HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-08-16; Planning Commission; Resolution 61451
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6145
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR
. MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE VILLAGES OF LA
COSTA MASTER PLAN TO TRANSFER FOUR DWELLING
5 UNITS FROM NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 TO NEIGHBORHOOD
3.1, COMBINE THE REQUIRED COMMUNITY RECREATION
6 FACILITIES FOR NEIGHBORHOODS 3.1 AND 3.3 INTO
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1, AND MODIFY THE TEXT AND
7 GRAPHICS OF THE MASTER PLAN TO REFLECT THE
g CHANGES TO THE MASTER PLAN ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE
9 ROAD, SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE, AND NORTH OF
CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES
10 MANAGEMENT ZONE 11.
CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD
11 3.1
12 CASE NO: MP 98-01 (E)
13 WHEREAS, Real Estate Collateral Management Company,
14 "Developer/Owner," has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property
described as
16
Lots 202, 205, and 215 of the City of Carlsbad Tract
17 CT 99-04-03, Villages of La Costa, La Costa Oaks North, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map No. 15318 filed in the Office of the San Diego
19 County Recorder on April 18, 2006, as File Number 2006-
0271049
20
("the Property"); and
21
„„ WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Master Plan
23 Amendment as shown on Exhibit "MP 98-01(E)" dated August 16, 2006, on file in the
24 Carlsbad Planning Department, LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 -
25 MP 98-01(E), as provided by MP 98-01(D) and Chapter 21.38 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code;
26 and
27
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of August 2006,
28
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
3
relating to the Master Plan Amendment; and
4
WHEREAS, on October 16, 2001, the City Council approved MP 98-01, as
5 described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5013 and City Council
7 Resolution No. NS-605; and amended MP 98-01(D) most recently on February 16, 2005, as
o0 described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5837.
9 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
10
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
11
1 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
13 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 -
14 MP98-01(E) based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
15
jfi Findings;
17 1. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance
with the Elements of the City's General Plan, based on the facts set forth in the staff
IB report dated August 16, 2006, and as included in Planning Commission Resolutions
No. 6146 and 6147 for CT 05-14 and PUD 05-11.
2Q 2. That all necessary public facilities can be provided concurrent with need and adequate
provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the Capital Improvement
21 Program applicable to the subject property, in that the Minor Master Plan Amendment
does not increase the number of dwelling units but transfers four units from
22 Neighborhood 3.3 to Neighborhood 3.1, combines the recreational facilities of
2~ Neighborhoods 3.1 and 3.3 into Neighborhood 3.1, and adds text and graphic
changes consistent with the provisions of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
24
3. That the residential and open space portions of the community will constitute an
25 environment of sustained desirability and stability, and that it will be in harmony with or
provide compatible variety to the character of the surrounding area, and that the sites
2" proposed for public facilities, such as schools, playgrounds and parks, are adequate to
27 serve the anticipated population and appear acceptable to the public authorities having
jurisdiction thereof, in that there is no increase in the total number of dwelling units
2g and that the combining of two smaller recreational facilities into one common
facility will still be adequate to serve the surrounding neighborhoods.
PCRESONO. 6145 -2-
4. That in the case of institutional, recreational, and other similar nonresidential uses, such
2 development will be proposed, and surrounding areas are protected from any adverse
effects from such development, in that the location of the combined recreation area for
3 Neighborhoods 3.1 and 3.3 is separated from residential uses by intervening slopes
that are approximately 10 feet in height that create a sufficient buffer.
4
<- 5. That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to carry the
anticipated traffic thereon, in that the proposed amendment will not change the total
6 number of average daily vehicle traffic trips generated from the Master Plan.
7 6. The Planning Director has determined that:
o
a. The project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan
g (MP 98-01) for which a program EIR was prepared and a notice for the activity
has been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of
10 the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the
activity for the purposes of CEQA [15168(c)(2) and (e)].
b. This project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above.
13 c. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection
with the prior plan.
14
d. The project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as
* •* significant in the prior EIR.
e. None of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR
17 under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist.
18 f. All feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Villages
of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, which are appropriate to this
Subsequent Project, have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
20 7. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
21 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
22 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
23 Conditions:
24
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
25 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
27 future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
28 property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
PCRESONO. 6145 -3-
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Minor Master Plan
2 Amendment.
3 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Master Plan documents) necessary to make them internally
consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur
<- substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different
from this approval shall require an amendment to this approval.
6
3. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold
7 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
o or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Minor Master Plan
Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
10 discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and
(c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
11 including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the
facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation
survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's
13 approval is not validated.
