 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 964 51 188 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 308 1 Saturation Plow Module: II II 1 1 Mi Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.15 0.91 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1,00 0.83 1.00 0.74 hanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat,: 0 1727 1468 288 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 1 1 J Capacity Analysis Module: • II • ] I |M Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.56 0.03 0.65 0.66 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.14 0,00 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** IM Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.23 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.81 0.05 0.94 0.96 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0,00 0,59 0.00 0,96 Delay/Veh; 0.0 16.3 5.5 62.9 33.1 0.0 0.0 0 1.0 0,0 41.2 0.0 82.1 1^-User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 16.3 5.5 62,9 33.1 0.0 0.0 0 1.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 82.1 MM DesignQueue: 0 21 1 4 26 0 0 0 0 11 0 15 ********************************************************************lfc*********** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rtel-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:18:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************^***^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/Melrose Drive ************************************************************** ********^.^^^^^j^^^^ Cycle (sec): 131 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.946 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.8 Optimal Cycle: 157 Level Of Service: D *************«********************************************************^^jj,^^^^^^^ Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Ovl I I Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 10 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 • 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 mm Volume Module: Base Vol: 264 890 0 0 1051 185 319 0 504 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Initial Bse: 264 890 0 0 1051 185 319 0 504 0 0 0 Mi User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 MH PHF Volume: 293 989 0 0 1168 206 354 0 560 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 293 989 0 0 1168 206 354 0 560 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 293 989 0 0 1168 206 354 0 560 0 0 0 Mi Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 HI Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.77 0.95 1.00 0.85 1,00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 wm Final Sat.: 1641 3281 0 0 3281 1468 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 Mi Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0,30 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.14 0.20 0.00 0.35 0.00 0,00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** m Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.56 0,00 0.00 0.38 0.74 0.37 0.00 0.37 0,00 0.00 0.00 p Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.53 0,00 0.00 0.95 0.19 0.54 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.00 0,00 Delay/Veh: 89.5 18.1 0.0 0.0 54.2 5.1 33.6 0.0 64.6 0.0 0,0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p AdjDel/Veh: 89.5 18.1 0.0 0.0 54.2 5.1 33.6 0.0 64.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 i DesignQueue: 18 34 0 0 58 4 17 0 28 0 0 0 • ***-**********************************************,*************************^^^^^ i it Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Pi i p Ex+Rtel-AM m m m m P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:18:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Marcos Blvd/P.A.R. ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 121 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.135 Loss Time (sec): 12 [Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 68.4 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R south Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Ovl 11 I I Protected Include Protected Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ^m Volume Module: Base Vol: 120 554 714 118 791 571 198 523 40 428 942 53 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 p Initial Bse: 120 554 714 118 791 571 198 523 40 428 942 53 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 133 616 793 131 879 634 220 581 44 476 1047 59 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 616 793 131 879 634 220 581 44 476 1047 59 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 133 616 793 131 879 634 220 581 44 476 1047 59 II 11 11 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.81 0.84 0.75 0.84 0.84 0,75 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3088 3183 1424 1592 3183 1424 1900 1900 1900 0,89 0,92 0.82 2,00 2.00 1.00 3397 3502 1567 1900 1900 1900 0.89 0.91 0.91 2.00 1.89 0,11 3397 3288 185 I-II Capacity Analysis Module: II I I Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.19 0.56 0,08 0.28 0.45 0.06 0.17 0,03 0.14 0.32 0.32 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** tlHH Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.51 0.56 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.28 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.39 1.13 1.13 0.55 0.79 1.13 0.91 0.15 0.91 1.13 1.13 Delay/Veh: 72.7 19.6 108.5 180.7 20.8 26.2 162.7 65.0 41,8 69.6 117 117.1 User DelAdj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 AdjDel/Veh: 69.0 18.6 103.0 171.7 19,8 24.9 154.5 61.8 39.7 66.2 111 111.2 IMI DesignQueue: 9 22 31 8 31 20 14 33 2 28 55 3 *********!»********************************************************************** P Mi Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex+Rtel-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:18:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *****************************************************^***********^^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #4 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR-78 EB Ramps *************************************************************^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 98 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.287 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 137.6 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 D 0 0 0 wm Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 588 460 137 1473 0 393 0 748 0 0 0 mm Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 588 460 137 1473 0 393 0 748 0 0 0 wm User Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 mm PHF Volume: 0 653 511 152 1637 0 437 0 831 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm Reduced Vol: 0 653 511 152 1637 0 437 0 831 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 653 511 152 1637 0 437 0 831 0 0 0 Ml Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 mm Adjustment: 1.00 0.86 0.77 0.86 0,86 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2,00 1,00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1,00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 wm Final Sat.: 0 3281 1468 1641 3281 0 1644 0 2584 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0,20 0.35 0.09 0.50 0,00 0.27 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** IP Green/Cycle: 0.00 0,27 0.27 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0,00 P Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.74 1.29 0.24 1.29 0.00 1.06 0.00 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 35.8 182.6 20.4 165 0.0 98.9 0.0 177.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 35.8 182.6 20.4 165 0.0 98.9 0.0 177.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 27 22 5 62 0 19 0 36 0 0 0 • *************************************************************** ***************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P PI p p p p p p Ex+Rtel-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:18:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps *******ilr************************************************************************ Cycle (sec): 97 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.055 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 59.3 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bo\md L-T-R West Bound L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include II Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes; 10 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 1! 0 0 1 Volume Module: II Base Vol: 318 663 0 0 464 263 0 0 0 1146 3 214 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 318 663 0 0 464 263 0 0 0 1146 3 214 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0,90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 353 737 0 0 516 292 0 0 0 1273 3 238 m Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 353 737 0 0 516 292 0 0 0 1273 3 238 p PCE Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 »Mi Final Vol.: 353 737 0 0 1 , - .. . 516 292 ...... t 0 1 . 0 0 ...11 1273 3 238 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 i 1 II IM Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 0,86 0.77 1.00 1.00 1 .00 0.87 0.87 0.87 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 1.72 0.01 0.27 km Final Sat.: 1641 3281 0 0 3281 1468 0 0 0 2839 6 446 t — - , Capacity Analysis Module: t 1 " " i 1 Vol/Sat: 0.22 0,22 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.20 0,00 0.00 0 .00 0.45 0.53 0.53 Crit Moves: **** **** **** mm Green/Cycle: 0.21 0,21 0.00 0.00 0.19 0,19 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.51 0.51 0.51 Volume/Cap: 1.01 1,05 0.00 0.00 0.83 1,05 0,00 0.00 0 .00 0.89 1.05 1.05 Delay/Veh: 89.0 87.6 0,0 0.0 47.4 108,6 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.5 63.6 63.6 fmm User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 89.0 87.6 0.0 0.0 47.4 108.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.5 63.6 63.6 P DesignQueue: 16 33 0 0 23 13 0 0 0 38 0 7 *******************************************************ik*ik********************** Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P EX+Rtel-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:19:24 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: EX+Rtel-PM Command: Default Command mm Volume: Ex+Rtel-PM Geometry: Ex-AM MM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration mm p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA EX+Rtel-PM Wed Dec 12, 2001 15:42:54 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 3-1 P Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) A**-***************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/Saxi Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (x): 1.665 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 62.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Permitted Include 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 I I East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Permitted Include 0 0 0 10 10 0 11 I- Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHP Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol,: I Permitted Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 11 11 0 1200 122 259 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 149 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1. 00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 0 1200 122 259 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 149 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0 1333 136 288 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1333 136 288 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 166 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1 ,00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1 ,00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 0 1333 136 288 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 166 II 11 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.11 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 204 1727 0 0 0 0 II II 1900 1900 1900 0.83 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.00 1.00 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.77 0.09 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.85 0.85 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.91 0.11 Delay/Veh: 0.0 14.2 1.4 3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 0.0 14.2 1.4 3 DesignQueue: 0 15 1 ******ik********** ************* 11 1.41 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,05 0.00 0.12 **** **** 0.07 1.68 0.85 0.85 1.66 0.74 31.4 5.5 1.00 1.00 31.4 5.5 3 12 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.0 68.6 0.0 397.1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 68.6 0.0 397.1 0 5 0 10 ************************************************** P P P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA EX+Rtel-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:19:24 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************************* ****^^j^^^^^^^^jj^.^j^.^ Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/Melrose Drive ******************************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 131 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.738 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 30,3 Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C ********************************************************************** ^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: I I Protected Include I I Protected Ovl Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 D 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 •Mi Volume Module: Base Vol: 266 1210 0 0 844 211 359 0 312 0 0 0 MM Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 266 1210 0 0 844 211 359 0 312 0 0 0 p User Adj: 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 ,90 m PHF Volume: 296 1344 0 0 938 234 399 0 347 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 296 1344 0 0 938 234 399 0 347 0 0 0 pp PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 p MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 ,00 Final Vol.: 29 6 1344 0 0 938 234 399 0 347 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustiment: 0.86 0.86 1.00 LcUies: 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1641 3281 0 I I I I I I 1 Capacity Analysis Modul Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.41 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.24 0.63 Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.65 Delay/Veh: 52.7 15.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh: 52.7 15.8 DesignQueue: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.86 0.77 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3281 1468 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 I I e: 0.00 0.00 0.29 ** * * 0.16 0.22 0.00 * * * * 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 17 40 *********************** 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.69 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.23 0.0 0.0 36.7 7.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 36.7 7.8 0 0 45 6 *******! 0.74 0.00 46.6 0.0 1,00 1.00 46.6 0.0 22 0 0.72 46.1 1.00 46.1 19 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0,0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 p r************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P EX+Rtel-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:19:24 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 5-1 pm P p P P Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Marcos Blvd/P.A.R. **-*«*****-***iif************ ******************** *********************************** Cycle (sec): 121 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.726 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 206.6 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Ovl I I Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 c 1 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 1 Volume Module: 1 1 i 1 . Base Vol: 212 1318 916 147 649 179 644 1641 44 663 592 76 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 212 1318 916 147 649 179 644 1641 44 663 592 76 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 236 1464 1018 163 721 199 716 1823 49 737 658 84 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 236 1464 1018 163 721 199 716 1823 49 737 658 84 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 236 1464 1018 163 721 199 716 1823 49 737 658 84 I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.81 0.84 2.00 2.00 3088 3183 II1 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.75 0.84 0.84 0.75 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1424 1592 3183 1424 1 I 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.89 0.92 0.82 0,89 0.91 0.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 2,00 1,77 0.23 3397 3502 1567 3397 3052 390 I-II-! Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.08 0.46 0.71 0.10 0.23 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.35 0.57 Volume/Cap: 0.64 1.11 1.73 1.73 0.64 0.25 Delay/Veh: 54.5 96.4 369,3 424.0 33.9 13.5 User DelAdj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 AdjDel/Veh: 51.8 91.5 350.8 402.8 32.2 12.8 DesignQueue: 14 64 47 11 33 6 **************************** II 0.21 0.52 **** 0.03 0.22 0.22 **** 0,22 0.21 0.30 0.30 0.13 0.22 0.22 1.00 1.73 0.10 1.73 1.00 1.00 80.7 373 30.6 389.4 79.8 79.8 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 76.7 354 29.0 369.9 75.8 75.8 40 98 2 46 37 5 **************************************************** Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P EX+Rtel-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:19:24 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) **************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #4 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR-78 EB Ramps **********************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 98 Critical Vol./Cap. (x): 1,293 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 118.2 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F *************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green; Lanes: I Volume Module: Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 II I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 10 0 2 Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 1160 790 169 791 0 406 2 630 0 0 0 Ml Growth Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1.00 1, .00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 Initial Bse: 0 1160 790 169 791 0 406 2 630 0 0 0 •Mt User Adj: 1, .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1.00 1, .00 1.00 1. .00 1, .00 1, .00 PHF Adj: 0, .90 0.90 0 .90 0 ,90 0 .90 0. .90 0,90 0. .90 0.90 0, .90 0. .90 0, .90 Hum PHF Volume: 0 1289 878 188 879 0 451 2 700 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mm Reduced Vol: 0 1289 878 188 879 0 451 2 700 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1. ,00 1.00 1. ,00 1.00 1, .00 1. .00 1, .00 MLF Adj: 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1 ,00 1 .00 1. ,00 1,00 1. ,00 1.00 1. ,00 1. ,00 1. .00 Final Vol.: 0 1289 878 188 879 0 451 2 700 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.86 0.77 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3281 1468 I I I I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0,39 0.60 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.46 0.46 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.85 1.29 Delay/Veh: 0.0 28.1 169.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 28.1 169.1 DesignQueue: 0 41 29 ***************************** I I 1900 1900 1900 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1641 3281 0 1900 1900 1900 0.77 0.77 0.68 0.99 0.01 2.00 1462 6 2584 I-I 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.11 0.27 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.27 **** **** 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.55 1.29 0.00 1.29 1.29 1.14 36,8 182 0.0 189.0 189 117.0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 36.8 182 0.0 189,0 189 117.0 8 40 0 20 0 31 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0,0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 ************************************************^^^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P EX+Rtel-PM IP P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:19:24 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #1 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *******************************************************************************T Intersection #5 Rancho Sante Fe Road/SR 78 WB Ramps ****** ***ik****** ********************************************************* ******T Cycle (sec): 97 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.364 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 114.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F *******************************************************************************! Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include II Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: .. 1 1 0 ' 2 0 0 II 0 0 1 2 0 1 ..... 1 0 0 0 0 0 ...II 1 0 1! 0 0 p 1 Volume Module 1 1 1 1 II p Base Vol: 757 809 0 0 411 448 0 0 0 549 1 267 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 III Initial Bse: 757 809 0 0 411 448 0 0 0 549 1 267 p User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 p PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0 ,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0,90 PHF Volume: 841 899 0 0 457 498 0 0 0 610 1 297 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 841 899 0 0 457 498 0 0 0 610 1 297 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 Final Vol.: 841 899 0 0 457 498 0 0 0 610 1 297 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 0.86 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1641 3281 0 II I I I I 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.86 0.77 0.00 2.00 1.00 0 3281 1468 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.01 0.49 0 0 0 2352 3 769 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.51 0.27 0 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.38 0.38 0 Volume/Cap: 1.36 0.73 0 Delay/Veh: 204.6 28.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 204.6 28.3 DesignQueue: 32 32 II ,00 0.00 0,14 I I II 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 **************************** 0.34 **** 0.00 0,25 0,25 0.00 0,56 1,36 0,0 32.7 217.2 1,00 1,00 1.00 0.0 32.7 217.2 0 19 22 ***************** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0,39 0.39 * * ** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.28 0,28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 1.36 1.36 0,0 0.0 0.0 46.6 208 208.3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 208 208.3 0 0 0 25 0 13 *********************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA il P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:41 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-AM Command: Default Command mm Volume: Ex-AM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation M Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Mi Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration •M p m Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:08:20 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- . Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *******-*************************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol,/Cap. (X): 0.874 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.3 Optimal Cycle: 95 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase p Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •I Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 p Volume Module: ' Base Vol: 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 p Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse; 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 M User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ^m PHF Adj: 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 m Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 P PCE Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 «M Final Vol.: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 IM Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.86 0,91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1,00 0.74 MM Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 MM Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0,56 0.03 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,14 0.00 0.14 Crit Moves: **** * * * * **** mm Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.06 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.80 0.05 0.80 0.87 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,85 0.00 0.87 Delay/Veh: 0.0 15.2 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 ipi AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 15.2 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75.1 DesignQueue: 0 21 1 5 20 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *-*************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^_^,^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue **************************************************^^^^j^^^^^^^^^^^^^_^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.757 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28,0 Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: c *****************************************************^^.^^^^^^^_^^^^^^_^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I I East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Volume Modult Base Vol: Growth Adj : Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Voltune: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: I I Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 11 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 mam 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 mm 140 633 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm 140 633 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 MM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 140 633 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 Saturation Flow Module: I i I I Sat/Leme: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.96 1718 3352 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.56 0,56 Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.34 0,34 Delay/Veh: 59.7 12.3 12.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 59.7 12,3 12.3 DesignQueue: 7 16 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.04 1,00 1.73 0.27 74 1718 2905 459 II ! 1900 1900 1900 0.86 0.91 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1641 1727 1468 II 1900 1900 1900 0.86 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.25 0.75 1641 1939 1159 0.01 0.36 0.36 **** 0.03 0.48 0.48 0.34 0.76 0,76 50.9 23.3 23.3 1.00 1.00 1,00 50.9 23,3 23.3 1 33 5 0.18 0.02 **** 0.23 0.28 0.76 0.06 44.2 26.1 1.00 1.00 44.2 26.1 13 1 0.16 0.28 0.58 32.7 1.00 32,7 10 ***********************************************^^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 0.00 0.04 0.04 **** 0.01 0.06 0.06 0,58 0.76 0.76 97.6 62.8 62,8 1.00 1.00 1.00 97,6 62.8 62.8 0 5 3 ***************** P P P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P p p p p Hi p p p Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********ik************************************************************ *********** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ************!******************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.875 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.4 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service: D ********ik*********************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Boxmd L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Ovl Protected Include I I Protected Include II Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 ' 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 Volume Module: •1 1 Base vol: 67 480 522 111 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 121 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 67 480 522 111 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 121 User Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0. 90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 ---- I ---- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.83 Lanes: 2.00 3,00 Final Sat,: 3183 4715 I I 1900 0,77 1,00 1468 1900 1900 0.84 0.80 2.00 3.08 3183 4678 III Capacity Analysis Module: II 1900 1900 1900 0.80 0,84 0,83 0.92 2,00 3,00 1395 3183 4715 II I I 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.77 0.84 0.81 0.81 1.00 2.00 2.62 0.38 1468 3183 4047 579 II-I Vol/Sat: 0, 02 0. 11 0. 40 0. 04 0. 36 0. 36 0. 07 0. 12 0. 09 0. 30 0. 23 0. 23 Crit Moves: ** * * ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 03 0. 32 0. 66 0. 11 0. 41 0, 41 0. 11 0. 14 0. 14 0. 34 0. 37 0. 37 Volume/Cap: 0, 87 0. 35 0. 60 0. 35 0. 87 0. 87 0. 63 0. 87 0. 67 0. 87 0. 63 0. 63 Delay/Veh: 123 .9 35 .1 13 .8 56 .2 40 .7 40 .7 61 .1 69 .5 63 .2 50 .1 35 .7 35 .7 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 123 .9 35 .1 13 .8 56 .2 40 .7 40 .7 61 .1 69 .5 63 .2 50 .1 35 .7 35 .7 DesignQueue: 5 28 16 8 80 24 15 38 9 50 47 7 ******************************************************************************** p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P k Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) *************************************************************^*^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa *****************************************************************^^^^^^^^j,^^.^.^^^ Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.596 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.2 Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: c *********************************************************^^^j^^^^j,^^^^^^^^^^^^^.^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include 1 I Protected Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 mm Volume Module: Base Vol: 203 619 27 136 763 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 mat Growth Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Initial Bse: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 m» User Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ml Reduced Vol: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MM MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 MB Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.88 0,12 2.00 2.29 0.71 2.00 2.00 1.00 1,00 1.31 0.69 wm Final Sat.: 3334 4706 203 3334 3634 1127 3432 3538 1583 1769 2189 1165 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.19 0.19 0,13 0.08 0.13 0.03 0.17 0.17 Hi Crit Moves: **** ** * * **** **** P Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.23 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.29 0.29 P Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.38 0,38 0.38 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.20 0.33 0,33 0.60 0,60 P Delay/Veh; 68.6 40.3 40.3 64.3 43.8 43.8 53.3 28.6 30.5 63,7 47.2 47.2 User DelAdj: 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 P AdjDel/Veh: 41.1 24.2 24.2 38.6 26.3 26.3 32.0 17.1 18.3 38.2 28.3 28.3 DesignQueue: 14 33 1 9 41 13 31 15 11 4 23 12 ***************************************************************^^^^^^^^.^j^^^^^^^^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p p p p p Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 E.C.R./P.A.R, ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 160 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.122 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 68,6 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Boxind West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I I Control: Protected Protected Protected II Protected p Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mi Lcuies: 2 C 1 3 0 1 2 C 1 3 0 1 2 C 1 2 1 0 2 ( ) 3 0 1 Voliune Module: Base Vol: 50 570 300 366 483 271 142 676 77 487 1309 1057 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 pi Initial Bse: 50 570 300 366 483 271 142 676 77 487 1309 1057 p User Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 p PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 56 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 MM Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 p PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m Final Vol.: 56 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 Saturation Flow Module: Ml Sat/Lame: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.89 0.83 Ml Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.69 0.31 2.00 3.00 1.00 p Final Sat.: 3334 4938 1537 3334 4938 1537 3432 4493 514 3432 5083 1583 MM Capacity Analysis Module: P Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.13 0.22 0.12 0.11 0.20 0.05 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.29 0.74 P Crit Moves: **** * ** * **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.11 0.45 0,11 0.20 0.24 0.04 0.36 0.36 0.34 0.66 0,66 Volume/Cap: 0.75 1.12 0,48 1,12 0.54 0.81 1.12 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.43 1,12 Delay/Veh: 110.9 147 30.9 155,9 58.0 69.8 189.2 39.4 39.4 41.6 13.0 95.0 P User DelAdj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m AdjDel/Veh: 110.9 147 30.9 155.9 58.0 69.8 189.2 39.4 39.4 41.6 13.0 95.0 • DesignQueue: 5 51 17 33 39 21 14 44 5 33 47 42 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P MM IM Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:40:17 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxjme Alternative) •******************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^j^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #6 E.C.R./College ********************************************************^^^.