HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 98-47; El Camino Real Widening; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (2)CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1} APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C
Q Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
Q Administrative Variance
[^ Coastal Development Permit
[] Conditional Use Permit
Q Condominium Permit
&\ Environmental Impact
Assessment
Q General Plan Amendment
Q Hillside Development Permit
Q Local Coastal Plan Amendment
Q] Master Plan
Q Non-Residential Planned
Development
Q Planned Development Permit
HECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
bDptQ-W
Q Planned Industrial Permit
Q Planning Commission
Determination
O Precise Development Plan
Q Redevelopment Permit
|~) Site Development Plan
Q Special Use Permit
Q Specific Plan
O Tentative Parcel Map
Obtain from Engineering Department
C3 Tentative Tract Map
n Variance
I | Zone Change
n List other applications not
specified
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
2)
3)
4)
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).:
PROJECT NAME:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type)
CMy @c {^M&l^^fcC^
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE DATE
6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY AND STATE
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM
OWNER AND THAT ALL
CORRECT TO THE BEST
SIGNATURE
ZIP TELEPHONE
THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
DATE
7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT:"EH
ON THE
BETWEEN
STREET ADDRESS
SIDE OF
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
AND
(NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS
13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE
1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE
22) EXISTING ZONING
11) NUMBER OF EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/
SQUARE FOOTAGE
17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN
ADT
20) EXISTING GENERAL
PLAN
23) PROPOSED ZONING
(NAME OF STREEfN— -
(NAME OF STREET)
12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
15) PROPOSED COMM
SQUARE FOOTAGE
18) PROPOSED SEWER
USAGE IN EDU
21) PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION
24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE-PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
T{>tEt*mY FOR THIS/§URPpSlE ..—-J-
SIGNATURE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION
APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED
TO
D/s
TAL FEE REQUIRED
kTE FEE PAID
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY:
RECEIPT NO.
Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2
168-050-17ROBERTSON FAMILY^ TRUSTROBERTSON FAMILY
TRUST
212-150-01
EVANS POINT/HOMEOWNERSsASSOC.
KELLY LAND
COMPANY
KELLY LAND
COMPANY
KELLY LAND
COMPANY
KELLY LAND
COMPANY
208-020-38
211-010-26
SAN DEGO GAS 4 ELECTRIC CO.212-010-05
CITY OF CARLSBAD
211-010-28
DIEGO GAS 4 ELECTRIC CO.212-010-11
CITY OF CARLSBAD
C B RANCH
ENTERPRISES 211-023-13
CARLSBADRANCHCOMPANY
211-100-14
CARLSBAD ESTATE
HOLDING INC.C B RANCH
ENTERPRISES
CANNON ROAD WEST / EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING
OWNERSHIP MAP - OCTOBER 21, 1998
OF CARLSBAD
SPACE PARCEL NUMBER
TO 99 771-880-50-01 TO 99
IOO TO 199 771-880-51-00 TO 99
200 TO 299 771-680-52-00 TO 99
505 77l-680-Si~OS
» PRIVATE STREET
168-05
SHT, 2
NO SCALE
07/08/98 Kg
GHANGI
BLK
5,
50
51
51
SO
SI
50
52
50
52
50
52
51
51
52
52
51
50
51
52
91
90
50
90
53
OLD
7B
73
21
IS
06
22
85
71
PICKUP
'1CKUP
77
lOJeM
1CKUP
56
85
HCKUP
*1CKUP
90
03fc59
33
PICKUP
9\
1QCUP
46
NEW
Mil
KILL
KILL
KILL
K3LL
raa
Kn^
Kill
27
BlftftS
n^
raj.
M
KILL
KUL
M
12
KUL
KILL
KUL
44
KU.
45
inii-
KOL
ES
YR
ffl
fit
93
*«
9^
re
y^
1ft
1
)
\
M
00
M
»
97
98
M
H
M
Fl
M
CUT
UBS
4244
4338
4410
4O71
4128
4163
4334
4006
4050
4144
4191
4245
4OOO
4075
4000
4078
41S1
4212
4231
400O
SP210
Q
itK DlfGO CUUNIY
ASSESSOR Mff
BOOK 168 'fat 05 SHT. 2 MM NOT COMdY WTO Ifll RANCHO CASLSBAD MOBILE HOME PARKMAPPED FOR MOBILE HOME ASSESSMENT ONLY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
City of Carlsbad
1. Project Title:
El Camino Real Widening Project (Case No. CDP 98-47)
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009-1576
3. Contact Person and Phone Number
Sherri Howard, Associate Engineer
(760) 438-1161, extension 4427
4. Project Location:
The project is located in an approximately 0.3-mile segment of El Camino
Real in the City of Carlsbad on both sides of the bridge over Agua
Hedionda Creek (Figure 1) . The project site is about 0.9 mile westerly
of the intersection of El Camino Real and College Boulevard, and about a
mile easterly from the intersection of El Camino Real and Tamarack
Avenue. The segment includes the site of the planned future
intersection with Cannon Road, just westerly from the bridge over Agua
Hedionda Creek.
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
City of Carlsbad
Public Works - Engineering Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009-1576
6. General Plan Designation:
The project site is within the route of El Camino Real, a circulation
element roadway, as designated in the Carlsbad General Plan.
7. Zoning:
The project site is the unzoned right-of-way of El Camino Real.
8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases
of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation.
Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.)
Page 1 of 24
A
N
600 0 600 1200 Feet
Figure 1
Project Location Shown on
1994 Aerial Photography
IREC&N
The project is the improvement of El Camino Real for approximately 1,600
linear feet, including the widening of the existing bridge over Agua
Hedionda Creek, a segment approximately 440 feet east of the bridge, and
a segment approximately 1,020 feet west of the bridge. The project site
includes the future intersection of El Camino Real with Cannon Road.
The project will include widening the bridge and an area west of the
bridge. The bridge is presently 108 feet wide; the project would add
two feet to each side for sidewalk to increase the width to 112 feet.
The bridge construction will be completed from the current bridge with
no impacts from construction to the area below the bridge. El Camino
Real would be widened from the bridge westerly by adding up to 17 feet
to the width of paving on the north side and up to 29 feet to the width
of paving on the south side. The widening would result in a paved width
for El Camino Real of 106 feet east of the Cannon Road intersection and
138 feet west of that intersection to allow for planned geometry and
striping at the future intersection with Cannon Road to the south.
Construction of Cannon Road to the south of the intersection is not a
part of this project, but will be constructed at the same time, and the
proposed project has been coordinated with plans for the construction of
that segment of Cannon Road. The Carlsbad Circulation Element shows
Cannon Road extending northeasterly from El Camino Real to where Cannon
Road presently stubs out at the City limit in Oceanside, but that
extension is not an active project at this time. Project plans do
include, however, an extension of paving northerly from the El Camino
Real/Cannon Road intersection to an existing blacktop road giving access
to properties in that area.
This Initial Study is based on a review of project plans available at
the time the study was prepared. During the course of the Initial
Study, a modification of the project was developed which reduces
biological impacts of the proposed project but for which engineering
plans are not available. This alternative is referred to in the
biological report as the Reduced Impact Alternative. It would reduce
the length of the free right-turn lane from El Camino Real onto Cannon
Road by 150 feet and avoid construction in any wetland area (Figure 2).
The City Engineering Department has agreed to implement this
modification of the project, and final plans for construction will
reflect it. The assessment of impacts and mitigation in this Initial
Study uses the reduced impact alternative as the project.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings. Attach additional
sheet(s) if necessary).
On the north side of El Camino Real, just easterly from the project
site, is a mobile home park. Other areas around the project site are
presently mostly vacant and undeveloped, although there are widely
scattered residences to the north. A plant nursery is located in the
area adjacent to El Camino Real just west of the mobile home park. Agua
Hedionda Creek flows northwesterly through the mobile home park. Just
north of the mobile home park and El Camino Real, it is joined by
another drainage from the east. Agua Hedionda Creek flows south under
the El Camino Real bridge and then turns westward under the future route
of Cannon Road. The creek then flows generally westward into the
wetlands of Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
Page 3 of 24
REVISED EDGE OF PAVING
REVISED GRADING
! 8 V—REVISED
V LOCATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
FENCING
FIGURE 2
Reduced Impact Alternative
o
South of the project site, higher ground rises. This area to the south
is known as Kelly Ranch and is presently vacant and mostly undeveloped,
but is the site of proposed future residential development. Development
of Kelly Ranch will include the construction of Cannon Road south from
El Camino Real, including the Cannon Road/El Camino Real intersection.
10. Other Public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits financing approval, or
participation agreement):
California Department of Fish and Game (CDF6): The proposed project may
require an agreement under Section 1601 of the California Fish and Game
Code for a streambed alteration associated with the road widening and
drainage improvements. The agreement would be required if the
Department, in reviewing the project, determines that the disturbed mule
fat scrub impacted by the project is a vegetative community associated
with the Aqua Hedionda Creek streambed.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use and Planning
Population and Housing
Geological Problems
Water
Air Quality
Paleontology
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
Hazards
Noise
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Public Services
Utilities and Service Sys.
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the environmental checklist have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The
mitigation measures required are listed in Appendix A.
Signature Date
Printed Name For
Page 5 of 24
c
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parenthesis following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific
factors as well as general standards.
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as
well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant If
there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is
required.
4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures
has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact" Hie lead
agency must describe the mitigation measure, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than
significant level.
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). Earlier analyses
are discussed in Section XVn at the end of the checklist
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts. References to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a
reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
Page 6 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MTTIOATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving:
LAND USE & PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designations or \ ) j | | |
zoning?
The project consists of improvements to a Circulation Element road
in the city of Carlsbad and is consistent with the General Plan.
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or | | | | E?| | |
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
The project will affect wetlands associated with Agua Hedionda
Creek, but permits from the appropriate resource or trustee
agencies (USACE and CDFG) will be required for project
implementation, and adequate mitigation for impacts to biological
resources is included in the project (see Section VII below) .
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the | | | | | | E£|
vicinity?
The project is the widening of an existing major street and would
not change any land use in the vicinity.
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations? | | | [ | | E?|
No agriculture is currently being conducted on any of the land
that is within the limits of work indicated on project plans. A
horticultural nursery north of El Camino Real in the project area
will not be affected.
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an | | | | | | [^
established community?
El Camino Real already is constructed in this alignment. The only
established community or neighborhood in the project vicinity is
the mobile home park northeast of the future intersection. The
physical arrangement of the mobile home park would not be affected
by the proposed project.
Page 7 of 24
c
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
E. POPULATION & HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local \ \ \ } | \
population projections?
The project is the widening of an existing road and would have no
effect on either regional or local population projections.
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly \ \ \ | [""] ^\
or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undevel-
oped area or extension of major infrastructure)?
The project is intended to serve population and development growth
consistent with the Carlsbad General Plan and to make road
improvements consistent with the General Plan's Circulation
Element.
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable | ) | | j~"|
housing?
No housing would be affected by the project.
GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts
involving:
a) Fault rupture? |~| f~| E3 |~|
A geotechnical evaluation of the project performed for the project
by Ninyo & Moore in June of 1998 is included in this Initial Study
as Attachment A. Responses in this section are based on that
report. In addition, a comprehensive geotechnical evaluation of
the project will be performed and reviewed by the City prior to
final approval of construction plans.
Like all of southern California, the site is in a seismically
active area. The most significant maximum credible earthquake
event that could affect the project site is considered to be an
earthquake of magnitude 7.0 on the Rose Canyon fault zone. The
geotechnical evaluation concluded, based on a review of pertinent
literature, that no active faults have been mapped across the
project site, and that the potential for ground surface rupture at
the site is low.
Page 8 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
POTENTIALLY
SK3NIF1CANT
UNLESS
MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
b) Seismic ground shaking?D
NO
IMPACT
D
The geotechnical evaluation of the project concluded that
construction of the project is feasible from a geotechnical
perspective. The project site is in Seismic Zone 4 of the Uniform
Building Code, and there is a potential for strong ground motions
to occur at the site. Before final plans for the project are
approved, a comprehensive geotechnical evaluation will be required
by the City in which the potential for ground shaking will be
considered. Feasible mitigation by means such as compaction of
soil materials and roadbed preparation is available, and the
project would widen portions of an existing road, not construct a
new road. Under these conditions, the risk from ground shaking is
not considered significant.
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?D D D
The presence of loose, granular soils and the shallow depth of
groundwater at the site increase the potential for liquefaction
and dynamic settlement at the site. The project does not propose
to modify or create deep foundational elements such as bridge
pilings, and will not increase the risk of ground failure or
liquefaction.
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? I I I I I I R?j
Conditions for seiche or volcanic hazard do not exist at or near
the project site. The geotechnical evaluation finds the potential
for damage due to tsunami to be very low, based on the location
approximately 2.5 miles from the coastline.
e) Landslides or mudflows?D D D
There is no high ground adjacent to the project area that would
present the danger of landslides or mudflows that could affect the
roadway.
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil \ | | |
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?D
Project plans include an erosion control plan for construction and
the stabilization and control of runoff by means of slope
armoring, storm drains, and energy dissipators as part of the
completed project.
g) Subsidence of the land?D
The project would not include any features, such as mining or
groundwater withdrawal, that could cause land subsidence.
Page 9 of 24
c
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
UNLESS
MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT IMPACT
h) Expansive soils?D D D
The geotechnical evaluation did not find expansive soils to be a
problem at the site. However, the fill and alluvial soils that
characterize the site may induce unacceptable settlement.
Subsurface investigation and laboratory testing will be required
to address the potential. Such testing will accompany the compre-
hensive geotechnical evaluation that will be required by the City
prior to project implementation.
i) Unique geologic or physical features?D D
Geologic and physical conditions of the site are typical of the
location, without any remarkable or unique features.
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface runoff?D D D
A water quality evaluation was prepared for the proposed project
in June of 1998 and is included in this Initial Study as
Attachment B. Responses below are based on that study.
There would be a slight, but not significant, increase in runoff
due to the increase in the area of paved and other impermeable
surfaces. The project will not affect Agua Hedionda Creek, for
which channel improvements will be constructed as part of the
Cannon Road construction project. Runoff from reconstructed El
Camino Real will be controlled and released through energy
dissipators into existing drainage patterns. During construction,
the project will be required to comply with Best Management
Practices for control of runoff through the National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements of the
federal Clean Water Act.
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?D D
Bridges and channel improvements are designed to avoid flooding in
a design storm of 100-year frequency.
Page 10 of 24
o
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration | | | | j^ j |
of surface water quality (e.g. temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)?
Project plans include an erosion and runoff control plan during
construction. Areas disturbed by construction will be stabilized
when construction is completed, and runoff from the road surfaces
will be stabilized and controlled principally into drains with
energy dissipators at the outlets of the drains. Construction of
the project will be subject to the requirements of the NPDES
permitting process, which will require the employment of Best
Management Practices for the control of water quality.
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any j | | \ |~] ^
water body?
Runoff from the project site will be directed into drains and will
eventually drain into Agua Hedionda Creek and the Agua Hedionda
Lagoon. The volume of runoff from the relatively small area of
increase in paved surfaces, however, will not appreciably affect
the amount of surface water in these water bodies.
e) Changes in currents, of the course or direction of |~] | | [""] R?l
water movements?
The patterns, currents, courses, and direction of drainage into
Agua Hedionda Creek and Agua Hedionda Lagoon will not be
substantially affected by the project. The planned drainage
control measures for the completed project will discharge runoff
in ways similar to the existing course and direction of runoff
flows.
f) Change in the quality of ground waters, either | [ | \ \ \
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
Withdrawal or addition to groundwater is not a part of the proj-
ect, and grading for construction will not result in cuts deep
enough to affect any groundwater aquifer.
Page 11 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? | | | | | [
Although the groundwater table is relatively high at the
project site, deep excavation is not proposed and construction
dewatering is not anticipated. If temporary construction
dewatering should occur and the effluent is released to surface
waters such as Agua Hedionda Creek, then the discharge will be
required to meet the effluent limits specified by the Regional
Water Quality Control Board (Order No. 96-41/NPDES CAG919002).
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? | | | | f>^] | |
Some runoff from the project may percolate to groundwater, since
the water table in the project vicinity is relatively high. For a
discussion of potential impacts, see the response to IV.a above.
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of j | | j f"~]
groundwater otherwise available for public
water supplies?
No use of groundwater is proposed.
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:.
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to | [ | | [' J
an existing or projected air quality violation?
Emissions will result from internal combustion engines used to
power construction equipment and from traffic to and from the site
during construction. Motorized construction equipment is regulated
by Air Pollution Control District (APCD) rules and must comply
with APCD emissions standards. Motor vehicles licensed for road
use are regulated for pollution control by the state Department of
Motor Vehicles.
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? j | | | [~| |^|
No unusual pollutants or amounts of pollutants would be generated
by construction of the proposed project. See the preceding
response.
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or j | | | j \
cause any change in climate?
The project will not be of a scale or nature to significantly
affect meteorological factors.
Page 12 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
UNLESS
MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
NO
IMPACT
d) Create objectionable odors? | | | |
No objectionable odors would be produced.
VL TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? j | | |
Construction of the project may cause some disturbance of normal
traffic patterns on El Camino Real. Project plans include traffic
control and temporary striping plans to minimize the disruption of
traffic during construction. When completed, the project will
improve traffic flow in the project area.
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.
sharp curves or dangerous intersections or
incompatible uses)?
[""] | |
The project has been designed to meet applicable City design
standards. Road widening and lane geometry are designed to City
standards, and the wider road will allow design for greater
safety.
c)Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses?
| ||~~| | |
There will be no restriction of emergency access to the site or to
any other area. During construction of the project, alternate
routes will be available to areas where construction restricts any
access route to nearby properties. Project plans include the
provision of access to nearby uses north of El Camino Real from
the Cannon Road intersection.
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?| | l~~|| |
No features of the project would affect public parking.
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?j | | |
Except for possible temporary obstruction during construction, no
part of the project will adversely affect pedestrian or bicycle
routes. Bike lanes in both directions will be provided as part of
the completed project, and widening the bridge will allow
pedestrian sidewalks.
Page 13 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting | | | | | \
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
Bike lanes will be provided by the completed project in accordance
with City policies.
g) Rail, waterbome, or air traffic impacts? |"~| j| | | R?|
The project will not affect any of these modes of transportation,
either directly or indirectly.
VIL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their \ \ ^j j \ \ \
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
The project was the subject of field surveys and biological
evaluation in May of 1998. Responses in this section are based
on the biological report for the project that is included in
this Initial Study as Attachment C. The project evaluated in
this checklist is the Reduced Impact Alternative described in
the biological report, since the City has agreed to implement
that alternative (see Figure 2).
Biological surveys of the site discovered no endangered,
threatened* or rare species on the site. Sensitive bird
species may use riparian habitats on or near the site. To
avoid direct impacts to these species, a biologist shall survey
the site prior to the start of construction to assure potential
nesting species are not disturbed (see Appendix A).
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? j~"| | | | } ^
No locally designated species are present on the project site.
Mitigation listed in Appendix A would avoid impacts to all species
with the potential to occur on the site that are covered in the
draft Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City
of Carlsbad (December 1, 1997).
Page 14 of 24
w
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITH3ATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak | | ^j | j | [
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
The project would affect 0.35 acre of coastal sage scrub and
0.32 acre of mule fat scrub, natural communities designated for
conservation in the draft Habitat Management Plan for Natural
Communities in the City of Carlsbad (December 1, 1997) . The mule
fat scrub affected is not a wetland according to USAGE criteria.
Mitigation for impacts to these communities will be accomplished
by restoration of 0.31 acre of higher-quality mule fat scrub and
0.39 acre of higher-quality coastal sage scrub on-site when
construction is completed (see Appendix A) . The project would
also affect a very small amount of wetland habitat from shading by
the widened bridge. Because there would be no ground area of
wetland affected, and only a small area of tree canopy affected,
this effect is not considered significant.
d) Wetland habitat(e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal { | ^j | | | |
pool)?
As originally proposed, the project would have permanently
impacted 0.03 acre of alkali marsh and temporarily impact 0.01
acre of alkali marsh. It would also have permanently impacted
0.10 acre of disturbed mule fat scrub) and temporarily impacted an
additional 0.22 acre of disturbed mule fat scrub. The disturbed
mule fat scrub affected does not meet USAGE criteria for wetland
habitat but may qualify as a wetland under CDFG jurisdiction. The
Reduced Impact Alternative, which the City has agreed to
implement, would eliminate the project's impacts to any habitat
defined as a wetland by USAGE criteria, other than a very small
amount of increased shading of freshwater marsh and southern
willow scrub by the widened bridge (see the preceding response).
Mitigation for impacts of the reduced impact alternative are
presented in Appendix A.
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? | | | | £>?] | |
The biological report for the proposed project concludes that
because of the quality and location of natural communities in the
project area, and the presence of El Camino Real as an existing
feature, impacts on wildlife movement corridors will not be
significant.
Vffl. ENERGY & MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? | | | | | |
Energy will be consumed by construction equipment. That expendi-
ture will be required to implement the project and does not
conflict with adopted energy conservation plans.
Page 15 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and | | | | | |
inefficient manner?
See the preceding response. Energy and materials will be consumed
during construction, and some of this expenditure will be from
non-renewable resources. No evidence for wasteful or inefficient
use of non-renewable resources has been identified.
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known j { | | |j |S?|
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the state?
A geological reconnaissance of the site revealed no known or
expected mineral deposits of significant economic value that would
be affected by the project (see Attachment A).
LX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of | | | j | |
hazardous substances (including but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
The proposed project was the subject of a hazardous materials
evaluation, including review of maps, photographs, and documents
and a site reconnaissance by Ninyo & Moore in June of 1998. A
report on the evaluation is included in this Initial Study as
Attachment D. Responses in this section are based on that report.
No extraordinary risk of this nature is anticipated. Any trans-
portation, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous substances
during construction will be conducted according to all applicable
state, federal, and local regulations. No chemicals or hazardous
substances will be stored at the project site.
b) Possible interference with an emergency response | | | | ££| [ |
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Construction of the project would affect traffic on El Camino
Real. Project plans include traffic control and temporary
striping plans to maintain through routes in the project area
during construction.
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential | | | { | } |^|
health hazard?
No potential or actual health hazards would be associated with the
project. Any use or temporary storage of hazardous materials at
the site during construction will be subject to all applicable
federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
Page 16 of 24
c
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
StCrOFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of [""] j | \ |
potential health hazards?
There are no known health hazards associated with the project.
According to the hazardous materials evaluation performed for the
project, there is no known repository of hazardous materials in
the project area.
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable j"~j | | | j ^|
brush, grass, or trees?
The proposed project would not be susceptible to damage by
ordinary wildfires and will not increase the presence of
unprotected, flammable structures or substances on the site.
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increase in existing noise levels? \~~\ \ | \\ ^)
Ambient noise at the project site was measured in May of 1998 and
the noise effects of the project assessed in a technical report.
Responses in this section are based on that report, which is
included in this Initial Study as Attachment E.
Construction of the project would at times generate higher than
usual levels of noise. A mobile home park is located north of El
Camino Real just east of the project area, and may be affected by
construction noise. This effect would be temporary and would be
restricted to normal working hours of the day. After construction,
the project would not result in any significant change in the
distance from the source of traffic noise to the mobile home park
and would not change the composition or volume of traffic using El
Camino Real. For the mobile home park, there would be no change
in future noise conditions as a result of the project, and no
other sensitive off-site receptors would be affected.
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? | j
See the preceding response. Construction noise would be temporary
and restricted to usual weekday working hours. The completed
project would have no significant effect on noise levels in the
project area, compared to conditions that would prevail if the
project were not implemented.
Page 17 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MTTIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? l~~l PI l~l
The project will not increase local fire protection demands.
b) Police protection? l~l l~"l l~l ERI
No increase in demands for police protection will result from the
project.
c) Schools? D D D 121
No feature of the proposed project would generate a demand for
school services.
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? j | j | E?| | |
Road maintenance will continue to be required at normal intervals,
but there will be no significant increase the amount of mainte-
nance required after construction is completed.
e) Other governmental services? | | |~"| | | ^|
The proposed project is part of the maintenance and planned
improvement of infrastructure elements by the City of Carlsbad.
It would not substantially affect other public services.
Xn. UTELITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? I II I E^l I I
Like many public roads, the El Camino Real right-of-way serves as
the route for a number of underground utility conveyance lines.
Project plans identify these utilities and require the construc-
tion contractor to avoid or properly relocate them. Coordination
with the utility operated will also be required of the contractor.
Under these conditions, no unforeseen interruption or substantial
alteration of power, natural gas, or other utilities is expected.
b) Communications systems? | | | | j^ [ |
See the preceding response.
Page 18 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MtnGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution | | |~| E?| j |
facilities?
See response XII.a.
d) Sewer or septic tanks? f~1 i~"1 E3 II
See response XII.a.
e) Storm water drainage? |~~| |~| 153 I I
Project plans include an erosion and runoff control plan during
construction. Areas disturbed by construction will be stabilized
when construction is completed, and runoff from the road surfaces
will be stabilized and controlled principally into drains with
energy dissipators at the outlets of the drains.
f) Solid waste disposal? \ | { | | |
The proposed project will not generate solid waste.
g) Local or regional water supplies? | | | | | |
Project plans call for disturbed slopes to be reseeded with
hydroseed mix. Water use for the completed project will be
minimal and will not substantially affect local or regional water
supplies.
AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? | | | | | | |S?|
El Camino Real in this area is not a scenic highway. The project
is the widening of an existing road and will not significantly
change views or vistas in the project area.
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? | | | | ^j | |
The project will result visually in minor changes to existing
features, a roadway and bridge that are already present in the
project area.
Page 19 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
c) Create light or glare? [~| (~~| |~|
Street lights and signal lights will be installed to meet City
standards. Lighting will of a type typically used for street
lighting in the city of Carlsbad and will not create unusual light
or glare.
XTV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? | | F?| | | | |
The project is located in an area geologically characterized by
recent alluvium and fill overlying the Eocene-age Santiago
Formation. Excavation during construction could disturb the
Santiago Formation, which is approximately 45 million years in age
and has produced significant fossil finds in the areas relatively
near the project site. If important fossils were destroyed during
construction of the project, the impact would be significant. The
impact can be mitigated to a level less than significant by
requiring a paleontological monitor to be on-site during initial
cuts that would affect the Santiago Formation. The paleontologist
would be empowered to salvage and curate any significant fossils,
which would be donated to a museum collection (see Appendix A) .
b) Disturb archaeological resources? | ] [ | ["""] E?I
Cultural resource records were reviewed and a field survey for
cultural resources in the project area was conducted in April of
1998. A report on the record search and field survey is included
in this Initial Study as Attachment F.
Based on the cultural resources report, no archaeological or
historical resources would be affected by construction of the
project within the construction limits shown on project plans.
c) Affect historical resources? [ | | | [ | |X1
See response XIV.b.
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change whic j | | | | | |^|
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
See response XIV.b. No areas possessing unique ethnic cultural
value were discovered or are known to exist in the project area.
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within | | | | [""]
the potential impact area?
See response XIV.b. No existing religious or sacred uses are
known to occur in the project area.
Page 20 of 24
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increases the demand for neighborhood or [""] j j j |
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
The project would not increase or affect population and would
generate no demand for recreational facilities.
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? |~] | | | j
No recreational facilities are located in the area that would be
directly affected by the project.
Page 21 of 24
XVI. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects
have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. (Section 15063(c)(3)(D).) In this case a
discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
No earlier analyses for this project were used.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
No such earlier document was used.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated," describe,
on attached sheets, the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and
the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project
Mitigation measures for the proposed project and the reduced impact
alternative were developed specifically for the project.
Page 22 of 24
c
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
POTENTIALLY UNLESS LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT MITIGATION SIGNIFICANT NO
IMPACT INCORPORATED IMPACT IMPACT
XVH. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the [ | j | j |
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
See responses to Section VII in this checklist.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short | [ \\ \ | |S?|
term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
The project is intended to improve the geometry and flow of
traffic on a major thoroughfare in the city of Carlsbad. Envi-
ronmental impacts are relatively minor, mitigable, and will be
mitigated in accordance with long-term environmental and conserva-
tion planning for the City and the project area. The project is
proposed at this time to accomplish improvements to El Camino Real
that are coordinated with planned construction of Cannon Road to
the south, avoiding the inefficiency of separately-phased projects
affecting the same project area.
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually || [ | [""] E?|
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
The project is a part of the City's Capital Improvements Program
to implement the Circulation Element. Cumulative impacts of this
project and the Cannon Road project that affects the same project
area have been considered and found not to be significant with
mitigation required by the City's environmental review of each
project and the conditions of permits required from resource and
trustee agencies.
d) Does the project have environmental effects | | | | [""] |^j
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
No such effects have been identified, taking into account the
nature and characteristics of the project and recent evaluation of
conditions in the project area.
Page 23 of 24
DETERMINATION.
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, including
revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore,
a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
Planner Signature Date
Planning Directory's Signature Date
Page 24 of 24
APPENDIX A
1. List of Mitigating Measures
2. Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Checklist
3. EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING (CDP-98-47)
LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES flF APPLICABLE)
1. Project plans shall show the "Reduced Impact Alternative" as described in the biological
report for the Initial Study, with a 400-foot-long free right-turn lane from El Camino Real to
Cannon Road.
2. A permit under the 4(d) rule shall be obtained for the take of 0.35 acre of disturbed coastal
sage scrub and 0.32 acre of disturbed mule fat scrub.
3. A Department of Fish and Game 1601 Streambed Alteration agreement shall be obtained, if
required by the department, for impacts to 0.32 acre of disturbed mule fat scrub.
4. Limits of construction shall be flagged, staked, and fenced prior to the initiation of clearing,
brushing, or grading to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
5. If construction begins between March 1 and September 15, a sensitive birds survey shall be
conducted to determine the presence of least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher,
yellow warbler, tricolored blackbird, or yellow-breasted chat.
6. Suitable disturbed areas on-site will be revegetated to restore 0.39 acre of high quality Diegan
coastal sage scrub and 0.31 acre of high quality mule fat scrub.
7. Eucalyptus trees in an area of 0.09 acre of eucalyptus woodland on-site will be removed and
the area will be revegetated with mule fat scrub.
8. Best management practices shall be used to implement National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System standards, subject to the Statewide NPDES construction permit and the
City of Carlsbad's NPDES municipal permit.
9. A qualified paleontologist shall monitor any grading that may affect the Santiago formation
to salvage, clean, sort, catalog, and curate any significant fossils discovered.
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 1 of 2
PROJECT NAME: EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING FILE NUMBERS CDP-98-47
APPROVAL DATE MITIGATED NEG. DEC.
The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project in order to mitigate
identified environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this
mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill
3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
Mitigation Measure
Project plans shall show the "Reduced Impact
Alternative" as described in the biological report for
the Initial Study, with a 400-foot long free right turn
lane from El Camino Real to Cannon Road.
A permit under the 4(d) rule shall be obtained for the
take of 0.35 acre of disturbed coastal sage scrub and
0.32 acre of disturbed mule fat scrub.
A Department of Fish and Game 1601 Streambed
Alteration agreement shall be obtained, if required by
the department, for impacts to 0.32 acre of disturbed
mule fat scrub.
Limits of construction shall be flagged, staked, and
fenced prior to the initiation of clearing, brushing, or
grading to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Monitoring Type
Project, prior to
grading permit
issuance.
Project, prior to
grading permit
issuance
Project, prior to
grading permit
issuance.
Project, prior to
grading.
Monitoring
Department
Engineering
Planning
Planning
Planning
Shown on
Plans
YES
NO
NO
YES
Verified
Implementation Remarks
O
O
Explanation of Heading*:
Monitoring Type: - Project, ongoing, cumulative.
Monitoring Department * Department or agency responsible for monitoring the mitigation
measure.
Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure Is shown on plans, this column will be Initialed
and dated.
Verified Implementation » When mitigation measure has been Implemented, this column will
be initialed and dated.
Remarks * Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure or for other Information.
RD - Appendix P.
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 2 of 2
PROJECT NAME: EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING FILE NUMBERS CDP-98-47
APPROVAL DATE MITIGATED NEG. DEC.
Mitigation Measure
If construction begins between March 1 and
September 15, a sensitive birds survey shall be
conducted to determine the presence of least Bell's
vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, yellow warbler,
tricolored blackbird, or yellow-breasted chat.
Suitable disturbed areas on-site will be revegetated to
restore 0.39 acre of high quality Diegan coastal sage
scrub and 0.31 acre of high quality mule fat scrub.
Eucalyptus trees in an area of 0.09 acre of eucalyptus
woodland on-site will be removed and the area will be
revegetated with mule fat scrub.
Best management practices shall be used to
implement National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System standards, subject to the Statewide NPDES
construction permit and the City of Carlsbad's NPDES
municipal permit.
A qualified paleontologist shall monitor any grading
that may affect the Santiago formation to salvage,
clean, sort, catalog, and curate any significant fossils
discovered.
Monitoring Type
Project, prior to
grading.
Project, on
completion of
grading.
Project, on
completion of
grading.
Project, prior to
issuance of
grading permits.
Project, prior to
issuance of
grading permits.
Monitoring
Department
Planning
Planning
Planning
Engineering
Planning
Shown on
Plans
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
Verified
Implementation Remarks
o
o
Explanation of Heading*;
Monitoring Type: « Project, ongoing, cumulative.
Monitoring Department - Department or agency responsible for monitoring the mitigation
measure.
Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure Is shown on plans, this column will be initialed
and dated.
Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been Implemented, this column will
be Initialed and dated.
Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure or for other Information.
RD - Appendix P.
_u June 4, 1998
4241 Jutland Drive, Suite 201
San Diego, CA 92117-3653
619/270-5066
fax 270-5414
Ms. Sheni Howard
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009 DEPARTMENT
Reference: Cultural Resource Survey of a Segment of El Camino Real Widening Project Area
(RECON Number 3018A)
Dear Ms. Howard:
This letter report presents the results of the cultural resource investigations for the proposed widening
of El Camino Real at its crossing with Agua Hedionda Creek (Figures 1 and 2). The investigations
include archival research, historic map review, and a pedestrian reconnaissance survey of the project
area. Archival and fieldwork indicate that there are no important cultural resource sites, features, or
isolates within the proposed project area and none are anticipated. A 1948 road segment, which
extends into the study area, constitutes an historic-era feature within the project; however, alterations
and maintenance of this road segment have been extensive in the project vicinity altering any
meaningful historic-era association. The proposed project will have no significant impact on this
historic-era element. No additional cultural resource work is recommended for this project as
proposed, given the results of the current investigation.
A review of the existing cultural resource site documents was conducted on April 27,1998, at the
South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University (Attachment 1). This institution is
the official State of California repository for such records in San Diego County. A self-search was
conducted in order to expedite the collection of pertinent information regarding the study area. Site
records, historic maps of the area, and listings of historic landmarks were reviewed. There are no
recorded cultural resource sites or historic landmarks within or adjacent to the study area. The
historic map review indicated that one historic-era road occurs within the study area. This road
which still exists is indicated on the 1948 USGS 7.5' San Luis Rey quadrangle. This road segment
has lost its historic appearance and context due to alterations and maintenance. This historic-era
feature does not constitute an important historic resource.
Within one-half mile of the proposed project a number of historic- and prehistoric-era resources are
present The 1948 USGS map indicates a total of three structures, one to the southwest and two to
the southeast of the study area. The structure to the southwest appears to be present among a group
of structures. None of these structures are recorded as historic-era resource sites.