14 4. This approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 05-14 and CT 05-15, PUD 05-11,
and PUD 05-12 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 6146 and 6148, 6147, and 6149 for those other approvals incorporated
, s herein by reference.
17 5. Prior to the issuance of any permits for the project, the applicant shall submit to the
Planning Director a digital copy and a camera-ready master copy of the LA COSTA
18 OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 - MP 98-01(E) exhibits consistent with
Exhibit MP 98-01(E) dated August 16,2006.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PCRESONO. 6145 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of August, 2006, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa,
Dominguez, Heineman, and Whitton
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
ABSTAIN:
MARTELL B. MONTGOMERY,¥nairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
DON NEU
Assistant Planning Director
PCRESONO. 6145 -5-
Exhibit "MP 98-01(F)
July 19,2006
La Costa Greens
MP98-01(D)
(Minor amendment to reflect the relocation of the School Site within Neighborhood 1.7
and common recreation area from Neighborhood 1.7 to 1.6)
APPROVED BY:
Planning Commission Resolution # 5837, February 16, 2005
***
La Costa Oaks North
MP98-01(E)
(Minor amendment to transfer four dwelling units between Neighborhoods 3.3 to 3.1 and
to modify the location of the recreation centers to Neighborhood 3.1)
APPROVED BY:
Planning Commission Resolution # 6145, August 16, 2006
***
La Costa Greens
MP98-01(F)
(Minor amendment to transfer four dwelling units from Neighborhood 1.16 to 1.3 and
to modify the location of the recreation vehicle parking area from Neighborhood 1.2 to 1.3)
APPROVED BY:
Planning Commission Resolution #6130, July 19, 2006
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
MASTER PLAN
LA COSTA OAKS
VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
EXHIBIT 7-A VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE
LA COSTA OAKS
NEIGHBORHOOD/
OPEN AREA
i , ' * '
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
3.14
3.15
3.A
3.B
3.C
3.D
3.E
Circulation Element Roadways
VILLAGE TOTALS:
LAND USE
DESIGNATION
*j'' i f '}» ';*"-"'
RLM
CF
. RLM
RLM
RLM
RMH
RM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
RLM
O/S
0/S
O/S
O/S
O/S
—
ZONING
V^'.-tti' ',
R-l
C-F
R-l
R-l
R-l
RD-M
RD-M
R-l
R-l
R-
R-
R-
R-
R-
R-
0-S
O-S
0-S
O-S
O-S
—
GROSS ACRES
„ «4«-" ,'t*/|6|^
27.9
6.6
46.6
14.5
13.9
16.0
13.8
26.4
32.0
16.4
22.5
15.4
37.8
29.4
44.9
116.5
177.6
9.5
6.0
12.5
26.4
712.6
MA
Maximum Allowable
Dwelling Units
L t ., - - ' .,>% '& ~ i « t ~ * a*
80
—
134
45
46
171
45
74
88
36
53
27
64
66
103
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,032
STER PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
Development Type
, i. i , '< , V,""<>-' ' - ', ' "~ *.*"! ' If* a ^ IMt&'-k 31 ,S"* 3t* -1
SFD - 5,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
Community Facilities
SFD - 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 5,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 5,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
Multi-Family (Affordable Housing)'2'.
Townhomes/Small Lot
SFD - 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size T
SFD - 10,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD - 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
HCP Open Space
HCP Open Space
Utility Corridor
Open Space
Open Space
Major Roadways
JHAYVLC MP
7-4
, 2000
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA OAKS
MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
H
Common recreation areas per the requirements of the Planned
Development Ordinance, Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code, are proposed for La Costa Oaks Neighborhoods
3.1, 3.6, 3.7, 3.9, and 3.11. Conceptual locations are shown on
Exhibit 7-5, Trails and Recreation Plan. Precise locations and
sizes of the various areas will be determined at the time of
planned development or condominium permit approval for each
respective neighborhood.
Open space lots will be located within each Neighborhood during
the final map process. Landscaping within these lots shall be
designed to provide maximum visibility for police surveillance
and to create a safe feeling for users. The exact details of
landscaping on open space lots shall be approved by the Planning
Director.
In addition to the areas listed above, lands associated with the
trail system discussed in Section 7.2.4 of this chapter are
considered Master Plan Outdoor Recreation Areas.
4. Open Space for Public Health and Safety
All common maintained slope areas will be maintained as open
space. Each Neighborhood shall provide for dedication of open
space easements for slope maintenance purposes at the time of
final map approval for that Neighborhood.