^^^^^^.^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.582 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 10,3 Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B *******************************************************^^^,^^^^^^^^^^^^.^j^j^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 127 384 0 0 1202 624 44 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1 .00 1, .00 1. .00 Initial Bse: 127 384 0 0 1202 624 44 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1 .00 1, .00 1. .00 PHF Adj: 0 .90 0.90 0, .90 0. .90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0, .90 0 .90 0, .90 0, .90 PHF volume: 141 427 0 0 1336 693 49 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 141 427 0 0 1336 693 49 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1, .00 1 .00 1. ,00 1 ,00 1. .00 1, .00 MLF Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1, .00 1 .00 1. ,00 1 ,00 1. ,00 1. .00 Final Vol.: 141 427 0 0 1336 693 49 0 0 0 0 0 I II - --II---- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0,90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.81 0.90 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2,00 0.00 0,00 2.00 1.00 2,00 0.00 Final Sat,: 1718 3437 0 0 3437 1537 3432 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1900 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.12 0.00 Crit Moves; **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.92 Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.14 63.9 0.6 I I Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh: 63.9 0.6 DesignQueue: 10 3 ***************************** 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.77 0,00 0.50 0.0 6,4 1.00 1.00 0.0 6.4 0 28 0.45 **** 0.77 0.58 7.7 1,00 7,7 14 0.01 0.00 **** 0.02 0.00 0.58 0.00 82.3 0.0 1.00 1.00 II- 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 82.3 4 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 ***********************************************^^^^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA PM MM MM p p Ex-AM Fri Dec 7, 2001 09:17:11 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative **************************************************************** Intersection #7 E.C.R./SR 78 EB Ramps **************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: **************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R ) *******-********* **************** 0.677 17.9 B **************** West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Ovl I I I I Protected Include Permitted Include I I Permitted Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module t 1 1 1 Base Vol: 0 508 554 305 1758 0 200 0 88 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 0 508 554 305 1758 0 200 0 88 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 ,00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 0 564 616 339 1953 0 222 0 98 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 564 616 339 1953 0 222 0 98 0 0 0 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 ,00 Final Vol.: 0 564 616 339 1953 0 222 0 98 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.93 1.00 0.69 1 .00 0.81 1.00 1 .00 1 ,00 Lanes: 0.00 2,00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0 .00 1.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 Final Sat.: 0 3538 1583 3432 3538 0 2637 0 1537 0 0 0 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 • 1 1 Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.16 0.39 0.10 0.55 0.00 0,08 0 .00 0.06 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.17 0.82 0.00 0.12 0 .00 0.12 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.25 0.60 0.60 0.68 0.00 0.68 0 .00 0.51 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 11.0 16.0 59.8 6.3 0,0 68,4 0.0 63.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0 .97 0.97 0.97 0 .97 0 .97 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 10.6 15.5 58.0 6.2 0.0 66.3 0.0 61.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 17 20 24 35 0 16 0 7 0 0 0 ****************************************************************** MM Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************* ********^.^.^^^^^^^^^^^._^.^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #8 E.C.R./SR 78 WB Ramps ********** ***********************************^^^^^^^^^^^j^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^_^^ Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.920 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.4 Optimal Cycle: 138 Level Of Service: D *************************************** *********^^^.^^.^^j^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 II Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Permitted Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Permitted Include 0 0 0 110 0 1 1 I I I Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: ---I 116 684 0 0 1342 342 0 0 0 995 0 402 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 116 684 0 0 1342 342 0 0 0 995 0 402 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0,90 0.90 0 .90 0. 90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 129 760 0 0 1491 380 0 0 0 1106 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 760 0 0 1491 380 0 0 0 1106 0 447 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 129 760 0 0 1491 380 0 0 0 1106 0 447 11 11 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.90 0.93 2.00 2.00 3432 3538 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1,00 1.00 0.93 0,83 1,00 1,00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 2,00 1,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0 0 3538 1583 0 0 0 2725 0 1615 II---II 0,24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.21 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.50 0.00 Vol\ime/Cap: 0.92 0.43 0.00 Delay/Veh: 124.2 24.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 124.2 24.2 0.0 DesignQueue: 10 34 0 ***************************** 0.00 0.42 **** 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.92 0.0 47.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 47.0 0 75 0.46 0.52 29.7 1.00 29.7 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0 0.0 1.00 1,00 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0.41 0.00 **** 0.44 0.00 0.92 0.00 50.9 0.0 1.00 1,00 50.9 0.0 56 0 0.28 0.44 0.63 34.2 1.00 34.2 22 ************************************^*^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA ^M p p m p k p Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-PM Command: Default Command Volume: Ex-PM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration p ll Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ****************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ***************************************,^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.010 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34 2 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: c ****************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: 1 Initial Bse: User Adj: 1 PHF Adj: 0 PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: 1 MLF Adj: 1 Final Vol.: II Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 0 I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 11 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 mm 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 Saturation Flow Module: II Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 1.00 0.91 0.00 1.00 0 1727 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,83 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 00 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0,00 0.77 0.09 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.76 Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.01 0.0 40,4 I I I I Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0,0 40.4 DesignQueue: 0 24 0.76 0.12 3,5 1.00 3.5 2 0.11 0.63 **** 0.11 0.87 1.01 0.72 120.6 4.3 1.00 1.00 120.6 4.3 10 10 *************************************^^^ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.05 0.00 **** 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.05 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 159.1 0.0 1.00 1-00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0,0 159.1 0.0 0 0 0 5 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 ****** 0.04 0.05 0.79 97.9 1.00 97.9 3 P P P P ********************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA k MB Ex-PM P k m p p Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 R2Uicho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue **************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol,/Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 73 Level Of Service: **************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R **************** 0.782 29 .4 C -**************** West Bound L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lcuies: 10 1 1 0 1 c 1 1 1 0 10 1 0 1 10 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 User Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 PHF Volume: 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Final vol.: 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0,88 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.86 0,82 0. 82 Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,31 0. 69 Final Sat.: 1718 3398 35 1718 2671 663 1641 1727 1468 1641 2032 1079 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0,34 0.34 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.19 0.07 0.12 0.01 0.03 0. 03 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0,55 0.55 0,06 0.42 0.42 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.04 0. 04 Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.26 0.47 0.47 0.78 0. 78 Delay/Veh: 51,7 16.4 16.4 59.1 27.7 27.7 45.4 29.4 31.8 63.0 74.1 74 .1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.7 16.4 16.4 59.1 27.7 27.7 45.4 29.4 31.8 63.0 74.1 74 .1 DesignQueue: 11 32 0 3 31 8 14 5 8 1 3 2 ******************************************************************************** HI p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********** ********^*j,^^^^^^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ***********************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.061 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 60.7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ***********************************************^^^^^^j,^^^^^^^^^^^^_^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: I I I I 198 1151 956 155 1024 326 451 726 250 613 602 114 MM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 198 1151 956 155 1024 326 451 726 250 613 602 114 wm 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 807 278 681 669 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MM 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 807 278 681 669 127 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mw 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 807 278 681 669 127 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.84 0,83 2.00 3.00 3183 4715 1900 0.77 1.00 1468 I-IIII 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.81 0,81 2.00 3.03 0.97 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.52 0.48 3183 4598 1463 3183 4715 1468 3183 3868 734 Capacity Analysis Module: II Vol/Sat: 0. 07 0. 27 0. 72 0. 05 0. 25 0, 25 0. 16 0. 17 0, 19 0. 21 0. 17 0. 17 Crit Moves: ** * * ** ** ** ** * * ** 17 17 Green/Cycle: 0. 12 0. 48 0. 68 0. 05 0. 42 0. 42 0, 18 0. 18 0. 18 0. 20 0. 20 0. 20 Volume/Cap: 0. 60 0. 56 1. 06 1. 06 0, 60 0, 60 0. 87 0. 96 1. 06 1. 06 0. 87 0. 87 Delay/Veh: 59 .3 25 .4 67 .6 151 .9 31 .1 31 .1 67 .1 76 .5 128 .1 106 .7 61 .3 61 ,3 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 59 .3 25 .4 67 .6 151 .9 31 ,1 31 .1 67 .1 76 .5 128 .1 106 .7 61 .3 61 .3 DesignQueue: 15 53 30 12 53 17 32 52 18 43 61 42 61 8 ************ *** * ** * * **-. k ** * ****** * * *** *** *** ****** ***** ****** ****** *** ** *** *** **: p m Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P 1^ Ex-PM P P P P P P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 E.C.R-/La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.911 Loss Time (sec): 12 {Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.0 Optimal Cycle: 141 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: I I 11 I I Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 10 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 316 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 192 68 183 92 Growth Adj: 0 ,96 0 ,96 0, .96 0.96 0.96 0 .96 0.96 0 .96 0 .96 0 .96 0.96 0 .96 Initial Bse: 303 875 78 268 872 599 537 548 184 65 176 88 User Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0 .90 0 .90 0, .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0. .90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0,86 0.86 0.88 0.87 Lanes: 2.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 3334 4482 397 3334 3292 I Capacity Analysis Module: I I II 1900 1900 1900 0.74 0.90 0.93 1.00 2.00 2.00 1399 3432 3538 II II 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.83 0.93 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.33 0.67 1583 1769 2237 1124 IIi Vol/Sat: 0. 10 0. 22 0. 22 0. 09 0. 29 0. 48 0, 17 0. 17 0. 13 0. 04 0. 09 0. 09 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** * * ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 11 0. 45 0. 45 0. 18 0, 52 0. 52 0, 19 0. 23 0. 23 0. 06 0. 10 0. 10 Volume/Cap: 0. 91 0. 48 0. 48 0. 48 0, 56 0. 91 0. 91 0. 75 0. 56 0. 75 0. 91 0. 91 Delay/Veh: 91 .8 29 .3 29 .3 55 .3 24 .5 40 .0 76 .4 57 .3 52 .9 96 .2 95 .8 95 .8 User DelAdj: 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 AdjDel/Veh: 55 .1 17 .6 17 .6 33 .2 14 ,7 24 .0 45 .8 34 .4 31 .8 57 .7 57 .5 57 .5 DesignQueue: 26 47 4 21 41 29 42 41 14 6 15 8 *************************lt****************************************************** p k Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ************************************ ********^^.^^^^^j,^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #5 E.C.R./P.A.R. *******************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 160 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.978 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 62.3 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service; E *******************************************^^^,^^^^^^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 II Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol; Growth Adj: 1 Initial Bse: User Adj: 1 PHF Adj: 0 PHF voltime: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: 1 MLF Adj: 1 Final Vol.: -------I- II I I 63 551 382 879 791 173 232 1151 131 412 875 562 MM 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 63 551 382 879 791 173 232 1151 131 412 875 562 Ml 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 MM 70 612 424 977 879 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •1 70 612 424 977 879 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 70 612 424 977 879 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 Saturation Flow Module: II-II-II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0,81 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.89 0.83 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.69 0.31 2.00 3.00 1.00 1537 3334 4938 1537 3432 4494 513 3432 5083 1583 Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.88 0.87 2.00 3.00 3334 4938 Capacity Analysis Module: II I I Vol/Sat: 0. 02 0. 12 0. 28 0. 29 0. 18 0. 12 0. 08 0. 28 0. 28 0, 13 0. 19 0. 39 Crit Moves: ** ** * * ** ** ** 19 ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 05 0. 15 0. 30 0. 30 0. 40 0. 47 0. 08 0. 33 0. 33 0. 15 0, 40 0. 40 Volume/Cap: 0. 45 0. 85 0, 92 0. 98 0. 45 0. 26 0. 98 0. 87 0, 87 0, 87 0. 47 0. 98 Delay/Veh: 76 .2 76 .3 78 .6 78 .7 35 .4 25 .4 122 .9 56 .1 56 .1 80 .9 35 .4 77 .1 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 76 .2 76 .3 78 .6 78 .7 35 .4 25 .4 122 .9 56 .1 56 .1 80 .9 35 .4 77 .1 DesignQueue: 6 48 28 65 49 9 22 82 9 36 54 77 36 ************ *** ***** *** *** ****** *** * * *** *** ****** * ** * * ****** * * * *** ***** ****** *** ^M ^M p IM Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ml P P m m P P p P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:36 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 E.C.R./College ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.804 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.8 Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights; Protected Include II Protected Include I I 1 I Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: Lanes: 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol; 24 1557 0 0 481 117 547 0 34 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1. ,00 1.00 1. ,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1, .00 1. 00 1 .00 1. ,00 Initial Bse: 24 1557 0 0 481 117 547 0 34 0 0 0 User Adj: 1. .00 1.00 1. ,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1, .00 1. 00 1 .00 1. ,00 PHF Adj; 0. ,90 0.90 0. ,90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0. .90 0, .90 0. 90 0 .90 0. ,90 PHF Volume; 27 1730 0 0 534 130 608 0 38 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 27 1730 0 0 534 130 608 0 38 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1, .00 1.00 1. .00 1 ,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1, .00 MLF Adj: 1, .00 1.00 1, .00 1 ,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1, .00 Final Vol.: 27 1730 0 0 534 130 608 0 38 0 0 0 I II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.81 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.; 1547 3093 0 0 3093 I I Capacity Analysis Module: I I 1900 1900 1900 0.73 0.81 0.90 1.00 2.00 0.00 1384 3088 0 II 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.75 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 1424 0 0 0 II Vol/Sat: 0. 02 0. 56 0.00 0. 00 0. 17 0, 09 0. 20 0 .00 0. 03 0 .00 0, .00 0.00 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** * * * * Green/Cycle: 0. 06 0. 70 0,00 0. 00 0. 63 0. 63 0. 24 0 .00 0. 24 0 .00 0, .00 0.00 Volume/Cap; 0. 27 0. 80 0.00 0. 00 0. 27 0. 15 0. 80 0 .00 0. 11 0 .00 0. .00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 68 .4 18 .1 0,0 0 .0 12 .4 11 .3 59 ,6 0.0 44 .1 0.0 ( 3.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1, 00 1 .00 1, .00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68 .4 18 .1 0.0 0 .0 12 .4 11 .3 59 .6 0.0 44 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 2 50 0 0 17 4 40 0 2 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:36 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) *************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #7 E.C.R./SR 78 EB Ramps ******.*******************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec); 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.014 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 42 3 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D ******************** ******************.^.^^^^^^^^.^^^^^^^^_^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 Permitted Include 0 0 0 110 0 1 Permitted Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol; Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj; Final Vol.: I I I 0 1217 926 344 1451 0 521 9 223 0 0 0 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1217 926 344 1451 0 521 9 223 0 0 0 mwi 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 •HB 0 1352 1029 382 1612 0 579 10 248 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 1352 1029 382 1612 0 579 10 248 0 0 0 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IM 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1352 1029 382 1612 0 579 10 248 0 0 0 II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.93 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 3538 1583 3432 3538 III II-- 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.81 0.81 0,00 1.97 0.03 0 3023 52 II 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 1537 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.65 0.11 0.46 Crit Moves: **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.11 0.75 Volume/Cap; 0.00 0,60 1.01 1.01 0.61 Delay/Veh: 0.0 16.1 58.6 116.7 8.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 16,1 58.6 116.7 8.9 DesignQueue: 0 45 36 29 38 0.00 0.19 0.19 **** 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 1.01 1.01 ***************************** 0.00 0.00 0.0 101.7 102 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 101.7 102 0 41 1 0.19 0.85 79.8 1.00 79.8 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 ***********************************^^^^^^^^J^^^^^^^^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P m m p p p p MM p k p pi Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:36 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *******************************************************************************' Intersection #8 E.C.R./SR 78 WB Ramps *******************************************************************************i Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.901 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 39.7 Optimal Cycle; 121 Level Of Service: D *******************************************************************************! Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R I I Control: Rights; Protected Include Protected Ovl Permitted Include 11 Permitted Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 C 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 : 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 145 1609 0 0 1144 427 0 0 0 760 0 496 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 Initial Bse; 145 1609 0 0 1144 427 0 0 0 760 0 496 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 ,90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 PHF Volume; 161 1788 0 0 1271 474 0 0 0 844 0 551 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 161 1788 0 0 1271 474 0 0 0 844 0 551 PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 Final Vol.: 161 1788 0 0 1271 474 0 0 0 844 0 551 I II II II Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 3432 3538 0 0 3538 1583 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 0.72 1,00 0.85 2.00 0,00 1.00 2725 0 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.51 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle; 0.06 0.56 0.00 Volume/Cap; 0.72 0.90 0.00 Delay/Veh: 80.0 35.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 80.0 35.3 0.0 Des ignQueue; 13 75 0 ***************************** I I I I I I 0.00 0.36 0.30 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.31 0.00 0.34 **** **** 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.72 0.0 31.2 1.00 1.00 0.0 31.2 0.50 0.60 28.5 1.00 28.5 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0,00 0,00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0.38 0.00 0.82 0.00 47.1 0,0 1.00 1.00 47.1 0.0 0.38 0.90 60.3 1.00 60.3 0.0 0.0 0 59 21 0 0 0 46 0 31 **************************************************! P P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P k Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario; Ex+Rte2-AM Command: Default Command MM Volume: Ex+Rte2-AM Geometry; Ex-AM •MM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation; Default Trip Generation IMI Trip Distribution; Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths >W Routes; Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration MM Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte2-AM P P P ll P MM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.946 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.6 Optimal Cycle; 143 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement; North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 I Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 0 11 II I- Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: 11 Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 868 146 69 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1, 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 0 868 146 69 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 1 ,00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 ,00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 ,90 0 .90 0. 90 0 ,90 0.90 0 .90 0,90 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1. 00 1 ,00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 11 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1900 1900 1900 0.86 0.91 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1641 1727 0 Capacity Analysis Module: I I IIII 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 IIIII Vol/Sat: 0. 00 0. 56 0. 11 0. 05 0. 66 0. 00 0, 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.21 0.00 0. 14 Crit Moves: * * * * ** ** * * * * Green/Cycle: 0. 00 0. 65 0, 65 0. 05 0. 70 0, 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.22 0.00 0. 22 Volume/Cap: 0. 00 0. 86 0. 17 0. 86 0. 95 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0, 00 0.95 0.00 0. 64 Delay/Veh; 0 .0 22 ,9 7 .9 105 .6 29 ,6 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 77.8 0.0 44 .4 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 0 .0 22 .9 7 .9 105 ,6 29 ,6 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 77.8 0.0 44 .4 DesignQueue: 0 24 4 5 25 0 0 0 0 17 0 10 ************ *** ***** *** *** ****** ***** *** *** *** *** * * * ** **• **** *** *********** *** *** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P k Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************************^*^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #2 Rancho Samte Fe Road/La Costa Avenue *******************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^.^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.793 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.3 Optimal Cycle; 76 Level Of Service: c *********************** *******************************1,**^r^,1,^r^,***^,^,^,^,^,^,i,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^, Approach: North Bound South Boxind East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Protected Rights: Include Min. Green: 0 0 Lanes: 10 11 I Volume Module: 11 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 10 110 --II Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 1 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I I I I Base Vol: 126 670 13 17 1050 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Growth Adj; 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1, .00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 126 670 13 17 1050 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 User Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1.00 1 .00 1, .00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0 .90 0.90 0, .90 0, .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0, .90 0,90 0 .90 0, .90 0. .90 PHF Volxme; 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1, .00 1.00 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 MLF Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1. .00 1, .00 Final Vol.; 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 Saturation Flow Module: II-II I I Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat,; 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.96 1718 3363 Capacity Analysis Module; 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.04 1,00 1.75 0.25 63 1718 2949 422 II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.82 0.82 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 0.75 1641 1727 1468 1641 1939 1159 I I Vol/Sat; 0. 08 0. 22 0, 22 0. 01 0. 40 0. 40 0. 18 0. 02 0, 16 0. 00 0. 04 0, 04 Crit Moves; ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 10 0. 57 0. 57 0. 03 0. 50 0. 50 0. 22 0, 27 0. 27 0. 01 0. 06 0. 06 Volume/Cap: 0. 79 0. 39 0. 39 0. 39 0. 79 0. 79 0. 79 0, 06 0. 60 0. 60 0. 79 0. 79 Delay/Veh: 65 .2 11 .8 11 .8 52 .7 23 .5 23 .5 48 .1 27 .1 34 .4 109 .5 68 .1 68 .1 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh; 65 .2 11 .8 11 .8 52 .7 23 .5 23 .5 48 ,1 27 .1 34 .4 109 .5 68 .1 68 .1 DesignQueue: 7 19 0 1 36 5 13 1 10 0 5 3 ************ *** ***** *** * ** **: **** * ** * * *** * * * ******* ***** *** *** ****** ***** ****** *** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P P Ex+Rte2-AM P m m P P P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real *******************-************************************************************* Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.875 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 44.5 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Min. Green; Lanes: I I Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 i I I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 I- Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume; Reduct Vol; Reduced Vol; PCE Adj; MLF Adj: Final Vol.: I I I I I I 67 480 522 211 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 221 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 67 480 522 211 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 221 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 246 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 246 I II II--- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0,83 0,77 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1,00 2.00 3.08 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3183 4715 1468 3183 4678 1395 3183 4715 1468 II 1900 1900 1900 0.84 0.80 0.80 2.00 2.38 0.62 3183 3619 950 Capacity Analysis Module: I I II Vol/Sat: 0. 02 0. 11 0. 40 0. 07 0. 36 0. 36 0. 07 0. 12 0. 09 0. 30 0. 26 0, 26 Crit Moves: ** ** * * * * ** ** * * * * Green/Cycle; 0, 03 0. 26 0. 60 0. 17 0. 41 0, 41 0. 10 0. 14 0, 14 0. 34 0. 38 0. 38 Volume/Cap: 0. 87 0. 43 0. 66 0. 43 0. 87 0. 87 0. 68 0. 87 0. 67 0. 87 0. 68 0. 68 Delay/Veh: 123 ,9 41 .7 19 .6 50 .7 40 .7 40 .7 64 ,8 69 .5 63 .2 50 •.1 36 .4 36 :.4 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 123 .9 41 ,7 19 .6 50 .7 40 .7 40 .7 64 .8 69 .5 63 ,2 50 .1 36 .4 36 .4 DesignQueue: 5 30 19 15 80 24 15 38 9 50 46 12 ************ *** ** * ** *** *** *** *** ***** *** *** *** *** * * * ** ****** *** *** ***** *** *** *** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxame Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.760 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.1 Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Boxmd East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include 11 I I Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 C 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 mm, Volume Module: Base Vol: 203 719 27 136 863 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 Initial Bse: 203 719 27 136 863 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 wm User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 wm PHF Volume: 226 799 30 151 959 263 569 357 263 72 459 244 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Reduced Vol: 226 799 30 151 959 263 569 357 263 72 459 244 m PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 m MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 Final vol.: 226 799 30 151 959 263 569 357 263 72 459 244 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.86 0,86 Lanes: 2.00 2.89 0.11 Final Sat,: 3334 4736 178 I II II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.88 0.88 2.00 2,35 0.65 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 3334 3751 1029 3432 3538 1583 1769 2190 1164 Capacity Analysis Module: tl I I Vol/Sat: 0. 07 0. 17 0. 17 0. 05 0. 26 0. 26 0. 17 0. 10 0. 17 0. 04 0. 21 0. 21 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 09 0. 34 0. 34 0, 09 0. 34 0. 34 0. 22 0. 40 0. 40 0. 10 0. 28 0. 28 Volume/Cap: 0, 76 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 76 0. 76 0. 76 0. 25 0. 42 0. 42 0. 76 0, 76 Delay/Veh: 77 .6 40 .1 40 .1 66 .4 46 .5 46 .5 59 .5 30 .4 33 .2 65 .4 53 .5 53 .5 User DelAdj; 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0, 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0, 60 AdjDel/Veh: 46 .5 24 .0 24 .0 39 .8 27 ,9 27 .9 35 .7 18 .3 19 .9 39 .2 32 .1 32 .1 DesignQueue: 17 46 2 12 56 15 39 18 14 5 29 15 ************ *** ***** *** *** *** *** ***** *** * * * **i * * * * ***** ** * *** *** *** ***** ****** *** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P i P P P P Ex+Rte2-AM P P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 E.C.R,/P.A.R. ***********-********************************************************************* Cycle (sec): 160 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.147 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 73.1 Optimal Cycle; 180 Level Of Service; E A-******************************************************************************* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Ovl I I Protected Ovl II Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PI Lanes: 2 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 1 D 3 0 1 p Volume Module; p Base Vol; 50 670 300 366 583 271 142 676 77 487 1309 1057 Growth Adj; 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 50 670 300 366 583 271 142 676 77 487 1309 1057 p User Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Voltime: 56 744 333 407 648 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 P" Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 744 333 407 648 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 p PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 w Final Vol.: 56 744 333 407 648 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 Saturation Flow Module: ^m Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.89 0.83 wm Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1,00 2.00 2.69 0.31 2.