Ten prehistoric sites are recorded within one-half mile of the study area. Most of these sites are
situated on the uplands to the south, with a few to the north of the proposed project. Of these sites,
eight are reported to be campsites or resource processing locations of limited use. Two of the sites
are reported to be larger concentrations of cultural material, both in site size and in deposit content.
One of these sites is an upland camp located to the south of the study area while the other is a low-
lying midden deposit, situated downstream from the road widening area.
The pedestrian survey of the project area was completed on April 28,1998. Resumes of key project
personnel are provided in Attachment 2. Near the creek there is a broad area of sand and flotsam
which has been deposited at the margins of the creek by runoff from recent periods of high water.
Ground surface visibility in these areas varied from poor to good depending on the amount of
exposed ground surface. Care was taken to examine all areas within the survey corridor where the
ground surface was exposed, for indications of cultural material. Overgrown and obscured areas
were not examined, comprising approximately 50 percent of the stream margin. The roadbed for El
Camino Real includes a layer of soil fill which extends laterally into the survey area, on either side of
PROJECT LOCATION
AGUA HEDIONDA
LAGOON
2 Af/L£5 0
FIGURE I
Regional Location of the Project
PROJECT LOCATION
^Sintorosa i.Country Club
'Aqua '
jiil Map Source: U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute topographic map,
II San Luis Rey quadrangle
400 200 FEET 0
FIGURE 2
Project Location
Ms. Sherri Howard
Page 2
June 4, 1998
the pavement. The fill soil forms a bank that is occasionally buttressed along the study segment with
rip rap. This portion of the project was considered to have the lowest potential to yield cultural
material.
The northwest portion of the survey area supports a thick growth of weeds, brush, and trees. The
surveyed areas closer to the stream have been cleared of these (Photograph 1), creating fair to good
ground surface visibility. Some areas of swampy ground were not inspected closely because of
potential hazards and areas covered with accumulated debris were obscured. The remainder of the
northwest portion of the project area was composed of clean sand.
The southwest portion of the survey area is bounded by an improved dirt road. The area between the
road and the stream supports a dense stand of willow and other riparian flora. The growth was
impenetrable and was visually inspected along the margins. The surface visibility in this area was
poor but the existing conditions did not suggest that archaeological debris was likely. The opposite
flank of the dirt road is dominated by a marsh that was not surveyed (Photograph 2). The marsh
extends to the edge of the fill bank of El Camino Real and occupies virtually all of the survey area in
this quadrant.
A mobile home community occupies the southeast portion of the project area (Photograph 3).
Development of the mobile home community has extensively altered the natural ground surface. A
palm tree nursery occupies the northeast portion of the study area (Photograph 4). This area has been
graded level and is clear of vegetation. The ground surface visibility in this area was excellent in the
rows between the trees.
The results of the pedestrian survey were negative. No indications of prehistoric cultural resources
were identified within the study area. Historic materials and debris were limited to recent trash and
litter. The dynamic nature of the stream has probably had a limiting effect on the selection of this
location for settlement during either the prehistoric or early historic periods. Site record information
indicates that archaeological sites exist at a somewhat greater distance from the stream. Selectivity
of site location has likely contributed to the absence of cultural materials within the study area.
No additional cultural resource investigations are recommended for the El Camino Real widening
project as proposed, based on the results of the documentary research and pedestrian survey.
However, alterations to the proposed project that would extend beyond the areas covered would
necessitate additional investigations to evaluate potential impacts in those areas.
Thank you for the opportunity to work on this project. Please call me or Dayle Cheever if you have
any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Russell Collect
Project Archaeologist
ROC:sh
Attachments
I
1
PHOTOGRAPH 1
Northwest Portion of the Project Area
Showing Cleared Area Backed by Thick Brush
PHOTOGRAPH 2
Southwest Portion of the Project Area Occupied by Marsh
IRECDN
PHOTOGRAPH 3
Southeast Portion of the Project Area Occupied by
Mobile Homes, with El Camino Real in Foreground
PHOTOGRAPH 4
Northeast Portion of the Project Area Occupied by Nursery
IRECDN
ATTACHMENT 1
'1'c iliiivHiMty
South Coastal Information Center
Social Science Research Laboratory
College of Arts and Letters
5500 Campanile Drive
SonOiegoCA 92182-4537
619-594-5682
FAX: 619- 594 -1358
RECEIVED
MAY • «'«
RECON
CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION SYSTEM
SITE FILES RECORD SEARCH
Source of Request:
Date of Request:
Date Request Received:
Project Identification:
RECON - Russ Collett
April 27, 1998
April 27, 1998
El Camino Real Widening (#3018A)
() The South Coastal Information Center historical files show NO recorded sites
within the project area nor within one mile of the project boundaries.
(X) The South Coastal Information Center historical files show recorded site
location(s) within the projected area and/or within one mile of the project.
Project maps have been reviewed. The bibliographic material for reports in your project area
and/or within one mile have been included.
The historic maps on file at the South Coastal Information Center have been reviewed as have
the National Register, State Landmarks, and Points of Historic Interest. If there are historic
properties noted in those materials, in your area, the information has been included.
Archaeological/Historic Site check: SELF
Project Map/Bibliographic check: SELF
Historic check: SELF
Date: April 28, 1998
Date: April 28, 1998
Date: April 28, 1998
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY • BokersMd - Channel Islands • Chico. Dominguez Hills -Fresno • Fullerton > Hoywotd. Humboldt • Lang Beach • Los Angeles • Maritime Academy
Monterey Bay • Northridge * Pomona • Soaamento * San Bernardino • Son Diego • Son Francisco • San Jose • Son Luis Obispa • San Marcos • Sonomo. Stanislaus
ATTACHMENT 2
DAYLE M. CHEEVER
Senior Archaeologist
Education/ Master of Arts, Anthropology, San Diego State University, 1983
Certifications Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology, San Diego State University, 1979
Certified by Society of Professional Archeologists (SOPA) in field research and
teaching since 1983
Credential for life from the California Community Colleges as an instructor of
anthropology
Certified by the City and County of San Diego in Archaeology
Permits U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Cultural Use
Permit, Coastal and California Desert Districts, Arizona Desert
Experience 18 years of experience
RECON
1988-present, Senior Archaeologist
As the senior member of RECON's Cultural Resources Group Ms. Cheever has
directed and participated in all aspects of cultural resource identification and
assessment programs, including research, survey, mapping, impact assessment,
significance testing, data recovery, mitigation recommendations (including
preservation plans and implementation), and technical report preparation. Has
completed cultural resource projects involving compliance with Section 106 of
the State Historic Preservation Act and the California Environmental Quality Act.
Tasks are directed towards fulfilling standards set in CEQA and NEPA as well as
numerous municipal policies for the evaluation of cultural resources through
documentation and analysis.
Has devised and managed archaeological mitigation monitoring activities for
numerous construction projects. Works closely with clients and resource agencies
in developing feasible mitigation strategies. Has worked in the coastal, mountain,
and desert areas of southern California and in Arizona, with particular expertise in
the management of cultural and historic resources of San Diego County.
Is directly responsible for supervision and scheduling of field and laboratory
personnel, for the development of research designs, protection and preservation
plans, and data recovery programs for RECON. Also develops and monitors
project budgets.
WESTEC Services, Inc.
1985-1988, Project Archaeologist
Consulting Archaeologist, Consulting Faunal Analyst
1979-1985
Cheever, 2
Selected Projects Federal Projects (Section 106, NAGPRA, HABS/HAER)
Naval Post Graduate School Monterey, Wherry Housing Demolition Plan,
Cultural Resource Documentation
Pacific Bell Highway 80 Alignment Corridor, Cleveland National Forest
Loveland Reservoir Land Exchange, Sweetwater Authority and Cleveland
National Forest
Guatay Grazing Allotment, National Register Assessment of Three Prehistoric
Sites, Cleveland National Forest
National Register Evaluation of Building 5, Fleet Combat Training Center Pacific,
U.S. Department of the Navy, Southwest Division, NAVFACENGCOM
National Register Evaluation/Documentation of Schwanbeck's Store, Crossroads,
CA. Lake Havasu Field Office, Bureau of Land Management
Section 106 Compliance for Paseo Ranchero and Telegraph Canyon Road Water
Reclamation Pipelines, Otay Water District
Section 106 Compliance for Otay Mesa Water Reclamation Pipeline, Otay Water
District
Historic American Engineering Record Documentation of Six Base End Stations
in the White's Point Reservation, Los Angeles County, California. National
Park Service and Department of the Air Force (SMC/AXFV)
Naval Subase Artifact Inventory, NAGPRA Compliance, and GIS Site
Information, Southwest Division, NAVFACENGCOM
Phase I - Cultural Resource Surveys
Cultural Resource Survey of Parcel 3, Carmel Creek Road, and Site Significance
Evaluation of CA-SDI-9677, San Diego, CA
Fanita Ranch Specific Plan, Santee, CA
Archaeological Constraints Study for LCAC Training Activities and Access
Roads at Green Beach and Blue Beach, MCB Camp Pendleton, CA
Archaeological Constraints Study for Military Vehicles at Red Beach and White
Beach, MCB Camp Pendleton, CA
Edom Hill Landfill Expansion, Riverside County, CA
Republic Imperial Landfill Expansion, Imperial County, CA
Deletion of SA 680 from the County of San Diego Circulation Element, County of
San Diego, CA
Pipeline 2000 Phase IV, San Diego Gas & Electric, San Diego, CA
Eden Valley Drainage, San Diego County, CA
Mojave Crossing, Apple Valley and Victorville, CA
Whitewater River Levee/Palm Springs Line 34 in Riverside County, CA
Torrey View-Allred/Sorrento Hills Project. San Diego, CA
Torrey Reserve Terrace Project, San Diego, CA
Beazer Property (NAS Miramar, Parcel "C"), San Diego, CA
SDG&E Pipeline Alignment near Interstate 805/8 Junction, San Diego, CA
Forty-fourth Street Condominiums Project, San Diego, CA
Eagle Mountain Mine and Kaiser Industrial Railroad, Riverside County, CA
Mataguay Scout Reservation near Warner Springs, CA
Portions of the Shaw Valley Property, San Diego, CA
Proposed Alignment at Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, CA
Carrillo Ranch Road Realignment Study Area, Carlsbad, CA
Cheever, 3
Phase II - Determination of Significance
CA-SDI-8472, Locus C, North Torrey Pines/Genesee Avenue, San Diego, CA
CA-SDI-7979, Border Avenue Development, Del Mar (LC94/9), CA
CA-SDI-10,940, Del Mar, CA
110 Acres within Carmel Highlands Precise Plan Neighborhood 8A; SDI-10,218,
Locus A; SDI-10,219; and SDI-4905, San Diego, CA
Stallions Crossing Project: SDI-7290, SDI-7291, SDI-7293, SDI-7298, SDI-7300,
SDI-10,118, San Diego, CA
Archaic Occupations within the San Dieguito River Valley: SDI-687, San Diego,
CA
SDI-11,297: A Prehistoric Site in Dulzura, San Diego County, CA
Four Prehistoric Sites within the Railroad Canyon Road Project Area, Lake
Elsinore, CA
SDI-6753, SDI-6754, SDI-6819, and SDI-2046: Four Prehistoric Sites within the
Aviara Development, Carlsbad, CA
SDI-8813: The Palomar Heights Project, San Marcos, CA
A Portion of SDI-197: Torrey Enterprises-Sorrento Valley Property, San Diego, CA
San Dieguito Valley Project Area, San Diego, CA
SDM-W-2135: A Prehistoric Site within the Southridge Trails Project Area C,
Oceanside, CA
Pacific Business Park, Otay Mesa, San Diego, CA
SDI-11,019: University of California, San Diego Scripps Institution of
Oceanography Master Plan, San Diego, CA
Phase in - Data Recovery/Mitigation
CA-SDI-12,123, Carmel Valley, San Diego, CA
CA-SDI-4687, Carrillo Ranch, Carlsbad, CA
Home Avenue Trunk Sewer Data Recovery Project, San Diego, CA
A Proposed Research Design for the Completion .of the Mitigation of Impacts to
SDI-6941, Locus D; SDI-7604, Locus E; and SDI-10,200, California Terraces
Project, Otay Mesa, San Diego, CA
SDI-4907, Loci A, B, and C, Neighborhood 8A Carmel Mountain, San Diego
County, CA
SDI-6753 and SDI-6819: Aviara Development Project, Carlsbad, CA
Data Recovery at Nine Cultural Resource Sites, Aviara Development, Carlsbad,
CA
Mechanical Excavation and Removal of Sixteen Burial Features from SDI-691,
Aviara Development, Carlsbad, CA
Mitigation Monitoring
Mission Valley West Monitoring, San Diego, CA
Christianitos Creek Groundwater Monitoring Well Excavation Monitoring, Camp
Pendleton, CA
San Diego Avenue Construction Grading and Historic Feature Recovery, Old
Town, San Diego, CA
Mission Valley West LRT Extension, Morena Segment/North Mission Valley
Interceptor Sewer, San Diego, CA
A Portion of Hillside Drive in La Jolla, CA
Cheever, 4
Trenching on a Portion of Jefferson Street in Old Town, San Diego, CA
Salk Institute East Building and North Parking Lot Expansion, San Diego, CA
Water Main Replacement Group 477, San Diego, CA
Trenching for South Creek Tentative Map and Penasquitos Creek Improvement
Plan, CA
South Chollas Valley Interceptor Sewer Project, San Diego, CA
Water and Sewer Main Replacement Group 466A in Downtown San Diego, CA
Pomerado Extension Trunk Sewer, Poway, CA
Savage/Spreckels Tire Factory and Aztec Brewing, San Diego, CA
Cultural Resource Investigation, Monitoring, and Worker Education Program at
the Mataguay Scout Reservation near Warner Springs, CA
Special Projects
Proposed Research Design for a Portion of Cleveland National Forest in Vicinity
of Loveland Reservoir, Sweetwater Authority, San Diego County, CA
Cultural Resource Guidelines for the City of Carlsbad, CA
RUSSELL O. COLLETT
Project Archaeologist
Education/ Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology, San Diego State University, 1989
Certifications Postbaccalaureate course work in archaeological method and theory, San Diego
State University, 1989,1990,1991
Experience 12 years of experience
RECON
1989-present, Project Archaeologist
An experienced archaeologist with special expertise in cultural resources of the
southwestern United States, is responsible for conducting background research,
field surveys, test excavations, data recovery excavations, and construction
monitoring for cultural resource studies. Began his career in archaeology with the
excavation and analysis of the San Diego Royal Presidio over the course of six
field seasons. Since receiving his bachelor's degree, has been project archaeo-
logist at RECON, where he has supervised more than 50 prehistoric and historic
projects and participated in over 150 survey and excavation projects.
As project archaeologist, he is responsible for conducting prehistoric and historic
background research, site records maintenance, personnel training and review,
and assembling crews for completing projects. Planning and directing project area
surveys, mapping including the use of geographic information system (GIS), and
translation of results into reports. Is responsible for archaeological significance
testing and excavation of mitigation projects. Is also responsible for the
coordination of preparation, cataloging, and analysis of artifacts by laboratory
staff, and interpreting the results. Is knowledgeable in data entry and editing, and
is experienced in transferring the results of his field surveys into RECON's GIS.
RECON
1988-1989, Field and Laboratory Assistant
Alan Lyons, Inc.
1987-1989, Distribution Controller
Selected Projects Phase I - Cultural Resource Surveys
Carmel View Development, San Diego, CA
Beckman Property, Carlsbad, CA
North Santee Reservoir, Santee, CA
Cuyamaca Street Offsite Extension, Santee, CA
South Carlsbad Village Storm Drain Alignment, Carlsbad, CA
Buckel Minor Subdivision, Potrero, CA
Medina-Donaldson Survey, San Diego, CA
Carmel Oaks VTM Survey, San Diego, CA
Santa Fe Depot, San Diego, CA. Affinis
Carmel Valley Towne Center Property, San Diego, CA
Collett, 2
Newland Property, North City West Neighborhood 8A, San Diego, CA
San Diego Gas & Electric Company Property within the Hillside Review Zone,
San Diego, CA
San Diego Gas & Electric Company Two Pipeline Alternatives, San Diego and
Santee, CA
Proposed Antelope Valley Business Park, Palmdale, CA
Proposed Los Coches Subdivision, San Diego, CA
80-Acre Parkview Project Site, San Diego, CA
San Marcos Corporate Center, San Marcos, CA
Proposed Sycamore Canyon Power Plant, San Diego, CA
Black Mountain Road Bridge Expansion, San Diego, CA
Rose Ranch Property, San Marcos, CA
El Camino Memorial Park, San Diego, CA
Phase II - Determination of Significance
Site CA-SDI-4628 Carmel View Development, San Diego, CA
Site HN-1 (temp) Hecht-Nielsen Property, San Diego, CA
Site CA-SDI-8195 Dove Lane/Lohf Property, Carlsbad, CA
Site B-S-1 (temp) Beckman Property, Carlsbad, CA
Site CA-SDI-9677 Perl Property, San Diego, CA
Site CA-SDI-4690 Carrillo Ranch, Carlsbad, CA
Site CA-SDI-9676 Cetel Property, San Diego, CA
Sixteen Archaeological Sites on the McCrink Ranch Property, San Diego County, CA
Site SDI-12,122H: Sorrento Hills Phase 1 Coastal Development Area, San Diego, CA
SDI-11,944 and Archival Research of a Suspected Historic Era Swine Farm
within the South Palm Precise Plan, San Diego, CA
Site SDI-6699A within the South Palm Precise Plan, San Diego, CA
Ginsberg Property, San Diego, CA
Phase m - Data Recovery/Mitigation
Carrillo Ranch, Site CA-SDI-4687 Data Recovery Excavations, Carlsbad, CA
Black Mountain Ranch, Site CA-SDI-4832 Complex and Site CA-SDI-11,982
Data Recovery Excavations, San Diego, CA
North City West Neighborhood 10, Site CA-SDI-12,123, San Diego, CA
Home Avenue Trunk Sewer Data Recovery Excavations, San Diego, CA
Construction Monitoring
North Mission Valley Interceptor Sewer Pipeline, San Diego, CA
Rose Canyon Trunk Sewer Archaeological Data Recovery and Monitoring, San
Diego, CA. RMW Paleo Associates.
Home Avenue Trunk Sewer Archaeological Monitoring, San Diego, CA
North Mission Valley Interceptor Sewer, San Diego, CA
South Chollas Valley Sewer, San Diego, CA
Water and Sewer Replacement Group 466A, San Diego, CA
Section 106/NAGPRA/Other Federal Projects
National Register Documentation for White's Point Reservation, Base End
Stations, San Pedro, CA., National Park Service, San Francisco Field Office.
National Register Eligibility Assessment for Three Sites in the Guatay Grazing
Allotment Area, Cleveland National Forest, San Diego, CA
National Register Eligibility Determination for Schwanbeck's Store, Cross Roads,
CA. Bureau of Land Management Lake Havasu Field Office
Collett, 3
Data Recovery Excavations for Prehistoric Sites in the San Joaquin Hills
Transportation Corridor, Irvine, CA. With Chambers Group, Inc., Irvine, CA
Cultural Resource Survey for the "Fillmore Alternative" for State Route 86,
Riverside County, CA. Caltrans District 11, San Diego, CA
Data Recovery Excavations for Prehistoric Archaeological Sites CA-ORA-106
and CA-ORA-482 within the Area of Potential Effect of the Proposed New
Ford Road, Irvine, CA. With Chambers Group, Inc., Irvine, CA
Demolition Monitoring for the Spreckles/Savage Tire Company and Aztec
Brewery, San Diego, CA
Construction Monitoring for the Big Pipe Project, San Diego, CA. With Mariah
Associates, Reno Nevada branch office
Special Projects
Revised RECON's Archaeological Laboratory System for the Treatment and
Processing of Artifacts and Data
Created a Lab Director's Handbook, Filed Director's Handbook, and Manual of
Field Procedures to Accompany the Revised Laboratory and Field
Methodologies
7-27-1998 1=31PM F^"N PLANNING SYSTEMS 760 9315744 •'**> P- 2
PLANNING
SYSTEMS
LAND USE / COASTAL PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE -IAWOO
POLICY AND PROCESSING
ENVIRONMENTAL MrTIGATION
July 27,1998
Ms. Sherri Howard
Engineering Department, City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576
»i
This letter is provided to present information gathered at your request regarding
vegetation potentially disturbed by proposed north bound right turn lanes along El
Camino Real (project), accessing future west bound Cannon Road. On July 13,1998,
Fred Sproul, biologist, and Greg Evans, Landscape Architect, surveyed the proposed
site along El Camino Real to determine if vegetation identified by City
environmental consultant RECON is indeed wetland vegetation as defined by U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers guidelines. Our assessment of existing the vegetation
follows.
The project site is comprised of the roadway edge, an existing manufactured slope
supporting the raised roadbed, and a bench area that transitions from this upland
condition to a wetland corridor west of the project area which is linked to Upper
Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The linear study area extends from the proposed Cannon
Road R.O.W. northward along El Camino Real approximately 500 feet to an existing
box culvert providing drainage beneath El Camino Real from points east.
An area of Mulefat scrub, approximately 0.10 acre in size, occurs on a bench within
the present construction zone, located approximately between roadway Station
447+50 and Station 449+75. Mulefat Scrub is identified on-site where Mulefat
(Baccharis salicifolia) is the dominant vegetative cover. On the site it occurs in
association with several other plants including: Western ragweed (Ambrosia
psilostachya). Coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis var. consanguinea) and Saltgrass
(Distichilis spicata). This community is bordered on its lower boundary by weed
infested Ruderal vegetation. That these plants occur in association identifies this
area as a transitional community between an upland plant association and a
wetland plant association. ^
None of the plants occurring in this Mulefat scrub are identified as obligate wetland
species as identified in the "National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:
California Region O", May 1988. Several of the dominant species observed are
equally likely to occur in upland or wetland conditions. Some of the dominant
species observed are facultative or obligate upland plants.
To be considered a jurisdictional wetland, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's
(USACOE) requires that three wetland components occur simultaneously: wetland
21 u PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD. CA 92009 • <760)93i-o78o • FAX (760)931-5744
7.-27-1998 1 :32PM Ff"*Y PLANNING SYSTEMS 760 9315744 P. 3
soils, wetland hydrology, and wetland vegetation. Two pits in excess of 24" deep
were dug to examine ground water and soil characteristics in the Mulefat scrub area.
The results failed to show either hydrologic or wetland soil characteristics.
A Wetland Determination of the subject Mulefat scrub was performed (see attached
Wetland Determination). The results conclude that the subject Mulefat scrub is not
a wetland.
We recommend that the City minimize impacts to this transitional plant
community. Impacts to Mulefat scrub can be lessened by strictly limiting the
construction zone. We recommend that revegetation of a transitional community
similar to the existing Mulefat scrub is accomplished in post-construction areas
presently supporting ruderal vegetation.
Sincerely?
Greg Evans, Landscape Architect, LA #3900
7-27-1998 1:32PM PLANNING SYSTEMS 760 9315744 P. 4.
Applicant
DATA row i
VETtAfiT) OSTESWIXAT10N
Application
State i
Date; J[c(y {O.i s
County: y 5^ L*gal Description: Tovnship ;*%.•? Range
Hoc
v«)t»tatien [list th« three dominant cpeci«» in each vegetttion layer (5 if
only I or 7 layers)]. Indicate specie* vlch ob«erved morphological or knovn
phy«i?l«|ical adaptations with «n a*terisk.
Indicator
5t«t<i«
of species that «re OBL, ?ACW, »nd/»r rAC Othtr
Soil
s«i
Moetltrf: Tfes
Cltyti: V«S
Kydrtc soil.:
; So )C . Mottle colors
Ko X Other lndic«tor«:
_ N-° >C ; Basis;
; Matrix
Inundated; ye«_ ^_; f>o X > Depth of standing water:
Saturated *otl«: Yes, _; KoJ^_. »«pth CP »*sur«ted
Other indicators?
hydrology: Yes _ ; Wo X - Basin
situ»tico: Tee
CtteuHSt«ne«sT Ye
Wetland i NotiwetUnd
Ccireen tt ;
Oeternined by:L
B2
PLANNINGSYSTEMS
TRANSPORTATION DIVISION MEMORANDUM
September 21, 1998
TO: US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE - JULIE VANDERWIERfc
CA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME - DAVE LAWHEAD XV,:
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION - BILL PONDER
PRINCIPAL PLANNER - DON RIDEOUT
ASSOCIATE PLANNER - CHRISTER WESTMAN
PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER - RICHARD ALLEN
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER - MIKE SHIREY
PLANNING SYSTEMS - PAUL KLUKAS
FROM: Associate Engineer
31845 - EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING
NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NUMBER - CDP 98-47
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described
project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a
result of said review, a negative declaration (declaration that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued fort he subject project.
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy if the Negative Declaration with supportive documents has been attached for
your comment. Additional copies are available in the Public Works - Engineering
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Please submit
comments in writing to the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Attention Christer
Westman, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009 within 30 calendar days
of the September 25, 1998 publication date of the Negative Declaration. If you have
any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 438-
1161, extension 4448.
SHERRI HOWARD
Associate Engineer
Attachments
c. (without attachments)
Public Works Director
Traffic Engineer
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Carlsbad Field Office
2730 Loker Avenue, West
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760)431-9440
FAX (760) 431-9624
CA Dept. of Fish & Game
1416 Ninth Street
PO Box 944209
Sacramento, CA 94244-2090
(916) 653-9767
FAX (916) 653-2588
Mr. Christer Westman
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009
OCT 2 2 1998
Re: Mitigated Negative Declaration for the El Camino Real Widening Project, City of Carlsbad, California;
CDP 98-47
Dear Mr. Westman:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and California Department of Fish and Game (Department),
collectively the Wildlife Agencies, have completed their respective reviews of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
(ND) prepared by the City of Carlsbad (City) for the above-referenced project which involves the widening of El
Camino Real between College Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. The following materials were consulted as part
of this review: The ND, inclusive of the Environmental Impact Assessment Form dated September 25, 1998, the
"Biological Technical Report for the El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad, California" (RECON,
September 18, 1998), a letter report which discusses the results of a cultural resource survey for the El Camino
Real widening project (RECON, June 4, 1998), and the "Noise Technical Report for the El Camino Real Road
Widening Project, City of Carlsbad, California" (RECON, June 3, 1998).
The project site is located along El Camino Real, between College Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue, just north of
Evans Point. The existing road crosses Agua Hedionda Creek and includes the future intersection with Cannon
Road. The project to be implemented is the "Reduced Impact Alternative" discussed in the biological report
which would widen the roadbed and the bridge crossing over Agua Hedionda Creek from 108 feet to 112 feet,
construction of an access road north of El Camino Real, and the construction (or reconstruction) of two energy
dissipaters. Site elevation is approximately 40 feet above mean sea level (ASML); underlying soils are
predominantly Salinas clay loam with areas of riverwash in Agua Hedionda Creek.. Native or naturalized habitats
which occur in the project area include the following: alkali marsh, mulefat scrub, Diegan coastal sage scrub, and
non-native grassland. No sensitive plant or animal species were identified during the field surveys, however
focused surveys do not appear to have been conducted for sensitive animal species.
Project implementation will result in both temporary and permanent impacts to the following habitats: disturbed
mulefat scrub (0.22 acre temporary/0.10 acre permanent), Diegan coastal sage scrub (0.06 acre temporary/0.29
acre permanent), Eucalyptus woodland (0.09 acre temporary/0.09 acre permanent), and non-native grassland (0.07
acre temporary/0.14 acre permanent). The remaining impacts would involve disturbed or developed areas.
Mitigation is proposed at a ratio of 1:1 and would be accomplished through revegetation of temporarily affected
areas and newly-constructed manufactured slopes. Potential indirect impacts to sensitive breeding bird species are
proposed to be mitigated through performance of clearance surveys if vegetation removal and/or grading would
occur between March 1 and September 30, annually.
Mr. Christer Westman 2
The mitigation measures proposed in the ND do not adequately compensate for biological impacts which will
result from project implementation and are not consistent with measures generally recommended by the Wildlife
Agencies. As such, we recommend the following:
1. Mitigation through restoration or enhancement of habitat which is implemented concurrent with project impacts
requires a ratio of at least 2:1 to compensate for the temporal loss of habitat function and value to wildlife.
Therefore, the amount of coastal sage scrub and mulefat scrub to be restored would need to be 0.70 acre and 0.64
acre, respectively. Should mitigation for coastal sage scrub impacts be through the purchase of habitat in a
mitigation bank or area approved by the Wildlife Agencies, the mitigation ratio would be 1:1 (0.35 acre). Any
restoration program should include specific, measurable success criteria as well as a discussion of remedial
measures to be put in place should the program not meet targeted milestones. Monitoring should be conducted for
no less than three years. The success criteria included in the Biological Opinion for Cannon Road Reaches 1 and 2
(1-6-97-F-51) would be acceptable for the mulefat scrub restoration program.
2. To avoid direct and/or indirect impacts to sensitive bird species, vegetation removal and grading activities
should not occur during the breeding season which is considered to be from February 15 through September 15,
annually. [This encompasses the breeding season for both the coastal California gnatcatcher and least Bell's
vireo.] If this cannot be accomplished, the City should consult with the Wildlife Agencies to develop alternative
mitigation strategies (e.g. pre-construction surveys for species presence, nests, etc.) which, when implemented, will
mitigate impacts.
3. This project would require formulation of a Streambed Alteration Agreement. Please contact Ms. Terri
Dickerson (Department) at (949) 363-7538 to obtain a Section 1601 package.
The ND does not discuss how the City intends to permit the loss of coastal sage scrub which would result from
this road widening project. As the impacts to coastal sage scrub are less than one acre, the loss could be accounted
for through the use of the de minimus exemption to the 4(d) Special Rule if these two additional criteria can be
met: a) the impact is less than one acre; and b) habitat loss would not compromise conservation planning efforts in
the area. The use of this exemption still requires mitigation and the deduction of the impact amount from the
City's five percent allotment. A major difference between the de minimus exemption and a habitat loss permit
(HLP) is that the former may still be used absent sufficient five percent remaining in the City's allotment. Should
surveys demonstrate that coastal California gnatcatchers are not present in the project area, the Wildlife Agencies
would not object to the use of the de minimus exemption for this project.
We appreciate the opportunity to review this ND for the El Camino Real road widening project. If you have any
questions regarding the contents of this letter, please contact Julie Vanderwier (Service) at (760) 431-9440 or
David Lawhead (Department) at (619) 467-4211.
Sincerely,
Sheryl L. JBarrett
Assistant Neld Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
cc: Sherri Howard, City of Carlsbad
1-6-98-CA-032
William E. Tippets
Habitat Conservation Supervisor
California Department of Fish and Game
City of Carlsbad
Public Works — Engineering
November 18,1998
Mr. William E. Tippets
Habitat Conservation Supervisor
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
4949 Viewridge Avenue
San Diego, CA 92123
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING PROJECT
Dear Mr. Tippets:
The following information is in response to your department's letter of comment, dated
October 22, 1998 (CDP 98-47) on the City's Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the
above-referenced project.
On November 17, 1998, Sherri Howard and Christer Westman of the City met on the site of the
El Camino Real Widening project with Terri Dickerson of the California Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG) and consultants from RECON and Planning Systems. The purpose of the
meeting was to discuss CDFG's recommendations in a letter of response, dated October 22,
1998, to the City's circulation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project. The
participants walked the site, paying particular attention to the condition of the mulefat scrub on-
site, which is in an area elevated above wetland areas and has been highly disturbed by
transient worker encampments. As a result, Ms. Dickerson and the City agreed on the
following:
1. The mulefat scrub is not associated with the streambed and, therefore, no Streambed
Alteration Agreement with CDFG will be required.
2. Impacts to coastal sage scrub can be mitigated off-site at a ratio of 1:1 using credit from
the City's Carlsbad Highlands mitigation bank.
3. Impacts to mulefat scrub can be mitigated off-site at a ratio of 2:1 by restoring additional
area at the City's Cannon Road project mitigation site in Macario Canyon or by
enhancing existing wetlands at a greater ratio.
4. To ensure there are no impacts to sensitive bird species if construction begins between
February 15 and September 15, the City will conduct pre-construction surveys for active
nests in suitable habitat within 250 feet of the construction zone. If active nests are
found, no construction will occur within 200 feet of an active nest until the end of the
breeding season (September 15).
5. Because off-site mitigation for mulefat scrub and coastal sage scrub will fully mitigate
project impacts, restoration and monitoring of these communities on-site will not
be required, other than standard City requirements for erosion control planting
(or hydroseeding) with native species.
2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 431-5769
November 18, 1998
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING PROJECT
Page 2
The City will include these measures in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the
final MND.
On behalf of the City, I would like to commend Ms. Dickerson and CDFG for their cooperation
and help in resolving the environmental issues on this project. If you have any questions,
please call me at (76Q)438-1 161 , extension 4427.
Sincerely,
SHERRI HOWARD
Associate Engineer
SHrjb
c: Public Works Director
Traffic Engineer
Principal Civil Engineer, Richard Allen
Principal Planner, Don Rideout
}?fissoc\ate Planner, Christer Westman
RECON, Tom Held
USFWS, Julie Vanderwier
CDFG, Terri Dickerson
CDFG, Dave Lawhead
[Christer Westman -^ B -"""% Page 1
"""mim'"<if- ' ' !• J^^K*!*!:^^ „,„................^ f«, ,„...,£ Vniiijd^ ^ " ' '" ""* ^..*-^....—-.
From: Sherri Howard
To: Terri Dickerson
Date: 10/27/98 5:04PM
Subject: El Camino Real Widening Mitigated Neg Dec CDP 98-47
I am trying to take simplest fastest and of course correct route to obtain permits for the addition of the right
turn lane from El Camino Real to Cannon Road. Would it be simpler to amend Cannon Road West
Streambed Alteration Agreement rather than process a new agreement?
Anyway I have requested that RECON try to set up a meeting at the site to look at area and what City is
proposing. I'd prefer to mitigate on-site because it enhances the Agua Hedionda Lagoon property. With
the conditions to the mitigated neg, it appears agencies prefer we use Carlsbad Highlands.
We actually did redesign the right turn lane as much as we safely could to avoid impacts.
I know you are very busy. We would meet you out at the site at your convenience. It would also be a
good opportunity to see the mitigation area. I think you will be pleased with the growth at this point.
Please give me a call.
Thanks,
Sherri
760-438-1161, ext. 4427
CC: Bob Johnson, Christer Westman, Lloyd Hubbs, Ri...
Page J
From: Tom Held <theld@recon-us.com>
To: GW-Domain.PO-LP(Showa)
Date: 11/2/98 9:07AM
Subject: El Camino Real Widening
I talked to Dave Lawhead about the 10/22 letter. He had this to say
about mitigation:
Coastal Sage Scrub: Looks like the City has a choice. You can mitigate
at the site: this would require 0.39 acre in the right-of-way and 0.31
acre adjacent to the row. In that case, there would have to be a
restoration program and at least 3 years monitoring. Or you could
mitigate by using credit off-site in a preserve area, like Carlsbad
Highlands. In that case, the mitigation site would be 0.35 acre; no
restoration plan and monitoring program would be required. The City
will probably want to evaluate the relative costs of these options.