A Fire Protection Plan shall be approved by the Fire Department
for any area designated as a Fire Protection Zone on one of the
Neighborhood Development Plans prior to the approval of the
tentative map for the affected Neighborhood. The Fire Protection
Plan is described in Section 4.7.9 of the Master Plan.
5. Open Space Maintenance
The responsibilities for the maintenance of the Open Space Areas
of La Costa Oaks are described by Exhibit 7-3. Maintenance
7-12
JHAWLC MP December, 2000
^||I^-^-; --/^
"V.S - - - / °D . \\ >:•• -__: • __--
•^Jf • • "Tf • • " " • *m-». I I I(—3.7
TOWN HOMES/
SMALL LOT
3.15
7,500 MIN.S.F.IBTS
LEGEND
| Recreation Center
City-Wide Trails
Local Trail
VILLAGES OF
LA COSTA
Exhibit 7-5
LA COSTA OAKSTRAILS AND RECREATION PLAN
Page 7-19
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
MASTER PLAN
LA COSTA OAKS
VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
EXHIBIT 7-C COMMON RECREATION AREA LOCATION SUMMARY
LA COSTA OAKS
La Costa Oaks Neighborhoods
Requiring Common Recreation Areas
Neighborhood 3.1
Neighborhood 3.3
Neighborhood 3.4
Neighborhood 3.5
Neighborhood 3.6
Neighborhood 3.7
Neighborhood 3.9
Neighborhood 3. 10
Neighborhood 3.11
Location of Common
Recreation Areas
Neighborhood 3.1, Exhibit 7-19
Neighborhood 3.1, Exhibit 7-19
Neighborhood 3.1, Exhibit 7-19
Neighborhood 3.1, Exhibit 7-19
Neighborhood 3.6, Exhibit 7-24
Neighborhood 3.7, Exhibit 7-25
Neighborhood 3.9, Exhibit 7-27
Neighborhood 3.11, Exhibit 7-29
Neighborhood 3.11, Exhibit 7-29
7.2.7 Village Development Permits
Prior to the development of each La Costa Oaks neighborhood, a series of
permits must be submitted for review and approval by the City. Permits
required for the development of each individual neighborhood are
summarized on the Village Permit Matrix, Exhibit 7-D. In some cases
specific permit requirements will depend on the type of development
which is proposed. For example, a neighborhood proposed for small-lot,
single-family detached homes would require a Planned Development
Permit, while a condominium project would call for a Condominium
Permit. In addition to the Village Permit Matrix provided in this section,
development permit requirements are listed under the heading, "Required
Development Permits," for each neighborhood in Section 7.7.3.
JHAYVLC MP
7-21
December, 2000
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA OAKS
MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN— i - ""•'
Municipal Code Section 21.45 et seq. shall be utilized
unless otherwise modified in the Master Plan. The
number of Master Plan units planned for this area is 80.
Dwelling unit transfers between Neighborhood 3.1 and
other neighborhoods in La Costa Oaks may occur as
described hi Section 2.5.2.
c. Required Development Permits
The following development permits are required:
Tentative Map, Planned Development Permit and a
Hillside Development Permit. A Hillside Development
Permit (HDP) and Floodplain Special Use Permit
(FPSUP) will be processed with the Master Tentative
Map for the La Costa Oaks Village. An additional HDP
and FPSUP may be necessary for the development of
Neighborhood 3.1 depending on the final grading plan
and development design.
d. Permitted Uses
Single dwellings. Common recreation areas are
specifically permitted as an accessory use.
e. Product Type
Single-family detached homes
f. Minimum Lot Size
5,000 square feet
g. Minimum Lot Width
Minimum lot width shall be 50 feet,
h. Lot Coverage
Refer to Section 4.6 of this Master Plan.
7-69
JHA\VLC MP December, 2000
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA OAKS
MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
!. -
units shall be incorporated to soften views of
these structures from Rancho Santa Fe Road.
• Landscaping in this area shall be compatible with
existing native vegetation.
. Special attention shall be given to incorporating
the adjacent Open Space Area as an amenity to
the Neighborhood.
« Common recreation areas shall be provided in this
Neighborhood to serve Neighborhoods 3.1, 3.3,
3.4 and 3.5. The required common recreation
areas shall begin construction prior to the
occupancy of the first unit and be approved for
use prior to the occupancy of 50% of the first
units in the Neighborhoods listed above.
A Fire Protection Zone, as defined and illustrated
in Section 4.7.9 and which separates developed
areas and manufactured slopes from HCP Open
Space Areas, will be incorporated where
necessary so as to have limited, if any, impact on
the Open Space Areas. The final location of the
zone will be determined during Tentative
Subdivision Map review.