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.; 3334 4938 1537 3334 4938 1537 3432 4493 514 3432 5083 1583 P Capacity Analysis Module: mm Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.22 0.12 0.13 0,20 0.05 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.29 0.74 Crit Moves: ** ** **** **** **** Wm Green/Cycle; 0.02 0.13 0.46 0.11 0.21 0.25 0,04 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.65 0.65 Volume/Cap; 0.70 1.15 0,47 1.15 0,61 0.77 1.15 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.44 1.15 Delay/Veh: 101.6 153 29.7 165,3 58.0 64.4 198,2 40.3 40.3 42.5 14.1 105.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 101.6 153 29.7 165.3 58.0 64.4 198.2 40.3 40.3 42.5 14.1 105.9 Ml DesignQueue: 5 59 17 33 47 21 14 45 5 33 49 44 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ml Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 8 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 E.C.R./College **************************************************************************^^^^^.j. Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.647 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.0 Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; II Protected Include Protected Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 10 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 < D 0 0 0 Volume Module: Ease Vol; 127 484 0 0 1302 624 44 0 0 0 0 0 Mi Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 127 484 0 0 1302 624 44 0 0 0 0 0 P User Adj; 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ml PHF Voltome; 141 538 0 0 1447 693 49 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 141 538 0 0 1447 693 49 0 0 0 0 0 PM PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 141 538 0 0 1447 693 49 0 0 0 0 0 P Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lcme: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 P Adjustment: 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.81 0.73 0,81 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Lanes; 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P Final Sat.: 1547 3093 0 0 3093 1384 3088 0 1710 0 0 0 P Capacity Analysis Modul Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.17 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.92 Volxjme/Cap: Delay/Veh; User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 67.5 0,7 DesignQueue; 10 4 *********************** 0.65 0.19 67.5 0.7 e: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 ******* 0.00 0.47 0.50 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 **** **** 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.60 0.0 7.6 1.00 1.00 0.0 7.6 0 30 0.77 0.65 9.0 1.00 9.0 14 0.02 0.00 0.65 0.00 90.3 0.0 1.00 1.00 90.3 0.0 4 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0,0 0 p p p p A***********-************************************** Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P p Ex+Rte2-AM P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 9 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 E.C.R./SR 78 EB Ramps *************************-******************************************************* Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.710 Loss Time (sec) ; 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ; 18.6 Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Ovl Protected Include Permitted Include I I Permitted Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 0 C 1 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 110 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 p 1 Volume Module: - I • 1 1 1 1 Base Vol: 0 508 654 305 1858 0 200 0 88 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 0 508 654 305 1858 0 200 0 88 0 0 0 user Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 564 727 339 2064 0 222 0 98 0 0 0 wm Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 0 564 727 339 2064 0 222 0 98 0 0 0 IM PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mi Final Vol.; 0 564 727 339 2064 0 222 0 98 0 0 0 \ Saturation Flow Module: -•'•'! 1 ' 1 ! 1 ^m Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1,00 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.93 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Lanes: 0,00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •i Final Sat.; 0 3538 1583 3432 3538 0 2641 0 1537 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: MM Vol/Sat; 0.00 0.16 0,46 O.IO 0.58 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** P Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.15 0.82 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0,00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0,24 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.54 0.00 0,00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0,0 9.4 16.3 64.6 6.6 0.0 71.0 0.0 65.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 0.0 9.4 16.3 64.6 6.6 0,0 71.0 0.0 65.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ml DesignQueue; 0 16 22 25 36 0 17 0 7 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** PI p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p p Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) *********************** *********************•i,•^t***************^r*^,*^,^,^,^,^,^,^i,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^, Intersection #8 E.C.R./SR 78 WB Ramps **************************************** ***********************^^^^jj^^^^^.^^^^^^.^ Cycle (sec); 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.964 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 49.0 Optimal Cycle; 180 Level Of Service; D ******************************************************^^*^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^.^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 I I Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: I I Permitted Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II Permitted Include 0 0 0 110 0 1 I I I 1 Base Vol: 116 684 0 0 1342 342 0 0 0 1095 0 402 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 1.00 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 1. 00 1. .00 1 ,00 Initial Bse: 116 684 0 0 1342 342 0 0 0 1095 0 402 tm User Adj; 1 .00 1 ,00 1, .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1. .00 1. .00 1, .00 1. 00 1, .00 1 ,00 PHF Adj; 0 .90 0 .90 0, .90 0, .90 0.90 0 .90 0. .90 0. .90 0, .90 0, 90 0, .90 0 .90 wm PHF Volume: 129 760 0 0 1491 380 0 0 0 1217 0 447 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 129 760 0 0 1491 380 0 0 0 1217 0 447 w PCE Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1. .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1. ,00 1. ,00 1. .00 1. 00 1, .00 1 .00 Mi MLF Adj; 1 .00 1 ,00 1. .00 1. .00 1.00 1 ,00 1. ,00 1. ,00 1. ,00 1. 00 1. .00 1 .00 Final Vol.; 129 760 0 0 1491 380 0 0 0 1217 0 447 II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0,93 1.00 1.00 0.93 0,83 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0,00 2.00 1,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.; 3432 3538 0 0 3538 1583 0 0 0 •-I1 II 1900 1900 1900 0.72 1.00 0.85 2.00 0.00 1.00 2721 0 1615 Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.21 0.00 Crit Moves; **** Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.48 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0,96 0.45 0,00 Delay/Veh; 138.5 26.4 0,0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 138.5 26.4 0.0 DesignQueue: 10 35 0 ****************************** 0.00 0.42 * * * * 0,00 0.44 O.OO 0.96 0.0 56.3 1.00 1.00 0,0 56.3 0 78 I!--II 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.55 32.2 1.00 32.2 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0,0 0 0.45 0.00 **** 0.46 0.00 0.96 0,00 56.4 0,0 1.00 1.00 56.4 0.0 59 0 0.28 0.46 0.60 31.1 1.00 31.1 21 P P P P P *************************************************, Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P s p p Ex+Rte2-PM P k Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:21 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex+Rte2 • •EM Command: Default Command Volume: Ex+Rte2• •PM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee; Default Impact Fee Trip Generation; Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration p Ml P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA 1^ P Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********************.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ********************************************** ***^^^^^^^^^j^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.087 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 51.1 Optimal Cycle; 180 Level Of Service: D **************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes; Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 0 II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II R Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol; Reduced Vol: PCE Adj; MLF Adj; Final Vol.: ----I 0 1200 222 159 977 0 0 0 0 169 0 49 Mi 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0 1200 222 159 977 0 0 0 0 169 0 49 P 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1,00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ml 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 188 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 168 0 54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Ml 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 188 0 54 11 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: 0.00 0,77 **** Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.71 Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: 0,17 0.71 0.24 5.8 1.00 5,8 5 ****************************** 0.00 1.09 0.0 68.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: DesignQueue; 0.0 68.9 0 29 0.11 0.63 **** 0.10 0.81 1.09 0.78 146.0 8.3 1.00 1.00 146.0 10 II-II 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.3 15 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1-00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.12 0.00 **** 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.00 0.0 143-3 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 143.3 0-0 0 11 0 O.04 0.11 0.35 47.5 1-00 47.5 3 **************************************************** m p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P ^M p p M| Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 m m k p Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue **************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 81 Level Of Service: **************************************************************** Approach; Movement; North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R **************** 0.818 30.1 C **************** West Bound L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Min. Green; Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I Volume Module: Base Vol; 213 1153 11 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 213 1153 11 User Adj; 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 237 1281 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 237 1281 12 PCE Adj; 1.00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 Final Vol.: 237 1281 12 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 1 I II Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat,: 1718 3401 32 54 89 8 19 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 54 898 198 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0,90 0.90 60 998 220 0 0 0 60 998 220 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 60 998 220 III 275 107 164 1.00 1.00 1.00 275 107 164 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 306 119 182 0 0 0 306 119 182 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 306 119 182 III 10 58 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 58 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0,90 0.90 11 64 34 0 0 0 11 64 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 64 34 Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle; 0.17 0,56 0.56 Volume/Cap: 0,82 0,67 0.67 Delay/Veh: 56.6 16,4 16.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 56.6 16,4 16.4 DesignQueue: 11 34 0 **************************** 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.88 0.88 1,00 1,64 0.36 1718 2740 604 III 1900 1900 1900 0.86 0.91 0.77 1,00 1,00 1.00 1641 1727 1468 1900 1900 1900 0.86 0.82 0.82 1,00 1,31 0,69 1641 2032 1079 11 0.03 0,36 0.36 * *** 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.67 0.82 0.82 64.6 27.9 27.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 64.6 27.9 27.9 3 34 7 ****************** 0.19 0.07 0.12 * * * * 0.23 0-25 0-25 0.82 0-27 0-49 49.9 30,3 32.9 1.00 1,00 1,00 49.9 30.3 32.9 14 5 8 ****************** 0.01 0.03 0,03 **** 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.49 0.82 0.82 64.9 81.7 81.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 64.9 81.7 81.7 13 2 **************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *-''************************************************1,1,i,i,i,i,iri,i,*i,i,*i,ir**********iHr*** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ****************************************** **^,**^,^,^,^r^,^,^,^,^,^,^,1,^,^,^.^,1,i,^,^,^,^,^,.t,^^^,.f,.^.^.l,^^ Cycle (sec); 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.105 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 77.7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service; E ****************************************** **^li,^,^,1,1,ir^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^^,^,^,^^,^,^.^^^.f^^^^.^.^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Botind Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Volume Modul Base Vol; Growth Adj: Initial Bse User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 e: 198 1.00 198 1.00 0.90 220 0 220 1.00 1.00 220 I I I 1151 1.00 1151 1.00 0.90 1279 0 1279 1-00 1.00 1279 956 1.00 956 1.00 0.90 1062 0 1062 1.00 1.00 1062 255 1024 1-00 1.00 255 1024 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 283 1138 0 0 283 1138 1-00 1.00 1,00 1.00 283 1138 Saturation Flow Module; 1 I 326 1.00 326 1.00 0.90 362 0 362 1.00 1.00 362 451 1.00 451 1.00 0,90 501 0 501 1.00 1,00 501 826 1.00 826 1.00 0.90 918 0 918 1.00 1.00 918 250 1.00 250 I.OO 0.90 278 0 278 1.00 1.00 278 613 1.00 613 1.00 0.90 681 0 681 1.00 1.00 681 702 1-00 702 1.00 0.90 780 0 780 1.00 1.00 780 214 1.00 214 1-00 0.90 238 0 238 1.00 1.00 238 Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.84 0.83 2.00 3.00 3183 4715 1900 1900 1900 1900 0-77 0.84 0-80 0.80 1,00 2.00 3.03 0.97 1468 3183 4598 1463 II 1900 1900 0.84 0.83 2.00 3,00 3183 4715 1900 0.77 1-00 1468 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: AdjDel/Veh: DesignQueue: ********************************************** 1 I 1900 1900 1900 0.84 0.80 0.80 2.00 2.30 0.70 3183 3486 1064 II 0.07 0.27 0.72 0.09 0-25 0.25 0.16 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.22 **** **** **** **** 0.12 0.46 0.65 0.08 0.42 0.42 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.22 0.58 0-59 1.11 1.11 0.58 0.58 1.03 1-11 1.08 1.11 1.03 1.03 58.8 27.3 85.6 149.5 30.2 30.2 106.2 120 132.9 123.0 89.7 89.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 58.8 27.3 85.6 149.5 30.2 30.2 106.2 120 132.9 123.0 89.7 89.7 15 55 32 20 52 17 33 59 18 43 48 15 ********************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P p p ip p p p p p p p p Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************* Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol-/Cap. (X): 0.948 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.7 Optimal Cycle: 179 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights: Min. Green; Lanes; 1 I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 I I I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I- voltime Module; 1 I I I I I Base Vol; 316 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 192 68 183 92 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1 .00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 316 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 192 68 183 92 User Adj; 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1,00 1,00 1 ,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1 .00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0 ,90 0.90 0, .90 0.90 0.90 0 ,90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0, .90 0 .90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 351 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 213 76 203 102 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 351 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 213 76 203 102 PCE Adj: 1 ,00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1 .00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1 ,00 1.00 1. .00 1,00 1.00 1 ,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1 .00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 351 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 213 76 203 102 — I ---II - II II Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.87 0.74 0.90 0.93 0.83 Lanes: 2.00 2.75 0.25 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1,00 Final Sat.: 3334 4480 398 3334 3292 1399 3432 3538 1583 1900 1900 1900 0,93 0.88 0,88 1.00 1.33 0.67 1769 2237 1124 I I Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0. 11 0. 23 0. 23 0. 09 0. 31 0. 50 0. 18 0. 18 0. 13 0. 04 0. 09 0. 09 Crit Moves: ** * * * * ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 11 0. 45 0. 45 0, 18 0. 52 0, 52 0. 19 0. 23 0. 23 0. 06 0. 10 0. 10 Voltime/Cap; 0. 95 0. 50 0, 50 0. 50 0. 59 0, 95 0. 95 0. 78 0. 58 0. 78 0. 95 0. 95 Delay/Veh: 99 .7 29 .6 29 .6 55 .6 25 ,0 45 .2 83 ,1 58 .7 53 .6 101 .2 104 104 .0 User DelAdj: 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0, 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 AdjDel/Veh; 59 .8 17 .8 17 .8 33 .4 15 .0 27 .1 49 .9 35 .2 32 .2 60 .7 62 .4 62 .4 DesignQueue; 27 49 4 22 43 31 44 42 14 6 16 8 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) *********************************************i,i,1,i,1,1,i,i,i,i,i,^r*************1,1r*i,i,*i,*i,i. Intersection #5 E.C.R./P.A.R. ****** *************************************i,*i,i,*i,i,it**************i,i,**i,i,i,i,i,i,i,i,i,i,i. Cycle (sec); 160 Critical Vol./Cap. (x): 0.983 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 64.6 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service; E ***•********************************************1,1,1r^r***i,^,^,^,^,**i,1,^,^,^r^,^,^,^,^,i,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R •Mi Control; Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights; Ovl Ovl Include Include •Mt Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 MM Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse; User Adj: PHF Adj; PHF Volume: Reduct Vol; Reduced Vol; PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: I 63 651 382 879 891 173 232 1151 131 412 875 562 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 63 651 382 879 891 173 232 1151 131 412 875 562 IM 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 ,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 wm 70 723 424 977 990 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 723 424 977 990 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 wm 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 70 723 424 977 990 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 Saturation Flow Module; I I I I Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.; 1900 1900 0.88 0.87 2.00 3.00 3334 4938 Capacity Analysis Module; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.89 0.83 1.00 2.00 3-00 1.00 2.00 2.69 0.31 2.00 3.00 1.00 1537 3334 4938 1537 3432 4494 513 3432 5083 1583 II I I I I Vol/Sat: 0. 02 0. 15 0. 28 0. 29 0. 20 0. 12 0-08 0. 28 0. 28 0. 13 0, 19 0. 39 Crit Moves: ** * * * * * * * * ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 04 0. 15 0. 30 0. 30 0. 40 0. 48 0. 08 0, 33 0. 33 0. 15 0. 40 0. 40 Volume/Cap: 0. 50 0. 98 0. 91 0. 98 0. 50 0. 26 0. 98 0. 88 0. 88 0. 88 0. 48 0. 98 Delay/Veh: 77 .6 96 .6 76 .5 80 .0 35 .6 24 .8 124 .3 56 .5 56 .5 81 .5 35 ,6 78 .6 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1-00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 77 .6 96 .6 76 .5 80 -0 35 .6 24 .8 124 .3 56 .5 56 .5 81 .5 35 .6 78 .6 DesignQueue: 6 57 28 65 55 9 22 82 9 36 54 36 p p ***************************** ********************************************^^^^^^^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p Ex+Rte2- PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 8-1 MM P Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative **************************************************************** Intersection #6 E.C.R./College **************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 89 Level Of Service: **************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R ) **************** **************** 0.843 26.3 C **************** West Botmd L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Include I! 11 Protected Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green; Lanes: 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol; 24 1657 0 0 581 117 547 0 34 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1. .00 1. .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 1. .00 1. ,00 1. .00 Initial Bse; 24 1657 0 0 581 117 547 0 34 0 0 0 User Adj; 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1. .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 1. .00 1. .00 1. .00 PHF Adj: 0 .90 0.90 0, .90 0, .90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0, .90 0, .90 0, .90 0. ,90 0. .90 PHF volume: 27 1841 0 0 646 130 608 0 38 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 1841 0 0 646 130 608 0 38 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 1. ,00 1. .00 MLF Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 ,00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 1. ,00 1, .00 Final Vol.: 27 1841 0 0 646 130 608 0 38 0 0 0 1 11 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.81 0.73 Lanes: 1.00 2,00 0.00 0,00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1547 3093 0 0 3093 1384 I I I I 1900 1900 1900 0.81 0.90 0.75 2.00 0.00 1.00 3088 0 1424 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 III Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.02 0,60 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.05 0.71 Volume/Cap; 0.32 0.84 70.4 19.1 I I I I Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: 1,00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 19.1 DesignQueue: 2 52 0.00 0,00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0.00 0.21 0.09 0.20 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 **** **** 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0-14 0.84 0.00 0.11 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.0 11.6 10.1 63-7 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 11.6 10.1 63.7 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 20 4 41 0 2 00 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ********************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #7 E.C.R./SR 78 EB Ramps ******************************************1ClH,1C******************i,1,i,*i,i,ii1,i,i,i,i,i,i,i,.f, Cycle (sec): ISO Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.088 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 51.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D ************************************ir**********1t*i,i,1,i,1,i,i,i,i,4,i,ir*************i,t*i,1,1, Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: II Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 Volume Module: 11 Permitted Include 0 0 0 110 0 1 Permitted Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 1217 1026 344 1551 0 521 9 223 0 0 0 MH Growth Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 Initial Bse; 0 1217 1026 344 1551 0 521 9 223 0 0 0 MM User Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0 ,90 0 .90 MM PHF Volume: 0 1352 1140 382 1723 0 579 10 248 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1352 1140 382 1723 0 579 10 248 0 0 0 p PCE Adj; 1 ,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 m MLF Adj; 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 0 1352 1140 382 1723 0 579 10 248 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.93 0.83 Lanes; 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3538 1583 I 11 II 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.93 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 3432 3538 0 Capacity Analysis Module: II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3023 52 1537 0 0 0 I I Vol/Sat; 0. 00 0. 38 0. 72 0, 11 0 .49 0. 00 0. 19 0 .19 0. 16 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** * *** Green/Cycle: 0. 00 0, 66 0. 66 0. 10 0 .76 0. 00 0. 18 0 .18 0. 18 0. 00 0. 00 0, 00 Volume/Cap: 0. 00 0. 58 1. 09 1. 09 0 .64 0. 00 1. 09 1 .09 0. 92 0. 00 0, 00 0. 00 Delay/Veh: 0 .0 14 .2 80 .5 141 .2 8.7 0 .0 126 .7 127 94 .2 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 0 .0 14 .2 80 .5 141 .2 8.7 0 .0 126 .7 127 94 .2 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 DesignQueue: 0 42 38 29 38 0 41 1 18 0 0 0 ************ * * * ***** ****** ****** **** * * ** * * * ****** * * * * * * * : ** * * * ** * ** ***** ****** **• m m m Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte2-PM P k AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 E.C.R./SR 78 WB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.911 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 41.9 Optimal Cycle; 129 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights; Protected Include Protected Ovl Permitted Include 1 I Permitted Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 2 0 1 2 0 0 . . . 1 0 0 2 0 1 ...... 1 0 0 I .... . 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 . . ... 0 0 1 1 Volxime Module: I 1 1 1 ' 1 Base Vol: 145 1609 0 0 1144 427 0 0 0 860 0 496 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 Initial Bse: 145 1609 0 0 1144 427 0 0 0 860 0 496 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0 -90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0,90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 PHF Volume; 161 1788 0 0 1271 474 0 0 0 956 0 551 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 161 1788 0 0 1271 474 0 0 0 956 0 551 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 Final Vol.: 161 1788 0 0 1271 474 0 0 0 956 0 551 11 11 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.90 0.93 1.00 1,00 0,93 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0,00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 Final Sat.: 3432 3538 0 0 3538 1583 0 0 0 II 1900 1900 1900 0.72 1.00 0.85 2.00 0,00 1.00 2725 0 1615 III Capacity Analysis Module: II II Vol/Sat: 0. 05 0. 51 0 .00 0. 00 0. 36 0. 30 0. 00 0. 00 0 .00 0. 35 0 .00 0. 34 Crit Moves; ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle; 0. 06 0. 55 0 .00 0. 00 0. 49 0. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0 .00 0. 39 0 .00 0. 39 Volume/Cap: 0. 73 0. 91 0 .00 0. 00 0. 73 0, 61 0. 00 0. 00 0 .00 0. 91 0 .00 0. 89 Delay/Veh: 80 .8 36 .9 0.0 0 .0 32 .0 29 .2 0 .0 0 ,0 0,0 55 .3 0,0 57 .4 User DelAdj; 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh; 80 .8 36 .9 0.0 0 .0 32 .0 29 .2 0 .0 0 .0 0.0 55 .3 0.0 57 .4 DesignQueue; 13 76 0 0 59 22 0 0 0 52 0 31 ******************************************************************************** p Mi p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:28:56 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-AM Command; Default Command — Volume: Ex-AM Geometry: Ex-AM lt>L.«l1 Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation wm Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration mm p p p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA PI m m p p p p MM Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 13:08:20 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- . Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method .(Base Volume Alternative) ******************************** **********i,**it*1,***ir****************i, *********** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.874 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.3 Optimal Cycle: 95 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound HP Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protec ted Sp lit Phase Split Phase • Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 k Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 P Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 P Initial Bse: 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 P User Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.ob 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHP Volume: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 p Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 964 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 • • PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OO 1.00 wm Final Vol,: 0 9 64 51 77 1146 1 _ . . _ . 0 0 0 0' 213 0 197 Ml 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 ~ Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 Adjustment: 1.00 0,91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00. 1,00 .1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1-00 Mi Final Sat,: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 1.,,.. 0 1 0 1 0 0 1570 0 1 1405 1 - 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vol/Sat: 0.00 0,56 0.03 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Ita Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.06 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0,16 Volume/Cap: 0,00 0.80 0.05 0-80 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.87 Delay/Veh: 0.0 15.2 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75,1 User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 15.2 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75.1 DesignQueue: 0 21 1 5 20 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 ****************************************. **************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.757 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.0 Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green; Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 11 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 Volume Module: Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 1 I Base Vol: 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 mm User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume; 140 633 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 Reduct Vol: • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm Reduced Vol; 140 633 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 140 633 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 Ml Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 wm Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.89 0,89 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.82 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 0.75 P Final Sat.; 1718 3352 74 1718 2905 459 1641 1727 1468 1641 1939 1159 Ml Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0, 08 0. 19 0. 19 0. 01 0. 36 0. 36 0. 18 0. 02 0. 16 0. 00 0. 04 0. 04 Crit Moves; * * ** ** '** ** * * ** ** Green/Cycle: 0, 11 0. 56 0. 56 0. 03 0. 48 0. 48 0. 23 0. 28 0. 28 0, 01 0. 06 0. 06 Volxime/Cap: 0. 76 0. 34 0. 34 0. 34 0. 76 0. 76 0. 76 0. 06 0. 58 0. 58 0, 76 0. 76 Delay/Veh: 59 .7 12 .3 12 .3 50 .9 23 .3 23 .3 44 .2 26 .1 32 .7 97 .6 62 .8 62 .8 User DelAdj: 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 59 .7 12 .3 12 .3 50 .9 23 .3 23 .3 44 .2 26 .1 32 .7 97 .6 62 .8 62 .8 DesignQueue: 7 16 0 1 33 5 13 1 10 0 5 3 ************ *** * * ** * *** ** * *** *** ***** ****** * ** *** ***** ****** *** *** * * *** * * * *** *** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P P p p p p 1^ p k MM Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol,/Cap. (X): 0.875 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.4 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Protected Ovl Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 ' 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 67 480 522 111 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 121 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 67 480 522 111 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 121 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj ; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 Final Vol.; 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj ustment: 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0,80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0-84 0.81 0.81 Lames: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3,08 0,92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.62 0.38 Final Sat.; 3183 4715 1468 3183 4678 1395 3183 4715 1468 3183 4047 579 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 1 1 1 Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.11 0.40 0.04 0.36 0.36 0,07 0.12 0.09 0.30 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** * * * * Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.32 0.66 0,11 0.41 0.41 0.11 0,14 0.14 0.34 0.37 0.37 Voltune/Cap; 0.87 0.35 0.60 0,35 0.87 0.87 0.63 0,87 0.67 0-87 0.63 0.63 Delay/Veh: 123.9 35.1 13.8 56.2 40,7 40.7 61.1 69.5 63.2 50.1 35.7 35.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 123,9 35.1 13.8 56.2 40,7 40.7 61.1 69.5 63 .2 50.1 35.7 35.7 DesignQueue; 5 28 16 8 80 24 15 38 9 50 47 7 ****************************** ********************************** **************** PI Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******* *****•************************************1f********i,********.t,^,^,.