Mule Fat Scrub: Need 0.64 acre of restoration. 0.31 can be done
on-site (in the row). The rest would have to be offsite. Again, this
could be adjacent. Dave suggested combining with the Cannon Road
restoration. I don't know if any opportunity to do that is available.
Dave also mentioned mitigation for the "Kelly Ranch Core Area," which he
seemed to think is a possibility.
I mentioned, with regard to sensitive bird species, that perhaps
pre-construction surveys with a restriction on work within 200 feet of
active nests might be preferable to a seasonal restriction on
construction. Dave said that was a possibility. I also suggested that
if Cannon Road was being constructed downstream at the same time, that
might also be taken into account.
Dave also suggested that, if the transfer of Kelly Ranch property has
not occurred, it might be possible to mitigate mulefat off-site on that
property (adjacent to ECR). I spoke to Terri Stewart about Kelly Ranch.
She thought Dave might be right about mitigating there, but said I
really ought to talk to Tim Dillingham and Terri Dickerson. She also
suggested a meeting on-site to work it out. I have placed calls to Tim
and (several times) to Julie Vanderwier. So far no answer on those.
CC: Gerry Scheid <gscheid@recon-us.com>, Wendy Loeffle.
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Carlsbad Field Office
2730 Loker Avenue, West
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760)431-9440
FAX (760) 431-9624
CA Dept. of Fish & Game
1416 Ninth Street
PO Box 944209
Sacramento, CA 94244-2090
(916) 653-9767
FAX (916) 653-2588
RECEIVED
Ms. Sherri Howard
Associate Engineer
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009
JAN 1 5 1999
ENGINEERING
OEPARTMENT
JAN 14 1999
Re: Habitat Loss Permit for the El Camino Real Widening Project; City of Carlsbad Project
No. 31845
Dear Ms. Howard:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and California Department of Fish and Game
(Department), collectively the Wildlife Agencies, have completed their respective reviews of the
City of Carlsbad's request for a habitat loss permit (HLP) for the above-referenced project which
involves the widening of El Camino Real between College Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue.
The following materials were consulted as part of this review: The Negative Declaration (ND),
inclusive of the Environmental Impact Assessment Form dated September 25,1998, the
"Biological Technical Report for the El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad,
California" (RECON, September 18,1998), a letter report which discusses the results of a
cultural resource survey for the El Camino Real widening project (RECON, June 4,1998), the
"Noise Technical Report for the El Camino Real Road Widening Project, City of Carlsbad,
California" (RECON, June 3,1998), and the HLP application dated December 16,1998.
The project site is located along El Camino Real, between College Boulevard and Tamarack
Avenue, just north of Evans Point. The existing road crosses Agua Hedionda Creek and includes
the future intersection with Cannon Road . The project to be implemented is the "Reduced
Impact Alternative" discussed hi the biological report which would widen the roadbed and the
bridge crossing over Agua Hedionda Creek from 108 feet to 112 feet, construct an access road
north of El Camino Real, and construct (or reconstruct) two energy dissipaters. Site elevation is
approximately 40 feet above mean sea level (ASML); underlying soils are predominantly Salinas
clay loam with areas of riverwash hi Agua Hedionda Creek.. Native or naturalized habitats
which occur in the project area include the following: alkali marsh, mulefat scrub, Diegan coastal
sage scrub, and non-native grassland. No sensitive plant or animal species were identified during
the field surveys and it is unlikely that the project would affect any such species, including the
coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica; gnatcatcher).
Ms. Sherri Howard 2
Project implementation will result in both temporary and permanent impacts to Diegan coastal
sage scrub (0.06 acre and 0.29 acre, respectively). Mitigation is proposed at a ratio of 1:1 and
would be accomplished through the off-site acquisition of 0.35 acre of credit in the Carlsbad
Highlands Mitigation Bank. In order to ensure that there are no adverse effects to nesting birds,
the City will perform pre-construction surveys within 250 feet of the construction zone if
vegetation removal and/or grading would occur between February 15 and and September 15. If
active nests are identified within 200 feet of the construction zone, no construction will occur
until after September 15.
Based upon our review of the information submitted for this project, the resource agencies
concur with the issuance of a 4(d) Special Rule permit for the proposed project as this habitat
loss is consistent with the interim loss criteria established in the NCCP Conservation Guidelines
listed below:
• The habitat loss does not exceed the five percent guideline. While the City has now
exhausted its five percent allocation, sufficient acreage was reserved by the City to
accommodate the loss associated with the El Camino Real Widening project at its
November 17,1998 City Council hearing. As such, sufficient acreage exists for the loss
of this 0.35 acre of coastal sage scrub.
• The habitat loss will not preclude connectivity between areas of high habitat values. The
project does not lie within an identified core or linkage area and is not connected to any
other natural habitat lands within the City. The project consists of the widening of an
existing roadway.
• The habitat loss will not preclude or prevent the preparation of the sub-regional NCCP.
The loss of 0.35 acre of coastal sage scrub associated with the widening of El Camino
Real would not preclude or prevent plan preparation as the acreage is small and the
habitat value is low.
• Habitat loss has been minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable in
accordance with Section 4.3 of the NCCP Guidelines by providing mitigation for impacts
to coastal sage scrub at a ratio of 1:1 through the purchase of credits at the Carlsbad
Highlands Mitigation Bank.
• The habitat loss will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the
coastal California gnatcatcher in the wild. While protocol-level surveys were not
conducted for the gnatcatcher, the small and linear nature of the habitat to be affected
makes it highly unlikely to provide nesting habitat for the gnatcatcher. At best, the site
could provide habitat for one pair of birds, however, this loss would not preclude or
appreciable reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the species.
• The habitat loss is incidental to otherwise lawful activities. An Initial Study was prepared
and ND adopted for this project in 1998. Identified impacts will be fully mitigated
Ms. Sherri Howard 3
through the conditions which have been made part of the project description and as
requirements of HLP issuance.
As such, the Wildlife Agencies concur with the issuance of a HLP for the El Camino Real
widening project. It should be noted that this permit only allows for the loss of 0.35 acre of
coastal sage scrub in association with this project and expires within one year of Wildlife Agency
concurrence. The acreage of coastal sage scrub impacts and preservation should be submitted to
SANDAG for their use in the regional tracking system. Please provide us with copies of any
notification regarding the expiration of this permit.
If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, please contact Julie Vanderwier
(Service) at (760) 431-9440 or David Lawhead (Department) at (619) 467-4211.
Sincerely,
Sheryl LABafrett tys- William E. Tippets
AssistanrField Supervisor Habitat Conservation Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service California Department of
Fish and Game
cc: William E. Tippets, CDFG
1-6-98-CA-032
STATE OF CALIFORNIA —THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON. Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO COAST AREA
3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725
(619) 521-8036
NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL PERIOD
DATE: November 17, 1998
TO: Sherri Howard RECEIVED
City of Carlsbad, Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive 0 q 1QQft
Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 NUV L 3 I330
FROM: Bill Ponder, Coastal Program Analyst ENGINEERING
RE: Application No. 6-CMI-98-245 DEPARTMENT
Please be advised that on November 12,1998 our office received notice of local action on the
coastal development permit described below:
Local Permit*: 98-47
Applicant(s): City Of Carlsbad
Description: Approval of a mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring
and reporting program to allow for the widening of El Camino Real.
Location: Between College Blvd. And Tamarack Road At Cannon Road, Carlsbad
(San Diego County)
Unless an appeal is filed with the Coastal Commission, the action will become final at the end of
the Commission appeal period. The appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on November 30, 1998.
Our office will notify you if an appeal is filed.
If you have any questions, please contact me at the address and telephone number shown
above.
cc: City Of Carlsbad
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the
project has been acted upon.
SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON / '/- /O '
Application #: CDP 98-47 Filing Date: June 23. 1998
Case Name: El Camino Real Widening
Applicant: City of Carlsbad
Decision Date: November 4. 1998
Agent (if different): Sherri Howard
Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive
Phone: (760)438-1161
ACTION:
Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive
Phone: C76CD 438-1161 extension 4427
X
APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
DENIED
(Copy of final resolution/decision letter is sent to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it,
and the applicant).
COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS;
NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION.
APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An
aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days
following Coastal Commission receipt of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal
Commission as to the date the Coastal Commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be
made in writing to the Coastal Commission's district office at the following address: California
Coastal Commission, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108-1725,
Telephone (619) 521-8036.
The lime within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the
City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than
ninety (90) days following the dale on which this decision becomes final: however, if within ten (10) days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of
the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such a record, the time within which such
petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than thirty (30) days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party,
or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad,
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1 576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894
/"*•>•
Notice of Determination 3.80590
To:Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk
County of San Diego
Mailstop 833, Attn: MITA
PO Box 1750 8Y
San Diego, CA 92112-4147
From: CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Drive
il L E 0 Carlsba(LCA 920°9
Smith. Recorder/County Clerk (760) 438-1161
NOVnl8 1998
DEPUTY
Project No: CDP 98-47
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public
Resources Code.
El Camino Real Widening
Project Title
City of Carlsbad, Sherri Howard (760) 43 8- 1 1 6 1 ext. 4427
State Clearinghouse No.Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number
1,600 feet of El Camino Real at the intersection of Cannon Road in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego
County
Project Locations (include County)
Project Description: Improvements to El Camino Real to include a southbound right turn lane,
north and southbound left turn lanes and sidewalk on either side.
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on
November 4, 1998, and has made the following determination regarding the above described
project.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The project will not have a significant effect on the environment
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project.
A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project.
Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
This is to certify that the final Mitigated Negative Declaration with comments and responses
and record of project approval is available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
MICHAEL J. HOtZMIL
Date received for filing at OPR:
OFFICE OF THE COUNT
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON J2HJJLJ?!
NOV 1 8 1998 REMOVED DEC 1 B 199BPOSTF.n
RETURN ED Tj
DEPUTY
NCY 1998Revised October 198
c
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Address/Location:
Project Description:
Approximately 1,600 feet of El Camino Real between College
Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue at Cannon Road including a
bridge over Agua Hedionda Creek.
Improvement and widening of a portion of El Camino Real,
including the Agua Hedionda Creek bridge.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on
the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in
the Planning Department.
A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30
days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the
Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4448.
DATED:
CASE NO:
CASE NAME:
SEPTEMBER 25,1998
CDP 98-47
EL CAMINO ROAD WIDENING
PUBLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1998
MICHAEL J. H
Planning Director
2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894
PROOF OF PUBLK ION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Sept. 25, 1998
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
San Marcos
Dated at California, this p5th dav
Sept. 1998Of
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space i; r the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Hit. Negative Declaration
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONProject Address/Location: Approximately 1,600 feet of El
Camino Real between College Boulevard and Tamarack Av-
enue at Cannon Road including a bridge over Agua Hedionda
Creek.
Project Description: Improvement and widening of a portion of
El Camino Real, including the Agua Hedionda Creek bridge.The City of Carlsbad has cpnducted an environmental reviewof the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines forImplementation of the California Environmental Quality Actand the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City ofCarlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration(declaration that the project will not have a significant impacton the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project.
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Depart-
ment.
A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive
documents is on tile in the Planning Department, 2075 Las
Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from
the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing
the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance
you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the
Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4448.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 25, 1998
CASE NO: CDP 98-47
CASE NAME: EL CAMINO ROAD WIDENING
/s/Michael J. Holzmiller, Planning Director
Legal 59616 September 25, 1998
as
>m
J
*
PUBLIC HEARING COUNTYQERK
Mail to: County Clerk, County of San Diego, Mailstop 833, PO Box 1750, San Diego, CA szl 12
Response must be received by: Novembers. 1998
Public Hearing Date: November 4. 1998 _
Public Hearing Place: 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA. 92008 _
Public Hearing Time: 6:00 p.m. _
Project Title: El Camino Real Widening
Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD - PLANNING Contact Person:Sherri Howard
4427Street Address: 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE Phone: ("760)438-1161. extension
City: CARLSBAD Zip: 92009 County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY
PROJECT LOCATION:
County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY City/Nearest Community: CITY OF CARLSBAD
Cross Streets: El Camino Real/Cannon Road Total Acres: N/A
Assessor's Parcel No.N/A
Within 2 Miles: State Hwy#:
Airports: McCLELLAN/PALOMAR
Section:
N/A
N/A Twp. N/A Range: N/A Base: N/A
Waterways:
Railways: NCTD
Agua Hedionda Lagoon
Schools:Kelly School
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:
CEQA: Q] NOP Q Supplement/Subsequent
EIR (Prior SCH No.)
. _
U LGreg«yJ.SmRh, Recorder/County Clerk
Q Neg Dec |
Q Draft EIR
LOCAL ACTION TYPE:
Q General Plan Update
[] General Plan Amendment
Q General Plan Element
[~] Zone Code Amendment
DEVELOPMENT TYPE:
Q Residential:
[] Office:
Q Commercial:
[j Industrial:
Q Recreational:
>?| Other: Mitigated Negative Declaration
Q Specific Plan
Q Master Plan
Q] Planned Unit Development
Q Site Plan
Units N/A
Sq. Ft. N/A
Sq. Ft. N/A
Sq. Ft. N/A
N/A
PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT:
[j Aesthetic/Visual Q Flood Plain/Flooding
Q Agricultural Land f~| Forest Land/Fire Hazard
fj Air Quality Q Geological/Seismic
£3 Archaeological/Historical Q Minerals
Q Coastal Zone Q Noise
f~| Drainage/Absorption f-j Population/Housing Balance
Q] Economic/Jobs Q] Public Services/Facilities
Q Fiscal rj Recreation/Parks
BY
[~~| Rezone [~]
[~~| Use Permit rn
Q Land Division (Subdivision, [gj
Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) Q
Acres N/A
Acres N/A
Acres N/A
Acres N/A
Q Schools/Universities
Q Septic Systems
Q Sewer Capacity
[~] Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading
fj Solid Waste
rj Toxic/Hazardous
Q Traffic/Circulation
g] Vegetation
OCJT 1 2 1998
\Ji DEPUTEu
Annexation
Redevelopment
Coastal Permit
Other:
fj Water Quality
Q Water Supply/Ground Water
^ Wetland/Riparian
^ Wildlife
Q Growth Inducing
Q Land Use
Q Cumulative Effect
Q Other:
Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use
The project improvements within an existing road right-of-way.
Project Description:
Widening El Camino Real for a distance of approximately 1,600 feet to include turn lanes for north and south bound traffic, bicycle
lanes and sidewalks and the improvement of the intersection of Cannon Road and El Camino Real with traffic signals.
Where documents are located for Public Review: Community Development Center, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009
July 1994
o
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON OCT 1 I 1998
POSTED OCT 12 1996 RRMOVFn m \ I 1998
RETURNED Ift AGENCY ON NOV 1 2 1998
DEPUTY .
p/e,c o
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMPLETE DATE: June 23,1998
DESCRIPTION:
Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow improvement and
widening of approximately 1,600 feet of El Camino Real, including the Agua Hedionda
Creek bridge at the intersection of future Cannon Road in Local Facilities Management
Zone 8.
LOCATION:
This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone at: El Camino Real and at the
intersection of future Cannon Road.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
N/A
APPLICANT:
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas
Carlsbad, CA 92009
A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the
Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on November 4, 1998 at
6:00 p.m.
Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with
any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described
and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision.
Copies of the staff report will be available on or after October 29, 1998.
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Christer
Westman at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to
5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009,
(760) 438-1161, extension 4448.
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894
APPEALS
If you challenge the Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing.
1. Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council,
appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the
Planning Commission.
2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project:
^ This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
[~~| This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the
Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a
Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal
Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the
Coastal Commission is located at 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California
92108-1725.
CASE FILE: CDP 98-47
CASE NAME: EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING
PUBLISH: OCTOBER 22, 1998
c
EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING
CDP 98-47
PROOF OF PUBLIC/ .ON
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Oct. 22, 1998
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
San MarcosDated at California, this
of Oct. 1998
22nd _day
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space is the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Notice of Public Hearing
NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARINGCOMPLETE DATE: June 23, 1998
DESCRIPTION:
Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to
allow Improvement and widening of approximately 1 ,600feet of El Camino Real, including the Agua Hedionda Creek
bridge at the Intersection of future Cannon Road in LocalFacilities Management Zone 8. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad'sCoastal Zone at: El Camino Real and at the intersection offuture Cannon Road.ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: N/AAPPLICANT: City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad,CA 92009
\l byA public hearing on the above proposed project will be heldthe Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 1200,i Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on November4, 1998 at 6:00 p.m.Persons are cordially Invited to attend the public hearingand provide the decision makers with any oral or writtencomments they may have regarding the project. The projectwill be described and a staff recommendation given, fol-lowed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copiesof the staff report will be available on or after October 29,1998.If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of thedecision, please contact Christer Westman at the City of
Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday
7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 2075
Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009, (760) 438-
11 61, extension 4448.
APPEALSIf you challenge the Coastal Development Permit in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or some-
one else raised at the public hearing described In this no-tice. or In written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad prior to the public hearing.
1 . Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is ap-
pealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing
within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Plan-ning Commission.2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project:This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable AreaWhere the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commis-sion,appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission withinten (10) working days after the Costal Commission has re-ceived a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad.Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of thedate that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diegooffice of the Coastal Commission is located at 3111 CaminoDel Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108-1725.CASE FILE: CDP 98-47CASE NAME: EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING
EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING
CDP 88-47
Legal 59844 October 22, 1998
We City of CARLSBAD Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: November 4,1998
Application complete date: June 23, 1998
Project Planner: Christer Westman
Project Engineer: Sherri Howard
SUBJECT: CDP 98-47 - EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING - Request for approval of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
and Coastal Development Permit to allow improvement and widening of
approximately 1,600 feet of El Camino Real, including the Agua Hedionda Creek
bridge at the intersection of future Cannon Road in Local Facilities Management
Zone 8.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4417.
APPROVING a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4418 APPROVING CDP 98-47
based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The improvement to El Camino Real is a City Capital Improvements Project. Because the road
segment is located within the Coastal Zone a Coastal Development Permit is required. The area
of construction is within 100 feet of a wetland and stream and is therefore in the Coastal
Commission appeal area.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project is the improvement of El Camino Real for approximately 1,600 linear feet. The
improvements include widening the existing bridge over Agua Hedionda Creek to accommodate
sidewalks and intersection improvements at Cannon Road as shown on Exhibit A. North of the
bridge, El Camino Real will be widened on the southbound side by 29 feet and by 17 feet on the
northbound side. This widening will result in three travel lanes in either direction, a southbound
right turn lane to Cannon Road, a southbound left turn lane to Cannon Road, bicycle lanes in
either direction and sidewalks for an overall width of 138 feet. The additional width north of the
intersection is for the right turn lane for southbound traffic. South of the intersection, the
widening will result in a paved width for El Camino Real of 106 feet. The improvements will
result in three travel lanes in either direction, a northbound left turn lane to Cannon Road, bicycle
lanes in either direction and sidewalks.
CDP 98-47 - El CAMINO K&\L WIDENING
November 4, 1998
Page 2
IV. ANALYSIS
Construction of the improvements to El Camino Real are consistent with the Circulation Element
of the General Plan and is therefore consistent with the Local Coastal Program's designation for
land use. Improvement of the right-of-way implements the goal of the circulation element for El
Camino Real to be improved as a prime arterial.
The road improvements will not obstruct views or otherwise damage the visual beauty of the
coastal zone in that there are no significant visual resources associated with the area of
disturbance. The project has been designed and a construction program which will suspend the
additional bridge width from the existing bridge will completely avoid impacts to wetlands.
There are neither agricultural activities nor geologic instability issues existing onsite. The
project will implement the City's Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan
as well as the City's grading ordinance to avoid increased runoff and soil erosion.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An analysis of the site was conducted and significant but mitigable impacts were identified. A
Mitigated Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director and published for public
comment dated September 25, 1998. Direct impacts were identified to disturbed coastal sage
scrub and mule fat scrub. Applicable wildlife agency permits will be required. Although the
mule fat scrub is a wetland indicator species, it was determined that it was not part of a wetland
habitat because the required hydrology was not present. The bridge construction will be
completed by suspending the improvements from the existing bridge with no impacts from
construction to the area below the bridge. Therefore there will be no impacts to wetlands. The
project is subject to mitigation measures as described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4417
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4418
3. Location Map
4. Exhibits "A"-"C" dated November 4,1998
CW:mh
o
EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING
CDP 98-47
Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EVALUATION
EL CAMEVO REAL ROAD WIDENING PROJECT
EL CAMINO REAL AND
FUTURE CANNON ROAD
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
PREPARED FOR:
RECON
4241 Jutland Drive, Suite 201
San Diego, California 92117-3653
PREPARED BY:
Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants
10225 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A-112
San Diego, California 92121
SEP 2 i 1398
ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
June 4, 1998
Project No. 103635-02
10225 Barnes Canyon Road • SuiteA-J 12 • San Diego, California 92121 • Phone (619) 457-0400 • Fax (619J 558-1236
Oakland
(510) 893-2551
Irvine
(714) 472-5444
Los Angeles
(213) 488-51 1 1
Ontario
(909) 947-1588
Las Vegas
(702) 433-0330
Geotechn/cal and Environmental Sciences Consultants
June 4, 1998
Project No. 103635-02
Mr. Tom Held
RECON
4241 Jutland, Suite 201
San Diego, California 92117-3653
Subject: Hazardous Materials Evaluation
El Camino Real Road Widening Project
El Camino Real and Future Cannon Road
Carlsbad, California 920008
Dear Mr. Held:
Ninyo & Moore is pleased to present this report of hazardous material evaluation for the El
Camino Real Road Widening Project located in Carlsbad, California. Project tasks were per-
formed in general accordance with our proposal and scope of services dated January 13, 1998.
We understand that the findings of this study will be utilized in the preparation of environmental
impact documents.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to RECON on this project. Should you require
clarification of our findings, conclusions or recommendations as presented, please contact the un-
dersigned in our San Diego office.
Sincerely,
NINYO & MOORE
Peter D. Clark, R.E.A.
Project Environmental Geologist
PDC/SB/ccl
Distribution: (4) Addressee
Stephan A. Beck, C.E.G., H.G.
Manager, Environmental Sciences Division
10225 Barnes Canyon Road • Suite A-II2 • San Diego, California 92121 • Phone (619J 457-0400 • Fax (619) 558-1236
(510) 893-2551
Irvine
(714)472-5444
Los Angeles
(213) 488-51 1 1
Ontario
(909) 947-1588
Las Vegas
(702) 433-0330
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 10363 5-02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1
3. SITE DESRIPTION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3
5. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3
5.1. Topographic Conditions 3
5.2. Geologic Conditions 3
5.3. Site Geology 4
5.3.1. Artificial Fill 4
5.3.2. Alluvium 5
5.3.3. Santiago Formation 5
5.4. Groundwater Conditions 5
6. SITE HISTORY 5
6.1. Aerial Photographs 6
6.2. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps 7
6.3. City of Carlsbad Building Department 7
6.4. Planning and Zoning Information 7
6.5. Summary of Historical Site Use 8
7. SITE RECONNAISSANCE 8
7.1. Chemical Storage/Hazardous Waste Storage 8
7.1.1. Liquid Petroleum Pipelines 8
7.1.2. Natural Gas Pipeline 9
7.2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 10
7.3. Subsurface Structures and Buried Utilities 10
7.4. Surface Staining 10
7.5. Wells 10
8. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA BASE SEARCH 10
9. REGULATORY AGENCY FILE REVIEW 15
9.1. County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health 16
9.1.1. 4901 El Camino Real-Henry Yada 16
9.1.2. 4915 El Camino Real-Valdiviva Farm 16
9.1.3. 5003 El Camino Real 16
9.2. County of San Diego Department of Agriculture 16
3635-02R.DOC
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
9.3. City of Carlsbad Fire Department 17
9.4. San Diego Air Pollution Control District 17
10. SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS 17
11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 18
12. MITIGATION MEASURES 18
13. LIMITATIONS 19
14. PREPARERS OF REPORT 20
15. AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS CONTACTED 20
16. REFERENCES 21
Illustrations
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Topographic Map
Tables
Table 1 - Aerial Photographs Reviewed 6
Table 2 - Summary of Environmental Database Search 11
Appendices
Appendix A - Correspondence
Appendix B - Environmental Database Search
Appendix C - Department of Environmental Health Documentation
3635-02R.DOC
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
1. INTRODUCTION
In accordance with your request, Ninyo & Moore has performed a hazardous materials evaluation
of the project site located in Carlsbad, California (Figure 1). The purpose of this study was to
evaluate hazardous materials conditions using available data and to provide a report, which will be
utilized in the preparation of environmental impact documents. This report presents our findings
and conclusions pertaining to the proposed El Camino Real Road Widening Project (Project).
Subsurface exploration and laboratory testing of materials were not included in the scope of this
evaluation.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
RECON retained Ninyo & Moore to conduct a hazardous material evaluation for inclusion into an
environmental impact report (EIR). The services were conducted in general accordance with
Ninyo & Moore's proposal and scope of services dated January 13, 1998, and the subcontractor
agreement between Ninyo & Moore and RECON. Ninyo & Moore's scope of services included
the following tasks:
• Reviewing readily available maps, reports, photographs, plans and other documents pertinent
to hazardous materials issues for the site. The City of Carlsbad and RECON was requested to
provide copies of, or access to pertinent maps, reports, photographs, plans and other docu-
ments in their possession.
• Performing a site reconnaissance, subject to site access, to visually identify areas of possibly
contaminated surficial soil or water, improperly stored hazardous materials, possible sources
of pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls, and possible risks of contamination from activities
at the sites and adjacent properties.
• Reviewing available regulatory agency databases for the site and for properties located within
a specified radius of the project site. Databases were used to identify locations of known haz-
ardous waste sites, landfills, burn ash sites, leaking underground storage tanks, permitted
facilities that utilize underground storage tanks and facilities that use, store, treat or dispose of
hazardous materials.
• Reviewing readily available historical aerial photographs.
tyiny o
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
• Preparing this Hazardous Materials Evaluation report including an introduction, methodology,
existing conditions, impact analysis, criteria of significance and mitigation measures supported
by illustrations, references, agencies and individuals contacted, and a list of preparers.
3. SITE DESRIPTION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project area consists of an approximately 1,200-foot long section of El Camino Real (station
441+00 to 453+00), approximately 21A miles northwest of Palomar Airport Road in the city of
Carlsbad (see Figure 1). El Camino Real is currently a four-lane roadway, with a paved section
that is approximately 100-feet wide. In the project area, the roadway is located on a fill embank-
ment that ranges from seven to ten feet in height above the surrounding floodplain of Agua
Hedionda Creek. From Station 441+70 to Station 442+83, El Camino Real crosses Agua He-
dionda Creek via a concrete bridge. The bridge is 113-feet long and 108 feet wide and is
supported at two bents within the creek channel and two abutments. According to a report dated
January 15, 1997, prepared by Agra Earth and Environmental, Inc., (AGRA) the foundation of
the bridge consists of 14 Class XI piles at each abutment and bent. The AGRA report indicates
that the piles may be either precast, prestressed concrete piles or step-taper steel shells (Raymond
Step-Taper Piles) filled with concrete. The exposed portions of the piles at the bents are 16-inch
diameter concrete columns.
Elevations across the project area range from approximately 45.8 feet above mean sea level
(MSL) near the center of the bridge to roughly 29 feet MSL within the Agua Hedionda Creek
channel, west of the bridge. A topographic map is provided as Figure 2. Vegetation consists of
moderate to dense native growth along the sides of the creek channel and within the floodplain
west of the road. Agricultural land exists on the north side of El Camino Real, northwest of the
bridge. A trailer park development exists on the north side of El Camino Real, northeast of the
bridge. Existing conditions are further discussed in Section 7.0.
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project will consist of the widening of El Camino Real from approximately Station
441+00 to Station 453+00 (roughly 1,200 feet). The widening includes the addition of one lane
on each side, widening the existing bridge over Aqua Hedionda Creek by two feet on each side,
and the addition of a right-turn lane from southbound El Camino Real to (future) westbound Can-
non Road. The proposed Cannon Road will cross El Camino Real approximately 75 feet north of
the existing bridge, then will cross Aqua Hedionda Creek via a proposed bridge to be located ap-
proximately 150 feet southwest of the existing El Camino Real bridge.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The following sections include discussions of the topographic, geologic, soil and hydrogeologic
conditions; a review of available published documents; and presents the findings of our visual site
reconnaissance of the property and adjacent areas.
5.1. Topographic Conditions
In general, the project is located in near the center of Agua Hedionda Valley, and the area
surrounding the project consists of moderate to steeply ascending hills. Surface drainage in
the valley is towards the southwest into the nearby Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The approximate
elevation of the current road is 40 to 45 feet MSL. A topographic map is presented as
Figure 2.
5.2. Geologic Conditions
The project area is situated in the western portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic
province of southern California. This geomorphic province encompasses an area that extends
125 miles, from the Transverse Ranges and the Los Angeles Basin, south to the Mexican
border, and beyond another 775 miles to the tip of Baja California (Norris and Webb, 1990).
The geomorphic province varies in width from 30 to 100 miles, most of which is character-
ized by northwest trending mountain ranges separated by subparallel fault zones. In general,
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
the Peninsular Ranges are underlain by Jurassic-age metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks
and by Cretaceous-age igneous rocks of the southern California batholith. The westernmost
portion of the province in San Diego County, in which the site is located, generally consists
of Upper Cretaceous-, Tertiary-, and Quaternary-age sedimentary rocks.
The Peninsular Ranges are traversed by several major active faults (Figure 3, Fault Location
Map). The Whittier-Elsinore, San Jacinto, and the San Andreas faults are major active fault
systems located northeast of the site and the Agua Blanca-Coronado Bank and San Clemente
faults are active faults located to the west-southwest. The Rose Canyon fault zone is also a
major fault system, located offshore of Carlsbad, portions of which have recently been recog-
nized as active by the State of California. Major tectonic activity associated with these and
other faults within this regional tectonic framework is right-lateral strike-slip movement.
These faults, as well as other faults in the region, have the potential for generating strong
ground motions at the project site.
5.3. Site Geology
Based on our literature review, including published geologic maps and available geotechnical
reports, the project is underlain generally by artificial fill, alluvium, and formational materials
of the Santiago Formation. A brief description of these units, as described in the cited litera-
ture, or as observed at the project area, is presented below.
5.3.1. Artificial Fill
Previous construction along and adjacent to El Camino Real has resulted in the place-
ment of artificial fill. Based on review of previous geotechnical reports and topographic
maps, these fill soils are expected to be up to roughly 10 feet deep along the existing
roadway. These soils consist generally of clayey sands and silty sands. In addition to
these soils, riprap composed of boulder-sized rocks locally line the abutments of the ex-
isting bridge.
tyinyo
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
5.3.2. Alluvium
Recent alluvial deposits underlie the fill soils. The alluvium was within the floodplain of
Agua Hedionda Creek. Based on the previous geotechnical reports, the alluvium is de-
scribed as soft to stiff silty clay and loose to medium dense silty sand. The alluvium is
expected to be greater than 100-feet deep in the project vicinity.
5.3.3. Santiago Formation
Materials of the Eocene-age Santiago Formation underlie the alluvium in the project
area. The Santiago Formation is described as very dense, silty sandstone and interbedded
hard claystone.
A more detailed analysis of geologic conditions, including faults, liquefaction, landslides,
and other geologic hazards are discussed under a separate report prepared by Ninyo &
Moore dated June 4, 1998.
5.4. Groundwater Conditions
Based on our site reconnaissance and review of previous geotechnical reports, the depth to
groundwater is expected to occur at a depth of approximately 10 to 15 feet below the exist-
ing road grade. The depth to groundwater may be at or near the ground surface within Agua
Hedionda Creek. At the time of our site visit, on May 15, 1998, there was a moderate flow of
water within Agua Hedionda Creek. The depth to groundwater at the site may fluctuate with
seasonal variations and perched conditions may be locally present.
6. SITE HISTORY
The following sources were reviewed to compile a history of the site.
RECON
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad
June 4, 1998
Project No. 103635-02
6.1. Aerial Photographs
Based on our review of historical aerial photographs, it appears that El Camino Real was
constructed prior to 1928. A listing of selected photographs reviewed is presented below,
followed by observations of each photograph.
Table 1 - Aerial Photographs Reviewed
Date
1928
04-11-53
04-09-64
03-06-70
07-31-75
01-02-80
01-01-85
01-23-90
02-19-95
01-18-97
Photograph Number
30-E6
AXN-8M-101
AXN-4DD-197
30,018
5,925
0-B4
5-7D
SD90-7D
CVSD95-7D
CVSD97-1107
Source
A
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sources: A - County of San Diego, Department of Public Works, San Diego, California.
B - Ninyo & Moore, San Diego, California.
C - Aerial Fotobank, San Diego, California.
1928: El Camino Real is present and appears to be an unpaved road, with a small bridge pre-
sent over Agua Hedionda Creek. Calaveras Road is present to the north of the site; however,
Hidden Valley Road is not present to the south of the site. Vacant undeveloped land is present
to the adjacent north, east, south, and west of the site. Minor amounts of agricultural use are
shown in the vicinity of the site.
1953: El Camino Real appears to be a paved road in this photograph, with a small bridge pre-
sent over Agua Hedionda Creek. Vacant, undeveloped land, possibly used for pasture, is
present to the adjacent north, east, south, and west of the site. Minor additional agricultural
use is shown in the vicinity of the site.
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
1964: The site and adjacent properties appear similar to that shown in the 1953 photograph.
It appears that a new bridge is now present over Agua Hedionda Creek. Hidden Valley road
is now present south of the site. Additional agricultural use is shown to the west of the site.
1970: The site and adjacent properties appear similar to that shown in the 1964 photograph.
1975: The site appears similar to that shown in the 1964 photograph. Agricultural use is pre-
sent to the north of the site. Mass grading activities and large residential complex are now
shown to the east of the site. The Agua Hedionda Creek bed is present south of the site.
1980 & 1985; The site and adjacent areas appear similar to the 1975 photograph.
1990 & 1995; The site appears similar to that shown in the 1985 photograph.
1997: The site and vicinity appear in approximately their present configuration.
6.2. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
Available Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps were reviewed at the City of San Diego Main Library.
No coverage of the site or immediate vicinity is available.
6.3. City of Carlsbad Building Department
Since there are no buildings or addresses associated with the site, building permit files were
not reviewed.
6.4. Planning and Zoning Information
The City of Carlsbad Department of Planning and Zoning was contacted to inquire whether
or not the City of Carlsbad has any specific criteria of significance for hazardous materials
evaluations as part of an EIR. The City does not have any specific criteria of significance for
hazardous materials evaluations and defers to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) guidelines.
ty/nyo
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
6.5. Summary of Historical Site Use
Ninyo & Moore reviewed historical documents, including aerial photographs, to evaluate
prior features that may indicate structures, facilities or activities which might reflect the use,
storage or disposal of hazardous substances at the site. Our aerial photograph review indi-
cated that El Camino Real road was constructed prior to 1928. Past land use in the vicinity of
the site has been agricultural and residential. No documentation of commercial or industrial
land use adjacent to the site was found during the evaluation of the history of the site.
7. SITE RECONNAISSANCE
On May 15, 1998, a site reconnaissance was conducted by a representative of Ninyo & Moore,
and involved a walking tour of the site and visual observations of adjoining properties. Photo-
graphs taken during the reconnaissance are on file at Ninyo & Moore and are available for review
upon request.
7.1. Chemical Storage/Hazardous Waste Storage
At the time of the reconnaissance, warning signs and surface mark out for buried petroleum
pipelines and a natural gas pipeline were observed. Other areas of chemical or hazardous
waste storage were not observed on immediately adjacent to the site. Minor amounts of trash
were observed along each side of the road.