. Lighting within new development projects
adjacent to Conserved Habitat will be selectively
placed, shielded, and directed away from
Conserved Habitat.
. Development edges between natural open space
and development areas should maximize view
potentials. Open space fingers should extend into
residential areas where possible.
7-72
JHAWLC MP December, 2000
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA OAKS
MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLANr1
3. La Costa Oaks Neighborhood 3.3
a. Description
Neighborhood 3.3 is located in the north central portion
of La Costa Oaks. The single-family detached home
Neighborhood is bounded to the north by Neighborhood
3.1, to the west by the conserved habitat area of Open
Space Area 3.A, to the south by the SDG&E utility
corridor within Open Space Area 3.A, and Neighborhood
3.5, and to the east by Neighborhood 3.4. Access is
provided to the north portion of the Neighborhood by a
roadway which extends westward from Rancho Santa Fe
Road between Neighborhoods 3.1 and 3.4. The south
areas of the Neighborhood receive access from Rancho
Santa Fe Road by the westward extension of a roadway
between Neighborhood 3.4 and 3.5.
Neighborhood 3.3 consists of approximately 46.6 gross
acres. The Neighborhood 3.3 Development Plan is shown
on Exhibit 7-21.
b. Use Allocation
The General Plan Designation for Neighborhood 3.3 is RLM
(0-4 du/ac), with a Growth Management Control Point of
3.2 du/ac. The R-l Development Standards, as
established by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.10,
including accessory structures, second dwelling units,
building height, and lot coverage shall be utilized, unless
otherwise modified by this Master Plan. In addition, the
Planned Development Ordinance Development Standards,
as established by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.45
et seq. shall be utilized unless otherwise modified in the
Master Plan. The number of Master Plan units planned
for this area is 134. Dwelling unit transfers between
Neighborhood 3.3 and other neighborhoods in La Costa
Oaks may occur as described in Section 2.5.2.
7-79
JHAWLC MP December, 2000
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA OAKS
MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLANP.
o. Special Design Criteria
All Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines
described in Chapter 4 shall be implemented, as
applicable, in this area. The following specific design
criteria shall also be incorporated for Neighborhood 3.3:
Landscaping in this area shall be compatible with
existing native vegetation.
A Fire Protection Zone, as defined and illustrated
in Section 4.7.9 and which separates developed
areas and manufactured slopes from HCP Open
Space Areas, will be incorporated where
necessary so as to have limited, if any, impact on
the Open Space Areas. The final location of the
zone will be determined during Tentative
Subdivision Map review.
• Manufactured slopes may be enhanced with
sensitive plant species where appropriate.
Special attention shall be given to incorporating
the adjacent Open Space Area as an amenity to
the Neighborhood.
• Common recreation areas shall be provided in
Neighborhood 3.1 to serve Neighborhoods 3.1,
3.3, 3.4 and 3.5. The required common recreation
areas shall begin construction prior to the
occupancy of the first unit and be approved for
use prior to the occupancy of 50% of the first
units in the Neighborhoods listed above.
• Lighting within new development projects
adjacent to Conserved Habitat will be selectively
placed, shielded, and directed away from
Conserved Habitat.
7-83
JHAYVLC MP December, 2000
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA OAKS
MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLANj_
7.4, La Costa Oaks Village Phasing Plan and illustrated
on Exhibit 7-10.
o. Special Design Criteria
All Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines
described in Chapter 4 shall be implemented, as
applicable, in this area. The following specific design
criteria shall also be incorporated for Neighborhood 3.4:
Because of the Neighborhood's proximity to
Rancho Santa Fe, an acoustic study shall be
undertaken in conjunction with the tentative tract
map process, and any recommended noise
attenuation measures, including but not limited to
the erection of sound walls, shall be implemented
as necessary.
. All residential lot lines in this Neighborhood shall
be located a minimum of 50 feet from the
standard right-of-way of Rancho Santa Fe
Road.
For the areas identified on Exhibit 7-22 20% of
the units along a ridgeline/hilltop, which are
visible from a circulation element roadway, shall
be single story as required in Section 4.4 of this
Master Plan.
Exterior slope landscape screening of the dwelling
units shall be incorporated to soften views of
these structures from Rancho Santa Fe Road.
. Common recreation areas shall be provided in
Neighborhood 3.1 for the residents of
Neighborhoods 3.1,3.3,3.4 and 3.5. The required
common recreation areas shall begin construction
prior to the occupancy of the first unit and be
7-89
JHAWLC MP December, 2000
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA OAKS
MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLANt -
Common recreation areas will be included in
Neighborhood 3.1 for the residents of
Neighborhoods 3.1,3.3,3.4 and 3.5. The required
common recreation areas shall begin construction
prior to the occupancy of the first unit and be
approved for use prior to the occupancy of 50% of
the first units in the Neighborhoods listed above.
