HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-04-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 42611
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
i
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4261
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO
CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR SCENIC PRESERVATION
OVERLAY ZONE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL AND SOUTH OF COLLEGE
BOULEVARD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
5.
CASE NAME: FAIRWAY CORPORATE CENTER
CASE NO: SUP 97-1 1
WHEREAS, Z.B. Investment Co., L.L.C., “Developer”, has filed a
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Union Pacific 1
Company, “Owner”, described as
TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE EL
Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No. 17830, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, March 21,
1997 as file No. 1997-0129122 of official records.
(‘the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Spe
Permit as shown on Exhibit(s) “A”-“G” dated April 15, 1998, on file in the I.
Department FAIRWAY CORPORATE CENTER, SUP 97-11, as provided in Chapt
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 15th day of April, 1991
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all te
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a1
relating to the Special Use Permit;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the I
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Cor!
APPROVES FAIRWAY CORPORATE CENTER SUP 97-11, base
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings: -
I. Planning Commission finds that:
a) the project is a later activity considered by the Carlsbad Research Center
Plan and evaluated in a previous EIR;
b) the project is consistent with the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan;
c) there was an EIR certified in connection with the prior Carlsbad Researcl
Specific Plan;
d) the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as si$
in the prior EIR;
e) none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental E1
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist;
f) The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures iden
the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan which are appropriate
Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
2. That the project is consistent with General Plan Land Use Element in tha
development is included as an allowed use within the Planned Industrial 1;
designation.
3. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and enviro~
settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General P1
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area il
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surrounc
traffic circulation, in that the proposed office use is consistent with surroundi
and is consistent with the intent of the Carlsbad Research Center.
4. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
that all required onsite improvements including parking and employee eatin;
have been provided.
PC RES0 NO. 4261 -2-
1 I
b m
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 ~
5. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood
provided and maintained, in that all required setbacks have been provided.
6. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle 2
generated by the proposed use, in that the project is not expected to genera
than 2,400 Average Daily Traffic which is below the overall capacity of the I
local street.
7. That the project is consistent with the applicable development standard!
zoning ordinance and the development standards of the El Camino Real C
scenic preservation overlay zone in that all of the proper setbacks and heigl
have been observed, in that the building has been designed with a “campus’
and in that all of the necessary parking has been provided onsite.
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all co:
and modifications to the Special Use Permit document(s) necessary to ma
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Deve
shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed deve
substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this appr
2. The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar cop
Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body. The Site Plan shall re
conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to t
Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improvemt
submittal, whichever occurs first.
3. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conforma
the City’s Landscape Manual with a focus on enhancing the frontage along El 1
Real. The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning
prior to the approval of the building permit. The Developer shall construct and i~
landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain all landscaping in a
and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
4. A landscape plan shall be completed in accordance with the Landscape Man
presented for approval by the Planning Director.
Engineering
Note: Unless specifically stated otherwise in the condition, the developer shall satisfy a
following conditions, prior to the issuance of building permits.
PC RES0 NO. 4261 -3-
k 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m !B
FeedAgreements
4. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property ur
District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available.
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply c
requirements of the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and whe~
program is formerly established by the City.
6. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
7. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City 1
regarding drainage across the adjacent property.
Grading
8. No grading shall occur outside the boundary of this parcel unless a grading (
easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the applicant i:
to obtain the grading or slope easement, no grading permit will be issued. In that '
applicant must amend the site plan so grading will not occur outside the project
manner which substantially conforms to the approved project as determined by 1
Engineer and Planning Director.
9. Based upon a review of the proposed grading as shown on the site plan, a
permit for this project is NOT required.
10. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from the site, the develop1
submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul roul
developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engine
impose with regards to the hauling operation.
11. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this prc
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accc
with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer.
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 4261 -4-
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of April, 199
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Compas, Heineman, h
Nielsen, Savary, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
I”&-
MICHAEL J. HOBMILBR
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4261 -5-