7.1.1. Liquid Petroleum Pipelines
Two petroleum pipelines owned and operated by Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines (SFPP) are
located on the subject site. Ninyo & Moore contacted Mr. Don Quinn of the Kinder
Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., an operating partner with SFPP, L.P., to inquire about the
history, construction type, environmental status, and location of the two pipelines.
SFPP, L.P., operates and/or maintains one active 16-inch diameter high pressure refined
petroleum pipeline and an idle 10-inch diameter pipeline which is presently under a nitro-
gen charge. The pipelines are constructed of single wall welded steel, coated and under
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
cathodic protection. The 10-inch diameter pipeline was constructed in 1962 and the 16-
inch diameter pipeline was constructed 1985.
A hydrostatic pressure test performed on each of the pipelines at the time of construction
prior to placing them in service. The 16-inch diameter pipeline was also internally in-
spected in 1996 in accordance with the provisions of the "California Pipeline Safety Act"
as approved by the California State Fire Marshall.
The active pipeline currently has a leak detection system that is based on the computer-
ized surveillance of the volumetric line balance, pressure deviation and flow deviation.
Mr. Quinn indicated that plans have been formulated to install a new monitoring system
to enhance the leak detection capabilities by the end of 1999. According to Mr. Quinn,
historical information does not indicate that a spill or release of product has occurred in
the subject area.
Mr. Quinn supplied Ninyo & Moore with maps showing the location of the 10- and 16-
inch diameter pipelines. The 10-inch diameter pipeline is generally located on the south-
ern portion of El Camino Real, and the pipeline crosses south of the bridge that crosses
Agua Hedionda Creek. The 16-inch diameter pipeline is generally located in the middle
portion of El Camino Real, and the pipeline traverses through the approximate center of
the bridge. The request and response regarding the petroleum pipelines is included in
Appendix A.
7.1.2. Natural Gas Pipeline
A San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) high pressure natural gas line is located on the
subject site. A request was made to SDG&E regarding the history, construction type,
environmental status, and location of the pipeline. A response has not been received from
SDG&E at the time of this report.
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
7.2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Three pole mounted electrical transformers were observed on one pole near the southwest
corner of the intersection of El Camino Real and Hidden Valley Road. The electrical trans-
formers are owned and operated by SDG&E. The transformer's locations and identification
numbers were given to SDG&E, and a request was made to obtain the date of installation and
whether or not the transformer's fluid contained PCBs. According to an SDG&E representa-
tive, based on routine random testing performed by SDG&E, it is unlikely that the
transformers contain PCBs. No visible leakage from the transformers or soil staining was ob-
served in the area of these transformers.
7.3. Subsurface Structures and Buried Utilities
Evidence of substructures such as utility vaults, sewer manholes, water meters, and other ac-
cessways were observed on site. Available plans show subsurface water lines, sewer lines,
electrical lines, storm drain lines, a natural gas pipeline, and liquid petroleum pipelines are lo-
cated on or near the site.
7.4. Surface Staining
Areas of significant surficial staining were not observed during the site reconnaissance.
7.5. Wells
Water wells were not observed on or immediately adjacent to the subject site. The U.S.G.S.
San Luis Rey Quadrangle Map shows a well located approximately one mile to the north of
the site.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA BASE SEARCH
A computerized, environmental information database search was performed by Vista Information
Solutions, Inc. (Vista), dated May 5, 1998. The Vista search included federal, state, and local da-
10 tyinyo
RECON
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad
June 4, 1998
Project No. 103635-02
tabases. A summary of the environmental databases searched, their corresponding search radii,
and number of noted sites of environmental concern, are presented in the following table.
Table 2 - Summary of Environmental Database Search
Database
Name
National Priority List (NPL)
RCRA Corrective Action Sites List (CORRACTS)
RCRA Facilities List (TSD)
Cal-Sites Annual Work Plan (SPL)
Cal-Sites Abandoned Sites Program Information System (SCL)
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Information System List (CERCLIS/NFRAP)
Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Lists
Solid Waste Information System (SWIS/SWLF) List (landfills)
State of California Deed Restrictions List (DEED RSTR)
Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (CORTESE)
Toxic Pits Cleanup Facilities (TOXIC PITS)
RCRA Violators List (RCRA VIOL)
SARA Title Ill-Toxic Release Inventory System (TRIS)
Registered UST and AST Lists
Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) List
RCRA Generators List (GNRTR)
San Diego County Hazardous Materials Establishment List
(HE17)
NOTES:
Agency
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
Cal EPA
Cal EPA
U.S. EPA
SWRCB/
DEH
CIWMB/
SWRCB
DHS
CalEPA
SWRCB
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
SWRCB/
DEH
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
DEH
Date1
9-97
8-97
8-97
7-97
7-97
7-97
9-97/
8-97
4-971
5-97
4-94
2-95
2-95
8-97
12-96
1-94/
8-97
7-97
8-97
8-97
Search
Radius
(mile)
1
1
1/2
1
1
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/4
1/4
1/4
1/8
1/8
1/8
Sites2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
U.S. EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency
DHS = California Department of Health Services
CIWMB = California Integrated Waste Management Board
SWRCB = California State Water Resources Control Board
DEH = San Diego County Department of Environmental Health
1 Agency database release date.
2The number of sites includes some sites which are listed more than once because there are more than one business(s) or
occupants) listed for the address.
A complete description of the assumptions and approach to the database search, as well as the
results, are provided in Appendix B. The review was conducted to evaluate whether the site or
11
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
properties within the vicinity of the site have been identified as having experienced significant un-
authorized releases of hazardous substances or other events with potentially adverse
environmental effects. Figures on pages 3 and 4 of the Vista report indicate approximate locations
of properties which may pose environmental concerns. The database search identified several sur-
rounding properties of potential environmental concern on various databases.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Priorities List
This list identifies hazardous material sites slated for cleanup under the federally sponsored Su-
perfimd program. These sites receive remedial funding under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). Neither the site nor properties within a
one-mile radius of the site were listed.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. CORRACTS List
This list identifies RCRA facilities which are undergoing "corrective action." A "corrective action
order" is issued pursuant to RCRA when there has been a release of hazardous waste into the en-
vironment from a RCRA facility. Neither the site nor properties within a one-mile radius of the
site were listed.
California Department of Health Services. Annual Work Plan (formerly Bond Expenditure
Plan) for the Hazardous Substance Clean-Up Bond Act (AWP)
The Health and Safety Code, as amended by AB129, requires the California Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Department of Health Services to develop a site-specific expenditure plan
(Annual Work Plan) as the basis for an appropriation of California Hazardous Substance Clean-
Up Bond Act of 1984 funds. The Department is also required to update the report annually and
report any significant adjustments to the Legislature on an ongoing basis. The Annual Work Plan
(AWP) identifies California hazardous waste sites targeted for cleanup by responsible parties, the
Department and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency over a five year period. Neither the
site nor properties within a one-mile radius of the site were listed.
California Department of Health Services, Toxic Substances Control Division. CalSites List
Including Abandoned Site Pro2ram Information System (ASPIS)
This list, dated July 1997, identifies sites listed in the CalSites database (except for AWP sites
listed above), including abandoned facilities which may require investigation to determine whether
a release of hazardous substances has occurred. These site determinations were generally not
made via sampling and site characterization, but as a result of file searches and windshield sur-
veys. However, some of the sites may have had a site inspection with sampling. The information
has been compiled into this database by the California Department of Health Services in accor-
dance with Section 25359.6 of the California Health and Safety Code. Neither the site nor
properties within a one-mile radius of the site were listed.
12
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
United States Environmental Protection Agency, CERCLIS List
This list identifies hazardous material sites or environmental incidents recognized and listed on the
federal level. Sites identified by the EPA, which may have the potential for releasing hazardous
substances into the environment, are listed in the CERCLIS List. Neither the site nor properties
within a one-mile radius of the site were listed.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA TSD List
This list, dated August 1997, identifies EPA-listed facilities which report storage, treatment and/or
disposal of hazardous waste (TSD facility) under the EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) program. Neither the site nor properties within a one-half mile radius of the site
were listed.
California State Water Resources Control Board - Leaking Underground Storage Tank
(LUST) List
The Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) Information System is maintained by the State
Water Resources Board, pursuant to Section 25295 of the Health and Safety Code. Also listed
below are sites within a one-half mile of the subject property that fall under the jurisdiction of the
Local Oversight Program for unauthorized releases by the County of (DEH) ("County LUST").
Neither the site nor properties within a one-half mile radius of the site were listed.
California Integrated Waste Manaeement Board, Solid Waste Information System (SWIS).
Inactive and Closed Landfills, and Active Landfills
As legislated under the Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972, the Cali-
fornia Waste Management Board maintains lists of certain facilities (e.g., active solid waste
disposal sites, inactive or closed solid waste disposal sites and transfer facilities). Neither the site
nor properties within a one-half mile radius of the site were listed.
California State Water Resources Control Board - Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT)
This list, provided for under the Calderon legislation (Section 13273 of the Water Code), requires
that disposal sites with more than 50,000 cubic yards of waste provide sufficient information to
the Regional Water Quality Control Board to determine whether or not the site has discharged
hazardous substances which will impact the environment. Neither the site nor properties within a
one-half mile radius of the site were listed.
California Department of Health Services - Deed Restrictions
This list is compiled by the Department of Health Services - Land Use and Air Assessment. Deed
restrictions are agreements with owners of property who propose to build residences, schools,
hospitals, or day care centers on property that is "on or within 2,000 feet of a significant disposal
of hazardous waste." Neither the site nor properties within a one-half mile radius of the site were
listed.
13 Afin!/0&
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
California Office of Planning and Research, Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List
(Cortese List)
This list identifies hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action, land designated as haz-
ardous waste property, public land used for hazardous waste disposal, and public drinking water
wells which contain detectable levels of organic contaminants and are subject to water analysis
requirements. Neither the site nor properties within a one-half mile radius of the site were listed.
California State Water Resources Control Board - Toxic Pits Ciean-Up Facilities
The California State Water Resources Control Board compiles information in Toxic Pits Cleanup
Facilities. The Toxic Pits Clean-Up Act places strict limitations on the discharge of liquid hazard-
ous wastes into surface impoundments, toxic ponds, pits and lagoons. Regional Water Quality
Control Boards are required to inspect all surface impoundments annually. Neither the site nor
properties within a one-half mile radius of the site were listed.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, RCRA Violations
This list identifies EPA-listed facilities which report violations regarding generation, storage,
transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste under the EPA's Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) program. Neither the site nor properties within a one-quartet mile ra-
dius of the site were listed.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. TRIS
Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (also known as
SARA Title III) of 1986 requires the EPA to establish an inventory of toxic chemicals emitted
from certain facilities. The Toxic Release Inventory System (TRIS) list identifies facilities which
complete a Toxic Chemical Release Form (Form R) for specified chemicals. Neither the site nor
properties within a one-quarter mile radius of the site were listed.
California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) - Underground Storage Tank
(UST) and Above-ground Storage Tank (AST) Registration List
Information regarding underground and above-ground storage tanks registered with the SWRCB
are provided on the agency's UST list and AST list. Also listed are sites within a one-half mile of
the subject property that fall under the jurisdiction of the County of DEH Underground Storage
Tank program. Neither the site nor properties within a one-eighth mile radius of the site were
listed.
United States Environmental Protection Agency - ERNS
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national database used to collected
information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. The database contains informa-
tion from spill reports made to federal authorities including the EPA, the United States Coast
Guard, the National Response Center, and the Department of Transportation. The ERNS list
contains records for reports for the period beginning October 1986. Neither the site nor properties
within a one-eighth mile radius of the site were listed.
14 tyinyo
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
United States Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA Generator
This list identifies EPA-listed facilities that report generation of reportable quantities of hazardous
waste under the RCRA program for the identification and tracking of hazardous waste. Neither
the site nor properties within a one-eighth mile radius of the site were listed.
County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health (DEH), Hazardous Materials
Establishment
This list identifies businesses that use hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste at quanti-
ties that require regulation by the County of San Diego DEH. These businesses report quantities
of hazardous materials used, and hazardous wastes generated and stored for tracking purposes,
and are subject to inspection by County officials. The site was not listed. The following three
properties were located within a one-eighth mile radius of the site:
1. Steindorf Produce
5003 El Camino Real
Carslbad, California 92064
Location: 0.05 miles to the southeast of the site.
Map ID: 1
Violations Noted: None reported.
2. Valdiviva Farm
4915 El Camino Real
Carslbad, California 92064
Location: 0.09 miles to the west of the site.
Map ID: 2A
Violations Noted: None reported.
3. Henry Yada
4901 El Camino Real
Carslbad, California 92064
Location: 0.15 miles to the west of the site.
Map ID: 2B
Violations Noted: None reported.
9. REGULATORY AGENCY FILE REVIEW
Information was requested and reviewed from the following regulatory agencies.
15 tyinyo
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 10363 5-02
9.1. County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health
A request was made to the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health
(DEH) to review information regarding the following addresses: 4901 El Camino Real, 4915
El Camino Real, and 5003 El Camino Real. The sites are discussed below:
9.1.1. 4901 El Camino Real - Henry Yada
The facility is permitted by the DEH and has been assigned the establishment No.
H99286. Based on review of the limited information, the facility stores or historically has
stored liquid nitrogen fertilizer, dry fertilizer, and gasoline. A copy of the file is presented
in Appendix C.
9.1.2. 4915 El Camino Real - Valdiviva Farm
The facility is permitted by the DEH and has been assigned the establishment No.
H99153. Based on review of the limited information, the facility stores or historically has
stored liquid nitrogen fertilizer, dry nitrogen fertilizer, chlorothanolin, methamidophos,
diesel, and gasoline. A copy of the file is presented in Appendix C.
9.1.3. 5003 El Camino Real
The facility was permitted by the DEH and had been assigned the establishment No.
H99160. The file is inactive and the DEH could not locate the file for review. A copy of
the request is presented in Appendix C.
9.2. County of San Diego Department of Agriculture
A request was made to the County of San Diego Department of Agriculture (DA) to inquire
whether or not any information was available for the following addresses: 4901 El Camino
Real, 4915 El Camino Real, and 5003 El Camino Real. A response has not been received
from the DA at the time of this report.
16 ty/nyo
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
9.3. City of Carlsbad Fire Department
A request was not made to the City of Carlsbad Fire Department (CFD) for information on
the site or adjacent properties based on the site has no address and the adjacent properties are
currently vacant land, residential or agricultural in use. However, Ninyo & Moore did inter-
view Inspector Mike Smith, representative of the CFD, regarding any incidents of hazardous
materials releases at or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Inspector Smith stated, to the
best of his knowledge, that he is not aware of any spills or releases of hazardous materials in
the immediate vicinity of the site. Mr. Smith did state that a small gasoline aboveground stor-
age tank (less than 500-gallon capacity) is located at the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park
northeast of the site.
9.4. San Diego Air Pollution Control District
A request was not made to the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) for in-
formation on the site or adjacent properties based on the site has no address and the adjacent
properties are currently vacant land, residential or agricultural in use.
10. SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS
The City of Carlsbad Department of Planning does not have a criteria for significance determina-
tion guideline. Criteria for significance determination was obtained from the guidelines set forth in
the document entitled "Significance Determination Guidelines Under the California Environmental
Quality Act" prepared by the City of San Diego Planning Department, Environmental Analysis
Section, dated January 1991 (revised January 1994). The following criteria were compared with
each of the findings of this study to determine their impact significance to the proposed redevel-
opment project:
• All uses proposing the handling, storage, and treatment of hazardous materials (i.e., a hazard-
ous waste treatment center).
• Sites on or near known contamination sources.
• All cases of dewatering.
17
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
• Demolition of old commercial, industrial and residential structures (i.e., asbestos and other
hazardous materials).
• Removal of underground fuel tanks.
• Residential, day care, social agencies, and schools in industrial areas.
11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The following environmental impact sites, as identified in this study, were compared with the sig-
nificance criteria as outlined in Section 10:
• No environmental impacts relating to hazardous materials are anticipated for the proposed
project.
12. MITIGATION MEASURES
In accordance with the significance determination criteria discussed in Section 10, the following
mitigation measures are recommended:
• A hazardous waste treatment center is not proposed for the redevelopment, therefore, mitiga-
tion measures regarding such a facility are not required.
If hazardous materials are proposed to be temporarily stored on the site for construction pur-
poses, then they should be stored and used in accordance with all applicable federal, state and
local laws and regulations.
• The project site is not located on or near an area of known soil or groundwater contamination,
therefore, mitigation measures regarding known soil or groundwater contamination are not
required.
However, in order to prepare for the possibility of encountering unknown soil or groundwa-
ter contamination during construction, a contingency plan should be prepared to address
contractor procedures for such an event to minimize the potential for costly construction de-
lays.
• Although it is not anticipated, if construction dewatering is required for the project, the efflu-
ent must meet discharge requirements for National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permitting and/or City of Carlsbad sewer system discharge.
• Demolition of old industrial, commercial, or residential structures is not proposed for the road
widening project, therefore, mitigation measures are not required.
18
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
Underground storage tank removal is not proposed for the project; therefore, mitigation
measures regarding these activities are not required. It is our understanding that the natural
gas and petroleum pipelines will not be disturbed or relocated during the road widening proj-
ect. Extreme caution is warranted when working near the pipelines. The location of the
nearest shut off valves for the pipelines should be located and made accessible during the con-
struction phase of the project.
Residential, day care, social agencies, and schools are not proposed for the project; therefore,
mitigation measures regarding these facilities are not required.
13. LIMITATIONS
The environmental services described in this report have been conducted in general accordance
with current regulatory guidelines and the standard-of-care exercised by environmental consult-
ants performing similar work in the project area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made
regarding the professional opinions presented in this report.
This document is intended to be used only in its entirety. No portion of the document, by itself, is
designed to completely represent any aspect of the project described herein. Ninyo & Moore
should be contacted if the reader requires any additional information or has questions regarding
the content, interpretations presented, or completeness of this document.
Our conclusions, recommendations and opinions are based on an analysis of the observed site
conditions and the referenced literature. It should be understood that the conditions of a site can
change with time as a result of natural processes or the activities of man at the subject site or
nearby sites. In addition, changes to the applicable laws, regulations, codes, and standards of
practice may occur due to government action or the broadening of knowledge. The findings of
this report may, therefore, be invalidated over time, in part or in whole, by changes over which
Ninyo & Moore has no control.
This report is intended exclusively for use by the client. Any use or reuse of the findings, conclu-
sions and/or recommendations of this report by parties other than the client is undertaken at said
parties' sole risk.
19
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
14. PREPARERS OF REPORT
Peter D. Clark, REA 2984 Stephan A. Beck, RG 4375, CEG 1512
Project Environmental Geologist Manager, Environmental Sciences Division
15. AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS CONTACTED
County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health
Ms. Ermie Esquibel, Ms. Joan Swanson
San Diego Air Pollution Control District
Ms. Marcie Laudani
City of Carlsbad Fire Department
Mr. Mike Smith
City of Carlsbad Department of Planning and Zoning
Mr. Greg Fisher
San Diego Gas & Electric
Mr. Hal Larson, Mr. Dave Reed
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
Mr. Don Quinn
20 ty/nyo
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
16. REFERENCES
Aerial Fotobank, 1964 to 1997 (selected years), Historical aerial photographs of San Diego
County.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, 1994, Water Quality Con-
trol Plan for the San Diego Basin (9): dated September 8, amended October 13.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, 1997, List of Underground
Storage Tanks (LUST): dated September 10.
City of San Diego, Planning Department, Environmental Analysis Section, 1991, Significance
Determination Guidelines Under the California Environmental Act, January. Revised Janu-
ary 1994.
County of San Diego, Department of Public Works, 1928 (selected years), Historical Aerial Pho-
tographs of San Diego County.
County of San Diego, Department of Environmental Health, 1997, Site Assessment Listing: dated
April 2.
County of San Diego, Department of Environmental Health, 1997, Hazardous Materials Estab-
lishment Listing (HE17): dated April 2.
Kennedy & Tan, 1996, Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California,
CDMG Open File Report 96-02.
Kennedy, M.P. and Peterson, G.L., 1975, Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, Califor-
nia, California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 200, Plate 2 A.
Ninyo & Moore, 1998, Proposal for Geotechnical and Environmental Services, El Camino Real
Widening, Carlsbad, California: dated January 13.
Norris, R.M., and Webb, R.W., 1990, Geology of California, Second Edition: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
State of California, Department of Health Services, 1990, California Statewide Radon Survey:
Interim Results.
State of California, Department of Water Resources, 1967, Ground Water Occurrence and Qual-
ity, San Diego Region: dated June.
State of California, Division of Oil and Gas, Regional Wildcat Map, San Diego and Riverside
Counties, Wl-7, Dated February 27, 1993.
State of California, Department of Water Resources, 1967, Ground Water Occurrence and Qual-
ity, San Diego Region: dated June.
3635-02R.DOC 21
RECON June 4, 1998
El Camino Real Road Widening Project, Carlsbad Project No. 103635-02
State of California, Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, 1990, Well Inves-
tigation Program (AB1803): dated July.
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation and Forest Service, 1973, Soil Sur-
vey, San Diego Area, California: dated December.
United States Geological Survey, 1968, San Luis Rey, California: 7.5-minute series (topographic),
Scale 1:24,000: photorevised 1975.
Vista Information Solutions, Inc., 1998, Site Assessment Plus Report Number 103635-02: dated
May 5.
30M2R.DOC
**<fjs V "'-"-' g -LJ 1 flj V^ <f L_ Q \-
^v^nF^s^wiL^
/' CARLSBAD
J: 5|^|-|l ?g.%
j^ | ^iwufffciT' vi"'.^^_ _f 'fJL'J^- -
REFERENCE: 1997 Thomas Guide for San Diego County, Street Guide and Directory
0 2400 4800
Approximate Scale in Feet
NORTH
SITE LOCATION MAP
EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING
STATION 441+00 453+00
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
/" PROJECT NO.
\^ 103635-02
DATE ^
6/98 J
FIGURE
2000 0 2000 4000
Approximate Scale in Feet
REFERENCE: U.S.G.S., SAN LUIS REY QUADRANGLE, 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) MAP, DATED 1955, REVISED 1971.
N
A
if
i
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING
STATION 441+00 TO 453+00
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
PROJECT NO.
103635-02
DATE
6/98 X FIGURE >
2 )
E
- To:Mr. Don Quinn Fax:
Transmittal
(714)560-4603
Firm: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners Telephone: (714) 560-4940
Address: 1100 Town and Country Road, Orange, California 92869
From: Peter David Clark Total Pages:
Re:Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines Date:5/19/98
Document Name: Request for Information Project Number: 103635-02
0 Urgent
Original Document:
D For Approval
D Will Not Follow
0 For Your Use
0 Will Follow
0 Please Reply
D By U.S. Mail
D As Requested
D By Other
I am conducting a hazardous materials study for the planned road widening of El Camino Real in the City of
Carlsbad, California. I am working for Recon, Inc. and the City of Carlsbad. The site is approximately 1500
feet long and is located near the intersection of El Camino Real and Hidden Valley Road near Agua Hedionda
Creek (see attached site map). During the site reconnaissance two Santa fe Pacific pipelines were marked out
with paint on or near the road way. Potholes were observed on the south side of El Camino Real. I am
requesting the following information regarding the pipelines in the area of the site:
1) Date of installation of the pipelines, 2) location and approximate depths of the pipelines, 3) pipe diameter
and construction type, 4) leak detection, cathodic protection, hydrostatic pressure test or pipeline integrity
information regarding the pipelines, 5) type of products transported in pipelines, and 5) knowledge of leaks,
spills or releases in the general area of the road widening project.
Thank you for your time.
Peter David Clark
10225 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A-112, San Diego, CA 92121
Phone (619) 457-0400; Fax (619) 558-1236
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME
NAME
FAX
TEL
05/19/1998 14:30
NINYO & MOORE
6195870597
6194570400
DATE,TIME 05/19 14:29
FAX NO./NAME 17145604603
DURATION 00:01:28
PAGE(S) 02
RESULT OK
MODE STANDARD
ECM
KINDERfMORGAN
SFPP, L.P.
Operating Partnership
ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
p- "---"su
May 26, 1998
; 1598
,, ..... , __ ENG 4-2-1 (81.5 to 81.8 - 122)
>FiC£ (96.2 to 96.5 - 126)
Reference: 98-170-1
Peter David Clark
Ninyo & Moore
10225 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A-l 12
San Diego, Ca 92121
RE: Project No. 103635-02 Road Widening of El Camino Real Near
the Intersection of Hidden Valley Rd and Agua Hedionda Creek
Dear Ms. Callahan:
This is in reply to your transmittal fax of May 19,1998 requesting utility information in the
vicinity of the above referenced project in the City of Carlsbad, California.
SFPP, L.P.'s operates and/or maintains one active 16-inch high pressure refined petroleum
products pipeline and an idle 10-inch pipeline (presently under a nitrogen charge) within the
limits of the subject inquiry.
The pipelines are of welded steel construction, coated and under cathodic protection. The 16-inch
was installed in 1985 and the 10-inch was installed in 1962. Enclosed for your information is
one (1) copy each of Drawing LS-126, sheets 75 & 76 and LS-122, sheet 41 depicting the
general alignment of these pipelines within the subject area.
A hydrostatic pressure test was performed on both pipelines at time of construction before
placing them in service. The 16-inch pipeline was also internally inspected in 1996 in accordance
with provisions of the "California Pipeline Safety Act" as approved by the California State fire
Marshall.
The current leak detection system is based on the computerized surveillance of volumetric line
balance, pressure deviation and flow deviation. Plans are presently being formulated to have in
operation by the end of 1999, a new SCADA system that will enhance these leak detection
capabilities.
1100 Town & Country Road Orange, California 92868 714/560-4600 714/560-4601 Fax
Peter David Clark
May 26, 1998
Page 2
** Historical information does not indicate that a spill or release of product was experienced in the
m subject area.
^ If you have any questions concerning this matter I can be reached at (714) 560-4940 and please
** include the above file reference number on all correspondence.
Sincerely,
D. R. Quinn
Enclosures
DRQ/H:drq/letters/eng4-2-l/98-170-l
San Diego Gas & Electric
An Enova Company
8316 CENTURY PARK COURT • SAN DIEGO. CA 92123-1582 • 619/696-2000
FILE NO.
JuneS, 1998
Mr. Peter Clark
Ninyo & Moore Environmental Services
10225 Barnes Canyon Road. #A112
San Diego, Calif. 92121
Dear Mr. Clark;
This letter responds to your inquiry regarding any SDG&E-owned electric transformers
located along the SOUTH-SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL, AT THE INTERSECTION
OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD & EL CAMINO REAL, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. .
Our records indicate that there are presently three transformers in service at the above
location: SDG&E Station #783-435.
SDG&E has never specified PCB transformers for its electric distribution service.
Although only mineral oil transformers were purchased, some older (pre-1980) mineral
oil transformers were inadvertantly contaminated with PCB's by the manufacturer.
You are virtually assured that there are no PCB's in these mineral oil transformers. The
only way to know with certainty is by testing.
SDG&E is responsible for ensuring that its transformers comply with EPA regulations
governing PCB's, however, EPA regulations do not require the testing of individual
mineral oil transformers. Therefore, should you wish that done, there will be a charge if
the unit is confirmed to be non-PCB, and a electric service interruption may be necessary.
Please call me at (619) 654-8340 if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
Hal Larsen
Cust. Records Coord.
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
(EXTENDED BY 1/4 MILE)
PROPERTY
INFORMATION
Project Name/Ref #: 103635-02
Road widening
El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Latitude/Longitude: (33.149919, 117.297287 )
CLIENT
INFORMATION
Peter D. Clark
Ninyo and Moore
10225 Barnes Canyon Rd.
Suite A-1 12
San Diego, CA92121
Site Distribution Summary
Agency / Database - Type oF Records
A) Databases searched to 1 1/4 mile:
US EPA NPL National Priority List
US EPA CORRACTS RCRA Corrective Actions and
(TSD) associated TSD
STATE SPL State equivalent priority fet
STATE SCL State equivalent CERCLIS list
B) Databases searched to 3/4 mile:
US EPA CERCLIS / Sites currently or formerly under
NFRAP review by US EPA
US EPA TSD RCRA permitted treatment, storage,
disposal facilities
STATE REG LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
CO
STATE/ SWLF Permitted as solid waste landfills,
REG/CO incinerators, or transfer stations
STATE DEED RSTR Sites with deed restrictions
STATE CORTESE State index of properties with
hazardous waste
STATE TOXIC PITS Toxic Pits cleanup facilities
C) Databases searched to 1/2 mile:
US EPA RCRA Viol RCRA violations/enforcement
actions
US EPA TRIS Toxic Release Inventory database
STATE UST/AST Registered underground or
aboveground storage tanks
within 3/8
mite
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3/ato
1/2 mae
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7/2 to
3/4 mite
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
.
3/4 to
1 1/4 mite
0
0
0
0
_
.
.
-
_
-
-
_
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Version 2.5 Page #7
Site Distribution Summary
Agency / Database - Type of Records
within 3/8
mile
3/8 to
1/2 mile
1/2 to
3/4 mOe 11/4 mite
D) Databases searched to 3/8 mile:
US EPA ERNS Emergency Response Notification
System of spills
US EPA GNRTR RCRAregistered small or large
generators of hazardous waste
COUNTY HE17 SD County unauthorized release tist
This report meets the ASTM standard E-1527 for standard federal and state government database
research in a Phase I environmental site assessment. A (-} indicates a distance not searched
because it exceeds these ASTM search parameters.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Customer proceeds at Its own risk in choosing to rely on VISTA services, in whole or in part, prior to proceeding with any transaction.
VISTA cannot be an insurer or the accuracy of the information, errors occurring in conversion of data, or for customer's use of data.
VISTA and its affiliated companies, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors cannot be held liabte for accuracy,
storage, delivery, toss or expense suffered by customer resulting directly or indirectly from any information provided by VISTA.
NOTES
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5.1998
Version 2.5 Page /2
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
(EXTENDED BY 1/4 MILE)
Map of Sites within 11/4 Miles
Subject Site
Category:
Databases Searched to:
Single Sites
Multiple Sites
O
O
Highways and Major Roads
Roads
Railroads
Rivers or Water Bodies
Utilities
NPL, SPL,
CORRACTS
(TSD), SCL
CERCLIS\
NFRAP,
TSD, LUST,
SWLF
UST ERNS,
GENERATORS
For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403
Report ID: 103635002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Page if 3
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
(EXTENDED BY 1/4 MILE)
Map of Sites within 3/8 Mile
Subject Site
Category:
Databases Searched to:
Single Sites
Multiple Sites
Highways and Major Roads
Roads
Railroads
Rivers or Water Bodies
Utilities
NPL, SPL,
CORRACTS
(TSD), SCL
CERCLIS\
NFRAP,
TSD, LUST,
SWLF
UST
D
1/8 mi.
o
ERNS,
GENERATORS
For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403
Report ID: 103635002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Page #4
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
(EXTENDED BY 1/4 MILE)
Street Map
Highways and Major Roads
Roads
Railroads
Rivers or Water Bodies
Utilities
For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403
Report ID: 103635002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Page #5
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
(EXTENDED BY 1/4 MILE)
SITE INVENTORY
MAP
ID
1
2A
2B
2B
PROPERTY ANDTHE ADJACENT AREA
(within 3/8 mile)
VISTA ID
DISTANCE
DiRECTiON
STEINDORF PRODUCE 3492554
5003 EL CAMINO REAL ° °5 ^'
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
VALDIVIA FARM 4025665
491 5 EL CAMINO REAL 009/^
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
HENRY YADA 4286066
4901 EL CAMINO REAL a75 ^
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
YADA FARM 4045297
2928 VALLEYS! a75^
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
A
CL OQRRACTSflSD)ti
B
LL.
•3
LU
O
Q12 I|Q
8
CLo
XB
c
g
Sen
t/>
1
D
Z z LUX
X
X
X
X
MAP
ID
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA
(within 3/8 -1/2 mile)
VISTA ID
DISTANCE
DIRECTION
A
of
^v»fc
>2
i
8 ti O
B
o,
S2y
8 o i5
£
QLULUa GORfESE«2
a.
O
X2
c
n
iGRAiWU1
^
1
D
00
OfLU a LU
Z
No Records Found
MAP
ID
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA
(within 1 72-3/4 mile)
VISTA ID
DISTANCE
DIRECTION
A
etZ
^£
B
2
0o
_l S
B
a.
Ui
O
LU
O §
ft
1
1Of
g
LUi8
£
o
X2
c
g
^oOf
00 S1
D
t/>£
O ui
No Records Found
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5,1998
Page f6
MAP
ID
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA
(wfthin 3/4-1 1/4 mile)
VISTA ID
DISTANCE
Dwccrrcw
A
a.
SCOto{2
y
cc
8 £d
B
Q.
i^
CO
y
8 Q 1|
p.
Sa
tiia
8&
8
to
5Z
U
1
c
_l
>
3oat i
t>
1
D
aUl O LU
X
No Records Found
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5,1998
Page #7
UNMAPPED SITES
VfSEA (0
CARLSBAD 70700
CARLSBAD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
MAY BE ENCINITAS 4824647
E.END EL CAMINO REAL, N.OF VIA
ENCINITAS, CA
A
a.
Z coRRAct!fi 3
B
a.
2u.eERCUS/NX
a!2 g (/>
X DEEDRSTROO
a.
O
1
G
RCRftVtOi USt/AStiD
t/j
ZOfUl O Ul
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5,1998
Page f8
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
(EXTENDED BY 1/4 MILE)
DETAILS
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA {within 1/8 mile)
VISTA
Address?;SIEINDORF PRODUCE
5003 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
HE-17/SRC#4444
VISTA IDsfc
Distance/ Direction:
Ptotted as;
Agency ID:
3492554
0,05 Ml / SE
Point
H99160
Agency Address: STEINDORF PRODUCE3 J 5003 a CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD. CA 920083732
Business Type: Agency Code (K39)
Status:"UnknownO"
Notice of Violation Issued: NO
Inactive:YES permit Exp Date. UNKNOWN
Inspection Date: UNKNOWN Reinspection Date: MAY i. 1995
Map ID
1
VISTA VALDIVIA FARM
Address*: 4Q15 EL CAM|NO REAL
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
HE-17/SRC#4444
Agency Address:
Business Type:
Status:
Notice of Violation Issued:
Inactive: NO
Inspection Date: UNKNOWN
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 7727-37-9
Annual Qty (Units): * 20° <GAL)
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 684-76-346
Annual Qty (Units): 20°° (GAL)
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 8006-61-9
Annual Qty (Units): '°°° (GAL)
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
VISTA ID#; 4025665
Distance/Direction! 0.09 Ml / W
Plotted as; Point
Agency ID: H99153
VALDIVIA FARM
4915 a CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD, CA 920083731
Agency Code (K39)
"UnknownO"
NO
Permit Exp Date: UNKNOWN
Reinspection Date: SEPTEMBER i, 1996
LIQUID NITROGEN FERTILIZER
Qty Stored (Units) : 6°° <GAL)
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
DIESEL
Qty Stored (Units): 1°°° (GAL>
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
GASOLINE
Qty Stored (Units): 50° (GAL)
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
BRAVO (CHLOROTHALONIL)
Map ID
2A
* VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Page #9
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT.