^^^^^^^,^,^,^,.l^^^ Intersection #4 E,C.R./La Costa ******************************* ******************.i,*******i,*********.^^,.i,^^^^^^^.^.^.^ Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.596 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 27,2 Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: c ****************************************** **********i,********************^,^,*.^^,^,^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Include II Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 •Ml Volume Module: Base Vol: 203 619 27 136 763 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 Growth Adj: 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Initial Bse: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 19 8 mm User Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 kMH PHF Volume: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MM Reduced Vol: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 inM MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 •M Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 wm Adjustment: 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2,88 0.12 2.00 2-29 0.71 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 wm Final Sat.: 3334 4706 203 3334 3634 1127 3432 3538 1583 1769 2189 1165 mw Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.19 0-19 0.13 0.08 0.13 0.03 0.17 0.17 mm Crit Moves: **** ** ** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.23 0.41 0-41 0.10 0.29 0.29 Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.20 0.33 0-33 0.60 0.60 Delay/Veh: 68,6 40.3 40.3 64.3 43.8 43.8 53.3 28.6 30.5 63.7 47.2 47.2 ^M User DelAdj; 0.60 0,60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 ^M AdjDel/Veh; 41,1 24.2 24.2 38.6 26.3 26.3 32.0 17.1 18-3 38.2 28.3 28.3 DesignQueue; 14 33 1 9 41 13 31 15 11 4 23 12 ***************************** ************************* ***********i,************i,* Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA MM p p p p p p p p Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** intersection #5 E.C.R./P.A.R. ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 160 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.122 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 68.6 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green; Lanes; I I II Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 I- Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume; Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj; MLF Adj: Final Vol.: I I II 50 570 300 366 483 271 142 676 77 487 1309 1057 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 50 570 300 366 483 271 142 676 77 487 1309 1057 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 56 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 56 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 86 541 1454 1174 I II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.87 0.81 Lanes; 2.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3334 4938 1537 I I 1900 1900 1900 0.88 0.87 0.81 2.00 3.00 1.00 3334 4938 1537 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.88 0.88 2,00 2.69 0.31 3432 4493 514 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.89 0.83 2.00 3-00 1.00 3432 5083 1583 Capacity Analysis Module: I I Vol/Sat; 0. 02 0 .13 0. 22 0. 12 0-11 0. 20 0. 05 0. 17 0. 17 0. 16 0. 29 0. 74 Crit Moves; * *** ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle; 0. 02 0 .11 0. 45 0. 11 0. 20 0, 24 0. 04 0, 36 0. 36 0. 34 0, 66 0. 66 Volume/Cap; 0. 75 1 .12 0. 48 1. 12 0, 54 0. 81 1, 12 0. 46 0. 46 0, 46 0. 43 1. 12 Delay/Veh: 110 .9 147 30 .9 155 .9 58 .0 69 .8 189 .2 39 .4 39 .4 41 .6 13 .0 95 .0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 110 .9 147 30 .9 155 .9 58 .0 69 .8 189 -2, 39 .4 39 .4 41 .6 13 .0 95 .0 DesignQueue: 5 51 17 33 39 21 14 44 5 33 47 42 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:28:56 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *****************************************^,*************^,*^,.^,^^^,^,^,^,^^,.^.^^^.^^^,^^^^^^^^ Intersection #6 P.A.R./College *************************************************** **************^^^^,.f,^^,^^.i^^^^^.^^,^^ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.653 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9 Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service; B **************************************************i,*******^,^^,^,^^,^,^,^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R IIIIt11 I Control; Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights; Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 000000 00 0000 Lanes: 20201 lOOll 20301 20301 Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: -I Saturation Flow Module: I I 44 23 30 46 13 142 875 1812 34 27 927 59 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 44 23 30 46 13 142 875 1812 34 27 927 59 Ml 1 .00 1 .00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 •M 49 26 33 51 14 158 972 2013 38 30 1030 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 49 26 33 51 14 158 972 2013 38 30 1030 66 p 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 49 26 33 51 14 158 972 2013 38 30 1030 66 11 11 Sat/Lane; Adjustment: Laines: Final Sat-: 1900 1900 0.90 0.93 2.00 2.00 3432 3538 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.83 0.93 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.81 1.00 1-00 0.16 1.84 2.00 3.00 1.00 2,00 3-00 1,00 1583 1769 261 2949 3334 4938 1537 3334 4938 1537 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0,02 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.03 Volume/Cap: 0,45 0.23 50.4 48.2 II I I 1 I Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 50.4 48.2 DesignQueue: 3 1 * * * * 0.03 0.65 74.5 1.00 74.5 2 0.03 0.05 **** 0.08 0,08 0.35 0.65 44.9 50.3 1.00 1.00 44.9 50,3 3 1 0.05 0.08 0.65 50.3 1.00 50.3 8 ***************************** 0.29 0.41 **** 0.45 0.75 0.65 0.54 22.7 5.5 1.00 1.00 22-7 5.5 32 31 0.02 0.75 0.03 3.2 1-00 3.2 1 0.01 0.21 **** 0.02 0.32 0.54 0.65 59.5 30.3 1-00 1.00 59.5 30.3 2 41 0.04 0.32 0.13 24.3 1.00 24,3 3 P P P P P R ***********************************i,********i,****** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P Ex-AM P P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:28:56 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 P.A.R./I-5 NB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.828 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.1 Optimal Cycle; 79 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Split Phase Ovl 1 I Split Phase Include II Prot+Permit Include Prot+Permit Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 ] : 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 . . 1 10 3 0 0 . . . 1 0 0 3 0 2 1 Volume Module; 1 1 1 1 1 1 Base Vol; 161 0 1314 0 0 0 78 1451 0 0 802 533 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1-00 Initial Bse: 161 0 1314 0 0 0 78 1451 0 0 802 533 User Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF volume: 161 0 1314 0 0 0 78 1451 0 0 802 533 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 161 0 1314 0 0 0 78 1451 0 0 802 533 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 161 0 1314 0 0 0 78 1451 0 0 802 533 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 1 • 1 1 - - - I 1 — " • Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.93 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.87 1 .00 1.00 0.87 0.71 Lctnes; 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 0 .00 0.00 3.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1773 0 2786 0 0 0 578 4938 0 0 4938 2706 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 1 • 1 1 — 1 1 Vol/Sat: 0.09 0-00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.29 0 .00 0.00 0.16 0.20 Crit Moves: **** **** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.36 0 .00 0.00 0.29 0.29 Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.83 0 .00 0.00 0.56 0.68 Delay/Veh; 12.3 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 38.8 0.0 0.0 36.8 40.3 User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 12.3 0-0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 38.8 0.0 0.0 36.8 40.3 DesignQueue: 5 0 41 0 0 0 5 67 0 0 40 26 ******************************************************************************** pl p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:28:56 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************* *****.^*********.t,*.f,.^.f,^^^^^,^^, Intersection #8 P.A.R./I-5 SB Ramps *******************************************************************^,^,i,^^,^,^^^^.^.i^.^ Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap- (X): 0.610 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.2 Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B ********************************************** ******i,*******************^,**.^^,^,^,^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Boxind West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include I I Protected Include 0 0 I I Protected Ignore Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 ' 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 1060 0 207 0 445 107 0 489 452 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1060 0 207 0 445 107 0 489 452 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0-00 PHF Volume; 0 0 0 1178 0 230 0 494 119 0 543 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1178 0 230 0 494 119 0 543 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 1178 0 230 0 494 119 0 543 0 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0,81 1.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.61 0.39 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3334 0 1537 0 2768 667 0 3437 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0,15 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.16 0-00 Crit Moves; **** **** **** 0-00 Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.29 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.54 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 7.4 0.0 22.4 22.4 0.0 21.4 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 7.4 0.0 22-4 22.4 0.0 21,4 0,0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0 21 0 4 0 14 3 0 16 0 ************************** *******************i,*******i,********^^^^^^^^j^^^,.^^^^^^,^^^,^^^^^^ i Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P m Ml m m Ex-PM P P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:29:31 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-PM Command: Default Command Volume; Ex-PM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation; Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Conf iguration: Default Configuration in P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P IMI p p Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ****** *************************************************************.^^,.i^.^^,^^.f^.^.^.j^^^^. Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************* *****i,**********.^.j^.j^^^^.^.^.^ Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.010 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.2 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: c **************************************************** *********************^,*.f^^^^.f, Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Include Split Phase Include 1 I Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 MM Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 ~" Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF AdjI 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 MM PHF Volume: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •1 Reduced Vol: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •M MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 P Saturation Flow Module: tmt Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 ^m Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0-86 0.91 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 P Final Sat-: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 r 0 0 1 1570 r 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.77 0.09 0.11 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 mm. Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.11 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 P Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.01 0.12 1.01 0.72 0.00 0.00 0-00 O.OO 1.01 0.00 0.79 Delay/Veh: 0.0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 159-1 0.0 97.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 P AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 159.1 0.0 97.9 P DesignQueue: 0 24 2 10 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 P ******************* **********ir******* ************************ *****.l^^^^^^^^.f, ****** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P p Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rsuicho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.782 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 29.4 Optimal Cycle; 73 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include II Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm Lanes: 10 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 ' 0 1 1 0 P Volume Module: Base Vol: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •M Initial Bse: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 O.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume; 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 MM Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 P PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 Ml Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.91 0.77 0-86 0.82 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1,60 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 mm Final Sat.; 1718 3398 35 1718 2671 663 1641 1727 1468 1641 2032 1079 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.19 0.07 0.12 0.01 0.03 0.03 Crit Moves; **** **** **** **** HM Green/Cycle: 0,18 0.55 0.55 0,06 0.42 0.42 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.04 0.04 Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.63 0.63 0,63 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.26 0.47 0.47 0.78 0.78 Delay/Veh: 51.7 16.4 16.4 59,1 27.7 27.7 45.4 29.4 31.8 63.0 74.1 74.1 User DelAdj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml AdjDel/Veh; 51.7 16.4 16.4 59.1 27.7 27.7 45.4 29 .4 31.8 63.0 74.1 74.1 DesignQueue; 11 32 0 3 31 8 14 5 8 1 3 2 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7-5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *************************************************** ********************^^^^^^,^^^,^,.^ Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************** ****^.^^..^^.^^^^ Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.051 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 60.7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service; E ********************************************************************* **^,^^^^^^.^^^,^.^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Ovl Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 Ml Volume Module: Hi Base Vol; 198 1151 956 155 1024 326 451 726 250 613 602 114 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 198 1151 956 155 1024 326 451 726 250 613 602 114 P User Adj; 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 m PHF Volume: 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 607 278 661 669 127 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Reduced Vol: 220 1279 1062 172 1136 3 62 501 807 278 661 669 127 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 220 1279 1062 172 113 8 362 501 807 278 681 1 1 669 127 m Saturation Flow Module: II 1 p Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 p Adjustment: 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0-84 0-81 0.81 Lanes; 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.03 0.97 2.00 3.00 1-00 2.00 2.52 0.48 P Final Sat.: 3183 4715 1466 3183 4598 1463 3183 4715 1468 3183 1 3866 734 IMI Capacity Analysis Module: 1 1 Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.27 0.72 0.05 0.25 0.25 0,16 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.17 0.17 • Crit Moves: **** **** * * * * *** * p Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.48 0.68 0.05 0-42 0.42 0.18 0-18 0.18 0-20 0.20 0.20 MM Volume/Cap: O.60 0.56 1.06 1.06 0.60 0.60 0.87 0.96 1.06 1.06 0.87 0.87 Delay/Veh; 59.3 25.4 67.6 151.9 31.1 31.1 67.1 76.5 128.1 106.7 61.3 61.3 p User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p AdjDel/Veh: 59.3 25.4 67.6 151.9 31.1 31.1 67.1 76.5 128.1 106.7 61.3 61.3 DesignQueue; 15 53 30 12 53 17 32 52 18 43 42 8 ****** *************************************************************************.i^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA ^M P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.911 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 30.0 Optimal Cycle: 141 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 P Volume Module; 1 1 •i I •t 1 • Base Vol: 316 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 192 68 183 92 Growth Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 P Initial Bse: 303 875 78 268 872 599 537 548 184 65 176 88 iM User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Final Vol.; 337 972 86 29 8 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 P 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 1 j . 1 1 P Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.66 0.86 0-88 0,87 0.74 0.90 0.93 0,83 0.93 0.88 0.88 Ml Lanes: 2.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 0.67 wm Final Sat.; 3334 4482 397 3334 3292 1399 3432 3538 1583 1769 2237 1124 1 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 1 1 1 - - - • - 1 wm Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.29 0.48 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** P Green/Cycle: 0,11 0.45 0.45 0.18 0.52 0.52 0.19 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.10 0.10 Volume/Cap; 0.91 0.48 0.48 0.48 0,56 0.91 0.91 0.75 0.56 0.75 0.91 0.91 Delay/Veh; 91.8 29.3 29.3 55.3 24.5 40.0 76.4 57.3 52.9 96.2 95.8 95.8 user DelAdj: 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0,60 0.60 0,60 0,60 0-60 P AdjDel/Veh; 55.1 17.6 17.6 33.2 14.7 24.0 45 .8 34.4 31.8 57.7 57.5 57.5 DesignQueue; 26 47 4 21 41 29 42 41 14 6 15 8 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********************************************** ************************^^^.^.^^^^,^,^.^ Intersection #5 E.C.R./P.A.R. ***************************************************************************.f,.^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 160 Critical vol./Cap. (X): 0.978 Loss Time (sec): 12 (y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 62.3 Optimal Cycle; 180 Level Of Service; E ********************* *************************************.f^*.f,^,.t,^,^,^^^.^^..^.^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L- T- R Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse; User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volxome: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol-: Saturation Flow Module; I I Sat/Lane; Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.88 0.87 2.00 3.00 3334 4938 Capacity Analysis Module: 1900 1900 1900 1900 0,81 0.88 0.87 0.81 1.00 2,00 3.00 1.00 1537 3334 4938 1537 II--- 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.86 0.88 0-90 0.89 0.83 2.00 2.69 0.31 2.00 3.00 1.00 3432 4494 513 3432 5083 1583 I I Vol/Sat: 0. 02 0. 12 0.28 0. 29 0. 18 0. 12 0. 08 0. 28 0. 28 0. 13 0. 19 0. 39 Crit Moves; **** ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 05 0. 15 0.30 0-30 0. 40 0. 47 0. 08 0. 33 0. 33 0-15 0. 40 0. 40 Volume/Cap: 0. 45 0. 85 0.92 0. 98 0. 45 0. 26 0. 98 0. 87 0. 67 0. 87 0. 47 0. 98 Delay/Veh: 76 .2 76 .3 78.6 78 .7 35 .4 25 .4 122 .9 56 .1 56 .1 80 .9 35 .4 77 .1 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 76 .2 76 .3 78.6 78 .7 35 .4 25 .4 122 .9 56 .1 56 .1 80 .9 35 ,4 77 .1 DesignQueue: 6 48 28 65 49 9 22 82 9 36 54 36 ************ *** *** * * *** ****** *** * * * * * *** * * * ****** ***** ****** *** *** ***** ****** *** Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Mi Rights: Ovl Ovl Include Include MM Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 •M 63 551 382 879 791 173 232 1151 131 412 875 562 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 63 551 382 879 791 173 232 1151 131 412 875 562 Ml 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 KH 70 612 424 977 879 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ml 70 612 424 977 879 192 258 1279 146 458 972 624 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mi 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 70 612 424 977 679 192 258 1279 146 458 9 72 624 wm p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:29:31 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 3-1 P m Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxame Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 P.A.R./College ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.910 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.6 Optimal Cycle; 114 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include I I II Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: 1 - • • - Base Vol: 50 10 13 60 19 766 263 1123 75 33 1878 84 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Initial Bse; 50 10 13 60 19 766 263 1123 75 33 1878 84 User Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj; 0 .90 0 .90 0 -90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 56 11 14 67 21 851 292 1248 83 37 2087 93 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 56 11 14 67 21 851 292 1248 83 37 2087 93 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 MLF Adj: 1 .00 1 -00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 Final Vol.: 56 11 14 67 21 851 292 1248 83 37 2087 93 II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.84 0.84 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.95 Final Sat-: 3432 3538 1583 1769 77 3104 ! I 1900 1900 1900 0.88 0.67 0.81 2.00 3.00 1.00 3334 4938 1537 1900 1900 1900 0.88 0.87 0.81 2.00 3.00 1.00 3334 4938 1537 11 I I Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0-02 0.02 Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.17 0.49 Delay/Veh; 132.0 49.7 61.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 132.0 49.7 61.5 DesignQueue; 3 1 1 ***************************** 0.04 0.27 **** 0-30 0.30 0.13 0.91 25.5 46.1 1,00 1.00 25,5 46,1 3 1 0.27 0.30 0.91 46.1 1.00 46.1 35 0.09 0.25 **** 0.10 0.54 0.91 0.47 73.2 14.5 1,00 1.00 73.2 14.5 15 34 0,05 0.54 0.10 11.4 I. 00 II. 4 2 0.01 0.42 0.06 **** 0.02 0.46 0.47 0.91 52.6 30.8 1.00 1.00 52.6 30.8 2 69 0.46 0.13 15.3 1.00 15,3 3 *************************************************** P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:29:31 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 P.A.R./I-5 NB Ramps **********************************************************************^^^.^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.879 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 33.1 Optimal Cycle: 163 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I-IIII III Control: Split Phase Split Phase Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights; Ovl Include Include Include Min. Green: 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 Lanes; 01002 00000 10300 00302 Volume Module: II Base Vol: 142 1 706 0 0 0 176 1052 0 0 1858 1194 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 142 1 706 0 0 0 176 1052 0 0 1858 1194 Mi User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 158 1 784 0 0 0 196 1169 0 0 2064 1327 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ml Reduced Vol: 158 1 784 0 0 0 196 1169 0 0 2064 1327 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mt MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Final Vol.; 158 1 784 0 0 0 196 1169 0 0 2064 1327 MM Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 •M Adjustment: 0.83 0,83 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 0-21 0.87 1.00 1.00 0,87 0.71 Lanes: 0.99 0,01 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3,00 2.00 PI Final Sat,; 1573 10 2786 0 0 0 404 4938 0 0 4938 2706 wm Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.10 0.10 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.49 mm Crit Moves; * * ** **** * *** mwm Green/Cycle: 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 P Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.34 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.96 Delay/Veh: 33.7 33.7 63.3 0.0 0-0 0.0 43.6 10.8 0.0 0.0 26.7 43.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml AdjDel/Veh: 33.7 33.7 63.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.6 10.8 0.0 0.0 26.7 43.3 DesignQueue: 8 0 39 0 0 0 12 30 0 0 74 48 •M *****************************************************************1,**********^,^,i,^. Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA m p p p p p p Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:29:31 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative **************************************************************** Intersection #8 P.A.R./I-5 SB Ramps **************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle; 42 Level Of Service: **************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R ) **************** **************** 0.639 14.3 B **************** West Bound L-T-R Control; Rights; Split Phase Include I I II II Split Phase Include Protected Include Protected Ignore Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IP Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 C 1 0 0 1 0 c 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 p Volume Module: Base Vol; 0 0 0 637 0 191 0 620 308 0 1066 1011 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PI Initial Bse: 0 0 0 637 0 191 0 620 308 0 1066 1011 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.00 PHF Volume; 0 0 0 708 0 212 0 689 342 0 1184 0 MM Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 708 0 212 0 689 342 0 1184 0 Ml PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MM Final Vol.; 0 0 0 708 0 212 0 689 342 0 1184 0 Saturation Flow Module; Ml Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1-00 0.81 1.00 0,88 0.88 1.00 0.90 1.00 wm Lanes; 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.34 0.66 0.00 2.00 1.00 Ma Final Sat.; 0 0 0 3334 0 1537 0 2246 1115 0 3437 1900 ^M Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.34 0.00 Crit Moves: **** * * ** **** kM Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.54 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.00 0-64 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0,0 21.1 0.0 16.6 0.0 11.2 11.2 0.0 12.1 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0,0 21.1 0.0 18.6 0.0 11.2 11.2 0-0 12,1 0.0 Ml DesignQueue: 0 0 0 19 0 6 0 13 7 0 23 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA PI P Ex+Rte3-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:33:16 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario; Ex+Rte3-AM Command: Default Command mm Volume: Ex+Rte3-AM Geometry; Ex-AM Impact Fee; Default Impact Fee Trip Generation; Default Trip Generation M Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths M" Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration Ml p P P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P IM P P P P Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.946 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 34.6 Optimal Cycle: 143 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement; North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 0 I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module; Base Vol: 0 868 146 69 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 Growth Adj ; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P" Initial Bse: 0 868 146 69 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 lb User Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume; 0 9 64 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 MM Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 Ml PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 >• Pinal Vol.: 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 IM Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.74 IM Lanes; 0.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 IP Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module; •M • Vol/Sat: 0.00 0-56 0-11 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** P Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0-22 Volume/Cap; 0.00 0.86 0-17 0.86 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.64 Delay/Veh: 0.0 22.9 7.9 105.6 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.8 0.0 44-4 Ml User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 22.9 7.9 105,6 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.8 0.0 44.4 DesignQueue: 0 24 4 5 25 0 0 0 0 17 0 10 ******************************************************************************** p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ***********************************************************************^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.793 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.3 Optimal Cycle; 76 Level Of Service; c *************************************************************************^^^j^.^..^^ Approach: Movement; North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 10 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Ml Volume Module: IM Base Vol: 126 670 13 17 1050 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 126 670 13 17 1050 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 P User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P PHF Volume; 140 744 14 19 1167 167 269 28 240 8 87 52 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Reduced Vol; 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 m Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.66 0,91 0.77 0,86 0.82 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 0.75 m Final Sat.; 1718 3363 63 1716 2949 422 1641 1727 1468 1641 1939 1159 wm Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 m Crit Moves: **** **** **** * *** Green/Cycle; 0.10 0.57 0.57 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.22 0.27 0.27 0.01 0.06 0.0'6 p Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.79 0.79 0.79 0,06 0.60 0.60 0.79 0.79 Delay/Veh; 65.2 11.8 11.8 52.7 23.5 23.5 48.1 27,1 34.4 109.5 68.1 68.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p AdjDel/Veh: 65.2 11.8 11.8 52.7 23,5 23.5 48,1 27.1 34.4 109.5 68.1 68.1 DesignQueue; 7 19 0 1 36 5 13 1 10 0 5 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p p *M P P P P P P P Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.875 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 44.5 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service; D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Protected Ovl Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 ' 0 3 0 1 2 ' 0 2 1 0 voliome Module: Base Vol: 67 480 522 , 211 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 221 Growth Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 67 480 522 211 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 221 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 246 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 13 6 944 937 246 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 246 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj us tment: 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0.80 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.06 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.38 0.62 Final Sat.: 3183 4715 1468 3183 4676 1395 3183 4715 1468 3183 3619 950 Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.11 0.40 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.12 0.09 0,30 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** * ** * **** **** Green/Cycle; 0.03 0.26 0.60 0-17 0-41 0.41 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.34 0.38 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.43 0.66 0.43 0.87 0.87 0.68 0.87 0.67 0.87 0.68 0.68 Delay/Veh; 123.9 41.7 19.6 50-7 40.7 40.7 64.8 69.5 63.2 50.1 36.4 36.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 123.9 41.7 19.6 50.7 40.7 40.7 64.8 69.5 63.2 50,1 36.4 36.4 DesignQueue: 5 30 19 15 80 24 15 36 9 50 46 12 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method {Base Volume Alternative) ***************************************************************i,**********.^.^.f,^^.^.^ Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.760 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.1 Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service: C ****** *******************************************i,**********************.i^*.f,.i,^,^,^,^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Ml Volume Module: Base Vol: 203 719 27 136 863 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 PM Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 203 719 27 136 863 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 M User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.9O 0.90 NH PHF Volume: 226 799 30 151 959 263 569 357 263 72 459 244 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Reduced Vol; 226 799 30 151 959 263 569 357 263 72 459 244 P PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 226 799 30 151 959 263 569 357 263 72 459 244 P Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.88 0-84 0.84 0.90 0.93 0.83 0-93 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.89 0.11 2.00 2.35 0.65 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 P Final Sat.: 3334 4736 178 3334 3751 1029 3432 3538 1583 1769 2190 1164 P Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.04 0.21 0.21 PR Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.34 0,34 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.22 0.40 0.40 0.10 0.28 0.28 m Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.25 0.42 0.42 0.76 0.76 Delay/Veh: 77.6 40.1 40.1 66.4 46.5 46.5 59 .5 30.4 33.2 65.4 53.5 53.5 - User DelAdj: 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0-60 0.60 0.60 P AdjDel/Veh: 46.5 24.0 24.0 39 .8 27.9 27.9 35.7 18.3 19.9 39.2 32.1 32.1 P DesignQueue: 17 46 2 12 56 15 39 18 14 5 29 15 P ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P P Ex+Rte3-AM P P IM P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:45:11 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 E.C.R./P.A.R- ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 160 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 1.122 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 70.7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R 11 II Control; Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 I- Volume Module; Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 II--I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 11 Base Vol: 150 570 300 366 483 271 142 676 177 487 1309 1057 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 -00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 Initial Bse: 150 570 300 366 483 271 142 676 177 487 1309 1057 User Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 -90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 PHF Volume; 167 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 197 541 1454 1174 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 167 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 197 541 1454 1174 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 -00 1 .00 1 -00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 -00 1 .00 1 -00 1 -00 1 .00 1.00 Final Vol.; 167 633 333 407 537 301 158 751 197 541 1454 1174 11 It Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.67 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.81 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.; 3334 4938 1537 3334 4938 1537 1900 1900 1900 0-90 0.86 0-86 2.00 2.38 0.62 3432 3902 1024 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.89 0.83 2,00 3.00 1.00 3432 5083 1583 I I I I 1 I Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0. 05 0 .13 0, 22 0. 12 0. 11 0. 20 0-05 0. 19 0. 19 0. 16 0. 29 0. 74 Crit Moves: * *** ** ** ** * * ** ** Green/Cycle: ; 0. 06 0 .11 0. 43 0. 11 0. 17 0. 21 0. 04 0. 39 0. 39 0, 32 0. 66 0. 66 Volume/Cap: 0. 90 1 .12 0. 50 1. 12 0. 65 0. 94 1. 12 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 43 1. 12 Delay/Veh: 113 .3 147 33 .8 155 .9 64 .1 97 .3 189 .2 37 .6 37 .6 44 .8 13 .0 95 .0 User DelAdj: ; 1-00 1 .00 1. 00 1-00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh; 113 .3 147 33 .8 155 .9 64 .1 97 .3 189 .2 37 .6 37 .6 44 .8 13 .0 95 .0 DesignQueue: 14 51 18 33 41 22 14 43 11 34 47 42 ******************************************************************************** p p Traffix 7-5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte3-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:33:16 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************* *****************************.^.f,^^^^^^.i, Intersection #6 P.A.R./College **************************************************************************** ^**.^ Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.678 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.1 Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: B ******* **************************************************************^,^^,^,^,^^^^^,^,^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 10 0 11 Control: Rights; Min. Green: Lanes; I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse User Adj: PHF Adj; PHF Volume: Reduct Vol; Reduced Vol PCE Adj: MLF Adj; Final Vol.: Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 1 I 1 I 44 23 30 46 13 142 875 1912 34 27 1027 59 MM 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 44 23 30 46 13 142 875 1912 34 27 1027 59 mm 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 wm 49 26 33 51 14 158 972 2124 38 30 1141 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm 49 26 33 51 14 158 972 2124 38 30 1141 66 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 wm 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 49 26 33 51 14 158 972 2124 38 30 1141 66 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.90 0,93 0.83 Lanes; 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3432 3538 1563 I I I I Capacity Analysis Module; I I 1900 1900 1900 0.93 0.84 0,84 1.00 0,16 1.84 1769 261 2949 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.88 0.67 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.81 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 3334 4938 1537 3334 4938 1537 I I I I Vol/Sat: 0, 01 0. 01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 05 0. 05 0-29 0.43 0. 02 0. 01 0. 23 0. 04 Crit Moves: * * * * * * * * ** ** * * ** 04 Green/Cycle: 0. 03 0-03 0. 03 0. 08 0. 08 0. 08 0. 43 0.75 0. 75 0. 02 0. 34 0. 34 Volume/Cap: 0. 46 0. 24 0. 68 0-37 0. 68 0. 68 0. 68 0.57 0. 03 0. 57 0. 68 0. 13 Delay/Veh; 50 .9 48 .5 80 .3 45 .3 52 .0 52 .0 24 .3 5.5 3 .1 62 .9 29 .4 22 .8 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh; 50 .9 48 .5 60 .3 45 .3 52 .0 52 .0 24 ,3 5.5 3 .1 62 .9 29 .4 22 .8 DesignQueue: 3 1 2 3 1 8 33 32 1 2 44 2 ************ *** * * * * * ****** *** *** ***** *** *** * * : **** ******** *** **: * ** * ***** ** * *** **• p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p p p p p p II IP p ^M m Ex+Rte3-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 16:33:16 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 4 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 P.A.R./I-5 NB Ramps **************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol,/Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); Optimal Cycle: 147 Level Of Service; **************************************************************** Approach; Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Boxind L-T-R East Boxind L-T-R **************** 0.944 34.6 C **************** West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Ovl I I Split Phase Include II Prot+Permit Include I I Prot+Permit Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 c 1 3 0 2 1 Volxime Module: II II Base Vol: 161 0 1314 0 0 0 78 1551 0 0 602 633 Growth Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1,00 1,00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 161 0 1314 0 0 0 78 1551 0 0 602 633 User Adj: 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1 ,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0,90 0,90 0 ,90 0,90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 179 0 1460 0 0 0 87 1723 0 0 891 703 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 179 0 1460 0 0 0 87 1723 0 0 891 703 PCE Adj: 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 ,00 1.00 1,00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 179 0 1460 0 0 0 87 1723 0 0 891 703 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.93 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes; 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 Final Sat.: 1773 0 2786 0 0 0 II 1 I 1900 1900 1900 0.27 0.87 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 519 4938 0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0,87 0,71 0.00 3.00 2.00 0 4938 2706 Capacity Analysis Module; I I II I I mm Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.56 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 Volxime/Cap; 0.18 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.84 Delay/Veh; 13.3 0.0 37.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2 47.2 0.0 0.0 35.5 46.2 mm User DelAdj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 AdjDel/Veh: 11.4 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 40.6 0.0 0.0 30.5 39.8 DesignQueue: 5 0 48 0 0 0 6 79 0 0 43 34 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte3-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:33:16 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) **************************************************** ******************^**i,.t,^^^,^,^,^^ Intersection #8 P.A.R./I-5 SB Ramps ******************************************** *********************************^,.^.t. Cycle (sec); 70 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.648 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.5 Optimal Cycle: 43 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Min. Green: Lanes: Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 volxime Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volxime: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.; 1 I Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 110 Protected Ignore 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 I I I I 0 0 0 1160 0 207 0 445 107 0 489 452 •mm 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 1160 0 207 0 445 107 0 489 452 mm 1 .00 1-00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0.00 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.00 0 0 0 1289 0 230 0 494 119 0 543 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm 0 0 0 1289 0 230 0 494 119 0 543 0 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0-00 MM 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0.00 0 0 0 1289 0 230 0 494 119 0 543 0 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 Lanes; 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 I I I II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.61 0.39 0.00 2.00 1.00 0 3334 0 1537 0 2768 667 0 3437 1900 Capacity Analysis Module; I I I I 1 I Vol/Sat; 0 .00 0.00 0. 00 0. 39 0. 00 0. 15 0.00 0. 18 0, 18 0. 00 0, 16 0. 00 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle; 0 .00 0.00 0. 00 0. 60 0. 00 0. 60 0.00 0. 28 0. 28 0. 00 0. 28 0. 00 Volume/Cap: 0 .00 0.00 0. 00 0. 65 0. 00 0. 25 0.00 0. 65 0. 65 0. 00 0. 57 0. 00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0 .0 10 .1 0 .0 6 .9 0.0 24 .0 24 .0 0 .0 22 .7 0 .0 User DelAdj: 1 .00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh; 0.0 0.0 0 .0 10 ,1 0 .0 6 ,9 0.0 24 ,0 24 .0 0 .0 22 ,7 0 .0 DesignQueue; 0 0 0 22 0 4 0 15 4 0 16 0 ************ * * ********* * * * **-**** * * * * * *** *** * ** ******** **-. **** *** *** ***** *** *** * *' p p p p p Traffix 7-5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA m p m m m p p p p p p Ex+Rte3-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:36:37 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex+Rte3• •PM Command: Default Command Volume: Ex+Rte3• •PM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes; Default Routes Configuration; Default Configuration |M P Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA MM MM p p Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) **********************************************************************^^^^.^^^^^^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 1.087 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 51.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D **«****************************************************************************^ Approach: North Boxind Soxith Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green; Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 0 Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volxime: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final vol.: — I 0 1200 222 159 977 0 0 0 0 169 0 49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. .00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1200 222 159 977 0 0 0 0 169 0 49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0. 90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 MM 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 166 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 188 0 54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 wm 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.oo 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 188 0 54 wm Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 1.00 0.91 0.00 1.00 0 1727 II----ilII- 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1466 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: I I Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.77 Crit Moves; **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.71 Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.09 Delay/Veh: 0.0 68.9 user DelAdj: 1,00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0,0 68.9 0.17 0.11 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.12 0.00 0.04 0.71 0.24 5.8 1.00 5.8 0.10 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 1.09 0.78 146.0 8.3 1.00 1.00 DesignQueue: 0 29 5 ***************************** 146.0 10 ).3 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.00 0.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 143.3 0.0 47.5 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 143.3 0.0 47.5 0 0 0 0 11 0 3 *************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ml P IP P k Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 5, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxme Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.818 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.1 Optimal Cycle: 81 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Boxind Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I I Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I Volume Module: 1 I I I Base Vol: 213 1153 11 54 89 8 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse; 213 1153 11 54 898 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 p User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p PHF Adj : 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume; 237 1281 12 60 998 220 306 119 162 11 64 34 Ml Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 237 1281 12 60 996 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 P PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml Final Vol.; 237 1281 12 60 998 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 Ml Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,88 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.86 0,82 0.82 wm Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1,64 0.36 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,31 0.69 Final Sat.: 1718 3401 32 1718 2740 604 1641 1727 1468 1641 2032 1079 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.36 Crit Moves; **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.56 0.56 0.05 0.45 Volume/Cap; 0.82 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.82 Delay/Veh: 56.6 16.4 16.4 64.6 27.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh; 56.6 16,4 16.4 64.6 27.9 DesignQueue: 11 34 0 3 34 I I I I 0.36 0.19 0.07 0-12 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.45 0.82 27.9 1.00 27.9 7 0.23 0.25 0.82 0.27 49.9 30.3 1.00 1.00 49.9 30.3 14 5 0.25 0.49 32.9 1.00 32.9 8 0.01 0.04 0.49 0.82 64.9 81-7 1.00 1.00 64.9 81.7 0.04 0.82 81.7 1.00 81.7 2 ******************************************************************************** P P Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap, . (X) : 1.105 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 77 .7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E PMI ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxind South Bound East Bound West Boxind Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 3 1 D 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 •mm Volume Module: Base Vol: 198 1151 956 255 1024 326 451 826 250 613 702 214 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 198 1151 956 255 1024 326 451 826 250 613 702 214 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1-00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 220 1279 1062 283 1138 362 501 918 278 681 780 238 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mm Reduced vol: 220 1279 1062 263 1138 362 501 918 278 681 760 238 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 1 220 1279 1062 1 283 1138 1- 362 II 501 918 278 II 681 780 238 1 m Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.64 0.83 2.00 3.00 3183 4715 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.77 0.64 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 1.00 2.00 3.03 0.97 2.00 3.00 1.00 1468 3183 4598 1463 3183 4715 1468 1900 1900 1900 0.84 0.80 0.80 2.00 2.30 0.70 3183 3466 1064 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.07 0.27 0.72 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.46 Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.59 58.8 27.3 I I Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 58.8 27.3 DesignQueue: 15 55 **** 0.65 1.11 85-6 1.00 85.6 32 ***************************** 0.09 **** 0-08 1.11 149.5 1.00 149.5 20 ****** 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.19 0.19 0.21 0-22 0.22 0.42 0.58 30.2 1.00 30-2 52 ***** **** 0-19 0.22 1.11 1.03 0.42 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.58 1.03 1.11 1.08 30.2 106.2 120 132.9 123.0 89.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 30.2 106.2 120 132.9 123.0 89.7 17 33 59 1! 43 48 0.22 1.03 89.7 1.00 69.7 15 **************************************** P P P P P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P Ex+Rte2-PM ^M P P k Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.948 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.7 Optimal Cycle: 179 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I---IIII Protected Include Control; Rights: Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 I D 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 p Volxime Module: Base vol: 316 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 192 66 183 92 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 w Initial Bse; 316 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 192 68 183 92 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 351 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 213 76 203 102 p Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 351 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 213 76 203 102 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IM Final Vol.: 351 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 213 76 203 102 P Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.87 0.74 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.88 0.88 PM Lanes: 2.00 2.75 0.25 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 0-67 mw Final Sat.: 3334 4480 398 3334 3292 1399 3432 3538 1583 1769 2237 1124 Capacity Analysis Module: mm Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.31 0.50 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ** ** mm Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.18 0.52 0.52 0.19 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.10 0.10 Volxime/Cap: 0.95 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.59 0-95 0.95 0.76 0.56 0-78 0.95 0.95 Delay/Veh: 99.7 29.6 29.6 55.6 25.0 45.2 83.1 58.7 53.6 101.2 104 104.0 User DelAdj: 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 IM AdjDel/Veh: 59.8 17 .8 17.8 33.4 15.0 27 .1 49.9 35-2 32.2 60.7 62 .4 62 .4 DesignQueue: 27 49 4 22 43 31 44 42 14 6 16 8 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex+Rte3-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:46:17 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ***********************************************************************^.^.i,^,.^.f^.f,^^, Intersection #5 E.C.R./P.A.R. ********************************************** ************^^^^^^^^^.ij,^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec); 160 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.978 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 65.3 Optimal Cycle; 180 Level Of Service: E ************************************************************************.^*.j,.j^.j^^.^.^ Approach: North Bound South Boxind East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 I I Volxime Modul Base Vol; Growth Adj; Initial Bse User Adj; PHF Adj; PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol PCE Adj ; MLF Adj: Final Vol-; Protected Ovl 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 I I e: 163 1.00 163 1.00 0.90 181 0 181 1.00 1.00 181 I 551 1.00 551 1.00 0.90 612 0 612 1.00 1.00 612 382 1.00 382 1.00 0.90 424 0 424 1.00 1.00 424 879 1.00 879 1.00 0.90 977 0 977 1.00 1.00 977 791 1.00 791 1.00 0.90 879 0 879 1.00 1.00 879 173 1.00 173 1.00 0.90 192 0 192 1.00 1.00 192 232 1.00 232 1.00 0.90 258 0 258 1.00 1.00 258 1151 1.00 1151 1.00 0.90 1279 0 1279 1.00 1.00 1279 231 1.00 231 1.00 0.90 257 0 257 1.00 1.00 257 412 675 1.00 1.00 412 675 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 458 972 0 0 458 972 1-00 1.00 1,00 1.00 458 972 562 1.00 562 1.00 0.90 624 0 624 1.00 1.00 624 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.88 0.87 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 Final Sat.: 3334 4938 I 11 II Capacity Analysis Module: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.61 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.90 0.87 0,87 1.00 2.00 3,00 1.00 2.00 2.50 0.50 1537 3334 4938 1537 3432 4127 829 II 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.89 0.83 2.00 3.00 1.00 3432 5083 1583 1 I II Vol/Sat: 0. 05 0. 12 0, 28 0. 29 0. 18 0. 12 0. 08 0. 31 0. 31 0. 13 0. 19 0. 39 Crit Moves; ** * * ** '** * * ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 10 0. 15 0. 29 0. 30 0. 34 0-42 0. 08 0. 34 0. 34 0, 14 0. 40 0. 40 Volxime/Cap: 0, 52 0. 85 0. 95 0. 98 0. 52 0. 30 0-98 0. 92 0. 92 0. 92 0. 47 0. 98 Delay/Veh: 69 .3 76 .3 86 .1 78 .7 42 .6 31 .2 122 .9 60 .3 60 -3 90 .7 35 .4 77 .1 User DelAdj; 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 69 .3 76 .3 86 ,1 78 .7 42 .6 31 .2 122 .9 60 .3 60 .3 90 .7 35 .4 77 .1 DesignQueue: 15 48 26 65 54 10 22 61 16 36 54 36 ************ *** ***** ****** *** *** ***** * * : **** ****** * * * ** *** *** ****** ***** *** *** **• p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P Ex+Rte3-PM p p p ^M k Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:36:37 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 P.A.R./College ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.935 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 34.2 Optimal Cycle: 129 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxind South Boxind East Bound West Boxind Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R II Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: Lanes: 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 Volxime Module; - - - I 1 1 Base Vol: 50 10 13 60 19 766 263 1223 75 33 1978 84 Growth Adj; 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 1. .00 1, .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1.00 1, .00 Initial Bse; 50 10 13 60 19 766 263 1223 75 33 1978 84 User Adj; 1 ,00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1.00 1, .00 PHF Adj: 0 .90 0, .90 0, .90 0, .90 0, .90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0, .90 0, .90 0.90 0, .90 PHF Volume: 56 11 14 67 21 851 292 1359 63 37 2198 93 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 11 14 67 21 851 292 1359 63 37 2198 93 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 1. .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1,00 1, .00 MLF Adj; 1 ,00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 1, .00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1, .00 1, .00 1.00 1. .00 Final Vol.: 56 11 14 67 21 851 292 1359 83 37 2198 93 I II II Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.87 Lanes; 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.95 2.00 3.00 Final Sat.; 3432 3538 1563 1769 77 3104 3334 4938 I I II 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.81 0,88 0.87 0.81 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1537 3334 4938 1537 III Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0,02 Volume/Cap: 0.94 0.18 Delay/Veh: 142.1 49.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh: 142.1 49.8 DesignQueue: 3 1 1 ***************************** .01 0.02 0.51 63.3 1.00 63.3 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.28 0.05 0.01 0.45 0.06 **** **** **** 0.55 0.10 10.9 1.00 10.9 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.94 26.1 50.6 1.00 1.00 26.1 50.6 0.29 0.94 50.6 1.00 50.6 0,09 0,55 0,94 0,50 79.4 14.3 1.00 1.00 79.4 14.3 3 1 36 15 36 2 2 71 3 *************************************************** 0,02 0.48 0,50 0.94 53,8 32.6 1.00 1,00 53.8 32.6 0.48 0.13 14.7 1.00 14.7 Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P Ex+Rte3-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:36:37 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********************************************* **i,************^*^^t,^,.f,^^.i^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #7 P.A.R./I-5 NB Ramps ****************************************** *************************.^^^^^^,.t,^^^^.^.^.^^^^ Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.879 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.6 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service; c ************************************** **************************.i,.^^^^,^,^^^.i,^,.^^^^^,^^ Approach: North Boxind South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green; Lanes: Split Phase Ovl 0 0 0 0 10 0 2 1 I Volxime Module; Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj; PHF Adj: PHF Volume; Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol; PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: I I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Prot+Permit Include 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 I I I I Prot+Permit Include 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 I I 142 1 706 0 0 0 176 1152 0 0 1858 1294 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 142 1 706 0 0 0 176 1152 0 0 1858 1294 P 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PI 156 1 784 0 0 0 196 1280 0 0 2064 1438 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 158 1 784 0 0 0 196 1280 0 0 2064 1438 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 158 1 784 0 0 0 196 1280 0 0 2064 1438 Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.83 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.99 0.01 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat,: 1573 10 2786 0 0 0 I I II Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.10 0,10 0.28 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.28 0.28 Volume/Cap; 0.36 0,36 35.0 35.0 I I 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.20 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.71 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 2,00 382 4938 0 0 4938 2706 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: 0.96 0,96 AdjDel/Veh; 33,6 33.6 DesignQueue: 8 0 ***************************** 0.28 1.00 75.8 0.96 72.6 40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0 0.0 0.96 0.96 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.96 0.0 0 0.51 0.26 **** 0.67 0.64 0.77 0.40 46.5 10.3 0-96 0.96 44.6 9.9 12 32 II 0.00 0.00 0.42 0,00 0.00 0.0 0.96 0.0 0 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.79 0.0 24.4 0.96 0.96 0.0 23.4 0 71 0.53 **** 0.53 1.00 52.4 0.96 50.3 50 P P P P *************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p p p p p p p p Ex+Rte3-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:36:37 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #3 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 P.A.R./I-5 SB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0-677 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.4 Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include I I Protected Include II Protected Ignore Min. Green: Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 D 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 D 2 0 0 1 Volxime Module: Base Vol; 0 0 0 737 0 191 0 620 308 0 1066 1011 Growth Adj: 1.00 1-00 1 .00 1-00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 737 0 191 0 620 308 0 1066 1011 User Adj; 1.00 1, 00 1 .00 1-00 1 .00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0. 90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.00 PHF Volxime: 0 0 0 819 0 212 0 689 342 0 1184 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 819 0 212 0 689 342 0 1184 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Vol.; 0 0 0 819 0 212 0 689 342 0 1184 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 I I 1900 1900 1900 0.88 1.00 0.81 2.00 0.00 1.00 3334 0 1537 IIII 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.00 1.34 0.66 0-00 2.00 1.00 0 2246 1115 0 3437 1900 I I Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves; Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue; 0 0 0 ***************************** 0-25 0.00 **** 0.36 0.00 0.68 0.00 20.4 0.0 1.00 1.00 20-4 0.0 22 0 0.14 0.00 0.31 0.31 0-00 0,34 0.00 0.36 0.38 16.9 1.00 16.9 5 **** 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.60 0.0 12.8 1.00 1.00 0.0 12.8 0 14 0.51 0.60 12.8 1.00 12.8 7 **** 0.00 0-51 0.00 0.68 0,0 14.0 1,00 1,00 0.0 14.0 0 25 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 *************************************************** P P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:51:43 Page 1-1 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Mi Scenario Report m*i Scenario: Ex-AM Command: Default Command mm Volxime: Ex-AM Geometry; Ex-AM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation M Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths •MI Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration MM m p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA ^M k p Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:08:20 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- . Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Reoort 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) • ***********************************************.^.^.^.,.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^_^_^_^^^^^_^_^^^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ****************************** *****************************^.^^^.^^^^^^,^^,.^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.874 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26 3 Optimal Cycle: 95 Level Of Service; C ******-*****************************************^^,^-^.^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Approach: North Boxind South Boxind East Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R West Boxmd L-T-R Control: Protec ted E •rotec ted II SDlit Pi lase MM Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 wm Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 1 P 1 Volume Module; 1 1 Base Vol: 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0' 0 0 192 0 177 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 868 46 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 Mi User Adj: 1 ,00 1,00. . 1.00 1 .00 1.00 i.ob 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj; 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 0 9 64 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 •M Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ Reduced Vol: 0 9 64 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 • 0 197 ^m • PCE Adj: 1. .00, 1.00 1.0.0 1. ,00 1.00 1.00 1. .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. .00 1.00 1.00 1. .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Pinal Vol.: 0 9 64 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0" 213 0 197 Satxiration Flow Module; Sat/Lane: ' 1900 1900 - 1900 Adjustment: 1,00 0.91 0.77 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 .Final Sat.; 0 1727 1468 I I Capacity Analysis Module; ' 1900 1900 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1641 1727 1900 1.00 0.00 0 1900 1900 1.00.1.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1900 .1.00 0.00 0 •1900 1900 1900 0.83 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.00 1.00 1570 0 1405 Vol/Sat: Crit Moves; Green/Cycle: Volxime/Cap: Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: I.OO 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 15.2 DesignQueue: 0 21 ****************************** 0.00 0.56 **** 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.80 0.0 15.2 0.03 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 • **** **** 0.70 0.05 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.05 0.80 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.87 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75.1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 75,1 1 5 20 0 0 0 0 . 11 0 11 ********************** ***************** ***************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2 000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.757 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28,0 Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxind South Boxind East Boxind West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L - T - R Control; Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights; Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 10 110 10 110 10 10 1 1 0 110 Volxime Module: Base Vol: 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Growth Adj ; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Initial Bse; 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Pi User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hp PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 140 633 14 19 1056 167 "289 28 240 8 87 52 Reduct Vol: - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pi Reduced Vol: 140 633 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HI MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OO 1,00 Final Vol.: 140 633 . 