. All landscaping and grading within the SDG&E
transmission easement shall meet the approval of
SDG&E.
. A Fire Protection Zone, as defined and illustrated
in Section 4.7.9 and which separates developed
areas and manufactured slopes from HCP Open
Space Areas, will be incorporated where
necessary so as to have limited, if any, impact on
the Open Space Areas. The final location of the
zone will be determined Tentative Subdivision
Map review.
. Lighting within new development projects
adjacent to Conserved Habitat shall be selectively
placed, shielded, and directed away from
Conserved Habitat.
« The slopes along Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be
undulated to simulate natural topography where
feasible.
. Common streetscape and landscape areas shall
conform to community requirements as
established in this master plan. Street trees,
landscape zones, entries, irrigation systems, walls,
fencing, lighting, etc., have been selected to
provide consistency in design and quality.
7-96
JHAYVLC MP December, 2000
LA COSTA RIDGE
NEIGHBORHOOD/ OPEN
AREA REFERENCE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ZONING GROSS
ACRES
NET
ACRES (1)
GROWTH
MANAGEMENT
CONTROL POINT
DENISTY
GENERAL PLAN
DWELLING UNITS
MASTER PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
Maximum Allowable
dwelling Units
NET
DENSITY
DU/AC
Development Type
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.A
2.B
VILLAGE TOTALS
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RMH - Residential Medium-High
OS - Open Space
OS - Open Space
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
RD-M
O-S
O-S
49.4
37.5
41
22.3
40.4
11.5
284.5
6.5
493.1
36.1
29.8
35.5
19.2
31.6
10.4
—
—
162.6
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
11.5
—
—
116
95
114
61
101
120
—
—
607
55
38
70
34
66
57
—
—
320
1.5
1.3
2.0
1.8
2.1
5.5
—
—
2.0
SFD — 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size / HCP
SFD — 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size / HCP
SFD — 10,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size / HCP
SFD — 10,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size / HCP
Townhomes
HCP/Open Space
HCP/Open Space
(1) To obtain net developable acres, all of the 100 percent constrained areas and one-haf of the areas having 25-40 percent slopes are subtracted from the gross acreage figure.
LA COSTA OAKS
NEIGHBORHOOD/ OPEN
AREA REFERENCE
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
3.14
3.15
3.A
3.B
3.C
3.D
3.E
Circulation
VILLAGE TOTALS
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
CF - Community Facilities
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RMH - Residential Medium-High
RM - Residential Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
RLM - Residential Low-Medium
OS - Open Space
OS - Open Space
OS - Open Space
OS - Open Space
OS - Open Space
—
ZONING
R-1
C-F
R-1
R-1
R-1
RD-M
RD-M
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
O-S
O-S
O-S
O-S
O-S
—
GROSS
ACRES
27.9
6.6
46.6
14.5
13.9
16
13.8
26.4
32
16.4
22.5
15.4
37.8
29.4
44.9
116.5
177.6
9.5
6
12.5
26.4
712.6
NET
ACRES (1)
25.5
6.4
39.8
14.4
14
13.4
11.5
21.7
29.3
13.9
20.2
15.1
32.3
27.4
44.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
329.8
GROWTH
MANAGEMENT
CONTROL POINT
DENISTY
3.2
—
3.2
3.2
3.2
11.5
6
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
—
——
—
——
GENERAL PLAN
DWELLING UNITS
82
—
127
46
45
154
69
69
94
44
65
48
103
88
144
——
—
—
——
1178
MASTER PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
Maximum Allowable
Dwelling Units
76
—
138
45
46
171
45
74
88
36
53
27
62
66
105
—
—
—
——
—
1032
NET
DENSITY
DU/AC
3.0
—
3.5
3.1
3.3
12.8
3.9
3.4
3.0
2.6
2.6
1.8
1.9
2.4
2.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.1
Development Type
SFD — 5,000 Sc^FI. Minimum Lot Size
Community Facilities
SFD — 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 5,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 5,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
Multiple Famijy (Affordable Housing)
Townhomes
SFD — 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size—
SFD — 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size'
SFD — 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 10,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
SFD — 7,500 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size
HCP/Open Space
HCP/Open Space
HCP/Open Space
HCP/Open Space
HCP/Open Space
Major Roadways - Rancho Santa Fe Rd
(1) To obtain net developable acres, all of the 100 percent constrained area* and one-haf of the areas having 25-40 percent slopes are subtracted from the grow acreage figure.