C.A.S. #:
Annual Qty (Units):
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #:
Annual Qty (Units):
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #:
Annual Qty (Units):
Chemical Name:
7897-45-6
70 (GAL)
7727-37-9
5000 (LBS)
70265-92-6
0 (GAL)
Qty Stored (Units):
Carcinogen:
NOT REPORTED
DRY NITROGEN FERl
Qty Stored (Units):
Carcinogen:
NOf REPORTED
METHAMIDOPHOS-MONITOR 4
Qty Stored (Units):
Carcinogen:
NOT REPORTED
5 (GAL)
NO
500 (LBS)
NO
2 (GAL)
NO
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8 -1/4 mile)
VISTA HENRY YADA
Address*: 4goi £L CAMjNO REAL
CAR1SBAD, CA 92008
HE-17/SRC#4444
Agency Address:
Business Type:
Status:
Notice of Violation Issued:
Inactive: wo
Inspection Date: UNKNOWN
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 7727-37-9
Annual Qty (Units) : 200 (GAL)
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 7727-37-9
Annual Qty (Units): 6°°° <"«;
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 8006-67-9
Annual Qty (Units): ° (GAL>
Chemical Name:
VISTA ID*
Dista nee/Direction:
Plotted as:
Agency ID:
4286066
0.15 Ml /W
Point
H99286
SAME AS ABOVE
Agency Code (K39)
"UnknownO"
NO
Permit Exp Date: UNKNOWN
Reinspection Date: FEBRUARY i. 7998
LIQUID NITROGEN FERTILIZER
Qty Stored (Units) : 40° (GAL>
Carcinogen: wo
NOT REPORTED
DRY FERTILIZER
Qty Stored (Units): 14°° (LBS)
Carcinogen: wo
NOT REPORTED
GASOLINE
Qty Stored (Units) : 50° (GAL>
Carcinogen: NO
NOJ REPORTED
Map- ID
2B
* VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Page #70
SITES 1NTHE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8 -1/4 mile) CONL
VISTA YADA FARM
Address*: £928 VALUY ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
HE-17/SRC#4444
Agency Address:
Business Type:
Status:
Notice of Violation Issued:
Inactive: NO
Inspection Date: UNKNOWN
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 7727-37-9
Annual Qty (Units) : 24°° (GAL>
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 7727-37-9
Annual Qty (Units) : 200° (LBS>
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 733-06-2
Annual Qty (Units): 5(LBS)
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 7897-45-6
Annual Qty (Units): 7<GAL)
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 7970-42-5
Annual Qty (Units): 2 <GAL)
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 86-50-0
Annual Qty (Units): 5 (LBS>
Chemical Name:
Chemical Name:
C.A.S. #: 23735-22-0
Annual Qty (Units): ' <GAL)
Chemical Name:
VISTA ID#: 4045291
Distance/Direction: O.I 5 Ml / W
Ptotled as: Point
Agency ID: H99088
YADA FARM
2928 VALLEY ST
CARLSBAD, CA 920087752
"Inventory Only"
"Unknownf)"
NO
Permit Exp Date: UNKNOWN
Reinspection Date: FEBRUARY 7, 7998
LIQUID NITROGEN FERTILIZER
Qty Stored (Units): 40° (GAL>
Carcinogen: wo
NOT REPORTED
DRY FERTILIZER
Qty Stored (Units): 5°°(LBS)
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
CAPTAN
Qty Stored (Units): 25«-BS)
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
BRAVO (CHLOROTHALONIL)
Qty Stored (Units): 2<GAL)
Carcinogen: wo
NOT REPORTED
GRAMOXONE 37 %
Qty Stored (Units): 4 (GAL>
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
GUTHION 50 % AZINPHOS
Qty Stored (Units): W<LBS>
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
OXAMYL VYDATEL
Qty Stored (Units): 3(GAL>
Carcinogen: NO
NOT REPORTED
Map ID
2B
* VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Version 2.5 Page/11
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (withfn 1/8 - 1/4 mile) CONL
HE-17/SRC#4444
Agency Address:
Business Type:
Status:
Notice of Violation Issued:
Inactive: yfs
Inspection Date: DECEMBER 26. 7997
| Agency ID:
YADA FARM
4901 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD. CA 920087121
"Inventory Only"
"UnknownO"
NO
Permit Exp Date: UNKNOWN
Reinspection Date: DECEMBER t
H99089
7992
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 -1/2 mile)
No Records Found
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/2 - 1 mile)
No Records Found
* VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Page /72
UNMAPPED SITES
VISTA CARLSBAD
Address*; CARL$BAD
CARISBAD.CA 92008
Financial Type: Date
VISTA ID#i 70700
: Financial Amount ($):
ACTUAL OBLIGATION AUGUST 18. 1982 894
ACTUAL OBLIGATION MARCH 78. 7983 686
COST RECVRY DECSN DOCMT NO SUE FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT NOT REPORTED
EPA Region:
Congressional District:
Federal Facility:
Facility Ownership:
Site Incident Category:
Federal Facility Docket:
NPL Status:
Incident Type:
Proposed NPL Update #:
Final NPL Update f :
Financial Management System ID:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Lat/Long Source:
Lat/Long Accuracy:
Dioxin Tier:
USGS Hydro Unit:
RCRA Indicator:
Unit Id:
Unit Name:
Type. IMMEDIATE REMOVAL
Qualifier: CLEANUP
Name: IMMEDIATE REMOVAL
Plan Status: PRIMARY
9
43
NOT A FEDERAL FACILITY
PRIVATE
ABANDONED
SITE IS NOT INCLUDED ON THE DOCKET
NOT ON NPL
NON-OIL SPILL
0
0
09U1
3309360
77727000
GENERATED BY THE GEOGRAPH DATABASE
Unknown
Unknown
0
Unknown
0
ENTIRE SITE
Lead Agency: COASTGUARD
Category: unknown
Actual Start Date: UNKNOWN
Actual Completion UNKNOWN
Date:
* VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Version 2.5 Page /13
UNMAPPED SITES CONT.
VISTA
Address*MAYBEENCINITAS
LEND EL CAMINO REAL, N.OF VIA
ENCINITAS, CA
VISTA ID#;4824647
JWMUDS / SRC* 3938 Agency ID:9370116NUR
Agency Address:
Solid Waste Inventory System ID:
Facility Type:
Facility In State Board Waste Discharger
System:
Chapter 15 Facility:
Solid Waste Assessment Test Facility:
Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Facility:
RCRA Facility:
Department of Defense Facility:
Open To Public:
Number Of Waste Management Units:
Rank:
Enforcements At Facility:
Violations At Facility:
SAME AS ABOVE
NOT REPORTED
Not reported
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
1
73
NO
WO
* VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Page f!4
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
(EXTENDED BY 1/4 MILE)
DESCRIPTION OF DATABASES SEARCHED
A) DATABASES SEARCHED T01 MILE
NPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1.25 mile of your
SRC#: 3622 property.
The agency release date for NPL was January, 1998.
The National Priorities List (NPL) is the EPA's database of uncontrolled or abandoned
hazardous waste sites identified for priority remedial actions under the Superfund
program. A site must meet or surpass a predetermined hazard ranking system score,
be chosen as a state's top priority site, or meet three specific criteria set jointly by the
US Dept of Health and Human Services and the US EPA in order to become an NPL
site.
SPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1.25 mile of your
SRC#: 4544 property.
The agency release date for Calsites Database: Annual Workplan Sites was January,
1998.
This database is provided by the Cal. Environmental Protection Agency, Dept. of
Toxic Substances Control. The agency may be contacted at: 916-323-3400.
SCL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1.25 mile of your
SRC#: 4543 property.
The agency release date for Calsites Database: All Sites except Annual Workplan
Sites (incl. ASPIS) was January, 1998.
This database is provided by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. The
agency may be contacted at: .
The CalSites database includes both known and potential sites. Two- thirds of these
sites have been classified, based on available information, as needing "No Further
Action" (NFA) by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. The remaining sites are
in various stages of review and remediation to determine if a problem exists at the
site. Several hundred sites have been remediated and are considered certified.
Some of these sites may be in long term operation and maintenance.
CORRACTS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1.25 mile of your
SRC#: 4244 property.
The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was October, 1997.
The EPA maintains this database of RCRA facilities which are undergoing "corrective
action". A "corrective action order" is issued pursuant to RCRA Section 3008 (h) when
there has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment
from a RCRA facility. Corrective actions may be required beyond the facility's
boundary and can be required regardless of when the release occurred, even if it
predates RCRA.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Version 2.5 Page /75
B) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/2 MILE
CERCLIS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRCf: 4465 The agency release date for CERCLIS was February, 1998.
The CERCLIS List contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National
Priorities List(NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for
possible inclusion on the NPL. The information on each site includes a history of all
pre-remedial, remedial, removal and community relations activiies or events at the
site, financial funding information for the events, and unrestricted enforcement
activities.
Cal Cerclis VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 2462 The agency release date for Ca Cerclis w/Regional Utility Description was June, 1995.
This database is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.
The agency may be contacted at:. These are regional utility descriptions for
California CERCLIS sites.
NFRAP VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4466 The agency release date for CERCLIS-NFRAP was February, 1998.
NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination
was found, contamination was removed quickly, or the contamination was not
serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration.
RCRA-TSD VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4244 The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was October, 1997.
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The
RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report
generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA
TSDs are facilities which treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste.
SWLF VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4424 The agency release date for Ca Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) was January,
1998.
This database is provided by the Integrated Waste Management Board. The agency
may be contacted at: 916-255-4021.
The California Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database consists of both open
as well as closed and inactive solid waste disposal facilities and transfer stations
pursuant to the Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972,
Government Code Section 2.66790(b). Generally, the California Integrated Waste
Management Board learns of locations of disposal facilities through permit
applications and from local enforcement agencies.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at i - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Version 2.5 Page #76
WMUDS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 3938 The agency release date for Waste Management Unit Database System (WMUDS) was
May, 1997.
This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board. The agency
may be contacted at: 916-892-0323. This is used for program tracking and inventory
of waste management units. This system contains information from the following
eight main databases: Facility, Waste Management Unit, SWAT Program Information,
SWAT Report Summary Information, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15), TPCA
Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information; also some
information from the WDS (Waste Discharge System). This database con
The WMUDS system also accesses information from the following databases from the
Waste Discharger System (WDS): Inspections, Violations, and Enforcements. The sites
contained in these databases are subject to the California Code of Regulations -
Title 23. Waters.
LUST VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 3273 The agency release date for Region #9-SLIC List was August, 1996.
This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #9.
The agency may be contacted at: 619-467-2975.
LUST VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4548 The agency release date for Lust Information System (LUSTIS) was February, 1998.
This database is provided by the California Environmental Protection Agency. The
agency may be contacted at: 916-445-6532.
LUST RG7 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4416 The agency release date for Region #7-Colorado River Basin Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Listing was November, 1997.
This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #1.
The agency may be contacted at: 760-346-7491.
LUST RG9 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRCf: 4420 The agency release date for Region #9 Leaking Underground Storage Tank List was
December, 1997.
This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #9.
The agency may be contacted at: 619-467-2975.
HE17 LUST VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4444 The agency release date for San Diego County Environmental Health Services
Database-LUST Sites was January, 1998.
This database is provided by the San Diego County Dept. of Health Services. It
contains information concerning any sites which fall under the jurisdiction of this
agency. Cases classified as Releases appear under "County Lust" in this report
regardless of the "Cause" or "Case Type". Sites classified as USTs appear under
"County UST", and Solid Waste facilities appear under "County SWLF". Sites with
violation and/or disclosure information are reported under "SDC Site" in this VISTA
report.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Version 2.5 Page f 17
CORTESE VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 2298 The agency release date for Cortese List-Hazardous Waste Substance Site List was
February, 1995.
This database is provided by the Office of Environmental Protection, Office of
Hazardous Materials. The agency may be contacted at: 916-445-6532.
The California Governor's Office of Planning and Research annually publishes a listing
of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites throughout the State of California
under Government Code Section 65962.5. This database (CORTESE) is based on
input from the following: (l)CALSITES-Department of Toxic Substances Control,
Abandoned Sites Program Information Systems; (2)SARA Title III Section III Toxic
Chemicals Release Inventory for 1987,1988, 1989, and 1990; (3)FINDS;
(4)HWIS-Department of Toxic Substances Control, Hazardous Waste Information
System. Vista has not included one time generator facilities from Cortese in our
database.; (S)SWRCB-State Water Resources Control Board; (6)SWIS-lntegrated
Waste Management Control Board (solid waste facilities); (7)AGT25-Air Resources
Board, dischargers of greater than 25 tons of criteria pollutants to the air; (8)A1025-Air
Resources Board, dischargers of greater than 10 and less than 25 tons of criteria
pollutants to the air; (9)LTANK-SWRCB Leaking Underground Storage Tanks;
(10)UTANK-SWRCB Underground tanks reported to the SWEEPS systems;
(ll)IUR-lnventory Update Rule (Chemical Manufacturers); (12)WB-LF-Waste Board -
Leaking Facility, site has known migration; (13)WDSE-Waste Discharge System -
Enforcement Action; (14)DTSCD-Department of Toxic Substance Control Docket.
VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
The agency release date for Deed Restriction Properties Report was April, 1994.
This database is provided by the Department of Health Services-Land Use and Air
Assessment. The agency may be contacted at: 916-323-3376. These are voluntary
deed restriction agreements with owners of property who propose building
residences, schools, hospitals, or day care centers on property that is "on or within
2,000 feet of a significant disposal of hazardous waste".
California has a statutory and administrative procedure under which the California
Department of Health Services (DHS) may designate real property as either a
"Hazardous Waste Property" or a "Border Zone Property" pursuant to California Health
Safety Code Sections 25220-25241. Hazardous Waste Property is land at which
hazardous waste has been deposited, creating a significant existing or potential
hazard to public health and safety. A Border Zone Property is one within 2,000 feet of
a hazardous waste deposit. Property within either category is restricted in use, unless
a written variance is obtained from DHS. A Hazardous Waste Property designation
results in a prohibition of new uses, other than a modification or expansion of an
industrial or manufacturing facility on land previously owned by the facility prior to
January 1, 1981. A Border Zone Property designation results in prohibition of a variety
of uses involving human habitation, hospitals, schools and day care center.
Toxic Pits VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 3/4 mile of your property.
SRC#: 2229 The agency release date for Summary of Toxic Pits Cleanup Facilities was February,
1995.
This database is provided by the Water Quality Control Board, Division of Loans
Grants. The agency may be contacted at: 916-227-4396.
Deed
Restrictions
SRC#: 1703
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Version 2.5 Page *18
C) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/4 MILE
RCRA-Vlols/Enf VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was October, 1997.
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The
RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report
generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA
Violators are facilities which have been cited for RCRA Violations at least once since
1980. RCRA Enforcements are enforcement actions taken against RCRA violators.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 573 The agency release date for Fullerton Underground Storage Tank List was June, 1992.
This database is provided by the Fullerton Fire Department. The agency may be
contacted at:; Caution-Many states do not require registration of heating oil tanks,
especially those used for residential purposes.
USFs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 /2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 1612 The agency release date for Underground Storage Tank Registrations Database was
January, 1994.
This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board, Office of
Underground Storage Tanks. The agency may be contacted at: 916-227-4337;
Caution-Many states do not require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those
used for residential purposes.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 3945 The agency release date for Alameda County UST List was June, 1997.
This database is provided by the Department of Environmental Health. The agency
may be contacted at: 510-567-6713; Caution-Many states do not require registration
of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
USFs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4415 The agency release date for San Bernardino County UST List was December, 1997.
This database is provided by the San Bernardino County Fire Department,
Hazardous Materials Division. The agency may be contacted at: 909-387-3200;
Caution-Many states do not require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those
used for residential purposes.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4419 The agency release date for Sutler County UST Owner List was November, 1997.
This database is provided by the Sutler County Agricultural Department. The agency
may be contacted at: 916-822-7504; Caution-Many states do not require registration
of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4431 The agency release date for Riverside County UST List was January, 1998.
This database is provided by the Riverside County Environmental Health. The agency
may be contacted at: 909-358-5055; Caution-Many states do not require registration
of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Version 2.5 Page/19
USFs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 /2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4441 The agency release date for Los Angeles County UST "Street Number" Book was
November, 1997.
This database is provided by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Words,
Environmental Programs. The agency may be contacted at: 818-458-3514;
Caution-Many states do not require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those
used for residential purposes.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 112 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4444 The agency release date for San Diego County Environmental Health Services
Database-UST Sites was January, 1998.
This database is provided by the San Diego County Department of Health Services.
The agency may be contacted at: 619-338-2268; Caution-Many states do not
require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4552 The agency release date for Ventura County "BWT (Business, Waste, Tanks) List was
February, 1998.
This database is provided by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. The
agency may be contacted at: 805-654-2813; Caution-Many states do not require
registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4576 The agency release date for San Francisco Current Active UST List was February, 1998.
This database is provided by the San Francisco Department of Health. The agency
may be contacted at: 415-252-3900; Caution-Many states do not require registration
of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
USTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4582 The agency release date for Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing was February, 1998.
This database is provided by the Kern County Environmental Health Department. The
agency may be contacted at: 805-862-8700; Caution-Many states do not require
registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
HE17 UST VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4444 The agency release date for San Diego County Environmental Health Services
Database-LUST Sites was January, 1998.
This database is provided by the San Diego County Dept. of Health Services. It
contains information concerning any sites which fall under the jurisdiction of this
agency. Cases classified as Releases appear under "County Lust" in this report
regardless of the "Cause" or "Case Type". Sites classified as USTs appear under
"County UST", and Solid Waste facilities appear under "County SWLF". Sites with
violation and/or disclosure information are reported under "SDC Site" in this VISTA
report.
ASTs VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 4320 The agency release date for Aboveground Storage Tank Database was December,
1997.
This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board. The agency
may be contacted at: 916-227-4364.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002
Version 2.5
Date of Report: May 5, 1998
Page f20
TRIS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 3716 The agency release date for TRIS was December, 1996.
Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (also
known as SARA Title III) of 1986 requires the EPA to establish an inventory of Toxic
Chemicals emissions from certain facilities( Toxic Release Inventory System). Facilities
subject to this reporting are required to complete a Toxic Chemical Release
Form(Form R) for specified chemicals.
D) DATABASES SEARCHED T01/8 MILE
ERNS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within .375 mile of your
SRC#:4144 property.
The agency release date for was September, 1997.
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national database used to
collect information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. The
database contains information from spill reports made to federal authorities
including the EPA, the US Coast Guard, the National Response Center and the
Department of transportation. A search of the database records for the period
October 1986 through September 1997 revealed information regarding reported
spills of oil or hazardous substances in the stated area.
RCRA-LgGen VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within .375 mile of your
SRC#: 4244 property.
The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was October, 1997.
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The
RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report
generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA
Large Generators are facilities which generate at least 1000 kg./month of
non-acutely hazardous waste (or 1 kg./month of acutely hazardous waste).
RCRA-SmGen VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within .375 mile of your
SRC#: 4244 property.
The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was October, 1997.
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The
RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report
generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA
Small and Very Small generators are facilities which generate less than 1000
kg./month of non-acutely hazardous waste.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Version 2.5 Page f2 7
San Diego VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within .375 mile of your
HE17 property.
SRC#: 4444 The agency release date for San Diego County Environmental Health Services
Database-LUST Sites was January, 1998.
This database is provided by the San Diego County Dept. of Health Services. It
contains information concerning any sites which fall under the jurisdiction of this
agency. Cases classified as Releases appear under "County Lust" in this report
regardless of the "Cause" or "Case Type". Sites classified as USTs appear under
"County LIST", and Solid Waste facilities appear under "County SWLF". Sites with
violation and/or disclosure information are reported under "SDC Site" in this VISTA
report.
End of Report
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 103635-002 Date of Report: May 5,1998
Version 2.5 Page #22
05/13/1998 09:38 6195870597 NINVO S MOORE PAGE 05
OFFICE USE ONLY
Request # -S~- f £
REQUEST TO REVIEW DEH RECORDS
rtf&Moare__^T
IgCeunty of 8«n Diego
D*fUitm*m of Environmental Health
P.O. Box 83261
f*San Ol«go, CA 9218S-5261
L(S19) 438-2268
FAX (*1») 338-2377
fif/nyi
Geotechnlcal & Environmental Sciences Consultants
Geotechnlcal Engineering Peter D. Clark
Environmental Assessment sgnior Staff Environmental Geologist
Regulatory Compliance
Materials Testing
HyOrogeotogy
Geology
10225 Barnes Canyon Ro»d • SuiteA-112 • SsnDltgo. California 92121
Phone(6)9)457-O400 - F»x(&19| 558-1236
"A request Is hereby made to review Department of Environmenta Health (DEH) records, as indicated below for the following reason:
Si
Signature Title Date
separate form must be completed for each file/address. Each request is limited to a MAXIMUM OF 5 addresses.
Establishment Name EXACT Address/City REQUIRED Zip Code REQUIRED File # (Optional)
(No Street Ranges Accepted) -r•—
- ,.
tarYPE OF INFORMATION REQUESTED (Check as many aslpply) Must be checked.
0? JB1
D
Ro«m« ln*p««ion Tan«: Romoval Tank InsteJIaSon/ Corrtamination Emergency Complaint Monitoring Weils
Permit Ra Repiping F"88 Retpons* APN#
(Must Provide)
m':^^:m^B^
Files checked for
• Confidential Information
• By/Data:
Hff ATf NT#TS /^/OfJ^'HIRT#«
Time:
!•
Research Pulling,
Initials
thecking Misc.
Initials
Initials
Initials
reviewed by:
hotocopies
of Date:.
Cost Paid
Photocopies picked-up/mailed on .By.
Date Name
E . .
A review of records has been conducted and HMMD finria PIU record of the files you requested for this site.
Signature Title Dale
tl C/9m//Vo RtftL
COUNTY OF SON DIEGO COMPLIANCE INSPECTION! REPORT ROUTE 039
*M KOZ 06/26/95 H 9 9 1 S 3
INVENTORY
MAX QTY ANN QTY UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
001
CAS NO; 7727-37-9 60O 1.200 GALS AN1
LIQUID NITROGEN FERTILIZER 2_ X- "3 *=>£?
HAZARD CAT 1: CORROSIVE HAZARD CAT 2: ( ' **/
FIELD NOTE:
MAX QTY ANN QTY UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
002
CAS NO: 6SH--76-34-6 1.000 2.000 GALS DM5
DIESEL
HAZARD CAT 1: FIRE HAZARD HAZARD CAT 2; & ^~ V.
FIELD NOTE:
MAX QTYr» ANN OTY 1 UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
003
CAS NO: 8006-61-9 ~* -KS- -5STTT GALS DM5
GASOLINE
HAZARD CAT 1: FIRE HAZARD HAZARD CAT 2: ^ 4" p
FIELD NOTE;
MAX QTY ANN QTY UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
OOH-
CAS NO: 1897-H-5-6
BRAVO
10 GALS DPI VES
HAZARD CAT 1: DELAYD HLTH HAZARD HAZARD CAT 2: IMMED HEALTH HAZRD
FIELD NOTE:
HEen-20-oi PAGE 3
COUNTY OF SON DIEGO COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT ROUTE 099
K02 OS/2B/95 H 9 9 1 5 3
DOS
CBS NO: 7727-37-9 500 5.000 L8S BA
DRV NITROGEN PERT
HAZARD CAT 1: IMMED HEALTH HAZRD HAZARD CAT 2: OTHER
FIELD NOTE:
f i jp\ {*) £.£^' ^7 *~) /* ^) f^) *~JCAS NO: / L/ *- &lz? ** 6 *— — <^ X-j ^ ^~
/ / t f /
CHEMICAL NAME: /V/^'/t'1 ^? *V» ICf £> & If) 6 5 — A/lOlA. f ( & V~ ^T~^ A ;
HAZARD CAT 1: C^ "^ HAZARD CAT 2: C^^f-
FIELD NOTE:
HE2H-20-01 PACE H-
-FOR OFFICE OSE ONLY—
HH ESTAB NUMBER CENSUS TR/INC CODE
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
VRTHENT OF AGRICULTURE/WEIGHTS AND MEA vS
5555 u/ERLAND AVE.. BUM. 3, SAN DIEGO, CA 92^3-1292
PHONE: (619) 694-2739
H
BUS CODE UNITS ANNUAL FEE EXPIR DATE(M-DAY)
T 2ZS
SIC-l
21
SIC-2 FIRE
28 31 35 41
WATER SEWER ZONING MAP'ON FILE STATUS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
T T T
53 55 57 59
D
61
T
62 64
-%LEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING SECTION-
ESTABLISHMENT OWNER NAME (AREA)
^AUJ^iJoi 'vVi'.l'Vr'i1..1 i i i i i i i i i i i
OWNER PHONE
'4
.SPtBLISHMENT ADDRESS:
iEt NUMBER
104
DIRECTION STREET NAME BLDG/SUITE
125 127 147
STATE ZIP CODE (AREA) BUSINESS PHONE
166 168.177
ECOND NAME OR NAME OF MANAGEMENT COMPANY:
87
AILING ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM ESTABLISHMENT ADDRESS):
TP.ET NUMBER DIRECTION STREET NAME BLDG/SUITE
228 230 250
STATE ZIP CODE
269 271
S^BLISHMENT NAME:GAS STATION
YES - 1
OTHER - 2
314
FOR APPLICATION:
1 - NEW 3 - OWNER CHANGE
2 - RE-OPEN
AME OF PREVIOUS OWNER
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES:IF OTHER, LIST TYPE OF BUSINESS:
DATE BUS ASSUMED
IP
16
OtyfiACT PERSON
346
ALL APPLICANTS PLEASE COMPLETE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTARY FORMS•i
DECLARE UNDER PENA1ELOF PERJURY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE STATEMENTS MADE
Rfft. I HEREBXONSENT TO ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS MADE PURSUANT TO LAW AND INCIDENTAL TO TH^ IS
THE OPERATION, OF THIS BUSINESS.
\
IN ARE CORRECT AMI
ICEf'OF THIS PERMIT
Ut|ftQ24D
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
•• K02
•• HENRY YADA
H-901
CARLSBAD
EL CAMINO REAL
92008-
I
COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
01/25/96
MOIL TO : HENRY YADA
1835
CARLSBAD
ROUTE 099
H 9 9 2 8 6
P"
BUENA VISTA WAY
CA 92008
CONTACTi HENRY YADA
PHONE : 7CO OOSH
OWNER : HENRY YADA
FIRE DISTRICT: 02 CDF DISTRICT:
INSPECTION;
12/09/92 BETSCHART
09/12/94- BETSCHART
09/18/95
2/3/77
/ f BP ACCEPTANCE DATE
HISTORY
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
SIC1:SIC2: K39
M> PERMIT STAFF:
C3 DEACTIVATE
C3 DUPLICATE EST-MUM
«•
Ci AGENCY LETTERCS3:
C3 NOTICE ISSUED
C3 COMPLAINT INSPECTION
__ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
POP-UP;
TO SPECIALIST:FOR:
HE2H-20-01 PACE
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT ROUTE 099
•M K02 Ol/ES/96 H 3 9 £ 8 6
EMERGEMCV RESPONSE INFORMATION
001 NAME: HENRY YADA
WORK PHONE: 720-062*
ADDRESS: 1835 BUENA VISTA WAV CARLSBAD
NAME:
WORK PHONE:
ADDRESS:
TITLE: OWNER
HOME PHONE: 819-720 - 062*
PROCESS DATE: 07-09-93
TITLE:
HOME PHONE:
PROCESS DATE:
HE2H-20-01 PACE Z
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT ROUTE 099
K0a 01/25/96 H 9 9 2 S S
INVENTORY
MAX QTY ANN QTY P^ UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
001
4LQQ. '
CAS NO: 7727-37-9 1-00 3 aa. - GB
LIQUID NITROGEN FERTILIZER
HAZARD CAT it IMMED HEALTH HAZRD HAZARD CAT 2:
LS AN1
OTHER
FIELD NOTE:
MAX QTV ANN QTY / UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
003
CAS NO; 8006-61-9_
GASOLINE
500 GALS AS1
HAZARD CAT 1: FIRE HAZARD HAZARD CAT 2: IMMED HEALTH HAZRD
FIELD NOTE:
MAX QTY ANN QTY UMTT STR MSDS CON CAR
CAS NO:
CHEMICAL NAME:
HAZARD CAT 1: " HAZARD CAT 2:
FIELD NOTEs
HE24-20-01 PAGE 3
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
mm K02
— HENRY YADA
4-901
CARLSBAD
EL CAMINO REAL
92008-
COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
06/27/95
MAXL TO : HENRY YADA
1835
CARLSBAD
ROUTE 099
H 9 9 2 8 6
BUENA VISTA UAY
CA 92008
CONTACT: HENRY YADA
PHONE
OWNER : HENRY YADA
FIRE DISTRICT: 02 CDF DISTRICT:
INSPECTION;
HISTORY
SITE:
12/09/92 BETSCHART
09/12/9H- BETSCHART
/ / BP ACCEPTANCE, DATE
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
SIC1:SIC2-. K39
P. PERMIT STAFF;
C3 DEACTIVATE
mm
C3 DUPLICATE EST-NUM
•M
C3 AGENCY LETTERCS3:
C) NOTICE ISSUED
CJ COMPLAINT INSPECTION
_ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
POP-UP;
TO SPECIALIST:FOR:
HE2S-20-01 PAGE
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO COMPLIANCE INSPECTION! REPORT ROUTE 093
K02 06/27/35 H 9 9 2 8 6
INVENTORY
MAX QTV ANN QTV UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
001
CAS NO: 7727-37-9 H-00 200 GALS AN1
LIQUID NITROGEN FERTILIZER
HAZARD CAT 1: IMMED HEALTH HAZRD HAZARD CAT 2: OTHER
FIELD NOTE:
MAX QTY ANN QTY UNIT STR MSDS COM CAR
002
CAS NO-. 7727-37-9 l.H-OO 6.000 LBS BA
DRY FERTILIZER
HAZARD CAT 1: IMMED HEALTH HAZRD HAZARD CAT 2:
FIELD NOTE:
MAX QTY ANN QTV ~f UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
003
o/TCAS NO: 8006-61-9 500 ^OOB'l GALS AS1
GASOLINE
HAZARD CAT 1: FIRE HAZARD HAZARD CAT 2: IMMED HEALTH HAZRD
FIELD NOTE:
MAX QTY ANN QTY UNIT STR MSDS CON CAR
CAS NO:
CHEMICAL NAME:
HAZARD CAT It ' HAZARD CAT 2:
FIELD NOTE:
HE2H-20-01 PAGE 3
BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT
FOR THE
EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING PROJECT
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
Prepared by
WENDY E.LOEFFLER
BIOLOGIST
RECON NUMBER 3018B
SEPTEMBER 18,1998
4241 Jutland Drive. Suite 201
San Diego. CA 92117-3663
619/270-5066 fax 270-5414
This document printed on recycled paper
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Findings 1
Introduction 1
Survey Methods 4
Existing Conditions 4
A. Topography and Soils 4
B. Botany 5
C. Zoology 12
D. Sensitive Biological Resources 12
Project Impacts 25
A. Proposed Project 25
B. Reduced Impact Alternative 29
Mitigation Measures 29
A. Proposed Project 32
B. Reduced Impact Alternative 33
References Cited 34
FIGURES
1: Regional location of the project 2
2: Project location 3
3: Existing plant communities and sensitive plant species 6
4: Reduced impact alternative 30
TABLES
1: Plant Species Observed 7
2: Wildlife Species Observed/Detected on the El Camino Real Road Widening Site 13
3: Sensitive Plant Species Observed or with the Potential for Occurrence 15
4: Sensitivity Codes 17
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
TABLES (cont)
5: Sensitive Wildlife Species Known (or Potentially Occurring) 20
6: Proposed Project Impacts 27
7: Reduced Impact Alternative Impacts 31
ATTACHMENT
1: Wetland Delineation Report
Summary of Findings
As proposed, the project would significantly impact the following sensitive habitats:
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub (0.74 acre), alkali marsh (0.04 acre), and disturbed
mule fat scrub (0.32 acre). Permanent impacts to these habitats would be 0.47 acre of
coastal sage scrub, 0.03 acre of alkali marsh, and 0.10 acre of disturbed mule fat scrub.
Temporary impacts would be 0.27 acre of disturbed coastal sage scrub, 0.01 acre of alkali
marsh, and 0.22 acre of disturbed mule fat scrub. No sensitive plant or animal species
were observed within the project boundaries.
An alternative to the project design has been proposed to reduce the length of the
southbound right-turn lane and is acceptable to the City. This alternative would eliminate
the impact to alkali marsh and reduce impacts to disturbed coastal sage scrub to 0.35 acre.
Under this alternative, the project would result hi no impacts to alkali marsh, the same
impacts to disturbed mule fat scrub as the proposed project, and 0.06 acre of temporary
impacts and 0.29 acre of permanent impacts to disturbed coastal sage scrub.
Mitigation for impacts to disturbed coastal sage scrub will be accomplished through the
restoration and enhancement of temporarily impacted areas and revegetation of newly
manufactured slopes for a total of 0.39 acre of restored Diegan coastal sage scrub.
Significant permanent impacts to 0.13 acre of alkali marsh and disturbed mule fat scrub
will be mitigated by restoration of 0.09 acre of eucalyptus woodland to mule fat scrub and
by the restoration of 0.04 acre off-site to 0.01 acre of mule fat scrub and 0.03 acre of
alkali marsh. Significant temporary impacts to 0.23 acre of these types of habitat will be
mitigated by restoration of the area impacted to the original condition, or to a higher
quality habitat.
For the proposed project, impacts to alkali marsh would require a Section 404 permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). A Section 1601 agreement with the
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) would be required for impacts to alkali
marsh and disturbed mule fat scrub. The disturbed mule fat scrub does not meet USAGE
criteria for jurisdictional waters or wetlands. The alternative with reduced impacts may
require a Section 1601 agreement with CDFG.
Introduction
The El Camino Real road widening site is located in the city of Carlsbad, California
(Figure 1), between the intersections of El Camino Real with Tamarack Avenue and
College Boulevard (Figure 2). The proposed project includes the widening of the
roadbed and the bridge crossing over Agua Hedionda Creek, the construction of an access
road north of El Camino Real, and the construction and/or reconstruction of three energy
PROJECT LOCATION
AGUA HEDIONDA
LAGOON
4 2 MILES 0
FIGURE 1
Regional Location of the Project
., 'Water :
(\ 7 Tank »
PROJECT LOCATION
Smlorosa I
'.Country Club, ,
H Map Source: U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute topographic map,
jijlji; San Luis Rey quadrangle
200 FEET 0
FIGURE 2
Project Location
dissipators on each side of the road. The reduced-impact alternative would eliminate
reconstruction of one of these energy dissipators. The site is bounded by residential
development and a nursery to the north, a private residence to the northwest, and a ranch
to the south.
This report provides biological data and background information required for
environmental analysis by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Survey Methods
A biological resources survey was conducted by RECON biologist Wendy Loeffler on
May 7,1998 from 10:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. and May 11,1998 from 7:00 to 9:00 A.M. The
area surveyed included a corridor of habitat that was 25 feet from the pavement on both
sides of El Camino Real for a length of approximately 1,650 feet. In addition, adjacent
areas along the road that will be modified for a haul road and storm water runoff were
also surveyed. The surveyed area is larger than the actual limits of construction and thus
larger than the area of impact. Animal species observed directly or detected from calls,
tracks, scat, nests, or other sign were noted. All plant species observed on-site were also
noted, and plants that could not be identified in the field were identified later using
taxonomic keys.