14 19 1056 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 — Saturation Flow Module: MM Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.69 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.82 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 0.75 Final Sat.; 1718 3352 74 1716 • 2905 459 1641 1727 1468 1641 1939 1159 Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat; 0.08 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.36 0.36 0.18 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 P Crit Moves: **** **** * * * * ** * * Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.56 0.56 0.03 0,48 0.48 0.23 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.06 0.06 Ml Volxime/Cap: 0.76 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.-06 0.58 0.58 0.76 0.76 Delay/Veh: 59.7 12.3 12.3 50.9 23.3 23.3 44.2 26.1 32.7 97.6 62.6 62.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh: 59.7 12.3 12.3 50.9 23.3 23.3 44.2 26.1 32.7 97.6 62.8 62.8 Mi DesignQueue: 7 16 0 1 33 5 13 1 10 0 5 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P p Ex-AM Thu Dec e, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.875 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 43.4 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Boxind L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Ovl Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •M Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 P Volxime Module: 1 1 1 Base Vol: 67 480 522 111 1497 445 195 517 122 850 843 121 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PI Initial Bse ;• 67 460 522 111 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 121 p User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ^M PHP Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume; 74 533 - 580 123 1653 49 6 218 574 136 944 937 134 MM Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol ; 74 533 580 123 1653 496 218 574 135 944 937 134 MM PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1,00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Final Vol.; 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 m 1 Saturation Flow Module: I 1 ... . , 1 1 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0,80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.81 0.81 mm Lanes; 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.08 0.92 2.00 3,00 1.00 2.00 2.52 0.38 MM Final Sat.: 3163 4715 1466 3183 4678 1395 3183 4715 1468 3183 4047 579 Capacity Analysis Module: wm Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.11 0.40 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.12 0.09 0.30 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** mm Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.32 0.66 0.11 0.41 0.41 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.34 0.37 0.37 Volxime/Cap; 0.87 0.35 0.60 0.35 0.67 0-87 0.63 0.87 0.67 0.87 0.63 0.63 wm Delay/Veh; 123.9 35.1 13.8 56.2 40.7 40.7 61.1 69.5 63,2 50.1 35.7 35.7 User DelAdj: 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m AdjDel/Veh: 123-9 35.1 13.8 56.2 40.7 40.7 61.1 69.5 63.2 50.1 "35.7 35.7 DesignQueue; 5 28 16 8 60 -24 15 38 9 50 47 7 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:51:44 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) **********************************************************************t,*t,.i^.^..^^,^,f,.i, Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ************************************************************** ****************.f^^. Cycle (sec); 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.596 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.2 Optimal Cycle: SO Level Of Service: c ******************************************************* *****************t,^,.^^,^,^,^,^, Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: 1 i Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 • 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 ' 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volxime Module; Base Vol: 203 619 27 136 763 237 512 321 237 65 413 220 Growth Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 Initial Bse: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 User Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime; 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 183 557 24 122 687 213 461 289 213 59 372 198 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.88 0.86 0.86 0,86 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.88 0.12 2.00 2.29 0.71 2.00 2.00 1-00 1.00 1.31 0.69 Final Sat.: 3334 4706 203 3334 3634 1127 3432 3538 1583 1769 2189 1165 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.08 0.13 0.03 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves; **** **** **** * * * * Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.31 0.31 0,10 0.32 0.32 0.23 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.29 0.29 Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.20 0.33 0.33 0.60 0.60 Delay/Veh: 68.6 40.3 40.3 64.3 43.8 43.8 53.3 28.6 30.5 63.7 47.2 47.2 User DelAdj: 0.60 O.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0-60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 AdjDel/Veh; 41.1 24.2 24.2 38.6 26.3 26.3 32.0 17.1 18.3 38.2 28.3 28.3 DesignQueue: 14 33 1 9 41 13 31 15 11 4 23 12 *************************************************************************^,*.f,^.^.^^ Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA MM p p p p p p p Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:51:44 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 La Costa/I-5 NB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.668 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.9 Optimal Cycle; 47 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Bound South Boxind East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include 11 Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 110 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 p Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 0 474 0 0 0 164 765 0 0 740 374 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse; 43 0 474 0 0 0 164 765 0 0 740 374 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 48 0 527 0 0 0 182 850 0 0 822 416 pl Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 48 0 527 0 0 0 182 850 0 0 822 416 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Final Vol.: 48 0 527 0 0 0 182 850 0 0 822 416 Saturation Flow Module: Ml Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.87 0,93 0.68 0.93 0. 93 0. 93 0.84 0.84 0.93 0.93 0.81 0.75 wm Lanes: 2.00 0,00 2.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 MM Final Sat.; 3297 0 2591 0 0 0 1598 3196 0 0 4592 1430 Capacity Analysis Module: wmm Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.00 0. 00 0-00 0.11 0.27 0.00 0,00 0,18 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** * *** Im Green/Cycle; 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.17 0.61 0.00 0,00 0,44 0.44 Volxime/Cap: 0.05 0.00 0.67 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0,67 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.67 Delay/Veh: 24.6 0.0 32-6 0.0 0 .0 0 .0 45.1 10.8 0.0 0.0 19.6 25.3 mm User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 24.6 0.0 32.6 0.0 0 .0 0 .0 45.1 10.8 0.0 0.0 19.6 25.3 Mi DesignQueue: 2 0 21 0 0 0 9 20 0 0 27 14 ******************************************************************************** p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:51:44 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************.^.^^ Intersection #6 La Costa/I-5 SB Ramps ****************************************************i,***********i,***********^,^,^^^^ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.649 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 26.8 Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: c **************************************************************************^^.f^.j^.^.^.f^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Boxind Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights: Split Phase Include II Split Phase Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 MM Volxime Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 582 13 381 0 365 89 427 353 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 0 0 0 582 13 381 0 365 89 427 363 0 mw User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 wm PHF Volume; 0 0 0 647 14 423 0 405 99 474 403 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 647 14 423 0 406 99 474 403 0 PCE Adj : 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol,: 0 0 0 647 14 423 0 406 99 474 403 0 P Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ml Adjustment; 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.86 0.95 Lanes; 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.61 0.39 2.00 2.00 0.00 P Final Sat,: 0 0 0 2943 64 1504 0 2549 621 3167 3265 0 nn Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.26 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.15 0,12 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** P Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.48 0.00 P Volxime/Cap: 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.65 0.00 0.65 0,65 0.65 0.26 0.00 Delay/Veh; 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.9 20.9 24.6 0.0 35.8 35.8 36.9 15.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.9 20.9 24.6 0.0 35.8 35,8 36.9 15.7 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0 21 0 14 0 18 4 21 12 0 P ***************************** *************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P ll p p Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:52:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-PM Command: Default Command Volxime: Ex-PM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee; Default Impact Fee Trip Generation; Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution; Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********************************************************** ******************.^.^.^..^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.010 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.2 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxind South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Include Protected Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 IM Volxime Module: Ma Base Vol; 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 P User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PI Reduced Vol: 0 1333 13 6 177 1085 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Ml MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 PI Saturation Flow Module: Ml Sat/Lane: 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1-00 0.00 1.00 P Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 1 0 0 1 1570 1 0 1405 1 Ml Capacity Analysis Module; 1 1 1 Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.77 0.09 0.11 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0-00 0.04 P Crit Moves: **** **** **** P Green/Cycle; 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.11 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0,05 P Volxime/Cap: 0.00 1.01 0.12 1.01 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 1.01 0,00 0.79 Delay/Veh; 0.0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 159.1 0.0 97.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 159-1 0.0 97,9 Ml DesignQueue: 0 24 2 10 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 *********************************************** ********************^^*.t^.^.^.^^^,.^^,.^.^^ Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex-PM P P P P k m k p k Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Remcho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical vol./Cap. (X); 0.782 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.4 Optimal Cycle: 73 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach; Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Boxmd L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include II Protected Include 11 Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volxime Module: 1 1 1 1 1 t " • - Base Vol: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 54 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 237 1170 12 60 887 220 305 119 182 11 64 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 237 1170 12 50 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 1 1 -. -----[ 1 -1 1 — ., Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 Adjustment; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.82 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.60 0,40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.59 Final Sat.: 1718 3398 35 1718 2671 553 1541 1727 1468 1641 2032 1079 1 1 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 j ,. — 1 1 1 Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.19 0.07 0.12 0.01 0.03 0.03 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.55 0.55 0.05 0.42 0.42 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.04 0.04 Volxime/Cap; 0.78 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.26 0.47 0.47 0.78 0.78 Delay/Veh; 51.7 16,4 16.4 59.1 27.7 27.7 45.4 29.4 31.8 53.0 74.1 74.1 User DelAdj; 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 51.7 16.4 16.4 59.1 27.7 27.7 45 .4 29 .4 31.8 63.0 74.1 74.1 DesignQueue: 11 32 0 3 31 8 14 5 8 1 3 2 ******************************************************************************** p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P pi P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real *******************************************************************************j. Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 1.061 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 60.7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement; North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Boxmd L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Ovl Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 mm Volxime Module: dim Base Vol; 196 1151 956 155 1024 326 451 726 250 613 602 114 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 198 1151 956 155 1024 326 451 725 250 613 602 114 tmm User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 PHF Volxime: 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 807 278 681 659 127 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Reduced Vol; 220 1279 1062 172 1136 362 501 807 278 581 669 127 PCE Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final vol.: 220 1279 1062 172 1136 362 501 807 278 681 669 127 MM Saturation Flow Module; p Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 p Adjustment; 0.84 0.83 0-77 0.64 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.81 • 0.61 Lanes; 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.03 0.97 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2-52 0.48 p Final Sat.: 3183 4715 1468 3183 4598 1463 3183 4715 1468 3183 3868 734 p Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0. 07 0. 27 0. 72 0. 05 0. 25 0. 25 0. 16 0. 17 0-19 0.21 0. 17 0. 17 Crit Moves; ** ** ** ** * * ** **** Green/Cycle: 0. 12 0. 48 0. 68 0. 05 0. 42 0. 42 0. 16 0. 18 0. 18 0.20 0. 20 0. 20 Volxime/Cap: 0. 60 0. 55 1. 06 1. 06 0-60 0. 60 0. 67 0. 96 1. 06 1.06 0. 87 0. 87 Delay/Veh: 59 .3 25 .4 67 -5 151 .9 31 .1 31 .1 67 .1 76 .5 128 .1 106.7 61 .3 61 .3 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 59 -3 25 .4 67 .6 151 .9 31 .1 31 .1 67 .1 76 .5 128 .1 106.7 61 .3 61 .3 DesignQueue: 15 53 30 12 53 17 32 52 18 43 42 8 ************ *** * * * * * * * * * * * ****** ***** ****** *** *** * ** * * ****** *********** *** *** * * 1 Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA ^M P P Ex-PM P P P 1^ P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:52:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.911 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.0 Optimal Cycle; 141 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Boxmd East Boxmd west Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R It 11 Control; Rights: Min. Green; Lanes; Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 --I- Volxime Module: Base Vol; Growth Adj; Initial Bse; User Adj; PHF Adj; PHF Volxime: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.; Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 III Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 11 316 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 192 68 183 92 0.96 0.96 0 .96 0.96 0.96 0-96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 .96 0,96 0 .96 303 875 78 268 872 599 537 546 184 65 176 88 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 337 972 86 298 969 666 596 609 205 73 195 98 Saturation Flow Module: I! I I Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.88 0,86 2.00 2.76 3334 4482 1900 0.86 0.24 397 Capacity Analysis Module: II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.88 0.87 0.74 0.90 0.93 0.83 2.00 2.00 1.00 2,00 2.00 1.00 3334 3292 1399 3432 3538 1583 ---III 1900 1900 1900 0.93 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.33 0.67 1759 2237 1124 mm Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.29 0.48 0.17 0.17 0,13 0.04 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves; **** **** **** **** MM Green/Cycle; 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.18 0.52 0.52 0.19 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.10 0.10 Volxane/Cap; 0.91 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.56 0.91 0.91 0.75 0.56 0.75 0.91 0.91 Delay/Veh: 91.8 29.3 29.3 55.3 24,5 40.0 76.4 57.3 52.9 96.2 95.8 95.8 mm User DelAdj: 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 AdjDel/Veh; 55.1 17.6 17.6 33.2 14.7 24.0 45.8 34.4 31.8 57.7 57.5 57.5 Ml DesignQueue: 26 47 4 21 41 29 42 41 14 6 15 8 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:52:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 La Costa/I-5 NB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap, (X): 0.722 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23,4 Optimal Cycle; 54 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************j^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I II----It III Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green; 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 Lanes; 11002 00000 10200 00301 I---IIIIti i Volxime Module: Base Vol: 118 4 593 0 0 0 126 677 0 0 603 406 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 118 4 593 0 0 0 126 677 0 0 803 406 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 131 4 659 0 0 0 140 752 0 0 892 451 Reduct vol: 00 000000 0 000 Reduced vol: 131 4 659 0 0 0 140 752 0 0 892 451 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 131 4 659 0 0 0 140 752 0 0 892 451 III II- II t Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.77 0.77 0.66 0.93 0.93 0-93 0.84 0.84 0.93 0.93 0.81 0.75 Lanes; 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2857 87 2591 0 0 0 1598 3196 0 0 4592 1430 III---ItII--I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.05 0.05 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.19 0-32 Crit Moves; **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.35 0.35 0-35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 Volxime/Cap: 0.13 0.13 0-72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.72 Delay/Veh; 22.1 22.1 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 12.9 0.0 0.0 19.9 27.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.1 22.1 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 12-9 0.0 0-0 19.9 27.3 DesignQueue: 5 0 25 0 0 0 7 19 0 0 29 15 ******************************************************************************** P P p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P Ex-PM P k k p p p k Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:52:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 La Costa/1-5 SB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.572 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 25.8 Optimal Cycle; 39 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Boxmd Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include I I Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 D 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol; 0 0 0 400 2 153 0 445 88 532 370 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Initial Bse; 0 0 0 400 2 153 0 445 88 532 370 0 User Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0-90 0 -90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 444 2 170 0 494 98 591 411 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 444 2 170 0 494 98 591 411 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1-00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 444 2 170 0 494 98 591 411 0 I II • Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.79 0.79 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2994 13 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves; Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 Volxime/Cap; 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 I I It• 1900 1900 1900 0.79 0.95 0.84 1.00 0.00 1.67 1504 0 2656 II• 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.84 0.83 0-86 0.95 0.33 2-00 2,00 0.00 527 3167 3265 0 III Delay/Veh: User DelAdj; 1,00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0.00 0.00 0,0 1.00 0.0 0 0,15 0.15 **** 0.26 0.26 0.57 0.57 33.3 33,3 1.00 1.00 33.3 33-3 19 0 0.11 0.00 0.19 0.19 **** 0.26 0.44 31.7 1.00 31.7 7 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.57 0.0 28.8 1.00 1.00 0.0 28.8 0 19 0.32 0.57 28.8 1.00 28.8 4 0.19 0.13 **** 0.33 0.65 0.57 0.19 28.7 7.0 1.00 1.00 28.7 7.0 23 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P k k Ex+Rte4-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:55:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario; Ex+Rte4 -AM Command; Default Command Volume; Ex+Rte4 -AM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee; Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Conf igurat ion: Default Configuration m m m ^M p p Ml Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Mi p Ex+Rte2-AM P P m m k m Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.946 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.6 Optimal Cycle; 143 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Boxmd L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Boimd L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Include 11 Protected Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 li Volxime Module; 1 1 ' 1 1 • ----- 1 1 Base Vol: 0 868 146 69 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 0 868 146 69 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 IH Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J.. Reduced Vol; 0 9 54 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 P PCE Adj : 1-00 1.00 I.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 — Final Vol.: 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 P Saturation Flow Module; 11 1 1 - . Sat/Lane: 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 1-00 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 Ml Lanes; 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Ml Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 1 Capacity Analysis 1 Module; 1 1 1 1 I 1 MM Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.55 0.11 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** ** ** •M Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.22 0-00 0.22 Volxime/Cap: 0.00 0.85 0.17 0.86 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.64 mm Delay/Veh; 0.0 22.9 7.9 105.6 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.8 0.0 44.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 22.9 7.9 105.6 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.8 0.0 44.4 DesignQueue: 0 24 4 5 25 0 0 0 0 17 0 10 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol-/Cap. (X); 0.793 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.3 Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L • - T - R East Boxmd L-T-R West Boxmd L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 MM Volxime Module; Base Vol; 126 670 13 17 1050 150 250 25 216 7 78 47 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 126 670 13 17 1050 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PI Reduced Vol; 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HH MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Final Vol.: 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 P Saturation Flow Module: m Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.69 0.69 0,86 0.91 0.77 0-86 0-82 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.25 0.75 P Final Sat.: 1718 3353 63 1718 2949 422 1641 1727 1468 1541 1939 1159 Ml Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0,08 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 I^M 1*.. u.. Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** I^M 1*.. u.. Green/Cycle; 0-10 0.57 0.57 0.03 0.50 0,50 0.22 0.27 0.27 0.01 0.06 0.06 p Volxime/Cap: 0,79 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.06 0.60 0-60 0.79 0.79 Delay/Veh: 65.2 11.8 11.6 52.7 23.5 23.5 48,1 27.1 34.4 109.5 68.1 56.1 p User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 65.2 11.8 11.8 52.7 23.5 23.5 48.1 27.1 34.4 109.5 68.1 68.1 iP DesignQueue: 7 19 0 1 36 5 13 1 10 0 5 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte2-AM P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.875 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 44.5 Optimal Cycle; 112 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Boimd West Boxmd Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected m Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 n Volume Module: 1 .. [ j . •1 I Base Vol: 67 460 522 211 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 221 Growth Adj ; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse; : 67 480 522 211 1497 446 19 6 517 122 850 843 221 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj ; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 74 533 580 234 1663 495 218 574 136 944 937 246 IM Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: : 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 246 mm PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm Final Vol.; 74 533 580 234 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 246 Wm 1 Saturation Plow Module: I 1 .... . 1 1 1 1 Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.64 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0.80 Lanes; 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.08 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.38 0.62 •M Final Sat.; 3183 4715 1456 3183 4676 1395 3183 4715 1468 3183 3619 950 — 1 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 . - 1 1 t 1 • •Mt Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.11 0.40 0.07 0.36 0.36 0-07 0-12 0.09 0-30 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** ** * * **** **** Mi Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.26 0.60 0.17 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.34 0.38 0.38 Volume/Cap; 0.87 0.43 0.66 0.43 0.87 0.87 0-68 0.87 0.67 0-87 0.68 0.68 wm Delay/Veh: 123.9 41.7 19.6 50.7 40.7 40.7 54.8 69.5 63.2 50.1 36.4 36.4 User DelAdj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm AdjDel/Veh: 123.9 41,7 19.6 50.7 40.7 40.7 64.8 69.5 63.2 50.1 36.4 36.4 DesignQueue; 5 30 19 15 80 24 15 36 9 50 46 12 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte4-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:56:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) *******************************************************************^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.772 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.2 Optimal Cycle: 79 Level Of Service: c *******************************************************************************^ Approach; North Bound South Boxmd East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; I i Protected Include Protected Include I I I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 • 0 2 1 0 2 1 3 2 1 0 2 ' 0 2 0 1 1 1 D 1 1 0 MM Volume Module: Base Vol; 303 619 27 136 763 237 512 321 337 65 413 220 MP* Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 303 619 27 136 763 237 512 321 337 65 413 220 mm User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 337 688 30 151 846 263 569 357 374 72 459 244 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MM Reduced Vol; 337 688 30 151 848 263 569 357 374 72 459 244 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 337 688 30 151 848 263 569 357 374 72 459 244 Ml Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0-88 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.88 0,88 Lanes: 2.00 2.87 0.13 2.00 2.29 0.71 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 Hi Final Sat.: 3334 4703 205 3334 3633 1127 3432 3536 1583 1769 2190 1164 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.10 0.24 0.04 0.21 0.21 Ml Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.13 0,33 0.33 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.21 0.42 0.42 0.07 0.27 0.27 IP Volume/Cap: 0.77 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.24 0.57 0.57 0.77 0.77 Delay/Veh: 71.3 39.5 39.5 64.2 50.2 50.2 60.5 28.6 34-8 73.4 54.4 54.4 User DelAdj; 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0,56 0.56 P AdjDel/Veh: 40.3 22.3 22.3 36-3 28.4 28-4 34.2 16.2 19.7 41,5 30.8 30.8 DesignQueue; 25 40 2 11 52 16 39 18 19 6 29 16 IH ******************************************************************************^,^, Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P k p p p p p k p p p Ex+Rte4-AM Thu Dec 5, 2001 18:56:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 La Costa/l-5 NB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.779 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.5 Optimal Cycle; 64 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Min. Green: Lanes: Split Phase Include 0 0 0 110 0 2 I I I I I- Volxime Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse; User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 I I 43 0 474 0 0 0 164 855 0 0 740 474 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 43 0 474 0 0 0 164 865 0 0 740 474 1 .00 1 ,00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 0 .90 0 ,90 0.90 0 .90 0 ,90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 48 0 527 0 0 0 182 961 0 0 822 527 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 527 0 0 0 182 961 0 0 822 527 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 48 0 527 0 0 0 182 961 0 0 822 527 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.90 0.66 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.; 3191 0 2507 II II 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.78 0.73 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 1547 3093 0 0 4444 1384 II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.21 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle; 0.27 0.00 Volume/Cap; 0.06 0.00 27.1 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 27.1 0.0 DesignQueue; 2 0 **** 0.27 0.78 39,5 1,00 39.5 22 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0-0 1.00 0.0 0 0.12 0.31 **** 0.15 0.64 0.78 0.49 56.1 9.6 1.00 1.00 56.1 9.6 9 21 I I 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0-0 1.00 0.0 0 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.38 0.0 16.1 1.00 1.00 0.0 16.1 0 24 0.38 **** 0.49 0.78 26.8 1.00 26.8 16 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P k Ex+Rte4-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:56:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ********************** *************************************************^^^^^^^^,^.^.^.^ Intersection #6 La Costa/1-5 SB Ramps ************************************* *************************************^^^,^,.^.^.^, Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap- (X): 0.549 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.0 Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: c *******************************************************i,******************^,^,.t,^,.^^ Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Boxmd Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include 11 Protected Include 1 I Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 m, Volxime Module; Base Vol; 0 0 0 682 13 381 0 365 89 427 363 0 MM Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 682 13 381 0 365 89 427 363 0 HI User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ml PHF Volume; 0 0 0 758 14 423 0 406 99 474 403 0 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Reduced Vol; 0 0 0 758 14 423 0 406 99 474 403 0 p PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 p MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 758 14 423 0 406 99 474 403 0 p Saturation Flow Module: p Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 p Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.86 0.95 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0,00 1.96 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.61 0.39 2.00 2.00 0.00 HI Final Sat-; 0 0 0 2953 55 1504 0 2549 621 3167 3265 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.26 0,28 0.00 0.16 0,16 0.15 0.12 0.00 P Crit Moves; **** **** **** 0.00 P Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.48 0.00 P Volxime/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.65 0.00 0.65 0.65 0,65 0.26 0,00 Delay/Veh: 0-0 0.