Limitations to the compilation of a comprehensive floral checklist were imposed by
seasonal factors, such as blooming period and emergence of some annual species. In
addition, nocturnal animals were not observed directly as both surveys were performed
during the day.
Floral nomenclature follows Hickman (1993) for common plants and Skinner and Pavlik
(1994) for sensitive species. Plant community classifications follow the California
Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB) (Holland 1986). Zoological nomenclature for birds
is in accordance with the American Ornithologists' Union Checklist (1983 and
supplements); for mammals, Jones et al. (1982); and for amphibians and reptiles, Collins
(1997). Assessments of the sensitivity of species and habitats are based primarily on
Skinner and Pavlik (1994), State of California (1997a, 1997b, 1998), U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS 1996), and Holland (1986).
Existing Conditions
A. Topography and Soils
Elevation of the site is approximately 40 feet above mean sea level (U.S. Geological
Survey 1968). Soils on the site consist of Salinas clay loam for the majority of the site
and riverwash for Agua Hedionda Creek. Salinas clay loam tends to be a well-drained
soil and is formed from sediments washed from a variety of other soil types. Riverwash
soils are typically sandy, gravelly, or cobbly with sparse vegetation consisting of
scattered sycamore or coast live oak trees and other shrubs or forbs occurring in patches
(U.S. Department of Agriculture 1973).
B. Botany
Eleven vegetation communities were identified on the 11.9-acre survey area: alkali
marsh, southern willow scrub, mule fat scrub, disturbed mule fat scrub, freshwater marsh,
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub, non-native grassland, eucalyptus woodland,
horticultural, open/disturbed, and developed. A vegetation map was recently prepared for
the Kelly Ranch property, which is located on the south side of El Camino Real (Planning
Systems 1997). These data were incorporated into the current vegetation map insofar as
the existing conditions were determined to be the same. One area identified as disturbed
mule fat scrub on the previous vegetation map has been brushed and was consequently
identified as open/disturbed during the current surveys. Figure 3 illustrates the locations
of the plant communities on-site on an approximately 1500-scale base map. A total of 66
plant species were identified within the surveyed area (Table 1). Of this total, 33 (50
percent) are species native to southern California and 33 (50 percent) are introduced
species.
1. Alkali Marsh
The approximately 0.10 acre of alkali marsh is located on the southeast corner of the
surveyed area and is located within an area revegetated as partial mitigation for impacts
incurred from the construction of the adjacent Evans Point housing development
(RECON 1994a). The dominant ground cover consists of saltgrass (Distichlis spicatd)
and jaumea (Jaumea carnosa), with pickleweed (Salicornia sp.) as a subdominant
species. Patches of other native species, such as Mexican rush (Juncus mexicanus), curly
dock (Rumex crispus), and yerba mansa (Anemopsis californica), are also present. This
habitat is immediately adjacent and contiguous with a small, inundated estuarine area that
supports a number of native floral and faunal species.
2. Southern Willow Scrub
Southern willow scrub was identified on approximately 1.12 acres of the surveyed area
and along both banks of Agua Hedionda Creek on the south side of the El Camino Real
bridge crossing. This habitat is dominated by mature arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis)
with a sparse understory of water cress (Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum), fennel
(Foeniculum vulgare), mustard (Brassica sp.), and bristly ox-tongue (Picris echioides).
Limit of Work
i
Boundary of Permanent Impact Area Limit of work
Limit of Work
^Modified
Boundary of
Permanent
Impact Area
Boundary of Permanent Impact Area
Modified Limit of Work
Limit of work
Note: Mitigation for all impacts to
freshwater marsh and southern willow
scrub is included within the Cannon
Road extension USAGE 404 permit
(#97-20130-TCD) and CDFG 1601
Streambed Alteration Agreement
(#5-044-97)
Open/disturbed
Horticultural/landscaped
Southern willow scrub
Disturbed coastal sage scrub
Mule fat scrub
Disturbed mule fat scrub
Freshwater marsh
Alkali marsh FIGURE 3
Existing Vegetation and Project Impacts
&&&® Eucalyptus woodland
I*• • ••*!
»'«y/.y'»*.'*VJ Non-native grassland
TABLE 1
PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Origin
Amsinckia menziesii (Lehm.) Nelson & J.F. Macbr.
Anagallis arvensis L.
Anemopsis californica (Nutt.) Hook. & Arn.
Apium graveolens L.
Artemisia californica Less.
Artemisia douglasiana
Arundo donax L.
Avena sp.
Baccharis salicifolia (Ruiz Lopez & Pav6n) Pers.
Brassica sp.
Bromus hordaceus L.
Bromus madritensis L. ssp. rubens (L.) Husnot
Chamomilla suaveolens (Pursh.) Rydb.
Cotula coronopifolia L.
Crypsis vaginiflora (Forsskal) Opiz
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.
Cyperus sp.
Distichlis spicata (L.) E. Greene
Eleocharis sp.
Encelia californica Nutt.
Equisetum arvense L.
Eriogonum fasciculatum Benth. var. fasciculatum
Eriophyllum confertiflorum (DC.) A. Gray var. confertiflorum
Erodium sp.
Eucalyptus spp.
Foeniculum vulgare Mill.
Gazania sp.
Gnaphalium luteo-album L.
hocoma menziesii (Hook. & Arn.) G. Nesom
Jaumea carnosa (Less.) A. Gray
Juncus mexicanus Willd.
Leptochloa uninervia (C. Presl) A. Hitchc. & Chase
Rancher's fireweed
Scarlet pimpernel, poor-man's weatherglass
Yerba mansa
Celery
California sagebrush
Mugwort
Giant reed
Wild oats
Mule fat, seep-willow
Mustard
Smooth brome
Foxtail chess
Pineapple weed, rayless chamomile
Brass-buttons
Pricklegrass
Bermuda grass
Nutsedge
Saltgrass
Spikerush
Common encelia
Common horsetail
California buckwheat
Golden-yarrow
Filaree, storksbill
Eucalyptus
Fennel
African daisy
Everlasting
Coast goldenbush
Jaumea
Mexican rush
Mexican sprangletop
DCSS N
DCSS,MF,O I
AM N
MF I
DCSS N
MF.DCSS N
FM I
DCSS,NNG,O,DMF N
MF,0,DMF N
DCSS,NNG,O,SWS I
DCSS,NNG,0 I
DCSS.NNG.O I
DCSS,O N
AM.MF.FM I
DCSS.AM I
FM,O,H I
MF.AM.FM N
AM.FM N
AM,FM N
DCSS N
FM.SWS N
DCSS N
DCSS N
DCSS.O I
H.EUC I
DCSS,MF,NNG,O,AM I
H I
DCSS,O,DMF
DCSS.O N
AM N
AM,MF N
AM.MF I
TABLE 1
PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
(continued)
Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Origin
Lobularia maritima (L.) Desv.
Lolium multiflorum Lam.
Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in Torrey & A. Gray) Ottley var. scoparius
Lupinus succulentus Koch
Malva parviflora L.
Marrubium vulgare L.
Medicago polymorpha L.
Melilotus alba Medikus
Mimulus aurantiacus Curtis
Nassella pulchra (A. Hitchc.) Barkworth
Paspalum dilatatum Poiret
Picrls echioides L.
Pinus sp.
Plantago lanceolata L.
Platanus racemosa Nutt.
Polygonum lapathifolium L.
Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf.
Pyracantha sp.
Raphanus sativus L.
Ricinus communis L.
Rorlppa nasturtium-aquaticum (L.) Hayek
Rosa calif arnica C. & S.
Rumex crispus L.
Salicornia virginica L.
Salix exigua Nutt.
Salix lasiolepis Benth.
Salvia mellifera E. Greene
Scirpus sp.
Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertner
Sisyrinchium helium Wats.
Solarium sp.
Sweet alyssum
Italian ryegrass
California broom
Arroyo lupine
Cheeseweed, little mallow
Horehound
California bur clover
White sweet clover
Bush monkeyflower
Purple needlegrass
Dallis grass
Bristly ox-tongue
Pine
English plantain
Western sycamore
Willow weed
Annual beard grass
Firethom
Radish
Castor bean
Water cress
California rose
Curly dock
Pickleweed
Narrow-leaved willow
Arroyo willow
Black sage
Bulrush
Milk thistle
Blue-eyed-grass
Nightshade
DCSS I
DCSS I
DCSS N
DCSS N
DCSS,O I
O I
DCSS.MF I
DCSS I
DCSS N
DCSS N
DCSS I
DCSS,O,FM,SWS,AM I
H I
FM I
DCSS N
MF N
MF.AM I
H I
DCSS.NNG I
DCSS I
SWS,FM,AM,MF I
DCSS N
MF,AM,FM,SWS,O I
AM N
MF N
SWS N
DCSS N
AM,MF,SWS,FM N
DCSS I
DCSS N
DCSS I
TABLE 1
PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
(continued)
Scientific Name
Typha sp.
Veronica anagallis-aquatica
Vitis girdiana Munson
Washingtonia robusta Wendl.
Xanthium strumarium L.
Common Name
Cattail
Water speedwell
Desert wild grape
Washington palm
Cocklebur
Habitat
FM.AM
FM
MF
FM
AM
Origin
N
I
N
I
N
HABITATS
AM = Alkali meadow
DCSS= Disturbed coastal sage scrub
DMF = Disturbed mule fat scrub
EUC = Eucalyptus woodland
FM = Freshwater marsh
H = Horticultural
MF = Mule fat scrub
NNG = Non-native grassland
O = Open places, waste places, roadsides, burns, etc.
SWS = Southern willow scrub
OTHER TERMS
N = Native to locality
I = Introduced species from outside locality
3. Disturbed Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Approximately 0.83 acre of disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub extends almost the entire
length of the surveyed area and is located adjacent to El Camino Real on the southern
side of the road. The community contains several of the key components of Diegan
coastal sage scrub; however, the habitat is dominated by non-native, weedy species. The
portion of this habitat located at the southeastern corner of the study area was also
revegetated as partial mitigation for impacts from the construction of the Evans Point
development (RECON 1994a). The dominant species include mustard, white sweet
clover (Melilotus alba), yellow sweet clover (M. officianalis), wild oat (Avena sp.), and
bristly ox-tongue, all non-native species. Approximately 30 percent of the habitat
includes native species characteristic of this community, such as California sagebrush
(Artemisia californica}, coast goldenbush (Isocoma menzesii), common encelia (Encelia
californicd), and golden-yarrow (Eriophyllum confertifolium).
4. Mule Fat Scrub
Mule fat scrub was identified on approximately 0.13 acre of the surveyed area and was
also planted as a component of the revegetation plan for the Evans Point development
(RECON 1994a). The two dominant plants are mule fat (Baccharis salicifolid) and
narrow-leaved willow (Salix exigua). Understory species identified include bristly ox-
tongue, curly dock, Mexican rush, bulrush (Scirpus sp.), nutsedge (Cyperus sp.), annual
beard grass (Polypogon monspeliensis), desert wild grape (Vitis girdiand), fennel, and
celery (Apium graveolens).
5. Disturbed Mule Fat Scrub
This habitat was identified on approximately 0.32 acre of the surveyed area and is located
on the south side of El Camino Real. This habitat contains many of the dominant species
characteristic of mule fat scrub; however, these areas also include a larger percent cover
of non-native, weedy species. This area, and adjacent areas off-site, are also heavily used
by migrant workers, whose camps are pervasive hi the area and contribute to the
disturbance of the habitat.
6. Freshwater Marsh
The area designated as freshwater marsh encompasses 0.48 acre of the Agua Hedionda
Creek channel and associated vegetated banks. This habitat is located on both the north
and south side of El Camino Real where the creek flows under the roadbed. The creek
channel is fairly shallow and unvegetated with associated riparian banks. The south side
of the road is more densely vegetated and is dominated by common horsetail (Equisetum
arvense). Water cress, fennel, giant reed (Arundo donax), willow weed (Polygonum
lapathifolium), and cattail (Typha sp.) are also present. The banks on the north side of El
Camino Real are more sparsely vegetated and include brass buttons (Cotula
10
coronopifolia), English plantain (Plantago lanceolatd), water cress, and Bermuda grass
(Cynadon dactylon).
7. Non-Native Grassland
A small area of non-native grassland, approximately 0.31 acre in size, is located on the
north side of El Camino Real on the northwest end of the surveyed area. This habitat is
dominated by wild oat, foxtail chess (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens), fennel, mustard,
sweet clover, and cheeseweed (Malva parviflorwri).
8. Eucalyptus Woodland
Approximately 0.18 acre of eucalyptus woodland was identified on the south side of El
Camino Real. The habitat is dominated by large, mature eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus sp.)
with a sparse understory.
9. Horticultural
Approximately 0.12 acre of common landscape/horticultural species is planted adjacent
to the roadbed on the north and south side of El Camino Real to the east of Agua
Hedionda Creek. The plants identified include African daisy (Gazania sp.), eucalyptus,
pine (Pinus sp.), firethora (Pyracantha sp.), and Bermuda grass.
10. Open/Disturbed
The approximately 3.92 acres of open/disturbed community on the site is primarily bare
ground with ruderal areas dominated by non-native species and an occasional native
shrub. The areas designated as open/disturbed include the strips of bare ground located
adjacent to El Camino Real on both sides, the area recently brushed, and a portion of a
palm tree nursery located on the north side of the road. All areas identified as
open/disturbed are located on the west side of Agua Hedionda Creek. The most common
plants observed include bristly ox-tongue, sow thistle (Sonchus spp.), wild oat (Avena
sp.), filaree (Erodium sp.), cheeseweed, scarlet pimpernel (Anagallis arvensis), and
Bermuda grass. The brushed area discussed above also includes a sparse regrowth of
mule fat and coast goldenbush.
11. Developed
El Camino Real and an access road for the Kelly Ranch property account for
approximately 4.40 acres of developed area. This area includes the asphalt roadways,
concrete sidewalks, and concrete median on El Camino Real.
11
C. Zoology
The site is overall of moderate value for wildlife species. The southern willow scrub on-
site does provide potential habitat for the least Bell's vireo and southwestern willow
flycatcher. A complete list of the wildlife species detected is provided in Table 2.
Sensitive species potentially occurring on-site are discussed in the Sensitive Biological
Resources section.
1. Amphibians
No amphibians were observed on-site. Species expected to commonly occur on-site
include Pacific treefrog (Hyla regilla).
2. Reptiles
Several male western fence lizards (Sceloporus accidentally) were observed on-site.
Other reptiles expected to occur include side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana) and San
Diego gopher snake (Pituophis melanoleucus).
3. Birds
Bird species observed on-site include Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), black phoebe
(Sayornis nigricans), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), and American crow (Corvus
brachyrhynchos). Several bird species, commonly found hi wetland and estuarine
habitats, were observed foraging hi the adjacent estuarine area and include great blue
heron (Ardea herodias herodias), great egret (Ardea alba), Forster's tern (Sterna
forsteri), and black tern (Chilodonias niger surinamensis). As these species were not
observed within the designated survey area, they are recorded hi Table 2 as flying
overhead.
4. Mammals
Cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus audubonii) were observed on-site, as was the carcass of a
coyote (Cam's latrans). Other mammals expected to use the site include California
ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi) and striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis).
D. Sensitive Biological Resources
For purposes of this report, species will be considered to be sensitive if they are (1) listed
by state or federal agencies as threatened or endangered or are proposed for listing; (2) on
List IB (considered endangered throughout its range) or List 2 (considered endangered hi
California but more common elsewhere) of the California Native Plant Society's (CNPS)
Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (Skinner and Pavlik
12
TABLE 2
WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED/DETECTED
ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
Common Name Scientific Name Occupied Habitat Status
Evidence of
Occurrence
Reptiles (Nomenclature from Collins 1997)
Western fence lizard Sceloporus occidentalis
Birds (Nomenclature from American Ornithologists' Union)
Great blue heron
Great egret
Snowy egret
Mallard
Killdeer
Forster's tern
Black tem
Mourning dove
Anna's hummingbird
Black phoebe
Western scrub-jay
Yellow-breasted chat
Song sparrow
Red-winged blackbird
Ardea herodias herodias
Ardea alba
Egretta thula thula
Anas platyrhynchos
platyrhynchos
Charadrius vociferus vociferus
Sterna forsteri
Chlidonias niger surinamensis
Zenaida macroura marginella
Calypte anna
Sayomis nigricans semiatra
Aphelocoma califomica
Icteria virens auricollis
Melospiza melodia
Agelaius phoeniceus
i (Nomenclature from Jones et al. 1982)
Cottontail rabbit
Coyote
Sylvilagus audubonii
Canis latrans
DCSS
F
F
F
F
O
F
F
DCSS.EUC
DCSS,MF
FM.SWS
EUC
AM
MF,AM
F
DCSS,O,EUC
O
SDC,*
SDC,*
SDC,*
CSC
CSC.SDC
O
O
O
O
O
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
O
O
c,oc
Habitats
AM =
DCSS =
DMF =
EUC =
Alkali meadow
Disturbed coastal sage scrub
Disturbed mule fat scrub
Eucalyptus woodland
F = Flying overhead
FM = Freshwater marsh
MF = Mule fat scrub
O = Open places, waste places, roadsides, burns, etc.
Status
CFP
CSC
SDC
= California fully protected species
= California Department of Fish and Game species of special concern
= City of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance "Sensitive Species"
= Taxa listed with an asterisk fall into one or more of the following categories:
• Taxa considered endangered or rare under Section 15380(d) of CEQA guidelines
• Taxa that are biologically rare, very restricted in distribution, or declining throughout their range
• Population(s) in California that may be peripheral to the major portion of a taxon's range, but
which are threatened with extirpation within California
• Taxa closely associated with a habitat that is declining in California at an alarming rate
(e.g., wetlands, riparian, old growth forests, desert aquatic systems, native grasslands)
Evidence of Occurrence
V = Vocalization
O = Observed
C = Carcass/remains
1994); or (3) considered rare, endangered, or threatened by the NDDB (State of
California 1994, 1997a) or local conservation organizations or specialists. Noteworthy
plant species are considered to be those which are on List 3 (more information about the
plant's distribution and rarity needed) and List 4 (plants of limited distribution) of the
CNPS Inventory. Sensitive habitat types are those identified by the California Natural
Diversity Data Base (Holland 1986) or are considered sensitive by other resource
agencies.
Assessments for the potential occurrence of sensitive or noteworthy species are based
upon known ranges and habitat preferences for the species (Skinner and Pavlik 1994;
Reiser 1994), species occurrence records from the NDDB, and species occurrence records
from other sites hi the vicinity of the project site.
1. Sensitive Plants
No sensitive plants were observed on-site. Several other sensitive plant species are
known to occur in the vicinity of the project site and are considered as potentially
occurring on-site. A botanical survey was conducted to search for sensitive plant species.
Table 3 summarizes the status, habitats, and results of the botanical survey for each of
these potentially occurring species. Many of these species, such as shrubs or large cactus,
would have been easily observed on the site during the sensitive plant survey. Others
were either within their blooming period during the survey or are easily identifiable
through vegetative characters. Thus, with the fact that they were not observed, they are
considered to have a low potential for occurrence.
2. Sensitive Wildlife
No wildlife species considered sensitive by resource agencies were observed on the site
during the survey; however, several birds that are afforded some protection by resource
agencies were heard or observed in the alkali marsh and in the estuarine area adjacent to
the alkali marsh on-site. The yellow-breasted chat (Icteria virens), a California species of
special concern, was heard within several clumps of vegetation just outside of the survey
area. This species has been identified previously on the adjacent Kelly Ranch property
and there is a potential for this species to nest on-site (Planning Systems 1997). Several
seabirds were observed foraging within the estuarine area on-site. These include the
black tern, Forster's tern, snowy egret (Egretta thula thula), great egret, and great blue
heron; however, there is no evidence or expectation of nesting colonies or rookeries,
which are the protected resource for each of these species. Several sensitive wildlife
species have been identified in the vicinity of the project site, such as least Bell's vireo
(Vireo bellii pusillus), Belding's savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi),
coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica calif arnica), and orange-throated
whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus) (Planning Systems 1997). In addition, the
southern willow scrub community on the Kelly Ranch property has been identified as
14
TABLE 3
SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES
WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE
ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
Species
State/Federal CNPS CNPS
Status List Code Typical Habitat/Comments
Acanthomintha ilicifolia
San Diego thornmint
Adolphia californica
California adolphia
Artemisia palmeri
San Diego sagewort
Brodiaea filifolia
Thread-leaved brodiaea
Chorizanthe orcuttiana
Orcutt's spineflower
Cordylanthus orcuttianus
Orcutt's bird's-beak
CE/PE IB 2-3-2 Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, valley and
foothill grassland/clay soils; not
observed on-site
-/- 2 1-2-1 Chaparral, coastal scrub/clay soils; not
observed on-site
-/- 2 2-2-1 Coastal sage scrub, riparian scrub/sandy;
not observed on-site
CE/PT IB 3-3-3 Coastal scrub, cismontane woodland,
valley and foothill grassland, vernal pool
clay; not observed on-site
CE/PE IB 3-3-3 Coastal sage scrub; Del Mar to Point
Loma, San Diego County; not observed
on-site
-/- 2 3-3-1 Coastal sage scrub; not observed on-site
Dichondra occidentalis —I—
Western dichondra
Dudley a variegata -I- IB
Variegated dudleya
Euphorbia misera —I— 2
Cliff spurge
Ferocactus \\ridescens -I- 2
Coast barrel cactus
Harpagonella palmeri var. palmeri -I- 2
Palmer's grappling hook
Hemizonia parryi ssp. australis -I- IB
(-Hemizonia australis)
Southern tarplant
1-2-1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland,
coastal sage scrub, valley and foothill
grassland; not observed on-site
1-2-2 Chaparral, coastal sage scrub; not
observed on-site
2-2-1 Coastal sage scrub/rocky; no suitable
habitat
1-3-1 Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, valley and
foothill grassland; not observed on-site
1-2-1 Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, valley and
foothill grassland; not observed on-site
3-3-2 Valley and foothill grassland; not
observed on-site
TABLE 3
SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES
WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR OCCURRENCE
ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
(continued)
Species
State/Federal CNPS
Status List
CNPS
Code Typical Habitat/Comments
Juncus acutus ssp. leopoldii (=Juncus
acutus ssp. sphaerocarpus)
Spiny rush
Muilla clevelandii
San Diego goldenstar
IB
1-2-1 Coastal dunes (mesic), meadows
(alkaline), coastal salt marsh; not
observed on-site
2-2-2 Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, valley and
foothill grassland, vernal pools; not
observed on-site
Quercus dumosa
Nuttall's scrub oak
Romneya coulteri
Coulter's matilija poppy
Selaginella cinerascens
Ashy spike-moss
Viguiera laciniata
San Diego County viguiera
-/- IB
-/- 4
-/- 4
-/- 4
2-3-2
1-2-3
1-2-1
1-2-1
Coastal chaparral; not observed on-site
Coastal sage scrub; not observed on-site
Chaparral, coastal sage scrub; not
observed on-site
Chaparral, coastal sage scrub; not
observed on-site
NOTE: See Table 4 for explanation of sensitivity codes.
TABLE 4
SENSITIVITY CODES
FEDERAL CANDIDATES AND LISTED PLANTS
FE = Federally listed, endangered
FT = Federally listed, threatened
FPE = Federally proposed endangered
FPT = Federally proposed threatened
STATE LISTED PLANTS
CE = State listed, endangered
CR = State listed, rare
CT = State listed, threatened
CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCDZTY
LISTS
1A = Species presumed extinct.
IB = Species rare, threatened, or
endangered in California and
elsewhere. These species are
eligible for state listing.
2 = Species rare, threatened, or
endangered in California but
which are more common elsewhere.
These species are eligible for
state listing.
3 = Species for which more infor-
mation is needed. Distribution,
endangerment, and/or taxonomic
information is needed.
4 = A watch list of species of limited
distribution. These species need
to be monitored for changes in the
status of their populations.
R-E-D CODES
R (Rarity)
1 = Rare, but found in sufficient
numbers and distributed widely
enough that the potential for
extinction is low at this time.
2 = Occurrence confined to several
populations or to one extended
population.
3 = Occurrence limited to one or a
few highly restricted populations,
or present in such small numbers
that it is seldom reported.
E (Endangerment)
1 = Not endangered
2 = Endangered in a portion of its range
3 = Endangered throughout its range
D (Distribution)
1 = More or less widespread outside
California
2 = Rare outside California
3 = Endemic to California
potential nesting habitat for the southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii
extimus) by USFWS (1998).
The yellow-breasted chat, a California species of special concern when nesting, is a
riparian species that is found in dense vegetation generally along watercourses or marshes
(State of California 1990). This species was observed in the southern willow scrub
habitat approximately 0.5 mile from the site (Planning Systems 1997). The presence of
this species within the alkali marsh just adjacent to the site and the previous season's
observation in habitat contiguous with the southern willow scrub on-site indicate the
potential for this species to nest on-site.
The least Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher, both state- and federally listed
endangered species, are riparian species that nest in dense willow riparian habitats. The
least Bell's vireo was not identified during focused surveys conducted in 1992 and 1994
within the alkali marsh habitat adjacent to the site to the east (RECON 1992, 1994b).
However, during surveys conducted hi 1996 and 1997, nesting least Bell's vireos were
observed on the Kelly Ranch property and in Macario Canyon located on the east side of
the proposed Cannon Road extension. Several southwestern willow flycatchers were
observed in Macario Canyon during surveys in 1996 and 1997 (as cited in USFWS 1998).
It is believed, based on observational evidence, that these were transitory birds; however,
the riparian habitat along the Agua Hedionda Creek is suitable habitat for this species (as
cited hi USFWS 1998). The southern willow scrub on-site is contiguous with the
occupied least Bell's vireo habitat and has been identified as suitable habitat for nesting
southwestern willow flycatchers; therefore, there is a potential for these birds to nest on-
site.
The Belding's savannah sparrow is a bird that is typically found hi salt marshes, lagoons,
and other habitats dominated by pickleweed (Salicornia sp.). This bird was observed on
the Kelly Ranch property approximately 1.25 miles from the site within a salt pan habitat
located just above Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The alkali marsh habitat identified on the site
does contain pickleweed; however, this is present as a subdominant and is of a size and
density that is not suitable for nesting Belding's savannah sparrows. In addition, surveys
conducted hi 1997 of this habitat did not identify any individuals of this species (Planning
Systems 1997). The nearest individuals were identified over one mile away hi the salt pan
habitat located near Agua Hedionda Lagoon. There is a low potential for this species to
nest on-site.
The California gnatcatcher, a federally listed threatened species, and orange-throated
whiptail, a California species of special concern, are known to occur hi the vicinity of the
site (Planning Systems 1997). Both species were observed southwest of the site
approximately 0.5 to 0.75 mile away. The majority of California gnatcatchers were
observed in non-disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub and the whiptails were observed hi
upland areas not a part of the survey area. Neither of these species was observed during
18
the surveys of the site and they are not expected to occur as a result of the highly
disturbed and degraded nature of the habitat on-site and the isolation of this habitat from
the observed locations.
Table 5 lists sensitive species observed on-site and those that could potentially occur on-
site based on the ranges and habitat requirements of these species. The likelihood of
these species occurring on-site is also presented in Table 5.
3. Sensitive Plant Communities and Habitats
The following communities identified on-site are considered sensitive by the NDDB
(Holland 1986): alkali marsh, southern willow scrub, disturbed mule fat scrub, disturbed
Diegan coastal sage scrub, and freshwater marsh.
a. Alkali Marsh
Alkali marshes are typically low-lying areas with a high water table that have alkaline
soils. Evaporation of ponded water often results in salts remaining on the surface. This
habitat is identified in Holland (1986) and NDDB as a sensitive habitat and is a wetland
habitat, all of which are considered sensitive by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). All wetland
habitats have been greatly reduced throughout then* entire range and continue to decline
as a result of urbanization and are considered sensitive by state and federal resource
agencies.
b. Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Diegan coastal sage scrub is restricted to the coastal areas of southern California and
northern Baja California. Development and other human-related activities have seriously
impacted this plant community and its associated plant and wildlife species. Estimates of
loss range from 36 percent (Klopatek et al. 1979) to 85 percent (Westman 1981). These
losses have accelerated rapidly in the last decade (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995). As a
result, the state initiated its first habitat-based conservation planning effort, the Natural
Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), using coastal sage scrub as its pilot community
type. A scientific review panel, convened to provide assistance in the development of
this program, has identified approximately 75 sensitive plant and animal species
associated with this community, many of which occur in San Diego County. Diegan
coastal sage scrub habitat is considered to be sensitive by the federal and state resource
agencies, most southern California jurisdictions, and local conservation organizations.
The habitat on-site is quite disturbed and degraded. While there are components of
coastal sage scrub present, the habitat is approximately 70 percent weedy, non-native
vegetation. This habitat is not expected to support any sensitive resources.
19
TABLE 5
SENSITIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED (OR POTENTIALLY OCCURRING)
ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
Species Status Habitat Occurrence/Comments
Birds (Nomenclature from American Ornithologists' Union)
Yellow-breasted chat (nesting) CSC
Icteria virens
KNOWN ON-SITE
OTHER SENSITIVE SPECIES
Dense riparian woodland. Localized
summer resident.
POTENTIALLY OCCURRING ON-SITE
LISTED/PROPOSED SPECIES
Heard adjacent to survey area and known in
vicinity of project; potential to nest on-site.
Amphibians (Nomenclature from Collins 1997)
Arroyo toad FE, CSC
Bufo californicus
California red-legged frog FT, CSC
Rana aurora draytonii
Open streamside sand/gravel flats. Quiet,
shallow pools along stream edges are
breeding habitat.
Slow-moving streams, ponds, etc., with
dense vegetation cover providing shade
over water surface.
Nocturnal except during breeding season (March-
July). No suitable habitat; not expected to occur.
Believed to be extirpated from county; not
expected to occur.
Birds (Nomenclature from American Ornithologists' Union)
White-tailed (=black-shouldered) kite (nesting) CFP, *
Elanus leucurus
Western yellow-billed cuckoo (breeding)
Coccyzus americanus occidentalis
SE
Nest in riparian woodland, oaks,
sycamores. Forage in open, grassy areas.
Year-round resident.
Riparian woodlands. Summer resident.
Very localized breeding.
Suitable nesting habitat present; foraging habitat
nearby. Potential to occur on-site.
Only a few recent sightings in region; not expected
to occur.
TABLE 5
SENSITIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED (OR POTENTIALLY OCCURRING)
ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
(continued)
Species
Southwestern willow flycatcher
Empidonax traillii extimus
Bank swallow
Riparia riparia
Coastal California gnatcatcher
Polioptila californica califomica
Least Bell's vireo (breeding)
Vireo bellii pusillus
Belding's savannah sparrow
Status Habitat
SE, FE, FSS Nesting restricted to willow thickets. Also
occupies other woodlands. Rare spring
and fall migrant, rare summer resident.
Extremely localized breeding.
ST Steep riverbanks, gravel pits. Nest in
colonies.
FT, CSC Coastal sage scrub, maritime succulent
scrub. Resident.
SE, FE Willow riparian woodlands. Summer
resident.
SE Salt marshes, lagoons dominated by
Occurrence/Comments
Several non-breeding individuals observed in
vicinity but thought to be transitory (USFWS
1998); moderate potential to occur as a non-
breeding migrant.
No suitable habitat present; not expected to occur.
Very degraded habitat present; not expected to
occur.
Suitable habitat present; known from adjacent
areas. Potential to occur on-site.
No suitable Salicornia present; not expected to
Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi Salicornia. Resident.occur on-site.
Mammals (Nomenclature from Jones et al. 1982)
Pacific little pocket mouse FE, CSC
Perognathus longimembris pacificus
Amphibians (Nomenclature from Collins 1997)
Western spadefoot CSC
Spea hammondii
Open coastal sage scrub; fine, alluvial
sands near ocean.
OTHER SENSITIVE SPECIES
No suitable soils present; not expected to occur on-
site.
Vernal pools, floodplains, and alkali flats No suitable habitat present; not expected to occur,
within areas of open vegetation.
TABLE 5
SENSITIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED (OR POTENTIALLY OCCURRING)
ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
(continued)
Species Status Habitat Occurrence/Comments
ptiles (Nomenclature from Collins 1997)
San Diego horned lizard
Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillii
Belding's orangethroat whiptail
Cnemldophorus hyperythrus beldingi
CSC,
CSC
Birds (Nomenclature from American Ornithologists' Union)
San Diego cactus wren CSC, *
Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus couesi
Yellow warbler (nesting)
Dendroica petechia brewsteri
Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow
Aimophila ruficeps canescens
Bell's sage sparrow
Amphispiza belli belli
Tricolored blackbird
Agelaius tricolor
CSC
CSC
CSC
CSC
Chaparral, coastal sage scrub with fine, No suitable habitat present; not expected to occur,
loose soil. Partially dependent on
harvester ants for forage.
Chaparral, coastal sage scrub with coarse No suitable habitat present; not expected to occur,
sandy soils and scattered brush.
Maritime succulent scrub, coastal sage
scrub with Opuntia thickets. Rare
localized resident.
Breeding restricted to riparian woodland.
Spring and fall migrant, localized summer
resident, rare winter visitor.
Coastal sage scrub, grassland. Resident.
Chaparral, coastal sage scrub. Localized
resident.
Freshwater marshes, agricultural areas,
lakeshores, parks. Localized resident.
No suitable habitat present; not expected to occur.
Suitable habitat present; potential to occur on-site.
Very degraded coastal sage scrub, not steep or
rocky, no open grass clumps. Not expected to
occur.
Very degraded coastal sage scrub present; not
expected to occur.
Suitable habitat adjacent to site; foraging habitat
present on-site.
TABLE 5
SENSITIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED (OR POTENTIALLY OCCURRING)
ON THE EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING SITE
(continued)
Species Status Habitat Occurrence/Comments
Mammals (Nomenclature from Jones et al. 1982)
Northwestern San Diego pocket mouse CSC
Chaetodipus fallaxfallax
San Diego desert woodrat CSC
Neotoma lepida intermedia
San Diego County west of mountains in
sparse, disturbed coastal sage scrub or
grasslands with sandy soils.
Coastal sage scrub and chaparral.
No suitable soils; not expected to occur.
Marginal habitat present; low potential to occur.
Status Codes
Listed/Proposed
FE = Listed as endangered by the federal government
FT = Listed as threatened by the federal government
SE = Listed as endangered by the state of California
ST = Listed as threatened by the state of California
Other
CFP
CSC
FSS
California fully protected species
California Department of Fish and Game species of special concern
Federal (Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service) sensitive species
Taxa listed with an asterisk fall into one or more of the following categories:
• Taxa considered endangered or rare under Section 15380(d) of CEQA guidelines
• Taxa that are biologically rare, very restricted in distribution, or declining throughout their range
• Population(s) in California that may be peripheral to the major portion of a taxon's range, but which are threatened with extirpation within California
• Taxa closely associated with a habitat that is declining in California at an alarming rate (e.g., wetlands, riparian, old growth forests, desert aquatic systems,
native grasslands)
c. Southern Willow Scrub and Disturbed Mule Fat Scrub
Southern willow scrub and disturbed mule fat scrub are riparian communities that are
generally considered wetlands and thus sensitive by CDFG and USAGE. Both habitats
are found along rivers, streams, and intermittent drainages throughout southern
California. Channelization of rivers, streams, and drainages for flood control and land
development has resulted in cumulative losses of these habitat types throughout the state.
The loss of riparian habitats in southern California has been estimated at greater than 95
percent (Faber et al. 1989). Southern willow scrub in general potentially supports several
endangered and otherwise sensitive wildlife species. A wetland determination using
USAGE criteria was performed by Planning Systems of Carlsbad hi July, 1998, on the
disturbed mule fat scrub habitat on the site (Attachment 1). The assessment concluded
that the habitat was not a wetland, since (1) it contained no obligate wetland plant species
and did contain some dominant facultative or obligate upland species and (2) test pits to
examine ground water and soil characteristics failed to show either hydrologic or wetland
soil characteristics
d. Freshwater Marsh
Freshwater marsh vegetation occurs hi open bodies of fresh water with little current flow,
such as ponds, and to a lesser extent around seeps and springs. This habitat is identified in
Holland (1986) and NDDB as a sensitive habitat and is a wetland habitat considered
sensitive by USAGE and CDFG. All wetland habitats have been greatly reduced
throughout then- entire range and continue to decline as a result of urbanization and are
considered sensitive by state and federal resource agencies.
4. Wetlands
Three habitat types identified on-site would be considered wetlands and would fall under
the jurisdiction of both USAGE and CDFG. These habitats are alkali marsh, southern
willow scrub, and freshwater marsh. A USAGE 404 permit and a CDFG 1601 agreement
would need to be processed, and mitigation for impacts would be required. A fourth
habitat type, disturbed mule fat scrub, does not meet USAGE criteria for classification as
a wetland but might be classified as habitat associated with the Agua Hedionda Greek
streambed by CDFG. If so, impacts to the habitat would be subject to a streambed
alteration agreement under Section 1601 of the California Fish and Game Code. A
determination of the jurisdictional status of the disturbed mule fat scrub has not been
made by CDFG.
5. Wildlife Movement Corridors
Wildlife movement corridors are defined as areas that connect suitable wildlife habitat
areas in a region otherwise fragmented by rugged terrain, changes hi vegetation, or
human disturbance. Natural features such as canyon drainages, ridgelines, or areas with
24
vegetation cover provide corridors for wildlife travel. Wildlife movement corridors are
important because they provide access to mates, food, and water; allow the dispersal of
individuals away from high population density areas; and facilitate the exchange of
genetic traits between populations. Wildlife movement corridors are considered sensitive
by resource and conservation agencies.
This site is located in an area that is bounded to the southwest by Kelly Ranch, where
Agua Hedionda Creek and the associated riparian and marsh habitats extend to Agua
Hedionda Lagoon and the Pacific Ocean. Across El Camino Real, Agua Hedionda Creek
does continue to flow naturally and the channel is vegetated; however, it does flow
through a housing development. From there the creek flows through undeveloped, open
space that is surrounded by development within approximately one to two miles. While
there is value of this area as a movement corridor that would allow some dispersal and the
creation of breeding or expansion of foraging territories of several of the bird species, the
value is fairly low as a result of the finite habitat available.
Project Impacts
Impacts are assessed for two versions of the project. As proposed and as reflected in
project design plans currently available, the project includes a free right-turn lane from El
Camino Real to Cannon Road that is 550 feet in length. Constructing the turn lane would
require reconstruction of the outlet of the drain under El Camino Real that discharges into
the alkali marsh area. All impacts to alkali marsh are associated with construction of the
turn lane and the drain outlet.
It is possible to redesign the turn lane so that its length is reduced to 400 feet. This
redesign is acceptable to the City Engineering Department but has not been formally
included in project design plans. It has been examined on a conceptual basis sufficient
for the assessment of biological effects. Its principal effects would be to eliminate
impacts to the alkali marsh and substantially reduce impacts to disturbed coastal sage
scrub. This redesign is assessed below as the reduced-impact alternative.
A. Proposed Project
The proposed project will include the widening of the existing roadbed of El Camino
Real and the widening of the El Camino Real bridge that currently crosses Agua
Hedionda Creek by two feet on each side for a sidewalk. The existing bridge will be
widened from the top of the existing road with no construction or modifications occurring
from underneath. In addition, the project will include the reconstruction of one existing
energy dissipator on each side of El Camino Real and construction of two energy
dissipators where water flow was previously concentrated at curb cuts on each side of El
25
Camino Real. These energy dissipators will serve to improve the maintenance of existing
storm drainage runoff locations by containing the runoff and keeping water velocities to a
lower rate.
The project will temporarily impact a total of 2.08 acres and permanently impact a total
of 3.15 acres. Temporary impacts are defined as the area within the established limit of
work but outside of the grading limits and will result from construction of haul roads and
stockpile and staging areas. Permanent impacts are defined as the area within the
established grading limits and will result from the extended roadbed, energy dissipators,
the shading resulting from the widening of the El Camino Real bridge, and adjacent
manufactured slopes. Table 6 presents a breakdown of temporary and permanent impacts
to each vegetation community.
The biological impacts of the project were assessed according to guidelines set forth hi
CEQA. Mitigation is required for impacts that are considered significant under CEQA
guidelines.
1. Plant Community Impacts
The development will temporarily impact a total of 2.08 acres and permanently impact a
total of 3.15 acres as a result of project implementation (see Table 6). Impacts to alkali
marsh, disturbed mule fat scrub, and disturbed coastal sage scrub would be considered
adverse and significant and will require mitigation according to CEQA guidelines.
Impacts to southern willow scrub and freshwater marsh will consist of indirect effects of
shading from the extension of the El Camino Real bridge by 2 feet on each side for a total
of 0.004 acre of impact to southern willow scrub and 0.007 acre to freshwater marsh.
These impacts would be considered adverse, but not significant because the construction
will be completed solely from the top of the bridge and because the area affected would
be restricted to small areas of the existing tree canopy and not to the ground surface. The
actual acreage of vegetation impacted is even less than the calculated amount because the
habitat also includes the unvegetated creek channel and the sparsely vegetated area north
of the existing El Camino Real bridge, which accounts for 0.005 acre of the proposed
freshwater marsh impacts. Impacts to eucalyptus woodland, non-native grassland,
horticultural, and open/disturbed areas would be considered less than significant. There
will be no impacts to mule fat scrub.
2. Wildlife Impacts
The majority of the general wildlife observed consist of bird species with a high mobility;
thus, there are few impacts to general wildlife associated with the project. Small
mammals, amphibians, and reptiles with low mobility may be inadvertently killed during
grading of the site. Impacts on general wildlife are considered less than significant.
26
TABLE 6
PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
Vegetation Communities
NDDB Sensitive Communities
Alkali Marsh
Mule Fat Scrub
Disturbed Mule Fat Scrub*
Disturbed Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Subtotal
NDDB Non-Sensitive Communities
Eucalyptus Woodland
Non-Native Grassland
Horticultural
Open/Disturbed
Subtotal
TOTAL
Temporary
Impacts
0.01
0
0.22
0.27
0
0.50
0.09
0.13
0.02
1.34
1.58
2.08
Permanent
Impacts
0.03
0
0.10
0.47
0
0.50
0.09
0.14
0.06
2.25
2.54
3.04
Total
Impact Area
0.04
0
0.32
0.74
0
1.10
0.18
0.27
0.08
3.59
4.12
5.22
*A wetland delineation for the project determined that the disturbed mule fat scrub on-
site does not meet U.S. Army Corps of Engineers criteria for a wetland habitat.
Indirect impacts associated with project implementation include an increase in noise due
to an increase in vehicular traffic and an increase in litter and pollutants into adjacent
wildlife habitat. These impacts are not expected to reduce the wildlife populations of the
area below self-sustaining levels and are thus considered less than significant.
3. Sensitive Biological Resources Impacts
a. Sensitive Plants
No sensitive plants were observed or are expected to occur on-site and, thus, there will be
no significant impacts incurred as a result of project implementation.
b. Sensitive Wildlife
The project will impact approximately 0.004 acre of southern willow scrub, which would
impact the least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, yellow warbler, tricolored
blackbird, and yellow-breasted chat habitat as a result of increased shading from the
widening of the bridge that crosses Agua Hedionda Creek. Because of the small area of
impact and the fact that these birds were not observed within the permanent impact area
either during 1997 (Planning Systems 1997) or the current surveys, the impact would be
considered less than significant. In addition, the USFWS biological opinion (USFWS
1998) for the adjacent Cannon Road project states that road construction in this area "is
not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the least Bell's vireo [or] southwestern
willow flycatcher." It also states that this adjacent project will not adversely affect
critical habitat designated for these species as the work is proposed outside of these
designated areas. Because the proposed El Camino Real road widening project is
adjacent and contiguous with the Cannon Road project, it follows that the expected
impacts will be the same.
Approximately 0.49 acre of potential roosting and foraging habitat for the white-tailed
kite will be impacted within the alkali marsh, southern willow scrub, non-native
grassland, and eucalyptus woodland. White-shouldered kites are fairly common within
the county and although, if present, impacts would be locally adverse, they would be
considered less than significant.
c. Sensitive Plant Communities
The project will either temporarily or permanently impact 0.74 acre of sensitive upland
habitat and 0.37 acre of wetland habitats (see Table 6). Upland impacts include 0.27 acre
of temporary impacts and 0.47 acre of permanent impacts to disturbed Diegan coastal
sage scrub. Wetland impacts consist of the following temporary and permanent impacts:
0.01 acre of temporary and 0.03 acre of permanent impacts to alkali marsh; 0.004 acre of
permanent impacts to southern willow scrub; 0.22 acre of temporary and 0.10 acre of
permanent impacts to disturbed mule fat scrub; and 0.007 acre of permanent impacts to
28
freshwater marsh. The disturbed mule fat scrub does not qualify as a wetland under
USAGE criteria but may be subject to CDFG jurisdiction. For purposes of impact
assessment and mitigation, it is considered a sensitive plant community in this report.
Impacts to disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub, alkali marsh, and disturbed mule fat
scrub will be considered significant and will require mitigation in the form of habitat
replacement and/or enhancement. Impacts to southern willow scrub and freshwater marsh
will be considered adverse, but less than significant for the reasons stated above.
d. Wildlife Movement Corridor
There will be no impacts to wildlife movement corridors.
e. Cumulative
There are no cumulative impacts associated with this project.
B. Reduced Impact Alternative
As described earlier in this section, this alternative would reduce the length of the turn
lane from El Camino Real eastbound to Cannon Road from 550 to 400 feet. This would
allow the area of disturbance in that part of the project site to be reduced. The
environmental fence limiting the area of construction activity could be relocated to
exclude the alkali marsh and an area of disturbed coastal sage scrub from the construction
zone (Figure 4). As a result, the redesigned project would have no impacts on alkali
marsh and impacts on disturbed coastal sage scrub would be reduced from 0.74 acre to
0.35 acre.
The redesigned alternative will temporarily impact a total of 1.76 acres and permanently
impact a total of 2.89 acres. Temporary and permanent impacts are defined the same way
as for the proposed project. Table 7 presents a breakdown of temporary and permanent
impacts to each vegetation community. Impacts and mitigation were assessed in the
same way as for the proposed project.
Impacts to plant communities and other biological resources for this alternative would
differ from the proposed project's only with respect to alkali marsh, which would not be
impacted, and disturbed coastal sage scrub. Permanent impacts to coastal sage scrub
would be reduced to 0.06 acre of temporary impacts and 0.29 acre of permanent impacts.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation is required for impacts that are considered significant, including impacts to
listed species, sensitive plant communities and habitats, and wetlands. Mitigation is
29
REVISED EDGE OF PAVING
REVISED GRADING
REVISED
VOCATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
FENCING
FIGURE 4
Reduced Impact Alternative
TABLET
REDUCED IMPACT ALTERNATIVE IMPACTS
Vegetation Communities
NDDB Sensitive Communities
Alkali Marsh
Mule Fat Scrub
Disturbed Mule Fat Scrub*
Disturbed Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Subtotal
NDDB Non-Sensitive Communities
Eucalyptus Woodland
Non-Native Grassland
Horticultural
Open/Disturbed
Subtotal
TOTAL
Temporary
Impacts
0
0
0.22
0.06
0
0.28
0.09
0.07
0.02
1.30
1.48
1.76
Permanent
Impacts
0
0
0.10
0.29
0
0.39
0.09
0.14
0.06
2.21
2.50
2.89
Total
Impact Area
0
0
0.32
0.35
0
0.67
0.18
0.21
0.08
3.51
3.98
4.65
*A wetland delineation for the project determined that the disturbed mule fat scrub on-
site does not meet U.S. Army Corps of Engineers criteria for a wetland habitat.
intended to reduce significant impacts to a level of less than significant. Mitigation
measures typically employed include resource avoidance, habitat replacement, or the
paying of fees into a mitigation bank.
A. Proposed Project
This is the project for which plans are available. The City has indicated a willingness to
implement the project changes that would result in the Reduced Impact Alternative
described in this report. In that case, the mitigation described for the proposed project
will not be required. Reduced mitigation requirements for the Reduced Impact
Alternative would be required instead. Mitigation for the proposed project is presented
below for purposes of comparison.
Mitigation for 0.47 acre of permanent impacts and 0.27 acre of temporary impacts to
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub would be mitigated by the revegetation and
enhancement of the temporarily impacted areas as well as the newly created
manufactured slopes adjacent to El Camino Real. This should provide 0.39 acre of higher
quality Diegan coastal sage scrub as mitigation for the loss of 0.74 acre of disturbed
habitat.
Significant permanent impacts to 0.04 acre of alkali marsh would be mitigated at a 1:1
ratio both on- and off-site. The 0.01 acre of alkali marsh temporarily impacted on-site
would be restored, and the remaining 0.03 acre permanently impacted would be mitigated
by restoration of 0.03 acre of alkali marsh hi the Agua Hedionda wetland area south and
west of the project site or hi another site acceptable to the City of Carlsbad, USFWS, and
CDFG.
Impacts to disturbed mule fat scrub would be mitigated by the restoration of 0.31 acre on-
site and an additional 0.01 acre hi adjacent areas off-site. The mitigation for alkali marsh
and disturbed mule fat scrub impacts will be designed to be consistent with or
comparable to mitigation required in Biological Opinion (B.O.) 1-6-97-F-51 for similar
impacts from the Cannon Road Reaches 1 and 2 project. Success criteria, monitoring,
maintenance, and buffering of the mitigation site shall also be consistent or comparable
with that described hi B.O. 1-6-97-F-51.
Temporary impacts to alkali marsh and disturbed mule fat scrub totaling 0.23 acre shall
be mitigated by revegetating and restoring the impact area to the original condition
(condition before disturbance), as with the alkali marsh, or to a higher quality habitat, as
with the disturbed mule fat scrub. Revegetation shall include remedial work such as
decompaction and surface treatment of the ground and restoration of natural contours.
Revegetation must be monitored for a period of three years.
32
To avoid direct or indirect (i.e., noise) impacts to any breeding sensitive bird and raptor
species that may be present in or adjacent to the riparian and eucalyptus habitats on-site, a
clearance survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to grading to ensure
that no active nests will be impacted by project implementation. This will only be
required if grading and vegetation removal is scheduled to begin within the breeding
season, which is approximately from March 1 through September 30.
Impacts to wetland habitats will require a USAGE 404 permit and CDFG 1601
agreement. If mitigation required by the 404 permit and/or 1601 agreement differs from
the mitigation required above, the mitigation required by the USAGE 404 permit and the
CDFG 1601 agreement shall take precedence.
B. Reduced Impact Alternative
Mitigation for 0.29 acre of permanent impacts and 0.06 acre of temporary impacts to
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub would be mitigated by the revegetation and
enhancement of the temporarily impacted areas, the newly created manufactured slopes
adjacent to El Camino Real, and other areas within the right-of-way. This would provide
0.39 acre of restored Diegan coastal sage scrub as mitigation for the loss of 0.35 acre of
disturbed habitat.
Temporary and permanent impacts to disturbed mule fat scrub would be mitigated by the
restoration of 0.31 acre of higher quality habitat on-site. The mitigation for alkali marsh
and disturbed mule fat scrub impacts will be designed to be consistent with or
comparable to mitigation required in B.O. 1-6-97-F-51 for similar impacts from the
Gannon Road Reaches 1 and 2 project. Success criteria, monitoring, maintenance, and
buffering of the mitigation site shall also be consistent or comparable with that described
in B.O. 1-6-97-F-51. Revegetation shall include remedial work such as decompaction
and surface treatment of the ground and restoration of natural contours. Revegetation
must be monitored for a period of three years.
To avoid direct or indirect (i.e., noise) impacts to any breeding sensitive bird and raptor
species that may be present in or adjacent to the riparian and eucalyptus habitats on-site, a
clearance survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to grading to ensure
that no active nests will be impacted by project implementation. This will only be
required if grading and vegetation removal is scheduled to begin within the breeding
season, which is approximately from March 1 through September 30.
Impacts to disturbed mule fat scrub habitat may require a CDFG 1601 agreement. If
mitigation required by the 1601 agreement differs from the mitigation required above, the
mitigation required by the CDFG 1601 agreement shall take precedence.
33
References Cited
American Ornithologists' Union
1983 Check-list of North American Birds. 6th ed. Washington, D.C., with
Supplements in 1985,1987,1989,1991,1993, and 1995.
California, State of
1990 California's Wildlife: Birds. Department of Fish and Game. November.
1994 Special Plants List. Natural Diversity Data Base. Department of Fish and
Game. January.
1997a Special Plants List. Natural Diversity Data Base. Department of Fish and
Game. April.
1997b State and Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Animals of California.
The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game. Revised April 1.
1998 Special Animals. Natural Diversity Data Base. Department of Fish and Game.
August.
Collins, Joseph T.
1997 Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American
Amphibians and Reptiles. 4th ed. Herpetological Circular No. 25. Society for
the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Zoology, Miami
University, Oxford, Ohio.
Faber, P. M., E. Keller, A. Sands, and B. M. Massey
1989 The Ecology of Riparian Habitats of the Southern California Coastal Region: A
Community Profile. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service Biological Report 85(7.27).
Hickman, James C. (editor)
1993 The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California
Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Holland, Robert F.
1986 Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.
Nongame-Heritage Program, California Department of Fish and Game.
October.
34
Jones, J. K., D. C. Carter, H. H. Genoways, R. S. Hoffman, and D. W. Rice
1982 Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico. Occasional
Papers of the Museum, Texas Tech University 80:1-22.
Klopatek, J. M., R. M. Olson, C. J. Emerson, and J. L. Jones
1979 Land-use Conflicts with Natural Vegetation of the United States.
Environmental Conservation 6:191-199.
Planning Systems
1997 Biological Inventory, Offer to Dedicate Area, Kelly Ranch.
RECON
1992 Least Bell's Vireo and Off-Site Road Survey Report for Evans Point, Carlsbad,
California.
1994a Evans Point Revegetation Plan.
1994b Evan's Point Least Bell's Vireo Survey, 1994.
Reiser, C. H.
1994 Rare Plants of San Diego County. Aquafir Press, Imperial Beach, California.
Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf
1995 A Manual of California Vegetation. California Native Plant Society.
Sacramento.
Skinner, M. W., and B. M. Pavlik
1994 Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. California Native
Plant Society Special Publication No. 1,5th edition. Sacramento.
U. S. Department of Agriculture
1973 Soil Survey, San Diego Area, California. Edited by Roy H. Bowman. Soil
Conservation Service and Forest Service. December.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
1996 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Review of Plant and Animal
Taxa that are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species,
Proposed Rule. Federal Register 61(40). February 28. 50 CFR 17.
1998 Biological Opinion on the Cannon Road (Reaches 1 and 2) Permit Application
No. 97-20130-TCD and 97-20131-TCD, City of Carlsbad, California (1-6-97-
F-51)
35
U.S. Geological Survey
1968 San Luis Rey quadrangle 7.5-minute topographic map. Photorevised 1975.
Westman, W. E.
1981 Factors Influencing the Distribution of Species of Californian Coastal Sage
Scrub. Ecology 62:439-455.
36
ATTACHMENT 1
PLANNING
SYSTEMS
LAND USE / COASTAL PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • LA3900
POLICY AND PROCESSING
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
July 27,1998
Ms. Sherri Howard
Engineering Department, City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive ,
Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576
This letter is provided to present information gathered at your request regarding
vegetation potentially disturbed by proposed north bound right turn lanes along El
Camino Real (project), accessing future west bound Cannon Road. On July 13,1998,
Fred Sproul, biologist, and Greg Evans, Landscape Architect, surveyed the proposed
site along El Camino Real to determine if vegetation identified by City
environmental consultant RECON is indeed wetland vegetation as defined by U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers guidelines. Our assessment of existing the vegetation
follows.
The project site is comprised of the roadway edge, an existing manufactured slope
supporting the raised roadbed, and a bench area that transitions from this upland -
condition to a wetland corridor west of the project area which is linked to Upper
Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The linear study area extends from the proposed Cannon
Road R.O.W. northward along El Camino Real approximately 500 feet to an existing
box culvert providing drainage beneath El Camino Real from points east.
An area of Mulefat scrub, approximately 0.10 acre in size, occurs on a bench within
the present construction zone, located approximately between roadway Station
447+50 and Station 449+75. Mulefat Scrub is identified on-site where Mulefat
(Baccharis salicifolia) is the dominant vegetative cover. On the site it occurs in
association with several other plants including: Western ragweed (Ambrosia
psilostachva). Coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis var. consanguinea) and Saltgrass
(Distichilis spicata). This community is bordered on its lower boundary by weed
infested Ruderal vegetation. That these plants occur in association identifies this
area as a transitional community between an upland plant association and a
wetland plant association.
None of the plants occurring in this Mulefat scrub are identified as obligate wetland
species as identified in the "National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:
California Region O", May 1988. Several of the dominant species observed are
equally likely to occur in upland or wetland conditions. Some of the dominant
species observed are facultative or obligate upland plants.
To be considered a jurisdictional wetland, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's
(USACOE) requires that three wetland components occur simultaneously: wetland
2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD.CA 92009 • (760)931-0780 • FAX (760) 931-5744
soils, wetland hydrology, and wetland vegetation. Two pits in excess of 24" deep
were dug to examine ground water and soil characteristics in the Mulefat scrub area.
The results failed to show either hydrologic or wetland soil characteristics.
A Wetland Determination of the subject Mulefat scrub was performed (see attached
Wetland Determination). The results conclude that the subject Mulefat scrub is not
a wetland.
We recommend that the City minimize impacts to this transitional plant
community. Impacts to Mulefat scrub can be lessened by strictly limiting the
construction zone. We recommend that revegetation of a transitional community
similar to the existing Mulefat scrub is accomplished in post-construction areas
presently supporting ruderal vegetation.
Sincerely,
Greg Evans, Landscape Architect, LA #3900
DATA FORM I
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Naae:
Application
Number:
Project /->
State; County: \J $ & Legal Description: Township;
Pate: JtyfO./TO Plot No.: #^0/65" s«tion:
Vegetation [list the three doainant specie* In each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate specie* vlth observed morphological or Vnown
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator
Status _
Indicator
Status
6. 12.
Z of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC;?P<<? Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes /.^ No _^C_. Basis: 4,50/0 Or wM
S_oil
Series and
Mottled: Yes
Gleyed: Yes_
Hydrlc soils:
^ hydric soils list? Yes _; No
; Ko )^ . Mottle colori_ ^y/T ; Matrix color:
__ No X Other indicators:
Yes So X. '. Basis:
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes . _; Wo X • Depth of standing watery
Saturated soils: Yes ; No X • Depth to saturated
Other indicators:
Wetland hydrology: Yes _ ; No X •
Atypical situation: Yes ; No X •
Normal Cticxrastances? Yet A So
Wetland Determination: Wetland
Comnents:
Basis:
Nonvetland
Determined by:
B2
NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT
FOR
EL CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING PROJECT
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
2915 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92009-1576
Prepared by
DAVID M. GOTTFREDSON
ACOUSTICIAN
RECON NUMBER 3018N
JUNE 3,1998
• 1983-
"r>!\i^-u!\vj
•j'ARTMENT
4241 Jutland Drive, Suite 201
San Diego, CA 92117-3653
619/270-5066 fax 270-5414
lUlUliMllllill
This document printed on recycled paper
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary 1
Introduction 1
Analysis Methodology 4
A. Applicable Standards and Definitions of Terms 4
B. Existing Noise Level Measurements 5
C. Traffic Noise Analysis 5
Existing Conditions 5
Acoustical Environment and Impacts Due to the Project 6
A. Traffic Noise 6
B. Construction Noise 9
Mitigation 9
References Cited 10
FIGURES
1: Regional location of the project 2
2: Project location 3
3: Measurement locations and existing roadway configuration 7
ATTACHMENT
1: Noise measurement data
Summary
The proposed project would widen El Camino Real in the vicinity of the Agua Hedionda
Creek crossing. Implementation of the proposed project would shift traffic slightly closer
to existing sensitive uses in the mobile home park adjacent to the project, as well as allow
for acceptable level of service operation of future anticipated traffic volumes.
It is anticipated that future noise levels will increase by 2.8 decibels at the mobile home
park due primarily to greater projected future traffic volumes. Increases in exterior noise
levels of less than 3 decibels are not considered to be noticeable. Therefore, because
noise levels in the mobile home park currently exceed City of Carlsbad exterior noise
standards, implementation of the proposed project is not expected to result in significant
noise impacts. No mitigation is required.
Additionally, noise will result from construction. Due to the short-term variable nature of
construction noise, no significant construction noise impacts are anticipated.
Introduction
The proposed El Camino Real road widening project is located in the segment of road in
the city of Carlsbad where El Camino Real crosses Agua Hedionda Creek on a bridge
(Figures 1 and 2). The project site is approximately 0.9 mile west of the intersection of
El Camino Real and College Boulevard and about a mile east of the intersection of El
Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue. The segment includes the future intersection with
Cannon Road, just west of the bridge over Agua Hedionda Creek.
The project is the improvement of El Camino Real for approximately 1,600 linear feet,
including the existing bridge over Agua Hedionda Creek, a segment approximately 440
feet east of the bridge, and a segment approximately 1,020 feet west of the bridge. The
project site includes the future intersection of El Camino Real with Cannon Road. The
project will widen the bridge and an area west of the bridge.
The bridge is presently 108 feet wide; the project would add two feet to each side to
increase the width to 112 feet. El Camino Real would be widened west of the bridge by
adding up to 17 feet to the width of paving on the north side and up to 29 feet to the
width of paving on the south side. The widening would result in a paved width for El
Camino Real of 106 feet east of the Cannon Road intersection and 138 feet west of that
intersection to allow for planned geometry and striping at the future intersection with
Cannon Road to the south.
PROJECT LOCATION
AGUAHEDIONDA
LAGOON
2 MILES 0
FIGURE 1
Regional Location of the Project
PROJECT LOCATION
,,,. . -., ,Water' -.-. . \ 1'-..\-MTank* -iV ' -.\ :' A
jijl Map Source: U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute topographic map,
III; San Luis Rey quadrangle
400 200 FEET 0
FIGURE 2
Project Location
Construction of Cannon Road to the south of the intersection is not a part of this project,
but the construction of that segment of Cannon Road is integrated into project plans. The
Carlsbad Circulation Element shows Cannon Road extending northeasterly from El
Camino Real to where Cannon Road presently stubs out at the city limit in Oceanside, but
that extension is not an active project at this time. Project plans do include, however, an
extension northerly from the El Camino Real/Cannon Road intersection to an existing
blacktop road giving access to properties in that area. Project plans also include channel
improvements to Agua Hedionda Creek under the El Camino Real bridge. Those channel
improvements would extend southerly and westerly under the planned Cannon Road
bridge.
Analysis Methodology
A. Applicable Standards and Definitions of Terms
The community noise equivalent level (CNEL) is a 24-hour A-weighted decibel average
sound level [dB(A) LJ from midnight to midnight obtained after the addition of 5 dB to
sound levels occurring between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. and 10 dB to the sound levels
occurring between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. A-weighting is a frequency correction that
often correlates well with the subjective response of humans to noise. The 5 dB and 10
dB penalties added to the evening and nighttime hours account for the added sensitivity
of humans to noise during these time periods.
Impacts to future sensitive receivers were evaluated in relation to the noise level
standards promulgated in the City of Carlsbad's adopted General Plan Noise Element.
The Noise Element of the City of Carlsbad states (City of Carlsbad 1994):
Policy C.5:
. . . sixty (60) dBA CNEL is the exterior noise level to which all
residential units should be mitigated.
Policy C.9:
Discourage the exclusive use of noise walls in excess of 6 feet in
height as mitigation for noise along Circulation Element roadways.
For comparing changes in ambient noise levels along the roadway due to implementation
of the proposed project, a change in exterior noise levels of 3 dB is considered
perceptible; changes of less than 3 decibels in general are not noticeable in the outdoor
environment (Bolt, Beranek, and Newman 1973:1-20; Beranek 1988:598-599).
Therefore, if the increase in traffic-generated noise along the roadway is less than 3
decibels, in general, it is not considered a significant impact.
Construction noise is regulated by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 8.48. Generally,
construction activities are limited to the daytime hours, with no construction allowed on
Sundays or holidays except hi the event of an emergency.
B. Existing Noise Level Measurements
Existing noise levels adjacent to the project site were measured using a Larson-Davis
Model 720 Type 2 Integrating Sound Level Meter, serial number 0274. The following
parameters were used:
Filter: A-weighted
Response: Slow (1/8 second)
Time History Period: 5 seconds
The meter was calibrated prior to the day's measurements. Four ground-floor measure-
ments (five feet above the ground) were made: two for approximately 30 minutes each
and two for approximately 15 minutes each.
C. Traffic Noise Analysis
1. Traffic Parameters
Existing traffic volumes in the project vicinity are estimated to be 24,000 average daily
trips (ADT) on El Camino Real (San Diego Association of Governments 1997). Series 8
future traffic volumes are projected to be approximately 39,000 ADT on El Camino Real.
2. Analysis of Traffic Noise
Noise generated by traffic on El Camino Real was projected using the Federal Highway
Administration Noise Prediction Model (1979), which uses California vehicle noise
emission levels (California Department of Transportation 1983).
The alignment and elevations of the roadway were also obtained from the 1 inch equals
40 feet scale maps prepared for the project, as well as from AutoCAD files provided by
the project engineer (Matthews, per. com. 1998).
Existing Conditions
The project site is El Camino Real in the vicinity of Agua Hedionda Creek. North of El
Camino Real and east of Agua Hedionda Creek is a mobile home park. North of El
Camino Real and west of the creek is a nursery. South of El Camino Real is open space.
The only existing sensitive receivers in the vicinity of the proposed project are the mobile
homes. The mobile homes are essentially at the roadway grade. There is an existing
approximately five-foot-high wall along El Camino Real adjacent to the mobile home
park as shown in Figure 3. However, this wall functions primarily as a privacy wall and
is not a sufficient traffic noise barrier due to its height and configuration.
Noise measurements were taken around the project site on Tuesday, May 19, 1998,
between the hours of 12:40 A.M. and 2:40 P.M. The weather was warm and sunny. Two
approximately 30-minute measurements and two 15-minute measurements were made.
Figure 3 shows the locations of the measurements. These locations were chosen to obtain
existing noise levels in the vicinity of the project in order to assess the existing noise
environment. The noise measurement data are contained in Attachment 1.
Measurement location 1 is at the western end of the existing mobile home wall adjacent
to El Camino Real. This measurement was slightly above the roadway grade. During the
30-minute interval, the average noise level was 73.1 dB(A).
Measurement location 2 is down the slope on the south side of El Camino Real west of
Agua Hedionda Creek as shown in Figure 3. At this location the meter was below the
roadway grade. During the 30-minute measurement interval, the average noise level was
62.2 dB(A).
Measurement location 3 is on the El Camino Real median east of Agua Hedionda Creek.
During the 15-minute measurement interval, the average noise level was 74.1 dB(A).
Measurement location 4 is located at the bottom of the slope in the Agua Hedionda Creek
channel north of El Camino Real. At this location the meter is well below the roadway
grade. During the 15-minute measurement interval, the average noise level was
61.6dB(A).
Based on these noise measurements, existing noise levels in the mobile home park
currently exceed the City's 60 CNEL exterior noise standard for residential uses.
Acoustical Environment and Impacts Due to
the Project
A. Traffic Noise
The proposed project would not widen the pavement adjacent to the mobile home park
and would widen both the north and south sides of the bridge by two feet. West of the
bridge, the project would widen the north side of El Camino Real by approximately 17
Mobile Home Park
Agua Hedionda Creek
FIGURE 3
Measurement Locations and Existing Roadway Configuration
feet and would widen the south side of El Camino Real by approximately 29 feet.
Additionally, the project would reconfigure the roadway median to incorporate a
westbound left-turn lane at the intersection with future Cannon Road. However, the
proposed project does not include the construction of future Cannon Road.
There are no existing sensitive receivers west of the bridge adjacent to the proposed
project. The only existing sensitive receivers in the project vicinity are at the mobile
home park east of the bridge. Adjacent to the mobile home park, El Camino Real is full
width and is currently striped to transition from three to two lanes westbound and is
striped for three lanes eastbound. The proposed project would restripe the westbound
lanes such that there would be three lanes adjacent to the mobile home park.
As indicated above, the roadway is not being widened adjacent to the mobile home park.
Restriping El Camino Real from five lanes (two westbound; three eastbound) to six lanes
(three westbound; three eastbound) adjacent to the mobile home park will have the effect
of shifting the noise source (traffic) slightly closer to the mobile homes. In the FHWA
model, this distance is expressed as the "equivalent lane distance." The restriping will
effectively reduce the equivalent lane distance from approximately 78 feet to 70 feet.
This eight-foot reduction in equivalent lane distance is expected to increase noise levels
in the mobile home park by approximately 0.7 decibel.
The road widening west of the bridge is being accomplished to maintain acceptable levels
of service for the future anticipated traffic volumes. Therefore, existing and future traffic
speeds are not anticipated to change with implementation of the proposed project. If the
project were not implemented, future traffic speeds would be expected to decrease.
Additionally, implementation of the proposed project would not change the vehicle mix
or distribution.
Therefore, the increase in ADT from 24,000 ADT existing to a future traffic volume of
39,000 ADT would increase noise levels in the vicinity of the project by approximately
2.1 decibels. In combination with the 0.7-decibel increase due to the decrease in
equivalent lane distance discussed above, future traffic noise levels adjacent to the mobile
home park are expected to increase by approximately 2.8 decibels relative to existing
noise levels.
It should be noted that with the future construction of Cannon Road, a signal will be
installed at the intersection of Cannon Road and El Camino Real. The effect of this
signal will be to reduce the average traffic speed on El Camino Real. Therefore, the
actual increase in future noise levels adjacent to El Camino Real is expected to be less
than the 2.8 decibels indicated above.
Because existing noise levels at the mobile home park exceed the City's 60 CNEL
standards, noise level increases of less than 3 decibels are generally not considered
significant. There are no other existing sensitive receivers in the project vicinity.
Therefore, implementation of the proposed road widening project is not anticipated to
create any significant noise impacts.
B. Construction Noise
As indicated above, construction noise is regulated by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
8.48. Generally, construction activities are limited to the daytime hours on weekdays
(including Saturday).
Temporary construction noise impacts vary markedly, because the noise strength of
construction equipment ranges widely as a function of the equipment used and its activity
level. Earth-moving (grading) activities are the noisiest sources during construction, with
equipment noise ranging from 70 to 95 dB(A) at 50 feet from the source. As a general
rule, noise decreases by 6 dB for each doubling of distance for a flat site (no topography).