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 24.6 0,0 35.8 35.8 36.9 15.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 P AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 24.6 0.0 35.8 35.8 36.9 15.7 0.0 P DesignQueue: 0 0 0 25 0 14 0 18 4 21 12 0 P ******************************************************************************^,^ Traffix 7.5,1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte4-PM P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:58:51 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario; Ex+Rte4 • •PM Command: Default Command Volxime; Ex+Rte4• •PM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation; Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Conf iguration; Default Configuration Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA PI P Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ***************************************************** **************^,^.j^.j^.f,.^.j^.f^^^^..^.^.^ Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 1.087 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 51.1 Optimal Cycle: 160 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Boxmd West Boxmd Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected SDlit Phase Solit Phase Rights; Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volxime Module: Base Vol; 0 1200 222 159 977 0 0 0 0 169 0 49 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1200 222 159 977 0 0 0 0 159 0 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.9O 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 188 0 54 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 188 0 54 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 0 1333 247 177 1086 0 0 0 0 188 0 54 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.77 0.17 0.11 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.04 Crit Moves; **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.10 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 Volxime/Cap: 0.00 1.09 0.24 1.09 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.00 0.35 Delay/Veh: 0.0 56.9 5.8 146.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 143.3 0.0 47.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 68.9 5.8 146.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 143.3 0.0 47.5 DesignQueue: 0 29 5 10 15 0 0 0 0 11 0 3 ****************************** ************************************^*^^^^^^^^j^j^^^ p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P H P Ex+Rte2- PM Thu Dec 5, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.818 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.1 Optimal Cycle; 81 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Bound West Boxmd Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control; Protected Protected Protected Protected P Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *• Lanes: 10 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 P Volume Module; Base Vol; 213 1153 11 54 898 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm Initial Bse: 213 1153 11 54 898 198 275 107 154 10 58 31 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume; 237 1261 12 60 998 220 306 119 182 11 54 34 wm Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 237 1281 12 60 998 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 IH PCE Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 237 1281 12 60 998 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 m Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-88 0-86 0.66 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.82 0.82 wm Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.64 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.31 0.69 P Final Sat.: 1718 3401 32 1716 2740 604 1641 1727 1468 1641 2032 1079 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0. 14 0. 38 0. 38 0. 03 0. 36 0. 36 0. 19 0. 07 0. 12 0. 01 0. 03 0. 03 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle; 0. 17 0. 56 0. 56 0. 05 0. 45 0. 45 0. 23 0. 25 0. 25 0. 01 0. 04 0. 04 Volume/Cap: 0. 82 0. 67 0. 67 0. 67 0. 82 0. 82 0. 82 0. 27 0. 49 0. 49 0-82 0. 82 Delay/Veh: 56 .6 16 .4 16 .4 54 .6 27 .9 27 .9 49 -9 30 .3 32 .9 64 .9 81 .7 81 .7 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1-00 1. 00 1-00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 AdjDel/Veh: 56 .6 16 .4 16 .4 64 .6 27 .9 27 .9 49 .9 30 .3 32 .9 64 .9 81 .7 81 .7 DesignQueue: 11 34 0 3 34 7 14 5 8 1 3 2 ************ * ** * * * * * * * * *** ** * ** * **i i** *** *** *** * * * **i t** • * * *** * ** *** **-i c ** *** *** **' p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P Ex+Rte2-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:22 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.105 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 77.7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Boxmd West Boxmd Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected HI Rights: Ovl Include Include Include MM Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 HI Volxime Module: PI Base Vol; 19 8 1151 956 255 1024 326 451 826 250 613 702 214 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 19 6 1151 956 255 1024 326 451 826 250 613 702 214 P User Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume; 220 1279 1062 283 1138 362 501 918 278 681 780 236 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Reduced Vol: 220 1279 1062 283 1138 362 501 918 278 581 780 238 m PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 220 1279 1062 283 1138 362 501 918 276 681 780 238 mm Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.84 0.83 0-77 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.60 0.80 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.03 0.97 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.30 0.70 P Final Sat.: 3163 4715 1468 3183 4598 1463 3183 4715 1456 3183 3486 1064 P Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.27 0.72 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.22 0-22 H| Crit Moves: **** **** **** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.46 0.65 0.08 0.42 0.42 0.15 0.18 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.22 P Volxime/Cap: 0.58 0.59 1.11 1.11 0.58 0.58 1.03 1.11 1.08 1.11 1.03 1.03 Delay/Veh; 58.8 27.3 85.6 149.5 30.2 30.2 106,2 120 132.9 123.0 89.7 89.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 AdjDel/Veh: 58.8 27.3 65.6 149.5 30.2 30.2 106.2 120 132.9 123.0 89.7 89.7 DesignQueue; 15 55 32 20 52 17 33 59 18 43 48 15 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7-5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte4-PM Thu Dec 5, 2001 18:58:51 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 E.C.R./La Costa ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.984 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.4 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Boxmd west Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Include I I Protected Include 11 11 Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ml Lanes; 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 10 1 1 0 1 Volxime Module; 1 1 1 I II Base Vol: 415 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 292 68 183 92 Growth Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml Initial Bse: 416 911 81 279 908 624 559 571 292 68 183 92 User Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 462 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 324 76 203 102 wm Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 462 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 324 76 203 102 mm PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MM Final Vol.: 462 1012 90 310 1009 693 621 634 324 76 203 102 Saturation Flow Module: Pi Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.87 0,74 0.90 0.93 0.63 0.93 0.88 0.88 MM Lanes: 2.00 2.75 0.25 2.00 2.00 1,00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 0.67 Final Sat.: 3334 4480 398 3334 3292 1399 3432 3538 1563 1769 2237 1124 1 Capacity Analysis Module; II 1 1 1 1 Ml Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.31 0.50 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.04 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** * * ** * ** * ** ** P Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.46 0.46 0.19 0.50 0.50 0.18 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.09 0,09 Volxime/Cap; 0.98 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.98 0.98 0.79 0.90 0.90 0.98 0.98 Delay/Veh; 101.6 28.8 28.8 55.2 27.1 54.7 92.8 59.6 80.2 135.7 115 114.7 Pi User DelAdj: 0,56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0,56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 AdjDel/Veh: 57.4 16.3 16.3 31.2 15.3 30.9 52.4 33.6 45.3 76,7 64.8 64.8 P DesignQueue; 34 46 4 21 45 32 44 43 22 6 16 8 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte4-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:58:51 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) *******************************************************************************.„ Intersection #5 La Costa/1-5 NB Ramps *************************************************************************** **^,i^.^ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.874 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 25.8 Optimal Cycle; 91 Level Of Service: C ************************************************ ************************.^^,^,^,.f,.^.^^, Approach: North Bound South Boxmd East Bound West Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights; Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 110 0 2 0 i 0 0 0 0 1 ' 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 wm Volume Module; Base Vol: 118 4 593 0 0 0 126 777 0 0 803 606 Mk Growth Adj; 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Initial Bse; 118 4 593 0 0 0 125 777 0 0 803 506 P User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P PHF Volume: 131 4 659 0 0 0 140 863 0 0 892 673 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vol: 131 4 659 0 0 0 140 863 0 0 892 673 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Final Vol.: 131 4 659 0 0 0 140 863 0 0 892 673 Ml Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.79 0.79 0.70 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.95 0.95 0-82 0.77 Lanes: 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.; 2918 89 2646 0 0 0 1632 3265 0 0 4691 1461 MM Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0. 04 0. 04 0. 25 0, 00 0. 00 0 .00 0. 09 0. 26 0. 00 0, 00 0. 19 0, 46 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 28 0. 28 0. 28 0. 00 0. 00 0 .00 0. 10 0. 63 0. 00 0. 00 0. 53 0, 53 Volxime/Cap: 0. 16 0. 16 0, 87 0. 00 0. 00 0 .00 0, 87 0. 42 0, 00 0. 00 0, 36 0. 87 Delay/Veh: 26 .9 26 .9 45 .1 0 .0 0 .0 0.0 82 .0 9 .7 0 .0 0 .0 13 .9 31 .6 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 26 .9 26 .9 45 .1 0 ,0 0 .0 0.0 82 .0 9 .7 0 .0 0 .0 13 .9 31 .6 DesignQueue: 5 0 27 0 0 0 7 19 0 0 24 20 ************ * * * ***** *** *** ****** ***** * * * * * **** *** ***** ****** *** *** ** * * * ****** *** P p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex+Rte4-PM P P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:58:51 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 La Costa/1-5 SB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.613 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 26.9 Optimal Cycle; 42 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Boxmd South Boxmd East Boxmd West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights: Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 L 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 D 2 0 0 p 1 Volxime Module; 1 1 • 1 1 It 1 p Base Vol: 0 0 0 500 2 153 0 445 88 532 370 0 Growth Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse; 0 0 0 500 2 153 0 445 88 532 370 0 IBL.. User Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 0 0 0 556 2 170 0 494 98 591 411 0 •Ml Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 0 0 0 556 2 170 0 494 96 591 411 0 P PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ml Final Vol.; 0 0 0 556 2 170 0 494 98 591 411 0 1^ Saturation Flow Module: I 11 1 ^m Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.84 0.84 0.83 0.86 0,95 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.99 0,01 1.00 0.00 1.67 0.33 2.00 2.00 0.00 IM Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2996 11 1504 0 2656 527 3167 3265 0 Capacity Analysis Module; 1 1 i Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.19 0.19 0,19 0,13 0.00 Crit Moves; **** **** **** mm Green/Cycle; 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.61 0.00 Volxime/Cap; 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.37 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.21 0,00 Delay/Veh; 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.1 31.1 27.9 0.0 31.0 31.0 30.9 8.9 0.0 *" User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0-0 0.0 31.1 31.1 27.9 0.0 31.0 31.0 30.9 8.9 0.0 IM^ DesignQueue: 0 0 0 22 0 7 0 20 4 24 9 0 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:33 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex-AM Command; Default Command mm Volxime: Ex-AM Geometry; Ex-AM Impact Pee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths •Ml Routes: Default Routes Conf igurat ion; Default Configuration MM p p k m Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:08:20 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- . Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) *******************************************^***.^^:^.^.^.i^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road *********-*******************************************************.i^^.^.^^.^^.^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.874 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.3 Optimal Cycle: 95 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************** ******^,.^^,.^,.i,.^^,^,^^.^^,^,^,^,.^^.^.^.^^. Approach: Movement: North Boxmd L-T-R Ml P Control: I----- Protected ^m Rights: Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 Ml Lanes; 0 0 10 1 South Boxmd L-T-R Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 0 East Boimd L-T-R Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • West Boxmd L-T-R Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volxime Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse; User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol; Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj : Final Vol.; 0 868 45 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 1 .00 i.oo 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0 868 45 69 1031 0 0 0 0 192 0 177 1 .00 1.00 . 1 .00 • 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1. .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0, .90 0.90 0, .90 0 .90 0,90 0 .90 0 .90 0 .90 0, .90 0.90 0. .90 0.90 0 9 64 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 64 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0 213 0 197 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. ,00 1.00 1. ,00 1. .00 1. ,00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. ,00 1. 00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 0 9 64 51 77 1146 0 0 0 0" 213 0 197 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 Lanes; 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.; 0 1727 1458 -'-I: ----1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.56 1900 1900 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1641 1727 1900 1.00 0.00 0 1900 1900 1.00,1.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1900 .1.00 0.00 0 1900 1900 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.00 1570 0 1900 0.74 1.00 1405 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: Volxime/Cap: Delay/Veh: User DelAdj ; Adj Del/Veh: DesignQueue: **** 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.80 O-.O 15.2 1.00 1.00 0.0 15.2 0 21 *************************** 0.03 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 **** **** 0.70 0.06 ^0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 o.ie' 0.05 0.80 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.87 5.2 87.6 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 68.0 0.0 75.1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.2 87.5 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 58.0 0.0 75-1 1 5 20 0 0 0 0 . 11 0 11 ******************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.757 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.0 Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Boxmd West Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 10 110 10 110 10 10 1 1 0 110 Volxime Module: Base Vol: 126 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 125 570 13 17 950 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 •1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 140 633 14 19 1056 167 "289 28 240 8 87 52 Reduct vol: • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 140 633 14 19 1056 157 289 28 240 8 87 52 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final vol.: 140 633 14 19 1056 157 289 28 240 8 87 52 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19 00 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.85 0.82 0.82 Lanes; 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.25 0,75 Final Sat.: 1718 3352 74 1718 • 2905 459 1641 1727 1468 1641 1939 1159 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.06 0.19 0. 19 0. 01 0.36 0. 36 0.18 0. 02 0.16 0. 00 0. 04 0. 04 Crit Moves: **** **** *** * * * ** Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.56 0. 56 0. 03 0.46 0. 48 0.23 0. 28 0.26 0. 01 0. 06 0. 06 Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.34 0. 34 0-34 0-75 0. 76 0.76 0. •05 0.58 0. 58 0. 76 0. 76 Delay/Veh: 59.7 12.3 12 .3 50 .9 23-3 23 .3 44.2 26 .1 32.7 97 .6 62 .8 62 .8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh; 59.7 12.3 12 .3 50 .9 23.3 . 23 .3 44.2 26 .1 32.7 97 .6 62 .8 62 .8 DesignQueue: 7 16 0 1 33 5 13 1 10 0 5 3 ************ *********** *** *** *** ******** *** ***• ******** *** ****** *** ***** *** *** *** p p p p p p p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM P P m p Thu Dec 6, 2001 17:35:42 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.875 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.4 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service; D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Boxmd East Boxmd west Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I 11 ---It - II 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Min. Green: 00 0 00 0 0"0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 20301 20310 20301 20210 I il It-- II - I Volxime Module: Base Vol: 67 480 522 111 1497 446 196 517 122 850 843 121 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 Initial Bse:- 67 480 522 111 1497 446 195 517 122 850 843 121 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 74 533 - 580 123 1663 496 216 574 136 944 937 134 Reduct Vol: 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 deduced Vol: 74 533 580 123 1663 496 216 574 136 944 937 13.4 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 I.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 74 533 580 123 1663 496 218 574 136 944 937 134 III-IIIt- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0.60 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.81 0.81 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.08 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.62 0.38 Final Sat.: 3183 4715 1468 3183 4678 1395 3183 4715 1468 3163 4047 579 i 1111 II-I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.11 0.40 0.04 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.12 0.09 0.30 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle; 0.03 0.32 0.66 0.11 0.41 0.41 0,11 0.14 0.14 0.34 0.37 0.37 volume/Cap: 0.87 0.35 0.60 0.35 0-87 0.87 0.63 0.87 0.67 0.87 0.53 0.63 Delay/Veh: 123.9 35.1 13.8 56.2 40.7 40.7 61,1 69.5 63.2 50.1 35.7 35.7 user DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 123.9 35.1 13.8 56.2 40.7 40.7 61.1 69.5 63.2 50.1 35.7 35.7 Des ignQueue; 5 28 16 8 80 24 15 38 9 50 47 7' ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:33 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *********************************** *****************************************.^^,^,f, Intersection #5 Encinitas Blvd/I-5 NB Ramps ************************************************************* **^^^^.j.^^^j,^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec); 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.692 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.3 Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: c *******************************************************************************^, Approach: North Boxmd South Boxmd East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include II Split Phase Include Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 10 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 MM Volxime Module; Base Vol: 115 1 353 0 0 0 148 788 0 0 854 374 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 115 1 353 0 0 0 148 788 0 0 854 374 User Adj: 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0,90 0,90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 MB PHF Volxime: 128 1 392 0 0 0 164 876 0 0 949 416 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PI Reduced Vol: 128 1 392 0 0 0 164 876 0 0 949 416 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IP MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 128 1 392 0 0 0 164 876 0 0 949 416 P Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 P Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.81 Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 Ml Final Sat.: 1602 13 1615 0 0 0 1718 3437 0 0 3437 1537 •n Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0. 08 0. 08 0. 24 0. 00 0. .00 0. 00 0. 10 0. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 28 0. 27 Crit Moves; ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 35 0. 35 0. 35 0. 00 0. ,00 0. 00 0. 14 0. 54 0. 00 0. 00 0. 40 0, 40 Volume/Cap: 0. 23 0. 23 0. 69 0. 00 0. ,00 0. 00 0. 69 0. 47 0. 00 0. 00 0-69 0. 68 Delay/Veh: 18 .5 18 .5 25 .9 0 .0 c ).0 0 .0 41 .4 11 .7 0 .0 0 .0 21 -5 22 .9 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. ,00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 18 .5 16 .5 25 ,9 0 .0 c ).0 0 .0 41 .4 11 .7 0 .0 0 .0 21 .5 22 ,9 DesignQueue: 4 0 12 0 0 0 6 19 0 0 27 12 *************************************************************** ***************** IW p Traffix 7,5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM P P k Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:33 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Encinitas Blvd/I-5 SB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 110 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.772 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 31.2 Optimal Cycle: 64 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Boxmd L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control; Rights: Min. Green: Lanes; Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Volume Module; M Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 I II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 110 Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 327 1 188 0 628 102 357 504 0 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 327 1 188 0 628 102 357 604 0 User Adj: 1 .00 1. 00 1. oo 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj; 0 .90 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 698 113 397 671 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 698 113 397 671 0 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj; 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 698 113 397 671 0 11 i I Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1,00 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 1.72 0.28 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1533 4 1537 0 2896 469 i I 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1718 3437 0 li Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0. 00 0.00 0, .00 0. 24 0. 24 0. 14 0. 00 0. 24 0, 24 0. 23 0. 20 0 .00 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle; 0. 00 0.00 0, .00 0. 31 0. 31 0. 31 0. 00 0. 31 0, 31 0. 30 0. 61 0 .00 Volume/Cap: 0, 00 0.00 0, .00 0-77 0. 77 0. 44 0. 00 0. 77 0. 77 0. 77 0. 32 0 .00 Delay/Veh; 0 -0 0.0 c ).0 42 .3 42 .3 31 .3 0 .0 37 .9 37 .9 42 .2 10 .4 0.0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1.00 1. .00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 AdjDel/Veh: 0 .0 0.0 c ).0 42 .3 42 .3 31 .3 0 .0 37 .9 37 .9 42 .2 10 .4 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0 16 0 9 0 31 5 18 17 0 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:33 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 El Camino Real & Garden View Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.769 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 27.8 Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach; Movement: North Boxmd L-T-R South Bound L-T-R Control: Rights; Protected Include t I East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 ( D 3 0 1 1 1 D 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 wm Volume Module: Base Vol; 84 806 49 188 1796 90 32 94 205 113 151 224 IMP Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Initial Bse; 84 806 49 186 1796 90 32 94 205 113 161 224 Ml User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 93 896 54 209 1996 100 36 104 228 126 179 249 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Reduced Vol: 93 896 54 209 1996 100 36 104 228 126 179 249 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 93 896 54 209 1996 100 36 104 228 126 179 249 P Saturation Flow Module; P Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 P Adjustment: 0.90 0.87 0.81 0.90 0.87 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.81 0.95 0,95 0.81 Lanes; 1.00 3,00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Ml Final Sat.; 1718 4938 1537 1718 4938 1537 1805 1805 1534 1805 1805 1534 IH Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0. 05 0. 18 0. 04 0. 12 0. 40 0. 07 0. 02 0. 06 0. 15 0. 07 0. 10 0. 16 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 07 0. 36 0. 36 0. 24 0. 53 0. 53 0. 03 0. 19 0. 19 0. 09 0. 25 0. 25 Volxime/Cap; 0. 77 0. 51 0, 10 0. 51 0. 77 0. 12 0. 64 0. 30 0. 77 0. 77 0, 39 0. 64 Delay/Veh: 71 ,0 25 .5 21 .5 34 .0 20 .3 12 .1 70 .4 34 .7 46 .4 64 .0 31 .2 35 .4 User DelAdj; 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1, 00 AdjDel/Veh; 71 .0 25 .5 21 ,5 34 .0 20 .3 12 ,1 70 .4 34 .7 46 .4 64 ,0 31 .2 35 .4 DesignQueue; 5 33 2 9 58 3 2 5 11 6 8 11 p ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P P P p p MM p Ex-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:33 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Encinitas Blvd & Balour Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.852 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.2 Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement; North Bound L-T-R South Boxmd L-T-R East Boxmd L-T-R West Boxmd L-T-R Control; Rights: Protected Include I I II Protected Include Protected Include II Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 1 C 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 Volxime Module: Base Vol; 138 0 351 0 0 0 0 886 97 481 930 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Initial Bse: 138 0 351 0 0 0 0 886 97 481 930 0 User Adj: 1,00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 153 0 390 0 0 0 0 984 108 534 1033 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 153 0 390 0 0 0 0 984 108 534 1033 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 153 0 390 0 0 0 0 984 108 534 1033 0 I II • Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 III Capacity Analysis Module: II 1900 1900 1900 1,00 1.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 1.80 0 0 3050 II• II 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.89 0.88 0.90 1.00 0.20 2.00 2.00 0.00 335 3334 3437 0 III IM" Vol/Sat; 0.08 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.16 0.30 0.00 Crit Moves; **** **** **** IM Green/Cycle; 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.57 0,00 Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.53 0.00 Delay/Veh: 17.2 0.0 34.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 34.4 8.3 0.0 tmt User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 17.2 0.0 34.6 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 34.4 8.3 0.0 MM DesignQueue: 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 22 2 15 16 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ex-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:33 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Encinitas Blvd/E.C-R- ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 130 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.987 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 60.7 Optimal Cycle; 160 Level Of Service; E ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Boxmd South Boxmd East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights: Protected Include i I Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 1 D 2 1 0 2 1 D 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 D 1 1 0 MM Volume Module: Base Vol: 98 474 185 322 1284 201 243 745 127 314 420 125 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse : 98 474 185 322 1284 201 243 745 127 314 420 125 Mi User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 mm PHF Volume: 109 527 206 358 1427 223 270 828 141 349 467 139 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wm Reduced Vol : 109 527 206 358 1427 223 270 828 141 349 467 139 PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 M MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 109 527 206 358 1427 223 270 828 141 349 467 139 Saturation : Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 wm Adjustment; 0-90 0.83 0.83 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.87 0.87 Lanes: 1,00 2,16 0.84 2.00 2.59 0.41 2.00 1.71 0.29 1.00 1,54 0.46 mm Final Sat.: 1718 3401 1329 3334 4165 654 3334 2872 489 1718 2558 761 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.20 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** P Green/Cycle : 0.06 0.24 0.24 0.17 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.29 0.29 0.21 0.34 0.34 P Volxime/Cap: 0,99 0.54 0.64 0.64 0.99 0.99 0,53 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.53 0.53 Delay/Veh: 142.0 45.4 45.4 52.9 61.1 61.1 51.8 71.2 71.2 95.6 34.6 34.6 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P AdjDel/Veh: 142.0 45.4 45.4 52.9 61.1 61.1 51.8 71.2 71.2 95.6 34.6 34.6 DesignQueue : 7 30 12 22 73 11 17 45 8 21 23 7 • ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex-PM P P ^P Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:46 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario; Ex-PM Command: Default Command Volxime: Ex-PM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee; Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths; Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-PM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) *********************************************************************^..f,.f^^*.^.f^.f^^.^^^ Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ****************************************************************************.f^.j^.^^ Cycle (sec); 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.010 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.2 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************^^ Approach: North Boxmd South Boxmd East Boxmd West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights: Protected Include I I Protected Include Split Phase Include Split Phase Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 mm Volume Module; iBMfe Base Vol: 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1200 122 159 977 0 0 0 0 69 0 49 m User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hi PHF Volume; 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Reduced Vol: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 P PCE Adj ; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Final Vol.: 0 1333 136 177 1086 0 0 0 0 77 0 54 P Saturation Flow Module: HI Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj us tment: 1.00 0,91 0-77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 Ml Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Ml Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.00 0.77 0.09 0.11 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-05 0.00 0.04 P Crit Moves: * *** **** **** P Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.11 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 P Volxime/Cap: 0.00 1.01 0.12 1.01 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.79 Delay/Veh: 0.0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 159.1 0,0 97.9 P User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 P AdjDel/Veh; 0-0 40.4 3.5 120.6 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 159.1 0.0 97.9 p DesignQueue; 0 24 2 10 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 ************************************************************************.i^.^ ****** Traffix 7-5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-PM P P P P P Thu Dec 6, 2001 16:25:35 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.782 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29-4 Optimal Cycle: 73 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Boxmd L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Boxmd L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes; Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 II Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I- Volxime Module: I I II Base Vol: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1,00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 213 1053 11 54 798 198 275 107 164 10 58 31 p User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 O.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 237 1170 12 60 867 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 pi Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 237 1170 12 60 887 220 306 119 182 11 64 34 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 M" Final Vol.; 237 1170 12 60 887 220 305 119 162 11 64 34 P Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.82 0.82 PM Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 IM Final Sat.: 1718 3398 35 1718 2671 663 1641 1727 1468 1641 2032 1079 Capacity Analysis Module: MM Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: 0.14 **** 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.33 **** 0.33 0.19 **** 0.07 0.12 0.01 0.03 **** 0.03 km Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.55 0-55 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.04 0.04 ,volxime/Cap: 0.78 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.78 0.78 0,78 0.26 0.47 0.47 0.78 0.78 Delay/Veh: 51.7 15.4 16.4 59-1 27.7 27,7 45.4 29 .4 31.8 53-0 74.1 74.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P AdjDel/veh: 51.7 16.4 16.4 59.1 27.7 27.7 45.4 29.4 31.8 63.0 74.1 74.1 DesignQueue: 11 32 0 3 31 8 14 5 8 1 3 2 ************* ******************************************************************* p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA k p HI k Ex-PM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:46 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Encinitas Blvd/I-5 SB Ramps *******************************************************************^^^.^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.816 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 32.7 Optimal Cycle: 74 Level Of Service: c ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Bound West Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 Control: Rights: Min. Green; Lanes: I I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 110 Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 Volxime Module; 1 I 1 I Base vol: 0 0 0 327 1 188 0 715 136 357 604 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 327 1 188 0 715 136 357 604 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 794 151 397 671 0 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 794 151 397 671 0 PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 794 151 397 671 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 0.68 0.88 0.90 0.90 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 1.66 0.32 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.; 0 0 0 1533 4 1537 0 2618 536 1718 3437 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0-00 0.00 0,24 0.24 0.14 0-00 0.28 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** * * * * **** Green/Cycle; 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.63 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.47 0.00 0.82 0.82 0-82 0.31 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 32.9 0.0 37.5 37.5 47.1 9-5 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 32.9 0.0 37.5 37.5 47.1 9.5 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0 17 0 9 0 34 6 18 16 0 *******************************************************************************^ p p p p p p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p P MM Ex-PM P P P Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:45 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 1.061 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 60.7 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement; North Boxmd L-T-R South Boxmd L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Boxmd L-T-R II Control: Protected Protected Protected I I Protected p Rights; Ovl Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mi Lanes: 2 ( ) 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 p Volxime Module: Base Vol: 198 1151 955 155 1024 326 451 726 250 613 602 114 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P Initial Bse: 198 1151 955 155 1024 326 451 725 250 613 602 114 P User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 P PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 PHF volume; 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 807 278 681 669 127 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 807 278 681 669 127 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 P Final Vol.: 220 1279 1062 172 1138 362 501 807 278 681 669 127 P 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 1 - - - -P Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.81 0.81 IH Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1,00 2.00 3.03 0.97 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.52 0.48 Ml Final Sat.; 3183 4715 1468 3183 4598 1453 3183 4715 1468 3183 3868 734 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 1 1 •1 i 1 1 • Mi Vol/Sat; Crit Moves; 0.07 0.27 0.72 * *** 0.05 ** ** 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.17 0.19 **** 0.21 **** 0.17 0.17 P Green/Cycle; 0.12 0.48 0.68 0.05 0.42 0,42 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.20 volxime/Cap; 0.60 0,55 1,06 1.06 0.60 0.60 0.87 0.96 1.06 1.06 0,87 0.87 Delay/Veh: 59.3 25.4 67,6 151.9 31.1 31.1 67.1 76.5 128.1 106.7 61.3 61.3 IP User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 P AdjDel/Veh: 59.3 25,4 67,6 151.9 31.1 31.1 67.1 76.5 128.1 106.7 61.3 61,3 P DesignQueue: 15 53 30 12 53 17 32 52 18 43 42 8 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P Ex-PM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:46 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Encinitas Blvd/I-5 NE Ramps ********************************************************* *******^j.^.^.^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (x): 0.957 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.0 Optimal Cycle: 124 Level Of Service: c ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Boxmd East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Split Phase Include I i Split Phase Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 D 2 0 1 Volxime Module: Base Vol; 191 1 423 0 0 0 222 906 0 0 1000 574 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 191 1 423 0 0 0 222 906 0 0 1000 574 P User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ml PHF Volume: 212 1 470 0 0 0 247 1007 0 0 1111 638 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Reduced Vol: 212 1 470 0 0 0 247 1007 0 0 1111 638 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 P MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 212 1 470 0 0 0 247 1007 0 0 1111 638 Ml Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 mm Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 O.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.81 Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2-00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 p Final Sat.; 1607 8 1615 0 0 0 1718 3437 0 0 3437 1537 p Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.13 0.29 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.41 p Crit Moves: **** **** **** p Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 p Volxime/Cap: 0.43 0.43 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.96 Delay/Veh; 22.9 22.9 57.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 21,1 46.7 User DelAdj; 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p AdjDel/Veh: 22,9 22,9 57.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.0 10-0 0.0 0.0 21.1 46.7 DesignQueue: 7 0 16 0 0 0 10 20 0 0 30 18 Ml ******************************************************** ****************.^^,.^.^.f,^,^^^, Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P Ex-PM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:46 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 El Camino Real & Garden View Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.964 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.8 Optimal Cycle; 150 Level Of Service; D ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Boxmd L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control; Rights: Protected Include ! I Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include Min- Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pl Lanes: 10 3 0 1 10 3 0 1 10 1 1 0 1 1 D 1 1 0 p Volxime Module: Base Vol; 206 1690 83 238 1268 131 105 190 282 179 200 261 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 206 1690 83 238 1268 131 105 190 282 179 200 261 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 229 1878 92 264 1409 146 117 211 313 199 222 290 PI Reduct vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 229 1878 92 264 1409 146 117 211 313 199 222 290 P PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wm Final Vol.: 229 1878 92 264 1409 146 117 211 313 199 222 290 P Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.90 0.87 0,81 0.90 0.87 0.81 0.95 0,95 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.81 wm Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P Final Sat.: 1718 4938 1537 1718 4938 1537 1805 1805 1534 1805 1805 1534 Capacity Analysis Module: mw Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.38 0.06 0.15 0.29 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.20 0,11 0.12 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** * ** * P Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.39 0.39 0.16 0.38 0.38 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.24 0.24 Volxime/Cap: 0.75 0.96 0.15 0.96 0.76 0,25 0.78 0.55 0.96 0,96 0.51 0.78 IH Delay/Veh: 49.5 42.5 19.6 86.1 28.9 21.6 67.3 35-9 68.6 96.2 33.1 41.3 IH User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p AdjDel/Veh: 49.5 42.5 19.6 86.1 28.9 21.6 67-3 35.9 68.6 96.2 33-1 41.3 HI DesignQueue: 11 69 3 13 52 5 6 10 14 10 10 13 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5-1015 (c).20O0 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex-PM Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:46 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Encinitas Blvd & Balour Drive ***********************************************************************j,*^**^j^^^ Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.936 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.3 Optimal Cycle: 91 Level Of Service: c *********************************************************************^^.^^^^^^^^^ Approach; North Boxmd South Bound East Bound West Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R ----IIIItIII Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights; Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 000 00 0 000 00 0 Lanes: 10001 00000 00110 20200 Volxime Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.; I II 1 I 80 0 354 0 0 0 0 1272 43 374 1338 0 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 80 0 354 0 0 0 0 1272 43 374 1338 0 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 -00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0. 90 0 .90 0. 90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 89 0 393 0 0 0 0 1413 48 416 1487 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 393 0 0 0 0 1413 48 416 1487 0 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 89 0 393 0 0 0 0 1413 48 416 1487 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 I I I I I Capacity Analysis Modul Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.00 Crit Moves; Green/Cycle: 0.26 0,00 Volxime/Cap; 0.19 0,00 Delay/Veh: 17.5 0.0 User DelAdj: 1,00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 17.5 0.0 DesignQueue: 2 0 *********************** 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 --•-It e: 0.24 **** 0.26 0.94 50.0 1.00 50.0 10 ******* 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.90 1.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.93 0.07 2.00 2.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 3307 112 3334 3437 0 I I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 0,00 0.43 **** 0,00 0.46 0,00 0.94 0.0 26.4 1.00 1.00 0.0 26.4 0 28 0.43 0.46 0.94 26.4 1.00 26.4 1 0.12 0.43 **** 0.13 0.59 0.94 0.73 53.0 10.3 1.00 1.00 53.0 10.3 12 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 ************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ml P P P m Ex-PM IH P Wed Dec 12, 2001 17:54:46 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Encinitas Blvd/E.C.R. ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 130 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.014 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.2 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service; E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Boxmd South Bound East Boxmd West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R II Control: Rights; Protected Include Protected Include I I I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes; 10 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 1 D 1 1 0 10 1 1 0 HI Volxime Module: Base Vol: 199 984 171 185 1131 234 264 661 146 151 794 353 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 p Initial Bse; 199 984 171 185 1131 234 264 661 146 151 794 353 Kl User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Kl PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 PHF Volume: 221 1093 190 206 1257 260 293 734 162 168 882 392 |M Reduct vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 221 1093 190 206 1257 260 293 734 162 168 882 392 PCE Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm Final Vol.; 221 1093 190 206 1257 260 293 734 162 168 882 392 1 II • Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lsme; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.65 0.85 0.88 0,84 Lanes: 1,00 2.56 0.44 2.00 2,49 Final Sat.: 1718 4114 715 3334 3985 It I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 1.01 0.75 0.75 Delay/Veh; 121.4 38.7 38.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 121.4 38.7 38.7 DesignQueue: 14 54 9 ***************************** II 1900 1900 1900 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.51 2.00 1.64 824 3334 2739 II• III 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.88 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.36 1.00 1.38 0-62 605 1718 2270 1009 11----1 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.09 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.39 0.39 **** **** **** 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.38 0,38 0.75 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.78 0.78 0.78 1.01 69.1 71.6 71.6 116.0 41.6 41.6 71.4 69.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 69.1 71.6 71.6 116.0 41.6 41.6 71.4 69.0 14 67 14 20 37 8 11 43 *************************************************** 1.01 69.0 1-00 69 .0 19 M^ Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P p P Ex+Rte5-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 18:11:14 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Scenario Report Page 1-1 Scenario: Ex+Rte5-AM Command: Default Commsmd Volxime; Ex+Rte5-AM Geometry: Ex-AM Impact Fee; Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation mm Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes; Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration wm, m P m ^M p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte2-AM Ml P P PI P Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Rancho Sante Fe Road/San Elijo Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 112 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.946 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.6 Optimal Cycle: 143 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Boxmd East Bound West Bound p Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R p Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase p Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes; 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ' 0 0 0 1 p volxime Module; Base Vol; 0 868 146 69 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 Growth Adj : 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 0 868 146 59 1031 0 0 0 0 292 0 177 p User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volxime: 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 •M Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vol; 0 964 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 IP PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 M-Final Vol.: 0 954 162 77 1146 0 0 0 0 324 0 197 IM 1 Saturation Flow Module: - - 1 1 1 1 1 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.77 0.86 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.74 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 m Final Sat.: 0 1727 1468 1641 1727 0 0 0 0 1570 0 1405 Capacity Analysis Module: mm Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.55 0.11 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Um Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0-22 Volxime/Cap; 0.00 0.85 0.17 0.86 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.64 Delay/Veh; 0.0 22.9 7.9 105.6 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.8 0.0 44.4 User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 P AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 22.9 7.9 105.6 29.6 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77 .8 0.0 44.4 DesignQueue: 0 24 4 5 25 0 0 0 0 17 0 10 ******************************************************************************** p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte2-AM Thu Dec 6, 2001 18:19:15 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL- ROUTE #2 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Rancho Sante Fe Road/La Costa Avenue ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.793 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.3 Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement; North Boxmd L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Boxmd L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes; Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 i I I- Volxime Module: Protected Include 0 0 0 10 10 1 II Protected Include 0 0 0 10 110 I I I I Base Vol: 126 670 13 17 1050 150 260 25 216 7 78 47 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 126 670 13 17 1050 150 250 25 216 7 76 47 P User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 HI PHF Volxime: 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Reduced Vol; 140 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 14 0 744 14 19 1167 167 289 28 240 8 87 52 p Saturation Flow Module; mm Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 19 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0-90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0,89 0.89 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.86 0-82 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 0.75 m Final Sat.; 1718 3363 63 1718 2949 422 1641 1727 1458 1641 1939 1159 Hi Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0. 06 0. 22 0. 22 0. 01 0. 40 0. 40 0. 18 0. 02 0. 16 0. 00 0. 04 0. 04 Crit Moves: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0. 10 0. 57 0. 57 0. 03 0. 50 0. 50 0. 22 0. 27 0. 27 0. 01 0. 06 0. 06 Volxime/Cap: 0-79 0. 39 0. 39 0. 39 0. 79 0. 79 0. 79 0. 06 0. 60 0. 60 0. 79 0. 79 Delay/Veh: 65 .2 11 .8 11 .8 52 .7 23 .5 23 .5 48 .1 27 .1 34 .4 109 .5 68 .1 68 .1 User DelAdj; 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1-00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 65 -2 11 .8 11 .8 52 -7 23 .5 23 .5 46 .1 27 .1 34 .4 109 .5 58 .1 68 .1 DesignQueue; 7 19 0 1 36 5 13 1 10 0 5 3 ************ *** *** ** *** *** *** *** ***** *** *** ****** ***** *** *** ****** * ** * * ****** *** p p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P P Ex+Rte5-AM p Wed Dec 12, 2001 18:11:14 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Olivenhain Road/El Camino Real ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 135 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0,940 Loss Time (sec); 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 45.2 Optimal Cycle: 158 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R II I I Control: Rights: Protected Ovl Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 ( ) 3 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 w Volxime Module; 1 1 1 1 1 1 Base Vol: 67 480 622 111 1497 445 196 617 122 950 943 121 Growth Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse; 67 480 622 111 1497 445 195 617 122 950 943 121 User Adj; 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 74 533 691 123 1663 496 218 586 136 1056 1048 134 |M Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 74 533 691 123 1663 496 218 686 136 1056 1048 134 IH PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 MM Final Vol.: 74 533 691 123 1663 496 218 686 136 1056 1048 134 IM 1 Saturation Flow Module: 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^M Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.80 0.60 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.84 0.81 0.81 wm Lanes; 2,00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.08 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.66 0.34 in Final Sat.; 3183 4715 1468 3183 4678 1395 3183 4715 1468 3183 4109 525 1 1 Capacity Analysis Module: j - - 1 1 1 1 MM Vol/Sat: 0,02 0.11 0.47 0.04 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.15 0.09 0.33 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.32 0.67 0.09 0-38 0.38 0.11 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.40 0.40 Volxime/Cap; 0.94 0.36 0.70 0.44 0.94 0.94 0.64 0.94 0.60 0.94 0.64 0.64 Delay/Veh: 146.5 35.8 15.4 59.5 48,9 46.9 61.7 76.4 57.5 56.9 33.3 33.3 User DelAdj: 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 TLdjDel/Veh: 138.8 33.9 15.5 56.4 46,3 46.3 58.4 72.3 54.4 53.9 31.5 31.5 P DesignQueue: 5 28 19 8 84 25 15 45 9 55 50 6 ******************************************************************************** p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA ^M pi p Ex+Rte5-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 18:11:14 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 4 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Encinitas Blvd/I-5 NB Ramps ********************************************************************^**^^^.^^^^^^ Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.806 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.0 Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service; C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Boxmd West Boxmd Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights; Split Phase Include I I Split Phase Include 1 I Protected Include II Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 • 2 0 1 Volxime Module: Base Vol: 115 1 453 0 0 0 148 788 0 0 954 374 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 115 1 453 0 0 0 148 788 0 0 954 374 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 128 1 503 0 0 0 164 876 0 0 1060 416 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 128 1 503 0 0 0 164 876 0 0 1060 416 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 128 1 503 0 0 0 164 876 0 0 1060 416 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.81 Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1602 13 1615 0 0 0 1718 3437 0 0 3437 1537 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.31 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.10 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 Volxime/Cap: 0.21 0-21 0.81 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.81 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.71 Delay/Veh: 16.5 16.5 29.5 0-0 0.0 0.0 54.9 13.6 0.0 0.0 25.8 24.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/veh: 16.5 16.5 29.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 13,6 0.0 0.0 25.8 24.8 DesignQueue: 4 0 15 0 0 0 7 21 0 0 31 12 *******************************************************************************^ p p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P Ex+Rte5-AM P P P P IP P Wed Dec 12, 2001 18:11:14 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Encinitas Blvd/I-5 SB Ramps ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap, (X): 0.842 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 34.8 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Boxmd East Bound West Bound Movement: L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control; Rights: Split Phase Include II Split Phase Include II I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: .... 1 0 c 1 0 0 0 . . . 1 0 1 1 .... . . 0 0 1 ......11 0 c 1 1 1 0 ,.. 1 10 2 0 0 1 Volxime Module t * — 1 i II 1 1 Base Vol: 0 0 0 327 1 188 0 628 102 457 604 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 327 1 188 0 628 102 457 604 0 User Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0 .90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 698 113 508 671 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 698 113 508 671 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 363 1 209 0 698 113 508 671 0 I II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1-00 1.00 0.81 0.81 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1533 4 i I II• 1900 1900 1900 0.81 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.00 1.72 1537 0 2896 II 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.89 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.28 1.00 2.00 0.00 469 1718 3437 0 III Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves; Green/Cycle; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue; 0 0 0 ***************************** 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.30 0.20 0.00 **** 0.28 0.28 0.84 0.84 51.2 51.2 1.00 1.00 51.2 51.2 17 0 0.28 0.48 33.8 1,00 33.8 9 **** 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.84 0.0 43-7 1.00 1.00 0.0 43.7 0 32 0.29 0.84 43-7 1.00 43.7 5 0.35 0-64 0.84 0.31 43.3 9.1 1.00 1.00 43.3 22 9.1 16 0-00 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 0 *************************************************** p p I^M Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA P P Ex+Rte5-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 18:11:14 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volxime Alternative) ******************************************************************************^* Intersection #7 El Camino Real & Garden View Road ******************************************************************************^^ Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.793 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); 28.6 Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: c ******************************************************************************** Approach; Movement; North Boxmd L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lcines; 1 1 D 3 0 1 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 Q 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volxime Module; Base Vol; 64 806 49 186 1796 90 32 94 205 113 161 224 Growth Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse; 64 806 49 168 1796 90 32 94 205 113 161 224 User Adj; 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 0 .90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0-90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 93 896 54 209 1996 100 35 104 228 126 179 249 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 93 896 54 209 1996 100 36 104 228 126 179 249 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 MLF Adj: 1 .00 1-00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 93 896 54 209 1996 100 36 104 228 126 179 249 Saturation Flow Module; I I I I II Sat/Lane; Adjustment: L£mes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.88 0.84 1,00 3.00 1667 4790 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0,78 0.88 0.84 0.78 0.92 0.92 0.78 0.92 0.92 0.78 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1491 1667 4790 1491 1751 1751 1488 1751 1751 1488 Capacity Analysis Module; 11 II II Vol/Sat: 0. 06 0. 19 0. 04 0. 13 0. 42 0. 07 0. 02 0. 06 0. 15 0. 07 0. 10 0. 17 Crit Moves: ** ** * * ** * * ** ** ** Green/Cycle: 0-07 0. 36 0. 36 0. 24 0. 53 0. 53 0. 03 0. 19 0. 19 0. 09 0. 25 0. 25 Volxime/Cap: 0-79 0. 52 0. 10 0. 52 0. 79 0. 13 0. 66 0. 31 0. 79 0. 79 0, 40 0. 66 Delay/Veh: 75 .6 25 .7 21 .5 34 .4 21 .1 12 .1 74 .3 34 .8 48 .4 67 .6 31 .3 36 ,1 User DelAdj; 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 75 -6 25 .7 21 .5 34 .4 21 .1 12 .1 74 .3 34 .8 48 -4 67 ,8 31 .3 36 .1 DesignQueue: 5 33 2 9 58 3 2 5 11 6 8 11 ************ *** ***** *** * * * * * -**** ***** * * * * * * *** *** ** * ** ****** *** ** * ***** *** *** * * * p p p Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA p p p p p Ex+Rte5-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 18:11:14 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Encinitas Blvd/E.C.R. ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 130 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1,015 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 65,1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service; E ******************************************************************************** Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R L-T-R Control: Rights: Protected Include Protected Include I I Protected Include Protected Include Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Lanes; 10 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 D 1 1 0 Volxime Module: Base Vol: 98 474 185 322 1284 301 343 745 127 314 420 125 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p Initial Bse: 98 474 185 322 1284 301 343 745 127 314 420 125 User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 109 527 206 358 1427 334 381 828 141 349 457 139 Pi Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 109 527 206 356 1427 334 381 828 141 349 467 139 p PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mi Final Vol.: 109 527 206 358 1427 334 381 828 141 349 467 139 ma Saturation Flow Module: ^m Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 0.83 0.83 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.87 0.87 wm Lanes: 1.00 2.16 0.84 2.00 2.43 0.57 2.00 1.71 0.29 1.00 1.54 0,46 P Final Sat.; 1718 3401 1329 3334 3889 910 3334 2872 489 1718 2558 761 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.06 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.25 0.25 Volume/Cap: 1.02 0.62 0.62 Delay/Veh: 152.0 44.2 44.2 User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 152.0 44.2 44.2 DesignQueue; 7 30 12 ***************************** 0.11 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.20 0.18 0.18 **** **** **** 0.17 0.36 0.36 0.19 0.28 0.62 1.02 1.02 0.61 1.02 51.8 67.0 67.0 50.4 79,6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 51.8 67.0 67.0 50.4 79.6 22 72 17 23 46 0.28 0.20 0.30 1.02 1,02 0.61 79.6 104.5 40.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 79.6 104.5 40.4 8 21 25 0.30 0,61 40.4 1.00 40.4 7 *************************************************** P Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA Ml Ex+Rte5-AM Wed Dec 12, 2001 18:11:14 SAN MARCOS LANDFILL Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volxime Altemative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Encinitas Blvd & Balour Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec); 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.890 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.0 Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L-T-R South Bound L-T-R East Bound L-T-R West Bound L-T-R Control; Rights: Protected Include Protected Include Protected Include II Protected Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 1 1 D 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 •M Volxime Module; Base Vol; 138 0 351 0 0 0 0 966 97 481 1030 0 pp Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 138 0 351 0 0 0 0 966 97 481 1030 0 p User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 O.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ml PHF Volxime: 153 0 390 0 0 0 0 1096 108 534 1144 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HI Reduced Vol; 153 0 390 0 0 0 0 1096 108 534 1144 0 PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 153 0 390 0 0 0 0 1096 108 534 1144 0 Hi Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 mn Adjustment; 0.95 1.00 0-85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.90 1.00 Lanes; 1.00 0.00 1,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82 0.18 2.00 2.00 0.00 Mi Final Sat-: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3088 304 3334 3437 0 Ml Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.16 0.33 0.00 ^M Crit Moves: **** * * * * **** p Green/Cycle; 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.58 0.00 Volxime/Cap: 0.31 0-00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.58 0,00 Delay/Veh: 17.8 0-0 40.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.5 24.5 39.3 8.4 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p AdjDel/Veh: 17.8 0.0 40.6 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24,5 24.5 39.3 8.4 0.0 DesignQueue: 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 24 2 15 17 0 HI ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LLG, SAN DIEGO, CA ^M p p p p