Therefore, noise levels from quieter construction noise sources are expected to be below
75 dB(A). However, noise levels from the louder construction equipment may still be
above 75 dB(A) 500 feet from the source.
Construction noises are expected to occur during daylight hours on weekdays, when
residential noise sensitivity is generally lower than during morning and evening hours
and on weekends. Nocturnal noise-generating construction activities are expected to
occur only as emergency operations are necessary. Construction activities will shift as
construction of the roadway progresses, thereby reducing the length of time that any
single location would be impacted. Although construction noise impacts may be
intrusive, they are generally considered below significant levels because of the
progressive construction of the project. No single location will experience long-term
construction noise impacts.
Mitigation
No significant noise impacts are anticipated to existing sensitive receivers. No mitigation
is required.
9
References Cited
Beranek, Leo L., editor
1988 Noise and Vibration Control. Rev. ed. Institute of Noise Control Engineering.
Washington, D.C.
Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc.
1973 Fundamentals and Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise.
California, State of
1983 California Vehicle Noise Emission Levels. Report No. FHWA/CA/T1-84/13.
August. Department of Transportation.
Carlsbad, City of
1994 Noise Element. City of Carlsbad General Plan.
Federal Highway Administration
1979 Federal Highway Administration Noise Prediction Model. Report No. FHWA-
RD-77-108, with California Vehicle Noise Emissions Levels. Washington, D.C.
Matthews, Greg
1998 Personal communication with David Gottfredson, RECON, May 27. O'Day
Consultants.
San Diego Association of Governments
1997 Traffic Flow Map, North San Diego County.
10
ATTACHMENT 1
L:\DRAFT\3018N\MEASURE\19MAY_12.bin Interval Data
Site Location
L(IOO)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Meas
Nurobei
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c Date
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
Time
12:43:33
12:44:00
12:45:00
12:46:00
12:47:00
12:48:00
12:49:00
12:50:00
12:51:00
12:52:00
12:53:00
12:54:00
12:55:00
12:56:00
12:57:00
12:58:00
12:59:00
13:00:00
13:01:00
13:02:00
13:03:00
13:04:00
13:05:00
13:06:00
13:07:00
13:08:00
13:09:00
13:10:00
13:11:00
13:12:00
13:13:00
13:24:40
13:25:00
13:26:00.
13:27:00
13:28:00
13:29:00
13:30:00
13:31:00
13:32:00
13:33:00
13:34:00
13:35:00
13:36:00
13:37:00
13:38:00
13:39:00
13:40:00
13:41:00
13:42:00
13:43:00
13:44:00
13:45:00
Durat
26.3
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
43.4
19.6
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
ion. L
73.7
70.9
71.6
72.0
73.2
74.1
72.1
73.6
74.7
74.5
73.3
74.5
71.7
75.2
75.3
73.2
68.2
70.8
70.2
73.8
70.5
73.7
70.6
73.8
72.7
74.8
70.1
74.5
73.7
69.8
74.9
61.0
61.7
60.9
66.1
61.4
61.1
62.2
55.7
61.7
62.5
64.5
59.5
62.6
59.8
63.8
65.3
60.6
62.1
58.5
63.6
64.6
60.9
,eq !
88.0
88.7
89.4
89.8
91.0
91.9
89.9
91.4
92.5
92.2
91.1
92.3
89.5
93.0
93.0
91.0
86.0
88.6
88.0
91.6
88.2
91.4
88.4
91.6
90.5
92.6
87.9
92.2
91.4
87.5
91.3
73.9
79.5
78.7
83.9
79.2
78.8
80.0
73.5
79.4
80.3
82.2
77.3
80.3
77.6
81.6
83.0
78.4
79.8
76.2
81.4
82.4
78.7
SEL
82.6
76.9
78.3
77.7
79.2
80.9
79.2
79.9
81.6
80.9
82.5
83.3
79.1
81.8
82.2
78.3
75.2
77.4
78.4
79.4
78.7
78.7
78.7
80.1
79.0
78.6
75.7
81.1
82.7
77.1
81.2
66.6
66.7
68.5
76.9
68.4
68.9
69.7
63.0
66.6
68.6
70.1
67.2
68.3
66.5
70.9
77.0
70.1
67.9
65.7
69.9
70.8
67.2
Lmax
52.6
51.8
55.3
49.8
52.2
54.6
50.2
57.0
55.6
63.0
58.3
58.0
57.3
64.2
64.0
58.7
54.4
50.9
48.8
63.1
52.6
63.0
53.7
49.9
60.5
63.0
52.9
55.8
55.8
52.2
50.9
53.3
51.2
51.6
51.5
53.1
50.5
53.2
44.4
45.2
52.1
59.1
50.1
48.8
52.3
55.5
50.6
49.7
49.2
46.4
53.9
56.7
47.1
Lmin
95.6
92.3
98.8
101.3
96.5
97.1
92.5
96.2
96.0
94.4
99.8
97.5
95.5
95.7
99.5
92.5
99.2
97.9
92.7
95.9
94.2
95.7
96.2
97.0
94.2
97.0
99.5
95.2
98.2
92.4
98.9
89.2
80.3
82.4
87.7
79.7
86.6
85.0
76.9
88.5
89.9
89.8
90.8
81.9
80.2
88.9
90.6
82.7
81.7
82.6
84.5
83.9
83.1
Peak.
105.6
99.6
97.1
99.6
97.1
103.1
97.1
99.6
99.6
103.1
103.1
104.4
98.4
107.1
103.1
99.6
99.6
99.6
101.6
99.6
99.6
101.6
99.6
101.6
101.6
99.6
101.6
101.6
105.6
97.1
103.1
97.1
0.0
0.0
101.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
95.5
103.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.1
97.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Uwpk.
81.9
76.3
77.0
76.9
78.1
78.2
77.0
78.6
80.5
79.2
80.6
79.6
78.1
78.9
79.4
77.5
74.1
76.6
77.1
78.4
77.3
77.6
77.3
78.9
76.7
77.8
75.1
79.8
78.8
75.8
80.0
66.1
65.8
65.6
72.7
66.0
66.6
66.8
60.5
65.6
68.0
68.9
66.1
67.0
63.6
69.2
72.6
66.9
67.3
63.8
68.7
69.0
64.7
L( 5}
79.6
75.4
75.9
76.0
76.9
77.0
76.4
77.2
79.5
78.2
78.2
78.3
75.4
77.9
78.5
76.8
73.0
76.2
75.8
77.4
73.9
77.0
75.9
77.9
76.0
77.3
74.2
78.2
77.7
74.2
79.5
65.5
65.3
63.8
70.4
64.5
64.9
66.0
59.0
64.8
67.2
68.3
64.2
66.3
62.9
68.0
68.3
65.3
66.5
62.8
67.9
67.5
63.8
M10>
60.2
68.5
69.4
69.9
71.3
73.2
69.4
71.0
72.4
72.9
69.3
72.9
69.5
74.4
74.3
71.8
65.6
66.3
63.1
72.6
68.0
71.6
67.0
72.0
71.5
74.5
68.0
73.3
70.3
66.2
71.8
58.7
59.9
59.3
61.2
60.0
58.5
61.3
54.0
61.1
59.5
62.5
56.1
61.1
58.3
61.3
60.0
57.5
59.7
55.9
61.0
63.3
60.5
U50J
53.5
54.4
59.0
51.8
57.9
66.3
56.0
64.5
61.2
69.3
60.1
60.8
64.3
68.9
65.5
66.2
57.9
54.0
51.5
68.1
53.6
67.2
57.1
50.9
65.7
69.3
54.2
57.9
59.2
54.0
55.1
53.8
53.8
54.0
53.2
54.4
51.8
55.4
46.0
53.8
53.8
60.4
51.5
51.0
54.3
57.9
52.6
51.8
51.1
47.7
55.3
60.0
49.0
H90>
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
LU001
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
INTERVAL.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
19May
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
13:46
13:47
13:48
13:49
13:50
13:51
13:52
13:53
13:54
14:01
14:02
14:03
14:04
14:05
14:06
14:07
14:08
14:09
14:10
14:11
14:12
14:13
14:14
14:15
14:16
14:22
14:23
14:24
14:25
14:26
14:27
14:28
14:29
14:30
14:31
14:32
14:33
14:34
14:35
14:36
14:37
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:34
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:07
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00.
:00
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
46.7
25.1
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
57.8
52.6
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
26.7
59.9
64.9
61.2
56.3
62.9
59.8
61.3
62.5
61.1
76.5
71.6
75.3
73.6
74.5
74.4
73.9
73.4
73.9
74.3
73.7
76.2
72.3
72.9
74.5
73.4
56.4
63.5
59.4
61.6
59.7
61.1
63.8
62.2
62.1
61.6
61.6
61.4
62.0
61.7
61.0
63.2
77.6
82.7
79.0
74.1
80.6
77.6
79.1
80.3
77.8
90.5
89.4
93.1
91.4
92.3
92.2
91.6
91.2
91.7
92.1
91.5
94.0
90.1
90.7
92.3
91.0
73.6
81.3
77.2
79.4
77.5
78.9
81.6
80.0
79.9
79.4
79.4
79.2
79.8
79.5
78.8
77.4
66.2
74.3
66.7
66.4
69.9
65.0
66.9
68.3
68.0
81.7
79.6
84.5
80.4
80.2
81.0
84.5
81.7
82.4
82.1
83.0
84.9
79.1
80.6
81.7
80.2
64.6
78.0
66.4
66.2
65.2
66.9
70.0
70.6
68.4
67.5
67.6
69.9
68.4
67.1
66.2
67.8
48.7
47.3
48.8
41.4
50.7
46.9
46.5
45.8
54.0
68.9
57.4
61.8
61.0
59.1
57.6
59.3
58.6
61.6
58.6
59.7
54.2
56.1
54.6
61.6
55.8
46.9
46.3
48.7
52.0
49.9
51.6
55.8
52.2
51.1
55.1
49.9
53.6
51.4
51.8
52.3
56.1
82.6
88.1
79.5
81.9
88.2
79.5
88.3
91.1
84.4
95.1
100.7
99.8
94.4
95.0
94.3
100.3
96.6
97.3
95.8
98.3
98.7
92.6
94.1
95.7
94.7
81.1
114.0
81.0
80.8
80.5
83.2
82.5
86.3
82.8
84.1
86.0
83.6
83.9
83.9
84.5
82.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.1
97.1
104.4
103.1
105.6
106.7
106.7
106.7
109.1
103.1
104.4
106.7
105.6
106.7
103.1
103.1
101.6
101.6
0.0
114.8
0.0
97.1
0.0
0.0
97.1
97.1
99.6
97.1
0.0
99.6
99.6
0.0
0.0
99.6
64.7
69.8
65.3
61.8
68.3
63.9
65.9
67.1
67.0
80.9
78.1
80.0
78.3
78.4
79.5
79.5
79.4
78.2
80.0
79.8
83.4
77.4
78.9
78.4
78.5
61.5
67.1
65.1
65.7
64.3
65.8
68.0
67.2
66.6
66.2
65.7
66.6
66.7
66.1
65.5
66.8
64.2
68.1
64.1
60.2
66.5
63.4
65.3
66.0
64.2
79.6
76.7
79.0
76.9
77.8
78.7
78.0
77.0
77.0
78.4
78.3
80.9
76.5
78.2
77.5
77.5
60.5
65.8
64.2
65.2
63.7
65.2
67.3
65.7
65.9
65.4
65.1
64.9
65.8
65.5
64.9
65.7
58.3
62.7
60.3
51.7
60.6
59.0
59.1
61.8
59.3
75.6
67.9
72.5
72.7
74.1
72.4
69.7
70.8
73.0
72.3
70.4
69.1
70.2
66.9
73.6
71.1
53.3
57.7
56.4
60.4
57.4
58.0
62.3
60.4
61.0
59.8
60.4
59.4
59.9
60.2
58.6
62.3
50.0
49.3
55.6
42.9
53.1
48.6
48.7
46.8
55.5
71.7
60.9
64.2
65.6
63.2
61.0
60.8
61.0
66.0
61.0
62.6
54.9
59.4
55.6
65.5
59.6
47.5
47.7
50.0
54.7
52.1
51.7
57.0
54.5
51.9
56.5
52.8
55.5
52.8
53.0
54.5
59.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
INTERVAL.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
L:\DRAFT\3018N\MEASURE\19MAY_12.bin
Sample Period (sec): 5.000
Time History Data
Site Location
Meas
Number Date Time Level Peak SEL
Run
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Key
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
19May 98
0 19May 98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12:43:33
12:43:38
12:43:43
12:43:48
12:43:53
12:43:58
12:44:03
12:44:08
12:44:13
12:44:18
12:44:23
12:44:28
12:44:33
12:44:38
12:44:43
12:44:48
12:44:53
12:44:58
12:45:03
12:45:08
12:45:13
12:45:18
12:45:23
12:45:28
12:45:33
12:45:38
12:45:43
12:45:48
12:45:53
12:45:58
12:46:03
12:46:08
12:46:13
12:46:18
12:46:23
12:46:28
12:46:33
12:46:38
12:46:43
12:46:48
12:46:53
12:46:58
12:47:03
12:47:08
12:47:13
12:47:18
12:47:23
12:47:28
12:47:33
12:47:38
12:47:43
12:47:48'
12:47:53
12:47:58
12:48:03
12:48:08
12:48:13
12:48:18
12:48:23
12:48:28
12:48:33
12:48:38
12:48:43
12:48:48
12:48:53
12:48:58
12:49:03
12:49:08
12:49:13
12:49:18
12:49:23
12:49:28
12:49:33
12:49:38
55.0
54.0
65.0
70.0
80.0
72.0
69.0
61.0
63.0
55.0
53.0
64.0
73.0
69.0
75.0
75
73.0
72.0
71.0
64.0
76.0
72.0
62.0
65.0
67.0
76.0
74.0
70.0
62.0
71.0
62.0
57.0
52.0
51.0
62.0
71.0
75.0
76.0
72.0
75
0
0
75.0
75.0
71.0
69.0
68.0
69.0
66.0
55.0
72.0
77.0
74.0
77.0
75.0
75.0
72.0
74.0
77.0
78.0
74.0
72.0
67.0
74.0
73.0
76.0
65.0
53.0
68.0
77.0
76.0
75.0
70.0
74.0
74.0
67.0
62.0
61.0
72.0
77.0
87.0
79.0
76.0
68.0
70.0
62.0
60.0
71.0
80.0
76.0
82.0
82.0
80.0
79.0
78.0
71.0
83.0
79.0
69.0
72.0
74.0
83.0
81.0
77.0
69.0
78.0
69.0
64.0
59.0
58.0
69.0
78.0
82.0
83.0
79.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
•78.0
76.0
75.0
76.0
73.0
62.0
79.0
84.0
81.0
84.0
82.0
82.0
79.0
81.0
84.0
85.0
81.0
79.0
74.0
81.0
80.0
83.0
72.0
60.0
75.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
77.0
81.0
81.0
74.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 12:49:43 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 12:49:48 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 12:49:53 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 12:49:58 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:03 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:08 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:13 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:18 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:23 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:28 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:33 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:38 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:43 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:48 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:53 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 12:50:58 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 12-.51-.03 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:08 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:13 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:18 80.0 87.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:23 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:28 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:33 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:38 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:43 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:48 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:53 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:51:58 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:03 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:08 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:13 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:18 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:23 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:28 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:33 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:38 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:43 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:48 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:53 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:52:58 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:03 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:08 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:13 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:18 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:23 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:28 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:33 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:38 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:43 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:48 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:53 81.0 88.0
0 0 19May 98 12:53:58 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:03 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:08 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:13 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:18 80.0 87.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:23 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:28 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:33' 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:38 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:43 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:48 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:53 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:54:58 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:03 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:08 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:13 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:18 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:23 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:28 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:33 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:38 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:43 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:48 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:53 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:55:58 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:03 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:08 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:13 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:18 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:23 73.0 80.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 12:56:28 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:33 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:38 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:43 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:48 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:53 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 12:56:58 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:03 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:08 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:13 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:18 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:23 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:28 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:33 80.0 87.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:38 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:43 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:48 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:53 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:57:58 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:03 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:08 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:13 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:18 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:23 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:28 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:33 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:38 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:43 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:48 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:53 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 12:58:58 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:03 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:08 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:13 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:18 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:23 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:28 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:33 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:38 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:43 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:48 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:53 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 12:59:58 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:03 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:08 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:13 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:18 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:23 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:28 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:33 64.0 '71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:38 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:43 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:48 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:53 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:00:58 51.0 58.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:03 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:08 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:13 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:18' 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:23 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:28 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:33 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:38 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:43 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:48 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:53 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:01:58 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:03 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:08 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:13 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:18 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:23 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:28 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:33 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:38 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:43 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:48 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:53 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:02:58 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:03 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:08 69.0 76.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 13:03:13 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:18 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:23 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:28 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:33 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:38 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:43 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:48 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:53 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:03:58 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:03 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:08 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:13 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:18 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:23 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:28 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:33 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:38 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:43 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:48 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:53 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:04:58 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:03 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:08 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:13 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:18 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:23 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:28 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:33 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:38 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:43 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:48 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:53 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:05:58 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:03 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:08 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:13 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:18 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:23 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:28 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:33 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:38 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:43 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:48 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:53 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:06:58 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:03 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:08 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:13 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:18 71.0 '78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:23 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:28 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:33 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:38 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:43 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:48 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:53 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:07:58 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:03' 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:08 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:13 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:18 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:23 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:28 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:33 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:38 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:43 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:48 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:53 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:08:58 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:03 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:08 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:13 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:18 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:23 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:28 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:33 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:38 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:43 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:48 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:09:53 73.0 80.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 13:09:58 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:03 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:08 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:13 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:18 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:23 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:28 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:33 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:38 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:43 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:48 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:53 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:10:58 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:03 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:08 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:13 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:18 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:23 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:28 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:33 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:38 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:43 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:48 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:53 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:11:58 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:03 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:08 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:13 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:18 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:23 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:28 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:33 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:38 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:43 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:48 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:53 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:12:58 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:03 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:08 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:13 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:18 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:23 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:28 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:33 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:13:38 54.0 61.0
Stop Key
Run Key
0 0 19May 98 13:24:40 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:24:45 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:24:50 59.0 -66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:24:55 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:00 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:05 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:10 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:15 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:20 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:25 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:30 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:35' 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:40 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:45 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:50 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:25:55 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:00 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:05 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:10 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:15 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:20 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:25 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:30 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:35 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:40 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:45 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:50 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:26:55 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:00 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:05 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:10 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:15 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:20 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:25 72.0 79.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 13:27:30 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:35 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:40 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:45 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:50 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:27:55 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:00 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:05 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:10 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:15 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:20 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:25 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:30 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:35 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:40 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:45 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:50 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:28:55 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:00 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:05 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:10 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:15 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:20 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:25 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:30 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:35 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:40 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:45 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:50 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:29:55 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:00 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:05 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:10 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:15 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:20 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:25 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:30 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:35 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:40 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:45 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:50 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:30:55 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:00 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:05 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:10 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:15 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:20 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:25 51.0 58.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:30 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:35 60.0 -67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:40 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:45 45.0 52.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:50 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:31:55 47.0 54.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:00 49.0 56.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:05 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:10 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:15 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:20' 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:25 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:30 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:35 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:40 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:45 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:50 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:32:55 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:00 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:05 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:10 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:15 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:20 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:25 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:30 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:35 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:40 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:45 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:50 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:33:55 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:34:00 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:34:05 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:34:10 63.0 70.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19May 98 13:34:20
19May 98 13:34:25
19May 98 13:34:30
19May 98 13:34:35
19May 98 13:34:40
19May 98 13:34:45
19May 98 13:34:50
19May 98 13:34:55
19May 98 13:35:00
19May 98 13:35:05
19May 98 13:35:10
19May 98 13:35:15
19May 98 13:35:20
19May 98 13:35:25
19May 98 13:35:30
19May 98 13:35:35
19May 98 13:35:40
19May 98 13:35:45
19May 98 13:35:50
19May 98 13:35:55
19May 98 13:36:00
19May 98 13:36:05
19May 98 13:36:10
19May 98 13:36:15
19May 98 13:36:20
19May 98 13:36:25
19May 98 13:36:30
19May 98 13:36:35
19May 98 13:36:40
19May 98 13:36:45
19May 98 13:36:50
19May 98 13:36:55
19May 98 13:37:00
19May 98 13:37:05
19May 98 13:37:10
19May 98 13:37:15
19May 98 13:37:20
19May 98 13:37:25
19May 98 13:37:30
19May 98 13:37:35
19May 98 13:37:40
19May 98 13:37:45
19May 98 13:37:50
19May 98 13:37:55
19May 98 13:38:00
19May 98 13:38:05
19May 98 13:38:10
19May 98 13:38:15
19May 98 13:38:20
19May 98 13:38:25
19May 98 13:38:30
19May 98 13:38:35
19May 98 13:38:40
19May 98 13:38:45
19May 98 13:38:50
19May 98 13:38:55
19May 98 13:39:00
19May 98 13:39:05'
19May 98 13:39:10
19May 98 13:39:15
19May 98 13:39:20
19May 98 13:39:25
19May 98 13:39:30
19May 98 13:39:35
19May 98 13:39:40
19May 98 13:39:45
19May 98 13:39:50
19May 98 13:39:55
19May 98 13:40:00
19May 98 13:40:05
19May 98 13:40:10
19May 98 13:40:15
19May 98 13:40:20
19May 98 13:40:25
19May 98 13:40:30
19May 98 13:40:35
19May 98 13:40:40
19May 98 13:40:45
19May 98 13:40:50
19May 98 13:40:55
co A
fii o.
c-3 n
c-3 A
61 0cc n
cc A -
CA A
CO A
CO A
CO A
CO A
C7 A
f. A A
CT A
f.A A
60 0
C1 A
CC A
c n n
c -a A
CO A
f. 0 A
CC A
£.7 A
CC A
£A f)
C A A
CQ n
fi? n
fi9 A
si n
CC A
CC A
CO A
CO A _
CO A
£.0 A
CO A
65 0
C1 A
£.1 0
co n
CQ n
C Q n
CO A
£0 A
fin n
61 0
CO A
7 A A
(if. A
f.-) A
CO. A
CA A -
CA A
CT A
CO f)
Cf\ A
CO A
C-1 A
CO A
CC A
CC A
C.Q 0
CO A
CQ A
CO A
CQ A
7 A A
7 A A
68 0
CO A
f. 0. A
C7 A
C. A A
59 0
C A A
CA A
67 0
n n
67 0
68 0
CO A
C7 A
60 0cc n
7 A A
7-3 A
74 o
70 n
71 A
C7 A
f. 0 A
CC A
CO A
CQ A
CO A
C C A
CO A
C.7 A
C -3 A
CC A
CQ A
7 A A
7C A
7C A
72 0
CO A
.CO A
C Q A
C7 A
- fi^ 0
{.Q A
C Q A
67 0
68 0
CO A
77 A
7-5 A
7 A A
{.ft A
C1 A
fi1 0
CO A
C Q A
C7 A
- 7^ n
CO A
CC A
CC A
CO A
C-D A
CC A
C Q A
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 13:41:00 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:05 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:10 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:15 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:20 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:25 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:30 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:35 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:40 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:45 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:50 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:41:55 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:00 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:05 51.0 58.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:10 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:15 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:20 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:25 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:30 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:35 48.0 55.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:40 48.0 55.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:45 51.0 58.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:50 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:42:55 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:00 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:05 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:10 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:15 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:20 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:25 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:30 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:35 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:40 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:45 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:50 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:43:55 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:00 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:05 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:10 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:15 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:20 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:25 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:30 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:35 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:40 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:45 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:50 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:44:55 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:00 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:05 63.0 '70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:10 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:15 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:20 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:25 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:30 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:35 48.0 55.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:40 49.0 56.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:45 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:50' 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:45:55 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:00 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:05 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:10 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:15 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:20 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:25 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:30 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:35 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:40 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:45 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:50 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:46:55 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:00 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:05 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:10 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:15 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:20 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:25 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:30 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:35 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:40 69.0 76.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 13:47:45 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:50 49.0 56.0
0 0 19May 98 13:47:55 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:00 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:05 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:10 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:15 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:20 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:25 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:30 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:35 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:40 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:45 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:50 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:48:55 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:00 46.0 53.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:05 42.0 49.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:10 48.0 55.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:15 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:20 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:25 47.0 54.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:30 51.0 58.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:35 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:40 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:45 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:50 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:49:55 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:00 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:05 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:10 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:15 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:20 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:25 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:30 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:35 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:40 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:45 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:50 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:50:55 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:00 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:05 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:10 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:15 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:20 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:25 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:30 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:35 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:40 49.0 56.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:45 48.0 55.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:50 52.0 '59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:51:55 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:00 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:05 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:10 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:15 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:20 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:25 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:30 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:35 49.0 56.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:40 53.0 60.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:45 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:50 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:52:55 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:00 47.0 54.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:05 46.0 53.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:10 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:15 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:20 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:25 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:30 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:35 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:40 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:45 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:50 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:53:55 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:00 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:05 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:10 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:15 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:20 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:25 60.0 67.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 13:54:30 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:35 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:40 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 13:54:45 60.0 67.0
Stop Key
Run Key
0 0 19May 98 14:01:34 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 14:01:39 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:01:44 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:01:49 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:01:54 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:01:59 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:04 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:09 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:14 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:19 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:24 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:29 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:34 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:39 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:44 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:49 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:54 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:02:59 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:04 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:09 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:14 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:19 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:24 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:29 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:34 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:39 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:44 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:49 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:54 81.0 88.0
0 0 19May 98 14:03:59 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:04 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:09 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:14 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:19 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:24 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:29 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:34 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:39 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:44 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:49 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:54 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:04:59 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:04 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:09 72.0 '79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:14 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:19 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:24 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:29 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:34 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:39 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:44 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:49 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:54' 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:05:59 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:04 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:09 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:14 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:19 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:24 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:29 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:34 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:39 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:44 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:49 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:54 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 14:06:59 80.0 87.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:04 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:09 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:14 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:19 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:24 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:29 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:34 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:39 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:44 67.0 74.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 14:07:49 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:54 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 14:07:59 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:04 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:09 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:14 80.0 87.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:19 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:24 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:29 69.0 76.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:34 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:39 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:44 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:49 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:54 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:08:59 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:04 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:09 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:14 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:19 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:24 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:29 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:34 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:39 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:44 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:49 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:54 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 14:09:59 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:04 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:09 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:14 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:19 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:24 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:29 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:34 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:39 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:44 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:49 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:54 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:10:59 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:04 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:09 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:14 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:19 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:24 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:29 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:34 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:39 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:44 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:49 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:54 61.0 '68.0
0 0 19May 98 14:11:59 57.0 64.0
0 ' 0 19May 98 14:12:04 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:09 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:14 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:19 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:24 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:29 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:34 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:39 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:44 82.0 89.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:49 82.0 89.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:54 81.0 88.0
0 0 19May 98 14:12:59 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:04 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:09 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:14 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:19 71.0 78.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:24 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:29 66.0 73.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:34 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:39 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:44 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:49 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:54 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:13:59 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:04 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:09 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:14 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:19 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:24 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:29 56.0 63.0
TIMEmST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0 0 19May 98 14:14:34 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:39 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:44 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:49 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:54 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:14:59 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:04 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:09 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:14 78.0 85.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:19 70.0 77.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:24 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:29 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:34 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:39 76.0 83.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:44 73.0 80.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:49 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:54 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:15:59 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:04 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:09 68.0 75.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:14 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:19 67.0 74.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:24 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:29 74.0 81.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:34 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:39 77.0 84.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:44 79.0 86.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:49 75.0 82.0
0 0 19May 98 14:16:54 72.0 79.0
Stop Key
Run Key
0 0 19May 98 14:22:07 49.0 56.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:12 48.0 55.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:17 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:22 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:27 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:32 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:37 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:42 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:47 48.0 55.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:52 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 14:22:57 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:02 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:07 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:12 72.0 79.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:17 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:22 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:27 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:32 51.0 58.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:37 61.0 -68.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:42 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:47 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:52 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 14:23:57 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:02 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:07 52.0 59.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:12 51.0 58.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:17 50.0 57.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:22' 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:27 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:32 55.0 62.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:37 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:42 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:47 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:52 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 14:24:57 54.0 61.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:02 57.0 64.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:07 59.0 66.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:12 56.0 63.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:17 58.0 65.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:22 61.0 68.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:27 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:32 63.0 70.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:37 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:42 60.0 67.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:47 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:52 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:25:57 65.0 72.0
0 0 19May 98 14:26:02 64.0 71.0
0 0 19May 98 14:26:07 62.0 69.0
0 0 19May 98 14:26:12 56.0 63.0
TIMEmST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 19May 98 14:26:17
0 19May 98 14:26:22
0 19May 98 14:26:27
0 19May 98 14:26:32
0 19May 98 14:26:37
0 19May 98 14:26:42
0 19May 98 14:26:47
0 19May 98 14:26:52
0 19May 98 14:26:57
0 19May 98 14:27:02
0 19May 98 14:27:07
0 19May 98 14:27:12
0 19May 98 14:27:17
0 19May 98 14:27:22
0 19May 98 14:27:27
0 19May 98 14:27:32
0 19May 98 14:27:37
0 19May 98 14:27:42
0 19May 98 14:27:47
0 19May 98 14:27:52
0 19May 98 14:27:57
0 19May 98 14:28:02
0 19May 98 14:28:07
0 19May 98 14:28:12
0 19May 98 14:28:17
0 19May 98 14:28:22
0 19May 98 14:28:27
0 19May 98 14:28:32
0 19May 98 14:28:37
0 19May 98 14:28:42
0 19May 98 14:28:47
0 19May 98 14:28:52
0 19May 98 14:28:57
0 19May 98 14:29:02
0 19May 98 14:29:07
0 19May 98 14:29:12
0 19May 98 14:29:17
0 19May 98 14:29:22
0 19May 98 14:29:27
0 19May 98 14:29:32
0 19May 98 14:29:37
0 19May 98 14:29:42
0 19May 98 14:29:47
0 19May 98 14:29:52
0 19May 98 14:29:57
0 19May 98 14:30:02
0 19May 98 14:30:07
0 19May 98 14:30:12
0 19May 98 14:30:17
0 19May 98 14:30:22
0 19May 98 14:30:27
0 19May 98 14:30:32
0 19May 98 14:30:37
0 19May 98 14:30:42
0 19May 98 14:30:47
0 19May 98 14:30:52
0 19May 98 14:30:57
0 19May 98 14:31:02
0 19May 98 14:31:07
0 19May 98 14:31:12
0 19Hay 98 14:31:17
0 19May 98 14:31:22
0 19May 98 14:31:27
0 19May 98 14:31:32
0 19May 98 14:31:37
0 19May 98 14:31:42
0 19May 98 14:31:47
0 19May 98 14:31:52
0 19May 98 14:31:57
0 19May 98 14:32:02
0 19May 98 14:32:07
0 19May 98 14:32:12
0 19May 98 14:32:17
0 19May 98 14:32:22
0 19May 98 14:32:27
0 19May 98 14:32:32
0 19May 98 14:32:37
0 19May 98 14:32:42
0 19May 98 14:32:47
0 19May 98 14:32:52
0 19May 98 14:32:57
58.0 65.0
57.0 64.0
61.0 68.0
53.0 60.0
53.0 60.0
55.0 62.0
56.0 63.0
61.0 68.0
57.0 64.0
53.0 60.0
52.0 59.0
52.0 59.0
52.0 59.0
52.0 59.0
60.0 67.0
63.0 70.0
65.0 72.0
64.0 71.0
61.0 68.0
64.0 71.0
66.0
67
66
-- 73.0
0 74.0
0 73.0
67.0
65
74.0
0 72.0
62.0 69.0
59.0 66.0
58.0 65.0
63.0 70.0
59.0 66.0
57.0 64.0
62.0 69.0
64.0 71.
62.0 69.
67.0 74.
65.0 72.0
60.0 67.0
62.0 69.0
62.0 69.0
62.0 69.0
60.0 67.0
57.0 64.0
54.0 61.0
56.0 63.0
59.0 66.0
62.0 69.0
66.0 73.0
66.0 73.0
65.0 72.0
62.0 -69.0
63.0 70.0
60.0 67.0
53.0 60.0
61.0 68.0
58.0 65.0
52.0 59.0
55.0 62.0
61.0 --
60.0
59.0
65.0
66.0
61.0
58.0
57.0
57.0
63.0
64.0
64.0
60.0
66.0
59.0
60.0
55.0
52.0
64.0
63.0
60.0
61.0";>; n
68.0
67.0
66.0
72.0
73.0
68.0
65.0
64.0
64.0
70.0
71.0
71.0
67.0
73.0
66.0
67.0
62.0
59.0
71.0
70.0
67.0
68.0fi9 n
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM
I
0 19May 98 14:33:02
0 19May 98 14:33:07
0 19May 98 14:33:12
0 19May 98 14:33:17
0 19May 98 14:33:22
0 19May 98 14:33:27
0 19May 98 14:33:32
0 19May 98 14:33:37
0 19May 98 14:33:42
0 19May 98 14:33:47
0 19May 98 14:33:52
0 19May 98 14:33:57
0 19May 98 14:34:02
0 19May 98 14:34:07
0 19May 98 14:34:12
0 19May 98 14:34:17
0 19May 98 14:34:22
0 19May 98 14:34:27
0 19May 98 14:34:32
0 19May 98 14:34:37
0 19May 98 14:34:42
0 19May 98 14:34:47
0 19May 98 14:34:52
0 19May 98 14:34:57
0 19May 98 14:35:02
0 19May 98 14:35:07
0 19May 98 14:35:12
0 19May 98 14:35:17
0 19May 98 14:35:22
0 19May 98 14:35:27
0 19May 98 14:35:32
0 19May 98 14:35:37
0 19May 98 14:35:42
0 19May 98 14:35:47
0 19May 98 14:35:52
0 19May 98 14:35:57
0 19May 98 14:36:02
0 19May 98 14:36:07
0 19May 98 14:36:12
0 19May 98 14:36:17
0 19May 98 14:36:22
0 19May 98 14:36:27
0 19May 98 14:36:32
0 19May 98 14:36:37
0 19May 98 14:36:42
0 19May 98 14:36:47
0 19May 98 14:36:52
0 19May 98 14:36:57
0 19May 98 14:37:02
56.0
59.0
60.0
59.0
63.0
66.0
67.0
66.0
59.0 66.0
66.0 73.0
66.0 73.0
60.0 67.0
61.0
59.0
57.0
59.0
66.0
65.0
68.0
66.0
64.0
66.0
73.0
72.0
64.0 71.0
60.0
55.
55.
67.0
62.0
62.0
56.0 63.0
54.0 61.0
55.0 62.0
65.0 72.0
64.0 71.0
64.0 71.0
64.0 71.0
59.0 66.0
53.0 ---
53.0 ---
57.0 ---
60.0
60.0
64.0
64.0 71.0
62.0 69.0
57.0 64.0
63.0 70.0
59.0 66.0
65.0 72.0
64.0 71.0
65.0 72.0
58.0
56.0
65.0
63.0
54.0 61.0
58.0 65.0
61.0 68.0
65.0 72.0
69.0
65.0
62.0
58.0
58.0 65.0
59.0
57.0
63.0
66.0
64.0
70.0
TIMEfflST.TXT 06/01/98 10:53 AM